You are on page 1of 1

C 115/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 14.5.

2005

omitted to take a decision on the authorisations requested by concerning the marks awarded in the oral test and his exclu-
the Spanish authorities concerning the establishment of joint sion from the list of successful candidates in the competition
enterprises, in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No of 22 April 2004;
2792/1999 of 17 December 1999 laying down the detailed
rules and arrangements regarding Community structural assis-
2. order the Commission to pay the costs.
tance in the fisheries sector (OJ 1999 L 337, p. 10), as
amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2369/2002 of 20
December 2002 (OJ 2002 L 358, p. 49) — the Court of First
Instance (Third Chamber), composed of M. Jaeger, President, J.
Azizi and E. Cremona, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an Pleas in law and main arguments
order on 10 January 2005, the operative part of which is as
follows:
The applicant in these proceedings contests the decision of the
selection board in Competition COM/B/2/02, excluding him, as
a result of the marks awarded in his oral test, from the list of
1. The action is dismissed so far as concerns the requests relating to candidates finally selected.
the vessels Balcagia and Enterprace;

In that respect, the applicant requested the chairman of the


2. There is no further need to adjudicate on the remainder of the selection board to review his oral test; the chairman replied
action; that the selection board had confined itself in his case to
applying the assessment criteria (‘grille d'évaluation’) used for
all the candidates and that the manner in which the selection
board had applied the classification procedure was protected by
3. The applicant shall bear the costs. the requirement of confidentiality.

(1) OJ C 201 of 7.8.2004. In support of his claims, the applicant alleges infringement of
the principle of transparency and disregard of what constitutes
a ‘document’, for Community purposes, basing its decision to
exclude the applicant on an existing document (la grille
d'évaluation), the contents of which are not specified and
which remain confidential.

Action brought on 30 December 2004 by Arturo Ruiz


Bravo-Villasante against the Commission of the European
Communities

Action brought on 19 January 2005 by Claire Staelen


(Case T-507/04) against European Parliament

(2005/C 115/42) (Case T-32/05)

(Language of the case: Spanish) (2005/C 115/43)

(Language of the case: French)

An action against the Commission of the European Commu-


nities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 30 December 2004 by Arturo Ruiz An action against the European Parliament was brought before
Bravo-Villasante, residing in Madrid, represented by Jose Luis the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on
Fuertes Suárez, lawyer. 19 January 2005 by Claire Staelen, residing in Bridel (Luxem-
bourg), represented by Joëlle Choucroun, lawyer, having an
The applicant claims that the Court of First Instance should: address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:


1. annul the decision of the appointing authority, namely the
Director of the European Personnel Selection Office, of 23
August 2004, dealing with the complaint against the deci- 1. annul the decision of the selection board of 18 August
sion of the selection board in Competition COM/B/2/02, 2004 in Competition EUR/A/151/98;