Professional Documents
Culture Documents
9/19/2010
Submitted to:
Submitted by:
Subhojit Chatterjee
Roll No.: 406
Division E, MBA - Core
“Study on what factors people look for when they take a home”
Contents
Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………3
Methodology …………..……………………………………………………………………………3
Conclusion….…. …………………………………………………………………………………...12
2|Page
“Study on what factors people look for when they take a home”
Introduction
In India buying a home is one of the biggest aspirations of any household irrespective of the
class to which that household belongs. A lot of thought process and research work goes into the
process and research work goes into the process of selecting a perfect house. Also such
considerations are take place while taking a house for lease or rent.
A house is such a basic need that people do not change it that easily even if they are
unsatisfied with it. Also a person, if asked won‟t reveal that easily that he/she is unsatisfied with
his/her current house. This kind of natural behavior forces the person to give a biased answer
when asked about the overall satisfaction level from his/her house. My research aims at finding
the relation of some of the factors which affect the overall satisfaction level of a home owner.
For convenience I have targeted NMIMS students specially first year to get genuine response. I
also wanted to verify our analysis as we are using most crucial tool SPSS.
Methodology
As a part of Advanced Methods of Data Analysis project, I chose to study Real Estate because
of the reason that it is one of the hottest sectors these days. With limited amount of resources
available to a country, it is of utmost importance to manage it properly. It‟s very essential for a
researcher to understand the satisfaction level of customers while having a home so that they
can more focus to cater their preferences. Being in Mumbai, the costliest city in India & among
the top 100 costliest cities all around the world, the study of factors on which a person chooses
his/her household becomes all the more important.
The objective of the study was to study various aspects as to what influences the behavior of an
individual having a house. These include locality, size, price, availability of electricity as well as
water etc. The detailed questionnaire is as follows:
Q3. Are you satisfied with total square feet area of your house?
Highly satisfied to not satisfied (scale 1 to 5)
Q6. How much maintenance charges you can afford annually for your house?
0 to 3000
2.3000 to 6000
3.6000 to 9000
4. more than 9000
I searched for the questions through internet which becomes the secondary data, discussed it in
group through our brainstorming sessions & then finalized the above questionnaire.
Originally we had a set of 16 questions but then we had to make the questionnaire a bit concise
so that it catches the attention of the respondent & he does not fill the questionnaire for the sake
of it. Through discussion I selected only above mentioned 9 questions which I thought was the
most important while having a house.
After the questionnaire was designed, I gathered the responses of 97 respondents which
constitute my primary data. The responses were gathered through online as well as personal
surveys. After the responses were gathered, I analyzed the data through SPSS techniques
which included Cluster analysis and Factor analysis.
4|Page
“Study on what factors people look for when they take a home”
Sampling Technique
My motto from this project was to analyze our data by using SPSS tool and for the verification of
analysis done by me after using SPSS, I asked 5 respondents and asked them to comment on
my analysis and got good response which is mentioned in “Final analysis” part of this project. I
chose Convenience Sampling as sampling Technique because it is easiest and cheapest to
conduct so that I can keep a genuine and more accurate data. My respondents constitute an
informal pool of friends.
Nature of Data
The data collected is through Questionnaire hence it is primary data.
Study on what
people look for when they take a home and their satisfaction level.xls
Cluster Analysis
From the above table we see that the coefficient in agglomeration schedule increases by 5.241
in case of 3 cluster and 3.334 in case of 3 clusters.
Agglomeration Schedule
1 81 97 1.000 0 0 9
2 86 88 1.000 0 0 18
3 57 78 1.000 0 0 16
4 29 64 1.000 0 0 20
5 17 59 1.000 0 0 39
5|Page
“Study on what factors people look for when they take a home”
6 6 56 1.000 0 0 21
7 26 44 1.000 0 0 16
8 30 38 1.000 0 0 10
9 81 90 1.500 1 0 22
10 8 30 1.500 0 8 38
11 33 77 2.000 0 0 37
12 24 76 2.000 0 0 33
13 62 73 2.000 0 0 71
14 16 71 2.000 0 0 25
15 58 63 2.000 0 0 35
16 26 57 2.000 7 3 19
17 10 45 2.000 0 0 30
18 86 93 2.500 2 0 30
19 26 65 2.500 16 0 27
20 9 29 2.500 0 4 42
21 5 6 2.500 0 6 37
22 35 81 3.000 0 9 38
23 18 67 3.000 0 0 40
24 22 50 3.000 0 0 60
25 16 46 3.000 14 0 65
26 3 19 3.000 0 0 52
27 26 83 3.600 19 0 54
28 31 94 4.000 0 0 55
29 68 89 4.000 0 0 59
30 10 86 4.000 17 18 41
31 11 85 4.000 0 0 76
32 55 75 4.000 0 0 54
33 24 70 4.000 12 0 43
34 12 69 4.000 0 0 67
35 25 58 4.000 0 15 45
36 4 43 4.000 0 0 44
6|Page
“Study on what factors people look for when they take a home”
37 5 33 4.333 21 11 53
38 8 35 4.417 10 22 56
39 17 61 4.500 5 0 76
40 7 18 4.500 0 23 55
41 10 54 4.600 30 0 45
42 9 84 4.667 20 0 46
43 24 53 5.000 33 0 60
44 4 15 5.000 36 0 62
45 10 25 5.389 41 35 61
46 9 47 5.500 42 0 77
47 34 95 6.000 0 0 63
48 13 91 6.000 0 0 68
49 72 79 6.000 0 0 71
50 23 37 6.000 0 0 53
51 1 28 6.000 0 0 64
52 3 80 6.500 26 0 73
53 5 23 6.600 37 50 75
54 26 55 6.667 27 32 61
55 7 31 6.667 40 28 74
56 8 14 6.857 38 0 69
57 48 87 7.000 0 0 81
58 52 74 7.000 0 0 62
59 21 68 7.000 0 29 66
60 22 24 7.000 24 43 75
61 10 26 7.472 45 54 69
62 4 52 7.833 44 58 77
63 34 60 8.000 47 0 70
64 1 36 8.000 51 0 67
65 16 40 8.333 25 0 79
66 21 27 8.333 59 0 73
67 1 12 8.333 64 34 82
7|Page
“Study on what factors people look for when they take a home”
68 2 13 9.000 0 48 78
69 8 10 9.412 56 61 80
70 34 42 9.667 63 0 72
71 62 72 10.000 13 49 78
72 34 66 10.250 70 0 74
73 3 21 10.250 52 66 83
74 7 34 10.560 55 72 86
75 5 22 11.476 53 60 79
76 11 17 11.667 31 39 85
77 4 9 11.960 62 46 80
78 2 62 12.833 68 71 83
79 5 16 13.250 75 65 84
80 4 8 13.324 77 69 84
81 41 48 13.500 0 57 88
82 1 32 14.600 67 0 88
83 2 3 15.347 78 73 87
84 4 5 15.679 80 79 86
85 11 96 16.000 76 0 90
86 4 7 17.742 84 74 87
87 2 4 18.661 83 86 89
88 1 41 21.611 82 81 89
89 1 2 24.423 88 87 91
90 11 20 31.667 85 0 92
91 1 39 33.435 89 0 92
92 1 11 45.791 91 90 0
When case cluster 90 and 91 gets combined the % change = (33.435-31.667)/31.667 * 100 =
5.58 %
When case cluster 90 and 91 gets combined the % change = (31.667-24.423)/24.423 * 100 =
29.67 %
Because of the larger change in the agglomeration schedule I have taken 3 cluster solution as
the optimum solution.
8|Page
“Study on what factors people look for when they take a home”
We now run the K means analysis r for 3 cluster analysis and we got 33, 12 and 48 cases in
cluster 1, 2 and 3 respectively
Cluster 1 33.000
2 12.000
3 48.000
Valid 93.000
Missing 4.000
ANOVA
Cluster Error
The F tests should be used only for descriptive purposes because the clusters have been chosen to maximize the differences
among cases in different clusters. The observed significance levels are not corrected for this and thus cannot be interpreted
as tests of the hypothesis that the cluster means are equal.
9|Page
“Study on what factors people look for when they take a home”
From the ANOVA table we find that all the factors are significant except for V3 which is the
dummy variable for „How old is your house?‟. Thus we infer that people do not take into
consideration of the age of the house in Mumbai while making a purchasing decision.
Report
Are you Are you Are you Are you Overall
satisfied with satisfied with satisfied with satisfied with satisfaction
the location of area of your your electricity and level with your
Cluster Number of Case your house? house? neighborhood? water supply? current house?
1 Mean 4.47 4.55 4.37 4.35 4.51
N 49 49 49 49 49
Std. Deviation .616 .542 .636 .631 .505
2 Mean 3.37 3.51 2.71 3.93 3.51
N 41 41 41 41 41
Std. Deviation .799 .779 .981 .932 .675
3 Mean 1.57 1.57 1.71 2.00 1.57
N 7 7 7 7 7
Std. Deviation .787 .787 1.113 1.528 .787
Total Mean 3.79 3.90 3.47 4.00 3.88
N 97 97 97 97 97
Std. Deviation 1.080 1.056 1.251 1.031 1.003
We can see the figures which are red are preferred maximum and those are blue are minimum
preferred to satisfaction in a particular cluster so we find that :-
Cluster 1:- These respondents most prefer their satisfaction as “Area of the house” and least
prefer to “Electricity and water supply”
In the same way in Cluster 2:- Maximum “Electricity and water supply” and Min “Neighborhood”
10 | P a g e
“Study on what factors people look for when they take a home”
Cluster 3:- Maximum “Electricity and water supply” and similar least preference to 2 attribute
Location and area of the house
• KMO and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy
tests whether the partial correlations among variables are small. Bartlett's test of sphericity tests
whether the correlation matrix is an identity matrix, which would indicate that the factor model is
inappropriate.
Factor Analysis
To find which are main attributes which lead to the satisfaction level of the customers buying a
house?
Options -> Exclude case list wise and suppress small coefficient to 0.1 in coefficient display
Then we find all values in correlation matrix are less than 0.05 so all are significant.
If KMO is less than 0.5 then the data is inadequate for factor analysis. We got KMO value of
0.770 which means that the data is adequate for factor analysis.
df 28.000
Sig. .000
Rotated component matrix: There are two main components. In component 1 we had location of
the house, area of the house, Neighborhood and Water+ Electricity supply, V1 (Household
income level) and V4 (Maintenance charge affordability).
In component 2, we had V2 (family member to bedroom ratio) and V3 (how old is your house)
a
Rotated Component Matrix
Component
11 | P a g e
“Study on what factors people look for when they take a home”
1 2
V1 .631 .358
V2 -.085 .732
V3 .038 .635
V4 .405 -.323
Conclusion
We get only very few information through forming of clusters and factors, only what are the main
factors on which the choice of the house of a person depends on. We should extend our
analysis to discriminant analysis and multidimensional scaling.
We conclude that there are mainly 3 clusters into which the people can be segregated and also
there are two main factors on which the buying behavior depends. They are: 1) Features and
ambience of the house and 2) requirement-characteristics fit of the house.
12 | P a g e