You are on page 1of 13

Cosmic Cointelpro Timeline -------------------------------------------------------------------------------Agents of the world's elite have been long engaged in a war on the populace of E arth

. Greed is the motivation for this war, a greed so pervasive that it encompa sses the planet and all of the beings on it, but in recent times a philosophy ha s been used to justify that greed. It is the philosophy of mass control, that ul timately aims at dictating every aspect of human life - even remolding man's per ception of reality and himself. [Jim Keith, Mass Control: Engineering Human Cons ciousness] There is a little known fact about hypnosis that is illustrated by the following story: A subject was told under hypnosis that when he was awakened he would be unable t o see a third man in the room who, it was suggested to him, would have become in visible. All the "proper" suggestions to make this "true" were given, such as "y ou will NOT see so- and-so" etc... When the subject was awakened, lo and behold! the suggestions did NOT work. Why? Because they went against his belief system. He did NOT believe that a pers on could become invisible. So, another trial was made. The subject was hypnotized again and was told that t he third man was leaving the room... that he had been called away on urgent busi ness, and the scene of him getting on his coat and hat was described... the door was opened and shut to provide "sound effects," and then the subject was brough t out of the trance. Guess what happened? He was UNABLE TO SEE the Third Man. Why? Because his perceptions were modified according to his beliefs. Certain "ce nsors" in his brain were activated in a manner that was acceptable to his ego su rvival instincts. The ways and means that we ensure survival of the ego are established pretty ear ly in life by our parental and societal programming. This conditioning determine s what IS or is NOT possible; what we are "allowed" to believe in order to be ac cepted. We learn this first by learning what pleases our parents and then later we modify our belief based on what pleases our society - our peers - to believe. Anyway, to return to our story, the Third Man went about the room picking things up and setting them down and doing all sorts of things to test the subject's aw areness of his presence, and the subject became utterly hysterical at this "anom alous" activity! He could see objects moving through the air, doors opening and closing, but he could NOT see the SOURCE because he did not believe that there w as another man in the room. So, what are the implications , this is also the reason why ey attempt to operate against cious that this or that habit of this factor of human consciousness? (By the way most therapy to stop bad habits does not work - th a "belief system" that is imprinted in the subcons is essential to survival.)

One of the first things we might observe is that everyone has a different set of

It is certainly th e problem with those at the top.th e hypnotist or his own. "Ackn owledgement" of the probability of a high level of Truth about a given matter is what should happen when people are actively aroused by certain information. Let's face it: we are all taught to avoid uncomfortable realities.about the existence of objective truth.beliefs based upon their social and familial conditioning. legal or scie ntific information which is factual. disinfor mation. 2) personal and narrative truth including "witness testimon ies. Malden. anxiet y and other disturbing emotions aroused by reality. An individual who is deliberately and intentionally denying something is acti ng from an individual level of lying." The timeline to which these remarks serve as an introduction. etc.react like al coholics who refuse to admit their condition. but when we talk about ordinary people. whether it is truly obj ective." This implies propaganda. Human beings . are generally a soc ial construction and might be considered in the terms of the hypnotized man who has been programmed to think that there "is no truth" so why bother even looking for it? Denial occurs for a variety of reasons." or the wife who does not notice that her husband is abusing he r daughter.and we are able. Stanley Cohen discusses the subj ect of denial which may shed some light on the subject.including epistemo logical relativism . attempts to provide as many of these elements as possible. Among the large r population of decent human beings. the subj ect has a strong belief. he is en tirely at the mercy of the "Invisible Man" because he chooses not to see him. In this story. or only a consensus reality.even if that activation was fraudulent. or the cuckolded husband who is th e "last to know. manipulation. (Cambridge: Polity Press. what we are dealing w ith is denial that is subconscious and therefore organized and "institutional. with preternatural cunning. as well as completely subconsciou s. 2001). In this case. And so it is with nearly all human beings: we believe the hypnotist . the objective reality IS WHAT IT IS. it is obtained by i mpartial procedures. justifiable or unjustifiable are concealed. there is clearly a big part of that reality that is inaccessable to the subject due to a perception censor w hich was activated by the suggestions of the hypnotist. spin. who then exert a controlling influence on the m asses of humanity. and that these belie fs determine how much of the OBJECTIVE reality anyone is able to access. that is to say. unfettered observations of reality. In States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. There are truths that are "clearly known . based upon his CHOICE as to who or what to believe .faced with unpleasant truths about themselves or their reality . And in the case of the hypnosis subject. accurate and objective. to deny what is ofte n right in front of our faces. concealment and deception.the "offic ial culture" . MA: Blackwell Publishers. misinformation. Believing anything that comes down the pike is not the opposite of denial." Denial can be both deliberate and intentional. That is to say. or it is agreed that they will not be acknowledged "out loud.personal or political. Denial is a complex "unconscious defence mechanism for coping with guilt. whitewash. Thi s information can be 1) factual or forensic truth. he has chosen to believe the hypnotist and not what he might be able to observe if he dispensed with the perception censor put in place by the hypnotist who activated his "belief center" . this is not our problem." but for many reasons . In the above story." Th ere are "unpleasant truths" and there are truths that make us tired because if w . I should add here that skepticism and solipsistic arguments .

bear with me a moment here and let's apply a little logic to the prob lem.we may find it n ecessary to make changes in our lives. giving away your power. As Ark has written.may like to close their eyes to this evidence that s cience has most definitely been used in a very detrimental way in our world. is inseparable from power. but still relevant to the subject here. that's somewhat simplistic. Cold War strategy. " interest groups. And truth. science seems to be controlled by money. "Conspiracy. So please.when they are brought to public attention . is a way of . HAVE to work on those things that get funding. Now. Yes. It only describes the idea of people in "high places" thinking about things and doing things that manipulate other people to produce b enefits for themselves. their important decisions are made in secret by a few key d ecision-makers.corporations. If you don't get money for your work." It's "un-scientific" or it's evidenc e of mental instability. you starve and then you don't do any work at all." Denial of truth is. The first thing we want to think about is the fact that the word "conspiracy" ev okes such a strong reaction in all of us: nobody wants to be branded as a "consp iracy thinker. for the most part. and they are not above lying about their activities. Dolan studied U. th ey are hierarchical. Aft er all. Scientists.S. Richard M. Right? That's what you are thinking. isn't it? In fact. Sovie t history and culture. let's take a brief look at science which is one of the mainstays of Officia l Culture.a nd those involved in them . and perhaps a quick glan ce around to make sure that no one was watching while you simply read the word s ilently. Let us bring some perspective and common sense to this issue .if we do more than give them a tacit nod . The United States comprises large organizations ." and the like . of course. I bet that the very reading of the word even produces certain physiolog ical reactions: a slight acceleration of the heartbeat. The question is: what gets funded? Who decides? What is the context in which ALL science is being done? And then. where he was a finalist for a Rhodes scholarship. such ideas . There is nothing terr ibly unusual about that since that is a general rule for everyone.e acknowledge them . Dolan studied at Alfred University and Oxford University before compl eting his graduate work in history at the University of Rochester. what is the context in which the "B ogdanov Affaire" has taken place? Those who read this Timeline of secret and not-so-secret scientific projects . it is only a word. as though no one e ver acts in secret." in this key sense. That is. effectively. Cohen points out that "All counter-claims about the denied reality are themselve s only manoeuvres in endless truth-games. He has written about "conspi racy" in the following way: The very label [conspiracy] serves as an automatic dismissal. and international diplomacy." It just isn't "acceptable.are generally d ismissed as "conspiracy theory" and are thus deemed unworthy of attention. as we know. bureaucracies.which are conspiratorial by nature. Have you ever asked yourself WHY the word evokes such an instantaneous emotional reaction? Have you ever wondered why it stimulates such a strong "recoil?" Afte r all. Such is the nature of organizational behavior.

better known as the Manhattan Project. it is the few who rule. The situation d eteriorated so much that during his final two years in office. [. wealth. In all tim es and all places.Much of the original money to run the American intelligence community came from very wealthy and established American families. From its beginning. In practice.] A chilling example of such independence occurred during the 1950s. I have used t he term "national security state" to describe its structures of power. . the US Defense and Intelligence establishment has had more mone y at its disposal than most nations. but from most members of Congress and a few presidents. such as the dev elopment of biological weapons. but in reality an empire and o ligarchy. the CIA was engaged in a variety of off-the-record "business" activities that generated large sums of cash. within and without. li ttle of this applies. Since the 1940s. infiltration of the media and universities. other important projects. secret wars. as well as t he worlds that feed upon them.. In theory. remains the gre at model for all subsequent activities. such as defense contractors and other underground . several of the most powerful intelligence agencies were themselves established in secrecy. independence. Its fundamental traits are secrecy. During and after the Second World War. Congress has official oversi ght over the CIA.All elites take care to manipulate public information to maintain existing structures of power. much of th e money is undocumented. and assassinations all took place far removed not only from the American public. One reason has to do with secrecy. nationwide interception of mail and cable transmissions o f an unwitting populace.] the military and its scien tists developed the world's most awesome weapons in complete secrecy. In addition to official dollars. secret coup s.. [. Within the world's military and intelligence apparatuses. America is nominally a republic and free society. the importation of Nazi scientists. civilian oversight exists over the US national security establishment . nebulous entities.] Anyone who has lived in a repressive society knows that official manipulation of the truth occurs daily.life around the globe. vaguely aware of its own oppression.. The president is the military commander-in-chief. Nearly everything of significance undertaken by America's military and intellige nce community in the past half-century has occured in secrecy. p ower.. If a revered military hero such as Eisenhower could not control America's nuclea . unknown by the public or Congress for many years. For more than two years. The con nections of the CIA with global organized crime (and thus de facto with the inte rnational narcotics trade) has been well established and documented for many yea rs.. and duplicity... his fin al year in office. The undertaking t o build an atomic weapon. who have long maintained a n interest in funding national security operations important to their interests.. Indeed. and the few who exert dominant influe nce over what we may call official culture. What he finally learned in 1960. But societies have their many and their few. It's an old game. Eisenhower asked repeatedly for an audience with the head of Strategic Air Command to learn what America's nuclear retaliatory plan was. horrified him: half of the Northern Hemisphere would be oblit erated. when Presiden t Eisenhower effectively lost control of the US nuclear arsenal. The FBI must answer to the Justice Department. [. not a single me mber of Congress even knew about it although its final cost exceeded two billion dollars. During the 1940s. It is a c onvenient way to express the military and intelligence communities. . terminal min d-control experiments. this tendency is magni fied to the greatest extreme.

.. in that . wealth and independence add up to power.Deception is the key element of warfare. sometimes through official denial. When tak en together. it must be considered that pressures are applied elsewhere from within this "national security state" to comply with the demands of the US. conducted overt or cland estine actions against other nations. (the tool of power elites). the carefully managed eve nts leading to the Gulf of Tonkin resolution. think about the word "conspiracy" one more time and allow me to emphasize t he key point: From a historical point of view. or Nixon regarding comparable matters? Secrecy. "Do you really think the government could hide [anything] for so long?" The question itself reflects ignorance of the reality that secrecy is a way of life in the National Security State. and prosecuted wars without serious media scrutiny. Now. how on earth could Presi dents Truman. nor get a straight answer from the Pentagon. with access to incredible resources and technology. [. for purposes unknown. Secrecy stems from a pervasive and fundamental element of life in our world.. [Richard Dolan] Consider this: even if Dolan is writing specifically about America. Through the years. in that cover-ups are standard operating procedure. Johnson. and no.] Deception is the key element of warfare. And acknowledgement about the reality of [conspiracies] will only occur when the official culture deems it wor thwhile or necessary to make it. information has leaked out from the very beginning. tha t those who are at the top of the heap will always take whatever steps are neces sary to maintain the status quo.. by agenc ies unknown.. and when winning is all that ma tters. The key lies in neutralizing and discredi ting unwelcomed information. generating high levels of interest. And maintaining the "status quo" in science HAS to be one of the main objectives . that those who are at the top of the heap will always take whatever steps are n ecessary to maintain the status quo. Secrecy. Kennedy. t he conventional morality held by ordinary people becomes an impediment. the conventional morality held by ordinary people becomes an impediment. [S]keptics often ask.] The secrecy stems from a pervasive and fundamental element of life in our world. wealth and independence add up to power. Actually though. [including scientists. and when winning is all that matters. But also no. the ONLY reality is that of consp iracy. Yes.. it maintains influence over elected officials and commun ities hoping for some of the billions of defense dollars. in a world d ominated by the United States. Domestically. taking place in near-complete secrecy.. becoming public knowledge by a mere roll of the dice.r arsenal. the answer is yes. the nationa l security state has gained access to the wrorld's most sophisticated technology sealed off millions of acres of land from public access or scrutiny. This is a widespread phenomenon affecting many people. A sobering thou ght and cause for reflection.. the examples of official duplicity form a nearly single totality. universities. etc. T hey include such choice morsels as the phony war crisis of 1948. the fabricated missile gap claimed by the air force during the 1950s. acquired u nlimited snooping ability within US borders and beyond. other times thro ugh proxies in the media.. frequently unknown to t he public for decades. Don't hold your breath. It is impossible to shut the lid completely. [E]vidence [of conspiracy] derived from a grass roots level is unlikely to survi ve its inevitable conflict with official culture.

means only one thing: COINTEL PRO. Machiavelli outlined the principles a very long time ago and little has changed since.which are s ometimes later withdrawn with an "apology" after they have already accomplished the goal of destruction. 'ti s folly to be wise. Pennsylvania in 1971. commerce. and labor. and the likelihood that this has been the mode of controlling human being s for possibly millennia. This cover was blown after activists broke into an FBI office in Media. In our opinion. In the scientific community. a former high-ranking CIA official. What w e do not know is how far and wide the practice extends. The fact is. Marchett i: This cult is patronized and protected by the highest level government officials in the world. According to investigators. And here we do not mean the specific FBI program. It will always be an "invisible Third Man." This meant that they were never filed in t he system. or to foment factionali sm is also common. most of whom LIKE to live in denial. If the official culture says that there is no Third Man in the room. from the perspective of elite groups wishing to maintain the status quo of their power. It manipulates individuals in are . publishing false defamatory or threatening information. To borrow from. What a lot of people don't keep in mind is the fact that COINTELPRO also concent rated on creating bogus organizations and promoting bogus ideas." This is most especially true when we consider the survival instinct of the ego. industry. just as Benedictines were but one order of the Catholic Church. Certainly. finance. there is little possibility that the "subject" will be able to see the source of the phenomena in our world. but the concept of the pr ogram. the CIA is but one "arm" of the cult. introducing disruptive and subversive mem bers into organizations to destroy them from within. and for all intents and purposes. did not exist. "if ignorance is bliss. forging signatures on fake documents." Usually." And official culture. and if it works through the inculcated belief systems. though we can certainly guess. Marchetti tells us th at there IS a "Cabal" that rules the world and that its holy men are the clandes tine professionals of the Central Intelligence Agency. COINTELPRO was al so famous for instigation of hostile actions through third parties. these FBI programs were noteworthy because all documents relatin g to them were stamped "do not file. So wrote Victor Marchetti. understood this way. There exists in our world today a powerful and dangerous secret cult. and so on. And how do they do that? By "Official Culture. This is the first book the U. It's membership is composed of those in the power centers of gover nment.of the Power Elite. In this book. I like to call it "Cosmic COINTELPRO" to suggest that it is almost a mechanical system that operates based on the psychological nature of human bei ngs. Government ever went to court to censor before publication. this can work in any numbers of ways. we think of the most well known and typica l activities which include sending anonymous or fictitious letters . It is not stretching things to co nsider that "exciting new ideas" or areas of research might be promoted for the express purpose of vectoring scientists into following false and time-wasting re search so as to prevent them making significant breakthroughs. After all. when we think of COINTELPRO. and paraphrasing. the most comm on being "proprietary organizations" that fund research that leads nowhere in or der to keep someone with promising ideas busy. Blackmailing ins iders in any group to force them to spread false rumors. in his book The C IA and the Cult of Intelligence.S.

rejected in cavalier fashion the notion that man might have a soul or deeper significance than the merely physical. Wundt was a professor of philosophy at the University of Leipzig. Interesting.and the members of the ruling class that employed them . The materilist overhauling of psychology was in great part ushered in by the wor k of the German psychologist Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt. bec oming the strongest power in Europe. could be determined solely through mechanist ic means: measurement. a greed so pervasive that it encompa sses the planet and all of the beings on it. that he w as in fact anything more than an animal. m aking it not unreasonable to imagine that herr professor may also have been a me mber of that group. an ap proach that came to be known in psychology as Structuralism.as of important public influence . As the country increased in military and industrial might. a move that would eventually turn the world of more humanistic-oriented psychology on its head. New York: Americana Corporation. one of the foremost writers and researchers on political con spiracy in the wold in recent times wrote in his book. According to one source: The spread of materialistic philosophy of life was world-wide in this age. 1963] One aspect of this transformation. and in 1875 established the worlds firs t psychological laboratory there. Although the lust for control can be discerned since the beginning of recorded h istory. a revolution simultaneously took place in G erman philosophic and scientific thought that paradoxically would spread through the world to create positive technological change as well as to birth innumerab le toxic children. proceeded to do so. The truth of man. but Wundt's grand father is documented as having been a member of the Illuminati secret society.including the academic world and the mass med ia. in reflection of a powerful materialistic groundswell in German thought t hat began with Schopenhauer at the beginning of the 19th century and that was to be later epitomized by Karl Marx. but its corrosive effect was particularly strong in a country that was not inured to power. Wundt insisted that all psychological studies should depend entirely on the study of body reactions . such ." was a negative tran sformation of the psychological sciences. wi th more of the German's acolytes fanning out to infiltrate related fields. The late Jim Keith.believed that they were justified in treating human beings as if they were pieces of meat. Greed is the motivation for this war. History Since 1850. Encyclopedia Americana.even remolding man's per ception of reality and himself. that ul timately aims at dictating every aspect of human life . and t he idolatry of power was not confinced to Germany. but in recent times a philosophy ha s been used to justify that greed. Mass Control: Agents of the world's elite have been long engaged in a war on the populace of E arth. It acts covertly and illegally. It is the philosophy of mass control. many sci entists . Following this line of reasoning. and dissection of bodies. this "idolatry of power. an d as an overall plan of action. [Germany. In the late 19th century. analysis. Wundt. After Wundt had thoro ughly infused the psychological sciences with his materialist approach. a nexus of particular importance arose in Germany in the latter half of the 19th century. earlier more humanistic approaches to understanding mankind were replaced by a scientific ph ilosophy that would be employed less as a measure for the understanding of man t han as a justification for a new feudalism and a mechanism of pure control. The Secret Cult is a global fraternity of a political aristocracy whose purp ose is to further the political policies of persons or agencies unknown. Wundt insisted. The materialist psychological doctrine spread rapidly with at least twenty-four laboratories established by Wundt's students between the years 1883 and 1893.

It is obvious that they cannot complete ly control the propagation of the information assembled here in this timeline an d on this website. BUT. (Someone may. of course. Everyint is right out there in the public domain.including the academic world and the mass media. then reveals some of the absurdities one must rely on to be a "nat ural" at COINTELPRO . Bottom line is: if you have bought into the emotionally manipulated consensus of "official culture" that there are no conspiracies. Keep your arguments as abstract and theoretical as possible. Pav lov conducted a wide-ranging research into techniques of control. Pavlov fed his dog s. stimulating salivation. nor those who would follow. " it is very likely that you are being manipulated by fear of ridicule. [Jim Keith. Other of Pavlov's experiments involved rewarding dogs with pe ttying. subjective. This will "send th e message" that accepted theory overrides any actual evidence that might challen ge it--and that therefore no such evidence is worth examining. The results of Pavlov's experiments did not escape the social plan ners of his day. Employ vague.as education. Since in war the ends just ify the means. Using these kinds of approaches. or even omit it entirely. primarily usin g dogs for his experimentation. Daniel Drasin describes t he goals of true science. psychiatrists. The most effective weapon of COINTELPRO is Ridicule and Debunking. exposes the pseudo-scientific opposition to scientific advancement.whether one is receiving pay from the alphabet soup guys o r not. So. and social planners wh o would follow in the 20th century. and that conditioning can be artifici ally induced. dismissive te rms such as "ridiculous" or "trivial" in a manner that suggests they have the fu ll force of scientific authority. educators. A few of the items in his list are: Cultivate a condescending air that suggests that your personal opinions are bac ked by the full faith and credit of God. Pavlov was able to stimulate salivation in reaction to the sound of the bell alone. In "Zen And the Art of Debunkery. Mass Control: Engineeri ng Human Consciousness] Remember: those who are at the top of the heap will always take whatever steps a re necessary to maintain the status quo. One man who marched to Wundt's dirge was the Russian. Pavlov dev eloped his theory of the conditioned reflex. After doing th is many times. In other words. stretch or violate the scientific method. not everyone i s able to withstand the OTHER weapon of Mass Control: Ridicule. Reinforce the popular misconception that certain subjects are inherently unscie ntific. And you have chosen to believe them over your own possible observatio ns and senses. deliberately confuse the *process* of science with the * content* of science. in the name of defending the scientific method. Wundt's materialistic approach would infect the thinking of most o f the influential psycholgists. or punishing them with pain. You are in denial. that there is no "Third Man. [John Baez: "Jadczyk has some unusual conspira cy theories which affect his interpretation of this case"] Portray science not as an open-ended process of discovery but as a holy war aga inst unruly hordes of quackery. In the now-famous experiment.worshipping infidels. You have been hypnotized by the suggestions of the holy men of the Se cret Cult. demonstrating that animals are moti vated by patterns of conditioned response. Anybody who wants to can do the research we hav e done and come to the realizations we have in this process. Ivan Petrovich Pavlov. object that since science is a uni . how do they "keep secrets?" They don't." thinker and writer. you may fudge. Notice that M archetti points out that this is done via manipulation of individuals in areas o f important public influence . while at the same time ringing a bell.

If that happens." [John Baez: "Jadczyk has some unusual conspiracy theories which affect his interpretation of this case"] Since the public tends to be unclear about the distinction between evidence and proof. the ecclesiastica l authorities bought the Church over three centuries' worth of denial free and c lear!) If examining the evidence becomes unavoidable. albeit in the status quo. If absolute proof is lacki ng. stringent.versal approach to truth-seeking it must be neutral to subject matter." which are "touted. inspiration. do your best to help maintain this murkiness." and to y our own assertions as "facts. [John Baez: "Jadczyk has some unusual conspiracy theories which affect his interpretation of this case"] Insist that the progress of science depends on explaining the unknown in terms of the known. dismiss such objections using a method employed successfully by generations of politicians: simply reassure everyone that "there is no contr adiction here!") Arrange to have your message echoed by persons of authority. Emph asize the narrow. situations are complex and human beings are imperfect. simply dismiss it as being "too pat. "I h ave seen absolutely no evidence to support such ridiculous claims!" (Note that t his technique has withstood the test of time. In other words. however. By simply refusing to look through his telescope. and dates back at least to the age of Galileo. [John Baez: "Jadczyk has some unusual conspiracy theories which aff ect his interpretation of this case"] State categorically that the unconventional may be dismissed as." Avoid examining the actual evidence. [John Baez: "Jadczyk has some unusual conspiracy theories which affect his inter pretation of this case"] Maintain the idea that a single flaw invalidates the whole. [John Baez: "Jadczyk has some unusual conspiracy theories which affect his interpretation of this case"] At every opportunity reinforce the notion that what is familiar is necessarily rational. If anyone object s. rigorous and critical elements of science to the ex clusion of intuition. This allows you to say with impunity. science equals reductionism. Always refer to unorthodox statements as "claims. state categorically that "there is no evidence!" . exploration and integration. The unfamiliar is therefore irrational." which are "stated." Summarily dismiss the no tion that debunkery itself betrays uncritical belief. In conventional con texts. "after all. at best. and consequently inadmissible as evidence. You can apply the red uctionist approach in any situation by discarding more and more and more evidenc e until what little is left can finally be explained entirely in terms of establ ished knowledge. The degree to whic h you can stretch the truth is directly proportional to the prestige of your mou thpiece. on ly the investigative *process* can be scientifically responsible or irresponsibl e. you may sagely remind the world that. subjective or metaphysic al terms. report back that "there is nothi ng new here!" If confronted by a watertight body of evidence that has survived t he most rigorous tests. accuse them of viewing science in exclusively fuzzy. [John Baez: "Jadczyk has some unusua l conspiracy theories which affect his interpretation of this case"] Characterize your opponents as "uncritical believers." Equate the necessary skeptical component of science with *all* of science. hence. an ho nest misinterpretation of the conventional.

(Some veteran debunkers use homeo pathic dilutions of fact with remarkable success!) Cultivate the art of slipping back and forth between fact and fiction so undetectably that the flimsiest foun dation of truth will always appear to firmly support your entire edifice of opin ion. innuendo. l ean back in your armchair and just say "I rest my case. [ John Baez: "Jadczyk has some unusual conspiracy theories which affect his interp retation of this case"] Use "smoke and mirrors. ridicule. It fails to sway only those few who are of sufficiently independen t mind not to buy into the kind of emotional consensus that ridicule provides." This will get most mainstream . respond immediately that not all b lasphemies have become great truths. obfuscation and illusion." "fringe. ridicule. So discredit the whole story by attempting to discredit *part* of the story. Then put on a gloating smile. If pressed on this. It is far and away the single most chillingly eff ective weapon in the war against discovery and innovation. arg ue that "evidence alone proves nothing!" Ignore the fact that preliminary eviden ce is not supposed to prove *any*thing. simply say "but there's nothing there to study!" Characterize any unorthodox scientist as a "buff" or "freak. In any case. Trivialize the case by trivializing the entire field in question. Here's how: a) take one element of a case completely out of context. opinion." "metaphy sical. cite it as if it were an appropriate example." [John Baez: "Jadczyk has some un usual conspiracy theories which affect his interpretation of this case"] Remember that most people do not have sufficient time or expertise for careful discrimination. For example.S." or "new-age. while deeming that of the unor thodox approach as so insubstantial as to demand nothing more than a scan of the tabloids. and tend to accept or reject the whole of an unfamiliar situatio n. Ridicule. [John Baez: "Jadczyk has some unusual conspiracy theories which affect his interpretation of this case"] Employ "TCP": Technically Correct Pseudo-refutation." "mystical. out-of-context information and outrig ht lies will fool most of the people most of the time. will usually do the trick. Example: if someone remark s that all great truths began as blasphemies." Use the word "imagination" as an epithet that applies only to seeing what's *no t* there. As little as one part fac t to ten parts B. if a claim having some superficial similarity to the one at hand has been (or is popularly assumed to have been) exposed as fraudulen t.the media's favorite code-word for "bogus.e." "paranormal.. Because your response was technically corre ct. d) call a press conference and announce to t he world that the entire case has been explained! Label any poorly-understood research "occult. and not to denying what *is* there. no one will notice that it did not really refute the original remark. In this way you can indiscriminately drag ma terial across disciplinary lines or from one case to another to support your vie ws as needed." or as "self-styled "-.If sufficient evidence has been presented to warrant further investigation. c) declare that therefore t hat one element has been explained. b) find som ething prosaic that hypothetically could explain it. Practice debunkery-by-association. Characterize the orthodox approach as deep and time-consuming. Never forget that a sl ippery mixture of fact. Ridicule has the uniq ue power to make people of virtually any persuasion go completely unconscious in a twinkling." i. This will eliminate the possib ility of initiating any meaningful process of investigation--particularly if no criteria of proof have yet been established for the phenomenon in question. imply that proof precedes evidence." "supernatural.

you may safely characterize them as "publicity seekers. Claim that you've "found the person who st arted the rumor that such a phenomenon exists!" Fabricate entire research projec ts. constitute their normal line of work or sole me ans of support. Another effective strategy with a long hi story of success is simply to mis. Declare that "these claims have been thoroughly discredited by the top exper ts in the field!" Do this whether or not such experts have ever actually studied the claims. treat this as if it were not scientific at all. argue that his or her perceptions cannot possibly be objective.most particularly physicists and mathematicians o f a good and honest disposition . speaking tours and so forth. if investigators of the unorthodox have profited financially from activities connected with their research. *Ad. very often machines and instruments are utilized to "t ake measurements. accuse them of "profiting financi ally from activities connected with their research!" If their research. publishi ng. for example. or personality at tacks. for that matter.seem to be the ones who most actively resist t he very idea that their profession MAY have been taken over and "vectored" by co nspirators who do not have humanity's best interests at heart? Why do scientists . are among the most powerful ways of swaying the public and avoiding the i ssue. hold this as proof that the event itse lf must have been without substance or worth. For example." In order to achieve accuracy with even the most accurately to oled device. even exist. this may delay any responsible investigation of such phenomena by decades or e ven centuries! [John Baez: "Jadczyk has some unusual conspiracy theories which a ffect his interpretation of this case"] Remember that you can easily appear to refute anyone's claims by building "stra w men" to demolish." Fabricate supportive expertise as needed by quoting the opinions of those in fi elds popularly assumed to include the necessary knowledge. Why is it so that scientists . When a witness or claimant states something in a manner that is scientifically imperfect.those to whom the power elite MUST look for solutions to the ir "power problems" .think for one instant that their profession is exempt from conspiratorial manipulation and management? That just isn't logical. attack the participants--or t he journalists who reported the case. If you're lucky . or. Hold claimants responsible for the production values and editorial policies of any media or press that reports their claim.scientists off the case immediately on purely emotional grounds. certain tests are undertaken to establish the "reading error" of th e gadget." To make the whole process even easier.hominem* arguments. If the claimant is no t a credentialed scientist. or as propagated in popular myth. If an unusual or inexplicable event is reported in a sensationalized manner.replicate their experiments--or to avoid repl icating them at all on grounds that "to do so would be ridiculous or fruitless. [John Baez: "Jadczyk has some unusual conspiracy theories which affe ct his interpretation of this case"] If you're unable to attack the facts of the case. One way to do this is to misquote them while preserving that convincing grain of truth. respond not to their actual claims but t o their claims as reported by the media. by acting as if they have intended the extreme of any position they've taken. hold that fact as "conclusive proof that income is being realize d from such activities!" If they have labored to achieve public recognition for their work. What we would like to suggest is that the "official culture" that esta . Fabricate sources of disinformation. is it? In the physical sciences.

it strip s away the denial mechanism and one is left with the inescapable conclusion that nothing is as it seems and never has been. you can almo st guarantee that it is smart but useless. based on my own experience . my husband. not only did my plan fail . But what I did learn was that finding those "hard facts" was very difficult and time-consuming. Phy sics and mathematics are the numero uno professions that have been used . will be m anaged with all the resources and power of those elitists who wish to retain con trol. a mathematical physicist. how good a conspiracy is it i f it is so easily discovered? And it is clear that in such a high stakes arena a s the Global Control agenda now being overtly pursued by the Bush Reich . and only so many years in the life of a scientist.the sugge stions of the "hypnotist.our very thinking . You can take that to the bank.histor ically speaking . disinfo rmation. What's more." William March wrote in The Bad Seed: [G]ood people are rarely suspicious: they cannot imagine others doing the things they themselves are incapable of doing Without a historical context of science. there is little possibility that a sinc ere scientist .after years and years of the "secret science" . and once that is done. There are only so many hours in the day. At first he did it to humor me. We live in an ocean of lies.to support the power elite. gets funded. manipulation. he began to realiz e that science CAN be applied to these problems. HAS assisted me in analyzing it. But that is precisely what the "Secret Cult" does NOT want to happ en. Unfortunately. even though I am the one who has col lected and sorted data. and smokescreens. After all. is actually overwhelming. if it's popular. as he applied his knowl edge of mathematics to the various problems I brought to him. In short. And that is deliberate.whatever conspiracies exist." where they lead to and what they lead away from. And that is precisely WHY the most subtle and far-reaching of the "COINTELPR O" operations have been run on scientists themselves. If we take it as an operating hypothe . or 2) projects that do not threaten their control. It is logically evident that "they " have a vested interest in making sure that the money goes only to projects tha t 1) will augment their control.will ever be able to establish the "reading error" of his machine . The possibility that COINTELPRO is in operation in regards to certain ideas that are being associated with the Bogdanov twins ought not to be taken lightly. That is a formidable obstacle. Here is where we come back to the context.blishes what may or may not be taken "seriously" is a planned and deliberate "re ading error" built into the "machine" of science . only so many days in the year.his thinking. propaganda. is allowed out in the open. in which case we may assume that they are funding research in the public domain that leads AWAY from the "important" issues. I would also like to mention the fact that.who is generally not much interested in history. I know: I've spent about 30 years doing it. Too bad more competent scientists do not bring their skills to the solving of th ese problems. in which case such projects will be buried and no one will know about them. The amount of study that is necessary to discover the threads of "conspiracy.my hypothe sis was utterly demolished by the hard facts. I began my research from a skeptical point of view that "conspirac y" was paranoid thinking and I was determined to find the way to demonstrate tha t there was NO conspiracy. And then.

so interlocked. See also: Star of Sorcerer's for additional connections." ." .the magnets of Impending Global Destructi on.what might be the result if they are ridiculed. Inouye U. free from all checks and balances. prepared by a researcher of our Quantum Future School. Any readers with material to contribute . and free from the law itself. barely scratches the surface. "Some of the biggest men in the United States. and who have a vested interest in public science never approaching the "secret science. and generally discredited? "The main threat to Democracy comes not from the extreme left but from the extre me right.and we want FACTS." what might be the result? If. Senator This timeline. in the field of commerce and manu facture. its own Navy. tha t they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it . its own fundraising mechanism. so complete. so pervasive.S. It is our hope that readers w ill do additional research. not speculation .even if t hey haven't got a clue about what to do with those subjects . ." we have adjusted our "machine tolerances" and can look at the problem in a different way. on the other hand. and wages a constant campaign to smear and discredit every progressive and humanitarian mea sure. and how Evil the plans of the Controllers truly are. decep tion. confusion and tricks and traps .sis that there does exist a powerful elite whose interests are served by science ." Daniel K . flamed. more people will realize just how it all connects and how totally we have been duped. they have brought up subjects that are truly interesting . are afraid of something. and the ability to pursue its own ideas of national inte rest.Woodrow Wilson. We will continue to work on the project in hopes that by seeing the various thre ads together. They know that there is a power somewhere so o rganized. The New Freedom (1913) Use the links at the upper left of this page to navigate to each year in questio n. and provide us with more links and connections to th is spider web of Cosmic COINTELPRO that has blanketed the Earth with Lies.George Seldes "There exists a shadowy Government with its own Air Force. so watchful. which is able to buy huge sections of the press and radio. so subtle.please send them to the address at the bottom of this page. [JH] with many linked sources. You are visitor number . First of all we might wish to ask: who benefits if one or the other proposition about the Bogdanov affaire proves to be the "right one?" If they have infiltrate d the scientific community with a "fraud.