7.6K views

Uploaded by Rev Andrew Salinas

- Mth 289 Fall 2015
- Free Energy - The Divine Oneness by David Wilcock
- Cosmology Notes
- Ch8Real
- The Hidden Mysterious of The Universe
- Cosmo 1.3 ModernCosmology
- Scientific Reliability of the Bible
- Computational Capacity of the Universe (WWW.OLOSCIENCE.COM)
- Evolution is a Fairy Tale
- A Colorful Virtual Universe Called CFD
- CAT 2000 Solution
- Evolution of Creativity
- Theory
- Arguments for the Existence of God
- Progress in Physics Vol. II 2010
- Rainbows and Rationalism
- 01 lectureoutline
- Mywebquest.jess
- APLS_SaadFlyer_131022_1C8y.pdf
- Klsbetting Betfair Betting eBook

You are on page 1of 4

Odds?

(Most of the information for this page was taken from Dr. Bert Thompson's The Scientific

Case for Creation, Apologetics Press Inc., 1999)

Borel's law of probability states that if the odds of an event happening are worse than 1 in

1*10^50, then that event will NEVER HAPPEN.

Dr. Harold Morowitz, former professor of biophysics at Yale University, estimated that

the probability of the chance formation of the smallest, simplest form of living organism

known is 1 out of 10^340,000,000. One out of ten to the 340 millionth power is

unimaginable odds. This large figure is a "1" followed by 340,000,000 zeroes. As you can

see, Morowitz' odds against even the simplest life evolving were infinitely more than

1*10^50, making them impossible.

The very popular evolutionist, Dr. Carl Sagan of Cornell University, figured even steeper

odds against the simplest life beginning naturally on a planet such as earth. According to

Sagan, the probability would be about 1 out of 10^2,000,000,000. Try to imagine ten to

the 2 billionth power. Pretty astounding odds. Interestingly, these impossible odds against

evolution came from one of the most prominent evolutionists of our time.

According to evolutionists, we just got lucky. However, the odds against this luck have

been shown above. Borel's law of probability should have been enough to refute

evolution completely, but I know that the evolutionary "intellectuals" need more

convincing data.

Here is a good mental workout: Let us attempt to figure the total amount of things that

have taken place in the universe. Even evolutionists will agree that only a certain amount

of events have taken place in this universe. If this total number of possible events is even

barely close to the number of chances needed for the first step in evolution to take place,

then we will agree that life did evolve from non-life. Here we go.

We are attempting to determine how many events have ever taken place in the universe.

To do so, we must first determine the size of the universe so that we can pack it with

event-accomplishing particles.

So how big is the universe? Scientists have estimated it to be about 5,000,000,000 light

years across. To give the evolutionists a little help, let's assume that it is a million times

wider, taller, and deeper. The new diameter would be 5*10^15, or 5 quatrillion light

years. This will make our experimental universe 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 bigger than

the real universe. Many events can occur in such a big place.

diameter.

Now that we have thought big, lets think small. The effective diameter of a proton is

about 2.4*10^-15 meters, or 2.4 femtometers. To help understand this tiny size, one inch

is equal to about 10 trillion protons lined side to side.

Remember, we are trying to figure how many events could ever happen. We need to

know how many particles exist so they could do stuff through the ages. That's what we're

calculating.

We should use particles a good bit smaller than protons, so that the evolutionists will

have enough particles to do lots and lots of events. By volume, the real universe contains

billions and billions of times more space than particles. Since we are attempting to

determine how many events have ever occurred in the universe, let us give the

evolutionists the benefit of the doubt by completely filling our experimental universe

with particles. This will give them billions of times more events to produce life.

Protons are way too big. We are figuring the total amount of events that have ever taken

place, and more particles can do more events. We should give the evolutionists lots and

lots of particles so that life has a better chance of evolving. Therefore, we will be using

particles having a diameter 1 trillion times smaller than protons. This will allow us to

pack our experimental universe with (1 trillion)^3, or

1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, more particles than would be

possible with "large" protons.

First, let us determine how many of our extra-small particles could be lined across the

diameter of our extra-large universe.

• 3*10^28 miles = 5*10^31 meters = 1.2*10^47 proton diameters = 1.2*10^59

extra-small particle diameters.

Therefore, 1.2*10^59 of the "smaller than possible" particles lined side to side would

stretch across the "larger than possible" universe. This should provide plenty of particles

to interact and make life from non-life.

Evolutionists believe that the Big Bang blew everything from a central point in the

beginning. Therefore, this universe should be spherical. We will now figure the volume of

our universe and pack it with particles.

• Universe Volume = (4/3)*(PI)*[(Diameter)^3]*(1/8)

• Universe Volume = (4/3)*(PI)*[(1.2*10^59 "small-particle diameters)^3]*(1/8)

• Universe Volume = 8*10^177 particles.

As mentioned before, our real universe is full of empty space, but this theoretical

universe is packed full of "smaller than possible" particles. This increase in the number of

particles has helped the terrible odds against evolution. The total amount of particles

possible is 8*10^177. Remember that we generously allowed for a universe 1 million

times wider than reality, and we used particles 1 trillion times smaller than protons.

Okay, now we have the number of particles available for life-making. How much can

each particle do in a second? Since we don't know, let's be generous to our evolutionary

friends. Let's assume that each of the 8*10^177 particles can participate in one trillion

trillion trillion events at one time. This factor would be 1*10^36 events per second.

Now that we know the amount of particles and the work-rate of each, let's determine the

amount of time that they have to perform their life-producing tasks. I think that the

current estimated life expectancy of the universe is about 30 billion years. This could be a

little small or large; I'm not sure (I believe that the universe is only a couple of thousand

years old). Anyhow, to give the evolutionists a little more time than they really have, let's

multiply their time by 1 billion. This would give the universe 30 quatrillion years to

produce life.

The universe, crammed with 8*10^177 particles working at 1*10^36 events per second

for 1*10^27 seconds, could only make:

Dr. Morowitz postulated that life could evolve from non-life every 1 out of

1*10^340,000,000 events. The great Dr. Sagan calculated 1 out of every

1*10^2,000,000,000 events. However, only 8*10^240 events could ever be possible, in

the entire universe, with all of the time possible.

Unfortunately, we would need 10^339,999,759 TIMES AS MANY EVENTS to have

1*10^340,000,000 events. Compared to Sagan's predictions, we would need

10^1,999,999,759 TIMES AS MANY events to achieve the odds necessary for life.

The total number of events ever possible was only 8*10^240. This was only 10% of

8*10^241, or 1% of 8*10^242, or 0.1% of 8*10^243. You can see that 8*10^240 was not

enough events by any means to reach the number of events needed for the evolution of

life. And we're talking about the most primitive, simple kind of life forming. These odds

are impossible.

It is hard to argue with basic probability. Simple mathematics has helped us to realize that

life could never evolve from non-life.

- Mth 289 Fall 2015Uploaded byjohn
- Free Energy - The Divine Oneness by David WilcockUploaded byCharlie
- Cosmology NotesUploaded byncl12142
- Ch8RealUploaded byBrenton Taylor
- The Hidden Mysterious of The UniverseUploaded byRishabh Jain
- Cosmo 1.3 ModernCosmologyUploaded bycapiberibe
- Scientific Reliability of the BibleUploaded byromenydrummer649893
- Computational Capacity of the Universe (WWW.OLOSCIENCE.COM)Uploaded byFausto Intilla
- Evolution is a Fairy TaleUploaded byacts2and38
- A Colorful Virtual Universe Called CFDUploaded byKeerthana Jayakumar
- CAT 2000 SolutionUploaded bynishanth
- Evolution of CreativityUploaded byrkhattab95
- TheoryUploaded byCherie Delotina
- Arguments for the Existence of GodUploaded byToh Qin Kane
- Progress in Physics Vol. II 2010Uploaded byParis
- Rainbows and RationalismUploaded byŽarko Almuli
- 01 lectureoutlineUploaded byapi-225960274
- Mywebquest.jessUploaded byJesselyn Cristo
- APLS_SaadFlyer_131022_1C8y.pdfUploaded byAndres Tuells Jansson
- Klsbetting Betfair Betting eBookUploaded byZoranMatuško
- #1 Su'17 Biol 1210 Syllabus.pdfUploaded bykjhf
- examreviewUploaded byapi-358666637
- bio101Uploaded byAaron Chong
- Why the Big Bang Model Cannot Describe the ObservedUniverse Having Pressure and RadiationUploaded byDr Abhas Mitra
- Let ReviewerUploaded byRose Tejada
- Perspective Use It or Lose ItUploaded byPhil Haxton
- My-Clippings-Export-2012-01-15_04-45-10-AMUploaded byLith Ium
- Awakening Heart - The Blissful Path to Self-RealisationUploaded byAndrew Marshall
- Concerning Time, Space and MusicUploaded byChrisTselentis
- Negarestani - Rainbows and RationalismUploaded bylaura_mclean_15

- What About the DifferenceUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- Upload Test DocUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- What You Must Possess TheUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- TribulationUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- The Wonder of Bird FeathersUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- 64 Interview QuestionsUploaded byshivakumar N
- You Must Get Out of the BoatUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- What is Acceptable Worship to GodUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- Who Owns YouUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- WorshipUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- What the Devil Wants From YouUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- Wind and FireUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- Watchman on the WallUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- What's in a NameUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- What Holds Us TogetherUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- The Portrait of an IntercessorUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- The Seven Steps of SalvationUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- the tentUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- The Last SupperUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- The Former and the Latter RainUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- The Race is onUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- The Christian's Declaration of IndependenceUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- the handUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- The pre-existent ChristUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- The Unseen HeroUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- The Holy GhostUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- The Coat of Many ColorsUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- The Christian RaceUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- The Seven Last WordsUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas
- The Lords in the MiddleUploaded byRev Andrew Salinas

- Bell_violation_in_primordial_cosmology.pdfUploaded bygianluca perniciano
- HongSHUploaded bySajjad Anwar
- Awa Anchor Block DesignUploaded byBimji Kurji
- Session_5Uploaded bykaren dejo
- 5.2 Nuclear Energy.pdfUploaded byLilli
- Concept Question Newton 1Uploaded byHarshit Rathee
- 1-5 Bonding in Compounds (Part 1)Uploaded byapi-3734333
- Simple StrainUploaded byAngeloLorenzoSalvadorTamayo
- Computational Analysis of Co-flow Jets From Elliptical NozzleUploaded byvetrirani
- Tensile Test 2010Uploaded byjuanomoran
- Formulas Corriente electrica (by Carrascal)Uploaded byIñaki
- MechEngHandbook v2 pUploaded bynatuan74
- f5_c2_linearlaw__new_ (1).docUploaded byysheng98
- Tobias Salger et al- Directed Transport of Atoms in a Hamiltonian Quantum RatchetUploaded byYidel4313
- 1detailed Lesson Plan- Solving ProblemsUploaded byKhim Chavez
- CHAP02Uploaded bymoji20067147
- 10bt60303-Heat Transfer (3)Uploaded bySoumya Bsoumya
- Heat Transfer Excel Calculations 1 (1)Uploaded bySharon Lambert
- conveyor belt Aratron_kuggrem_polyuretan_9berakning.pdfUploaded byDiego JA
- Moistairtab ExamplesUploaded byAditya Suardi
- AASHTO T-85Uploaded bykamp
- Statistical Mechanics Homework 6 Prof. YuUploaded bypalison
- rssc_stdy_chp_2.pdfUploaded bymien nam
- RehanAsif CVUploaded byrehanhulks
- Sound Noise ControlUploaded byMohamed Tahoun
- Vector SolutionsUploaded bysandrakristik
- Principles and Procedures of Insulation Co-OrdinationUploaded bygiovanipiffer
- ts7Uploaded byvikas_ojha54706
- network theory qb_102409002155_1Uploaded byChippyVijayan
- 47829 Bmat Test SpecificationUploaded byDamjan Pavlov