This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
INTEGRATED MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT MANUAL IN LATIN AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN CITIES
(Based on the original edition: Manual Gerenciamento Integrado de Resíduos Sólidos, 2001)
1st EDITION – 2008
MINISTRY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND TERRITORY – ITALY General Director Corrado Clini Director, Division I, Environment and Development Research Department Paolo Soprano Consultant, Division I, Environment and Development Research Department Pierluigi Manzione INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH CENTRE, IDRC – Canada Senior Program Specialist Walter Ubal Giordano Research Officer Alicia Iglesias Program Assistant Clara Saavedra Webmaster María Noel Estrada BRAZILIAN INSTITUTE OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION – IBAM General Director Mara Biasi Ferrari Pinto Director, National School of Urban Services – ENSUR Tereza Cristina Baratta Director, Urban Development and the Environment – DUMA Ana Lucia Nadalutti La Rovere PUBLICATION Technical coordination Karin Segala Technical content – Update and Adaptation Gilson Leite Mansur José Henrique Penido Monteiro Chapter 2 – Collaboration Victor Zular Zveibil Silvia Martarello Astolpho Technical Revision Andrea Pitanguy de Romani Karin Segala Translation from Spanish to English Liliana Battipede and David Reed Design and Layout Roberto Tostes / Doble Clic Editoras Publishing Coordination and Revision, English version Víctor L. Bacchetta and Laura Pallares
Manual on municipal solid waste integrated management in Latin American and Caribbean cities / José Henrique Penido Monteiro …[et al]; updated and adapted by Gilson Leite Mansur and José Henrique Penido Monteiro; technical coordination by Karin Segala; translation by Liliana Battipede and David Reed. – Montevideo: IDRC, 2008. 264p.; 21 X 29.7cm Adapted from: Manual gerenciamento integrado de resíduos sólidos, 2001. 1. Solid waste. I. Monteiro, José Henrique Penido. II. Mansur, Gilson Leite. III. Segala, Karin (coord.). IV. International Development Research Centre (IDRC).
PRESENTATION PREFACE 1 The general situation of solid waste management in Latin America and the Caribbean 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Regional Evaluation of Municipal Solid Waste Management Services in Latin America and the Caribbean 1.3 Solid waste sector trends Integrated Solid Waste Management Institutional models and payment for services 3.1 Concept 3.2 Forms of administration 3.3 Payment for services 3.3.1 Guidelines for the calculation of a waste collection rate Legislation 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 and Environmental Licenses Introduction Legislation Environmental Licenses Regulations applicable to solid waste 6 12 14 15 15 22 28 32 33 34 39 42 44 45 45 47 48 50 51 51 51 52 59 59 62 63 63 65 66 70 74 75 75 76 78 80 82 83 84 87
Solid waste: origin, definition and characteristics 5.1 Definition of rubbish and solid waste 5.2 Solid waste classification 5.2.1 Potential environmental contamination risks 5.2.2 Nature and origin 5.3 Characteristics of solid waste 5.3.1 Physical characteristics 5.3.2 Chemical characteristics 5.3.3 Biological characteristics 5.4 Influence of solid waste characteristics on urban cleaning system planning 5.5 Factors that influence solid waste characteristics 5.6 Processes for determining principal physical characteristics Solid waste quantity projections Solid waste preparation and storage 7.1 Concept 7.2 The importance of appropriate preparation and storage 7.3 Characteristics of pre-collection storage containers 7.4 Domestic waste pre-collection preparation and storage 7.5 Pre-collection storage of street waste 7.6 Pre-collection storage of waste in low demographic density and low-income areas 7.7 Pre-collection storage of waste produced by large generators 7.8 Special domestic waste pre-collection storage 7.9 Special origin waste pre-collection storage
Solid waste collection and transport 8.1 Domestic waste collection and transport 8.1.1 Concept 8.1.2 Collection regularity 8.1.3 Collection frequency 8.1.4 Collection times 8.1.5 Restructuring domestic collection routes 8.1.6 Collection vehicles 8.1.7 Tools and implements used by collectors 8.2 Public solid waste collection and transport 8.2.1 Concept 8.2.2 Collection of waste gathered by sweeping 8.2.3 Collection of waste from weeding and vegetation cutting 8.2.4 Tree pruning waste collection 8.2.5 Collection of rubble and other construction waste 8.2.6 Special collections 8.2.7 Vehicles and equipment used for collection 8.3 Waste collection in tourist cities 8.4 Solid waste collection in informal settlements 8.5 Collection of medical waste 8.5.1 Acknowledgement of the problem 8.5.2 Segregation 8.5.3 Separate collection of common, infectious and special waste 8.5.4 Vehicles for collection and transport 8.5.5 Aspects of collection planning Solid waste transfer 9.1 Concept 9.2 Types of transfer station 9.2.1 Direct transfer station 9.2.2 Station with storage facilities 9.2.3 Alternative transfer systems 9.3 Vehicles and machines for transfer stations Street cleaning 10.1 The importance of street cleanliness 10.2 Waste found in the street 10.3 Street cleaning services 10.3.1 Sweeping services 10.3.2 Weeding and scraping services 10.3.3 Cutting services 10.3.4 Drain cleaning services 10.3.5 Market cleaning services 10.3.6 Manual and mechanical waste removal services 10.3.7 Beach cleaning services 10.4 How to reduce street waste 10.5 Street cleaning in tourist cities Recovery of recyclable materials 11.1 Concept 11.2 Selective collection programs 11.2.1 Selective door to door collection 11.2.2 Voluntary Drop-off Centres (VDC) 11.2.3 Segregator organizations
90 91 91 91 92 93 94 100 105 106 106 106 107 108 109 109 110 113 114 115 115 116 117 117 119 120 121 122 122 122 124 124 126 127 128 129 130 136 138 143 145 146 147 150 152 154 155 156 157 159 161
Solid waste treatment 12.1 Concept 12.2 Domestic solid waste treatment 12.2.1 Recycling 12.2.2 Composting 12.2.3 Choosing a treatment option 12.3 Treatment of special domestic waste 12.3.1 Construction rubble 12.3.2 Tyres 12.3.3 Batteries and fluorescent tubes 12.4 Treatment of waste from special sources 12.4.1 Industrial solid waste 12.4.2 Radioactive waste 12.4.3 Port and airport waste 12.4.4 Medical waste Solid waste final disposal 13.1 Introduction 13.2 Impacts of inappropriate solid waste disposal 13.3 Sanitary landfill 13.3.1 Sanitary landfill site selection 13.3.2 Environmental licenses 13.3.3 Master plan 13.3.4 Landfill installation 13.3.5 Sanitary landfill operation 13.3.6 Equipment 13.4 Controlled landfills 13.5 Environmental recuperation of refuse dumps 13.6 The situation of segregators 13.7 Special domestic waste disposal 13.7.1 Construction rubble disposal 13.7.2 Disposal of batteries 13.7.3 Disposal of fluorescent tubes 13.7.4 Disposal of tyres 13.8 Disposal of waste from special sources 13.8.1 Industrial waste disposal 13.8.2 Radioactive waste disposal 13.8.3 Port and airport waste disposal 13.8.4 Medical waste disposal 13.9 Sanitary landfills and carbon credits: Opportunities to help resolve environmental problems 13.9.1 Greenhouse effect: causes and consequences 13.9.2 The “logic” of carbon credits 13.9.3 Circumstances in which biogas from a sanitary landfill can be utilized 13.9.4 Requirements for the implementation of GHG emission reduction projects in solid waste landfills 13.9.5 General considerations
164 165 166 166 170 174 177 177 182 184 184 184 185 186 186 196 197 198 199 203 211 213 215 222 232 233 236 238 239 239 240 240 241 241 241 245 246 246 247 248 249 251 252 253 255 258 259
BIBLIOGRAPHY GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS GLOSSARY
The resulting projects (specifically in Latin America and the Caribbean) will be expressly devoted to establishing new partnerships (within the broad category of the “type II initiatives” launched in Johannesburg) in areas of interest common to private and public sectors. In this regard. such as sustainable water and sanitation management. NGOs and the private sector. This agreement focuses attention on some specific areas related to local environmental policy. the role that municipalities can play in the sustainability process is of great importance: the local dimension should be considered as the most significant for experimenting with new environmental strategies and best practices and demonstrating their effectiveness on a broader dimension. pertain to the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed by the Ministry for Environment and Territory of Italy and IDRC. oversee planning processes. social and environmental infrastructure. local authorities construct. This collaboration had previously resulted in significant benefits through the organization of a high level meeting held in Sao Paulo (Brazil). they play a vital role in educating. or within each of them. which gathered experts. represented a significant step in the fruitful collaboration between the Ministry for the Environment and Territory of Italy and the International Development Research Centre of Canada (IDRC) through the Environmental Management Secretariat (EMS). administrators. 6 . but also their intention to initiate actions at all levels with the participation of developed and developing countries. As stated in chapter 28 of Agenda 21. These peak activities. urban waste management. mobilizing and responding to the public in the promotion of sustainable development. all of which are processes geared to ensuring local sustainable development. which came into force in 2005 and is aimed at achieving common objectives related to environmental protection and integrating them with social and economic development. international institutions. the promotion of clean technologies and industrial processes and the use of renewable energy sources. establish local environmental policies and regulations. held in December 2005 in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil). professionals and heads of public institutions in order to quantify the process towards sustainability in the urban solid waste management sector and to assess the situation through an exchange of information and an evaluation of best practices in each field. operate and maintain economic. together with some others carried out during the year.PRESENTATION The role of local authorities for a better environmental policy The training course on integrated urban solid waste management in municipalities of Latin America and the Caribbean. and assist in implementing national and sub-national environmental policies. and to supporting local authorities in developing voluntary processes at the local level. The MoU established a partnership between the two institutions and implies not only that both parties are committed to achieving the agreed objectives. As the level of governance is closest to the people.
so as to enable the decoupling of environmental degradation from population growth and economic development. In these circumstances major improvements in efficiency are needed. transport. the promotion of renewable energy sources and the improvement of people’s quality of life by preventing pollution in urban areas. The real challenge is to transform waste into reusable resources: measures should be initiated to stimulate private investment in this field and to create opportunities to include municipalities as potential beneficiaries of the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism for curbing greenhouse gas emissions. especially because continued population growth and the expansion of economic activities stimulate higher consumption of resources and a greater waste generation. it rather aims to focus on each policy in an isolated manner: thus. local authorities can play a more effective role in developing the capacity to deliver feasible sustainable development outcomes. For these reasons. including the adoption of specific action plans. a change in the policy framework itself is required today.Indeed. Paolo Soprano Ministry for the Environment and Territory – Italy 7 . enforce laws and regulations and promote initiatives suitable for local conditions. Waste management issues are at the centre of environmental concerns in many urban areas. waste and water management. This is particularly true for the urban waste management sector. Policies such as housing. in addition to the improvement of specific policies. awareness raising campaigns and influencing the market towards the attainment of an environmentally sound waste cycle. An effective environmental management of industrial (hazardous) and urban waste can also serve as a significant mechanism for the creation of new job opportunities. and to diminish environmental pressures to sustainable levels. local governments can play an important supervisory role. In more general terms. urban development. the development of clean technologies – by replacing refuse dumps with final waste disposal centres – can be included among the advantages of responsible and sustainable local government policy-making. have significant impacts on how cities grow. The traditional framework of policies is not designed to consider interrelationships between the policies of different sectors.
administradores. Anteriormente esta colaboración ya había logrado un importante resultado a través de la organización de una reunión de alto nivel que tuvo lugar en San Pablo (Brasil). El Memorando de Entendimiento. el papel que podrían desempeñar los municipios en función del proceso de sustentabilidad es de gran importancia: la dimensión local debería ser considerada como la más significativa en la experiencia de nuevas estrategias ambientales y mejores prácticas. a través del Secretariado de Manejo del Medio Ambiente (EMS-SEMA). Este Acuerdo fija su atención en algunas áreas específicas vinculadas a las políticas ambientales locales. ha sido uno de los pasos más importantes en la fructífera colaboración entre el Ministerio de Ambiente y Territorio – Italia y el Centro Internacional de Investigaciones para el Desarrollo (IDRC) de Canadá. instituciones internacionales. En este sentido. gestión sustentable del agua y saneamiento. que establece una asociación entre las dos instituciones. sino que también desean poner en marcha acciones a todo nivel con la participación de países desarrollados y en desarrollo. Estas actividades destacadas – combinadas con otras que se desarrollaron en el transcurso del año – corresponden al Memorando de Entendimiento firmado conjuntamente por el Ministerio de Ambiente y Territorio – Italia y el IDRC. y para apoyar a las autoridades locales en el desarrollo de procesos voluntarios a nivel local. promoción de tecnologías y procesos industriales limpios y uso de fuentes de energía renovable. que entró en vigor en el año 2005 y apunta al logro de objetivos compartidos relativos a la protección del medio ambiente y a hacer que los mismos fueran compatibles con el desarrollo social y económico. realizado en diciembre de 2005. organizaciones no gubernamentales (ONG) y el sector privado. mostrando su efectividad en una dimensión más amplia. y para evaluar la situación a través del intercambio de información y evaluación de las mejores prácticas en cada área. donde expertos.PRESENTACIÓN El papel de las autoridades locales para una mejor política ambiental El curso de capacitación sobre gestión integrada de residuos sólidos urbanos a nivel de Municipios de América Latina y el Caribe. o dentro de cada uno de ellos. siendo todos ellos procesos acometidos para asegurar un desarrollo local sustentable. en Río de Janeiro (Brasil). profesionales y autoridades de instituciones públicas se reunieron para cuantificar el proceso en pro de la sustentabilidad en la gestión integrada de residuos sólidos urbanos. Los proyectos resultantes (en especial en América Latina y el Caribe) estarán expresamente dedicados al establecimiento de nuevas asociaciones (en la categoría más amplia de “iniciativas tipo II” que fueran lanzadas en Johannesburgo) en las áreas de interés entre los sectores público y privado. Tal como se establece en el capítulo 28 de la Agenda 21. como por ejemplo en los casos de gestión de residuos sólidos urbanos. 8 . implica no sólo que ambas partes están comprometidas con el logro de objetivos acordados. las autoridadeslocales construyen.
gestión de desechos y agua. Políticas públicas como la de vivienda. A medida que el nivel de gobernabilidad se acerca más a los pueblos. las autoridades locales pueden desempeñar un papel más eficaz en el desarrollo de la capacidad para producir resultados más efectivos en cuanto al desarrollo sustentable. asegurando el cumplimiento de la legislación y las reglamentaciones y promoviendo acciones adecuadas a las condiciones locales. producen un importante impacto en la forma en que las ciudades crecen. supervisan los procesos de planificación. sensibilización. transporte. las autoridades locales desempeñan un papel crucial en la educación. y para reducir las presiones ambientales a niveles sustentables. incluyendo la adopción de planes de acción específicos. y liderando al mercado en la dirección correcta para el logro de un ciclo de manejo de desechos que resulte ambientalmente saludable. Esto resulta particularmente cierto en el caso del sector de gestión de desechos urbanos. El verdadero desafío está en transformar los residuos en recursos reutilizables: deberían preverse medidas para estimular la inversión privada en este campo y generar oportunidades para incluir a los municipios como beneficiarios potenciales del Protocolo de Kyoto sobre Mecanismos de Desarrollo Limpio. Los problemas en torno al manejo de residuos constituyen la principal preocupación ambiental en muchas zonas urbanas. además de la mejora de algunas políticas específicas.operan y mantienen la infraestructura económica. en especial porque el constante crecimiento poblacional y la expansión de las actividades económicas estimulan un mayor consumo de recursos y un incremento en la generación de desechos. el desarrollo de tecnologías limpias – sustituyendo vertederos por centros para la disposición final de los residuos – podría incluirse entre las ventajas que se derivarían al contar con políticas responsables y sustentables en los gobiernos locales. más bien intenta focalizar cada política de manera aislada: es por eso que hoy se requiere un cambio en el propio encuadre de las políticas públicas. De hecho. desarrollo urbano. La gestión ambiental efectiva del desecho industrial (peligroso) y urbano también podría ser un mecanismo importante en la creación de nuevas oportunidades de empleo. social y ambiental. Paolo Soprano Ministerio de Ambiente y Territorio – Italia 9 . en la más amplia difusión de la adopción de fuentes de energía renovable y para mejorar la calidad de vida de las personas. En términos más generales. y colaboran en la implementación de políticas ambientales nacionales y sub-nacionales. se requiere una considerable mejora en la eficiencia para permitir la separación de la degradación ambiental del incremento de la población y el desarrollo económico. Por todas estas razones. evitando la contaminación en zonas urbanas. En tales circunstancias. movilización y respuesta al público para promover el desarrollo sustentable. para abatir las emisiones de gases con efecto invernadero. implantan las políticas y reglamentaciones ambientales locales. los gobiernos locales pueden desempeñar un papel importante en la supervisión. El marco tradicional de las políticas no ha sido diseñado para tener en cuenta la interrelación entre las políticas sectoriales.
che stabilisce una partnership tra le due istituzioni. operano e mantengono le infrastrutture economiche. con le organizzazioni internazionali. costruiscono. la promozione di tecnologie e processi industriali puliti e l’utilizzo di risorse energetiche rinnovabili. tutti finalizzati a garantire lo sviluppo sostenibile locale. Tale collaborazione aveva già ottenuto un risultato importante attraverso l’organizzazione di un incontro ad alto livello tenutosi a San Paolo del Brasile. prevede non solo l’impegno di entrambe le istituzioni al raggiungimento degli obiettivi concordati. il ruolo che i comuni possono ricoprire verso il processo di sostenibilità è di estrema importanza: la dimensione locale va considerata come la più significativa per sperimentare nuove strategie ambientali e migliori pratiche. a Rio de Janeiro del Brasile. ha rappresentato un significativo passo in avanti a favore della fruttuosa collaborazione fra il Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio – Italia ed il Centro Internazionale di Ricerca per lo Sviluppo Canadese (IDRC) attraverso il proprio Segretariato per la Gestione Ambientale (EMS). con le ONG e con il settore privato. tenutosi a dicembre 2005. di professionisti e di dirigenti di istituzioni pubbliche si sono riuniti per quantificare il processo verso la sostenibilità del settore della gestione dei rifiuti solidi urbani e per valutare la situazione grazie ad uno scambio di informazioni ed ad un esame delle migliori pratiche di ogni settore. e sostenere gli enti locali nello sviluppare dei processi volontari a livello locale. supervisionano i processi di pianificazione. dove un gruppo di esperti. la gestione sostenibile dell’acqua e dei servizi igienici. sociali ed ambientali. Il memorandum di intenti. Tale accordo si concentra su settori specifici collegati alla politica ambientale locale come ad esempio: la gestione dei residui urbani. e che ha come scopo l’ottenimento degli obiettivi comuni per la tutela ambientale e la sua compatibilità con lo sviluppo economico e sociale. o con ciascuno di loro. di amministratori. ma anche l’attuazione di attività ad ogni livello con la partecipazione dei paesi industrializzati e quelli in via di sviluppo. Poiché inoltre essi rappresentano il li- 10 . I progetti che ne verranno (in particolare in America Latina ed i Caraibi). Queste attività di spicco – combinate ad altre attività svoltesi durante l’anno – sono contenute nel memorandum di intenti siglato fra il Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio – Italia e l’IDRC. saranno espressamente volti a stabilire una nuova partnership (nella categoria più ampia delle “iniziative di tipo II” lanciata a Johannesburg) nei settori di interesse fra il settore privato e quello pubblico. dimostrando la loro efficacia su scala più ampia.PRESENTAZIONI Il ruolo degli enti locali per una politica ambientale migliore Il corso di formazione sui sistemi integrati di gestione dei rifiuti solidi urbani nei comuni dell’America Latina e dei Caraibi. Come affermato nel capitolo 28 dell’Agenda 21 “gli enti locali. A questo riguardo. entrato in vigore nel 2005. stabiliscono le politiche e le regolamentazioni in materia ambientale a livello locale e partecipano all’implementazione delle politiche nazionali e sub-nazionali in ambito ambientale.
garantendo l’applicazione delle leggi e delle norme e promuovendo delle attività adatte alla condizioni locali. sullo sviluppo urbano. In queste circostanze è necessario un miglioramento dell’efficienza al fine di scollegare il degrado ambientale dalla crescita della popolazione e dallo sviluppo economico ed al fine di ridurre la pressione ambientale a livelli sostenibili. si stimola un maggior consumo delle risorse ed una maggiore produzione di rifiuti. Una gestione dei rifiuti urbani ed industriali (pericolosi) potrebbe essere anche un meccanismo importante per la creazione di nuovi posti di lavoro. sui trasporti. Paolo Soprano Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio – Italia 11 . al contrario si concentra su ogni politica in modo isolato ed è.vello di governo più vicino ai cittadini. a causa della continua crescita demografica e dell’espansione delle attività economiche. La vera sfida è trasformare i residui in risorse riutilizzabili: vanno presi dei provvedimenti per incoraggiare gli investimenti privati in questo settore e per creare le opportunità affinché i comuni vengano inclusi come potenziali destinatari del Meccanismo di Sviluppo Pulito del Protocollo di Kyoto per la riduzione delle emissioni di gas ad effetto serra. l’aumento della consapevolezza e la conduzione del mercato verso la direzione giusta per l’ottenimento di un ciclo integrato dei rifiuti. Ciò è particolarmente vero per il settore della gestione dei rifiuti. Le politiche sugli alloggi. In termini più generali. alla mobilizzazione ed alla responsabilizzazione del pubblico nella promozione dello sviluppo sostenibile. Per queste ragioni. gli enti locali giocano un ruolo vitale rispetto all’educazione. Le questioni relative alla gestione dei rifiuti sono al centro dell’attenzione ambientale in molte zone urbane in quanto. per diffondere l’adozione di risorse energetiche rinnovabili e per migliorare la qualità di vita della gente grazie alla prevenzione dell’inquinamento nelle zone urbane. includendo l’adozione di piani d’azione specifici. pertanto. lo sviluppo di tecnologie pulite – che sostituiscano l’interramento con degli impianti per lo smaltimento finale dei rifiuti – può essere inserito fra i vantaggi delle politiche responsabili e sostenibili dei governi locali. i governi locali possono giocare un ruolo importante di regia. sulla gestione dei rifiuti e dell’acqua hanno un impatto notevole sulla crescita delle città. adesso necessario modificare lo schema di per sé. oltre naturalmente a migliorare le singole politiche. Lo schema tradizionale delle politiche non è atto a considerare l’interdisciplinarità fra le politiche di settore. Effettivamente gli enti locali possono giocare un ruolo più efficace nello sviluppare la capacità di trasmettere risultati validi per lo sviluppo sostenibile.
the universalization of urban cleaning services. but principally the creation of instruments that incorporate and structure integrated management models as a fundamental strategy to achieve a healthy city. NGOs and civil society to deal with aspects of integrated solid waste management in a sustainable way. including clean development mechanisms. water course and aquifer contamination in the environmental field. It deals with subjects that are fundamental to the understanding and improvement of urban cleaning systems and services and covers technical and administrative issues. social concerns relating to segregators. political. questions relating to the preparation. companies. In several situations negative impacts relating to solid waste are fundamentally associated with inappropriate management. environmentally appropriate treatment and final disposal practices. Another aspect of urban cleaning that has more recently come to the fore is the issue of the final disposal of solid waste in relation to Clean Development Mechanisms. the withdrawal of children from rubbish dumps. Deep behavioural change is necessary in order to reverse traditional policies and practices and establish strategies that incorporate the following elements: ! ! ! ! ! the reduction of consumption. social and legal aspects. 12 . and pressures deriving from tourist activities. in particular children living on rubbish dumps.PREFACE There is a notably growing demand for solutions to urban cleaning issues both in global bodies and at the level of civil society and local communities. agencies. economic. This Manual on Municipal Solid Waste Integrated Management is aimed at contributing to an improvement in the technical capacities of the public sector. the potential generation of work and incomes related to waste. promoting the social and economic inclusion of segregators. storage and final disposal of waste. Acknowledging that the main responsibility for providing urban cleaning services falls on the municipal level of government. For a long time these issues have been relegated to the background but diverse governmental and civil society sectors are now mobilizing to address the problem due to several areas being affected: disease transmission and therefore public health. wastage and waste generation by citizens. as well as institutional. Changing this state of affairs involves not only a mobilization of resources and improvements in technical knowledge of the appropriate processes and technologies for each reality. the Manual provides guidelines that serve as a reference for decision-makers in the formulation of public policies and corresponding legislation.
Tereza Cristina Baratta Director. held in December 2005 with representatives from several Latin American and Caribbean countries. Within this perspective the Manual’s objective is to be a useful tool in integrated administration training for all those who work with solid waste and to be sufficiently flexible so that from all the information provided on different forms of “know how” that which is most useful for application to the particular conditions of each city can be chosen. including institutional adaptations that are necessary for the administration of services and the allocation of available resources in a responsible way. It is essential that municipal teams in charge of the planning and operation of services are properly equipped to prepare and implement programs. and was subsequently revised and completed. plans and initiatives geared to improving urban cleaning systems. You are therefore invited to consider and use the solutions offered by this Manual. It is intended for use as a basic didactic instrument that can orientate future workshops. National School of Urban Services – IBAM 13 . using appropriate technologies and methods and respecting the particular economic social and cultural circumstances of the local population. As part of their work methodology a preliminary version was examined by participants in the first IBAM training course.The Manual has been prepared by professionals with long-term experience in this sector who also serve as teachers in the courses offered by IBAM.
1 The general situation of solid waste management in Latin America and the Caribbean 14 .
However.1. As it is the best document produced up to now on this subject. The Solid Waste Evaluation constitutes a first regional effort in which 36 LAC countries participated within a common evaluation strategy. a better evaluation can be made of trends both in service quality and the types of approach to the issue employed by municipal.paho. However.org and http://www.1 Introduction In the municipal solid waste management sector. which covered the entire region. The collection of information for 1. 1. which is significant for answering the question: is waste management improving in Latin American cities? In practically all Latin American countries urban cleaning services are the responsibility of municipalities and often a well functioning system in a particular city does not necessarily reflect the trend in the country as a whole but rather the mayor’s determination to solve the problem. its executive summary is transcribed here.2 Regional Evaluation of Municipal Solid Waste Management Services in Latin America and the Caribbean 1 The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) in support of Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) governments.ops-oms. an interruption in the payment of bills by the municipality can paralyze services. 2005. if a study includes a wider range of cities. and taking into consideration the significant role performed by urban sanitation services to reduce health risk factors and environmental impacts. as well as NGOs involved in solid waste management in countries in the Region. IADB and PAHO. an evaluation made during a certain period has only a relative value as the quality of services can change very quickly.org/bvsars/fulltext/informeng/informeng. provincial and national governments in each country.bvsde. a periodical analysis of the state of solid waste management services in several cities of a country can indicate the general trend. Even if the system is in the hands of a private company. 15 . A well administrated landfill can became a rubbish dump in a few days if a tractor stops functioning due to some defect that the municipality is not able to quickly repair because of slow bureaucratic processes involved in buying spare parts or contracting a maintenance service. Based on Diagnosis of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Latin America and the Caribbean. through outsourcing or concession contracts. The general situation of solid waste management in Latin America and the Caribbean 1. (www.htm). updated in the form of “Report on the Regional Evaluation of Municipal Solid Waste Management Services in Latin America and the Caribbean". The most recent update of the Report on the Regional Evaluation of Municipal Solid Waste Management Services in Latin America and the Caribbean. was carried out by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) in 2005. coordinated the Report on the Regional Evaluation of Municipal Solid Waste Management Services with the direct participation of public institutions and private agencies. 1997.
mainly to the final disposal of waste with the purpose of looking for solutions or alternatives at a national and local level to improve the current situation and be able to accomplish waste management that is truly efficient. the materials used in industrial production and the introduction of Figure 1 – Disordered settlement and informal market close to a rubbish dump 16 . which is critical in many countries. health. education and socioeconomic data from the country and specific indicators related to urban sanitation services referred to the year 2001.the Evaluation took place in the countries between 2002 and 2003 through a national coordinating group of representatives from national and local entities involved in solid waste. as well as service providers and the community in general. The life styles. Within this context. as can be seen by the alarming environmental deterioration and the sanitary problems related to unsafe solid waste management and the scarce attention given to this area. The information was complemented with an analytical report for the country executed by each country. The Solid Waste Evaluation proposal emerges from the need to have a frame of reference that makes the solid waste sector visible in LAC to identify their needs and possibilities within the comprehensive management concept guided towards improving the communities’ quality of life. the purpose of the Regional Evaluation is to generate and expand the knowledge of the current situation. among which Agenda 21 stands out – agreed upon in 1992 in Rio de Janeiro during the United Nations International Conference on the Environment and Development – comprehensive solid waste management still represents one of the most important challenges that national and municipal governments face. the high levels of consumption. Even though it is true that moderate progress has been made as a result of national and international initiatives. The information was obtained through a series of forms that collected basic demographic.
streets. in which only 69% of the population has collection service.790 kg/inhab/day. These gaps are seen not only at a local level. The general situation of solid waste management in Latin America and the Caribbean persistent materials in daily human activities. more noticeable in medium and small populations. tend to increase the volumes of solid waste. institutions and organizations that are involved in this area. The situation worsens with the lack of adequate hospital and hazardous waste management. necessary strategies or components that will allow for the guidance. at best in dumps with an uncertain control. but also in institutions at a national level in charge of defining policies and assigning resources. of which the majority lack public service infrastructure and have completely spread out in a disorderly manner without any urban planning. highways and waterways contaminating the environment and endangering the population’s health. as well as in final disposal sites. The intensive migration of indigent populations from rural areas to medium and large cities has created outlying poverty belts. a common practice in several countries in the Region. The Solid Waste Evaluation estimates that by the year 2001.000 tons of waste are indiscriminately deposited in the environment. mainly when they are dumped together with municipal waste. It is presumed that the remainder. to find in garbage. Approximately half of the waste generated in LAC is produced by medium and small centers. transportation. their only means for survival. where they are more evident. which is not collected. Adequate sanitary final waste disposal coverage (landfill) for the LAC Region is 23%. around 230.” This means that of the 299. in the streets. manage insufficient information. takes many families. As a consequence. The Solid Waste Evaluation confirmed the information gaps that exist in the solid waste area in the countries of the Region. which tend to have more difficulty in waste management. which makes it evident that there is a serious environmental and health problem due to the proliferation of open air “dumps. is burned or dumped without any control in vacant lots. mainly women and children. the economic and social impoverishment present in these settlements. 21% in medium size urban centers and 23% in small urban centers.000 tons collected daily in the Region. regulation and institutional development of the municipalities as sanitation service providers. Waste collection coverage in the Region varies from 11%-100% with a regional average of 81%. Just a few of the LAC countries have comprehensive plans or programs to respond to the sector’s demands.3%) is urban and generates around 369. treatment and final disposal. of which 56% is generated in large urban centers. although with great differences within the countries. Practically all of them.1. representing serious problems for its collection. the LAC population reached 518 million of which 406 million (78. the impact to the environment being considerable since the disposal of these wastes is usually deficient. The Solid Waste Evaluation shows that average regional generation of residential solid waste per capita reaches 0. with a noticeable fluctuation in countries 17 . In addition.000 tons of municipal solid waste daily. as well as the due training of human resources and the capitalization of financial resources are not proposed.
which does not allow for the demands of an adequate solid waste management. among others. The LAC countries are in different stages of development in the solid waste sector.with a low Human Development Index (HDI). The costs for urban sanitation services in the Region fluctuate between US$15 and US$105 per ton. mainly regarding sanitary final disposal. adequately disposed of and treated waste. in countries where tourism is an important economic factor. which makes it difficult to implement follow-up mechanisms. and therefore. Ecuador.100 kg/inhab/day while the small and poor settlements in Latin America generate an average of less than 0. outsourcing and the granting of concessions. municipalities maintain responsibility for services. These facts show that economic growth and the level of consumption have a great influence in solid waste generation. the per capita generation reaches 2. yet. large cities are the largest generators of municipal waste per capita with close to 1. lack management and financial capability. The private sector has been becoming ever more prominent. specifically the smaller ones. health and environmental ministries have been evolving to replace the governing of the sector and the regulation of services to a certain point. not only in providing urban cleaning services but also in investment in solid waste sector development. the per capita generation varies between 0. collection and urban sanitation in main streets. as is the case in Bolivia. but with differing operational modalities: direct public sector administration. 18 . With regard to the legal aspects applicable to the sector. There are cases in which the per capita generation does not exceed 0.500 kg/inhab/day. Likewise. they are scattered in several legal bodies.250 kg/inhab/day. as well as hazardous waste. the effectiveness of current legal tools are minimized. with an average of US$29 per ton for collected. transfer. demand a more efficient management of urban sanitation services. Several deficiencies are observed in guiding the sector. great gaps can be observed in the judicial development and in different instruments for their compliance. even when several countries are developing specific laws and regulations for municipal. Municipalities.370 kg/inhab/ day to 2. Therefore. This produces an overlapping effect and inconsistencies. control and sanctions. Even though there is an abundance of environmental laws.400 kg/inhab/day. treatment and final disposal. in its planning and programming at medium and long term.650 kg/inhab/day with a regional average of 0.910 kg/inhab/day. With regards to municipal waste. At national levels. At a local level. Mexico and Peru. and consequently. The breakdown of these costs corresponds to sweeping.
handling and inadequate disposal of waste to the community are growing and are significant. The formal segregation and recovery of recyclable materials is not carried out on a large scale in LAC. several diseases are related to wastes when the conditions conducive to the development of several disease agents are present. The majority do not have the minimum prevention and occupational safety measures. lastly. but it is part of other services such as public lighting. In the English speaking Caribbean countries. The situation is more critical for individuals working and living from the recovery of materials from waste. This general rate is not exclusively assigned to the urban sanitation service.9% is for inorganic recycling and 0. Informal recycling is widely promoted in Latin America and its magnitude is difficult to identify due to the fact that the activities are subtle. financial support for this service is received through the collection of a municipal rate. among which there is a significant number of women and children. of which 1. in infrastructure works for final disposal.2% of the materials are recovered from garbage. and concentrate in acquiring equipment and. The monthly average rates for residential waste in LAC reaches US$2. who work under unsanitary and subhuman conditions. real estate taxes and others. 19 . representing between 60% and 70% of the total cost. The environmental impacts are mainly revealed in the contamination of surface and underground waters for public supply and the obstruction of drainage canals due to the uncontrolled dumping of solid wastes in bodies of water. The direct and indirect environmental and social costs that represent the production. mainly made up of food and garden waste. Although the direct casualty has not been determined. coupled by the lack of initiatives to integrate this form of subemployment into the solid waste sector. urban sanitation services are strongly subsidized by the central government. This is the case of the personnel who work in this sector. In the majority of Latin American countries. Informal segregation has increased in countries that have gone through a rapid and deep economic crisis as a result of the increase in poverty and unemployment.5 per user. On average. Investments in the sector are minimal compared to other public services such as electricity. The inadequate management of solid waste has serious consequences in the environment and the health of the population. mainly those who are in contact with wastes. potable water and basic wastewater. The general situation of solid waste management in Latin America and the Caribbean The cost breakdown indicates that the highest cost corresponds to sweeping and waste collection and transportation.3% to organic waste recycling. through a consolidated fund formed by different environmental taxes. the Evaluation showed that only 2. a value that does not cover the cost for urban sanitation services.1. which reflects a deficit of close to half the real cost of those services.
These are in addition to aesthetic and nuisance impacts due to noise and bad odours. the use of very low cost technologies that use animal. This is complemented with a great variety of courses. Technological and research development in relation to solid waste is reduced in the majority of LAC countries. Figure 2 . workshops and seminars focused on solid waste management. the incineration of waste without adequate control equipment. The advantages of these companies resides in the intensive use of labour force. Community participation occurs mainly when there is support from NGOs and a strong educational component. the transmission of pathogen microorganisms through water. the participation of small companies and private micro companies in solid waste collection has been increasing more and more. 20 . The contribution in research and technological development from institutes and universities for the solid waste area is scarce. mainly because this means a more economic alternative for the municipalities and/or sanitation municipal companies. and at the same time is supported by a strong national political base that guides the solid waste sector.Other important impacts that affect human health are the emission of air contaminants due to open air burning. human or mechanic (tricycles) traction and the promotion of greater community participation to facilitate the material collection and separation operation at the generation source. The community has a limited participation in solid waste management in LAC.” reduction. the breeding of bovine and porcine livestock with contaminated organic waste. Such participation is key to put into practice activities that take into consideration the principle of the three “R’s. The training of human resources in the solid waste area is usually carried out in some universities in the Region as part of the courses related to sanitation engineering and environmental sciences. by food. as well as vectors that transmit diseases.Environmental degradation caused by a refuse dump In several countries in LAC. reuse and recycling.
Figure 3 . The general situation of solid waste management in Latin America and the Caribbean Initiatives such as primary environmental care. promoting healthy life styles. especially those which have scarce managerial capability and limited resources. create healthy environments. institutional and functional organization. should be carefully evaluated in each of the countries to determine the appropriate steps. allowing more efficient approaches and alternatives for their development. NGOs and the private sector with the purpose of establishing healthy policies. personal capacity building through education and empowerment. healthy municipalities and communities. national and provincial governments should provide more support to municipalities. financial self-sustainability and the participation of the private sector and the community. therefore. in which the lack of information is more significant. 21 . to achieve the proposed national and municipal goals.1. These initiatives offer great potential for establishing long lasting activities and allowing the use of shared experiences through community networks and alliances with different institutions that share a common interest. especially in school and Ecoclub environments on solid waste management topics. local government. health-promoting schools and other health promotion strategies are basic to coordinate initiatives with the capacity to maximize participative management that includes the community. Taking into consideration that solid waste management is a local activity. The management aspects of the sector. within the real possibilities of the countries. regulations and operation of solid waste management services.Correct landfill operation resulting from public administration commitment The solid waste sectoral analysis will continue being a key instrument in this aspect by providing a comprehensive vision of the sector.
The issues dealt with below can present variations between one country and another and between one city and another depending on the greater or lesser degree of both commitment by mayors and community participation. which demands a more professional management by the municipal administration. Public awareness of the importance of urban cleaning services and municipal solid waste management In almost all LAC countries there has been an increase in community awareness of the need for improved solid waste management. Municipalities with a population of over 200.un. based on Solid Waste Evaluation together with other studies and experiences in this field. not only in collection services but more so in final disposal.org/millenniumgoals. international cooperation has a broad field of action. and technical cooperation to guide their efforts towards the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals 2 open new opportunities to promote and coordinate national and international activities to improve solid waste management in the Region. 2. ! the perceived relationship between solid waste management and the wellbeing and health of citizens. especially where universal coverage is sought in the urban zones of a municipality. ! the widespread exposure in the media of problems in developed countries caused by defective handling of hazardous industrial waste or its inappropriate final disposal and the resultant damaging effects on the health of the population. makes it possible to identify general sector trends. especially in institutional capacity building and in the identification and support of sectoral investments. The commitment and will of the governments and financial organizations.Likewise. 1. ! the increasing cost of services. 22 .3 Solid waste sector trends The above summary of solid waste management in Latin America and the Caribbean.000 have more financial resources and capabilities to deal with the difficulties involved in maintaining sustainable solid waste management. Circumstantial differences in service provision between small municipalities and large or medium-sized cities A gradual improvement in solid waste management can be found in large cities. For more information consult http://www. The principal causes of this increase are: ! the growing occurrence of environmental problems that affect people’s daily life and the dissemination of information about them through the media.
23 . those responsible for municipal services have to pay more attention to the waste issue and are less able to ignore the problem. in zones where inhabitants can influence public policy (commercial and high income residential zones) and final disposal takes place in one or more open air dumps without any sanitary or environmental control. NGOs. service coverage will not be universal and service quality will not be satisfactory. The general situation of solid waste management in Latin America and the Caribbean In small urban centres. to obtain resources through the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from their industrial or urban activities. The training of municipal personnel in the preparation of tender specifications and contracts is a critical element for an efficient initiation and operation of contractual relationships with private counterparts. the category into which most Latin American population centres fall (in Brazil. budget resources will not be allocated to it. If the mayor does not consider it to be a priority sector. but smaller ones often only have one person running these services and for essential material resources depend on departments with other functions. Although the legal framework is important. for the most part regular. cooperatives. it is not the only requirement for the achievement of good quality solid waste management. The legal framework Some large municipalities are establishing norms for solid waste management through municipal regulations or mayoral decrees and some countries are endeavouring to develop a national solid waste policy. a classification into which all Latin American countries fall.1. The importance of political will Sound solid waste management in Latin American cities depends to a large extent on the mayor’s commitment to this issue. In order for legislation and norms to translate into an improved solid waste management service a formal commitment by the mayor to their application is necessary. It is evident that with easier access to information and its dissemination through the internet. but these initiatives are sometimes hindered by political and economic interests that delay their implementation. 80% of municipalities have less than 30.000 inhabitants). Carbon credits and the clean development mechanism The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) allows developing countries. urban cleaning services are limited to collection. thus improving coverage and service quality. etc. Larger municipalities generally have a department of urban cleaning. Only when pressured by society and environmental control bodies do municipal administrations eventually become more aware of the problem and begin to allocate more resources to the sector. for example.
Many mayors regard the timing of the arrival of carbon credits as opportune for providing financial support for municipal endeavours to improve solid waste management services. Difficulties involved in the establishment of new landfills PAHO’s diagnosis confirms that one of the weak points of solid waste management systems in Latin American cities is final waste disposal. or to begin one from scratch in another place. A complementary advantage of a composting system is that it can contribute to the viability of establishing and operating a medium or large size plant by generating income through the sale of Emission Reduction Certificates. which can be operated manually in small towns or be mechanized where large amounts of waste have to be processed. In many cases these problems result in municipalities continuing to operate rubbish dumps and abandoning the establishment of new installations for the final disposal of waste collected in the city. 24 . Municipal administrations or contracted companies offer compensation to local residents but this is not always accepted. As mayors become increasingly aware of the seriousness of this problem. In such cases the municipality must decide whether to establish a landfill in the same place. municipal administrations will know how to maximize its economic advantages to fulfil municipal needs. This is so because there is an already existing methodology. The resources obtained from the sale of Emission Reduction Certificates (ERC) will not guarantee the operation of urban cleaning services. Composting Composting is a procedure that is increasingly applied in developed countries due to the prohibition of organic matter dumping in landfills. and in addition prolongs the latter’s useful life. and is now reappearing in developing countries. where people are already accustomed to refuse disposal. refuse dumps are beginning to be closed or converted. which is the harmful gas that would be generated in a landfill if the organic matter was deposited there. but with the dissemination of information on how this mechanism functions. This system. Nevertheless it must be remembered that such benefits from the Kyoto Protocol Clean Development Mechanism are in effect only up to 2012. tested by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). offers the great advantage of reducing the generation of leachate instead of producing biogas in landfills. The latter option has presented such serious problems that the construction of several new landfills has had to be suspended in response to the reaction of the local community. not to mention the difficulties involved in obtaining environmental licenses for new sites. that has determined that composting does not merely reduce but avoids the emission of greenhouse gases as organic matter in aerobic decomposition only gives off carbonic gas and water and not methane.
Even where the recycling system is institutionalized with the participation of segregator organizations. On the one hand this activity has positive aspects: waste can be a source of income for these people who do not have any other way of surviving and their work removes a significant amount of material from the urban cleaning circuit. materials that can be commercialized separated and the waste that the segregator is not interested in is left scattered on the street. On the other hand. with bags of domestic waste being opened. In addition municipalities that are implementing formal selective collection systems are facing difficulties in that before the truck passes to collect the recyclable waste. the segregation of materials is often done in a disorderly way. as well as extending the useful life of landfills. In many South American cities segregators working in rubbish dumps or landfills react forcefully when the municipality attempts to implement the closure of the site and begins a new landfill where their activity will not be allowed. which produces serious problems and much more work for the sweeping services. 25 . This resistance on the part of segregators is due to the danger of them losing their only source of income. transfer and final disposal. This phenomenon is happening in almost all large and medium-sized cities in Latin America and the prognosis is that it will increase. Informal segregators and formal selective collection systems Due to the growing unemployment that is found in almost all Latin American cities. The last hope is recyclable waste that can be found amongst the refuse. while the public authority is not able to create hundreds of jobs overnight or provide programs that generate income to replace that gained from segregation activity in landfills and the streets. especially the larger ones. It is necessary to convince local residents that a well managed landfill can exist relatively close to houses. This situation will continue while unemployment remains one of the principal scourges of Latin American countries. more and more people resort to the streets in search of some means of survival. the street segregators have already taken it. other independent segregators compete in the streets with the formal system. and therefore reduces the costs of collection. The general situation of solid waste management in Latin America and the Caribbean Communities have also reacted negatively to the establishment of new transfer stations on the grounds that in general landfills and other urban cleaning installations are poorly managed.1. This is a long process and satisfactory results will depend on the provision of numerous examples until residents become convinced that it is possible.
Contract types Municipal administrations face two big challenges in relation to solid waste management in Latin American cities: to provide a universal service and to improve its quality. way of disposing of their rubbish. As a result. provided that the specifications are reasonable and the tender process respects the limits required by law and administrative probity. The municipality for its part takes on the monthly payment of bills for services rendered and the coordination and supervision of such services. usually does not solve this problem. mayors are beginning to look for more effective and less expensive service provision models and are increasingly contracting work. no doubt inappropriate. In recent times some large cities have contracted services with long term concessions. As municipal budgets are finite. The incidence of payment arrears is high and there is not much that can be done to reduce it as an interruption of collection services would only reduce the cleanliness of the city as households that do not receive this service would find another. The resources needed for the maintenance of sound and sustainable urban cleaning operations have to be allocated from the municipal budget and this represents the biggest challenge faced by administrators. In general this has proved to be a satisfactory solution. a municipality’s income from rates or specific tariffs is nowhere near enough to cover the costs of urban cleaning services. a state of affairs that is detrimental to other municipal services. but success is dependent on the mayor’s level of commitment and political will to prioritize the issue. transfer and final disposal operations thus transferring to the private sector the burden of investment and operational costs. The trends of change Many municipalities are training their technical personnel and seeking resources from provincial or national bodies with a view to improving service quality. most large and medium-sized cities outsource collection. This is due not 26 . Economic sustainability of the sector In general. This constitutes one of the main impediments to good quality service management as municipal administrations have to allocate monies from their budgets for urban cleaning services without a corresponding income from rate or tariff collection. especially for the establishment and operation of large sanitary landfills that require significant investment and therefore a longer period to see a return on it. Money raised together with national governmental or multilateral bodies for investment in equipment such as collection trucks or in the construction of installations such as landfills.
There is now an unprecedented level of attention and debate on municipal solid waste management and a seemingly inexorable search by municipalities for models that are sustainable from both a socioeconomic and environmental perspective. but also to the improved performance of environmental control bodies and national ministries that oversee municipalities’ compliance with their legal obligations. municipal administrations are signing agreements that establish periods within which service provision has to reach specified levels of quality and coverage. As a result. even if sporadic. with the help. of provincial and national governments. 27 . The general situation of solid waste management in Latin America and the Caribbean only to the increased awareness of both mayors and the general public about the significance of this issue.1.
2 Integrated solid waste management 28 .
Typical situations are: ! high technology industrial processes aimed at competitive insertion in global markets side by side with obsolete industrial processes that produce significant environmental damage. It is of fundamental importance to also take into consideration the generation of waste. as a result of which they are now called the 29 . to the maximization of its reuse through the implementation of more appropriate collection systems for each situation and the employment of treatment. dealing only with the management of the system. This is the approach recommended by Agenda 21: the transformation of the production and consumption matrix on the basis of the 3R’s – reduce. in order to establish a shared concept in which all win and positive socio-environmental outcomes are produced. The reduction of waste to be collected. recovery and recycling processes and technologies. consumption. recycling or recovery. Traditional practices. address the problems of solid waste in a partial way. treatment plants and final disposal. It is important to emphasize the significant differences between traditional and integrated approaches to this subject: in the latter waste is always regarded as a raw material for the production of new products through reuse. recyclers and managers. generally insulated. frameworks and practices in regard to solid waste management. discarding and final disposal. In practice this concept ranges from the minimization of waste generation in the production process. In this way only waste with no utility is left for final disposal. consumers. Integrated solid waste management Latin American and Caribbean cities present great regional and local imbalances. Waste therefore has a commercial value that can be added to the production chain thus creating new work opportunities and generating income for various sectors of society.2. including packaging. ! the availability of waste processing technologies together with a lack of the financial and human resources necessary to maintain them and the presence of large groups of segregators in streets and rubbish dumps. The optimization of these circuits reduces to a minimum the amount of waste for final disposal. which call for the establishment of new concepts. the sustainability of systems and the role of citizens as generators. reuse and recycle – to which has now been added a new R for recover. The concept of integrated solid waste management considers the entire cycle including production. transported and disposed of in landfills – which as a consequence will occupy smaller areas or will have a longer useful life – contributes to the economic and environmental sustainability of systems. ! consumption pockets having a pattern associated with high levels of refuse production equivalent to that of developed countries together with large sectors of the population who do not have access to consumer goods.
labour and technology. social. not only provided by the municipality but also by other agents participating in the management. Integrated management depends on the functioning of specific sub-systems that involve installations. Participation processes allow the different stakeholders to identify opportunities that can lead to solutions for the problems presented by solid waste.” (Agenda 21. or in the case of smaller countries. the integration of technical. Some elements are essential for the development of integrated solid waste management (ISWM) processes: ! the participation of all public. ISWMPs must be complemented by national and regional policies on this issue. chapter 21) Putting these criteria and the concept of integrated solid waste management into practice in Latin American and Caribbean cities requires the development of local participation processes. and in the implementation of an urban cleaning system. juridical. However it is possible for a group of municipalities to develop them and share some solutions especially for the final disposal of waste. 30 . This model has been used as a tool to solve problems arising from the increasing amounts of solid waste generated by the industrial society. rainwater drainage and vector control. ! the articulation of proposed solid waste systems with overall urban planning and other urban systems. environmental. amongst which are: ! citizens themselves. Plans can also be formulated at a regional. responsible for the separation and differentiated pre-collection storage of recyclable materials and other domestic waste. including water provision. even national level. “Environmentally sound waste management must go beyond the mere safe disposal or recovery of generated waste and seek to address the root cause of the problem by attempting to change unsustainable patterns of production and consumption. machines. On whatever scale they are made. particularly environmental sanitation.4R’s. sewerage systems. This implies the application of the integrated life cycle management concept. which presents a unique opportunity to reconcile development with environmental protection. through the development of an Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan (ISWMP). institutional and political aspects in order to guarantee system sustainability. ! ! the integration of all elements of the solid waste cycle in the 4R’s processes. Usually it is recommended that these plans are developed at a municipal or local level. private and community stakeholders in the conception and planning of processes and solutions. provincial.
Political-institutional – the integration of public authorities and other stakeholders and institutions with a clear delimitation of responsibilities. 31 . and by means of contracts. responsible for separating recyclable materials discarded by citizens and selling them to the relevant companies. thus generating income and jobs. the determination of the appropriate technology for each situation. reusable material recovery. environmental and political-institutional dimensions and system sustainability. specific approaches must be promoted in each related field: Social – community participation and quality control. In order to guarantee sustainability from a multi-disciplinary and trans-disciplinary perspective. a rational use of natural resources taking into account waste minimization. the provision of sufficient capacity in machines and labour to provide universal coverage in public urban cleaning services. Technical-operational – the establishment of a specific department and the appointment of responsible personnel. agreements and cooperation accords. and the social inclusion of segregators who have to be organized. the formulation of specific policies for solid waste management. segregators organized in cooperatives. responsible for their own waste.2. integrated solid waste management prioritizes the social. plays the principal role in the integrated management of the entire system. institutions and contracted companies. including the possibility of consortium solutions. irrespective of the socioeconomic level and ethnic origin of the population. Integrated solid waste management ! ! large generators. ! health institutions with an internal management of infectious waste that either sterilizes it or appropriately separates it by type for differentiated collection. In addition to the technical and financial aspects of conventional urban cleaning systems and final disposal systems. Economic-financial – an analysis of system costs and the possibility of minimizing them in order to make systems economically viable. valued and associated in the solid waste production chain. environmental information dissemination and education as instruments for the transformation of personal and collective production and consumption patterns. that through its agents. the definition of training programs. ! the municipality. the implementation of juridical instruments and ISWMPs. Environmental – the development of clean technology for application to solid waste. and appropriate treatment and final disposal. the recovery of operational costs through differentiated charge mechanisms according to generator profile and payment capacity.
3 Institutional models and payment for services 32 .
and public institutions active in the city and having significant environmental responsibilities. ! ! ! The municipal solid waste management model not only has to allow for the participation of the community but also specifically facilitate it in order to generate public awareness of the different activities involved in the system and its implementation costs. contribute to the solution of socioeconomic problems related with the issue. to the maximum degree possible. It is important that citizens know that they are the ones who are paying for the system through taxes. In summary. the appropriate preparation and storage of waste for collection and consequently a cheaper operation.1 Concept A city’s urban cleaning system should be institutionalized on the basis of an integrated management model that. Such regulations must clearly reflect the objectives of the public authority and raise public awareness in regard to appropriate urban solid waste management and environmental problems. has the capacity to: ! foster the economical sustentability of operations. 33 . protect inhabitants’ quality of life. Policy instrumentation will be structured through the approval of urban cleaning regulations whereby the city legitimizes the adopted management model and social obligations. rates or tariffs. and in the subsequent budget allocation to the system that should include provision for environmental education and the development of programs that generate income opportunities and employment. and defines infractions and their respective fines. This priority must be considered in the definition of municipal fiscal policy. Institutional models and payment for services 3. Policy making is based on the participation of social leaders. community participation is a key element in the sustainability of the system while the municipality is responsible for establishing an integrated management that necessarily includes awareness raising programs for citizens who will then perceive that the political will to prioritize municipal solid waste management exists. which has to be technically and socially just.3. Such participation would directly result in a reduction of solid waste generation. cleaner streets. protect the environment. private companies. and induce an acknowledgment by citizens of their role as consumers and therefore as generators of solid waste.
Autonomous authority This modality involves the creation of a public company specifically for the administration of urban cleaning. political interference and frequent crises in the service. It also facilitates greater management autonomy. directly or through delegates with the objective of effectively satisfying collective needs. and distinguishes it from other economic activities. and indeterminate service costs. The negative results of this group of difficulties are: a dissatisfied public. under a partially or totally public regime. Public services are all material activities assigned by law to the State for it to exercise. the creation of a specialized labour force and better conditions for budgetary planning.2 Forms of administration In general the municipality is. low degree of training. A public service is an activity undertaken by a public body with a view to satisfying a public interest need.3. directly or indirectly. responsible for organizing and providing essential local services and is therefore responsible for urban cleaning services. Urban cleaning systems can be administered in different ways: Direct municipal management In this case the provision of urban cleaning services is the responsibility of a municipal department or body. This model is more flexible than direct municipal administration and is more compatible with the dynamic of daily urban cleaning tasks. This model is generally used in smaller cities that do not have a volume of service provision that is attractive to the private sector. the chronic problems inherent to this model are: insufficient budget. What characterizes a public service. 34 . sanitary and environmental problems. is that it is essential for the community and therefore its provision represents an obligation for the public authority and its management is subject to the legal principles specifically related with the efficient provision of service to the community. inevitable bureaucracy. Except where they have been resolved in particular cases.
Integrated Solid Waste Management Workshop organized by IDRC in Sao Paulo. In addition.000. specialized in certain types of operation such as landfill management. Outsourcing In this model a private sector company is contracted to undertake an activity. especially in regard to the speed of response to operational requirements (for example the purchase of spare parts for collector vehicles). workers cooperatives or small companies through contracts established by municipalities. 35 . from contracting well structured companies. treatment. Outsourcing is based on the concept of public administration undertaking the functions of planning. 3. coordination and overseeing while the private company is responsible for operations. 2005. In many LAC cities outsourcing is employed for urban cleaning services with sweeping and/or collection often undertaken by small civil society organizations. organizes. Brazil. with a predefined mechanism of payment based on the specific services to be provided and technical-administrative convenience. This model is only appropriate for large cities as it requires the creation. Colombia and Costa Rica with populations of no more than 500. implements and coordinates the service. supervision and the charging of tariffs for services provided. All these cases of delegating state functions to civil society authenticate outsourcing as an efficient practice. and can even outsource operations and collect payments directly from users/beneficiaries of the service. to contracting micro-companies or independent workers who undertake waste collection with carts pulled by animals or the manual operation of small-sized landfills. Some functions are undertaken by NGOs. Institutional models and payment for services Positive examples of urban cleaning administration by municipal public companies can be found in some cities in Ecuador.3. for example. final disposal and the recovery of energy from waste by generating biogas and in some cases selling carbon credits 3. Concessions In this modality the concession holder plans. organization and equipping of a new specialized structure in the municipality. In these cases the companies have several responsibilities including planning. they have the necessary flexibility to adopt appropriate alternatives for the provision of some components of the service. Outsourcing. It should be emphasized that service outsourcing can be employed on different scales. including sweeping. if well planned at every stage – from specifications in the bidding phase to the overseeing of operations – can make a large contribution to the municipal administration’s ability to improve the quality of services provided to the public.
It can also be applied to the collection of construction rubble and other civil construction waste in order to alleviate the burden on the public system. although it functions less well when applied in small cities. calculating costs and overseeing services. However. the issuing authority keeps the ownership of the service and the right to oversee it. All of each municipality’s human and financial resources available for a certain initiative. but has been widely employed with relative successs in landfill management. In general. Free market This model can be applied for example to large-scale solid waste generators when municipal regulations have defined the maximum quantities permitted for collection by the common domestic collection system and have established that large-scale generators have an obligation to contract. significant difficulties lie in the limited guarantees that concession holders receive in regard to the collection of payment for their services and the problems that municipalities have in preparing tender specifications. 36 . at their own expense.This management model is adopted in special situations where the public authority does not have the necessary technological or budgetary resources to implement interventions or finance the significant investments that are indispensable in dealing with problems related to municipal solid waste management in general or a particular aspect of it. Consortium A consortium results from an agreement between municipalities with the objective of achieving established common goals. Any of these alternatives. This type of modality has proved ineffective for collection services. authorized companies for the collection of excess waste. concession contracts are long term to allow for a return on investments in the system through tariffs charged to users. which implies a need for technical and administrative training in order to undertake the activities pertaining to the process. program or project are combined in a consortium to facilitate its implementation. formulation of tender specifications and contracts. has to be selected on the basis of both low cost and environmentally sound technique and with a view to establishing a self-sustainable system that is resistant to changes of administration. and the overseeing and control of service provision. In the case of public services that are delegated to third-parties through concessions. including technical decisions. or any combination of them. definition of reference framework.
As has already been said. Urban cleaning administration by a public company specifically created for that purpose. autonomy in the application and reallocation of budgetary resources. Employed when the public authority lacks sufficient resources to finance the necessary investment in the system. responsiveness to changing economic circumstances. Applied in the cases of large-scale generators where regulations define maximum limits for municipal collection. ! ! ! ! responsiveness to social and political demands. while at the same time taking into account the following factors: ! ! ! ! ! cost of service administration. The contracting of a private company to undertake certain activities. investment capacity for technological development. leaving the generator responsible for contracting a collection company at their own expense. autonomy and flexibility in planning and decision-making. 37 . Institutional models and payment for services Table 1 Forms of urban cleaning service administration Administration Direct municipal management Description Urban cleaning activities run by a municipal department or body. investment capacity for human resources and the generation of income and employment. An association of municipalities for common measures and projects. Autonomous authority Outsourcing Concession Free market Consortium A city’s urban. In such cases management is usually undertaken by a municipal body or department that shares resources with other sectors of public administration.3. management and supervision. demographic and economic characteristics as well as the socio-cultural particularities of its inhabitants must be considered in defining the form of administration. direct administration of the entire urban cleaning system is common in small cities. especially in solid waste final disposal. IT systems and quality control. responsiveness to operational emergencies. responsiveness to growth in demand for services.
the municipality only undertakes the administration of contracts and the monitoring of service quality and therefore the municipal administrative nucleus can be small. in the context of large Brazilian cities. In determining the form of urban cleaning services administration in tourist cities seasonal fluctuations in demand for services has to be particularly taken into consideration. A model that is worth highlighting is the one employed by the Rio de Janeiro City Urban Cleaning Company (COMLURB). changing economic circumstances and operational emergencies. For their part. liberating the municipality of the need to invest resources in the purchase of machines and equipment. and by the Public Cleaning Companies of Cuenca. Colombia.This type of administration that shares resources with other bodies of the municipality usually has a relatively low cost in comparison with a body or institution exclusively devoted to urban cleaning management. In such a model there can be problems when unforeseen eventualities arise. such as ones relating to social and political demands. All of them are autonomous urban cleaning companies and are therefore able to define their own budget allocations. management and administrative services. as the predetermined form of remuneration established in the contract may not cover them. and define the technical terms of contracts. determine plans. and Pereira. 38 . in the context of medium-sized cities in the Andean region. These companies can develop or subsidize research and technologies related to urban cleaning in general as well as specific areas of it. It is therefore advisable that the municipality establishes contract devices or alternative plans to deal with such eventualities. They can also outsource operational. The existence of such agencies exclusively devoted to urban cleaning demonstrates the commitment of the municipality to keeping the city clean and caring for the urban environment. establish human resource policy and most importantly. the other factors listed above are difficult to achieve and the service tends to have a lower priority than other services sharing the same resources and having a greater potential for political visibility. Whatever model is adopted. activities should always be regulated by the public authority. In cases where refuse collection and street cleaning services are outsourced by contracting specialized companies. strategies and the logistics of their operations. Ecuador. However. the companies charge the municipality enough to cover both operational costs and capital expenditure.
3. 39 . for example. The term “rate” on the other hand. direct or autonomous. which must be well defined and specifically calculated. the municipality has to harmoniously combine two elements: ! ! just and sufficient payment for services. whether the taxpayer uses it or not. street cleaning and final disposal. The value of the rate must reflect divisibility amongst tax-payers in accordance with potential usage by each one. an urban cleaning system can simply be divided into three components: domestic waste collection. refers to a tax on the availability of a public service provided by the public authority. 3 Payment for services The singularities of tax legislation in each Latin American and Caribbean country makes it difficult to compile a complete generalized summary of the issue of payment for urban cleaning services. which in some cases may need to be adapted to the particularities of each country’s legislation. the company responsible for providing such services may also be responsible for collecting payments for them. Institutional models and payment for services In all cases. a municipality cannot charge residents of a street for the sweeping and cleaning services of that street in particular as it is an indivisible service. This chapter therefore concentrates on a basic outline of the subject. Financial resources raised by the waste collection rate cannot be allocated exclusively to the system due to municipal tax regulations. Urban cleaning systems are financed by almost all of the population but not in a direct way. It is therefore necessary that municipal policy ensures a sufficiently large budget allocation to cover the cost of the system and essential investment in it. that is to say that the tariff is proportional to the amount and quality of the service used. the Municipality can charge residents a specific rate. usually called “Waste Collection Rate (WCR)”. Certain specific services where usage can be measured and users are clearly identifiable can be priced and therefore be charged for exclusively through a tariff. and whatever the administration modality. In regard to the collection of payments for service provision.3. In the case of domestic waste collection. Similarly. The term “tariff” refers to the price charged for a public service provided in an optional form. ensured collection of charges for urban cleaning. In cases of concession.
where payment levels are related to the volume of waste generated. The municipal solid waste management will be defective due to insufficient resources and the population may not accept the payment of rates because it is not receiving good quality service.e.In some Latin American cities there is an incipient trend towards payment through tariffs. There are few legal remedies for the problem of non payment. which in general is not inclined to increase the tax burden imposed on citizens. It is therefore necessary to reverse the tendency to attribute a low priority to urban cleaning services that results in them receiving fewer resources than are necessary. as electricity or drinking water provision can be. especially so in view of the socioeconomic conditions of most Latin American and Caribbean populations. the quality of services deteriorates and a vicious circle is established. in some cases an authority may resort to inscribing the property of the nonpayer in the municipal register of public debt. This is being applied to particular geographical areas and follows the “pay as you throw” principle. There are no guarantees that they will be used in the urban cleaning sector. In some countries only a reform of the tax system would provide municipalities with the necessary instruments to reimburse them in a socially just way for the urban cleaning services that they provide to citizens. because rubbish put in the street by the non-payer has to be collected anyway for public health reasons. i. and even though it is a legally dubious measure. until the situation balances itself with an improvement in the quality of services provided. The municipality then has to choose one of the following options: ! to face for a certain period the political cost involved in increasing taxes. In the absence of other available strategies. There is no consensus about the most appropriate basis on which a municipal rate for financing urban cleaning services should be calculated. However this measure does not have much punitive value as it represents only a long term threat to the non-payer in the form of the eventual confiscation of his or her property. etc. this being dependent on the political will of the administration or public budget control mechanisms. or to the frontage width of the plot. Once these issues are resolved. It should also be noted that the updating or correction of the rate depends on authorization by the municipal council. or delayed payment. if this is necessary. it has to be taken into account that financial resources raised by cleaning and solid waste management rates become part of the Municipal Treasury. 40 . of rates or tariffs. Waste collection is not a service that can be suspended when bills are not paid. If it is not possible to adequately finance the system. There have been attempts to relate the determination of this rate to the consumption of drinking water or electricity.
when an industry is producing a certain product the cost of an appropriate final disposal of waste generated in the production process should be reflected in the sale price of that product. a sustainable balance must be established between generators and the private operators of centres for treatment and final disposal. both for the purchase of equipment and the installation of treatment and final disposal units. In this case. In such cases a concession can also be an appropriate alternative especially when the necessary investment is higher and requires a more prolonged period to allow for a return on it. maintenance. technological development and administration. at which point the subsidy can be gradually reduced as its value is gradually incorporated in the rate specifically charged to finance the service. supervision and support services. The investment needed for these units is very high and the acquisition of licenses from environmental control bodies involves a long and complicated process. In regard to investment. It is worth digressing to mention industrial waste management. as has already been mentioned. 41 . research. transport. capital expenditure.3. street cleaning. backup. Here a tariff is determined as the means by which the concession company makes a return on its investment. A feasible solution for municipalities that do not have resources for investment is. Payment for urban cleaning systems is calculated by applying the following basic equation: Payments = Expenses Expenses = Municipal Treasury resources + amount collected from WCR + amount collected from tariffs and various other incomes Payments should cover the costs of the system which include expenditure on labour. However. with their own resources (labour and machinery). municipalities almost invariably need to resort to sources of finance that do not always offer appropriate terms and involve prerequisites that are not easy to adapt to. undertake collection. treatment and final disposal services. Institutional models and payment for services ! to subsidize the cost of the service during an initial period until service quality reaches an adequate level. outsourcing through contracts with private companies that. replacement of vehicles and other equipment.
The payment for waste collection services to large generators (restaurants. that can be measured) such as special collections. It should be emphasized that all operations not financed by adequate tariffs and an efficient tax collection system. The establishment of reliable administration and supervision mechanisms for all services relating to urban cleaning is essential in order to correctly ascertain the real costs involved in service provision and therefore the appropriate base for calculating the amount of finance needed to operate the system in an efficient and sustainable way. otherwise the Municipality would have to reallocate resources designated for other areas. medical waste collection and the removal of construction rubble or discarded items. will have to be sustained by resources from the Municipal Treasury. in which case the budget must allow for a specific allocation to the urban cleaning sector. taking into consideration factors such as social stratum (with a view to socially just pricing) and operational characteristics.3.e. etc. 42 .1 Guidelines for the calculation of a waste collection rate For the system to be economically sustainable. can be charged by collecting companies authorized by the municipality. 3. or create waste recycling subsidies. hotels. supermarkets. the basic unit of the waste collection rate (WCR) should be the quotient of the total budget for domestic solid waste collection services and the number of households in the city. The charging of a realistic and socially just rate that citizens can afford and that effectively covers the cost of services and applies the “he who can pays more” principle implies political measures that are dependant on the will and determination of the mayor. The basic WCR value can be adapted to the particularities of individual neighbourhoods in the city. Municipal Treasury resources plus the money from tariffs should be equivalent to the budget for expenditure and capital costs for all the operations involved in the cleaning of a city.) as well as for other services to which a tariff can be applied (i.Irrespective of the management model adopted. It should be noted that an efficient way of reducing urban cleaning costs is to motivate the population to decrease the amount of waste generated and implement specific programs for the segregation of recyclable waste at source and its selective collection.
Operational characteristics reflect the amount of labour and materials used in the collection process depending on property usage (commercial. residential. etc. In recent years a more conservationist vision is increasingly influential in the determination of pricing polices for urban cleaning. type of road surface. etc. education and technological development that are linked to collection. produces an economic benefit for the population as a whole. so that higher income sectors subsidize services provided to the less well off. The promotion of this model is important but depends on a wide motivational and educational campaign in the community. market. treatment and final disposal. location. management. so that those who generate more rubbish pay more. etc. This approach involves a greater community commitment to segregating waste at source (home.3.). as well as costs relating to administration. demographic density. capital expenditure. In general a distributive criterion is applied. shop.) in order to facilitate collection. topographic conditions. Institutional models and payment for services Social stratum is determined on the basis of the average purchasing power of the inhabitants of different zones of the city. handling and particularly recycling. transport. The establishment of a charging mechanism based on the amount of rubbish generated. The budget also has to cover the costs of transfer. 43 . monitoring systems.
4 Legislation and environmental licenses 44 .
orientates. ordinances.4. In Latin American and Caribbean countries there is wide ranging legislation in the form of laws. and by not throwing rubbish in the streets. and defines administrative processes and punitive measures. This approach could be called the principle of service reliability and citizen cooperation for integrated solid waste management. cooperating with cleaning by reducing the amount of waste. ! the second. The community participates in this management in two ways: ! ! contributing to the financing of services and monitoring them.1 Introduction Integrated municipal urban cleaning system management is based on the fundamental conceptual premise of community participation and a systematic political exercise involving all institutions linked to the pertinent spheres of government. Legislation and environmental licenses 4. segregating. Citizens can be encouraged to reduce the amount of waste that they produce in order to diminish the costs of the operation. establishes the legal forms for institutionalizing the administration of a system and the methods of payment and charging for services. A combination of citizen cooperation and measures to increase the reliability of urban cleaning services constitutes a powerful pairing that can solve the principal problems relating to urban cleaning systems. Measures geared to guaranteeing good quality operations and a well structured program of environmental education need legal instruments that support them. of a political and economic order. rulings and regulations that manifest an increasing concern 45 . regulates and determines procedures and the obligations of tax-payers and urban cleaning agents. appropriately preparing and storing waste for collection. classifying and recycling materials. Community cooperation should be considered as the principal agent for transforming the efficiency of services and consequently generating beneficial operational and budgetary results. 4. ! the third is the legal structure that regulates general environmental issues on a national basis and in particular deals with licenses for the implementation of activities that represent a risk to public health or the environment. establishes operational codes. decrees. reusing.2 Legislation The legislation required to set up an urban cleaning system falls into three general categories: ! the first.
authorizes them to supplement federal and state legislation where appropriate. and sub-section VIII grants them exclusive authority to legislate on land planning and land usage in their territory. In regard to urban cleaning initiatives mostly emanate from municipal councils under their organic law and through local legal instruments. either directly or through agreements. State and Municipal) and the community a duty to defend and preserve the environment for present and future generations thus establishing that a municipality has an obligation of environmental protection. municipal urban cleaning regulations should serve as the spine of the city’s urban cleaning system by establishing the essential principles that govern the conduct of both municipal authority and citizens. regulate the granting of licenses by the relevant municipal body for the exploitation of water and mineral resources. the Brazilian Federal Constitution determines that a municipality constitutes a political entity. Sub-section II of the same article. the design of environmental protection projects. a municipality can. Specifically. when the governing plan for a city is formulated. as prescribed by the 1st and 18th articles. the analysis of projects. provide services. including the making of agreements to improve environmental management. and the requiring where necessary of environmental impact studies or environmental recuperation guarantees prior to the granting of a license. municipalities are also responsible for the protection of the environment. the implementation of environmental impact assessment processes. 46 . Taking into account the urban scale (determined by the number of inhabitants) and the city’s socioeconomic and cultural circumstances. works or activities that actually or potentially produce environmental degradation. Furthermore. and introduce other public authority instruments aimed at protecting the environment. As established by article 23. sub-sections VI and VII. The municipality can therefore pass environmental protection legislation and enforce it. Article 30 sub-section I allows them to legislate for local matters in the public interest and therefore to implement municipal environmental policy. combating contamination and preserving forests. Article 225 of the Federal Constitution imposes on public authorities (Union. the form of management. Environment Conservation Fund and Municipal Environment Department). Municipalities can legislate. For example. The environmental management system will include amongst its functions. in the section on environmental policy an environmental management system can be established through which environmental policy is implemented (Municipal Council for the Environment. irrespective of their institutional status in the country. under their organic law municipalities must decide on the best alternative for the institutionalization of the urban cleaning system.for environmental protection. under its organic law. the states and the municipalities. establish and collect municipal taxes and choose their mayors and councillors. fauna and flora. In most Latin American and Caribbean countries. which establish that the Brazilian Federation comprises the Union. the charging of rates and tariffs and associations with other bodies that can contribute or cooperate.
SISNAMA. Waste disposal in water courses represents an environmental risk that renders populations vulnerable. establishes that the public authority. enlargement and operation of establishments or the undertaking of activities that use environmental resources and are considered as actually or potentially contaminating or degrading to the environment. In many cases the renewal of a license is necessary to authorize the recommencement of an operation.4. Peru and Brazil. has come to the fore in environmental assessment: the incorporation of the river basin concept in the definition of the area of influence or impact of a project. especially in the event of natural disasters and particularly so in the case of flooding. a federal law establishes National Environmental Policy mechanisms. instalment. known as ecosystem management. This concept is particularly significant in the case of defective management of solid waste dumps located near the higher courses of rivers that form part of a water basin used for water supplies to cities downstream. establishes criteria for environmental impact assessments and identifies activities that require a prior environmental impact study. Another legal instrument. With a view to facilitating the granting of licences for new sanitary landfills and refuse dump recuperation in small and medium-sized municipalities. In Brazil. specific legislation can be passed that simplifies the processes involved in obtaining environmental licenses and adapts them to the economic capacity of the Municipal Treasury. such as the installation of a sanitary landfill. Under the legislation of many Latin American countries it is the Environment Ministry that is responsible for issuing licenses. 47 . Paraguay. in exercise of its regulatory function. Legislation and environmental licenses In recent times an innovative vision. must grant the respective licenses before the establishment of an installation and its operation can begin. Chile. as for example in Colombia. The same law requires that the construction. 4. including the granting of licenses and the revision of “actually” or “potentially” contaminating activities.3 Environmental licenses It is necessary to establish a system for the granting of environmental licenses that defines responsibilities. which requires legal instruments to cover the extrapolation of municipal responsibilities. without prejudice to other required licenses. are dependent on the prior granting of a license by the competent provincial body integrated in the National Environmental System. echoing the text of the National Environmental Policy law.
! regulate environmentally sound initial disposal and management of used batteries. regulate all related aspects and establish criteria for determining which jurisdictions issue them. ! the definition of the minimum conditions required in the planning. ! establish a system for the granting of environmental licenses. ! establish criteria for the granting of licences for industrial activities and for the specific controls that existent waste. reuse. tyres. such as: ! the classification of solid waste by its potential risk to the environment and public health. so that each type of waste can be appropriately handled and disposed of. ! create security zones around airports that restrict the establishment within them of operations that attract birds. or the generation of waste. ! define appropriate treatment and final disposal for medical waste. ! establish criteria for the definition of requirements to obtain licences for works involving sanitary issues. used oils. contaminated. ! regulate the final disposal of discarded car. should be subject to. ! define the responsibilities of and criteria for environmental impact assessments and identify activities that require an environmental impact study.4. including their collection. etc. ! establish the definition and classification of solid waste from healthcare institutions. railway stations and bus terminals and the minimum procedures for its management. Finally. uncategorized or abandoned material that is deemed to be a potential source of environmental risk. treatment and final disposal. truck and bus batteries. ! determine appropriate procedures for the handling of damaged. there are aspects of solid waste management that can be subject to technical regulations. airports. recycling. ! determine a colour code system for different types of waste that must be used for container identification and in educational campaigns on waste segregation. ports. until the relevant environmental body takes responsibility for it. establishment and operation of non-hazardous waste landfills in order to appropriately protect 48 .4 Regulations applicable to solid waste In other Latin American and Caribbean countries there are legal instruments applicable to solid waste management that: ! prohibit the entrance into the country of waste material for final disposal or incineration.
its operators and neighbouring residents. Legislation and environmental licenses superficial and underground water resources. ! the definition of criteria for the presentation of projects to establish municipal solid waste controlled landfills. 49 . ! the definition of criteria for the presentation of projects to establish municipal solid waste sanitary landfills.4. establishment and operation of hazardous waste landfills. ! the definition of criteria for the planning.
definition and characteristics 50 .5 Solid waste: origin.
CLASS II NON-INERT SOLID WASTE Combustible. undesirable or disposable by the generators and that may be solid or semi-solid” (substances or products with a humidity content of less than 85%). Solid waste: origin.2. biodegradable or soluble waste that can represent health or environmental risks but does not fall within Class I. or Class III. The more usual classifications take into account the waste’s potential risk for environmental contamination or its nature and origin.1 Potential environmental contamination risks Solid waste can be classified as: CLASS I HAZARDOUS SOLID WASTE Solid waste that is intrinsically inflammable. 51 .5. 5. The concept of the reuse of waste therefore prompts a reconsideration of the traditional concept of solid waste. reactive. It should be emphasized however. In this manual solid waste and refuse comprises all solid or semisolid unwanted material that must be collected because the person that discards it considers it to be of no use and gets rid of it by putting it in any receptacle intended for that purpose.2 Solid waste classification Solid waste can be classified in different ways.1 Definition of rubbish and solid waste The general public tends to think that “rubbish is everything that is not wanted any more and is discarded. worn out and without any value. as what is of no use for the person who discards it. Only material that is not reusable by anybody can be truly considered to be rubbish. corrosive. The authors of studies on solid waste tend to use the terms “refuse” and “solid waste” without distinction. that in regard to rubbish the term “of no use” is relative. 5. things that are useless. hazardous waste.” Technically. can be transformed into raw material for a new product or process. inert waste. toxic or pathogenic and therefore represents a risk to public health in the form of increased mortality or morbidity. definition and characteristics 5. some regulatory entities define rubbish as: “the leftovers from human activity that are considered useless. or produces adverse environmental impacts when inappropriately handled or disposed of.
railway station and bus terminal waste agricultural waste medical waste RESIDENTIAL OR DOMESTIC WASTE Waste generated by daily activities in houses. condominiums and other types of residential building. the characteristics of which depend on the particular activities pursued by such establishments. 52 . According to this criterion.2 Nature and origin Origin is the principal element in categorizing solid waste. except in regard to aspect. apartments. airport.CLASS III INERT SOLID WASTE Waste with intrinsic characteristics that do not represent a risk to health or the environment and that when sampled in a representative way in accordance with the relevant norms and subjected to static or dynamic contact with distillate or deionized water at room temperature (dissolution tests). does not have any of its dissolved components in concentrations higher than those in drinking water patterns. solid waste can be grouped in five categories: ! ! ! ! Residential or domestic waste Commercial waste Street waste Special domestic waste: ! ! ! ! rubble batteries fluorescent tubes tyres ! Special origin waste: ! ! ! ! ! industrial waste radioactive waste port. colour.2. turbidity and taste. 5. COMMERCIAL WASTE Waste generated by commercial establishments.
such as rubble. definition and characteristics In urban cleaning terms. In general. Municipal urban cleaning regulations can precisely define these two sub-groups. and large rubble generators are those that generate a greater volume each day. “domestic waste” is made up of “residential waste” and “smallscale commercial waste” which. 53 . STREET WASTE Waste that is found in the streets produced by nature. articles considered to be of no more use.000 kg or 50 bags of 30 litres per day. the quantity of waste that defines the limit between small and large solid waste generators should correspond to the average amount of solid waste generated daily by a household with five residents. branches. Alternatively it is important to identify large generators so that the waste generated by them can be collected and transported by a private company authorized by the municipality. soil and sand. and waste discarded by people in a disorganized and improper way. packaging and food remains. Clearly these sub-categories cannot be adopted without also establishing a minimum interval between any two collections of rubble from the same generator and/or cumulative limits (by volume or weight) for that generator over a certain period. represents the majority of solid waste produced in cities. Solid waste: origin. Large commercial waste generators are establishments that generate more than 120 litres of waste per day. paper. The parameters could be: Small commercial waste generators are establishments that generate up to 120 litres of waste per day. dust. small generators of construction rubble are individuals or companies that generate up to 1. In an urban cleaning system the definition of the sub-groups “small” and “large” generators is important because a tariff can be applied to the collection of waste produced by large generators. Commercial waste and construction rubble can both be divided into two sub-categories: “small generator” and “large generator”. Similarly.5. such as leaves. thus producing an additional source of income that contributes to the economic viability of the system. together with waste from street cleaning. This practice reduces by between 10% and 20% the cost of domestic waste collection by the municipality.
ceramics and soil. wood. SPECIAL DOMESTIC WASTE This category consists of construction rubble.000 inhabitants. While in developed countries the average waste produced in the construction of new buildings is less than 100kg per m². only comes under this category due to the large amounts in which it is generated and the importance that its recovery and recycling is acquiring globally. in Brazil.Street waste is directly related with the aesthetic appearance of a city and special attention should therefore be paid to planning street cleaning services in tourist cities.0 1. cardboard.0 100. mortar. the corresponding figure is approximately 300kg per m². also known as civil construction waste.0 7. fluorescent tubes and tyres.0 54 . plastic. In many countries commonly used construction techniques for new buildings involve a waste of materials. Such material represents 50% of the total weight of municipal solid waste that is collected in cities of the region with more than 500. for example. Table 2 Average composition of construction rubble in Brazil Components Percentage (%) Mortar Concrete and concrete blocks Others Organic waste Total Source: USP – University of Sao Paulo.0 29. It is important to emphasize that construction rubble. 63. Rubble The civil construction industry uses more natural resources and generates more waste than any other. Civil construction waste is a mixture of inert materials such as concrete. batteries. metal. glass.
silver and nickel have a negative impact on the environment and particularly on human health. and are classified as “Class I . collapse. The substances in batteries that contain these metals are corrosive. cadmium (Cd). nickel (Ni). button cell) and sizes and contain one or more of the following metals: lead (Pb). reactive and toxic. mercury (Hg). zinc (Zn). silver (Ag). They can have different shapes (cylindrical. Other metals found in batteries such as zinc. convulsions and coma) ! ! Pb (lead)* ! ! ! ! ! gingivitis. metallic taste in the mouth) congestion. salivation. Substances that contain cadmium. pharynx and oesophagus ulceration.Hazardous Waste”. pulmonary problems peripheral neuritis (paralysis) encephalopathy (somnolence. delirium. convulsions brain and neurological lesions that produce psychological problems ! Hg (mercury) ! ! ! ! ! ! digestive problems (nausea. manganese and lithium can also cause environmental problems. indigestion dermatitis and arterial hypertension stomatitis (inflammation of the mouth mucosa). kidney and digestive tract lesions insomnia. lithium (Li). headaches. diarrhoea (with blood in the faeces) abdominal pains (especially epigastria. rectangular. lead. vomiting. lack of appetite. Table 3 Contaminant potential of chemical elements used in batteries Element Effects on human health abdominal pains (colic. see table 3.5. Solid waste: origin. definition and characteristics Batteries The basic principle of a battery is the conversion of chemical energy into electrical energy using metals. vomiting. delirium. manias. mercury. diarrhoea) kidney malfunction pulmonary problems poisoning (when ingested) pneumonitis (when inhaled) cancer Cd (cadmium)* ! ! ! ! * Even in small amounts 55 . spasm and rigidity) kidney malfunction anaemia. manganese (Mn) and their compounds.
An accumulation of mercury can also occur in the tissues of other wild species such as aquatic birds and animals.) Element Effects on human health digestive disturbances and mouth impregnation argyria (chronic intoxication producing bluish skin colour) death ! Ag (silver) ! ! ! inhalation – causes damage even with immediate attention ingestion – minimal residual damage without treatment Li (lithium) ! ! neurological system malfunctions neurological disturbances stammering and insomnia Mn (manganese) ! ! ! ! pulmonary disturbances can produce residual damage without immediate treatment contact with eyes – causes serious lesion even with immediate attention Zn (zinc) ! ! cancer dermatitis general intoxication Ni (nickel) ! ! Batteries made with non-toxic substances are now available on the market and these can be disposed of without significant problems together with domestic refuse. Consequently they are classified as Class I hazardous waste because mercury is a toxic substance that attacks the human nervous system and when inhaled or ingested can provoke an enormous variety of physiological problems. a progressive increase in mercury concentrations in the tissue of for example fish. which is particularly sensitive to its toxicity. which then become less healthy or even dangerous to consume.Table 3 (cont. 56 . burned or buried in sanitary landfills. contain mercury steam and release mercury when they are broken. both the common cylindrical tubes and the compact fluorescent bulbs. When mercury is released into the environment and enters bodies of water “bioaccumulation” takes place. Fluorescent tubes Fluorescent tubes. When pregnant women eat such fish mercury is transferred to the foetus.
storage and final disposal are the responsibility of national public bodies and are subject to very rigorous controls. Its composition varies greatly according to the type of product that is being made. For all the above reasons. the rubber generates huge amounts of particles and toxic gases requiring a very efficient and expensive gas treatment system. preparation. railway station and bus terminal waste This category comprises waste generated in terminals as well as in boats. tyres accumulate rainwater and serve as a breeding place for mosquitoes thus fostering their proliferation. meat and plants. Solid waste: origin. transport and final disposal. In Brazil. If left in the open air. definition and characteristics Tyres The inappropriate disposal of tyres generates many environmental problems. airports and terminals results from consumption by passengers in transit and its hazardous nature lies in the risk of transmission of diseases already eradicated from a country when the incoming transports come from an area where such diseases are endemic. Waste from ports. 57 . the handling. the disposal of tyres has become a serious environmental problem that still does not have a truly effective solution. trains and buses. airport.5. Consequently it is necessary to examine each case individually in order to categorize it as Class I (hazardous). Radioactive waste Waste that emits radiation in excess of limits stipulated by environmental law. Class II (non-inert) or Class III (inert). If they are disposed of in conventional landfills. they will cause hollows in the mass of waste and increase landfill instability. SPECIAL ORIGIN WASTE Waste that due to its particular characteristics requires special handling. storage and final disposal of radioactive waste is undertaken by the National Nuclear Energy Commission (CNEN. Port. in Portuguese). If incinerated. Transmission can also take place through potentially contaminated loads. storage. The main types of special origin waste are: Industrial waste Waste generated by industrial activity. such as animals. airplanes. for example. Due to its specific nature and dangerous characteristics its handling.
A. HIV. it is often mixed with common waste and disposed of in municipal dumps or even worse. organs.Agricultural waste This category mostly comprises the remains of containers and packaging impregnated with dangerous pesticides and chemical fertilizers used in agriculture. scalpel blades and glass. A.1 Biological A. ampoules.6 Patient care 58 .positive blood.Tissue. foetuses. Sharp and puncturing Contaminated animals Needles. serum. vaccine that is unusable or past its use-by date. blood used for analysis. The classification of medical waste according to Brazilian standards (NBR 12. Secretions and other organic liquids from patients. as well as waste that has been in contact with them. Skeletons or parts of animals that have been inoculated.4 A. blood and pathological and other organic liquids resulting from surgery and autopexudates sies. The handling of this type of waste should therefore follow the same practices and use the same containers and process as those used for the handling of Class I industrial waste. anatomical parts. Due to a lack of controls and low fines for inappropriate handling of this type of waste. Medical waste This category consists of all the waste generated by healthcare institutions. ABNT) is presented as an example in table 4. pipettes. Table 4 Classification of medical waste Type Name Characteristics Class A – Infectious waste Cultures. plasma and other derivatives. Blood and blood derivatives past their use-by date. exposed to pathogenic micro-organisms or are carriers of infectious diseases. including remains of food. thrown into bodies of water or is burnt in remote rural establishments thus generating toxic gases.808 of the Brazilian Association of Technical Standards. anatomical.5 A. filters used to prevent inhalation of gases in areas contaminated by infectious agents and any refuse contaminated by the above materials. and waste contaminated by the above materials.2 Blood and blood derivatives A.3 Surgical. a mix of micro organisms and an inoculated culture medium coming from clinical or research laboratories. inoculae. as well as waste contaminated by them.
) Type Name Characteristics Class B – Special waste B. apparent specific weight. chemical and biological characteristics. economic.00 4.20 10.00 Waste can be analyzed according to its physical.20 8. definition and characteristics Table 4 (cont.40 3.00 3. probably due to the large amount of semiprepared food available in the market.00 Germany 61.80 18. Toxic.3 Class C – Common waste C Common waste Waste that does not fall into classes A or B and that. Table 5 shows the variation in waste composition in some particular countries from which it can be deduced that the percentage of organic matter tends to diminish in more developed or industrialized countries.00 22. reactive genotoxic or mutagenic waste. Solid waste: origin. B.3. humidity content and compressibility. inflammable.1 Radioactive waste Pharmaceutical waste Hazardous chemical waste Radioactive material or material contaminated with radionuclide. contaminated. cultural. Table 5 Gravimetric composition of waste in some countries (%) Component Organic matter Glass Metal Plastic Paper Brazil 65.2 B.00 25.3 Characteristics of solid waste Solid waste characteristics can vary according to the social. does not present any additional risk to public health.70 6. corrosive.70 6.50 6. gravimetric composition.50 USA 35.5.1 Physical characteristics Solid waste can be categorized according to the following physical characteristics: per capita generation. originating in clinical analysis laboratories. nuclear medicine services and radiotherapy.80 5. 5. 59 . geographical and climatic factors that distinguish one community from another and even one city from another.80 The Netherlands 50.30 14. explosive.00 3. interdicted or of no further use. 5.50 41.60 8. Medicine that is past its use-by date. due to its similarity with domestic waste.
these parameters should be considered with certain reservations as particular local conditions may produce distortions in individual cases.000 over 5.000 from 30. determine the daily waste generation per inhabitant in relation to the population’s socioeconomic profile. figure 4 shows the correlation between the per capita generation of solid waste and the population of cities. Although representative of averages determined by several studies.000 Generation per capita (kg/inhab/day) 0.Variation in per capita solid waste generation in relation to population size 60 .80 a 1. based on statistical data. per capita generation can be estimated through table 6.50 from 0.000 from 500.000 a 500. In the absence of precise data.000.00 Like table 6.PER CAPITA GENERATION The relation between the amount of solid waste produced in a given region per day and the number of inhabitants in that region.80 from 0.00 over 1.50 a 0.000 a 5. However.000. the ideal is to carry out field research and. Tabla 6 Frequently used categories for determining per capita solid waste generation Size of the city Small Medium-sized Large Megalopolis Urban population (inhabitants) Up to 30. Figure 4 .
180 kg/m³ for medical waste and 1300 kg/m³ for construction rubble. organic matter and “other”. for example. Table 7 Most common components in gravimetric composition Organic matter Paper Cardboard Rigid plastic Malleable plastic PET Ferrous metals Non-ferrous metals Aluminium Transparent glass Coloured glass Wood Rubber Leather Cloths Bones Ceramics Fine aggregate The decision about which components to include in a gravimetric composition study is made on the basis of the type of study to be carried out and must involve great care to avoid distortions. Solid waste: origin. The most commonly used categories in the determination of the gravimetric composition of municipal solid waste can be found in table 7. many technicians tend to simplify the categories. metal. plastic. glass. APPARENT SPECIFIC WEIGHT The apparent specific weight is the weight of loose waste in relation to the volume that it freely occupies without any form of compacting and is expressed in kg/m³. If precise data is not available. as are the markets for ferrous and non-ferrous metals. the following general specific weight values can be used: 230 kg/m³ for domestic waste.5. definition and characteristics GRAVIMETRIC COMPOSITION Gravimetric composition indicates the percentage of the total weight of an analyzed waste sample that each component represents. although useful for determining the dimensions of a composting plant or other urban cleaning system installations. This type of simplified category list. is not ideal in a precise economic study for recycling or selective collection as. It is fundamental for determining the dimensions of necessary equipment and installations. the market for rigid plastics is very different from the market for malleable plastic. for example considering only paper/cardboard. it is necessary to carefully evaluate the specific situation before adopting these values as variations exist in peoples customs and practices across the different regions and countries of Latin America and the Caribbean. 61 . However. However.
3. total mineral residue. POTENTIAL OF HYDROGEN (pH) The potential of hydrogen indicates the acidity or alkalinity of waste which is generally found to be between 5 and 7. potassium. on average the volume of waste can be reduced to between a third (1/3) and a quarter (1/4) of its original volume. CHEMICAL COMPOSITION The chemical composition indicates the amount of ashes. soluble mineral residue and fats contained in solid waste. must be heeded when operating a landfill. This parameter can vary by between 40% and 60 % depending on the season and amounts of rainfall. COMPRESSIBILITY Compressibility is the degree of compacting that is possible. This phenomenon. carbon. organic matter. 62 . that is. measured as a percentage of its weight.000 kcal/kg.2 Chemical characteristics CALORIFIC VALUE This chemical characteristic indicates the potential heat generating capacity of a material when incinerated. 5. called expansion. calcium. The average calorific value of domestic solid waste is approximately 3. When the compacting pressure is withdrawn the mass of solid waste tends to expand but it does not return to its original volume.HUMIDITY CONTENT The humidity content is the amount of water contained by solid waste. phosphorus. nitrogen. Subjected to a pressure of 4kg/cm². the reduction of volume that can be achieved in a mass of solid waste when it is compacted.
inform the selection of appropriate treatment and final disposal methods. Table 8 Influence of waste characteristics on urban cleaning Characteristics Importance This data is fundamental for estimating the amount of Per capita generation waste to be collected and disposed of. In general for domestic waste that ratio is around 35/1.3. 5. definition and characteristics CARBON/NITROGEN RATIO (C/N) The Carbon/Nitrogen ratio indicates the degree of decomposition of solid waste organic matter in treatment and final disposal processes.4 Influence of solid waste characteristics on urban cleaning system planning Table 8 illustrates the influence of solid waste characteristics on urban cleaning system planning and on the design of certain units that form part of the system. tariffs charged for collection and the necessary capacity of all the units that comprise the urban cleaning system.5. Similarly. Solid waste: origin. 5. together with the chemical characteristics. final disposal and degraded site recuperation processes are being developed based on the biological characteristics of waste.3 Biological characteristics Solid waste biological characteristics are determined by the microbial and pathogenic agent populations and. Knowledge of the biological characteristics of solid waste has been extensively utilized to develop odour inhibitors and substances used to delay or accelerate the decomposition of organic matter. 63 . It is important for determining vehicle and machine capacity requirements. which are generally applied inside collection vehicles to avoid or minimize problems caused to people along the routes of the vehicles.
Directly influences the decomposition rate of matter in the composting process. Important for determining the potential risk posed by solid pH Chemical composition waste to human health and the environment. Contributes to the determination of the most appropriate form of treatment for collected waste.). transfer stations with waste compaction facilities and fixed compaction containers. Very important for determining the required capacity of Compressibility collection vehicles. Fundamental to the evaluation of composting process evolution and determining the quality of the compost produced. An important indicator in the solid waste decomposition process in treatment and final disposal units. pyrolysis. 64 . Fundamental for the identification of odour inhibitors and substances to accelerate or delay the decomposition of organic matter in solid waste. the use of organic matter to produce compost and the application of other processes to the solid waste. Indicates the degree of corrosiveness of collected waste and is used to establish the type of protection against corrosion that it is necessary to apply to vehicles. mobile and fixed containers and other collecting equipment. thereby indi- Apparent specific weight Humidity content rectly influencing the determination of required incinerator and composting plant capacity.) Characteristics Importance Indicates the potential for the commercialization of recy- Gravimetric composition clable components. machines and metal containers and boxes.Table 8 (cont. Directly influences the calorific value and apparent specific weight of solid waste. Fundamental to correctly quantifying the required capacity of the collection fleet. etc. Directly influences the calculation of percolate production and the required capacity of the percolate collection system. Important in determining the sanitary risk posed by solid C/N ratio Biological characteristics waste. Influences the determination of the required capacity of Calorific value installations for all thermo treatment processes (incineration.
glass and rigid plastic bottles) Demographic Urban population size ! the larger the urban population the greater the per capita solid waste generation 65 . Bank holidays and school holidays have an influence on the quantity of solid waste generated in tourist cities. Table 9 shows the principal factors that have a strong influence on solid waste characteristics. Consequently it is necessary to take into account seasonal factors that can influence particularly the physical characteristics of solid waste in order to avoid wrong conclusions in determining the overall characteristics of waste. Table 9 Principal factors that influence solid waste characteristics Factor Climatic/seasonal Rain Autumn Summer ! ! ! Effect increase in humidity content increase in leaf content increase in drinks container content (cans. the percentage of aluminium (beer and cold drinks cans) in the waste increases. and throughout the summer.5. Solid waste: origin. malleable plastic and metal) increase in organic matter content School holidays ! ! population decrease in non-tourist areas population increase in tourist areas Other festivals ! increase in drinks container content (cans. definition and characteristics 5. glass and rigid plastic bottles) Special periods Christmas / New Year ! ! increase in packaging content (paper/ cardboard.5 Factors that influence solid waste characteristics Clearly during rainy periods the humidity content in solid waste increases and during the celebrations around the end of the year.
a 150 kg capacity weighing machine.Table 9 (cont. the higher the proportion of recyclable material and the lower the proportion of organic matter Purchasing power (monthly) ! greater consumption of luxury goods immediately after payday (end and beginning of month) Purchasing power (weekly) Technological development ! greater consumption of luxury goods at weekends ! reduction in apparent specific weight of waste due to the introduction of increasingly lighter products Commercial promotions ! increase in the amount of packaging 5. an oven and tools and implements commonly used in urban cleaning. The physical characteristics however can be easily determined through processes undertaken in the field and only require: 200 litre metal containers.6 Processes for determining principal physical characteristics Amongst the various types of solid waste characteristics the physical ones are the most important to identify for proficient urban cleaning services management.) Factor Socioeconomic Purchasing power ! Effect the higher the purchasing power of the population. gravimetric composition. or have the financial resources to contract private laboratories. humidity content and per capita generation. the samples must be taken from different collection sectors to obtain results that are as realistic as possible. The practical procedures presented below are employed to determine municipal solid waste specific weight. SAMPLE PREPARATION collect initial samples with a volume of 2 to 3m³ from un-compacted solid waste (loose refuse). Not all municipalities can afford to set up laboratories to determine the chemical or biological characteristics of solid waste. ! 66 .
1m³. rain.5. ! ! separate the waste according to the defined list of components. i. spread the contents of one of the containers on a canvas sheet extended on flat land. using shovels and hoes to rip plastic bags and break cardboard boxes. classify as “other” all material found that does not fall into any of the categories on the predefined list of components. fill a two litre container with the broken up material and close the container as hermetically as possible. crates and other materials used to package the waste. ! ! add up the net weights. ! divide the pile of homogenized waste into four equal parts and select two of them (always opposite quarters. determine the apparent specific weight (expressed in kg/m³) by dividing the total net weight of the waste in the five containers (in kg) by the total volume of the 5 containers. not adjacent ones). Mix these two parts homogenizing the content (the remaining two quarters should be sent for final disposal in the landfill). APPARENT SPECIFIC WEIGHT DETERMINATION ! weigh each of the filled 200 litre containers and determine the net weight of the waste subtracting the weight of the container.e. Solid waste: origin. ! ! weigh each component separately. break up the rest of the selected quarter with machetes in a place that is protected from the elements (sun. ! repeat the previous procedure until the volume of each of the quarters is just over 1m³: ! separate one quarter at random and use it to completely fill five previously weighed 200 litre metal containers. ! after filling the containers. wind or high temperature). divide the total weight of the sample by the weight of each component and calculate the percentage of each component in relation to the whole in order to determine the gravimetric composition. definition and characteristics ! deposit the initial samples on a sheet of canvas extended on flat land and mix them until obtaining one homogeneous pile. GRAVIMETRIC COMPOSITION DETERMINATION ! ! define the list of components to identify depending on the objectives. 67 .
these are atypical days for the purposes of determining waste generation. put the sample in an oven at 105ºC for 24 hours or at 75º C for 48 hours. ! ! ! CALCULATION OF PER CAPITA GENERATION The per capita generation of solid waste can be determined by means of field studies on households pre-selected on the basis of appropriate statistical data so that they are representative of the overall socioeconomic profile of the population. convert the total volume (in m³) of waste that has arrived at the landfill into total weight (in kg). based on the above percentage and the total number of inhabitants in the city calculate the number of inhabitants served by the collection service. ! ! estimate the percentage of the population served by the collection service. weigh the dry material repeatedly until the weight remains constant. using the specific weight value determined by applying the technique described in a previous section. subtract the dry material weight from the humid sample weight thus determining the percentage of humidity. 68 .HUMIDITY CONTENT DETERMINATION ! weigh the two litre sample. or by means of procedures undertaken at the final disposal site that produce relevant data. due to collection patterns. ! ! calculate the per capita generation rate by dividing the total weight of waste (in kg) by the number of inhabitants served and then dividing this result by seven to obtain the daily rate. The following observations are significant: ! sample collection and the measurement of waste being taken to a landfill must never be undertaken on a Sunday or Monday as. The following is a simplified calculation methodology for use in cities without a weighbridge to weigh solid waste on arrival at the final disposal site. ! measure the volume of waste taken to the landfill during one working week.
! never measure humidity content on a rainy day.5. ! 69 . unless a determination of seasonal influence on the city’s waste generation is required. where possible measurements should always be taken between the 10th and the 20th of a month to avoid distortions nearer the end of a month. definition and characteristics ! in tourist cities samples should never be taken during school holidays or bank holidays. Solid waste: origin.
6 Solid waste quantity projections 70 .
642 85. Let us suppose that a projection is required for an urban cleaning system in a nontourist city with a current urban population of 50.195 Year 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Urban population (inhabitants) 69. especially in tourist cities where tourists can sometimes generate more solid waste than permanent residents. in 71 .305 It is known that the greater the economic development of a city (in general related to population size).287 73.238 67.500 53.636 56.000 51.121 87.702 61.629 77.235 82. With a projection horizon of 20 years population values would be as in table 10: Table 10 Demographic projection Year Current 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Urban population (inhabitants) 50.045 54. Therefore.338 65.275 57.6. A careful analysis should be made of up to date demographic data in order to make reliable population projections (see table 10) and calculate solid waste production over time. The following example shows procedures to be followed.000 that is growing at an annual rate of 3% and where the per capita waste generation has been measured as 530g/ inhab/day.493 63.898 80.963 59.211 71. It is important to have data on seasonal fluctuations in population numbers and to take this into account when making projections for solid waste generation in tourist cities. Solid waste quantity projections For an accurate solid waste generation projection.675 90. it is necessary to have demographic data on the resident and seasonal populations. the larger the per capita solid waste generation.426 75.
642 85.5 39.963 59.8 44.3 37.5 27.426 75.2 35.275 57.211 71.235 82.54 0.55 0.53 0.636 56.500 53.55 0.53 0.55 0.0 29.5 46.54 0.such a case the evolution of the per capita production would be estimated as in table 11: Table 11 Evolution of per capita solid waste generation Period Year 1 to 7 Year 8 to 14 Year 15 to 21 Per capita (g/inhab/day) 530 540 550 Thus the projected amount of solid waste produced daily over 20 years is as in table 12: Table 12 Projected amount of solid waste generation Year Current 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Demographic projection (inhabitants) 50.195 69.53 0.338 65.3 28.045 54.8 48.53 0.54 0.2 36.53 0.287 73.7 72 .53 0.493 63.2 34./day) 0.675 90.53 0.8 30.54 0.305 Per capita (g/inhab.898 80.702 61.6 33.54 0.7 31.54 0.121 87.6 42.4 38.54 0.1 29.55 0.629 77.55 Amount of waste (t) 26.2 49.55 0.1 45.55 0.000 51.7 41.238 67.
especially in mediumsized and large cities in Latin America and the Caribbean.6. For projections relating to solid waste treatment and final disposal a 15 year term is more common. Solid waste quantity projections When an Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan is formulated. A five year horizon is used because changes in a city’s urbanization are significant over a period of time greater than that. 73 . At the end of the five years an assessment of the situation is made and if necessary planning is updated. it is common to consider a five year projection horizon for planning waste collection and the cleaning of streets and other public spaces.
7 Solid waste preparation and storage 74 .
avoiding vector proliferation. reducing waste heterogeneity (in the case of selective collection). horses and pigs.7. Figure 5 – Open air solid waste accumulation point Incorrectly prepared and stored solid waste attracts animals. Appropriate preparation and storage is important for: ! ! ! ! ! avoiding accidents. on the day and at the time established by the urban cleaning body responsible for collection. facilitating collection. In urban zones of low quality dwellings and low demographic density there are generally more animals. such as dogs. 75 . Solid waste preparation and storage 7. damage to the environment and a risk to public health. Citizens participation in this operation is therefore of great importance. cockroaches and other disease vectors that feed and breed in the refuse.1 Concept Pre-collection solid waste preparation and storage should be done in an appropriately sanitary way taking into account the type and quantity of waste 7. In addition such domestic waste attracts rats. mice.2 The importance of appropriate preparation and storage The quality of solid waste collection and transportation operations depends on an appropriate preparation and storage of waste and its presence in the place. flies. minimizing visual and odour impacts. that roam freely in the streets and frequently tear rubbish bags and knock down containers to access the remains of food. which results in waste being scattered over a large area. In many cities open air domestic waste accumulation points appear spontaneously causing scattered refuse in the streets.
inhabitants of such zones are instructed to put refuse out in the street at a time as close as possible to the collection time. In Latin American and Caribbean cities diverse containers are used for putting out and storing domestic waste for collection: ! ! ! ! ! metal or plastic bins. with special anchoring devices that enhance their stability. 76 . There are also creative initiatives for storing this type of waste. where alternative containers are skilfully made with old tyres. Larger containers should be standardized so that they can be handled by mechanical devices incorporated in the collector vehicles in order to reduce manual labour. frequency of collection. ! the relevant public body takes action to contain the proliferation of rats and mice.To limit damage caused by the activities of such animals it is recommended that: ! the municipality implements regular operations to remove animals that are free in the streets. This is a way of using discarded tyres but the containers are heavy and not very practical. supermarket type or specifically for refuse.3 Characteristics of pre-collection storage containers The choice of container type should be based on: ! ! ! ! ! refuse characteristics. ! a more appropriate type of container is provided for the solid waste. type of building. however they are acceptable in the context of the socioeconomic conditions that prevail for most inhabitants there. wood or cardboard boxes. quantity of refuse generated. Receptacles for domestic waste pre-collection storage should have the following characteristics: ! a maximum loaded weight of 30 kg if the collection is manual. stationary or on wheels. An example can be found in cities in the north and northeast of Brazil. sometimes cut in half. ! ! refuse collection is more frequent and regular in such zones. 7. plastic bags. used oil and fuel drums. price of container. large metal or plastic containers.
the use of supermarket plastic bags (used for transporting purchased products to the home) can be acceptable for the pre-collection storage of domestic waste as they do not involve any extra cost. Another issue is that most plastic bags are non-biodegradable.7. after collection there will be no receptacles left on the street and residents will not need to clean receptacles. Rigid and semi-rigid receptacles (plastic and metal bins. an important factor particularly for nocturnal collections. non-returnable (so collection is more efficient) and allow for silent collection. ! safe in that injury is not caused to users or collectors by sharp edged or pointed waste. For these reasons. not producing excessive noise when handled. ! ! their price is affordable and they can be standardized. especially in connection with waste incineration processes. polythene bags do not contaminate the atmosphere when appropriately incinerated. but as the use of sanitary landfills is a practically definitive waste disposal method. containers) should have lids and be stable enough that they are not easily knocked over. In the latter case collection will be more efficient. they are light. there are not many objections to their use. From an environmental perspective there are usually reservations about the use of plastic bags for domestic waste storage. However. Solid waste preparation and storage ! devices that facilitate its movement between its place in the building and the place of collection. ! ! From a planning perspective another characteristic has to be taken into account: whether the receptacles are returnable or non-returnable. In Latin American and Caribbean cities where the income level of most inhabitants is low. Flexible packaging (plastic bags) should be closable. including when separately packaged. 77 . it can be concluded that plastic bags are the most convenient receptacles for storing domestic waste prior to manual collection because: ! they are easy to close by tying. easy to empty without leaving waste at the bottom. ! closable in order to avoid waste spillage or exposure. ! economical and affordable for the general public.
Figure 6 – Standardized wheelie bins 7. it being fundamental for example. Plastic bags with a capacity of more than 100 litres are not safe as collectors tend to hold them against their bodies while carrying them to the truck and pieces of glass and other sharp objects in the waste can injure them. 78 . and economical due to their durability (especially if not exposed permanently to sunlight) and have a pleasing appearance. For multi-family housings (apartment blocks) and office blocks standardized wheelie bins with lids are more appropriate as they allow for semi-automatic collection. These containers are easy to handle as they have wheels. relatively silent. which is more efficient and safer.In regard to the safe handling of plastic bags containing waste. There are wheelie bins of 120. that they wear appropriate protection gloves. are light.4 Domestic waste pre-collection preparation and storage The most appropriate containers for pre-collection domestic waste storage are plastic bags. 240 and 360 litre capacity on the market. wheelie bins and metal containers. appropriate procedures to reduce the risk of injury to collectors must always be observed.
generally have four small wheels and can be emptied by means of tipping devices installed in compaction trucks. They are used for the storage and transport of domestic waste. They are made of partly recycled material plus additives to protect them from the action of ultraviolet rays.7. a tape to close the top. Solid waste preparation and storage Plastic bags Waste can be stored in non-returnable plastic bags to be collected by collection vehicles. Figure 7 – Plastic wheelie bin Metal containers These receptacles.500 litres. Plastic wheelie bins These are containers made of high density polyethylene (HDPE) with a capacity of 120. a colour standardized by the relevant body In general these characteristics are regulated by technical standards. Domestic waste produced by large generators – the collection and transport of which should be undertaken if possible by private companies authorized by the municipality – can be stored in containers similar to the one in figure 7. a lid and wheels. Figure 8 – Metal container 79 .100 litres (four wheeled containers). with a capacity that ranges between 750 and 1. but can also be used for certain public waste (for example when they are used to store the waste from street sweeping). 30. comprising a body. different only in their colour from those for residential waste. 50 or 100 litres. Such plastic bags should have the following characteristics: ! ! ! ! resistance so that they do not break when handled. a capacity of 20. 240 or 360 litres (two wheeled bins) and 760 or 1.
5 Pre-collection storage of street waste Rubbish bins There are several types of container that can be installed in the street for passers-by to deposit rubbish. Currently plastic rubbish bins are increasingly used as they are lighter. due to an ever intensifying use of portable electrical and electronic gadgets. squares. The high costs of the production. These containers should be installed in parks. In this context the use of plastic rubbish bins with a 50 litre capacity. Such rubbish bins have a capacity of 50 litres and consist of a body in which rubbish is deposited. This type of bin can be used for other purposes. streets. a lid and a metal tray to stub out cigarettes before throwing them into the bin. They are made of partly recycled material plus additives to protect them from the action of ultraviolet rays. a standardized colour and a special hole in the front part of the lid represents a good option for storing discarded batteries. easier to install and cheaper. For example. 80 . a growing environmental awareness in society is resulting in the separation of used batteries that. public gardens. For many years this type of container was metallic and was of a shape and colour determined by municipal administrations. in order to maintain the city in a hygienic and clean condition. maintenance and replacement of these metal bins were an obstacle to them being more widely used. more durable. are becoming increasingly numerous. avenues and other public spaces that people pass through.Figure 9 – Mechanized metal container tipping 7.
Metal containers used for public waste pre-collection storage are stationary receptacles generally with a volumetric capacity of 5 or 7 m³ that can be emptied by compactor trucks (depending on the nature of the waste) or by dumpster carrier trucks equipped with a multifunctional crane to load and unload the containers. Construction rubble requires the use of thicker plastic bags with less volumetric capacity due to the higher specific weight of the material to be stored. This system is also known as “brooks” or “dumpster”.7. Solid waste preparation and storage Figure 10 – Rubbish bin Figure 11 – Battery bin Plastic bags Plastic bags similar to those used for residential waste can be used for the pre-collection storage of public waste. plastic containers for public waste are exactly like those used for storing residential waste. The difference is that bags for public waste. Wheelie bins /stationary containers As with plastic bags. particularly that collected by sweeping. This type of container is interchangeable and the vehicle that collects a full container brings an empty one to replace it. Figure 12 . can be bigger.– Dumpster carrier truck with multifunction crane transporting stationary container 81 . However metal containers are different.
there can be fires due to acts of vandalism and a bad odour is produced. However experience demonstrates that this type of container does not produce satisfactory results as. and when they do have one.7.6 Pre-collection storage of waste in low demographic density and low-income areas In informal settlement dwellings and low-income housing estate households there is usually little space for storing waste. when this type of storage is adopted containers must be changed at appropriately frequent and rigorously observed intervals in order to maintain the cleanliness of the area. Consequently as waste is produced it is taken out of the houses and put on the street. 82 . animals forage in it. users tend to ignore it. Figure 13 – Brooks dumpster outside a low income community settlement Compaction containers represent a more appropriate solution than brooks dumpsters for pre-collection storage of domestic solid waste in such special areas. which results in the above mentioned environmental and sanitary problems. one alternative is to provide brooks type dumpsters. For all the above reasons. In such circumstances standardized plastic containers (with wheels and lid) can be located at previously determined points with as frequent collections as possible. Their use depends on the amount of waste generated by a community and the technical. one of which is the design of the containers that in general do not have a lid. waste becomes scattered around it. If it is not possible to provide plastic containers. awareness raising campaigns should be instigated in the community and an efficient supervision system should be set up. amongst other problems. and are handled by special vehicles. Such problems result from a series of factors. operational and economic capacities of the municipality. They are stationary closed metal containers with an incorporated waste compaction device.
The associations hire their own employees and are responsible for the management of the work. For collections from large generators and public establishments.7 Pre-collection storage of waste produced by large generators Where a specific regulation specifies that commercial and industrial establishments generating more than 120 litres of solid waste per day are categorized as “large generators”. blue containers for large generators and orange containers for normal collections). One of the conditions of this type of contract is that local labour is employed so that local jobs are generated and the community’s awareness of these issues increases as it becomes directly responsible for the cleaning of the settlement. Solid waste preparation and storage Figure 14 – Compaction container system It is advisable to establish a team of workers to operate a system for maintaining clean and hygienic conditions in the most problematic poor communities. Rio de Janeiro for example. Satisfactory results from this type of program have led to its implementation in almost all of Rio de Janeiro’s informal settlements. The limit of 120 litres was established to correspond with the capacity of the smallest plastic container with lid and wheels that is available on the market. It is practical for containers used by large generators to be different in colour and size from those used for normal collections in order to facilitate supervision (for example. 7. in general two main types of large container with a capacity of more than 360 litres are used: 83 . containers for the pre-collection storage of such waste should be standardized. provides technical support and supervises the quality of the operation. The body responsible for urban cleaning pays for the services undertaken. In some cities.7. contracts are established with residents associations in low income communities whereby they undertake the operation of domestic waste collection and cleaning services for internal streets.
These metal containers have a capacity of 3 to 30 m³.8 Special domestic waste pre-collection storage Construction rubble Due to its high apparent specific weight. generally metal. and can be equipped with electric devices for compaction. similar to those used for storing public waste.500 litres. Due to the large volumes of rubble. The biggest challenges presented by construction rubble are: 84 . 1. and therefore the size of containers needed to store it. In addition construction rubble uses a lot of space in sanitary landfills. Interchangeable containers are moved by dumpster carrier trucks with multifunctional cranes or by roll-on /roll-off type trucks. construction rubble is normally stored in stationary metal containers of 4 or 5m³. The very large containers (20 to 30 m³) are moved by roll-on/roll-off truck equipment either with steel cables pulled by a winch or by hydraulic cylinders. Within the concept of sustainable development established by Agenda 21. In general these containers have a capacity of 760. Containers of up to 5m³ are emptied into collection trucks by means of steel cables powered by hydraulic devices. ! stationary containers without wheels. in which cases they are informally referred to as “compactainers”. a significant problem is caused for the circulation of passers-by and vehicles as well as for parking vehicles. Figure 15 – Double dumpster carrier truck with interchangeable containers Figure 16 Roll-on /roll-off truck 7.! metal or plastic (high density polyethylene) containers on wheels that are taken to collection vehicles and mechanically emptied into them.150 or 1. that are interchangeable or are emptied into collection trucks. the reduction of waste and the reuse of it and its by-products are fundamental to the new approaches that society must adopt. space that could be used to deposit non-recyclable types of waste.
commercial outlets and technical assistance networks. Containers with stored batteries must be sealed to avoid the release of hydrogen. Due to their toxicity and the difficulties involved in stopping them being discarded in domestic refuse. and their treatment and final disposal. treatment and final disposal systems. Partially discharged nickel-cadmium batteries must be individually pre-wrapped in plastic bags. Such legislation should reflect the “polluter pays” principle. collection. have resulted in them often ending up together with the general domestic waste in sanitary landfills where they contaminate the environment. responsibility for the storage. Storage containers should be located in places with good ventilation and protection from the elements. Batteries Partially discharged batteries must be stored in such a way that their electrodes do not come into contact with the electrodes of other batteries or with metal objects such as the internal sides of a metal drum. Fluorescent tubes Fluorescent tubes also require specific legislation to regulate the way in which they are discarded. and must be kept on platforms or pallets in order to keep them dry. transport and final disposal of batteries should be taken on by producers. recycling. which is explosive in contact with the air.7. importers. stored and handled. ! to reuse generated rubble in the productive cycle thus reducing the consumption of energy and natural resources. together with their small size and the general public’s lack of knowledge about the dangers that they pose. Legislation should also establish a timeframe within which producers and importers of batteries must implement reuse. Any legal measures implemented for the regulation of such a system must set a specific timeframe for these stakeholders to establish operational mechanisms for the collection. The large numbers and variety of devices that use batteries. 85 . transport and storage of discarded batteries. Solid waste preparation and storage ! to reduce the amount of rubble generated thus reducing the use of limited space available for disposal.
details of the transport company and the recycling company. a record of these invoices must be kept for at least three years. date dispatched. ! ! ! ! if a tube breaks. and following the example of the system for dealing with batteries. producers and importers of tyres should be obliged to collect and dispose of discarded tyres in an environmentally sound way. 86 . One of the principal problems with the storage of tyres for collection or recycling is that they accumulate water when left out in the open and thus facilitate the proliferation of disease vectors. ! they should never be burned. tubes should not be broken or physically modified. if possible plastic ones. ! if it is necessary to keep them. Tyres Due to problems associated with the inappropriate disposal of tyres. ! all boxes should be labelled. Discarded tyres have been used as fuel in furnaces for the production of cement and also to produce asphalt. ! broken tubes should be stored in sealed containers and labelled in the following way: “Broken fluorescent tubes containing mercury”. the pieces of glass must be removed and the area must be washed.Procedures for handling fluorescent tubes that contain mercury must respect the following requirements: ! intact tubes should be stored in boxes. number of tubes sent. in a reserved area to avoid them being broken. accompanied by the following information: ! ! ! source (name and address of company or institution). this should be done in covered areas protected from the elements. Tyre storage should respect the following guidelines: ! tyres should not be accumulated but should be sent for disposal at the time that they are discarded. once a sufficient number of tubes has been accumulated they should be sent for recycling.
9 Special origin waste pre-collection storage Industrial waste Industrial waste is usually stored in: ! 200 litre metal drums for non-corrosive solid waste. storage and management. ! containers must be radiation proof (lead. 360. ! medium-sized cardboard boxes of up to 50 litre capacity for waste to be incinerated. Radioactive waste The handling and storing of radioactive waste must comply with the stipulations of the national body responsible for the control and supervision of this type of waste. It is therefore necessary to establish permanent sanitary vigilance and handle waste in a particularly hygienic manner. Medical waste The handling of medical waste (see table 4) must follow specific regulations that stipulate procedures for waste segregation at source. special methods must be applied to the handling of personal waste and goods coming from countries with epidemics. 240. Solid waste preparation and storage 7. Port and airport waste From a sanitary perspective ports and airports are places where not only people and goods disembark but also diseases. etc. handling and storage of waste follows the same procedures and uses the same receptacles as those for domestic waste. i. 200 or 300 litre plastic drums for corrosive solid waste or semi-solid waste in general. However in cases of quarantine alert. usually of woven polypropylene.600 litres for waste that allows for the use of returnable containers.). 87 .100 and 1.7. concrete. In normal conditions. with a large storage capacity almost always of more than 1m³.e. flexible containers. bags. ! ! ! standardized plastic containers of 120. 750. or other situations of risk identified by the body responsible for sanitary vigilance. which include the following requirements: ! personnel handling this type of waste must use the obligatory minimum individual protection equipment. 1.
Infectious waste represents between 10 and 15 % of all waste but carries a high contamination risk while common waste does not require any special treatment. recyclable opaque colours – common waste. Infectious waste must in general be put in well identified strong impermeable plastic bags at the moment of its generation. etc. glass. Pre-collection storage of common waste follows the same procedures as for domestic waste. Special waste should be stored in receptacles that guarantee its physical integrity. Puncturing and sharp waste (needles.The principal procedure is the segregation at source of infectious and common waste. the rate of hospitalization due to such infections diminished by 80%.) must be separately discarded at source in rigid containers with hermetic lids and a clear identification of the type of waste that they contain. An example that illustrates this is the case of municipal hospitals in Rio de Janeiro where. Plastic bags should comply with established colour code specifications. In Brazil the criteria are the following: ! transparent – common waste. They should be strong. A lack of care when handling infectious waste is the principal cause of infections in hospitals. after the introduction of clear infectious waste segregation procedures. non-recyclable cream – infectious or special waste (except radioactive waste) ! ! Figure 17 – Plastic bags for medical waste 88 . rigid plastic containers with hermetic lids and a clear identification of the type of waste that they contain.
7. Solid waste preparation and storage
Subsequently the plastic bags must be placed in containers that can be easily moved to a temporary storage facility. These containers must be white for infectious waste and any other colour for common waste.
Figure 18 – Infectious waste containers
Temporary storage facilities must have tiled floors and walls and rounded corners to facilitate the washing of floors and walls.
Figure 19 – Temporary storage facility for infectious waste containers
Personnel handling infectious waste (except radioactive and hazardous chemical waste, which are not the responsibility of urban cleaning systems) should use the following individual protection equipment (IPE):
! ! ! ! !
plastic apron; plastic gloves; PVC boots (for floor and wall washing) or closed shoes; goggles; mask.
Solid waste collection and transport
8. Solid waste collection and transport
Domestic waste collection and transport Concept
Collection is the removal of waste stored by the generator for dispatch by appropriate transport to a transfer station, treatment unit or final disposal site. The collection and transportation of domestic waste generated in households and small-sized public, commercial or service establishments is generally undertaken by the municipal body responsible for urban cleaning. Municipalities may provide these services through their own resources, concessions to companies, outsourcing to companies, or mixed systems such as rented vehicles and municipal labour. It is recommended that solid waste from large generators (establishments that produce more than 120 litres of waste a day) is collected by private companies, registered and authorized by the municipality, without any cost to the public system.
Hotels and restaurants are examples of large solid waste generators in tourist cities.
Common domestic waste collection can be defined as the collection of refuse produced in residential, public and commercial buildings, provided that the latter do not represent large generators.
Domestic waste collection services to each building should be regular, always on the same days of the week and at the same times. When services are regular, citizens will become accustomed to taking waste containers or bags out to the pavement in front of their building a short time before the collection vehicle passes. Consequently domestic waste is not left exposed in the street for more time than is necessary, thus avoiding the presence of unsightly waste in the street and its scattering by animals or people.
In tourist cities special attention should be paid to the amount of time that waste remains in the street, due to the importance of aesthetics, unpleasant odour emissions and the danger of attracting disease vectors and animals.
Regular collection is therefore one of the principal requirements for a good quality service.
In cities that have the means to weigh collected waste, the regularity of collections can be mathematically verified by comparing the weight of waste over two or three consecutive weeks. The weight of waste collected on the same day of each week (for example the weight of the waste collected on a Monday compared with that of the waste collected the following Monday) should not vary by more than 10%. Similarly, the distance travelled by collection vehicles should be more or less constant on the same day of different weeks as the itinerary of each particular day of the week is always the same (with the same number of journeys to the waste destination point). Collection irregularities are clearly indicated by accumulations of waste in the streets and by the amounts of complaints received. The ideal for a domestic solid waste collection system is therefore to establish fixed collection times and inform the entire community of them through individual communications to the responsible person in each building and even the posting of notices in the streets. The community will come to trust the reliability of the collection service and will then cooperate by not discarding waste in inappropriate places, by storing waste for collection in appropriate receptacles and by putting it out in the appropriate place on the day and at the time stipulated, all of which will contribute to increased environmental hygiene and public health, and the cleanliness and improved appearance of the street.
For climatic reasons, in most Latin American and Caribbean cities the interval between domestic waste generation and its final disposal should be of no more than one week in order to avoid bad odours and the proliferation of flies, rodents and other animals attracted by the waste.
This situation is exacerbated in cities that use transfer stations (see chapter 9) as waste is stored there for one or two days before being transported to the landfill where it is finally covered with earth at the end of the day it arrives. If domestic waste collection frequency is three times a week, the waste produced for example on a Saturday may not be collected until the following Tuesday (three days later). If it is then stored in the transfer station for two days and one more day is required for its burial in the landfill, the total number of days between generation and final disposal can be as many as six. Consequently, the minimum collection frequency recommended for warm weather countries is three times a week.
Twice weekly collections, which are very common in suburban areas of Latin American and Caribbean cities, should therefore be avoided. Budgetary restrictions represent one of the main obstacles that municipal administrations face in their attempts to provide sufficiently frequent services. The capacity of households to store solid waste also has to be taken into consideration. In informal settlements and other low income communities, houses do not have the
8. Solid waste collection and transport
capacity (due to limited space) to store waste for more than one day. The same problem is faced in city centres where commercial and service provision establishments not only have insufficient storage space but also produce a considerable amount of waste. In all such cases daily waste collection is preferable.
To significantly reduce costs and optimize the use of collection vehicle fleets, if possible, collection should always be done in two shifts. To obtain maximum performance the ideal usage of the collection fleet would be:
Monday, Wednesday and Friday Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday
¼ of the routes ¼ of the routes
¼ of the routes ¼ of the routes
If for example, 24 collection routes are established, with a collection frequency of three times a week, the number of collection vehicles required would be 24÷4= 6 (with an additional reserve representing at least 10% of the operational fleet, in this example one extra vehicle).
It is recommended that the day is divided into two 12 hours periods with one eight hour working shift in each period. The first shift for example, could begin at 07.00 hrs and the second at 19.00 hrs, so that there would be an interval for maintenance and repair services between the two shifts. In many Latin American and Caribbean cities the ideal of two waste collection shifts per day is not possible due to the type of urbanization that exists in some neighbourhoods where, for example, access streets are precarious and street lighting is scarce, which can make a nocturnal collection shift impossible. The issue of urban violence should also be considered here.
In streets and public areas where sweeping services are not frequent the cleanliness of the collection operation is very important, that is, it is necessary to collect the refuse put out for collection without leaving any refuse scattered in the street.
Whenever possible, sweeping should be done after a collection to remove any refuse that may have been left scattered in the area.
In purely residential neighbourhoods it is preferable that collection takes place during the day but avoiding the times when there is more traffic on the principal roads. 94 . so that the physical effort required of the different teams is equivalent.In central and commercial zones collection should take place at night when the circulation of people and vehicles has diminished. reflecting the tendency for higher productivity with private labour. Several elements should be taken into account. electric ones perhaps. such as: Collection teams In Latin American and Caribbean cities teams have from two to five members per truck. During night time collections all necessary measures should be taken to reduce noise. Municipal teams tend to have more members than those of private companies that provide collection services.1. In the future more modern and silent vehicles may be needed. to respond to an ever more demanding general public. The collection team should be instructed not to raise their voices. changes in the characteristics of neighbourhoods and an irregular collection service. particularly in large urban centres. In tourist cities collections should avoid the hours of peak tourist activity in relevant locations. A team is the group of workers assigned to a collection vehicle to perform solid waste collection activities. The team leader’s stop/start commands should be given through a switch at the back of the truck connected to a light in the drivers cab. The truck’s engine should always be well tuned and its silencer in good condition.5 Restructuring domestic collection routes Some of the factors that indicate a need for the restructuring of collection routes are: increases or decreases in the population. 8. The determination of collection times should also take into account the parking of private vehicles in streets. Equilibrium between routes The tasks assigned to each collection team have to represent the same amount of work. In the case of a collection truck with compaction facility the motor should not be revved up to accelerate the cycle of compaction but should at all times have its automatic acceleration device functioning.
ideally a more precise technical evaluation of this parameter should be made. Although it is possible to calculate the per capita domestic waste generation rate through the simplified method explained in chapter 5. 95 .35kg and 1.00kg per person per day in different areas of the city. given the great variations between the different zones of a city. as this data is essential for an effective restructuring of regular waste collection routes. depending on the socioeconomic stratum of the inhabitants. medium and low income neighbourhoods. It should also be taken into account that different workers have different physical constitutions and teams should be balanced in this respect. The physical notion involved is that of “work”: work = force x distance The restructuring method described here is one of the more simple ones and consists of the division of the area to be restructured into “sub-areas” with a similar demographic density and waste concentration (measured in kg/m). table 6 – Frequently used categories for determining per capita solid waste generation). public establishments and commercial premises.8. Collection route starting points Routes should be laid out in such a way that teams begin at the point farthest from the destination of the waste so that as they work they are diminishing the remaining distance to be covered. Verification of the amount of domestic waste generated It is important to verify the amount of solid waste that is generated in households.50 and 0. the amount of calories consumed can be approximately the same. daily per capita waste generation can be calculated. whereas in zones with low concentrations of waste they carry less weight but walk further. Each of these sub-areas can then represent the same amount of work and working time. a certain technical rigour should be applied to the determination of this rate as it can vary between 0.80 kg/inhab/day (see chapter 5. In both cases. Such variations could distort the dimensions of collection routes which would then require considerable adjustment during the implementation phase of a new collection program. Solid waste collection and transport In zones with high concentrations of waste collectors carry a lot of weight but walk relatively short distances. As has already been mentioned. Data collection must include statistical data from high. In most small and medium-sized Latin American and Caribbean cities the average per capita generation is between 0. The location of the fleet garage is another factor to be heeded in planning. Using data projection based on the latest available census.
To calculate the amount of waste by cubing a standard receptacle of known capacity.000 inhabitants x 0.000.70kg/inhab/day = 140. can be used to restructure collection routes on the basis of the volume of collected waste. for example 100 litres. so that necessary adjustments can be made. The number of times that the receptacle is emptied into the collection truck is counted to determine how many times it is filled during a collection from one street block. called cubing. ! writing down on a map the number of receptacles per street block. ! test the new routes in practice. an alternative should be sought such as gaining access to the weighbridge of a company or public body. Should this prove impossible.Where for example the daily per capita solid waste generation is 0. repeating this process for each trip in each shift. The calculation of per capita waste generation can be done at the same time as studies to determine solid waste characteristics. is used. after which problematic details can be adjusted. In this way the total number of receptacles per trip and the number of trips per shift. In practice. ! on pronounced slopes collections should be made beginning at the top and working downwards to save the energy of the team and the fuel of the truck.70kg and the population is 200. see example in figure 20. recording times. When the restructuring plans are ready the new routes can be used for two weeks. in general Mondays and Tuesdays. a simplified approximate method. Lack of a weighbridge to weigh waste If there is no weighbridge to weigh truck loads of solid waste at its destination. and is repeatedly filled and emptied until all collected waste has passed through it. the weight of waste generated daily for collection will be: 200. 96 . the restructuring of collection routes can be more complex and involve other variables that the planner has to take into account. per vehicle can be determined. until the truck is full.000kg/day This data is essential for calculating the required number of vehicles in the domestic waste collection fleet. following the itinerary of the route. ! progressively adding up the number of receptacles per street block. This method consists of: ! doing the cubing per block on the days of the week with more waste production.
the avoidance of left turns in two-way streets and duplicated or unproductive stretches. taking into account the direction of traffic. See figure 21 for an example of a rational collection route (heuristic method) Figure 21 . pronounced slopes and ease of access and manoeuvre for the vehicles. Collection route layouts tend to be arrived at through the “heuristic” method. that is those along which there is no waste to collect.Example A street block is each one of the sides of a block in the city.Heuristic method collection route layout 97 . Collection route layouts Collection routes should be laid out in such a way that unproductive stretches are minimized. Routes should be designed through successive experimentation with a view to finding the optimum one that at the same time responds to conditions such as the direction of one-way streets.8. Solid waste collection and transport Figure 20 .
012 1.65 9. analyzing the collected data.400 15.977 2.Collection route restructuring method This method consists of: ! ! ! ! dividing the city in sub-areas. covered in two shifts three times a week by two compaction vehicles.100 153.400 14. II and III.900 4.660 15.839 1.000 1.78 8.300 19.410 15.20 0.100 17.96 1.180 14. A city where the collection routes need to be restructured has to be divided into subareas of similar demographic density.325 4.15 1.851 2.141 - Weight of waste Kg (2) 16.72 8.915 Kg/m** (2)/(1) 1.600 18.19 1.550 4.828 1.575 4.250 13.13 Kg/Worker (2)/(4) 4. Let us suppose that in sub-area II there are currently eight collection routes.667 1. restructuring routes based on: ! ! ! the elimination (or minimization) of overtime.93 - Workers per team (4) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 - Rates Kg/hr (2)/(3) 2.12 1.500 18. The data for the current program can be seen in table 13.875 4.169 1.870 15.01 8.100 3.36 10.99 9.275 - 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Averages Totals * hours calculated in decimals ** kg/m = waste concentration 98 .120 18.17 1.600 16.18 1.20 7. Sub-area II I – Commercial sub-area Sub-area I II – Predominantly residential sub-area III – Hills sub-area Sub-area III Figure 22 Table 13 Current routes – Mondays and Tuesdays Routes Length of route m (1) 14.200 17. for example. the new weight of waste for collection per shift. surveying and systematizing the characteristics of each route.525 4.08 1.75 8.900 Average time of work hrs* (3) 8. sub-areas I.040 13.300 17. the concentration of waste in each area.350 3.
624kg Total weight 112.343kg = 2.839 x 8 = 14. applying the formula: LxC=W Where: L = length of route (m) C = waste concentration (kg/m) W = average weight of future routes (kg) 99 .012 x 8 = 16.096kg W07 = 1.336kg W08 = 1.343kg. in practice two routes more. Thursdays and Saturdays.000 x 8 = 16.816kg W04 = 2.667 x 8 = 13. W = kg/h x Ts Where Ts is the duration of the work shift (8hours in this case).03 new routes That is. it will be necessary to initiate: 31. As in future the area will be covered by 10 routes.828 x 8 = 14. the length of each route is multiplied by the waste concentration until obtaining an approximate weight of 15. Wednesdays and Fridays and the other on Tuesdays.744kg Average weight 15.900kg – 112. the average weight per route will be: 153. If the objective is to finish the collection in eight hours and thus avoid overtime.977 x 8 = 15.156kg ÷ 15. it can be seen that the time used to complete the routes is too much and therefore requires overtime (based on the supposition that the collection is done regularly).390kg/route. To achieve this.808kg W06 = 2.343kg/ route.169 x 8 = 17.156kg As the average collection weight for new routes would be approximately 15. one on Mondays.000kg W02 = 1.900kg ÷ 10 routes = 15.744kg = 31. Therefore: W01 = 2.343kg As the weight that can be collected in an eight hour work shift is 15.390kg/future route Future routes should be marked on the map taking into account the concentration of waste in each area (expressed in kg/m).8. uncollected waste would amount to: 153.851 x 8 = 14. Solid waste collection and transport With a normal work shift of 8 hours.352kg W05 = 1.712kg W03 = 1. the weight to be collected per working shift can be calculated assuming no change in the productivity of collectors.
The number of vehicles will be: number of routes ÷ 4 = 2. 8.390kg. A good domestic waste collection vehicle should have the following characteristics: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! that it does not spill waste or leachate on the street. a waist high loading height of no more than 1. the average weight of the future routes will be approximately 15.5m³. fast unloading of waste at its destination. even load distribution on the truck’s chassis.1. good manoeuvrability and potency for steep inclines. that is 3m³ are reduced by compaction to 1m³. the average load per journey would be 15. the possibility of emptying at least two receptacles at the same time. adequate carrying capacity to minimize the number of journeys to the waste destination while at the same time being appropriate for the characteristics of the operational area. rear loading (preferably). without compaction – with the box closed by sliding doors. lifting devices to empty different types of containers.695kg.In the example. When it is raining the weight of waste increases by 20%. Particularly in smaller cities with limited budgetary resources conventional open dump trucks are frequently used as well as other equipment described later.5 So. The type and capacity of the vehicles depend on the number of journeys that are necessary to the final disposal site. For example. three vehicles can be used during the first shift and two during the second. adequate space for transporting the team. if on Mondays and Tuesdays two journeys are necessary.20m from the floor. Fluctuations in the number of tourists also have to be taken into account as they cause increases or decreases in waste production. a loading compartment capacity of at least 1. 100 .6 Collection vehicles There are two types of specialized vehicle in general use for domestic waste collection and transport: ! ! compactors – rear loader or side loader. a compaction rate of at least 3:1.390kg ÷ 2 = 7.
the most recommendable technical solution is to use compactor collection vehicles wherever possible. In addition adequate space should always be available on the truck for the collection team.Containers being emptied into a compaction truck Solid waste collection operations involve dangers for the collection personnel. In such cases the most cost efficient type of vehicle and equipment should be selected. Some vehicles and equipment in general use for domestic waste collection are described below. manoeuvring conditions. topography. Solid waste collection and transport Figure 23 . 101 . However.). etc. sometimes this is not an option for operational or economic reasons. Every time the vehicle stops the team is exposed to the risk of injury through other vehicles colliding with the rear of the collection truck. Therefore. The vehicle that is chosen should be the one with more of the above listed characteristics while taking into account the particular conditions of the service provision area (the condition of the streets. due to the characteristics of a particular urban area. In compactor vehicles it is essential to always take precautions with the compaction mechanism.8. The risk of being run over is high and efficient preventative measures must always be taken.
are made of steel and have a capacity of 6. 15 or 19m³ corresponding to a truck TGWs of 9. 14. which are usually rear loaders but can be side loaders. Unloading is by hydraulic box tipping. The box volume can vary from 4 to 12m³ corresponding to a truck total gross weight (TGW) of from 7 to 12 tons.Closed box collection trucks A solid waste collection vehicle without compaction. This type of vehicle is used for domestic. especially in zones where there are high concentrations of solid waste from large generators or a high demographic density. 10. 16 and 23 tons respectively.Closed box truck Compactor collection trucks Solid waste compactor collection trucks. 102 . Figure 24 . Total gross weight (TGW) = chassis weight + box weight + load weight. 12. They may have hydraulic devices for the automatic and independent unloading of standardized containers. public and commercial waste collection. It requires great physical effort from the collection team who have to lift the waste up to the edge of the box. much higher than the compactor collector loading compartment height of approximately one metre. It can also be used in areas with pronounced inclines. or roads unsuitable for heavy vehicles. unpaved and potholed surfaces. This truck represents a low cost option in terms of both purchase and maintenance but has quite a low productivity. which is more than two metres high. 12. Its use can be limited by unfavourable road conditions such as irregular layouts. appropriate for working in small communities with a low demographic density.
Side loader compactor collection truck – 6m³ Figure 26 .8.Rear loader compactor collection truck – 19m³ Dumpster carrier trucks for 5m³ stationary containers Domestic waste collection systems that employ 5m³ stationary containers replaced by dumpster carrier trucks with multifunctional crane are appropriate for zones with low quality houses or difficult access. Solid waste collection and transport Figure 25 .Rear loader compactor collection truck – 10 to 15m³ Figure 27 . Containers are located at strategic points close to 103 .
Stationary compactor (compaction container) collection trucks For the collection of large volumes of domestic waste special stationary metal containers incorporating a compaction device can be used. while those with greater capacity are transported by roll-on / roll-off trucks. the volume of which can vary from 4 to 12 m³ in trucks that correspondingly vary from 7 to 12 tons TGW.that transport only one 5m³ stationary container at a time. As with closed box collection trucks. compaction containers offer aesthetic. These containers are called stationary compactors. unloading is by tipping the box. in general have capacity for 7 to 20m³ of loose waste and are transported on special vehicles. Figure 28 .the communities they serve but with easy access for the dumpster carrier trucks that replace loaded containers with empty ones. The 7m³ capacity stationary compactors can be transported by dumpster carrier trucks with multifunctional crane. There are two types of dumpster carrier truck with differing operational capacity: ! ! single .that can transport two 5m³ stationary containers at the same time.Compactor container Traditional dump truck type collection vehicles These open box vehicles without a compaction device and not specifically designed for domestic solid waste collection are frequently used in small communities with a low demographic density and in areas of rough topography where it is difficult to manoeuvre bigger compactor trucks. In big cities this system is slowly replacing the system of open stationary containers transported by dumpster carrier trucks with multifunctional crane because. sanitary and economic advantages. being more hermetic and having a greater waste storage capacity. 104 . double .
1. Special solid waste storage systems serviced by dump trucks equipped with a hydraulic crane are now available on the market. Another advantage is its low purchase and maintenance costs. However it is necessary to carry out a viability study before implementing this system as it requires significant initial investment for purchasing the containers. including in informal settlements. Amongst them is the “Molok” system that can be considered as an option in special situations. canvas or plastic sheeting can be used but in practice the efficiency of this is questionable as it significantly reduces the productivity of the collection team. Productivity is also negatively affected by the loading height of the box and this too should be considered. a specialized vehicle would be unused for significant periods of time. and is therefore appropriate for small cities where. due to its operational.8. Figure 29 shows this system in operation. due to the low level of waste production. Figure 29 . not only waste collection. The main disadvantage for domestic waste collection is that the box is open and it is therefore difficult to keep the load inside it (particularly lighter waste) and avoid it being scattered by the wind along the route. 105 . For this purpose medium-sized sweeper brooms and shovels should be used. In order to minimize this problem.Dump truck with crane moving a special “Molok” container 8. It can be used for various different activities.7 Tools and implements used by collectors It is important that collection teams collect domestic waste without leaving any of it scattered around. etc. Solid waste collection and transport This type of vehicle is attractive for small municipalities due to its operational flexibility. aesthetic and sanitary advantages when compared with other more conventional systems. plastic bags.
8. wheelbarrow and wheelie bin 106 . such as sweeping. 8. These days the latter are increasingly being used. There are three basic categories that determine the collection method for public waste: ! ! ! loose waste accumulated on the ground. on pronounced inclines. waste packed in plastic bags. for which purpose hand carts made of steel tubing with a metal container (sweeper cart). The method. wheelbarrows may be used. Differences in specific weight and other physical characteristics of waste demand different solutions for loading (manual or mechanical) and transport to a transfer station or final disposal unit.2 Public solid waste collection and transport 8. the type of waste generated and the form of storage. Figure 30 .Sweeper cart. waste stored in wheelie bins or dumpsters.2. vehicles and equipment to be used in collection depend on the specific nature of each individual cleaning operation.2.1 Concept Public solid waste collection includes the collection and transport of waste gathered as a result of routine and emergency street cleaning activities.2 Collection of waste gathered by sweeping Waste collected by street sweeping can be transported by the sweepers while performing the service. weeding.A medium sized sweeper broom has a wooden base with 22 holes into which natural fibres or recycled plastic bristles are fixed. pruning and special waste collection (for example waste and mud deposited in the street by flooding). wheelie bins or.
8. Solid waste collection and transport
In all cases it is recommendable that waste, which mostly comprises light material that can be easily scattered by the wind, is stored in plastic bags for collection. They can then be collected by compactor trucks (rear loaders or side loaders), which are especially appropriate in large cities due to the high productivity of this type of vehicle and the large volume of waste to be collected. The collection of this type of waste at the same time as domestic solid waste represents an important device for rationalizing collection and transport costs. Vehicles without compaction devices can also be used: closed box trucks, traditional dump trucks or dumpster carrier trucks that can handle stationary containers. Because sweeping is undertaken in the more urbanized zones of the city it is important to carefully plan the collection of this type of waste so that it remains on the street for the minimum possible time, bearing in mind that a slower collection process could adversely affect the municipal administration’s image of efficiency. As sweeping has to be done in each zone as a programmed routine on pre-established days and at specified times, it is completely feasible to integrate it with collection. To determine the quantity of waste collected by street sweeping, it is necessary to do a field survey in order to identify the average generation per sweeping route and, on that basis, calculate the production of each sector. The generation of waste collected by sweeping is influenced by various factors such as the predominant usage of the street or public space, the level of environmental education of passers by, the type and state of the surfacing on the street and pavement, as well as the characteristics of any trees. Depending on the type of trees, the generation of street waste can increase considerably due to seasonal factors, that is, the falling of leaves and fruit onto pavements and streets.
Collection of waste from weeding and vegetation cutting
Weeding and vegetation cutting activities generate vegetation waste that usually accumulates in piles along the section of a street where the work has taken place. From there it is carried by hand to the box of the collection truck (generally a conventional dump truck). An operational alternative that is sometimes adopted is to locate an open stationary container near to the area where the work is taking place so that waste can be deposited in it as the work advances. Such containers are subsequently removed by dumpster carrier trucks with multifunctional crane.
When the dimensions of collection and transport services are being determined the low specific weight of this type of waste should be taken into account as it results in the load capacity of the collection truck being under used. The integration of this waste’s collection with the collection of soil and sands that have accumulated on the streets is an option for utilizing the truck’s full load capacity.
The identification of nearby locations appropriate for the disposal of this waste, eroded areas for example, can also reduce the cost of transport, but appropriate sanitary and environmental care should always be taken in disposing of it. The necessary dimensions of the collection fleet are assessed by experienced operators during a pre-operational visit to the site on which weeding and land clearing services will be undertaken.
Tree pruning waste collection
Tree pruning is often linked with the municipal urban cleaning sector. Due to the nature of this activity it usually requires the support of a truck to transport tools, implements and labour. It is therefore often natural that the same truck is used to collect the waste generated as work progresses. This type of waste includes loose leaves, small branches and thick trunks, and its physical characteristics mean that when it is loaded into the box of the truck many spaces are left unoccupied. Due to this low specific weight, the collection and transport operation is relatively expensive and involves low productivity. As with the disposal of weeding and land clearing waste, disposal sites that are near to the generation site can be sought for pruning waste. The load can be prepared for collection at the generation site using standard pruning tools (machetes, saws and chain saws) to make the material more homogeneous and to prepare part of the waste for reuse (the thicker trunks, for example). Recently new technological alternatives have been incorporated in pruning operations to address the low productivity and high cost of collection and transport in cities that produce large amounts of such waste. A branch grinder can be an important component of an economical and environmentally sound operational solution to this problem. This is a robust and compact machine, available in towable models, that can reduce by up to ten times the volume of a pruning waste load. Another advantage of this system is that the ground waste is easy to dispose of in appropriate nearby locations as the final product has a low granulometry and can be used as coverage for natural soil, minimizing erosion risks and incorporating organic matter. Pruning operations tend to use a fixed box truck with a special elevation platform to raise the worker for the cutting of higher tree branches.
8. Solid waste collection and transport
Collection of rubble and other construction waste
This type of service can be provided directly by the public administration or by authorized private companies. In the latter case previous authorization is needed so that the identity of service providers is known and their activities can be overseen on an ongoing basis in order to prevent the clandestine disposal of waste in inappropriate places. Basically there are two types of situation that require rubble collection services:
where rubble has been clandestinely disposed of in the street, on wastelands or on the banks of bodies of water;
where generators of this type of waste request or contract services.
In the first case it is clearly the responsibility of the public administration to collect construction rubble that has been indiscriminately disposed of in the city, a responsibility that requires the urban cleaning body to maintain the necessary infrastructure for this purpose. Where requests for collection are made by generators it is recommended that this service is provided by the municipal urban cleaning system only to small volume generators (there should be a specific municipal regulation on this subject). Where construction works produce larger amounts of rubble the “polluter pays” principle should be applied. Whoever provides the service it should be scheduled, with the cooperation of the generator, for the day and time most appropriate for waste collection taking into account factors such as the traffic flow and parking conditions in the street closest to the place of generation. Service provision should be organized not only to coordinate requests that have been granted and to incorporate field survey data, but also to ensure a rational route that minimizes unproductive journeys and maximizes operational productivity. Construction rubble collection is in general undertaken by conventional dump trucks or 5m³ stationary containers transported by dumpster carrier trucks with multifunctional crane.
This type of service is necessary in certain situations, which regrettably are common in Latin American and Caribbean cities, where inappropriate waste accumulation sites or clandestine rubbish dumps arise, generally located on wasteland or unoccupied plots. The expression “rubbish attracts more rubbish” summarizes the underlying causes of this type of accumulation: small volumes of pruning waste for example are left in a particular place, this may then be added to by other people disposing of construction rubble there. Subsequently local residents add plastic bags of residential waste and in a short time there is a large accumulation of waste that causes serious sanitary and environmental impacts.
In general the existence of waste accumulation sites and clandestine refuse dumps results from operational defects in the regular domestic waste collection and street cleaning system together with deficiencies in the supervision of municipal activities. The lack of attention to these issues by those responsible for urban cleaning means that the causes of this serious problem are not addressed but only its consequences, and thus new cases repeatedly arise necessitating more and more special collection services.
Due to the large amount of waste that accumulates on such sites, collection operations may require mechanical loading equipment (mechanical loader), rather than a manual operation, and large vehicles for collection and transport to the final disposal site.
Vehicles and equipment used for collection
Dumpster carrier trucks with multifunctional crane for handling 7 ton containers
A truck (minimum total gross weight 13.5 tons) with a mounted minimum 7 ton capacity hydraulic crane for lifting and transporting open metal containers loaded with solid waste. These trucks can be single carriers to transport one container at a time or double carriers to transport two containers at a time. To be productive they have to operate over short distances between container locations and the unloading site.
Figure 31 - Dumpster carrier truck with multifunctional crane
8. Solid waste collection and transport
Short dump truck
A two axle vehicle for the collection of public waste, construction rubble and earth with a box of 5 to 8m³ capacity with a respective truck TGW of from 12 to 16 tons.
Figure 32 - Short dump truck
Long dump truck
A three axle vehicle for the collection of public waste, construction rubble and earth. The box generally has a 12m³ capacity and the truck a TGW of 23 tons. This truck is usually loaded by a mechanical loader to reduce human effort and increase productivity.
Figure 33 - Long dump truck
Roll-on / roll-off container carrier truck
A collection truck with devices for lifting 10 to 30m³ stationary containers without a compaction device (figure 16). Each vehicle should handle six containers for its productivity to justify its use. These three axle trucks should have a TGW of 23 tons.
Figure 35 . It can be used to transport rubble or in support of large earth or mud collection operations. For street operations machines with a scoop capacity of 1.Semi-trailer A semi-trailer dumper with capacity of 25m³ pulled by a 4x2 truck with a 45 ton pulling capacity. mud and waste. and to load dump trucks.5m³ are normally used. dumper boxes and semi-trailers in street cleaning operations and at waste accumulation sites. rubble. while for loading semi-trailers it is advisable to use machines with a 3m³ scoop to increase productivity and because of the higher loading level. Figure 34 . It is loaded by mechanical loader and is unloaded at the final destination by box tipping.Mechanical loader 112 . A canvas or plastic sheet should cover the top of the box to avoid waste being scattered in the road by the wind while the vehicle is moving. A semi-trailer is a trailer the front part of which has to be supported on a towing vehicle called a semi-trailer truck.Semi-trailer Mechanical loader A wheeled tractor loader used to pile up earth.
Waste collection schedules should therefore be set for times when traffic is less heavy. ! ! ! an increase in the number of collection shifts. Beaches In coastal cities where tourists tend to concentrate around the beaches. A reduction in the frequency of collections should never be considered. As the usual fluctuations (weekly and monthly) have little effect on the size of the fleet that is needed. It is important to note that these measures should be taken in sequence in order to limit the increase in collection costs to a minimum. not only in regard to the increased amount of waste but also the frequency and times of collection. Solid waste collection and transport 8. the contracting of extra vehicles from private companies or individuals. the utilization of the reserve fleet in operations. within the limits imposed by employment legislation. even though it may be attractive for economic reasons. Whenever possible the contracting of extra vehicles should be planned in advance to avoid overpricing. as the longer the interval between collections the greater the danger of waste accumulation sites appearing in the streets. Other important factors to take into account are: Traffic In tourist cities the traffic is usually congested during holiday periods. which impedes the movement of collection vehicles and increases the time taken to cover collection routes.3 Waste collection in tourist cities The amount of waste to be collected varies according to tourist season related population fluctuations as well as the usual all year round fluctuations. this section will deal with the necessary procedures for maintaining the quality of domestic waste collection in tourist cities during the season of population influx. 113 . The basic measures to take are: ! the introduction of overtime for collection workers.8. which are detrimental to the city’s sanitary and environmental condition and discourage tourists. collection routes that cover streets bordering the sea should be revised and restructured in order to adapt them to seasonal requirements.
These factors have to be taken into account in planning alternative waste collection systems in these communities with a view to improving a situation that presents serious risks to public health and the environment. (4x4) – two axle vehicle with four wheel drive.Micro tractor Figure 37 . A lack of basic urban infrastructure in these communities causes significant obstacles for the provision of domestic waste collection services: ! ! ! difficult access for conventional collection trucks. Mini-tractors or agricultural tractors with 4x2 or 4x4 drive towing 2. the tendency of inhabitants to discard waste immediately after generation as there is minimal space inside the houses.4 Solid waste collection in informal settlements There are informal settlements in many Latin American and Caribbean cities due to the poor socioeconomic conditions experienced by a significant sector of the population in the region.8.Micro tractor and dump trailer 114 . inadequate or nonexistent preparation and pre-collection storage of waste. is the use of special vehicles that are narrow. often with a pronounced incline. Figure 36 . One solution to the problem of access through narrow internal streets. (4x2) – two axle vehicle with rear wheel drive. have good manoeuvrability and the capacity to deal with steep slopes.5m³ capacity trailers with metal or wooden boxes are feasible alternatives.
for example. medical centres. If appropriately clean conditions and supervision are not maintained there is a risk of people setting fire to the waste. It is worth noting that contracting community collectors involves the principle of community participation as it encourages other residents to participate in the maintenance of the place where they are living as they may feel an obligation to keep public areas clean when it is one of their neighbours who is doing this work. When installing open containers in informal settlements it is necessary to take the precautions already mentioned in chapter 7 in order to avoid a prejudicial proliferation of insects and animals. In several cities the contracting of community collectors has produced good results. veterinary clinics. which then selects the people who will work in the collection team (as well as carrying out weeding and channel cleaning tasks. Appropriate internal transport and storage together with subsequent collection and external transport of waste complete the measures aimed at reducing infections. the municipality contracts the community centre.8. The frequency of collections should be carefully considered and ideally there should be only short intervals between them. The problem of pre-collection waste storage in these areas can be dealt with by siting containers along the micro tractor collection route. walls. body fluids and any waste from medical activities. daily collection being the best option.5 Collection of medical waste 8.) are fundamental for the prevention of infections. etc. etc.5. preferably plastic containers with lid and wheels. It is normally recommended that stationary containers are used for this temporary storage and they are then either transported by special collection vehicles (dumpster carrier trucks) or emptied into large compactor trucks. In these cases.). Solid waste collection and transport As these vehicles are not appropriate for long journeys. In such cases collection should be manual. 115 .1 Acknowledgement of the problem Hygienic conditions in health service establishments (hospitals. with the waste being carried to some point that is accessible for some type of vehicle. Regular cleaning with germicide solutions keeps floors. clinics. It has to be pointed out that in many of these communities it is not even possible to use the mini-tractors for collection due to a lack of passable access. 8. roofs and furniture free of dust. the collected waste is transported to a temporary storage place where it is kept for subsequent transport to a final disposal site.
63 3.In hospitals medical waste generation rates are related to the number of beds. infectious or special (see table 4). laundries. ! infectious waste must be stored in accordance with stipulated technical standards. 8.5. ! non-critical areas: where in theory there is no risk of infection. 116 . Table 14 Medical solid waste generation rates Place Chile Venezuela Argentina Peru Paraguay Brazil Rio de Janeiro Average generation kg/bed/day 0.98 Medical waste is classified as common. ! semi-critical areas: where the risk of contamination is less. ! puncturing and sharp waste (needles.93 3.97 – 1. in well closed plastic bags (generally coloured cream). laboratories.) should be stored in special receptacles specifically for this purpose. etc. such as the rooms occupied by patients with non-infectious diseases.21 3. infectious disease isolation rooms.85 – 3. refectories and kitchen areas etc.2 Segregation There are regulations that must be followed for the segregation of infectious and common waste in health service establishments: ! at the time of its generation all infectious waste should be put in a receptacle close to the place where it is produced. Hospital areas are classified in three categories: ! critical areas: where there is a greater risk of infection such as operating theatres. nurses’ rooms. Table 14 shows waste generation per bed in some countries and in Rio de Janeiro city. delivery rooms. such as administration rooms. etc. storerooms. etc.65 2.80 2. glass.10 1.
If there is no separation of infectious and special waste all of the waste should be packaged. infectious and special waste Infectious and special waste should be separated from common waste before collection. Solid waste collection and transport ! waste from clinical analysis. In some cases it 117 . collection vehicles should not have compaction systems and. 8. organs and tissues should be separately put in cream plastic bags that are then appropriately closed.5. blood transfusion therapy and microbiological research should be sterilized in the place of generation.4 Vehicles for collection and transport As plastic bags with infectious or non-separated waste can break and release contaminated liquids or air. collected and disposed of as though it is infectious or special waste. Infectious waste and the rest of the special waste should be stored in cream plastic bags which are put into standardized containers that are mechanically emptied into special vehicles for medical waste collection. The load compartment should be lined with fibre glass in order to avoid the accumulation of infectious waste at the edges and in cracks and to facilitate washing and cleaning.8. must be hermetic and have liquid capturing devices. 8.3 Separate collection of common. Current norms recommend that in most cases medical waste is collected daily. are suitable for the collection of puncturing and sharp objects from chemists. analysis laboratories. Van A light van with the driver and passenger cab independent from the load compartment and a load capacity of 500 kilos. as an additional precautionary measure. Light vans with hermetic load compartments and a capacity for approximately 2m³ of waste. dental clinics and other similar establishments. even on Sundays. Radioactive waste should be dealt with in accordance with each country’s specific regulations issued by the respective governing body. stored.5. The types of vehicle usually recommended for medical waste collection are presented below. Common waste generated in these establishments should be collected by the normal collection service. Depending on their size they should have mechanical devices for both empting the containers and unloading the vehicle. ! infectious waste consisting of human body parts. This waste represents at the most 30% of the total medical waste generated.
The rear door of the load box must close with an efficient seal. The hydraulic powered system is coupled with the gearbox and is pneumatically operated from inside the cab. A tipping system may be incorporated for the emptying of plastic or metal containers with a capacity of up to 700 litres. MB 914 and Ford Cargo 81. Figure 38 . The box is made of steel with continuous welded seams to avoid liquid leakage and has a compartment for capturing liquid originating from the load with a device for unloading it in an appropriate place.Van for medical waste collection Truck for infectious waste collection A two axle collection truck with a capacity of 6 to 8m³. without a compaction device. The unloading of waste is done through the tipping of the load box after the rear door has been fully opened.Truck for infectious waste collection 118 . which will then transport it to the final disposal site. Amongst the chassis recommended are: VW 8150.may be economical for these vans to unload waste that they have collected in the loading areas of bigger medical waste collection vehicles. Figure 39 .
To achieve good quality medical waste management it is important to instigate educational processes that prepare people for change. Solid waste collection and transport 8. medical centres. ! train the service operation teams. 119 .5 Aspects of collection planning When planning the collection of this type of waste a determination should be made. prevent contamination.5. while at the same time establishing appropriate methods for its pre-collection preparation and internal storage. of the amount of waste generated in each establishment and the possibilities for treating it at source.8. The steps to follow include: ! locate on a map all health establishments: hospitals. ! select van type collection vehicles with leak-proof load compartments and liquid retention trays. acknowledge employees’ work. together with the generators and the responsible health authority. out-patient departments. avoid work accidents. size and number of collection vehicles. determine the necessary type. ! based on collected data. reduce absenteeism. intensify safety measures. including in measures for their own protection and work safety practices. maintain an organized and pleasant work environment. The basic guidelines for rationalizing costs and establishing an appropriate service management policy are the following: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! facilitate treatment. emergency services and clinics. chemists. the frequency of collections and collection routes.
9 Solid waste transfer 120 .
! increased unproductive time that collection teams spend waiting for the return of the truck from unloading at the landfill. transfer stations are sometimes used even when the distance to the sanitary landfill is shorter. reduced productivity of collection trucks. Consequently final disposal sites are being established further and further away from centres of large-scale waste generation.1 Concept At the same time as large and medium-sized cities have experienced intense urban expansion there has been an increase in both environmental pressures and the resistance of residents to accepting the installation close to their homes of facilities related with solid waste final disposal. In large cities where traffic conditions make travel very slow. The establishment of a transfer station should be preceded by a feasibility study that evaluates the economic and operational advantages that it could provide to the collection system.9. Vehicles used for transporting waste from transfer stations to final disposal sites usually have three times more load capacity than collection trucks. Transfer stations are units sited close to areas of large-scale waste generation so that collection trucks can unload there and return rapidly to continue their collection route. In general transfer stations begin to be considered when the distance between the location of large-scale collection activities and the sanitary landfill is greater than 25km. Waste unloaded in transfer stations is transported to the sanitary landfill by a larger vehicle that involves lower transport cost per unit. Solid waste transfer 9. which are specialized and therefore expensive vehicles. ! ! increased transport costs. In addition urban land is too expensive to be used for sanitary landfills. To solve these problems some municipalities are establishing transfer stations. This increased distance between collection areas and sanitary landfills creates the following problems: ! delays in completing collection routes thus prolonging the time that waste is exposed on the street. 121 . for which large areas are required.
2 9. Boat – suitable for long distances and an excellent option in cities that have navigable rivers or bays.1 Types of transfer station Direct transfer station This is a commonly used type of transfer station. Truck – the most used system. a larger fleet of transfer vehicles is required to avoid collection trucks having to wait too long to unload. It has a drop between the unloading platform and the loading area.Modes of transport from transfer stations can be: Train – suitable for long distances or for cities where traffic on roads to the final disposal site is too congested. Ideally waste should be transported in closed containers to avoid scattering. This requires a complementary system of trucks to transport waste from the unloading site to the sanitary landfill.2. recommended for transporting over medium distances and in places where the traffic on roads to the final disposal site is not too congested. Amongst the more commonly used models for transfer stations with storage facilities are: 122 . Figure 40 – Direct transfer station 9. The simultaneous arrival of vehicles makes it indispensable that the station has an appropriate place for the storage of waste to deal with unloading “peaks”.2. so that a collection truck on the higher level unloads directly into the transfer truck below. A complementary system of trucks is required to transport waste from the unloading site to the sanitary landfill. Waste storage also facilitates the operation of the system with fewer vehicles.2 Station with storage facilities In most cities all collection trucks begin their routes at the same time and so it is probable that the vehicles become full and arrive at the transfer station within the same timeframe. 9. As there is no space for waste storage in these stations.
9. Station with floor storage without compaction Another model commonly used is that of floor storage stations. This model facilitates the fast unloading of collection trucks and loading of transfer vehicles. Solid waste transfer Station with silo storage and compaction The main objective of these stations is to increase the specific mass of waste in order to reduce transport costs. These stations have covered paved floors with closed sides to avoid the exposure of waste to the elements and improve the aesthetics of the establishment.000 tons per day as in larger units it would imply excessive construction costs. Figure 41 . The traditional model has a storage silo and a drop between loading and unloading platforms. Figure 42 – Station with storage without compaction 123 . A hydraulic system installed in the silo compacts waste inside the transfer vehicles. Hydraulic digger type machines load waste from the silos into transfer vehicles. When this equipment is used weight specifications for the transfer trucks must be observed so that loads do not surpass the legal limits. The loading of transfer vehicles is done by hydraulic diggers or mechanical loaders. This model is more appropriate for stations that receive a maximum of 1. and can be used in small or large stations.Transfer station with storage and compaction Station with silo storage without compaction Some units have storage silos to receive waste brought by collection trucks.
may involve the unloading of collected solid waste in a stationary container (or equivalent receptacle) at a site where larger vehicles do have access and can collect the waste and transport it to its final destination.9. manoeuvred by vehicles equipped with cranes to lift them onto and off platforms. although originally developed to respond to the needs of large cities. Semi-trailer tippers A semi-trailer tipper towed by a 4x2 semi-trailer truck with a 45 ton pulling capacity.3 Alternative transfer systems The transfer station concept. an alternative collection system using carts pulled by animals to cover streets that are not accessible to collection trucks. 9. Figure 43 – A 45m³ semi-trailer tipper 124 . The model most commonly used has a capacity of 45m³. The models most used in transfer stations are: semi-trailer tippers and semi-trailers with movable floor. and unloaded by tipping. or semi-trailers with or without compaction. It is loaded from a transfer ramp or by a mechanical loader or hydraulic digger.3 Vehicles and machines for transfer stations To transport waste unloaded in transfer stations large interchangeable tipper containers can be used. can be incorporated on a smaller scale in special situations in small communities where access is not possible for conventional collection vehicles. For example.2.
It is loaded from a transfer ramp or by a mechanical loader or hydraulic digger. towed by a 4x2 semi-trailer truck with a 45 ton pulling capacity.9. 125 . Solid waste transfer Semi-trailer with movable floor A semi-trailer with a capacity of 70m³. and unloaded by the alternating movement of the movable floor’s strips. Figure 44 .A 70m³ semi-trailer with movable floor In all open semi-trailers the load should be covered with plastic sheeting or a net to avoid waste falling in the roads.
10 Street cleaning 126 .
it was recognized for the first time that human waste not collected. 127 . flies and cockroaches attracted by it and the transmission of diseases through those vectors was also discovered.10. The relationship between waste dumped in the street. as are the plagues and epidemics that they produced. As a result of developments in medicine and sanitary engineering during the 19th century. Most animal excrement (except for dog excrement) was eliminated from the streets with the advent of motorized transport that replaced animal driven carts. ! to avoid damage to health caused by dust coming into contact with eyes. in several cities of the world for many centuries there have been laws and municipal regulations prohibiting the discarding of waste and objects in the streets. ears. It was then that effective measures began to be taken for the collection of domestic waste rather than allowing it to be thrown onto streets or wasteland. Safety ! ! to avoid damage to vehicles from branches and sharp objects. nose and throat. treated and appropriately disposed of is a significant source of disease and can provoke fast spreading epidemics. The principal motives for keeping streets clean are: Sanitary ! to prevent diseases caused by vector proliferation in waste accumulations on the street or on wasteland. However. the rats.1 The importance of street cleanliness Up to the mid-19th century there was not only refuse in city streets but also the remains of food and large amounts of animal and human excrement. to promote road safety by eliminating dust and earth that can cause skidding and dry leaves and grass that can cause fires. Flies and rats that proliferate in rubbish can transmit many diseases. Keeping streets clean is important for the community and the collective interest must be given priority over individual interests in order to respect the wishes of most citizens. They are called disease “vectors”. ! to avoid rain water drainage systems becoming clogged up. Street cleaning 10. The surfacing of streets and the dissemination of hygiene and public health principles in schools also contributed to the reduction of waste in the streets. The filthy conditions in Europe during the Middle Ages are well documented.
helps to attract new residents and tourists.2 Waste found in the street Waste commonly found in the streets: ! ! ! ! ! ! material from road surface break-up. in the context of tourism it is hard for a visitor to leave with a positive impression when a place is aesthetically ugly due to a lack of cleanliness. it is important that tourist city municipalities implement urban cleaning education campaigns specifically addressed to visitors. landscape beauty or cultural richness of a city. Whatever the historical significance. packaging. weeds and other vegetation. a consumer of space. he is a mere visitor. it should also be noted that he himself is in many cases contributing to its dirtiness. In general the tourist does not establish an attachment with the place he is visiting. Consequently his consideration for the place is less intense than that of residents. The aesthetic aspect of street cleanliness forms a significant part of arguments for the implementation of policies and measures to improve the image of cities. domestic waste (in general in small amounts. improves the appearance of a place. 128 . While it is true that a tourist demands cleanliness of a city.Aesthetic ! a clean city inspires pride in its inhabitants. newspapers. plastic. paper. particularly so in tourist cities. 10. principally on wasteland and areas close to informal settlements). sand and earth carried by vehicles or coming from wasteland and slopes. rubber from tyres and residues from brake pads and linings. ! ! dog and other animal excrement (also in small amounts). increases the value of property and stimulates business. tree branches and leaves. In view of these attitudes. with a view to maintaining urban aesthetics and therefore contributing to an improvement in the city’s sanitary conditions. particles from atmospheric contamination. In general people take more care of their own houses than of spaces that do not belong to them.
bits of plastic. with pieces of paper and plastic in the gutters Figure 46 .3 Street cleaning services Street cleaning services in general include activities such as sweeping. tree pruning. have an ugly appearance and attract undesirable animals). A gutter with some earth and material from road surface break-up is not perceived as “dirty” by the general public while paper and plastic items are associated with “rubbish” (i. grass and vegetation cutting.10. packaging and the remains of food discarded in the street. 10. the unblocking of drains. Street cleaning Figure 45 . pest control.A street considered as “dirty”. 129 . with no visible refuse The types of refuse that most offend citizens’ sense of hygiene and cleanliness are papers.e. kerb painting and street washing. They can also cover other activities such as beach cleaning. drain cleaning. More developed cities are giving increasing importance to a combination of cleaning services and street conservation measures (maintaining street surfaces and pavements in good condition. types of waste that produce bad odours. street market cleaning and waste removal. etc.) when defining quality standards for urban cleaning services that are compatible with client-citizens’ ever more demanding criteria. weeding and scraping. disinfection.A street considered as “clean”.
the length of each one (expressed in metres of pavement and gutter) and the teams assigned to it (sweepers). Service quality As there is no process for determining precisely the degree. those responsible for urban cleaning have to use their own criteria. Rainwater also carries debris towards the kerb. They will determine the methodology and frequency of cleaning and 130 . Figure 47 .10. in the direction of the drains.1 Sweeping services Characteristics of city streets In surfaced streets most debris is found in the gutters (at the most 60 cm from the kerb) due to the air displacement produced by passing vehicles that “pushes” dirt towards the kerb. Restructuring manual sweeping routes Review of the existing sweeping plan The organization of existing sweeping routes should be examined. In the streets themselves there is practically no dirt unless there is almost no traffic. The gutters are in reality “channels” designed to conduct rainwater. The review of the plan should register the street sections that are swept on each route. due to the transverse curvature of the street. quality and standard of cleanliness that each street requires.3.Cross section of a street In non-surfaced streets dirt and litter behave in a different way and it is necessary to clean the entire width of the street. It is essential to take these characteristics into account when determining street cleaning methodology.
These sites should be photographed periodically to facilitate a comparative checking. This information is significant as. how many metres of gutter and pavement can be swept per worker per shift. it is advisable to evaluate workers’ productivity in the field. that is. workers of medium performance are chosen and for a period of approximately fifteen days the distance that each one sweeps in each type of street is measured thus determining the average distance covered per shift. commercial and tourist streets. To carry out the tests. One of the first measures to take in order to improve services is the identification of sites that influence public opinion. Identification of sites that influence public opinion Citizen participation is indispensable for public cleaning services to maintain an appropriate level of cleanliness. form and consolidate a favourable public opinion on the part of both residents and tourists in regard to the cleanliness of the city. which then encourages the public to cooperate in maintaining clean and hygienic conditions in the streets. investigating previous complaints and consulting press files. commercial centres and access roads to the city are sites that influence public opinion. the new plan can be laid out on a map to a scale appropriate for the relevant area. New sweeping plan layout Once the existing plan has been examined and productivity indexes (metres of gutters and pavements swept per worker per shift in each type of street). Reference sites should therefore be established where comparative studies can be made of resource mobilization and the quality of services provide by the responsible body. This index is of fundamental importance for the restructuring of sweeping routes and is usually measured in samples of typical residential. and principal thoroughfares. Productivity tests As each city has its own characteristics. if they are kept clean. Tourist areas. if a street needs to be swept every day double the number of workers will be needed than if it is swept every other day. for example. certain streets that. Determination of sweeping frequency The minimum sweeping frequency necessary to maintain the required level of cleanliness in streets has to be determined. It is possible to gauge public opinion about cleaning services by carrying out opinion surveys. sites that influence public opinion and minimum sweeping frequency for the different areas have been determined. that is. habits and culture. Street cleaning will evaluate the approval or disapproval of the public according to the number and content of complaints and suggestions received.10. principal streets and avenues. 131 .
small broom and shovel. shovel (7) and special waste collection pan (8) Figure 49 .Modern broom (1). and the reaction of the public should be evaluated through opinion surveys and the registration of complaints. on the basis of which necessary adjustments can be made. Implements. Up to three workers can be assigned to each route but it is recommended that only one is assigned to each route in order to clarify responsibilities and facilitate supervision. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) Figure 48 .Manual sweeping 132 . small broom (4).Once the new plan is operational. tools and clothing The principal tools and implements for manual sweeping are: ! ! ! ! sweeper broom (vegetable fibre or plastic). hoe for cleaning drains (6). key for drains (5). used to collect waste and finish sweeping. key for opening drains. brush (3). sweeper broom (2). the level of cleanliness achieved should be checked through photos. hoe for cleaning drains and extracting waste from them.
high closing shoes and cap. empty rubbish bins. particularly for nocturnal work. A large mechanical sweeper can sweep an average of 30 km of gutter per shift. In such cases it is advisable to consider the possibility of mechanical sweeping. Nevertheless there are exceptions. tunnels and bridges represent dangerous situations for manual sweeping. a mechanical sweeper can replace 15 human sweepers. large mechanical sweepers and mini-vacuums. clean rainwater drains on the route. Sweeper tasks In general each sweeper should: ! ! ! ! ! collect domestic waste discarded in the street (not packaged for collection). manual sweeping is in general more appropriate. mechanical sweepers with vacuum system. As the average productivity of the manual system is 2km of gutter per worker per shift. Types of sweeping In spite of the cost. Street cleaning Clothing can be the same as for most urban cleaning service workers: trousers. However the monthly cost of renting a large mechanical sweeper in Latin American and Caribbean countries can be equivalent to the wages of at least 18 sweepers and taking into account the importance of job creation for citizens who have received little education. In tourist areas and city centres small mechanical sweepers can be used as they have a positive impact on public opinion by demonstrating the efforts made and the resources invested by the municipality in the urban cleaning sector. 133 . t-shirt. For safety reasons the use of reflecting strips on the uniform is recommended. sweep the pavement and gutter along the assigned route. mechanical sweeping is recommended for some situations. The main mechanical sweepers used are mini-sweepers.10. weed the gutters and areas around trees and posts (once every 15 days). where roads with high volumes of fast moving traffic. mechanical sweepers without vacuum system.
squares.MINI-SWEEPER A self-propelled sweeper and vacuum machine with two front brushes and water sprinkler nozzles to avoid raising dust. two frontal brushes.Mini-sweeper MECHANICAL SWEEPER WITHOUT VACUUM SYSTEM A medium-sized self-propelled sweeper machine.3m³ receptacle. In general they provoke curiosity and create public awareness of the municipality’s efforts to improve and modernize the urban cleaning system. These machines are used for the mechanical sweeping of roads with fast moving traffic and represent a good option wherever human sweepers would be in danger of being run over. with a 2. These machines are used for the mechanical sweeping of pavements. without vacuum. pedestrian ways. etc. one central brush and water sprinkler nozzles to avoid raising dust. Figure 50 .Mechanical sweeper without vacuum 134 . Figure 51 .
Figure 52 .10. This machine is used for cleaning cycle ways. When its waste receptacle is full it can be emptied directly into a dump truck that operates together with it. both driven by hydraulic motors. 135 .Large mechanical sweeper MINI-VACUUM Small vacuum machine that sucks debris through a flexible tube manoeuvred by the operator. It has lateral and central brushes. Street cleaning MECHANICAL SWEEPER WITH VACUUM SYSTEM A 14ton TGW sweeper machine with a capacity of 6m³ and a vacuum system driven by an auxiliary engine. pavements and parks. and water sprinkler nozzles to avoid raising dust. bridges and large streets with high traffic volumes. This machine is used for sweeping tunnels. LARGE MECHANICAL SWEEPER A self-propelled sweeper and vacuum machine with two lateral brushes. thus avoiding having to move the sweeper itself to empty its load in a transfer station. one central brush and water sprinkler nozzles to avoid raising dust.
In such cases weeding and scraping services are necessary to remove earth from the gutters and re-establish good drainage conditions and the appropriate appearance of the street.Weeding 136 .2 Weeding and scraping services Where sweeping is not regularly undertaken or rain carries debris onto surfaced streets.3. Figure 54 .Figure 53 . earth can accumulate in gutters and weeds begin to grow.Mini-vacuum 10.
is a simple and well known method. Wheelbarrows. When there is a large amount of earth. pick and scraper Figure 56 . Figure 55 . requires large numbers of workers. involves fewer environmental risks. The main advantages and disadvantages of each method are listed below: Manual ! ! ! uses unqualified labour.Rake Types of weeding Weeding operations can be manual or chemical.Hoe. Rakes can be used to complete weeding and brushes to finish the cleaning. When the earth is very compact hoes or picks are used to scrap it. the operation uses more time. usually after intense rain in streets close to slopes. the main one being erosion processes due to the inappropriate removal of vegetation. A scraper is used to deal with mud. Street cleaning In general these services are carried out using very sharp 3½ pound hoes and the waste is collected using shovels or four pronged pitchforks. small or big mechanical loaders are used for scraping. as they tend to become clogged when gutters are covered with earth and weeds. depending on the amount of material and on the type of access and space for manoeuvring. It is important that drains are cleaned at the same time as weeding and scraping operations are undertaken. ! ! ! machines and tools are easy to obtain and operate. wheelie bins or stationary containers can be used for waste collection operations.10. 137 . plastic bags.
Chemical weeding uses herbicides and should always be undertaken in compliance with the producer’s specifications and the relevant legal and environmental restrictions. which quickly dies. its use is restricted to specific situations and is always an auxiliary to manual weeding. Manual cutting uses tools such as scythes and slicers that can also be used for cutting tree branches.Scythe. cleaning and maintenance techniques. For the manual cutting of grass a broad scythe is used. and when it is adopted regulatory restrictions and requirements should be rigorously observed as should the instructions on the product labels. This decision depends on the characteristics of each particular area and the more common method employed is manual weeding. ! the use of machines and tools involves diverse operating. 10. slicer and broad scythe 138 . when done well. and exclusively under the guidance of a specialized professional. It should only be used as an auxiliary and complementary method side by side with manual weeding.3 Cutting services Cutting services are necessary when grass or vegetation is too long and can be carried out manually or mechanically. facilitates the removal of vegetation.3. Planning of weeding operations The first planning task is to determine the type of weeding: manual or chemical.Chemical ! ! ! the operation uses less time and requires fewer workers. represents a risk to the environment when used without fulfilling technical requirements. ! ! ! requires qualified labour. it involves few environmental risks. with appropriate techniques and products. Figure 57 .
One of these machines can cut approximately 800m² per day. The manual cutting of grass and other vegetation with sickles or scythes does not produce good quality results or represent good productivity (only 100m² per worker per day). The cutters attached to tractors are appropriate for relatively flat land and can cut between 2. tractor cutters. tractor mounted side-arm cutters and cutters towed by an agricultural tractor. Portable cutters are suitable for rough land and places that are difficult for larger cutters to access. Portable mechanical cutters that operators carry on their backs and cutters mounted on small.Manual cutting Mechanical cutting employs machines such as portable cutters.Portable cutter (backpack type) 139 . Figure 58 .000m² per day. For cutting operations on the borders of roads cutters with articulated arms laterally mounted on agricultural tractors can be used.000 and 3. Street cleaning Rakes can be used to complete the operation. Figure 59 .10. medium and large tractors are currently available and produce a good quality result with good productivity. lateral cutters.
tractor mounted side-arm cutter. Portable cutter An approximately 11 kg cutting machine powered by a petrol engine with the rotation transmitted to the cutting head through a flexible cable. towed grass cutter and stationary or towed branch-grinder. mini-tractor grass cutter. while the toothed disc and the blade are appropriate for thicker vegetation and 140 . Four to ten pronged pitchforks and long rakes should be used for gathering and removal operations.Cutter attached to a tractor Cut vegetation and the refuse that inevitably appears should ideally be gathered on the day of the cutting operation using standard or long rakes.Figure 60 . The nylon string is appropriate for light vegetation and grass and where the machine is used as an edge cutter.Long rake and four pronged pitchfork Mechanical equipment for cutting vegetation Commonly used mechanical equipment: portable cutter. which should not be delayed for more than two days to avoid them catching fire or becoming scattered. chainsaw. Figure 61 . a disc or a nylon string depending on the type of vegetation. Waste can be put in bags and cut vegetation organized into piles to await collection. The cutting can be done by a blade.
At the extreme of the arm there is a hydraulically operated rotating axis blade cutter. Tractor mounted side-arm cutter A hydraulic arm with wheeled head that is mounted on the rear part of a mediumsized agricultural tractor. which rotate at high speed.10. The machine’s useful life is short. Figure 64 . Figure 62 .Backpack cutter Figure 63 . principally after storms and gales. Street cleaning bushes such as guinea grass (Panicum maximum).Tractor mounted side-arm cutter 141 . where for example they are likely to fall and cause accidents. Precautions should be taken to isolate the area surrounding the work site because the blades.Chainsaw Chainsaw A tool powered by a two stroke petrol engine. approximately 2. can throw out objects such as small stones from under the vegetation with the risk of causing injury to people or animals. after which maintenance costs are excessively high. It is used to prune and cut trees or large branches. It is used to cut large lineal extensions such as roadside strips and slopes.000 hours.
Mini-tractor grass cutter
A compact machine on wheels with a central blade. It is appropriate for cutting large flat and even extensions of grass. This machine does not cut edges but has the advantage of not throwing out stones or other objects while in use.
Figure 65 - Mini-tractor grass cutter
Towed grass cutter
An implement towed by an agricultural tractor. Its cutting width is up to 1.20m and is appropriate for relatively flat land. As with the micro-tractor grass cutter, this implement does not throw out stones or other objects while in use.
Figure 66 - Towed grass cutter
Stationary or towed branch grinder
This machine is powered by a diesel motor. Branches and foliage are fed into the grinder and the ground material passes through a tube to be deposited in a dump truck or container. It is used in areas with many trees and bushes where frequent pruning takes place.
10. Street cleaning
Figure 67 - Branch grinder
An important rule for mechanical vegetation cutting: Work should only be undertaken in a screened off area using protective netting to stop the circulation of people near the area of operations in order to avoid people, vehicles or objects being hit by stones thrown out by machines. Workers should use all the recommended IPE (individual protection equipment).
10.3.4 Drain cleaning services
A well functioning street sweeping system significantly reduces the volume of waste that falls into storm drain inlets or is carried there by rainwater. Consequently the cleaning of drain inlet boxes is usually assigned to the body responsible for urban cleaning. As some sweepers may otherwise sweep debris into the drain inlet boxes, thus slowly clogging them, in general sweepers themselves are responsible for cleaning them. The first step of this operation is to remove the covering grill using a drain key. If the grill is stuck it can be levered out. Where asphalt type material used for repairing the road surface is partially covering the grill it can be removed with a hammer and chisel taking care not to break the grill. The same procedures should be followed when working with any type of rainwater drain. Waste that has accumulated in drain inlet boxes can be removed using worn hoes, which are narrower than new ones, grub hoes or special shell shaped tools. Waste with a low specific weight (leaves and branches) can be put into bags and collected together with sweeping waste. Earth extracted from drains should be collected by dump trucks.
Figure 68 - Clogged drain
Figure 69 - Lever (1), hammer (2), chisel (3) and drain key (4)
Drain inlet boxes can also be cleaned using special machines with suction hoses (VacAll type) or sweepers with vacuum suction equipment.
The cleaning of the rainwater drainage network is done with special machines through points of access to the drainage system.
Figure 70 - Pumping truck
A pumping truck is used in urban and industrial operations for cleaning drain boxes, drain accesses, septic tanks, separated chambers and sewers. Waste is pumped through a four inch diameter hose and the most commonly used models have a capacity of 6, 7 or 8m³ corresponding to a truck TGW of 12, 14 or 16 tons respectively. Mechanical sweepers with suction systems usually have tubes appropriate for drain cleaning.
The cleaning of drain inlet boxes in areas that are susceptible to flooding in the event of heavy rain should be regarded as a priority.
10. Street cleaning
10.3.5 Market cleaning services
In most Latin American and Caribbean countries there are informal public street markets set up particularly for the sale of vegetables, fruit, fish and other types of food. Many people go to them and generate large amounts of waste. It is therefore necessary to plan appropriate cleaning services in order to keep the markets clean from the moment they begin functioning until the stalls are dismantled. Market cleaning is done manually and the size of teams should correspond to the size of the market, i.e. the number of stalls and the number of people visiting it. Independently of the market cleaning services that it provides, the Municipality should take firm measures to ensure that stall operators themselves avoid waste being discarded in the street and install receptacles to store waste by their own stalls. While large markets are functioning workers can be collecting waste produced by stall owners and their customers by circulating with manual collection carts lined with large plastic bags. When full these bags can be kept at a storage point adjacent to the market in a location chosen to incur the minimum possible nuisance to the public and facilitate collection by the collection vehicle. Where possible 240 litre plastic containers with lid and wheels should be used to store waste produced while the market is operating. Special attention should be given to stalls selling fish, chicken and pork products.
Figure 71 - Containers located close to a market
When the market is dismantled a larger team of between four and eight workers sweeps and cleans the area. For this task sweeper brooms are used together with shovels and brushes for collecting the waste. In some cities large wooden squeegees are used as an auxiliary tool. Waste is collected by a compactor truck or a dumpster carrier truck.
Once it has been swept the street should be washed by a street washing truck with a pressure water jet, paying particular attention to areas around fish stalls sites, which, along with the drains, should be washed with disinfectant and deodorant products.
Figure 72 - Sweeper broom (1), brush (2), wooden squeegee (3) and shovel (4) used in market cleaning
10.3.6 Manual and mechanical waste removal services
In many cities with large wasteland areas refuse is often irregularly discarded there. Open wastelands and uncared for public areas, in combination with inadequate urban cleaning systems, generate what are called “waste accumulation sites”. The accumulation often begins with construction rubble being dumped and, as “rubbish attracts rubbish”, this is followed by the addition of pruned vegetation, old tyres, the remains of packaging, and organic waste. Later weeds start to grow and the entire scenario results in blocked drains and serious sanitary and environmental consequences. To deal with this type of problem cleaning services should establish a specific operational methodology as these situations involve not only clearing activities (weeding and vegetation cutting) but also the removal of all types of waste that have accumulated on such sites. This work requires machines and tools appropriate for each type of waste, not only for clearing tasks but also for collection and transport to the final destination, all of which places an additional burden on the system through higher operational costs due to the extra personnel and machines required in these cases. This type of activity is commonly called waste removal and can be manual or mechanical. The removal of unpackaged refuse such as common waste, soil and rubble can be done manually with shovels, lifting it directly into the box of a dump truck or into metal containers that will later be removed by appropriate trucks with cranes. To remove cut vegetation a four pronged fork is used. A three or four pronged pitchfork
alternative structures for depositing waste can be used such as setting vertical concrete pipe sections on the beach lined with plastic bags. ! labour requirements are calculated according to the surface area to be maintained.10.3. Where it is not possible to install purpose made rubbish bins. 147 .Mechanical loader at work Figure 74 .7 Beach cleaning services Sandy beaches have to be kept clean by the application of various complementary measures. awareness raising campaigns should be initiated to promote the use of rubbish bins for waste generated on the beach. Each summer. Once these basic measures have been adopted. In cases where there is a large amount of waste and especially where a lot of soil or rubble has to be removed the use of a wheeled front loader (mechanical loader) is recommended.Three pronged pitchfork 10. the planning of services should involve the following principal elements: ! the frequency of beach cleaning operations should be organized with a view to the beach always being as clean as possible and in good condition for use by citizens. Street cleaning is used to separate the pile of accumulated waste in order to facilitate its handling and transport. The first and most important of these is to reduce the amount of waste that gets onto the beach by installing rubbish bins both on the beach itself and on pavements that border it so that people can deposit waste in them. ! the timing of operations should be compatible with beach activities so as not to inconvenience users. Figure 73 . the required frequency of operations and productivity rates determined by field measurements.
as well as plastic bags and containers for carrying the waste to the compaction vehicle or dump truck that accompanies the team as it progresses. ten pronged pitchforks and plastic net sieves. (1) (2) (5) (3) (4) Figure 75 .Wire rake (1). The labour productivity rate varies depending on diverse factors such as user behaviour and the availability of rubbish bins. ten pronged pitchfork (3).Waste containers Figure 77 . concrete pipe section with plastic bag (4) and container (5) Figure 76 . Beach cleaning services can involve both manual and mechanical operations. plastic net sieve (2). The manual cleaning of the beach surface should ideally be done at the end of every sunny day using wire rakes (usually having 20 to 25 prongs with a 1cm gap between them).000m² per hour per worker can be taken as an initial base value.Manual removal of beach waste 148 .! service organization can be based on defined sectors or on the entire extension of the relevant beach. An average of 1.
Figure 80 .000m² per hour. aired and returned to the beach. The type of net used in the sieve varies according to the characteristics of the beach. four wheel drive agricultural tractors with trailers can be used to accompany the cleaning team as they progress along the beach and transport waste to a truck similarly progressing along the street bordering the beach. On very wide beaches (where there is more than 30 metres of sand between the water and the land). The operation of this machine is entirely mechanical. Sand is taken from a maximum depth of 20cm. cigarette ends and food remains. sieved. This type of cleaning collects large and medium-sized waste but leaves ice cream sticks.10. pass it through a vibratory sieve in order to catch smaller objects and produce a bactericidal effect by exposing lower layers of sand to sunlight. Street cleaning Figure 78 . In out of season periods beaches should be cleaned with machines that stir the sand.Mechanical beach cleaning 149 . Beach cleaning machines towed by four wheel drive mini-tractors with a maximum potency of 60hp are used.Transfer of beach waste from a tractor drawn trailer to a truck Figure 79 .Manual beach cleaning Mechanical cleaning is appropriate for beaches with large amounts of waste and big extensions of sand. In these cases purpose built machines towed by agricultural tractors are used and have a productivity of approximately 10. straws.
on corners. ! instalment of rubbish bins in streets with high pedestrian concentrations. Figure 83 . gutters and pavements.An option that may be considered for very crowded beaches is to replace sand above the tide line with sand from below it that has been washed by the sea and is therefore cleaner. appropriate dimensions and maintenance for rainwater drainage systems. 10.4 How to reduce street waste The amount of solid waste in streets can be reduced through: ! ! smooth surfaces and appropriate inclination for streets. Figure 81 .Uneven gutters make cleaning difficult ! planting tree species in combinations that do not result in abundant leaf fallings several times a year.Smooth pavements and gutters facilitate cleaning Figure 82 . at bus stops and in front of bars. cafes and supermarkets.Rubbish bins 150 . Such an operation should be carried out using tractor-bulldozers and mechanical loaders after an environmental study has been undertaken by specialists.
Waste being swept into the street 151 . In general it can be observed that in well cared for and well maintained streets passersby are more conscious of cleanliness and discard less rubbish on the ground. plastic and packaging. made up of papers.A dirty square The dirty and uncared for appearance of the square is added to by so-called “white waste”. urban cleaning issues are related to various aspects of public urban works and should be taken into account by the respective municipal bodies when urban improvement projects are being planned. ! ! public awareness raising campaigns related to the maintenance of cleanliness. Figure 84 . Commercial establishments should not be allowed to sweep their waste onto the street. Street cleaning ! regular sweeping and waste removal from waste accumulation sites (“rubbish attracts rubbish” while “cleanliness promotes cleanliness”).10. (Figure 85) Figure 85 – Figure 85 . establishment of legal devices that sanction citizens who disobey urban cleaning regulations. Those who persist in doing so should be fined and for this the municipality needs to have a good supervision system. As can be seen.
5 Street cleaning in tourist cities As is the case with domestic waste collection. beach cleaning. They discard rubbish indiscriminately and fail to comply with behavioural norms and regulations. There are also cultural and behavioural questions with some tourists who take the view that as it is not their city they are not interested in keeping it clean. Figure 86 . principally in regard to sweeping and. A good example is the increase in the number of people circulating through the streets and the consequent generation of waste in different quantities and at different times than those in the normal routine of the city. an influx of tourists to a city causes considerable problems for the street cleaning service. the measures that have to be implemented to maintain required levels of street cleanliness are: ! increase the hours of work shifts (overtime) on some sweeping routes in order to respond to the greater seasonal demand for services.“Molok” type container in use 152 . Another aspect that creates difficulties for cleaning services is that in general tourists are not acquainted with the operational routine of cleaning in the city and many times they do not do what they should as users to cooperate with the body providing the service. taking into account the limits imposed by employment legislation.10. in the case of coastal cities. These however are the same tourists who will not return to the city if they consider it dirty or not well cared for. ! restructure existing routes increasing the number of sweeping shifts and contracting extra workers on a temporary basis. An underlying cause of these problems is the temporary population increase and the resultant increase in demand for public services. In regard to sweeping.
they do not maintain teams exclusively for beach cleaning services. with few exceptions. Extending work shifts and giving seasonal tasks to workers who normally perform other activities is in general neither feasible nor sufficient to solve the problem completely. and equip it with all the tools necessary to carry out this service. Street cleaning It is also important to increase the numbers and maintenance of containers and rubbish bins strategically positioned in streets. The aesthetics of these units and their integration with the landscape should be taken into account. 153 . Such a campaign can and should be directed to the entire city but may concentrate more on neighbourhoods associated with tourism and along the seashore where applicable. For an effective provision of this service during the tourist season the most appropriate course of action may be to contract a separate team to undertake the cleaning of the beach and its bordering seafront. The campaign should encourage people to take better care of the city and guide visitors to cooperate in maintaining hygienic conditions and cleanliness in the streets. difficult to mechanize and relatively labour intensive. which are complex. In the case of coastal tourist cities the problems are more difficult to solve as. such as hotels. One general administrative measure that a municipality can take to reduce problems faced by the urban cleaning sector during the high tourist season is to schedule employees’ holidays for the months of the low season so that during periods when demand for services is at its greatest the entire staff is available. An ongoing awareness raising campaign can be run throughout the high tourist season with the participation of companies that benefit from tourism.10. restaurants and entertainment establishments. squares and other public spaces to facilitate appropriate waste disposal.
11 Recovery of recyclable materials 154 .
Reuse. mostly associated with energy generation. Recycle and Recover). 4 Rs practice: reduce – aimed at diminishing the amount of disposable packaging and containers. Reduce. This concept establishes the principle of waste generation prevention. Recycle.11. Recover. Recovery of recyclable materials 11. taking as its departure point reduction. The increased per capita waste generation. favouring products with more durability and less packaging. On an international level these issues have prompted a debate about the consumption habits of societies and the responsibility of companies. newspapers. 155 . a reorientation of consumers’ needs and purchasing preferences. The reorientation of consumers’ preferences. reuse – the reuse of a material or product without changing its shape or original nature. not to mention the negative impacts caused by an irrational consumption of non-renewable natural resources. One of the most important incentives for recycling is the saving of energy and natural resources. books and other products. This concern with waste issues is due both to the potential for contamination and the continuous need to find new final disposal sites. Reuse.1 Concept With the growing prominence of environmental conservation policies citizens are becoming increasingly concerned about solid waste issues. recycle – the transformation of materials into raw material for production processes. That is. a positive contribution where reduce and reuse are not applicable. recover – principally related to appropriate waste incineration processes that produce energy and consequently conserve fossil fuels. and therefore of companies’ production. magazines. maximize or diversify the use of a given consumer product. resulting in what is known as 4Rs practice (Reduce. in transfer stations or at final disposal sites. Different types of waste can be reused such as bottles. putting pressure on producing companies to use the least amount of packaging possible. recycling is the one that provokes most public interest principally due to its clear claims to environmental benefits. not only concerns environmentalists but also governments and the general public. In spite of the integral nature and order of the 4Rs. the less waste the better. favouring products that are less damaging to the environment and avoid wastage. This process requires the segregation of waste at source. fruit of capitalist society’s high consumption model. through a change in consumption habits.
2 Selective collection programs A significant role can be played by educational programs that promote 4Rs practice and foster the development of environmental awareness amongst citizens. This aspect has a significant relevance to many Latin American and Caribbean cities where social crises have resulted in large numbers of people turning to refuse segregation as a means of survival through the commercialization of recyclable materials. the generation of income and employment. For example. for the most part related to pre-recycling waste segregation. the saving of energy in production processes. The principal benefits of recycling discarded materials (plastic. is the one most applied in Latin American and Caribbean cities. In practice. metal and glass) are: ! ! ! ! the saving of non-renewable raw materials. can become instruments for income and employment generation. where large parts of the population live in poor socioeconomic conditions projects can be established that involve the “bartering” of recyclable materials for food and an increased level of community participation. almost always in extremely precarious conditions. These programs. A scarcity of resources often hinders the implementation of such programs but some municipalities are endeavouring to promote alternative models adapted to fit their particular economic circumstances.11. paper. offices. Traditional models applied in developed countries almost always involve public subsidies and are difficult to apply in developing countries. a model involving the selective collection of materials at the source of generation (houses. The great challenge in implementing selective collection programs is to find a model that is in itself economically sustainable. 156 . such as segregator cooperatives. the prolongation of sanitary landfills’ useful life. in which the latter undertake the collection of materials. shops and factories) and associated with a program of income and employment generation. However the social and environmental benefits of these programs also have to be considered. Another example is the establishment of partnerships between public authorities and civil organizations. particularly in less developed countries.
11. Figure 87 – Selective collection by compactor truck Figure 88 – Selective collection by truck without compaction The separation of recyclable materials in households can be done in two ways: identifying and separating different types of recyclable material and storing them in separate containers. voluntary drop-off centres. or putting all recyclable materials in one container.1 Selective door to door collection The most commonly used model for selective collection programs is the segregation by residents of discarded recyclable materials. in a similar way to conventional domestic waste collection. segregator organizations. which are then collected by specialized vehicles from each housing unit. 11.2. 157 . Recovery of recyclable materials Amongst the options available for the segregation of recyclable materials at the source of generation are: ! ! ! selective door to door collection.
where materials are separated by type in preparation for their commercialization. metal. Once collected. Segregation plants should also have presses so that materials with a lower specific weight (paper and plastic) can be baled to facilitate storage and transport. 158 . recyclable materials should be transported to a segregation plant. Figure 89 – Recyclables segregation plant It is important that the public is clearly informed of the correct criteria for the separation of materials for commercialization in order to avoid the expense incurred with transporting and handling non-recyclable waste at the segregation plant. one for each type of recyclable material. With the other more commonly used model residents separate domestic waste into two categories: ! organic material (damp) – including the remains of food and non-recyclable materials that are stored in a container for this category and are collected by the normal domestic waste collection service. which are stored in a container for this category and are collected by the selective collection service. door to door selective collection can be made once a week using open box trucks. which makes it more difficult in apartments or small houses. glass and plastic. The relatively long interval between selective collections is possible because of the inert nature of recyclable materials.The system in which different types of recyclable materials are separated requires more space for keeping the containers. The principal disadvantages of door to door selective collection are the increased transport costs involved in the need for extra collection trucks and the high unitary cost of collection compared with conventional collection. This model also requires a collection truck with a box divided into compartments to transport materials separately. ! recyclable materials (dry) – paper. generally equipped with tables. In most cities where the system is operated.
as well as in waste segregation educational campaigns. etc. regulate and foster the process without participating directly in its operation. Table 15 Colour code for recyclable solid waste Container colour Blue Red Green Yellow Brown Recyclable material Paper and Cardboard Plastic Glass Metal Organic waste Source: CONAMA resolution Nº 275 of 25/4/2001 (Brazil) 159 . results in significant economic benefits for the urban cleaning system as previously segregated recyclable materials will not need to be collected. which are fundamental to maintaining citizen participation levels. grinders. to add value to the recyclable material. The responsible public body usually standardizes the program to facilitate organization and community participation. Selective collection is not profitable when the municipality uses its own vehicles. all of which reduces the costs and work of the municipality. Recovery of recyclable materials Both before and after the initiation of selective collection services the public authority should continuously encourage citizen participation through promotional campaigns and environmental education.2 Voluntary Drop-off Centres (VDC) Containers sited in public places for the public to voluntarily deposit pre-segregated recyclable waste. 11.11. labour and structure. Consequently planning for a project has to allow for the necessary resources to run such campaigns. A selective collection system in which a municipality does not directly participate but establishes alliances with the community for operating it. which will then be used for identifying containers and collection trucks.2. washers. transported and disposed of in a landfill. See the suggestions in table 15. As an incentive it could invest in warehouses and equipment such as bale-presses. Ideally it should standardize. It can for example define a colour code for the different types of waste.
Here too it is important to regularly empty VDC containers in order to avoid irregular waste accumulation on the site.VDCs can be set up in partnership with private companies that can for example finance their installation in return for the use of the site for advertisements. The establishment of VDCs in tourist areas should take into account potential communication problems with the labelling of containers.Special containers for a VDC Figure 91 . To overcome the language problem it is recommended that images are used to indicate the correct storage container for each type of recyclable material. Figure 90 .Examples of VDCs 160 . Some municipalities are establishing partnerships with recycling companies that finance both the installation of containers and the collection of materials deposited in them.
providing juridical and administrative assistance for legalization processes and. Assistance should also be provided for the training of organization members to promote greater autonomy. 161 . transportation and final disposal. in an effort to include a social dimension in their selective collection programs or pressed by groups of segregators themselves.11. It is important that municipalities adopting this model offer institutional support to segregator organizations. working conditions for most segregators are still very precarious and many of them continue to work without any support or acknowledgement. Many municipalities. establish some type of agreement or partnership with segregator cooperatives that then undertake the collection and separation of discarded recyclable materials. In spite of advances. as has already been mentioned. the organization of segregators’ work to avoid untidiness in waste collection and the storage of materials in the streets. held in Brazil in 2003 and 2005. providing basic equipment such as bale-presses. presses. Segregators from several Latin American countries met to define common strategies at the first and second Latin American Congress of Recyclable Material Segregators. etc. Improvements in this sector’s working conditions depend to a large degree on several institutions having an articulated vision and commitment that leads to the formulation and implementation of effective public policies. One of the main factors that fosters the strengthening and success of segregator organizations is the profitable commercialization of recyclable materials. which though still incipient has nevertheless grown significantly 4. bale lifters) so that the segregated materials increase in value in the recyclables market. Recovery of recyclable materials 11.2. a reduction in the costs of selective collection programs.3 Segregator organizations The appearance of numerous segregator organizations in Latin America and the Caribbean during recent decades reflects not only the socioeconomic crises that many of these countries have experienced but also segregators’ capacity for articulation and organization. principally in regard to granting the use of physical space. The principal advantages of working with segregator organizations are: ! ! ! ! the generation of income and employment. the social inclusion of segregators (who mostly live in the streets) as citizens. Such savings on costs should benefit segregator organizations in the form of investment in uniforms and infrastructure (warehouses for segregation and storage. carts. ! a reduction in the costs of the city’s urban cleaning system due to the collection of part of the waste by segregators leaving less waste for collection. The less 4. standardized carts.
! implementation of environmental education programs for segregators. the lack of which would hinder efficient performance. ! ! ! ! implementation of a social assistance program for segregators and their children. especially when operations are beginning to be established. provision of uniforms and individual protection equipment. Amongst the measures that should be taken in support of segregator organizations are: ! administrative and accounting support. the better the selling conditions. These conditions are rarely achieved by small groups but the organization of joint commercialization centres is an option that creates better conditions for direct negotiations with recycling companies.intermediaries that are involved in the process between the segregator organizations and the final consumer (the recycling industry) the higher the sale price will be. implementation of rehabilitation programs for those with a dependency on chemical substances. the contracting of a professional specialized in management to train the group. ! ample scale of production and storage: the larger the production and the quantity available to the buyer. The following basic conditions should be met: ! good quality material (sorted by type of material. When a public authority enters into partnership with a segregator organization it is important that it continues to offer institutional support for the provision of basic needs. ! regular production and delivery to the final consumer. implementation of literacy courses and training for segregators. with a low impurity content and appropriate packaging or baling). Figure 92 – Segregators from a cooperative working in the street 162 .
163 . it is recommended that the group has a small liquid capital so that segregators’ minimum incomes are guaranteed until better commercialization conditions are re-established. Recovery of recyclable materials Taking into account the lack of experience of those running the organizations.11. All these initiatives and types of support should be applied with a view to eventual sustainability. the public authority can. also help with the commercialization of recyclable materials. it is important that the strengthening of the segregator groups leads in the long term to them gaining more autonomy and independence in their activities. during the initial phase. For the eventuality of difficulties related to fluctuations in the buying market. that is.
12 Solid waste treatment 164 .
The most effective treatment is applied by the general public when they take action to reduce the amount of solid waste by avoiding wastage. other acids of low molecular weight and some unpleasantly smelling toxic gases such as sulfhidric acid (H2S). of oxygen at a lower temperature than that involved in incineration. Biological ! aerobic – stabilization and composting processes that principally generate water. acetic acid. ! pyrolysis – thermally induced waste degradation in the absence. known as waste treatment. Solid waste treatment 12. separating recyclable material at source and appropriately disposing of waste. economic and sanitary benefits. thermal or biological. Mechanical ! classification – sorting by economic criteria or as a preparatory step for subsequent processing. ! anaerobic – important for the production of methane. reusing materials. ! grinding – reduces the granulometry and volume of waste as well as mixing and homogenizing it. ! compaction – reduces empty spaces (increases waste density).12. Thermal ! incineration – controlled burning at high temperature in purpose built equipment with environmental control devices. These processes. producing high energy liquids and gases and less atmospheric contamination.1 Concept Between collection and final disposal municipal solid waste can be subject to processes that produce technical-operational. 165 . or limited presence. Waste degradation is slower and generates fatty acids. The objectives of solid waste treatment are to reduce its volume and to lower its contaminating potential by transforming it into inert or biologically stable material. carbon dioxide and heat. contribute to human and environmental protection. Processes applied to solid waste can be mechanical.
! The ideal recycling system begins with the separation of solid waste in homes so that only potentially recyclable materials are sent to segregation plants.2 Domestic solid waste treatment 12. Such prior separation reduces the amount of contamination affecting materials and in consequence increases the productivity of segregation plants. Recyclable material segregated from mixed solid waste is dirty and contaminated. glass and metal from domestic solid waste. depending on the plant’s size and degree of sophistication. where it would be subject to more rigorous environmental controls. plastic. the outcome is much worse than if the waste had been disposed of in a sanitary landfill. 166 .12. In such a case. Recyclable material contained in general domestic solid waste can be separated in the segregation plant through manual or electromechanical processes that in terms of weight usually yield only 3% to 6%. greater public awareness of social and environmental problems. energy saving.2. If the necessary precautions are not taken recyclable material transformation processes can be extremely harmful to the environment. their sale to specialized companies and their transformation into material for producing goods that can be sold in the consumer market. economies in solid waste transport costs and in the occupation of landfills (as the amount of waste to be transported to the landfill is reduced). The high cost of recyclable material transformation processes has resulted in many recycling companies not following environmental guidelines stipulating the use of clean (but expensive) technologies.1 Recycling The recycling process comprises: the segregation of materials such as paper. Recycling offers the following advantages: ! conservation of natural resources. together with the rest of the domestic waste. ! ! ! generation of income and employment. so its processing is more complicated and expensive.
12. The gravimetric values (in weight) of the different types of solid waste after processing in a segregation plant with a composting unit. It can be seen that.4%) Sieving Figure 93 . which are: ! small-sized unit (low quantity of waste to be processed) which facilitates maximum efficiency of manual segregation. the rest of the domestic waste. Solid waste treatment After the segregation of recyclable material that can be used for production. ! reception of domestic waste from differentiated collections.6%) Landfill Refuse Grinding of the predominantly organic fraction 60kg/day (humidity loss 4%) Selection table Pre-selection of bulky objects Reception Recyclable materials Compost curing piles Loss of matter heat+CO +water 225kg/day (15%) Recoverable materials Storage of composted ground material Refuse Organic preparation (compost) 456kg/day (30. thus avoiding a mixture of recyclable and non-recyclable waste and reducing the percentage of nonrecoverable waste. 167 . ! existence of a strong and diversified market for recyclable materials so that the commercialization of a wide range of materials is possible.Flow chart of the process and mass fraction proportions These percentages however are based on the optimum operational performance conditions for a segregation and composting plant. from the total amount of waste that arrives for processing only 12. Domestic waste collection 189kg/day (12. This material is inert and therefore not contaminating because the residual organic content has been stabilized with most of the organic matter being transformed into compost. provided there is compost production. This subject is dealt with in the next section.6% needs to be transported to the final disposal site. are in general as expressed in the following flow chart of a hypothetical plant with an intake capacity of 1. and their uses. thus reducing the amount of non-recoverable waste.500kg/ day (see figure 93). can be processed to obtain compost for agricultural use. which is fundamentally organic.
the average production of nonrecoverable waste in recycling and composting plants can be estimated as 25% of the total weight of refuse processed there. or in smaller establishments by means of estimative calculations. In bigger establishments devices can be used to enable trucks to unload solid waste directly onto the processing lines. as mentioned in chapter 5. 168 . In smaller plants feeding can be manual. Selection In this sector the flow of waste on the selection lines is regulated and segregation by type of recyclable material is carried out. which results in a larger percentage of non recyclable waste at the end of the process. feeding and selection. Feeding The loading of waste onto the processing line by means of machines such as loaders. Clearly this proportion depends on the composition of the domestic solid waste generated in each city. thus freeing the operation of the processing lines from dependence on the functioning of feeding equipment. which can be affected by local particularities. or hydraulic arm grabs. overhead cranes. Reception Here collection trucks unload domestic solid waste and the following processes are applied in sequence: ! determination of the volume or of the weight using a weighbridge. The operation of a segregation and composting plant is divided into three stages: reception. ! storage of unloaded waste in silos or warehouses of a size compatible with the daily processing capacity. As in practice optimum conditions rarely exist.In the case of bigger recycling and composting units (in large cities) the level of recyclable material recovery tends to be less and the amount of disposable material for treatment greater.
etc. In this type of plant the waste that arrives from collection is unloaded close to the end of the selection table and is transferred to the table by a worker with a pitchfork or another appropriate tool.Manual selection in a small capacity recycling plant 169 . The ones near the beginning of the conveyor belt separate larger objects (paper. The selection conveyor belt speed should be 10 to 12m/min. Examples of auxiliary equipment are: sieves. Figure 94 . Solid waste treatment Equipment used for flow regulation comprises metal conveyor belts and mixer drums. The distinct selection processes can be set up independently of each other or be interconnected.12. cardboard and sheet plastic) so that smaller objects (aluminium cans. ballistic separators. Segregators are stationed along the selection belt next to channels or containers. In general. The latter are appropriate for plants with a maximum capacity of 10tons per hour per line. In general simple plants only have selection conveyor belts. instead of a selection belt. glass containers. the first position on the selection line is occupied by a worker who breaks open bags and scatters their contents across the width of the belt in order to facilitate the work of the other segregators. In plants that process up to 10tons/day. Waste is manually pushed along the table by segregators using small planks as recyclable materials are withdrawn. while more complete ones use other equipment that itself removes recyclable materials or assists manual segregation. to allow sufficient time for the manual separation of materials by the segregators.) can be seen and separated by segregators nearer to the end of the line. a concrete table can be used that should be slightly inclined and have raised lateral borders to avoid the fall of waste. In establishments that have several parallel selection belts they should be installed on a level that is high enough to allow for a level below them where baling presses can operate and there should be enough space available for moving segregated materials. magnetic separators and pneumatic separators.
It is important to note that a segregation plant can only operate if the urban cleaning system of the city includes the selective collection of hazardous waste. lead. It 170 . such as medical waste. etc. ferrous metal (cans. However in most plants the following materials are segregated: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! paper and cardboard.2 Composting Composting is the natural biological degradation of organic materials (with carbon in their structure) of animal or vegetable origin through the action of micro organisms. transparent glass. sheet plastic (low density polyethylene).). 12. sheet metal. coloured glass. HDPE.Manual selection in a large capacity recycling plant The type of recyclable material that will be separated in a segregation plant depends above all on demand from the industry.). non-ferrous metal (aluminium cans. entire bottles. antimony. mixed glass.Large capacity recycling plants need to use a high level of mechanization for feeding and the movement of the large volumes of waste along the operational lines. Figure 95 . Street sweeping waste and construction rubble should also not be brought to the segregation plant as they contain materials that can damage the machines. It is essential that this type of material does not arrive at the segregation plant in order to avoid endangering workers who handle the waste.2. hard plastic (PVC. PET). etc.
Solid waste treatment is not necessary to add any type of substance. Stages of composting The aerobic composting process can be divided into two stages. maturing. degradation is caused by micro organisms that live in environments without oxygen. emits a strong unpleasant odour and requires more time for the organic matter to stabilize. degradation is caused by micro organisms that only live in environments containing oxygen. dark in colour and high in colloidal particle content that when applied to soil improves its physical characteristics for agriculture. Factors that influence composting A sufficient quantity of the micro organisms necessary for degrading organic matter is inherently present in domestic waste. involves a significant increase in the temperature of the organic mass. The waste also contains pathogenic micro organisms such as salmonella and streptococcus. to the mass of organic domestic waste for composting to take place. it takes place at relatively low temperatures.12. therefore the water content has to be controlled during the process. reaching 65ºC and later stabilizing at the ambient temperature towards the end of the cycle. 171 . Structurally the micro organisms that degrade the organic matter are approximately 90% water. takes another 30 days. which in natural composting systems takes approximately 60 days. The first stage. the more appropriate treatment for domestic waste. bio-stabilization. including chemical substance. depending on the presence or absence of oxygen in the process. The final product of an organic waste aerobic composting process is compost. Composting can be aerobic or anaerobic. In anaerobic composting. In aerobic composting. If humidity and airing are appropriately controlled these micro-organisms proliferate quickly and homogeneously throughout the mass of waste. The second stage. Hummus is a completely bio-stabilized homogeneous organic substance. a material rich in hummus and mineral nutrients that can be used in agriculture to improve soil quality and as a fertilizer. In this stage the humidification and mineralization of the organic matter takes place. These pathogenic agents are eliminated by the heat generated in the biological process as they do not survive temperatures in excess of 55ºC for more than 24 hours. Temperatures can reach 70ºC. odours are not unpleasant and degradation is quicker.
Factors such as humidity. Sufficient space for the storage of compost that is ready for use should also be made available. During the aerobic stage the more the matter is exposed to oxygen.In aerobic composting the metabolism of the micro organisms needs oxygen. Simple composting plants Simple plants make compost naturally in the open air. if particles are too small an excessively compacted mass can result. well compacted and if possible surfaced. The organic matter remains there until its bio-stabilization and is stirred with a predetermined frequency (for example. A lack of oxygen produces unpleasant odours. In small units it can be stirred manually with pitchforks or other tools. In addition. every 10 days until completing 60 days). and from then on. temperature and granulometry influence the availability of oxygen. the greater the surface area that is exposed to oxygen and therefore the shorter the composting process. the smaller the particles. The surface of the area where piles are set in a composting plant should be smooth. on the third day after the formation of the pile. Compost is aired by stirring the material with mechanical loaders or special machines. Composting piles should have a pyramidal or conical shape. These effluents. should be sanitarily treated in stabilization ponds. In such plants the waste is fragmented in a hammer-mill and then “piles” are set. However. Once it is biologically stable the material is refined in a sieve and is ready to be used in the preparation of agricultural soils. Figure 96 . When designing the composting area sufficient space has to be planned for between the piles so that trucks.Aerobic composting in a small capacity plant 172 .50m to 2m in height. with bases of up to 3m per side or 2m diameter and be no more than 1. the quicker the degradation. which makes the airing process more difficult. which in well managed piles are produced in very small quantities. with enough of a slope (2%) for rainwater and leachates produced in the composting process to run off. mechanical loaders and special machines for stirring the piles can circulate.
Solid waste treatment Figure 97 . Characteristics of compost The principal characteristic of compost produced by domestic waste composting is the presence of hummus and mineral nutrients.0 Margin . magnesium and iron. which are absorbed by plant roots. whether or not chemical fertilizers are being used. In Brazil.0% < 40% < 18/1 > 6. It can be used to correct soil acidity and rehabilitate eroded areas.10% . Hummus makes soil more porous thus facilitating the airing of roots and the retention of water and nutrients. the amounts of which determine the quality of the compost. calcium. phosphorus. Compost can be used for any type of cultivation. for example. Table 16 Values established in Brazil for commercialized compost Parameter Organic matter Total Nitrogen Humidity C/N relation PH Value > 40% > 1.10% 173 . These values are presented in table 16 as a reference.10% + 10% 21/1 .Aerobic composting in a large capacity plant If the height of the piles is more than 2m it is difficult to stir and air the organic mass. A conical form facilitates the running off of rainwater and avoids the pile becoming saturated.12. Mineral nutrients can comprise up to 6% of the weight of the compost and include nitrogen. Compost quality In general compost quality is standardized on the basis of parameters established by public institutions in each country with a view to ensuring its effective application in agriculture. commercialized compost produced by domestic waste composting plants must comply with minimum values established by the Ministry of Agriculture. potassium.
availability of sufficient space to establish a segregation plant and/or composting area. existence of a market for recyclables and compost in the region. One of the main concerns of compost users is the presence of heavy metals in sufficient concentrations to be prejudicial for cultivation and/or produce consumers. Composting plants’ segregation operations must remove these materials as much as is possible from the waste that is received.3 Choosing a treatment option Segregation and/or composting plants are alternatives that municipalities should consider when planning the treatment of domestic solid waste that they collect. it is unlikely that compost produced from domestic waste will contain a concerning level of heavy metals because of the socioeconomic characteristics of most of the population and therefore the type of waste generated. availability of personnel with sufficient technical training to select appropriate technology. existence of selective collection for domestic.2. 174 . supervise the setting up of a plant. before proceeding they should examine the practicalities of the following required conditions: ! ! ! ! existence of a reasonably efficient and regular collection system. especially in small and medium-sized ones. ! ! availability of resources to finance initial investment. 12. In most Latin American and Caribbean cities. the higher the initial investment and maintenance costs and the lower the level of employment generation. rubber. However.Compost must be periodically subject to physical and chemical analysis in order to verify its compliance with the minimum quality standards established by the relevant governmental body. maintain machines and supervise their operation. When determining which machines to install it should always be taken into account that the more sophisticated and automatic they are. ceramics and batteries contain heavy metals. Some components of domestic waste such as coloured paper. textiles. public and medical waste.
environmental benefits). ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY STUDIES Prior to the establishment of a segregation or composting plant an economic feasibility study should be carried out covering the following points: Investment ! ! ! ! ! environmental licenses. sale of compost and recyclable material. labour intensive systems are recommended such as manual segregation plants. generation of incomes and employment. management and administration teams). Solid waste treatment In Latin American and Caribbean countries. 175 . Expenditure ! ! ! ! personnel (non-qualified labour. Income ! direct ! sale of compost and recyclable material.12. architectural and engineering planning and works. operational and maintenance costs. energy and tariffs of public service concessionaires. purchase of machines and tools. the implementation. ! indirect ! ! savings through the reduced cost of transport to the sanitary landfill. and on the other. A considered economic feasibility study of any proposed project should be undertaken taking into account on the one hand the advantages of installing a plant (reduction of the amount of waste to be transported and buried. technical. spare parts and machine replacement. capital expenditure (interest and amortization) and depreciation. purchase and legalization of land. operation and maintenance. where there is high unemployment. savings through reduced sanitary landfill costs resulting from reduced waste volumes.
promotion of public environmental awareness.Environmental ! ! ! energy savings. represents a significant environmental and economic benefit from segregation and composting plants. natural resource savings. The use of recyclable material results in a saving of energy and resources that would otherwise be used in the transformation of raw materials and this. it can be seen as being extremely positive when indirect income and the potential for significant environmental and social benefits are considered. However. It is unlikely that the direct income from a segregation and composting plant will cover its expenditures and the project should not be entered into as a profitable undertaking from a strictly commercial perspective. Social ! provision of dignified and formal employment for segregators – the participation of segregator organizations in plants should be prioritized whenever possible. Companies that buy recyclables impose three basic conditions: ! ! ! sufficient production scale. regularity of supply. RECYCLABLE MATERIALS MARKET The market for recyclable material is growing rapidly and offers significant rates of return. Segregation and composting plants generate income and employment and reduce the amount of waste to be disposed of in sanitary landfills or refuse dumps. although there has been a concomitant increase in quality requirements. 176 . ! ! income generation. taken as a whole. reduced environmental contamination from waste. good quality material. together with the transformation of organic matter separated from waste into compost that improves agricultural soils.
or difficult access to. the conservation of non-renewable raw material. an improvement in the urban environment due to reduced indiscriminate dumping of construction rubble in the streets. eliminating intermediary agents. 12. In order of importance they are: Demographic density – a high demographic density in the area is essential to ensure a constant supply of rubble to the recycling plant. the creation of employment for unqualified labour.3. depends on the existence of local recycling companies that are interested in them. The commercialization of these products. Market prices vary and are directly influenced by the price of raw materials as well as other factors such as the level of demand from recycling companies for a particular recyclable material at certain periods of the year. The recycling of construction rubble has the following advantages: ! ! ! a reduction in the extraction of raw material. Another fundamental requirement is to have a storage place for the materials in order to rationalize their transport to the customer and be able to offer larger amounts of recyclable material and in consequence obtain better prices. are easier to commercialize in the market. Availability of natural aggregate – a scarcity of. aluminium cans and hard plastic.12. cleaning and grinding for reuse in the construction industry itself. Recycled rubble can be used in the base and sub-base of roads or as gross aggregate in construction works. and so more valuable. However an abundance of. natural deposits of raw material favours rubble recycling. relatively clean. and 177 . Solid waste treatment Materials that are appropriately segregated. ! ! the availability on the market of cheaper construction materials.1 Construction rubble The most common treatment of construction rubble is its segregation. reinforced concrete works of art and pre-moulded elements. The establishment of recycling plants for this type of material should therefore be fostered and the possibility of charging special tariffs should be considered to ensure their economic viability. They will also endeavour to sell directly to companies.3 Treatment of special domestic waste 12. Some segregator cooperatives seek ways of increasing the value of their recyclable material by for example endeavouring to make it as clean as possible and at least segregating and baling the different types of paper and cardboard. including the sale price and production flow. Three factors should be analyzed in a pre-establishment evaluation for a rubble recycling plant in a particular location.
place of origin. natural deposits does not necessarily exclude the viability of rubble recycling. distances. technical team. reserves). responsible agent. Also. demolition and renovation (techniques applied. price). type and quality.basic features 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 - Administration Control centre Entry checkpoint Feeder Grinder Conveyor belt Rubble to be recycled Storage Area Reception Area Green Belt Garden 178 . the following factors should be studied: In connection with rubble received: ! rubble characteristics (quantity. organization and machines).Rubble recycling plant . current consumption. regulations in force). existing local regulations). ! ! ! In connection with commercialization: ! ! ! natural raw material (quality. recycled material (technical quality. processing (feasibility. standards). Figure 98 . rubble transport). collection and final disposal possibilities (prices. quantity.easy access to. The location of a recycling plant on the periphery of an urban area is of fundamental importance in order to keep the final cost of the recycled product down. market conditions (type. price. Technical level – it is necessary to use appropriate technologies to avoid environmental degredation.
the unloading of the vehicle will not be allowed and it will be sent to a sanitary landfill. baled and commercialized. 179 . ! in the reception area it is superficially inspected to determine whether the load is compatible with the grinder.General view of a rubble recycling plant The plant should receive only inert waste so that there is no possibility of releasing contaminating substances. If it is not of an appropriate type. which is pressed. The grinder feeder should be equipped with water sprinklers to minimize the emission of dust and a rubber lining to keep noise levels within the limits established by environmental control bodies. The rest of the material passes through a revolving sieve that segregates it according to granulometric characteristics. The appropriate procedures and control devices should be adopted to avoid the emission of particles. Solid waste treatment Construction rubble recycling can be done in two ways: automatic and semi-automatic. Operational sequence for a semi-automatic plant ! rubble brought in by collection trucks is weighed on the recycling plant’s weighbridge and sent to the reception area.12. Figure 99 . In the semi-automatic process iron is separated before grinding. able to receive and grind construction rubble without the prior separation of iron rods that therefore remain inside concrete blocks. After being ground the material passes through a magnetic separator to remove ferrous material. The automatic process employs a robust machine of great potency.
if the material is compatible with the machinery the vehicle unloads in the reception area. Manual segregation takes place there, separating out material of no use such as plastic, metal and small amounts of organic matter;
during manual segregation a mechanical loader is used to stir the material and facilitate the work of segregators;
the separated out material is categorized into what can be commercialized (scrap iron) and what is for disposal (the rest of the material), and is put in separate areas for storage and future disposal respectively;
material with larger dimensions than those of the feeding mouth is not accepted, nor concrete blocks with internal iron rods that can damage the mill by breaking the hammers. In some cases reception area workers can break the blocks and separate out the iron;
material in which significant amounts of plastic are incorporated must never be admitted as it can damage the machines;
rubble from small construction works often arrives in bags and is manually unpacked before the feeding and grinding operations;
once material that is of no use has been removed, the rubble is lightly dampened by a sprinkler system in order to minimize the dust generated during grinding. A mechanical loader then places it in the feeder, which regulates its entry into the grinder.
Figure 100 - Rubble recycling plant - feeder and grinder
from the feeder the material passes to the mill where it is ground. From the grinder the material moves along a small conveyor belt equipped with a magnetic separator to separate iron that was not seen during the manual segregation and was introduced into the impact mill;
12. Solid waste treatment
later the material passes to the vibratory sieve that segregates it according to predefined granulometry;
each type of material is transported to its respective storage area on a conventional constant speed conveyor belt.
Conveyor belts are mounted on wheels so that they can be moved sideways in a semicircle in the storage area. This facilitates direct transportation to the storage area in an interrupted operation that avoids the need to move piles of ground material with a mechanical loader.
Figure 101 - Rubble recycling plant - grinder and conveyor belt
The conveyor belt wheels should move on a concrete surface strong enough to support its weight. The sideways movement of the belt is a manual operation carried out by storage area workers each time that the pile of ground rubble reaches the maximum height allowed by the incline of the belt. In the storage area the ground material should always be kept damp to avoid scattering by the wind and dust generation. Vehicles that take ground rubble away are loaded with a mechanical loader similar to the one used in the reception area. Products made with recycled rubble include:
! ! ! ! !
pavement paving slabs; road sub-base and base; breeze blocks for cheaper housing walls and masonry; fine aggregate for surfacing; aggregate for storm drain inlet, kerb and gutter construction.
The costs presented here are based on the establishment and operation of a large automatic rubble recycling plant with a 100 ton/hour production capacity located 10km from the urban perimeter:
cost of the plant (construction work + machines): US$ 1,091,274.33 unit production cost: US$ 10.30/ton
The establishment and operational costs for a semiautomatic plant are as follows: A 120 ton/day capacity plant:
! ! !
investment costs: US$ 45,000.00 construction work: US$ 25,000.00 maintenance/operation: US$ 11.50/ton
A 240 ton/day capacity plant:
! ! !
investment costs: US$ 80,000.00 construction work: US$ 30,000.00 maintenance/operation: US$ 13.60/ton
Problems caused by the inappropriate disposal of tyres in wasteland, watercourses and streets, especially in peripheral urban areas, are a source of growing concern for public authorities due to their significant environmental impacts. Due to climatic conditions and other characteristics particular to Latin American and Caribbean countries, the problem is of equal concern from a public health perspective as inappropriately discarded tyres become a shelter and breeding ground for disease vectors due to the water that accumulates in them. In the United States, where the consumption of tyres is equivalent to one tyre per inhabitant per year (approximately 300 million tyres a year), the most common treatment is burning in thermoelectric plants. However due to difficulties involved in this process it is applied to no more than 5% of used tyres.
In both the 100 million dollar Modesto plant in California, which burns 4.5 million tyres a year generating 15 megawatts and providing energy to 14,000 houses, and the Sterling plant in Connecticut, which burns 10 million tyres a year generating 30 megawatts, operational costs are double those for coal burning plants.
12. Solid waste treatment
The disposal of used tyres in sanitary landfills is inappropriate as there are operational problems involved in burying them and they provoke empty spaces that cause points of instability in the mass of waste. Consequently alternatives have been sought to address this problem but up to now no definitive solution has been found. This problem came to the fore in Brazil in the mid 1990s when the annual tyre production had reached 35 million. At the end of that decade CONAMA introduced a requirement obliging tyre companies to take responsibility for the disposal of waste resulting from their production (used tyres) under the “polluter pays” principle. Burning in cement industry clinker furnaces was the immediate solution that producers turned to. However not all furnaces were adapted to burn tyres and there were some restrictive factors associated with the procedure because of a change in the quality of the cement produced and the emission of gases not in compliance with limits established by environmental bodies. In recent years the ongoing search for new technological processes has seen developments such as one in Brazil that uses organic solvents to separate rubber from the wire and nylon in tyres facilitating its recovery and recycling. However, many of these new developments are not economically viable. In spite of these efforts the problem continues and, as in other situations, it is the urban cleaning system that has to bear the significant expenditure involved in dealing with used tyres habitually discarded in unpopulated peripheral areas as it has an obligation to collect them for sanitary and environmental reasons.
In this context, an initiative that can serve as an example for other urban cleaning bodies in Latin American and Caribbean cities is the COMLURB “ecotyres” experience in Rio de Janeiro. Concerned with the growing number of used tyres discarded in the city, a study was carried out on the route taken by tyres from their moment of purchase in different neighbourhoods of the city to the moment when they are discarded, in general in peripheral zones. The study found this route to be: producers, dealers, recovery agents and tyre workshops. Tyres without any further possibility of use are discarded on wasteland, in drainage channels or are burned. This data led to the following measures: the registering of all locations, both formal and informal, where tyres are repaired; the implementation of the “ecotyres” system 5 in cooperation with the private tyre sector; and the development of an information program on the use of the “ecotyres” system covering dealers, tyre mechanics, bus companies and haulage companies.
A network of locations with the minimum infrastructure necessary for the reception and storage of unusable tyres that, when a predetermined number have accumulated, are then taken away by the private sector to be recycled.
The public authority should introduce specific regulations that consolidate the application of the “polluter pays” principle by establishing the responsibilities of producers and distributors for waste generated when their products are discarded.
12.3.3 Batteries and fluorescent tubes
The number of batteries present in domestic waste continues to increase as the use of electrical and electronic gadgets spreads in modern society and plays an increasing role in people’s daily lives. The incidence of this type of waste in the overall composition of domestic solid waste is clearly dependent on the socioeconomic condition of the population as here the relation between consumption and disposal is direct. In Latin American and Caribbean countries the problem has therefore yet to reach the concerning proportions that it has in the United States, Japan and European countries. However immediate action is necessary to establish control mechanisms for this type of waste as it should receive the same level of treatment as hazardous industrial waste. Fluorescent tubes fall into a similar category and due to their high level of toxicity, together with the difficulties involved in controlling environmental contamination from them, they should be dealt with in the same way as toxic waste.
In the cases of both batteries and fluorescent tubes specific legislation is required to consolidate the “polluter pays” principle. Under such legislation responsibility for the treatment and final disposal of these types of waste would be assigned to producers, with the participation of dealers and distributors in the reception of discarded material and of the general public in separation, appropriate storage and delivery.
Treatment of waste from special sources
12.4.1 Industrial solid waste
It is usual to treat industrial waste with a view to its reuse, or at least to leaving it inert. Due to its diversity however there is no pre-established universally applicable process so research and development for economically viable processes is always needed. This waste should not be the responsibility of the urban cleaning authorities but of the waste generators themselves, the industrial companies that produce it. Such an
185 . Recycling and recovery In general there is a trend towards transforming waste into base material for other processes. Solid waste treatment approach requires comprehensive legislation and effective supervision mechanisms to avoid irregular disposal of the waste. some states issue free periodical publications in which industrial companies anounce waste that they have for sale or donation. ! incorporation – the adding of waste to a mass of concrete or clay in a proportion that does not damage the environment. or the adding of it to combustible material where gases that are harmful to the environment will not be generated during burning. ! encapsulating – the lining of waste with a coat of impermeable synthetic resin with a very low leaching level. 12. drying by mixing – the mixing of waste that has a high humidity content with dry waste or inert material such as sawdust.12. However transformation processes require significant investment and offer unpredictable returns as the scope for corresponding charges on the price of the product is limited. without any participation by the urban cleaning sector.4. To encourage waste recycling and recovery. Atomic stabilization processes for radioactive material have been developed but still cannot be used on an industrial level. but this risk reduces as technological developments provide more secure and economical ways of using the material.2 Radioactive waste There are still no economically viable treatment processes for radioactive waste. Other treatment processes The most common treatment processes are: ! ! neutralization – for waste with acid or alkaline characteristics. As has already been explained this type of waste is the responsibility of a specialized national body that operates within international regulations and safety procedures. or waste that they want to purchase. ! thermal destruction – incineration and pyrolysis. thus generating savings in the industrial process.
3 Port and airport waste This type of waste is not usually treated in a special way except in the case of waste generated on boats or planes coming from regions where a particular disease is endemic.4. that is. ! process sufficient volumes in relation to the capital and operational costs of the system in order to be economically viable in terms of the local economy. Incineration. In general most waste generated on these sites has similar characteristics to domestic waste and can be collected and sent to the same final disposal units. microwave. or another equivalent treatment. is usually recommended for waste with a high potential risk.4 Medical waste There are many technical processes for the treatment of medical waste. collection. which has imposed economic restrictions on its use. 186 . 12.4.12. autoclave. New technical processes have led to the development of several treatments that are already available on the market. electro-thermal deactivation and chemical treatment. pyrolysis. treatment and final disposal of this waste. Until a short time ago the debate on medical waste treatments was between incineration and autoclave treatment as many countries do not allow its disposal in septic tanks at sanitary landfills. The available commercial processes that meet these fundamental requirements are: incineration. ! avoid the de-characterization of waste thus ensuring that it is recognizable as medical waste. ! comply with regulations established by the government’s environmental control body for effluents and gas emissions. In such cases it is important that the work of the urban cleaning team is integrated with that of the professionals responsible for sanitary vigilance so that appropriate sanitary and environmental procedures can be applied to the storage. Recent progress in environmental research led to the discovery of atmospheric contamination risks in the incineration process and resulted in a requirement for very expensive treatments of generated gases. ionizing radiation. Irrespective of its technical basis any waste treatment that is adopted should: ! reduce the biological content of waste in accordance with stipulated requirements. the elimination of bacillus stearothermophilus in the case of sterilization and of bacillus subtyllis in the case of disinfection.
In the case of waste composed exclusively of carbon. before being discharged into the atmosphere through a chimney. Normally the amount of oxygen used in incineration is 10% to 25% greater than is necessary in the common burning of waste. transforming it into gases. phosphorus or sulphur. hydrogen and oxygen atoms all that is required is an efficient system to filter particles expelled together with the combustion gases. releasing heat and generating ashes as residue. However installation and operational costs are generally high principally because of the need for filters and sophisticated technological devices to reduce or eliminate the contamination of the air with gases produced during the burning of waste. As the waste burning temperature is not high enough to melt and volatilize metals. 187 . There are different types of incineration furnace.12. Correctly carried out waste incineration is also an effective means of reducing the volume of waste and leaving it absolutely inert in a short time. gases not only need to remain for more time inside the chamber (approximately two seconds) but also require treatment by sophisticated systems before they can be discharged into the atmosphere. In the first chamber solid and liquid waste is burned with a high level of oxygen at a temperature of 800ºC to 1.400°C.000ºC.200ºC to 1. they become mixed with the ashes from where it is possible to separate and recover them for commercialization. the most common being fixed grate. ashes and scoria. Gases resulting from the secondary combustion are rapidly cooled to avoid the recomposition of their extensive toxic organic chains and are then treated in washers. In the case of toxic waste that contains chlorine. cyclones or electrostatic precipitators. In the second chamber gases produced by the initial combustion are burned at a temperature of 1. Basically an incinerator consists of two combustion chambers. Solid waste treatment INCINERATION Incineration is a burning process in the presence of a high level of oxygen. moving grate and rotary kiln. through which carbon based materials are decomposed.
188 . Ashes and scoria resulting from the burning process fall through the holes of the grate into an ash pit. the first one is for drying and the waste is completely burned in the second and third sections. Hot ashes and scoria from the burning are continuously deposited in a pit located under the furnace from where they are removed mechanically or by water. Chimney Overhead crane Feeding Collection truck Air blower Fixed grate Reception pit Contamination control equipment Combustion chamber Ash outlet Ash outlet Air extractors Figure 102 . Air for combustion in the furnace is provided by two blowers. from where they are removed mechanically or by water. the air flow is augmented by an extractor located at the base of the chimney. one that blows air amongst the waste (air below fire) and the other that introduces air above the waste (air above fire). The combustion grate is divided into three sections. To ensure the level of oxygen necessary for the complete combustion of waste and gases.Fixed grate incinerators In this process waste is deposited on a fixed grate where it is burned.Fixed grate incinerator Moving grate incinerators The grate consists of stepped cast iron sheets connected to a hydraulic system for moving it in a swaying motion that conducts the waste from the access door through to the ash and scoria pit. Air is introduced from above the grate to minimize the trailing of ashes.
The entrance is at the higher end.Moving grate incinerator Rotary kiln Rotary kilns are useful for the thermal destruction of infectious waste but are more used for burning hazardous industrial waste. so that the waste moves slowly downwards due to the rotation of the cylinder. the opposite end to the burners. Gases resulting from this burning flow into heat interchangers and washing equipment. Solid waste treatment Chimney Overhead crane to transport waste Overhead crane to transport ashes Heater Condenser Gas cooler Filter sleeve Gas re-heater Reagent catalytic reactor Steam control valve Use of heat generated by waste Steam turbine Condensation tank Swaying grate Ventilation blower Overhead crane for bulky waste Bulky waste pit Waste pit Furnace Conveyor belt for ashes Fly ash treatment Ash pit Gas washer Ventilation blower Bulky non-combustible waste Magnetic separator Aluminium separator Ferrous material press Rotary sieve Bulky combustible waste Ground combustible material Aluminium press Aluminium storage Slow speed blade grinder Hammer grinder Ferrous material storage Figure 103 . Gases generated pass to a secondary burning chamber that accommodates burners for liquids and gases. Chimney Heat interchanger Washer water oxidation Feeder system Liquid waste burner Rotary kiln Electrostatic filters Gas washer Collection truck Reception pit Post-burning chamber with chimney Air extractor Figure 104 .Rotary kiln 189 . mounted with a slight incline in relation to the horizontal plane.12. They are cylindrical incinerators with a diameter of approximately four metres and a length of up to four times the diameter.
Its main advantages are: ! ! effective treatment is guaranteed given optimum operational conditions. Secondary air Cyclone Ash extractor Boiler Air extractor Figure 105 . carbon based materials de-compose into combustible gases or liquids and carbon. Its main disadvantages are: ! high operational and maintenance costs. pyrolysis is a thermal destruction process with the difference that it absorbs heat and takes place in the absence of oxygen.Pyrolytic furnace The feeder system can be automatic (continuous) or semi-automatic (by lots) and the auxiliary burners can burn diesel or gas. substantial reduction in the volume of waste to be disposed of (almost 95%). Primary air Temperature Gradient Drying Decomposition Gasification .PYROLYSIS Like incineration. Pyrolytic furnaces are very much used in the treatment of medical waste.200ºC in the secondary chamber. where the calorific value of the waste maintains a certain temperature during the process. In this process. 190 .000ºC and 1.000ºC and dual chamber models with temperatures of between 600ºC and 800ºC in the primary chamber and between 1. There are single chamber models where the operating temperature is approximately 1.
Basically it consists of a feeder system that conveys the waste into a hermetic chamber where a vacuum is created and steam is then injected (from 105ºC to 150ºC) under certain pressure conditions.Medical waste incineration plant with a capacity of 250kg/hour AUTOCLAVE Originally used for the sterilization of surgical equipment.12. Solid waste treatment ! maintenance difficulties requiring constant cleaning work in the auxiliary fuel feeder system. unless natural gas is used. Figure 106 . 191 . ! ! risk of air contamination due to the emission of particulate matter. this process was adapted and developed for waste sterilization. ! high risk of air contamination from dioxins generated by the inappropriate burning of chloro materials present in PVC bags and disinfectants. It should be noted that neither incineration nor pyrolysis completely solve the medical waste final disposal problem as both the ashes that are produced and the sludge resulting from the treatment of gases require an appropriate final disposal. high cost of effluent treatment.
relatively easy and cheap maintenance. does not emit gases and effluent is sterile. waste is processed in lots. Disadvantages: ! there is no guarantee that the steam will reach all parts of the mass of waste unless it has been appropriately ground before the sterilization phase. 192 .The waste remains in the chamber for a certain period until it is sterile. into a microwave furnace where there is a device to stir and transport the mass so that all of the material uniformly receives the microwave radiation.Autoclave Advantages: ! ! ! relatively low operational costs. MICROWAVE In this process waste is ground. ! ! does not reduce the volume of waste unless it is previously ground. Figure 107 . continuous treatment is not possible. dampened with steam at 150ºC and is fed. after which water is discharged from one side and the waste from the other. as a continuous process.
12. Disadvantages: ! ! relatively high operational costs. generated by a source of enriched cobalt 60. Solid waste treatment Advantages: ! ! absence of emissions or any type of effluent. Its advantages are the absence of any type of effluent emission and the fact that it is a continuous process. This process has the following disadvantages in comparison with previously mentioned processes: ! treatment effectiveness is questionable as a possibility exists that part of the mass of waste is not exposed to the electromagnetic rays. ! the used cobalt 60 source (radioactive) requires appropriate disposal.Microwave IONIZING RADIATION In this process. which render micro organisms inactive. waste in its natural form is exposed to the action of gamma rays. Figure 108 . continuous process. 193 . the volume of waste to be buried is not reduced unless it is ground.
with the addition of equipment maintenance difficulties. The advantages and disadvantages of this process are the same as those for the microwave process. reaching a final temperature of 95ºC to 98ºC. In this process there is no effluent or gas emission. chlorine dioxide or formaldehyde gas. CHEMICAL TREATMENT In this process waste is ground and then submerged in a disinfectant solution that can be sodium hypochlorite.Ionizing radiation ELECTRO-THERMAL DEACTIVATION This process consists of double grinding prior to treatment. followed by the exposure of the ground mass to a high potency electrical field.Deodorizer HEPA Filter Pre-filter Automatic doors Dust collector Deodorizer HEPA Filter Pre-filter Hydraulic press Weighbridge Reception pit Primary grinder primary cyclones Liquids Secondary grinder secondary cyclones Waste reception Processing unit Grinding and homogenization To the landfill Container Press Control panel Transport Class C waste Treatment Figure 109 . 194 . generated by low frequency electromagnetic waves. and there is no volume reduction unless a post-treatment grinding system is installed. The mass of waste remains in the solution for some minutes and the treatment is by direct contact.
waste passes through a drying system generating an environmentally harmful effluent that has to be neutralized. Bags of medical waste Particle filtering Gas washing Pulverizer Nº 2 (disinfectant) Air extractor HEPA filter Rotary discharge screw conveyor Vapour Feeder Vertical screw conveyor Discharge tube Grinder Nº 1 co nv ey or Mixer ½ to 2 inch grater Grinder Nº 2 sc re w Pulverizer Nº 1 (disinfectant) In cli ne d ½ to 2 inch grater (dry) Horizontal screw conveyor Figure 110 . The disadvantages are the need for effluent neutralization and the absence of volume reduction unless the waste is ground. The advantages of this process are its low operational and maintenance costs and the effectiveness of the waste treatment.12.Chemical disinfection Im m er sio n Sodium hypochlorite solution 195 . Solid waste treatment Before being deposited in the outlet container. which would have to be a separate process.
13 Solid waste final disposal 196 .
Consequently. while if the final disposal of waste is carried out in an inappropriate way. in controlled landfills. the water table and neighbouring land.13. These people make their living from the separation of recyclable material and often live in huts and shacks on the site of the dump. it is common to find refuse dumps where collected waste is deposited directly on the ground without any supervision or environmental care. it is essential that the political will exists to allocate the necessary budgetary resources for the implementation and correct operation of the approved project. specific sanitary engineering and environmental planning and a relatively high initial investment before it is established. Solid waste final disposal 13. It is therefore necessary to defeat this stigma through thorough studies and project planning. particularly the smaller ones. At the same time. there are serious social problems connected with the segregators that they attract. The latter issue deserves attention because if collection is inefficient public pressure is put on the municipality to improve service quality due to it being an exposed and visible activity. raising families and even forming communities. and with a broad awareness raising process in society that communicates the difference between sanitary landfills and dumps. the urban cleaning system will tend to leave final disposal in the background giving priority to waste collection and street cleaning. few people will be directly disturbed by this and so it will not generate complaints.1 Introduction Urban cleaning systems have to face the challenge not only of collecting solid waste from streets and buildings in ever-growing cities but also of ensuring an appropriate final destination for such waste. but also due to the natural resistance that arises in people when they know that they will be living close to a place where waste will accumulate. as many municipalities in Latin America and the Caribbean have a limited budget. The only appropriate form of solid waste final disposal is in sanitary landfills or. As a result in many municipalities. provided certain conditions that will be described later are fulfilled. contaminating soil. The initiation of a sanitary landfill presents difficulties not only because it involves environmental studies. In addition to the sanitary and environmental problems that refuse dumps present. This rejection stems from a perception that society has of solid waste disposal sites as being inadequately set up and badly managed. composting and incineration plants) are in reality waste treatment processes that need a landfill for the final disposal of the remaining waste. air. All the other processes that are regarded as disposal (recycling. 197 .
At the final disposal site the biological decomposition of the remains of food and other organic material contained in domestic waste generates an effluent with a high BOD (biochemical oxygen demand) that moves and incorporates other substances contained in the mass of waste. Landfills are a kind of melting pot for chemical and biological activity and reactions that produce effluents. ! lack of physical barriers (areas without fences) and a vegetation belt ! access for people and animals. principally composed of methane. lack of covering. or only partial covering. ! ! practice of burning waste ! safety risks for people. health risks and accidents. ! inappropriate disposal of medical waste mixed with domestic waste ! increased risk to people and of environmental contamination. ! proximity to environmentally protected areas (ecological reserves and equivalents) ! degradation of the area and environmental contamination risks. ! ! segregation activities carried out by women.13. Biogas is not only toxic but is one of the contributory factors to the greenhouse effect. In addition domestic solid waste anaerobic decomposition processes generate biogas. energy wastage. proximity to population centres. for example). ! pig raising and presence of other animals ! zoonosis and other public health risks. of waste ! vector proliferation. old people and children ! citizenship degradation. dispersion of odours and waste particles. exposure to unhealthy conditions. atmospheric contamination.2 Impacts of inappropriate solid waste disposal Problematic situations often encountered around the site of incorrect municipal solid waste disposal and their respective consequences are: ! proximity to bodies of water ! water contamination. odours. Measures to avoid the negative effects that result when waste is inappropriately disposed of on the ground should include the creation of an environment less favourable for 198 . As a result this leachate is highly contaminating due to its high BOD and chemical reactions between its components (heavy metals. the nature of which depends on the components of the waste. unsightliness and landscape contamination. men. The composition of this biogas includes gases with an unpleasant smell such as hydrogen sulfide and mercaptans. which is explosive in concentrations of 5% to 15% in the air. educational centres and kindergartens ! inhabitants subject to various nuisances and sanitary risks. hence the previous segregation of special waste is indispensable.
13. In a solid waste final disposal unit the soil is the principal receptor and conductor of contaminants. which has been incorporated in many technical norms and adopted by environmental bodies and entities. It states that: “The sanitary landfill is a technique for the final disposal of solid waste in the ground that causes no nuisance or danger to public health or safety. This technique uses engineering principles to confine the waste to as small areas as possible. Finally it is necessary that effluents and gases are dealt with in an appropriate way. which can be used provided that technical and environmental norms established by regulatory legal instruments are respected. of the Pan American Health Organization. 13. In addition. It is therefore necessary to isolate or minimize the contact between waste components that could react with each other. Cells are constructed next to each other. 199 . Where these favourable conditions do not exist naturally. in Spanish). each one supported by the previous one. engineering resources should be used to comply with the required technical specifications and applicable regulations.3 Sanitary landfill The objectives and principles of sanitary landfill construction and operation can be defined in different ways. the landfill can have two or more levels. In Latin American and Caribbean countries an acceptable alternative for smaller municipalities with limited economic resources is the controlled landfill. A solid waste final disposal project should therefore incorporate technical solutions that comply with the basic guidelines for avoiding the above mentioned environmental impacts. The cell is built against a retaining wall that can be a pre-existent natural elevation. neither does it harm the environment during its operations or after its closure. covering it daily with layers of earth and compacting it to reduce its volume. depending on project requirements.” A sanitary landfill unit of construction is called a cell. it anticipates the problems that could be caused by the liquids and gases produced by the decomposition of organic matter. Nevertheless it can also serve as protection against the contamination of underground water and the environment provided that it is sufficiently deep and impermeable. The recommended method for domestic waste final disposal is the sanitary landfill. in which each day’s solid waste (or the waste from a shorter period if the daily amount of waste is too great) is deposited in compacted sloping layers and is covered with a layer of earth that is also compacted. Solid waste final disposal undesirable chemical and biological reactions. In our opinion the most appropriate definition is the one established by the Sanitary Engineering and Environmental Sciences Pan-American Centre (CEPIS. forming a “landfill level”. a berm previously formed with compacted earth or other cells.
Figure 111 – Construction of the operational area . the width of the work face and its height. ! the height should be between 3 and 6 metres depending on the amount of waste to be dealt with (sanitary landfill capacity). Operational units ! ! domestic waste cells.Embankment ! waterproofing of the bottom (obligatory) and of the top (optional). A sanitary landfill consists of operational and support units.When determining the dimensions of a cell. ! the advance should be calculated according to the daily volume of waste. some basic criteria should be taken into account: ! the width of a cell’s work face should not be greater than is necessary for the safe manoeuvring of machines and vehicles. medical waste cells (where the municipality does not have a more effective final disposal process for this type of waste). Figure 112 – Waterproofing of the operational area 200 . ! dimensions are adjusted according to the stability and availability of the land.
Figure 115 – Rainwater drainage system 201 .13. Figure 114 – Biogas collection and burning ! rainwater drainage and channelling system. Figure 113 – Leachate collection and treatment ! biogas collection and burning (or use) system. Solid waste final disposal ! collection and treatment system for percolated liquid (leachate).
Figure 118 – Preparation of an internal service road 202 . topographical and geotechnical monitoring systems. Figure 116 – Storage area for materials Support units ! fence and vegetation barrier.! ! environmental. storage area for materials. Figure 117 – Vegetation barrier ! access and service roads.
Figure 119 – Weighbridge for weighing loads ! ! entrance checkpoint and administrative offices. Figure 120 – Support units The sanitary landfill pre-operational process consists of the selection of the site. 13.3. The intense urbanization and land use in cities limits the availability of sites that are both close to where waste is generated and large enough for the installation of a sanitary landfill that will meet the needs of the municipality. Many other factors have to be taken into account such as the technical requirements of the norms and guidelines issued by relevant public bodies. obtaining the necessary licenses. juridical aspects. mechanical and tyre workshops. formulating the project master plan and installation. 203 . Solid waste final disposal ! weighbridge for trucks and waste checkpoint.13.1 Sanitary landfill site selection The selection of the sanitary landfill site is a complex task.
access roads and political and social aspects involved in the approval of the project by politicians. However the operational usage as a percentage of the total area will depend on the particular conditions of each site (topography. determination of all selection criteria. in tons. slopes of 1:3 (vertical : horizontal) and an 80% operational occupation of the land. local and regional development centres. definition of the selection criteria order of priority. To make an approximate calculation of the minimum total area necessary for the installation of a sanitary landfill. Applying this strategy minimizes the corrective measures that have to be taken to adapt the land to technical requirements and thus reduces the need for initial investment. so that the site that most complies with the required conditions in terms of its natural land characteristics is selected. the media and the community. by the factor 560. a critical analysis of each potential site in relation to the prioritized criteria. Requirements for the appropriate establishment of a sanitary landfill are therefore very rigorous and it is necessary to carefully define an order of priorities. some experts multiply the quantity of waste collected daily. in square metres. The selection strategy for a new sanitary landfill site consists of the following steps: ! ! ! ! preliminary identification of land available in the municipality. This factor is based on the following landfill project parameters: Useful life = 20 years. the distance over which waste will have to be transported. the governing plan of the corresponding municipality. Economic and financial factors must be a major consideration as municipal resources always have to be used in a balanced way. landfill height = 20 m. for example).governmental requirements. 204 . PRELIMINARY IDENTIFICATION OF AVAILABLE SITES The preliminary identification of available sites in the municipality should be carried out as follows: ! preliminary calculation of the total area needed for the sanitary landfill. hydrology and geometric shape.
Technical and legal criteria The selection of a sanitary landfill site for domestic solid waste final disposal should fulfil the technical criteria imposed by technical norms and regulations stipulated by the different levels of authority in each country. study of documents relating to the sites. giving priority to land owned by the municipality. economic-financial. It should be noted however that specific aspects of legislation in any particular country may vary from the concepts and dimensions described here. lagoons and oceans and should be not less than 50 metres from any other body of water. All the conditions and restrictions commonly stipulated by technical norms and relevant regulations are listed in table 17. Table 17 Technical and legal criteria Criteria Observations The site should be outside the limits of any environmental Land use conservation areas and in a zone where designated land use is compatible with the operation of a sanitary landfill. ! survey of the available sites within the delimited perimeters. where there are no zoning or land use restrictions and sites have dimensions compatible with the preliminary calculation. Solid waste final disposal ! perimeter delimitation of rural and industrial zones and conservation areas existing in the municipality. lakes. SELECTION CRITERIA The criteria are divided into three groups: technical and legal. It is very important that the legal situation in relation to the ownership of a site is in order to avoid potential problems for the municipality and delays in the licensing process. ! ! determination of ownership of surveyed sites. which in such cases should be appropriately modified. 205 . Distance to bodies of water The site should be not less than 200 metres from major bodies of water such as rivers. and socio-political.13. excluding those where the documentation is not in order.
Table 17 (cont. 206 . Topography favourable to drainage The rainwater drainage basin should be small in order to avoid significant amounts of rainwater entering the landfill. The site should not be located in the proximity of airports or aerodromes and should comply with current legislation in this respect. in order to keep the cost of waste covering low. the distance between the water table and the waterproofing layer should not be less than 3 metres. It is recommendable that the soil of the selected site has Natural soil impermeability good natural impermeability in order to reduce the possibility of aquifer contamination. Water table depth ! in a smaller landfill the bottom of which is waterproofed by a layer of compacted clay with a permeability coefficient of less than 10-6cm/s. Availability of material for covering It is preferable that the site has. The length of a sanitary landfill’s useful life is very important as it is increasingly difficult to find new sites close to the collection area that are suitable for receiving the volume of urban waste generated in the municipality. The minimum distances recommended are the following: ! Distance to airports in a sanitary landfill with plastic membrane waterproofed bottom. or is close to. The soil of the selected site should be clayey. the distance between the water table and the membrane should not be less than 1.5 metres.) Criteria Distance to urban residential centres Observations The site should be not less than 300 metres from urban residential centres with 200 or more inhabitants. Roads leading to the site should not have pronounced Easy access for heavy vehicles inclines or curves and should be well surfaced in order to minimize wear and tear on collection vehicles and enable them to have easy access even at times of intense rain. deposits of material appropriate for covering. Minimum useful life It is recommended that the site is compatible with a useful life for the new sanitary landfill of at least 8 years. This is largely due to the natural rejection of residents to having this type of waste final disposal unit close to where they live.
If the land is not owned by the municipality. and communications facilities. Solid waste final disposal Economic and financial criteria Table 18 Economic and financial criteria Criteria Observations The distance that collection vehicles have to cover on existing Proximity to collection area roads and streets between the collection area and the sanitary landfill should be as short as possible in order to minimize wear and tear on trucks and waste transport costs. 207 . and therefore Land purchase costs has to be purchased. It is important that the selected site has access to service infrastructures in order to limit expenditure on water provision. it is preferable that it is located in a rural area where purchase prices are lower than in other areas where the landfill could be sited (industrial areas for example). Construction and infrastructure investment costs Drainage system maintenance costs Political and social criteria Table 19 Political and social criteria Criteria Observations The passage of vehicles transporting waste along residential Access to the site through low demographic density areas streets constitutes an inconvenience for the inhabitants of those streets and it is therefore recommended that truck routes to the sanitary landfill pass through areas of low demographic density and preferably on roads designed to handle heavy vehicles. electricity supply. The selected site should have a gentle incline to avoid soil erosion and limit expenditure on cleaning and maintaining drainage system components. rain water drainage. non-governmental organizations (NGOs) or the media in the area as any past disharmony with the public authorities is likely to cause negative reactions to the proposed landfill. It is recommended that a site is not chosen if there have been previous problems between the municipality and the Local community acceptance local community. collection and treatment of local effluents.13.
“partial compatibility. Table 20 Criteria hierarchy Criteria Compatibility with environmental legislation Compatibility with political and social conditions Compatibility with the main economic conditions Compatibility with the main technical conditions Compatibility with other economic conditions Compatibility with other technical conditions Priority 1 2 3 4 5 6 In order to determine which is the best site for the sanitary landfill. each candidate site should be the subject of an exhaustive analysis in regard to each of the established criteria. Both the priorities and the compatibility with the defined criteria are given a relative weight. or total with work” or “no compatibility”. as shown in table 21. For each criterion the analysis should allocate one of the following categories and provide reasons for doing so: “total compatibility”. Table 21 Weight given to criteria and compatibility Priority of criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 Weight 10 6 4 3 2 1 Compatibility Total Partial or total with work No compatibility Weight 100 % 50 % 0% 208 .SELECTION CRITERIA ORDER OF PRIORITY Table 20 shows a suggestion for the selection criteria order of priority in choosing a sanitary landfill site.
taking into account the relative priority of each one. As an example we present the case of a municipality that has to determine which is the best site amongst three pre-selected candidate sites. When the natural attributes of the selected site are not totally compatible with a certain criterion. Table 22 Site characteristics Criteria Distance from bodies of water Distance from residential centres Distance from airports Water table depth Access through low demographic density areas Acceptance by local community Land purchase costs Existence of infrastructure Minimum useful life Land use Natural impermeability of soil Favourable topography for drainage Easy access for heavy vehicles Coverage material availability Drainage system maintenance Proximity to collection centre Priority 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 6 Compatibility Site 1 T T T P P N P T P T P P T N P T Site 2 T T T P P P P T T T P P P P P P Site 3 T P T T P T T P T T P T P T T P Note: T = Total compatibility. P = Partial compatibility. its deficiencies should be remedied by the application of modern engineering solutions. N = No compatibility. The site with more points will be considered the best. 209 . the characteristics of which are shown in table 22. Solid waste final disposal SELECTION OF THE BEST SITE Analysis of candidate sites in relation to the established criteria The site chosen for the sanitary landfill should be the one that is compatible with the highest number of criteria.13.
0 6.0 3.5 56.0 3.0 5.0 Site 2 100% Site 2 10.0 Site 3 10.0 10.0 1.0 5.0 2 50% 50% 100% 1. in spite of being located relatively close to a residential centre.0 3.0 1 100% 50% 50% 1. is the one that overall has the most advantages.0 1. site 3.0 4.0 10.0 10 10 6 100% 50% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 50% 10.5 67.0 2.0 1.After the weighting process is applied.5 1.5 3.0 Distance from bodies of water Distance from residential centres Distance from airports Water table depth Access through low demographic density areas Acceptance by local community Land purchase costs Existence of infrastructure Minimum useful life Land use Natural impermeability of soil Favourable topography for drainage Easy access for heavy vehicles Coverage material availability Drainage system maintenance Proximity to collection centre Points total 10 100% 10 100% 100% 50% 10.5 3 50% 50% 100% 1.5 2.0 1.0 1.5 3.5 4.0 3.0 5.0 6 0% 50% 100% 0.0 1.0 3.0 10.0 2.0 0.0 3 100% 50% 50% 3.5 3 0% 50% 100% 0. 210 .5 1.5 As can be seen.0 4.5 0.0 4 4 3 3 3 50% 100% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 2. the candidate sites have the following points: Table 23 Points for each site Priority weight Compatibility weight Site 1 100% Criteria Points for each site Site 3 Site 1 10.5 60.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 3. in accordance with table 21.0 10.
Solid waste final disposal After choosing the sanitary landfill site the municipality should not immediately proceed with the purchase or compulsory purchase of the land as the project first needs approval from the relevant environmental body. biotic (flora and fauna) and anthropic (related to human activities) environment.). EIS is a technical study.3. It also establishes measures that can be taken to avoid or diminish identified negative impacts. As these studies are highly specialized. Thus society in general can form an opinion on the subject and participate democratically in the licensing process. with the objective of determining the positive and negative aspects of the project in regard to the physical (climate.2 Environmental licenses The procedures for obtaining the necessary licenses for a sanitary landfill site depend on formal processes and relevant legislation in each country. The process begins with the presentation of a formal request by the applicant (the municipality or private company. a second report has to be prepared that presents a summary of the principal finding of the EIS in a language that is accessible for the general public.13. 13. technical guidelines and conclusions are. the environmental control body prepares technical instructions (or terms of reference) in which the relevant aspects to be evaluated in an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) are defined. for example) to the relevant environmental body. in comparison with other alternative sites. Once the request is received. hydrology. as far as is possible. The preliminary plan for the sanitary landfill should be ready before this study is carried out. etc. This document should be accompanied by general information about the site and the conceptual basis of the sanitary landfill project. It is important to note that environmental studies should be carried out with the cooperation of technical teams from both the municipality and the environmental control body. with complex methodologies and technical terminology. 211 . through a licensing process that is based on deeper environmental studies. The basic actions to take and process stages are presented here: STAGE I Approval of the land for landfill use The objective of this stage of the environmental license application process is to evaluate the selected site to determine whether it is appropriate for use as a landfill. undertaken by specialized companies. compatible with the policies of these entities. so that the methodology. geology. pedology.
access and service roads. which will analyze them and issue a technical opinion. as should plans for layouts. are required. In the specific case of a new sanitary landfill it is always advisable to hold such public consultations. and on the basis of the environmental impact study. etc. the collection and treatment of leachate. support unit buildings and landscaping. superstructures. The compilation of field data must be completed in this stage. Detailed plans that deal with environmental issues should also be completed. vehicle and equipment maintenance. the environmental control body determines the conditions and restrictions that the applicant has to comply with in order to obtain an environmental license to commence sanitary landfill installation works. The master plan should also include a detailed operational plan covering the operation of the sanitary landfill. the environmental control body will grant the authorization document that licenses the selected site for the installation of a sanitary landfill. Finally detailed plans for foundations. Once completed. It should be noted however that this license does not authorize the immediate commencement of works. weighbridge operation (if there is one) and machine. where this is the policy of the environmental control body. After this opinion is presented the community can be called to participate in public hearings on the approval process. geotechnical and topographical monitoring. the studies should be immediately sent to the environmental control body. Once the environmental impact study is approved. electricity supply. water and sanitation. the collection and burning of biogas. STAGE II Authorization to commence sanitary landfill installation works In the initial stage of the licensing process. together with the pertinent palliative measures. these plans should be submitted to the environmental control body that will ascertain whether the requirements and conditions established when granting 212 .Once completed. rainwater drainage. EIS presentation at a public hearing should be accompanied by all available audio-visual aids as the participating public will mostly be lay people who will better be able to understand proposed solutions if they can see visual images of them. telephones. and after the necessary environmental impact compensatory measures are established. including detailed topographical surveys and new geotechnical probes and tests. The detailed engineering plan (master plan) should therefore take into account those requirements and incorporate the concepts contained in the environmental impact control and minimization plans recommended in the environmental assessment. as first several complementary procedures have to be carried out by the applicant. environmental monitoring.
the environmental body will issue the license that authorizes commencement of sanitary landfill installation works. and showing the location of accesses. Therefore. minimizing installation costs and ensuring appropriate environmental monitoring and safeguards. with contour lines representing each metre. etc. Fulfilling the relevant environmental requirements and installing systems and devices in accordance with the project plans are essential for obtaining the environmental license that will authorize the operation of the sanitary landfill. should be part of the daily routine of engineers.3. 13. Solid waste final disposal the stage I license have been met.13. the master plan begins to be put into practice. In this phase the applicant has to take into account that works should be carried out in a way that rigorously respects not only the engineering plan but also control plans and programs resulting from the environmental impact study that conditioned the approval of the project by the environmental control body. access road construction. The master plan should include the following documents: ! planialtimetric plan for the landfill in an appropriate scale. water quality analysis results for surrounding bodies of water and the water table. plateaus. constructions and other significant features. fully utilizing the natural characteristics of the land. which has to rigorously comply with technical norms and environmental legislation. ! geotechnical research and test results.3 Master plan The sanitary landfill master plan should maximize the useful life of the available area. Consequently. paying attention to the circulation of vehicles and machines during the work. In general it takes from 90 to 120 days to formulate a sanitary landfill master plan. is carried out. If they have. excavation. drainage. ! 213 . the regulation of the internal combustion engines and the dispersion of suspended particles in the work area. amongst other aspects. earth works. STAGE III Authorization for commencement of sanitary landfill operation Once the environmental license authorizing the commencement of works is obtained. in addition to covering the work itself. planning should include an efficient and responsible environmental management strategy. that is. overseers and all professionals involved.
including bottom and top waterproofing layers (where applicable). environmental monitoring plan. sewerage. ! delimitation plans of sanitary landfill plots. landscaping and structures related to water and electricity provision. the biogas collection and burning network and quantification of machine. vehicle and labour requirements for landfill operation and maintenance. sanitary landfill closure plan. ! superficial drainage plans for the landfill. ! layout plan for terraces. informing citizens about the nature of a sanitary landfill. the benefits of appropriate solid waste disposal and the compensatory measures applicable to residents of the area. it is essential that it is presented to the community using simple and direct language and the best audiovisual aids. ! plans for the collection and treatment of leachate. water drain pipes and discharge structures. the contamination control measures that will be taken. including water table monitoring wells. electricity and rainwater drainage systems. including the calculations for foundations and structures. architectural design. 214 . ! ! ! ! a record of the calculations made for landfill and construction stability studies. pumping network and treatment plant. showing cross-sections and details. Such an approach will help to avoid problems during the installation and operation of the sanitary landfill. construction structures. including layout. services and materials involved in the work. including leachate treatment plant operations and rainwater drainage network maintenance. landfill operational manual covering the routine activities of solid waste disposal. biogas collection and burning system plans. electricity and water installations. surfacing and drainage. construction plans. including post-closure environmental monitoring plan.! access and service roads plan. earth works. bottom drainage network. ! Once the master plan has been approved. ! ! external network plans for water. communications. drainage of the definitive berms. including the slope of the platforms both for the landfill’s intermediate stages and for the final stage. security and others. ! technical specifications of all equipment. embankments and the final configuration of the sanitary landfill and plans for each annual filling stage with cross sections. superficial and deep water drainage networks.
13. electricity. and scrapping off the vegetation layer on operational areas such as the landfill area that will receive domestic and public waste and the effluent treatment plant area. as well as with the requirements of technical norms. contain airborne particles and help to reduce the dissemination of characteristic waste odours. fire control and others).4 Landfill installation When the master plan has been approved and authorization for installation has been obtained. The objectives of this are to block the line of sight to the operational area. Works should always comply with technical specifications and all the other conditions set out in the master plan. environmental legislation and norms and directives issued by public service concessionaires (water. INITIAL LAND CLEARING WORKS This includes the removal of natural vegetation (clearing and stump removal) by cutting trees. 215 .3. In medium-sized and large landfills the sequence of construction is in general as follows: SITE FENCING Site fencing is necessary to discourage the entrance of non-authorized people and animals such as dogs. Solid waste final disposal 13. telephone. An approximately two metre high fence is recommended made of concrete or wood posts and galvanized wire with small spaces in the lower part so that small animals cannot enter. land clearing and constructing the foundations for a weighbridge (where applicable). cows or pigs. horses. bushes etc. wherever possible preserving landscape composition elements even if this does not appear in the plans. grass. work on the landfill can begin with fencing. government bodies that establish employment and work safety policies. A barrier of vegetation should be planted along the wire fence with a minimum width of 15 metres. environmental control bodies.
Earth works finish with the organization of the storage area for materials. They should have a uniform incline towards one side to direct rainwater to a drainage system that runs along the side of the road. sound sanitary and environmental conditions. Road maintenance should be a priority in planning for the entire projected operational life of the sanitary landfill in order to ensure the regular flow of collection vehicles to the landfill and. ACCESS AND SERVICE ROAD WORKS Sanitary landfill access roads are categorized as external or internal and permanent or temporary. As has been previously explained. Layers that need to be compacted should be dampened until “ideal humidity” is achieved. WATERPROOFING WORKS A 3m layer of clayey soil (k<10-7cm/s) between the bottom of the landfill and the top of the water table provides an excellent protection against the contamination of underground water. therefore. These roads have to be easily passable in all seasons of the year and must have appropriate surfacing and road signs so that they are safe for the heavy vehicles that will use them and for the local residents. 216 . As a naturally occurring formation of this type is quite rare. construction rubble or quarry products. compacted in layers of 15 to 25cm. special attention has to be paid to the surfacing of external access roads and their capacity to support heavy vehicles right from the stage when alternative sanitary landfill sites are being evaluated. which should ideally be located close to the landfill operational area. depending on the volume of traffic and therefore the landfill’s size. The recommended thickness for a landfill’s internal road surfaces is from 30 to 50cm. Internal access and service roads should be built with a primary surface of gravel or selected rubble. gravel. In smaller landfills internal roads can have different types of surface: brick dust.EARTH WORKS Earth works should rigorously respect the plans for them and excess material from cuts should be stored in an appropriate place to be used in the future as cover material for landfill cells. a technical solution that may be applied is the use of geo-membrane (plastic membrane) lining to waterproof the bottom of the sanitary landfill.
Landfill bottom drainage leading effluent and contaminated water to the treatment unit.” This principle requires the installation of three drainage systems for liquids: Peripheral interception drainage that stops rainwater entering the landfill and contaminated water exiting it. Whenever possible rainwater drainage should be through ditches lined with cement soil. The collection of percolated leachate should be done through pipes laid on the waterproofing layer at the bottom 217 . Once the waterproofing work is completed the network of leachate collection pipes should be laid. Solid waste final disposal The bottom of the domestic waste sanitary landfill should be waterproofed immediately after removing the superficial layer of soil from the operational area and this work consists basically of laying the high density polyethylene (HDPE) membrane on the compacted clayey soil. to avoid the use of buried pipes. such as smaller sanitary landfills or where soil conditions are relatively favourable and underground bodies of water are deep. The viability of this solution should be verified by specific technical studies carried out by the project management and its approval depends on compliance with the relevant environmental body’s regulations and norms. it is covered with a layer of earth to protect it against perforation and cutting by materials contained in the waste.13. In some cases. grass. The passing of the leachate collection pipes through the plastic membrane is done by means of a special union already incorporated in the membrane that is soldered to the body of the tube. the bottom of the landfill can be waterproofed with an at least 80cm thick layer of compacted clay with a permeability coefficient of less than 10-6cm/s. The soldering of the membrane sections should be done by a specialized team and it is recommended that the supplier provides this service. DRAINAGE WORKS “Water does not enter a landfill plot from outside or come out from inside of it without being controlled. Access roads (permanent or temporary) have their own drainage systems that also serve service roads. Once this geo-membrane is installed. Superficial drainage installed during the operational stage minimizes rainwater infiltration and consequently reduces the flushing of contaminants. etc. the quantity of effluent and the anaerobic reaction in the mass of buried waste.
with secondary pipes that conduct the collected leachate into the main pipe.of the landfill in a zigzag pattern. should be wrapped in geo-textile membrane to avoid silting. Geo-textile membranes can be used instead of the layers of sand. A more effective alternative is to install a Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) or HDPE perforated tube in the gravel bed. see figure 121. and then medium grain sand in order to avoid the silting of the pipes by solids suspended in substantial quantity in the leachate. Effluent treatment unit (ETU) Pumping unit PVC pipe See enlargement Secondary drainage pipe Collection pit 1. These pipes should be bedded on gravel or crushed stone (blind drainage) and covered by large grain.5m PLOT 1 30m PLOT 1 60m PLOT 2 PLOT 2 Secondary drainage pipe L Principal drainage pipe Pumping unit LANDFILL Bidim ® Principal drainage pipe Collection pit LANDFILL To ETU Percolated liquid minimum level Sumergible pump PVC pipe Clay protection layer PVC pipe HDPE membrane Figure 121 . This is used for the sanitary landfill’s principal percolated liquid drainage lines. This system is the most frequently used for a sanitary landfill’s secondary drainage lines.Leachate drainage system 218 . The whole. The liquid flows to a storage pit from where it is pumped to a treatment plant. formed by the pipe and the gravel.
but on the contrary requires. Figure 122 . thermal or a mixture of these (combined processes). The effluent treatment process can be biological. the decomposition of which tends to intensify with the addition of micro organisms contained in the effluent. 219 .13. Solid waste final disposal The following figure shows cross sections of these two types of underground pipe.Types of underground leachate drainage pipe INSTALLATION OF EFFLUENT TREATMENT SYSTEM The determination of the best leachate treatment system and its dimensions for a particular landfill requires a previous study of the characteristics of the actual effluent generated in the sanitary landfill. physico-chemical. storage pit and primary treatment plant. This circumstance does not prevent. physical. At the same time the mass of waste functions as a filter. A low cost process that can be used is the recirculation of the effluent through the mass of buried waste. Another advantage is the reduced volume of effluent to be treated due to evaporation by sun and wind. This stage of effluent treatment system works should therefore include at least the installation of a leachate recirculation system. the inclusion in the sanitary landfill project of an initial treatment facility (for at least primary treatment) and a final monitoring lagoon before discharge into the receptor body. reducing the contaminating potential of the re-circulated effluent.
for example modifications in the route of internal roads may be necessary where they are incompatible with the location of support units. because it holds all the information and technical specifications covering the overall context of the work. It is recommended that the planner is on site during construction work. Once installed the weighbridge should be officially calibrated in the presence of the supervision team. adapting them to some condition of the site that may have been overlooked during the formulation of the master plan. Before works commence it is very important to check the location of these buildings again as this is the last opportunity to modify plans. or at least it should be consulted. adjustments often have to be made due to difficulties that arise on site. It is obligatory that a weighbridge is mounted on pillars so that the weighing platform does not settle and therefore remains level.Figure 123 – Leachate treatment lagoon CONSTRUCTIONS WORKS Construction works include the foundations and superstructure of support buildings and the treatment plant. Any modification or adjustment of the plan should ideally be made by the planning company. As in all works of a certain size. 220 . ELECTRO-MECHANICAL INSTALLATIONS The assembly of the weighbridge should meticulously follow the manufacturer’s instructions and the weighing platform should be perfectly level.
Surface water should also be monitored at different points along any nearby body of water upstream and downstream from the sanitary landfill area of influence. Flow of underground water Landfill Operational area Watercourse Monitoring well Surface water sample collection points Figure 124 .Location of environmental monitoring wells Protecting structure Thread cap Cover Internal lining (Ø 4” rigid PVC pipe) Filling (impermeable material: clay. incorporating the elements shown in figures 124 and 125. Solid waste final disposal DIGGING OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING WELLS At least three monitoring wells should be dug.00 221 . excavated earth) Padlock Sanitary Protection slab protection Sanitary seal Ø Hole 8” Ø Pipe 4” Cement seal WT (Water Table) Perforated or grooved pipe Pre-filter (washed sand or quartz gravel) Fixed cap (pressure or thread) Impermeable layer Figure 125 .13. one upstream and two downstream from the sanitary landfill operational area.Outline cross-section of a monitoring well 5.
5 Sanitary landfill operation Once the installation work is finished and the operational authorization has been obtained. 222 .COMPLEMENTARY WORKS Finishing works on the landfill site. If there is no weighbridge. LANDFILL OPERATIONS When the construction method for a landfill is being determined. 13. the vehicle goes to the entry checkpoint where the responsible person writes down data identifying the truck and its load. Construction materials should be bought from traditional market suppliers that are if possible located close to the site. The vehicle then goes to the operational area to unload the waste it is carrying. The basic activities carried out at a sanitary landfill are listed below: WASTE RECEPTION CHECKING On entering the landfill site the collection vehicle goes directly to the weighbridge where it is weighed and all the information relating to its load is registered. The operational plan should be simple and cover all the routine activities carried out at a sanitary landfill while at the same time making provisions for their safety. three main factors have to be taken into account: ! ! ! topography. the sanitary landfill can begin receiving loads of waste in accordance with the pre-established operational plan. the acquisition of materials and machines can present difficulties. water table depth. Arrangements should be made so that machines and vehicles necessary for particular tasks arrive on the site in accordance with the work schedule.3. including landscaping and general cleaning work. soil type. Depending on the location of the landfill. including an estimate of its weight (or volume).
Figure 126 – Trench method Ramp method – this is appropriate where the landfill site is flat.13. the site conditions. A natural embankment against which cells can lean inspires the name of this construction method. 223 . Solid waste final disposal In general there are three possible methods of construction and the choice depends on the concept behind the particular sanitary landfill project and. Figure 127 – Ramp method Area method – this is the most appropriate technique for a completely flat site and begins with a berm (artificial embankment) of clayey soil against which the first cells of waste lean. in the last analysis. The construction methods are: Trench or ditch method – this is the most appropriate technique for land that is flat or has only a slight incline and where the water table is relatively deep. dry and with a type of soil suitable for use as waste covering material. Subsequently procedures are the same as for the ramp method.
! ! the final layer of covering material should be at least 50cm thick. on each of the levels (superimposed layers) are: ! prepare the work face. ! the ideal thickness of the coverage soil layer is between 20cm and 30cm for the daily covering of waste. and the internal slopes. The procedures to be followed for each cell in each of the operational plots of the sanitary landfill. including a truck manoeuvring area with primary surfacing that is big enough for trucks to unload their waste and make the necessary turning manoeuvres to return. with an incline of 2% towards the edges.BERM RUBBISH 1st Cell 2nd Cell Figure 128 – Area method Solid waste disposal processes are almost identical in the three methods. ! with a provisional 20cm thick layer of soil cover the top of the cell. ! cover the external slopes with the definitive 50cm thick layer of clay. ! the height of the cell should be between four and six metres to provide optimum decomposition conditions for the buried waste. the cell should be as narrow as possible but wide enough to allow the simultaneous unloading of a certain number of trucks depending on the sanitary landfill’s capacity (or the demands of collection) so that queues do not form and collection is not delayed. ! to obtain good compaction the waste should be distributed in not very thick layers and a bulldozer should pass over the mass of waste of each layer three to six times. ! the usual incline of operational slopes is one metre of base for each metre of height in an active cell and three metres of base for each metre of height in a finished cell. 224 . The basic rules of operation for a sanitary landfill are: ! the distribution and compaction of waste should be done if possible from the bottom to the top to achieve better results.
5 0. with an incline of 2% towards the edges.0 Maximum 8.0 28. ! when burying the cells of the last level.000. Solid waste final disposal ! some days before completing cell 1.140.0 225 .0 966. prepare the work face for unloading waste into cell 2 in the same way as for cell 1.0 0. the high contaminating potential of “new leachate” gradually reduces over a period of ten years to a point when it does not need treatment.7 3. repeat the operations for filling each cell and preparing the next one until plot 1 is entirely filled.0 0.900. ! fill cell 1 of the upper level following the same operational sequence used on the lower level. Table 24 Range of leachate composition variation Parameters pH (un.) Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Nitrate Nitrogen Nitrite Nitrogen Ammoniacal Nitrogen COD Range of variation Minimum 5. Consequently. ! ! as cell 1 is being filled the gas venting system should be progressively built into it. 3 and so on until the lower level is completed. Table 24 shows the range of parameter variation for some sanitary landfill percolated liquids in Brazil and is presented here as an example of the difficulties involved in a definitive pre-establishment of the type of effluent that will be produced in a particular sanitary landfill.13. ! repeat the sequence of operations until all plots on all levels are completely filled. These difficulties arise because the type of effluent produced depends on the particular characteristics of the waste (determined by its component substances) deposited in the landfill and on a series of specific factors that influence the decomposition process in the mass of organic waste.1 2. due to progressive exhaustion of the biodegradable organic matter. make the final coverage of the completed cells with a layer of 50cm thick compacted clay.0 5. EFFLUENT TREATMENT The main characteristic of sanitary landfill effluent is its changing composition over time. ! repeat the same operations to fill plots 2.9 15.0 6.
0 11.2 2.1 0. COMLURB (Rio de Janeiro. Stabilization lagoons One of the most frequently used forms of treatment involves lagoons into which leachate effluent is discharged after passing through a grate or a mechanical sieve and 226 .0 35.0 0. the annual rainfall and a factor determined by characteristics of the land. However distortions may occur.0 14.0 1.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.3 6.800.9 x 107 1. Note: all values are in mg/l. A way of calculating the potential flow of effluent from a new sanitary landfill is by direct correlation with percolate generation data obtained from measurements in similar but already operating landfills located in regions with similar climatic conditions. Another procedure is the “Swiss method” that calculates the flow of sanitary landfill percolated liquid by means of an equation involving the dimensions of the operational area.0 230. The volume of percolated liquid produced by a sanitary landfill registers seasonal variations depending on climatic conditions in the region and the local drainage system.7 0.2 0.000. the nature of the cell coverage material and in particular its permeability.) Parameters BOD5 Chlorides Sulfates Total Phosphorus Copper Lead Iron Manganese Zinc Cadmium Total Chromo Faecal Coliform (un. Brazil).1 0.0 Maximum 19.0 3.0 50.000. Another more complex procedure calculates the production of sanitary landfill percolated liquids through the water balance.0 26.) Range of variation Minimum 480. except where another unit is indicated. 1993. It is influenced by temperature. evapotranspiration.) Total Coliform (un.800. rainfall quantity. and many other factors.7 x 108 Source: Data compilation.9 4.2 3.Table 24 (cont.0 49. the vegetation cover on the sanitary landfill area.3 1.
Percolate drainage Equalization tank Sanitary landfill Grates First aerobic lagoon Overflow outlet Second aerobic lagoon Finishing lagoon Receptor body Figure 129 . sludge should be periodically removed so that the effectiveness of the treatment is not impaired. 227 . Lagoon borders should be treated so that no vegetation grows in the air-effluent intermediate zone. retention time – 25 days minimum. Entry to the lagoons should be through a two pipe system to improve the flow of effluent in the lagoon avoiding dead zones and short cuts. In addition. This lagoon is also aerobic and has the same physical characteristics as the previous ones but only retains the effluent for seven days. In general aerobic stabilization lagoons have the following basic characteristics: ! ! ! form – truncated pyramidal.13. depth – 1. Solid waste final disposal remaining for at least 24 hours in an equalization tank to homogenize its composition as much as possible. The following figure presents an outline of a typical leachate treatment system employing aerobic lagoons.Treatment in aerobic lagoons It is recommended that a superficial aeration device is installed in the equalization tank to improve the homogenization of the liquid mass and the aerobic condition of the effluent to be treated. The height of the effluent overflow outlet should be adjustable to ensure that leachate remains inside the lagoons for the minimum required time irrespective of the flow volume.5 metres. This series of lagoons ends with a smaller one where the effluent receives a finishing treatment. as such vegetation could harbour mosquitoes and other vectors.
Evaporation is an important factor in leachate recirculation and it functions better in regions with a negative water balance. while the liquid can be directly discharged into the receptor body. Effluent flow measurement should be carried out at a minimum of two points on the treatment system: ! ! immediately after the storage pit or immediately before the equalization tank immediately before the point of discharge into the receptor body Gross effluent and treated effluent should be periodically monitored. In this process the effluent gradually looses its toxicity (basically its organic content) due to airing and the biological action of micro organisms present in the mass of waste. In determining the type of treatment to use the more correct procedure is a laboratory study of the effluent’s characteristics.This removed sludge should be put to dry in a drying bed and then deposited in the sanitary landfill. Ideally the pit should be designed to hold one complete day’s production of leachate during the rainy season. Recirculation Another commonly used treatment of sanitary landfill percolated effluent is its recirculation through the mass of waste using sprinklers. regions where the rate of evaporation is higher than that of rainfall. gross effluent will inevitably drain into some body of water producing environmental damage. If the electricity supply or the recirculation pump fail. The disadvantages of this process stem from its high electricity consumption together with its dependence on a constant supply of electricity and the functioning of the pump. tank trucks or infiltration beds. Another important aspect to consider is that the leachate storage pit should have enough capacity to store a sufficient amount of liquid for the recirculation pump not to have to be used at very short intervals. In addition part of the re-circulated effluent evaporates and to encourage this sprinkler nozzles should be adjusted to produce a fine spray. thus increasing the rate of evaporation. thus making it possible for recirculation to take place only once a day and preferably during the eight hour period that the operator is present at the sanitary landfill. It is not advisable to use only documented data to calculate the necessary dimensions of a treatment unit. It can also be used in other regions during dry seasons as an auxiliary procedure complementary to the principal method being used. that is. 228 .
such as stabilization lagoons or an activated sludge system. from where it is discharged into the receptor body. A part of that sludge then returns to the aeration tank while the settled sludge is put together with the sludge from the primary settling tank and goes to a drying bed. usually on the surface. From the secondary settling tank the liquid part goes to a finishing lagoon similar to the one at the end of the aerobic lagoons process.Infiltration bed recirculation Activated sludge Other processes that can be used in the treatment of sanitary landfill percolated liquids are the activated sludge system and evaporation. which generates a secondary sludge that remains in suspension. In the activated sludge system effluent passes through a preliminary treatment generally in the form of a chamber with bars after which it is directed to a primary settling tank where solids settle.13. Solid waste final disposal Ideally recirculation should serve as a complementary procedure to one of the conventional effluent treatment processes. inject air into the liquid mass allowing the aerobic bacteria to stabilize the organic matter. The effluent from the aeration tank passes to a secondary settling tank where the previously generated sludge precipitates. It then goes to an aeration tank where aerators. Suction pit overflow Drainage valley Submergible pump Ditch for percolated liquid Pumping pipe PVC Ø 02” Service roads Recirculation area Perforated PVC pipes Ø ½” Landfill Suction pit Landfill Ditch for percolated liquid Nº 2 gravel beds Figure 130 . 229 . The dried sludge is taken back to the landfill for disposal. The following figure shows a recirculation system using infiltration beds.
now more dense with 30% of it being solid material. Treated air outlet Burner Biogas inlet T= 80ºC to 90ºC Percolated liquid inlet Thermal lining Humidity filter Temperature of departing air 750ºC to 900ºC Chimney Evaporator Concentrated sludge Sludge outlet Average concentration 30% solid Sludge pump Biogas inlet Combustion air Supporting base Figure 132 . where it is heated to a temperature of 80ºC to 90ºC causing part of the liquid to evaporate and consequently the effluent to become more concentrated.Activated sludge Evaporation In the evaporation process effluent is sent to a metal tank.Leachate evaporator 230 .Primary settling tank Aerators Preliminary treatment Aeration tank Secondary settling tank Finishing lagoon Flow measurement Receptor body Figure 131 . The hot vapour leaving the evaporator passes through a filter that retains humidity and then goes to a final heating chamber from where it is discharged. into the atmosphere. dry. the evaporator. The great advantage of this process is its low operational cost as the fuel used to evaporate the effluent is biogas from the sanitary landfill itself. The sludge. comes out through the lower part of the evaporator and is disposed of in the landfill.
the decomposition process that gradually takes place in the mass provokes frequent settlings of the surface. at its edges. The gas venting system should be constantly monitored so that burners are always alight. comprising mostly organic matter. particularly underground conduits. GAS VENTING The gas venting system comprises vertical wells surrounded by gravel or gross ground stone. and on the slopes.13. A burner should be installed in the mouth of the well. As the sanitary landfill is constructed with solid waste. Figure 133 . located at a distance of 50m to 60m from each other. treated effluent should meet all discharge standards established by the environmental control body. It is important to constantly make adjustments to the system accommodating to these movements in the mass of the landfill. the ground around it should be covered over a radius of approximately two metres with a 50cm thick layer of clay to avoid the dispersion of gas into the atmosphere. In both cases the pipe should be high enough to serve as a guide for its further extension when work begins on the next level up. in order to promptly correct potentially damaging effects on the rainwater drainage devices. Once the well is installed. RAINWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM The rainwater drainage system should be kept clean and free of obstructions. Solid waste final disposal Whatever treatment option is selected.Installation of gas drainage wells 231 . There are two methods for installing a gas drainage system: extending the pipe as the landfill evolves (recommended) or excavating the completed cell to install the pipe.
! GEOTECHNICAL AND TOPOGRAPHICAL MONITORING At all times during the filling of sanitary landfill cells attention must be paid to topographical alignment. and the frequency of readings should be increased when significant settling is observed. dump truck .3. These frameworks should be read monthly. The quality of these samples is evaluated so that they can be compared with future samples. compacting and covering of waste. The frequency of sampling and the parameters that are analyzed must comply with regulations established by the environmental control body. 13. total and fixed sedimentary residues and colimetry tests. analyzing results for the same parameters in each case. including tests for pH. Careful attention should also be paid to topographical aspects in determining the incline of percolated liquid drains to ensure optimum drainage conditions after collection. The reading of these frameworks will also be useful to monitor the geotechnical stability of the sanitary landfill through the measurement of horizontal displacement. The second phase of environmental monitoring commences when effluent generated by the sanitary landfill begins to be stored for treatment and gases begin to be produced. up to and including the creation of the final covering surface incline. chemical and bacteriological analyzes of gross and treated effluent in the treatment system. BOD. concrete frameworks should be installed in the work faces for the purpose of monitoring the differential settling of the buried layers.physical.for transporting coverage material and material for surfacing internal access roads.analysis of water from the monitoring wells and from water body sampling sites both upstream and downstream from the sanitary landfill. In addition to these considerations. Every three months . Example of an environmental monitoring program: ! Monthly . COD.6 Equipment Commonly used machines and vehicles for the operation of a sanitary landfill are: ! ! bulldozer . 232 .for the distribution.ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING The monitoring of water in the area surrounding the sanitary landfill should begin before the commencement of its operational phase with the collection and analysis of samples from nearby bodies of water and the water table.
233 . a rigorous system controlling its use should be established not only in relation to the number of hours that machines are operating for. The sanitary landfill’s operational method is the principal factor that determines the selection and dimensions of machinery needed for landfill operations.4 Controlled landfills With everything that has been previously explained about sanitary landfills. As this equipment represents the most significant operational expenditure for a sanitary landfill. the extensive range of technical components involved in them can be appreciated as can the amount of resources that it is necessary to allocate. Nevertheless. plastics. In Latin American and Caribbean countries the limited availability of public resources and the great demands made upon them create a situation in which it is very difficult to establish sanitary landfills. In addition.for digging and maintaining drainage ditches. The most appropriate definition of a controlled landfill is: “A controlled landfill is a modified version of a sanitary landfill where the rigorous technical requirements applicable to the latter are more flexible in order to facilitate urban solid waste final disposal on the ground.) to avoid it being scattered. Such definitions tend to focus on specific aspects of particular projects rather than providing a wider conceptual description. to such a degree that only a few municipalities can install them. but also in regard to their correct operation during daily tasks in order to optimize their use and minimize unproductive procedures. etc. a type of landfill that is often misunderstood or badly defined even by the technical community itself. 13. tank truck – to supply water for reducing dust on internal roads and dampening lighter waste (papers. with the waste duly isolated and covered. Factors that have to be taken into account when selecting machinery are: the availability of financial resources. from the planning and installation phase to the final disposal of urban solid waste.13. even when the necessary financial resources are available for installation there can be difficulties in obtaining sufficient resources and qualified labour to operate a sanitary landfill in a way that meets its rigorous technical requirements.to load trucks. In this context the alternative “controlled landfill” option arises. specialized labour for maintenance and spare parts for immediate delivery. mechanical digger . and the wear and tear on their components. Solid waste final disposal ! ! ! mechanical loader . not only for installation but also for their ongoing operation in compliance with all the technical requirements and applicable regulations. in spite of all these obstacles it is necessary to deal with the problem of solid waste disposal as it has such serious consequences for sanitary and environmental conditions in cities.
a bulldozer exclusively and permanently allocated to final waste disposal. and in doing so demonstrates the principle “the ideal can be the enemy of the good”. self-propelled waste compactors).0m Water table 234 . Of these systems it is the absence of effluent treatment that causes such municipalities most problems. the principal characteristics of which should be: soil that is not very permeable (clayey) and a deep water table (at least 3 metres below the level of the natural land). operate and maintain some of the systems required by the norms that regulate sanitary landfills. the natural characteristics of which minimize the risk of negative environmental impacts.Cross section of a controlled landfill h>3.complying with minimum sanitary control requirements through the selection of a site. Upper waterproofing Controlled landfill Lower waterproofing Maximum water level Flow of underground water Impermeable soil Figure 134 . as the more effective that system is the less effluent will be produced in the landfill. Consequently special care should be taken with the rainwater drainage system of controlled landfills. It is common for controlled landfills to be used in small cities that collect up to 50 tons of solid waste per day and where municipalities are not in an economic condition to maintain. The cells of a controlled landfill are also built with compacted layers of waste but without necessarily using specialized machines (bulldozers.” The key to a successful controlled landfill project is therefore the choice of the land where it will be installed. A controlled landfill offers municipalities with limited investment and budgetary capacity a relatively immediate opportunity to operate a low cost urban solid waste disposal system that eliminates the environmental and social aggression of refuse dumps. Where the soil type is not appropriate the controlled landfill project should make provision for the installation of an at least 50cm thick waterproofing layer of clayey soil brought from the nearest deposit. though it must be routinely covered with earth. or to implement. There is no exact definition of a “controlled landfill”. In this respect it is also important that the waste coverage layers are of clayey earth and particular attention should be paid to the top covering when the landfill reaches its maximum height. that is. as they vary from very simple installations to ones that are similar to sanitary landfills. waste can be manoeuvred using lighter equipment or manual tools. for example.
Figure 135 . This is not a realistic possibility for most small-sized municipalities in Latin America and the Caribbean with their budgetary limitations and the significant under use of equipment that this would imply due to the relatively small amount of waste to be disposed of. pitchforks and forks. The covering of waste should be done at the end of each working day. Waste compacting can be done with mallets. A mechanical digger for example could excavate trenches for future waste cells where the land type permits the employment of this method of solid waste landfill construction. mallets.Manual compaction of waste in a cell 235 . The waste can be manoeuvred and the top surface and lateral sloped (1:1) surfaces can be levelled using hoes. An entirely manual operation is recommendable only for a daily waste volume of up to 40m³ or approximately 10 tons. Solid waste final disposal One of the requirements for a sanitary landfill is the permanent presence of specialized machines for the manoeuvring. Manoeuvring and coverage work is done manually as described below. as well as the drain on equipment resources needed for other municipal services. When it is not possible to guarantee even the infrequent programmed availability of machines to do the heavier work involved in landfill routines (such as excavating earth). the selection of the site becomes fundamentally important for an effective functioning of the controlled landfill.in the preparation of the weekly work face. In such a case resultant material would be stored in a nearby place for later use in the covering operation. The ideal in such a case is a small dry natural hollow. In this case additional compaction can be achieved by collection vehicles being driven over filled areas as the cell advances. For such municipalities a controlled landfill allows for alternative solutions such as the periodic and programmed use of machines from other municipal sectors .for example those used for road maintenance . rakes. compaction and covering of waste. A practical alternative for small-sized municipalities is to use easily obtainable manual tools for landfill operations.13.
clothing.Where a landfill is manually operated it is indispensable that workers engaged in the manoeuvring and covering of waste have. An analysis of these alternatives is fundamental to appropriate planning for future solid waste final disposal. 13. the recuperation of the degraded refuse dump area and the installation of a new final disposal system on another site. In this way the municipality can avoid generating negative impacts on a virgin site before exhausting the waste disposal capacity (useful life) of the area previously used as a refuse dump. On rainy days they should wear plastic waterproofs. In practice however this procedure is not usually economically viable and in most cases it is anyway impossible to implement due to the physical characteristics of the dump site. shoes and gloves that guarantee their protection and safety. It is always recommended. environmental. Another aspect to consider is the availability of resources. a refuse dump is an inappropriate form of urban solid waste disposal as it produces a series of negative environmental impacts and poses sanitary risks for the population. especially in cities with restricted financial resources. subsequently recuperating the excavated area by filling it with natural soil from the region. Areas degraded by refuse dumps should therefore be recuperated by containing such impacts and re-establishing healthy conditions there. 236 . Therefore whenever possible the refuse dump site or neighbouring land should be used to install a new final disposal system. in addition to the appropriate tools. that is. technical-operational and economic results. It should be noted that the strategic context of a refuse dump environmental recuperation exercise can be: ! ! that the area will be recuperated after it is closed for the dumping of waste. that investment in the environmental recuperation of a dump is combined with the creation of disposal service and environmental protection infrastructure in the same place.5 Environmental recuperation of refuse dumps As has been explained. Often a municipality does not have access to sufficient finance for carrying out two works. so it will naturally opt for undertaking the latter and leave aside remedying the environmental liability incurred by the refuse dump. thus allowing for the continued disposal of waste there but in sanitary conditions. Theoretically the correct way to recuperate land degraded by a refuse dump is to collect all the waste inappropriately disposed of there and transfer it to a sanitary landfill. or that the area will be recuperated in such a way that it will be able to continue receiving waste but on a sound sanitary and environmental basis. in order to optimize the use of resources and maximize sanitary.
and the quality of underground water should be checked through the monitoring wells. f) give the top surface an incline as indicated in the section on drainage. previous urban cleaning personnel should be consulted to determine as precisely as possible the extent of the area affected by waste and the principal physical characteristics of the natural land. and site recuperation is undertaken. l) spread a layer of top soil over the layer of clay on the top surface and slopes. as should the surface water in nearby bodies of water. h) recuperate the excavated area by filling it with natural soil from the region. Leachate that accumulates in the storage pits should be periodically recirculated in the mass of waste. j) dig one or more storage pits for effluent collected by the leachate drainage devices. c) carry out probes to measure the thickness of the layer of waste throughout the degraded area. the basic procedures are: a) if there is no reliable cadastral data. m) sow grass and native plant species with short roots. e) form lateral slopes with an appropriate incline. g) after they have been levelled. Solid waste final disposal When a refuse dump is permanently closed. in general 1:3 (V:H). thus ending any type of waste disposal there.13. The recuperation of a refuse dump does not finish with the implementation of these procedures. including the lateral slopes. k) construct vertical wells for gas venting. b) delimit the affected area in situ. through sprinklers (similar to those used for grass watering) or infiltration beds. d) remove the waste from the parts of the site where the layer of waste is thinner (in general less than one metre) and deposit it on the part of the refuse dump where the layer of waste is thickest. cover the exposed waste surfaces with an at least 50cm thick layer of good quality clay. n) use three of the previously made probe holes to install water table monitoring wells: one on the upstream side of the area of the recuperated dump and two on the downstream side. gas vents should be periodically checked so that those extinguished by wind or rain can be relit. i) install rainwater and leachate drainage devices appropriate for the particular project. 237 .
! install a leachate recirculation system and (depending on the climatic conditions of the zone) an effluent treatment system with stabilization lagoons. together with collection trucks and scrap dealers. but as a landfill. Refuse dump recuperation projects are therefore not limited to engineering issues but also have to solve a complex social problem that cannot and should not be the sole responsibility of the body providing urban cleaning services. one upstream and two downstream from the future operational area. ! ! ! excavate one or more storage pits for effluent generated in new cells.6 The situation of segregators In the present situation of Latin American and Caribbean countries there are not enough employment opportunities in the formal work market to allow universal entrance into it by a growing population. ! dig water table monitoring wells. Even more serious is the presence of children at dumps. whenever possible a recuperated dump site should continue to be used. in addition to creating a serious risk of accidents involving the working machines and vehicles.As has been previously explained. which together with low work training levels leads people to seek any activity that at least provides a means of survival for themselves and their families. but rather requires articulated action involving various governmental sectors. due to the difficulty of finding new sites appropriate for sanitary landfills. Segregators tend to circulate freely in the operational area of a refuse dump. In this case. it has become an “alternative job” as a result of the now endemic large-scale social crisis. either due to a lack of alternative options for parents who do not have anybody to take care of them while they are engaged in segregation work. and such activity hinders distribution. compaction and covering as if it were a sanitary landfill. ! install the necessary rainwater drainage channels to stop rain water run off reaching future work faces. 13. establish procedures for distribution. the sequence of procedures listed in the previous paragraph is modified after point “g” in the following way: ! prepare the excavated area to receive more solid waste. Even though recyclable waste segregation in refuse dumps and streets is an unhealthy activity. 238 . compaction and covering operations. as the landfill evolves build vertical wells for gas venting. or because the children themselves are segregating materials in order to increase family income. waterproofing it with good quality clay and installing underground pipes to collect leachate.
239 . it is disposed of at the bottom of a landfill. with effective management. Disposing of construction rubble in a sanitary landfill is not economical as it is inert waste that is being deposited in a specialized system surrounded by technical resources designed to protect the environment. Depositing this type of waste in a sanitary landfill is also not economical from an environmental perspective as the useful life of the landfill will be diminished by waste that.7 Special domestic waste disposal 13.13. the provision of technical training for segregators so that they can engage in other activities in the formal labour market. the ideal destiny for construction rubble is recycling. for example).7. could be used for the recuperation of excavations resulting from the extraction of materials used in the construction industry. when it could be disposed of in more simple landfills at a lower cost. Figure 136 – Recycling plant operated by a segregator cooperative 13. Solid waste final disposal Some of the initiatives that should be implemented to gradually change this situation are the development of alternative income and employment programs (such as segregator cooperatives. programs that provide children with integral fulltime places in schools or sports and recreational centres and a compensatory system for parents whose children cease to engage in segregation work.1 Construction rubble disposal As has been explained in the chapter on solid waste treatment. cooperation with non-governmental institutions and private companies. However when a municipality does not have this option.
2 Disposal of batteries As used batteries constitute hazardous waste. treatment and final disposal. is in a landfill designed specifically for industrial waste with this risk classification.3 Disposal of fluorescent tubes Often small pieces of broken tubes are accidentally discarded together with common waste in sanitary landfills.7. the body responsible for urban cleaning should ensure the participation of producers. ! develop a project together with associations of authorized technical service providers for the installation of battery collection containers on their premises. who should be responsible for financing such a process. particularly due to the presence of heavy metals in their composition. who should therefore be responsible for its collection. ! establish an agreement with mobile phone producers under which they set up a discarded battery collection program that includes the provision of a telephonic information centre providing the location of places where there are special containers for used batteries.The only appropriate types of rubble disposal in a sanitary landfill are: ! ! its use as base material for internal roads and unloading areas. Corresponding regulations should be brought into force in support of this type of model to avoid the risk that the municipality will be left with responsibility for costs associated with production process waste from private sector enterprises. However. especially in large amounts. with a view to recycling or another form of treatment and final disposal.7. 13. 240 . In this case too the “polluter pays” principle applies. Two initiatives are presented below as examples of measures that the private sector can adopt for the collection and final disposal of batteries. dealers and other players in this economic sector. their final disposal should be managed with the same criteria as are applied to industrial waste that carries the same type of risk. Batteries collected in this way would be removed once a month and taken to a treatment or recycling site. its use for the temporary covering of urban waste when there is a scarcity of the usual covering material in the zone. Before organizing a system for battery separation at source. as there is mercury in them the appropriate final disposal of such waste. 13. This waste should be regarded as waste from the industrial process of its producers.
industrial landfills. waste barrages and other forms of disposal are commonly used for industrial waste. a new layer of waste can be treated in the same soil.4 Disposal of tyres When it is not possible to recycle used tyres or use them in cement industry furnaces. 13.8. In support of this current perspective on the problem national legislation is needed to facilitate a progressive reduction in the quantity of such waste through a policy that fosters recycling by the industry and suppliers. Although the same land can be used repeatedly the disadvantage of this method is its need for large areas of land as the layers are not thick. This treatment is very much used for the final decomposition of oil by-products and organic compounds. Once the micro organisms complete the degradation work. which should be the responsibility of producers and distributors as it is their economic activity that generates this waste.8 Disposal of waste from special sources 13. repeating the same steps. SOIL BIO-REGENERATION Soil bio-regeneration (land farming) is a biological treatment through which the organic part of waste is decomposed by the micro organisms that live in the upper layer of soil. for example. 241 . The body responsible for urban cleaning should not have to take on the problematic final disposal of used tyres. The treatment consists of mixing and homogenizing waste with the upper layer of soil (to a ploughing depth of 15cm to 20cm).13.1 Industrial waste disposal Soil bio-regeneration (land farming). Finally it is necessary to pay attention to the import of used but still usable tyres as together with these goods the companies of exporter countries are also exporting the problem of disposal when they are of no further use. Solid waste final disposal 13. and so on.7. The following figure shows an outline cross section of a bio-regeneration area. they can be disposed of in sanitary landfills after being ground so that they do not cause structural problems in the landfill.
Soil bio-regeneration outline INDUSTRIAL LANDFILLS Industrial landfills are classified according to the hazard presented by the waste to be deposited there. Rain Evaporation Superficial drainage Leaching Waste landfill Leaching Percolation Maximum water level Flow of underground water Non-saturated zone Wastewater Impermeable soil Figure 138 . those for Class II. the incursion of rainwater falling outside the limits of the landfill that would otherwise increase the volume of effluent percolating inside the landfill. as demonstrated in the following figure. non-inert waste. absorption and adsorption in the upper layer Figure 137 . 242 . the first step is to avoid. by means of barriers and drainage ditches. only inert waste.Flow of water in a landfill In order to reduce the amount of effluent to be treated. and those for Class III. for example. In any type of industrial waste landfill a rainwater drainage system and bottom waterproofing are essential to avoid soil and water table contamination from rainwater that has percolated through the waste. landfills for Class I waste can receive hazardous industrial waste. In Brazil.Periodic application and mixing of waste and soil Containment of rainwater that falls on the treatment area Evaporation Diversion of rainwater that falls outside the treatment area 200 m Infiltration Water course Aerobic decomposition.
00m Intermediate coverage (soil – t = 25cm) Plastic membrane t = 20 to 30cm Waste Waste Vegetation coverage Pumping unit Blind drainage I = min 0. Solid waste final disposal The second step is waterproofing the bottom of the landfill with a plastic membrane in order to stop leachate contaminating the soil and the water table.13.0 to 2.typical cross-section 243 . on the reduction of waste production and its treatment so that only unusable refuse is deposited in industrial landfills. before waste is unloaded at the landfill the list of compatible wastes published by environmental control bodies must be consulted. The operational cost varies according to the waste’s degree of toxicity. that is.000 tons requires an initial investment of approximately two million dollars and involves operational costs of 50 to 150 dollars per ton. The main disadvantage of an industrial landfill as a means of final waste disposal is that it requires a large area of land in order to be economically and operationally viable and it should be taken into account that the waste continues to be potentially dangerous until it can naturally incorporate itself in the environment. Industrial landfill for Class I waste Final coverage layer I = 2% Rainwater drainage Drainage layer t = 25cm h = 4 to 6m Waste t = 0. production of smoke and gases that are toxic and inflammable. that is. wastes that do not react in contact with each other or with infiltrated rainwater. An industrial landfill with a capacity of 15. fire or explosion.5% Physical protection layer t = 30cm Waste Storage pit Maximum water level To the effluent treatment unit PVC tube Plastic membrane (double layer) t =1. dissolution of toxic substances and violent polymerization.60 to 1. The most common phenomena produced by the mixture of incompatible wastes are: heat generation. In this context the best course of action is to concentrate efforts on earlier stages. Consequently. When operating an industrial landfill special precautions have to be taken to control the type of waste unloaded there as only chemically compatible wastes can be disposed of in any given landfill.5mm h > 3m Leakage detection layer (t = 25cm) Figure 139 .Industrial landfill for Class I waste .
5% Physical protection layer t = 30cm To the effluent treatment unit PVC tube Plastic membrane t = 0.6cm/s.5m above the highest level of the water table and going from bottom to top this type of landfill usually consists of the following layers: ! ! ! ! bottom waterproofing with PEAD membrane. Industrial landfill for Class II and Class III waste Final coverage layer I = 2% Rainwater drainage Drainage layer t = 25cm h = 4 to 6m Waste t = 0. a top waterproofing layer of plastic membrane or good quality clay (k = 10 . percolates drainage system.Industrial landfill for Class II and Class III waste – typical cross-section Industrial landfills for Class II and Class III waste are similar to domestic waste sanitary landfills but do not usually have a gas venting system.00m Vegetation coverage Pumping unit Blind drainage Waste Storage pit Maximum water level t = 20 to 30cm Waste Waste I = min 0. thickness > 50cm) is recommended.Industrial landfills for Class I waste require more rigorous waterproofing than those for Class II and III. physical protection for the plastic membrane.8 to 1.60 to 1.0m to 6. 244 . drainage layer on top of the top waterproofing layer (t = 25cm). ! ! ! leakage detection layer between the bottom waterproofing layers. ! although it is not obligatory. layers of waste (from 4. A minimum water table depth of three metres is required and the following layers are compulsory: ! double layer of bottom waterproofing: PEAD membrane and clay protection layer (k < 10 .5m Figure 140 .7cm/s). ! 25cm thick sand drainage (necessary only where there is top waterproofing). top waterproofing layer. Beginning at least 1.0m thick) with 25cm thick layers of soil between them.5mm h > 1.
OTHER FORMS OF DISPOSAL Highly hazardous waste can be disposed of in underground saline or calcareous caves. Solid waste final disposal ! ! organic soil (thickness > 60cm). 13. A top waterproofing layer is not required as the surface serves to evaporate off part of the liquid content. all very expensive and sophisticated: ! construction of special shelters with double walls of high resistance concrete.13. Such barrage systems use a double layer of waterproofing only on the bottom. when the top layer of waste has solidified. The type of treatment depends on the characteristics of the waste deposited in the landfill but usually a complete physicochemical process is applied. They have a filtration and drainage system at the bottom (flute) to collect and treat the liquid part while containing the solid matter inside the barrage. or can be injected into exhausted oil wells.8. 245 . The percolated liquid. vegetation coverage with short root plant species. WASTE BARRAGES Waste barrages are used for the disposal of liquid waste as well as sludgy waste that has a humidity content of more than 80%.2 Radioactive waste disposal There are three final disposal processes for nuclear waste. preferably underground. ! encapsulation in an impermeable concrete covering followed by dumping in the deep ocean (this process is very much criticized by environmentalists and in some countries is prohibited). These landfills are not deep and cover an extended area. After the closure of the landfill. followed by a conventional biological process (stabilization lagoons or activated sludge). should be led to a treatment unit. collected through a drainage system similar to the one in the previous figure. the surface is waterproofed with a layer of clay to reduce rainwater infiltration and thus the need for ongoing treatment of percolated liquids.
Top waterproofing should begin as soon as the volume of waste reaches its final height and should progress at the same rate as the filling of the trench.8. Conceptually a septic trench is in reality a Class II industrial landfill. There are two types of septic trench: individual ones such as may be used by large hospitals and ones that are annexed to a municipal sanitary landfill.1. However. When the septic trench is annexed to a municipal landfill. It is therefore essential that an effective and safe solid waste storage. a distinct plot should be separated for medical waste disposal. which involves the daily covering of waste and obligatory waterproofing but no leachate collection. In recent years the sanitary vigilance authorities of several countries have begun to implement measures that increase controls in ports and airports out of a concern for the potential economic impact of diseases such as foot-and-mouth or mad-cow disease being “imported” from other countries or regions. 246 . handling and internal transport system is implemented in order to avoid contact between common waste and waste that is contaminated or represents a potential sanitary risk. as described in 13. due to its low investment and operational costs.8. the surfaces of which should be covered daily.! disposal in saline underground caves that are sealed so as not to contaminate the biosphere. six months or a year). trenches should be excavated with dimensions appropriate for receiving waste generated over a pre-determined period (a month. a method that is very much questioned by most professionals but. This plot should be fenced and isolated from the rest of the landfill. The bottom and sides of the excavated trench are then waterproofed and waste begins to be deposited there.3 Port and airport waste disposal In some countries it is required by law that port and airport waste is disposed of by incineration. 13. in many of these countries only some ports and airports comply with such environmental legislation while in the others no special attention is paid to waste disposal. Port and airport waste not at risk of being contaminated by contact with waste generated in boats or planes arriving from areas with endemic diseases can be disposed of in sanitary landfills. is a viable option for cities with budgetary limitations.8. 13.4 Medical waste disposal The only final disposal process for this type of waste in the ground is the septic trench. In the first type.
especially in relation to the final disposal of waste. surface and underground water and represent a potential source of epidemics and fires as well as being susceptible to disintegration. The unpleasant appearance and the bad odour that they emit discredit city administrations where waste is not appropriately disposed of. Many mayors have been held directly accountable by environmental bodies. The simplest and cheapest option for solving the problem of refuse dumps is undoubtedly the installation of sanitary landfills. in spite of spectacular promotional offers by equipment manufacturers. Solid waste final disposal The procedures for waste disposal and waterproof layer installation are similar to those previously described. From an environmental perspective dumps are a real calamity as they contaminate the soil. Final coverage Drainage layer Plastic membrane Fence Waste 3m to 4m Waste Waste Top coverage Lateral slopes coverage Plastic membrane Figure 141 . they require significant financial investment and their operation involves a high level of complexity. both of which are beyond the capacity of municipalities that lack financial resources and specialized personnel. the atmosphere.Septic trench installed in a sanitary landfill 13. Attempting to resolve urban solid waste final disposal problems through the installation of recycling or incineration plants is often not feasible as. auditing tribunals and public prosecutors for poor urban cleaning management. provided they are well built and correctly 247 .9 Sanitary landfills and carbon credits: Opportunities to help resolve environmental problems The environmental damage resulting from refuse dumps and irregular dumping always causes significant problems for municipal administrations.13.
the average 248 . This combustible gas can be used to fuel boilers. for example. which are offering resources and information for the installation of sanitary landfills with systems that recover and exploit “waste biogas”. principally water vapour. However such initiatives involve investment and operational costs that in general are beyond municipalities’ financial means. furnaces and vehicle internal combustion engines or to generate electricity. As with the glass panels of a greenhouse. as established in the Kyoto Protocol the objective of which is to reduce the proportion of gases that provoke the greenhouse effect in the earth’s atmosphere. Sanitary landfills do not contaminate or emit unpleasant odours and after their final closure they can be used for the construction of sports complexes or public parks. Over recent decades the concentration of these gases in the atmosphere has increased. If this phenomenon did not exist. As a result of this situation the problem of solid waste disposal in Latin America is far from being solved. the presence of certain gases in the atmosphere. according to which the percentage of cities that still have refuse dumps is very high. our planet would be as cold and sterile as Mars. which is then reflected outwards. as is revealed by PAHO reports on basic sanitary services (see chapter 1). One potentially positive economic factor being studied with increasing attention as a solution to this problem is the exploitation of biogas naturally produced during organic waste anaerobic decomposition processes. In this chapter we will try to clarify the question of carbon credits as the recovery and use of biogas for fuel has already been dealt with in many technical publications. principally due to the intensive use of fossil fuels such as coal and oil in domestic and industrial activities and in transport. approximately 50% of which is methane. carbonic gas and methane. sterile and with an extremely high ambient temperature. This new opportunity is beginning to receive support from the World Bank and other international development bodies.9. 13. Consequently. while if it existed to a greater degree the Earth would be similar to Venus. in which case they should be replaced by a sanitary landfill elsewhere that will then receive the city’s domestic waste. impedes the release into space of heat generated by the incidence of the sun’s rays on the Earth’s surface. Refuse dumps can be eliminated either by transforming them into sanitary landfills or by eradicating them altogether in an environmentally sound way.operated. The naturally occurring “greenhouse effect” is a phenomenon of the Earth’s particular type of atmosphere that ensures climatic conditions favourable for life as we know it.1 Greenhouse effect: causes and consequences This phenomenon is similar to the one produced by the glass panels of a greenhouse that retain heat produced by the sun. with the additional advantage that its producers will receive Certified Emission Reductions (CERs).
00 per ton of carbon while in countries not included in Annex 1 of the Protocol they vary from US$ 1. the Kyoto Protocol came into force on 16th February 2005.int/2860.9. Out of a concern to stop. are not obliged by the Protocol to reduce emissions but rather can transfer to Annex 1 countries credits corresponding to emission reductions produced by projects implemented for that purpose that qualify as what are called CDM (Clean Development Mechanism) projects. the moment at which the timeframe for commitments taken on in that international agreement became applicable. Global carbon markets have therefore begun to form and several international funds have been created to support the development of projects that reduce anthropogenic 6. according to the most accepted theory. such as Latin American and Caribbean countries. Consequently commitments were established that defined greenhouse gas emission reduction goals for developed countries listed in Annex 1 of the Protocol and a program of reduction quota commercialization. or at least reduce.13.00 to US$ 30. Following its ratification by Russia in November 2004. the acceleration of this process the UN called a summit. A dramatic example of what a change in the Earth’s climate can imply is the extinction of the dinosaurs that once lived all over the planet and. which established the “Framework Convention on Climate Change” that finally became the Kyoto Protocol 6 signed in 1997 in the Japanese city of that name. disappeared when a layer of dust was raised by the impact of a meteorite on the surface of the Earth provoking a drastic fall in global temperatures. As a result of these cost differences the Emissions Reduction Market was created where the current value of a ton of CO2 or equivalent that is not emitted.00. Countries not included in Annex 1 of the Protocol. The Protocol defined a baseline criterion separating the group of surplus emission producing countries (credit buyers) and the group of sub-baseline producing countries (credit sellers). The Kyoto Protocol established that between 2008 and 2012 countries listed in its Annex 1 (developed countries) should reduce their emission of green-house gases (GHG) to a level approximately 7 % below that of 1995. Available on the Convention on Climate Change website http://unfccc. thus endangering the delicate balance that makes our environment liveable. is approximately US$ 10.00 per ton of CO2. In developed countries these costs can reach to values higher than US$ 500.php 249 . or is captured. Solid waste final disposal temperature on Earth is increasing. 13.2 The “logic” of carbon credits The interest in buying Certified Emission Reduction credits is due to differences between countries in the cost of emission reduction through processes applied to installations. Rio 92.
Latin American cities are beginning to invest in urban waste treatments that reduce methane emissions and generate income through CERs linked to sanitary landfill projects implemented in accordance with CDM. To take advantage of this new economic opportunity. has been put to tender with the support and assistance of the World Bank.5 per ton) and its first client is the government of the Netherlands. The application of CDM to sanitary landfills is very effective for emission reduction. In relation to the greenhouse effect it should be noted that each ton of methane is equivalent to 21 tons of CO2. already approved by the Brazilian government through the Inter- 250 . the planning. whether emission reductions are additional to those that would take place if the project was not implemented (baseline). that is. it is not required by law. Buenos Aires. In consequence CERs are generated to the degree that the combustion of methane takes place and the emission of CO2 equivalent is therefore diminished. Each ton of CO2 that a developing country does not emit or captures (that is. The first CDM project approved by the Executive Council is in Brazil: an electricity generating station fuelled by methane from landfill biogas in Nova Iguaçu (Rio de Janeiro). This is the first Argentinean project that has been presented to the Kyoto Protocol Executive Council as a CDM. transforms for example into vegetable matter. taking into account: ! ! ! whether the project is entered into voluntarily. implementation and operation of a project should be certified and audited by independent bodies authorized by the UN.5 million tons of carbonic gas (US$ 4. whether there are real measurable long term benefits. the concession for the collection and treatment of methane produced by the large sanitary landfill at Villa Dominico. a process called fixation in plants) can be traded on the global market in the form of the above mentioned CER credits. is aligned with public policies for the improvement of sanitary and environmental conditions and results in a better quality of life for the urban population by contributing to the transformation of refuse dumps into sanitary landfills. requires low investment.carbon emissions. For CERs to be issued. The project is expected to capture the equivalent of 2. In Argentina for example. Another Brazilian project for implementation in the Salvador Centre Metropolitan sanitary landfill (Bahia).
It is therefore clear that the carbon credit market is rapidly expanding and adapting to the CDM principles established by the Kyoto Protocol. the electricity distribution company or gas consumer company where there is energy or gas generation using biogas. Finally. provincial or municipal environmental conservation bodies. and national. headed by the Science and Technology Ministry. the company operating the sanitary landfill where that service is subcontracted. There should also be a national policy for solid waste management establishing minimum service provision standards and requiring the implementation of final waste disposal systems that are both sanitarily and environmentally sound.3 Circumstances in which biogas from a sanitary landfill can be utilized For an effective implementation of a biogas recovery and utilization project. Here we present some of the essential conditions that the various sectors involved in the operation of an urban cleaning system should fulfil in order to achieve the established objective. with its consequent reduction of methane emission into the atmosphere. 13. as well as a specific annual budget allocation to municipal solid waste management large enough to cover the system’s investment and operational costs. Institutional The mayor and secretaries of departments related to municipal solid waste management and the environment should clearly and unequivocally demonstrate their intention to implement a permanent program of domestic waste collection and final disposal that covers the entire urban population (universal coverage) in order to ensure healthy conditions for everybody and the protection of the local environment. there are requirements that have to be met.9. 251 . is at present awaiting the evaluation of the Kyoto Protocol Executive Council. To achieve these objectives there must be a separate management unit within the municipal administration with sufficient training to carry out these functions. The first pilot project in Latin America was implemented in Uruguay at Las Rosas sanitary landfill.962 tons of methane over the course of 15 years. Maldonando province.13. an organizational agreement should be established between the different institutions involved in the project such as the municipality. Solid waste final disposal ministerial Climate Commission. with the objective of capturing 18.
4 Requirements for the implementation of GHG emission reduction projects in solid waste landfills The implementation of emission reduction programs for methane produced in urban waste landfills should comply with CDM requirements. 13. the possibility of recuperating the land at the same time as sanitary or controlled operations begin on it should be examined. If the site is not operated in a sanitary way. by the national body responsible for climate change issues. with a view to the possible allocation of public resources or investment by the private sector at a national or international level. the surface of the landfill and its slopes are covered with clay except for the work face where trucks unload. to give an idea. the layer of waste is at least 10 metres deep. in order to avoid the difficulties involved in the implementation of a new landfill in an urban area even when it will be operated on a sound basis.200 cubic metres. 252 . and there is a regular reception of at least 50 tons of domestic waste per day. In addition guarantees are required not only for an effective collection of the biogas and the transformation of its methane into carbon dioxide (CO2) but also for the long term continuity of the process as biogas continues to be produced during a period of more than 15 years after the closure of a landfill as a waste disposal site.Physical and operational The existence of a sanitary landfill principally dealing with the disposal of domestic waste with a high organic matter content that has already received a minimum quantity of 15. the resources needed to solve them and the responsibilities that each party has in the process. provided that the ownership. by a 10m high prism with sides of 60m). so that they can be analyzed and given different degrees of priority by the Interministerial Commission on Global Climate Change. considering a density of 0.7t/m³. Consequently the formulation of a table of conditioning factors is recommended that can be filled in according to the specific characteristics of each project and subsequently analyzed to determine if a given project can receive preliminary approval from the national body responsible for the environment and later. the waste is not covered with clay and there is no leachate and biogas collection. urban zoning and minimum environmental conditions are appropriate. Social A public awareness raising program should be instigated focusing on the issue of urban cleaning with a view to informing all citizens about sanitary problems in their region.000 tons of waste (corresponding to 25. which occupies a volume that can be represented. Disposal operations should preferably continue on the site of the old refuse dump.9. where relevant. that is.
are less onerous than other GHG emission reduction options. a qualified technical team within the responsible body. 13.5 General considerations The relation between sanitary landfills and carbon credits is based in the fact that landfill biogas capture and utilization projects. ! ! a sub-contraction of the landfill operation. ! a political decision on the part of the mayor to recuperate the existing refuse dump. the existence of a body responsible for urban cleaning in the municipality. a landfill operation that is ongoing and functions in a regulated way: a sufficiency of machines. and install a new sanitary landfill. a daily waste collection delivered to the site of at least 50 tons. ! an existing or planned public awareness raising campaign on environmental issues in general or urban cleaning in particular. a landfill growth plan that is followed. ! an effective body of municipal regulations applicable to urban cleaning that may be part of a general body of municipal regulations. more than 10 metre thick layers of waste.13. a municipal budgetary allocation specifically for urban cleaning services that is big enough to maintain the quality of those services at an appropriate level. a waste collection system coverage of at least 80% of the population. the compaction of waste and its regular coverage with a layer of clay. where applicable. in the medium term it can represent real financial assistance for municipalities enabling them to ensure the correct operation of urban 253 .000 inhabitants. a collection and either treatment or recirculation of leachate. ! no depositing of industrial waste in the landfill. involving burning and transformation into CO2. Even though income from CERs is not received immediately after the transformation of a refuse dump into a sanitary landfill. Such sanitary landfill projects are therefore likely to be of interest to large international corporations as a way of obtaining cheaper CERs. Solid waste final disposal The following is a list of project related characteristics that will facilitate the analysis of a given project prior to a decision on whether or not basic CDM requirements are met: ! ! ! ! ! ! an urban population of more than 30. ! a municipal urban cleaning or waste collection rate that covers more than 40% of service costs.9. ! the existence of land owned by the municipality that meets the environmental conditions necessary for installing a sanitary landfill.
which can lead to CER income. 254 . This offers municipalities a definitive and low cost way of fulfilling their constitutional and moral duty to appropriately dispose of waste produced in urban concentrations and provide basic sanitary conditions for the inhabitants of the city they administer. reducing leachate generation and avoiding methane emissions.solid waste final disposal installations. Finally it should be noted that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has recently approved a new methodology for calculating the emissions avoided by composting processes. This is of interest as it can facilitate the viability of projects that add this form of waste treatment to the operation of sanitary landfills thus extending their useful life.
Marlene. de V. v. nº 004/95. construção e operação. Francisco Ricardo Andrade. NBR 13.. In: CARDOSO. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. 2001. BIDONE. M. Maria de Fátima. nº 237/97. ZVEIBIL. Comitês de bacias: a inscrição do urbano e do social na gestão dos recursos hídricos. 1998. nº 005/93. CONSELHO NACIONAL DO MEIO AMBIENTE – CONAMA. Serviços de limpeza urbana. 2nd ed. Victor Zular. H. Rio de Janeiro: Consórcio Parceria 21.896 – Fixa condições mínimas exigíveis para projeto. Rio de Janeiro: ABES. Brasília: CEF. Rio de Janeiro: IBAM.057. NBR 10. nº 008/91. Cidades Sustentáveis: formulação e implementação de políticas públicas compatíveis com os princípios de desenvolvimento sustentável definidos na Agenda 21. Rio de Janeiro: Lúmen Júris. Do lixo à cidadania: estratégias para a ação. Victor Zular (Orgs. DUTRA. CAMPOS. BIDONE. NB 844 – Apresentação de projetos de aterros controlados de resíduos sólidos urbanos. Ação civil pública ambiental. Constituição (1998). Rio de Janeiro: ABES. Resoluções nº 001/86. Serviços de saneamento ambiental. MEIRELES. (PROSAB Project). T. ____________. A. 2. 94 p. Berenice de Souza. de forma a proteger adequadamente as coleções hídricas superficiais e subterrâneas próximas. 2001. 255 .418. Samyra (Coords. 1996. nº 006/88.025 – Aterros de resíduos perigosos – Critérios para projeto. Francisco Ricardo Andrade (coord. M. nº 006/91. bem como os operadores destas instalações e populações vizinhas. nº 005/88. NB 842 – Apresentação de projetos de aterros de resíduos industriais perigosos. BRASIL. ____________. nº 258/99. I. CHENNA.BIBLIOGRAPHY ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS – ABNT. Modelos tecnológicos para sistemas de coleta e outros serviços de limpeza urbana. Jurandyr. 1999.e. NBR 8. S. ABREU.004 – Classifica resíduos sólidos quanto aos seus riscos potenciais ao meio ambiente e à saúde ambiente e à saúde pública. In: CURSO de aperfeiçoamento em limpeza urbana.. Brasília: ASSEMAE/FNS/ MS. p. São Carlos: EESC/USP. NBR 8. In: CURSO modelo de gestão integrada dos resíduos sólidos urbanos. CRESPO. nº 011/86. NBR 8. 131-149. 1992. ____________. BARROS. ARAÚJO.849. et al. 2001. Elizabeth Dezouzart. S. Lílian Alves de. para que estes resíduos possam Ter manuseio e destinação adequados. Manual Global de Ecologia: o que você pode fazer a respeito da crise do meio ambiente. Manual de saneamento e proteção ambiental para os municípios. Resíduos sólidos provenientes de coletas especiais: reciclagem e disposição final.). ____________. NBR 1. Raphael T. Passed on 5th October 1998. 1995. 1999. nº 257/ 99. 1996. Belo Horizonte: [n. São Paulo: Augustus. nº 002/91. módulo 4.) Metodologias e técnicas de minimização. reciclagem e reutilização de resíduos sólidos urbanos. nº 275/01 e nº 283/01 CORDEIRO. ____________.]. ZVEIBIL. Conceitos básicos de resíduos sólidos. NB 1. Gestão metropolitana: experiências e novas perspectivas. ____________. implantação e operação de aterros de resíduos não perigosos.419. I. 1998. Rio de Janeiro. 2000. ABES – Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental. São Paulo: Saraiva. Walter H. NB 843 – Apresentação de projetos de aterros sanitários de resíduos sólidos urbanos. CORSAN.). importância e planejamento. ____________. Povinelli. In: FERNANDES. K.
Osmar de Oliveira. 2000. Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Rio de Janeiro: PNUD/IPEA. Gilson Leite. Rio de Janeiro: REDEH/BID. SENGÉS.e. PROJETO para recuperação do aterro de Gramacho. PEREIRA NETO. JARDIM. São Paulo. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. Formação e Assessoria em Políticas Sociais. SISINNO. In: METODOLOGIA em educação ambiental. 278 p. São Paulo. MANUAL de gerenciamento integrado do lixo municipal. (1969). Introdução à engenharia ambiental. 128p. C. OTERO. José Dantas de. Manual de compostagem: processo de baixo custo. L. 56p. 2000. et al. 155p. O que é preciso saber sobre limpeza urbana. JUSTEN FILHO. Belo Horizonte. 1999. DIAGNÓSTICO DO MANEJO DOS RESÍDUOS SÓLIDOS URBANOS – 2003. Brasília: AMB. Inspira Comunicação e Design. 1995 . São Paulo: IPT/CEMPRE. 1989.DIAGNOSIS of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Latin America and the Caribbean. 31. SCHNEIDER. Rio de Janeiro: ABES. Rio de Janeiro: IBAM/MBES. Brasília. Rio de Janeiro. Resíduos sólidos. S. In: Políticas públicas para mulheres no Brasil: balanço nacional cinco anos após Beijing. João Tinôco. (coordenação). 1997-2005. LIMA. CLR Balieiro. São Paulo. INAM. Limpeza urbana: métodos e sistemas. MANSUR. MEIO AMBIENTE. 1993. CD-ROM Sistema FIEMG. Belo Horizonte: [n. M. 1995. UNICEF. Gastão Henrique. 2000. PanAmerican Health Organization . ambiente e saúde: uma visão multidisciplinar. In: CURSO de análise de projetos para gestão integrada de resíduos sólidos urbanos. MOTA. n. 1999. ed. Planejamento. Lixo municipal: manual de gerenciamento integrado. MONTEIRO. São Paulo: INT. INTERNATIONAL Directory of Solid Waste Management: 1994/5 The ISWA Yearbook. 1994. DIAS FILHO. 370p. 2000. [n. MINISTÉRIO DAS CIDADES. desenvolvimento sustentável e pobreza. Rio de Janeiro: FIOCRUZ. 256 . Gestão de resíduos sólidos urbanos no Brasil. (EPA/530-SW-89-072). 138p. 1996. PROGRAMA lixo e cidadania: Criança no lixo. 2000. nunca mais!: manual do promotor público. Coleta seletiva: reciclando materiais. R. Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnológicas: CEMPRE. produto. processo. PÁDUA. EXPERIÊNCIAS INOVADORAS EM SERVIÇOS URBANOS. PÓLIS: Estudos. Manual de gerenciamento integrado. PNSB. PESQUISA NACIONAL de saneamento básico. reciclando valores. Marçal. Paraíba. Penido. Maria Luiza D’almeida et al. 2005.] 1997.. Rio de Janeiro: IBAM. 1998. 1999. 1995. 1996. London: James & James.e. 11p. 2001. Suetônio. Suzana. 2000. Nilza Silva et al. Vânia Elisabete. José Henrique R. Rio de Janeiro: ABES. São Paulo. Sistema Nacional de Informações sobre Saneamento. 2. São Paulo: [ n.p. 2001.SNSSA: IPEA. MANUAL fortalecendo a participação das mulheres nas políticas locais de desenvolvimento sustentável. Silveira & OLIVEIRA. Concessões de serviços públicos. 2nd ed.I. Aspectos administrativos e financeiros de sistemas de limpeza urbana.PAHO. 1993. RELATÓRIO sobre desenvolvimento humano no Brasil.]. Brasília: Procuradoria Geral da República.]: IESA.1996. Decision-maker’s Guide to Solid Waste Management. Manual de gerenciamento de resíduos sólidos de saúde.
org) 257 .org.abepet.com.SKINNER.bracelpa. WEB PAGES Associação Brasileira de Embalagens de PET – ABEPET (http//www.(http://www. C.cepis. H.abividro.br) Associação Brasileira de Celulose e Papel – BRACELPA (http:// www. Rio de Janeiro: IBAM/CPU.org) Pan American Center for Sanitary Engineering and Environmental Sciences (http:// www. Consulta nacional sobre a gestão do saneamento e do meio ambiente urbano: relatório final.br) Associação Brasileira da Indústria de Plástico – ABIPLAST (http://www.abiquim. reciclagem. Hélia Nacif (Coord.br) Empresa Recicladora de Latas de Alumínio – LATASA (http://www.).com.bvsde. 1995.cempre. tratamento e destinação final.br) Associação das Indústrias Automáticas de Vidro – ABIVIDRO (http://www. Cássio H.ops-oms.latasa. In: VELLOSO.br) Environmental Industry Associations .abiplast. – Capina química em vias e logradouros públicos de Belo Horizonte – PBH/SLU. Manejo dos resíduos sólidos urbanos e industriais: redução reutilização.ops-oms.org. XAVIER.br) Virtual Library of Sustainable Development and Environmental Health (http:// www.org. 1997.br) Associação Brasileira de Materiais Plásticos – PLASTIVIDA (http:// www.org.envasns. V. In: CURSO de atualização em saneamento. VELLOSO. 1995.com. Waste management principles consistent with sustainable development. Belo Horizonte: ASSEMAE. John H.org) Compromisso Empresarial para a Reciclagem – CEMPRE (http://www. V.
Brazil COD – Chemical Oxygen Demand COMLURB – Rio de Janeiro Urban Cleaning Company CONAMA – National Commission on the Environment.GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS ABNT – Brazilian Institute of Technical Standards ASCE – American Society of Civil Engineers BOD – Biochemical Oxygen Demand CEPIS/PAHO – Pan American Center for Sanitary Engineering and Environmental Sciences CER – Certified Emission Reduction CDM – Clean Development Mechanism CNEN – National Nuclear Energy Commission. Brazil TGW –Total Gross Weight UN – United Nations VDC – Voluntary Drop-off Centres WCR – Waste Collection Rate 258 . IDRC GHG – Green-House Gas HDI – Human Development Index HDPE – High Density Polyethylene IADB – Inter-American Development Bank IBAM – Brazilian Institute of Municipal Administration IDRC – International Development Research Centre of Canada IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPE – Individual Protection Equipment ISWM – Integrated Solid Waste Management ISWMP – Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan LAC – Latin America and the Caribbean Region LDPE – Low Density Polyethylene MoU – Memorandum of Understanding NGO – Non-Governmental Organization PAHO – Pan-American Health Organization PET – Polyethylene Terephtalate PVC – Poly Vinyl Chloride Rio 92 – United Nations International Conference on Environment and Development (Rio de Janeiro. 1992) SISNAMA –National Environmental System. Brazil EIS – Environmental Impact Study EMS – Environmental Management Secretariat.
259 . Greenhouse effect: the absorption by the Earth’s atmosphere of infrared radiation emitted by its surface. Indivisible service: a public service available to all tax-payers that cannot be measured on the basis of the amount used by individual citizens. Intermediary agents: agents involved in the commercialization of recyclable materials in general as intermediaries in sales by segregators to recycling companies. clinics.GLOSSARY Biogas: combustible gas naturally generated during the organic matter putrefaction process. medical centres and all other establishments where any level of human or animal healthcare is practiced with a view to prevention. resulting in increased heat on the Earth’s surface and thus an increase in the average temperature of the planet. diagnosis. Healthcare institutions: public and private hospitals. Integrated solid waste management plan: a technical planning instrument for activities linked to urban cleaning. treatment or rehabilitation. veterinary clinics. Environmental impact assessment: a procedure aimed at identifying and interpreting the effects of public or private actions or projects that may cause environmental impacts or alter the quality of life. Composting: procedures for the transformation of biodegradable organic municipal solid waste into organic compounds. Governing plan: a fundamental legally binding policy instrument for the development and organization of the municipal territory aimed at guaranteeing an appropriate social functioning of the city. Domestic waste: residential waste and waste from small commercial generators. Compensatory measures: measures to compensate communities or social groups for the use of non-renewable environmental resources. Final disposal: the final process applied to solid waste resulting in its ultimate placement. or for unavoidable negative environmental impacts. which implies a reduced financial income for segregators. laboratories. Clean technology: technology that does not produce secondary effects or impact on the environmental balance or natural systems. This phenomenon stops heat from the sun leaving the atmosphere and returning to space. replicating on a planetary scale an effect similar to the one observable in a greenhouse.
Municipal Treasury: the resources of a municipality out of which the municipal budget is financed. Organic law: a municipality’s foundational law defining the areas of jurisdiction and responsibility for its executive. of residential. treatment and final disposal of solid waste. Plant: a solid waste processing site including the land. or from markets. Municipal waste: solid or semisolid waste generated by activities in population centres. design and evaluation. small industries and the sweeping and cleaning of public spaces. collection. legislative and judicial branches. Refuse: all waste produced by human activity that is not reused. Urban cleaning service: all activities relating to solid waste management: preparation and storage. 260 . healthcare institutions. Solid waste management: all technical and administrative activity. recyclable material recovery. Medical waste: all waste generated by healthcare institutions. including planning. works and added features. commercial or institutional origin. Segregator: a person engaged in the separation of recyclable material from refuse. Refuse dump: a place where waste is indiscriminately dumped in the open air without the application of any sanitary treatment. Recycling company: a company specializing in the recycling of material. Master plan: a document containing all of the necessary elements for the complete implementation of a project in accordance with relevant technical regulations. structures. also called scavenger or waste picker. transfer.Leachate: liquid that drains through solid waste. that is related to appropriate solid waste management. street cleaning. contains materials in solution or in suspension and results from the decomposition process plus the infiltration of rainwater. transport.