1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1358980v3
SPECIALLY-APPEARING DEFENDANT DAVID MISCAVIGE’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF PROCESS, & STRIKE POS AS FRAUDULENT
E
L K I N S
K
A L T
W
E I N T R A U B
R
E U B E N
G
A R T S I D E L L P
1 0 3 4 5 W . O l y m p i c B l v d . L o s A n g e l e s , C a l i f o r n i a 9 0 0 6 4 T e l e p h o n e : 3 1 0 . 7 4 6 . 4 4 0 0 • F a c s i m i l e : 3 1 0 . 7 4 6 . 4 4 9 9
ELKINS KALT WEINTRAUB REUBEN GARTSIDE LLP JEFFREY K. RIFFER, State Bar No. 87016
jriffer@elkinskalt.com
10345 W. Olympic Blvd. Los Angeles, California 90064 Telephone: 310.746.4400 Facsimile: 310.746.4499 Attorneys for Defendant David Miscavige SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT CHRISSIE CARNELL BIXLER; CEDRIC BIXLER-ZAVALA; JANE DOE #1; MARIE BOBETTE RIALES; and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, v. CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL; RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY CENTER; CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY CELEBRITY CENTRE INTERNATIONAL; DAVID MISCAVIGE; DANIEL MASTERSON; and DOES 1-25, Defendants. CASE No. 19STCV29458 [Assigned for All Purposes to: Hon. Steven J. Kleifield, Dept. 57] SPECIALLY-APPEARING DEFENDANT DAVID MISCAVIGE’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT AND TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS’ PROOF OF SERVICE AS FRAUDULENT Date: March 11, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 57 RESERVATION ID: 770700581282 Action Filed: August 22, 2019 Trial Date: Not Set
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/04/2020 05:09 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by W. Moore,Deputy Clerk
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1358980v3
2
SPECIALLY-APPEARING DEFENDANT DAVID MISCAVIGE’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF PROCESS, & STRIKE POS AS FRAUDULENT
E
L K I N S
K
A L T
W
E I N T R A U B
R
E U B E N
G
A R T S I D E L L P
1 0 3 4 5 W . O l y m p i c B l v d . L o s A n g e l e s , C a l i f o r n i a 9 0 0 6 4 T e l e p h o n e : 3 1 0 . 7 4 6 . 4 4 0 0 • F a c s i m i l e : 3 1 0 . 7 4 6 . 4 4 9 9
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
PLAINTIFFS’ DECLARATION OF MAILING IS FALSE OR FRAUDULENT ..................................................................................................... 8
PLAINTIFFS’ ALLEGATIONS REGARDING MR. MISCAVIGE’S OFFICE ADDRESS ARE BASELESS AND IRRELEVANT ............................... 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1358980v3
3
SPECIALLY-APPEARING DEFENDANT DAVID MISCAVIGE’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF PROCESS, & STRIKE POS AS FRAUDULENT
E
L K I N S
K
A L T
W
E I N T R A U B
R
E U B E N
G
A R T S I D E L L P
1 0 3 4 5 W . O l y m p i c B l v d . L o s A n g e l e s , C a l i f o r n i a 9 0 0 6 4 T e l e p h o n e : 3 1 0 . 7 4 6 . 4 4 0 0 • F a c s i m i l e : 3 1 0 . 7 4 6 . 4 4 9 9
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) State Cases
City Breeze, LLC v. Shahi
Gilbert v. Sykes
, 147 Cal. App. 4th 13 (2007) ........................................................................................ 4
Lebel v. Mai
, 210 Cal. App. 4th 1154 (2012) .................................................................................... 5
Federal Statutes
Code of Civil Procedure
§ 128.7(b) ................................................................................... 7
Code of Civil Procedure
§ 415.20(b) ................................................................................. 8
State Statutes
Bus. & Prof. Code
§ 6068(d) ............................................................................................. 7
Rules
California Rules of Professional Conduct
, Rule 3.3(a) .................................................... 7
California Rules of Professional Conduct
, Rule 8.4(c) .................................................... 7
