## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

com, you must read and accept the following conditions: By using and reading any book published by BOOKYARDS.com, it is presumed that you have accepted the following conditions: BOOKYARDS goal is to promote and encourage a taste for reading in all people regardless of age. In the pursuit of this goal, BOOKYARDS has created a bank of books from different sources that are intended for people of all ages, including the reproduction of printed editions. Books found in BOOKYARDS E-bank are not submitted to any copyright and are therefore considered as being "Public Domain" in the U.S.A. Any book can be copied, exchanged or otherwise distributed as long as such copy, exchange or distribution is not made in a lucrative purpose. All formats of all books published on BOOKYARDS are the sole and exclusive property of BOOKYARDS.com, and cannot therefore be reproduced in any manner without the express authorization of BOOKYARDS.com BOOKYARDS.com will not be held responsible for any damage whatsoever and of any nature that can be suffered, directly or indirectly, by the use or download of the books published in BOOKYARDS. You can notify BOOKYARDS on typing and / or other errors by writing to: service@bookyards.com

UNIVERSAL LAW OF GRAVITATION BY: ISAAC NEWTON CATEGORY: SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY – PHYSICS The Universal Law of Gravitation By Sir Isaac Newton There is a popular story that Newton was sitting under an apple tree. by Newton's 2nd Law there must be a force that acts on the apple to cause this acceleration. Sir Isaac's Most Excellent Idea . What Really Happened with the Apple? Probably the more correct version of the story is that Newton. upon observing an apple fall from a tree. we expect the apple to be accelerated toward the ground. Then imagine the apple tree is twice as high. so this suggests that this force that we call gravity reaches to the top of the tallest apple tree. began to think along the following lines: The apple is accelerated. and he suddenly thought of the Universal Law of Gravitation. an apple fell on his head. this is almost certainly not true in its details. Again. Let's call this force "gravity". As in all such legends. since its velocity changes from zero as it is hanging on the tree and moves toward the ground. Thus. but the story contains elements of what actually happened. and the associated acceleration the "accleration due to gravity".

(Remember that an acceleration is a change in velocity and that velocity is a vector.Now came Newton's truly brilliant insight: if the force of gravity reaches to the top of the highest tree. as indicated by the shortest trajectory in the figure. so it has both a magnitude and a direction. Newton reasoned that if the cannon projected the cannon ball with exactly the right velocity. might it not reach even further. Suppose we fire a cannon horizontally from a high mountain. the orbit of the Moon about the Earth could be a consequence of the gravitational force. This can be illustrated with the thought experiment shown in the following figure. in particular.) But as we increase the muzzle velocity for our imaginary cannon. the cannon ball would have been put into orbit around the Earth. That is. which is curving away at the same rate that the projectile falls. always falling in the gravitational field but never reaching the Earth. Finally. because of the gravitational force directed toward the center of the Earth and the associated acceleration. Thus. the projectile will travel further and further before returning to earth. an acceleration occurs if either or both the magnitude and the direction of the velocity change. might it not reach all the way to the orbit of the Moon! Then. the projectile would travel completely around the Earth. Newton concluded that the orbit of the Moon was of exactly the same nature: . because the acceleration due to gravity could change the velocity of the Moon in just such a way that it followed an orbit around the earth. the projectile will eventually fall to earth.

The Center of Mass for a Binary System If you think about it a moment. in the process he modified Kepler's 3rd Law. endowing it with almost god-like qualities that justified its special place. with the force having a universal form: The constant of proportionality G is known as the universal gravitational constant. However Newton. It is termed a "universal constant" because it is thought to be the same at all places and all times. demonstrated that the situation actually was more symmetrical than Kepler imagined and that the Sun does not occupy a privileged postion. Newton came to the conclusion that any two objects in the Universe exert gravitational attraction on each other. it may seem a little strange that in Kepler's Laws the Sun is fixed at a point in space and the planet revolves around it. . thus producing its orbit. Why is the Sun privileged? Kepler had rather mystical ideas about the Sun. and thus universally characterizes the intrinsic strength of the gravitational force. largely as a corollary of his 3rd Law.the Moon continuously "fell" in its path around the Earth because of the acceleration due to gravity. By such reasoning.

it doesn't matter whether the Sun is labeled with 1 and the planet with 2.0. (Caution: this applet is written under Java 1. The fulcrum point at which the see-saw will exactly balance two people sitting on either end is the center of mass for the two persons sitting on the see-saw. Newton realized that in the planet-Sun system the planet does not orbit around a stationary Sun. It should work on Windows systems under Netscape 4. which is only supported by the most recent browsers. where P is the planetary orbital period and the other quantities have the meanings described above. Now notice what happens in Newton's new equation if one of the masses (either 1 or 2.) Newton's Modification of Kepler's Third Law Because for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.06 or the most recent version of Internet Explorer 4. suppose the Sun is labeled as mass 1.Consider the diagram shown to the right.1. with the Sun as one mass and the planet as the other mass. One obtains the same result in either case.) Notice the symmetry of this equation: since the masses are added on the left side and the distances are added on the right side. We may define a point called the center of mass between two objects through the equations where R is the total separation between the centers of the two objects. this form of the equation assumes that masses are measured in solar masses. He then modified Kepler's 3rd Law to read. remember the symmetry) is very large compared with the other. In particular. The center of mass is familiar to anyone who has ever played on a see-saw. Newton proposed that both the planet and the Sun orbited around the common center of mass for the planet-Sun system. or vice-versa. times in Earth years. but may not yet work on Mac or Unix systems or earlier Windows browsers. Instead. Here is a Center of Mass Calculator that will help you make and visualize calculations concerning the center of mass. and its mass is much larger than the mass for . (As in the earlier discussion of Kepler's 3rd Law. and distances in astronomical units.

where one mass is much larger than the other. we see that the center of mass for the system essentially concides with the center of the massive object: This is the situation in the Solar System: the Sun is so massive compared with any of the planets that the center of mass for a Sun-planet pair is always very near the center of the Sun. However. Two Limiting Cases We can gain further insight by considering the position of the center of mass in two limits. Then it is easy to see that the center of mass lies equidistant from the two masses and if they are gravitationally bound to each other. as Kepler originally thought. detailed observations made after Kepler show that Newton's modified form of Kepler's 3rd Law is in better accord with the data than Kepler's original form. each mass orbits the common center of mass for the system lying midway between them: This situation occurs commonly with binary stars (two stars bound gravitationally to each other so that they revolve around their common center of mass). However. Then the sum of the two masses is always approximately equal to the mass of the Sun. and if we take ratios of Kepler's 3rd Law for two different planets the masses cancel from the ratio and we are left with the original form of Kepler's 3rd Law: Thus Kepler's 3rd Law is approximately valid because the Sun is much more massive than any of the planets and therefore Newton's correction is small. now consider the other limiting case where the two masses are equal to each other. The data Kepler had access to were not good enough to show this small effect. for all practical purposes the Sun IS almost (but not quite) motionless at the center of mass for the system.any of the planets. Then. In many . First consider the example just addressed. Thus.

These limiting cases for the location of the center of mass are perhaps familiar from our afore-mentioned playground experience.) Weight and the Gravitational Force We have seen that in the Universal Law of Gravitation the crucial quantity is mass. the fulcrum must be placed close to the heavier person to achieve balance. Here is a Java applet that implements Newton's modified form of Kepler's 3rd law for two objects (planets or stars) revolving around their common center of mass. the fulcrum must be placed in the middle to balance. It should work on Windows systems under Netscape 4.06 or the most recent version of Internet Explorer 4. but if one person weighs much more than the other person.binary star systems the masses of the two stars are similar and Newton's correction to Kepler's 3rd Law is very large. If persons of equal weight are on a seesaw. but may not yet work on Mac or Unix systems or earlier Windows browsers. We can illustrate by choosing the Earth as one of the two masses in the previous illustration of the Law of Gravitation: . which is only supported by the most recent browsers. and masses for Keplers' laws as modified by Newton (see subsequent section) to include the effect of the center of mass. separations.1. (Caution: this applet is written under Java 1. in reality they are related but quite different things. In popular language mass and weight are often used to mean the same thing. Here is a Kepler's Laws Calculator that allows you to make simple calculations for periods.0. What we commonly call weight is really just the gravitational force exerted on an object of a certain mass. By making one mass much larger than the other in this interactive animation you can illustrate the ideas discussed above and recover Kepler's original form of his 3rd Law where a less massive object appears to revolve around a massive object fixed at one focus of an ellipse.

) The measured gravitational acceleration at the Earth's surface is found to be about 980 cm/second/second. at the surface of the Earth. It follows that mass is constant for an object (actually this is not quite true.Thus. (We assume the Earth to be spherical and neglect the radius of the object relative to the radius of the Earth in this discussion. thus. but weight depends on the location of the object. but we will save that surprise for our later discussion of the Relativity Theory). r. if we transported the preceding object of mass m to the surface of the Moon. with the acceleration due to gravity as the proportionality constant. mass and weight are proportional to each other. the weight of an object of mass m at the surface of the Earth is obtained by multiplying the mass m by the acceleration due to gravity. For example. The acceleration due to gravity is approximately the product of the universal gravitational constant G and the mass of the Earth M. divided by the radius of the Earth. Mass and Weight Mass is a measure of how much material is in an object. Thus. squared. but it will weigh much less on the . g. our object has mass m both on the surface of the Earth and on the surface of the Moon. but weight is a measure of the gravitational force exerted on that material in a gravitational field. the gravitational acceleration would change because the radius and mass of the Moon both differ from those of the Earth.

.surface of the Moon because the gravitational acceleration there is a factor of 6 less than at the surface of the Earth.

- Chapter 7 Problems
- gravitation simulation
- Imso 2011 Essay
- Layouts in Java
- Gravitation
- SUPA Calculus Buoy Project
- Mass+and+Weight
- Satellite Tool Kit
- lp hs ess1 4 n q 2 f le 1 g mg 1 f if 4
- Lower Energy Cost Increases Economic Transactions
- Natsc2 seatwork
- ap physics 1 - newtons laws
- int 1st yr ann 97
- Gravity 3
- Earth is Slowing Down and Gravity Plays a Huge Part in Human Evolution
- Phy Space Fatmuscle
- 25304576 the Problem of Increasing Human Energy by Nikola Tesla
- 1-s2.0-S1319157814000032-main
- Isaac Newton, Gale E. Christianson
- CACPT Science Paper
- EOB..M-BA-e-0710
- Newton
- 4200_techmanual
- Numerical Solution of Time-Dependent Gravitational Schrodinger Equation
- Year 11 Full Investigation
- force and newton weebly
- Paper 3 Nov 2003 Physics
- A a A
- A report on communication satellites
- 1GRAVITATIONBASICFORCES.pdf

Skip carousel

- Exercises for lower-limb amputees
- As 2498.8-1991 Methods of Testing Rigid Cellular Plastics Determination of Water Absorption
- Amusement Park Physics
- Commercial Standard Fire & Marine Co. v. Beard Well Servicing Co., Inc, 210 F.2d 560, 10th Cir. (1954)
- Formula Handout November 2016 (1)
- 43459_1925-1929
- Mercury Capsule Number 2 Configuration Specification (Mercury-Redstone No. 1)
- District Truck Safety Enforcement Plan
- Chocolate causes weight loss
- United States v. Earl Thomas Smith, Jr., 51 F.3d 980, 11th Cir. (1995)
- Mission Aircrew Inflight Guide
- tmpFF95.tmp
- CIA Weightregainmenopause
- Research on the Weight of Buses and Touring Coaches - Final Report
- Mercury Capsule No. 15A Configuration Specification MA-10
- Danielle Ostendorf
- tmp3D8F
- 58466_1945-1949
- How Body Weight Works ( Or Doesn't Work So Well)
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co., 430 U.S. 519 (1977)
- World Products, Inc., a Corporation of the State of Ohio (Plaintiff), in No. 14731 v. Central Freight Service, Inc., a Corporation of the State of New Jersey (Defendant), in No. 14732, 342 F.2d 290, 3rd Cir. (1965)
- United States v. Steven Pirre, 927 F.2d 694, 2d Cir. (1991)
- 28323_1935-1939
- NASA Facts Weightlessness
- Launch Vehicle No. 12 Flight Evaluation
- tmp4AA5.tmp
- 28323_1930-1934
- United States v. Garcia, Et Ano, Jeffrey Camacho, 900 F.2d 571, 2d Cir. (1990)
- 48775_1925-1929
- Teacher Guide Activity 4 Action-Reaction

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading