This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
In my humble opinion; the neglect of the “Original Organic Constitution dated 1787”, is evidence of our demise and corruption in the courts, to wit, I see little we can do about it, especially due to the modification and omissions of the “missing Thirteenth Amendment”. We can attempt legal remedy in the courts, but what do you expect a corrupt court to do except protect it's own position. We the People may very well need to resort to brute force to take back what is ours or give it up completely, if the courts should disregard our attempt to restore the “Republic for which it stands”. . . what is next and who will lead the charge? Rod Class? To date I have not heard of him winning in court with his excellent works. He is truly making a valiant effort, and I commend him on his brilliant fight on “THEIR” turf, where judges referee and attorney (lawyers, counselors at law) preside over the “common man” . . . The only place where a man can set himself apart is on the battlefield, where the true strength of mind and body conspire to preserve ones own beliefs and survival; anything else is a fiction created by legislators, attorneys, congressmen, and those who would benefit from titles of nobility at the expense of your rights and freedoms.
The Original Thirteenth Amendment
Ratified March 12, 1819 The Founders held an intense disdain and distrust of "Nobility" as a result of a long history, during Colonial times, of abuses and excesses against the Rights of Man and the established Common Law and Constitutions by the "Nobility", and therefore placed in the new Constitution two injunctions against acceptance of Titles of Nobility or Honor or emoluments from external sources. The Revolutionary War for Independence was primarily waged to eliminate these abuses and excesses of the "Nobility" and the "Monied Classes" from the life of the Nation, recognizing the Equality of all men. As there was no penalty attached to a title of nobility or honor in the Constitution as originally ratified, the Original Thirteenth Amendment was proposed in December of 1809 to institute penalty for accepting or using a "Title of Nobility or Honor" to set oneself apart from, or superior to, or possessing of any special privileges or immunities not available to any other citizen of the United States, and to eliminate the widespread use of "emoluments" as bribery and graft of the legislatures and judiciary used to further the causes and positions of "Special Interests". It was an attempt to keep politicians and civil servants "Honest" in their service to the citizens. As noted in the discussion in Article 1 of the Constitution, the original Thirteenth Amendment, was ratified in 1819, adding a heavy penalty upon any person holding or accepting a Title of Nobility or Honor, or emoluments from external powers by making that person "cease to be a citizen of the United
States" and "incapable of holding any Office of Trust or Profit under the United States". This Amendment was proposed, properly ratified, and was a matter of record in the several States archives until 1876, by which time it was quietly, and fraudulently deleted, never repealed, during the period of Reconstruction after the Civil War and the presently acknowledged Thirteenth Amendment was substituted. The original records of the original 13th amendment were thought to be destroyed at the time of the burning of the capitol during the War of 1812, but have since been found in the archives of the British Museum, the national archives and in the archives of several of the States and territories. The fact of its existence had been lost to memory until, by chance, researchers discovered in the public library at Belfast, Maine an 1825 copy of the U. S. Constitution. Subsequent research shows that it was in the records of the ratifying states and territories until 1876, the last to drop it from record was the Territory of Wyoming after 1876. The most intriguing discovery was the 1867 Colorado Territory edition which includes both the "missing" Thirteenth Amendment and the current 13th Amendment, on the same page. The current 13th Amendment is listed as the 14th Amendment in the 1867 Colorado edition. – See Images CO1868-1, CO1868-2, CO1868-3, CO1868-4, and CO1868-5. Located on this site; http://www.barefootsworld.net/consti12.html Amendment on the same page. The current 13th Amendment is listed as the 14th, the current 14th amendment is omitted, and the current 15th Amendment is in proper place. See Images WY1876-1, WY1876-2, WY1876-3 - See Ref. "Thirteenth Amendment Publication Table" For further discussion and the history of the Original Thirteenth Amendment see "Demon of Discord, Ratification and Suppression of the Original Thirteenth Article of Amendment to the Constitution of the United States." On December 3, 1860, the month after Lincoln was elected, President Buchanan asked Congress to propose an "explanatory amendment". It was to be another 13th Amendment, to eradicate and cover-up the deletion of the Original Thirteenth Title of Nobility and Honour Amendment. This proposed amendment, which would have forever legalized slavery, was signed by President Buchanan the day before Lincoln took office. Under the Constitution of 1787 all sworn judges and officers are properly seated and are de jure Officers properly functioning in proper Offices. Under the Constitution of 1871 all sworn judges and officers are not properly seated and are de facto officers improperly functioning in "Mob Rule" fictional offices, under vi et armis, under the corporate state of Washington, District of Columbia, a ten mile square (actually, a 68 square mile) Foreign Country, whose states are Guam, Puerto Rico, American
Samoa, the Virgin Islands, etc., etc. THE MOST SIGNIFICANT difference between (1) the Original, Organic, Constitution for the united States of America adopted in 1787, and (2) the Constitution adopted for the “Act of 1871”, being the Constitution of the United States of America, is the obvious changes in the Amendments, such changes being, not subtle, but extreme and contrary. Secondarily, the Preface to the Original Organic Constitution for the united states was, exactly that, a Constitution (contract) for the newly formed states of the Republic. The latter (1871) Constitution of (belonging to) the United States is a corporate charter for the now defunct federal government. These changes, on the surface, may seem insignificant, however, once the definition of the “changed” word (term) in question is examined, you’ll find a MAJOR, yes, even catastrophic to society, difference. Please pay close attention to the next two (2) brief statements. From Black’s Law Dictionary, 1st Edition, 1891 (active in the time frame of the “Act of 1871”), the definition of the word “for” is; “For. In French Law. A tribunal. Le for interieur, the interior forum; the tribunal of conscience.” (Emphasis added.) From Black’s Law Dictionary, 1st Edition, 1891, the definition of the word “tribunal” is; “tribunal. The seat of a judge; the place where he administers justice; a judicial court; the bench of judges.” Logic concludes that if a judge (or, any/all other officer(s)) has not taken an Oath to uphold the Original, Organic, Constitution for the united States of America, he is UN-SEATED!! Remember, the latter (1871 edition) Constitution is not “for” the Union of States, but rather “of” (belonging to – a possession of). Also, keep in mind, that the latter Constitution was initiated as a Charter for a Commercial Corporation, an enterprise for gain and profit! We know (from history) that the latter Amendments to the Constitution are different than the earlier Amendments. The original document, at Amendment 13, specifically denies any holder of Title of Nobility (T.O.N.A., Titles Of Nobility Act) to any access of the Public Trust, Citizenship, etc., while the “superimposed” document prevents private ownership of slaves and the actions of involuntary servitude at Amendment number 13. Thus, we are observing some vast differences, originating well after the established fundamentals of law had been in place for over one hundred years. Other differences of a similar nature have effectively
placed the unknowing, living man into a position of bondage, involuntary servitude, and slavery. This constitutional study could easily fill volumes by itself . . . –
The Constitution (1st or 2nd) requires who's justice to be served? One is of the people, the other of corporate greed.
Consider the TWO (2) constitutions, the “Original Organic Constitution for the United States of America, dated 1789, AND the corporate charter constitution titled “Constitution of the United States”, dated 1871, a.k.a. Act of 1871 – you should be specific as to which one an oath has been sworn to. – by: Phil Daniels
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.