You are on page 1of 10

Francesco Algarotti

Sopra la presa di Bergen-op-Zoom

Discorso X dei XX Discorsi Militari
in Opere del Conte Algarotti, Cavaliere dell’Ordine del Merito e Ciamberlano di S. M. il Re di
Prussia, Tomo IIII, Livorno, MDCCLXIV, presso Marco Coltellini = Vol. V dell'Edizione 1779
and the Wikipedia Article " Siege of Bergen op Zoom (1747)"

French soldier of the Normandie brigade 1740s

Siege of Bergen op Zoom (1747)

Low Countries: War of the Austrian Succession. Bergen op Zoom is in the upper center.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Date July – September 1747
Location Bergen op Zoom, Dutch Republic
Result French victory


Dutch Republic Great Britain France

Commanders and leaders
General Cronström Count Lowendal
initially 10,000, varying during the siege initially 30,000, varying during the siege
Casualties and losses
5,000[1] 5,259[2]
The Siege of Bergen op Zoom (Dutch, Beleg van Bergen op Zoom) took place during the Austrian War of Succession, when a
French army, under the command of Lowendal and the overall direction of Marshal Maurice de Saxe, laid siege and captured the
strategic Dutch border fortress of Bergen op Zoom on the border of Brabant and Zealand in 1747.[3] Bergen op Zoom was defended
by allies, consisting of: the Dutch, Austrians, British, Hanoverians and Hessians, that supported the Pragmatic Sanction. After seven
years of brutal war, both sides in this conflict were suffering from weariness of the war. Although tentative peace initiatives had been
put forward, neither side was yet willing to make meaningful concessions.[4] The capture of Bergen op Zoom would be a signal
defeat for the Dutch and would open the door for an invasion of the Dutch Netherlands. The siege was the center of attention in
Europe and news of it followed eagerly in numerous reports with the Pragmatic allies confident that the fortress would withstand the
French and the French determined it should fall.[5]
Preliminary maneuvers Following his victory at the Battle of Lauffeld, the French Marshal de Saxe detached a force 30,000[6]
strong under the command of General von Lowendal, a master in the art of siege craft,[7] to lay siege to Bergen op Zoom.[8] Saxe
calculated that his numerically inferior opponents would not be able to adequately defend two fortified cities at once.[9] Needing to
protect Maastricht from the threat posed by De Saxe's forces, neither the British commander, the Duke of Cumberland, nor the
Austrian commander, Batthiani, felt able to move to support Bergen op Zoom. For the Dutch this proved the unwillingness of her
allies to assist them in their time of need, while their British allies felt the Dutch demands for greater allied effort in this war was
absurd – given the Dutch had still not declared war on France.[10] Bergen op Zoom was a fortress town with a population of some
5,000 people and an initial garrison of 3,000 under the command of the 86 year old, vigorous Governor General Cronström. The
circumference of the fortress ramparts was about three miles with ten bastions covered by five hornworks. The intervals contain
twenty one ravelins which are covered by stone lunettes. Much of the surrounding country was marshland. Additionally, an
intrenched camp at Rosendahl, defended by three forts: Moermont, Pinsen, Rovers, and trench lines connecting to the city on the
northeast, were held by the Prince of Hildburghausen with 20 battalions of infantry and 14 squadrons of cavalry that could reinforce
or relieve the garrison. Because of these lines and and some lesser lines to the west, Bergen op Zoom could not be completely
invested, or surrounded. Further, because of the low lying ground, large areas fronting the defenses were inundated by the Dutch
using various sluices and channels and this prevented any French approach in those parts of the field. The fortress was the chief work
of the great Dutch engineer, Menno van Coehoorn. It was believed to be impregnable[11] and was considered the strongest
fortification in Dutch Brabant.[12] Bergen op Zoom had withstood two previous sieges, the first in 1588 and a second in 1622. It could
be supplied with munitions and provision by boats using two navigable canals each defended by its own fort.[13] Bergen op Zoom was
well-garrisoned and well-supplied, so the siege by French forces did not cause immediate alarm in the Netherlands.[14] The fortress
had access to the sea, and the Dutch navy supplied the fortress without serious interference by the French. The French, since they
were the besieging force and controlled much of the surrounding area, were also well-supplied and reinforced. However, the allies
had an army under Prince Waldeck nearby which posed a countinuing threat to French supply lines.[15]

The various bastions, ravelins and lunettes of the fortification were all named and would mount over 230 cannon and mortars during
the course of the siege. The principal effort of the French concentrated on the bastions Coehoorn and Pucelle. Facing the French
trench lines, the sides of Coehoorn were flanked on its right by the ravelin Antwerpen and on its left the ravelin Diden. Between the
bastion and Antwerpen was the lunette Holland and between the bastion and Diden was the lunette Zealand. To the left of Diden was
the lunette, Utrecht, and left of that the bastion Pucelle. The area between the bastions of Coehoorn and Pucelle was chosen partly
because the ground was drier and partly because this was the only part of the fortress not directly covered by additional lines as was
the northwest and south east sides of Bergen op Zoom. This area would witness the most continuous and fierce combat of the
Laying the parallels On the night of the 14 July the French opened the trenches using 2,400 workers supported by 10 companies of
grenadiers and 5 battalions of infantry.[17] Lowendal used 12,000 of his troops to man the trench lines and deployed the other 18,000
as an army of observation.[18] The first parallel was laid overnight of the first day, 400 paces out from the fortifications. On 17 July
the second parallel was dug and over the night of 22 July the third parallel was completed. Batteries were raised and the French
artillery began to bombard the defenders on the 20 July. Each of the trench parallels were laid and their saps pushed forward by the
French, drawing ever closer to the fortress. The fourth parallel was finished between 26 and 28 July and a fifth laid up against the
works on 8 September.[19] Various stormattacks followed on the outer works of the fortress, but the defences held firm. The French
had also dug mines under the redoubts, ravelins and lunettes to blow them up. They were in their turn countermined by Dutch
sappers. On 25 July Loudon's Highlanders, also known as the 64th Foot, made a sally from Fort Rover which took and destroyed a
major French battery.[20] Over the course of the siege, other British troops, engineers and artillery joined[21] the allied garrison as well
as some Austrian miners. After a month of fighting the French made a lodgement in the covered way.[22] Unfortunately for the
French, the Dutch still possessed several lunettes in the area, which were used to bombard the French held covered way. The lunette,
Zealand, was held by a battalion of Hessian allies. Using mines, stormattacks and continuous bombarding the French drove the
Dutch out of these lunettes. The 75 mines sprung, 43 by the Dutch and 32 by the French, between the bastions Coehoorn and
Pucelle[23] exemplify the intensity of these operations around the covered way. After two months of intense fighting French were
finally able to bombard the main wall. Saxe sent Lowendal 12,000 reinforcements to make up for serious losses, while the garrison
received reinforcement and reflief from troops within the lines of the fortified camp.[24] On 8 August the allied army, formerly under
Waldeck but now commanded by Prince Schwartzenberg, in conjunction with the corps of Hildburghausen, made a badly
coordinated and poorly executed night attack on the French in an attempt to break the siege. Even so, the allies were repelled with
difficulty and Swartzenberg continued to harass and intercept French supply convoys taking a convoy on 14 August.[25]
Storming the breaches Lowendal felt an urgency to take the town because autumn rains were coming. The rains would cause certain
failure of the siege. Löwendahl, advised that several breaches in the defensive fortification were practicable,[26][27] stormed the city in
a coup de main attack on the early morning of 18 September 1747. The Dutch commanders did not perceive the breaches as
practicable and had taken no particular cautionary measures. The city garrison consisted of nine battalions: two Scots battalions,
Colyear and Majoribanks; Waldeck and Saxe-Gotha, Lewe, Evertsen, Holstein-Gottorp, Deutz and van Rechteren.[28] French columns
accompanied by laborers to clear any obstacles were prepared for each breach. In the center were 14 companies of grenadiers
supported by 13 battalions of the main body of infantry. On the French left the bastion Coehoorn would be assaulted by 6 companies
of grenadiers and 6 battalions. On the right, 7 companies of grenadiers from the regiments of d'Eu, Coincy, Chabrillant, la Trasne and
50 dismounted Royal dragoons would assault the bastion Pucelle supported by the first battalions of the regiments of Normandie,
Montboissier and d'Eu followed by 3 brigades of sappers, 20 gunners, 300 workers. In addition the first battalions of the regiments
Montmorin, Royal de Vaisseaux and Beauvoisis would march in support of the attack.[29] The Enfants Perdus, or Forlorn Hope,
consisted of 200 volunteers, 2 companies of grenadiers supported by a battalion of infantry and were destined to attack Diden, the
half-moon, or ravelin.[30] At 4 a.m. a brief signal bombardment of the ravelin was made and a contingent of French Grenadiers gained
the fosse, penetrated the breaches and then opened a sallyport which allowed the rest of the troops inside where they formed up in the
gorge of the ravelin and then gained the ramparts without opposition. The French then seized the gates and entered the city sword in
hand. The garrison commander, Cronström, and his officers had reportedly still been asleep in their beds when most of the officers
were captured by the French.[31] The brigade of Loudon's Highlanders[32] put up a tenacious defense against the French through the
streets of the city, making a stand in the market place losing two-thirds their number but enabling Governor Cronström to escape.
The Dutch and their allies suffered some 3,000 casualties during the storm and the sack while French losses were only 479.[33] After
the fall of the town, the garrisons of the forts of Rovers, Pinsen and Moermant in the lines outside the city surrendered.[34] Following
the coup de main, the French soldiers lost their discipline and sacked the town and, although the sack ended quickly, several thousand
civilians were reportedly killed or injured. Lowendal declared his regrets but European opinion was outraged. Saxe defended
Löwendhal to Louis XV saying, "There is no middle course, either you must hang him or make him a Marshal of France."[35]
Aftermath With the capture of Bergen op Zoom, the French now had control of the entire length of the river Scheldt.[36] The defeat
caused a rift between the Dutch and British governments.[37] The British now began to realise that they had overestimated the military
capability of the Dutch Republic and, therefore, its ability to resist the French forces.[38] The Dutch on the other hand were furious
about the fact that her allies were unwilling to relieve the city. The city was key to opening up the Dutch Republic and Hanover to a
potential French invasion. Lowendal was made a Marshal of France for his exploit and the French now controlled the length of the
Scheldt river. Along with the defeat at Lauffeld, the defeat at Bergen op Zoom forced the British to re-enter negotiations, and to take
seriously the on-going talks at the Congress of Breda, leading to a treaty in 1748.[39]
1. ^ Skrine, p. 337
2. ^ Skrine, p. 337
3. ^ Lodge p.271.
4. ^ Browning. Austrian Succession, pp.317-319.
5. ^ The Gentleman's Magazine, Vol. 17, London, 1747. pp. 328-329, 401-402, 409-412, 464-465. Cust: Annals, V.II, p. 121,
"The fate of Bergen-op-Zoom, on which the eyes of all Europe were fixed...".
6. ^ Cust, Edward. Annals of the wars of the eighteenth century, Vol.II, London, 1858, p. 120
7. ^ Cust: Annals, V.II, p. 121.
8. ^ Lodge p. 260.
9. ^ Browning: Austrian Succession, p. 318
10. ^ Browning: Austrian Succession, p. 321.
11. ^ d' Espagnac, Jean-Baptiste-Joseph Damarzit de Sahuguet. Histoire de Maurice, comte de Saxe, duc de Courlande et de
Semigalle, Vol. 2, Paris, MDCCLXXV. p.283.
12. ^ Cust, Edward. Annals of the wars of the eighteenth century, Vol.II, London, 1858, p. 120
13. ^ Skrine: Fontenoy, p.335.
14. ^ Lodge p.260–71
15. ^ Skrine: Fontenoy, p.336
16. ^ Wittje, G.. Die wichtigsten Schlachten, Belagerungen und verschanzten Lager vom Jahre 1708 bis 1855. Leipzig und
Heidelberg, 1861. pp. 270 to 275.
17. ^ d'Espagnac: Histoire, p.283.
18. ^ Browning: Austrian Succession, p. 319.
19. ^ Wittje, G.. Die wichtigsten Schlachten, Belagerungen und verschanzten Lager vom Jahre 1708 bis 1855. Leipzig und
Heidelberg, 1861, pp. 270 to 275.
20. ^ Browne, James, A history of the Highlands and of the Highland clans, Volume 4, Galsgow, 1840, p.241.
21. ^ Browne, J.A..England's artillerymen: an historical narrative of the services of the Royal Artillery, London, 1865, p.17.
Along with British engineers and artllery, James Braddock and Simon Frasier served at the siege.
22. ^ [1] Contemporary map of the course of the siege.
23. ^ [2] Contemporary diagram of the attacks on the covered way.
24. ^ Cust: Annals, p.120.
25. ^ Skrine: Fontenoy, p.336.
26. ^ Cust, Edward. Annals of the wars of the eighteenth century, Vol.II, London, 1858, p. 121
27. ^ The Gentleman's Magazine, Vol. 17, 1747, London, p.410.
28. ^ SHAT,A4 86 envoi Wagner, piece 9c -Copie des archive de la Haye.
29. ^ d' Espagnac: Histoire, p. 317.
30. ^ The Gentleman's Magazine, Vol. 17, 1747, London, p.410, Lownedhal's account to Saxe.
31. ^ Lodge p.290
32. ^ Browne: Highlands and of the Highland clans, pp. 240–241, " ...from 1450, are now reduced to 330 ...". Similarly,
Ferguson, James. ed. Papers Illustrating the History of the Scots Brigade, Edinburgh, 1899, p. 226 states of 1,500, 1,124
were killed.
33. ^ Skrine, p.337. Also, Browning: Austrian Succession, p.320.
34. ^ The Gentleman's Magazine, Vol. 17, 1747, London, p.410.
35. ^ Browning: Austrian Succession, p. 320
36. ^ Cust: Annals, p. 122.
37. ^ Cust: Annals, p. 122.
38. ^ Lodge p.290–92
39. ^ Browning: Austrian Succession, p.329. Also, Simms: Three Victories, p. 350.
• Browning, Reed. The War of the Austrian Succession. St. Martin's Griffin, 2008, ISBN 0312125615.
• Cust, Edward. Annals of the wars of the eighteenth century, Vol.II, London, 1858.
• Lodge, Sir Richard. Studies in Eighteenth Century diplomacy 1740–48. John Murray, 1930.
• Nimwegen, O. van De Republiek der Verenigde Nederlanden als grote mogendheid. (1740–1748). Amsterdam, 2002,
ISBN 906707540X
• Rodger, N.A.M. The Insatiable Earl: A Life of John Montagu, Fourth Earl of Sandwich, 1718–1792. Harper Collins, 1993,
ISBN 0393035875.
• Simms, Brendan. Three Victories and a Defeat: The Rise and Fall of the First British Empire. Penguin Books, 2008, ISBN
• Skrine, Francis Henry.Fontenoy and Great Britain's Share in the War of the Austrian Succession 1741–48. London,
Edinburgh, 1906.
• An authentick and accurate journal of the siege of Bergen-op-Zoom by an English Volunteer. London, 1747.
• The Gentleman's Magazine, Vol. 17, September, 1747. London, 1747.
• d' Espagnac, Jean-Baptiste-Joseph Damarzit de Sahuguet. Histoire de Maurice, comte de Saxe, duc de Courlande et de
Semigalle, Volume 2, Paris, MDCCLXXV.
• Wittje, G.. Die wichtigsten Schlachten, Belagerungen und verschanzten Lager vom Jahre 1708 bis 1855. Leipzig und
Heidelberg, 1861.
Recommended reading
• An authentic journal of the remarkable and bloody siege of Bergen-op-Zoom by the French, under M. de Lowendahl.
Begun July 14, and ended September 16, N.S. 1747 By an English volunteer, late of the garrison of Bergen-op-Zoom,
Dublin : printed by Joshua Kinneir, 1747
Example of a section of a fortress in the 18th century showing covered way, bastions, ravelins.

Example of 2 bastions
Example of a hornwork

Example of 2 kinds of lunettes