## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Om Prakash Sha Department of Ocean Engineering and Naval Architecture Indian Institute of Technology – Kharagpur, 721 302

1.

INTRODUCTION

Rudder and other control surfaces such as bow thrusters are crucial in achieving the controllability objectives. Different control devices can help in achieving the desired controllability characteristics of a vessel, but the rudder is the most simple and popular control device and hence this section will look into the design process of a rudder. During the concept and preliminary design stage, a naval architect has little information on which to base decision. Nevertheless he has to decide at this early stage, the hull form in terms of the shape of the underwater body, distribution of buoyancy, the shapes of sections and underwater profile. He then has to take decisions regarding the location and sizes of propeller, rudder and thrusters. All these decisions, which are interrelated, will affect controllability of the vessel. It is, therefore, important for the naval architect to evaluate at the preliminary design stage the type of rudder, its hydrodynamic efficiency, its structural supports, and clearances between propeller and rudder. The following are the four major constraints that limit the design of a rudder and any other control surface. (a) In profile, the rudder should fit within the dimensions dictated by the shape of the hull. Its maximum span should fit within the vertical distance measured from the bottom of the deepest projection below the baseline of the ship permitted by draught or docking restrictions upward to the bottom of the hull immediately over the rudder or to the minimum prescribed depth below the water surface, whichever is lower. If the rudder is abaft the propeller, its chord should fit within the horizontal distance from the extremity of the ship to a line corresponding to a prescribed clearance from the propeller. (Control surfaces that extend significantly beyond the block dimensions of a ship, such as fin stabilizers, or the bow planes on some submarines, are almost always designed to the retractable). (b) The rudders, in maintaining a straight course, should minimise speed loss at every level of ship power plant output. (c) The rudder, the rudder stock, the rudder support, and the steering engine, considered together, should be of minimum size, weight, complexity, and initial cost, consistent with required effectiveness and acceptable standards of reliability and low upkeep costs.

(d)

Undesirable effects of the rudder on the ship such as rudder-induced vibration should be kept to a tolerable level.

Violation of any of the four listed constraints constitutes a misjudgement in rudder design. Because of the influence of the rudder on ship power [constraint (b)], adherence to a minimum total ship cost [constraint (c)] requires consideration of the entire ship design process.

2.

HYDRODYNAMIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR RUDDER DESIGN

The considerations for rudder design from hydrodynamic point of view are summarised as follows: (a) Type of rudder and location

The type of rudder, its location and relative placement have significant influence on rudder effectiveness and ship controllability. Ideally, rudders should be located near the stern and should be located in the propeller stream for good controllability. Theoretically and from experience it can be shown that for dynamically stable forward moving ship at all speeds except dead slow, lateral control forces should be exerted at the stern and not at the bow. The formula for a ship’s dimensionless turning rate as derived from linear equation of motion for dynamically stable ships is Turning rate = where

L =

L = δR R

⎡ Yν′ Nδ − Nν′ Yδ′ ⎤ ′ ⎢ ′ ′ ⎥ ⎣ Yν N r − Nν′ (Yr′ − Δ′) ⎦

ship length

R = turning radius

δ R = rudder angle.

With conventional rudder location at the stern, the dimensionless turning rate is proportional to the sum of the magnitudes of the two numerator terms. But if the rudder is located at the ′ bow, the sign of the factor N δ is reversed, and the turning rate is then proportional to the difference in magnitudes of the two terms.

The physical effect of locating the rudder at stern and bow for ahead motion is illustrated in Fig 1.

Fig. 1 Effect of location of steering force [1]

When combined with forward ship motion these actions generate drift angle in the same direction, and drift angle brings into play the large hydrodynamic side force and consequent yaw moment that actually causes the turning. If, instead, the lateral control force acts at the bow, the contributions to drift angle due to yaw rotation and lateral translation are in

These are • • • • All movable rudder Horn rudder Balanced rudder with fixed structure All moveable rudder with tail flap Each of these types has been used as single or multiple rudders or single and multiple screw ships. clearances of one propeller radius or more are common between the propellers and rudders of high-powered ships. Locating rudders at the stern in the propeller race takes advantage of the added velocity of the race both at normal ahead speeds and at zero ship speed. One is the possibility of rudder-induced ship vibration. Because both contributions are large. There are. Bow planes are moderately effective in this case because they either extend beyond the hull lines or are located on a superstructure above the main hull and hence do not interact too unfavourably with the hull. The primary function of bow planes is to improve control at low speed at periscope depth under a rough sea. however. Submarines have horizontal bow planes and stern planes to control their motion in the vertical plane. For this reason. . Fig. in this case the stern planes can cause ambiguous effects for reasons associated with the existence of the hydrostatic moment.opposite directions and tend to cancel each other. The reason for this fortunate circumstance is that a properly shaped rudder in the race can recover some of the rotating energy of the race. and turning rate is much smaller than in the rudder-aft case. some negative aspects associated with locating a rudder in the propeller race. This advantage is significant and may not require any increase in propulsion power over what would be required if the rudder were not in the race. Bow planes extending beyond the hull lines are usually made retractable. In the case of submarines that are very unsymmetrical about the xy -plane. their difference is small. which would otherwise be lost. bow planes are also useful to control depth at very low speeds deeply submerged. 2 shows some of the major rudder type available to the designer. M θ .θ .

On the other hand. For ships that are unstable without a rudder. the horn rudder or balanced-with-fixed structure rudder is an attractive alternative to the all-moveable rudder. This is because the total (fixed plus moveable) rudder area of either of these rudders can be adjusted independently to provide the necessary controls-fixed stability. the rudder area needed to achieve control-fixed stability may be larger than that necessary to provide the specified course-changing ability. the all-moveable rudder is preferred for ships that possess control fixed stability without a rudder. The minimum moveable area should satisfy the constraint (c) of Section 1. The . Unless structural support is provided to the bottom of the rudder. The main drawback of the all-moveable rudder is from structural considerations. 2 Various rudder arrangements [1] All movable rudders are desirable for their ability to produce large turning forces for their size. the moveable area can be adjusted independently to provide the required manoeuvring characteristics. With the possible exception of large fast ships. The minimum total area generally satisfies the constraint (b) but not necessarily the constraint (c) of Section 1.Fig. the rudder stock of an allmoveable rudder has to withstand large bending moment as well as torque moment. In such cases.

260 0. Unless necessary.bottom-supported type of rudder was common on slow and medium speed single-screw merchant vessels.7 0. But its use is avoided on high-speed ships as the cantilevered support is a potential source of vibration and its contribution to the support of the rudder may be structurally complicated.6 0. On these ships.255 0. The bending moment on the stock for these rudders is considerable reduced because bearing support is provided close to the span-wise location of the centre of pressure of the rudder. The stern rudder is also more effective than a rudder placed at bow for manoeuvring ahead where as the bow rudder will be more effective in astern manoeuvring. Table 1 gives a rough first guide in selecting the balance ratio based on the block coefficient (CB) of the ship. combinations such as single rudder with twin screws or single screw with twin rudder should be avoid as per as possible. At zero or low speed the propeller slip-stream increases the effectiveness of the rudder. The horn rudder is also favoured for operation in ice. or by the use of horn rudder or balanced rudder with fixed structure.8 Balance ratio 0.265 – 0.250 – 0. . The rudder stock size tends to become excessive on large fast ships. The reason for this is the direction of drift angle which makes substantial contribution to the turning of the ship when the rudder is located aft. The balance ratio is defined as Area of rudder forward of the rudderstoc k total rudder area Table 1 Balance ratio CB 0. a reduction in required rudder stock size can be achieved by extending the lower support bearing down into the rudder as far as practicable.256 – 0.270 The preferred location of the rudder should aft of the propeller at the stern.

6. The rudder area should be calculated and verified during the initial design stage. Size and Height of rudder A suitable rudder area for a given hull form is to be selected so as to satisfy the desired level of dynamic stability and manoeuvring performance in calm water. Ships having higher block coefficient are less stable and therefore require larger rudder area for meeting stability requirements.6 ⎞ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ AR ⎠ 1 2 The DnV formula applies only to rudder arrangement in which then rudder is located the directly behind the propeller. . the rudder area is increased by a factor given by ⎛ 1. The proposed DnV formula for calculating the minimum rudder area is given as: AR ≥ L×T 100 2 ⎡ ⎛B⎞ 1 + 25 ⎜ ⎟ ⎢ ⎝L⎠ ⎢ ⎣ ⎤ ⎥ ⎥ ⎦ ≥ where L×T ⎛ B⎞ ⎜ ⎟ 15 ⎝ L ⎠ 3 4 for L = 5 to 8 B AR T L B = = = = rudder area draught length between perpendicular breadth of the ship The above formula is to be used for aspect ratio ( AR ) of rudder around 1. It may also be noted that larger rudder areas have better performance under adverse conditions of wind and wave. For any other arrangement the DnV suggests an increase the rudder area of at least 30 per cent.(b) Area. A table giving rudder area coefficients for different vessels is given. If the aspect ratio of rudder is less than 1. The value of rudder should be compared with existing rudder areas for similar ship type and size.6 ⎞ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ AR ⎠ 1 3 to ⎛ 1.6.

0 2.3 – 3. However it is desirable to increase the height as much as possible so as to obtain a more efficient high aspect ratio for a given rudder area. The bottom of the rudder is kept just above the keel for protection. Vessel Type Rudder area as a percentage of L × T 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Single screw vessels Twin screw vessels Twin screw vessels with two rudders (total area) Tankers Fast passenger ferries Coastal vessels Vessels with increased manoeuvrability Fishing vessels Sea-going vessels Sailing vessels 1.6 – 1. .5 – 2. No.0 2.9 1.3 2. The rudder height is usually constraint by the stern shape and draught of the vessel.0 A large number of potential manoeuvring troubles can be avoided by providing a margin of extra rudder area at the preliminary design stage.0 – 3. The effectiveness of larger rudder area is directly dependent on the inherent dynamic course stability of the vessel. For some vessels the benefit of larger rudder area will diminish after the rudder area becomes greater than 0. Recommended propeller.8 – 2. A higher value of the bottom clearance is preferred for vessels having frequent operations with trim by stern.3 – 1.0 2.Table 2 : Rudder area coefficients Sl.0 – 4.1 1.5 3.2 × L T .1 2.0 – 6. A vessel with positive inherent dynamic course stability will benefit least with increase of rudder area whereas vessel with instability will benefit most from increased rudder area.5 – 5.9 1. hull and rudder clearances as given by LRS are shown in Fig 3.

The trailing edge of rudder has a noticeable thickness rather than taper to a knife-edge. NACA section having any desired maximum thickness t. Thicker sections offer reasonable drag characteristics and are also preferred from structural considerations. the choice of the chord wise section shape is governed by the following considerations: • • • • • • Highest possible maximum lift Maximum slope of the lift curve with respect to the angle of attack Maximum resistance to cavitation Minimum drag and shaft power Favourable torque characteristics Ease of fabrication. 3 Propeller clearances [3] (c) Section Shape For a given rudder location and rudder area. can be obtained multiplying the basic ordinates by the proper factor as follows: . This allows increased ruggedness of construction and is also beneficial for astern operations. A relatively higher thickness to chord ratio section shapes like NACA0018 and NACA0021 are preferred.Fig. This is because these sections have a relatively constant centre of pressure.

beyond a certain rate further improvements in transient manoeuvres are insignificant.20 ( x − 0. i.± yt = t 0.2969 0. the transient manoeuvres (those manoeuvres in which the period of time the rudder is in motion is relatively long compared to the total manoeuvre time) determine the rudder deflection rate.126 x − 0.1015 x 4 ) where x is the chord length expressed in fraction of chord length along x -axis from 0 to 1. the design maximum rudder angle .3516 x 2 + 0. The quickness of response in yaw and overshoot improve at increased rudder deflection rates.e. Whereas the design rudder deflection angle decides the desired steady turning characteristics. (e) • Maximum rudder deflection angle The maximum rudder deflection angle could be The maximum angle to which the steering gear can turn the rudder. Large full-form ships benefit more from having large rudder areas than from an increase in rate of swing. Fig.2843 x 3 − 0. The effect of an increase over the prescribed minimum of 2 1 3 deg/sec is the greatest on fast and response vessels. Fig. However. 4 shows the basic rudder foil chord wise cross-section with a table of ordinates for a rudder having a thickness of 20% of the chord. 4 Basic ordinates of NACA family airfoils (d) Rudder deflection rate The classification societies and regulatory agencies prescribe a minimum rate of 2 1 3 deg/sec and this value is independent of ship parameters.

the maximum useful rudder deflection may exist at angles of attack less than that of the stall angle. Therefore. The maximum useful rudder deflection angle will decide the design maximum rudder angle and the manoeuvre maximum rudder angle. However. i. i. Rudders experience a loss of lift at stall angles. the manoeuvre maximum rudder angle The maximum rudder deflection angle which when exceeded yields no significant improvements in the characteristics of the manoeuvre. maximum useful rudder deflection angle.e. the maximum useful rudder angle will likely be just lower than the stall angle. 5 Orientation of ship and rudder in a steady turn to starboard . Fig.e.• • The maximum angle specified to be used for a particular manoeuvre.

On the other hand. The geometric drift angle is a function of the radius of turning circle. during a steady turn the angle of attack on the rudder is far less than the deflection angle. The geometric drift angle at the rudder is given by β = βR + ε where ε = angle due to straightening influence of hull and propeller on the flow to the rudder. For example when a rudder is laid over in the opposite direction to check overshoot manoeuvre the angle of attack on the rudder may be larger than the deflection angle if the rudder deflection rate is very fast. β . 5) α = δR − βR where δR βR = = rudder deflection angle actual drift angle at the rudder. by tan (β R + ε ) = tan β + 1 2 R cos β where L is the length of the ship and R is the turning circle radius Measurements of β made during the turning experiments of single-screw merchant ships models reported indicate . Thus the useful maximum rudder deflection angle is likely to be far greater in steady turn than that of overshoot manoeuvre. β R + ε is related to the drift angle at the origin of the ship.The possibility of the rudder achieving an angle of attack exceeding the stall angle is most likely during transient manoeuvres such as overshoot manoeuvre rather than during a steady turn. For a rudder located at a distance L 2 aft of the origin. The magnitude of the maximum rudder deflection angle will in almost all cases be determined by steady turn considerations. The angle of attack at the rudder during steady turn is (see Fig.

which is independent of turning considerations. Certain types of steering gears may not be suitable for mechanical reasons for deflection angles larger than 35 degrees.e. • • RUDDER DESIGN The process of rudder design is usually conducted in two parts: Selection of the geometric parameters and turning rate necessary to develop the desired ship characteristics. ⎡ ⎢ α = δ R − ⎢ tan − 1 ⎢ ⎢ ⎣ ⎧ ⎫⎤ ⎪ ⎪⎥ L ⎨tan 22. Most naval ships and Great Lakes ships are built with design maximum rudder angles up to 45 degrees.β ≈ 22. and Calculations of torque loadings on the arrangement including the steering gear that must control the rudder movements Determination of the hydrodynamic forces and torque on the rudder as the hull turns requires an accurate assessment of: • Hull wake .5 L R (where β is in degrees) The straightening effect of the hull and propellers on the rudder is approximately a linear function of the geometric drift angle in the rudder.5 L R + ⎬⎥ ⎛ 22.5 L ⎞ ⎪⎥ ⎪ 2 R cos ⎜ R ⎟ ⎭⎥ ⎝ ⎠ ⎦ ⎩ ( ) (1 − j ) In most cases the steering gear capabilities tend to impose an upper limit on the rudder deflection angle. 3. ε ≈ j (β R + ε ) ε= j βR 1− j for 0 ≤ j ≤ 1 Combining the preceding equations the following expression of angle of attack on rudder during steady turn is obtained. i.

(e) Bearing radii and coefficients of friction. On ships that have no restrictions on the use of rudder in going astern. The acceptance trials include demonstration of the workability of the Instruction Plate limit. Accordingly. (b) and (d) have to be known for both maximum ahead and maximum astern speeds. It seems reasonable to allow use of full astern power for crash stops. items (a). On recent naval ships.• • • • Hull drift angle Change in the rudder angle of attack as the hull turns In addition we need to know The frictional losses in the rudder stock bearings Steering gear drive mechanism The computation of rudder-stock size requires knowledge of: (a) (b) The maximum design value of the resultant force on the rudder The location of the span-wise centre of pressure resultant force (c) The location of the rudder bearings corresponding to the maximum The computation of the rudder-stock location and steering-gear torque for all the rudder requires knowledge of: (d) The rudder normal force F and the location chord-wise centre of pressure (CP) c as a function of rudder angle of attack at the maximum ship speed. heavy steering gear. . but there is no need to go astern at high speed after stopping. Adequate design for that astern speed would require large. instruction plates are provided limited the sustained astern shaft rotational speed to that which permits steering gear operation within the ahead limits. there has been recognition of the following: • • • • • Typical combatant ships have large astern powers and hence are capable of correspondingly high astern speeds.

81 ∗ L ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ Thrust deduction fraction (t) Wake fraction ( w ) Total appendaged resistance at V (RT) Density of water (ρ ) Propeller Diameter (D) Maximum Astern Speed (Vastern) Design speed ahead V = 0. Details for computation of rudder forces and torque for spade and horn rudders have been given Harrington [2].5144 ⎞ ⎟ Froude Number ⎜ Fn = ⎜ 9. (V R ) max Rudder effective aspect ratio. in order to use free stream data to compute the maximum design value of normal force. location. .5144 ∗ Vknots Speed of Advance (VA ) = V (1 − w) Propeller Thrust ( T ) = RT 1− t = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Newtons kg/m3 m knots m/s m/s Newtons m m knots . α max . Design Speed Ahead (V) ⎛ V ∗ 0. Empirical formulas and experimental data are used for estimating rudder forces and moments. and steering gear torque on the ahead conditions. The maximum flow velocity averaged over the rudder. However.Thus. assumptions have been made concerning: • • • The maximum angle of attack the rudder is likely to encounter.1 Rudder Torque Calculations for a Spade Rudder – Ahead Condition Number of rudders Length on waterline (L) Draught (mean) (T) Max. a . 3. design practice for naval combatant ships bases the calculation of rudder-stock size.

rudder stock centre line location and distribution of rudder area forward and aft of stock centreline must be determined as has been discussed before and the rudder diagram prepared similar to Fig. X 5 . where M = 5 ⎡ 2 (35 − δ )⎤ + 7 ⎢ 7 35 ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ 7o. 6. X 8 and X 9 . 10o. X 4 . Rudder shape. 25o Fig. X 2 . The diameter of lower and upper stock bearings d1 and d 2 in meters and type of bearing must also be noted from Fig. 21o.Dynamic Pressure ( p ) = 1 2 ρ vA 2 + 4T π D2 = = = N/m2 Rudder angle of deflection (δ ) Rudder angle of attack α = M ∗ δ Variation of δ to be considered Variation of α to be considered = = degrees degrees. X 6 . Once the rudder geometry is known the following quantities must be noted in meters: X 1 . 28o. X 7 . Taper Ratio : λ= X5 (X1 + X 2 ) . 14o. 15o. 35o 5o. 20o. 6 Stern arrangement and support details of spade rudder The stern contour and propeller position must be available. 6. X 3 .

3 ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ 2 Δ CD = 2 2 CL 2 − CL 2 2.5 ( X 1 + X 2 + X 5 ) ⎡ 0.5625 − 122.25 − CPC ) C N 1 − Δ C L 2 2 .63 λ − 0.5α a= X3 ⎡ α⎤ 2− ⎥ 75 ⎦ C ⎢ ⎣ : : CL 1 CD 1 Drag coefficient (see Figs 9 and 10) Centre of pressure (see Figs 11 and 12) : CPC1 Lift coefficient C L 1 .73 Δ CL = a CL 2 = CL 1 + Δ CL ⎡ α ⎤ ⎢ 57.25 − 3751. drag coefficient C D 1 and centre of pressure CPC1 can now be determined for various α values and the effective aspect ratio a for sweep angle Ω = 0 and 11 degrees from the graphs given in Figs.Mean chord Sweep angle Rudder deflection angle in degrees Rudder angle of attack in degrees Rudder deflection angle in degrees Effective aspect ratio Data for uncorrected taper ratio • • • Lift coefficient (see Figs 7 and 8) : : : : : : : c = 0.38 a CD 2 = CD 1 + Δ CD C N 1 = C L1 cos α + C D1 sin α C N 2 = C L 2 cos α + C D 2 sin α 1 C M C 4 = (0. 11 and 12. M = 5 ⎡ 2 ⎛ (35 − δ ) ⎞⎤ + ⎜ ⎟ 7 ⎢ 7 ⎝ 35 ⎠⎥ ⎣ ⎦ δ = 61. 8. Lift coefficient correction Corrected life coefficient Drag coefficient correction Corrected drag coefficient Uncorrected normal hydrodynamic coefficient Corrected normal hydrodynamic coefficient : : : : : : 1. 10.25 ( X 5 − X 1 − X 2 ) + X 2 − X 4 ⎤ Ω = tan −1 ⎢ ⎥ X3 ⎣ ⎦ δ α = M . 7. 9.δ where.

Corrected centre of pressure Normal hydrodynamic force Hydrodynamic torque Rudder stock bearing friction : : : : CPC 2 = 0. CN 2 X2 + X4 ⎤ ⎡ QH = F ⎢c .2 for phenolic bearing = 0.01 for roller bearing = 0. QD and QR can be calculated and tabulated for various angles of attack a The maximum bending moment (Q BM ) max and hydrodynamic torque (QH ) max acting on the rudder can be computed as follows : : (Q H ) max = F d − CPc ( ) s (QBM ) max = L2 + D 2 ( ) ( CP 1 2 + b) where F . X 3 . ⎡ 0. ⎥ 2 X8 2 X8 ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ Rudder torque (displacing) Rudder torque (restoring) The coefficient of friction μ is given as : : QD = QF + QH QR = QF − QH = 0.1 to 0. CPC 2 − ⎥ 2 ⎦ ⎣ QF Q F = μ1 .05 to 0. QH . it would be desirable to locate the rudder stock just forward of the centre of pressure. CPc and CPs are determined at α = α max and maximum speed and b is the distance from the root chord of the rudder to the centre of the lower bearings supporting he rudder. F . If the chordwise centre pressure on a rudder remained in a fixed location as the angle of attack on the rudder increased.25 − CM C 4 CN 2 2 F = p .F ⎢ .42 X 3 + X 8 + X 9 ⎤ ⎡ 0. This would insure a low maximum torque value and in the event .42 X 3 + X 9 ⎤ d1 d2 . QF . L .1 for bronze bearing Thus. c .F ⎢ ⎥ + μ2 . D .

on most rudders the centre of pressure moves aft as the angle of attack increases. The 10 to 15-deg zero point torque is used to minimise the power required for routine steering and course keeping. most ship rudders are not designed as trailing rudders. However. Therefore. If the rudder was free at this point it would flip over to either ± 15 deg port or starboard. . which on most ships seldom requires more than 10 to 15 degrees of rudder angle. This instability may produce rattling. A typical torque versus angle of attack curve takes the form as shown in Fig. 13 that such a rudder is unstable at α = 0 deg. in order to reduce the maximum torque value. if the zero point were taken at a larger angle of attack. Unfortunately. The practice is to determine the location of the stock on the basis that the hydrodynamic torque should be zero at an angle of attack of about 10 to 15 deg.that the rudder were inadvertently freed. 13. It can be seen from Fig. the maximum torque at α = ± α max could be significantly reduced. Some designers therefore recommend that the rudder stock should be located at ( α = 0 deg) position of centre of pressure. the rudder would tend to trail at δ R = 0 deg as long as α = 0 deg. Therefore. shock and excessive wear in gear mechanisms. this recommendation will lead to a requirement for a larger capacity steering gear.

sweep angle 0 deg [2] . 7 Lift coefficient.Fig.

8 Lift coefficient. sweep angle +11 deg [2] .Fig.

sweep angle 0 deg [2] . 9 Drag coefficient.Fig.

sweep angle +11 deg [2] .Fig. 10 Drag coefficient.

sweep angle 0 deg [2] .Fig. 11 Chordwise centre of pressure.

sweep angle +11 deg [2] . 12 Chordwise centre of pressure.Fig.

2 Rudder Torque Calculations for a Horn Rudder – Ahead Condition Number of rudders Length on waterline (L) Draught (mean) (T) Max.Fig.5144 ⎞ ⎟ Froude Number ⎜ Fn = ⎜ 9. Design Speed Ahead (V) ⎛ V ∗ 0.81 ∗ L ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ = = = = = m m knots . 13 Typical torque versus angle of attack relationship 3.

28o. 35o 5o. 10o. X 4 .5144 ∗ Vknots Speed of Advance (VA ) = V (1 − w) Propeller Thrust (T) = Dynamic Pressure (p) = RT 1− t 1 2 ρ vA 2 + = = = = = = = = = 4T = π D2 Newtons kg/m3 m knots m/s m/s Newtons N/m2 degrees degrees. Once the rudder geometry is known the following quantities must be noted in meters: X 1 .Thrust deduction fraction (t) Wake fraction ( w ) Total appendaged resistance at V (RT) Density of water (ρ ) Propeller Diameter (D) Maximum Astern Speed (Vastern) Design speed ahead V = 0. 20o. where M = 5 ⎡ 2 (35 − δ )⎤ + 7 ⎢ 7 35 ⎥ ⎦ ⎣ Rudder angle of deflection (δ ) Rudder angle of attack α = M ∗ δ Variation of δ to be considered Variation of α to be considered = = = = 7o. rudder stock centre line location and distribution of rudder area (fixed and moveable) forward and aft of stock centreline must be determined as has been discussed before and the rudder diagram prepared similar to Fig. 14o. 15o. X 5 . X 3 . X 7 . X 2 . . 25o The stern contour and propeller position must be available. X 8 . X 9 and X 10 . 21o. X 6 . 14. Rudder shape.

14 Stern arrangement and support details of spade rudder The diameter of lower and upper stock bearings d1 . μ 3 = = = = = = = = m m m . d 2 and d 3 in meters and type of bearing and their corresponding bearing friction must also be obtained Upper stock outer diameter d1 Lower stock outer diameter d 2 Rudder pintle outer diameter d 3 Upper stock bearing type Upper stock bearing fraction coeff. μ 2 Rudder pintle bearing type Rudder pintle friction coeff. μ1 Lower stock bearing type Lower stock bearing fraction coeff.Fig.

Lower Rudder Section Taper Ratio Mean chord Sweep angle : : : λ= X5 (X1 + X 2 ) c = 0.25 − CPC ) C N 1 − Δ C L 2 2 CPC 2 = 0.38 a CD 2 = CD 1 + Δ CD C N 1 = C L1 cos α + C D1 sin α C N 2 = C L 2 cos α + C D 2 sin α 1 C M C 4 = (0.5 ( X 1 + X 2 + X 5 ) : ⎡ 0. drag coefficient C D 1 and centre of pressure CPC1 can now be determined for various α values and the effective aspect ratio a for sweep angle Ω = 0 and 11 degrees from the graphs given in Figs. 10.63 λ − 0.25 ( X 5 − X 1 − X 2 ) + X 2 − X 4 ⎤ Ω = ⎢ ⎥ X3 ⎣ ⎦ a1 = X3 ⎛ X2 α⎞ ⎜2 − . 7. ⎟ X 1 + X 2 75 ⎟ c ⎜ ⎝ ⎠ Aspect ratio : Data for uncorrected taper ratio : • • • Lift coefficient (see Figs 7 and 8) : CL 1 CD 1 Drag coefficient (see Figs 9 and 10) : Centre of pressure (see Figs 11 and 12): CPC1 Lift coefficient C L 1 . 9. 11 and 12. Lift coefficient correction Corrected life coefficient Drag coefficient correction Corrected drag coefficient Uncorrected normal hydrodynamic coefficient Corrected normal hydrodynamic coefficient : : : : : : 1.25 − CM C 4 CN 2 2 Corrected centre of pressure : . 8.73 ⎡ α ⎤ Δ CL = ⎢ 57.3 ⎥ a1 ⎣ ⎦ CL 2 = CL 1 + Δ CL 2 Δ CD = 2 2 CL 2 − CL 2 2.

Fu ⎢1 − ⋅ [μ 2 . Fl ⎢1 + ⎥ + ⎢ ⎥ [μ 2 . ⎡ d3 0. d 2 ( X 8 + X 9 ) + μ1. 15) : Normal hydrodynamic force Hydrodynamic torque Bearing friction : : : CHM Fu = p . ⎡ d3 Fl ⎡ 0.Normal hydrodynamic force Hydrodynamic torque Rudder stock bearing friction : : : Fl = p . CPC 2 − ⎥ 2 ⎣ ⎦ QFl QF l = μ3 . C N 2 X2 + X4 ⎤ ⎡ QH l = F ⎢c . c .42 X 7 + X 12 .42 X 3 + X 12 ⎤ . d 2 ( X 8 + X 9 ) + μ1 .42 X 7 + X 12 ⎤ Fu 0. d1 X 9 ] 2 X 10 + X 11 ⎦ 2 X 8 ⎣ X 10 + X 11 ⎦ ⎣ Upper Rudder Section Mean chord Normal force coefficient (see Fig. C Nu 2 QH u = p cu X 7 C HM QF u QF u = μ 3 . X 7 . d1 X 9 ] ⎥+ 2 X 10 + X 11 ⎦ 2 X 8 X 10 + X 11 ⎣ Total Rudder Section Hydrodynamic torque Bearing friction Single ram correction Rudder torque (displacing) Rudder torque (restoring) : : : : : QH = QH l + QH u QF = QF l + QF u r= μ1 d1 cos α 2R Q D = QF + Q H + r Q F + Q H QR = QF − QH + r QF − QH . X 3 . 15) : : cu = X1 + X 6 2 C Nu Hinge moment coefficient (see Fig.42 X 3 − X 12 ⎤ 0. c u .

the frictional torque is significant. 15 Hinge moment and normal force coefficients of rudder area abaft horn [2] Fig. and small movements tend to dissipate the effects of friction in making the transition to Point b on the QH curve. .Fig. The rudder is then held in position by the hydraulic ram pressure. Movement of the rudder from centreline would entail torques following the curve until the ordered angle is reached at Point a . 16 shows a graph of the torque elements ( QH . causing movement to Point c . The QD curve represents the sum of frictional and hydrodynamic components. QF . QD and QR ) during a simple manoeuvre. As can be seen. If the rudder is then ordered to the centreline. the process works in reverse from the − QH curve moving to the QR curve. A drift angle is assumed by the vessel.

Joessel derived empirical relationships for the variation of torque and variation of centre of pressure with the angle of attack.3 Astern Torque Calculations – Joessel Method Based on experiments conducted in the Loire river (having a maximum current of 1.3 m/s) with rectangular plate of span 30 cm and chord 40 cm.Fig.305 sin α w ) . 16 Rudder torque elements during a simple manoeuvre 3. when corrected for larger density of sea water.122 + A v 2 w sin α and x = ( 0.195 + 0. These relationships. are as follows: Q = 418.

By applying the foregoing equations along with an inclusion of a Joessel coefficient.305 sin α )) w1 h1 + w2 h2 (0. Q A = = = = = = rudder torque about leading edge of the plate in N ⋅ m area of the plate in m 2 velocity of water in m 2 sec width of the plate in m angle of attack in deg distance of centre of pressure from leading edge in m v w α x By combining the above two equations. i.122 A v 2 sin α F = x 0.305 sin α and K astern are the Joessel coefficients or the experience factors [ ] Compute the hydrodynamic torque in astern condition using the above Joessel’s formula for different rudder angles of attack α .195 − 0.where.305 sin α ) − b ⎞ ⎤ 2 ⎟ w1 h1 + w2 h2 ⎥ (Q H ) ahead = K ahead 418..805 − 0305 sin α ) 0.122 v 2 sin α 2 (a − w1 (0.305 sin α The horn type rudder shown in Fig. ( Fl ) astern and ( Fu ) astern from the above equation.e. expressions for ahead and astern torque become as follows: ⎡⎛ w (0.122 v 2 sin α ⎢⎜ 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0.195 − 0.305 sin α ⎠ ⎣⎝ ⎦ (QH ) astern = K astern where K ahead 418. the resultant force on the plate is determined to be: Q 418.195 + 0.195 − 0. . Compute the normal hydrodynamic force on the lower and upper rudder sections in astern condition. 17 can be transformed into two rectangles as shown by the dashed lines.195 − 0.

Fig. Calculate (QT ) ahead and (QT ) astern for all angles of attack. . : QT = QH + QF + Q A QH QF QA = = = hydrodynamic torque bearing frictional torque error allowance = Fmax × 0.02 c The error allowance for both lower and upper rudder section to be calculated and summed up.4 Steering Gear Torque and Power Total steering gear torque where. 17 Model of a horn-type rudder used with Joessel method [2] 3.

75 to 0. Power required for steering gear : P= (QT ) max s kW 1000η g where η g is the steering gear efficiency ≈ 0. 2 δ max π ⋅ 180 t maximum rudder deflection on either port or starboard side time require in seconds δ max t = = The regulatory class requirements for minimum deflection rate ( s ) is 2 1 3 radians /sec. 18). 18 Efficiency of a Rapson-slide steering engine .Select the maximum torque (QT ) max = Maximum of { (QT ) ahead and (QT ) astern } Rudder deflection rate ( s ) in radians /sec is defined as s = deflection angle from hardover port to hardover starboard time required to move from hardover port to hardover starboard = where.85 (see Fig. Fig.

17 Y2 ) − A2 (Y1 + 0.333 ⎥ ⎦ mm (ahead) (b) where δ SA = 83.5 Y3 ) (Refer to Fig. in loaded condition actual astern speed. whichever is greater rudder area in m 2 rudder coefficient 0.248 for ahead condition and rudder in propeller ship stream 0. X PF as calculated but not less than .333 ⎥ ⎦ mm (astern) VF VA AR KR KR KR = = = = = = = = = maximum service speed. in knots.5 Rudder Stock Diameter (Lloyds Rule Part 3 Ch 13) Basic stock diameter.185 for astern condition coefficient dependent on rudder support. in knots.5VF .5 ⎤ 0. δ S at and below lowest bearing (ahead or astern) is given by: δ S to be greater of the following: (a) δ SF = 83. YR where YR is the depth of rudder at stock centerline in metres. or 0. .3 K R ⎡(V F + 3)2 ⎢ ⎣ 2 R 2 X PA + N 2 0.3 K R ⎡(V F + 3)2 ⎢ ⎣ (A (A 2 R 2 X PF + N 2 ) ) 0. A1 N N X PA .67 Y1 + 0.12 AR X PA .5 ⎤ 0.3. 19) horizontal distance in m horizontal distance from centerline of rudder pintle to centre of pressure Astern condition X PA = Ahead condition X PF = horizontal distance from centerline of rudder pintle to centre of pressure 0. X PF (0.

craft turn is less than the geometric angle (α ) due to yaw of the craft. Since the effective angle of attack (α eff ) of a rudder during a 2. 4.Fig. Augment the appendage craft resistance to account for added drag due to yaw and heel of the craft in a turn. α where α eff and α are in degrees and . 3.9 Estimation of Turning Circle Diameter [4] The procedure described below is given in Ref [4]. The results obtained from this procedure have been compared with field trials of fast vessels of both displacement and planing type. Then. 19 Rudder area distribution for stock diameter computation 3. the steady turning speed U C is less than the steady forward speed U A at that engine power. When a vessel takes a turn. calculate the increment in rudder drag at various angles of deflection (or attack) over the drag at zero angle. Estimate the drag of the rudder ( s ) at various rudder angles over the desired speed range as per the procedure described earlier. Estimate the resistance to forward motion of the craft including all appendages with rudder held at ship centerline position over the desired speed range. For estimating the reduced speed U C . the following relationship is assumed: α eff = M . Estimate the rudder drag at zero angle using the ITTC friction line for frictional drag. the following procedure is followed: 1.

Steady turning radius in feet. φ is given by φ = α − α eff The drag of the craft with appendages in yaw can be given by φ⎤ ⎡ D φ = D ⎢1 + 0. LR C where L RC UA UC KC ( ( ) ) ⎤2 ⎥ ⎥ ⎦ 1 = = = = = where Fn2∇ = Craft length in feet. Vessel forward speed in ft/sec. Draw the new speed power curve EHP versus U C assuming the same engine power for the corresponding speeds U A and U C .M= 5 ⎡⎛ 2 ⎞ ⎛ (35 − α ) ⎞⎤ + ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ 7 ⎢⎝ 7 ⎠ ⎝ 35 ⎠⎥ ⎣ ⎦ Then craft angle of yaw.075 ⎥ 5⎦ ⎣ where D is the drag of the craft with appendages at no yaw condition. Once U C has been estimated. an empirical constant which is 30 K C = Fn2∇ × α Displacement Froude number. Vessel steady turning speed in ft. 5 For each rudder angle considered. the turning circle radius RC can be estimated from the following relationship: 2 2 ⎡ U A − UC =⎢ 2 ⎢ KC UC ⎣ 6./sec. add increment of rudder drag to resistance of yawed craft in turn to obtain the total resistance of craft in turn for that forward speed U A and rudder angle α . which is Fn ∇ = UA 1⎤2 ⎡ ⎢g ∇ 3 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ 1 .

B. L. R. REFERENCES Lewis. 1991. 1. 2. Lloyds Register of Shipping – Rules and Regulations Denny. “Rudder Torque Prediction”. 28. “Prediction of Craft Turning Characteristics”. pp. V..4. 4. No. (Ed). Trans. “Principles of Naval Architecture – Vol. Jan. SNAME 1981. 1. Marine Technology. S. E. 3. SNAME 1990. and Hubble. III”. N. E.. Vol. Harrington. . Trans. 1-13.

- Estimation of MainDimensions
- Rudder Design
- Empirical Formula
- Rudder Calculation
- DNV rudder, steering gear, anchoring, mooring.pdf
- Propeller Design Calculation
- DNV RULES FOR RUDDER
- Rudder
- Anchor Chain Locker Volume Calculation
- Ship Design Procedure Booklet
- Rhino Ship Hull Tutorial
- 53473887-Rudder
- Scantling Calculation
- Propeller design calculation
- Keel and rudder
- SD 1.5.4 Bulbous Bow Design
- Elements of Ship Design
- Weight Estimating and Margins Manual
- Rules for Cosntruction
- Ship Design and Construction - Robert Taggart
- Planing Craft
- Alignment and Installation Procedure for UW Eqpts[1]
- Anthony F Molland_ Stephen R Turnock_ Dominic a Hudson-Ship Resistance and Propulsion _ Practical Estimation of Ship Propulsive Power-Cambridge University Press (2011)
- Christopoulos B.river Towboat Hull a.jul.1983.MT
- Rudder construction
- Seakeeping Onboard
- Preliminary Ship Design
- Rudder
- CFD in Ship Design
- Design and Performance of Bow Thrusters-Beveridge-1971

Close Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Loading