You are on page 1of 13

The 9/11 Era of Environmental–Terror in the City of Toronto

Toronto is the provincial capital of the Province of Ontario, and the largest city in Canada.

City of Toronto has been a NEST OF ACTIVITY for the Environmental–Terror–Movement, be-
ginning in 1987 with the creation of Environmental Protection Office of Toronto Public
Health, which was given the mandate to respond to growing community and political con-
cerns about the impact of environmental contaminants on human health.

Toronto Public Health is the largest public health unit in Canada.

BOTH Toronto Public Health ( TPH ) and Environmental Protection Office ( EPO ) became
MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT SHIELDS for the Environmental–Terror–Movement.

TPH and EPO DUPED Elected Officials in City of Toronto into believing that PROHIBITION of
pest control products was necessary. Consequently, in 2004, Elected Officials voted in fa-
vour of PROHIBITING the use of conventional pest control products in the Urban Landscape.

By 2008, the Province of Ontario itself followed with PROHIBITION regulations.

If there had been no Toronto PROHIBITION, if Toronto Elected Officials and staff had not
supported PROHIBITION, there would NOT have been an Ontario PROHIBITION.

Disagreement within City of Toronto

Not everyone within City of Toronto was in agreement with the passage of PROHIBITION.

According to an internal City Clerk report in May 2004 ―

« Some Committee members DID NOT NECESSARILY AGREE that there is a health concern
with the use of pesticides and noted that several presentations to the Committee found that
only pesticide products with a wide margin of safety are currently available for use on home
lawns. »

« This information was conveyed through several documents, including Health Canada’s
Pest Management Regulatory Agency ( PMRA ). »

« The Medical Officer of Health, in her report Implementation of the Pesticide By–Law, indi-
cates that the Federal Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development has
identified weaknesses in the federal testing and registration process for products. »

« This raises concerns about the management of the risks to health and the environment
with pesticides. »

« The Federal Government has passed new legislation, which will update the types of pesti-
cides currently on the exempt and non–exempt list. »
Prohibition Carnage in the Professional Lawn Care Industry

DAMAGES to the Professional Lawn Care Industry were EXTENSIVE because there were NO
valid economical alternatives to replace the prohibited products.

VIRTUALLY ALL Green Alternatives were almost TOTAL INEFFECTIVE except under very spe-
cific circumstances. Consequently, Professional Lawn Care Companies were UNABLE to pro-
vide adequate weed and insect control, and were UNABLE to keep their customers satisfied.

If there had been no Toronto PROHIBITION, if Toronto Elected Officials and staff had not
supported PROHIBITION, there would NOT have been an Ontario PROHIBITION.

Directly or indirectly, PROHIBITIONIST Elected Officials and staff EXTENSIVELY DAMAGED


hundreds of businesses, and HARMED thousands of employees.

Prohibition Carnage in Toronto Green Spaces

The CARNAGE wrought on Public Green Spaces in City of Toronto quickly became evident
after PROHIBITION. Toronto was given the unflattering nick–name of « Dandelion City ».

As early as February 2004, an internal report from City of Toronto predicted ...

« A weed free turf area, in the absence of the use of herbicides and a plant health care
program, will become infested with weeds such as dandelions to a 50% cover within 4−5
years. »

« Within 7−8 years, the turf area will be 80–90% non−turf ground cover ( weeds ). »

Legislation and Court Challenge ― The CropLife–Toronto Affair

Once City of Toronto passed its PROHIBITION, it was LEGALLY CHALLENGED by the manu-
facturers of pest control products, through the CropLife Canada Trade Association.

City of Toronto had used the pretext that this PROHIBITION ...

« [ ... ] will promote the health of the inhabitants of City of Toronto. »

Rather than challenge Toronto’s RIDICULOUS PRETEXT for PROHIBITION, CropLife decided
to challenge Toronto’s AUTHORITY TO PROHIBIT the use of pest control products. And for
some misguided reason, CropLife never challenged the PROHIBITION for the sake of the
Professional Lawn Care Industry, but rather on the basis that the Toronto PROHIBITION ...

« [ ... ] sets a troubling precedent for Canadian FARMERS, [ despite the fact that ] there
may not be a lot of farms in City of Toronto. »
In 2004, the Court of Appeal for Ontario concluded that City of Toronto DID have the au-
thority to PROHIBIT.

By 2005, CropLife Canada continued its legal challenge before The Supreme Court of Can-
ada, where the case was dismissed with costs.

With this failure, the floodgates were opened for NEEDLESS, SENSELESS, and MALICIOUS
PROHIBITIONS across the Province of Ontario, and throughout Canada.

CropLife was DOOMED even before it presented its case to The Supreme Court of Canada.

There were very clear indications that The Supreme Court of Canada was INFESTED with
Enviro–Maniac–Activists.

Furthermore, one of the presiding judges was Michel Bastarache.

Bastarache was one of the judges who had also ruled against the Professional Lawn Care
Industry in the case of PROHIBITION in the Town of Hudson, Quebec, in 2001.

CropLife Canada should have demanded to have Bastarache recused from the case.

The CropLife–Toronto Affair was not only BOTCHED, but also CURSED WITH BAD LUCK.

Elected Officials

On May 20th, 2004, City of Toronto IMPLEMENTED its residential PROHIBITION of pest con-
trol products, with enforcement on homes starting in September 2007, and in September
2005 for Professional Lawn Care Companies.

Not every Elected Official within City of Toronto was in agreement with the passage of a by–
law that prohibited pest control products.

26 Voted YES for prohibition.

17 Voted AGAINST prohibition, including Rob Ford, the Mayor elected in 2010.

Many of these Elected Officials presented themselves as CANDIDATES in the 2010 Toronto
Election Campaign.

Many candidates who sought re–election, and had voted YES for prohibition ( or SUPPOR-
TED prohibition ), were DEFEATED.

ABSOLUTELY ALL candidates who sought re–election, and had voted AGAINST prohibition,
were RE–ELECTED.

Candidates who voted YES, or SUPPORTED prohibition, seemed to possess a DEFECT IN


CHARACTER that led them to DEFEAT in the 2010 Election Campaign. MANY WERE DUM-
PED, AND PUT OUT TO PASTURE FAIRLY QUICKLY.
Many Enviro–Basterd
Prohibition Councillors
Dumped by Toronto Electorate

Statistical Analysis of the Toronto 2010 Municipal Election Results ―

Almost HALF of all councillors who voted YES for the prohibition of pest control products
were DEFEATED in the 2010 Toronto Election Campaign.

Only ONE–THIRD of all councillors who voted YES for prohibition were RE–ELECTED, and 15
per cent were RE–ELECTED with a VERY NARROW MARGIN.

TWO–THIRDS of all candidates who had SUPPORTED prohibition prior to seeking office in
Toronto, and who sought election as councillor for the first time, were DEFEATED ( including
a major mayoral candidate ).

ABSOLUTELY ALL councillors who voted AGAINST the prohibition of pest control products
were RE–ELECTED ( or ELECTED as Mayor ).

Conclusions ―

Politicians who vote YES and SUPPORT the prohibition of pest control products tend to end
up being viewed as BAD or UNDESIRABLE for re–election by the electorate.

Politicians who vote YES and SUPPORT prohibition seem to possess a DEFECT IN CHARAC-
TER that leads them to DEFEAT in the next election.

Politicians who vote YES and SUPPORT prohibition TEND TO BE PUT OUT TO PASTURE FAIR-
LY QUICKLY.

They seem disposed to FACE POLITICAL SUICIDE.

Politicians who vote AGAINST the prohibition of pest control products seem to possess a
STRENGTH IN CHARACTER that leads them to RE–ELECTION ( or ELECTION as Mayor ).

Politicians who vote AGAINST prohibition are ASSURED OF A LONGER CAREER as Elected
Officials.
AUG IMER I, Mari a DAVIS, Jan et
Candidate for councillor Candidate for councillor
Ward 9 ― York Centre Ward 31 ― Beaches ― East York
Voted YES for prohibition Voted YES for prohibition
RE–ELECTED BY A VERY NARROW MARGIN RE–ELECTED

BERARDINETT I, Mich elle De BAERE MAEKER, Glen n


Candidate for councillor Candidate for councillor
Ward 35 ― Scarborough Southwest Ward 38 ― Scarborough Centre
Voted AGAINST prohibition Voted YES for prohibition
RE–ELECTED RE–ELECTED

BUSSIN, San dra de J ONG, Frank


Candidate for councillor Candidate for councillor
Ward 32 ― Beaches ― East York Ward 18 ― Davenport
Voted YES for prohibition Enviro–Maniac leader of Ontario Green
DEFEATED Party that SUPPORTED prohibition
DEFEATED

CHO, R a ym on d
Candidate for councillor DEL GRANDE, Mik e
Ward 42 ― Scarborough ― Rouge River Candidate for councillor
Voted YES for prohibition Ward 39 ― Scarborough ― Agincourt
RE–ELECTED Voted AGAINST prohibition
RE–ELECTED
Di G IOR G IO, Fra nk GR IMES, Ma rk
Candidate for councillor Candidate for councillor
Ward 12 ― York South ― Weston Ward 6 ― Etobicoke ― Lakeshore
Voted AGAINST prohibition Voted AGAINST prohibition
RE–ELECTED RE–ELECTED

FIL ION, Joh n HALL, S u za n


Candidate for councillor Candidate for councillor
Ward 23 ― Willowdale Ward 1 ― Etobicoke North
Voted YES for prohibition Voted YES for prohibition
RE–ELECTED DEFEATED

FLETCHER, P aula HOL YDA Y, D ou g


Candidate for councillor Candidate for councillor
Ward 30 ― Toronto Danforth Ward 3 ― Etobicoke Centre
Voted YES for prohibition Voted AGAINST prohibition
RE–ELECTED BY A VERY NARROW MARGIN RE–ELECTED

FORD, Ro b JENKINS , Cliff


Candidate for mayor Candidate for councillor
Former councillor Ward 25 ― Don Valley West
Voted AGAINST for prohibition Voted YES for prohibition
ELECTED AS MAYOR DEFEATED
KELL Y, N orm L INDSA Y LUB Y, Glo ria
Candidate for councillor Candidate for councillor
Ward 40 ― Scarborough ― Agincourt Ward 4 ― Etobicoke Centre
Voted AGAINST prohibition Voted YES for prohibition
RE–ELECTED RE–ELECTED BY A VERY NARROW MARGIN

LAYTON , Mik e MA MMOL IT I, Gi orgio


Candidate for councillor Candidate for councillor
Ward 19 ― Trinity ― Spadina Ward 7 ― York West
Related to Enviro–Maniac Voted AGAINST prohibition
leader of New Democratic Party RE–ELECTED
that SUPPORTED prohibition
ELECTED

McCONNE LL, Pam


Candidate for councillor
L I PRET I, Pe ter Ward 28 ― Toronto Centre ― Rosedale
Candidate for councillor Voted YES for prohibition
Ward 8 ― York West RE–ELECTED
Voted YES for prohibition
DEFEATED
MIHEVC, J oe PALACIO, C esa r
Candidate for councillor Candidate for councillor
Ward 21 ― Saint Paul’s Ward 17 ― Davenport
Voted YES for prohibition Voted AGAINST prohibition
RE–ELECTED RE–ELECTED

MILC ZYN, P ete r PANTALONE, Jo e


Candidate for councillor Candidate for mayor
Ward 5 ― Etobicoke ― Lakeshore Former councillor
Voted YES for prohibition Ward 19 ― Trinity ― Spadina
DEFEATED Voted YES for prohibition
DEFEATED

MINNAN–W ONG, Den zil


Candidate for councillor PITFIE LD, Jan e
Ward 34 ― Don Valley East Candidate for councillor
Voted YES for prohibition Ward 29 ― Toronto ― Danforth
RE–ELECTED Voted YES for prohibition
DEFEATED

NUNZIATA, Franc es
Candidate for councillor
Ward 11 ― York South ― Weston
Voted AGAINST prohibition
RE–ELECTED
SAUNDERCOOK, Bill STINTZ, Karen
Candidate for councillor Candidate for councillor
Ward 13 ― Parkdale ― High Park Ward 16 ― Eglinton ― Lawrence
Voted YES for prohibition Voted AGAINST prohibition
DEFEATED RE–ELECTED

SHINER , Davi d THO MPSON, Mic hael


Candidate for councillor Candidate for councillor
Ward 24 ― Willowdale Ward 37 ― Scarborough Centre
Voted AGAINST prohibition Voted AGAINST prohibition
RE–ELECTED RE–ELECTED

SMITHER MAN, Ge orge TINDAL , Ch ris


Candidate for mayor Candidate for councillor
Formerly Enviro–Maniac minister Ward 27 ― Toronto Centre ― Rosedale
with Government of Ontario that Enviro–Maniac associated with
SUPPORTED prohibition Green Party of Canada that
Voted YES for prohibition SUPPORTED prohibition
DEFEATED DEFEATED
Force Of Nature presents THE WHOLE TRUTH FROM AN INDEPENDENT PERSPECTIVE from National Organization Responding Against HUJE that
seek to harm the Green Space Industry (NORAHG). It is a series of Reports destined for the Green Space Industry, the Environmental Terror
Movement, Governments, and the Media, nationwide across Canada, the United States, and overseas. The information presented in Force Of
Nature has been developed for the education and entertainment of the reader by providing a sequence of historical events WITH COMMEN-
TARY. The neutrality of these Reports might be disputed. Don’t thank us. It’s a public service. And we are glad to do it.

HUJE are identified on the basis of their statements, activities, affiliations, and whereabouts. Even though each Enviro Maniac Culprit is a mis-
guided adversary, each still deserves our respect. The use of the terms Maniac, Culprit, Terrorist, or Basterd are not accusations of any legal
wrong doing. Force Of Nature is simply holding Enviro Maniac Activists accountable for conspiring to change public policies that TERRORIZE,
HARM, and THREATEN the Green Space Industry.

HUJE is a term used to describe Enviro Maniac Activists that routinely concoct FEAR MONGERING, FRAUDULENT LIES, MISCONCEPTIONS, CO-
ERCION, THREATS, DECEPTIONS, TERROR, and PARANOID CONSPIRACIES that are DESIGNED to SCAM and DECEIVE the public into believing
there is some IMAGINARY DANGER with conventional pest control products. HUJE also SCAM and DECEIVE Government Officials into the
NEEDLESS, SENSELESS, and MALICIOUS CONSPIRACY to PROHIBIT conventional pest control products that are FEDERALLY LEGAL, SCIEN-
TIFICALLY SAFE, TOTALLY IRREPLACEABLE, and ABSOLUTELY INDISPENSABLE.

HUJE have created LOSS OF REVENUES, BUSINESS FAILURES, BANKRUPTCY, and UNEMPLOYMENT, inflicting DESPAIR and DESTITUTION for
THOUSANDS of hapless victims throughout the Green Space Industry. The DEPRAVED INDIFFERENCE of Maniac Culprit Terrorist Basterd HUJE
is viewed as a form of TERROR, HARM, and THREAT against the Green Space Industry.

This Report provides NO guarantee regarding accuracy or completeness. In no event shall Force Of Nature be liable for any incidental or con-
sequential damages, lost profits, or any indirect damages. Force Of Nature is TOTALLY INDEPENDENT of any trade association or business op-
erating within the Green Space Industry. The events, characters, companies, and organizations, depicted in this Report are not always ficti-
tious. Any similarity to actual persons, living or dead, may not be coincidental. All information, excerpts, and pictures contained in this Report
were found somewhere on the Internet, and may be considered in the public domain, serving one of the following purposes ― archive, educa-
tion, promotion, publicity, or press release.

Force Of Nature, and its various incarnations, is the brainchild of William H. Gathercole and his colleagues. Mr. Gathercole is a principal FOUN-
DER of the Modern Professional Lawn Care Industry in BOTH Ontario and Quebec. He holds a degree in Horticulture from the UNIVERSITY OF
GUELPH, and another pure and applied science degree from McGILL UNIVERSITY. He has worked in virtually all aspects of the Green Space In-
dustry, including GOLF, PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE, and CHEMICAL INDUSTRY, and has served in environmental compliance, government
negotiations, public affairs, and workplace safety. Mr. Gathercole has supervised, consulted, programmed, and/or overseen the successful and
safe execution of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of pest control applications in the urban landscape. He has trained, instructed, and consulted
with THOUSANDS of turf managers and technicians. Mr. Gathercole has also been an agricultural agronomist. For many years, Mr. Gathercole
was a contributing columnist for TURF & Recreation Magazine, Canada’s Turf and Grounds Maintenance Authority.

Mr. Gathercole and his colleagues have followed the evolution of ENVIRONMENTAL TERRORISM for over a quarter century. For FIFTEEN
YEARS, the strategies designed and implemented by Mr. Gathercole and his colleagues guaranteed the control of the VERMIN OF ENVIRON-
MENTAL TERROR for the entire Modern Green Space Industry across Canada. Their involvement in Environmental Issues reached a fevered
pitch in the 1990s, when he orchestrated, with his colleagues, legal action against the Forces of Environmental Evil in the Town of Hudson,
Quebec.

Today, Mr. Gathercole is the ONLY TRUE RELIABLE WITNESS of the Hudson Affair. Mr. Gathercole is personally credited for crafting the Golf
Industry Exception Status that endures to this day. He is also the creator of the signs that are now used for posting after application. His vast
knowledge of our long journey with Environmental Issues is UNDENIABLE ― hopefully ! Mr. Gathercole is now retired, although his name con-
tinues to appear as FOUNDER of Force Of Nature.

THE LIBRARY OF REPORTS • A LOOK AT Technical Information for the Green Space Industry • Agriculture • Bee Colony Collapse Disor-
der • BOGUS Green Alternatives • BRITISH COLUMBIA Enviro Terror Conspiracy • CALGARY (Alberta) Enviro Terror STOPPED • Ca-
nadian Association of Physicians for the Environment • Canadian Cancer Society • Canadian Environmental Law Association • CARNAGE
caused by PROHIBITION TERRORISM • CONSEQUENCES of PROHIBITION TERRORISM • Cottam & Ghost Writers • Culprits Who Con-
spired to Prohibit • David Suzuki Foundation • Dating Services for Enviro Maniacs • DDT and Politicized Science • Environmental Ter-
rorists UNMASKED • Enviro PROFIT Accumulated by Greedy & Avaricious Enviro Maniacs • Environmental Terror Organizations • Envi-
ronmental Terror That NEVER Ends • Famous Quotations • FERTILIZER Enviro Terror • Global Warming • GOLF INDUSTRY Looming
Shipwreck & Collision Course • Green Space Industry • Health Canada • HEROES Speaking Out Against Enviro Terror • History of the
Environmental Terror Movement • June Irwin, the Clown of Junk Science • Landscape Trades CAPITULATE • In VIOLATION of Federal
Law • Lying Sacks of (Enviro Maniac) CWAP • Myth Busting • NATIONAL Enviro Terror Conspiracy • Needless Hysteria • NEW
BRUNSWICK Enviro Terror Conspiracy • NOVA SCOTIA Enviro Terror Conspiracy • ONTARIO Haven for Environmental Terror • Organic
Fertilizers • Paranoid Theories • Paul Tukey, The Bin Laden of Environmental Terror • Pests and Disorders of Ornamental Plants •
Pests and Disorders of Turfgrasses • Pesticide Free BC • Pesticide Q & A (Questions & Answers) • Positive Waves (The Green Space In-
dustry Responds with Outstanding and Innovative Ideas) • TWISTED Precautionary Principle • PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Enviro Terror
Conspiracy • QUEBEC Enviro Terror Conspiracy • RACHEL CARSON, the Queen of Junk Science • SASKATCHEWAN Enviro Terror Infes-
tation • Satire, Laughs & Insanity • TERROR Talk & Weasel Words • The 9/11 Era of Environmental Terror • The FAILURE of Inte-
grated Pest Management • The FAILURE of Pesticide Free Parks • The Industry STRIKES BACK Against Environmental Terror • The
MISCONCEPTIONS About Cancer • The National Annihilation of the Modern Green Space Industry • The Wisdom of Bill Bell • The Wis-
dom of Drysdale • The Wisdom of Health Canada • The Wisdom of Hepworth • The Wisdom of Holland • The Wisdom of Lowes •
The Wisdom of Mains • The Wisdom of Milloy • The Wisdom of the Solomons • The Wisdom of Whelan • Update • Using Children,
Pets, & Death as WEAPONS OF ULTIMATE TERROR • U.S. Enviro Terror Conspiracy • 2,4–D • Warning •