This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
SUSAN NAOMI BERNSTEIN. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Washington: Oct 10, 2003. Vol. 50, Iss. 7; pg. B.5
Bernstein teaches developmental courses in writing and reading at a public, open-admissions university in downtown Houston. Bernstein believes the courses are valuable because they help people with unconventional ways of learning reach their potential. » Jump to indexing (document details) Full Text (1317 words) (Copyright Oct. 10, 2003 by The Chronicle of Higher Education) More than 25 years ago, as an anxious freshman at a small, private, liberal-arts college in the Midwest, I sat stoically in front of a midterm exam in introductory geology. The course had been designed for geology majors, but it could be taken by nonmajors -- like me -- to fulfill the distribution requirement in science. Having grown up along with the environmental movement, I was very interested in nature and ecology, and I had especially appreciated the hands-on learning of our class's field trip to a limestone quarry near the Mississippi River, not far from our college. There, breathing the crisp autumn air and surrounded by dappled leaves on the changing trees, I had felt at peace. But peace was hardly what I experienced when I saw the charts and diagrams on the midterm. Although I had studied for the exam for days, I was lost without textbook illustrations that I could not reproduce from memory, and confused as I tried to remember how the lectures had fit with the professor's chalkboard drawings. I struggled through the multiplechoice and short-answer sections, squirming with frustration at the thought of my college career's ending as it was just beginning. Then I reached the essay section of the exam. I knew I was saved: I could write my way out of any pit that I managed to fall into. I don't remember the wording of the question, but I do remember my response. I wrote about our field trip to the limestone quarry -- about the natural setting of that environment, including the features of the Midwestern landscape, the geological history that had led to the formation of limestone, and the dew on the spider webs almost hidden behind the trees.
I earned a C on that midterm, and at the end of the semester I passed the course. Now, more than two decades later, I still remember the feel of the limestone underneath my fingers and the look of the delicate water droplets on the spider webs. I also remember the wisdom of my elderly professor, who understood what I had learned from the course even if I could not replicate the terms on a diagram. Clearly, I did not choose to major in geology, but I left the course with a layperson's strong (indeed, lifelong) appreciation for the subject. I am a verbal learner, one who learns best by reading and writing. Today, given my difficulties in elementary and high school with visual learning and coordination (tying shoes, replicating cursive writing, throwing a softball, drawing a geometrical figure, driving a car, reading peers' facial expressions), I might be diagnosed as having a nonverbal learning disability. Had my admission to college been determined by standardized "basic skills" tests in mathematics, I might well not have gotten in. I certainly would have been advised to avoid that geology course -- and my education would have suffered immeasurably. Now I teach developmental courses in writing and reading at a public, open-admissions university in downtown Houston. The courses I teach do not count for college credit, and many academics and lawmakers (not to mention members of the public) wonder if the courses belong in a senior public university. After all, if students did not learn the basic skills of writing and reading in high school, aren't they uneducable? Why should they take up professors' time and taxpayers' money? Yet I realize that, were it not for the accident of my birth into a middle-class background, those judgments could easily have been applied to me. I was a quiet, well-behaved white girl with educated parents whose first language was English, and I attended good suburban public schools. Once my teachers learned how to decipher my hard-to-read handwriting (that was in the days before computers), they were amazed at the mature prose I could produce. My writing ability kept me out of remedial classes, but so did my background. If I had been perceived as uncooperative or slow, if I had not understood from my experiences in honors classes how to create high expectations for my schooling and myself (which helped me to navigate and question the challenges of higher education), if my education had been confined primarily to preparation for standardized tests and hadn't included the creative and expressive arts, then I might well have found myself failing.
So it is for many of my students. Urban public elementary and secondary schools that feature inadequate instruction and overcrowded classrooms (among other difficulties) have given my students unequal access to education from their earliest years. Whether they were labeled "problem" children or managed to get along in stealth or silence, they arrive in developmental courses defined not by their strengths, but by their deficits. Often such students face the same lessons in basic skills that failed to take during previous years of schooling -- the same tired paragraphs to read and to write, problems to solve, blanks to fill in. Often their classes are overcrowded, just as they were in school. In addition, besides completing their college courses, many of my students must work at full-time jobs and deal with family situations complicated by poverty, like caring for sick relatives who have no health insurance, or taking responsibility for younger siblings or nieces and nephews because adequate child care is not available. Nonetheless, my students arrive fresh in my classroom each semester, and I owe them the fresh opportunity to challenge themselves -- in 15 weeks to learn more than they ever imagined possible, to move beyond basic skills and get ready for college- level courses that will require extensive reading and writing. Teachers teach as they were once taught, and I have found the lessons from my privileged education to be quite helpful. I remember my geology professor's holistic approach to learning, the field trips that allowed me to see and feel how geologists spend their days. That experience exposed me to a different epistemology, one that has proved useful in my work with developmental students, even if I no longer travel to limestone quarries to do research. However, if that geology course had not assumed that I would be an intelligent and engaged learner -- if only the basic concepts had been reviewed and the essay questions and field trips had not been requirements -- I have no doubt that geology would have remained a barely accessible subject for me, one to be quickly forgotten, just another requirement to check off on my way to completing my degree. With the challenge and the support I received, I was able to finish the course and have a valuable experience in the process because of, not in spite of, my learning differences. As a verbal learner, I had come to rely on writing and language. Having the opportunity to study the new vocabulary of geology allowed me to grow intellectually. So it is with the students in my developmental courses in writing and reading. Like me, they can rise to the intellectual occasion rather than just
fill in the blanks. Some of their approaches to learning may look unconventional (one student did his best silent reading standing at a podium; another wrote an acrostic poem to help her understand the concepts of a text), but the results are clearly beneficial. Students grow more knowledgeable and confident, and better prepared to become full participants in the world waiting for them in other classrooms and outside the campus. With enough time and support for students as whole people with varied interests and abilities -- and with unconventional ways of learning -- those who need to take developmental courses can become valuable contributors to the world at large. To deny them that opportunity, through our own impatience and lack of understanding, is a terrible waste of educational resources and of human lives. Susan Naomi Bernstein is an assistant professor of English at the University of Houston-Downtown.
Indexing (document details) Subjects: College students, Curricula, Learning Author(s): SUSAN NAOMI BERNSTEIN Document types: Commentary Document features: photographs Section: THE CHRONICLE REVIEW Publication title: The Chronicle of Higher Education. Washington: Oct 10, 2003. Vol. 50, Iss Source type: Periodical ISSN: 00095982 ProQuest document 444186551 ID: Text Word Count 1317 Document URL: http://proquest-.umi-.com-.proxy-.libraries-.uc-.edu/pqdweb-?did=4441865 me=PQD
Print | Email | Copy link | Cite this | Mark Document ^ Back to Top « Back to Results
Copyright © 2009 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions Text-only interface
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.