Case Nos 10-56634 and 10-56813
IN THE UNIED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
___________ Log Cabin Republicans, a non-profit corporation,
Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross Appellant,
vs United States of America; Robert M Gates, Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity,
Defendants-Appellants/Cross Appellees
. ___________ ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No CV 04-8425, Honorable Virginia A Phillips, Judge ___________
1: [PROPOSED] INTERVENOR DR JOSEPH ZERNIK’S REQUEST TO FILE, NOTICE TO RELIABLY INFORM THE COURT OF UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, AND NOTICE OF MOTION AND VERIFIED MOTION TO INTERVENE
Joseph Zernik, PhD Human Rights Alert (NGO)
In Pro Se
2231 South Court, Palo Alto, CA 94301 Telephone: (323) 521-6209, Facsimile (213) 261-9881 jz12345@earthlink.net
*
Simultaneously filed with the Senate and House Judiciary, Armed Services, and Finance Committees, UN Human Rights Council, and the Basel Accords Committee on International Banking
Digitally signed by Joseph Zernik DN: cn=Joseph Zernik, o, ou, email=jz12345@earthlink.net, c=US Date: 2010.12.27 15:50:07 +02'00'
A. TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. Table of Contents … i B. List of Exhibits … i C. List of Cases and Courts … iii D. Table of Authorities … iii E. Notice
… 1
… 3
… 4
… 7
… 11
… 12
K. Case Status
… 13
… 14
… 15
N. Certificate of Service
___________
Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al
(2:04-cv-08425): Notices to parties of intent to intervene and request to confer
None
i
1: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO INTERVENE
PAGE 1PAGE 30PAGE 35
Exhibit 3:1:
Zernik v Connor et al
(2:08-cv-01550): a) March 5, 2009 Complaint (Dkt #001) (face page), and b) The respective NEF, bearing the ‘electronic document stamp’, as required by
General Order
08-02 for valid electronic certificate of authentication/attestation Exhibit 3:2:
Zernik v Connor et al
(2:08-cv-01550): a) March 7, 2008 Order Returning Case for Reassignment (Dkt #009). and b) The respective NEF, missing the ‘electronic document stamp’ Exhibit 3:3:
Zernik v Connor et al
(2:08-cv-01550):
a) April 24, 2009 Judgment (Dkt #107), and b) The respective NEF, missing the ‘electronic document stamp’ Exhibit 3:4:
Zernik v Connor et al
(2:08-cv-01550): a) Table form summary of NEFs’ validity, or lack thereof, and b) Compiled NEFs of Judicial, and Clerical Records, as obtained from the office of the Clerk on December 29, 2009.
Exhibit 4:1:
Fine v Sheriff et al
(2:09-cv-01914): a) The March 19/20, 2009 Petition for Habeas Corpus (Dkt #01) (face page), and the respective NEF, bearing the ‘electronic document stamp’, as required by
General Order
08-02 for valid electronic certificate of authentication/attestation; b) The June 29, 2009 Judgment (Dkt #31). Upon inspection on December 29, 2009, the respective NEF, was discovered to be missing the ‘electronic document stamp’. c) The February 18, 2010 Mandate (Dkt #59) as docketed in the US District Court – with no certification by a Circuit Judge and with no NDA (Notice of Docket Activity) from the US Court of Appeals, and the respective NEF, bearing no ‘electronic document stamp’. Exhibit 4:2:
Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al
(2:04-cv-08425): December 6, 2010, request upon counsel of parties in the Appeals to provide copies of the NEFs in
Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al
in the US District Court, and confirmation of receipt by counsel for the USA. Exhibit 4:3:
Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al
(2:04-cv-08425): December 9, 2010, request upon Clerk of the US District Court Terry Nafisi to provide copies of the NEFs and certify the PACER docket.
None
None
ii
1: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO INTERVENE
PAGE 87PAGE 121PAGE 130PAGE 139