You are on page 1of 8

0263 – 8762/99/$10.00+0.


© Institution of Chemical Engineers
Trans IChemE, Vol 77, Part A, October 1999

*Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands †Department of Chemical Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York, USA


Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model is developed for describin g the hydrodynamics of sieve trays. The gas and liquid phases are modelled in the Eulerian fram ework as two interpenetrating phases. The interphase momentum exchange (drag) coef cient is estim ated using the Bennett et al. correlatio n as a basis. Several threedimensional transient simulatio ns were carried out for a rectangular tray (5 mm holes, 0.22 m3 0.39 m cross section) with varying super cial gas velocity, weir height and liquid weir loads. The sim ulations were carried out using a comm ercial code CFX 4.2 of AEA Technology, Harwell, UK and run on a Silicon Graphics Power Challenge workstation with six R10000 200 MHz processors used in parallel. The clear liquid height determ ined from these simulatio ns is in reasonable agreement with experim ental measurements carried out for airwater in a rectang ular tray of the same dimensions. It is concluded that CFD can be a powerful tool for sieve tray design.

Keywords: computational uid dynamics; sieve trays; clear liquid height; froth height; froth density

The descriptio n of the hydrodynamics of sieve trays is of great im portance in industria l practice. For a given set of operating conditions (gas and liquid loads), tray geometry (colum n diameter, weir height, weir length, diam eter of holes, fractiona l hole area, active bubbling area, downcomer area) and system properties, it is required to predict the ow regim e prevailin g on the tray, liquid hold-up, clear liquid height, froth density, interfacial area, pressure drop, liquid entrainm ent, gas and liquid phase residen ce time distributions and the mass tran sfer coef cients in either uid phase. There are excellent surveys of the published literature in this 1 2 3 area (Kister , Lockett , Zuiderweg ). Published literature correlations are largely empirical in nature. In recent years there has been considerable academic and industrial interest in the use of computational uid dynamics (CFD) to model two-phase ows in process equipm ent. The volum e-of- uid (VOF) technique can be used for a priori determin atio n of the morphology and rise characteristics of 4 single bubbles rising in a liquid (Krishna and van Baten ). Considerable progress has been made in CFD modellin g of bubbling gas-solid uidized beds and bubble columns. CFD modelling of uidized beds usually adopts the Eulerian framework for both the dilute (bubble) and dense phases (emulsio n) and makes use of the granular theory to 5 calculate the dense phase rheological param eters (Bogere , 6 7 8 Boemer et al. , Ding and Gidaspow , Fan and Zhu , 9 10 ` Ferschneider and Mege , Gidaspow , Jenkins and 11 12 13 Savage , Kuipers et al. , Syamlal and O’Brien , van 1 4 ,1 5 Wachem et al. ). Discrete particle Lagrangian simulations of the particle phases have also been attem pted 16 (Hoomans et al. ). The use of CFD models for gas-liquid bubble colum ns has also evoked considerable interest in recent years and both Euler-Euler and Euler-Lagrange 639

frameworks have been employed for the description of the 17 18 gas and liquid phases (Boisson and Malin , Delnoij et al. , 19 20 Devanathan et al. , Grevskott et al. , Grienberger and 21 22 23 24 Hofmann , Jakobsen , Krishna et al. , Kumar et al. , 25 26 2 7,28 Lapin and Lu bbert , Lin et al. , Sokolichin et al. ¨ , 29 30 Torvik and Svendsen ). A recent review (Jakobsen et al. ) analyses the various modelling aspects involved for vertical bubble driven ows. There have been two recent attempts to model tray 31 hydrodynamics using CFD (Fischer and Quarini , Yu 32 32 et al. ). Yu et al. attempt to model the two-phase ow behaviour using a two-dim ensional model, focusing on the descriptio n of the hydrodynamics along the liquid ow path, ignorin g the variations in the direction of gas ow 31 along the height of the dispersion. Fischer and Quarini have attem pted to describe the 3-D transient vapour-liqu id hydrodynamics. An im porta nt key assum ptio n made in the 31 sim ulatio ns of Fisch er and Quarini concerns the interphase momentum exchange (drag) coef cient; these authors assumed a constant drag coef cient of 0.44, which is appropriate for uniform bubbly ow. This drag coef cient is not appropriate to describe the hydrodynamics of trays operating in either the froth or spray regimes. In this paper a three-dim ensional transient CFD model is developed, within the two-phase Eulerian fram ework, for hydrodynamics of a rectangular tray. The required interphase momentum exchange coef cient is estimated on the 33 basis of the correlation of Bennett et al. for the liquid holdup. Simulations have been carried out with varying supercial gas velocity, liquid weir loads and weir heights and the results compared with experimental data generated for the air-w ater system. The objective of this work is examine the extent to which CFD models can be used as a design tool in industria l practice.

8. storage tank for liquid.3. Sieve plate. 5. and measurement technique are available on our web site: http://ct-c r4. the dispersio n height hdisp is read from the graduated scale attached to the side of the tray. October 1999 . The sieve tray geometry used in the experiments is shown in Figure 2 and consists of a total of 276 holes of 5 mm diameter (fraction al hole area on tray is 0. 7. 1. M G. 6.L + r G eG g m L eL ($ uL (3) ­ ( r L e L uL ) ­ t +$ · ( r L e L uL uL 2 M G. per weir length. 11. Schematic of experimental set-up to measure hydrodynamics of rectangular sieve tray.44 ReG = r L UG dG /m L (10) and for the inertial regim e. 13. pG = pL . For the Stokes regim e CD = 24 /ReG . 12. uniformly over the downcomer cross section through seven equidistant holes of 2 mm diameter. No turbulence model is used for calculating the velocity elds within the dispersed gas phase. the turbulent contribution to the stress tensor is evaluated by means of k 2 e model. switched off and the liquid on the tray is allowed to drain to the container beneath.5 to 1.2 m s 2 1 . liquid inlet tube. s k = 1 and s e = 1 . y. liquid. uk . gas supply. C 1e = 1 . and instantly . To measure the clear liquid height. Vol 77. 14. estimate d the drag coef cient of a swarm of large bubbles using Figure 2. liquid lled stainless steel tube connected to a pressure sensor. Top view of the geometry of the rectangular sieve tray used in the experiments. the macroscopic density.uva. liquid outlet. 15. p is the pressure. consists of a rectangular sieve tray and ancillary gas and liquid distribution devices. liquid owm eter.L + ($ uL ) )) (4) T =2 eL $ p 2 + r L eL g where r k . 34 Krishna et al. shown in Figure 1. For the churn-turbulent regim e of bubble colum n operation. 10.92. liquid pump. For gas-liquid bubbly ows the interp hase momentum exchange term is 3 eG M L. CD =3 4 rL 2 rL rG gdG 1 2 V slip (12) Trans IChemE.0627).L . For a speci ed set of operating conditions. the gas inlet and liquid inlet are sim ultaneously. The liquid ow rate is measured by a calibrate d liquid owmeter (4). ranged from 43 102 4 to 123 10 2 4 m 3 s 2 1 m 2 1 . which has a cap on top to ensure uniform out ow of gas. 9. phase. CFD MODEL DEVELOPMENT For either gas (subscrip t G) or liquid (subscript L) phases in the two-phase dispersio n on the tray the volume-averaged mass and momentum conservation equations are given by Figure 1.G = r L C D ( uG 2 uL ) | uG 2 uL | (9) 4 dG where C D is the interphase mom entum exchange coef cient or drag coef cient. volum e fraction and viscosity of the kth phase. Valve. The super cial gas velocity UG used in the experim ents ranged from 0. 2. hcl . respectiv ely. velocity. the interphase momentum exchange between and liquid phases and g is the gravitational force. Measurement of the volum e of the liquid thus collected allows determin ation of the clear liquid height. ­ ( eG rG ) ­ t ­ ( eL r L ) ­ t +$ +$ ·( r G eG uG ) ·( r L e L u L ) =0 (1) (2) m G e G ($ uG =0 + ($ uG ) )) T EXPERIMENTAL The experimental set-up. weir (exchangeable). Further details of the experimental set up. For the continuous. Part A. downcomer (adjustable in vertical direction). The gas enters the sieve tray trough a 0. 4.chem. A calibrated rotam eter (8) is used to control the gas ow rate (7). The liquid loads. = 0. gas owm eter. Various weir heights. C 1e = 1 . Hw of 60. QL /W . ek and m k represent. also known as the turbulent regim e CD (11) 31 which is the relation used by Fischer and Quarini .09. conductivity cell for residence time distribution measurements.025 m diam eter copper tube. 90 and 100 mm were used in the experiments.44. The gas and liquid phases share the sam e pressure eld. tracer injection. 3. quick shut-off valve. using standard single phase param eters C m = 0 .640 KRISHNA et al. including photographs of the rig. The liquid from the storage tank (2) is fed to the downcomer (6) by means of a centrifug al pump (3). The liquid inlet tube (5) with an inner diameter of 15 mm is placed above the downcomer (6) and distribute s the liquid ­ ( r G e G uG ) ­ t +$ ·( r G eG uG uG 2 =2 e G $ p + M G.

The choice B 2 G eG of the grid size is based on experience gained in the modelling of gas-liquid bubble colum ns operating in the 37 churn-turbulent regime (Krishna ). The use of square holes inside of circular holes does not impact on the simulatio n results because the Eulerian fram ework is used for describin g either uid phase. Trans IChemE. In order to overcom e this problem equation (17) is modi ed as follow s M L. In this work the Bennett et al. The dimensions of the computational space are 0. which is used for a priori predictio n of bubble dynamics (Krishna 4 and van Baten ) Simulations have been perform ed on a Silicon Graphics Power Challenge with six R10000 processors running in parallel at 200 Mhz. Average liquid hold-up has been calculated by dividing clear liquid height by dispersion height. Figure 4 shows the layout of holes at the sieve plate in the bottom of the system . however. UK. as shown in Figure 3. gives numerical dif culties during start-up of the tray with fresh liquid because in the freeboard the liquid hold-up is zero. Grid cells of 5 mm size are used in the x-.G = eG eL ( r L 2 rG) g 1 1 ( uG 2 2 ( UG /eB ) eB L G B eL uL ) | uG 2 uL | (18) where the term 1 /( U / ) 1 / is estimated a priori from the Bennett relation (16). Layout of the sieve plate used in the CFD simulations.and z. y.CFD SIMULATIONS OF SIEVE TRAY HYDRODYNAMICS where V slip is the slip velocity of the bubble swarm with respect to the liquid 641 V slip = | uG 2 uL | 1 2 V slip (13) Substituting equations (12) and (13) into equation (9) gives M L. Part A. For the convective term s in equations (1) – (4) hybrid differencing was used.G = eG ( r L 2 ( UG /eB ) G 2 ( uG 2 uL ) | uG 2 uL | (17) This form ulation. The total number of grid cells within the computational space is 783 243 44 = 82368.55 us rG )g W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW r gas r liq 2 r gas ) ] 0 . The pressure-velocity coupling is obtained using the 36 SIMPLEC algorithm (Van Doorm al and Raithby ). From the simulatio n results. however. A commercial CFD package CFX 4. indeed for the range of super cial gas velocities used in our experim ents and simulatio ns there are no well de ned bubbles.2 of AEA Technology. Harwell. The fractiona l free-area in the computations is the same as that used in the experiments. square holes are used in the simulatio ns rather than circular holes because a rectangular Cartesian coordinate system is used. An improved version of the Rhie-Chow algorithm is used to calculate the velocity at the cell faces. Figure 4.directions.393 0. This package is a nite volum e solver. The grid size is 5 mm and 216 5 mm square holes are used in the simulations. A fully implicit backward differen cing schem e was used for the tim e integration. Dispersion height has been de ned by the height at which the average liquid hold-up drops below 10 percent. October 1999 .22 m. values of uG . using body. average liquid hold-up as a function of height has been determin ed. estim ate the gas hold-up: eL B = exp [ (! 2 12 . eG B =12 eL B (16) 1 The interphase momentum exchange term is therefore M L. 91 . Clear liquid height has been determined by multiplying the average total system liquid hold-up with the height of the system. Speci cation of the computational space used in the CFD simulations.uid mixture.123 0.tted grids. eG and eL are used. The geometry of the holes would in uence the results in VOF simulatio ns. The two-phase Eulerian simulatio n approach used here only requires that the gas phase be the dispersed phase. transient. uL . The chosen grid size of 5 mm is smaller than the smallest grid used in our earlier 37 study (Krishna ). where grid convergence was satis ed. this dispersio n could consist of either gas bubbles or gas jets. Vol 77. A further point to note is that use of equation (18) for the momentum exchange obviates the need for specifying the bubble size. This approach ensures that the average gas hold-up in the gas-liquid dispersio n on the froth conforms to experimental data over a wide range of 33 conditions (as measured by Bennett et al.G = eG ( r L 2 rG )g ( uG 2 uL ) | uG 2 uL | (14) The slip between gas and liquid can be estim ated from super cial gas velocity UG and the gas hold-up eG V slip = UG /eG 33 (15) correlatio n is used to Figure 3. ). The grids are non-staggered and all variables are evaluated 35 at the cell centres. was used to solve the equations of continuity and momentum for the two. A representative dynamic simulatio n took about 2 days to attain steady state. or a combination thereof. When incorporating equation (18) for the gas-liquid momentum exchange within the mom entum balance relations (3) and (4) the local.

Snapshots of the front view of the Eulerian simulations at a super cial gas velocity. Vol 77. Figure 5.chem.uva. weir height hw Trans liquid weir load QL /W = 8 . Part A. An animation of the simulation . = 80 mm.642 KRISHNA et al.7 m s2 1 . UG = 0.253 10 2 4 m 3 s2 1 m 2 1 . October 1999 can be viewed on our web site: http://ct-cr4.

Quasi-stead y state values are obtained by running a dynamic simulatio n until no more changes in the total liquid hold-up in the system are observed for a period large enough to obtain a time average. boundary conditions. Typically. October 1999 . Figure 6. The largest time step used in the –3 643 simulatio ns is 23 10 s. Trans IChemE. instantaneous results have been averaged over a tim e period in which the liquid holdup in the system rem ained practically constant. presented later in this work.CFD SIMULATIONS OF SIEVE TRAY HYDRODYNAMICS Further details of the computational algorithms used.25 3 10 2 4 m 3 s2 1 m 2 1 . Vol 77. 3000 tim e steps are required to attain quasisteady state conditions. uva.7 m s 2 1 . Snapshots of the top view of the Eulerian simulations at a super cial gas velocity. UG = The approach to a quasi-steady state is done by monitoring the liquid liquid in the system . including an animation of a typical simulation are available on our web site: http://ct-cr4.chem.uva. weir height hw = 80 mm. liquid weir load QL /W = 8 .chem. Part A. To obtain steady state values of the clear liquid height. An animation of the simulation can be viewed on our web site: http://ct-cr4.

Of the literature correlatio ns. QL /W = 8 . 7 m s 2 1 . Clear liquid height as a function of the weir height.directions and over a suf ciently long time interval once quasi-steady state conditions are established. Weir height 3 2 1 2 4 h w = 80 mm. W eir height h w = 80 mm. as is the chaotic behaviour of the tray. The simulated trends in the liquid hold-up with gas velocity UG are in line with 3 experimental data (e.7 m s 2 1 . Comparison of experimental data with literature correlations and CFD simulations. 253 10 2 4 m 3 s2 1 m 2 1 .and y.7 and 0. those of 38 40 Colwell and Stichlma ir agree best with our experimental results. Colwell3 8 .5. Hofhuis and 39 40 Zuiderweg . The values of the clear liquid height from the simulations are obtained after averaging over a suf ciently long time interval once quasi-steady state conditions are established and determining the cumulative liquid hold-up within the computational space. Weir height hw = 80 mm. Figure 7. Part A. 0. . liquid weir load QL /W = 8 . The values of the hold-up are obtained after averaging along the x. The values of the clear liquid height from the simulations are obtained after averaging over a suf ciently long time interval once quasi-steady state conditions are established and determining the cumulative liquid hold-up within the computational space. respectiv ely. The values of the clear liquid height from the simulatio ns are obtained after averaging over a suf ciently long time interval once quasi-steady state conditions are establish ed and determ ining the cumulative liquid hold-up within the computational space. Comparison of experimental data with literature correlations and CFD simulations. UG = 0.253 10 2 4 m 3 s2 1 m 2 1 .direction s and over a suf ciently long tim e interval once quasi-steady state conditions are establish ed. Figure 7 presents typical sim ulation results for the variation of the liquid hold-up along the height of the dispersion. CFD SIMULATIONS VS EXPERIMENTS Figures 5 and 6 present computational snapshots of the front view and top view of the tray. Clear liquid height as a function of the liquid weir load. In the present experim ents it was found that small amounts of im purities and surface active agents tend to in uence the experimental results to a signi cant extent. In Figure 10 it is noted that the deviation between our CFD sim ulations and the Bennett correlation for the clear liquid height increases when the weir height increases to Figure 8. If coalescence is suppressed by the presence of impuritie s.644 KRISHNA et al. The Bennett correlation and our CFD simulatio ns give a good representation of systems which show good coalescence behaviour. Comparison of experimental data with literature correlations and CFD simulations. Super cial gas velocity UG = 0 . October 1999 . The values of the clear liquid height from the simulations are obtained after averaging over a suf ciently long time interval once quasi-steady state conditions are established and determining the cumulative liquid hold-up within the computational space. Zuiderweg ). Trans IChemE.9 m s 2 . Apparently. Figure 8 compares the experimental data for the clear liquid height with varying super cial gas velocity with the results from CFD simulatio ns and four typical literature 33 correlations (Bennett et al.253 10 m s m 2 1 . liquid weir load QL /W = 8 . The values of the hold-up are obtained after averaging along the x. the gas holdup would tend to increase with a concomitant decrease in the clear liquid height. Vol 77. Clear liquid height as a function of the super cial gas velocity. Stichlm air ). Distribution of liquid hold-up along the height of the dispersion 1 for super cial gas velocities. Stichlma ir and Hofhuis and Zuiderweg work best for non-coalescing system s. Figure 9.and y. Figure 10. the correlatio ns of Colwell. Figures 9 and 10 compare the experim ental data for the clear liquid height with varying liquid weir loads and weir height. Such system s can be sim ulated by making the appropriate changes in the slip velocity relation used in equation (18). The existence of liquid circulatio n cells is apparent. with the results from CFD simulatio ns and literature correlatio ns.g. Super cial gas velocity UG = 0 .

van Duijn. kg m 2 3 stress tensor. N m 2 2 Subscripts cl clear liquid disp dispersion G referring to gas phase k index referring to one of the three phases L referring to liquid phase slip slip Superscripts B from Bennett correlation REFERENCES 1. Chem Eng Sci. J... 7. Chem Eng Sci. For a typical run. and (b) over x and z directions respectively. USA. volume fraction of phase. Qi. there is a tendency for the CFD sim ulations to consistently overpredict the clear liquid height for our measurements..CFD SIMULATIONS OF SIEVE TRAY HYDRODYNAMICS 645 between the gas and liquid phases on a tray. S. the clear liquid heights in the x . J. The values of the clear liquid height from the simulations are obtained after averaging over a suf ciently long time interval once quasi-steady state conditions are established and determining the clear liquid height by averaging over (a) y and z. 1986. N. H.. N m 2 2 pressure. A rigorous description of gas-solid uidized beds. 1992. m coordinate. and Van Baten. (Cambridge University Press). 2. There is a need for developing more fundamental models for calculation of the interphase momentum exchange Trans IChemE.directions are given in Figure 11 (a) and (b). 1982. 1995. hw = 80 mm.. Van Wachem. A view on the state of the art.. M. A numerical model of gas. 9. 1992. m s 2 weir length. Eulerian computation of uidized bed hydrodynamics— A comparison of physical models. s 1 velocity vector. 12. D. Simulating the motion of gas bubbles in a liquid.. Schouten. m s2 super cial gas velocity. B. Bogere.. Chem Eng Sci. `ge. U. B. Cambridge).253 10 2 4 m 3 s 2 1 m 2 1 . 1998. J. UG = 0.. m interphase momentum exchange term. M.and y. NOMENCLATURE dG CD g H M p QL Re t u UG Vslip W x y z diameter of gas bubble. It is concluded that CFD simulatio ns can be a powerful design and simulatio n tool. Sieve trays. T. AIChEJ . 51: 603 – 622. m coordinate. and Van Swaaij. New York). In Figures 8. J. and O’Brien. R. dimensionless acceleration due to gravity.. Such relations must clearly be dependent on the operating regime of the tray. 36: 523 – 538. 270 . m drag coef cient. C. P. W . 9 and 10 the clear liquid heights were determin ed by averaging over the x . Krishna. ranged from 0 – 25 mm.. 130: 187 – 202. Gidaspow. 11. F. liquid weir load and weir height. y and z direction s of the computational space (see Figure 3). Vol 77. CONCLUDING REMARKS A transient three-dim ensional CFD model has been developed for tray hydrodynamics.directions. and Me ´ phase uidized beds. M. J. 1994. Kister. Distillation Tray Fundamentals . 22 – 31. dimensionless time. Computer simulation of bubbles in a uidized bed. Jenkins.. R. Proc 13th Int Conf on Fluidized Bed Combustion. Orlando. Syamlal. M .7 m s 2 1 .. suggests that the assum ed drag relations are more applicable to the bubbly froth regime rather than to the spray regim e. 6. The reason for this deviation is because the values of hw in the experim ents of Bennett et al. nearly elastic spherical particles. Ferschneider. Principles of Gas-Solid Flows. A. UG = 0 . A theory for the rapid ow identical. However. K. 14.. The reason for this overprediction is the Bennett correlatio n for estim ation of the slip between the gas and liquid phases. and Savage. 1996. Multiphase Flow and Fluidization– Continuum and Kinetic Theory Descriptions. 1989. (M cGraw-Hill. 775 –787. The importan t advantage of the CFD simulatio ns is that the in uence of tray geometry is automatically taken into account by the code. Greek letters e m r t values larger than 80 mm . dimensionless viscosity of phase. D. m s 2 Reynolds number. T.81 m s 2 2 dispersion height. 37: 1441 – 1464. 47: 1913 –1924. 5. 398: 208. A. and Zhu. 1983. J. H. The im proved agreem ent between the CFD simulatio ns and experim ents with increasin g weir heights. M. van Beckum. The ‘bath-tub’ pro les of the clear liquid height are clearly evident. pp. P.7 m s 2 1 and hw = 80 mm . Ding. Pa s density of phases. Clear liquid height along the x. 1990. N m 2 3 1 liquid ow rate across tray.and y. Lockett. m coordinate. 1999. Renz. M.. and Van den Bleek. C. AIChE Symp Series No. 51: 301 – ¸ 307. (Cambridge University Press.. 3. smooth.253 10 2 4 m 3 s 2 1 m 2 1 .. Eulerian simulation of dense 9.. G. G. this correlation is appropriate for system s without any coalescence inhibiting impurities or surface active agents. The only empirical input to the CFD simulatio ns is the slip velocity between the gas and liquid phases. Zuiderweg. Nature. for this purposes the 33 Bennett correlatio n was used. Distillation Design. J and Gidaspow. A bubbling uidization model using the kinetic theory of granular ow. Comput Chem Eng . P. J. Eulerian simulations of bubbling behaviour in gassolid uidized beds. Kuipers. 1996. M. 8. H.. C. Fan.uidized beds. F. October 1999 . 13. Boemer. S. m 3 Figure 11. Revue de L’Institut Francais du Pe trole. Vasquez and Boysan. 22: S299 – S306. The gas and liquid phases are treated as interpenetrating continuo us phases and modelled within the Eulerian framew ork. L. (Academic Press). 1998. with QL /W = 8 . The predictio ns of the clear liquid height and liquid hold-up from the CFD simulatio ns show the right trends with varying super cial gas velocity. J Fluid Mech. 85: pp. 4. Z. 10. QL /W = 8 .. M.. m s2 1 1 slip velocity between gas and liquid. J. Krishna. F. Part A.

uva. 18. T. and Kashiwa. Devanathan. C. Detailed modelling and numerical simulation. M. 1998. Devanathan.. N. A. Hjarbo. A... Paper presented at the Working Party meeting on Distillation.. and Chow. New pressure drop correlation for sieve tray distillation columns. and Liu. 42: 301 – 318. and Ellenberger. G. A. 5-7 October 1998 . F. Lapin. 32. Krishna. L. S.. 37. and Lu bbert. J. Trondheim).. Delnoij. 1998. B. J. P. 54: 2141 – 2149. K.. Chem Eng Sci. and Van Swaaij. A. H. bubble size distributions. Cagliari. 49: 3661 –3674. Sannæs. M. and Malin. Dr Ing Thesis. and Fan.. Urseanu. 1993. J. 1984. IChemE Symp Series No 56 . and Zuiderweg. M. A. N. Chem Eng Sci. M.. Y. Part A. L. 1997. D. Sokolichin. Validation of the Eulerian simulated dynamic behaviour of gas-solid uidized beds. 47: 2215 – 2220. M. H. Gas-liquid ow in bubble columns and loop reactors: Part I. Yu. You. A. 20: 298 –307. Trans IChemE. Chem Eng Sci. 21: 1525 –1532. A.. 29: 434 – 442. Num erical simulation and experimental veri cation of gas-liquid ow in bubble columns. Krishna. M odelling of slurry reactors. W . B. M. Num erical study of the turbulent ow past an airfoil with trailing edge separation. Grundlagen der Dimensionierung des Gas/ ¨ Flu ssigkeit-Kontaktapparates Bodenkolonne . R. M . (E-mail: krishna@chemeng. 1992. and Lu bbert.. 91: pp. 49: 5735 – 5746.2/1 – 2.. 11 – 19.. Van Wachem. Chem Eng Sci. Investigations and modelling of bubble columns. Grevskott. 23: 1289 –1310. Modeling of bubble driven vertical ows. University of Am sterdam. Discrete particle simulation of bubble and slug formation in a two-dimensional gas. S. Grevskott.. 22.. and Svendsen. J. 26. 51: 1703 – 1713. 54: 171 – 183.. and Svendsen.. 33. C. Liquid circulation.. Direct numerical simulation of gas-liquid two-phase ows. J. J. M. M . A. Chem Eng Sci . and Svendsen. Vanderheyden. 1018 WV Am sterdam.. 27. 1983. 54: 4903 –4911. Quantitative analysis and computation of two-dimensional bubble columns. P. Agrawal. Enhancement of the SIMPL E method for predicting incompressible ows. P. Van Baten. B. J... Int J Numerical Methods in Fluids . Department of Chemical Engineering. 1998. Dudukovic. F.. 15-20 November 1998.uid model. 20. 21. W einheim). R. Dynamic simulation of dispersed gas-liquid two-phase ow using a discrete bubble model.. EFChE. J. X. H. Van Baten. M. Ind Eng Chem Res. Num erical prediction of twophase ow in bubble columns. Chem Eng H. 1999. M. On the modelling and simulation of bubble column reactors using a two. Nieuwe Achtergracht 166.. 36: 4052 –4074. J and Raithby. 52: 611 – 626.. AIChE Symp Series No. Computational uid-dynamics and experimental veri cation of twophase two-dimensional ow on a sieve column tray. A fundamental approach. 7: 147 – 163... Grienberger.. (Verlag Chemie. I. Chem Eng Sci. T. M. 19. H. J. C. R. and Ellenberger.. Yan... 1983. Krishna. 1990. 16. G. 1979. R. D. H.and three-phase bubble columns. H. W. W. P.. 1996. 45: 2325 – 2332.. AIChEJ. and Van Swaaij. 1978. A.. J. J. The manuscript was received 15 January 1999 and accepted for publication after revision 14 May 1999. H. 305 . T. 39. 51: 99 – 118. 15. and Lubbert. A. Urseanu. ¨ 28. Briels. 1995. Powder Technol. 2. Boisson. The Norwegian Institute of Technology... Schouten. 25. Reprotext. Ind Eng Chem Proc Des Dev. Colwell. and Ellenberger. A. A. R.. 100: 137 – 146. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Netherlands Foundation for Scienti c Research (NW O) is gratefully acknowledged for providing nancial assistance to J. 1995. Chem Eng Sci. and Quarini. pp.. Kuipers. F. J.. Lapin.. Rhie. S. W. M . R. M . ¨ Chaotic ow in bubble column reactors. W. Kuipers.. G. S. Chem Eng Sci. A. and Cook. Eigenberger. The Netherlands.. Rise velocity of a swarm of large gas bubbles in liquids... B. Jakobsen. Padial. October 1999 . L. Sokolichin. 23. J and Hofm ann. Paper presented at the AIChE annual meeting. Miami Beach. Liu. Chem Eng Sci. Dudukovic.. Hoomans. (The University of Trondheim.. B. Vol 77. Sannæs. N. Kum ar. B. 52: 1429 – 1458. F. G. 1979. 1994..646 KRISHNA et al. A. 31. Stichlmair. J. M.. and solids movement in two. K. E. Reese. Van Doorm al. X. Lapin. 24. H. T. 1996. ADDRESS Correspondence concerning this paper should be addressed to Professor R. Lammers. USA.. Bennett.. Fischer. 1996. C. M. AIAA Journal. C. Department of Chemical Engineering. M. Van Baten. Krishna. Absorption and Extraction. Numer Heat Transfer. J.. Euler/Euler versus Euler/Lagrange. P. Krishna. 38. C. Dudukovic. J. Lin. Hong. 40. S. J. P. 30. Chem Eng Sci . and Eigenberger.. Sieve plates: dispersion density and ow regimes. Three-dimensional heterogeneous modelling of distillation tray hydraulics. 1994. L. In Industrial Mixing Fundamentals with Applications. P. 29. 1999. N. B.. W .2/ 26. F. P. 36. I. 1999.. van Baten. and Van den Bleek. Num erical simulation of the dynamics ¨ of two-phase gas-liquid ows in bubble columns. R. 35. Hofhuis. Clear liquid height and froth densities on sieve trays. 34. In uence of scale on the hydrodynamics of bubble columns operating in the churn-turbulent regime: Experiments vs Eulerian simulations. A.. Chem Eng Sci. G. 1996. Scale effects in uidized multiphase reactors. Jakobsen. 50: 2661 – 2667. 1997.. AIChEJ . Torvik. 1997. 17.uidized bed: A hard sphere approach. J. G.M. F.