You are on page 1of 41

1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

IDP-R1: Integrated Development Strategy Project Reference Number ESV-DES-0000


Consultant to fill only shaded areas
IDP Team Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

All below mentioned requirements to be attached when applicable


Document / Approved
Submission Requirements Submitted Comments
Attachment Yes No
Process chart for the IDP developed
1
at project inception, detailing:
Team structure listing team members
1.a and their roles
Design milestones and workshops
listing participants, goals, expected
1.b outcomes, required actions with tasks
assignments
Methodology for ensuring appropriate
stakeholders are involved, including
construction team, commissioning
1.c agent, potential tenants, building
operators and relevant regulatory
authorities and permit agencies
Narrative summarizing initial vision,
2 objectives and targets set jointly by
the project team for the project
Implementation strategy for
3 achieving transition between project
stages and project packages
Meeting minutes, action items and
team member responsibilities from
4
key workshops held as part of the
IDP
Narrative highlighting the reasons
5 for any changes from the initial IDP
process chart.

Required credit achieved?

Other Supportive Documents:

1.a: Team Structure / Members


Applicable
Name Company
yes no

Acoustic Consultant

Architect

ADM | IDP-R1: Integrated Development Strategy Page 1 of 3


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

Commissioning Agent

Construction Manager

Cost Consultant

Developer/Owner

Environmental Consultant

Geotechnical Engineer

Landscape Architect

Life Cycle Analyst

Master planner

Modeling Specialist

Project Manager
Safety and Security
Consultant
Sustainability Consultant

Utilities/MEP Engineer

Waste Specialist

Waste Specialist

Other Consultant

1.b: Design Milestones & Planned Workshops / Meetings


Provide copy for each Meeting Minutes

Date

Organize team & work


Understand site context
Plan site layout
Design outdoor space
Design indoor space
Design building systems
Submittal
Build Villa
Verify Performance
Submittal

ADM | IDP-R1: Integrated Development Strategy Page 2 of 3


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

1.c: Involvement Methodology


Narrative

2: Vision, Objectives & Targets (Narratives)

Vision

Objectives

Targets

3: Implementation Strategy
Narrative:

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only

ADM – Estidama Team Signature Status Comments Date


Comply Rejected

ADM | IDP-R1: Integrated Development Strategy Page 3 of 3


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

IDP-R2: Tenant Fit-Out Design & Construction Guide Project Reference Number ESB-DES-0000
Consultant to fill only shaded areas
IDPT Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

All below mentioned requirements to be attached when applicable


Document / Approved
Submission Requirements Submitted Comments
Attachment Yes No

6 Under taking letter

Required credit achieved?

Other Supportive Documents:

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only

ADM – Estidama Team Signature Status Comments Date


Comply Rejected

ADM | IDP-R2: Tenant Fit-Out Design & Construction Guide Page 1 of 1


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

IDP-R3: Basic Commissioning Project Reference Number ESB-DES-0000


Consultant to fill only shaded areas
IDPT Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

All below mentioned requirements to be attached when applicable


Approved
Document /
Submission Requirements Submitted Comments
Attachment
Yes No
CV of Commissioning Agent for
7
design review and construction
Contract with the Commissioning
Agent for
• Design review
• Commission the installed
systems
o HVAC, refrigeration,
8 o onsite energy generation,
o lighting and lighting control ,
o Domestic Hot and Cold Water
Systems,
o On-site Water Treatment
including swimming Pools,
Automated Control Features

9 Design Documents reviews

Commissioning Plan clearly


indicating commissioning
requirements for the project,
10
including:
- Commissioning Requirements
- Basis of Design narrative

Required credit achieved?

Other Supportive Documents:

ADM | IDP-R3: Basic Commissioning Page 1 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

Specification and Design Review Results

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only


ADM – Estidama Team Signature Status Attachment Date
Comply Rejected

ADM | IDP-R3: Basic Commissioning Page 2 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

LBi-R1: Healthy Ventilation Delivery Project Reference Number ESV-DES-0000

IDP Team Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

Documents / Approved
Submission Requirements Submitted Comments
Attachments Yes No
Narrative describing how the
mechanical design system meets the
26 Credit Requirements, including
description of mechanical ventilation
system
Documentation of an observational
study of local air quality including
27
photographs of surrounding sources of
pollutant emissions
Mechanical system drawings marked-
up to clearly show distances between
air intake points and exhaust air or
28
other discharge points and the
distances from the air exhaust points
to any defined public realm areas
Spreadsheet calculations of fresh air
29 ventilation rates based on the
ventilation rate procedure for all zones

Required credit achieved?

Other Supportive Documents:

Supporting Documents (attachments)


o (Calculation Attachments)
o Specifications (attachments)
o Ref. to Standards used
o Other Attachments
Note: Provide attachment reference

ADM | LBi-R1: Healthy Ventilation Delivery Page 1 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

Targets planned to be achieved

Ways / Equipments used to achieve targets

Calculation Results

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only

ADM – Estidama Team Signature Status Comments Date


Comply Rejected

ADM | LBi-R1: Healthy Ventilation Delivery Page 2 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

LBi-R2: Smoking Control Project Reference Number ESV-DES-0000

IDP Team Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

Document / Approved
Submission Requirements Submitted Comments
Attachment Yes No
Written commitment from the
building owner/developer that there
will be no smoking policy operated
within the building or common areas
30 for residential buildings or additionally
for school grounds by inclusion in
Contracts of Sale and Lease/Rent
Agreements that smoking will be
banned by future owners and tenants
Extracts from specifications and/or
drawings indicating the locations of
posted signage stating that the entire
31 building is a no smoking environment
and detailing the negative health
impacts of smoking installed in all
dedicated external smoking areas
Drawings indicating the location of
dedicated outside smoking areas and
facilities for collecting ash and
32
cigarette ends which clearly indicate
their distance from entrances,
operable windows and air intakes
For residential units, provide
specifications for weather-stripping of
33
doors and drawings that highlight
impermeable deck to deck partitioning

Required credit achieved?

Other Supportive Documents:

Supporting Documents (attachments)


o (Calculation Attachments)
o Specifications (attachments)
o Ref. to Standards used
o Other Attachments
Note: Provide attachment reference

ADM | LBi-R2: Smoking Control Page 1 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

Targets planned to be achieved

Ways / Equipments used to achieve targets

Calculation Results

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only

ADM – Estidama Team Signature Status Comments Date


Comply Rejected

ADM | LBi-R2: Smoking Control Page 2 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

LBi-R3: Legionella Prevention Project Reference Number ESV-DES-0000

IDP Team Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

Document / Approved
Submission Requirements Submitted Comments
Attachment Yes No
Narrative and drawings of the air
conditioning systems regardless of
whether water-based cooling towers are
34 present or not. The Narrative must explain
the approach to Legionella Management,
or confirm no water-based systems are
present
35 Narrative and drawings of the
project’s other water-based systems;
Relevant water based systems include but
are not limited to:
• Water systems incorporating a cooling
tower;
• Water systems incorporating an
evaporative condenser;
• Hot and cold water systems;
• Other plant and systems containing
water which is likely to exceed 20ºC and
which may release a spray or aerosol
during operation OR when being
maintained; Humidifiers; Air washers;
• Spa baths and Pools;
• Car / bus washes;
• Wet scrubbers; Fountains and

• Water features (Indoor and Outdoor);


• Sprinkler and hose reel systems
Legionella Management Plan for the
treatment of Legionella in the project’s
water-based systems.
The Legionella Management Plan must
include:
• Risk Identification and Risk Assessment;
36 • Risk Management Plan for management
responsibilities, training & competence;
• An Exposure Risk Prevention or Control
Plan;
• Record Keeping Plan; and
• Responsibility Plan for manufacturers,
importers, suppliers & installers
Required credit achieved?

ADM | LBi-R3: Legionella Prevention Page 1 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

Other Supportive Documents:

Supporting Documents (attachments) o Specifications (attachments)


o (Calculation Attachments) o Ref. to Standards used
o Other Attachments
Note: Provide attachment reference
Targets planned to be achieved

Ways / Equipments used to achieve targets

Calculation Results

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only

ADM – Estidama Team Signature Status Comments Date


Comply Rejected

ADM | LBi-R3: Legionella Prevention Page 2 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

LBo-R1: Plan 2030 Project Reference Number ESB-DES-0000


Consultant to fill only shaded areas
IDPT Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

All below mentioned requirements to be attached when applicable


Document / Approved
Submission Requirements Submitted Comments
Attachment Yes No
A letter from the UPC confirming
that the proposed development is:

• Located within an established


20 Urban Growth Boundary
• Did not require significant
variance or special relief from
Plan 2030, Development Code
and/or Area Plan for approval

Required credit achieved?

Other Supportive Documents:

=
Plan 2030 (Refer to planning approval)

Is the building located within an established Urban


Growth Boundary Yes No

Does the building require significant variance or


special relief from Plan 2030 or the Development Yes No
Code?

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only


ADM – Estidama Team Signature Status Comments Date
Comply Rejected

ADM |LBo-R1: Plan 2030 Page 1 of 1


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

LBo-R2: Urban Systems Assessment Project Reference Number ESV-DES-0000


Consultant to fill only shaded areas
IDPT Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

All below mentioned requirements to be attached when applicable


Document / Approved Comments
Submission Requirements Submitted
Attachment Yes No Yes
Urban Systems Assessment
Report (to identify the existing
site conditions), should include:
21 Narrative
Maps
Site photographs (Time
stamped)
CV of appointed suitably qualified
22
environmental professional

Required credit achieved?

Other Supportive Documents:

1.a: Narrative (Site Description)

Project Site

Urban Context

Connectivity

ADM | LBo-R2: Urban Systems Assessment Page 1 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

1.b: Maps

Marked-Up Site Plans showing activities within 350m Radius:

1.c: Site Photographs

Time stamped & Location referenced Site photographs:

2: Qualified Environmental Professional

Personnel CV / Specialist Pre-Qualification:

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only

ADM – Estidama Team Signature Status Comments Date


Comply Rejected

ADM | LBo-R2: Urban Systems Assessment Page 2 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

LBo-R3 Outdoor Thermal Comfort Strategy Project Reference Number ESV-DES-0000


Consultant to fill only shaded areas
IDPT Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

All below mentioned requirements to be attached when applicable


Document / Approved Comments
Submission Requirements Submitted
Attachment Yes No Yes
Outdoor Thermal Comfort
Strategy report highlighting
all measures contributing to
improving the building’s
23 exterior microclimate
including:
• Narrative
• Drawings of the public
realm spaces and priority
shade areas
Plan and tabulated results
showing achievement of % of
shading of applicable
24
spaces at 1:00pm clock time
on the Equinox and Summer
Solstice

Extracts from specifications


25 relating to the SRI of all
cover elements

Required credit achieved?

Other Supportive Documents:

Outdoor Thermal Comfort Strategy*


*Drawings to be attached
Narrative

ADM | LBo-R3: Outdoor Thermal Comfort Strategy Page 1 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

Shading Provisions

Does the project have any areas requiring shade? Yes No


Shading
Minimum Percentage Requirement
Shaded Surface
Space Type Surface Area, m2 Area to be of Area that Achieved?
Area, m2
shaded is Shaded, %
Yes No

Exterior Surface Parking with


more than 10 spaces
40%
(including parking on roof
surfaces)

Public Open Spaces


60%
(including privately owned)
Pedestrian Walkways
(based on 1.8m width within 75%
the through zone)
Cycle Tracks 50%

Playgrounds 90%

Other

Shading Systems

List of all Shading Elements for the Applicable Spaces (minimum SRI of 29)
SRI Value Achieved?
Shading Element Solar Reflectance Index (SRI)
Yes No

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only

ADM – Estidama Team Signature Status Comments Date


Comply Rejected

ADM | LBo-R3: Outdoor Thermal Comfort Strategy Page 2 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

NS-R1: Natural Systems Assessment Project Reference Number ESB-DES-0000


Consultant to fill only shaded areas
IDPT Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

All below mentioned requirements to be attached when applicable


Document / Approved
Submission Requirements Submitted Comments
Attachment Yes No
Natural Systems Assessment Report
including:
- Narrative
- Maps
11 - Site photographs
Maps and site photographs must clearly
identify the extent of different habitats
and/or other significant natural system
features

Review of the site against Environmental


12
Policy Statements included in Plan 2030

CV of appointed suitably qualified


13
environmental professional

Required credit achieved?

Other Supportive Documents:

Natural Systems Assessment

Is the site of any natural system significance? Yes No


Narrative (Attach maps & photographs)

ADM | NS-R1: Natural Systems Assessment Page 1 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

Site Review Against Environmental Policy Statements in Plan 2030

Narrative

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only


ADM – Estidama Team Signature Status Comments Date
Comply Rejected

ADM | NS-R1: Natural Systems Assessment Page 2 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

NS-R2: Natural Systems Protection Project Reference Number ESB-DES-0000


Consultant to fill only shaded areas
IDPT Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

All below mentioned requirements to be attached when applicable


Document / Approved
Submission Requirements Submitted Comments
Attachment Yes No
Supporting calculations,
summarizing total site area,
14 protection area and/or
mitigation area/compensation
area in hectares

Construction strategy to protect


sensitive habitats and protected
15
species from construction
impacts

Details of the appointed


suitably qualified ecological
16 consultant’s professional status,
if different to the consultant
details provided in NS-R1

Environmental Impact
assessment report including
17
protection and mitigation
strategies

Required credit achieved?

Other Supportive Documents:

Natural Systems Assessment

Are there any significant or valuable natural systems


assets identified in NS-R1?
Yes No

ADM | NS-R2: Natural System Protection Page 1 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

Supporting calculations

Total Site Area: Protection Area:

Mitigation Area: Compensation Area:

Other:

Strategy to protect habitats from construction impacts

Brief:

ecological Consultant(s) Details (if applicable)

Name Company Email Telephone CV

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only


ADM – Estidama Team Signature Status Comments Date
Comply Rejected

ADM | NS-R2: Natural System Protection Page 2 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

NS-R3: Natural Systems Design & Management Strategy Project Reference Number ESB-DES-0000
Consultant to fill only shaded areas
IDPT Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

All below mentioned requirements to be attached when applicable


Document / Approved
Submission Requirements Submitted Comments
Attachment Yes No
Natural Systems Design and
18 Management Strategy that
includes:
• Plans and drawings illustrating
layout and design of
landscaped and habitat areas
• Details of soft and hard
landscaped areas
• Details and justification of
plant selection (ensuring that
only native and adaptive
drought and saline tolerant
species are specified for
habitat areas)
• Details of soil strategy for
testing, protection,
enhancement and maintenance
• Irrigation strategy
• Details of landscape
maintenance procedures
including fertilizer, herbicide
and pesticide application
• Details of specific
establishment, maintenance
and protection requirements
for sensitive areas
• Details of monitoring
requirements
Details of the appointed suitably
qualified environmental
19 consultant’s professional status, if
different to the consultant details
provided in NS-R1

Required credit achieved?

ADM |NS-R3: Natural Systems Design & Management Strategy Page 1 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

Other Supportive Documents:

=
ecological Consultant(s) Details (if different to the consultant details provided in NS-R1)

Name Company Email Telephone CV

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only


ADM – Estidama Team Signature Status Attachment Date
Comply Rejected

ADM |NS-R3: Natural Systems Design & Management Strategy Page 2 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

PW-R1: Min. Interior Water Use Reduction Project Reference Number ESV-DES-0000

IDP Team Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

Document / Approved Comments


Submission Requirements Submitted
Attachment Yes No
Brief narrative describing all proposed
37
water conservation strategies
Extracts from specifications for all
proposed fixtures and fittings
38
indicating flow rates and flow
regulation systems
Extracts from specifications for all
39 proposed appliances including
information on their water use
Building Water Calculator confirming
that the building’s predicted interior
potable water consumption will be no
40
greater than the baseline building
interior potable water consumption
using efficiency measures only

Required credit achieved?

Other Supportive Documents:

Supporting Documents (attachments)


o (Calculation Attachments)
o Specifications (attachments)
o Ref. to Standards used
o Other Attachments
Note: Provide attachment reference

Targets planned to be achieved

ADM | PW-R1: Minimum Interior Water Use Reduction Page 1 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

Ways / Equipments used to achieve targets

Calculation Results

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only

ADM – Estidama Team Signature Status Comments Date


Comply Rejected

ADM | PW-R1: Minimum Interior Water Use Reduction Page 2 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

PW-R2: Exterior Water Monitoring Project Reference Number ESV-DES-0000

IDP Team Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

Demonstrate that easily accessible and clearly labeled water meters are provided and capable of monitoring the water
consumption of, at a minimum, the following exterior water uses (where present):
• Heat rejection;
• External hose bibs;
• Irrigation systems;
• Swimming pools; and
• Water features
All meters must have data logging capability and be connected to a central monitoring system so that information on
the exterior water consumption can be recorded

Document / Approved Comments


Submission Requirements Submitted
Attachment Yes No
Brief narrative describing how the
requirements of the credit will be
41
achieved

Extracts from specifications and MEP


drawings clearly indicating the type,
42
extent and locations of all metering,
and central monitoring system
List of all exterior uses and
43
corresponding metering equipment

Required credit achieved?

Other Supportive Documents:

Supporting Documents (attachments)


o (Calculation Attachments)
o Specifications (attachments)
o Ref. to Standards used
o Other Attachments
Note: Provide attachment reference

ADM | PW-R2: Exterior Water Monitoring Page 1 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

Targets planned to be achieved

Ways / Equipments used to achieve targets

Calculation Results

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only

ADM – Estidama Team Signature Status Comments Date


Comply Rejected

ADM | PW-R2: Exterior Water Monitoring Page 2 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

RE-R1: Minimum Energy Performance Project Reference Number ESV-DES-0000

IDP Team Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

Document / Approved
Submission Requirements Submitted Comments
Attachment Yes No
Energy Model Template summarizing
the dynamic energy simulation,
confirming that the minimum
requirements of this credit will be
achieved; this should cover the
followings but not limited to:
Lighting; Heating; Cooling; Heat
rejection; Pumps; Fans; Service water
heating; and Receptacle and process
44
loads
Demonstrate a minimum 12%
performance improvement compared
to the baseline building performance
demonstrated by the energy
simulation model as per the
methodology outlined within Appendix
G of Standard 90.1-2007.

Building levels, occupancy, zoning,


HVAC schematic drawings, zones
thermal loads, occupancy, settings,
control sys
Chillers and pumps design settings,
narratives and schematic drawings
Narratives of interior and exterior
Lighting sys and Control Sys’s used
Hot Water Service sys; narratives,
settings, controls, schematic drawings
Other power equipments, narratives
schematics,
Receptacle and process loads
narratives schematics,

Confirmation that simulator is tested


to ASHREA std 140
Compliance with ASHREA 90.1 – 2007,
App G Mandatory Provisions

ADM | RE-R1: Minimum Energy Performance Page 1 of 3


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

Energy Model Template for Baseline


and Proposed Building
Energy Model Template – Building
Envelope for Baseline and Proposed
Building
Energy Model Template – HVAC for
Baseline and Proposed Building with
summary on the following systems
• Cooling / chillers
• Heating
• Heat rejection
• Pumping
• Zoning
• Air sys
Energy Model Template – Lighting and
Process for Baseline and Proposed
Building

Energy Model Template – Occupation


and Fresh Air for Baseline and
Proposed Building

Energy Model Template – Service Hot


Water for Baseline and Proposed
Building

Required credit achieved?

Other Supportive Documents:

Supporting Documents (attachments)


o (Calculation Attachments)
o Specifications (attachments)
o Ref. to Standards used
o Other Attachments
Note: Provide attachment reference

ADM | RE-R1: Minimum Energy Performance Page 2 of 3


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

Targets planned to be achieved

Ways / Equipments used to achieve targets

Dynamic Energy Model Name: Version

Calculation Results

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only

ADM – Estidama Team Signature Status Comments Date


Comply Rejected

ADM | RE-R1: Minimum Energy Performance Page 3 of 3


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

RE-R2: Energy Monitoring & Reporting Project Reference Number ESV-DES-0000

IDP Team Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

Document / Approved
Submission Requirements Submitted Comments
Attachment Yes No
45 o Brief narrative describing how the
requirements of the credit will be
achieved;
Demonstrate that easily accessible
and clearly labeled energy sub-
meters are provided which enable a
minimum of 90% of the estimated
annual energy consumption for
major end use energy consuming
plants, equipments and appliances
• Cooling
• Dehumidification
• Service water heating
• MCC fans
• MCC pumps
• Lighting
• Receptacles and process loads
• Other major energy consuming
plants (swimming pools, kitchens,
server room, lifts and escalators
for all building areas; landlord,
offices, retails, residential and
non residential areas
All onsite energy generating systems
must be separately metered
Separate meters must be provided
for all plant exceeding the sizes in
the table below:
Plant Description

Cooling installations comprising one or more units feeding a common distribution circuit
Motor control centers providing power to HVAC equipment
Final electrical distribution boards (power/lighting)
o Narrative Building Type; school,
multi-residential, office, retails,
mix use

ADM | RE-R2: Energy Monitoring & Reporting Page 1 of 3


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

o Narrative energy consuming Plants &


Ancillary Equipments installed;
o HVAC, AUH Units,
o Exhaust Fans,
o Pumps, etc
installed for different building
occupancy areas
o Provide schedule of energy loads of
the above equipments and plants
for 90% of total loads; starting form
largest load descending; for land lord
and other tenants areas
o Narrative of energy consuming
o appliances and process loads,
o service water heating and
o Lighting installed in different
building occupancy areas
o Provide schedule of energy loads
for all of the above for 90% of total
loads; starting form largest load
descending;; for land lord and other
tenants areas
o Narrative of major energy landlord
consuming plants; swimming pools,
kitchens, server rooms, lifts,
escalators, etc
o Provide schedule of energy loads of
end use energy consuming
equipments and plants for 90% of
total loads; starting form largest load
descending; for land lord and other
tenants areas
Narrative of All onsite energy
generating sys
Energy system schematics illustrating
the proposed metering strategy
46
confirming that the required level of
metering will be achieved
47
Extracts from specifications and
Building services layout design
drawings clearly indicating the type,
extent and locations of all metering,
and the central monitoring system

Required credit achieved?

ADM | RE-R2: Energy Monitoring & Reporting Page 2 of 3


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

Other Supportive Documents:

Supporting Documents (attachments)


o (Calculation Attachments)
o Specifications (attachments)
o Ref. to Standards used
o Other Attachments
Note: Provide attachment reference

Targets planned to be achieved

Ways / Equipments used to achieve targets

Calculation Results

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only

ADM – Estidama Team Signature Status Comments Date


Comply Rejected

ADM | RE-R2: Energy Monitoring & Reporting Page 3 of 3


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

RE-R3: Ozone Impacts of Refrigerants & Fire


Project Reference Number ESV-DES-0000
Suppression Systems

IDP Team Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

Refrigerants & Fire Suppression Systems


Demonstrate that all refrigerants and gaseous Fire Suppression Systems to be installed within the project site boundary
have an ozone depletion potential (ODP) of zero
Documents / Approved
Submission Requirements Submitted Comments
Attachments Yes No
Brief narrative describing how the
48
project meets the credit requirements
Specification extracts for all proposed
refrigerants and gaseous fire
49
suppression systems confirming ODP
of each refrigerant and gas is zero

Required credit achieved?

Other Supportive Documents:

Supporting Documents (attachments)


o (Calculation Attachments)
o Specifications (attachments)
o Ref. to Standards used
o Other Attachments
Note: Provide attachment reference

ADM | RE-R3: Ozone Impacts of Refrigerants & Fire Suppression Systems Page 1 of 2
1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

Targets planned to be achieved

Ways / Equipments used to achieve targets

Calculation Results

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only

ADM – Estidama Team Signature Status Comments Date


Comply Rejected

ADM | RE-R3: Ozone Impacts of Refrigerants & Fire Suppression Systems Page 2 of 2
1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

SM-R1: Hazardous Materials Elimination Project Reference Number ESV-DES-0000


Consultant to fill only shaded areas
IDPT Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

All below mentioned requirements to be attached when applicable


Document / Approved Comments
Submission Requirements Submitted
Attachment Yes No Yes
Extracts from specifications
indicating that no ACMs or CCA-
50
treated timber are to be used in
the project as per the Credit
Requirements
Where portions of the project are
reused from an existing building:
- Results of a hazardous materials
survey documenting the existence,
if any, of ACMs in the building. It is
51 recommended to follow
internationally recognized
standards such as ASTM E 256-04 –
Comprehensive Building Asbestos
Surveys or similar standards
- Where ACMs were found,
Asbestos removal and disposal plan

Required credit achieved?

Other Supportive Documents:

Extracts from specifications*

Specs Volume Section Clause Attachment Reference

ADM |SM-R1: Hazardous Materials Elimination Page 1 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

Reuse from existing buildings

Portion of the project are reused from existing


building?
Yes No

Hazardous materials survey conducted?** Yes No

Standards used in survey

Hazardous materials found? Yes No

Asbestos removal and disposal plan


Yes No
submitted?***

Attach extracts from project specifications


Attach Hazardous Materials Survey Report
Attach Asbestos Removal and Disposal Plan

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only

ADM – Estidama Team Signature Status Comments Date


Comply Rejected

ADM |SM-R1: Hazardous Materials Elimination Page 2 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

SM-R2: Basic Construction Waste Management Project Reference Number ESV-DES-0000

IDPT Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

All below mentioned requirements to be attached when applicable


Document / Approved Comments
Submission Requirements Submitted
Attachment Yes No Yes
Construction & Demolition Waste
Management Plan (CDWMP)
52
conforming to the Credit
Requirements

Schedule of items to be
53 recycled/salvaged (complete
Design table below)

Required credit achieved?

Other Supportive Documents:

Construction & Demolition Waste Management Plan (CDWMP) *

Construction & Demolition Waste Management Plan


(CDWMP) Submitted?
Yes No

recycled/salvaged Items Schedule

Source within Estimated Volume, Potential Reclaim/Recycling


Item to be Recycled/Salvaged
Project m3 Hauler Name or Location

ADM | SM-R2: Basic Construction Waste Management Page 1 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

Summary of Construction Waste to be Recycled/Salvaged

Measurement unit

Estimated total construction waste arising from development

Estimated construction waste to be recycled/salvaged

Percentage of construction waste to be recycled/salvaged %

*Attach Construction & Demolition Waste Management Plan (CDWMP)


** Attach Villa Waste Calculator output

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only

ADM – Estidama Team Signature Status Comments Date


Comply Rejected

ADM | SM-R2: Basic Construction Waste Management Page 2 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

SM-R3: Basic Operational Waste Management Project Reference Number ESV-DES-0000

Consultant to fill only shaded areas


IDPT Responsible Individuals Signature Role Date Revision

All below mentioned requirements to be attached when applicable


Document / Approved
Submission Requirements Submitted Comments
Attachment Yes No
Narrative summarizing options
researched and selected to meet
the diversion targets. must
54 address waste minimization,
storage, collection, and treatment
and links to private or municipal
and regional infrastructure and
programs
Calculations documenting
projected waste quantities for the
development during operation on
an annual basis. Waste
55 benchmarks may be obtained
from the Centre of Waste
Management, waste audits of
similar buildings or literature
research. References must be
clearly listed
Drawing(s) indicating location of
the storage/disposal facilities and
56 vehicle access areas designed to
ensure adequate space for
maneuvering delivery and waste
removal vehicles
Waste transfer inventory outlining
the intended receiver of waste.
57 This should include information
indicating that the carrier,
recycling and disposal facilities
are licensed

Required credit achieved?

ADM | SM-R3: Basic Operational Waste Management Page 1 of 2


1 Pearl Building Rating System - Design Rating

Other Supportive Documents:

Operational Waste Strategy

For ADM Estidama Team staff use only

ADM – Estidama / HSE


Signature Status Comment Date
Teams
Comply Rejected

ADM | SM-R3: Basic Operational Waste Management Page 2 of 2