You are on page 1of 21

Let Your System Speak

Sequencing Tech Adoption Based on


Your System’s Pull Signals
Dr. John F. Carrier
© Massachusetts Institute of Technology
▪ Dr. Carrier works with senior and front-line managers to
improve manufacturing and business processes and
About serves as an on-site hands-on coach in support of
Dr. John projects.
▪ His research focuses on the competitive advantage of
Carrier synchronization of operations within supply chains.
▪ He teaches a popular Executive Education course on
Industry 4.0 and IIoT (https://tinyurl.com/yafmbdqe )
▪ He has more than 20 years of experience in a variety of
corporate, entrepreneurial, and consulting
environments.
▪ Dr. Carrier holds a BS in Chemical Engineering from
the University of Michigan, a PhD in Chemical
Engineering from MIT, and an MBA from Harvard
Business School.

Website: www.jfcarrie@mit.edu
2
© Massachusetts Institute of Technology
What’s the problem?

▪ History presents us with a graveyard of failed


technological launches

▪ They generally follow the pattern of:


– New technology forced upon system
– System does its best to expose flaws of that new
technology
– A long painful period follows

Are we matching our systems to the technology, or


matching the technology to our systems?
© Massachusetts Institute of Technology
… but it comes along with a lot of hype

© Massachusetts Institute of Technology


… yet it must be remembered

© Massachusetts Institute of Technology


A Paradox -

“There are more good tools out there


than companies who use them.”
- Prof. John DC Little, MIT Sloan School

© Massachusetts Institute of Technology


Your Trash Can Contains a Kanban

• This is a trash can

• It contains a kanban

• Can you see it? Bill


Gates couldn’t …

© Massachusetts Institute of Technology


Similar systems – different synchronization

• Identify systems with


valuable total assets

• Find the “clock” in the


system and measure its
utilization time – does it
“de-synchronize”?

• The higher the $/minute,


the more synchronization
is justified

© Massachusetts Institute of Technology


The System Speaks …
The Twelve Leverage Points to
Intervene in a System
(ordered by effectiveness)

Donella Meadows
1941- 2001
MIT Researcher

Source: The Sustainability Institute © Massachusetts Institute of Technology


Finding a Hidden Factory …

20% defective
BEFORE

WELDING SHOP
ALASKA NORTH SLOPE
Design Welder Customer
(Town) (Slope)

70% arc time

20% defective
CURRENT

Design Inspector Welder Customer


(Town) (Slope) (Slope)

90% arc time

WHERE’S SYSTEM 2 IN THE CURRENT STATE?

© Massachusetts Institute of Technology


The 3+1 Method

Scope String Scal



e
Discuss the “power of
• Find the lost minutes and • Select the sensor
seconds (symptom) you need the platform” and your
company’s role
• What’s a minute really
worth (in $)? • Select the IIoT kit, • Identify
sensor and requirements for
• Scope down to the
prototype platform your supply chain
location of the root
cause(s)
• Review your
• Design the output
• Write the problem format, algorithm,
current network
statement infrastructure
and control action
• Go “see” and • Match against
capture an artifact • “String it up” current offerings
• Identify the tech that would
“change the system” • Retain options for
• Make into a use
flexibility
case

Stakeholders – (three perspectives)


© Massachusetts Institute of Technology
The Paramo Paradox
• 1960’s: A high school instructor
purchases slide rules for his
honors physics class

• He wanted the class to spend


less time on routine calculations
and more time on the physics

• Halfway through the exam, he


heard a slapping sound – the
students were going back to
hand calculations when they
came to the more difficult
problems

• This was the opposite of his


intent. Why ?
© Massachusetts Institute of Technology
An example from Industry 3.0
Location: Germany, 1973

The problem: You want to sell


calculators, but the engineers FRON
are sticking with their trusty slide T
rules (Why?)

The Innovation: Make it easier BAC


for the “customer” to make the K
transition

Adoption rate depends more on the SYSTEM than on the TECHNOLOGY


© Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Diabetes Management (2019)

• Diabetes is currently a $320B/yr


problem in the US

• The Novo Insulin pen (simple


delivery) had more impact than
Genentech’s human insulin

• Currently, patients are required


to record paper logs, and nurses
are required to interpret control
charts

• How does this explain low


adoption if insulin is a life-saving
drug?
Source: Pascal Witz, PWH Advisors, 2019 MITEF
Connected Things Conference © Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Let’s look at your system …
Defect Defect
Created Detected
As Designed

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step n


* *

Hidden Factory
Work-
around Work- ~ 30% of
around
Work- work
around
Work- Feigenbaum
around
(1960’s)

Exercise: How Can Industry 4.0 help?

© Massachusetts Institute of Technology


Finding Hidden Factories Using Little’s Law

“Good” process
Does this look
Special familiar?
Cause
Failure
Frequency

How does the


hidden factory
decide how your
organization is run?
Time in System (“W”)
The CEO
asked for it Visited Do you see the
Hidden business model?
Factory

This is your System speaking! © Massachusetts Institute of Technology


A model for managing creative enterprises

Defect
Defect Created Detected SYSTEM 1
Created Detected
** CUSTOMER
**

We earn here
Scientific
SHARE Swarm
Scientific
Swarm SYSTEM
We learn here
System 2: Focused
Factory for
Defect Elimination
ESCALAT
E

- We don’t earn We clog the system with


defects until failure
- We don’t learn

© Massachusetts Institute of Technology


Aligning Definitions

• Lean
• synchronizing the parts of your system to meet
customer demand

• Agile
• Re-synchronizing the parts of your system to meet
changing customer demand

© Massachusetts Institute of Technology


When you go back to your system …
YOUR FACTORY =
(“GOOD” + HIDDEN)
SYSTEM “GOOD” FACTORY HIDDEN FACTORY FACTORY
Productivity Good Poor
Quality Good, repeatable Poor, variable
Responsiveness Good Abysmal
Safety and Risk Low, known, stable High, unknown, unstable

Moral and retention Good Poor


Learning and innovation TBD “Noise” Who decides?

Culture Your culture “Hidden Factory” Culture

Quality of your people Good+ Same as the “Good”


Factory
Leadership Good Defects make decisions
Frequency

What’s a minute worth?

Time in System (“W”)


© Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Key Lessons

▪ Set your organization’s principles

▪ Start removing what doesn’t meet these principles


(5S/VSM – make space and time)

▪ … then bring in technology so that the System will


not reject it

© Massachusetts Institute of Technology


On Culture …

Culture depends on how we think

Ed Schein
Emeritus Professor
Sloan School of Mgmt

© Massachusetts Institute of Technology

You might also like