Professional Documents
Culture Documents
© 2002 Society for the Study of Addiction to Alcohol and Other Drugs Addiction, 97, 761–766
762 Book Reviews
The cases are analyzed with sensitivity, logic and unusual combination of characteristics is the fact that
reason. There is no moralizing or sense of ethical the book starts with a chapter on the historic develop-
superiority. The analyses provide guides to action rather ment of the community reinforcement approach (CRA)
than definitive decisions by deriving conclusions about in the 1970s and the 1980s. This reminded me of my first
the most appropriate course of action from sound (and treatment studies between 1970 and 1985, and the
for the most part universal) ethical principles, such as fights we had with the scientific community as well as
autonomy, beneficence, justice, honesty, conscientious with practitioners to implement some principals of CRA
refusal, stewardship and non-maleficence. Legal annota- in our treatment trials for drug and alcohol addicts.
tions have been added to this new edition to show the However, beyond this personal involvement, I think that
connection between ethical and legal issues. it is extremely valuable of the authors to describe the
To the extent that the ethical principles discussed roots and the developments of CRA in the United States
in this book are universal, they would apply to most and the strong opposition to that approach on the back-
countries, professional groups, and clinical situations. ground of traditional treatment concepts for addictions
Nevertheless, the book is written for an American audi- around that time. The history helps to understand the
ence. The case studies are derived from the kinds of present state, strength and weaknesses of CRA.
ethical dilemmas, professional issues, organizational sit- Apart from the (first) chapter on the history of CRA
uations and legal problems that are distinctly American, and a summary, the book covers three major areas: (1)
reflecting that country’s relatively large investment of the early 1973, 1976 and 1982 Azrin CRA studies and
resources in addiction treatment services and other kinds a modern replication by the editors with an extended
of substance abuse programs. The book would there- design and statistical analysis; (2) a description of CRA
fore not be very useful as an ethical training manual components; and (3) some studies on the application
for addiction professionals outside the United States. of CRA for specific target groups: homeless, cocaine
Nevertheless, it may be relevant to those in other coun- and opiate dependents and finally families of substance
tries interested in the application of a very practical abusers. A must for young researchers is the list of pos-
approach to their own ethical dilemmas. Here its value sible errors and mistakes in the design and handling of
would be primarily to illustrate how ethical decisions can clinical studies (p. 101).
be made, with the legal discussions being far less relevant. What are the central characteristics of CRA? The first
But to the extent that this book is unique in its content chapters define CRA by a functional analysis and a
and approach, it has a great deal to offer to anyone inter- slightly arbitrary list of techniques with a social ‘touch’,
ested in the improvement of ethical decision-making such as communications skills training or social rein-
in the addictions field; and for the legions of addiction forcement of abstinent behavior. You have to reach p.
workers in the United States, it may well take its place 167 for a discussion of the theoretical basis. I agree with
next to the Holy Bible as a moral compass to guide them the editors that CRA in the first place . . . ‘is good behav-
through the ethical minefields they often encounter in ior therapy’ (p. 168). That means: (1) classic functional
their everyday work. analysis of problem behaviors, of the social environment,
of resources and targets of the client; and (2) allocation
TOM BABOR
of treatment components according to individual condi-
University of Connecticut
tions. But within this broad spectrum, CRA emphasizes
Farmington
the role of positive social reinforcement, e.g. the reverse
CT, USA
side of the medal. This bias is strength as well as weak-
ness or CRA: strength, as cognitive-behavior therapy, the
actual dominant concept, forgets the social contingencies
FURTHER REVIEWS
of substance related disorders. Weakness, as the CRA
stress on social reinforcement neglects ‘inner’ problem-
A Community Reinforcement Approach to Addiction
related conditions; e.g. how to deal with Marlatt’s inter-
Treatment
nal relapse stimuli? Therefore, I personally like to add to
ROBERT J. MEYERS & WILLIAM R. MILLER, eds
CRA a pinch of Pavlow and Beck.
Cambridge University Press, 2001, 188 pp, £49.95,
The authors finally ask the question why CRA has
US$74.95, ISBN 0521 77107 2
not been used more broadly and give some hypothetical
It is very rarely that I read a scientific book of about 200 answers. I have two additional hypotheses: The ‘selling’
pages in a rather short period of time, that such a book of CRA, together with the concept of controlled or mod-
is not only scientifically sound and well written, but in erate drinking, which is theoretically understandable
some parts even exciting in such a way that you do not but not necessary, made CRA even more suspicious of
want to stop reading it. Part of the secret for such an clinical practitioners. Secondly, CRA needs much more
© 2002 Society for the Study of Addiction to Alcohol and Other Drugs Addiction, 97, 761–766
Book Reviews 763
therapist engagement, creativity, competence and work effected notable change in the way those who experi-
outside their work-place than the classic in-patient group enced them viewed their world. In plain language, those
sessions, based on clients’ experiences and insight inter- affected became ‘new people’.
pretations. Nevertheless, the majority of German thera- As the authors acknowledge, there is much in the
pists would definitely not undertake ‘home visits’ or build reports of their respondents which is resonant of the
up a ‘buddy system’. Reinforcement of therapists is a pre- writings of the mystics and much which can be trans-
requisite of a wider CRA utilization. lated into religious terms. What is novel about their
Altogether the book is a well-written and needed plea approach is their attempt to apply a modern psychologi-
for a broader use of CRA, but with good critical distance cal understanding to these events. Even so, they do not
to the concept and the outcome of that approach (e.g. see pretend to have understood these phenomena; indeed,
p. 99). However, the problem could be that not enough they leave us with some intriguing observations: for
people will read the book: the scientific community has example, that such events undeserved and ineffable may
a precise and relatively short overview of the research represent ‘periodic reminders to human kind of what we
on CRA and about future research needs, but many col- have already known and yet have failed to take seriously’.
leagues will claim to know already the described studies. What recommends this book is that the authors have
Many practitioners should read the book, but I fear that taken such ‘reminders’ seriously and in doing so have
it will be too research-dominated in their eyes. I would opened us up to a line of therapeutic enquiry which had
wish the book to be also read by supervisors, trainers previously hidden behind that inadequate phrase ‘spon-
and those responsible for service provisions. Obviously, taneous recovery’. If only all books offered for review
students will like the book for the sake of time-saving. were such a joy to read.
Just occasionally one is asked to review a book, accep- Women and Alcohol in Social Context: Mother’s Ruin Revis-
tance of which is not dictated by academic obligation but ited by Jan Waterson considers women’s drinking prac-
by a real sense of excitement. This is one such book. It tices more holistically than many other studies, placing
is a book which one would have wished to have written. them within the context of their work and family circum-
Its subtitle marks it out as different. Except that its stances. In particular, she attempts to go beyond the myth
authors are esteemed behavioural psychologists, whose of ‘mother’s ruin’, the enduring image of the negligent,
copious scientific publications attest to their serious drunken mother, to uncover the reality of women’s expe-
purpose, it could signify a religious tome or one of those riences with alcohol. Influences and consequences, both
innumerable guides to self-improvement. In fact it is positive and negative, are seen as shaping their drinking
neither. It is a serious attempt to understand one of psy- careers. Waterson explores the drinking experiences of 60
chology’s more mystifying phenomena—the transforma- new British mothers to develop a portrait of their drinking
tion of lives apparently without therapeutic intervention. careers. By organizing the women according to social
Basing themselves on a number of volunteered class (professional versus non-professional) and alcohol
accounts of such changes the authors attempt to under- consumption (heavy versus light), she is able to examine
stand what might have prompted them, the process by the influences upon their drinking habits of employment
which they were wrought and their permanence. In status and type of job, partner’s job and family history.
the course of their analysis, Miller & C’de Baca discern Several major themes emerge from her analysis, in partic-
some remarkable consistencies. The changes were often ular the strong linkages between drinking practices and
unsought, they broke in upon ordinary unsuspecting social class, psychiatric co-morbidity and gender role
lives, were almost always experienced as benevolent, expectations.
occasioned a great sense of connectedness, peace and A considerable focus of the book is on the relationship
emotional outpouring and were permanent. They between drinking practices and social class. Like many
© 2002 Society for the Study of Addiction to Alcohol and Other Drugs Addiction, 97, 761–766
764 Book Reviews
authors, Waterson finds that more affluent women drink Waterson puts forth several commonsense recom-
more frequently and more heavily than less affluent ones, mendations for addressing the issue of potentially
due to factors such as more financial access, more leisure harmful drinking among women. Citing the myriad
time and greater social acceptance of female drinking. missed opportunities for ‘teachable moments’, she sug-
She argues that working class women’s drinking is less gests implementing screening, education and possible
likely to occur at home, and is usually tied more closely brief interventions in a variety of the health and social
to a pub culture than that of middle-class women. When service settings which women commonly frequent. She
opportunities for socializing outside the home diminish also cites the dearth of treatment options for women in
with the birth of a child, there is a concomitant reduc- Britain, and calls for a significant increase in access to
tion in drinking among non-professionals. Working-class treatment options. Her suggestion that ‘positive’ drinking
women who did drink heavily experienced more prob- opportunities for economically disadvantaged women
lems as a result of their drinking. Few of the middle-class should also be increased, and that doing so would result
women, even those regularly consuming considerable in decreased negative drinking practices, is certain to be
amounts of alcohol, mentioned alcohol-related prob- more controversial.
lems. Waterson attributes this difference to alcohol’s A final note: the book contains numerous typo-
exacerbation of existing problems, the primary cause of graphical, grammatical and spelling errors, which dis-
which is social injustice. It should be noted that the tract the reader from the substance of the material. It
pattern Waterson documents may not generalize beyond is hoped that these errors can be corrected in future
her narrowly defined study sample. In many other coun- editions.
tries, there is both less of the pub culture she describes
STACY STERLING
and also fewer social strictures on working-class women
Kaiser Permanente
not to drink at home. Additionally, what may be lost on
Northern California Division of Research
those less familiar with the subtleties of the British class
Oakland, CA
system are the many cultural and socio-economic factors
USA
which shape the drinking mores of the study groups.
CONSTANCE WEISNER
The book does not give the same attention to other
Department of Psychiatry
problems the women may have, such as psychiatric
University of California
symptoms or drug use. The author views their problems
San Francisco, CA
more as discrete ‘difficulties’ rather than co-morbid con-
USA
ditions, and frames the relationship between them and
the women’s drinking practices in terms of ‘drinking to
cope.’ Although it is difficult to think that drug use is not
Substance Abuse Intervention, Prevention,
an important factor related to their drinking, she does not
Rehabilitation, and Systems Change Strategies. Helping
address it at all. While she attributes most of the women’s
Individuals, Families, and Groups to Empower
difficulties, including mental health problems, to social
Themselves
injustices, she does acknowledge that their psychiatric
EDITH M. FREEMAN
problems may be independent from their socio-economic
New York, Columbia University Press, 2001, 487 pp,
status. It would have been instructive to explore further
$42.50, £28.50 ISBN 0231 10236 4
questions such as whether, in fact, some of the mental
health issues were the result of such heavy alcohol Edith M. Freeman has written an ambitious book on
consumption. personal, social and environmental ways to deal with
Several limitations detract from the larger importance substance abuse problems. The first part of her book
of the book. Although she describes clearly the sample’s delineates the conceptual, theoretical and research foun-
lack of generalizability, she does not address what may dations of empowerment principles and practice in sub-
be universal about these women and their drinking. stance abuse services. The second part tackles funding
The research she uses is, on the whole, confined to the and power issues in this service system. The third part
European literature. Much, although not all, of the other describes ways in which this system could be improved
work on women and drinking, including that by Linda by expanding the client-centred continuum of care, and
Beckman, Genevieve Ames and Sharon Wilsnack, is con- the last part describes four community programmes
firmed by her study and would have helped in under- for special populations. The epilogue pulls together
standing its relevance for a broader group of women. the lessons learned from empowerment practices and
Little attention is paid to how the study’s conservative research.
definition of problematic consumption might also impact Freeman defines her basic concept, empowerment, as
the generalizabity of findings. ‘a lifelong, dynamic process that involves certain power-
© 2002 Society for the Study of Addiction to Alcohol and Other Drugs Addiction, 97, 761–766
Book Reviews 765
© 2002 Society for the Study of Addiction to Alcohol and Other Drugs Addiction, 97, 761–766
766 Book Reviews
In addition to its review of the significance, methods injecting is no easy task’ and we must understand ‘why
and findings of qualitative research around injecting, the and how people decide to engage in such dangerous
book also explains the important relationship of such behaviour’. This accessible volume makes it easy to see
qualitative work to interpreting the findings of quan- the wisdom of this view.
titative research, whose practitioners (especially medical
infectious disease epidemiologists) often scorn such data ERNEST DRUCKER
because it they not framed positivistically. But the ratio- Albert Einstein College of Medicine
nale for its significance is made clear in the foreword by Bronx, New York, USA
EMCDDA Director, George Estevienart: ‘Studying drug
© 2002 Society for the Study of Addiction to Alcohol and Other Drugs Addiction, 97, 761–766