Nokia Vs Apple 11.01.06

Nokia
versus
Apple 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6 0 7 9 0 1 2 7 0 8 3 4 6 1 6 4 7 5 2
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
3
6
3
5
5
7
9
1
8
1
5
6
8
9
8
3
9
4
4
5
3
1
9
6
7
2
8 UK
0 patents
German German Dutch
patents patents patents
The patent 25 6 9 ?
battlefield
as of
06 Jan 11 10
2
5 5 2 4 7 5 2
7 7
The next 20 24
pages show
how this
conflict has
escalated.
Move by
W E L R
District of Delaware
move. Trade Commission

I L
Western District
US International
England & Wales
's-Gravenhage
of Wisconsin
Landgericht
Landgericht
High Court of
D D W G B
Düsseldorf
Rechtbank
Mannheim
T G
E W H M G
C D
version 11.01.06.100
I C A H
© 2011 by Florian Mueller
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com
Twitter: @FOSSpatents
9 6 2
3 7
9 2 4 6
1 9 ?
24 5 4 7 5 2 R Unknown
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E 5 8 7 7 3 4 7 6 9 9 1 2 5 9 number of
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4 9
1 8 9
6
7
2
6
0
5
5
4
3
0
1
9
4
7
8
1
0
5
1
6
9
0
5
9
UK
patents
German
patents
6
2
Move #1
22 Oct 09 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
Nokia
files
first suit
against 10
Apple
in Move #1:
Delaware Nokia files a suit against Apple with the
US District Court for the District of Delaware,
alleging the infringement of 10 patents
it claims are essential to industry standards.
In that case, Nokia would have made
FRAND (fair, reasonable & non-discriminatory)
licensing commitments concerning them.

D
E

10
Apple
Move #2
11 Dec 09 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
Apple 13
files
counter-
claims 10
over
13 patents District of Delaware
D
E
© 2011 by Florian Mueller Move #2:

http://fosspatents.blogspot.com Apple makes counterclaims against Nokia
Twitter: @FOSSpatents in Delaware, alleging the infringement of
13 patents.
13
10
R
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4
1 8
6
Move #3
29 Dec 09 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6 0 7 9 0 1 2 7
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
3
6
3
5
5
7
9
1
8
1
5
6
8
9
Nokia 13
files a
second
Delaware 10 7
suit and a 7
complaint 17
Move #3:
with the Nokia bundles seven "implementation" patents
ITC (patents it claims are not essential to standards,
hence not subject to FRAND commitments)
and asserts them in a second Delaware suit
as well as an ITC complaint.
Trade Commission
I
US International
D
T
E
C
13
10 7
R
17
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4
1 8
6
Move #4
15 Jan 10 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6 0 7 9 0 1 2 7
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
3
6
3
5
5
7
9
1
8
1
5
6
8
9
Apple 13 9
files a
complaint
with the 10 7
ITC 7
17
Trade Commission
I
US International
D
T
E
C Move #4:
Apple lodges a complaint with the ITC,
alleging the infringement of 9 patents:
© 2011 by Florian Mueller 4 patents already asserted in counterclaims
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com in the first Delaware suit, and 5 new ones.
9
9 4
13 5
17 7
R
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E 5 8 7 7 3
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4 9
1 8 9
6
7
2
6
0
5
5
4
6
4
Move #5
19 Feb 10 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6 0 7 9 0 1 2 7
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
3
6
3
5
5
7
9
1
8
1
5
6
8
9
Apple 13
9 9
amends its
counter-
claims in 10 7
the first 7
Delaware 17
suit
Trade Commission
I
US International
D
T
E
C Move #5:
In the first Delaware suit, Apple
amends its counterclaims,
© 2011 by Florian Mueller dropping the 4 patents
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com that its original counterclaims in this suit
Twitter: @FOSSpatents had in common with the ITC complaint
lodged in January.
9
9 4
13 9 5
17 7
R
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E 5 8 7 7 3
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4 9
1 8 9
6
7
2
6
0
5
5
4
6
4
Move #6
24 Feb 10 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6 0 7 9 0 1 2 7
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
3
6
3
5
5
7
9
1
8
1
5
6
8
9
Apple 9
18 9
makes
counter-
claims in 10 7
the second 7
Delaware 17
suit
Trade Commission
I
US International
D
T Move #6:
E In the second Delaware suit, Apple
C makes counterclaims against Nokia
asserting 9 patents: the ones to which
its ITC complaint already related.
© 2011 by Florian Mueller Those 9 patents include 4 that Apple
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com dropped from its counterclaims in the
Twitter: @FOSSpatents first Delaware suit five days earlier.
9 18 9
9 4
9 5
17 7
R
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E 5 8 7 7 3
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4 9
1 8 9
6
7
2
6
0
5
5
4
6
4
Move #7
03 Mar 10 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6 0 7 9 0 1 2 7
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
3
6
3
5
5
7
9
1
8
1
5
6
8
9
Delaware 18 9
District
Court
orders 10 7
stay for 7
one of the 17
Move #7:
two cases The District Court for the District of Delaware
stays the second suit there (filed by Nokia,
during counterclaims made by Apple) while the ITC
ITC investigates complaints involving all of the
investi- patents asserted in that Delaware suit
(7 Nokia patents, 9 Apple patents).
gation Trade Commission

I
US International
The other Delaware suit continues.
D
T
E Apple's counterclaims in the
C second (stayed) Delaware suit

18 9
9 4
9 5
17 7
R
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E 5 8 7 7 3
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4 9
1 8 9
6
7
2
6
0
5
5
4
6
4
Move #8
26 Apr 10 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6 0 7 9 0 1 2 7
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
3
6
3
5
5
7
9
1
8
1
5
6
8
9
ITC orders 18 9
partial
consoli-
dation 10 7
7
17
Trade Commission
I
US International
Move #8:
D The ITC orders a partial consolidation
T of Apple's complaint against Nokia
E into the investigation of Apple's
C complaint against HTC, merging only
the five patents Apple asserts in its
ITC complaints against
© 2011 by Florian Mueller both Nokia and HTC.
On this page, the five patents
consolidated into the
18Apple vs. HTC case
9 have a green
background, while the four patents 9 4
remaining in the original case have a
9 5
blue background.
17 7
R
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E 5 8 7 7 3
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4 9
1 8 9
6
7
2
6
0
5
5
4
6
4
Move #9
07 May 10 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6 0 7 9 0 1 2 7 0 8 3 4 6
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
3
6
3
5
5
7
9
1
8
1
5
6
8
9
8
3
9
4
4
5
3
1
9
6
Nokia files 18 9
new suit in
Wisconsin
(5 patents 10 7 5
initially) 7
17 Move #9:
Nokia files a new suit
in the Western District
of Wisconsin, alleging the
infringement of 5 patents.
W
Trade Commission
I
US International
Western District
of Wisconsin
D D
T
E W
C
I
18 9
9 4
9 5
17 7 5 R
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E 5 8 7 7 3
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4 9
1 8 9
6
7
2
6
0
5
5
4
6
4
Move #10
28 Jun 10 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6 0 7 9 0 1 2 7 0 8 3 4 6
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
3
6
3
5
5
7
9
1
8
1
5
6
8
9
8
3
9
4
4
5
3
1
9
6
Apple 18 9 7
makes
counter-
claims 10 7 5
in 7
Wisconsin 17
(7 patents)
W
Trade Commission
I
US International
Western District
of Wisconsin
D D
T
E W
C
I
Move #10:
18 9 Apple makes counterclaims
9 4
in the Western District
of Wisconsin, alleging the
9 5 7 infringement of 7 patents.
17 7 5 R
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E 5 8 7 7 3 4 7 6 9 9 1 2
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4 9
1 8 9
6
7
2
6
0
5
5
4
3
0
1
9
4
7
8
1
0
5
1
6
9
0
6
4
Move #11
21 Jul 10 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6 0 7 9 0 1 2 7 0 8 3 4 6
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
3
6
3
5
5
7
9
1
8
1
5
6
8
9
8
3
9
4
4
5
3
1
9
6
Nokia 18 9 7
drops a
patent
from its 10
1
76 5
ITC 7
complaint 17
Move #11:
Nokia drops the '735 patent
from its ITC complaint.
W
Trade Commission It still asserts that patent in a

I
US International
Western District
of Wisconsin
Delaware suit.
D D
T
E W
C
I
18 9
9 4
9 5 7
17 7 6 5
R
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E 5 8 7 7 3 4 7 6 9 9 1 2
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4 9
1 8 9
6
7
2
6
0
5
5
4
3
0
1
9
4
7
8
1
0
5
1
6
9
0
6
4
Move #12
16 Aug 10 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6 0 7 9 0 1 2 7 0 8 3 4 6
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
3
6
3
5
5
7
9
1
8
1
5
6
8
9
8
3
9
4
4
5
3
1
9
6
Apple 18 9 7
amends its
Wisconsin
counter- 10
1
6 5
claims, 7
replaces 17
(bacically
updates) Move #12:
Apple amends its
one patent counterclaims in the
Western District of
W Wisconsin, replaces
Trade Commission
I
US International
Western District
one patent (of seven).
of Wisconsin
D D The new '559 patent is a
T continuation of a
E W divisional of the old
C (and dropped) '905
I patent. The new one
was granted about
© 2011 by Florian Mueller three weeks
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com prior to this
Twitter: @FOSSpatents amendment.
18 9
9 4 7
9 5 76
1
17 6 5 R
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E 5 8 7 7 3 4 7 6 9 9 1 2 5
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4 9
1 8 9
6
7
2
6
0
5
5
4
3
0
1
9
4
7
8
1
0
5
1
6
9
0
5
9
6
4
Move #13
17 Sep 10 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6 0 7 9 0 1 2 7 0 8 3 4 6 1 6
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
3
6
3
5
5
7
9
1
8
1
5
6
8
9
8
3
9
4
4
5
3
1
9
6
7
2
8
0
Nokia 18 9 7
amends its
Wisconsin
complaint, 10
1
6 5 2
adds 7 7
two new 17
patents Move #13:

Nokia amends its complaint
in the Western District of
Wisconsin, adds two new
patents on top of the five
W previous ones.
Trade Commission
I
US International
Western District
of Wisconsin
D D
T
E W
C
I
18 9
9 4 7
9 5 6
1
17 6 5 7
R
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E 5 8 7 7 3 4 7 6 9 9 1 2 5
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4 9
1 8 9
6
7
2
6
0
5
5
4
3
0
1
9
4
7
8
1
0
5
1
6
9
0
5
9
6
4
Move #14
29 Sep 10 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6 0 7 9 0 1 2 7 0 8 3 4 6 1 6
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
3
6
3
5
5
7
9
1
8
1
5
6
8
9
8
3
9
4
4
5
3
1
9
6
7
2
8
0
Apple 18 9 7 9
files suit
with
High Court 10
1
6 5 2
of 7 7
England 17
and Wales
Move #14:
W E Apple takes the dispute
Trade Commission
I
US International
Western District
England & Wales

across the Atlantic and
of Wisconsin
High Court of
D D W files a suit over 9 UK patents
T (according to Nokia,
E W H those are equivalents
C of some US patents Apple
I C previously asserted against
Nokia) with the Chancery
© 2011 by Florian Mueller Division of the High Court
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com of England & Wales.
18 9
9 4 7
9 5 6
1 9
17 6 7 R
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E 5 8 7 7 3 4 7 6 9 9 1 2 5 9
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4 9
1 8 9
6
7
2
6
0
5
5
4
3
0
1
9
4
7
8
1
0
5
1
6
9
0
5
9
UK
patents
6
4
Move #15
27 Oct 10 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6 0 7 9 0 1 2 7 0 8 3 4 6 1 6
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
3
6
3
5
5
7
9
1
8
1
5
6
8
9
8
3
9
4
4
5
3
1
9
6
7
2
8
0
ITC staff 18 9 7 9
report is
negative
on 4 of 10
1
6 5 2
Apple's 7 7
asserted 17
patents
Move #15:
In early November, media reports
say that an ITC staff report dated
27 October didn't identify any
W E infringement of valid patent claims
Trade Commission
I by Nokia. That report related to only
US International
Western District
England & Wales

of Wisconsin
High Court of
D D W 4 of the 9 patents asserted by Apple
T against Nokia: those that were asserted
E W H only against Nokia but not against HTC
C ('431, '599, '726, '354).
I C The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
can still decide differently from
© 2011 by Florian Mueller the staff recommendation, which
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com is just an opinion.
18 9
9 4 7
9 5 6
1 9
17 6 7 R
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E 5 8 7 7 3 4 7 6 9 9 1 2 5 9
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4 9
1 8 9
6
7
2
6
0
5
5
4
3
0
1
9
4
7
8
1
0
5
1
6
9
0
5
9
UK
patents
6
4
Move #16
28 Oct 10 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6 0 7 9 0 1 2 7 0 8 3 4 6 1 6
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
3
6
3
5
5
7
9
1
8
1
5
6
8
9
8
3
9
4
4
5
3
1
9
6
7
2
8
0
Apple 18 9 6 7 9
drops 4
patents
from ITC 10
1
6 5 2
complaint 7 7
(3 of them 17
were also
asserted
against
Nokia)
W E
Trade Commission
I
US International
Western District
England & Wales

of Wisconsin
High Court of
D D W
T
E W H
C
I C
Move #16, part 1/2:
Apple drops 4 patents from
18 96 ITC investigation no. 337-TA-710.
9 96 42 7
3 of those patents were asserted
3
against Nokia (and HTC).
9 2 54 6 The 3 patents relevant to Nokia
1 9
are the '867 patent...
17 6 7 R
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E 5 8 7 7 3 4 7 6 9 9 1 2 5 9
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4 9
1 8 9
6
7
2
6
0
5
5
4
3
0
1
9
4
7
8
1
0
5
1
6
9
0
5
9
UK
patents
6 Move #16, part 2/2:
...and the '131 and RE'486 patents.
All three patents are still asserted
in a Delaware suit.
42
Move #17
end of 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6 0 7 9 0 1 2 7 0 8 3 4 6 1 6
October Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
3
6
3
5
5
7
9
1
8
1
5
6
8
9
8
3
9
4
4
5
3
1
9
6
7
2
8
0
2010 18 6 7 9 ?
Apple
files suit 10
1
6 5 2
with 7 7
District 17
Court of
Dussel-
dorf
(Germany)
W E
Trade Commission
I L
Western District
US International
England & Wales

of Wisconsin
Landgericht
High Court of
D D W
Düsseldorf
T G
E W H Move #17:
C D Apple asserts an unknown number
I C of German patents against Nokia
in a suit filed with the District Court of
© 2011 by Florian Mueller Dusseldorf, Germany.
18 6
9 6 2
3 7
9 2 4 6
1 9 ?
17 6 7 R Unknown
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E 5 8 7 7 3 4 7 6 9 9 1 2 5 9 number of
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4 9
1 8 9
6
7
2
6
0
5
5
4
3
0
1
9
4
7
8
1
0
5
1
6
9
0
5
9
UK
patents
German
patents
6
2
Move #18
06 Dec 10 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6 0 7 9 0 1 2 7 0 8 3 4 6 1 6
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
3
6
3
5
5
7
9
1
8
1
5
6
8
9
8
3
9
4
4
5
3
1
9
6
7
2
8
0
Nokia 18 6 7 9 ?
drops a
patent
from its 10
12
65 5 2
ITC 7 7
complaint 17
Move #18:
Nokia drops the '036 patent
from its ITC complaint.
W E
The first two motions to that effect
Trade Commission
I L
Western District
US International
England & Wales

failed, but the third one finally
of Wisconsin
Landgericht
High Court of
D D W
Düsseldorf
meets the ITC's formal requirements.
T G
E W H
C D
I C
18 6
9 6 2
3 7
9 2 4 6
1 9 ?
17 6 5 7
R Unknown
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E 5 8 7 7 3 4 7 6 9 9 1 2 5 9 number of
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4 9
1 8 9
6
7
2
6
0
5
5
4
3
0
1
9
4
7
8
1
0
5
1
6
9
0
5
9
UK
patents
German
patents
6
2
Move #19
16 Dec 10 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6 0 7 9 0 1 2 7 0 8 3 4 6 1 6 4 7 5 2
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
3
6
3
5
5
7
9
1
8
1
5
6
8
9
8
3
9
4
4
5
3
1
9
6
7
2
8 UK
0 patents
German German Dutch
Nokia 18 6 7 9 ?
makes
counter-
claims in 10
2
5 5 2 4 7 5 2
London 7 7
Move #19:
and 17
Nokia
Dussel- countersues
in the UK and
dorf, in Dusseldorf,
files new files new suits
suits in in Mannheim
W E L R (Germany)
Mannheim Trade Commission

I L
Western District
US International
England & Wales

and
's-Gravenhage
of Wisconsin
Landgericht
Landgericht
High Court of
D D W G B
Düsseldorf
Rechtbank
Mannheim
and The The Hague
Hague T G (Netherlands).
E W H M G
C D
I C A H
18
9 6 2
3 7
9 2 4 6
1 9 ?
17 5 7 4 7 5 2 R Unknown
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E 5 8 7 7 3 4 7 6 9 9 1 2 5 9 number of
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4 9
1 8 9
6
7
2
6
0
5
5
4
3
0
1
9
4
7
8
1
0
5
1
6
9
0
5
9
UK
patents
German
patents
6
2
Move #20
06 Jan 11 4 1 6 9 1 5 7 9 6 6 0 7 9 0 1 2 7 0 8 3 4 6 1 6 4 7 5 2
Nokia 6
5
7
8
5
1
0
4
3
5
4
8
2
7
4
0
7
2
2
1
3
6
3
5
5
7
9
1
8
1
5
6
8
9
8
3
9
4
4
5
3
1
9
6
7
2
8 UK
0 patents
German German Dutch
Western 18
25 6 7 9 ?
Wisconsin
case
transferred 10
2
5 5 2 4 7 5 2
to 17 7 7
Delaware 24
W E L R
Trade Commission
I L#20:
Western District
US International
England & Wales
's-Gravenhage
of Wisconsin
Landgericht
Landgericht
High Court of
D D W On 04Move G B
Düsseldorf
Rechtbank
Mannheim
T G court
January 2011,
E W H grants Apple'sdistrict
the Wisconsin M G
C Drelevant
motion
I C (including counterclaims)
to transfer the case A H
© 2011 by Florian Mueller to Delaware, where it is
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com entered two days later.
Twitter: @FOSSpatents Nokia opposed this motion
unsuccessfully.
9 6 2
3 7
9 2 4 6
1 9 ?
17 5 7 4 7 5 2 R Unknown
24
7 4 8 3 0 1 1 0 7 2 4 3 E 5 8 7 7 3 4 7 6 9 9 1 2 5 9 number of
Apple 0
3
3
1
5
4
6
9
7 0
4 5
3
1
3
4
9
5
6
3
5
3
8 4 9
1 8 9
6
7
2
6
0
5
5
4
3
0
1
9
4
7
8
1
0
5
1
6
9
0
5
9
UK
patents
German
patents
6
2
Reference United States District Court for the District of Delaware
material Case no. 1:09-cv-00791 -- complaint filed on 22 October 2009
as per Nokia Corporation (of Espoo, Finland)

vs. Apple Inc. (of Cupertino, CA 95014)
06 Jan 11
On 29 December 2009, Nokia filed another suit against the same defendant with the same court (case no. 1:09-cv-01002).
page R-1 Allegedly infringing products
"products and services that comply with the GSM, UMTS, and/or IEEE 802.11 standards, including wireless communication devices such
as the Apple iPhone, the Apple iPhone 3G, and Apple iPhone 3GS" (item 70 of the complaint; matrix below the list of asserted patents)
Asserted patents (in order of appearance in the complaint)
asserted by Nokia in original complaint; Nokia admits (F)RAND licensing commitments in connection with GSM/UMTS/IEEE 802.11
5,802,465 ("465") Data transmission in a radio telephone network
5,862,178 ("178") Method and apparatus for speech transmission in a mobile communications system
5,946,651 ("651") Speech synthesizer employing post-processing for enhancing the quality of the synthesized speech
6,359,904 ("904") Data transfer in a mobile telephone network
6,694,135 ("135") Measurement report transmission in a telecommunications system
6,775,548 ("548") Access channel for reduced access delay in a telecommunications system
6,882,727 ("727") Method of ciphering data transmission in a radio system
7,009,940 ("940") Integrity check in a communication system
7,092,672 ("672") Reporting cell measurement results in a cellular communication system
7,403,621 ("621") System for ensuring crypted communication after handover
© 2011 by Florian Mueller S

s: .11 3G
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com : G/
ard 802 u cts e e3
Twitter: @FOSSpatents n d M TS E od on on
Sta GS UM IEE Pr iPh iPh
'465
'904
wireless '135
data
'548
'672
speech '178
coding '651
'727
security/
'940
encryption
'621
Reference United States District Court for the District of Delaware
material Case no. 1:09-cv-00791 -- complaint filed on 22 October 2009 -- continued from previous page
as per Apple counterclaims (11 December 2009 answer to complaint)

06 Jan 11 Apple makes counterclaims against plaintiff Nokia Corporation (of Espoo, Finland) as well as its subsidiary Nokia Inc. (a Delaware
corporation headquartered in Texas).
page R-2
Allegedly infringing products
For 8 patents, Apple's infringement allegations relate to "Nokia handsets using the [specified] platforms, including but not limited to [the
specified phone/s]". For 2 patents, the sole specifically accused product is the N900. For another 2 patents, the allegations relate to
devices "having [USB or GSM] functionality, including but not limited to [specified product/s]". 1 patent allegedly reads on the Carbide.c++
development tool, with Apple broadly accusing "Carbide.c++, applications developed using Carbide.c++, and phones having applications
developed using Carbide.C++" without specifying particular products (potentially that would be a very long list).
On the next page there is a matrix providing an overview of the different infringement allegations and accused technologies, operating
system platforms, and specified devices.
Asserted patents (in order of appearance in the court filing)
asserted by Apple in counterclaims (part of answer to first amended complaint, dated 06 July 2010)
5,634,074 ("074") Serial I/O device identifies itself to a computer through a serial interface during power on reset
then it is being configured by the computer
6,343,263 ("263") Real-time signal processing system for serially transmitted data
removed in first amended answer to complaint, filed on 19 February 2010;
previously asserted in ITC complaint (Investigation no. 337-TA-704) and subsequently in case 1:09-cv-01002
© 2011 by Florian Mueller 5,915,131 ("131") Method and apparatus for handling I/O requests utilizing separate programming interfaces to access
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com separate I/O services
Twitter: @FOSSpatents removed in first amended answer to complaint, filed on 19 February 2010;
5,555,369 ("369") Method of creating packages for a pointer-based computer system
6,239,795 ("795") Pattern and color abstraction in a graphical user interface
5,315,703 ("703") Object-oriented notification framework system
6,189,034 ("034") Method and apparatus for dynamic launching of a teleconferencing application upon receipt of a call
7,469,381 ("381") List scrolling and document translation, scaling and rotation on a touch-screen display
RE39,486 ("RE486") Extensible, replaceable network component system
5,455,854 ("854") Object-oriented telephone system
7,383,453 ("453") Conserving power by reducing voltage supplied to an instruction-processing portion of a processor
5,848,105 ("105") GMSK signal processors for improved communications capacity and quality
5,379,431 ("431") Boot framework architecture for dynamic staged initial program load
Reference ies
:
g ++ : :
material n olo ide.c orms s4
0
ian u cts
f e b 00
ch B M r b t r i 0 m od 1 10
Te US GS Ca Pla Se S6 Sy Pr E7 53 N9
as per '074
06 Jan 11 '263
'131
page R-3 '369
'795
'703
'034
'381
RE'486
'854
'453
'105
'431

http://fosspatents.blogspot.com United States District Court for the District of Delaware
Case no. 1:09-cv-01002 -- complaint filed on 29 December 2009
Nokia Corporation (of Espoo, Finland)
vs. Apple Inc. (of Cupertino, CA 95014)
On 22 October 2009, Nokia had already filed a suit against the same defendant with the same court (case no. 1:09-cv-00791).
On the day of this new Delaware complaint, Nokia asserted the same seven patents in an ITC complaint (investigation no. 337-TA-701).
The accused products and asserted patents are Identical with allegations made in Nokia's original complaint on the same day with the
ITC. Those products and patents are stated in the section on ITC investigation no. 337-TA-701.
Apple counterclaims (24 February 2010 answer to complaint)

On 24 February 2010, Apple made counterclaims in its answer to Nokia's complaint.
The accused products and asserted patents are identical to allegations made in Apple's ITC complaint of 15 February 2010 (investigation
no. 337-TA-704). Those products and patents are listed in the section on ITC investigation no. 337-TA-704.
Reference United States International Trade Commission
material Investigation no. 337-TA-701 on "certain electronic products, including mobile phones, portable music
players, and computers" -- complaint filed on 29 December 2009
as per
Nokia Corporation (of Espoo, Finland) and Nokia Inc. (of White Plains, NY 10604)
06 Jan 11 vs. Apple Inc. (of Cupertino, CA 95014)
page R-4 Allegedly infringing products

"certain electronic devices, including, but not limited to Apple's iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, iPod Touch, iPod Nano, iPod Classic, iMac,
Mac Pro, Mac Mini, MacBook, MacBook Pro, and MacBook Air" (item 9 of the complaint; see the matrix below the list of patents)
asserted by Nokia in original complaint; "implementation patents" (no standards-related FRAND commitments) according to Nokia
6,714,091 ("091") VCO* with programmable output power
6,834,181 ("181") Mobile communication device and related construction method
6,895,256 ("256") Optimized camera sensor architecture for a mobile telephone
6,518,957 ("957") Communications device with touch sensitive screen
6,073,036 ("036") Mobile station with touch input having automatic symbol magnification function
(removed from ITC complaint -- but not from Delaware suit -- by partial termination on 08 December 2010,
further to an unopposed Nokia motion filed on 06 December 2010; two prior Nokia motions were denied)
6,262,735 ("735") Utilizing the contents of a message
(removed from ITC complaint -- but not from Delaware suit -- by partial termination on 21 July 2010)
6,924,789 ("789") User interface device
* VCO stands for "voltage-controlled oscillator"

Twitter: @FOSSpatents S
3G ic ro ir
3 G/ ch no ss k kP kA ini
e ou a la oo oo oo ro
on dt dn dc cB cB cB ac cm cP
iPh iPo iPo iPo Ma Ma Ma iM Ma Ma
'091
'181
'256
'957
'036
'735
'789
material Investigation no. 337-TA-704 on "certain mobile communications and computer devices and components
thereof" -- complaint filed on 15 January 2010
as per
Apple Inc. (of Cupertino, CA 95014)
06 Jan 11 vs. Nokia Corp. (of Espoo, Finland) and Nokia Inc. (of White Plains, NY 10604)
page R-5 On 26 April 2010, the ITC ordered a partial consolidation (of 5 of the 9 patents) into another investiation (in which they were previously
also asserted against HTC).

"mobile communications devices (including smartphones, personal digital assistants ('PDAs'), and other handheld communication
devices" (item 3 of complaint)
"The technologies at issue in the '431, '867, '131, '70S, '354, and RE '486 patents relate to software architectures, frameworks, and
implementations, including various aspects of software used to implement operating systems. The technologies at issue in the '599
patent relate to a graphic system and corresponding management of graphic processing. The technologies at issue in the '726 and '263
patents relate to hardware interfaces and power management techniques." (item 14 of complaint)
"The Accused Products include computing and mobile communication devices, including but not limited to computers, cellular phones,
and PDAs manufactured, marketed, and/or sold by Nokia in the United States. The Accused Products also include software and
Nokia devices (such as the Nokia N900 and others) that incorporate such software including operating systems (such as the Symbian
OS), user interfaces, as well as other software (such as the Qt software), designed for use on, and intended to be loaded onto, such
devices." (item 15 of complaint)
"Exemplary Accused Nokia Symbian Products include the N97 mini, N97, N95, N86, N85, N79, 5800 XpressMusic, 5800
Navigation Edition, E75, E72, E71x, E71, E66 and the E63." (item 16 of complaint)
"Exemplary Accused Nokia S40 Products include the 7610 Supernova, 3600 Slide, and the 2760." (item 17 of complaint)
© 2011 by Florian Mueller Asserted patents (in order of appearance in documents filed with the ITC)
Twitter: @FOSSpatents asserted by Apple in original complaint
5,379,431 ("431") Boot framework architecture for dynamic staged initial program load
5,455,599 ("599") Object-oriented graphic system
5,519,867 ("867") Object-oriented multitasking system
(consolidated into ITC investigation no. 337-TA-710 as per order of 26 April 2010)
5,915,131 ("131") Method and apparatus for handling I/O requests utilizing separate programming interfaces
to access separate I/O service
5,920,726 ("726") System and method for managing power conditions within a digital camera device
5,969,705 ("705") Message protocol for controlling a user interface from an inactive application program
6,343,263 ("263") Real-time signal processing system for serially-transmitted data
6,424,354 ("354") Object-oriented event notification system with listener registration of both interests and methods
RE39,486 ("RE486") Extensible, replaceable network component system
material Investigation no. 337-TA-704 on "certain mobile communications and computer devices and components
thereof" -- complaint filed on 15 January 2010 -- continued from previous page
as per
06 Jan 11 Partial consolidation
On 26 Apr 2010, the ITC ordered the partial consolidation of this case into investigation no. 337-TA-710. As a result, Nokia Corp. (of
page R-6 Espoo, Finland) and Nokia Inc. (of White Plains, NY 10604) have to defend themselves alongside HTC against allegations of
infringement of five patents (the '867, '131, '705, '263 and RE486 patents). An unopposed Apple motion for partial termination on 28 Oct
2010 (relating to four patents, three of which were subject to partial consolidation) reduced that subset of patents to two (the '705 and
'263 patents). Information concerning HTC's allegedly infringing products is provided in a document covering Apple's disputes with
Motorola and HTC.
Patents/products matrix
Symbian Products S40 Products Qt Software N900

N97, N97 mini, N95, N86, N85, N79, 7610 Supernova, (products that
5800 Xpress Music, 5800 Navigation Edition, 3600 Slide, 2760 incorporate Qt)
E75, E72, E71x, E71, E66, E63
'431
'599
'867
'131
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com '726
Twitter: @FOSSpatents '705
'263
'354
RE'486
Staff report
In early November 2010, media reports claimed that the staff of the ITC (or more precisely, of its Office of Unfair Import Investigations)
had stated in a memorandum dated 27 October 2010 that "the evidence will not establish a violation ... as to any of the asserted
patents." However, the investigating staff is merely a party to the proceeding, and the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) assigned to the
case is free to decide against the staff recommendation. That has, in fact, happened in a number of cases.
Also, FOSS Patents pointed out that the staff report related only to the four patents remaining in investigation no. 337-TA-704, not to the
five patents consolidated into investigation no. 337-TA-710.
material Investigation no. 337-TA-710 on "certain personal data and mobile communications devices and related
software" -- complaint filed on 02 March 2010
as per
Apple Inc. and NeXT Software (both of Cupertino, CA 95014)
06 Jan 11 vs. High Tech Computer Corp. (of Taiwan), HTC America, Inc. (of Bellevue, WA 98005), Exedea Inc. (of Houston, TX 77036),
and as a result of partial consolidation, Nokia Corp. (of Espoo, Finland) and Nokia Inc. (of White Plains, NY 10604).
page R-7
Partial consolidation stated further below (added Nokia Corp. and Nokia Inc. as defendants).
Allegedly infringing Nokia products

On the previous page, a matrix shows the accused products for all patents originally asserted by Apple against Nokia in the ITC
complaint that gave rise to ITC investigation no. 337-TA-704, including the five patents partially consolidated into this proceeding.
Asserted patents (in order of appearance in documents filed with the ITC)
asserted by Apple in original complaint -- patents asserted only against HTC but not Nokia are green in the list below:
5,481,721 ("721") Method for providing automatic and dynamic translation of object oriented programming language-based
message passing into operating system message passing using proxy objects
5,519,867 ("867") Object-oriented multitasking system dropped as a result of Apple motion of 28 Oct 2010
6,275,983 ("983") Object-oriented operating system
5,566,337 ("337") Method and apparatus for distributing events in an operating system
5,929,852 ("852") Encapsulated network entity reference of a network component system
dropped as a result of Apple motion of 28 Oct 2010
5,946,647 ("647") System and method for performing an action on a structure in computer-generated data
5,969,705 ("705") Message protocol for controlling a user interface from an inactive application program
© 2011 by Florian Mueller 6,343,263 ("263") Real-time signal processing system for serially transmitted data
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com 5,915,131 ("131") Method and apparatus for handling I/O requests utilizing separate programming interfaces to access separate
Twitter: @FOSSpatents I/O service dropped as a result of Apple motion of 28 Oct 2010
RE39,486 ("RE486") Extensible, replaceable network component system dropped as a result of Apple motion of 28 Oct 2010
Partial consolidation
On 26 Apr 2010, the ITC ordered the partial consolidation of case no. 337-TA-704 into this one. As a result, Nokia Corp. (of Espoo,
Finland) and Nokia Inc. (of White Plains, NY 10604) have to defend themselves alongside HTC against allegations of infringement of five
patents (the '867, '131, '705, '263 and RE486 patents). An unopposed Apple motion for partial termination on 28 Oct 2010 (relating to
four patents, three of which were subject to partial consolidation) reduced that subset of patents to two (the '705 and '263 patents).
Information concerning HTC's allegedly infringing products is provided in a document covering Apple's disputes with HTC (and Motorola).
Reference United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
material Case no. 1:10-cv-00249 -- complaint filed on 07 May 2010 --
later transferred to United States District Court for the District of Delaware --
as per Case no. 1:11-cv-00015
06 Jan 11 On 04 January 2011, the court granted Apple's motion to transfer this case to the District of Delaware (case no. 1:11-cv-00015).
Nokia Corporation (of Espoo, Finland)

page R-8 vs. Apple Inc. (of Cupertino, CA 95014)

"one or more products and services, including wireless communication devices such as the Apple iPhone, Apple iPhone 3G, Apple
iPhone 3GS, and Apple iPad 3G." (item 24 of the complaint)
"one or more products and services, including wireless communication devices such as the Apple iPhone, Apple iPhone 3G, Apple
iPhone 3GS, Apple iPhone 4, Apple iPad, Apple iPad 3G, Apple iPod Touch, Apple MacBook, Apple MacBook Pro, and Apple MacBook
Air" (item 28 of the first amended complaint)
asserted by Nokia in original complaint; no FRAND commitments mentioned

6,317,083 ("083") Antenna having a feed and a shorting post connected between reference plan and planar conductor
interacting to form a transmission line
6,348,894 ("894") Radio frequency antenna
6,373,345 ("345") Modulator structure for a transmitter and mobile station
6,603,431 ("431") Mobile station and antenna arrangement in mobile station
7,558,696 ("696") Method and device for position determination
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com additionally asserted by Nokia in first amended complaint of 17 September 2010; no FRAND commitments mentioned
Twitter: @FOSSpatents 7,532,680 ("680") Multi-mode radio frequency transmitter
5,752,172 ("172") Distributed transmitter output power control circuit and method for a radio telephone
S ro
/3G Air /P
G ch ok
/
e e3 e4 3G tou Bo
on on on d d d c
iPh iPh iP h iPa iPa iPo Ma
"The Modulator Patent" '345
"The Positioning Patent" '696
'083
"The Antenna Patents" '894
'431
'680
"The Power Amplification Patents"
'172
Reference United States District Court for the for the Western District of Wisconsin
material Case no. 1:10-cv-00249 -- complaint filed on 07 May 2010 --
later transferred to United States District Court for the District of Delaware --
as per Case no. 1:11-cv-00015 -- continued from previous page
06 Jan 11
Apple counterclaims
page R-9 Apple makes counterclaims against plaintiff Nokia Corporation (of Espoo, Finland) as well as its subsidiary Nokia Inc. (a Delaware
corporation headquartered in Texas).

N97, N900, N8, "Nokia mobile phones running Nokia’s Ovi Maps software", "applications and system software developed using the
Nokia Qt Service Framework"
asserted by Apple in counterclaims (part of answer to original complaint, dated 28 June 2010)
5,946,647 ("647") System and method for performing an action on a structure in computer-generated data
5,612,719 ("719") Gesture sensitive buttons for graphical user interfaces
7,710,290 ("290") System and method for situational location relevant invocable speed reference
7,380,116 ("116") System for real-time adaptation to changes in display configuration
7,054,981 ("981") Method and apparatus for providing automatic high speed data connection in portable device
5,379,430 ("430") Object-oriented system locator patent
7,355,905 ("905") Integrated circuit with separate supply voltage for memory that is different from logic circuit supply voltage
as a result of Apple's 1st amended answer to original complaint, replaced with newer patent of the same title
additionally asserted by Apple in counterclaims (part of first amended answer to original complaint, dated 16 August 2010)
5,946,647 ("647") Integrated circuit with separate supply voltage for memory that is different from logic circuit supply voltage
a continuation of a divisional of the replaced '905 patent, issued on 20 July 2010
k
Frw
s ic e
ap erv
7 00 i M S
N9 N9 N8 Ov Qt
'647
"User Interface Patents"
'719
"Location-Based Software Patent" '290

'116
"Device Interface Patents"
'981
"Operating System Patent" '430
"Integrated Circuit Patent" '559 '905

Reference High Court of England and Wales (UK High Court of Justice), Chancery Division
material Case no. HC10CO3053 -- complaint filed on or before 28 September 2010
as per Apple announced this suit against Nokia. It is not known at this stage which entities belonging to the two groups (parent companies, local
subsidiaries) are parties to the suit.
06 Jan 11
The list of accused Nokia products is not available at this stage. Accused Apple products include iPhone, iPad and iPod touch (it is not
page R-10 known at this stage which particular versions and editions of those products are accused).
Patents asserted by Apple in its original complaint on or before 28 September 2010

The list of patents asserted by Apple is not available at this stage. Nokia told the Bloomberg news agency that the patents asserted by
Apple in this case are "nine implementation patents already in suit between the two companies in the U.S."
Patents asserted by Nokia in its counterclaims filed on or before 16 December 2010

The list of patents asserted by Nokia is not available at this stage. Nokia said in a press release that this filing covers "4 Nokia patents
related to touch user interface, on-device app stores, signal noise suppression and modulator structures."
Landgericht Düsseldorf (District Court of Dusseldorf, Germany), 4. Zivilkammer

Case no. unknown -- complaint filed in "late October 2010"
Apple sued Nokia. It is not known at this stage which entities belonging to the two groups (parent companies, local subsidiaries) are
parties to the suit.
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com On or before 16 December 2010, Nokia countersued Apple in this court. It is not known at this stage whether Nokia's suit was filed as a
Twitter: @FOSSpatents separate suit or as counterclaims in the suit instigated by Apple.

The list of accused products is not available at this stage.
The list of asserted patents is not available at this stage. Not even the number of patents asserted is known at this stage.
Reference Landgericht Düsseldorf (District Court of Dusseldorf, Germany), 4b. Zivilkammer
material Case no. 4b O 195/10 -- complaint or counterclaims filed on or before 16 December 2010
as per Nokia countersued Apple. Previously, Apple filed a suit against Nokia in the same court. It is not known at this stage which entities
belonging to the two groups (parent companies, local subsidiaries) are parties to the suit, and whether Nokia filed a separate suit with the
06 Jan 11 same court or made counterclaims in the one instigated by Apple.

page R-11 Accused Apple products include iPhone, iPad and iPod touch (it is not known at this stage which particular versions and editions of those
products are accused).

Nokia stated in a press release that this filing covers "7 Nokia patents related to touch user interface, antenna structures, messaging
functionality and chipsets."
Landgericht Mannheim (District Court of Mannheim, Germany), 7. Zivilkammer

Case no. 7 O 222/10 -- complaint filed on or before 16 December 2010
Nokia sued Apple. It is not known at this stage which entities belonging to the two groups (parent companies, local subsidiaries) are

Accused Apple products include iPhone, iPad and iPod touch (it is not known at this stage which particular versions and editions of those
© 2011 by Florian Mueller Asserted patents (in order of appearance in the court filing)
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com Nokia stated in a press release that this filing covers "5 Nokia patents related to on-device app stores, caller ID, display illumination and
Twitter: @FOSSpatents the integration of multiple radios."
Rechtbank 's-Gravenhage (District Court of The Hague, The Netherlands)

Case no. KG RK 10-3054 -- complaint filed on or before 16 December 2010
Nokia sued Apple. It is not known at this stage which entities belonging to the two groups (parent companies, local subsidiaries) are

Accused Apple products include iPhone, iPad and iPod touch (it is not known at this stage which particular versions and editions of those

Nokia stated in a press release that this filing covers "2 Nokia patents related to signal noise suppression and data card functionality."

Nokia Vs Apple 11.01.06

Uploaded by

Document Information

Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Description:

Copyright:

Available Formats

Nokia Vs Apple 11.01.06

Original Title:

Uploaded by

Description:

Copyright:

Available Formats

Nokia

move. Trade Commission

England & Wales

licensing commitments concerning them.

© 2011 by Florian Mueller

© 2011 by Florian Mueller Move #2:

gation Trade Commission

© 2011 by Florian Mueller

Trade Commission It still asserts that patent in a

patents Move #13:

England & Wales

England & Wales

England & Wales

England & Wales

England & Wales

Mannheim Trade Commission

England & Wales

England & Wales

as per Nokia Corporation (of Espoo, Finland)

Asserted patents (in order of appearance in the complaint)

© 2011 by Florian Mueller S

as per Apple counterclaims (11 December 2009 answer to complaint)

Asserted patents (in order of appearance in the court filing)

© 2011 by Florian Mueller

Apple counterclaims (24 February 2010 answer to complaint)

page R-4 Allegedly infringing products

Asserted patents (in order of appearance in the complaint)

* VCO stands for "voltage-controlled oscillator"

Allegedly infringing products

Symbian Products S40 Products Qt Software N900

Allegedly infringing Nokia products

Nokia Corporation (of Espoo, Finland)

Allegedly infringing products

Asserted patents (in order of appearance in the complaint)

asserted by Nokia in original complaint; no FRAND commitments mentioned

Allegedly infringing products

Asserted patents (in order of appearance in the court filing)

"Location-Based Software Patent" '290

"Operating System Patent" '430

"Integrated Circuit Patent" '559 '905

Asserted patents (in order of appearance in the court filing)

Patents asserted by Apple in its original complaint on or before 28 September 2010

Patents asserted by Nokia in its counterclaims filed on or before 16 December 2010

Landgericht Düsseldorf (District Court of Dusseldorf, Germany), 4. Zivilkammer

Allegedly infringing products

Asserted patents (in order of appearance in the court filing)

Allegedly infringing products

Asserted patents (in order of appearance in the court filing)

Landgericht Mannheim (District Court of Mannheim, Germany), 7. Zivilkammer

Allegedly infringing products

Rechtbank 's-Gravenhage (District Court of The Hague, The Netherlands)

Allegedly infringing products

Asserted patents (in order of appearance in the court filing)

Related Interests

You might also like