2 views

Uploaded by Particle Beam Physics Lab

save

- Energyband and Effective Mass
- Aspden - Power From Space - Inertia and Gravitation (1994)
- Electricity
- TUPMS033
- A2 Physics
- 1.0 Wave 1.1,1.2
- F. N. Beg et al- A study of picosecond laser–solid interactions up to 10^19 W cm^-2
- Vibrating String
- Toshi Tajima- Laser Acceleration and High Field Science: 1979-2009
- Magnetron
- 20 E-specimen Interaction
- Ppt Mech 5sem DOM
- Paper Physics 2004
- Structure of ATOM
- Derek K.K. Lee and Andrew J. Schofield- Metals without Electrons: the Physics of Exotic Quantum Fluids
- TALK00001
- Hydraulic Machine Vibration
- lectura Electromagnetismo.docx
- From Slide 15-30
- Electric Charge - Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia
- Scan#_20141211_0001
- Compton Scattering Class Exercises 2009-2010
- hw10
- 08-Mazilu
- Topic 2
- Mock Test-3 CBSE
- Document.rtf
- BOLTZMANN'S AND SAHA'S EQUATIONS
- 5ddd
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- null
- Untitled
- null
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- null
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- null
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- null
- Untitled
- 4 LHC Machine
- IEEEkeywords
- pellegrini 1991 0001
- LHC Machine
- Iran Ilsf Cdr
- Visiting Alba Sychrotron-EnG
- C. Biscari- Phi-Factory Design
- Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology - Atomic and Molecular Physics 2001
- Wilson 1980
- rosenzweig 1998 0400
- LHC Machine.pdf
- Handbook of VPLab 8
- Mechanical Engineering Issues
- Fb99
- Bernardini
- MÁY GIA TỐC
- plasma physics exam
- Xray Micro Tomography Print
- K. Hirata, J.M. Jowett and S.Y.Lee- ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 15
- Teilchenbeschleunigung
- physik
- Beam size and position measurement based on logarithm processing algorithm in HLS II.pdf
- Physics work energy.pdf
- Atomic Physics
- Modern X-ray Diffraction Methods in Mineralogy and Geosciences
- DESIGN, ANALYSIS AND MANUFACTURING OF A CENTRAL LOW VACUUM SYSTEM

You are on page 1of 8

,

C R O S S I N G OF A N I N C O H E R E N T INTEGRAL R E S O N A N C E

I N T H E E L E C T R O N RING ACCELERATOR*

C. P E L L E G R I N I t a n d A. M. S E S S L E R

**Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.
**

Received 6 April 1970

**In one m o d e o f operation o f an electron ring accelerator (ERA), the square o f the electron oscillation frequency (A 2) is (a) m u c h
**

at the e n d o f c o m p r e s s i o n rings are slowly m o v e d t h r o u g h the smaller a n d (b) m u c h larger t h a n the c o n t r i b u t i o n to the square

radialintegral b e t a t r o n resonance Qr = 1. A l t h o u g h the coherent o f the oscillation frequency f r o m the ions (A2). It is s h o w n that

radial oscillation frequency o f the ring as a whole remains below for the E R A , where case (a) applies, the increase in ring m i n o r

unity, t h e oscillation frequencies o f individual electron are dimensions, for given field errors a n d rate o f resonance crossing,

(incoherently) caused to pass t h r o u g h the resonance because o f is less t h a n in case (b) by a factor o f (A/A) 2. Numerical examples

t h e additional focusing f r o m ions t r a p p e d in the ring. In this show that the degradation o f ring quality in case (b) should,

p a p e r the effect o f field errors on ring m a j o r a n d m i n o r radii is with suitable attention to the design a n d construction o f the E R A

e v a l u a t e d - t h e o r e t i c a l l y - f o r the cases in which the spread in apparatus, be acceptably small.

**1. Introduction The increase in oscillation amplitude of a single
**

In the electron ring accelerators (ERA) now being particle crossing an integral resonance at a rate

studied at Dubna, Berkeley, Karlsruhe and Garchingl), r = d~off/dt is given approximately by

an electron ring is compressed in a magnetic field

having field index n - ~ - (r/B)(dB/t?r) such that Xs = eg2 2 , (1)

0 < n < 1. At the end of compression positive ions are

captured in the ring, which is subsequently extracted

from the compressor and brought into an accelerating where R is the beam radius, ~ the revolution frequency,

column having a constant magnetic field and hence and ( A B / B ) the magnetic field perturbation driving the

// == 0.

resonance2-5).

During the compression process the radial betatron Formula (1) shows, using typical E R A parameters,

frequency c0r = Qf2, where f2 is the revolution fre- that in order to maintain the increase in amplitude

quency and Q is approximately given by ( l - n ) ~, within reasonable limits, the requirements on the

stays below f2 or, equivalently, Q stays below unity. magnetic field are very strong; for instance, assuming

The capture of ions in the electron ring introduces an x, = 0.1 cm, R --- 3 cm, and Q = 104 sec -1, one has

additional focusing force on the electron, which has ( A B / B ) < 10 -5. Various possibilities have been sug-

the effect of increasing Q. During the extraction gested for reducing Q, so as to avoid crossing the

process n goes to zero, so that, in the absence of ions resonance: The use of image forces obtained by sur-

or other additional forces, Q would become equal to rounding the electron ring with a dielectric cylinder 6)

unity. As a result of both effects Q crosses the value or a slotted metallic cylinderT), or keeping Q > 1

Q=l. throughout compression and acceleration of the ring

As is well known, when Q = 1 an integer resonance by using the azimuthal magnetic field generated by a

is excited. This can produce a large displacement of current along the axis of the ringS).

the electron orbits and hence a beam loss. Moreover, The use of image forces seems to provide a practical

even if the beam is not lost it is possible that the way to avoid the resonance crossing when there are

crossing of the resonance could produce a large increase only few ions in the ring, but not when the ring is

in beam dimension and a corresponding decrease in charged with more ions than of the order of 1% of

the electric field that keeps the ions inside the ring. the electrons. The use of an azimuthal magnetic field

As a consequence, the external electric field which is to keep Q always above unity requires currents in the

applied so as to accelerate the ring would have to be conductor on the axis of the order of l0 s A - a n

lowered to an uninterestingly small value. inconvenient, but possible, design requirement.

It has, however, been pointed out by Van der

* This work was s u p p o r t e d by the U . S . A t o m i c Energy C o m -

mission.

Meer9), on the basis of qualitative arguments, that the

t P e r m a n e n t address: Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati application to the ERA of the formula for the single-

( R o m a ) , Italy. particle increase of amplitude during the resonance

109

110 C. P E L L E G R I N I AND A. M. SESSLER

crossing may be incorrect. In this paper we study the also in the case of the storage ring the crossing of the

effect of resonance crossing in detail. In particular we resonance produces only a beam widening, and that

consider the cases when Q would stay below unity in this widening is not too dangerous because of the strong

the absence of ions (i.e., the coherent integral resonance reduction introduced by the factor A2/A 2. This con-

is not crossed), but is shifted above unity by the ion clusion is in agreement with the experimental obser-

focusing force (i.e., the incoherent integral resonance is vations performed on electron storage rings.

crossed). We find that in this case the formula (1) is not

valid and that the behavior of the beam in crossing the 2. Formulation of the problem

incoherent resonance depends on the ratio of the We assume that the electrons move on a circular

spread in the square of the frequency in the electron orbit with a constant angular velocity f2, and that they

ring, A2, to the shift in the square of the frequency, oscillate in a direction orthogonal to this orbit under

A 2, induced by the ions. the action of the focusing forces due to the external

The result described by (1) applies only when the magnetic field and to the ions. The ions are assumed

condition to have zero angular velocity and to oscillate in the

A 2 / A 2 >~ 1, (2) same direction as the electrons under the action of the

focusing force due to the electrostatic field of the

since in this case each electron behaves as a single

electrons. We ignore ion-ion forces, since in practice

electron having a frequency (oo2 +A2) ½, where co is the

the ion density is sufficiently low that these terms are

frequency due to the external magnetic field and image

negligible.

forces, and A is the shift in frequency caused by the

Let us call Xk, Ok and ~j, ffj the transverse and the

ions. Thus resonance crossing leads to an increase in

azimuthal coordinates of the kth electron and jth ion.

beam minor dimensions, but no change in the beam

The equations of motion can be written as

center of mass.

On the contrary, in the case more often encountered xk (t) + CO2(t) x k (t) + a~ °2 (t) [Xk (t) -- ~ (t, Ok)] +

in the ERA, when

+ A~kO2(t)[xa(t)-- ,2(t, Ok)] = a COS (~0 k + (a),

A 2 / A 2 ,~ t , (3)

**there is a (small) change in the local beam center of mass, Ok = ~td-O~k,
**

but the beam minor dimension increase is smaller, by a

factor of (A2/A2), than that expected on the basis of (1). ~j (l) + M j2..[~j (t) -- .~ (t, I{/j)] = O,

Hence the limit on the tolerable magnetic field imper-

fections, AB/B (which is set by the strong requirement ~bj = const, (4)

of small minor dimensions of the ring), is lowered and

can more easily be satisfied. Thus our detailed analysis where ¢OgXa is the focusing force due to the magnetic

field, the A (e)2 term describes the force of electron on

supports the general conclusions of Van der Meer and

is in qualitative agreement with observation1°). electrons, A(i)R [Xk--~(t, Ok)] and M~ [ ~ i - ~ ( t , ~bj)] are

That the simple formula (1) does not apply to circular the forces between ions and electrons and a cos (~0 k + 4)

is the perturbation in the guide magnetic field. Note

electron beams partially or totally neutralized by ions

that we consider only field bump errors and do not

is of importance, also, for electron storage rings. In

include gradient error terms as they are - in practice -

this case, too, due to the long beam lifetime, a large

negligible4). We consider only the ~ - Fourier component

number of ions are captured by the beam, when

in the magnetic field perturbation, where ~ f ~ - COg.

clearing field electrodes are not used. Once again, the

The electron ion forces are written, in the linear

frequency shift introduced by the ions can cause a

approximation, as proportional to the distance of the

crossing of an integer resonance. Both the conditions

kth particle from the local center of mass of the

that Q remain below the nearest integer during the ion

particles of the other species, .~(t,O) and ~(t, rp). The

loading process and condition (3) are well satisfied in

local center of mass can be defined, with the help of the

storage rings. However, in this paper we have consi-

step function S(O), as

dered only azimuthally uniform beams, while the

electron beam of a storage ring is bunched. Hence, xk(t ) S(O k - O) S(O + d O - Ok)

we cannot directly apply our results to storage rings. ~(t,O) = k

Notwithstanding, we think that, at least to a first y S(Ok--O)S(O+dO--Ok)

approximation, the results of this work indicate that k

CROSSING OF AN INCOHERENT INTEGRAL RESONANCE IN THE ERA 111

**~i (t) S ( O j - ¢) S (~ + d f f - ~j) By use of (8), the system of (9) can be reduced to
**

~(t, ¢) = j (5) A kS( t O -2-~(e)Z+A(i)z__~2~Q2 } - A~i)2 ~-A(e)2 ~ a

k T I1 k = •

J

(10)

The nonlinearities of this force, as well as the non-

linearities in the external focusing force, are taken into The first of (9), together with (8), shows simply that,

account approximately by allowing a dependence of under the action of the external perturbation, the local

0.)2, M 2, A (e)2 and A (i12 o n some of the parameters of ion center of mass undergoes the same displacement

the particles such as oscillation amplitude or energy. as the local electron center of mass.

Newton's third law implies a subsidiary condition This result is also valid for slow changes of

among the A(~) and Mj. We need not invoke this COk,Mk, A(~,), and A(~), so that in general we can reduce

relation, as well be seen below. the equations of (4) to an equation for the electrons

The quantities COR,M), A(~,), and A(~) are functions of only, namely

time, because of the changes in the external magnetic

field and in the number of ions with time. Both these 5Ck+CO2(t)Xk+A2(O [Xk--X ] = a cos (~Ok+¢), (11)

variations are assumed to be very slow compared with

the electron and ion oscillation period. where we have set A] A(e)2±A(i)2 When COkand Ak

We are only interested in studying the closed-orbit are constant in time this clearly reduces to (10).

perturbations due to the magnetic field imperfections,

i.e., the particular solution of the nonhomogenous (4). 3. Normal mode analysis

We will first consider the case in which cok, A(~), Mk We have reduced the problem to solving (11),

and A(~) are constant in time. Since the driving force, which task is accomplished in this and the next two

a cos ( ~ 0 + ¢ ) , is periodic with respect to 0, we look sections. We can limit ourselves to the case in which the

for a solution having the same periodicity. Let us variation in time of cok and Ak is small compared which

assume fig2. It is then possible to perform a power-series

Xk(t ) = A k COS (fi0k+qS), expansion of these quantities, and to consider only

(6) terms up to first order, namely, to write

~j(t) = Bj cos (ff4/j+¢).

O12 = 602 (to) + r ( t - - to),

The local centers of mass are then given by (12)

A~ = A ~ ( t o ) + r ' ( t - t o ) .

~(t, 0) = ~ cos (~0+4~),

(7)

We also assume that r and r' are different from zero

~(t, lp) = B cos ( h ~ b + ¢ ) .

only in a time interval t o - t 1 during which the reso-

The amplitudes A, B are given, in the case of a beam nance is crossed, and that the initial and final values

containing Ne electron and N i ions uniformly distri- of co2 and CO2k + A 2k are respectively well below and well

buted along the circumference, and assuming that the above the resonant value ~2122. Notice, also, that we

distribution of the A k, Bk is independent of the have assumed r and r' to be equal for all particles. This

azimuthal position, by is a good approximation when the frequency spreads

for both co and A are small compared with ~g2.

Z Ak,

We can now obtain a solution of (11), assuming Xk

k=l to be of the form

Ne

(8) xk(t) = ~ An(t)Ck(n)exp [i(~Ok+¢)], (13)

= ~ Bj.

j=l n=l

**where the An(t ) are unknown functions and the C(7,)
**

Substituting (6) and (7) into (4), we obtain

are a complete orthonormal set of vectors defined as

Bj = A , the eigenvectors of the linear system of equations

A k¢ (Ok2 -+/Jk

-(e)2+A~i)2 j~2 Q2} __ A~e)2~__A(kI)2 B = a . [6o2 (to) + A 2 (to)] C~ n)- A~(to) C (n)

(9) = /"(2.)C(,n) . n = 1. . . . . N . . (14)

112 C. PELLEGRINI AND A. M. SESSLER

**where C (") is defined as and
**

N©

6 = {(l/Ne) Z [xk-ffl2} ~ = {(t/Ne) Z IAn(t)[2-x2} k'

k n

N e k=l (19)

as follows from (5) and (13); and F~.) is an eigenvalue. which are the local center-of-mass amplitude and the

Substituting (13) into (11) and using (12) and (14), root-mean-square (rms) b e a m size. Both ~ and 3 2, as

we get well as (17), depend on the Q") only through the

Ne

average values C (").

Z {A'.+2i~2A.+[F~.) -~2~22 +

n=l 4. Determination of the eigenvectors

+ (r + r') (t-- to) ] A,} C(k") -- i (t-- to) Z A , C (") = a. In this section we determine the eigenvectors and

n eigenvalues of (14) in the two cases: (a) A2/A 2 ~ 1,

(15) and (b) A2/A 2 >~ l. We consider case (a) first; case (b)

Using the orthonormality property of the Ck("), we is rather trivial and is discussed at the end of this

obtain section. It is convenient to start by solving (14) for

the case of zero frequency spread. The eigenvectors

A', + 2 i ~ A . + [r(.2) - ~2 ~2 + (r + r') (t - to)] A. - Ck(n)° are given, for A = 0, by

N© C(k")° = (1/X/N) e 2~i"k/u , (20)

-- r ' ( t - - t o ) N e Z A mC (m) C (") = a N eC ("). (16)

ttt=l

C(")° = (1/x/N) 6,,o, (21)

We assume that A , ( t ) is a function varying slowly

with respect to the characteristic oscillation periods, where we have employed N as a notation for Ne. The

so that it is possible to neglect the second derivative corresponding eigenvalues are

of A,(t) in (16) and write it as /~(2n) 0 2

= coo+Ao2 [1-6,,o]. (22)

2 inQA, + [F~,) - ~2 ~2 + (r + r') (t - to)] A, -

Notice that all the F~,) are equal, with the exception

Ne of F~o).

- r'(t-to)N ~ ~ A,,C'(m)C (") = a N ~ C ("). (17) For a small frequency spread, we can use pertur-

m=l

bation theory to determine the Ck("). Let us rewrite

The p r o b l e m is now reduced to finding the Ck(") and eq. (14) as

A,(t), i.e., to solving (14) and (17). (H (°) + H (')) C (") = ri 2) Q("), (23)

The solution will depend on the ratio A2/A 2, where

A 2 is the width of the distribution of the frequencies where C (") is a vector of c o m p o n e n t s C ("),

co2, and Ao2 is the average value of A 2. (We assume that

the widths o f the distribution o f COk and A k are small H(~°) = (co2 + A~)),~ - A g / N , (24)

c o m p a r e d with the average values of COkand Ak.)

In the remainder of this p a p e r we will study only /(1)

k~ = (co2 + A 2 2

-coo--A2)~kt - (Ak2 -- a o2) / N , (25)

the two cases

and COo 2 and A g are the average values of COk, 2 A 2. For

(a) A2/A 2 ~ |,

H (1) ---- 0, C (") is equal to C (")° as given by (20), and

F~n) = F(,)o2 as given by (22).

and

T o apply perturbation theory when H (1) # 0, one

(b) a~/A~ ,> 1, must r e m e m b e r that the unperturbed solution is

degenerate (all eigenfunctions, except C (°)°, belong to

for both of which solutions of (14) and (17) can be

the same eigenvalue), and use instead of the C(")°'s,

obtained.

for n 4= 0, a linear combination of these vectors such

We also notice that we are interested in the deter-

that H (1) is diagonalized. Calling these new vectors q~("),

mination of the two quantities

one has

= I(I/N~) ~ Xk[ = I~ A,,(t) C(")[ (18)

k n 4~(°) = C (°)° , (26)

CROSSING OF AN INCOHERENT INTEGRAL RESONANCE IN THE ERA 113

**and We can now use these results to simplify (17). In
**

N-1 the case n = 0 the equation contains zero-order terms

~(n) = B~C 0)° for n:#0, (27) and first-order terms in A2/AZo. Neglecting the first-order

terms, one has

where

2i~Odo+[O~--fi2Q2 +r(t-to)]Ao = a~/N. (37)

1 e2nint/(N_l)

(28)

B~ = ( N _ I ) + For n -# 0 (17) contains first- and second-order terms

in A2/A~. Keeping only lowest-order terms, one has

It is easy to verify that

2 i ~ o A n + [o~z + A~ - Kz 0~ + (r + r') ( t - to)] A, -

(q$,(n) H(1)q$(m)) = 0; n, m # 0 and n # m, (29)

- r' ( t - to) ~/(N) C(") Ao = a N C t") • (38)

and

In case (b) the coupling between particles is negli-

N-1 N-1

gible and the eigenvalues are almost equal to the single

(4,*(")u('4,("b = (1/N) kZ= O t Y= l ~ ~

(~Ok +Ak -- O~o--Ao)~ particle frequencies, i.e.,

= ~ o , + A n + O [ ( A o / A ) ]. (39)

x { e x p 2 7 r i t I ~+nk ] } N - 1 ; n # 0, (30)

The corresponding eigenfunctions are

and that

C~") = 6,, k + ~) [(A~/A 2)], (40)

N--1 N-1

(~*(°)H(')#")) = (i/N) E E (~-~b x and the C"(") are given, to lowest order, by

k=0 t=l

C(")= 1/N. (41)

1 {exp2rdt I ~ - + k]}-

x -( -N- - - -1)~ 1 (31) Eq. (17) now becomes, neglecting the coupling between

particles,

The solution of (23) is now given by 2 i~QA, + / m z + A,-2 ~2 oz + (r + r') ( t - to)] A, = a.

C(n) = 4/n) + ~ A~"4,(~), (32) (42)

m:#n

**and, to first order in the perturbation, one has 5. Determination of the amplitude functions
**

(4,,(m) H (. #n)) In this section we solve (37), (38), (42) for the

A n =

ra (33) functions A,(t).

riL-r2=)o

5.1. CASE (b)

F~2.) = F(,~0 + (q~*(")H(1)qg(")). (34)

We start from (42), which we write in the form

Notice that with our choice ofm 2, A z one has also

A , ( t ) - i g , ( t ) A,(t) = - ia, (43)

(~b*(°) H °) ~b(°)) = 0, where

so that there is no first-order correction to the coherent 1 [m2 + A 2 _ ~2 02 + (r + r') ( t - to)], (44)

g.(t) =

frequency F(~). The quantities C"~n) are now easily

obtained, and, to first order, one has

a

**C (°) = (1/~/N) + first order term, (35) = (45)
**

2~O"

~-,t.) = (1/~/N) (d?*C°) H (1) q~(n))/A2o The solution of (43), with the initial condition

N--1 N--1

A(to) = 0, is

= (1/NAzo) Z Z (o~-cog) x

k=0 t=l A.(t)=- i~{expli f[o O.(t')dt'l}x

i Iexp2nitlk+ n ]} (36)

x IN(N- 1)] ~ N- 1 X f[o dt' exp [-i f'i g.(t")dt"]. (46)

114 C. P E L L E G R 1 N I AND A. M. S E S S L E R

Evaluating the integrals, and using the notation for A o, substitute the result in (38), and solve for A,.

The result will be different according to whether the

D. = (092 + A 2 - ii 2 ~22)/2/iI2,

coherent frequency, coo, does or does not cross the

p = (r + r')/2 nf2, (47) resonance. We will consider here only the case in

which coo does not cross the resonance (i.e., the coherent

one has: integral resonance is not crossed), since this is the

situation which usually confronts us in practice. Under

L exp { -- i [D. (t' -- to) + ½ p (t' - to) 2] }dt'

= x/(n/p) exp [iD2/(2 p)] x

this assumption one can neglect the variation in time

of the coherent frequency and of Ao, and obtain

from (37)

a KIN

x {h ( P ( t - t ° ) + D " ) - h ( D. ~[, (48) A o = cog_(~f2)2. (54)

\ ~/(nP) ,/ \~(~p)/J

where Substituting this in (38) one obtains

h (x) = C ( x ) - iS (x), (49) ~ [ , - i [D + p ( t - to)] A, = - inN C (") [ 1 + q ( t - to)], (55)

**and C(x), S(x) are the Fresnel integrals. where
**

It is usually possible, when p is small and the 2 2 --2

integral extends from well below to well above the D = °)°+A°-n ~2

resonance, to make the approximation 2 ~2

D./~/(Trp) ~ -- 1, p - r+r'

2 iif2

Ep(t- to)+D.]lx/Ozp) >> 1. (50) a

2 ~if2

Since C(___oo) = S(___oo) = _+½, one has in this case

t

~ o

exp { - i [ D , ( t ' - t o ) + k p ( t ' - to)Z]} dt ' q -e)o2_~zQ2"

r

(56)

**(2rr/p) ½ exp [+i(Dz,/Zp)-izr/4]. (51) The solution can again be written, assuming A. (to) = 0,
**

as

The value of A, after crossing the resonance is then

given by

A.(t)=-iaNC(")exp{i fto [D+p(t'-to)]dt' I

A. ,,~ - i d ( 2 ~/p) "~exp {i [ D , ( t - to)+½p(t- to)2]} x

× exp [+i(D2./Zp)-i rc/4] x f, dt'[l+q(t'-to) ] x

d to

=- i~(2~z/p) "texp [ L

lirp(t-to)+

~

D.12

_J

_ iTr/4}. (52)

xexp (f/

--i

o

[D+p(t"-to)]dt" . ) (57)

**The final amplitude after crossing the resonance is The integrals of (57) can be evaluated by using (48)
**

therefore and

IA.I = a(2~/p)* = a [Tr/nt2(r+r')]~, (53)

a well-known result. ft ' d t ' ( t ' - to) exp { - i [D(t'-

o

to) + ½p(t'- to)Z]}

**5.2. CASE (a) =2ei(n~/2p,I D Fh(P(t-to)+D~_h( D )]
**

p / 2~/(~p)L \ ~/(rcp) ,/

In this case the frequency spread A 2 is small com-

pared with the frequency shift Aoz. The situation is

described by (37) and (38), and is clearly more com-

plicated than case (b). The procedure is to solve (37)

..,_, Es,,,\ ~/(2p) /

(58)

CROSSING OF A N I N C O H E R E N T INTEGRAL RESONANCE IN T H E E R A 115

**Assuming the conditions (50) to be satisfied, one 1°'
**

obtains an amplitude, after crossing the resonance, 62 = { a ( ~ f 2 ( r + r , j ) [I - - X

n(r+r')

A.(t),.~_i~N~(.)(2nl~:{1

\P/

qD}

----~p x (

× l + co~_~2a2/_lj

Ill × ~ ~j

×exp [ L

li[P(t--to)+Ol~ }

i -in/a ,

7(~- ~ (59)

z __afi2 f22 a ( f i Q (2+

COo n ) r') ½

where negligible contributions from the last term of (58)

have been dropped. By use of (56), (59) can be written

as x

[1 r (

n(r+r') 1 "~-CO2__~2~2

A+ )] X

A.(t) ~ i a v/(n) N(~ C")

--

[iif2(r + r')] +

X

x 2Re

[Ao

[

exp i [co~+A2°-n2f22+(r+r')(t-t°)]2

4/if2 (r + r')

x 1 n(r-+r') 1 + CO2--~2~ 2 X

64,

2 2 ~2

x exp i [ c o ° + A ° - 02+(r+r')(t--t°)]2 If

4nO(r+r') '4) (. n , ./+ 1 (65)

(60) >~

\fit2(r+r )] coo2 - - ~2 0 2 '

**6. Evaluation of beam position and size and
**

We are now in a position to evaluate the local

center-of-mass displacement, ~, and the rms beam n i) + AI I (66)

width, & which were defined in (18) and (19). ~Q(T+r' A-~ ~ ~ -2~,

CO 0 - - n 2 ~

**6.1. CASE (a): A2/A 2 < 1 then (63) and (64) become
**

Using (35), (36) (54), and (60), and introducing the a

~ (67)

quantities 0)2 -- ~2 ~r~2 '

N-1

A4 = (l/N) E (mR

2 --m0)

2 2, (61) rt , ) ~ Az

k=0 ×

N--1

6 ~ a fif2(r+r) AZ~o

A~ = (I/N) ~ (CO2--co~)2e-2~k/U, (62)

k=O

**so that A s is the rms spread in the square of the fre- x
**

[ 1 ~0"7/)

r' ( 1 -F °92o - .ll

~2 (22/1"

-.-,

(68)

**quency shift, one obtains
**

Eq. (67) shows that, when the rate of change of co

~_ a ia ( ~ ,)+x and A and the frequency spread are such as to satisfy

co~ -- (tTf2)z \fif2(r + r ) (65) and (66), the local beam center of mass is essen-

tially not influenced by the resonance crossing (but

only by the proximity of the coherent integral reso-

x l n(r+r') 1 ~ coo2 -- ~2 f22 x nance). However, and under the same conditions, the

crossing of the resonance can lead to an increase of

x exp{i[co2+A~-fi2122+(r+r')(t-t°)]2-i41 A---~4~ beam size, as shown by (68).

4 iiO(r + r') A 4' It is interesting to compare these results with the

increase in amplitude of a single particle crossing the

(63) resonance. For a single particle the amplitude after

116 C. P E L L E G R I N I AND A. M. SESSLER

**crossing is given by Assuming, again, that condition (50) is satisfied, (69)
**

and (30) become, to a good approximation,

xs = a ( r r ~ ~.

\~f2r} ~ O, (71)

**Taking, for the sake of comparison, r' = 0 the increase
**

in beam size, ~, is seen to be equal to xs multiplied by l z~ , /t (72)

the factor AE/A2, i.e., the ratio of frequency spread to

frequency shift. These last results are equivalent to saying that each

As a numerical example consider the case of an particle behaves as a single particle, so that, because of

ERA with parameters f2 = 10 a° sec -1, R (ring radius) the large frequency difference between particles, their

3 cm, cOo-f2 ~ 2 x 10-2 f2, r = 2O)o(do)o/dt ) ~ 2 x center of mass averages to zero and one gets essen-

(A/A) ~ 10 - 1 , a = - R I 2 2 ( A B / B )

X 1024 sec - 3 , r ' = 0, tially only a beam widening. But the width increase

3 x 102°(AB/B)sec -2, ~ = 1. The quantity r cor- is larger, by a factor of A2/Ag, than that obtained in

responds to a case such that e)o/f2 changes by 0.1 in case (a).

10 psec, a value typical for the ERA. One sees that (65)

and (66) are satisfied for these parameters. From (67)

We are indebted to G. Lambertson, L. Smith, and

and (68) one has

S. Van der Meer for stimulating conversations and,

in particular, to L. Smith who pointed out an error

~ 30(AB/B)cm, in the original manuscript.

6 ~ 37.5 (AB/B) cm,

References

so that a value of AB/B less than 10 -a should suffice 1 ) V. P. Sarantseev, Proc. Conf. Particle accelerator, Washington,

to keep the effect of the resonance crossing within D.C., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-16, no. 3 (1969) 15;

tolerable limits. D. Keefe, Proc. Conf. Particle accelerator, Washington,

D. C., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-16, no. 3 (1969) 25.

2) A. Garren et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 18-19 (1962) 525.

6.2. CASE (b): A2/A 2 >> 1 3) j. D. Lawson, Syrnp. Electron ring accelerators, UCRL-18103

(Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Berkeley, California,

From (52), (40), and (41) and from (18) and (19), I968) p. 301.

we have 4) K. R. Symon, Symp. Electron ring accelerators, UCRL-18103

(Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 1968)

p. 304.

~- , 2 exp {i [(Dk+p(t--to))2/2p]} 2) L.J. Laslett, ERA Internal Report (Lawrence Radiation

= a\iif2(r+r)] ~[ k Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 1969) unpublished.

6) A. M. Sessler, Symp. Electron ring accelerators UCRL-

(69) 18103 (Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Berkeley, California,

and 1968) p. 11.

7) A . G . Bonch-Osmolowskii et al., Preprint JINR-PG-4135

62 = a2zc { 1 ~exp[i(Dk+P(t--to).~2 (Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, USSR, 1968).

iiQ-~r+r') 1--NSk,h \ ~/(2p) / 8) See ref. 7, and also L. J. Laslett, Internal Report ERAN-51

(Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Berkeley, California,

1970).

9) S. Van der Meer, CERN Preprint ISR-PO-169-57 (1969).

(70) lo) V. P. Sarantseev et al., in Proc. VII Int. Conf. High energy

\ ~/(2p) / j j accelerators (Yerevan, USSR, 1969) to be published.

- Energyband and Effective MassUploaded byMohammad Gulam Ahamad
- Aspden - Power From Space - Inertia and Gravitation (1994)Uploaded byizoldo
- ElectricityUploaded bydk010784
- TUPMS033Uploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- A2 PhysicsUploaded byseeb19
- 1.0 Wave 1.1,1.2Uploaded bypanitiafiziksmkb
- F. N. Beg et al- A study of picosecond laser–solid interactions up to 10^19 W cm^-2Uploaded byPocxa
- Vibrating StringUploaded byprince_ganai
- Toshi Tajima- Laser Acceleration and High Field Science: 1979-2009Uploaded byVasmazx
- MagnetronUploaded byGoldy Banerjee
- 20 E-specimen InteractionUploaded byCarlos Diego
- Ppt Mech 5sem DOMUploaded byflorenceprasad
- Paper Physics 2004Uploaded byjoseph kunikina
- Structure of ATOMUploaded bySudhanshu Sakhare
- Derek K.K. Lee and Andrew J. Schofield- Metals without Electrons: the Physics of Exotic Quantum FluidsUploaded byPo48HSD
- TALK00001Uploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- Hydraulic Machine VibrationUploaded byMigadde Daniel
- lectura Electromagnetismo.docxUploaded byMariale Africano Barrera
- From Slide 15-30Uploaded byMarie Joy Engay
- Electric Charge - Wikipedia, The Free EncyclopediaUploaded bydonodoni0008
- Scan#_20141211_0001Uploaded byRon Julienne Rebugio
- Compton Scattering Class Exercises 2009-2010Uploaded byTiểu Quản Gia
- hw10Uploaded byÁlvaro Poch
- 08-MaziluUploaded byMai Kawayapanik
- Topic 2Uploaded byBebo Khan
- Mock Test-3 CBSEUploaded byAmandeep Singh
- Document.rtfUploaded byKushi Kohli
- BOLTZMANN'S AND SAHA'S EQUATIONSUploaded bysujayan2005
- 5dddUploaded bysamir

- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- nullUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- nullUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- nullUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- nullUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- nullUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- UntitledUploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab

- 4 LHC MachineUploaded byJesús Godoy
- IEEEkeywordsUploaded bygurudatha265
- pellegrini 1991 0001Uploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- LHC MachineUploaded bydchristian44
- Iran Ilsf CdrUploaded byMaher Shehab
- Visiting Alba Sychrotron-EnGUploaded byquantumproject
- C. Biscari- Phi-Factory DesignUploaded byYuers
- Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology - Atomic and Molecular Physics 2001Uploaded byJose Luis Pereyra Diaz
- Wilson 1980Uploaded byMarco Antonio
- rosenzweig 1998 0400Uploaded byParticle Beam Physics Lab
- LHC Machine.pdfUploaded byA B H
- Handbook of VPLab 8Uploaded byjoseabelino
- Mechanical Engineering IssuesUploaded byfirmjunk
- Fb99Uploaded byalam065
- BernardiniUploaded byrasty_01
- MÁY GIA TỐCUploaded byLưuTiểuDân
- plasma physics examUploaded byAnonymous ZaTAoJ3TP
- Xray Micro Tomography PrintUploaded byaileengraceongkiko1296
- K. Hirata, J.M. Jowett and S.Y.Lee- ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 15Uploaded byVasmazx
- TeilchenbeschleunigungUploaded byDiabolo
- physikUploaded bysidviciouswebde
- Beam size and position measurement based on logarithm processing algorithm in HLS II.pdfUploaded byYork Zeng
- Physics work energy.pdfUploaded byJeffrey Dixon
- Atomic PhysicsUploaded byaprenntice
- Modern X-ray Diffraction Methods in Mineralogy and GeosciencesUploaded byanon_982022273
- DESIGN, ANALYSIS AND MANUFACTURING OF A CENTRAL LOW VACUUM SYSTEMUploaded byGunabalan Sellan