Effect of Brand Image on Consumer Purchasing Behaviour on Clothing: Comparison between China and the UK’s Consumers

By Kwok Keung Tam

2007

A Dissertation presented in part consideration for the degree of “MSc International Business”

Table of Content
Page numbers Abstract i

Acknowledgements

ii

Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 The importance of brand image on fashion clothing 1.2 Background information of China and the UK clothing markets 1.2.1 China clothing market 1.2.1.1 Chinese spending habits 1.2.1.2 Impediments to China’s clothing brand development 1.2.2 UK clothing market 1.2.2.1 British spending habits 1.2.2.2 Characteristics of the UK clothing market 1.3 Theoretical framework 1.4 Objectives of the dissertation 1.5 Outline of the dissertation

1 1 2 2 3 4 5 5 6 7 7 8

Chapter 2: Literature review 2.1 Introduction 2.2 The important roles of brand 2.2.1 The characteristics of successful brands 2.3 Brand equity 2.3.1 Brand awareness 2.3.2 Perceived quality 2.3.3 Brand loyalty 2.3.4 Brand association 2.4 Consumer buying behaviour

10 10 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 19

2.4.1 Models of consumer behaviour 2.5 Summary

20 23

Chapter 3: Methodology 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Theoretical backgrounds 3.2.1 Review of different research traditions 3.2.2 Quantitative versus qualitative analysis 3.2.3 Reliability and validity of data 3.3 Justification of research method 3.4 Sampling 3.5 Interview schedule 3.5.1 Stage one 3.5.2 Stage two 3.5.3 Stage three 3.6 Administration 3.7 Analysis strategy 3.7.1 Grounded theory and its relationship to qualitative data analysis 3.7.2 Within-case and cross-case analysis 3.7.2.1 Within-case analysis 3.7.2.2 Cross-case analysis 3.8 Summary

24 24 24 24 25 26 27 29 31 31 32 34 34 34 34

35 36 37 37

Chapter 4: Research findings and discussion 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Backgrounds of respondents 4.3 Effect of clothing brand image on consumer buying behaviour 4.3.1 Significance of clothing brands on consumer purchasing decisions 4.3.2 Brand awareness

38 38 38 40 40

43

2.3.4 Brand loyalty 5.5 Summary 46 50 53 54 56 57 Chapter 5: Conclusions 5.3.2.2.5 Brand association 4.4 Results 4.1 Significance of clothing brands on consumer purchasing decisions 5.3.4.2 Brand awareness 5.3 Perceived quality 4.1 Introduction 5.2.2 Conclusions 5.2.3 Perceived quality 5.2.3.4 Brand loyalty 4.6 Consumer buying behaviour 5.4 Implications 5.3 Limitations 5.5 Brand association 5.5 Recommendations for further research 58 58 58 58 59 59 60 60 61 61 62 64 References 66 Appendix 1: The 100 top brands 2006 79 Appendix 2: Interview questions 80 Appendix 3: Interview transcription 81 .6 Consumer buying behaviour 4.

Having known that China has no influential clothing brands around the world. This study examines the factors which contribute to brand equity in the clothing industry. i . In the UK. more emphasis should be placed on the marketing strategies such as rewarding customer loyalty with a view to enhance the sustainable development of the clothing brands. comparing the consumer behaviour between the British and Chinese respondents based on the four respects of brand equity. Some may even regarded it as equity as it can add values to the products.Abstract Brand is a powerful tool to attract more consumers to buy particular products. Semi-structured interviews have been conducted to solicit responses from interviewees for analysis. it is important that Chinese factory owners together with marketers should join hands to have better control over the clothes quality. The findings suggested that Chinese tend to have negative perceptions towards the quality of clothes produced in their own country. perceived quality. namely brand awareness. clothing brands are much better developed than its China counterparts. brand loyalty and brand association. however.

She has given me support as well as valuable comments throughout the consultation period so that I can manage to handle one of the hardest subjects in my university life. I would like to extend my gratitude to my family members. In addition. Dr. Vicky Story. especially my father Chun Shiu Tam who has devoted himself to the clothing industry for nearly half a century. in assisting me to finish the dissertation. They have devoted their precious time for the interviews voluntarily and their wholehearted support contributes to the success of this dissertation. Last but not least. This dissertation is dedicated to my family and I will try my best to do anything. ii . but also encouraged me to face the challenge ahead. He has not only inspired me to do this dissertation. I would also acknowledge my school-mates for their help in the data collection process.Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisor.

1 The importance of brand image on fashion clothing Clothing. Once consumers make a purchasing decision. Owing to the proliferation of brands in the clothing sector. namely pre-purchase. Each stage is of equal importance that can alter the consumer buying decision. These highlight the complication of buying processes and the potential impact a brand could impose in between them. different genders and cultural backgrounds. purchase and post-purchase. clothes can also serve as fashion items. but also in other markets with high potential. decide which and where to buy. clothing can help represent our personal identity. the purchasing processes can be divided into three stages. determine whether to buy again from the same retailer. consumers may need to recognize their personal needs. choose the buying modes. consumers need to take serious consideration during the buying processes. read product information. As mentioned by Rayport and Jaworski (2003). Thus. Having a strong and remarkable brand image could help establish an identity in marketplace (Aaker. in addition to the basic functions. under the influence of globalization and concerted efforts from media advertising. express the status an individual has and what their personal image is like (O’Cass. 2000). have become popular not only in their country of origin. Nowadays. which can tell how significant an individual is. show satisfaction to the services or product quality and finally be loyal to the brand. as a matter of fact. 1996). is a kind of necessity that helps keep our bodies warm. 1 . Several brands. Shopping for clothes is one of the popular pastimes among people from all ages. Human beings cannot live without the protection from clothes in adverse conditions and this signifies how important clothing is for us.Chapter 1 Introduction 1.

1998. Ailawadi. the UK has transformed from an industrial country to a well-developed country in the recent decades. 1. In this paper.2 Background information of China and the UK clothing markets China and the UK are entirely different in their economic structures. The importance of brand image has inspired many marketing scholars and practitioners to begin researching the concept of ‘brand equity’ (Aaker. In order to differentiate one brand from another. 1996. contributing to 74. 2003). This may probably explain why China is now becoming one of the most influential countries within the clothing sector. Being an advanced developing country. brands are regarded as valuable assets which can help the companies generate lucrative revenues. 1. managing brand image is of utmost importance. Keller. (2004). 1993. On the other hand. The differences in their economies have triggered the interest of my study towards their consumer buying behaviour in the clothing sector. Corstjens and Lal. marketers would develop retail brands with unique image so as to continue to gain popularity and market share (Abend. 1991. 2001. 2000).1 China clothing market The clothing industry is one of the most important and hence heavily invested industry in China. 2000.16 billion US dollars in terms of export value and leading it to become the second largest clothing export market in 2 . 1993).2. In this way. encourage greater intermediary co-operation as well as increase the chance for further brand extension (Delgado-Ballester and Munuera-Aleman. 2005). In accordance with Delong et al.widen the profit margins. China tends to be more dependent on labour-intensive production activities rather than natural resource-based activities (Greenaway and Milner. the concept of brand equity would be utilized as a theoretical framework. Under this concept. which would be illustrated in the following chapters. consumers appear to rely on the brand image as long as they have little knowledge about the brand.

This points out the fact that a large majority of Chinese is still in favor of domestic brands in low-priced range. Chinese brands have competitive advantage in fitness and pricing (Delong et al. 2004). It is undeniable that the entry of WTO would provide business opportunities for China. China plays a role as a producer. It is believed that China could make use of its competitive advantages. people spend 7. It is shown that they would prefer buying middle-priced range clothes from Hong Kong and luxury brand-named clothes made in foreign countries. this would also engender intense competition since foreign firms are allowed to sell their products directly to China. pricing. however.1 Chinese spending habits According to a research conducted by the Hong Kong Trade Development Council (HKTDC) (2002). China is known for the manufacture of basic goods in large volumes and foreign registered brands are often designed elsewhere and produced in China. to further strengthen its position in the clothing sector. However. 1.2. As stated by Cui (1997). the development of clothing industry in China becomes even much faster. respondents rank fitness as their prime concern. the Grey China Base Annual Consumer Study (Bates.2005 (WTO. quality and finally trendiness. 1998) reveals that over two thirds of the consumers regard domestic brands as their first priority. The HKTDC (2002) research also reports on the average annual spending on clothing. With the accession of World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001. 2006). followed by cutting. for instances low labour costs and large portions of usable land. However. Nowadays. wielding the techniques and human resources to finish the orders placed by the foreign counterparts. On average. 3 ..3% of their income on buying clothes with women professionals having the highest demand and students’ spending the minimal amount.1. Regarding the criteria for buying clothes. Chinese customers show divergent opinions with respect to purchasing clothes. This disparity is probably due to the fact that professionals have higher spending power than the students’.

to middle-priced range market without fully penetrating to the luxurious level. they often find Hong Kong and Taiwan brand names confusing. 1..2.people still tend to buy luxury clothes produced in the foreign markets.2 Impediments to China’s clothing brand development China has competitive advantages in terms of production factors such as low labour costs and growing technology. Cui (1997) points out that customers would only justify a brand through its image as long as they know little about it. such confusion does not affect the overall perception towards brands in other countries. According to a report published by Business Week (2007). however. They tend to perceive US brands positively as US has a reputation in technological development and high fashion. This spells out the need for China to establish its own brands with good reputation. This is possibly owing to the fact that Chinese brands are confined to low. Besides. however. become a major hindrance to the global brands’ development process. China has been connoted with the reputation of low-cost products in the overseas markets for decades. 2004). However. Lim and O’Cass (2001) explain that people in the west tend to have negative perception towards brands from emerging economies and hence the number of famous clothing brands in China is limited. When it comes to the case 4 . none of the Chinese brands can enter the 100 Top Brands in 2006 (see Appendix 1) in which Nike was ranked 31. Such findings provide insights to the future development of local brands in China. followed by adidas in 71 and the Spain-found clothing company ZARA in 73.1. Also. Schmitt and Pan (1994) state that Chinese customers could not be able to differentiate between US and European apparel brands. the lack of globally influential brands is one of the main reasons why China lags behind in the clothing industry with respect to brand development (Delong et al. The originally advantageous factors. The lack of brand knowledge is probably attributed to the geographical and political differences.

The image of China-produced products needs improvement in this sense. Among the respondents. because of its mature economic structure. 1. In addition. it is ironic that most respondents find that they are less authentic.2 UK clothing market The UK is a European country with population of around 60 million.2.com. it is pursuing a stable rather than aggressive GDP growth rate.1 British spending habits Spending seems more welcome than saving among the British people. March 25). Regarding its GDP growth. nearly two thirds of the companies in China would like to establish their own global brand. The manufacturing sector. regardless of their quality.2. the overall image of Chinese brands could become better in the future. 2007).about the perception of China-produced foreign brands. The key motivation for doing so is to build up a global image so as to enhance the company’s international reputation and it is suggested that quality is the major determinant for the overseas customers to make their buying decisions. just around one-third of female respondents and less than half of the male respondents express that they have the saving habits. 2007). which is 21 times less than that of China (Economist. including the clothing industry. According to a research conducted by Weekes (2004). This can be revealed by the gradual decline of employment rate within the UK clothing industry (Jones and Hayes. 2004). pales in comparison with the development of the business sector and even has a sign of recession in the recent decades.com.2. With such impetus and the concerted effort from the industry members. contributing to nearly 30% of the total domestic products (Economist. females are more likely 5 . 1. the business services and finance sector are the most important source of gross domestic products. According to a research reported by Hargrave-Silk (2005.

This could be explained by the fact that store cards sometimes have much higher interest rates than that of the credit cards and personal loans (Mintel. 1999. 1995). 2004). 1999). with nearly half of female respondents saying that they have at least one store card and nearly two-thirds of them own one or two loyalty cards. short-life-cycle products. women may even shop for men’s clothing (Dholakia. As mentioned by Moore (1995). concentrated markets. Store cards and loyalty cards are common promotional tactics to solicit consumer’s loyalty. there is a trend for own brand development. 2002). the same research shows that store cards may not be regularly used even though special offers are often given to the cardholders (Weekes. the market is characterized by products with small differentiation (Birtwhistle and Freathy. fashion retailers tend to create product differentiation in which they can distinguish themselves from their potential competitors in terms of product features like design and price.to spend on clothes than males. strong competitive activities. 2003). as cited in Carruthers. 1998. However. the UK clothing industry has shifted its manufacturing section to other countries with low labour costs and skilled labour. In 6 . South and Spitze. as well as fluctuating consumer demand (Marciniak and Bruce. and occasionally. 2004).2. 1.2 Characteristics of the UK clothing market Like most of the developed economy.. 2004. Such move can probably account for the significant drop in employment rate and amount of output in the clothing sector (Jones. a polarized marketplace. 2003). 1994). However. this is found to hinder the development of British clothing design due to lack of manufacturing facilities (Dagworthy. As far as the UK fashion retail sector is concerned.2. leaving alone the design centre with well-trained designers. Moore. Siddiqui et al. Although the UK is overwhelmed with fashion brands. This may possibly explain why shopping is a gendered activity (Dholakia.

clothing is a kind of public 7 . marketers and practitioners could devise strategies to increase the sales revenues. Compared with other retailed sector. Having found out the relationship between brand image and consumer purchasing behaviour. As far as the same level of product quality is concerned. composing of independent. 1. the fashion retailing sector is found to incorporate the largest number of indigenous chains such as Next plc (Marciniak and Bruce. brand equity is mainly derived from four elements. 2003). perceived brand equity and brand associations. 2001. 1. the retailing sector is fragmented. brand loyalty. with the comparison between the Chinese and British consumers.addition. consumers would appear to be more likely to purchase the products in much higher prices. 2004. This phenomenon spells out the concept of brand equity. The clothing sector is particularly chosen in this research. Such phenomena have stimulated the emergence of brand name development in the competitive UK clothing market. 2004). As stated by Bearden and Etzel (as cited in Hogg et al. Mintel. According to Aaker (1991). with the later one contributing to the largest proportion of market share (Easey. The theoretical framework adopted in this dissertation would be based on the concept of brand equity and the details of each element are to be discussed and analyzed later in chapter four. namely brand awareness. consumers would prefer buying brand-name products (Bello and Holbrook. 1995). family-owed businesses and some large scale chain stores. 1998). Marciniak and Bruce.3 Theoretical framework With a well-known brand name..4 Objectives of the dissertation The aim of this dissertation is to investigate the effect of brand image on consumer purchasing behaviour in clothing.

containing the background information of China and the UK clothing industry. Two assumptions are made throughout the dissertation. In addition. brand image should have an impact on the consumer buying behaviour of clothing and second. China. being an emerging country with high potential on clothing brands. Famous clothing brands like H&M and ZARA have already obtained their footholds in these two markets that underlie their significant contribution to these companies (H&M. 1. Chinese and British consumers are going to be compared in this research since China and the UK have been targeted by many clothing retailers due to their enormous customer base. It is believed that this chapter could provide readers with general information like theories and issues in relation to consumer buying behaviour for clothes so as to make them more 8 . In this way. is on the lookout for extensions. 2007). First. there are differences in buying behaviour for consumers in China and the UK. mainly concentrating on clothing industry and consumer buying behaviour. ZARA. the research objectives and the dissertation outline. Chapter 2 will incorporate the review of previous studies. 2007. results obtained from the research on brand image could be more conspicuous. The results of such comparison would offer meaningful insights for further brand development in both China and the UK. whereas the UK is a mature market in which consumers are more experienced in purchasing brand-name clothes.necessity with weak reference group influence on the product category but strong reference group influence on the brand choice.5 Outline of the dissertation The structure of the dissertation is shown as follows: Chapter 1 is the introductory section.

Whether brand image would affect the consumer buying behaviour in the clothing sector is shown and also the similarities and differences regarding the circumstances in China and the UK are investigated. focusing on the description of research design and justification of data. 9 .understandable in the forthcoming sections. Chapter 4 is the core of the dissertation in which research findings are presented and discussed. Implications towards the business environment and research limitations are also included. Recommendations would be made with regard to the limitations so as to provide further directions in the future studies. Chapter 5 would draw conclusions on the findings from the previous chapters. Chapter 3 delineates the research methodology.

brand is a guarantor of reliability and quality 10 . However. 1998).2 The important roles of brand Brand is a name in every consumer’s mind (Mooij. In this chapter. In addition to a specific brand name. Keller. 2003). 1998) and it is characterized by a noticeable name or symbol which can differentiate the goods and services from the rivals’ (Aaker. packaging.. The emergence of brand equity underlies the importance of brand in marketing tactics and hence provides useful insights for managers and further research (Keller. promotion. 2001). a brand is also composed of products. This dissertation is going to investigate the differences of British and Chinese in purchasing clothes under the influence of brand image. the literatures concerning the roles of brand and brand equity are to be reviewed so as to provide a theoretical framework for the aforementioned analysis. 1991. Murphy. 1991. advertising.Chapter 2 Literature Review 2. most of them concentrate on a single country study. consume and dispose products and services (Blackwell et al. as well as its overall presentation (Murphy. there is a growing number of research conducted in the field of consumer buying behaviour. regardless of the importance of cross-country comparisons which will inspire innovative ideas for understanding the fast-changing consumer habits. 1998). 2. 1998).1 Introduction Consumer behaviour refers to the activities in which people acquire. Brand serves a pivotal role for distinguishing goods and services from those of the competitors (Aaker. From the consumers’ perspective. Owing to the proliferation of brands in the recent decades.

there are four elements for building a successful brand. 1998).. 1998. 2005).in consumer products (Roman et al. Nowadays. a potential brand is established through engendering customer 11 . namely tangible product. Murphy. consumers would have their preferences. Finally and most importantly. Tangible product refers to the commodity which meets the basic needs of the customers. nearly one-forth of the respondents are likely to impulse-buy clothes and accessories. 2.1 The characteristics of successful brands A brand can be an everlasting and lucrative asset as long as it is maintained in a good manner that can continue satisfying consumers’ needs (Batchelor. The brand can be further augmented with the provision of credibility. Although successful brands can be totally different in nature. on the other hand. 1998).2. 1999). basic brand. According to a research conducted by Freeride Media LLC (1998) on shopping habits. for instances well-priced products and consistent quality (Murphy. It is found that consumers’ emotions are one of the major determinants which affect their buying behaviour (Berry. consumers would like to buy and use brand-name products with a view to highlight their personality in different situational contexts (Aaker. Fennis and Pruyn. Successful branding could make consumers aware of the presence of the brand and hence could increase the chance of buying the company’s products and services (Doyle. When deciding which products to purchase. effective after-sales services and the like. which are developed in accordance with their perceptions towards the brand. they share something in common. 2000). As mentioned by Levitt (1983). consumers have a wide range of choice to choose from when they enter a shopping mall. augmented brand and potential brand. Basic brand. 1999. Added to this. 2006). considers the packaging of the tangible product so as to attract the attention from the potential customers.

One of the quintessential examples regarding brand as a kind of equity is the imposition of laws to protect intellectual property (Murphy. 2002). Added to this. 2007). which could impose beneficial or detrimental effects on the values arising from the products or services (Aaker. 2007). Yasin et al.. 1998).preference and loyalty. it happens when consumers are willing to pay more for the same level of quality just because of the attractiveness of the name attached to the product (Bello and Holbrook. many countries have set up laws to protect trade marks. Marks and Spencer. 1991. Vodafone. Keller (1998) points out that brand equity signifies the unique marketing effects imposed on the brand. 2. designs as well as copyright. the values of brands have been recognized to both the consumers and producers. 12 . brand equity could be ruined if it is not properly managed. giving rise to a reduction in sales volume. It is not uncommon to find some familiar brands listed on the stock markets in which they could be bought or sold. It is found that the volatility of stock market could affect consumers’ purchasing mood. 1998). including its name and symbol. poor product quality and customer services could adversely affect the brand image. 1996).3 Brand equity The term ‘brand equity’ refers to a set of assets and liabilities associated with a brand. Concerning the positive side of brand equity. Brands like HSBC. In addition. However. 1995). In order to combat piracy. In countries with well-established legal system. By doing so. the image of the brand could be well instilled in the customers’ mind. not to mention the growth or declines of retail sales (Blackwell. patents. brand is also a tradable product with measurable financial value (Murphy. Sainsbury and Tesco are all listed on the FTSE 100 index (London Stock Exchange. This is supported by the fact that brand equity depends on the number of people with regular purchase (Aaker. For instance.

Past purchasing experiences and familiarity with the brand could be attributable to the perceptions generated from the consumers (Aaker. 1991). namely brand loyalty. There is a high propensity for consumers with good perceptions to buy from the same shop again than those with poor perceptions. 1991). The level of brand awareness lies in a continuum. It refers to the ability of a potential consumer to recall and recognize the brand. Brand equity is a broad concept which can be further subdivided into four main areas.1 Brand awareness Brand awareness is one of major determinants of brand equity. These four main areas are to be discussed in the coming sections. consumers no longer focus on the short-term promotion but the brand on the whole. For the consumers. Besides. 1991. 2005). Owning to the positive image. perceived quality and brand associations (Aaker. As for the firm. It is important for the potential consumers to be aware of a product so that it can become one of the purchasing choices. brand equity could also be a source for the firm to generate cash flow.3. the merger between adidas and Reebok in 2005 not only increased their market share so as to compete with Nike in the US sports apparel market. with brand recognition being the lowest level and the first named brand with unaided recall being the highest level. name awareness. brand equity could provide them with information about the brand which influences their confidence during the purchasing process.The above examples highlight the values of brand equity for both consumers and the firm. 1998). but also attracted more people to invest in the bigger company with high potential (Business Week. This is due to the fact that the product needs to enter the awareness set before it comes to the consideration 13 . For instance. Keller. 1991). brand equity could also allow higher margins through premium pricing and reduced reliance upon promotional activities (Aaker. linking the brand with its corresponding product class (Aaker. 2.

It is found that advertisement attitude is attributable to the influence on brand attitudes. In addition. namely increasing brand name identity and associating it with the product class. there is an increasing number of advertising campaigns around the world. As for source 14 . For source credibility. two tasks are to be accomplished. In this way. In recent decades. Several factors can alter the level of brand awareness. Moreover.. 2005). In order to achieve brand awareness. 1990).. as pointed out by McGuire (1978).. being a special administrative region since 1997. owing to geographical differences. According to research conducted by Delong et al. 2007). Tsai et al. brand awareness can be enhanced through repeat exposure to the brand. 2007). brands with higher level of awareness would be more likely to be purchased (Yasin et al. As mentioned by Keller (1998). Advertising and celebrity endorsement could be some useful tools for raising brand awareness.set (Blackwell et al. For long time. 2000). affecting consumer’s intention to purchase (Mackenzie et al. due to their political separations. 2001) and an increase in brand awareness is conducive to a higher chance of entering the later set (Nedungadi.. brands from Taiwan and Hong Kong are sometimes confused. celebrities can disseminate messages to particular consumers and hence increase the brand awareness. This could probably explain why consumers tend to buy a recognizable brand rather than an unfamiliar one (Hoyer. its geographical location and politics could affect the consumer brand awareness level seriously. In case of China. celebrity endorsement can give rise to source credibility and source attractiveness. Consumers are hence well-equipped with comparative elements to judge which product or service to purchase (Alvarez and Casielles. Taiwan would like to become politically independent from China owing to their different political standpoint whereas Hong Kong. (2004). Macdonald and Sharp. 1986. has once been a colony of the UK. Chinese consumers cannot distinguish US apparel brand names from the European ones. 1990.

namely performance. It is defined as the customer’s perception of the overall quality or superiority of a product or service (Aaker. the country-of-origin of a product is found to affect its perceived quality (Khachaturian and Morganosky.. This association can raise the public awareness towards the brand. is judged by its corresponding tangibles. Service quality. 2004). perceived quality is determined by a number of factors. differentiating the position of a brand. perceived quality can further be classified into product quality and service quality. competence. durability. features. charging premium price. Keller.2 Perceived quality Another important attribute to brand equity is perceived quality. Similar to brand awareness. 2. motivating channel members to perform well and also introducing extensions into new brand categories (Aaker. Perceived quality of a brand could help generate values by providing a pivotal reason-to-buy. it is becoming more difficult to obtain satisfactory level of perceived quality owing to the fact that fast and continuous product advancement has already strengthened consumers’ expectations on product quality (Sherman. To be more specific. Nevertheless. 1992). In addition to the aforementioned dimensions. there are seven dimensions which affect the consumers’ perception. reliability. 1991. on the other hand. it is found that perceived quality is of utmost importance in determining brand loyalty as well as repeat purchase (Delong et al. 2007). 1991). Since it is a kind of intangible. reliability. overall feeling towards a brand. Yasin. 1998. conformance with specifications. it is subjective in nature and hence the knowledge of actual detailed product specifications could have little correlation with the perceived quality. successful endorsement can associate the culture of the celebrity world with the endorsed product (McCracken. 1991). serviceability as well as fit and finish.attractiveness.3. 1990) and also the perceptions towards the 15 . responsiveness and empathy (Aaker. Regarding product quality. In addition. 1989).

consumers could have their preferences for products made from one country over another (Papadopoulos et al. As mentioned by Srikatanyoo and Gnoth (2002). Based on the practice that repeat buying is one of the indicators for brand loyalty. regardless of the superior features. price is one of the important cues to evaluate perceived quality (Aaker. Second. Brand loyalty is regarded as valuable asset under different circumstances. 2. Some consumers with strong affiliation to one brand would switch to the shop in which a designated brand is sold. challenges that such measure may not be totally accurate.3 Brand loyalty Brand loyalty is one of the core components of brand equity and also positively and directly affected brand equity (Atilgan et al. Third. 1991). For many companies. Hence. however. 1991). having loyal customers is a kind of blessing. loyalty to a brand can enhance trade leverage. This is typically true when the product concerned is somewhat risky.. 1991). In this case. It is found that price is more relevant in judging the perceived quality of a product given that a person lacks the ability to evaluate the quality of a product.. The more loyal the consumers are towards the brand. Under the influence of brand loyalty. consumers are inclined to develop stereotypical beliefs about the products from particular countries. the less vulnerable the customer base would be. it can help reduce the marketing costs of doing business (Aaker. loyal customers could influence the others to purchase the brand. prices and convenience owned by its competitors (Aaker. consumers are assured to buy the product if they have some friends or relatives who 16 . consumers continue to buy the brand.purchased value (Ahmed and d’Astou. 2005). 1991). This is due to the fact that some consumers make habitual purchase towards a particular brand just because of its prominence in stock and effective promotions. 1993). Loyal customers confer to a higher possibility of repeat purchases and it is less costly to keep customers than to get new ones.3. Keller (1998). First. Moreover.

it is important to treat the customer with respect in order to keep them loyal. Moreover. 2000). 1991). brand loyalty can help provide ample time for the firm to response to competitors’ newly launched products. 2000). 17 . Customers can also be rewarded for their loyalty towards the firms so that they will continue to buy the products. Keller (1998) and Yasin et al. KLM and chain stores such as TOPMAN provide club-cards or loyalty cards to reward their customers with discounts and other benefits. Marney. as well as personal communication sources in making purchasing decision rather than more formal and organizational advertising campaigns (Bansal and Voyer. Due to the values obtained from brand loyalty. Finally. 1997. for instances innovativeness and distinctiveness are also taken into account as brand associations. (2007) further note that equity of a brand is largely supported by consumers’ associations towards the brand. It is defined as the specific linkage between the memory and the brand (Aaker. In addition to the tangible products. According to Aaker (1991).4 Brand association The last dimension for brand equity is brand association. the firm could make good use of the time lapse to develop more superior products in order to compete with its rivals. 1995. Consumers usually depend on informal. examples. 1998. 2. several airlines like Cathay Pacific.3. Hence. Brand association is such a complicated concept that connects to one another. many firms would devise different strategies to maintain and enhance the loyalty from customers. and facts that create a brand knowledge network (Yoo et al. which contribute to a specific brand image. consisting of multiple ideas.recommend the same model of product. For instance. episodes. This suggests why word-of-mouth communication is one of the most powerful tools in the marketplace (Henricks. the intangible qualities. customer satisfaction level needs to be properly managed through conducting consumer research. Silverman. Bansal and Voyer. 2000)..

Symbolic benefits. Second. 1991). the overall features of the product or service are concerned. Associations can also be used to trigger the customers to recall their past experiences. namely attributes. Function benefits signify the physical or basic advantages a brand may have. lying in a continuum from positive to negative (Gabbott and Hogg. Attributes can be further categorized into product-related attributes as well as non-product related attributes. Benefits are another category in brand associations. on the other hand. This can make the brand 18 . Finally. It is about brand positioning that a well-positioned brand will find it hard to be attacked by its competitors due to its uniqueness. For product-related attributes. Customers are sometimes forgetful and associations towards a brand serve as a brief summary for the customers to make their purchasing decision. As for non-product related attributes. making the customers remember the brand by heart. attitudes are regarded as the consumers’ overall assessments towards a brand. They incorporate summary evaluations of information which represent how consumers feel in a long run. Such kind of associations can provide bases for them to make purchase decisions and even become loyal to the brand (Aaker. First of all. Consumers are attracted by the signal when they purchase a product in a particular brand. 1998). Associations towards a brand can create value for the firm and so its customers in a number of ways. benefits and attitudes. user imagery as well as usage imagery are to be considered. experimental and symbolic. They can be classified into functional. brand associations can differentiate one brand from another. Different brands have different associations to their prospective customers. 1998). 1998) further divides brand associations into three categories. packaging. Signal effect is determined by the image of consumers and also the personality of the brand. Attributes refer to the specific characteristics a product has. refer to the signal effect that a brand may impose on the consumers. they help the customers to process or retrieve information (Keller.Keller (1993. they are related to consumers’ emotional feelings. price information. For experimental benefits.

unbeatable but it is quite difficult to achieve since consumer taste changes quite rapidly. brand associations may include some product attributes or consumer benefits which encourage the consumers to purchase the brand. adidas slogan ‘Impossible is nothing’. (2006) further provide a holistic view that defines consumer behaviour as the activities and the processes in which individuals or groups choose. 2. Madonna appearance in H&M’s collection advertisement can stimulate customers their positive feelings about the products. For examples. buy. the specific brand image attached on a product may differentiate itself from the others. use or dispose the products. Consumers would have their preferences in purchasing products from specific retailers and hence the remaining retailers 19 . consumer behaviour can influence the economic health of a nation (Blackwell et al. some associations can engender positive feelings.4 Consumer buying behaviour Many people do consume a wide range of products every day. Forth. 2006). As mentioned by Schiffman and Kanuk (2000). Third. money and effort. such phenomenon is one of the most interesting and hence heavily investigated topics in the marketing field. There may be products on the market with similar quality and design.. consumer behaviour is about how people make their decisions on personal or household products with the use of their available resources such as time. Once brand associations are constructed in a meaningful way. First of all. a vivid brand image is established. The study of consumer buying behaviour is of utmost importance in a number of aspects. Owing to the proliferation of products in the market. Brand image possibly affects how consumers perceive the brand and hence their purchasing behaviour. Gabbott and Hogg (1998) and Blackwell et al. from basic necessities to high-valued collectables. ideas or experiences. however. services. contributing to its higher premium price.

as well as disposal of used goods. These seven steps include need recognition. However. 2006). Arnoud et al. 2003). Therefore. 2006). consumption and disposal of products or services. the firms can make use of such information to devise corresponding marketing strategies in response to the consumers’ needs (Blackwell et al. For instance. such definition falls short of the continuity of the processes. As far as the consumer decision process model is concerned. tailor-made products can be made to enhance customer value and thus facilitate repeat purchase (Gabbott and Hogg. 2001. Moreover. purchase and post-purchase (Hoyer and Maclnnis.. comprising acquisition of goods and services. 1998). consumption. 2. Second. evaluation. present consumer behaviour studies regard consumers as important determinants of organizational success and it is found that the most successful organizations are customer-centric (Blackwell et al. 20 post-consumption evaluation and . (2001) define consumer behaviour as a summation of acquisition. The notion ‘the consumer is king’ should be deep-rooted in every business people’s mind that they should try to please these kings using their innovative methods. consumers need to go through seven steps before reaching their final decisions. search for information. pre-purchase. Blackwell et al. Although they vary in form of presentation. through understanding the reasons for consumers to buy the products and their buying habits. (2004) further propose the circle of consumption that recognize purchasing processes as a loop. and also which products to excel. which companies to succeed.are selected using the rule of ‘survival of the fittest’. most of them are composed of stages such as pre-purchase.. consumption. purchase. Rayport and Jaworski. Based on this loophole. consumers’ decisions can provide a clue for which industry to survive.1 Models of consumer behaviour Several models are developed with a view to provide explanations for the consumer buying behaviours.4.

1997). 2005).. Stage two is the search of information.divestment (Blackwell et al. search of information can further be divided into pre-purchase search and ongoing search. In this stage. Rayport and Jaworski (2003) propose a similar model with slight differences regarding the terms used. The buying process is initiated when people recognize their unsatisfied need (Levy and Weitz.. Ongoing search. past experiences. namely functional needs and psychological needs. (2006) add that most consumer research would primarily base on these seven stages and how different elements affect each stage of consumers’ decisions. Customers pursuing this kind of search would like to obtain the most updated information about the designated brand. 2006). 1992). is more likely to be based on personal interest on a particular brand. prior brand perceptions (Moorthy et al. social class. (2006). income. Functional needs are related to the performance of the product whereas psychological needs are intrinsically obtained when customers feel contented with shopping or owning a product which they long for. Stage one is need recognition which occurs when an individual is aware of a difference between their perception and the actual satisfaction level (Solomon et al. The length and depth of search vary for different customers and depend on variables like personality. size of purchase. Attributes like quantity. consumers pay particular attention to the attributes which are most relevant to their needs (Kolter et al. on the other hand. Any changes in 21 . There are two kinds of needs. quality and price are commonly used to judge a brand by customers.. Blackwell et al.. as well as customer satisfaction. size. As mentioned by Solomon et al. Pre-purchase search is initiated when consumers recognize a need and hence look for more information from the marketplace. Stage three comes to the pre-purchase evaluation that consumers compare between different products and brands to make a purchasing decision. 2006). regardless of the different terms and consolidation of stages.

as well as point-of-purchase advertising. Stage five. 2006). This gives rise to satisfaction when consumers’ expectations are higher than the perceived performance and vice versa (Blackwell et al. 22 . stage seven comes to divestment.these attributes can affect consumer decisions on brand or product choices (Blackwell et al. this new kind of non-shop retailing format has begun replacing the fairly established catalogue and TV shopping and its development is rapid albeit it is more recently found in comparison with the existing non-shop retailing modes. there are two phases contributing to the decision making processes. According to Porter (2004). Rayport and Jaworski (2003) further point out the significant impact of internet on consumer purchasing decision. As pointed out by Dholakia and Uusitalo (2002). Last but not least. in which consumers dispose or recycle the products and at the same time. 2003). This stage is crucial since customers could be possible to make repeat purchases provided that they are satisfied with the aforementioned stages (Rayport and Jaworski.. stage six and stage seven are under the category of the post-purchase stage. firms can create value by providing lower price or unique offers to the customers so as to excel their competitive advantages over the others. (2006). including retailer and in-store selection.. customers evaluate the consumption process. The firms need to think about the possibility of remarketing. In stage five. customers begin consuming the products whereas in stage six. visual displays inside the shops. Stage four refers to the purchase decisions made by the consumers after evaluating the offers from different retailers. In addition to in-store purchase. Retailer selection is made by judging which retailers to buy after investigating the attributes from the previous stage whereas in-store selection is affected by the selling skills of salesperson. 2006). As stated by Blackwell et al.

In this dissertation. brand loyalty and brand association with the consumer purchasing behaviour that will provide useful insights for the development of the clothing sector. whether the brand image would affect the consumers to purchase clothes is to be investigated. 23 .2.5 Summary This chapter provides a review about the major research and theories regarding the consumer purchasing behaviour. products are developed in an unprecedented way. Nowadays. perceived quality. and at the same time. brand loyalty and brand associations. including brand awareness. It is hoped that by finding out the relationships of brand awareness. All of them have significant contribution to the brand as equity to the firm. consumers seem to be more aware of the products they buy. perceived quality. Only by understanding the consumer behaviour can the products or brands be developed in a right way. Brand equity can be divided into four dimensions. Brands are so important that they are regarded as the equity to a firm.

The details of the sampling would also be discussed. there are two types of research methods. which are determined on the kinds of data being collected. 2004). namely qualitative and quantitative research. 3. research theories can be classified into different types. as well as justifying the most suitable approach for the research topic. the research traditions. there are three research traditions.1 Review of different research traditions Based on the methodology used. In general. namely positivism.2 Theoretical backgrounds In this section. 3. 2004).. During the course of consumer behaviour research. In terms of the science of knowledge acquisition. think and behave (Arnould et al.1 Introduction With a view to finding out the underlying principles of certain phenomenon. whereas methodology is acknowledged to be the science of finding out (Babbie. interpretive research and critical postmodernism.2. This chapter aims at discussing different theories and research methods. recorded and analyzed in a systematic and objective manner so as to apprehend and foresee how consumers feel. and also the validity and reliability of data are discussed in order to provide a general view about how the research is carried out and which factors influence the justification of research method. theories.Chapter 3 Methodology 3. epistemology is about the science of knowing. 24 . Each of them encompasses a variety of approaches. In accordance with Gephart (2004). research is required. data are gathered.

Positivism makes use of the stance of realism in which the objective reality can be understood by mirror of science.. qualitative research is sometimes regarded as a relatively minor methodology than its quantitative counterpart and there are some assumptions that only experimental data. quantitative research focuses on analyzing numerical data whereas qualitative research deals with meanings. 2004. Fisher (2004) further reveals that critical postmodernism is a kind of realism which comprises three levels of reality. it underlines the assumption of symbolic reality.2. it assumes that a social world exists externally that should be measured objectively (Easterby-Smith et al. 1993). Added to this. While positivism stresses on objectivity. Events are concerned about what has happened in the world by our experiences to them.2 Quantitative versus qualitative analysis Generally. events and mechanisms. As for critical postmodernism. Finally. mechanisms are the roots of events which are regarded as the deepest level among the three. including experiences. 3. official statistics. Fisher (2004) notes that the linkage between interpretations are dialogic and hence interpretive research aims at soliciting people’s accounts of how they find the world. As far as the description and explanation of phenomena are concerned. Dey. 2002). random sampling 25 . Experiences are our perceptions and encounters of the world. feelings and motivations of people (Babbie. examining the attitudes. interpretative research focuses on subjective interpretations to describe meanings and understand reality. In accordance to Fisher (2004). In the field of research. which is shaped by values and crystallizes over time. together with the structures and processes within it. the majority of positivist research incorporates the comparison of qualitative case studies to analyze if there are any connections between variables. research methods can be classified in a dichotomy between quantitative and qualitative research.

however. numeric data. Cicourel. These determine whether the research can engender 26 . 2000). Qualitative analysis. 3. it is more likely to look into people’s in-depth feelings. for example. Silverman. Besides. both of them are not perfect in a sense that they need to serve as a complement to each other.and quantified data can lead to valid or generalizable social facts. Quantitative research surpasses qualitative in a sense that it can analyze data based on representative samples from a large population (Proctor.2. Both the quantitative research and qualitative research have their own advantages and disadvantages. As for qualitative research. 2000). qualitative research tends to focus on describing the process of how we define and measure variables in everyday life (Silverman.3 Reliability and validity of data The reliability and validity of the data and findings are of pivotal importance to the whole research. 1975). 2000). 1989). 1986). quantitative analysis is stronger than qualitative analysis in that it can persuade readers with large-scale. 2000). Unlike quantitative research. (2002). That is why it is suggested that qualitative research should be used more often at the early or exploratory stage of a study (Silverman. attitude (Kirk and Miller. Nevertheless. research needs a partnership and it could be beneficial to collaborate rather than compete between the different kinds of research methods. 2000). In this way. which uses ad hoc procedures to define and measure variables (Blumer. 1964. As suggested by Easterby-Smith et al. having a complete set of categorization for the events or activities described (Silverman. 1956. suffers from the problem of ‘anecdotalism’ in which it just narrates some examples of phenomenon without taking less clear data into account (Silverman. the reliability of tape-recorded and transcribed data is argued by some to be weakened owing to the possibility of missing some trivial but crucial pauses and overlaps (Silverman.

the findings of qualitative research are not necessarily repeatable since they reflect reality at the time of data collection. 1992). As pointed out by Davis and Bremner (2006). validity concerns about the truth (Silverman. namely language-orientated approach. However. Hence. Reliability connotes to the consistency on the research results. These underlie the importance of ensuring reliable methods and making valid conclusions in the research process. one can replicate the same research to see whether the same outcomes are obtained on subsequent occasions. As mentioned by Tesch (1990). which are judged by different observers or by the same observer on different occasions (Hammersley. the research cannot be claimed valid so long as there are only few exemplary instances reported.useful findings or not. This dissertation makes use of the qualitative research method and there have been some discussions on qualitative research regarding its reliability and validity. As mentioned by Saunders et al. Besides. 2000). 2000). 2006). qualitative research is more suitable in terms of soliciting the consumers’ in-depth responses. 1992). (2003). 3. giving an accurate account to the social phenomena (Hammersley. This dissertation aims at finding out consumer purchasing behaviour on clothing in which their beliefs. there are as much as forty types of qualitative research in three main orientations. This may affect the reliability of the research findings. to justify reliability. it is found that having reliable research results is not always attributable to valid outcomes (Davis and Bremner. While reliability is correlated to consistency.3 Justification of research method Different research methods should be adopted based on the nature of research. opinions and attitudes towards brand image are investigated. and the original form of the materials is unavailable (Silverman. 27 .

2004). 2000). The structure of interviews lies in a continuum in which fully-structured and unstructured interviews are the two extreme poles (Breakwell. theory-building approach tries to examine the connections between social phenomena. Language-oriented approach concerns the use of language and meaning of words. interviewers may need to probe each answer and make use of the replies for further questioning (Proctor. However. During the course of interviews. interviews are chosen as the data collection methods. Thus. ranging from the initial stage for identifying areas to more detailed exploration. interviews are more controllable than focus groups in this regard. the thorough description and interpretation of social phenomena are the central focus. One may argue why interviews but not the other types of qualitative research methods are chosen in this research. 1992). Although focus groups are much more effective and cheaper than interviews as one may see. Qualitative interviews refer to the interaction between an interviewer and interviewee on a topic which needs not to follow particular order and words in questioning and answering (Babbie. Proctor (2000) notes that the usefulness of qualitative research depends heavily on the researchers’ skills. Added to this. as well as theory-building approach. Finally. in a room to engage in a guided discussion on a common topic (Babbie. In descriptive/ interpretative approach. In case of interviews. Breakwell (2006) points out that interviews are flexible in that they can be used at any stage in the research process. researchers may find it difficult to assemble a large group of people and the control over the interviewees is minimal (Gamson. researchers should show their ability to ask further in-depth questions based on the answers obtained.descriptive/ interpretative approach. 2004). 2006). For instance. Based on the descriptive and interpretive nature in this research. 28 . say 12-15 people. focus group can also be a useful kind of research method that brings together some interviewees.

Structured interviews are characterized by their fixed nature and sequence of questions or the fixed nature of answers allowed. Moreover. interviews depend on respondents’ accurate and complete responses. Being reliable does not necessarily attribute to validity but it is found that inconsistent responses may lead to certain inaccuracy (Davis and Bremner. 2000). This gives rise to the possibility of unreliable and invalid data. like other self-report methods. non-probability sampling is used 29 . it is suggested that interviewers be trained for a specific study if necessary since their manner in questioning could impose an effect on how reliable and valid the data will be (Proctor. leaving more room for the interviewees to respond. When it comes to the process of data collection. 3. This can enrich the data collected from the interviewing process (Smith and Eatough. unstructured interviews do not have specific formats. These can help solicit consistent responses and hence the reliability of data can be much enhanced. Such format can enhance the sensitive and empathic facets of the findings. semi-structured interviews are chosen in this research. it is important to develop a systematic set of questions and help the interviewees to understand the questions. It is suggested that interviews could be complemented with other types of data such as observation and diary techniques so that the data obtained can be more valid. Among different structures of interviews. 2000). In addition. Unlike structured interviews. with the use of a semi-structured format. Interviewees may find these kind of interviews constrained as they are not free to provide information which is important in their mind. As pointed out by Smith and Osborn (2003). underlying the importance human-to-human relationship of interviews (Fontana and Fry. 2006). In accordance with Breakwell (2006). interesting responses emerged during the interviews. researchers tend to regard people as experiential experts on a specific topic under investigation. 2006). researchers can follow up some unexpected.4 Sampling As far as the sampling method is concerned.

All of them are students aged between 22 and 28. in quota sampling method. Unlike probability sampling which select samples randomly in a pool of population. researchers tend to choose interviewees which are easier to be looked for. 2003). In this research. As mentioned by Proctor (2000). though a homogeneous sample has lesser degree of external validity. Student samples are used in this research because they can enhance homogeneity and it is much easier to control error during theory testing (Goldsmith. 9 of them are master students and the remaining one is a PhD student. Moreover. Hence. 2004).as the tool for this research. this can be sacrificed for a greater degree of internal validity (Carpenter and Fairhurst. 30 . 2002. They should have lived in China or the UK for long enough time than in other places that they are regarded as Chinese or British. 2005). 1982). non-probability sampling looks for participants on purpose (Babbie. 10 Nottingham University students were chosen to have face-to-face interviews. as comparisons of British and Chinese buying behaviour for clothes are investigated. equal proportions of British and Chinese were interviewed. This is a combination of quota sampling and convenience sampling under the non-probability sampling classifications. Among the 10 samples. researchers deliberately look for participants so that they are of equal distribution for comparison whereas in convenience sampling. The male to female ratio of Chinese and British samples is 1 to 1 (see Table 1 for details). Malhotra and King. The criteria for judging whether they are Chinese or British customers are based on the passports they are holding together with the number of years they have lived in their home country. findings reveal that homogeneous respondents can help reduce the possibility of measurement model error (Assael and Keon.

say 30 minutes. namely open-ended questions and closed-ended questions. As mentioned by Smith and Eatough (2006). After the introduction. The issues relating to confidentiality and record permission were already mentioned at the time when the appointment was made. the interview began with some general questions regarding consumer spending habits on clothing. The approximate length of the interview.5 Interview schedule The interview is composed of three stages. Open-ended questions are preferred since they allow the interviewees to answer as little or as much as they choose. 2006).1 Stage one In this stage. Also. the main theme of the interview was introduced with the provision of general ideas about what the interviewees were expected to answer. As suggested by Smith and Eatough (2006). which are discussed in the following sections. so they were not covered here. it is better to have mental prompts rather than constantly referring to the interview questions in the course of the interview. with the former one being dominant in the interview (see Appendix 2).Table 1: Distribution of samples in terms of gender and nationality Nationality Sample particulars Gender Number of respondents Chinese Male 2 Female 3 Male 3 British Female 2 3. The questions may not follow the order as set in the interview schedule as the respondents will react to them differently. Questions 1 31 . leaving more room for them to think of the issue (Breakwell. was mentioned.5. the questions were learnt by heart before the interviews. 3. There are two types of questions. a successful interview incorporates both general and specific questions which will move between each other fairly seamlessly.

Mooij. Moreover. these can help understand their spending styles. The questions in this stage are as follows. It also intends to investigate whether brand is an important criterion for consumers to choose particular products to purchase as mentioned in the literature (Doyle. In order to explore more information from interviewees’ responses. 32 . How much do you spend on clothing each month? 3. What is it about particular clothes that make you buy them? Questions 5 to 10 are brand equity-related questions. including brand and brand equity. 4.to 3 attempt to serve as ice-breaking as the interviewees may not be prepared to answer in-depth questions at the very beginning of the interview. There are three questions in this stage and they are listed as follows: 1. probing questions were asked if needed. Since this research is about the effect of brand image on consumer purchasing behaviour. 1998). were discussed. Which categories of clothes do you usually buy? 3. further probing questions would be asked if the respondents mention something related to brand and brand equity. Main issues covered in the literatures in chapter 2.5. As mentioned in the literatures. brand equity is regarded as the summation of brand awareness. 1999. How often do you buy clothes? 2. Question 4 attempts to find out the criteria of clothes selection in which the interviewees consider.2 Stage two This stage covers in-depth questions about their views to clothing brand image.

. In what ways do you usually learn about clothing brands? 6. 1993). 1991. Do you shop online for clothes? 12. purchase and post-purchase (Blackwell et al. 11. there are three stages for purchasing products or services. These questions are to find out whether brand equity is as important as what has been noted in the literatures. How do you judge the quality of the clothes? 7. including pre-purchase. What would you do if you are satisfied or dissatisfied about the clothes you purchase? 33 . Why do you like this brand? Question 11 asks for the interviewees’ opinions about the new emerging online shopping mode whereas question 12 is about their post-purchase actions they took towards the clothes they had purchased. Rayport and Jaworski. 2006. these two questions try to figure out their purchase and post-purchase behaviour. brand loyalty and brand association (Aaker. Do you regularly buy the same brand of clothes? 8. 5. Do you recommend brands? 9. 2003). Can you describe the image of your favorite brand? 10. As mentioned in some consumer behaviour models.perceived quality. Keller. After finding out what the interviewees would do before making their purchasing decisions from the aforementioned questions.

2004).1 Grounded theory and its relationship to qualitative data analysis Grounded theory is one of the important concepts suggesting how researcher conducts their research. and common categories from observational data (Babbie. themes.3. This serves as a summary of how interviewees perceive brands by providing their own definitions which may be similar or different from what is said in the literature.3 Stage three In the last stage of the interview. they would be thanked for providing their valuable time to attend the interview. repeated listening to the records which often reveal some unnoted recurring features. The processes were recorded with the use of MP3 player with the approval from the interviewees so as to facilitate the subsequent analysis.6 Administration The interviews were conducted in the places such as rooms in the student accommodations or common areas in the university where the interviewees felt comfortable to answer the questions.5. It focuses on 34 . They lasted for approximately 20 to 30 minutes. the interviewees were asked to write a sentence which starts with the words ‘Brand is’. it attempts to derive theories based on the analysis of patterns. The interviews were then transcribed. 3. 3. The production and the use of transcripts are essential research activities that they involve close. 1984). possibly attributing to important research findings (Atkinson and Heritage. depending on the interviewees’ familiarity to the questions and their willingness to provide more fruitful responses.7 Analysis strategy This section introduces the concept of grounded theory and the use of within-case and cross-case analysis as the strategies for analyzing the research data.7. After the interviewees have finished writing the sentence. 3. Originated from two socialists Glaser and Strauss (1967).

2006). qualitative data as well as interpretative thematic analysis of the qualitative data. Hence. linking and finally re-evaluation (Easterby-Smith et al. According to Easterby-Smith et al. namely within-case and cross-case 35 . leading to further analysis of themes. cataloguing concepts. maintaining an attitude of skepticism. which can enhance the validity and reliability of the data (Babbie. 2006). it demonstrates some main strategies of qualitative inquiry that contain creative interplay of theories and methods during the integrated process of social research (Henwood and Pidgeon. based on grounded theory. re-coding. interviews can be analyzed in two distinctive but interrelated ways. including familiarization. In addition..different ways to code data (Dey. 1993). There are seven stages for grounded analysis in total. methodology skills can be developed in a number of areas such as handling and analyzing of large volumes of ill-structured. researchers could be both scientific and creative at the same time under this theory. 2004).2 Within-case and cross-case analysis As mentioned by Miles and Huberman (1994). 3. As mentioned by Strauss and Corbin (1990). provided that they follow three rules. Grounded theory does have some impact on the qualitative research. Besides. (2002). 2002). patterns and categories. as well as following the research procedures. These imply the seriousness of such theory in interpreting data and provide the basis for analyzing the ten interviews conducted. one of the benefits of grounded analysis is that qualitative research structure has first been derived from the data. these could explain why grounded theory has gained much popularity in recent decades (Henwood and Pidgeon. especially the use of systemic coding.7. conceptualization. They include periodically stepping back and asking. reflection. The importance of research procedures is heightened in the grounded theory.

analysis. In this dissertation, the interviews conducted were investigated based on these two approaches. The summary of these two approaches is shown in Figure 1.

Within-case analysis

Listening to tape and producing a transcript

Coding the transcript

Analyzing data with tables in codes and quotes

Looking for patterns from similar and different responses

Creating tables based on responses from interviewees

Cross-case analysis

Figure 1: Overview of analysis

3.7.2.1 Within-case analysis During the interviews, notes were first jotted down and then the summary of each individual interview was made after listening to the MP3 recorder for the sake of keeping the fresh memory of the interview content. A full transcription of each interview (see Appendix 3) was made after the completion of the whole interview process. After finishing the transcription, the main ideas of the interviews were summarized and presented in form of tables with codes like ‘+’ standing for interviewee who has mentioned this idea, whilst ‘-‘ connoting to a negative response to the question. Some quotes from the answers would be

36

illustrated for explanation if necessary.

3.7.2.2 Cross-case analysis Cross-case analysis aims at looking for convergences and divergences in the data, recognizing ways to account for the similarities and differences of the respondents (Smith and Eatough, 2006; Smith and Osborn, 2003). Each interview was analyzed in the same way as mentioned in the within-case analysis. Then the patterns emerged were analyzed based the several tables in different themes.

3.8 Summary In this chapter, the methodology used in this dissertation has been justified and explained. Qualitative semi-structured interviews have been chosen as a mean to collect data since they are found to be more appropriate for soliciting responses in relation to attitudes, opinions and feelings. Besides, the sampling method was covered. In the course of data collection, the combination of convenience and quota sampling was being used. In addition, the schedule of interview was discussed with a view to providing some general ideas about the underlying reasons for asking such questions. The data collected would be analyzed using the methods of within-case and cross-case analysis. The research findings will be presented and discussed in the next chapter.

37

Chapter 4 Research Findings and Discussion
4.1 Introduction This chapter aims at presenting and discussing findings obtained from the interviews concerning the effect of clothing brand image on consumer purchasing behaviour. As mentioned in chapter 3, 10 people, including 5 British and 5 Chinese were interviewed. Each interview was recorded and transcribed for the purpose of analysis in this chapter.

As far as the analysis is concerned, it will be based on the most pertinent quotes, which reveal the viewpoints from the British and Chinese respondents respectively. According to Easterby-Smith et al. (2002), qualitative researchers need to communicate the findings in an honest and systematic manner, disseminating the richness of the findings and hence the experience of the researchers. In addition, the analysis should be open to verification as far as possible so that the others are free to repeat what has been done and check the conclusions (Breakwell, 2006).

The chapter consists of three sections in which the respondents’ backgrounds, the effect of brand image on them and also their opinions of brand are presented and compared.

4.2 Backgrounds of respondents All respondents are students from the University of Nottingham, with nine of them being master students and one of them being a PhD student. Their ages range from 22 to 27 and the male to female ratio is 1 to 1.

The first three questions try to solicit the interviewees’ response about their clothing spending habits, asking about their shopping frequency, money spent
38

One of the respondents revealed that he preferred buying clothes at special occasions like seasonal discounts so that the prices can be much more affordable. These are in line with the literature that students spend less than the other groups like working class as far as clothes purchasing is concerned (HKTDC. In England. Male 39 . ranging from every week to three or four times a year. Because I have been poor. British.” Narinder. 2002). “I’m a sort of impulsive buyer…’Oh gosh! I really need to buy some clothes now. 27. British. I will buy clothes if there are discounts. Generally. quite rare. buy every 4 to 5 months. so I’ll buy them when I need them…probably. “…This year…not at all (buying clothes). British. many respondents revealed that they buy clothes at a regular interval. let’s go’.” Mark. Female Besides. 2000). maybe 3 times a year.” Hannah. One of them was slightly different in that she indicated that she is an impulsive buyer and hence she would buy clothes based on her moods and feelings at the time of purchase. 23. 24. some of them pointed out that their financial status would have an impact on their frequency of buying clothes. This could probably be explained by the findings mentioned in chapter 2 that consumers’ emotion is one of the determining factors for buying clothes (Berry. 23. Male “In China.on clothes and also the types of clothes they purchased. normally I buy clothes 4 times a year (for each season). maybe one item every couple of month. Female “…Maybe not often recently because I have not got a lot of income for clothes. But before that.” Kevin. Chinese.

1994). One of the male respondents revealed that he would spend about 50 to 250 pounds for clothes each time. Sometimes. South and Spitze. Keller. however. British.3. retailers.When asking about the price range of clothes. brand is important for product development in that it can be instilled in consumers’ minds (Mooij. it does not really mean that males have less spending power. targeting to buy clothes in medium to high price ranges.1 Significance of clothing brands on consumer purchasing decisions As mentioned previously in chapter 2. Male The above quotes illustrate that clothes purchasing behaviour varies from time to time and from person to person. with more emphasis being placed on the comparisons between British and Chinese consumers so as to provide new insights for further development of brands in the clothing sector. 1998) and hence it could have a beneficial or detrimental effect on customers’ buying decisions (Yasin et al. “Probably. 2007). more than half of them were fond of buying clothes in the medium or high price ranges. In the coming section. the reasons why people buy them vary. 1999.3 Effect of clothing brand image on consumer buying behaviour 4. brand names can add tremendous value to the products. As mentioned in chapter 2. Whether brand is a determining factor is 40 . whether brand image would affect clothes purchasing behaviour is investigated. 1991. it varies anywhere between 50 to 250 pounds. There could be two identical clothes in the world. I buy lots of clothes and it lasts me for half a year…” Neil. It really gets a large variation. Although it is mentioned in the literature that more females would like shopping than males (Dholakia.. as well as consumers (Aaker. 4. 1993). More male than female respondents manifested that they would buy clothes in medium or above price ranges. 24. It could be as simple as they are cheap and good looking or they are brand-named.

+/. The results from both British and Chinese respondents are illustrated in Tables 2 and 3 accordingly. Suitable Jovi Chong Vivian Li Vanessa Fang Alick Wong Kevin Fang Key + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Pleasant. in which the respondents were asked about the reasons of buying particular clothes. Non-label Non-advert Hannah Smith Mark Morrison Neil Bowley Narinder Sandhu Michael Kosciukiewicz + + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Functional use (Sports) Personal need Table 3: Determining factors for clothes purchasing (Chinese respondents) Reason Name Brand Country of origin Advert Quality Style Price Others Comfortable. Intuition +/. The columns named ‘country of origin’ and ‘advert’ would be discussed in later sections.examined in question 4. Table 2: Determining factors for clothes purchasing (British respondents) Reason Name Brand Country of origin Advert Quality Style Price Others Comfortable.or words in blue: Response with prompt 41 .or words in black: Initial response without prompt.

I bought it (she points at her top) yesterday from NEXT. British. British. I wouldn’t buy something because it’s from H&M or because it’s from ZARA. in which one of them highlighted the importance of past shopping experiences as mentioned in the literature (Aaker. I mean I will buy clothes from a shop. If I have good experiences with something. 2002) seem also applicable to the UK respondents.” Mark. the British and Chinese interviewees showed some divergent viewpoints. When it comes to the effect of brand on buying clothes. Moreover. Actually. Because I know it a little bit good quality or that it’s going to be last well or perform well. style and price as some of the determining factors for buying clothes. 24.” Neil. Some of the UK respondents revealed that they look for brand names in buying clothes. However. In this regard. Female 42 . nine out of ten respondents had not provided immediate answer to question 4 regarding this issue until prompt was given. I probably buy again. British. 23. 24. but I do not particularly look for brand names. all respondents from both nations regard quality. 1991). They are probably the shops I like. the findings from literature that Chinese find these three as important criteria for buying clothes (HKTDC. Male “Well. “Yes.” Hannah.As observed from Tables 2 and 3. Male “Never. I wouldn’t specifically buy it because it’s from there. two UK interviewees stated that brand names do not initiate them to buy during their shopping. Well.

I changed my purchasing habits to some cheap stuff like Primark. it seems that brands are more likely to have an impact on Chinese than British interviewees. In addition. So. This issue was examined through asking the question ‘In what ways do you usually learn about clothing brands?’ There are mainly four ways for the respondents to learn about the brands. 26. But recently. The UK respondents tend to buy clothes they like but not merely because of the brands. 1991).All Chinese respondents found that brand is one of the key factors for them to consider when buying clothes. and buy more clothes to change. I bought some big brands like designer labels.” Jovi. Female Based on the above findings. do have better quality than cheaper brands. I can use less money. For some T-shirts. if I buy too many big brands. 24. Fennis and Pruyn.3. 2005). Chinese. Female “Yes.” Vanessa. This is consistent with the literature that brand-named products can be served as a guarantor of reliability.2 Brand awareness As mentioned in the literature. One of them mentioned that reputable brands in medium to high price ranges connote to better quality and cutting. which is coherent with the literature that brands are used to highlight personality under different circumstances (Aaker.. H&M and Dorothy Perkins…It’s quick for me to dislike the clothes that I bought. 1999. if I buy cheap ones. including 43 . 2006). I think they mostly get better cutting and better quality. It can be in consistent with my changing look and just lower the cost. one of them pointed out that brands can help change her personal style. brand can make potential consumers aware of the products (Aaker. “I do think most of the brands.to high-priced brands. it costs me too much. as well as quality (Roman et al. like medium. 4. so I have more faith in those brands for their clothes. Chinese.

. internet and shops. +/.or words in black: Initial response without prompt. 1986. with the number of Chinese respondents outweighing British. Internet From shops From shops Table 5: Ways to learn about clothing brands (Chinese respondents) Name Jovi Chong Vivian Li Vanessa Fang Alick Wong Kevin Fang Key +/.. peers. two of them 44 . Table 4: Ways to learn about clothing brands (British respondents) Name Hannah Smith Mark Morrison Neil Bowley Narinda Sandhu Michael Kosciukiewicz Advert Peers Others + - + + + From shops From shops.advertisement. The results are shown in Tables 4 and 5. Among these respondents. 2007). Some of the UK and Chinese respondents did regard it as one of the methods to know the brands.or words in blue: Response with prompt Advert Peers Others Internet + + + + + + + Internet Internet From shops Advertisement is a powerful tool for raising brand awareness (Mackenzie et al. Tsai et al.

so they associate themselves with brands. he was the representative of adidas previously…” Vivian. Male As far as peers influence on clothes purchasing is concerned. advertisements in the shopping mall. David Beckham. 1978) and enhance attractiveness (McCracken. 1989). Chinese.” Kevin.” “The adidas ‘impossible is nothing’ advert with leading sportsmen like Michael Jordan. Zidane (is very memorable)…because I know them through their sports achievement. 24. 23. Male “I guess it does (have an effect) on subliminal basis. Like Coby Bryrant. During the game break. they are familiar faces.mentioned that they became more aware of the brands through the celebrities in the advertisements.” “I used to play basketball and so I used to watch NBA games.” Neil. “It (Advertising) is important because the brand image is built up so that you will choose (to buy them). British. on the street…they (advertisers) put posters in the public areas. which confirms with the literature that celebrity endorsement can lead to product credibility (McGuire. you know. Chinese. 45 . and it’s easy to make connections. similar number of Chinese and the UK respondents agreed that it does have impact on their purchasing decisions. 23. Marketing people may affect me someway. they (basketball players) will show up. Female “TV. Lance Armstrong.

46 . I will consider them. in which interviewees were asked.” Kevin. that’s cool. and from my mind. 24. while 4 Chinese interviewees got their brand information via internet surfing.3. British. The findings are illustrated in Tables 6 and 7. they are nice to put them on. Chinese. I will ask them what the brand is…my brother bought a Helly Hansen sportswear.“Maybe they (my friends) buy very nice clothes. “How do you judge the quality of the clothes?” Their attitudes towards country-of-origins of clothes were also solicited from the follow-up questions.” Neil. 23. when I go shopping next time. 4 British interviewees revealed that they became familiar with the brands through shop visiting. 4. Male Other sources for raising brand awareness like internet surfing and shop visiting are also prevalent among Chinese and British respondents. So.3 Perceived quality The issue of perceived quality was investigated through question 6. Male “If I am training and I see a friend wearing a new T-shirt or something.

durability. +/. followed by style. colour.or words in black: Initial response without prompt. 1991). Most of them could mention these judging criteria at once. There are no significance differences between British 47 .or words in blue: Response with prompt As shown in Tables 6 and 7. price and performance. in which these criteria are important for consumers in judging product quality (Aaker. nine out of ten respondents regard materials as one of the criteria for judging clothes quality.Table 6: Criteria for judging clothes quality (British respondents) Criteria Name Materials Style Colour Durability Country of origin Others Hannah Smith Mark Morrison Neil Bowley Narinder Sandhu Michael Kosciukiewicz + + + + + + + Performance Price + - Table 7: Criteria for judging clothes quality (Chinese respondents) Criteria Name Materials Style Colour Durability Country of origin Others Jovi Chong Vivian Li Vanessa Fang Alick Wong Kevin Fang Key + + + + + + + + + + + + + - +/.

so the countries don’t really affect it. Female “It should all be good quality if they have a brand name on it because it’s what the brand name stands for.and Chinese respondents. British. France No comment No comment No comment Countries with lowest quality No comment No comment No comment No comment No comment 48 . 3 Chinese respondents found that it would have an effect on the clothes perceived quality. For buying Puma shoes. they represent better quality. Contradictory to the literature. “In some of the countries like Japan. Chinese. Regarding country of origin.” Michael. 24.” Jovi. Table 8: Perception towards countries which produce clothes with highest and lowest quality (British respondents) Countries Name Hannah Smith Mark Morrison Neil Bowley Narinder Sandhu Michael Kosciukiewicz Countries with highest quality Italy. 22. Two Chinese interviewees pointed out that country of origin is correlated with quality. France Italy. Male When further question was asked about the issue ‘Which country’s clothes do you think they’re of highest/ lowest quality?’ British and Chinese respondents showed divergent views. The results are listed in Tables 8 and 9. country of origin seems not to have an impact to the UK respondents on perceived quality. France or Italy. I expect Puma quality basically.

Italy Countries with lowest quality China. France. Malaysia. However. they show up the same quality standard in all countries. “I don’t have some preconception about it. many of them mentioned that France and Italy can produce clothes in high quality. South Africa Vanessa Fang Alick Wong Kevin Fang France. some South American countries Vivian Li UK. they should meet the required quality. 3 of the Chinese respondents could mention that some less developed countries. 24. you can buy good or bad clothes. British. Italy No comment Korea. Denmark Less developed countries No comment China As shown in Table 8..” Neil. just a few British respondents try to provide the names of specific countries. If Puma gets its stuff from China. Italy China. US. 49 . Male For those who can tell the names of specific countries. produce poor quality clothes. British.” Michael.Table 9: Perception towards countries which produce clothes with highest and lowest quality (Chinese respondents) Countries Name Jovi Chong Countries with highest quality Japan. 22. 2004). Male “They suppose to all be the same. Because I know from every country. Thailand. India. from Thailand. only Chinese respondents made comments on countries which make clothes in the lowest quality. These findings can be explained by the literatures in that China does not have influential brands with phenomenal quality (Delong et al. including China.

I will prefer France or Italy ones.” Vanessa. if I consider some basic ones. This is in line with what has mentioned in the literature that China is proficient in production and hence many foreign investors would like to produce their already-designed products there (Cui. 50 .“I think the UK and US have top brands. “China is good at manufacturing and Italy and France are good at design. Italy as well. 1997). 26.” Vivian. Actually.3. Female Nevertheless. maybe it’s the reason. I think those made-in-China are something good.4 Brand loyalty The issue regarding brand loyalty was investigated through questions 7. Chinese. 8 and 12 in which the respondents were asked whether they buy the same brands regularly and also if they recommend brands to the others. Lowest (quality) maybe China. The results are illustrated in Tables 10 and 11. Female 4. 23. China don’t have very famous brands. If it’s about big brands. Chinese. or some of the developing countries. one Chinese interviewee specifically pointed out different countries should have their competitive advantage in either production or design.

Table 10: Clothes purchasing habit (British respondents) Name Hannah Smith Mark Morrison Neil Bowley Narinder Sandhu Michael Kosciukiewicz Regular buyer Recommend brands Club card owner + + - + - - Table 11: Clothes purchasing habit (Chinese respondents) Name Jovi Chong Vivian Li Vanessa Fang Alick Wong Kevin Fang Regular buyer Recommend brands Club card owner + + + + + + + - + + + + As observed from Tables 10 and 11. recommend brands to friends or relatives. The quotes of regular buyers are shown as follow: 51 . For those who buy regularly from the same brands. and also hold the club cards of their favourite stores than the UK interviewees. whereas the others think they need to take other factors like price and style into consideration and hence they do not buy the same brands regularly. they pointed out that they are quite satisfied with the clothes they had purchased. more Chinese respondents tend to buy the same brands.

Male “(I like buying from) Diesel for jeans. 27. Female “If it is excellent performance and if someone asks me. “I will if I visit some shops and they have good stuff. In Hong Kong. for examples. say ‘Go ahead! They are really good. Female “I just like it. I like Fred Perry. Chinese. In the UK. British. British. 23. There are casual wears good for everyday dress and they are of reasonable prices. I will tell them. CEU and Vertical Club. 26.” Mark.“I do have a few brands that I prefer. none of the UK respondents have any clothing club cards even though the shops take this chance to reward their loyalty in terms of discounts 52 . 24. British. 23. Female “I reckon the design fits me and these brands have high quality which is what I’m looking for.’” Vanessa.” Jovi. there are quite many. four respondents cited that they would recommend brands as long as they are good. 24.the certain shops that I sort of rely upon…. Chinese.” Vivian. They have quite a lot of varieties of different design for me to choose from.” Neil. Female As far as brand recommendation is concerned. Topshop and All Saints. The Diesel jeans fit me well.. Male Surprisingly. Topshop’s price is affordable and also I like the style from All Saints” Narinder. Chinese. so I will buy them more often.. I will tell my friends.

it takes time to apply for it and maybe I will not spend much money on the same shops…I tried to apply House of Fraser and M&S (loyalty cards). 23. 26. The price is acceptable. Female “I think it’s casual and good quality. Female “Because we have student cards and we can enjoy the offer.3. not so complicated design” Jovi. Some of them did mention the drawbacks of applying these cards. Chinese. British. Store cards are dangerous. These findings confirm what has mentioned in the literature that associated brand images can help enhance the value of brands (Yasin. store cards try to get more money from me when I don’t have more. Chinese. Vivian. Female 4. 2007). Both the British and Chinese respondents managed to recall some positive connotations of their favourite brands.as cited in the literature (Aaker. we need not apply for the loyalty cards. Sometimes. It fits my age and my occupation as students. “I like something that is simple and good for casual and everyday wear. 27. Female 53 . It’s not stylish but it is well made. The quotes for some non-club card owners are shown below: “No. 24. Chinese. 1991).5 Brand association Regarding brand association.” Narinder. That’s why I don’t apply for it.” Vanessa. it is examined through questions 9 and 10 in which interviewees were asked about their favourite brand images. they always make them like credit cards and I don’t want to have one more credit card.

British. British. British.” Neil. khaki style…quality is good.3. Chinese. Male 4. 26. For jeans. Female “’Simply Me’. 23.” Vanessa. Male “Simple. 24.6 Consumer buying behaviour It is found in the literature that internet shopping is gaining its popularity among consumers (Dholakia and Uusitalo.” Mark. fits my age. 24. coloured fabrics…it’s a sort of a bit unusual. For shirts. Chinese. Female “Basically.” Kevin. they work well. the respondents were asked if they had shopped online for clothes in question 11. like grid shirts. 27. it’s a kind of like casual clothing. I prefer some simple image. British. I prefer very colourful image. All Saints is a bit more innovative. Male “For Topshop. For T-shirt. British. Chinese.” Narinder. Male “60s hippie. and they look good. usually cotton…” Hannah.“They do something stylish and good quality…sometimes good offer. I prefer blue jeans. 27. not like football. 2002). In order to investigate this issue. 23.” Alick. 54 . alternative sports. Male “They are practical. Female “It’s just sort of reasonably well-priced and sort of good quality. 22. crickets but skiing and snowboarding and surfing…” Michael.

These signify the fact that online shopping for clothes is not impossible but something need to be done to improve it as far as the problems of fitting before purchasing and online security are concerned. “No. not right colour. Male 55 . 23. British.” Kevin. you can buy it online. Female Even though some of the interviewees do not shop online for clothes.” Michael. Chinese. but I don’t buy online. Male “I don’t buy online. 22. try on to see if it is fit probably. including the varieties of choices. lower prices and informative websites. but I know many people do.Surprisingly.” Narinder. Chinese. I’ll have a look and compare prices. “For clothes. Because I can’t try the clothes to see if they are suitable or not” Jovi. Female “I like fitting. I can see how it looks like…so I never buy clothes online. One of them mentioned the poor internet security while the others revealed that they could not try the clothes before paying for it. 24. To be honest. no. Chinese. British. I will consider maybe it is not safe to shopping online. nine out of ten interviewees expressed that they had not bought clothes via the internet due to several reasons. The clothes online are cheap. right size as well” Vivian. just like the clothes from the markets. 23. 27. Female “Not really. some of them can point out the positive aspects of internet shopping. If you can’t find (suitable clothes) in the markets or in the shops. I am a little bit fat and if I put on it.

a way for companies to keep consumers back to spend their money. respondents were asked to provide their comments on brand. These are what internet offers. Male “Brand is a way for people to identify each other.” Vanessa. Chinese. British. “Brand is something that adds value to clothing but not a must” Jovi. 26. 26. Chinese. 24.) Vanessa.4 Results In the last question. Chinese. Chinese. 23. but it represents the taste and quality of them. It is good. almost everything is quite good. Female “Brand is not a paper bag. The quotes below show their perceptions towards what brand is in their mind. 27. Chinese. good quality and good prices.” Kevin. Female 4.” (It means brands are not easy to be broken up. 24.“(Shop online) Sometimes. and I’m not fond of popular ones!” Hannah. Female “Brand is something difficult to understand. Male “Brand is just like the name of people. The only thing is that sometimes the delivery fee is not that cheap. It may not be the spirit of clothes. Female “Brand is an important but not decisive indicator for my choice of shopping. 23.” Alick. Female 56 .” Vivian. maybe one or twice a month. Chinese.

Then it came to the analysis and discussion of interviews’ findings to look for any similarities and differences between British and Chinese respondents. I realized. that a brand can be a powerful draw for many shoppers.” Michael. 24. 22. British. manufacturer. however. Some of the responses from interviewees were quoted and analyzed so as to highlight the important findings for further brand image development. British.“Brand is not something I would follow because of the name. respondents’ backgrounds were introduced to provide some thorough understandings on their clothes purchasing habits. My clothes purchased tend to be based on the individual garment.” Neil. mainly focusing on the four dimensions of brand equity. Male “Brand is the label a company use to market/ advertise them with. Male “Brand is not unimportant to my decision making when buying clothes. Female “Brand is the identity of a product or service. 57 .” Narinda.” Mark. British. rather than the designer.5 Summary This chapter presented the findings from the interviews of both British and Chinese respondents. At the beginning of the chapter. 23. Male 4. 27. British.

It is then followed by the research limitations and recommendations for further research.2 Conclusions The findings in chapter 4 do have some implications for the development of brand image. It was found that there are slight differences between the Chinese and British consumers in terms of their attitudes towards brand equity. 5. style and price as their most important criteria for choosing clothes. This chapter will provide an overview of the research findings. they cited that what they liked is more important. this chapter draws conclusions on what has been analyzed and discussed. In addition. They are presented under each sub-section as shown below. 58 . The comparisons were made between the British and Chinese respondents’ purchasing behaviour throughout the last chapter. with the inclusions of similarities and differences between the British and Chinese consumers. brand is one of their considerations.1 Significance of clothing brands on consumer purchasing decisions The determining factors for clothes purchasing have been examined. 5. providing insights for comprehending consumer purchasing behaviour and further investigations. However.2. Our findings suggested that all British and Chinese respondents regard quality. For those British respondents who did not look for brands when purchasing clothes.Chapter 5 Conclusions 5.1 Introduction Based on the research findings in chapter 4. more Chinese than UK respondents expressed that brand is important for them to choose particular clothes to buy.

5. the brands need to become more aware among the consumers. However. internet and shops. 5. There are no significant differences between British and Chinese respondents regarding these issues. In general. these methods for spreading the brand image are commonly employed by both British and Chinese respondents. peers. when it comes to the country of origin of clothes. colour. price and performance.As revealed from the above findings. brand can have a value-adding function in that some respondents are fond of particular brands. whereas British respondents tended to know the brands through on-the-spot purchase in the shops. it could enhance the chance for consumers to buy the clothes. followed by style. for example. consumers think of the other criteria as well.2.3 Perceived quality The findings suggested that most respondents tend to judge the clothes quality by looking at the materials. That is to say. Nevertheless. many Chinese respondents had the preconception that China and 59 . respondents tend to know the brands through advertisements. In terms of advertisements. More Chinese respondents expressed that they had been influenced by advertisements and internet than British interviewees. if brand-named clothes can incorporate the other criteria the consumers are looking for. durability.2 Brand awareness To increase the publicity.2. famous sportsmen can be attributable to good sportswear performance. In addition. From the findings. some respondents from both nations cited that they had been affected by celebrity advertising in which they could associate the brand image with the celebrities’ images. none of the UK respondents thought it would affect their perception of clothes quality whereas some Chinese respondents had cited that some countries connoted to better quality.

Also. 5. This coincides with the findings by Keller (1993) that consumers are attracted by the signal when they consider buying particular product.4 Brand loyalty This aspect of brand equity is important for the development of customer base and encouraging repeat purchase. This brings out an important issue that Chinese brands should get rid of their poor image on perceived quality at least to the Chinese themselves. however. there would still be chances for China to produce well-perceived quality clothes. However. 2004). styles.. As brand can provide guarantee of quality to consumers. including the product features.2. it is good at manufacturing (Cui. while most of the Chinese respondents had. 1997).other developing countries produce clothes in poor quality. 60 .5 Brand association The association between brand and memory of respondents was investigated. such perceptions may be attributable to their loyalty towards the brands (Aaker. China does not have influential global clothing brands (Delong et al. functions etc. the British respondents did not have strong feelings about where the clothes come from.2. regardless of the nations the respondents belong to. From the findings. However. All respondents could recall some positive aspects of their favourite brands at once. some respondents did reveal that they are frequent buyers of the same brands and also recommend brands to their friends and relatives. by working on the brand development. none of the UK respondents cited that they had had some loyalty cards from clothing shops. Such discrepancies may be because the UK respondents tend to buy clothes from more independent stores which are less likely to offer loyalty cards. 1991). prices. whereas they did think that clothes from Italy and France normally confer to better quality. Some characteristics of the brands in which they are fond of were mentioned. 5.

the retailers should be more vigilant in the design of verification system. There are three limitations regarding the sampling method. One of the obstacles for online clothes purchasing is that the consumers can not try on the clothes to see if they are fit or not. several limitations were found to hinder the overall accuracy of the findings. something should be done on the aforementioned drawbacks. some respondents cited that online shopping is good for its informative websites. not to divulge personal information to unknown third parties.The establishment of such positive images can help enhance the brand values and there are no significant differences between the British and Chinese respondents in this regard. For online securities. whereas the shoppers need to be aware of the login procedures.6 Consumer buying behaviour Consumers can shop for clothes via different channels. 5. qualitative research can not provide representative samples from the target population even though they can detect 61 .3 Limitations During the course of research. In terms of fitting. As far as sampling method is concerned. Most of the interviewees expressed that they had not bought clothes through the internet. 2002) but the findings suggested that buying clothes online was not that common among the respondents. and whether online shopping for clothes is popular among the respondents from both nations was examined. the details of the size and materials should be listed on the website to reduce the chances of buying wrong clothes. time and also interpreting skills. Internet shopping is gaining its popularity (Dholakia and Uusitalo. However. Added to this. 5. various choices and cheaper prices. In order to make it more prevalent for clothes shopping.2. online security is also a matter of concern.

the characteristics of the interviewers. In addition. There are numerous brands around the world. 2000). interviewers’ questioning skill is also one of the determinants for answer accuracy. including the skills of handling follow-up and probing questions (Proctor. Finally.minor problems that are not obvious in a quantitative study (Proctor. for instances accent. 5. This is the author’s second time to do the dissertation and the aspects like nervousness and lack of experiences can also be regarded as some of the limitations for this dissertation. The dissertation was confined to finish within the summer term which lasted for 3 months. the responses from the in-depth interviews can be subjected to researcher’s effects. 1991).4 Implications This dissertation attempts to find out the effect of brand image on consumer purchasing behaviour. Such discretion of choosing samples may introduce a source of bias since there is a possibility to omit some types of people. gender and age. the number of samples interviewed is limited. since in-depth interviews were chosen to be the method of data collection. ideas and products of other cultures than older people (Netemeyer et al. During the interviews. especially for those who are difficult to contact (Proctor. however. Interviewers may ask leading questions that distort respondents’ answers (Levy and Weitz. As long as more time is allowed. having a propensity of getting deviated results. In selecting the students. Students were used as the subjects for investigation and they tend to be more susceptible to the views. 2000). the combination of quota and convenience samples was used. 2000). 62 . more samples could be gathered so that it could enhance the overall conclusiveness of the interviews. whether the brand is influential or not depends on how it is perceived.. will have an effect on the interviewees’ willingness to participate and their nature of answers. In terms of time. 1992) and data obtained are influenced by the interviewers’ manner.

style. manufacturers together with retailers need to join hands to produce better clothes for the customers to choose from. some Chinese respondents have negative perceptions towards clothes quality produced from China and other developing countries whereas their British counterparts do not have such strong feelings. it is of utmost importance to keep the customers’ positive perceptions towards the brands so that the chances for repeat purchase would be increased. marketers can devise different reward methods in different forms such as discounts. the investment in brand loyalty could enhance the chance of repeat purchase and broaden the customer base. namely brand awareness. As far as perceived quality is concerned. colour. four different areas were investigated. marketers can think of relevant strategies. In addition. aiming at finding out their similarities and differences in the consumer purchasing behaviour on clothes. marketers should make use good of the traditional channels like advertisements and word-of-mouth and devise new methods to communicate with customers. price and performance. This dissertation highlights the comparisons between British and Chinese.Therefore. As for brand association. To reward loyal customers. Under the premise that brand is regarded as equity for marketers. From the findings. the study of brand can provide an insight for further brand development. In terms of brand awareness. durability. having mentioned that customers judge the quality mostly based on the factors like materials. perceived quality and brand loyalty. brand loyalty and brand association. perceived quality. Chinese brand developers should put more efforts on quality control 63 . owing to the fact that consumers will buy clothes after they have known them well. Through understanding how customers behave in these four aspects. This provides an important insight that Chinese customers should get rid of their negative perceptions towards the clothes quality. Such positive connotations are achieved through working closely on brand awareness.

It is hoped that Chinese can have some influential global clothing brands by doing so. For instances. since famous clothing brands are not uncommon in such developed country. For the UK. 5. have done. it could think of making online clothes purchasing more popular and also introducing varieties of benefits to reward loyal customers. like supermarkets. in addition to semi-structured interviews. More samples should be interviewed as long as time and money are not constraints.with a view to establish some strong national clothing brands among themselves. This could provide much more conclusive results. could 64 . Besides. The use of club cards was found to be more common among Chinese than the UK respondents for buying clothes. there are several limitations as mentioned in the previous section. This may change the buying attitude that Chinese are now confined to buy luxury clothes produced in the foreign markets (HKTDC. Marketers could consider the feasibility of getting this idea widespread in the clothes retailing industry as other retail sectors. Other sampling groups. Further research could also be done on comparisons between some other countries’ consumers in which they are found to have significant impact on consumer behaviour. other kinds of research methods such as focus group and even some quantitative research methods could be used so as to provide findings from different perspectives. 2002). More interviewers could be hired and trained to collect as much data as they can. it should be more aware of the marketing strategies to enhance the overall brand equity. for instance working class.5 Recommendations for further research Although the findings from this research are interesting and useful as one may think. It is important to make improvement in the further research to provide more fruitful and representative findings.

researchers could be able to get more representative and deeper findings from different perspectives. 65 .also be investigated since they may provide entirely different results as what have been obtained from the student samples. exploring the research to a higher stratum as far as brand development is concerned. By taking the above recommendations.

54-70. S. A (1996). 36 (1). & Keon. J. 36-40. Alvarez. K. D. Nonsampling vs sampling errors in survey research. A & Casielles. 23 (3). 45-57. J. 46 (2). V. (2005). European Journal of Marketing . 39 (1). New York: The Free Press. Price. Arnould. L. R. Aksoy. Journal of Retailing. J. Aaker. (1999). B. (2000). Atilgan. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. H. E. Assael. Abend. S. 42 (2). European Journal of Marketing . Ahmed. 77 299-318. 237-248. Bobbin. Battle of the brands. A (1991). L. Journal of Marketing Research.. The retail power-performance conundrum: What have we learnt?. Building strong brands. 66 . D. Consumers. 27 (7). The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion. Determinants of the brand equity: A vertification approach in the beverage industry in Turkey. 114-123. Journal of Marketing. A.. Aaker. S. Managing brand equity. 39-52. (1982). New York: McGraw-Hill. & Akinci. (2004). E. (1993). Consumer evaluations of sales promotion: The effect on brand choice. A & d'Astou. Ailawadi. L. (2005).References Aaker. & Zinkhan. New York: Macmillan. Cross-national evaluation of made-in concept using multiple cues. G. (2001).

(2000). pp. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. C. (1984). Word-of-mouth processes within a services purchase decision context.Atkinson. A. Miniard. P. 125-131. Blackwell. J. p. L. (2001). Does an absence of brand equity generalize across product classes?. R. Journal of Service Research. Consumer behavior. (1998). 28 (1).. E. & Freathy. P. Brands as financial assets. (2000). F. 34 (2). The practice of social research. 26 (8). S. M. Journal of Business Research. B. Babbie. 3 (2). D. A. R. P. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. Cultivating service brand equity. December). Orlando: Harcourt College Publishers. In S. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth. 128-137. & Engel. L. G. Batchelor. (1998). The China Business Review. 95-103). (1998). J. Structures of social action. London: Macmillan Press Bates. Blackwell. Bello. & Heritage. H. 166-177. Berry. Bansal. Birtwistle.10. C. J. C. & Voyer. More than just a name above a shop . M. D. J. Hart. D. Understanding consumer mood. 318-323. & Holbrook. (2002. 67 . (2004). RIS News. (1995). W. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.26-32. The many China markets. Murphy Brands: The new wealth creators (pp.

Blackwell. (2006). (2005). 2007 from Business Week. 9 (3). Blumer. Building store loyalty through store brands. & Engel. Miniard. 232-253). 256-269. M. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management. Breakwell. (2000). 21 633-660. P. Corstjens. The fashion business: Can Britain cut it?. (2004). (2007). Consumer shopping value. Retrieved April 15. J. (1956). Sociological analysis and the 'variable'. 2007 from http://www. G. J. Cicourel. 37 281-291. S. Business Week. C. and loyalty for retail apparel brands.. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.com/bwdaily/dnflash/aug2005/nf2005084_8340. 68 . Management Today. (August).businessweek. satisfaction. Retrieved July 8.htm Business Week. M. Method and measurement in sociology. Breakwell. R. A. M. D. M. Smith Research methods in psychology (pp.. Hammond. Carruthers. 39-44.businessweek. In G.com/brand/2006/ Carpenter. F. (2005). American Sociological Review. Journal of Marketing Research . Fife-Schaw. R. New York: Free Press. Interviewing methods. W. H. Reebox and Adidas: A good fit. (1964). Consumer behavior. R. (2006). The 100 top brands 2006. Fairhurst. Mason: Thomson. Web site: http://bwnt. & Lal. A. J. A.

(2006). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. 69 . 30 (10). Dholakia. (1999). I. The China Business Review. J. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management. (2001). 141-153. & Uusitalo. M. Easey. Dholakia. Building successful brands. Research methods in psychology. Breakwell. M. 8 (2). Oxford: Blackwell. Doyle. J. Butterfield Excellence in advertising: The IPA guide to best practice (pp. J. P. The different faces of the Chinese consumer. & Bremner. 64-87). R.. H. pp. G. Does brand trust matter to brand equity. C.. In G. 459-469.. Fashion marketing. 3-21). Perception of US branded apparel in Shanghai. M. G. Journal of Product & Brand Management. In L. 14 (3). Fife-Schaw.Cui. R. Davis. (2005). A. Switching to electronic stores: Consumer characteristics and the perception of shopping benefits. M. A. (1993). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. S. Wu. Going shopping: Key determinants of shopping behaviors and motivations. R. Delong. Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists.34-38. Bao. & Munuera-Aleman. & Li. (2004). 154-165. Smith The experimental method in psychology (pp. London: Routledge. (2002). Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management. 187-196. 27 (4). E. Chao. R. Dey. M. Delgado-Ballester. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. Hammond. (1999). (1997). O.

Fontana. G. (2002). Retrieved July 7. & Pruyn. Essex: Pearson Education Limited. Consumers and services. female shoppers. 2007 from http://www. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. M. Electronic Advertising & Marketplace Report. R. Journal of Business Research. p. Fisher.Easterby-Smith. A. Denzin. 454-462. & Hogg. 70 . Recent study finds gap remains between male. Management research: An introduction. J.economist. Gabbott. R. B. (2004). K. Britain: Economic structure. (2007). (2004). T. New York: Cambridge University Press. W.. Economist. H. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Thorpe. Y. Thousand Oaks. H. Gephart. CA: Sage.com. You are what you wear: Brand personality influences on consumer impression formation. & Fry.com/countries/Britain/PrinterFriendly. 60 634-639. & Lowe. Gamson. Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. A (1992). (2006). Freeride Media LLC (1998. S. In N. (2000). M. The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. Lincoln Handbook of qualitative research . (1998). September 22).cfm?Story_ID=906 6156 Fennis. Talking politics. C. Researching and writing a dissertation for business students. M. 47 (4). Academy of Management Journal.17. A.

M. (1993). In G. Entrepreneur. Explaining and predicting consumer intention to purchase over the internet: An exploratory study. H&M. 342-364). M.. 2007 from Hong Kong Trade Development Council . A.com/us/investorrelations__investor. HKTDC. Retrieved March 12. K. R. (1992). Spread the word.hm.7. Smith Research methods in psychology (pp. S. D. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. 2007 from http://http://www. China brands eye global expansion. N. Grounded theory. 10 (2). Annual reports. (1967).com/tongjifenxi/fuzhuang. A. A. A. Apparel consumption report in five big cities of mainland China.nhtml Hammersley. (2002). Henwood. M. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. The discovery of grounded theory. March 25). Web site: http://www. What's wrong with ethnography? Methodological explorations. C. Fashion brand preferences among young consumers. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. New York: University of Michigan Press. Hargrave-Silk. Fife-Schaw. 22-28. London: Routledge. & Pidgeon. J. (2007).Glaser. Retrieved June 16. J. & Hill.htm Hogg. Trade and industrial policy in developing countries: A manual of policy analysis. (2006). M. p. C. (1998). Breakwell. 26 (2). Chicago: Aldine. Bruce. (2005. M. Hammond. Greenaway. (2002). Henricks. Goldsmith.ucbnet. (1998). & Milner. Media Asia. B. K. 71 . 120-125. L. & Strauss. G.

Hoyer. (2001). measuring. New Jersey: Pearson Education . L. W. Journal of Consumer Research. (1990). J. 18 (5). Hoyer. 141-148. measuring and managing brand equity. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. D. Jones. Kirk. 57 (January). S. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. (2003). L. and managing customer-based brand equity. measuring. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management . D. K. (2003). G. (1986). 293-300. 262-278. 428-439. L. 72 . (1990). Keller. The UK clothing sector 1993-2001: Hats. J. 8 (3). workwear and other wearing apparel-and the final analysis. (1998). 7 (4). R. Khachaturian. J. M. London: Prentice Hall International. & Maclnnis. The effects of brand awareness on choice for a common. & Morganosky. K. Quality perceptions by country of origin. Journal of Marketing. Conceptualizing. Consumer behaviour. D. 21-30. M. R. A. Keller. Building. Strategic brand management: Building. 1-22. Jones. M. The UK clothing industry: Extinction or evolution?. W. & Hayes. London: Sage. K. & Miller. and managing brand equity.26 (8). repeat-purchase product. Reliability and validity in qualitative research. (2004). L. M. Keller. 17 (2). (1993).

15 (2). G.. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 5-15.com/en-gb/pricesnews/prices/Trigger/indexs ector. M. Essex: Pearson Education Limited. M. Journal of Marketing Research. 10 (2). Identification of UK fashion retailer use of web sites. repeat purchase product: A replication . Levitt. The marketing imagination. Brand awareness effects on consumer decision making for a common.. Malhotra. Wong. Lutz. The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. J. (2000). B. B. & Bruce. Don't negate the whole field. (1983). 73 . (2001). Consumer brand classifications: An assessment of culture-of-origin versus country-of-origin. P. R. Marketing Research. 386-393. K. & King. Retrieved July 9. 120-136. Homewood: Irwin. 43-45. T.FTSE Macdonald.htm?bsg=true&in=1191205. 48 (1). Journal of Business Research. B. Journal of Product & Brand Management.londonstockexchange. A. (2007). London: Collier-Macmillan. A. 2007 from http://www. G. Mackenzie. S. & O'Cass. Saunders. Levy. London Stock Exchange. FTSE 100 constituents. & Weitz. M. Principles of marketing. (2005). (1992). Lim. K. & Armstrong. V. 32 (8). E. (2003). Retailing management. Marciniak..Kotler. N. T. R. & Belch. (2004). (1986). & Sharp. 23 130-143.

Sage: London. Marketing Magazine. An information processing model of advertising effectiveness. London: Macmillan Press . 23 (9). 156-180). S. G. M. Mooij. M. 23 (4). (1998). 263-277.Marney. Ratchford. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. J.. McGuire. Moore. J. Davis. Moorthy. (1989). (1995). Recall and consumer consideration sets: Influencing 74 . 310-320. Nedungadi. 14. Global marketing and advertising: Understanding cultural paradoxes. Murphy Brands: The new wealth creators (pp. Consumer information search revisited: Theory and empirical analysis.4. B. October 12). McCracken. M. The Guardian. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (1990). Who is the celebrity endorser?. New York: Ronald Press. p. J. London: SAGE Publications. Selling in tongues. L. Miles. J. J. High interest rates hurt store cards. P. (1995). & Huberman. Journal of Consumer Research . In S. From rags to riches: Creating and benefiting from fashion own-brand. 1-12). (1997). Journal of Consumer Research . & Talukdar. In H. (1978). M. C. 100 (38). 19-27. What is branding?. B. Mintel (2003). (1994). A. (1998). Clothing retailing: UK. Murphy. A. Mintel (2002. W. London: Mintel Publications. Silk Behavioural and management sciences in marketing (pp. T. D. 6 (3). Hart.

S. J. purchase decision. 7 283-294. J. L. N. M. Introduction to e-commerce. Durvasula. & Jaworski. B. M. (2003). M. Schiffman. T. 263-276. Consumer behavior. 75 . (2000). A. (2004). Rayport.choice without altering brand evaluations. Lewis. Upper Saddle River. London: Prentice Hall. & Kanuk. Heslop. Maas. (2003). G. Essentials of marketing research. D. G. F. E. How to advertise: What works. Papadopoulos. 28 320-327.. Porter. Research in Marketing. Journal of Marketing Research. L. & Lichtenstein. L. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. J. P. An assessment of consumers product. (2000). what doesn't-and why. London: Free Press. K. R. & Nisenholtz. & Thornhill.. 17 (3). A. & Bamossy. Essex: Pearson Education Limited. London: Kogan Page. advertising and consumption involvement in fashion clothing. Journal of Consumer Research. 21 545-576. A comparative image analysis of domestic versus imported products. Research methods for business students... A cross-national assessment of the reliability and validity of the CETSCALE. Proctor. (1991). (2005). Journal of Economic Psychology . N. A. Roman. (1991). New York: McGraw-Hill. O'Cass. (2000). Saunders. Netemeyer.

Potentials in Marketing. (2006). Smith. J. In G. Sherman. 32-48. & McCall. 30 (9).NJ: Prentice Hall. A & Osborn. H.91. 322-341). D. V. Breakwell. M. G. C. Silverman. Aggleton. In J. 345-355. In P. J. S. In 76 . A. Smith Research methods in psychology (pp. Journal of Fashion Marketing & Management . S. (1994). D. November 30). 7 (4). Fife-Schaw. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Hammond. (2000). social practices . N. Managing corporate and brand identities in the Asia-Pacific region. Silverman. G. Doing qualitative research. (1992. (2003). C. Accounts of organizations: Organizational structures and the accounting process. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. Silverman. (1997). (1975).. D. p. & Pan. Making sense of a precipice: Constituting identity in an HIV clinic. Lewes: Falmer. O'Malley. (1989). McKinlay Processing people: Cases in organizational behaviour . Y. Siddiqui. M. A & Eatough. Hart. B. Retailer and consumer perceptions of online fashion retailers: Web design issues. A. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. 14-16. (2003). J. London: Holt. Fortune. Harvesting the power of word of mouth. Rinehart and Winston. J. Schmitt. 36 (4). Silverman. Davies AIDS: Social representations. California Management Review. P. Smith. How to prosper in the value decade.

51-80). International Journal of Management. South. G.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2006_e/section4_e/iv82. 2005. O.. (2007). Askegaard. & Spitze.wto. & Gnoth. 3-14. Journal of Brand Management. S. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management . M. J. The effects of subliminal advertising on consumer attitudes and buying intentions. Housework in marital and non-marital households. 8 (1). (2004).. W. 139-148. Spending on clothing and attitudes to debt in the UK. A. Strauss. M. & Mohamad. Retrieved March 12. Country image and international tertiary education. Web site: http://www. London: Falmer Press.. Weekes. (2006). Noor. (1990).J. S. (2002). Newbury Park. & Liu. M.xls Yasin. Smith Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. Does image of country-of-origin matter to brand equity?. J. 24 (1). Srikatanyoo.K. Bamossy. 10 (2). N. & Hogg. A. World Trade Organization. N. 113-122. M.. Liang. G. Tesch. Consumer behaviour: A European perspective. Leading exporters and importers of clothing. 2007 from World Trade Organization. CA: SAGE. J. Essex: Pearson Education Limited. American Sociological Review. Solomon. & Corbin. M. Tsai. London: Sage. M. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Journal of Product & Brand 77 . (1990). (2007). N. R. (2006). T. (1994). 59 327-347. Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools.

(2007). Yoo. & Lee. An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity . Donthu.com/i06/index. S. ZARA. Stores locator. 28 (2). 195-211. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2007 from http://www. 16 (1).Management.html 78 . Retrieved June 16. N.zara. B.. 38-48. (2000).

U. France U. France U.S. Netherlands France France U. U.S.com Pizza Hut Danone Caterpillar Motorola Kodak adidas Rolex Zara Audi Hyundai BP Panasonic Reuters Kraft Porsche Hermes Tiffany & Co. Japan U.S.S.S.S.Korea Italy Italy Italy Britain Germany U.S. Germany U. U. U. Switzerland U. Germany U.S.S. U. U. Italy U. Finland Japan U.S.S. (Data adopted from Business Week (2007)) 79 . France U.S.S. U.S. France U.S.S.S. Britain Japan U. Japan S. U. U.S.S.S. U.S.S.S.S. U.S. U. U. U. U.S. Britain U.S.S.S. U. Hennessy Duracell ING Cartier Moet & Chandon Johnson & Johnson Shell Nissen Starbucks Lexus Smirnoff LG Bulgari Prada Armani Burberry Nivea Levi Name Nintendo Country Japan U.S. U. U.S.S. U. Japan Britain S. U.S.Korea Britain Japan Britain U.Appendix 1: The 100 Top Brands 2006 Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Microsoft IBM GE Intel Nokia Toyota Disney McDonald Mercedes-Benz Citi Marlboro Hewlett-Packard American Express BMW Gillette Louis Vuitton Cisco Honda Samsung Merrill Lynch Pepsi Nescafe Google Dell Sony Budweiser HSBC Oracle Ford Nike UPS JPMorgan SAP Canon Morgan Stanley Goldman Sachs Pfizer Apple Kellogg Ikea UBS Novartis Siemens Harley-Davidson Gucci eBay Philips Accenture MTV Name Coca-Cola Country U.S.S.S. Germany U.S.S.S.S.S.S. France U. Germany Japan U. U.S.S. Switzerland U. Germany Switzerland Spain Germany S. U.S.S. U.S. Germany France U.S. U.Korea U. Rank 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 Gap L’Oreal Heinz Yahoo! Volkswagen Xerox Colgate Wrigley KFC Chanel Avon Nestle Kleenex Amazon.S.S. U. Sweden Switzerland Switzerland Germany U. Netherlands Bermuda U. U.S.

Which categories of clothes do you usually buy? 4. Why do you like this brand? 11. Do you regularly buy the same brand of clothes? 8. Do you shop online for clothes? 12. Can you comment on what brand is to you? (Note: Further probing questions would be asked after each of the above question if necessary) 80 . In what ways do you usually learn about clothing brands? 6. Do you recommend brands? 9. What is it about particular clothes that make you buy them? 5. How often do you buy clothes? 2. How do you judge the quality of the clothes? 7. How much do you spend on clothing each month? 3. Can you describe the image of your favorite brand? 10. What would you do if you are satisfied or dissatisfied about the clothes you purchase? 13.Appendix 2: Interview Questions Name: Course: Nationality: Age: Year of study: Year of living in your home country: 1.

In England. so normally I spent 30 pounds more or less each time when I went shopping. normally I buy clothes 4 times a year (for each season). so in winter. I would like to ask you about your purchasing behaviour on clothes. Chris: How much do you spend on clothing each month? In case of China and also the UK? Kevin: In China. I had a girlfriend who likes shopping. Chris: Which categories of clothes do you usually buy? I mean high-priced. Kevin. Chris: So you buy clothes less frequently in the UK. It would talk about 30 minutes. In England. I was the company. I will buy clothes if there are discounts. 81 . maybe 3 times a year.Appendix 3: Interview Transcription Name: Kevin Fang Age: 23 Gender: Male Nationality: Chinese Chris: Hi. Summer clothes are cheaper than winter clothes. it would be like 40 to 50 pounds. Chris: Why? Kevin: Because in China. around 20 to 30 pounds each time. How often do you buy clothes? Kevin: In China. Kevin: Yes. since clothes are more expensive than those in China.

medium-priced or low-priced?

Kevin: Medium-priced. I don’t buy very cheap clothes. I prefer higher quality, good taste, so these clothes are more expensive.

Chris: What about the kinds of clothes you buy? Sports apparel, casual wear, formal wear or others?

Kevin: The first two. I buy casual wear more frequently than sports apparels. Sports apparels are just for doing some exercises, and I won’t wear sports apparels on streets. But I buy trainers.

Chris: You really seldom buy formal wear.

Kevin: There are not many chances for me to wear. I have one, just one.

Chris: What is it about particular clothes that make you buy them?

Kevin: I prefer quality as I said, and good taste…I prefer some grand clothes…I like Jack and Jones, and Levi’s. For shoes, I like adidas and Reeboks.

Chris: You have mentioned something about price before, so do you think price is one of your considerations?

Kevin: Yes of course. My girlfriend likes to go to some markets where she can find many cheap clothes. Some of them are on discount and some of them are out of season, she is pursuing that kind of clothes.

Chris: What about you?

82

Kevin: I like buying shoes in a very good ground. I don’t like bargain with the prices. Some clothes have the absolute prices.

Chris: So when you went to the market with your girlfriend, did you buy them? Because normally we need to bargain in the market.

Kevin: If you go to some small shops, these clothes do not have ground, you can bargain with the shop assistants. But in some shopping malls, some clothes have ground, you cannot bargain with them. Because they are of fixed prices and the quality is good.

Chris: Which one do you prefer? Shops or Market?

Kevin: Shops.

Chris: What about brand?

Kevin: Yea, Jack and Jones.

Chris: What about country of origin?

Kevin: Um…I’m not sure which countries these clothes come from because some are made in China, maybe the designers are from other countries. Most of them I think they are from Europe.

Chris: So you have no special preferences?

Kevin: No.

Chris: If I divide the question into 2, maybe do you have any preference for the country of manufacture?
83

Kevin: As I said, most of them are made in China.

Chris: What about the country of design?

Kevin: Europe.

Chris: Do you have special preferences for the clothes made in Europe?

Kevin: Actually, we can’t find the clothes made in Europe, but in China.

Chris: What about advertising?

Kevin: Advertising is important. Sometimes, I go shopping for clothes just up to the advertising…and maybe there are reputations.

Chris: Do you have any advertisement series come to your mind?

Kevin: Levi’s…their advertisement for jeans is very impressive…so are the one from Jack and Jones.

Chris: What is the advertisement about? For Levi’s, why can it make you so memorable?

Kevin: Because people who wear the clothes look very nice, look very handsome with the clothes.

Chris: You mentioned some people appearing in this advertisement. Are these people celebrities?

Kevin: No, just models. Some of them are Chinese and some of them are foreigners.
84

So it needs to keep the quality for that period. it will.Chris: If some advertisements feature the celebrities. For winter clothes. Chris: What about peer influence? Do you know some brands from your friends? Kevin: Yes. For summer clothes. from my perspective. 85 . would it have an impact on you to buy the clothes? Kevin: Yes. of course. Chris: Do you talk about buying clothes with your friends frequently? Kevin: No. and from my mind. they are nice to put them on. on the streets. I can’t afford it. advertisements in the shopping mall. Chris: But you maybe affected by them. but the prices for these kinds of clothes are high. Chris: How do you judge the quality of clothes? Kevin: It depends. How can they affect you? Kevin: Maybe they buy very nice clothes. not frequently. I will consider them. so maybe next time I go shopping. I only wear them for one to two year. Chris: In what way do you usually learn about clothing brands? Kevin: TV. they put posters in the public areas. it may be longer.

then it’s of high quality. 86 . Chris: Do you have some ideas that which countries’ clothes you think they are of highest or lowest quality? Kevin: Korea (for E-land). Chris: So you judge the quality in terms of durability.Chris: So if it’s durable. Chris: What about lowest quality? Kevin: China…maybe. some brands have their own manufacturing (plants) in China. you know. Kevin: As long as it can. and Demank (Jack and Jones). I never compare which clothes come from which countries. Chris: Any others to judge the quality? Kevin: Colour…the feeling…whether or not it becomes fade after washing it. by the colour. Would country of origin affect your perceptions towards clothes quality? Kevin: As I said most of them are made in China. keep the quality until out-of-date. Chris: So you think these two countries produce the highest quality clothes? Kevin: I consider brands more than the countries. by the feeling of texture and whether it will fade or not. these clothes are from very good brands and they quality is conceivable. I think their quality is good.

Chris: Do you regularly buy the same brand of clothes? Kevin: Every time I go shopping. Chris: You mean China usually sells cheap clothes? Kevin: Yea. Chris: So because of the quality and the appearance. famous among young people. Kevin: No. it’s high Chris: Do you recommend brands to your friends or someone else? 87 . I will go to those places…not E-land. we prefer clothes from other countries. Chris: So you believe quality goes with prices? Kevin: Actually for young people. the appearance is more important…the quality. maybe cheaper than from other countries.Chris: Why do you have such feelings? Kevin: I think quality goes high as prices go high. I think quality is not a problem for these brands. Chris: So you mean maybe China has some famous brands in sport apparels. it just likes Jack and Jones. we may buy some sport apparels like LiNing. I only bought E-land once… I also buy clothes from Kuhle. you go to that shop again to buy clothes? Kevin: Ah. of course. but it doesn’t have any brands in casual wear category. not many. but for casual wear.

So. I don’t know. To be honest. Chris: So you mentioned something about colour and simplicity. but I know many people do. maybe they will ignore it. For T-shirt. I am a little bit fat and if I put on it. if it is fit to me. After I put it on. you can buy it online. maybe they will keep in mind. I prefer some simple image. 88 . I prefer very colorful image. If you can’t find in the market or in the shops. Chris: Can you describe the image of your favorite brand? Kevin: I prefer very simple image. The clothes online are cheap. Maybe girls can find more suitable size than guys do. Chris: Why not? Kevin: I think every one has their own place. For jeans. advertising is the first impression and packaging is on-the-spot influence. I will buy it. I prefer blue jeans. if I recommend my preference to him or her. For shirts. I know many girls do that. Chris: Do you shop online for clothes? Kevin: No. like grid shirts. I never buy clothes online. how does such image come from? Kevin: I think its appearance. I can see how it looks like. like the clothes from the markets. Chris: Does such image come from advertising and packaging? Kevin: Yea.Kevin: No.

You can find some clothes which you can’t buy in the shops or markets. Chris: What are the bad things of buying clothes online? Kevin: As I said. at least once a week. the size may not fit and the quality as well… Chris: What would you do if you are satisfied or dissatisfied about the clothes you purchased? Kevin: If I am satisfied with the clothes I bought. Chris: If the shops do offer you some loyalty cards. they will give me 5 to 10 percent discount or some credits. I will not go to the see any clothes within a short interval. So next time I go to these shops to buy clothes. but less frequently.Chris: So. Kevin: Yea. 89 . I can get some gifts from the accumulated credits. it maybe the advantage of buying clothes online. But if I’m not satisfied with it. I have one from Kuhle and one from Jack and Jones. maybe after one or two month. they will give me a VIP card. of course I will wear it. maybe take it as my pajamas. that’s the main advantage. just after finish shopping. Chris: If you are satisfied. would you apply for it? Kevin: Yea. I will wear it very regularly. would you go to the same shops to have a look again? Kevin: Maybe I will go there next season when I go shopping. As long as l finish shopping. if I buy clothes more than 40 or 50 pounds once. Normally. maybe they are there. I will go there again to see some new clothes…new arrival…But I will not go to the same shops very frequently.

Chris: That’s all for the interview.like some accessories. It may not the spirit of the clothes. wallet. I would like you to help me finish a sentence starting with ‘Brand is’. sunglasses. but it represents the taste and quality of them. Thanks very much. belts. glasses. Chris: So you said ‘Brand is just like the name of people. something like that. 90 .