Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CRYSTAllizATiON
INduSTRiAl
CRYSTAllizATiON
EdiTEd by
J. W. MulliN
University of London
v
PREFACE
Session A
SECONDARY NUCLEATION
vii
viii CONTENTS
Session B
CRYSTAL GROWTH KINETICS
Session C
CRYSTAL HABIT MODIFICATION
Session D
CRYSTALLIZER DESIGN
Session E
CRYSTALLIZER OPERATION AND CASE STUDIES
Index 471
Secondary
Nucleation
SECONDARY NUCLEATION - A REVIEW
GREGORY D. BOTSARIS
1. INTRODUCTION
3
G.D. BOTSARIS
-+
A+A+
, , , , ,
, , , , , , (1)
, , , , , ,
A.l - 1 +A ~ A.l
o
w
w
(f)
~IOO
w
a::
....0::>
::> 80
....a::
(f)
w
•
:;:
<I 0
(f) 60
0
:x:
.... !&----tr-----
~
(f)
..J 40· CONDITIONS' PURE, STAGNANT SOLUTIONS
<I
....
(f)
>-
•
0
LH SEED
RH SEED
a::
0
D NO SEED
....0 20
::>
0
0
a::
a.
"- 00
0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15
if.
SUPERCOOLI NG, ·C
PURE
12 ppm ROI'4~~-'---'''''-
234 S 6789101112 13 14 IS
SUPERCOOLING, • C
Lal et ale (25) and Clontz and McCabe ( 9) used the same
system (MgS0 4 .7H2 0) as Sung et al. They failed, however, to
observe any nuclei breeding at ~T<4°C, while Sung et ale did
obs~rve nucleation at such supersaturations. The latter advanced
a very convincing explanation for this discrepancy: particles
(potential nuclei) are removed from the crystal surface in both
cases. However, their size is such that they do not survive at the
low supersaturations of the former investigators' experiments.
In Sung's experiments the generated potential nuclei were immed-
iately introduced into a region of high supersaturation where they
could survive and grow to crystals.
The "survival theory" assumes also that the number and the
size of the particles removed from the crystals is independent of
supersaturation. Sung et al., however, found that the number of
particles removed from the crystal by the shearing action of the
fluid does depend on the supersaturation.
Actually the same report indicates that when the crystals are
left to grow before sliding, the number of nuclei produced is not
anymore reproducible from crystal to crystal. This was attributed
to the fact that it is highly improbable for two different growing
crystals to have the same exactly profile of growth irregularities
on the surface, even when the experimental conditions are the same.
SECONDARY NUCLEATION 11
RTV Silicone
5.3% wt NaCl Uncoated
265 J/rft!>.
0.10 ~TR·Q7·K
0.05
• Baffles a Walls
o AlJit~tor
om
~T(·K)
0.10
T..
• 10"10 wt
0.05 o 3Y3"1o wt
• 1"10
002
(3)
The work of Evans et al. has definitely opened a new path for
the future developments in the field
-VN =. k
N
(t.c)
n
~.
1
m
(4)
were developed, where N/V is the nucleation rate per unit volume
and t.c the supersaturation.
where RPM are the revolutions per minute of the stirrer and TIPS
the impeller tip speed (ft/min).
Shor and Larson (43) and Liu and Botsaris (27) working with
SECONDARY NUCLEATION 21
5. CONCLUDING REMARKS
6. REFERENCES
1. Bauer, L.G., M.A. Larson and V.J. Dallons, Chem. Eng. Sci.,~
1253 (1974).
2. Bennett, R.C., H. Fiedelman and A.D. Randolph, C.E.P., ~,
86-93 (1973).
3. Botsaris, G.D., paper presented at the 5th Symposium on
Industrial Crystallization, CHISA, 1972, Praha, Czechoslovakia,
September 1972.
4. Botsaris, G.D., Denk,E.G'., and J. Chua, AIChE Symposium Series,
68, (No. 121), 21 (1972).
5. Botsaris, G.D., G. Sutwala and G. Molina-de-Longoria, paper
presented at 77th Annual AIChE Meeting, Pittsburgh, June 3,1974.
6. Burton, W.K., N. Cabrera and F.C. Frank, Phil. Trans. Roy.
Soc., A243,299 (1951).
7. Cayey, N.W., and J. Estrin, Ind. Eng. Chem.-Fundamentals, ~,
13 (1967).
8. Cise, M.D., and A.D. Randolph, AIChE Symposium Series, 68
(121), 42 (1972).
9. Clontz, N.A, and W.L. McCabe, Chem. Eng. Progress, Symposium
Series, 67 (No. 110), 6 (1971).
10. Denk, E.G, Jr., "Fundamental Studies in Secondary Nucleation",
Ph.D. thesis, Dept. Chem. Eng. Tufts Univ. Medford,Mass. (1971)
11. Denk, E; G., and G. D. Botsaris, J. Crystal Growth, 13/14,
493 (1972). --
12. Denk, E.G., and G. D. Botsaris, J. Crystal Growth, 15, 57 (1972).
13. Desai, R. M., J.W. Rachow and D. C. Timm, AIChE J. 20, 43 (1974).
14. Estrin, J., "Secondary Nucleation" to be published in
"Preparation and Properties of Solid State Materials",
Marcel Dekker, New York.
15. Evans, T.W., G. Margolis., A.F. Sarofim, AIChE J., 20, 950 (1974).
16. Evans, T.W., A.F. Sarofim and G. Margolis, AIChE J. 20, 959
(1974).
22 G.D. BOTSARIS
17. Fasoli U., and R. Conti, Kristal und Technik, 8, 931 (1973).
18. Frenkel, J., "Kinetic Theory of Liquids", p. 384, Dover Pub.
19. Garabedian, H., and R.F. Strickland-Constable, J. Crystal
Growth, 13/14, 506 (1972).
20. Garabedian, H., and R.F. Strickland-Constable, J. Crystal
Growth, 22, 188 (1974).
21. Garten, V.A.; and R.B. Head, J. Crystal Growth, ~, 349 (1970).
22. Johnson, R.T., Rouseau, R.W., ~nd W.L. McCabe, AIChE
Symposium Series, 68 (121), 31 (1972).
23. Kane, S.G., T.W. Evans, P.L.T. Brian and A.F. Sarofim,
AIChE J •• 20, 855 (1974).
24. Kliya, M.O~ Soviet Physics-Crystallography, I, 456 (1956).
25. Lal, D.P., R.E.A. Mason, and R.F. Str~ckland-Constable,
J. Crystal Growth, ~, 1 (1969).
26. Larson, M.A., Timm, D.C., and P.R. Wolff, AIChE J. 14,
488 (1968).
27. Liu, Yih-An, and·G.D. Botsaris, AIChE J., 19, 510 (1973).
28. Melia, T.P., and W.P. Moffitt, J. Colloid Sci., 19, 433 (1964).
29. Melia, T.P., Moffit, W.P., Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundamentals 1,
313 (1964).
30. Miers, H.C., Isaac, F.J., J. Chem. Soc. 89, 413 (1906).
31. Mo1ina-de-Longoria, G.O., MS thesis, Dept. of Chemical Eng.
Tufts University, 1975.
32. Mullin J.W., and C.L. Leci, AIChE Symposium Series, 68
(121), 8 (1972).
33. Ohara, M., and R.C.Reid,"Mode1ing Crystal Growth Rates from
Solution~ Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1973).
34. Ottens, E.P.K., Janse, A.H., and E.J. deJong, J. Crystal Growth
13/14 500 (1972).
35. Ottens, E.P.K., and E.J. deJong, I&EC Fundamentals, 12, 179
(1973).
36. Powers, H.E.C., Nature, 178, 139 (1956). Chemistry and Industry
14, 627 (1962). Industrial Chemist. p. 351 (July, 1963).
37. Randolph, A.D., and M.D. Cise, AIChE J., 18, 798 (1972).
38. Randolph, A.D., and M.A. Larson, AIChE J.-,-8, 639 (1962).
39. Randolph, A.D., and S.K. Sikdar, AIChE J., 20, 410 (1974).
40. Rogacheva, E.D., A.V. Belyustin, T.K. Vyatkina and N.M. Khrenova,
Soviet Physics - Crystallography, !l, 378 (1972).
41. Saratovkin, D.O., 'bendrite Crystallization;' Consultants Bureau
Inc., New York, p. 64-65 (1959).
42. Shah, B.C., W.L. McCabe and R.W. Rousseau, AIChE J., 19, 194
(1973).
43. Shor, S.M., and M.A. Larson, Chem. Eng. Progr. Symposium Sere
67 0.10), 32 (1971).
44. Strickland-Constable, R.F. AIChE Symp.Ser.68 (No.121), 1 (1972).
45. Sung,C.Y., J.Estrin and G.R. Youngquist, AIChE J., 19, 957 (1973)
46. Tai, C.Y.,'W.L.McCabe and R.W.Rousseau, paper presented at 77th
Annual AIChE Meeting, Pittsburgh, June 3,(1974)
47. Youngquist,G.R., and A.D.Rando1ph, AIChE J. 18, 421 (1972).
ATTRITION AND SECONDARY NUCLEATION IN AGITATED CRYSTAL SLURRIES
P.D.B. Bujac
INTRODUCTION
23
2,( P.D.B. BUJAC
ATTRITION STUDIES
10
• ____---------11 98 f~
-Ii
..,
Q
8
'"
UJ
..J
6
U
f-
a:
<t
a. 4
...
0
III
a:
UJ
m
:;
::J
Z
TIME (MINUTES)
~
:; 0
..J 5 II
z'"
::? 0
n
II ~
::J
c
Z ~
\!)
UJ
4 0
~ ..J
f-
<t
..J Z
::J Q
:; f-
::J ::J
~ m
\!) 3 a:
f-
0 III
..J
0
UJ
f- UJ
<t N
a: ;;;
z f-
0 U
~ <t
a.
a: ~
f-
f- 10 20 30 40
<t 0
PARTICLE DIAMETER D (I'm)
rates are true attrition rates. The general form of the attrition
function is shown in Fig •. 2. This indicates the exponential
dependence of numbers on size and the ease with which fragments can
be produced in agitated PE systems.
o
Z
.. ..
o<-'...J
III 3
~
""
a:
z
Q
~
~ 2
~
""
0· .. 0·7
LOG HOLD - UP
z
~ 40
,..:--
,
o
"
A 30
...o
Z
U.J
>
I-
<i
:3 20
~
:::>
u
U.J
I-
<i
a: 10 •
z >< I.L. VESSEL
0 x
l-
I(
• 5 L
a:
l-
.e:
• 6 20L
l- I(
<i
20 40 60 80
POWER INPUT TO VESSEL (ARB'TARY UNITS)
CRYSTALLISER STUDlES
z l( ATTRITION DATA
• MSMPR DATA
~ 4
- - EXTRAPOLATED
MSMPR SIEVE DATA
o
"..o 3
Z
...>
-
...«
:5 2
~
::>
u
Cl
o..J
10 30 40
PARTICLE DIAMETER D 'tAm)
Fig. 5 Size Distribution from MSMPR Crystalliser
ATTRITION AND SECONDARY NUCLEATION 29
DISCUSSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
NOMENCLATURE
a constant
b constant
D equivalent spherical diameter of particle
H crystal hold-up (g crystal/1OO ml of liquor)
Ilia (D) rate of production of fragments of size (D) by
attrition
m exponent in attrition rate equation
P power input
V volume of crystalliser
a relative supersaturation
REFERENCES
R.F. STRICKLAND-CONSTABLE
SUMMARY
Clontz & McCabe {2} have found in one typical experiment with
MgS0 4 .7H 20 that secondary contact nucleation resulted from the
expenditure of 2.2 ergs of work per nucleus.
INTRODUCTION
33
34 R.F. STRICKLAND-CONSTABLE
SURVIVAL THEORY
h = (1)
o. is the surface free energy of the ith face, and is its per-h.
p~ndicular distance from a fixed point within the cry~tal. Since
accurate values for the o. are seldom known, this formula, although
much more elegant than (I) is of restricted practical use.
COLLISION BREEDING FROM SOLUTION OR MELT 35
= R T x* J""R T [x :* x* ]
Q,n [ X (2)
d~ = V dP (3 )
2 x 42.4 x 147
h = = 9.7 x 10- 6 cm
1. 28 x 10 9
t Perry {4} P 247, gives a value of 1. 34 x lOll ergs /mole for the
heat evolved on solution of Epsomite at high dilution: we have
increased this to 1.8 x lOll to allow for the fact that in the
present case the solution is saturated.
COLLISION BREEDING FROM SOLUTION OR MELT 37
APPENDIX I
Heat of melting
= 2 x A
2 x lOll
= 2 x 2.34 x 10 9 = 42.4
APPENDIX I I
100
= 30 x 0L = 3.3
40 R.F . STRICKLAND-CONSTABLE
NOMENCLATURE
REFERENCES
Waseda University
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL
41
42 K. TOYOKURA ET AL.
Tank (8) and the state of the solution in the cell was watched
through a microscope. After several minutes, very small fines
appeared uniformly over the bottom surface of the cell and they
then grew larger to almost the same size. No further new crystals
appeared.
RESULTS
(1)
These data are almost the same as the mean crystal growth rates
calculated from the data of Mullin and Garside (1). Therefore,
growth rates of potash alum crystals may be considered approximately
independent of crystal size for industrial purposes (discussed
later) when the fluidized seed crystals have a size distribution
and the mean crystal size is used for calculation purposes.
0.040f---+--f--t-
E 0.035,r--t---+
.!:!.
0.030r-+--
0.D2 51--+--f---+t'---+t'--1
~ 0,020
u
"0 0,015
~
'iii
10 tludized bed ~
8
void fraction 0.55-0.91 .~
0 I = 0.121- 0.163 o~
0 0
V 1= 0,061-0,074
o~O
~ ~j
NE (1)/ ~o /6
.I.!. /B
~ 1/'
g ,
0.7 vr-~
05
/0
/
:v
0.3 V
V
0.2
-....
0.1
V
V b L
VL
0.0 7
0.0 5f-- V- r-VV-V
L
0.0
3
0.0 2
1/ ..l!... 6
fixed bed
void fraction Q36-0.47
0.00 7 ~ J
0,1 0,2 0,3 0,5 D.7 1 2' 3 5 7 10 20 30 5070100 200 300
Re2?(fld'\'02 «mol/l(H 2 0l 3 )
Fig. 3 Correlation between secondary nucleation rate and
Re 2 . 5 (f::,C)3.3
44 K. TOYOKURA ET AL.
When f' was plotted against Reynolds number for a constant super-
saturation, eq.4 was obtained:
(4)
Plotting the data on the basis of eqs 3 and 4 (Fig.3) gave the
following correlations:
Design Equations
Ko , b, and n are constants. G' and R- are the growth rate and
crystal size. From these assumptions, a height Z and cross-
section area S of a crystallizer become (2):
Z = 3Pkv R-i- b (C.F.C.)/~3 Kob,C~a
Design Procedure
4. f is obtained from
f = C'u
where C' is the concentration.
When f~R.JI. and f6 are plotted against ACI on a log-log basis, they
yield two straight lines, and the required supersaturation AC1*, is
the point of intersection.
(C.F.C. )mean, n = 1i
,~n/dy / (1-E2y l /3) {I+( ~-l )(Yf-l)}n (17) ,
(18)
Y1
(C.F.C.)
=cons t ,n
= ~1 \llny 4 dy/{l+(\ll-1)(y L l)/(y L l)}n (18)
1
I
FI
aU
= lYl
1
at('/1.~~)3HhT r~' (1+
(2l )
3Pc p ¢ny 2 dy
x
MKo~Cn£2{1+(¢-1)(y3_1)/(y'3_1)}n
2 I
DISCUSSION
2800
o
o
CD
2000
o
LO
(Y)
N
t ¢ p
(nmf) (-) (ton/mon)
xlO- 2
2.2 4.2 600
2.4 5.1 580
2.8 14.0 524
3.2 21.3 454
3.4 18.9 367
4.1 29.3 260
Fig. 4 Dimensions (rom) and operational data of th.e cone~type
industrial crystallizer
-
0.5
cp = 20
E
E
....... 0.4
...
--
~
3 21.3
0.3
o~
5.10 0 4.2
0.2
100 200 300 400 500 600
p (ton/mon)
Fig.) Correlation between 11 and P
SECONDARY NUCLEATION OF POTASH ALUM 49
REFERENCES
INTRODUCTION
51
S2 C.M. van 't LAND AND B.G. WIENK
SRINE.
VACUUM
5TEAM
t t t
C.ONDENSATE
VAPOUR VAPOUR
SEPARATOR ~EPARATOR
HEAT EXC.HANGER
"'tAT ()(C.H~N"ER
SCREW' PUMP
SC.RE\J PUMP
VAPOUR ~EPARATOR
FLUIDISED CR:iSTAL
BED
HEAT EXCHANGER
SC.REW PUMP
Much work on this topic has been carried out by Mrs M.A.
van Damme-van Weele and W.M. de Wolff (1,2).
Number 1 2 3 '4 5 6 7 8
Wi • % by wt 20 20 20 20 10 10 10 10
u or d u d u d u d u d
d50 • llm 650 700 700 750 600 650 650 700
Neither milled salt nor small salt cubes were added. The tip
velocity of the screw pump was varied. while the circulation rate
in m3 /h was kept constant.
Conclusion
Microscopic Studies
- ' - -......... --
Fig. 6 Laboratory crystalliser
NUCLEATION MECHANISM
1 4 14 0.4 - - 0 + - -
2 5 20 0.5 cubea from No. 1 10-50 600 + 100 -
3 5 20 0.5 cubestsieve fraction
industrial crystalliaer
70-125 300 + 30 -
4 4 12 0.4 chips, dry milled salt <20 200 + - 0
8 -
.
2 14 0.2 chips, wet milled salt*' <40 300 + 0
Conclusions
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
EXPERIMENTS
61
62 J. ESTRIN AND G.R. YOUNGQUIST
from the upper to the lower compartment. The seed crystal was
positioned in the upper compartment, just above one port. Complete
details of this apparatus are available in Sung's thesis. After
the solution and seed (Mg SO!t.7H20) were cooled to the desired
temperature and level of supersaturation., I1Tc, the growth rate of
the seed crystal «110) face) was measured using an optical reader
with internal scale and rider. Solution was drawn into the sub-
merged barrel of a syringe whose plunger was then activated by a
weight to provide a submerged jet of solution of known quantity and
velocity, which impinged upon the centre of the growing face.
Simultaneously the solution from the vicinity of the syringe tip
and seed flowed to the lower compartment maintained at lower
temperature or higher supersaturation., 11T}3. The nuclei developed
here and were counted as they ultimately rested upon the flat
transparent bottom.
RESULTS
Bl = v~H/kTTs
and A and NS are parameters evaluated by a fit of the data - nuclei
counted, NTOT, vs. ~Tc and ~TB. The data fit the functional form
of these relations with respect to supersaturation very well.
DISCUSSION
We wish to discuss the extent of inherent coupling between
growth and secondary nucleation. Following the leads offered by
Botsaris and Denk we recognize that the sources of nuclei are
either from the solid crystal per ~, from solution per ~, or from
the solution-solid interface. The direct approach of Denk and
Botsaris reveals convincingly that, at least for the enantiomorphic
J. ESTRIN AND G.R. YOUNGQUIST
deposition upon the surface occurs easily, and the surface is less
stable to uniform growth and is a potential source for dendrites
and the nuclei observed. The value of a is about 2 for the
magnesium sulphate-water system which permits rapid inherent growth.
SYMBOLS USED
1 2
A corresponds to (36n)3 v 3Y/kT from classical theory
i number of monomers in embryo; il critical size of embryo
relative to llTB; i2 size of embryo which number one in
Boltzmann's distribution
NS fitting parameter; corresponds to total number of all species
at the crystal solution interface
T absolute temperature; Ts saturation temperature
66 J. ESTRIN AND G.R. YOUNGQUIST
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES
TO SECONDARY NUCLEATION
SATOSHI OKUDA
INTRODUCTION
Fig. la shows the De Laval nozzle used for grinding. The feed
materials are forced into high pressure air, and the mixture of
solid particles and air is passed through the nozzle. Fig. lb shows
the De Laval nozzle with secondary air conduits. Fig. lc shows the
nozzle in which feed materials are introduced into the pressure
67
68 S.OKUDA
1 0 - - - 1 0 0 ----4100-
Air
30 ~-------r------------------------------------'
Sample: Lime stone 297-500 ~m
Secondary air pres~;ure: 3.0 kg/cm 2
mixing ratio: 1.00 (Feed/Air)
E
;:::l. Main pressure
--
~ 20 h ......~---t-----r---------------i
~
~ 3.0 kg/cm 2 •
3 3.5 kg/cm 2 t>
>, 4.0 kg/cm 2 0
u
c:
&
CIl
10~j~~-~~~~~D#-~~~~~~
CIl
l-
Ll...
--
l,{')
~
~
2(J 1-h4-1N--Po..-+--t--t-+---f---*-t-\:-i
are observed. The distribution curves with two peaks suggest that
grinding proceeds by a rubbing action and attrition of the surface.
From these experiments, it is clear that the secondary air is used
to grind the feed material to the middle size of about 200~m, and
these middle size particles are produced by splitting due to the
collision of particles accelerated by the secondary air.
G = a/m 1 / 3
W = MeG/1OO = Mea/lOa m1 / 3
= ~
100 •.M_2/3
"'6
M 1/3
a
GRINDING MECHANISM IN FLUID ENERGY MILL 71
Samp1e: Charnotte
-
l tI!
':::::10
III
833'·295 llm
Nozzle type' (a)
4.5 t (throat dia.)
III
10
Q.
~
o::t
0
5
+>
u
Main air pressure
~ • 2 kg/cm 2 (gauge)
~
e I> 3
~
0-
2 <t 4
o 5
5 10 50
Mixing ratio m [Solid/Air]
Fig. 3 Relation between product and mixing ratio
10
<II 70
~
10 r- t- Sample : PMMA 500-590 llm .-
<II 50
u
10 J I
'9
I+-
~
O'l
) r;
~
III .......
....
u '"EU
I+-
j
U V)
<II
Q. <J
III
On the other hand, the reduction of feed size G' (%) (= l-R,
where R is the residue of feed size) has the same relation between
m:
~ = G
a' G'
c I 111i~
o :l.
+-> .... fU"' ~
--
G ex: m-Q.44-o.47
~ 50 .... ~
....
~
lr'1
G "'t ~
-
ex: m O•42
"'C
CIJ - ~
5t!l ~
+->
u ~ 1,1,Jor-
i""1""
~
LL.
20
u~
--
........ 50
l(~
I:; S ex: m-D·s t---
.... e
..... u ""'(
I ~ .....
~~
u-
CIJ
ro r--..
Q.V)
IIl<J
~
I:; S ex: m 0.3
jQ:
.... 10
OCIJ ~
~
ClJra
III I I III I~~
raCIJ
ClJU Sample: PMMA,590-7l0 J.Im
~ra
u .... Nozzle type: (a)
C~
>,';
UO
1
,.... r-..-'
-X
I
c'J
·~~IJ.O 5 d.
O/. .......
-
ue n ex: m 0.6
..... u
....
CIJ
>,
". JY"
t;'
~~
K
~
CIJ )
~ 0.0 2
0.04 0.1 0.5 1.0
Mixing ratio m [-J
Fig. 5. G, 1:;8, n vs m (Target collision)
74 S.OKUDA
=
Within the limits of experiment (mixing ratio m 0.1-1.0,
particle diameter Ds = 250-1100pm, air pressure P = 3.0-5.0 kg/cm2
gauge), the following relation for the impact velocity Y (m/s) was
confirmed for a 900 fiat target:
( 8)
(10)
(11)
#
.~ U
~-
~
Q):%
.......
c::nV) 5
.~ <1
,"=, 11
c:: C'
~
<.!)
1
0.01 0.05 0.1 0.5 1.0
Mixing ratio m [Solid/Air]
n ex: mI' 0
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
Torino, Italy
INTRODUCTION
COLLISION NUCLEATION
77
78 U. FASOLI AND R. CONTI
r k IX
a
na2
This energy is equal to the power spent per unit volume P
multiplied by the volume of suspension engaged by the crystal and
by an efficiency coefficient, taking account that the energy spent
for nucleation is only a part of the total energy spent by the
crystal (the other part is dissipated by friction losses, elastic
behaviour, and so on). Experimental data have shown that the
volume engaged is proportional to the volume of the crystals and
therefore it is possible to write:
r k IX
a
na2 = nl N a
s
ns3 P
a n2 P
s s
r k a n2 = nl n ms u 2
a a
where u is the mobility of the crystal, put equal to the ratio
between its velocity v and the force F applied to it, n is the
number of collisions of the crystal in the time unit (and therefore
equal to l/Zs where Zs is the time interval between two subsequent
collisions) and rna is the mass of the crystal.
B,y comparing expressions 2 and 3 we can get:
N
= lmsv [4]
2 Fzs
which shows the meaning of the dimensionless number N since msv is
the momentum of the crystal and Fzs the impulse of the force applied
to it: N is the ratio between the theoretical maximum energy pro~
ortional to msv, and the energy dissipated in the surrounding fluid
poing to the shear stress, proportional to Fzs.
SECONDARY NUCLEATION IN AGITATED CRYSTALLIZERS 79
COEFFICIENT k
OTHER PARAMETERS
Power spent in the volume unit P. The power supplied to the sus-
pension was measured with a torque-meter (Vibro-meter sa.,
Fribourg, Switzerland). The total power was calculated by multi-
plying the torque by the agitator rotational speed. P was cal-
culated by dividing the total power by the volume of the suspension.
I
1T -
= D [ ( Pc g 6" ) 3 I ] [5]
s pC s
v = [6]
k et p3/2u 3 / 2D9/ 2m
a s s
= [9]
EXPERIMENTAL
4
$jleed
rellucer ~--...........,~ -.M!!ts
4 Ilat
blades
/'
~.:
./ ~
l- I '-
-
.~
din
I >J-<
In
q, 1 5in
thermostatic I
L..-._ _ _ _- - - I ba1h
61 •
r••
0
0• 7
o •
• 32
~
••
.1.
0 • 4 o 11
• 5
,_Of
0 c~ •
00
• •
~. ~
• -
Cl
0
• Cl
tTa
~
~
l·ttI l
oI 5 10 15 I 4 4 I
RESULTS
TYpe B runs. Since in the type A runs the initial values of rare
rather scattered, some tests were made with nickel-ammonium sulphate
crystals of e~ual dimensions (Ds = 1.06 rom). The crystals were grown
from 0.9 rom at different supersaturations: S = 1.08, 1.12 and
1.16.
The results are shown in Fig.3. They indicate that the scatter-
ing observed in the type A runs was due to the nifferent super-
saturations llsed to grow the crystals and confirm once more that
secondary nucleation is largely affected by supersaturation by means
of the remarkable variations caused in the value of k.
CONCLUSIONS
Table 1
run. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
I,ll 508 700 100 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700
0, c. .120 .120 .120 .120 .120 .14& .141 .146 .173 .173 .173
ell
P
-;;:;r 1200 5340 9310 5100 5940 5340 5650 5940 5340 5640 5940
I
Cs
-;;r .2&55 .2&55 .2&55 .177 .0885 .2655 .177 .0815 .2155 .177 .0815
d ell .078 .078 .078 .107 .16& .095 .130 .201 .112 .154 .238
CII
u 17.13 17.13 17.13 18.53 20.15 14.07 15.23 16.56 11.89 12.87 13.99
dr·e·sec
CII
I
SiC 5.96 12.57 1&.66 13.63 14.38 15.29 16.3& 17.50 18.10 19.35 20.71
• I
SiC 76.51 161.19 213.63 127.61 86.14 161.66 126.07 86.13 161.18 125.. 98 86.83
Da cm .00058 .00058 .00048 00058 .00058 .00055 .00055 .00055 .00050 .00050 .00050
Table 2
run. 12 13 14 15 16 17
C1S\SY .~"lz'IY .....¥
..
r,_ 110 711 711 711 711 711
Us
..• •Q5 .lt7 .111 .141 .MI
.- .- .- .- .- --
, -;;:;J 5771 5171 5151 5151 5111 5111
. •
-;;,
6• .111 .111 .151 .141 .111 .111
--- __
• ~ 51.11 51.a lUI 11.13 41'- 41.•
... -..-..
...!!!...
•• all a._ a._
.- .-.- .-.-
I tUt
.. • .-.
SECONDARY NUCLEATION IN AGITATED CRYSTALLIZERS 85
5.10 5
r ~r-~ S
A 1.08
4.10 5
•• 1.12
1.16
3.105
2.10 5
10 5
°o~~--~--~~--~
~ 1j 2 t5
z [hr]
Fig. 3
run ...
.
• 12
0 13
•...
6 i4
15
16
-
~ 17
8·10 6
.... ....
6'10 6~ • •
~
u CI
.~ •
2·10&
r ~~
......
1-
t(
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 l [hrJ 45 50
Fig. 4
86 U. FASOLI AND R. CONTI
REFERENCES
P. BENNEMA
INTRODUCTION
91
92 P.BENNEMA
as ease of filtration, caking tendencies during storage, etc.
It can be seen from Fig. 3 that for values of a > 3.5 there
is a 'two-dimensional' nucleation barrier for growth, since for
low 8 = ~~/kT values the growth ra1~e is zero. It was indeed found
that for 8 = ~~/kT < 0.5 and a > 3.5 the 'measured' curves could
be fi tted with a two-dimensional n·J.cleation curve where the nucleus
above nucleus also called birth ani spread model was used. This
94 P. BENNEMA
a 8/ '\,.7 Dy...,rnc
I
Continuous step model
Traffic flow B C F
t.
I
'il - - ~ Monte Carta Growth (m)
I
Morphology
H -t-e
.l
do!\.
(R,a) curves
/.!b
means that on the whole surface nuclei are formed and on top of
these new nuclei are formed, etc. It turned out that the events
occurring on the surface are much less regular than would be
obtained from analytical growth models. Even so, the nucleation
models give a good description of the (R,S) curves obtained from
computer simulation experiments (see Fig. 3).
0.25r---------,--------,.
./
020
015 r
k+d
010
0.05
Fig. 3 Dimensionless growth rate versus S(= .t\]J/kT) for 0 < S < 0.5.
Results of Gilme~ ~~d Bennema(11,12), 0 special purpose
computer resultsll J, dashed line = empjrical relation(14),
solid lines = nucleation formula resulting from a birth and
spread model.
0,15
0/
0,10
fiN
J+d '/"
//li/
Ii
0,05
o
0
0/
0- t>"
li
0,2 0,*
~
kT
results. For 0" « 0" 1 a parabolic law· is obtained and for 0" » 0" 1
a linear law (see Fig. 5). C and 0"1 are characteristic constants,
C gives the slope of the R(O") curve for 0" » 0"1 and 0"1 characterizes
the curvature for 0" < 0"1. In this formula the resistance for kink
integration is neglected. If this is taken into consideration the
parabolic depression obtained is stee:[ler than that given by the
formula above.
0,50
1
2
J
If
0,1fO 5
(j
~
~ 7
':>
0,30
~
'"'~
~
e 0,20
~
~
e
0,10
! !
The BCF theory is based among others on the idea that far from
the centre the steps can be considered as an infinite train of
equidistant steps. Gilmer (30) developed a theory for small
deviations from equidistant step-trains and this theory was compared
with steptrains having a large deviation from their equidistant
positions (the equidistant steptrain being used as a reference).
In these simulations the so-called Schwoebel effect (36) has also
been introduced. Here the relaxation time for entering the steps
from the right side is not equal to the relaxation time for entering
from the left side. As already shown by Schwoebel, this gives rise
to instabilities in trains of steps leading to 'head on collisions'
and the formation of macrosteps which may reduce the effectiveness
of the step propagation mechanism. This was also found by the
computer simulation experiments. However, recent computer
experiments have shown that it takes a long time before such head
on collisions do occur even with a strong Schwoebel effect (37,38).
We also do not believe that the Schwoebel effect is a general
mechanism so that the occurrence of complicated step patterns on
crystal surfaces in most cases probably cannot be explained on
the basis of a Schwoebel effect. Complicated step patterns
occurring on crystal surfaces probably must be attributed to
fluctuations in the volume diffusion field. We note that recently
Monte Carlo simUlations of step propagation of a train of steps
with four steps was compared with the simulations resulting from
solving coupled differential equations; the results of the two
types of simulations were in reasonable agreement with each other
(37). These two simUlations are complementary: 'real' simulations
of the atomic events on simple Kossel like crystals can be simulated
with a Monte Carlo simulation; the simulation of step-trains,
occupying much larger surfaces can be simulated by solving coupled
differential equations (these latter calculations take much less
computer time).
1,00
-*
Q!IO
Q70
F
f QOO
C
o,so
~---
<1'0
(),JO
Q20
,
- i.
.A.
R = A a 5 / 6 exp (-B/a)
As with the BCF curves B determines the curvature and A the 'slope'.
0.3
R
02
/
/
~ __-------o.= 02
/
0.1 i
________ - - - - - - - - - - - - - --0. = 01
_ (pf\2)V
oL-----~5------7.10~----~1~5----~2~0~----~25~----
30 1
25
/
/
/
/
, j
20 /
Q /
1/
~
E
15 k'
1
# I
a: 10 -1
i
j
",,,,..-"-'
5
/~/
... A:::"--- Y
00 0·02 0·04 0'06 0·08 0·10 0·12
rJ'j
(a) Very precise R(o) curves were determined for the (110) and
(001) faces o:f TGS (triglycine sulphate) by Novotny, MOravec and
Solc (45) and Moravec and Novotny (46,47). These authors determined
both optically (by projecting an image of the crystal on a screen)
and by weighing the rate versus supersaturation in a three vessel
system o:f the Walker-Kohman type. The range of supersaturation
was 0" a " 10- 2 .
(c) Finally we want to mention the work of Davey (52) and Davey
and Mullin (53,54) on ADP (ammonium dihydrogen phosphate).
Kinematic waves were observed on the prism faces. New rate versus
supersaturation curves were measured for the pyramidal faces.
Contrary to what was suggested before (1,44), the R(a) curves can
be better described by a BCF curve than by a two-dimensional
nucleation curve.
I
-+-+--i~+-++-I....I.
Fig. 9(a) Single and (b) Double spirals. The shape of the spiral
is given by 2 r* e, where r* is the radius of the critical
nucleus.
104 P. BENNEMA
are presented. Here the groups have one and two collaborating
spirals arising ~rom one and two screw dislocations emerging on
the sur~ace respectively. I~ we compare two crystallographic
~aces, whi ch are dominated by the groups a and b respectively,
it ~ollows that
= 9.5 ya/SkTx
s
where Y is the edge energy per growth illli t in the edge, Xs the
mean displacement and 8 the number o~ collaboration spirals:
8 is 1 and 2 ~or cases a and b respectively. This makes
and the rates o~ growth ~or the two cases in the parabolic part
(a < a1) where the BCF equation becomes R = C a 2 /a1 are
= = 5:4:3:2:1
These values 5, 4, 3 •••• can be considered to be the result
o~ the ~act that in case 3 the dominating group o~ spirals consists
o~ 5 spirals, in case 4 o~ 4 spirals etc. In the case o~ a set o~
dislocations o~ equal sign on a grain boundary a second linear law
occurs having a slope C1 where 0 < C1 < C, where C is the slope o~
the BCF curve (see re~s 30 and 44). Finally a special case concerns
two closely adjacent dislocations o~ opposite sign: below a certain
value o~ the supersaturation the growth rate is reduced, whereas
above this value a normal BCF law holds.
It was shown by Carlson (80) that for large crystals, sol vent
inclusion m~ occur as 'starvation veils' due to an insufficient
supply of fresh supersaturated solution to a part of the crystal
surface having a certain distance from the leading edge. The
hydrodynamic regime around the crystal is now recognized as
extremely important for the prevention of solvent inclusions.
Knowledge of the hydrodynamics has been applied by Scheel (81) to
grow large and high quality crystals from the flux. Solvent
CRYSTAL GROWTH FROM SOLUTION 107
CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
86. E.P.K. Ottens, A.H. Janse and E.J. de Jong, J. Cryst. Growth
13/14 (1972), 500.
87. H. Garabedian and R. F. Strickland-Constable, J. Cryst. Growth
(1972), 506.
88. E.G. Denk Jr. and G.D. Botsaris, J. Cryst. Growth 13/14 (1972),
493.
89. A.E. Nielsen, Kinetics of Precipitation (Pergamon Oxford, 1964).
90. S. Troost, J. Cryst. Growth 13/14 (1972), 449.
91. J.W. Mullin, Crystallization, London Butterworths, second edition
1972, chapter 6, pp. 174-232.
COMPUTER SIMULATION OF CRYSTAL GROWTH FROM SOLUTION
113
11" T.A. CHEREPANOVA ET AL.
(a) (8)
of.. .P 0( 0'-
1(+1- ol a 5 j
Iv
I(
K-i-
- fi
fJ
fJ
a
~
a a
.fo
E.
(L,j)
Fig. 1 (a) Model of crystal, (b) elementary transitions of particles
700
600
.,.~~ R=D,0II56
If--.....:,()( R-O,o906
a
Fig. 2 Simulation of a binary system: • =
equilibrium diagram
points, _ and X = kinetic diagram. points at supercoolings
a = 0.05 and 0.1 respectively
COMPUTER SIMULATION OF CRYSTAL GROWTH FROM SOLUTION 115
= =
are assumed, where wa ' w S' are the transition prooaoili ties prov-
ided that the type of the adherent atom is determined. According
to the scheme in Fig.lb:
w
a
= v
a
exp [-H /kT];
a =
where va' Vs are corresponding frequency (entropy) factors,
E
z
= ~
za
e
za
+ ~
zo
e
zo
+ ~ e
za' za
+ ~
zS
e
zS
= v
a
exp [- (H
a
+ ~E )/kT]
a
116
T.A. CHEREPANOVA ET Al.
i
za.
/i Q
z~
= 6;
= = 1,
E =
Z
p'
a.
= Pa./wa.' Ps = PS/wa. ' q'a = q /w , q'
a a. b
= qS/wa.
Then
p' = , =
a. ca.' pS = w c S ' q'a exp(e
a
- ~E
a
!kT] ,
p'
b = exp(eb - ~~/kT]
~ T exp[6b - ~~/kT]
where Pa + PB + Qz ~ 1.
zero. For the points indicated on the diagram the error Ilffi I ~
0.006. Corresponding temperatures are 450, 480, 555, 675, 750 K.
= c (k) =
a
4
S =
1
'4 < t Ik(i, j) -k(i~ jl)l>
i Ij I
Here averaging takes place over all atom columns i, j. For every
i, j summing over i~ j' extends over four adjacent columns.
Qa + 0, ~ + 0 ps/Pa + cb/c a
=
for the simulation case w = 1, and cb + C s with T + O.
"". -- _- _-.........-....
o fO 20 #<-
Fig. 3 Structure and composition of the transition zone between
phases at c = 0.5 and a = 0
a
D~______~______~~~~
SSS 52? 5fJO T
= (dR/do). D /AT
CL 0
REFERENCES
INTRODUCTION
001~
+ 010
100
123
124 V. R. PHILLIPS AND J. W. MULLIN
Gloss window
Wotn in
Solution in
EXPERIMENTAL
$upcrsaturation, a
Macro-
imperrections
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10
I I I I
I I
I I "Type F" Inyer".
Uo layers. I I Irregular-!:':Laped fast-n:cving
A.bsent Surfaces cCl!'!rletely clliTI!":PS,
I I Sn:all step h.irht.
featureless at x85.
I I S~read~ng vclocitj' in {om]
I I d,rectlon: (2 - ~)x10- n/s.
I I
I I
t;o laY€Ts. I I "Type 5" layers. I I raral] cl ] ayers.
I Hegular-sheped slow-
3urf'acea featur~.: I I Er;all step height.
less at x85 I !!':oving ellipses. I I SJ)Tcading veloc i ty in
Present ~x£ept fO:- macro-: I Large step height. I [OO~ direction:
I
lzr.perfectlOn!3 I Spreading velocity in I (1 - 3)x10- 5 mI ••
I
themselves. I I [001] directicn: I
I (1 - 5)x10- mI ••
I 7 I I
I I I I
I I I I I ~ ~ i i i I I
-
I
e'"
~
u
o
"ii
>
01
C
:0
1:1
CII
L.
-
a.
U)
o L I I
Supersaturation, 0"
INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
In this section, we attempt to explain why the layer
behaviour of surfaces without macro-imperfections differs from that
of surfaces with macro-imperfections. It appears that the different
types of layers seen on surfaces with and without macro-
imperfections are generated from sources of different strengths.
When a macro-imperfection is present, it provides a strong source,
one which may generate visible layers at a > 0.03. However, when
no macro-imperfection is present, the surface possesses only weak
sources, which can only generate visible la¥ers when a rises above
0.06. The strength of a source can be defined by the number and
magnitUde (Burgers vector) of the emergent screw dislocations
within it.
-
.,
E
>-
8X 10-7 f-
I I .- T
•8
0
0
8 -
:• ...
~
u f-
.~
••
0
~
> 4XIO-7 f-
C7I
.E
•
'"0
0
~
L-
0.. 0 I 8
en o 0·02 0'04 0·06 0'08
Sup~rsaturation, u
Fig. 8 Comparison of spreading velocities, in [OOlJ direction, of
Type S layers on (a) {100} faces which spontaneously have
macro-imperfections, and (b) {100} faces which were
previously without macro-imperfections but which have been
deliberately damaged.
Category (a), 24.0 0 c, "low growth regime"
Category (a), 24.0 0 c, "high growth regime"
Category (b), 25.0 0 C
134 v. R. PHILLIPS AND J. W. MULLIN
In the present work, the thin, Type F, layers were found to
spread about one hundred times as fast as the thick, TYpe S, layers.
It is physically not unreasonable for layer spreading velocity to
vary inversely with layer thickness if we consider layer fronts as
bunches of line sinks which must be fed by bulk and/or surface
diffusion (18). Some previous workers (14, 19, 20) report
experimental evidence that layer spreading velocity does vary
inversely with layer thickness, although others (1,21) report
spreading velocity to be independent of layer thickness.
REFERENCES
FLUIDIZED BED
INTRODUCTION
THEORETICAL ANALYSIS
135
136 c. LAGUERIE AND H. ANGELINO
(1), the value of exponent g (the growth rate order) varies between
1 and 2. When g = 1, equation 1 can be written as
(dm /dt)
c
= k um Ln a (C-C*)
c
where the liquid velocity and crystal size dependence are shown.
For experiments carried out in a fluidized bed with a batch of
uniform sized crystals, assumptions of perfect mixing of crystals
and of piston flow of' liquid lead to the equation
(dM/dt) = k um Ln A(C-C*)lm
which lS valuable for a short interval of time and over the whole
bed.
M = N a Pc L3 (4a)
and A = N 8 L2 (4b)
(3 a p /8) (dL/dt)
c
= k um Ln (C-C*)
1m
(5)
3 a p
c
(6)
8 t(C-C*)lm
in which
(C-C*)
1m
= 1.
t
Jt (C-C*)
1m
dt
o
The k, m and n parameters can be determined by using a numerical
method of identification based on minimisation of the following
apr
criterion
n
[k
exp m 1 - n 3
CR = L j u. l-n l-n - 8
J L2j - Llj
tj(C-C~)lmj (8)
j=l
GROWTH RATE OF CITRIC ACID MONOHYDRATE CRYSTALS 137
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
R = !:J.M/At
g
18 AGITATOR
15 DlSfMlUTOIt
14 VALlIE
13 FILTER
12 1l£RMOMETER
11 COLD IIIoN"ER
10 ttOT WATER
9 I£ATER
8 OIlER FlDN
7 CRVSTALUZER
8 COOLER
5 CXlNDUCTMTY CELL
4 Fu:NV IETER
3 BY MS~
2 PUMP
1 TANK
Fig. 1
Rg (kg of hydrate/h m2 )
+
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
, ,,
,,
6C{kg of hydrate/kg of water)
a 0.05 0.10
Fig. 2
GROWTH RATE OF CITRIC ACID MONOHYDRATE CRYSTALS 139
u L1 L2 T (C-C*) 1m t
kg
(cm/s) ( cm) ( cm) (OC) (h)
Rg = 3.75 ~C (10)
k
g
= 5.37 U O· 18 LO·IO (ll)
DISCUSSION
= (12)
Sh
0.16
0.14
0.12 +
+ +
+ o
0.10 + +.fj.+
..,+++
*++ +
0.Q9
+ + o
&:p 0 +
+ +
0.Q8
+ +
+ + CRYSTALLIZATION
0.07
o DISSOWTION
0.06
Re
0.1 0.15 Q20 030 0.40 aso 060 WO Q80 1D 12
Fig. 3
CONCLUSION
R
g
= 5.37 UD' 18 LD'ID ~C
NOMENCLATURE
REFERENCES
INTRODUCTION
Some years ago White and Wright (1,2) found results for-
sucrose crystals similar to those shown in Fig. 1. They called the
spread in sizes 'size dispersion'. Recently Natal'ina and Treivus
(3) published results which show growth dispersion for KDP crystals.
145
146 A.H. JANSE AND E.J. de JONG
G = 0.251 l;C1. 57
0
460 )Jm Temperature 31 C
~ 1.5 2
1 1 3
0 4 2: 4 1
10 1 1.03 1. 05 1. 07 1. 08 1. 09 1.10
I
12 I
I
I
,
I
I
,I
,I
,I
I,,'Iii I
I~I
1: 1
I t'
2
I 1
'"
, I
_L
o
'0(0) pm/s
.1 0.05
2 0.05
3 0.005
4 0.005
t 5
_---::;o.c::::::::::=-2
The first term represents the number of crystals growing into the
interval, the second the number of crystals growing out of the
interval and the third the number of crystals removed by the
product stream. For 6L goes to zero eq. 5a can be written as:
d f ( L ,G) + f ( L ,G)
dL G Tl
= ° (5b )
Integration between ° and L gives:
f(L,G) = f(O,G). exp (-L/G Tl ) (6a)
With eq. 7 f(L,G), n(L) and G(L) can be calculated from eqs. 6a,
3, and 4:
qT I + L -r (qT I + L )
9.
f(L,G) = n(L) • r(r-l) G • exp - (8)
• qTI qT I
qT I + L
(r-2).T I =~ +~)
G(L) = (r-2) • (1 qT I (10)
G(L) =~ (11)
r-2
As the steady state distribution under the above mentioned condition
is identical to eq. 9, it can be concluded that:
- from curved distribution the size dependent growth rate G(L) in
case 2 (no growth dispersion, size dependent growth rate) or the
average growth rate G(L) in case 3 (growth dispersion, no size
dependent growth rate) can be calculated. It can be proved that
this conclusion holds for each f(O,G) growth dispersion model.
- from such a curved distribution it cannot be concluded whether
growth dispersion occurs or size dependent growth rate.
The occurrence of growth dispersion results in a size dependent
average growth rate (eq. 10 and Fig. 5a). In Fig. 5b the same
results of the calculations are plotted on double logarithmic
paper. It appears that above 200 ~m a power law dependence on size
is found, with exponents ranging from 0.55 to 1.0. In the literature
(8,9,10) a lot of data show size dependent (average?) growth rates,
with size dependencies ranging grom LO.63 to L1.1. As the exponents
reported in the literature are in the same range as our calculated
exponents, the size dependent growth rates from the literature can
be explained by the occurence of the growth dispersion. So size
dependent average growth rates and growth dispersion are linked.
_3 fMTt )
(13)
\ V MeO)
0.5 .A ~
0
-;-
-.. 1;:;-
-..
E ~
3-0 3 ...J
~
Ie.!)
...J
CII
Ie.!) .2 1.
t t
2
o+-----,-----,---,-~
2.0 2.3 2.6 2.8 2.9
-L(,um) -logL
CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
NOMENCLATURE
REFERENCES
1. Wright, P.G. and White, E.T.; Proc. Queensland Soc. Sugar Cane
Technology, 36th Conf.; p. 299 (1969).
2. White, E.T. and Wright, P.G.; Chern. Eng. Progr. Sympos. Ser.,
(110) 67 (1970) 81-
3. Natal'ina, L.N. and Treivus, E.B.; Sov. Phys. Chrystallography,
19 (3), Nov.-Dec. (1974).
4. Bennema, P.; Paper B1; This Symposium.
5. Larson, M.A. and Randolph, A.D.; Chern. Eng. Progr. Sympos. Ser.
(95) 65 (1969) 1.
6. Abegg-:-C.F.; Steevens, L.D., and Larson, M.A.; A.I.Ch.E.J., 14
(1968) 118.
7. Canning, T.F. and Randolph, A.D.; A.l.Ch.E.J., 13 (1967) 5.
8. White, E.T., Bendig, L.L., and Larson, M.A.; Paper presented at
the 67th Annual A.l.Ch.E. Meeting, Washington, December 1974.
9. Mullin, J.W. and Gaska, C.; Canad. J. Chern. Eng. 47 (1969) 483.
10. McCabe, W.L. and Stevens, R.P.; Che. Eng. Progr. (4) 47 (1951)
168.
KINETICS OF Ti02 PRECIPITATION
INTRODUCTION
Despite the great attention which has been given in the liter-
ature to the study of titanium solution hydrolysis, both from the
viewpoint of precipitation kinetics (1-4) and the structure of the
solution (5,6) and the gel (1,2,7-9), no unambiguous result has been
found so far. We have studied the kinetics of Ti02 precipitation
from titanylsulphate solutions during thermal seeded hydrolysis and
tried to characterize the resulting Ti02 gel.
EXPERIMENTAL
155
156 O.SOHNELANDJ.MARECEK
a = (c - c)/c
o 0
a
t = K f x- 2 / 3 (1 - x) -1 dx = K I
P 0
P P
a
t = ~f x- l / 3 (1 - x)-l dx = ~ ID
0
a
t = K f x- 4 / 3 (1 - x)-m dx = K 1+
m m m
a
0
Based on the given facts and also some others inferred from
the literature (11), we conclude that the kinetics of Ti0 2 precipi-
tation from titanylsulphate solution during thermal seeded hydrolysis
is controlled by the polynuclear growth of seeds with the kinetic
order of unity. Because the expression
p = (m + 2)/3
KINETICS OF Ti0 2 PRECIPITATION 157
0,1
o
t
Fig. 1 The kinetic curve of hydrolysis
15
10
Ti02 GEL
The structure of the resulting Ti02 gel was also studied. The
gel consists of ellipsoidal particles approximately 2 ~m in size
(Fig.3). These so-called tertiary coagulates are rather loosely
bound aggregates of secondary coagulates o~ size 5000-8000~. ~hese
can be easily obtained by disintegration of the hydrolysate in
pyrophosphate solution using a turbine mixer.
dV/dt = P A/ ~(rVA-l + R)
!SUSPENSION
TO VACUUM
; : > - - - - PUMP
CIRCULATING
/.lOT WATER
Thus a plot t/V versus V is a straight line with the slope ~r/2PA2,
from which the specific resistance may be determined. According to
Brownell and Katz.(12)
Tertiary: 2.4
Secondary: 0.5 0.5-0.8
CONCLUSION
NOMENCLATURE
A filtration area
c actual concentration of solution
c initial concentration of solution
dO particle diameter
Ff friction factor depending on sphericity of
the particles and porosity of the
filter cake
r:
FRe Reynolds number factor
I p ' In' kinetic integrals
Kp ' Kn, ISn constants
m number of molecules forming a critical
surface nucleus
p kinetic order of polynuclear growth
P pressure
r specific filtration resistance
R resistance of filter medium
t time
KINETICS OF Ti0 2 PRECIPITATION 161
v total filtrate
X volume of cake per unit volume of filtrate
degree of hydrolysis
sphericity of particles
porosity of filter cake
viscosity of filtrate
REFERENCES
INTR ODUCTION.
163
164 A. WINZER AND H.-H. EMONS
EXPER IMENTAL
[mg]
500
c
~ 400
~
~ 300
.S
(g) ("m) (g) ("m) (mg/sec) (g/cm 2 sec) (em/sec) (cm 3 /sec) (g/sec)
[g]
1
50 2
3
40
'i
.!!
'0 30
'lii
~
u 20
U 10
:.::
N
"4
The time constant for the growth of ~aN03 crystals during Ostwald
ripening found experimentally by HO~ and Kahlweit by means of
cuvette microscopy (4) was 1.8 x 10-1 cm3 /sec. The mass .transfer
numbers and time constants obtained by us are generally higher,
which is most likely due to the fact that we used mechanically
stressed crystals.
[g)
5 2
i 60 c 4
.~ 0
'g ~ 3
;;
~ 40
__-e-_r--
1ft
u .S 2
3
U 20 U
:.:: :.:: 1
N N
-# -#
[g] [g] , - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
eo
c 1,5
.2
-; "i 60
C
y 1
;; ~
Oft
I,D ;;
.£ E- 40
u
U 0,5
p- ~
...~
50 100 150 200 250 300 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
time [min] tim. ~In]
For the Ostwald ripening of KCl with the above periodic temp-
erature changes the following mass transfer const.ants for the
dissolution kinetics of small 42KCl crystals were found:
Dissolution rate: 3.4 x 10-4 g/sec
Specific dissolution rate: 5.3 x 10-~ g/sec cm2
Mass transfer number: 1.4 x 10- cm~sec
Time constant per KCl particle: 1.2 x 10-12 cm Isec
Ostwald ripening under the influence of periodic temperature changes
is more suitable for increasing the mean size of crystalline products
than is isothermal Ostwald ripening because the mass transfer con-
stants for the dissolution of small KCl crystals are greater by a
factor of 20.
To trace the mass transfer between the small and large KCl
crystals, proceeding by way pf the solvent phase, we labelled the
small KCl crystals with the 42~ isotope and performed the Ostwald
ripening in saturated KCl solution. The microautoradiogram of cut
KCl crystals, which was obtained by the stripping film technique
during the Ostwald ripening,is shown in Fig.~ KCl crystals of size
~ 250 ~m show a blackened edge while the small crystals of ~ 50 ~m
are thoroughly blackened. This result can be interpreted through
the mass transfer process during Ostwald ripening.
The mass transfer between small and large KCl crystals under
the conditions of Ostwald ripening is much greater with periodic
temperature changes.
~ ~ 2
~ r~~~ro~~~HX~~
50 100 150 200 250
time [min]
900
Fig. 8 Dissolution kinetics of [mg]
small ~2KCl crystals during aoo
Ostwald ripening under periodic
temperature changes showing the
dependence on the inactive large c 700
.!!
crystal fraction. System volume :;
= 200 ml. 1: 1 g ~2KC1«45~m) "0
'"
600
+ 9 g KC1(>250~m), 2: 1 g ~2KCl
.S
«45~m) + 9 g KC1(160-200~m), 500
3: 1 g ~2KC1«45~m) + 9 g KCl U
:.::
(100-125~m), 4: 1 g 42KC1«45~m)
+ 9 g KC1(63-80~m).
...
N
400
300
20 40 60 80 100 120 140
tim. [min]
REFERENCES
INTRODUCTION
173
174 J. SKRIVANEK ET AL.
THEORETICAL
cnA(L,t) v (n - n A) c (n A GA )
= -
V
B
cL
(1)
Ct
lim n A = 0 (4)
L-+O
lim fiB = 0
Ir+oo
(6 )
=
where c1 and c~ are the equilibrium concentrations (solubilities)
176 J. SKRIVANEK ET AL.
J
00
dC B
= -v (c A - c B) - SPc nB(L) L2 GB dL
V
dt
0
t = 0 = c (10)
o
= c
o
(ll)
EXPERIMENTAL
8 9
m m
L32
•
=
~ n(L. )L~ ~ L
1 1 IL n(L. )L? ~ L
1 1
(14)
i=l i=l
m m 2
2
2: n(L. ) rJ~L
1 ~ n(L.1 ) L ~ L
0 = 1 1 (15)
m m
~ n(L.1 )
1
~ L z:1 n(L. )
1
~ L
D ~ G2 t In2
av
0.016
0.012
0.010
o 2 4 6 8 10 12
t (h rs)
0.014
[3.2
(em)
0.012
0.010
Fig. 4 Time dependence of mean particle size L3,2 for runs 7 and 8.
Experimental data: 0 run 7,0 run 8. Calculations: continuous
line run 7 (~T = O.30 C, t = 77s), broken line run 8 (~T =
l.loC, t = 77s).
RECRYSTALLIZATION IN SUSPENSIONS 181
n (l)
[cm] 0.0 0.5
r--
8.10' roo-
,r'"
-. ,
I
r'l.
,
J
,
!, ,I I
L,
--;:" I
I I
I
rJ
I ~I r-- ,r' I
I
:
.,,
I
I I I
J • J I
I
--: rJ 1I ,rJ
r
I
I -
, I
I
I
'-- J
I
~
,
'.,
I I
rf- " r
11 i,
I
I
I .J
I I
I
: ' ...
I
I
I
o 0.01
l [cm]
0020 0.01 0.02
L[cm]
r--
1.0 - 1.5
r--
~l.
....
, r--;:: '-:'
,
r
- . ..,
I
.
I
I I
I r- I
I •
", I I
-' H-.
I
J
I
4.1rf r .J.. r
L
•I I
,
.. .
I
r'
,
rJ
,
I I
I I
__
I
.,
I
'-- I
I ~ I
-,
r ", r
I
IL
I
. nl~?
I I
I
r~ r·
I
I I
I
n III
[cm"'"] ~
r-
2.5 4.5
8.10'
~
r-
~, I--
r
.: ..~ ,
L
r--
r--
f'"
• 1 .
L..
4.10'
·• ·..,.
.~ L
r r
r
I
~
rJ
I
! •
..
I
l
~
.
~
L~
I
hL -
~ r
r ~
~
r'
!
bJ.
II
I
~~
o 0.01 L[cm] 0.02 0 0.01 L (cm)
0.02
niL)
[cm""']
6.5 8.5
- r-
r--
..
J~
.l.,
~
r.l• r
.r' 'l,
.
~
·, ~.
r.l
•
I
•
..
I
¢-
•
r.l•
r
I
~L
.
.•,. .,
H-
.
I
r.l
r+- • ~
I
~ I-i-
o 0.01 0.02 0 0.01 0.02
L [cm]
Fig. 5 (continued)
RECRYSTALLIZATION IN SUSPENSIONS 183
12.5 10.5
&.10' 8.10'
4.10' 4.10'
1.1-
' .... rl
r~
r·
." i
i'
i
r"' (
0 0.01 0.02 0 0.01 0.02
L [cm] L[cm]
Fig. 5 (continued)
The set of equations 1-12 was solved numerically for the initial
conditions corresponding to the experimental data, i.e., for the
distribution function no evaluated by the aforementioned photo-
graphic method and for a concentration Co equal to the initial
concentration of the solution (saturated at 25°C). Eqs 1, 2, 8
and 9 were transformed to a difference form and solved using an
implied operator. With regard to the integrals on the right-hand
side of eqs 8 and 9 the computation was iterative, i.e., the
procedure was repeated at each time step ~t until the presumed
and the calculated distribution and concentration values in the
time t+ut were identical to a preset accuracy. Eqs 16 and 17
with a multiplication factor included on their right-hand side
were used as the kinetic relationships for the rates GA and ~.
A satisfactory agreement between the experimental and the
computational results of the mean particle size values L3 ,2 and
of the distribution functions nA (as shown in the Figs 3-5) was
achieved for the multiplication factor value 4 (i.e., for the case
where, at given oversaturation, the growth or dissolution rates
were four times higher than th~ eqs 16 and 17 would indicate).
This multiplication factor value does have a real meaning, for the
mass transfer at the solid - solution interface in the double
crystallizer jars where there is vibratory and rotatory agitation
is higher than that at the interface in the case of crystals in
the fluid bed. Further, the effect of an increased interfacial
area as compared with monotonous growth or dissolution must be
considered. In fact, the individual particles in the double
crystallizer undergo periodic growth and dissolution so that the
particle surface area exhibits a microscopical roughness (34).
184 J. SKRIVANEK ET AL.
NOTATION
RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ-CLEMENTE
INTRODUCTION
EXPER IMENTAL
The apparatus is shown in Fig.l. It consists of a thermo-
stated reactor, provided with a magnetic agitator, where a saturated
solution is prepared. This solution is pumped through a flow-meter
and refrigerator to the growth cell at the desired temperature and
velocity.
187
188 R. RODRIGUEZ-CLEMENTE
The growth cell is shown in Fig.2. The crystal was drilled and
mounted on a platinum wire without the need of an adhesive, thus
eliminating one possible source of contamination. The circuit was
entirely constructed from glass and Teflon tubes to avoid contamin-
ation and the temperature of the system was controlled with Chrome-
Alumel thermocouples (± O.OIOC).
em
1t'0·'
.C •• 28°C
a • 9.lxIO- 3
Vs • llcmlsec
Rg • 3.2~xl0-5cm/sec
T.C •• 28°C
a • 2.9xIO- 3
Vs • Ilcmlsec
Rg • 1.00xl0-5cm/sec
5 Face 1
5 10 15 minutes
Rg
cm
sec
x1
Fig. 4 Growth rate measure-
3
ments, changing the solution
velocity, at fixed tempera-
ture and supersaturation,
for five different single
crystals. The arrows
indicate the path of each 2
experiment.
cr =1.5 x 10-3
rc.=32·c.
Face 1
CRYSTAL GROWTH KINETICS OF NaCI FROM SOLUTION 191
Ceo KV C.
10
C.
1 = 1 +KV
S
+
1 + KV
(1 )
s s
R K (C. _ C )n (2 )
g r 1 0
Therefore,
Ceo KV C.
S 10 - C Jn
Rg = K + 1 +KV
r 1 + KV 0
s s
(C eo - C ) KV C. - C n
0 S 10 o ]
= K +
1 + KV
r 1 + KV
s s
KV cr cr.
s 10 n
= K Cn + ] (3)
r 0 1 + KV 1 +KV
s s
where Ceo = bulk solution concentration
Co = saturation concentration
Cio = concent.ration at the interface when Vs = 0
C·1 = concentration at the interface when V t- O
cr = bulk supersaturation, Ceo - Co/Co
crio interface supersaturation when Vs = 0, Cio - Co/Co
Kr = reaction rate constant
K = Langmuir adsorption isotherm constant
Rg rate of crystal growth.
INFLUENCE OF SUPERSATURATION
Growth rate measurements were made at 24, 28, 32 and 36°c and
at a constant solution velocity o~ 11 cm/s. As described previously,
runs were made usingthe same seed crystals ~or measurements at the
di~~erent conditions.
R = C cr (4)
g
that holds at high supersaturation (BCF) (6). The results at di~~
erent temperatures, and ~or the two kinds o~ ~aces, are shown in
Fig.7. The correlation was made using the average points o~ each
area o~ dispersion.
re.·zr. +
iii ... 7
723'557897(1777273" 723'56789707772737'
,,~
~~
(a) (b)
Rg
•
£!!1..
sec
xl(f5
3
~8°e
32°e
2
26°e
Face!
Q-= 7.5 x W 3
1 2 3 ,
IL em
r:i sec
Fig. 6 Average growth rates for three temperatures at the same
bulk supersaturation (see Table 1).
194 R. RODRIGUEZ·CLEMENTE
50 5.0
4.0 4.0
30 3.0
2.0 2.0
to 1.0
4 • • 10 12 14 III 4 II • 10 12 14 "
5.0 5.0
4.0
It>
~3.0
X
u
til
~u 2.0
4'.1012141. 4 • • 10 12 14 ,.
cr x10- 3
5,Q 5,0
4,0 4,0
//
3,0 3,0
2,0 2,0
t
1,0
24°C
1.0
t 28°c
2 4 8 8 10 12 14 16 1 4 8 ... 10
l' 14 16
5,0 5,0
4,0 4.0
,
In
$2
x
~ 3,0
~U
01
a::
2.0 2.0
1.0 1.0 !
32°c 36°c
2 . 6 8 10 12 14 18 2 4 8 8 12 14 16
(j _10- 3
rper
0.018 0.020 (8)
··
21 1.19 6~ 1.01~
II.Cl 0.OO1~ 26 21.1 2110 1.022 0.216 This
0.001~ 32 21.1 183 1.011 0.22~
··
··
0.007~ ~8 ~~.O 368 1.026 0.363
"
0.0061
0.0091
O.~
28
28
32
2~.9
3~.1
26.9
~1
110
313
1.011
1.01~
1.000
0.216
0.~2
0.2~1
·"
15
!!l.. I .)
Rg'
(21' Rg < 1st Measurement
as Rv < 2nd. ••
I 2 3 , 5 5 7 8 9 10 17 12 ",0') V
Rg Fig. 8 Evolution of single
S/1L
•• c growth rates by changing the
,,'0 growth conditions, the arrows
3J)
indicate the path of the
changes in the experiment.
2.5 The relation between the
initial and final growth
2.0 rate, is indicated in the
"" upper part of the diagram.
1.5
v, • 77c,%«
1.0 ():TCin·C'
- =5enseDf
evolution d the
experiment
AE
cm
FQCII2
"W3
750 - <r • 7.5,,70-3
re.< 32'c
"0
730 V, ·17.0 ~:c
720·
170
70
90
80
70
60
50
'0 -
30
20
70
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
R. BOISTELLE
203
204 R. BOISTELLE
Finally. one may also notice that the equilibrium habit of a crys-
tal is experimentally rathar difficult to raach. It seems that the
best method consists in creating small temperature fluctuations for
a crystal placed in a droplet of its saturated solution 126-281.
2) SUPERSATURATION-SOLVENT-SOLUTE
3) CRYSTALLIZATION TEMPERATURE
4) pH-SOLVENT-SOLUTE
5) pH-IMPURITIES-SUPERSATURATIoN
6) IMPURITIES-SUPERSATURATION
the (100) and (Ill) faces of NaCl. when the isotherms are saturated.
is the same as the number of Cd 2 + ions contained in the epitaxial
planes of the mixed salt Na2CdC14.3H20 growing on-the (100). (110)
and (Ill) faces of NaCl. It has then be concluded that the two-
dimensional adsorption compound in the crystal-solution interface
has the composition of the mixed salt. Furthermore. as the struc-
tural agreement is perfect only on the (111) faces of NaC!. one
can then understand that {Ill} is the final growth form of NaCl
crystals growing in the presence of cadmium. At last. as adsorp-
tion occUrs as well at low (isotherms) as at high (epitaxies) im-
purity poncentration on all crystal faces. the idea of the ~ele~
tivity of the adsorption must be understood in terms of bonding e-
nergies and of structural quality in the adsorption layers. but not
as a discrimination of adsorption between the different crystal
faces.
Till now. we have only considered some systems where the impuri-
ties lead to a decrease of the growth rates of oertain crystal faces.
Sometimes however. habit changes are more complex since an impurity
can slow down the development of a face and speed up the development
of another. So. the normal growth rate of the (001) and (DID) faces
of sodium triphosphate hexahydrate crystals is redwcad in the pre-
sence of traces of dodecylbenzenesulphonate. whereas the growth ra-
te of (100) is enhanced at low supersaturation and later on is re-
duced at higher supersaturation IB71. The adsorption_isotherms
show that the impurity is localized preferably on (010) resulting
in a hindrance for incorporation of the solute. It would be the in-
corporation kinetics of the large P30105- ions Which would be res-
ponsible for the growth rate changes of the faces since the latter
impose different structural conditions. In the case of the action
of phenol on the growth of NaCl crystals laal. the increase
CRYSTAL HABIT MODIFICATION IN SOLUTION 211
7) CONCLUSION
From the examples given above. it appears that most habit change
interpretations are based on the existence of an adsorption layer,
more or less epitaxial. in the crystal-solution interface. This
layer is composed of the solvent. the impurity. or an anhydrous or
hydrated mixed salt. The real composition remains however generally
hypothetical.
REFERENCES
E • V. KHAMSKII
215
216 E.V. KHAMSKII
0-20
60 60
0 <>I OQ fj 0 20 «)°C
a b
c d.
e
Fig.2 Some examples of habit changes: (a) and (b) potassium nit-
rate, (c) and (d) barium nitrate, (e) and (f) ammonium chloride.
218 E.V. KHAMSKII
B Molal ratio
°c Cl lm
·
Ceq C~q impurity: salt
Molal ratio
°c B Cl lm
· impurity: salt
C Ii..
A 0-5 B
0-2
o 0·2 0,", o 20
0-010
CK)06~ __ ~ __- L_ _ ~ _ _ _ _~
REFERENCES
INTRODUCTION
Gilmer and Bennema (1) have shown that the mechanism by which a
crystal surface grows, is determined by a surface energy parameter
(hereafter the a factor) given by:
2 (~ss + ~ff) - 4 ~sf
a [lJ
kT
This definition results from the use of a Tempkin interface model
in which the solid and fluid phases are divided into blocks ~ss'
~ff and ~sf , then being the bond energies between adjacent solid
blocks, fluid blocks and solid and fluid blocks respectively. For
a simple (001) face of a Kossel crystal, computer simulation of
crystal growth (1,2) has shown that when a < 3.2 the interface is
molecularly rough and growth is continuous. As a rises above 3.2,
the interface becomes molecularly smoother so that for 3.2 < a <
5.2 nucleation (birth and spread) growth is possible in the absence
of steps, while for a > 5.2 only step growth requiring dislocations
is possible.
223
224 J.R. BOURNE AND R.J. DAVEY
A B 4(tB A
sf - t sf ) (t~f - t~f)
a a + +
kT kT
A B
Thus if, for example, tff ~ ~ff it is clear that, if the solute-
solvent interactions are stronger in solvent B than in solvent A,
aB < a A • Hence the stronger the solvent-solute interactions the
smaller will be the a value for the interface. It follows therefore
that, since a determines the growth mechanism of an interface,
solvent-solute interactions ~ pl~ a role in determining the
measured kinetics of crystal growth.
and
GROWTH OF HEXAMETHYLENE TETRAMINE CRYSTALS 225
i = A 0 5/ 6 exp(-B/o)
2TT C 1/3 2 AS C
where A = ( 3 0 )
a
and [4 a J
The overall magnitude of the growth rate given by equations [3J and
[4 J is determined by the parameters C and A, while OJ. and B decide
the shape of the curves. Further, since the factor y'/kT which
appears in the above expressions for 01 and B, is related to a
through the equality (2):
...:L... = ..JL _ t.s [5J
kT 4 cn
It follows that solvent-solute interaction which tend to decrease a
will also decrease y'/kT. Indeed, Bennema et ale (2) find for a
Kossel crystal (001) face that as a falls below 3.2 y'/kT becomes
zero. This implies that both 01 and B become zero, so that equations
[3J and [4J reduce to:
,
L
and
.
L
respectively as a falls below 3.2.
Solvent ~~ _ ~ ~ Activi~coefficient
~ kJ/mol kJ/mol solvent HMT
from the vapour phase when the heats of solution and sUblimation
respectively ~ be used, ns/nt being equal to one half for the
{no} faces. This gives for growth from ethanol solu"tion a = ~.2
and from the vapour phase a = 15. The negative heat of solution
of BMT in water precludes the use of equation [2] in this case.
2) By estimating the pure edge energy.
According to Bennema et al. (2) for a Kossel crystal (001) face
the edge energy y" is related to a via:
y"/kT = a/4 [5]
The edge energy ~ be calculated from the surface energy (F)
using the relationship:
y" = F x step height x length of step occupied by one molecule
which for a monomolecular step on a {nO} face of an HMT
crystal reduces to:
y" = 34.8 x 10-16 F (erg/moleCule) [6]
The surface energy ~ be calculated from the heat of solution
assuming this to be the maximum value of the energy required
to form a new phase-, when:
F ~ ~/Nf
For ethanolic solutions this gives F~ 22.8 erg/cm2 but ~ not
be used for aqueous solutions since the negative ~ gives a
meaningless result. y" is then calculated from equation [6] and
a from equation [5] giving a = 7.7 for growth from ethanol sol-
ution. Just as the value of F is a maximal value, this value of
a should also be considered as maximal.
kd (W - W.)~
L
P (1 - W.)
~
230 J.R. BOURNE AND R.J. DAVEY
- - - Fitted B+S
curve
- - - Fitted BCF curve
o
o
1 o o Data from ref. (5)
ur = 84 mm/s
o 2 4 o. x 10 3 6
~
•
4
• 5
L {no} faces (x 10 mm/s)
1 Aqueous solution
o •
o. t> as for Fig.l
2 Ethanolic solution
o. as for Fig.2
3 Vapour phase (computed curve)
o 0.02 0.06
Model HMT-vapour
The data for vapour growth was well fitted by BCF type curves in
agreement with the calculated value of a = 15. At 25°C 01 was estim-
ated to be 0.43. Since a = 15 is roughly equivalent to y'/kT = 3.0
(2) and taking 1 :s; S :s; 5 (2), we find using equation [3a] that lOa
As
:s; :s; 50a which is reasonable.
The best BCF and B + S curves fitting the data measured in ethanolic
solutions are shown in Fig.2. Unique definition of C and 01 was not
possible since all the data points lie below 01. However, taking 01
= 0.89 and y' /kT I'::l 1.0 (this corresponds to a = 5.0)(2) we find from
equation [3a] for 1 :s; S :s; 5 that 2a:S; AS :s; lOa. This indicates a
smaller mean surface diffusion distance in growth from ethanol than
in growth from the vapour and ~ be understood since when ethanol
is present, the diffusing HMT molecule must carry with it a solvat-
ion jacket whieh would tend to increase the relaxation time for sur-
face diffusion. The best value of B from the B + S model gives, from
equation [4a], y' /kT = 0.3 which is roughly equivalent to a = 3.5
and certainly within the range of estimated a values given in Table 2.
For HMT growth in aqueous .solution, the fitted BCF and B + S curves
are· shown in Fig.l. The rather large scatter of data points does not
allow precise definition of the relevant parameters. For the BCF
equation we find 0 1 = 0.9 x 10- 3 which implies either that y' /kT is,
GROWTH OF HEXAMETHYLENE TETRAMINE CRYSTALS 235
CONCLUSIONS
It has been shown that through their effect on the a factor solute-
solvent interactions can determine the growth mechanism of a crystal
face from solution. For the growth of HMT from the vapour, ethan-
olic solution and aqueous solution estimates of a have confirmed
this possibility and indicate that for vapour growth a BCF mechanism
should operate, for growth from ethanol a dislocation or nucleation
mechanism may occur, and for growth from aqueous solution growth
may be continuous.
ACKNOWLEmEMENT
NOMENCLATURE
REFERENCES
239
240 c. BALAREW AND V. KARAIVANOVA
system ZnS04-CuS04-H20 this field .should be separated from all the
other fields, whereas for the systems ZnS04-FeS04-H20 and ZnS04-
CoS04-H20 and MgS04-CoS04-H20 this field will be separated by means
of an eutonic point only from the crystallization field of the
orthorhombic mixed crystals based on FeS04. 7H20 or CoS04. 7H20
because they are isotypic. In this case the single eutonic point
should separate the comparatively narrow crystallization field of
the host orthorhombic ZnS04.7H20 or MgS04.7H20 from a comparatively
wider crystallization field of the m:moclinic mixed crystals. The
solubility diagrams of the systems ZnS04-CoS04-H20 (Balarew,
Karaivanova and Oikova), MgS04-FeS04-H20 and MgS04-CoS04-H20
(Balarew, Dobreva and Oikova) at 25 0 C studied previously, have
exactly these features.
70
ZnS04.7~ _
60
50
10 20 30 40 50 \ 60 70
FeS04. 7H20
ISODIMORPHOUSLY INCLUDED Co(lil. Fe(lI) and Cu(ll) IONS 243
MgS04
o
Fig. 3 Solubility diagram of the system MgS04 CUS04-R20 at 25 C
REFERENCES
PHOSPHATE CRYSTALS
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL
245
246 R.J. DAVEY AND J.W. MULLIN
Water in
Glass window
Solution in
RFSULTS
(a)
(b)
(e)
(e)
(d)
"c 0·4
.i
1:" .... 0·3
ij
.. " 0·2
.~
11..•11
0·1
0
E -2 0 2 4 8 10
6
Tillie. minutes
200r--------------------,
c
Oft
C
o
Ow;
..,
:~
...
tE
fu
°e
c
.
u
"
~
o
4 6 8 10 12
Time minutes
100 ].1m
L...J
DISCUSSION
d < 2 'IT r*
r* = ~
O'kT
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
MIROSLAV BROUL
INTRODUCTION
. .. (2+ 2+ 3+)
The effects of varlOUS addltlves Mn ,Cu ,Al on the
process of ammonium sulphate crystallization were investigated at
varying rates of supersaturation of its solutions and at different
intensities of agitation. Since ammonium sulphate represents a
bulk quantity product, a considerable interest has been given to
the possibilities of improving its quality. As it is chemically
indifferent to most admixtures, it is possible to study the
influence of a wide range of additives on its crystallization and
properties. We selected bivalent cations Mn 2 + and Cu 2+, whose
favourable ef~ects have been known and qualitatively described In
literature, and Al 3+ ion, which is considered to be one of the
generally most effective additives.
253
254 M.BROUL
VALVE
II
1'.. -
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
r--
-
I...-
0 0 0
o oo 0
o o o o
"
2. 1
1
4
2
.106molal e(l+
4
2
2 3
LIST OF SYMEOLS
L crystal size
L mean (dominant) crystal size
t linear crystal growth rate
mc mass of crystals
nO nuclei population density
tc overall time of batch crystalliz~tion
a. volume shape factor
Pc density of crystals
262 M.BROUL
REFERENCES
EXPERIMENTAL
263
264 J. SCHROEDER ET AL.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9
10 11 12
13
Institute of Geology*
Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry**
269
270 s. ASLANIAN AND C. BALAREW
111-20, 2,05
1n-202 2,06
1n-20., 2.'5
111-0( .. )"2,09
b-.-l
o 0
• s
® 0..-
o "'9
:~: OW7
. $ oF~ 00 o smfi
ln all cases.
REFERENCES
12. Zahrobsky, F. and Baur, W., Acta Cryst., B24 (1968) 508.
13. Zalkin, A., Ruben, H. and Templeton, D., Acta Cryst., 15 (1962)
1219 and 17 (1964) 235. -
THE TRANSFORMATION OF AMORPHOUS CALCIUM PHOSPHATE INTO
CRYSTALLINE HYDROXYAPATITE
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
277
278 L. BRECEVIC AND H. FUREDI-MILHOFER
.
!;"'I H'C
2 - (.... ).[c:._j.U.IO" ..
- (.... ).[ca_ .1... . 10" ..
..!
u
.. ,
- - (II. J. [co. J. U..o-' ..
CJ
Tim. ( min.)
0.2 ~
a
RESULTS
ir~=~~~C-'"""~--j·
'-=-------- - - - - -
!k:-=~~~~
o • III III
nmelmin.1
GIl _ _ 210
I
D
•
I
/
i
I..
I
f -=:." I
)
_/
/'
20 &0 III III
Tim. (min.'
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
235-43.
9· Boskey, A.K. and Posner, A.S., J. Phys. Chem., II (1973)
2313-17·
10. Eanes, E.D., Colloques internationaux C.N.R.S. No.230 (1975)
295-310.
11. FUredi-Milhofer, R., Bilinski, R., Brecevic, LJ., Despotovic, R.,
Filipovic-Vincekovic, N., 01jica, E. and Purgaric, B., ibid
303-10.
12. Eanes, E.D., Termine, J.D. and Nylen, M.U., Calc. Tiss. Res.,
12 (1973) 143-58.
13. Furedi-Milhofer, R., Purgaric, B., Brecevic, LJ. and
Pavkovic, N., Calc. Tiss. Res., ~ (1971) 142-53.
14. Termine, J.D., Peckauskas, R.A. and Posner, A.S., Arch. Biochem.
Biophys., 140 (1970) 318-25.
THE EFFECT OF Fe(III) IONS ON THE GROWTH OF POTASSIUM DIHYDROGEN
PHOSPHATE MONOCRYSTALS
INTRODUCTION
285
286 J. KARNIEWICZ ET AL.
{lOO} ~ace 1S greater than one. This means that the concentration
o~ Fe(III) in the crystal, Cc ' is larger than that in the solution,
Cs ·
EXPERIMENTAL
J = k C
d c
g Fe (I II) / g KDP
103C ± 0.02 K
s c
.J
u[v]
Fig. 1 Polarogram for Fe 3+ and Fe 2 + ions in sodium acetate
288 J. KARNIEWICZ ET AL.
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
J.W. MULLIN
INTRODUCTION
291
292 J.W. MULLIN
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
-8
growth rate at the maxlmum supersaturation (5.6 x 10 m/s) and the
upflow velocity to suspend 1 mm crystals (144 m/h). Then the
calculations can be commenced.
v v v
F
p p p
a b c d
MSMPR MSMPR MSCPR MSCPR
fafal disdll1rge dear liquor total dlschorge d~rllQuor
overflow oyerflow
This does not mean to say that data obtained from small-scale
experimental units are always unreliable, but it does emphasise
that caution should always be exercised in the use of such data.
The possibility of unreliability always exists and it should never
be ignored.
298 J.W. MULLIN
,
AGITATION AND FLOW REGIMES
~
E-<
;;i
z
3
....
0
E-<
..;
H
Mass of K2 S0 4
::>
u Crystals
~
H
Suspended, 1 0
u kg/rn 3
....
<=>
::>
CI
H
H 2
u
H
~
E-<
<.:z
:.:
::>
H
0
>
Equal
areas
o 30
DRAFT-TUBE DIAMETER, ern
CONCWSIONS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Waseda University
INTRODUCTION
303
304 K. TOYOKURA ET Al.
equations:
V' =
When the dominant crystal size and production rate are set as
~ and P*, the design line B which gives the correlation between
F~.and P/pcV', is drawn parallel to the line A from 1.~ on the 1.m
axlS. The crystal growth rate (d1./dS)* and suspension density
(1-£)* are decided ~rom preliminary tests. Another design line E
is also drawn parallel to line D from point E ( (1-£)*, (d1./dS)* )
on part i Fig. 1. The cross point F between lines B and E is
the design point which gives F~* and (P/pcV')* against 1. m*,
(d1./dS)*, and (1-£)*. Then the volume of the crystallizer is
easily determined rrom p* and (P/pcV')*. When F~* at point F
does not agree with the correlation between F~ and d1./dS supposed
in the crystallizer, the assumed d1./dS and/or 1-£ should be changed
to reset. Alternatively, a fines trap and/or other device might
be planned.
Pip
c
= F' 1. 3 V'
v p
(4)
1.p =
size of classiried product crystal, (d1./dS)av = log mean
crystal growth rate.
0.1
,....,..
.....,
0.2
\.V
I
0.3
0.35
dll/d8(mm/min) 10-3 2 3 5 2 3
".........
L.. 3
..c.
-
~
E 2
L ..
(])
.£I
E 10 12
:J
C
......... 7
- t> 5
LL
7
0.02 ,03 ,05 ,07 0.1 0,2 0.3 0.5 0,7
p/fc V' (l/hr)
0.1
-
'-'
\.V 0.2
0.3
0.35
dUde (mm/min) 10-3 2 3 3
- ~ I
~
3 70
£. 80
- <r)
10
E 90 ~p
2 100
I/
~
ClJ 120
~
rI
E
- ~
:J 1011
160
C 180
7
~
lJ..
>
5 V 200
3 /0 /
2
/ /
In
~
7
0.02 .03 .05 .07 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7
pI~ V' (llhr)
EXPERIMENTAL
= 22 C 0·5
A
(6)
P =
o
d~/de = (8)
The product of the nucleation rate and shape factor, F~, was
calculated from reference 1:
DESIGN METHOD
~ 0
~
°0
/0
I(
..
_to 5 , /0
/1
~
5 10-4 2 3 5 10-3
d.l/ d. (DIll/min)
200 0.2
I-E=<>. 1 1-(=<>.1
,....
,100 0.1
......
..
70 0.07
0.05 ,....
50 0.1 0.05 ~
or ....
......
...0
30 0.03
I
~ >
20 0.02 ~
~
10 0.01
2 5 7 1012 2 3
F. (number/III hr)
Operating conditions are also decided from Eqs 6-8 and Figs
1-3. For design, the production rate P and the product crystal
size £m are generally set. A well-mixed bed type will now be
considered as an example. When the crystal growth rate is assumed
within the pilot plant test data, the solution retention time 8
(equal to that of the crystals for a well-mixed type) is calculated
by
8 = £ /3(d£/d6) (10)
m
The reaction rate is decided from the crystal growth rate by Eq. 8.
Therefore, the crystal production rate and the urea concentration
of the solution in the crystallizer are obtained from the reaction
rate by Eqs 6 and 7. The void fraction in the crystallizer is
calculated from the crystal production rate and the retention time.
2
,....
s::
.,i
"- 10 7
""
II
,D 8
§
s::
5
~
.~ ...
Jir.< 4
3
2
10-4 2 3 4 5 8 10-3
d RI de (1IIIII/min)
Fv ~ dt/d8 line and the product size lines in Fig. 5 become the
operational points. When the operational point is decided, the
operational conditions are easily calculated. These are listed
in Table 1 and show that large sulfamic acid crystals cannot be
precipitated under the crystallization rate correlations in Fig. 3.
If large crystals are desired, some special devices would be
required.
REFERENCES
Central Laboratory
INTRODUCTION
311
312 A.G. TOUSSAINT AND J.M.H. FORTUIN
I vapour
®
@ mother liquid
Lb~_I. _Ofeed
The velocity of the stirrer tip must not exceed the limit
above which excessive breakage of crystals will occur. This limit
depends on the properties of the crystals, and equals the product
of the propeller diameter and speed. If a correlation is known
for the pumping capacity of the propeller, the minimum diameter
and maximum speed of the propeller may be determined. To ensure
that the propeller will produce a trul~ axial flow, the lower
diameter of the draft-tube should be made only slightly larger
than the propeller diameter.
It has been shown (1) that points located on the same operating
line represent feed conditions with the same ratio Ryc between the
mass flow rates of the vapour and crystals produced. Feed conditions
for which 0 ~ Rvc ~ ~ lie in the region VMCZ'Z. For points located
on Me the ratio Rvc = 0; for points located on MV the ratio Rvc = ~.
Point V denotes the specific enthalpy of the vapour leaving the
crystallizer, and point C denotes ~he specific enthalpy of the
crystals formed. The practical operating ~egion is enclosed by
the solubility curve. This is the region marked VMS'Z'Z. Line WW'
is the tangent to the solubility cm-ve SMS' in point M. This tangent
is called the nucleation boundary line. The mixing criterion
demands that at a given condition of the mother liquid the feed
condition h f and wf must satisfy the relation:
z z·
h
v
h •
f
h (J /kg)
specific
enthalpy hf ____ _
I o
o 1
SYMBOLS
h specific enthalpy
m mass flow-rate
n number of stages
R ratio of mass flow-rates
T temperature
u velocity
V suspension yolume
w mass fraction
l1T temperature difference
l1p supersaturation
p density
<P entrainment factor
Subscripts:
BPR boiling point rise
c crystallizer, crystals
cw cooling water
f feed
m mother liquor
max maximum
v vapour
vc vapour-crystals
REFERENCES
INTRODUCTION
319
320 C.J. ASSELBERGS AND E.J. de .lONG
energy and the transport phenomena, which play a role. The design
model will be illustrated for the case of a continuous stirred
tank cooling crystallizer. The following aspects of design will
be discussed:
- material, energy, and population balances
- crystallization kinetics
- incrustation
- heat transfer
- suspension of crystals
- supersaturation criterion
An important feature of the design model will be the development
of two equations for crystallization and heat transfer respectively,
which describe the size of the crystallizer as a function of the
power input of the impeller of pump or agitator per unit mass of
slurry.
MATERIAL BALANCES
)
tion:
(1 +
~mv
~mol
- c0
(kg crystals/m 3 mother (3)
1- c.
~
PH
liquor)
temperature 8i °c 8e °c
volumetric 'hoI m3 liquor/s
m3 /s <Pmol kg liquor/s
flow rate 'vi feed roduct
kg/s 'mas kg crystals/s
mass flow rate <Pmi
ML kg crystals/m3 liq.
slurry concentration
e·
__-=T,---+-_te/
___ water in
Sci
1 1 t 1 1
"IT = he + k + hi + hr
H
he = jacket side film coeff.
water out _ hi = inside film coeff.
Sce hr =fouling coeff.
t = wall thickness
t product
Se
Figure 2.
P : 900 k9/h.
SplitCiflC
po •• r input LO :; 300 "m.
C (W/kgl 9 b ;; 2l-C.
-.....t42
10-1
3 4 5 I 7
~Tankdiam.t.r T(m)
ENERGY BALANCE
The general energy balance equation for the system described
above is given by:
Ijl - Ijl c (9. - 9 ) + Ijl P + Ijl r. (W) (5)
w - mi pi ~ e cr mv
(1 ZG:J ":Z
performing the integration, the CSD becomes:
:0 = + (9)
3
k = crystal volume shape factor; p = crystal density (kg/m ).
T~e dominant particle size based onCthe maximum of the weight
fraction distribution is given by:
3 GT
L - 0 ( 11)
D - (1-2z)
TC = TO (1 GU
+ q q < 1/4 (12)
n (13)
o
n
The slurry concentration of the product can be derived from the
third moment of the distribution. to give:
6 k p nO (GT )4
v c 0
M : (1-q)(l-2q)(1-3q)
CRYSTALLIZATION KINETICS
G : kG a P (m/s) (16 )
3
BO: kB e: h a r Mj ( H 1m .s) ( 17)
BO = kN Eh Gi Mj (18)
-rip
i = rip and kN = kB kG
Since the nucleation rate is defined by BO = nOG, the population
density at zero crystal size becomes:
nO = kN Eh Gi - 1 Mj (19)
(1-z)(1-2z)(1-3z)
(21)
6 k v p c kN
By combining equation 21 and 11 the dominant crystal size becomes:
LD
3
= (1-2z)
(1-z)(1-2z)(1-3z)
6 k v p c kN
!
1/i+3
(22)
(26 )
I
Substitution in eq. 22 gives the following design expression:
T 3'~- 3 M~-J
. 'jl/i+3
Ln = K .f(z) h i-l (27)
c E P
INCRUSTATION
HEAT TRANSFER
wherein q, is the total heat load (see eq. 5), U is the overall
coefficie~t of heat transfer, A is the heat transfer area. and
~eln is the logarithmic mean temperature difference. In order to
elaoorate eq. 28 it is necessary to make a choice of the type
and geometry of the crystallizer to be designed. In the present
case the application of eq. 28 will be shown for a well mixed
cooling crystallizer fitted with a jacket and a marine propeller
agitator. This choice is rather arbitrary since the derivations
go along the same lines for other systems. The main features
and dimensions of the jacketed vessel are illustrated in Fig. 2.
The liquid height H is equal to the tank diameter T.
The inside film heat transfer coefficient can be obtained from
correlations given in literature. For a vessel with baffles and
a marine propeller-h. is given by (4):
l
This equation can be used for suspensions if Nu. Re. and Pr are
based on suspension properties (5).
328 C.J. ASSELBERGS AND E.J. de .lONG
(30)
or: (34)
3 G
max
Thus when the quantities of the right-hand term of eq. 34 are
specified,a criterion results for the minimum crystallizer diameter.
330 C.J. ASSELBERGS AND E.J. de .lONG
Specific
pow•• Input
81 M
25ec I1kv,lm3
40·C 142
".
224 kW
175
E(W!kV)
t .
600C 470 12.
8b 21°C.
p • 900. kv,lh
LD • 300. I'm
68'n'- 1.'ec.
h. .3000. W/m2 oC.
10'"
t02.+----r--~--_,----r_~~~,__
° 2 4 6
._ _ Tankdiam.t •• T(ln)
t p .900kV/h
'°,
Lo"300 I'm
~. 23"t..
1 2 4 5 •
Tmln _ Tankdiam.t•• T(m)
(Watt)
Po = power number
P SL
Tank volume
(30)
REFERENCES
nOMENCLATURE
kw constant in eq. 30
k crystal volume shape factor
v
K constant in eq. 27
c
L crystal size
LD dominant crystal size
M slurry concentration
N rotational speed of impeller
n population density
P rate of production
Po agitator power number
T crystallizer diameter
U overall heat transfer coefficient
V crystallizer volume
parameters
kinetic constants
,
JAROSLAV NYVLT
z = 3 (L - ~)/(Lm - ~)
335
336 J.NYVLT
= (4)
we obtain the supersaturation balance (3):
dAw g n
dt = s - kG A~w - ~w
Fig.3 shows the effect of the cooling rate on the course of the
supersaturation with time. The shape of these curves corresponds
to the considerations leading to the simplified algebraic model
discussed above. Fig.4 represents a plot of differential size
distributions for various operating conditions of the batch cr,rstal-
liser with seeding. Increasing numbers denoting the curves corres-
pond to increasing amOunts of seeds and there exists a distinct
DESIGN OF BATCH CRYSTALLIZERS 337
M(L)
3 Na2So4·10H20
10 rn 3
5
BATCH
10
50
99
Fig. 1
.(t)
15
40 50 60
Fig. 3
5
40
30
m' (L)
20
10
Fig. 4
t:.w
t
Fig. 5
DESIGN OF BATCH CRYSTALLIZERS 339
where
LN/(Lt e ) (8)
=
The value of the system constant B can be determined e.g. from the
linearised crystal size distribution using e~uation 7 employing
i = (10)
and
340 J.NYVLT
= (n)
3
~ = [zN/ 6 f(zN)] ml-c/t
c e
(na)
and if we now take th.e value c = 2 for the most probable crystal-
crystal interactions (10) we obtain closer values of B = 0.37 and
B = 0.27 for the 2 and 20 litres crystallisers, respectively. This
corresponds to a roughly 30% difference between the two values
leading to maximum error in calculated crystal size of about 19%.
REFERENCES
NOMENCLATURE
APPENDIX
N~S04. 10 ~O Na2~02. 5 ~O
Na2S203· 5 ~O
Na2S04.10 ~O
20 litres 2 litres
HUGH M. HULBURT
(2)
const. (3)
iJi v r L3 n(L)
'"o
dL (4)
n(L) (5)
343
344 H.M. HULBURT
Lm
tvI
Then
Vm L3nl(L') dL' + tv Lj No (7)
Lo
where No = number of crystals/m3 of size Lo, the critical nuclei.
G (8)
L (9a) B Bo b (9b)
G (lla) C S* Sl + Cs (llb)
Cs -S* U + Co (12)
where
By choosing
(14)
Eq. 1 becomes
of 0 o
oe + OX (gf) (15)
f(x,O) (16)
POPULATION BALANCE MODELS FOR BATCH CRYSTALLIZATION 345
(17)
Also
g (18)
where
8 ,'< 8~< / Pc (20)
v
Cov Co/Pc (21)
where
e
glee - AI) J gl (A) de (27)
Al
and
f fl g2(xl)/g2(x) (28)
dx'
T (29)
g2 (x')
Boundary conditions at 9 = °
specify the initial seed distri-
bution f(x,O) = fo(xl). Hence for all points 91 = 0, Eq.28 gives
(30)
(32)
f (33)
POPULATION BALANCE MODELS FOR BATCH CRYSTALLIZATION 347
(34)
f (T ~ 9) (35)
(37)
where
a -1,0,2 (38)
91 9 + 1
·x
r -
(a - 1) -(a-I)]
- Xo (39)
a (a - 1) gl L
Thus when a 0, g2 = a,
1
91 9 (x - x o ) (40)
glg2
or
x - Xo gl g2 T (41)
348 H.M. HULBURT
(42)
and
(43)
al a+':' [1 _l ]
agl x Xo
or
1 1
aglT (44)
Xo x
This requires T < l/xoagl' and hence is limited to very small crys-
tals, since x ~ =
for T = 1/xoglg2. Thus diffusion must become
limiting before the growth rate reaches this high value.
f fl (xo/x)OI (46)
with
fl fo(x oy ) (T ~ a) , (y -1,0,2) (47)
or
fl fl (xoy,a - T) (T s a) , (y -1,0,2) (48)
where
xoy(x,a) is found from Eqs. 40, 43, or 45.
(49)
to = (50)
we find
Bo kbS*~ (53)
*(y - e) 1/ (4-Ci)
Ro (kgS I~) (55)
If two experiments were carried out with the same Sl(9) but differ-
ent reference states, they should give the same f(x,e). Then
In x In L I - In R~ In L" - In Rg (59)
In e In t I - In t~ In til - In t~ (60)
13 (a - 1) - 3y
6. In t 6. In S* (61)
4 - Ci
v - ~
6 In L ..l-.-...!:.. 6. In S* (62)
4 - a
350 H.M. HULBURT
4(@ - y) /), 1n s*
6. 1n n (63)
4 - a
The magma density, W, is a function of dimensionless variables only
and hence W(t) for two experiments with different S* but equal S~e)
should be superposable on a plot of W vs. 1n t.
J Jf (x) dx
3/4
J f(x) dx
co
n(L) dL = B~:o ( ~o )
o 0 o 0 (64)
3a(~ - y) 6 1n S* (65)
4(4 - a)
4R 2 (a-1) - 3aR 1
y 3a
(67)
where
R1 6 1n th 1n S* (68)
R2 6 1n Nmh 1n S* (69)
These relationships hold provided Sl(e) is the same for two ex-
periments in which S* differs. As a practical matter, this re-
quires controlling the supersaturation during the course of the
batch and will not often be feasible. However, if the supersatura-
tion holds a constant value, for measurements made during this con-
stant period, the crystal yield, Y, will be a function of dimen-
sionless variables, since
S* 1 - Cov Vm - Vmo
Y f.o....:...£ (U - Sl) c: ( )( ) (70)
Co Co Cov 1 - Vm
and
Cov S*Sl *
Y1 (
1 - Cov
) Y -
Co
~ U(e) • (71)
0
REFERENCES
353
354 I.V. MELIKHOV, E.V. MIKHIN, AND A.M. PECKLER
aw (V. t)
= a [D al/! (V. t) - ,1, (v t) ] +
at av v av rv'i" til
V
V = al a 3
ra 1S independent of a
= const. ra
dX IX>
dt
c
= N f [ YraA + J ] a 2 a2w(a, t) da (4 )
o
where Xc is the total quantity of impurity in the crystal"s, Y =
(Xo - Xc)/Vsoln is the mean concentration of impurity in the solu-
tion, Xo is the overall quantity of impurity in the system, A is
the coefficient of capture of impurity as a result of crystal growth,
J is the diffusive flux of impurity from solution to crystals and
a2 is the surface shape factor.
S = c - c*
da
r
a
= clt
=
where zl = 8.33 x 10-4 ~m/sec, z2 = 3.71 x 10- 5 z3 = 494 sec/deg C
and z4 = 0.75 x 10- 3 sec/deg C. The variance cr 2 was practically in-
dependent of the cooling rate, but increased as crystallization
continued (see Table I).
~(a , T) 1
0
w(O, t) = Lim ~l
a -+ 0
~ (00, t) = 0
a » ao
t » T
dY c
__
=
dt
mc = p f ul a3 ~(a, t) da
o
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES
IN AN MSMPR CRYSTALLIZER
INTRODUCTION
THEORY
363
364 S. JANCIC AND J. GARSIDE
a (nG) n
ar:;-= T (1)
ln nO L
ln n = (2)
GT
G = b < 1 (4)
Although this equation does not ~ollow directly ~rom known
mechanisms o~ crystal growth it satis~ies the ~ollowing require-
ments o~ size dependent growth models:
o b [ 1 (1 + XL)l - b ]
n =n (1 + yL)- exp G0Ty (1 _ b) - GOTy (1 _ b) (5)
1 (1 + yL)l - b
ln n = ln nO + 1 _ b - b ln (1 + yL) - (1 _ b) (6)
ACCURATE CRYSTAL SIZE DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS 365
d (In n)
dL
I =-y(l+b)
(8)
L =0
For size independent growth, b = 0 and the slope for all
values of L is - l/GT where G is the constant growth rate (see
equation 2). Equation 8, however, indicates that for size
dependent growth the nuclei growth rate, GO, cannot be calculated
from the initial slope of the population density plot unless the
value of b is known. Since the value of b is restricted to b < 1,
errors of up to 100% can result in deriving the nuclei growth rate
if the factor (1 + b) is ignored.
=
the nuclei growth rate GO replacing the constant growth rate G in
equation 3. Determination of the nucleation rate from equation
9 thus also requires a knowledge of the value of b.
The nucleation rate can also be determined from the overall
number balance on the crystallizer and is given by integrating
equation lover the entire size range:
JG~n
00
nO GO
d
which, Slnce n
G)
0,
1
T
gives
r dL (10)
366 S. JANCIC AND J. GARSIDE
1
= = ndL (11)
T
That is, since on average all the crystals in the crystallizer are
removed in one residence time, the nucleation rate is given by the
total number of crystals in the crystallizer divided by the resi-
dence time. Calculation of the nucleation rate from equation 11
is independent of any growth rate model and relies solely on the
determination of the total number of crystals in the crystallizer.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
8~-----r----~r-----'-----~------,
I.
....
!:;
:::
50 100
"ii
c Best curve of the fonn
a. given by equation 6
0
-' 2 lb. =0.65)
o
.:;> Coulter Counter
analysis
• Sieve analysi s
DISCUSSION
- (fluidized becU(10.11) ~ ~
'III5. 0.1
G:3.06x1{f3(1 +0.136 L10. 65
~/
o 0.03
The size dependent crystal growth rate evaluated when the size
analysis was extended down to 6 ~m is represented by equation 4
with the values of GO and b given in Table 1, i.e.
CONCLUSIONS
NOMENCLATURE
REFERENCES
1. M.A. Larson and J. Garside, The Chem. Engr., No. 274, June
1973, 318
2. A.D. Randolph and M.A. Larson, "Theory of' Particulate Pro-
cesses", 1971 (New York: Academic Press)
3. S. Janci6 and J. Garside, Chem. Engng. Sci., to be published
1975
4. S.H. Bransom, Brit. Chem. Eng. 2, 838 (1960)
5. T.F. Canning and A.D. Randolph, AIChEJ, 13, 5 (1967)
6. C.F. Abegg, J.D. Stevens and M.A. Larson, AIChEJ, 14, 118
(1968)
7. A.G. Jones and J.W. Mullin, Trans. Instn. Chem. Engrs., 51,
302 (1973)
8. British Standards Specif'ication, 410: 1969, "Test Sieves",
British Standards Institution
9. J.W. Mullin and J. Garside, Trans. Instn. Chem. Engrs., ~,
T291 (1967)
10. J. Garside, J.W. Mullin and S.N. Das., Ind. Eng. Chem.
Fundam., 13, 299 (1974)
11. J. Garside, R. Janssen-van Rosmalen and P. Bennema, J. Cryst.
Growth, to be published 1975
12. E.P.K. ottens, A.H. Janse and E.J. de Jong, J. Cryst. Growth,
13/14, 500 (1972)
Crystal Iizer
Operation and
Case Stud ies
TRANSIENT BEHAVIOUR IN CRYSTALLIZATION - DESIGN MODELS RELATED TO
PLANT EXPERIENCES
J.P. SHIELDS
INTRODUCTION
375
376 J.P. SHIELDS
3g+n = K ml+/m
a xiI 1+ 1+ (3a)
c c
1---4-m 1
111
LINES
I...._+,,-c--OF DIFFERENT
SUPERSATURATION
d~
ooS
CLEAR
LIQU~
OFFTAKE
003
RATE
Mmc(kg/sl
0'12 0'6
0'1 0'5
'4
SOLIDS
CON-
ENTRATION
x_loolo INCREASE IN
(';.C)
EVAPORATION 0·2
RATE
o-lo%DECREASE IN
002 EVAPORATION 0'1
RATE
~~~~~~~__~__~__~__~O·O
o 10 20 30 40 50 60
TIME SINCE PERTURBATION (hI
mc =
where (mc)o was a fixed datum production rate and (mc/m)o was a
fixed datum solids concentration. The measured values of solids
concentration (~/m) taken once per working shift determined the
production rate (rate of bagging of solids) until the next reading
was taken. Fig. 4 shows the effects, on supersaturation of this
control strategy in response to a 10% increase in evaporation
rate at t = O. It can be shown that the penalty for reaching
steady conditions earlier is a loss in particle size. The
criterion for steady state was defined as the attainment of a
production rate close to the desired value. As Fig. 4 shows,
there are many ways of attaining this, with various values of
supersaturation and size distribution. Many control strategies
can be tested in this manner.
)C-ex-0·2
0- 0(-0·3
0-0(-0·4
+-0(-0·6
o 30 80 130
TIME (h) SINCE PERTURBATION
:::?:
~ 0-35
:::?:
z 0-3
o
~ 0·25
a:
~ 0-2
UI
u • - THE NORMAL BATCH
~ 0-15 CRYSTALLISATION
u
\I) 0·1
o
~ O·
234
TIME (hI
The process. The vessel was charged with hot saturated feed
at 70 0 C and cooling commenced when the vessel was half-filled.
The contents were cooled to 30 0 C then dropped into a slurry
holding tank to await centrifugation. The time from initial
feeding to dropping the tank contents was about 4 h.
sense that the greater initial rate associated with lower cooling
water temperature caused supersaturation to reach a high maximum
value at an earlier point in the cycle. Since gjn ~ 1.5 in this
system, nucleation dominated the size distribution.
CONCLUSIONS
Solids n n
Supersat Mean Dia Time Evap Rate
Concentration
cr d (pm) t (h) 1I1w (kg/h)
mc/m
Super- Solids
Time Vessel Mean Particle
saturation Concentration
t (h) No Size d (jJm)
a mc/m
z
Q o- WITHOUT CLEAR LIQUOR
tc
a:
OFFTAKE OR FEED ADDITION
~
Z~
111-
U v
~~
U
0·1 START CLE AR LIQUOR
~ R£M&VAL AND ADDING FEED
~ 2 3 " STOP CLEAR LIQUOA
AND FEED
TIME (h'
It can be concluded:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
NOMENCLATURE
m mass kg
n population density function or index on
supersaturation for nucleation
N numbers of crystals
q numbers of 'crash nuclei'
R gas constant, 8.314 kJ/kmol K
t time h or s
t mean residence time
T temperature K
U integration factor
V volume of crystalliser contents
a relative supersaturation
p density kg/m 3
REFERENCES
APPENDIX
math
f
-mw -titm1 -th-tit
c sus
(3)
Solvent balance
(4)
(5)
(6)
TRANSIENT BEHAVIOUR IN CRYSTALLIZATION 387
Jill!!:
I-----lhml
~c
~ _____ ~
I----- msus
Fig. Al The Continuous Crystalliser
(7)
(8)
q 0,
q (9)
0, 1 ... v (10)
1
where t (11)
It follows from this that ani+l is the number leaving the total Ni
per unit time.
:. an o = :& (i3)
v-I
mc = I4 kvPc E Ni (di + di+l) (d i 2 + didi+l + di+1 2 ) + moo
i=O
(14)
The term m is the contribution to the total mass from the last
diameter i~terval. If the range of particle sizes considered is
large enough, a good approximation will be m = O. The above
equations provide a self-consistent mathematical description of a
dynamic crystalliser - 12 + 2v equations and 12 + 2v unknowns:
m, mw, mx , mc ' moo' 0, a,:&, q, N:i: (i = 0, 1. .• v), ni (i = 0,1. .•.
v+l). As data the formulation requires the values of: mf, row,
~l' mc , msus, mf (l-Cf), Ceq' kG, g, kN, n, am, Pc' dN, and di
(i = 0, l ••• v). These data should be either physical constants
or known functions of time. The total set consists of a number
(v+6) of differential equations and (v+6) subsidiary algebraic
equations. After rearrangement of the equations a stable
algorithm was used to obtain a single parameter iteration at each
time step.
(16)
N.1. 0, l •.• v
(17)
J.P. SHIELDS 389
where the prime denotes the value of that variable at the start of
the time step.
INTRODUCTION
391
392 B.G.M. de LEER, A. KONING, AND E.J. de JONG
model. From the lacation of all the poles conclusions can be drawn
with regard to:
- the stability and the eigen frequency of the uncoupled state
variables in the stable regions in relation to the parameter
values of the model.
- the question, which poles mainly determine the dynamic
behaviour of the state variables.
Yl=EXP[-RX1
In YO
t
=
Y3 EX P [ (z- 1) Xp - (R-l ) XF] E P X[-ZX]
o Xp - X
T rhr------..-----..---
q ~(O)
q ~ (0 )
1- t-+-t--+-t~,..... .t.
e
T T T
1
Our experience is, that the sum of these influences at e =1
is less than 10% of the value of the enwrapping exponential
function, which is determined by sll 9 -uke 1 -u1e
I e , 10 e at e =
K=2
STABILITY AND DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR OF CRYSTALLIZERS 395
u u U
I 3
I
7 c;f 7 7
I
6 1 6 6
I
,.~
5 5- 5-
4 4 4
_ 4'1, limit
3 3 3
Z:7;i:3 Z:7ji:l
2 2 2
1 1 1
'-~- --0-- -(;)- Z -0-- -0- --0- Xp "E)..-_.0---0- X
0 I
0 0 I
3 5 7 2 3 4 5 3 5 7
Figure 3.1 Figure 3.3 Figure 3.5
V V V
Xp: 3j i:3 Z:7;i:3 Z:7ji:l
l 3 3
1
'0 ,,
'0, ,
2
,. ...Q-- .... - .... 2 1
'-'"0_ - -0-
2
,(;), ,
1
''G.
0
....._:--
3
-8:--
---23
5 7
Z
0
2 3
I
5
Xp
0
3 5
i
7
..
Xp
0
3 5 7 3 5 0 8 12
u V U V
4 X F =0.2 2 X F =0.2 4 R=6 2 R= 6
U V u V
3 3 1.5 15
.• --ca.. " 0-R= 2
2 '~
I
2
I . --O.-L0- 0.5 I. . 2.CijL
_ -0_l ...... R= 2
0.5
R
o +--.--.--t.. o +--,r----.-_X..!jIC. o +-_.--.-,XI=,..
2 4 6 2 4 6 0.2 0.6 1.0 0.2 0.6 1.0
Figure 5.1 Figure 5.2 Figure 5.3 Figure 5.4
Parameters: Rand xf as given in the figures; no product clas-
sification (z = 1); j = 1, i = 3
Figure 5: The effect of fines removal (6 = 0) on the stability
(u) and the eigen frequency (v) of the uncoupled state
variables.
398 B.G.M. de LEER, A. KONING, AND E.J. de JONG
U,
2 Parameters:
i;z and xp as given in the figure
no fines removal (R = 1) ; j =1
shaded area :
sl and s! dominant poles
Stab ili ty li m i ts
z
Parameters:
2 i and xf as given in the figure
no product classification (z = 1);
j = 1; R = 6
shaded area:
s1 and si dominant
..- ..-
poles 2
""
,," "
,/
/ "
,/
,/
,/
,/ 10 15
Parameters:
i;z and x as given in the
figure; nB fines removal
(R=1);j=1
Stability limits
Parameters:
i and xf as given
in the figure; no 2
product classification
(z = 1); j = 1;
R = 6
CONCLUSIONS
Product. classification:
1. For certain fixed i values the stability (u) of the uncouped
state variables remains constant or even increases with
increasing values of z and decreasing values of xp, although
the absolute stability limits in those cases decrease.
2. At the same time however, the vibration time T = 2n/v of the
uncoupled state variables decreases (faster fluctuations).
3. Using the 4% criterium, the dynamic behaviour of the state
variables is mainly influenced by one dominating complex and
complex conjugate pole in some parts of the stable region
(z ~ 3.5; xp , 5).
4. For small z values the stability (ui) of the uncoupled state
variable 1 is small and rathe.r insensible to changes of the
parameter i at the stability limit.
5. For xp ~ 5 and larger values of z the stability (ui) of the
uncoupled state variable 1 is rather insensible to changes of
the parameter i in the stable region and rather sensible at the
stability limits.
DISCUSSION
NOMENCLATURE
nucleation rate at 1 = 0
growth rate of the crystals
growth rate of the crystals in the steady state
nucleatioD/g~owth rate exponent in the equation
BO = k n HT Gl
j nucleation/magma density exponent
k any given constant
1 crystal size
population density in the steady state
population density at 1 = 0 in the steady state
dynamic behaviour of the kth uncoupled state variable
around the equilibrium state ~
the equilibrium state of the kth uncoupled state variable
the dynamic behaviour of the kth uncoupled state variable
=[qk + qk (8)]
R factor describing the decreased residence time of fines
for x " xf (Fig. 1)
complex variable
kth complex pole
kth complex conjugate pole
vibration time
real part of the complex variable s
real part of the kth complex and complex conjugate pole
imaginary part of the complex variable s
imaginary part of the kth complex pole
dimensionless crystal size (= l/GT)
maximum dimensionless fines size with decreased residence
time
402 B.G.M. de LEER, A. KONING, AND E.J. de JONG
REFERENCES
INTRODUCTION
When a slurry is removed from a crystallizer, classification
or non ideal product removal can occur. Classification means that
the concentration of particles in the product stream and the
average concentration in the crystallizer are different. Recently
more information about the classification phenomenon has become
available (1-4). It was realized that this phenomenon is very
important for the correct interpretationof measured population
density curves as well as for the particle size control in industrial
crystallizers. Therefore some so-called classification experiments
using glass beads and water have been carried out in a 42.5 1
crystallizer. In this paper we present some of our results and
discuss the importance of the classification phenomenon.
EXPERIMENTAL
403
404 A.H. JANSE AND E.J. de .lONG
>.(L) = c c /c e (1)
RESULTS
The results of the glass beads experiments are presented
in four different ways:
- the separation coefficient versus the discharge velocity, with
the particle size as parameter (Fig. 2).
- separation coefficient versus the discharge velocity, with
the length of insertion as parameter (Fig. 3).
- separation coefficient versus length of insertion (Fig. 4).
- separation coefficient versus particle size (Fig. 5).
The accuracy of the separation coefficient is about 3%, the
accuracy of the discharge velocity about 2%.
From Fig. 2 it can be seen that a representative product removal
for the 70 and 320~m particles is achieved at a discharge velo-
city of 0.83 m/s. This value agrees within 5% with the expected
velocity based on the measured fluid velocity. So it can be
concluded that (under the stated conditions) isokinetic with-
drawal of glass beads smaller than 230~m results in an ideal
product removal.
For the larger particles the separation coefficient is
smaller than unity, indicating that preferential withdrawal
occurs. Although we work isokinetic at 0.83 mls classification
occurs. To transport particles in a vertical pipe the average
fluid velocity has to be about 5 times the terminal velocity
of the particles. For particles smaller than 710~m the trans-
portation through the discharge is assured.
As the separation coefficient is about 0.7 (L = 710~m and
10 mm length of insertion)t near the discharge a concentration
of 1.4 times the average concentration in the crystallizer is
expected. To obtain more insight in the non homogenity of the
suspension, we increased the stirrer speed and the length of
insertion.
STIRRER SPEED
The non homogenity of the suspension can be caused by
centrifugal forces acting on the particles when the downward
flow of the particles changes in an upward flow. According to
this mechanism a higher stirrer speed gives larger centrifugal
forces and therefore a higher concentration near the wall. This
means that for small length of insertion the concentration in
the product stream will be higher and the separation coefficient
lower.
It is also possible that the high concentration near the
wall is caused by the velocity profile. At low velocities the
chance that the particles will be transported to the upper part
of the crystallizer is small.
406 A.H. JANSE AND E.J. de .lONG
1.1
1.0.
0..9
0..8
c 0.7
Cooling ~oil .!!
I
I ~ 0.6 0 d .6.7mm
I
I "
Q.
NS .10.0.0. rpm.
I Ji 0..5 Li .10. mm
f
I
14
d .6.7mm
N• •1000 rpm.
l • 1260 I'm
12
c: ~o
•
~~
..
:; 1.
0
c 30
.! 2.1
;;
it,
1/1
t 1.. n
0
0
0 26
0 0
1.1 0
22
0
0
0
1.4
1.0
O. ts
0&
0
0.10 090 1.00 1.10
LENGTH OF INSERTION
As the concentration near the wall is relatively high an
increase in length of insertion has to give smaller concentra-
tions near the discharge. So a larger separation coefficient
is expected. This effect becomes more pronounced because the
fluid velocity decreases with increasing length of insertion
(Fig. 1). From Fig. 3 it appears that with increasing length
of insertion the separation coefficient of 1260~m glass beads
increases indeed. At small length of insertion the separation
coefficient increases with the discharge velocity:
Under this condition the ratio of the discharge velocity and the
fluid velocity ranges from 3 to 6. Due to the low velocity and
high velocity in the discharge liquid will be sucked from all dir-
ections. Also liquid which has already passed the plane of the
discharge opening. The higher the velocity in the discharge
the more suspension will be sucked and the higher the concentra-
408 A.H. JANSE AND E.J. de JONG
(3)
DISCUSSION
The two factors which mainly determine the separation coeffi-
cient are:
- homogenity of the suspension in the crystallizer
- the non isokinetic withdrawal
Both factors are determined by among others the stirrer
speed. In practice a lower stirrer speed will be established
than in our experiments. So in practice classification can be
more pronounced.
On the other hand substances with a much smaller difference
between particle and liquid density than glass beads and water
will give less classification. ~or instance a 0.5 mm potassium
alum crystal (density 1760 kglm ) has a terminal velocity of
about 0.035 mls in a saturated solution of 25 0 C. Assuming that
different solid-liquid systems can be compared on the basis of
terminal velocities, the same separation coefficients for 0.23
mm glass beads and 0.5 mm potassium alum crystals can be
expected. The crystallizer we have used. was provided with a
cooling coil. which influences the velocity profile. In stirred
vessels with out a cooling coil the tangential component of the
fluid velocity is much larger. As the velocity profile is quali-
tatively the same similar phenomena can be expected.
410 A.H. JANSE AND E.J. de .lONG
3D
2.'
.. 2.4
'E
10
2.8
2.6
/
/
/
//1'
2.4
d.'.7mm
NS .1000rpm.
9 Yd·1.0.2m/l
• Yd' 0..56"""
-.
:~
~ 22
c /
/
/
I
d .6.7mm
~ 2.0 / NS • 1000 rpm
!! / L j .10mm
"e- 1.'
III j
/ 2L j .l.mm
3 L j .30mm
u
t1.6 L 9 Yd' 1.02 nY-
1.1 / c!. Y d • 0.56m,1s
1.4 ---'ld • 0. 79 nvs
1.4
,/,,1-...
"
i . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . ......... ---1
1.2
1.2
'-',
lD 1.0
"}-----i
2
0.1
0.8
0.. 1
0.6
Q 0.
10.
~
20. :10
l.nlth of In •• r1l0" (mm)
o 250 SOD 7SO 1000 12SO
- Siu <I'm)
.
.
QI
c
.!!
.
:; 7
c ;; 0.7
,g l50(~m) CV."
...
.1 .. 01
1
2
175
195
51
56
ii 5
;; "E os 3 20.5 70.
~
II.
; 04 4 175 S2
:. 4 u
l(L) 114c'~ 1140 '9/.. '
1 (1
2 )1
t7 lOG t 03
121 100.
0.1
3 ))1 172 100
4 =1 100. 100.
0..1
NOMENCLATURE
Li length of insertion mm
Mc crystal mass concentration In the
crystallizer kg/m 3
crystal mass concentration In the
product stream kg/m 3
stirrer speed rpm
velocity in the discharge m/s
separation coefficient (eq. 1)
average liquid residence time s
412 A.H. JANSE AND E.J. de .lONG
REFERENCES
Terminal Velocities
413
414 Y. AOYAMA AND K. TOYOKURA
i I y
n
8 O. 1 1.1
9.2 0.51 0.71
10.5 0.40 0.53
12 0.26 0.37
14 0.19 0.29
16 0 .1 0.18
20 0.09 0.16
24 0.04 0·09
28
~.--------------------------------------------------,
lD~~~--~5~~I~.I~O--~2~----~5--~I~'I~--~2~~-L~5-L~IW,~,~~~
Crystal growth values W (mm g)
6' TM v"u", obtained lrom ... r..... h -"lI- 1 _ , NstCity
30~------------------------------~
10
,-.
~
.&:.
N'
5
E
u
........
01
E
E
'-JI
~IG)
"0"0
c(
-..
,,
It
-
~ I
.&:. 0.5
~
,,
I
~
01 I
-
iii
III I
u
>-
~
Q1
sb A: Thtl valutls obtaintld
from thtl rtlsults using
a thermal history
Q~i~--~~~~----~--~~~~~
Q25Q3 0.5 1 2 3 5 10
Supersturation de (HjPO.g/100g solution]
dw =
de
where dw/de and A are the crystal growth rate and surface area
respectively.
The composition of the feed liquid was 29.07 to 32.0 wt% P205,
0.36 to 0.42 wt% F, 3.23 to 3.42 wt% S04, 0.14 to 0.23 wt% CaO,
0.39 to 0.57 wt% A1203, 0.84 to 0.97 wt% Fe203, 0.25 wt% MgO, 0.32
to 0.47 wt% Si0 2 .
o
o
o Brine
outlet
Cooler
Brine
inlet
@
C
Disso 1u tion tank
}-..........w-....... to evaporator
Outl~t solution tank
-
,.......,.
~
0
~
'-'
c:
0 82
."
....c:
~
Q.o
u
c:
0
u
0
...
a..
:I:'"
81
9 10 11 12 14 15
Temperature
Operational conditions
CyclE' 1 : Excess finE's came out a after
10 hours operat ion
2: @-~Scaling appearE'd aftE'r 12 to 14
hou rs op E'ra t ion
3: ~Operated satisfactorily for
2 weeks
Fig. 5
420 Y. AOYAMA AND K. TOYOKURA
Water
Steam
PII
growing bed. This point was the most important one for this process.
Other improvements, like temperature control of the dissolution tank
(B), were added later.
CONCLUSION
COOLING
K. TOYOKURA
Waseda University
4-Chome, Nishiokubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
INTRODUCTION
421
422 T. AKIYA ET Al.
PRELIMINARY TESTS
d.L
= K 6T (1)
de o
(2)
0 T=13.6oC Vc = 2 1
Q 11.5 392
..c: 1.0
-....... e 10.0 82.3
/
i1s(b
,
Ei
8
0.5
4> 0/ I
'd
,,0
-.......
r-l
'd e e
/ /
0.1 ~--~~~~~~~~----~--~~~~~~~
0.01 o. 1 1.0
.1T (oC)
1.0
t..:>
o
-::: o. 1
§
o o vc = 2 1
~ e 82.3
Q 392
0.01
3.45 3.50 3.55
1/T x 10 3 ( 1/ o K
Fig.2 Relationship between K and 1/T
o
424 T. AKIYA ET AL.
r-I 0
..d 10 9
"-
0
- 0
O~OO
z 0
0
107
0 T=13.6oC Vc= 2 1
ee
~
g Q
11.5 392
e 10.0 82.3
5 I
10 0.01 0.1 1.0
~T °c )
1 Refrigerant outlet
2 Circulating solution inlet
3 Refrigerant inlet
4 Mist separator
5 Feed inlet
6 Circulating solution outlet
7 Sampling nozzle
12 8 Slurry outlet
9 Sampling nozzle
10 Thermometer nozzle
11 Agitator
12 Thermometer nozzle
10 Pressure gauge
13
7 8 9
Fig.5 Crystallizer
426 T. AKIYA ET Al.
A:rter about ten times the me&. retention time the caustic
soda solution was analysed and the erystal size distributi ODS
were measured.
P =
or (no seeding)
From equations 1 and 3 and the Shirotsuka and Toyokura CFC theory
(5), the ef'f'ective volume Vc of' a well-mixed, solvent crystallization
process and the dominant crystal size were calculated as
PI (Xt+~Xl+~) 1 1
m
V
c = ------
3PtKoAT (X~+XI+~Xl+~) (E,;-l) (l-E,; )
(4)
L
m = 3K AT
0
= 3T.dL/de (5)
Here E,; is the concentration f'actor, the ratio of' KOH concentration
of'the outlet solution (XB2 ) to that of'the inlet (XBl ). For
design purposes E,; is calculated f'rom the products and KOH
DIRECT CONTACT COOLING 427
0 upper sample
~
10
• lower sample
•
.....0""
:>.,
~?Oac.
t.>
s:1
(])
;:i
0
0<
(])
H
Ii; 0 0
o. 1
0 0.5 1.0
Crystal size ( mm
Fig.6 Crystal size distribution
(dl/dB=0.248mm/h ,L=0.568h
\ o L=0.568 h 45 rpm
0.6 o Q 0.710 45
e O.568 150
,..c: 0.4
'-...
E
E
(])
'1j 0.2
'-...
.....;
'1j
0
0 5 10
B/T:.. ( - )
Fig.7 Relationship between dl/de and 9~
428 T. AKIYA ET AL.
CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
NOMENCLATURE
REFERENCES
1. Goto, T., Hayano, I., Takeuchi, T. and Akiya, T., Proc. 4th
Internat. Sympos. on Fresh Water from the Sea, £ (1973) 517.
2. Hayano, I., Goto, T. and Ishizaka, S., Bull. Soc. Sea Water
Science Japan, 24 (1971) 253.
3. Randolph, A.D. and Larson, M.A., Theory of Particulate Process,
Academic Press, New York, 1971 p. 68.
4. Akiya, T., Goto, T. and Toyokura, K., 25th Ann. Meeting Soc.
Sea Water Science, Japan, 1972, p. 47 (preprints)
5. Shirotsuka, T. and Toyokura, K., C.E.P. Sympos. Ser., No. 110,
67 (1971) 145.
PROGRESS IN CONTINUOUS FRACTIONAL CRYSTALLIZATION
INTRODUCTION
431
432 G.J. ARKENBOUT. A. Van KUIJK. AND W.M. SMIT
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Several systems, including products o~ technical interest,
were separated using columns o~ 80 mm diam. and with lengths
varying ~rom 500 to 1 500 mm (1-3). The mixtures were crystallized
both ~rom the melt and ~rom solution.
SCALING-UP
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES
USING ULTRASOUND
M.J. ASHLEY
Ultrasonics Limited
INTRODUCTION
437
438 M.J. ASHLEY
EXPERIMENTAL WORK
Rotametus
tor
Ultrasonic rdrigorrant
probe flow rate
Ultrasonic
gornnator
IOOWmax
20 kHz
Cool ing coil
Rdrigeration
Unit includ ing
tormporroture
control and pump
PrYssure
f ilter
Cool ing
j acket
U Fil t rate
receIver
U "'-Saturation temperature
~
~ ,
100 rpm
"~ovy incrustation
15
900 rpm
'\\
~
-------
no incrus tot ion "
:\
o
Time [minutes]
R
....
..
~
~
.....
Q.
20
E
.><
"3
<D
15
0 5
T,me [minutes]
This topic has been covered previously by the author and space
does not permit repetition here (6).
CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES
Akzo Engineering bv
INTRODUCTION
449
450 C.M. van 't LAND AND K.J.A. de WAAL
BRINE
WATER VAPOUR
TO CONDENSER
STEA M~'--IIIIII,1
~lOTHER L I QUOR
SALT SLURRY
VAPOUR
'RINE
IIOl .J NG
ZONE -
OAAFT
TUBE
STEA ....
~Al'ER.
nJl!£S
~
CONOENSATE
t .,.
BOTTOM
CONE
5LUllRY
(a) (b)
,
narrowed tube entries
There were no lumps of salt on the upper tube sheet. Nor was
the wall of the boiling zone covered with salt crusts (see Fig.2).
To the left one will notice the draft tube and to the right the
wall of the vessel. There are only some small salt deposits on the
welds in the vapour/liquid separator. The cause of the trouble was
not, as was originally suggested, the formation of crusts on the
upper tube sheet but gradually narrowing tube entries in the lower
tube sheet due to salt growth. Fig.3 is a view from below of the
pump with the fixed outlet vanes. The majority of tubes haVe narr-
owed to about 50% of their original cross-sectional area. We found
incrustations in the tube entries over a distance of only 5 to 10 cm.
The remaining tube parts were perfectly clean. Some tubes have
wider openings. As these tubes are completely clogged, there will
be no flow of brine through them and hence no growth of crusts at
their entries.
After some months of operation any salt plant will have a
usually small percentage of tubes clogged by salt growth. These
tubes are manually cleaned every now and then, which practically
never offers any serious problems.
LITERATURE SURVEY
CONSIDERATIONS
After the boiling zone the slurry enters the draft tube. The
flow in this tube resembles plug flow with supersaturation decreas-
ing with the time spent in the tube.
between the draft tube and the vessel wall the slurry re-enters the
boiling zone.
Formally we de~ine
t=T
C
av
= 1. f 6C .dt (2)
T t=O
MC
= K.A.6C kg/m 3 .s
dt
Int egration:
(0..)
.9~!~__1 Case II
---25-
Slurry (lensity % by weight 2.5
Salt content kg/m 3 30 338
Average crystal size, 50%
by weight microns 400 600
Uniformity number, BRS-system 3 3
Specific area of crystals m2/~ 7.5 5
Area of crystals (A) m2 /m 225 1690
Area of crystals in the vessel
(Atot) m2 26000 286000
Appendix 1 deals with the estimation of mass transfer coeffi-
cients in m/s for the mass transfer of sodium chloride from brine
to the solid crystals.. It appears that ~t l20 0 C the mass transfer
coefficient may be assumed to be 5 x 10- m/s. The average super-
saturation may be calculated using:
SYMBOLS
REFERENCES
1. Richards, R.B., Chem. Eng. Progr., 52 (1956) 6, 58.
2. Rumford, F. and Bain, J., Trans. Instn. Chem. Engrs., 38
(1960) 10.
3. Hughmark, G.A., AIChE. J., 13 (1967) 1219.
4. Perry's Chemical Engineers'Jffandbook, 5-59, Fourth Edition,
McGraw-Hill.
APPENDIX
Experimental conditions:
Fluidization velocities: 3 and 5 cm/s in the empty tube.
Temperatures: 26 to 73 0 C (6 values)
Supersaturations: 0.5 to 2.5 gil (various values).
Hughmark (3) has analysed the data of many authors. For our case
1 < Re < 450and Sc < 250 and hence we may use:
Sh = 2 + 0.60 Re O. 50 Sc O. 33 [2]
The method given by (4) has been used for determining the set-
tling velocities. The following physical data were already avail-
able:
INTRODUCTION
461
462 W. WOHLK AND G. HOFMANN
~J
19,9 wl·'I. Potus....., cNondt
15.65 wl -Itj. Sod..... chIondo
1.02 wt ·'1. Mag_m chIondo
1,71 wl .'1. Caic",m chIondo
0.1 wi "1. CG!c.,m ~,.
D
i'
1-_
--
1- __ r--
~ ~-/
I. 3\
01 - -
\
\,..
\
-- '\
I \~.
.,
-
m
~
m 21'
10 20 30
'0QgH,0 -----_" • KClllOOO. 11,0
Process Technique
o
,£
i 1--
-- '---
..
~
z
•
-- -- -I- ...
"'" J
\ - .L
1 /'
-
,
\
\ 2
\.7P
as
_ '" 315
- - - - - - - - - - -•. • ~/~~O
Jllg~
23g NaCI - purity 53,1 % K/ll
1000 9 (102'C I
1999 KCt ; 10,45% KCI
157 9 NaCI ; 18,0 % NaCI
.1l1g,EL
_ pwIy: 60,5% K,O 1
5g NaCI
"
t- Hffi
Ii
oll ,
,
~ a
•{
'i
(
. ~.~
.
• ~. , K
1._
5.
111 '
v ," 1
,~
' \.
I
70
('. 0
I
9
'4t., '
98. I wt, .y, Potassium cIiortdol
9• r- d' , o.~
• 62.05 wI. .'/0 Potassium oxld. n,3,5
r- t-- .~
1.45 wI.·% 'sodium thloride
I I ~ 'f
.
0.081. wi. -% Calcium thIondot
0.082 wi. -% Magnesium thlorid.
0.006 wi. -% Calcium sulphate
01 . III ,I IIII•
"
•
IJII ILL/ J
' .!.
" II. I•.s·.,,-.l. ~
20
36.711
V rl/
50
111 II '/, 500 m'/h
~
!
VI VIJ ,I with 1I'<IlC. 0.3 gil crystals
~ 150 kg/h
,
/; I~ ~~
70
J I
I ,,
I
I
,
~ 11.5 10· particle.I
Wd,,: 0.1 mm
I
110
L / IL 'h ~ I
Ii~~
115
If ,,I
,, 10 000 kg/h
I
~ 15 10' I
99
0.4Inn l t25m r p<rticles
d d • 1,25 mm
a1 .3 J. 5 6 .7.8.91 3 4 5
pgrtide sia Imml
1
468 W. WOHLK AND G. HOFMANN
OPERATION OF A KCI CRYSTALLIZATION PLANT 469
RESULTS
471
472 INDEX