26 views

Uploaded by annieeby

- The Gödel's legacy: revisiting the Logic
- Spencer Brown - Laws of Form
- Oxford Philosophy (3rd Edition)
- pc_ex_1__18
- Logos - Book (11-15-11 0316)
- Euclidean Geometry October Final[1]
- Book List for Iit Jee
- 171100__089
- Reflective Property of Parabolas
- alignmentcalculationv107.xls
- math_2prim_t1_E
- icmis16prusprotassov.pdf
- First Note on the Definition of s1-convexity
- Study-Guide-2019-1 CSE.pdf
- commitlog
- study guide
- METHOD OF GEOMETRIC CALCULATION OF INVOLUTE_ALGO DE CORRECCIONES.pdf
- paper A sol
- maths project
- Russell_towrad PM 1905-08 - Contents

You are on page 1of 3

Archimedes’ Method, Proposition 1 v.

Archimedes: Quadrature of the Parabola, Proposition 24

Archimedes demonstrates in two ways that the segment of a parabola is 4/3 the

demonstration. He says that the proposition first became clear to him by mechanical

methods; the geometrical method came second, to provide an actual proof of the

Parabola). In examining these two proofs we hope to find a) the different methods

supposition is made that the segment is equal to a certain area K, which fits the formula

we are trying to prove. For if the segment is not equal to area K, says Archimedes, it

must be greater or less than the area K. The proof then shows both of these options to be

geometric relations. Then Archimedes strays wildly from familiar geometry. The

Euclid defines a line as breadthless length. Archimedes, in order for his demonstration to

1

work, must contradict Euclid’s definition. Proposition 1 claims that lines can be situated

with their “centers of gravity” at a given point and that lines can be in equilibrium about a

certain point. But for a thing to have a center of gravity or to balance about a point, it

must have mass; in order for it to have mass, it must have breadth.

line with breadth. Once we secure a proportion between an arbitrary line within the

triangle and a line within the segment, Archimedes tells us the relationship is the same for

the whole triangle and the whole segment since the triangle “is made up of all the parallel

lines” like the one in our proportion, and the segment “is made up of all the straight lines”

like the corresponding line in the proportion. Again, in order for a segment to be “made

as it strays from Euclidean principles and depends on truths of the physical world. The

one’s ability to visualize a line being dragged across the segment and watch, as if in

motion, the lines grow and shrink while always remaining in proportion.

geometric proof and is perhaps more intuitively understood, Archimedes ends his

proposition with a claim that the theorem has not been demonstrated; he only suspects it

to be true. In his assertion that he needs a purely geometric proof in order to show the

truth of the theorem, he seems to assume that truth can only be found in the realm of pure

geometry. Somehow, his use of physical phenomena (centers of gravity and points of

2

If mechanical demonstrations are corrupted by the use of physical phenomena and

are not trustworthy as proofs, why is it the mechanical proposition which occurs to

Archimedes first? Why is the mechanical proposition easier to visualize than the purely

because it relates more closely with our experience. Any line we can imagine does have

breadth. It is therefore feasible to imagine one dragging a line to complete the area of a

segment. Any “line” we can create does have mass and a center of gravity. So it is

possible to imagine that lines could balance against one another. The geometric proof, in

contrast, depends on other propositions (Prop 23, in particular) which, though graspable

because he hopes it will help him get a start on his own investigations. Though

mechanical demonstrations might not be accepted as proof of a theorem, they allow one

to see through the use of the physical world if the theorem is likely true. The fact that

mechanical proofs use our experience of the physical world makes them more accessible

and easier to visualize, even as they stray from the Euclidean world of pure logic.

- The Gödel's legacy: revisiting the LogicUploaded byGiuseppe Raguní
- Spencer Brown - Laws of FormUploaded bysigninsignin
- Oxford Philosophy (3rd Edition)Uploaded byadaptingsince1984
- pc_ex_1__18Uploaded byDr. Davide Iannone
- Logos - Book (11-15-11 0316)Uploaded bySteven Kowalski
- Euclidean Geometry October Final[1]Uploaded byjhdmss
- Book List for Iit JeeUploaded bysat2400
- 171100__089Uploaded byhuevonomar05
- Reflective Property of ParabolasUploaded byVihan Aw
- alignmentcalculationv107.xlsUploaded byPavel Morati
- math_2prim_t1_EUploaded byHana Habash
- icmis16prusprotassov.pdfUploaded byKosma Kosmic
- First Note on the Definition of s1-convexityUploaded byMarcia Pinheiro
- Study-Guide-2019-1 CSE.pdfUploaded byCzarina Jane Perez
- commitlogUploaded byaruvindhu
- study guideUploaded byCarlson E. Aberin
- METHOD OF GEOMETRIC CALCULATION OF INVOLUTE_ALGO DE CORRECCIONES.pdfUploaded byCarlosQuelart
- paper A solUploaded byasdfghjk
- maths projectUploaded byMeowNaik
- Russell_towrad PM 1905-08 - ContentsUploaded byfreemind3682
- musselmanteacher metaphorUploaded byapi-187972358
- 1-s2.0-S0196885804000417-mainUploaded byHaadi
- A Guide to Writing Scientific EssaysUploaded byHarshan Arumugam
- UntitledUploaded byTAn0Fm4ly2
- Vellor Question Bank5Uploaded byacdey2000
- Sol 3Uploaded byMartin Estrada
- PRACTICA Nº 2Uploaded byapi-19914195
- EffectivityUploaded byTobey Thompson
- Rationalism Explained GoodUploaded byYaqoob Attal
- cad8Uploaded byshiva kumar

- 1st Law of ThermodynamicsUploaded byRavi Parkhe
- 2018-06-05 (3)Uploaded byXxyyzz
- Chemical KineticsUploaded byavg
- ME6401-SCAD-MSM- By www.LearnEngineering.in.pdfUploaded byYenigalla Gamana
- OM 08.1 Operations SchedulingUploaded byChetas1992
- distributed_dbms_tutorial.pdfUploaded byVivekananda Ganjigunta Narayana
- xtableUploaded byRizky Ramdhani
- Earth as a SphereUploaded byjuriah binti ibrahim
- DC Machines Week 4Uploaded byEdilson Valderrama
- 10476.pdfUploaded byzorrito25
- -go-math-session 1001 and 1002Uploaded byapi-237149878
- Basic StatisticsUploaded byDoods Galdo
- ERROR DETECTION AND CORRECTION USING HAMMING CODEUploaded byArunabh Nag
- Q Testing and StatisticsUploaded bySanka De Silva
- C11-The-Mole.pptUploaded byCarl Agape Davis
- BoundaryUploaded byAlo Rovi
- Siemens-PLM-star-ccm+-brochure-66560-A11Uploaded byDaniel Riveros
- Soc Verif Udemy Lec 5 Methodologies Sim FormalUploaded byrenju91
- 07299689Uploaded byrallabhandiSK
- Digital Clock ManagersUploaded bySujeet Sharma
- Planeaciones de SegundoUploaded bymaryland1207
- 4-Pillars Forecasting BootcampUploaded byWatson Tan
- Catalog.college.emory.edu-Mathematics and Computer Science DepartmentUploaded byMaxwell Long
- Statprob 2Uploaded byDessyDwiRosAninda
- Assignment 1 (Winter 2017)Uploaded bymiggawee88
- s1_introUploaded bySuraj Motee
- Mission 02Uploaded byLoady Das
- School Form 5 (RBEC)Uploaded byJobel Sibal Capunfuerza
- FATIGUE LIFE PREDICTION MODELS FOR COMPOSITES - A REVIEWUploaded byIJIERT-International Journal of Innovations in Engineering Research and Technology
- Quiz-003Uploaded byDolly Lyn Reyes