You are on page 1of 2

c  



  c   .

 .

.

.

.

c .

.

   .

 .

.

 .

 c c .

 c.

.

DzIslamophobiadz) from Islamists and their enablers. There are at least two reasons for this. x    . First. Second. Any critique or exposeǯ of Islam is usually met with name-calling (e. Criticism of Islam. Allah or Mohammed is a criminal offense. as two examples below will attest. sharia law does not provide for nor protect free speech. public discourse and debates about radical Islam reveal the truth that Islamists donǯt want Americans to see. Two recent events reveal why Islamists and their enablers avoid genuine debate. They frequently get furious when we refuse to do so. and name call in the hopes of demonizing those who dare to expose the truth so as to keep the truth from the American people. rave.g. Hence.. y A recent event held in Des Moines. When Muslims attempt to suppress free speech critiques of Islam they are abiding by sharia law.dz produced a very illuminating exchange. and insisting that we non-Muslims bow before sharia law as well. rather than rational or factual responses and rebuttals. where ACT! for America chapter leader Steve Kirbyǯs question about sharia law and free speech was completely ignored by the Muslim moderator. entitled DzA Forum on Being An American Muslim. Iowa. they rant.

     .

  .

          .

. Prior to the debate. please click here. y A recent debate was held in New York.  To read Steveǯs short summary of this incident. the audience members were polled as to their position on the motion. please click here. (You will need Adobe Acrobat to open the PDF). debating the motion DzIs Islam a religion of peace?dz To view this fascinating debate.

Check out these eye-popping results! 36 were for the motion (a decrease of 5 percentage points) 55 were against the motion (an increase of 30 percentage points) 9 were undecided In other words. after seeing only one debate.  . most of the undecideds and some of those who initially agreed that DzIslam is a religion of peacedz changed their positions to opposing the motion. the audience was polled again. r  were for the motion 25 were against the motion 3r were undecided After the debate. Small wonder we see so few Muslims willing to step forward and defend sharia law and the ideology of radical Islam!! Truth and the facts are stacked so heavily against them they can only hope to Dzwindz by suppressing speech that exposes the truth.