Coral

Anika Theill c/o

Judy

Bennett 11260 Simpson Monmouth, Oregon 97361

541) 829-3871 coraltheill@hotmail.com

FILEJJ )4

TiFr·

i

.

;

.;

-

.

-...

_ _

L

l

1

.jbU.SI C·O~·p

UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

DISTRICT

OF

OREGON PORTLAND

DIVISION

Coral

Anika Theill, Plaintiff

v

State

of

Oregon Attorney

General

John Kroger

State

of

Oregon

Attorney

General

Hardy

Meyers State of Oregon

Attorney

General

Ellen Rosenblum State

of

Oregon

Chief

Justice

Thomas

A

Balmer

Presiding

Judge

Albin

Norblad Polk County Circuit Court

State

of Oregon

Presiding

Judge Paula

Brownhill,

Polk County Circuit Court

State

of

Oregon Presiding

Judge Charles

E.

Luukinen Polk County Circuit Court State

of

Oregon Presiding

Judge Monte

S.

Campbell

County

of

Polk, District Attorney

John

Fisher

County

of

Polk, District

Attorney

Aaron

Felton County

of

Polk, Deputy District

Attorney

John

Adams Attorney

J.

Mark

Lawrence

Attorney Daniel H.

Van Eaton

Attorney

J.

Michael

Alexander

Attorney

Richard

Alway CASE No.

3:17-CV-1722

SB

FILED IN ASSOCIATION WITH CASES 2:20-l 7-CV-02072, 17-cv-1974, 17-CV-05514, 17-CV-6063,

3:

17-CV-01669,

3:

17-CV-1786, 2:17-CV-768, CIV-17-1250 AMENDED CIVIL COMPLAINT ADA

Oregon

Chapter

Association

of

Family

and

Conciliation

Courts

Kathleen Gillis, PsyD,

President

Association

of

Family

and

Conciliation

Courts Peter

Salem, MA Executive Director Charles H.

Kuttner

M.D. Patricia Cox, Custody

Evaluator

Deborah Thompson, Executive Direction, Sable House Defendants.

Case 3:17-cv-01722-SB Document 5 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 45

 

COMPL INT

Plaintiff, Coral Anika Theill, alleges the following:

INTRODUCTION

1

Plaintiff mother is established in forma pauperis in this court. Coral Anika Theill, a qualified individual with a mental health disability, bring this complaint against the above-named Defendants State

of

Oregon, et al. (collectively Defendants ), who are public and/or private entities. From 1996 -2017 -present, Defendants have regarded Plaintiff as mentally ill, emotionally unfit, psychotic and suicidal. Sexual crimes she endured as a child, her previous post-partum depression and breakdown, her fertility and the

rape

by her husband became subjects for ridicule in court. Oregon Circuit Court Judge Albin Norblad laughed when he heard Ms. Theill became pregnant when Ms. Theill's husband raped her. They recognized her PTSD in court and on the record while failing to provide her protection. Defendants falsely accused Ms. Theill

of

PAS and being psychotic, mentally ill, suicidal and emotionally unfit. Ms. Theill's correct disability and impairment is called Complex Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Complex Post-traumatic stress disorder is an injury due to ongoing abuse and trauma that requires treatment. Defendants discriminated against Plaintiff according to these perceived mental impairments even though Defendants acted on assumptions and sexbased stereotypes about Plaintiffs' disabilities; and failed to individually analyze what services and supports would be appropriate considering those disabilities. Defendants refused to provide appropriate individualized treatment and accommodations necessary to ensure that Plaintiffs had full and equal opportunity to court proceedings to which Coral Anika Theill parental rights and children's custody were at issue. Moreover, Defendants exploited Plaintiffs' disabilities.

Case 3:17-cv-01722-SB Document 5 Filed 12/04/17 Page 2 of 45

 

2

Ms. Theill is a qualified individual with a mental health disability. She brings this complaint against the above-named Defendant State

of

Oregon et al. (collectively Defend-ants ), who are public and/or private entities. From 2008 -present, Defendants have regarded Plaintiff as having a mental impairment called alienating, bizarre, unknown mental health issue, and discriminated against Plaintiff according to these perceived mental impairments. Defendants acted on assumptions and sex-based stereotypes about

laintiffs

disabilities; and failed to individually analyze what services and supports would be appropriate considering those disabilities. Defendants refused to provide appropriate individualized treatment and accommodations necessary to ensure that Plaintiff had full and equal opportunity to court proceedings to which Ms. Theill's parental rights and children's custody were at issue. Moreover, Defendants exploited Plaintiffs' disabilities.

3

Plaintiff mother has taken on mammoth efforts to vindicate her rights and those

of

her children She has been met with opinions that side step the law, ignore the legal issues she raises and further ensures that plaintiffs and those similarly situated will be met with continued domestic and family violence, purposeful economic and emotional devastation to guarantee fathers have supremacy, even after a divorce.

4

Protection from Abuse was never part

of

Welfare Fatherhood and Marriage Promotion programs. Instead

of

building these programs with a domestic violence component, protection for Mothers and children was purposely left out. https://www.fatherhood.gov/ There is no motherhoodhood.gov website nor is there a parenthood.gov website. The government website is exists solely for fathers.

5

Plaintiffs intend to

go

to Multi district litigation with the cases listed in association with and

Case 3:17-cv-01722-SB Document 5 Filed 12/04/17 Page 3 of 45