Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PII: S0883-9441(20)30562-1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.05.003
Reference: YJCRC 53533
Please cite this article as: F. Zarka, A. Tayler-Gomez, T. Ducruet, et al., Risk of incident
bleeding after acute kidney injury: A retrospective cohort study, Journal of Critical Care
(2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.05.003
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such
as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is
not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting,
typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this
version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production
process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers
that apply to the journal pertain.
Risk of incident bleeding after acute kidney injury: a retrospective cohort study
Farah Zarka MDa, Alexandre Tayler-Gomez MDa, Thierry Ducruet MScb, Anatolie Duca MDa,
of
ro
Author affiliations:
-p
re
a. Department of Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 Blvd Gouin West,
b. Applied Clinical Research Unit, Hôpital Ste-Justine, 3175 Chemin de la Cote Ste-
na
Coeur de Montréal, 5400 Blvd Gouin West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4J 1C5
Jo
ameliebjean@gmail.com; josee.bouchard.1@umontreal.ca
1
Journal Pre-proof
E-mail: josee.bouchard.1@umontreal.ca
Phone 514-338-2883
of
Fax 514-338-2182
ro
Conflict of interest statement
-p
re
None.
lP
This study was supported by research grants from the Nephrology Consortium of the Univers ity
of Montreal and the Sacré-Coeur Hospital Research Center. Josée Bouchard was a scholar of the
ur
Fonds de la Recherche du Québec – Santé. Funding agencies did not have any role in study design;
Jo
collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing the manuscript and the decision to submit
Manuscript: 3092
2
Journal Pre-proof
Abstract
Purpose. End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) causes bleeding diathesis; however, whether these
findings are extrapolable to acute kidney injury (AKI) remains uncertain. We assessed whether
ESKD or kidney transplants. The primary outcome was the development of incident bleeding
of
analyzed by multivariate time-dependent Cox models.
ro
Results: In 1,001 patients, bleeding occurred in 48% of AKI and 57% of non-AKI patients
(p=0.007). To identify predictors of incident bleeding, we excluded patients who bled before ICU
-p
(n=488). In bleeding-free patients (n=513), we observed a trend toward higher risks of bleeding in
re
AKI (22% vs. 16%,p=0.06), and a higher risk of bleeding in AKI-requiring dialysis (38% vs.
lP
17%,p=0.01). Cirrhosis, AKI-requiring dialysis, anticoagulation, and coronary artery disease were
95%CI:1.45–3.80; and HR 1.84, 95%CI:1.06–3.20, respectively), while SOFA score and sepsis
ur
anticoagulant administration. Studies are needed to better understand how AKI affects coagulatio n
Keywords: acute kidney injury, bleeding, hemorrhage, outcomes, time-dependent Cox model
3
Journal Pre-proof
Abbreviations
of
HR: hazard ratio
ro
ICU: intensive care unit
4
Journal Pre-proof
Introduction
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is frequent and is independently associated with significant morbidity
and mortality [1-5]. However, the exact mechanisms underlying the increased morbidity and
mortality remain uncertain [6, 7]. In end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), uremia increases bleeding
diathesis by impairing platelet aggregation and platelet–vessel wall interaction [8, 9]. This risk
seems to be proportional to the degree and duration of uremia [8]. In AKI, the risk of bleeding may
also be related to other factors such as acute hepatic failure, thrombopenia, coagulopathy, recent
of
surgery, trauma or infection [8, 10, 11]. On the other hand, critically ill patients also often show
ro
signs of hypercoagulability [10, 11]. To our knowledge, only a few studies have characterized the
-p
risk of bleeding in AKI patients [12-15]. Whether AKI is an independent risk factor for bleeding
re
or a surrogate marker of increased severity of illness remains to be established.
lP
We aim to determine the incidence, sources, risk factors and outcomes of bleeding events
na
according to AKI status, and to determine the association between AKI and bleeding events in
critically ill patients. We hypothesized that AKI is an independent risk factor for incident bleeding
ur
events.
Jo
We performed a retrospective cohort study of critically ill patients admitted to a tertiary care
academic center between January 1 st and December 31st , 2012. Our center includes a medical
intensive care unit (ICU), general surgery, cardiac surgery, neurosurgery and trauma ICUs. We
included randomly selected patients aged 18 or older according to their chart number using a
5
Journal Pre-proof
computer-generated random list of numbers, and excluded patients readmittted to the ICU, on
chronic dialysis, admitted for less than 24 hours, and kidney transplant recipients. We determined
the timing of AKI, and the timing of bleeding events in relation to the diagnosis of AKI. In patients
with bleeding preceding AKI, we also characterized the incidence and timing of distinct new
episodes of bleeding. We presented our results in two cohorts. First, a descriptive cohort of all
eligible patients to characterize the epidemiology and prognosis associated with bleeding events
according to AKI status. This cohort allows us to assess the generalizability of our results. We then
of
presented a comparative cohort composed of all patients included in the descriptive cohort with
ro
the exception of those who had a bleeding event before ICU admission to characterize the
-p
predictors of incident bleeding. We followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational
studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines for observational studies [16]. The ethics’
re
committee of our institution approved the study. Written consent was waived given the
lP
retrospective observational nature of the study. The study was performed in accordance with the
na
AKI assessment
Jo
AKI was diagnosed on the day when the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)
serum creatinine (SCr) criteria were met; urine output criteria were not considered [17]. Patients
who had AKI before ICU admission were categorized as having AKI on day 0 if meeting AKI
criteria. Baseline SCr was defined as the closest value between 3 and 12 months before hospital
admission to reflect chronic kidney disease (CKD) status, and if unavailable, the furthest value
between 3 months before hospital admission and hospital admission. Baseline SCr was considered
missing if no SCr values were available before admission. According to KDIGO guidelines, when
6
Journal Pre-proof
baseline creatinine was missing, we used a baseline SCr computed from the Modification of Diet
in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula, assuming an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 75
Covariates
Our database includes patient demographics, premorbid conditions, laboratory results, sepsis
status, severity of illness scores and processes of care including surgical status, cumulative fluid
of
balance, administration of antiplatelet agents, anticoagulants, nonsteroidal anti-inflammator y
ro
drugs (NSAIDS), proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists, use of central catheters,
-p
mechanical ventilation (MV) and dialysis. Anticoagulant therapy was defined as the use of
re
warfarin, intravenous unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin, fondaparinux,
argatroban, and/or direct oral anticoagulant drugs (DOA) at doses providing therapeutic
lP
anticoagulation, which was assessed on a daily basis. CKD status was defined as an eGFR of less
na
than 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 . Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and non-renal SOFA
scores were assessed at ICU admission [18]. Cumulative fluid balance was the sum of daily fluid
ur
Outcomes
The primary outcome was the incidence of de novo bleeding events after ICU admission, which
was independently adjudicated by two investigators (A.D. and J.B.). The bleeding episodes were
characterized using standardized definitions from the HEmorrhage MEasurement (HEME) in the
ICU tool, a validated bleeding measurement tool in critically ill patients [19, 20]. Only major
bleeding episodes were considered in this study, defined by any of the 5 following criteria: 1) life
7
Journal Pre-proof
threatening bleeding with hypovolemic shock; 2) life threatening bleeding into a critical site (e.g.
intracranial or pericardial); 3) other critical bleeding (e.g., epidural, intraocular or intra-articula r);
bleeding requiring transfusion of 2 or more units of packed red blood cells, or associated with a
beats/minute [19, 20]. Other outcomes included requirement for dialysis and mortality at hospital
discharge.
of
ro
Statistical analyses and sample size calculation
-p
We used t-test or Mann-Whitney to analyze continuous variables when comparing 2 groups, and
re
ANOVA or Kruskall-Wallis when comparing more than 2 groups, where appropriate. We used the
2 -test or Fisher exact test to compare categorical variables, where appropriate. In patients free of
lP
bleeding at ICU admission, we used Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test to compare the length
na
of time after ICU admission until occurrence of first incident bleeding event in patients with and
without AKI. In the same population, we used a Cox proportional-hazards regression model with
ur
AKI modelled as a time-dependant variable to identify predictors of incident bleeding after ICU
Jo
admission. Variables with a p-value ≤0.20 by univariate analysis were included in the multivar iate
Cox regression model which was adjusted for age and gender. We also conducted a competing risk
analysis with mortality as the competing event. We verified the assumption of proportional hazards
using interaction terms with time. We used a multivariate Cox regression model to identify the
predictors of mortality at hospital discharge. Statistical tests were two sided and a p-value <0.05
was considered statistically significant for all comparisons. The analyses were performed using
SPSS, version 24.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY) and SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
8
Journal Pre-proof
Based on a previous study, the incidence of AKI and major bleeding at our center were 25% and
55% respectively [2]. A sample size of 1,000 patients would achieve a study power of 90% at a
type I error rate of 0.05 to detect a hazard ratio of 1.30 for the development of bleeding, assuming
Results
of
Overall population – descriptive cohort (n=1,001)
ro
We identified 2,464 patients admitted over a year, and 1,073 (43.5%) were randomly selected for
-p
the study population. After excluding 72 patients (Figure 1), 1,001 patients were included in the
re
descriptive analysis. For the comparative analysis, we excluded patients who experienced bleeding
before or upon ICU admission (n=488), to determine predictors of de novo bleeding (n=513).
lP
na
Patient characteristics, outcomes and bleeding sources are presented according to AKI and
bleeding status (Table 1). Among our population (n=1,001), 26% (n=257) developed AKI and
ur
55% (n=548) had a major bleeding event. AKI occurred at a median time of 1 day (IQR 0-3)
Jo
following ICU admission and 54% were stage 1, 18%, stage 2 and 28%, stage 3. Of the 101 patients
with a bleeding event occurring before AKI, 9 (8.9%) had one or more new bleeding events at a
median time of 2 (IQR 2-5) days after AKI. For the 21 patients who had a new bleeding event after
AKI, the first event occurred at a median of 2 (IQR 1-11) days after AKI. Overall, bleeding events
most often originated from peri and post-operative complications and intracerebral sources. Few
bleeding events originated from the gastrointestinal track (5.3%). Patients who did not develop
9
Journal Pre-proof
AKI nor bleeding events were younger, suffered from fewer comorbidities, had lower SOFA
scores, were less likely to receive vasopressors and had fewer previous hemorrhagic events.
A total of 33 patients required dialysis. The proportion of patients on dialysis was not significa ntly
different across AKI subgroups (AKI alone, 9.6%; bleeding before AKI, 13.9%; and bleeding after
AKI, 28.6%; p=0.05 between groups). Patients with bleeding after AKI had a 38.1% risk of in-
hospital mortality, compared to 25.7% of patients with AKI after bleeding and 23.7% of patients
of
with AKI alone. Patients without AKI (with and without bleeding) had lower in-hospital mortality
ro
rates (7.5% and 7.9%, respectively) (p<0.001 between groups). Patients with bleeding after AKI
-p
had a hospital length of stay (LOS) of 19 days (IQR 15-40), compared to 14 days (IQR 7-32) in
re
those with AKI after bleeding and 17 days (IQR 8-27) in those with AKI alone. Patients without
AKI (with and without bleeding) had a shorter LOS (10 days (IQR 6-20) and 8 days (IQR 5-15),
lP
After excluding patients with a hemorrhagic event before or on the day of ICU admission, patients
Jo
with AKI had a trend toward a higher risk of bleeding compared to those without AKI that did not
reach statistical significance (22% vs. 16%, p=0.06). Patients with AKI requiring dialysis had a
higher risk of bleeding than other critically ill patients (38% vs. 17%, p=0.01). Twenty-seven
and 6% (2/33) were on therapeutic anticoagulation while having a bleeding event. Therapeutic
anticoagulation was stopped when bleeding occurred in these 2 patients. The Kaplan-Meier curves
for cumulative incidence of bleeding according to AKI status are shown in Figure 2. In this cohort,
10
Journal Pre-proof
AKI occurred at a median time of 0 day (IQR 0–3) after ICU admission. The first bleeding event
occurred at a median of 2 days (IQR 1–7) after ICU admission in patients with AKI and 2 days
(IQR 1–8) after ICU admission in patients without AKI. In patients who developed AKI, the first
bleeding episode occurred at a median of 2 days after AKI (IQR 1–11). Most bleeding originated
gastrointestinal hemorrhages were rare (1.0%) (Table 2). Only one patient experienced bleeding
from a catheter, which was not installed nor used for dialysis.
of
ro
In univariate analysis, coronary artery disease, chronic liver disease, trauma, cardiac event as the
-p
main diagnosis at ICU admission, provision of surgery, mechanical ventilation, vasopressors,
re
NSAIDS, antiplatelet drugs and anticoagulant therapy during hospitalization were significa ntly
associated with the occurrence of bleeding (Table 2), whereas higher SOFA score at ICU
lP
admission and sepsis as the main diagnosis at ICU admission were inversely associated with the
na
occurrence of bleeding. In multivariate analysis, chronic liver disease, AKI requiring dialys is
anticoagulation therapy, and coronary artery disease (CAD) were associated with a higher risk of
ur
bleeding events, while higher SOFA score and sepsis had a protective association with the risk of
Jo
bleeding (Table 3). Mechanical ventilation and use of vasopressors were not included in the model
since these variables are already included in the SOFA score. There was no interaction between
AKI and CKD status in the multivariate analysis. We also performed a supplementary analysis to
predict the risk of bleeding competed by the risk of mortality. The HR of subsequent bleeding for
AKI requiring dialysis remained similar (HR 2.57 95% CI 1.32–4.96; p=0.005). (Supplementary
Table 1).
11
Journal Pre-proof
In a multivariate Cox regression model to predict mortality, age, mechanical ventilation, higher
fluid balance and SOFA score were significantly associated with a higher risk of death, while a
recent surgical procedure was associated with a lower risk of mortality (Table 4). The occurrence
of a new bleeding event was not associated with an increased risk of mortality.
Discussion
In this study, we have found that new bleeding events were relatively frequent following severe
of
AKI, occurring twice more often in patients with AKI requiring dialysis than in other critically ill
ro
patients (38% vs 17%; p=0.01). The excess of bleeding events occurred within days after AKI.
-p
This result was not related to anticoagulation administered for dialysis, since only two patients had
re
bleeding while on therapeutic anticoagulation. There was also a trend towards an increased risk of
bleeding in patients with AKI compared to patients without AKI (22% vs. 16%; p=0.06). In a Cox
lP
proportional hazards model where AKI status was modelled as a time-dependent variable, AKI
na
requiring dialysis was an independent risk factor for the development of bleeding, with a HR of
2.82 (95%CI 1.26–6.32). The crude mortality rate associated with bleeding following AKI was
ur
higher than when bleeding preceded AKI (38% vs. 26%), or when AKI occurred without bleeding
Jo
(24%). However, in a Cox proportional hazards model, incident bleedings were not associated with
Over the last decade, some studies have attempted to explain the excess mortality and morbidity
associated with AKI [6, 21]. Results from animal experiments suggest that AKI can affect other
organs, contributing to non-renal complications [6, 22-26]. Our study is one of a few on the
epidemiology of bleeding events following AKI [10, 12-15, 27-29]. Our results further support the
12
Journal Pre-proof
association between severe AKI and the risk of bleeding in a heterogeneous population of critica lly
ill patients.
The finding that AKI requiring dialysis is an independent risk factor for bleeding events is
consistent with prior preclinical studies. Firstly, uremia is responsible for qualitative platelet
defects, and higher levels of uremia make these defects more common and more severe. However,
the risk of bleeding appears to vary greatly across degrees of uremia [8, 9, 30]. In addition, studies
of
have shown that while dialysis improves platelet function, it rarely normalizes coagulatio n
ro
parameters [9].
-p
re
Limited studies have compared the risk of bleeding in patients with and without AKI [14, 15, 29].
In a case-control study of 348 patients undergoing radiocontrast exposure, 15% of the 60 patients
lP
that developed AKI and died had a pre-existing bleeding event and 27% developed a new bleeding
na
event after AKI [14]. No data were available on risk factors of bleeding. Some studies have found
that AKI independently predicts the risk of bleeding in specific populations, such as patients
ur
undergoing paracentesis for decompensated cirrhosis [29] or following transcatheter aortic valve
Jo
implantation (TAVI) [15]. One study has reported 13% of incident hemorrhagic events following
AKI [12].
In our study, we observed an incidence of bleeding after AKI requiring dialysis of 38%, which is
also comparable to what has been reported in the literature. Twenty years ago, the incidence of
bleeding complications in critically ill adults on dialysis ranged from 26% to 47% [27, 28]. In
more recent studies, the reported incidence of major bleeding varied between 23% and 27% [10,
13
Journal Pre-proof
13]. Regarding risk factors of bleeding, comparable risk factors in critically and non-critically ill
patients have been reported, such as liver disease [12, 31], AKI [12, 31], and anticoagulation [31].
One study has found infectious events to be a predictor of bleeding [31]. However, in our study,
sepsis was associated with a lower risk of bleeding. Another observational study of 83 patients
with decompensated cirrhosis corroborated this finding [29]. In addition, we found non-renal
SOFA score to be inversely correlated with bleeding. However, in the competing risk analysis, the
SOFA score was significantly associated with a higher risk of bleeding. We did not have daily data
of
to ascertain whether this relationship would remain over time. Finally, although uremia is
ro
associated with bleeding, our CKD population included only a limited number of patients with
-p
moderate to severe CKD who are at higher risk of hemorrhage [32, 33]. Therefore, we did not
re
expect that CKD would be associated with bleeding in our study.
lP
We found no evidence that bleeding events were associated with an increased risk of mortality
na
post AKI. This finding is consistent with a previous observational study of 198 patients with
undergoing TAVI showed that AKI was associated not only with an increased risk for major
Jo
bleeding, but also with life-threatening bleeding events [15]. Similarly, acute gastrointestina l
hemorrhage has been independently associated with an increased risk of death in AKI patients
admitted to a nephrology intermediate care unit [12]. Of note, our study was underpowered to
assess the relationship between bleeding events and mortality, which may have led to the lack of
an association between incident bleeding and mortality. Similarly, our study was underpowered to
14
Journal Pre-proof
Our study has several strengths. First, we used a recent database including a large heterogeneous
population of critically ill patients with detailed data on anticoagulation and suffering from various
degrees of AKI severity to reflect current practices and standards of care. Second, two independent
investigators adjudicated all suspected major bleeding events based on standardized definitio ns
from a validated tool in critically ill patients [19, 20]. Third, we performed a Cox proportional
hazards model with AKI modelled as a time-dependant variable and adjusting for the most
important covariates that may confound the association between AKI and the development of
of
bleeding. We also performed a competing risk analysis, the results of which were consistent with
ro
our main findings. We also found similar rates of AKI and bleeding events in our cohort to those
-p
reported in the literature, supporting the generalizability of our findings. Furthermore, the risk
re
factors we have identified are similar to those previously described and plausible from a
pathophysiologic standpoint.
lP
na
The present results, however, should be interpreted in light of some limitations. First, it was a
single-center study. Second, since it was an observational cohort, the possibility of residual
ur
confounding and bias remains. For example, we did not have daily data on SOFA scores to adjust
Jo
our results. Third, our study does not confirm the causal relationship between AKI and bleeding
nor offers a pathophysiological mechanism for how AKI could lead to bleeding. Finally, follow-
Conclusions
We have found that severe AKI requiring dialysis is associated with an increase occurrence of
bleeding events in critically ill patients. The association is independent of other usual bleeding risk
15
Journal Pre-proof
factors, including anticoagulation. Patients with severe AKI may benefit from a closer monitor ing
of bleeding events. Further studies are needed to understand how AKI may affect coagulation and
platelet function before these results can translate into clinical outcomes.
of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
16
Journal Pre-proof
Funding
This study was supported by research grants from the Nephrology Consortium of the Univers ity
of Montreal and the Sacré-Coeur Hospital Research Center. Josée Bouchard was a scholar of the
Fonds de la Recherche du Québec – Santé. Funding agencies did not have any role in study design;
collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing the manuscript and the decision to submit
of
Declarations of interest
ro
None.
Authors’ contributions
-p
re
Conceptualization: JB; data curation/interpretation: FZ, ATG, TD, AD, MA, ABJ, JB; formal
lP
analysis: FZ, TD, JB; writing original draft: FZ, ATG, JB; writing review and editing: TD, AD,
na
MA, ABJ. Each author provided intellectual content of critical importance to the work described
17
Journal Pre-proof
References
[1] Hoste EA, Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R, Cely CM, Colman R, Cruz DN, et al. Epidemiology
of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: the multinational AKI-EPI study. Intensive
[2] Bouchard J, Acharya A, Cerda J, Maccariello ER, Madarasu RC, Tolwani AJ, et al. A
Prospective International Multicenter Study of AKI in the Intensive Care Unit. Clinical
of
journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN 2015;10(8):1324-31.
ro
[3] Mehta RL, Burdmann EA, Cerda J, Feehally J, Finkelstein F, Garcia-Garcia G, et al.
-p
Recognition and management of acute kidney injury in the International Society of
re
Nephrology 0by25 Global Snapshot: a multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet
2016;387(10032):2017-25.
lP
[4] Mizota T, Dong L, Takeda C, Shiraki A, Matsukawa S, Shimizu S, et al. Transient acute
na
kidney injury after major abdominal surgery increases chronic kidney disease risk and 1-
[5] Li DH, Wald R, Blum D, McArthur E, James MT, Burns KEA, et al. Predicting mortality
Jo
among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury treated with renal replacement
therapy: Development and validation of new prediction models. J Crit Care 2019;56:113-
9.
[6] Doi K, Rabb H. Impact of acute kidney injury on distant organ function: recent findings
[7] Woodrow G, Turney JH. Cause of death in acute renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant
1992;7(3):230-4.
18
Journal Pre-proof
[8] Eberst ME, Berkowitz LR. Hemostasis in renal disease: pathophysiology and
[9] Castaldi PA, Rozenberg MC, Stewart JH. The bleeding disorder of uraemia. A qualitative
[10] Pschowski R, Briegel S, Von Haehling S, Doehner W, Bender TO, Pape UF, et al. Effects
in critically ill patients with dialysis-dependent acute renal failure. Anaesth Intensive
of
Care 2015;43(6):764-70.
ro
[11] Schetz MR. Coagulation disorders in acute renal failure. Kidney Int Suppl 1998;66:S96-
101.
-p
re
[12] Fiaccadori E, Maggiore U, Clima B, Melfa L, Rotelli C, Borghetti A. Incidence, risk
dependent acute kidney injury: Incidence and impact on outcome. Nephrol Dial
ur
Transplant 2010;25(4):1140-6.
Jo
[14] Levy EM, Viscoli CM, Horwitz RI. The effect of acute renal failure on mortality. A
[15] Ma M, Gao WD, Gu YF, Wang YS, Zhu Y, He Y. Clinical effects of acute kidney injury
[16] von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al.
19
Journal Pre-proof
2007;147(8):573-7.
[17] Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work
Group. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury. Kidney
[18] Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, et al. The
of
dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the
ro
European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996;22(7):707-10.
[19]
-p
Arnold DM, Donahoe L, Clarke FJ, Tkaczyk AJ, Heels-Ansdell D, Zytaruk N, et al.
re
Bleeding during critical illness: a prospective cohort study using a new measurement
[20] Arnold DM, Lauzier F, Rabbat C, Zytaruk N, Barlow Cash B, Clarke F, et al.
na
[21] Faubel S, Shah PB. Immediate Consequences of Acute Kidney Injury: The Impact of
Jo
[22] Grams ME, Rabb H. The distant organ effects of acute kidney injury. Kidney Int
2012;81(10):942-8.
[23] Hassoun HT, Grigoryev DN, Lie ML, Liu M, Cheadle C, Tuder RM, et al. Ischemic acute
kidney injury induces a distant organ functional and genomic response distinguishable
20
Journal Pre-proof
[24] Kelly KJ. Distant effects of experimental renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Am Soc
Nephrol 2003;14(6):1549-58.
[25] Liu M, Liang Y, Chigurupati S, Lathia JD, Pletnikov M, Sun Z, et al. Acute kidney injury
2008;19(7):1360-70.
[26] Park SW, Kim M, Kim JY, Ham A, Brown KM, Mori-Akiyama Y, et al. Paneth cell-
of
2012;189(11):5421-33.
ro
[27] Ward DM. The approach to anticoagulation in patients treated with extracorporeal
-p
therapy in the intensive care unit. Adv Ren Replace Ther 1997;4(2):160-73.
re
[28] van de Wetering J, Westendorp RG, van der Hoeven JG, Stolk B, Feuth JD, Chang PC.
Heparin use in continuous renal replacement procedures: the struggle between filter
lP
[29] Hung A, Garcia-Tsao G. Acute kidney injury, but not sepsis, is associated with higher
2018;38(8):1437-41.
Jo
[30] Steiner RW, Coggins C, Carvalho AC. Bleeding time in uremia: a useful test to assess
[31] Herzig SJ, Rothberg MB, Feinbloom DB, Howell MD, Ho KK, Ngo LH, et al. Risk
[32] Corapi KM, Chen JL, Balk EM, Gordon CE. Bleeding complications of native kidney
21
Journal Pre-proof
of Stroke, Bleeding, and Death in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and
of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
22
Journal Pre-proof
Table 1. Descriptive characteristics and outcomes of patients stratified by timing of bleeding and
acute kidney injury (n = 1,001)
of
Comorbidities (%)
Hypertension 583 (58) 61 (60) 88 (65) 18 (86) 245 (58) 171 (54) 0.02
Diabetes 260 (26) 26 (26) 57 (42) 10 (48) 94 (22) 73 (23) <0.001
ro
CAD 381 (38) 38 (38) 55 (41) 13 (62) 194 (46) 81 (26) <0.001
CKD 121 (12) 17 (17) 58 (43) 11 (52) 22 (5.2) 13 (4.1) <0.001
Chronic liver disease 21 (2.1) 9 (8.9) 4 (3.0) 2 (9.5) 6 (1.4) 0 (0) <0.001
History of bleeding
Previous ulcer (%)
NSAIDS on admission
24 (2.4)
28 (2.8)
85 (8.5)
6 (5.9)
6 (5.9)
11 (10.9) -p
6 (4.4)
4 (3.0)
11 (8.1)
2 (9.5)
1 (4.8)
4 (19)
7 (1.6)
12 (2.8)
41 (9.6)
3 (0.9)
5 (1.6)
18 (5.7)
0.003
0.22
0.10
re
(%)
Steroids on admission 92 (9.2) 7 (6.9) 21 (15.6) 6 (29) 27 (6.3) 31 (9.7) <0.001
(%)
lP
admission (%)
M ain ICU admission
diagnosis (%)
Cardiological 64 (6.4) 3 (3.0) 19 (14) 7 (33) 22 (5.2) 13 (4.1) <0.001
ur
infection
Surgery (%) 434 (43) 46 (46) 20 (15) 2 (9.5) 248 (58) 118 (37) <0.001
Trauma (%) 79 (7.9) 11 (11) 6 (4.4) 1 (4.8) 43 (10) 18 (5.7) 0.07
Other (%) 97 (9.7) 7 (7.0) 20 (15) 3 (14) 13 (3.1) 54 (17) <0.001
Surgery (%) 683 (68) 80 (79) 55 (41) 14 (67) 366 (86) 168 (53) <0.001
M echanical ventilation 564 (56) 81 (80) 73 (54) 18 (86) 285 (67) 107 (34) <0.001
(%)
Use of vasopressors (%) 513 (51) 80 (79) 99 (73) 16 (76) 222 (52) 96 (30) <0.001
SOFA score, median 5 (2-8) 8 (4.5-10) 7 (5-10) 6 (3.5-11) 5 (2-8) 3 (2-5) <0.001
(IQR)
Fluid balance, ml (IQR) 824 (-663 – 1890 (-558 1278 (- 871 (- 725 (-640 585 (-606 0.001
2519) – 5564) 825 – 3261 – – 2231) –1841)
4204) 4316)
PPI or anti-H2 per 829 (84) 82 (82) 116 (88) 20 (95) 352 (84) 259 (83) 0.39
hospitalization (%)
NSAIDS per 289 34 (34) 19 (14) 2 (9.5) 163 (38) 71 (23) <0.001
hospitalization (%) (29)
Antiplatelets drugs per 531 (53) 56 (55) 75 (56) 13 (62) 240 (57) 147 (47) 0.09
hospitalization (%)
23
Journal Pre-proof
Anticoagulation per 311 (31) 39 (39) 58 (43) 12 (57) 131 (31) 71 (23) <0.001
hospitalization (%)
Platelets levels, median 153 (93- 121 (60- 171 (101- 120 (82- 133 (84- 190 (134- <0.001
(IQR) 216) 167) 233) 218) 186) 254)
INR, median (IQR) 1.20 (1.07- 1.27 (1.14- 1.26 1.32 1.20 1.10 (1.02- <0.001
1.34) 1.40) (1.13- (1.15- (1.09- 1.24)
1.54) 1.81) 1.35)
PTT, median (IQR) 38.8 (34.8- 46.3 (38- 42.8 55 (39.8- 38.4 36.9 (33.4- <0.001
47.6) 59.1) (36.3- 113.3) (34.8- 43.4)
57.3) 43.8)
Bilirubin, umol/L, 9 (6-16) 14 (9-23) 9 (5-18) 15 (7-25) 9 (5-14) 8 (6-12) <0.001
median (IQR)
Anticoagulation therapy 195 (20) 20 (20) 37 (27) 9 (43) 83 (20) 46 (15) 0.001
(%)
Bleeding source (%)
Gastrointestinal 29 (5.3) 12 (12) n/a 3 (14) 14 (3.3) n/a <0.001
Intra-cerebral 132 (24) 18 (18) n/a 2 (9.5) 112 (26) n/a 0.06
of
Peri-operative 280 (51) 44 (44) n/a 6 (29) 230 (54) n/a 0.02
Post-operative 54 (9.9) 14 (14) n/a 3 (14) 37 (8.7) n/a 0.23
Other 53 (9.7) 13 (13) n/a 7 (33) 33 (7.7) n/a <0.001
ro
Requirement for dialysis 33 (3.3) 14 (14) 13 (9.6) 6 (29) n/a n/a 0.05
(%)
M ortality (%) 123 (12) 26 (26) 32 (24) 8 (38) 32 (7.5) 25 (7.9) <0.001
24
Journal Pre-proof
Table 2. Characteristics of patients free of bleeding at intensive care unit admission (n = 513)
of
Previous ulcer 11 (2.1) 3 (3.3) 8 (1.9) 0.40
NSAIDS on admission (%) 39 (7.6) 11 (12) 28 (5.5) 0.08
Steroids on admission (%) 63 (12) 13 (14) 50 (12) 0.52
ro
Anticoagulation on 75 (15) 14 (15) 61 (15) 0.82
admission (%)
Anti-platelets on admission 207 (40) 45 (50) 162 (38) 0.05
(%)
PPI or anti-H2 on admission
(%)
186 (36)
-p
33 (36) 153 (36) 1.00
re
M ain ICU admission
diagnosis (%)
Cardiological 60 (12) 30 (33) 30 (7.1) <0.001
Neurologic 44 (8.6) 6 (6.6) 38 (9) 0.46
lP
hospitalization (%)
NSAIDS per hospitalization 110 (22) 27 (30) 83 (20) 0.04
(%)
Antiplatelets drugs per 265 (52) 59 (66) 206 (50) 0.006
hospitalization (%)
Anticoagulation per 176 (35) 54 (59) 122 (29) <0.001
hospitalization (%)
Anticoagulation therapy (%) 119 (23) 41 (45) 78 (19) <0.001
Bleeding source (%)
Gastrointestinal 5 (1.0) 5 (5.5) n/a n/a
Intra-cerebral 8 (1.6) 8 (8.8) n/a n/a
Peri-operative 50 (9.7) 50 (55) n/a n/a
Post-operative 17 (3.3) 17 (19) n/a n/a
Other 11 (2.1) 11 (12) n/a n/a
Acute kidney injury (%) 0.17
No acute kidney injury 352 (69) 55 (60) 297 (70)
Stage 1 99 (19) 24 (26) 75 (18)
Stage 2 23 (4.5) 3 (3.3) 20 (4.7)
Stage 3 including dialysis 39 (7.6) 9 (9.9) 30 (7.1)
25
Journal Pre-proof
of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
26
Journal Pre-proof
HR 95% CI P HR 95% HR p
of
Surgical procedure 0.56 0.35-0.90 0.02 0.84 0.50-1.42 0.52
ro
Anticoagulant therapy 2.81 1.84-4.30 <0.001 2.34 1.45-3.80 <0.001
hospitalization
na
dependent)
Jo
No AKI -- -- -- -- -- --
Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury; SOFA, Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment.
27
Journal Pre-proof
Table 4. Predictors of mortality using a multivariable Cox proportional- hazards model (n = 513)
HR 95% CI p HR 95% HR P
of
Anticoagulation therapy 0.83 0.58-1.19 0.30 0.95 0.63-1.44 0.82
ro
(time-dependent)
dependent)
na
dependent)
ur
No AKI -- -- -- -- -- --
Jo
Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury; SOFA, Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment.
28
Journal Pre-proof
Figure legends
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier estimates for the development of bleeding, by severity of acute kidney
of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
29
Journal Pre-proof
Author Statement
Thierry Ducruet: data curation/interpretation, formal analysis, methodology, writing review and
editing
of
Martin Albert: data curation/interpretation, writing review and editing
ro
Amélie Bernier-Jean: data curation/interpretation, writing review and editing
-p
Josée Bouchard: conceptualization, data curation/interpretation, formal analysis, funding
re
acquisition, methodology, writing original draft, writing review and editing
lP
na
ur
Jo
30
Journal Pre-proof
AKI can affect distant organ function and increase non-renal complications
Incident bleeding after AKI is not independently associated with an increased risk of
death
of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
31