Haney v. Scientology: Answer To Petition For Review

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 53
 
S265314
IN
 
THE
 
CALIFORNIA 
 
SUPREME
 
COURT
 V 
 ALERIE
H
 ANEY
,
 Plaintiff and Petitioner,
v.
S
UPERIOR
C
OURT FOR THE
S
TATE OF
C
 ALIFORNIA 
,
 
C
OUNTY OF
L
OS
 A 
NGELES
,
Respondent,
C
HURCH OF
S
CIENTOLOGY
I
NTERNATIONAL AND
R
ELIGIOUS
T
ECHNOLOGY
C
ENTER
,
 Defendants and Real Parties in Interest
S
ECOND
D
ISTRICT
C
OURT OF
 A 
PPEAL
N
O
.
 
B307452 L
OS
 A 
NGELES
C
OUNTY
S
UPERIOR
C
OURT
C
 ASE
N
O
.
 
19STCV21210 H
ONORABLE
R
ICHARD
J.
 
B
URDGE
,
 
D
EPARTMENT
37
 ANSWER TO PETITION FOR REVIEW OF ORDER DENYING WRIT OF MANDATE
SCHEPER KIM & HARRIS LLP
*WILLIAM H. FORMAN (B
 AR
N
O
. 150477)DAVID C. SCHEPER (B
 AR
N
O
. 120174)MARGARET E. DAYTON (B
 AR
N
O
. 274353)800
 
W
EST
S
IXTH
S
TREET
,
 
18
TH
 
F
LOOR
L
OS
 A 
NGELES
,
 
CA 
 
90017-2701(213)613-4655
 
• FAX: (213)
 
613-4656wforman@scheperkim.com
 A
TTORNEYS FOR
 D
EFENDANT AND
R
EAL
 P 
 ARTY IN
NTEREST 
 
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
 
JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP
ROBERT E. MANGELS (B
 AR
N
O
. 48291) *MATTHEW D. HINKS (B
 AR
N
O
. 200750)1900
 
 A 
 VENUE OF THE
S
TARS
,
 
7
TH
F
LOOR
L
OS
 A 
NGELES
,
 
C
 ALIFORNIA
90067-4308(310)203-8080
 
• FAX:
 
(310) 203-0567mhinks@jmbm.com
 A
TTORNEYS FOR
 D
EFENDANT AND
R
EAL
 P 
 ARTY IN
NTEREST 
 
 RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY CENTER
 
   D  o  c  u  m  e  n   t  r  e  c  e   i  v  e   d   b  y   t   h  e   C   A   S  u  p  r  e  m  e   C  o  u  r   t .
 
2
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES
In accordance with Rule 8.208 of the Rules of Court, the undersigned certifies that they know of no entities that (1) have an ownership interest of 10% or more in Church of Scientology International or Religious Technology Center or (2) have a financial or other interest in this litigation that the Justices should consider when determining whether to disqualify themselves. Real Parties in Interest Church of Scientology International and Religious Technology Center are corporations. DATED: November 19, 2020 SCHEPER KIM & HARRIS LLP WILLIAM H. FORMAN DAVID C. SCHEPER MARGARET E. DAYTON By: WILLIAM H. FORMAN  Attorneys for Defendant and Real Party in Interest Church of Scientology International
   D  o  c  u  m  e  n   t  r  e  c  e   i  v  e   d   b  y   t   h  e   C   A   S  u  p  r  e  m  e   C  o  u  r   t .
 
DATED: Novemb
er
19,
2020 
JEFFER 
MANGELS BUTLER 
MITCHELL 
LLP 
ROBERT 
E.
MANGELS MATTHEW D.
HINK
S Attorneys for Defend
ant 
and 
R
eal 
Par
ty 
in
In
terest 
Religious Technology 
enter
   D  o  c  u  m  e  n   t  r  e  c  e   i  v  e   d   b  y   t   h  e   C   A   S  u  p  r  e  m  e   C  o  u  r   t .

Reward Your Curiosity

Everything you want to read.
Anytime. Anywhere. Any device.
No Commitment. Cancel anytime.
576648e32a3d8b82ca71961b7a986505