Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Interpretation of the Constitution: (Francisco vs. Article XVII, Section 2 of the 1987 Constitution
House of Representatives, GR No. 160261, Nov. 10, provides that subject to the enactment of an
2003) implementing law, the people may directly propose
1. Verba Legis – whenever possible, the words of the amendments to the Constitution through initiative.
constitution must be given their ordinary meaning,
except when technical terms are employed. Presidential vs. Parliamentary
2. Ratio legis est anima – when there is ambiguity, the In presidential government, there is separation of powers
words of the constitution should be interpreted in between the executive and legislative departments. In
accordance with the intent of the framers. parliamentary, there is fusion of both executive and
legislative powers in Parliament, although the actual
As we [the SC] have held in League of Cities of the exercise of executive powers is vested in a Prime
Philippines v. Commission on Elections— Minister who is chosen by and accountable to the
Ratio legis est anima. The spirit rather than the letter of Parliament.
the law. A statute must be read according to its spirit or
intent, for what is within the spirit is within the statute DOCTRINE OF AUTO-LIMITATION
although it is not within its letter, and that which is within The adherence of the Philippines to principles of
the letter but not within the spirit is not within the statute. international law as a limitation to the exercise of its
Put a bit differently, that which is within the intent of the sovereignty. It means that any state may, by its consent,
lawmaker is as much within the statute as if within the express or implied, submit to a restriction of its sovereign
letter, and that which is within the letter of the statute is rights (Reagan vs. CIR, No. L-26379, Dec. 27, 1969)
not within the statute unless within the intent of the
lawmakers. Withal, courts ought not to interpret and
should not accept an interpretation that would defeat the NATIONAL TERRITORY
intent of the law and its legislators (cited in Navarro vs. The ARCHIPELAGIC DOCTRINE emphasizes the unity
Executive Secretary, GR No. 180050, April 12, 2011).
of land and waters by defining an archipelago either as a
group of islands surrounded by waters or a body of
3. Ut magis valeat quam pereat – the constitution has waters studded with islands. For this purpose, it requires
to be interpreted as a whole. Sections bearing on a
that baselines be drawn by connecting the appropriate
particular subject should be considered and interpreted
points of the "outermost islands to encircle the islands
together as to effectuate the whole purpose of the within the archipelago. The waters on the landward side
constitution and one section is not to be allowed to
of the baselines regardless of breadth or dimensions are
defeat another, if by any reasonable construction, the
merely internal waters.
two can be made to stand together (Civil Liberties Union
vs. Executive Secretary, 194 SCRA 317).
The Archipelagic Doctrine is reflected in the 1987
Constitution. Article I, Section 1 provides that the
Doctrine of Constitutional Supremacy national territory of the Philippines includes the
Under the doctrine of constitutional supremacy, if a law Philippine archipelago, with all the islands and waters
or contract violates any norm of the Constitution, that law embraced therein; and the waters around, between, and
or contract, whether promulgated by the legislative or by connecting the islands of the archipelago, regardless of
the executive branch or entered into by private persons their breadth and dimensions, form part of the internal
for private purposes, is null and void and without any waters of the Philippines.
force and effect. Thus, since the Constitution is the
fundamental, paramount and supreme law of the nation, CONTIGUOUS ZONE is a zone contiguous to the
it is deemed written in every statue and contract (Manila
territorial sea and extends up to 12 nautical miles
Prince Hotel vs. GSIS, 267 SCRA 408 [1997]).
from the territorial sea and over which the coastal
state may exercise control necessary to prevent
"People power" as a concept recognized in the
infringement of its customs, fiscal, immigration or
Constitution
sanitary laws and regulations within its territory or
territorial sea. (Article 33 of the Convention on the
Article III, Section 4 of the 1987 Constitution
Law of the Sea.)
guarantees the right of the people peaceable to
assemble and petition the government for redress of
The EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE is a zone
grievances.
extending up to 200 nautical miles from the baselines
Article VI, Section 32 of the 1987 Constitution of a state over which the coastal state has sovereign
requires Congress to pass a law allowing the people rights for the purpose of exploring and exploiting,
conserving and managing the natural resources,
to directly propose and enact laws through initiative
whether living or nonliving, of the waters superjacent
and to approve or reject any act or law or part of it
to the seabed and of the seabed and subsoil, and with
passed by Congress or a local legislative body.
regard to other activities for the economic exploitation a. When the state commences a litigation, it
and exploration of the zone. (Articles 56 and 57 of the becomes vulnerable to a counterclaim (Froilan vs.
Convention on the Law of the Sea.) Pan Oriental Shipping, GR No. L-6060, Sept. 30, 1950).
Constitution reserves to Filipino citizens the use and • Intervention of the State would constitute
enjoyment of the exclusive economic zone of the commencement of litigation if the State asks for
Philippines. affirmative reliefs other than resisting the claims
against
Section 2. Article XII of the Constitution provides:
b. When the State enters into a business contract.
“The State shall protect the nation's marine part in its
Thus, contract bidded out for barbershop facilities in
archipelagic waters, territorial sea, and exclusive
Clark Field US Air Force was deemed commercial (US
economic zone, and reserve its use and enjoyment to vs. Guinto, 182 SCRA 644).
Filipino citizens." Section 7, Article XIII of the • But when the contract is in pursuit of a
Constitution provides: "The State shall protect the sovereign activity [construction of wharves for
rights of subsistence fishermen, especially of local national defense], there is no waiver of immunity
communities, to the preferential use of the communal (US vs. Ruiz, 136 SCRA 487).
marine and fishing resources, both inland and • i. Contracts entered into for the
offshore. It shall provide support to such fishermen maintenance of a Diplomatic mission for the
through appropriate technology and research, upkeep of air conditioning units, generator sets,
adequate financial, production, and marketing etc., in the embassy is a governmental contract
assistance, and other services. The State shall also (Republic of Indonesia vs. Vinzon, GR No.
protect, develop, and conserve such resources. The 154705, June 26, 2003). A provision in the
protection shall extend to offshore fishing grounds of contract containing a statement that all legal
subsistence fishermen against foreign intrusion. controversies shall be settled according to
Fishworkers shall receive a just share from their labor Philippine laws does not necessarily mean waiver
in the utilization of marine and fishing resources. of immunity.
• ii. The exercise of the power of eminent
ut without prejudice
domain is an act juri emperii b
DECLARATION OF PRINCIPLES AND STATE to Amigable vs. Cuenca.
POLICIES
When public officers may be sued without prior
consent of the state (Sanders vs. Veridiano, 162 SCRA
STATE IMMUNITY FROM SUIT 88):
The State may not be sued without its consent (sec. 3, a) To compel him to do an act required by law;
Art. XVI). Basis: There can be no legal right against the b) To restrain him from enforcing an act claimed to
authority which makes the law on which the right be unconstitutional;
depends (republic vs. Villasor, 54 SCRA 83). c) To compel the payment of damages from already
appropriated assurance fund;
Test to determine if suit is against the State: d) To refund tax over-payments from fund already
On the assumption that decision is rendered against the available for the purpose;
public officer or agency impleaded, will the enforcement e) When the judgment will not require any affirmative
thereof require an affirmative act from the State, such as act on the part of the State [sued in his personal
the appropriation of the needed amount to satisfy the capacity];
judgment? If so, then it is a suit against the State. f) Where the government itself has violated its own
laws;
CONSENT TO BE SUED
Express Consent – express consent may be given by
▪ The unauthorized acts of government officials are not
the act of Congress in a general or a special law.
a. General Law like CA 327, as amended which requires acts of the state, thus the public officer may be sued and
that all money claims against held personally liable in damages.
the government must first be filed with the COA. ▪ Where the public officer committed an ultra vires act,
But in Amigable vs. Cuenca, 43, SCRA 360, an action or where there is showing of bad faith, malice or gross
for recovery of the value of the property taken by the negligence, the officer can be held personally
government was allowed despite failure of the owner to accountable even if such acts are claimed to have been
file his claim with the COA. The state immunity from suit performed in connection with official duties (Wylie vs.
cannot be used to perpetrate an injustice. Rarang, 209 SCRA 357).
An action for revocation of donation for failure of the
defendant to comply with the stipulated conditions was
allowed. The action did not involve a money claim SUIT AGAINST GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
(Santiago vs. Republic, 87 SCRA 294). A. Incorporated – just look at the charter, if the charter
provides that it can sue and be sued, then suit will lie.
b. Special law – this form of consent must be embodied
in a statute and cannot be given by a mere counsel Samples:
(Republic vs. Purisima, 78 SCRA 470). 1) National Irrigation Administration;
PD 1620 – Immunity of IRRI may be waived by its 2) Municipal Corporations;
Director General. 3) Department of Agriculture (Act No. 3038)
Implied Consent
Page 2 of 26
Political Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
B. Unincorporated – inquire into the principal functions b) Requiring the members of the AFP to swear to uphold
of the agency. and defend the Constitution (sec. 5 [1], Art. XVI).
1) If governmental; NO suit without consent.
The separation of the Church and the State shall be
Samples: inviolable. This is reinforced by the following
a. Bureau of Printing; provisions:
b. Bureau of Customs; a) Freedom of religion clause (sec. 5, Art. III);
b) Non-registration of religious sect as political party
Note: even in the exercise of proprietary functions (sec. 2 [5], Art. IX-C);
incidental to its primary governmental function, an c) No religious sectoral representative (sec. 5 [2], Art.
unincorporated agency still cannot be sued without its VI);
consent (Bureau of Printing vs. BPEA, 1 SCRA 3400. d) No appropriation for sectarian benefit (sec. 29 [2], Art.
2) If proprietary; suit will lie. VI).
The ordinary requirements of procedural due process 2 Stages of Eminent Domain Cases:
yield to the necessities of protecting vital public interests i i. Determination of the authority of the plaintiff to
through the exercise of police power. Thus, the Pollution exercise the power and the propriety of its exercise in
Adjudication Board is permitted by law and regulations to the context of the facts of the case;
issue ex parte cease and desist orders (PAD vs. CA, ii ii. Determination of just compensation by the
195 SCRA 112). court.
b) Lawful Means – the means employed are reasonably
necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose, and
not unduly oppressive on individuals. POWER OF TAXATION
It is the power by which the sovereign, through its
Note: Both must concur (Ynot vs. IAC, GR No. 74457, law-making body, raises revenue to defray the necessary
March 20, 1987) expenses of government. It is a way of apportioning the costs
of government among those who in some measure are
It cannot be bargained away through the medium of a privileged to enjoy its benefits and must bear its burdens.
treaty or a contract (Ichong vs. Hernandez, 101 Phil. LIMITATIONS:
1155). A. Inherent Limitations –
Taxing power may be used as an implement of police 1. Public purpose;
power (Lutz vs. Araneta, 98 Phil. 148). 2. Non-delegability of the power;
3. Territoriality or situs of taxation;
Eminent domain may be used as an implement to attain 4. Exemption of government;
police objective (ASLP vs. Sec. of Agrarian, 175 SCRA 5. International comity.
343 [1989]).
Non-impairment contracts or vested rights clauses will B. Constitutional Limitations -
have to yield to the superior and legitimate exercise of
police power (Ortigas and Co. vs. CA, GR No. 126102, 1. Due process of law - tax should not be confiscatory;
Dec. 4, 2000). 2. Equal protection clause;
3. Public purpose – tax for special purpose, treated as a
special fund and paid for such purpose only; when such
POWER OF EMINENT DOMAIN purpose is fulfilled, the balance, if any shall be
transferred to the general funds;
Jurisdiction is with the RTC. The primary issue to resolve 4. Double taxation – additional taxes are laid on the
is the right to expropriate. Determination of value of the same subject by the same taxing authority during the
property is merely incidental [secondary] (Barangay San same taxing period and for the same purpose;
Roque vs. Heirs of Francisco Pastor, GR No. 138896, Despite absence of specific constitutional prohibition,
June 20, 2000) Expropriation proceedings is incapable double taxation will not be allowed if the same will result
of pecuniary estimation. in a violation of the equal protection clause.
• The change must not only impair the obligation SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS REQUISITES
of the existing contract, but the impairment must be Requisites:
substantial and effect a change in the rights of the 1. The interest of the public, in general, as distinguished
parties with reference to each other, and not with respect from those of a particular class, require the intervention
to non-parties (Phil. Rural Electric Coop. vs. Secretary of of the State [Lawful Subject];
DILG, GR No. 143076, June 10, 2003). 2. The means employed are reasonably necessary for
LIMITATIONS the accomplishment of the purpose and not unduly
• a) Police power – public welfare is superior to oppressive on individuals [lawful means].
private rights.
• An ordinance requiring all laundry
unicipal zoning ordinance is a police measure and
M establishments to issue receipts in English and Spanish
was held valid (Kwong Sing vs. City of Manila, 41 Phil.
prevails over a restriction contained in the title to 103).
property (Ortigas vs. Feati Bank, 94 SCRA 533). • But a law prohibiting traders from keeping their
Regulation of rentals of dwelling units is an exercise of books accounts in a language other than English,
police power and an exception to the non-impairment Spanish or any local dialect was held unconstitutional
clause (Canleon vs. Agus Dev. Corp., 207 SCRA 748). (Yu Eng Cong vs. Trinidad, 271 US 500).
• A provision which provides that the surviving
An AO probiting the assignment of salaries of teachers
spouse has no right to survivorship pension benefits if
to their creditors was not violative of the gurantee (Tiro the surviving spouse contracted marriage with the
vs. Hontanosas, 125 SCRA 697). pensioner within three years before the pensioner
Existing share tenancy contracts conversion to qualified for pension benefit [sec 18, PD 1146] was
leasehold tenancy through the exercise of police power declared invalid (GSIS vs. Montesclaros, 434 SCRA 41).
(Ilusorio vs. CAR, 17 SCRA 25).
PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS REQUISITES
ut the substitution of a mortgage with a security bond
B
Requisites:
for the payment of a loan violates non-impairment clause 1. An impartial court/tribunal clothed with judicial power
(Ganzon vs. Inserto, 123 SCRA 713). to hear and decide the matter before it.
• b) Eminent Domain -
urisdiction must be lawfully acquired over the
2. J
• c) Taxation –
person of the defendant and over the property which
is the subject matter of the proceeding. Otherwise,
• For both, see appropriate topics elsewhere.
decision is void.
NOTE: Franchises, privileges, licenses, etc., do not
come within the context of the guarantee. he defendant must be given an opportunity to be
3. T
heard.
BILL OF RIGHTS
Page 5 of 26
Political Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
3. Changes the punishment and inflicts a greater The grant of motion to quash may be appealed by the
punishment than the law annexed to the crime when prosecution, without placing the accused under DJ,
committed; because the accused has not been placed in [first]
4. Alters the legal rules of evidence, and authorizes jeopardy as there was yet been arraigned (sec. 9, Rule
conviction upon less or different testimony than the law 117, ROC).
required at the time of the commission of the offense;
5. Assumes to regulate civil rights and remedies only, 4) Defendant was previously acquitted or convicted,
but in effect imposing a penalty or deprivation of a right or the case dismissed or otherwise terminated
for something which when done was lawful; and without his express consent –
6. Deprives a person accused of a crime of some
lawful protection to which he has ▪ The mere filing of two informations or complaints
become entitled, such as protection of a former
charging the same offense does not yet afford the
conviction or acquittal, or a proclamation of amnesty.
accused in those cases the occasion to complain that he
is being placed in jeopardy for the same offense, for the
CHARACTERISTICS:
simple reason that the primary basis of the defense of
a) Refers to criminal matters [not mere procedural laws];
DJ is that the accused has already been convicted or
b) It is retroactive in application;
acquitted in the first case, or the same has been
c) It works to the prejudice to the accused.
terminated without his consent (P. vs. Miraflores, 115
SCRA 586).
The judge cannot motu proprio, initiate and subsequently
dismiss a criminal information without ay motion to that
DOCTRINE OF SUPERVENING EVENT
effect being filed by the accused based on the alleged
The accused may still be prosecuted for another offense
violation of the latter’s right against ex post facto law and
if a subsequent development changes the character of
double jeopardy (P. vs. Judge Nitafan, GR No.
the first indictment under which he may have already
107964-66, Feb. 1, 1999).
been charged or convicted. (see sec. 7, Rule 117, ROC).
• Note: A law can never be an ex post facto as
long as it operates prospectively since its strictures
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, FREEDOM OF THE
would cover only offenses committed after and not
PRESS
before its enactment.
No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech,
of expression, or of the press, or the right of the people
BILL OF ATTAINDER
peaceably to assemble and petition the government for
It is a legislative act which inflicts punishment without trial. In
redress of grievances.
history, it is an act of the Parliament in England declaring that
the blood of certain person/s has/have been attainted (with Limitation: Freedom of expression is NOT absolute. it is
evil) and lacks heritable character. always subject to the police power of the State. This is
premised on the need to protect society from injurious
CUSTODIAL INVESTIGATION exercise of said freedom and the need to promote or
Section 12, Article III of the 1987 Constitution states that protect public welfare, public safety, public morals and
any person under investigation for the commission of an national security (Suarez, 2008).
offense shall have the right to be informed of his right to
remain silent and to have a competent and independent FREEDOM FROM PRIOR RESTRAINT OR
counsel preferably of his own choice. If the person CENSORSHIP
cannot afford the services of counsel, he must be
provided with one. These rights cannot be waived except The arbitrary closure of a radio station DYRE was
in writing and in the presence of counsel. held violative of freedom of expression (Eastern
Broadcasting vs. Dans, 137 SCRA 647).
DOUBLE JEOPARDY
Requisites:[DJ for the same offense] Prohibition against the use of taped jingles in mobile
1) Valid complaint or information –
units used in election campaign was in the nature of
censorship (Mutuc vs. COMELEC, 36 SCRA).
• No DJ in Preliminary Investigation (Icasiano vs.
Sandiganbayan, 209 SCRA 377).
Prohibition against radio commentators or columnists
2) Filed before a competent court – from commenting on the issues involved in the
scheduled plebiscite on the organic law creating the
Subsequent filing of the case with a court of proper CAR was unconstitutional (Sanidad vs. COMELEC, 181
jurisdiction, after it was erroneously filed with a court, SCRA 529).
without territorial jurisdiction over the place where the
crime was committed, will not constitute DJ ((P. vs. Prohibition of posting of decals and stickers in mobile
Puno,208 SCRA 550).
Where the criminal case was dismissed by the RTC so units like cars and other moving vehicles was declared
that the appropriate information may be filed with the unconstitutional for infringement of freedom of
Sandiganbayan which had jurisdiction, the defense of DJ expression (Adiong vs. COMELEC, 207 SCRA 712).
is not available (Cunanan vs. Arceo, 242 SCRA 88).
OVERBREATH DOCTRINE
3) To which the defendant had pleaded – A prohibition on the government from achieving its
purpose by “means unnecessarily broad, reaching
Note: “Clear” indicates causal connection with the 2) Right to act on one’s beliefs – this is subject to
danger of the substantive evil from the utterance in regulation pursuant to the police power.
question while “present” indicates time element,
identified with imminent and immediate danger; the The Court upheld the right of the petitioners to refuse
danger must not only be probable but very likely to salute the Philippine flag on account of their religious
inevitable (Gonzales vs. COMELEC, No. L-27833, April scruples (Ebralinag vs. Division Superintendent, 219
18, 1969). SCRA 256 [1993]).
• It seems that there is more inclination to apply
the clear and present danger rule. The SC upheld the constitutionality of RA 3350,
exempting members of religious from being compelled to
b) Dangerous Tendency Rule – the words uttered join a labor union (Victoriano vs. Elizalde Rope Workers,
create a dangerous tendency of an evil which the State 59 SCRA 54).
has the right to prevent. It is sufficient if the natural
tendency and the probable effect of the utterance were
The SC recognized the right to proselytize as part of
to bring about the substantive evil that the legislative
body seeks to prevent (Cabansag vs. Fernandez, 102 religious freedom, and invalidated the application of a
Phil. 152). city ordinance imposing license fees on the sale of
religious merchandize (American Bible Society vs. City
c) Balancing of Interests Test – when particular of Manila, 101 Phil. 386).
conduct is regulated in the interest of public order, and
the regulation results in an indirect, conditional, or partial THE COMPELLING STATE INTEREST TEST
abridgment of speech, the duty of the courts is to Benevolent neutrality recognizes that government must
determine which of the two conflicting interests demands pursue its secular goals and interests, but at the same time,
the greater protection under the circumstances strive to uphold religious liberty to the greatest extent
presented (American Communication Ass. vs. Douds, possible within the flexible constitutional limits. Thus,
339 US 282). although the morality contemplated by law is secular,
benevolent neutrality could allow for accommodation of him must survive the test of reason; the strongest
morality based on religion, provided that it does not offend suspicion must not be permitted to sway judgment (P.
compelling state interest (Estrada vs. Escritor, AM No. vs. Austria, 195 SCRA 700).
P-02-1651, Aug. 4, 2003).
LIBERTY OF ABODE AND RIGHT TO TRAVEL RIGHT TO BE INFORMED OF THE NATURE AND
Limitation on the liberty of abode: Lawful order of the court CAUSE OF THE ACCUSATION AGAINST HIM
within the limits prescribed by law. To arraign an accused while he is in a state of insanity will
violate the right of the accused to be informed of the nature
Limitation on the right to travel: interest of national and cause of the accusation against him (P. vs. Alcalde, GR
security, public safety or public health, as may be No. 139225-26, May 29, 2002).
provided by law.
An administrative order suspending the deployment of VOID FOR VAGUENESS RULE
female domestic helpers abroad was upheld (PASE vs. Where the statute itself is couched is such indefinite
Drilon, supra). language that it is not possible for men of ordinary
intelligence to determine therefrom what acts or
he SC sustained the refusal of the government to
T
omissions are punished, there is violation of the right to
allow the petitioner’s return to the country on the ground be informed of the nature and cause of accusation and
that it would endanger national security (Marcos cs. due process (Estrada vs. Sandiganbayan, GR No. 148560, Nov.
Manglapus, 178 SCRA 760). 19, 2001).
Note: A lawful order of the court is also a valid restriction on
the right to travel. The court may validly refuse to grant the
RIGHT TO SPEEDY, IMPARTIAL AND PUBLIC TRIAL.
accused permission to travel abroad, even if he is out on bail
A trial free from vexatious, capricious and oppressive
(Manotoc vs. CA, 142 SCRA 149).
delays. But justice and fairness, not speed, are the
objectives. (Acevedo vs. Sarmiento, 36 SCRA 247).
RIGHT OF THE ACCUSED
RIGHT TO FACE THE WITNESS FACE TO FACE.
CRIMINAL DUE PROCESS (Mejia vs. Pamaran, 160 [aka the Right of Confrontation]
SCRA 457): 1. To afford the accused an opportunity to test the
1) The accused has been heard in a court of competent testimony of the witness by cross-examination; and
jurisdiction; 2. To allow the judge to observe the deportment of the
2) The accused is proceeded against the orderly process witness (US vs. Javier, GR No. 12990, Jan. 21, 1918).
of law;
3) The accused has been given notice and the
opportunity to be heard; and THE RIGHT TO COMPULSORY PROCESS TO
4) The judgment rendered was within the authority of a SECURE THE ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES AND
constitutional law.
PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE.
TRIAL IN ABSENTIA
The unreasonable delay in resolving a complaint by Whenever the accused has been arraigned, notified of
the Ombudsman violates due process and speedy trial date/s of hearing, and his absence is unjustified, trial
(Roque vs. Ombudsman, GR No. 129978, May 12, shall proceed despite the absence of the accused.
1999). Purpose: To speed up the disposition of criminal cases,
lso unreasonable d
A elay in the termination of trial of which could, in the past, be indefinitely deferred,
and many times completely abandoned, because of the
preliminary investigation violates due process (Tatad vs. defendant’s escape (P. vs. Agbulos, 222 SCRA 196).
Sandiganbayan, 159 SCRA 70). Note: Presence of the accused is mandatory:
However, when the delay is due to complexity of the 1) During arraignment;
issues, or the petitioner’s own acts, there is no violation 2) During trial for identification;
of due process and speedy trial (Santiago vs. 3) During promulgation of sentence, except for light
Garchitorena, 228 SCRA 214). offenses;
right to seek relief from the court, including the right to The right of a police officer to stop a citizen on the street,
appeal his conviction (P vs. Mapalao, 197 SCRA 79). interrogate him and pat him for weapons whenever he
observes unusual conduct which leads him to conclude
THE RIGHT AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION that criminal activity may be a foot [Terry Search] (Terry
(Availability) vs. Ohio).
Available not only in criminal prosecutions but also in all Requisite: The apprehending officer must have
other government proceedings, including civil actions a genuine reason, in accordance with the police
and administrative or legislative investigations. It is officer’s experience and the surrounding conditions,
available not only to the accused but also any witness to to warrant a belief that the person to be held has
whom a question calling for an incriminating answer is weapons or contraband concealed about him. The
addressed. search must precede the arrest.
A suspicion because the petitioner’s “eyes were moving
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Amparo Libertad) fast” does not justify a search under this rule (Malacat vs.
It is a writ directed to the person detaining another and
CA, GR No. 123595, Dec. 12, 1997).
commanding him to produce the body of the prisoner at
a certain time and place, with the day and the cause of
his caption and detention, to do, to submit to, and
receive whatsoever the court or judge awarding the writ 4. Where the search is an incident to a lawful
shall consider in his behalf. arrest.
Requisites:
Writ of Amparo [AM No. 07-9-12-SC] i. It is necessary that the apprehending officer must have
been spurred by probable cause in effecting the arrest
Is a remedy available to any person whose right to life,
which could be considered as on in cadence with the
liberty and security is violated or threatened with instances of permissible arrests enumerated in sec. 5,
violation by an unlawful act or omission of a public Rule 113, ROC;
official or employee, or of a private individual or entity.
The writ shall cover extralegal killings and enforced ith the arrest;
ii. Search is contemporaneous w
disappearances or threats thereof.
hus, where the officers, after conducting a buy-bust,
T
The Writ of Habeas Data [AM No. 08-1-16-SC] reported to the office and subsequently return to the
The writ of habeas data is a remedy available to any place of sale to conduct a search, such search is invalid.
person whose right to privacy in life, liberty or security
f search – includes
iii. Made within the permissible area o
is violated or threatened by an unlawful act or omission
the premises or surroundings under his immediate
of a public official or employee, or of a private individual control.
or entity engaged in the gathering, collecting or storing Thus, the search inside the house where the buy-bust
of data or information regarding the person, family,
operation was conducted outside the house is invalid
home and correspondence of the aggrieved party. (Espano vs. CA, 288 SCRA 558).
SEARCHES AND SEIZURES Note: Under this exception, the valid arrest must
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, precede the search. The process cannot be reversed (P.
houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable vs. Chua Ho San, GR NO. 128222, June 17, 1999).
searches and seizures of whatever nature and for any
purpose shall be inviolable, and no search warrant or 5. Search in vessels and aircrafts
warrant of arrest shall issue except upon probable 6. Search in moving vehicles (Extensive if there is
cause to be determined personally by the judge after probable cause. Visual search if otherwise.)
examination under oath or affirmation of the
7. Inspection of buildings and other premises for
complainant and the witnesses he may produce, and
the enforcement of fire, sanitary and building
particularly describing the place to be searched and
regulations.
the persons or things to be seized. (MEMORIZE)
8. When prohibited articles are in plain view
Requisites: (P. vs. Aruta, GR No. 120515, April 13,
WARRANTLESS SEARCHES AND SEIZURES
1998).
1. Right voluntarily waived;
i. Prior valid intrusion b ased on the valid warrantless
The consent must be voluntary, unequivocal, specific and
arrest in which the police are legally present in the
intelligently given, uncontaminated by any duress or pursuit of their official duties;
coercion. It cannot be lightly inferred but must be proved
by clear and convincing evidence. The burden of proof is • Valid intrusion includes being present in the
upon the State (Caballes vs. CA, GR NO. 136292, Jan. 15, place by reason of a warrantless arrest, search with a
2002). search warrant for other object sought, search incidental
to lawful arrest and other legitimate reasons
2. Routine airport security procedure as allowed unconnected with a search directed against the accused
under RA 6235. (United Lab. vs. Isip, GR No. 163858, June 28, 2005).
Strip search in the ladies’ room was held valid under the
circumstance (P. vs. Canton, GR No. 148825, Dec. 27, ii. The evidence is inadvertently discovered;
2002) iii. Evidence is immediately apparent w ithout any
further search;
3. When there is valid reason to “stop and frisk”. iv. Illegality of the evidence must be apparent.
When Repatriation Takes Effect: ▪ For the Senate, a political party must have at least 2
It retroacts to the date of filing of the application (Frivaldo
members to be entitled to one seat in the Commission.
vs. COMELEC, 257 SCRA 727).
Rounding off is not allowed (Ibid).
Effect of Repatriation:
Return to his original status before he lost his Philippine
citizenship. Thus, a former natural born Filipino citizen is ▪ The Commission on Appointments is independent of
deemed to have recovered his natural-born status the two Houses of Congress; its employees are not
through repatriation (Bengzon vs. HRET, GR No. technically employees of Congress. It has the power to
142840, May 7, 2001). promulgate its own rules of procedure.
See RA 8171.
e) By direct act of congress.
MODES OF REMOVAL
REPATRIATION
In accordance with Art. III, section 16(3), of the
Under the ruling in Bengson v. House of Constitution, Senators and Congressmen may be
Representatives Electoral Tribunal. 357 SCRA 545 removed by their EXPULSION for disorderly
[2001], by virtue of repatriation, a personis restored to behavior, with the concurrence of at least two-thirds
his original status as a natural-born Filipino citizen. of all the members of the House to which they
belong. In addition, they may also be removed in
consequence of an election contest filed with the
LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT Senate or House of Representatives Electoral
LEGISLATIVE POWER Tribunal.
The power to propose, enact, amend and repeal laws.
Nature of Legislative Power QUALIFICATION OF MEMBERS OF CONGRESS
The authority to make laws and to alter and repeal them QUALIFICATIONS: [Senator]
and vested in Congress, except to the extent reserved to 1) Natural-born citizen;
the people by the provisions on initiative and 2) At least 35 years old, on the election day;
referendum. The age qualification must be possessed on the election
day, that is, when the polls are opened and the votes are
APPROPRIATION OF PUBLIC FUNDS cast and not on the day of the proclamation.
All appropriation, revenue or tariff bills, bills authorizing 3) Able to read and write;
increase of the public debt, bills of local application, and 4) Registered voter;
private bills, shall originate exclusively in the House of 5) Resident of the Philippines for at least 2 years
Representatives, but the Senate may propose or concur with immediately preceding Election Day.
amendments. (A-P-R-I-L)
QUALIFICATIONS: regular member of House of
Representative
The President shall have the power to veto any particular 1) Natural-born citizen;
item or items in an appropriation, revenue, or tariff bill, but 2) At least 25 years old, on the day of election;
the veto shall not affect the item or items to which he does 3) Able to read and write;
not object. (A-R-T) 4) Registered voter in the district in which he shall be
elected, except for party-list representatives;
POWER OF AUGMENTATION 5) A resident in the district for not less than 1 year
REQUISITES immediately preceding the election day.
a. There must be surplus at the end of the fiscal year
b. There must be a law allowing the exercise of DISQUALIFICATIONS:
augmentation a) Incompatible office (1st part) –
c. The project for which needs to be augmented with Forfeiture of the seat in Congress shall be automatic
funds is an item found in the General Appropriations upon the member’s assumption of such other office
act deemed incompatible with his seat in Congress (Adaza
d. The augmentation must not be a cross-border vs. Pacana, 135 SCRA 431).
transfer of funds. Limited to each province of the
three great branches of the government. The rule does not apply where the office is only in an ex
oficio c apacity. It is deemed part of the function of his
principal office.
COMMISSION ON APPOINTMENT
Composition –
i i. Senate President, as ex oficio chairman; b) Forbidden office (2nd part) –
The ban against appointment to the office created or
ii ii. 12 Senators, and 12, Representatives, elected
emoluments thereof increased shall, however, last only
based on proportional representation.
for the duration of the term for which the member was
elected.
▪ Note: It is not mandatory to elect 12 senators to the
Commission, what the Constitution requires is that there
must be at least a majority of the entire membership Qualifications: [party-list representative]
(Guingona vs. Gonzales, 214 SCRA 789). 1) natural-born citizen;
2) a registered voter;
3) a resident of the Philippines for a period of not less member of Congress (Aquino vs. COMELEC, 248 SCRA
that one year immediately preceding the day of the 400).
election; REVIEW OF DECISIONS
4) able to read and write; Its decisions may be reviewed by the SC only upon
5) bona fide member of the party or organization which showing of grave abuse of discretion in a petition for
he seeks to represent for at least 90 days preceding the certiorari filed under Rule 65 (Pena vs. HRET, GR No.
day of the election; and 123037, March 21, 1997).
6) at least 25 years of age on the day of the election. In
case of the youth sector, he must at least be 25 but not
more than 30 years old on the day of the election (sec. SEPARATION OF POWER
9, RA 7941). The Power of Legislative Investigation
May refer to the implementation or re-examination of any
law or appropriation, or in connection with any proposed
(Section2(5), Article IX-C of the Constitution). Under legislation or for the formulation of or in connection with
the law, the following are grounds for future legislation, or will aid in the review or formulation
disqualification for registration in the party-list of a new legislative policy or enactment (Senate Rules
system: Governing Inquiries in Aid of Legislation).
1. It is a religious sect or denomination, organization Limitations:
or association organized for religious purposes; i i. It must be in aid of legislation (Bengzon vs.
2. It advocates violence or unlawful means to seek Senate Blue Ribbon, 203 SCRA 767);
its goal; ii ii. In accordance with duly published rules of
3. It is a foreign party or organization; procedure;
4. It is receiving support from any foreign iii As the Senate of each Congress acts separately
government, foreign political party, foundation, and independently of the Senate of the Congress before
organization, whether directly or through any of its it, the same is required to republish the Rules in order to
officers or members or indirectly through comply with sec. 21 (Neri vs. Senate, GR No. 180643,
third parties for partisan election purposes; Sept. 4, 2008).
5. It violates or fails to comply with laws, rules or iv iii. Right of persons appearing, in, or affected by
regulations relating to elections; such inquiry, shall be respected;
6. It declares untruthful statements in its petition;
7. It has ceased to exist for at least one (1) year; Thus, right against self-incrimination is available even in
legislative investigations in aid of legislation.
Four Inviolable Principles under RA 7941 and the
Constitution: (Veterans Federation Party vs. Sec. 21 Legislative Sec. 22 Oversight
COMEMLEC, GR No. 136781, Oct. 6, 2000) Investigation Function
As to persons who may appear
a) The 20% allocation. The combined number of all the Any person Only a department
party-list congressmen shall not exceed 20% of the total head
membership of the House of Representatives; As to who conducts investigation
b) The 2% threshold. Only those parties garnering a Committees Entire body
minimum of 2% of the total votes cast for the party-list As to subject matter
system are qualified to have a seat in the House;
Any matter for the Matters related to the
c) The 3 seat limit. Each qualified party, regardless of
purpose of legislation department only
the number of votes it actually obtained, is entitled to a
As to purpose
maximum of 3 seats;
d) Proportional representation. The additional seats In aid of legislation, the The objective of which
which a qualified party is entitled to shall be computed aim to which is to elicit is to obtain information
information that may in pursuit of oversight
“in proportion to their total number of votes”.
be used for legislation function
The continued operation of the 2% threshold as it As to attendance
applies to the allocation of the additional seat is now Compulsory Discretionary hence it
unconstitutional because this threshold mathematically is valid for the
prevents the filling-up of the available party-list seats. President to require
The additional seats shall be distributed to the parties in that the consent be
a second round of seat allocation (Barangay Ass. for required first before
National Advancement [BANAT] vs. COMELEC, GR No. her subordinates
179271, April 21, 2009). appear
As to compelling power of Congress
Can compel the Congress cannot
ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL attendance of compel appearance of
POWER: The SET and HRET shall be the sole judge of executive officials, executive officials if no
all contests relating to the election, returns and except the President consent is given.
qualifications of their respective members.
Electoral Tribunal may assume jurisdiction only after the DELEGATION OF POWERS
winning candidate shall have been duly proclaimed, has The Rule is that what has been delegated cannot be
taken his oath of office and assumed the functions of the re-delegated (Potestas delegata non potest delegare) .
office, because it is only then that he is said to be a The delegated power constitutes not only a right but a
duty to be performed by the delegate through the
instrumentality of his own judgment and not thorough the 3. Officers of the armed forces from the rank of
intervening mind of another. colonel or naval captain;
4. Other officers whose appointments are vested in
EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT him by the Constitution;
c. A treaty may pertain to subjects such as military vii. Applicability: Only to persons judicially charged for
alliance, extradition, etc. An executive agreement covers rebellion or offense inherent in or necessarily connected
such subjects as commercial and consular relations, with invasion.
most favored nation rights, patent rights, trademark and viii. Period of detention: 3 days, otherwise, he shall be
copyright protection, postal and navigational released.
arrangements and the settlement of claims.
d. A treaty requires ratification by at least 2/3 of all
members of the Senate. An executive agreement does PARDON AND AMNESTY
not require such ratification. (Commissioner of Customs PARDON AMNESTY
vs. Eastern Sea Trading, 3 SCRA 351). Pardon is granted by the Proclamation by the
Chief Executive Chief Executive and
Requisites for Validity of Treaty concurrence of Congress
a) Treaty-making capacity. Must be pleaded and Need not be alleged and
proved (private proved (public
Every State possesses the capacity to conclude treaties, act of the president) act which the courts can
as an attribute of sovereignty. International take judicial notice)
organizations, also possess treating capacity, although
may be limited by the purpose and the constitution of
such organizations. Pardon is granted only Can be granted generally
b) Competence of the representative/organ after final conviction at any time even before
concluding the treaty. prosecution is
commenced or after
Generally, the Head of State exercises the treaty-making conviction
power. In our country, it is the President who exercises
the power, subject to the concurrence of 2/3 of all the Generally available to Generally granted to
members of the Senate.
any class of crimes persons who are guilty of
c) Consent freely given. political offenses
The consent may be expressed by signature, exchange
of instruments constituting a treaty, ratification, approval
or accession, or by other means manifesting consent.
Pardon looks forward and Looks backwards and
Where consent is given in error or induced through
relieves the offender from abolishes and puts into
fraud, the treaty is voidable.
the imposition of the oblivion the offense itself
Doctrine of Unequal Treaties: Treaties which have
penalty but does not work and the person stands
been imposed, through coercion or duress, by a State of
for the restoration of the before the law as though
unequal character, are VOID.
rights to hold public he had committed no
d) Lawful subject/object.
office, or the right of crime
suffrage, and other Hence, the accused is
It must be within the commerce of nations and in
vestiges of the crime (like not considered a
conformity with international law.
moral turpitude) unless recidivist (US vs.
However, the object is deemed illegal only when it
expressly remitted in the Francisco, 10 Phil. 185).
contravenes or departs from an absolute or imperative
pardon)
rule or prohibition of international law.
e) Ratification in accordance with Constitutional
processes of the parties.
Section 21, Art. VII, 1987 Const. No treaty or JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
international agreement shall be valid and
effective unless concurred in by at least POLITICAL QUESTIONS
two-thirds of all the Members of the Senate. POLITICAL QUESTION
It means, in ordinary parlance, namely a question of
policy. It is concerned with issues dependent on wisdom,
MARTIAL LAW AND SUSPENSION OF PRIVILEGE not legality, of a given measure. It refers to either –
OF THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS a. Under the Constitution, are to be decided by the
i. Grounds: invasion or rebellion, when public safety people in their sovereign capacity; or
requires it. b. In regard to which, full discretionary authority has
ii. Duration: not to exceed 60 days, following which it been delegated to the executive or legislative branch of
shall be lifted, unless extended by Congress. the government.
iii. Duty to report to Congress: within 48 hours,
personally or in writing. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF APPOINTMENTS
iv. Congress’ power: may revoke or extend, on request An appointment is generally a political question so long
of the President, the effectivity of the proclamation by a as the appointee fulfills the minimum qualification
majority of all its members in a joint session, voting requirements prescribed by law. Where the validity of the
jointly. appointment is not challenged in appropriate
v. Supreme Court’s power of review – in an appropriate proceedings, the question of the competence of the
proceeding filed by any citizen to determine the public officer is beyond the pale judicial inquiry (Tañada
sufficiency of the factual basis of the proclamation, within vs. Philippine Atomic Energy Commission).
30 days from filing.
vi. Right to bail: Not impaired.
Page 15 of 26
Political Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
A party who has sustained or is in imminent danger of Ratio: separation of powers demands proper respect be
sustaining an injury as a result of the act complained of. accorded the other departments. The Court stressed that
Samples: it will not pass upon a question of constitutionality if the
a) Province has personality to question provisions case can be disposed of on some other ground (Mirasol
of the GAA relative to projects funded by IRA vs. CA).
(Province of Batangas vs. Romulo, 429 SCRA Every law has in its favor the presumption of
736). constitutionality, and to justify its nullification, there must
b) Legislator [senator] has standing to bring suit be a clear and unequivocal breach of the Constitution,
for usurpation of legislative powers (Ople vs. and not one that is doubtful, speculative or
Torres, 293 SCRA 141). argumentative (Arceta vs. Mangrobang, GR No. 152895,
c) Passengers of buses, trains and jeepneys in June 15, 2004).
questioning DOTC memo authorizing operators to
increase/decrease fares (KMU vs. Garcia, 239 DOCTRINE OF OPERATIVE FACTS – The general rule
SCRA 386). is that an unconstitutional law is void. It produces no
d) Registered voters in cases involving the right of rights, imposes no duties and affords no protection.
suffrage. However, the doctrine of operative fact is an exception to
e) Taxpayers in cases involving taxing or spending the general rule and it only applies as a matter of equity
powers of Congress. and fair play. Under the doctrine of operative fact, the
unconstitutional law remains unconstitutional, but the
Requisites: effects of the unconstitutional law, prior to its judicial
1) Public funds are disbursed by a political subdivision or declaration of nullity, may be left undisturbed as a matter
instrumentality; of equity and fair play. It can never be invoked to
2) A law is violated or some irregularity is committed by validate as constitutional an unconstitutional act.
allegedly ultra vires act (AGLP vs. CA, 260 SCRA 250).
f) The government is a proper party to question the JUDICIAL AND BAR COUNCIL
validity of its own laws (P. vs. Vera, 65 Phil. 56). The Judicial and Bar Council has the principal
function of recommending appointees to the Judiciary.
It may exercise such other functions and duties as the other office during their term without forfeiting their
Supreme Court may assign to it. (Art. VIII, sec. 8(5)). seat, does not distinguish between government
corporations with original charters and their
The JBC is composed of the Chief Justice as ex subsidiaries, because the prohibition applies to both.
officio Chairman, the Secretary of Justice and a
representative of the Congress as ex officio Members, 3. Section 2, Article IX-A of the Constitution, which
a representative of the Integrated Bar, a professor of prohibits Members of the Constitutional Commissions
law, a retired Member of the Supreme Court, and a from being financially interested in any contract with
representative of the private sector. (Art. VIII, or any franchise or privilege granted by the
sec. 8(1)). Government, does not distinguish between
government corporations with original charters and
The Supreme Court supervises the JBC andprovides their subsidiaries, because the prohibition applies to
in the annual budget of the Court the appropriations of both.
the JBC. (Art. VIII, sec. 8(4)).
4. Section 2(1), Article IX-D of the Constitution which
SEPARATION OF POWER provides for post audit by the Commission on audit of
Note: The Ombudsman may not initiate or investigate a government corporations, does not distinguish
criminal or administrative complaint before his office between government corporations with original
against a judge; he must first indorse the case to the SC charters and their subsidiaries, because the
for appropriate action (Fuentes vs. Office of the provision applies to both.
Ombudsman, GR No. 124295, Oct. 23, 2001).
The investigation conducted by the Ombudsman 5. Section 5, Article IX-B of the Constitution, which
encroaches into the SC’s power of administrative provides for the standardization of the compensation
supervision over all courts and its personnel, in violation
of government officials and employees, distinguishes
of the doctrine of separation of powers (Maceda vs.
between government corporations and their
Vasquez, 221 SCRA 469).
subsidiaries, for the provision applies only to
government corporations with original charters.
CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSIONS
RATIONAL SCHEME REMOVAL FROM OFFICE OF OFFICERS AND
The rational scheme of appointments in the COMELEC EMPLOYEES IN CIVIL SERVICE
refers to the appointment of the Commissioner and 5 of Under Art. IX-B. Sec. 2(3) of the Constitution, officers
its members not simultaneously but by intervals of every and employees in the Civil Service may only be
after 2 years upon expiration of their term of office. removed for cause as provided by law and after
observance of due process. Their removal must be
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION effected by the appropriate disciplinary authority in
accordance with Ch. 7 secs. 47-48 of Book V of the
CAREER SERVICE
Administrative Code of 1987 and the Civil Rules and
Career Service – Characterized by:
Regulations.
i. entrance based on merit and fitness to be determined,
as far as practicable by competitive examinations, or
based on highly technical qualifications;
SECURITY OF TENURE
ii. opportunity for advancement to higher career
There is no such thing as an absolute right to hold office.
positions; and
Except those who hold constitutional offices which
iii. Security of tenure. provide for special immunity as regards salary and
Note: The mere fact that the position belongs to the tenure, no one can be said to have vested right to office
Career Executive Service does not automatically confer
or salary. When loss of public position or office is due to
security of tenure. Such right will have to depend on the the exercise of the power of the President to regorganize
nature of appointment which, in turn, depends on his the executive department, then such is valid and there is
eligibility or lack of it. A person who does not have the
no violation of security of tenure. (Banda v. Ermita, GR.
required qualifications may be appointed only in an 166620 April 20, 2010)
acting capacity, in the absence of appropriate eligibles.
The appointment cannot be regarded as permanent,
even if it is so designated (De Leon vs. CA, GR No. COMELEC
127182, Jan. 22, 2001).
GRANT OF PARDON
GOCC WITH ORIGINAL CHARTER VS GOCC The Constitution requires recommendation from the
WITHOUT ORIGINAL CHARTER COMELEC before the President may grant executive
1. Section 13. Article VII of the Constitution, clemency for offenses violating election laws.
which prohibits the President from appointing his
spouse and relatives within the fourth degree of JURISDICTION
consanguinity or affinity does not distinguish between Jurisdiction to entertain petition to declare failure of
government corporations with original charters election: The COMELEC, sitting en banc, motu proprio
and their subsidiaries, because the prohibition applies or upon a verified petition, and with a hearing summary
to both. in nature.
Under Section 2(3), Article IXC of the Constitution, the winner. The votes cast for the winning bitdisqualified
COMELEC cannot decide the right to vote, which candidate shall be considered stray votes.
refers to the inclusion and exclusion of voters. Under
Section 2(6), Article IX-C of the Constitution, it can However, if the disqualification is not yet final and executory
only file petitions in court for inclusion or exclusion of on the day of the election, the candidate obtaining the 2nd
voters. highest number of votes cannot be declared as the winner. To
do so would be to disenfranchise the will of the electorate.
The COMELEC shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all The rules on succession to vacancy in elective office will apply
–pre-proclamation controversies [sec. 242, BP 881]. The instead.
possibility of conflict of jurisdiction between the
COMELEC and the HRET and SET regarding contests GROUNDS FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS
involving congressional elections has been foreclosed by
sec. 15, RA 7166, which prohibits pre-proclamation DISQUALIFICATIONS:
controversies in national offices, except of questions A. Under the OEC [BP 881, sec. 12] –
involving the composition and proceedings of the Board 1) Declared as incompetent or insane by competent
of Canvassers. Besides, see Aquino vs. COMELEC, authority.
supra, which delineated the jurisdictional boundaries 2) Sentenced by final judgment for subversion (no more
between COMELEC and the Electoral Tribunals. crime of subversion- already repealed), insurrection,
rebellion or any offense for which he has been
▪ However, the COMELEC is without authority to sentenced to a penalty of more than 18 months of
imprisonment.
partially or totally annul a proclamation or to suspend the
3) Sentenced by final judgment for a crime involving
effects of a proclamation without notice and hearing, as
moral turpitude.
this would violate due process clause (Bince vs.
COMELEC, 218 SCRA 782).
• Violation of BP 22 (Villaber vs. COMELEC, GR
No. 148326, Nov. 15, 2001).
▪ In the exercise of its exclusive appellate jurisdiction,
the COMELEC has the power to issue writs of
• Violation of Anti-Fencing Law (De la Torre vs.
prohibition, mandamus and certiorari because of the last
COEMLEC, 258 SCRA 483).
part of sec. 50, BP 697, and not had not been repealed
by BP 881 (Relampagos vs. Cumba, 243 SCRA 690).
4) A person who is a permanent resident of or an
EXCLUSIVE APPELLATE JURISDICTION immigrant to a foreign country.
RA 6679, in so far as its grants appellate jurisdiction to
the RTC over decisions of MTCs and/or MeTCs in • The “green card” is an ample proof that the
electoral cases involving elective barangay officials is holder thereof is a permanent resident of, or an
unconstitutional (Flores vs. COMELEC, 184 SCRA 484). immigrant of to the US (Caasi vs. COMELEC, 191 SCRA
229).
Note: Under the COMELEC Rules of Procedure, the
mere filing of the notice of appeal is not enough; it B. Under the LGC -
should be accompanied by payment of the correct Section 40. Disqualifications. - The following
amount of appeal fee, in order that the appeal may be persons are disqualified from running for any
deemed perfected. However, the rule is merely elective local position:
permissive. The COMELEC may refuse to take action (a) Those sentenced by final judgment for
until the docket fees are paid or outrightly dismissed the an offense involving moral turpitude or for
case (Sunga vs. COMELEC, 288 SCRA 76). an offense punishable by one (1) year or
JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DECISIONS more of imprisonment, within two (2) years
after serving sentence;
Only decisions of the COMELEC en banc may be
brought to the SC on certiorari. • Note: Even if the candidate is under probation,
the disqualification still subsists, because the effect of
▪ Only decisions of the COMELEC made in the exercise the probation is only to suspend the implementation of
of adjudicatory or quasi-judicial power may be brought to the sentence [not the fact of being convicted with an
the SC. Indeed, determinations made by the COMELEC offense involving moral turpitude] (De La Torre,
which are merely administrative in character, may be COMELEC, supra.)
challenged in an ordinary action before trial courts
(Filipinas Engineering vs. Ferrer, 135 SCRA 25). • However: Those who have not served their
sentence by reason of the grant of probation which
should not be equated with service of sentence, should
ELECTION LAWS not likewise be disqualified from running for a local
SECOND PLACER RULE elective office because the 2-year period of ineligibility
A distinction should be delineated as to when the finality does not even begin to run [during the period of
of judgment disqualifying the candidate took effect. If the probation] (Moreno vs. COMELEC, GR No. 168550,
disqualification is already final and executory before the Aug. 10, 2006).
day of the election, the Doctrine of Rejection of the •
Second Placer will not apply. The candidate obtaining (b) Those removed from office as a result of
the 2nd highest number of votes shall be proclaimed the an administrative case;
• Note: an elective local official who was removed government-owned or controlled corporations, shall be
from office as a result of an administrative case prior to considered ipso facto resigned from his office upon the filing
Jan. 1, 1992 [the effectivity of LGC], is not disqualified of his certificate of candidacy.
from running for an elective local public office because
the sec. 40 cannot be given retroactive effect (Grego vs. ELECTION PROTEST
COEMELEC, GR No. 125955, June 19, 1997). Jurisdiction Over Election Contests:
A. Original and Exclusive –
• A municipal mayor who had been ordered 1) President/Vice-President – Supreme Court en banc
removed from office by the SP, was disqualified despite acting as Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET)
his allegation that the decision is not yet final [and 2) Senator –Senate Electoral Tribunal (SET).
executory] because he had not received a copy of the 3) Representative – House of Representatives Electoral
decision, inasmuch as it is shown that he merely refused Tribunal (HRET).
to accept delivery of the copy of the decision (Reyes vs. 4) Regional/Provincial/City – COMELEC.
COMELEC, 254 SCRA 514).
5) Municipal – RTC.
6) Barangay – MTC, MeTC, MCTC
(c) Those convicted by final judgment for
7) Sangguniang Kabataan - .DILG (Alunan vs. Mirasol,
violating the oath of allegiance to the
GR No. 108399, July 31, 1997).
Republic;
• In the absence of any express provision in the
(d) Those with dual citizenship; governing law, it is the RTC, which has jurisdiction over
• Note: Just connect to topic on citizenship and controversies involving election of members of the SK
see Mercado vs. Manzano, 307 SCRA 630). (Mercado vs. Board of Election Inspectors, GR No.
109713, April 6, 1995).
• In the absence of any official action or approval
by the proper authorities, a mere application for
B. Appellate Jurisdiction –
repatriation, does not, and cannot amount to an
1) From RTC/MTC – appeal shall be made exclusively to
automatic reacquisition of applicant’s Philippine
the COMELEC, whose decision shall be final and
citizenship (Labo vs. COMELEC, GR No. 105111, July
unappeasable.
3, 1992).
• The “oath of allegiance” contained in the COC, ▪ Period to Appeal: 5 days from promulgation or receipt
which is substantially similar to the one contained in sec. of a copy of the decision.
3, of RA 9225 [The Citizenship Retention and
Reacquisition Act], does not constitute the personal and ▪ The filing of a MR is a prohibited pleading and does
sworn renunciation sought under sec. 5[2], RA 9225.
The renunciation of foreign citizenship is an additional not interrupt the running of the 5-day period (Veloria vs.
requisite only for those retained or reacquired Philippine Garcia, 211 SCRA 907).
citizenship under RA 9225 and who seek elective public
posts, considering their special circumstance of having ▪ The RTC/MTC has the competence to order execution
one citizenship (De Guzman vs. COMELEC, GR No. of its decision pending appeal, it being a judicial
180048, June 19, 2009). prerogative and there being no law dis-authorizing the
same (Garcia vs. De Jesus, 206 SCRA 779).
(e) Fugitives from justice in criminal or
non-political cases here or abroad; ▪ In the exercise of its exclusive appellate jurisdiction,
• Note: Fugitives from justice “includes not only
those who flee after conviction to avoid punishment, but the COMELEC has the power to issue writs of certiorari,
prohibition and mandamus under sec. 50 of BP 697, it
likewise those, who after being charged, flee to avoid
prosecution”. Because the arrival in the Philippines from being not amended by BP 881 (Relampagos vs. Cumba,
the US preceded the filing of felony complaint in LA 243 SCRA 502).
Court by almost 5 months, Rodriguez cannot be
considered a fugitive from justice (Rodriguez vs. ▪ The provision of RA 6679, granting appellate
COMELEC, GR No. 120099, July 24, 1996). jurisdiction to the RTC over decisions of MTC in electoral
cases involving barangay officials is
(f) Permanent residents in a foreign country or unconstitutional (Flores vs. COMELC, 184 SCRA 484).
those who have acquired the right to reside
abroad and continue to avail of the same right ▪ Galang Doctrine [Galang vs. Geronimo]
after the effectivity of this Code; and
A petition for certiorari questioning an interlocutory order
• Note: see Caasi vs. COMELEC, supra.
of a trial court in an electoral protest is within the
appellate jurisdiction of the COMELEC (Ceriaco Bulilis
(g) The insane or feeble-minded.
vs. Victorino Nuez, GR No. 195953, Aug. 9, 2011).
EFFECT OF FILING CERTIFICATE OF CANDIDACY ▪ The fact that decisions, final orders or rulings of the
APPOINTIVE AND ELECTIVE OFFICE COMELEC in appealed cases involving municipal and
Section 66, BP 881. Candidates holding appointive office or barangay officials are final [and executory] and
positions. - Any person holding a public appointive office or unappealable does not preclude a recourse to the SC by
position, including active members of the Armed Forces of way of a special civil action for certiorari (Galido vs.
the Philippines, and officers and employees in COMELEC, 193 SCRA 78).
to the UCPB shares purchased using said funds. preventive suspension pending appeal [sec 47, Ibid.]
However, declaring the said funds as partaking the (Gloria vs. CA, supra).
nature of private funds, ergo subject to private
appropriation, removes them from the coffer of the public
funds of the government, and consequently renders DE FACTO OFFICERS
them impervious to the COA audit jurisdiction. Clearly, One who has the reputation of being the officer that he
the pertinent provisions of PD Nos. 961 and 1468 divest assumes to be, and yet is not good officer in point of law. He
the COA of its constitutionally mandated function and must have acted as an officer for such length of time, under
undermine its constitutional independence. Accordingly, color of title and under such circumstances of reputation or
article III, sec. 5 of both PD Nos. 961 and 1468 must be acquiescence of the public and public authorities, as to afford
struch down for being unconstitutional (Philippine a presumption of election or appointment, and induce
Coconut Producers Federation vs. Republic, GR Nos. people, without inquiry, and relying on the supposition that
177857-58 & 178193, Jan. 24, 2012).
he is the officer he assumes to be.
MONEY CLAIM
IMPEACHMENT
Under Section 2(1) IX-D of the Constitution, the
A national inquest into the conduct of public men. A
Commission on Audit has the authority to settle all method by which persons holding government positions
accounts pertaining to expenditure of public funds. of high authority, prestige and dignity and with definite
tenure may be removed from office for causes closely
related to their conduct as public officials.
ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC OFFICERS
IMPEACHABLE OFFICERS [exclusive]
PREVENTIVE SUSPENSION
i. President;
Under sec. 24, RA 6770, the Ombudsman or his deputy
ii. Vice-President;
is authorized to preventively suspend any officer or
iii. Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme
employee under his authority pending an investigation
Court;
irrespective of whether such officer or employee is
iv. Chairmen and members of Constitutional
employed in the office of the Ombudsman or in any other
Commissions;
government agency (Buenaseda vs. Flavier, 226 SCRA
v. The Ombudsman.
645).
Requisites:
GROUNDS [exclusive]
i i. The charge against the officer or employee
i. Culpable violation of the Constitution;
should involve dishonesty, oppression or grave
ii. Treason;
misconduct or neglect in the performance of duty;
ii ii. That the charge/s should warrant removal iii. Bribery;
from the service; iv. Graft and corruption;
iii iii. The respondent’s continued stay in office v. Betrayal of public trust; and
would prejudice the case filed against him. vi. Other high crimes.
Duration: [Not to exceed] 6 months. Note: An impeachable officer who is a member of the
Bar cannot be disbarred without first being impeached
(Jarque vs. Desierto, 250 SCRA 11).
Under secs. 11 and 15, RA 6770, the Ombudsman is
clothed with the authority to conduct PI and to prosecute
all criminal cases involving public officers and NATIONAL ECONOMY AND PATRIMONY
employees, not only those within the jurisdiction of the
Sandiganbayan, but those within the jurisdiction of the
regular courts as well (Uy vs. Sandiganbayan, GR No. ACQUISITION OF LAND: CITIZENSHIP ISSUE
105965-70, March 20, 2001). LEASE OF PUBLIC LAND
Alienable lands of the public domain shall be limited to
Two Kinds of Preventive Suspension in Relation to agricultural lands. Private corporations or associations
the Right to Salary: may not hold such alienable lands of the public domain
a) Preventive suspension pending investigation. Not except by lease, for a period not exceeding twenty-five
entitled to salary, even if he is exonerated, because in years, renewable for not more than twenty-five years,
order to be entitled to payment of back salaries, it is not and not to exceed one thousand hectares in area.
enough that an employee be exonerated, in addition, it
must be shown that his suspension is unjustified. But GR: No private land shall be transferred or conveyed
under the CSL, preventive suspension of civil service except to individuals, corporations or associations
employees charged with dishonesty, oppression, grave qualified to acquire or hold lands of public domain.
misconduct or neglect of duty, is authorized. Thus, even Exceptions:
if the charges are dismissed later, the suspension is not a. Hereditary succession. – Foreigners who inherent
unjustified (sec. 51, Book V, Title I, Subtitle A, through intestate succession.
Administrative Code of 1987).
Refers only to intestate succession (Ramirez vs. Vda.
b) Preventive suspension pending appeal. When the De Ramirez, 111 SCRA 704).
penalty imposed by the disciplining authority is b. Former natural-born citizens (sec. 8, Art. XII)–
suspension, or dismissal, and after review, the
respondent is exonerated, he is entitled not only to Under BP 185, as amended by RA 8179,
reinstatement but also to back salaries for the period of i. 5,000 sqm. for urban land –
Page 21 of 26
Political Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
ii. 3 hectares for rural land. proper economic and social equilibrium in the
interrelations of the members of the community,
• The land may be used for business and for any constitutionally, through the adoption of measures legally
other purposes like residential, etc. justifiable, or extra constitutionally, through the exercise
of powers underlying the existence of all governments,
• c. Americans [under the Parity Amendment] on the time honored principle of salus populi est
holding valid title as against private persons. suprema lex ( Calalang vs. Williams, GR No. 47800, Dec.
2, 1940)
Thus, although an American cannot acquire private
lands [as the Amendment refers only to agricultural, COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
mineral and timber lands of the public domain and
natural resources] under the Parity Amendment, a • The CHR has no jurisdiction or adjudicatory
previous owner may no longer recover from an American powers over certain specific types of cases, like alleged
buyer who succeeded in obtaining title over the land. It is human rights violations involving civil and political rights.
only the State through the institution of escheat (Cariño vs. CHR, GR No. 96681, Dec. 2, 1991).
proceedings or through an action for reversion (Republic
vs. Quasha, 46 SCRA 160). • Having merely the power to investigate, the
• d. Ownership in condominium units to certain CHR cannot and should not try and resolve on the merits
allowable participation of aliens. the matters involved in striking teachers case.
• e. Those with dual citizenship under RA 9225. CHR HAS NO POWER TO ISSUE TRO
In Simon vs. Commission on Human Rights, 229
ENGAGEMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSION SCRA 117. the Court held that the Commission on
Art. XII, Sec. 14 provides that the practice of all Human Rights has no power to issue a restraining
professions in the Philippines shall be limited to order or a writ of injunction and has no power to cite
Filipino citizens, save in cases prescribed by law. for contempt for violation of the restraining order or a
Here the treaty has the force of law. writ of preliminary injunction.
EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF NATURAL RIGHTS OF LABORER: STRIKE
RESOURCES (MINERALS) Art. XIII. sec. 3 of the Constitution guarantees the
The President may enter into agreements with right of all workers to engage in peaceful concerted
foreign-owned corporations involving either activities, including the right to strike in accordance
technical or financial assistance for large-scale with law.
exploration, development, and utilization of
minerals, petroleum, and other mineral oils
according to the general terms and conditions EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,
provided by law, based on real contributions to
the economic growth and general welfare of the
ARTS
country. In such agreements, the State shall
promote the development and use of local ACADEMIC FREEDOM: FLAG SALUTE; FREEDOM
scientific and technical resources. OF RELIGION
The President shall notify the Congress of every
contract entered into From the standpoint of the educational institution: The
freedom of the university to determine –
EEZ RESERVED EXCLUSIVELY TO FILIPINO i. Who may teach;
CITIZEN ii. What may be taught;
The State shall protect the nation’s marine wealth in its iii. How shall it be thought; and
archipelagic waters, territorial sea, and Exclusive iv. Who may be admitted to the study.
Economic Zone, and reserve its use and enjoyment
exclusively to Filipino citizens. According to Reyes v. Court of Appeals, 194 SCRA
402, academic freedom is the freedom of a faculty
OWNERSHIP PUBLIC UTILITIES (60-40 RULE) member to pursue his studies in his particular
MASS MEDIA (100%) specialty and thereafter to make known or publish the
ADVERTISING (70%) result of his endeavors without fear that retribution
would be visited on him in the event that his
SOCIAL JUSTICE LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS conclusions are found distasteful or objectionable by
SOCIAL JUSTICE the powers that be, whether in the political, economic,
Social justice is neither communism, nor despotism, nor or academic establishments.
atomism nor anarchy, but the humanization of laws and
the equalization of social and economic forces by the As held in Ebralinag v. The Division Superintendent of
State so that justice in its rational and objectively secular Schools of Cebu. 219 SCRA 256 [1993], to compel
conception may at least be approximated. students to take part in the flag ceremony when it is
against their religious beliefs will violate their religious
Social justice means the promotion of the welfare of all freedom. Their expulsion also violates the duty of the
people, the adoption by the government of measures State under Article XIV, Section 1 of the Constitution
calculated to ensure economic stability of all component to protect and promote the right of all citizens to
elements of the society through the maintenance of
Page 22 of 26
Political Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
quality education and make such education voters, of which every legislative district must be represented
accessible to all. by at least three per centum of the registered voters therein.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE
Under Section 3(3), Article XIV of the Constitution, at
the option expressed in writing by the parents or
guardians, religion shall be allowed to be taught to FOR THE POLICE POWER, EMINENT DOMAIN AND
their children or wards in public elementary and high LOCAL TAXATION, refer discussion supra
schools within the regular class hours by instructors
designated or approved by the religious authorities to VALIDITY OF ORDINANCE
which the children or wards belong, without additional Requisites for a valid ordinance (Magtajas vs. Pryce,
cost to the Government. GR No. 111097, July 20, 1994) –
i. Must not contravene the Constitution or any statute;
RIGHT TO CHOOSE PROFESSION ii. Must not be unfair or oppressive;
iii. Must not be partial or discriminatory;
Under Section 5(3), Article XIV of the Constitution,
iv. Must not prohibit, but may regulate trade;
the right to choose a profession is subject to fair,
v. Must not be unreasonable;
reasonable and equitable admission and academic
vi. Must be general in application and consistent with the
requirements. The rule does not violate equal
public policy.
protection. As held in Department of Education,
Culture and Sports v. San Diego,180 SCRA 533
(1989), the five-strike rule is a valid exercise of police BOUNDARY DISPUTE
power to ensure that those admitted to the medical Section 118. Jurisdictional Responsibility for
profession are qualified. Settlement of Boundary Dispute. - Boundary
disputes between and among local government
CADEMIC REQUIREMENTS must always be
A units shall, as much as possible, be settled
scrutinized under Equal Protection Clause and amicably. To this end:
Police power of the state (a) Boundary disputes involving two (2) or more
barangays in the same city or municipality shall
be referred for settlement to the sangguniang
AMENDMENT AND REVISION panlungsod or sangguniang bayan concerned.
AMENDMENT VS REVISION (b) Boundary disputes involving two (2) or more
Amendment Revision municipalities within the same province shall be
Broadly refers to a Broadly implies a referred for settlement to the sangguniang
change that adds, change that alters a panlalawigan concerned.
reduces, deleted, basic principle in the Note: The power of the SP to settle boundary disputes is
without altering the Constitution. There is limited to implementing the law creating the municipality,
basic principle involved also revision if the and any alteration of boundaries not in accordance with
change alters the the law would exceed this authority (Municipality of
substantial entirety of Jimenez vs. Borja, 265 SCRA 182).
the Constitution (c) Boundary disputes involving municipalities or
Generally affects only Generally affects component cities of different provinces shall be
the specific provision several provisions of jointly referred for settlement to the sanggunians
being amended the Constitution of the province concerned.
(d) Boundary disputes involving a component city
Tests applied to determine whether the proposal or municipality on the one hand and a highly
was a revision of amendment: urbanized city on the other, or two (2) or more
a. Quantitative Test – whether the proposed change is
highly urbanized cities, shall be jointly referred
so extensive in its provisions as to change directly the
for settlement to the respective sanggunians of
“substance entirety” of the Constitution by the deletion or
the parties.
alteration of numerous provisions. The Court examines
only the number of provisions and not the degree of (e) In the event the sanggunian fails to effect an
change. amicable settlement within sixty (60) days from
the date the dispute was referred thereto, it shall
b. Qualitative Test – whether change will accomplish issue a certification to that effect. Thereafter, the
such far-reaching changes in the nature of our basic dispute shall be formally tried by the sanggunian
governmental plan as to amount to a revision. concerned which shall decide the issue within
sixty (60) days from the date of the certification
Note: Revision of the Constitution cannot be effected referred to above.
through initiative and referendum.
Reason: Formulation of provisions revising the Constitution
requires both cooperation and debate which can only be PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW
done through a collegial body (Bernas, 2011). DEPLOMATIC IMMUNITY
Duration of Immunities/Privileges:
INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM The privileges are enjoyed from the moment he enters
Amendments to this Constitution may likewise be directly the territory of the receiving state and shall cease only
proposed by the people through initiative upon a petition of the moment he leaves the country, or on expiry of a
at least twelve per centum of the total number of registered reasonable time in which to do so; although with respect
to official acts, immunity shall continue indefinitely.
Page 23 of 26
Political Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
These privileges are available even in transit, when interest in bringing pursuant to its own
traveling through a third State on way to or from the someone to justice interest
receiving state. Generally exists only by An inherent right of the
Treaty stipulation State as a sovereign
The alien is brought only He may be brought, not
Waiver of Immunities to the requesting State necessarily to his own
Diplomatic privileges may be waived, but as a rule, the waiver State, but to any State
cannot be made by the individual concerned since such willing to accept him.
immunities are not personal to him. Waiver may be made
only by the government of the sending State if it concerns INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE:
immunities of the head of the mission; in other cases, the JURISDICTION
waiver may be made either by the government or by the chief
of the mission. International Criminal International Court
Court [ICC] of Justice [ICJ]
EXECUTIVE AGREEMENTS (supra) As to Nature of jurisdiction
TREATIES (supra) Has criminal jurisdiction to Does not have
prosecute individuals criminal jurisdiction to
EXTRADITION VS DEPORTATION prosecute individuals
EXTRADITION As to Parties
Is the surrender of a person by one State to another State To prosecute individuals It is a civil tribunal that
where he is wanted for prosecution, or if already convicted, for genocide, Crimes deals primarily with
for punishment. against humanity, war disputes between
Fundamental Principles: crimes and the crime of Sates
a. Based on consent, as expressed in a treaty or aggression
manifested as an act of goodwill. As to Independence from UN
b. Principle of Specialty – A fugitive who is extradited The ICC is independent of The ICJ is a principal
may be tried only for the crime specified in the request the UN judicial organ of the
for extradition and is included in the list of offenses in the UN
extradition treaty. As to Nature of the Tribunal
Criminal tribunal Civil tribunal
Non-list type extradition treaties: Offenses punishable under
the law of both States by imprisonment of one year or more MUNICIPAL LAW VS. INTERNATIONAL LAW
are included among the extraditable offenses. RULES IN CASE OF CONFLICT BETWEEN
INTERNATIONAL LAW AND MUNICIPAL LAW
c. Political and religious offenders are generally not A. International Court/Body deciding – International
subject to extradition. Law should prevail.
Attentat Clause: The murder of the head of State or any
member of his family is not to be regarded as a political B. Domestic Court deciding – efforts should first be
offense, neither is genocide. exerted to harmonize the seemingly conflicting laws. As
d. The offense must have been committed within the a rule, municipal law prevails. Ratio: Police power
territory or against the interest of the demanding State. cannot be bargained away through a medium of a treaty
or contract (Ichong vs. Hernandez, 101 Phil. 115.
e. The Double Criminality Rule: The act for which the
extradition is sought must be punishable in both the Above is, however, subject to the following modifications
requesting and the requested State. – (Review Lecture)
a) Conflict between Constitution and jus cogens norm –
EXPULSION or DEPORTATION – may be predicated on the jus cogens p revails. No derogation is allowed.
ground that the stay of the alien constitutes a menace to the b) Conflict between Constitution and jus dispositivum -
security of the State or that his entry was illegal, or that the Constitution prevails.
permission to stay has expired, or that he has violated any c) Conflict between Constitution and Treaty based on jus
limitation or condition prescribed for his admission and dispositivum – Constitution prevails.
continued stay. d) Statute and Norm of International law –
EXTRADITION DEPORTATION i. Statue vs. jus cogens norm – jus cogens prevails.
apply the rule on lex
ii. Statute vs. jus dispositivum –
Is the surrender of a Is the expulsion of an
posterior derogat priori a nd the general and special law
person by one State to alien considered
rule.
another State where he is undesirable by the
wanted for prosecution, local State
That is, the later law governs and that special law
or if already convicted, for
prevails over general law dealing on the same subject
punishment.
matter.
The Surrender is Deportation is a
generally at the request unilateral act of the
SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY OF STATES (supra)
of the State where he is local State
wanted for prosecution or
PRINCIPLE OF NON-INTERVENTION
punishment
Each state is sovereign and equal. It is a generally accepted
At the instance of the At the instance of the
requesting State for its local State made principle not to intervene with the affairs of other
co-equal states.
Page 24 of 26
Political Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338