Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
1.0 The background of M.M. Thomas.................................................................................... 1
2.0 Biography of M. M. Thomas ............................................................................................. 3
3.0 M. M. Thomas’ Theology of Salvation as Humanization ............................................... 4
4.0 Target Groups of Humanization ...................................................................................... 5
5.0 Means of Humanization .................................................................................................... 6
6.0 The Goal of Humanisation ................................................................................................ 7
7.0 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 7
Page 1 of 7
and the majoritarianism was prevalent. The colonialization and the mission works were going
hand in hand.
There was a national struggle for the liberation of the nation. The forerunner was the Indian
national congress found by A O Hume. There were also struggles between the Hindus and the
Muslims in the nation but the common enemy was the British government.
M. M. Thomas sees the British rule in India as apart of god’s intervention in the society. That
god used Britishers to annihilate the social evils that were existing in the nation. It was to judge
and correct the traditional Indian life and put India on the path of progress and in turn ordaining
Indian nationalism to remove the tool of judgment.
The subjugation of the Hindus under the Muslim rule and the British rule have also contributed
to the rise of Hindu nationalism during the freedom struggle. There were mass conversions of
Hindus to Christianity due to the missionary works. This had shaken the foundation of the
Hinduism in the Indian society. This gave rise to the Hindu Maha Sabha and the RSS which
promoted the Hindu nationalism. The RSS have identified Muslims and Christians as two man
religious forces that propagated values that lead to the denationalization and westernization.
The emergence of Muslim league under Muhammed Ali Jinnah marked the significant role of
the Muslim community in the nationalism. After the independence there were Hindu Muslim
communalism and this have caused unrest in the nation. The political revolution in India was
primarily aimed liberating the Indians from the hands of the britishers. The social revolution
against the system and the structure of Indian society that deprived the poor and the
marginalized people of the Indian society.
The foundation of the Indian system was basically on the cast system. There was inequality in
the status of the people. But this was legitimised by the customs and practices. The dalits were
the people who were victims of all kind of sufferings. They were the powerless in the society
they were the outcast. There was an anti-Brahmin movement in the nation. The anti-Brahmin
movement that arose during the Indian freedom struggle sometimes revolted against the
Hinduism and other times asked for the reform within it. We also see the Dalit movements like
the Dalit panther movement. That advocated for the Dalit upliftment challenging the upper-
class.
The tribals and the adivasies were the indigenous people but they were not having any positston
in land alswell as they had no rights and privileges. There were fights for the liberation and
freedom and autonomy. The Indian society was also curbed by the patriarchy poverty too.
These all lead to the formation of different ideologies in like the Humanism1, secularism2,
Gandhism3 and Marxism4. These all contexts have influenced in the theology of M.M. Thomas
especially in the area of salvation and humanization.
1
Humanism tries to emancipate humanity from the clutches of religious orthodoxy and dogmatisms.
2
The term ‘secular’ was added to the Indian constitution by an amendment. In 1970 by the supreme court of
India the primary aim to add the term secular was to prevent the nation from becoming a theocentric state which
gave first class citizenship to the particular followers of that religion.
3
Gandhism an ideology focused on human beings and their welfare
4
Marxism is an ideology that works and struggles to eliminate all kinds of exploitation, oppressing,
discrimination.
Page 2 of 7
2.0 Biography of M. M. Thomas
Madathilparampil Mammen Thomas was born on 15th May 1916 at Kavungumprayar and he
was brought up at Kozhehengery in Travancore. He was the eldest child in the family they were
altogether 9 children in the family. He was from a rural middle class family. His father
Mammen was a Gandhian socialist. He belonged to the Syrian Mar Thoma church of Malabar.
His mother was a school teacher. He was brought up in the evangelical piety at home. He
believed that the intercession for a personal social and religious life would impact the society
towards humanization. He was also influenced by the faith practices that he was following. He
was an active participant in all the church activities. He has a sound foundation in the Christian
spirituality also in the national patriotism. He was influenced by the Gandhism. Since he had
the affinity to the Marxism he was denied the ordination form the Mar Thoma church. He was
also denied the membership in the communist party because of his Christian membership. He
was married to Elizabeth Pennamma in 1945.
He was a graduate in chemistry. He was awarded as the best student of the science college at
Trivandrum. In his auto biography he writes like this “Jesus Christ became real to me as the
bear of the divine forgiveness and gave my life awakened to adolescent rages, a principle of
integration and sense of direction. He also worked a teacher he have also pioneered several
fellowships and interreligious fellowships of students. His ministry experience among the poor
made him realise that the gospel also needs to address the social conditions and needs. He was
annoyed on the just focus on the salvation of the soul apart from the social conditions and later
this lead him to the concept of salvation and humanization. He also worked as the secretary of
the beggar relief committee in Trivandrum. Also he worked as the secretary of the Balabhavan,
he also mastered shoe making to tach boys to make a living and so on. He was also the member
of the founding members of Youth Christian Council of Action. He was active as the secretary
of the Mar Thoma church. He was also the vice chairman of the world student Christian
federation. He have also made extensive travels to different part of the world. That have also
expanded this style in teaching. He have also served as the moderator of the Uppsala WCC
meeting and also elected as the chairman for the post assembly period. He was at the post until
he resigned the post in 1972. He have also served as the governor of Nagaland in May 1990.
He was never been to any seminary for his theological studies. He made the studies by himself
and he was awarded three honorary doctorate for his contributions. The Thiruvella sangam was
a group of theologians formed by M.M. Thomas and his friends for informal discussions. He
have added to the definition of theology as faith seeking understanding and social
responsibility.
He focused on maintaining the centrality of Christ in all the area of life while grappling with
the realities of other religion s and of the social concerns. His spirituality was a Christo centric
spirituality, and was against the dicomatization and compartmentalization of the spirituality
and the social activity. He believed in the power of the gospel to change the social life of the
people. Therefor he involved in the social works.
Page 3 of 7
3.0 M. M. Thomas’ Theology of Salvation as Humanization
Salvation according to Thomas is “the spiritual inwardness of true humanisation and that
humanization it inherent in the message of salvation in Christ.”5
He finds a close link between the salvation and humanization. He sees the salvation as present
reality as well as eschatological in nature. The real humanization includes the salvation. The
term humanisation was coined in 1971 by M. M. Thomas. For Thomas humanisation means
making the human genuinely and fully human. Liberated from all social political and religious
dehumanization. For him it’s the penultimate human destiny. The salvation and humanization
are happening in the real world and are like the two side of a single coin. For Thomas Christ is
the centre of the humanisation. His concepts are Christo centric and salvation happens thorough
Christ and it will result in the humanization. It’s only possible through Christ.
The oppressive structures in the world is the centre factor that leads to the concept of the
.theology and not the scripture. Is a response to the social oppression and injustices, According
to Thomas God’s salvific plan to leave his divinity and to take the on humanity. So the
anthropology is the starting of God’s redemptive plan. So he sees identifying the social
situations as the basic nessacity of the effective missions. Thomas sae the redemption and
salvation as similar terms. In his earlier works he have used this terms interchangeably. He
gave importance of personal redemption and collective redemption. The social but he gave the
importance for the social redemption than for the personal one. It’s more an evangelical
approach. He have also emphasised the salvation of the body and soul. Like the liberation
theologians Thomas insisted that the marginalized people should unite to resist the exploitation
of their oppressors.
From the late 1970 onwards Thomas moved from an ecumenical approach to a liberal and
pluralistic approach. The salvation of God in Christ offers and leads to humanization of people.
The concepts of Thomas according to Walter’s position its Christological, dialogical and
effective in religiously pluralistic society. He was against all that which opposes the basic
needs of survival. He sees that the alienation from God, Castism religion and modernization
as the factors that obstacles the humanisation. He was against all the one sided spirituality that
only emphasised the spiritual needs of the people. For Thomas sin is not absence of good but
self-claim for self-sufficiency and self-dependency.
Thomas believes that the restoration of the Dalit dignity depends on the renewal of traditional
cultural and religious values. He also critiques the cast system as the reason for the current
situation of the people. He had a positive approach towards the modernization in the early times
but in the later times he even personified the modernisation as Rakshasa. And identified it as
the source of dehumanisation. One another factor that we see us that in his understanding the
technological world has become aggressive and destructive towards humanity. Thomas
advocated the humanization for all the people but his focus is for the people who are
marginalised. He identifies the human goal is to eliminate the poverty and the indignity of the
people. The focus was mainly on the people who are supressed in the society. Especially the
5
Ibid., 93.
Page 4 of 7
marginalised, Dalit and the poor. For Thomas the humanisation of the people depends on the
humanisation of social and political structures as they promote dehumanisation.
The mission of the church is not simply the proclamation of the gospel and the growth of the
church. The goal of Community must be the humanisation. But these barriers that are created
by the human beings work against the task of humanisation.
Page 5 of 7
through the church have made the influx of people of other faith to become a part of the faith
community. Leslie Newbigin says that the identity in Christ have made the people from ‘no
people’ to ‘God’s people’.
Page 6 of 7
6.0 The Goal of Humanisation
He sees the people as the subject of history. The goal of the humanization is to give people
their dignity lost personhood and peoplehood so they become subject of history and makers of
history with all rights and equality. The purpose of God for humanisation according to Thomas
is to give them freedom and responsibility as that they can work with God and work for God
to fulfil God’s plan for the humanity and human existence. Thomas interpret humanisation as
“New Humanity” in Christ. The Goal of human community is to practice for Justice for the
poor and the submerged and supressed groups like the dalits, tribals and women. According to
Thomas tradition and technology have to be humanised so that they support to eco justice and
social justice which will lead them to new humanity in Christ. He envisages a new humanity
in Christ which is humanised community is free from all forms of oppression and subjugating
and enjoys and experiences equality of rights and privileges.
Like Aloysius Pieris Thomas believed that the church should exercise a “divine option for the
poor. “ the church needs to participate in the prophetic mission of humanisation.
In the later parts of his life and writing revels greater shifts from the ecumenical to a pluralistic
a pluralistic position whereby he acknowledges the importance of the collective role of all
religions and secular ideologies towards the task of humanisation in the context of religious
pluralism.
7.0 Conclusion
M. M. Thomas became a well-known theologian and a social activist from Kerala. He spoke
for the people who were marginalised and oppressed and he was a voice for the voiceless and
he have used the secular tools like the Marxian philosophy to understand the society and the
political scenarios. His thoughts and ideas were influenced by this social setting and the hard
realities of oppression in the land. His exposure to the tribal people in the north east have
enabled him to understand their pathos. And he formulates his theology in which he says
salvation and humanisation. Where Humanisation is the penultimate and Salvation is the
ultimate Goal of life. He have moved from an inclusive understanding to a pluralistic
understanding in the later period of his life.
He gave more importance to the People groups like the Dalits, Women and the Tribals. And
the stood for the humanisation of the people by bringing up their dignity and giving them new
standards of living.
His theologies are Christocentric in nature and upholds a cosmic view of salvation. He
understands Secularism, interreligious dialogue, conscientization and revolution as a means of
humanisation. He gives more importance for the life on earth than hoping for a life in heaven.
The main goal of humanisation is to keep up the dignity of the people and to have a better life
on earth free from any kind of oppression where people lives in freedom and joy.
Page 7 of 7