aFinnish-language site

Merged by m3Zz

In photographs above a visual comparison is made. In the left we can see WTC-1 being destroyed (soarce: 911 Eyewitness) and in the right a shallow underground nuclear explosion is bursting from the ground (Storax Sedan 104 Kt). Below are the links to the articles of Finnish military expert.

For readers I would suggest first to examine the unusual features of the collapses of the Twin Towers and also the issue of Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons.

The theory of military expert is controversial. Some find it as a plausible explanation while some obviously not.

A reply from military expert to criticism of Mr. Partanen


More on the subject

The US Government's Usage of Atomic Bombs - Domestic - WTC By Ed Ward, MD Update

The Nuclear Threat That Doesn't Exist - or Does It? by Sam Cohen and Joe Douglass

Spooked and Anonymous Physicist: Anonymous Physicist: China Syndrome at the WTC

Writings of a Finnish Military Expert on 9/11

Written in spring 2005, a modestly language-corrected version Corrected by another person than the original author.

Every site content got merged together in a single PDF by m3Zz.

The photographs attached in this non-profit distribution are for securing volatile, important evidence on 9/11 for discussion and education. Author hereby grants full permission to reproduce the drawing 'The Bombs in the WTC' and his writings. You are encouraged to mail, publish and mass produce these documents or your enhanced versions of them. Due to concerns for his personal safety, the author has chosen to remain anonymous.

• The 9/11 Operation: A Summary

• The Bombs in the WTC

• The Development of Bomb Technology Related to the 9/11 Operation

• Observations Suggesting the Use of Small Hydrogen Bombs

• View of a Military Expert: Why the Towers of the World Trade Center Collapsed

• Evidence of advanced fusion devices at the WTC

• CRASH COURSE on Hard-to know Military Explosives Details

• Basic principles how wars are being planned

• Has something like this ever happened before?

• History of American false flag operations

The 9/11 Operation: A Summary

The 9/11 operation consisted of at least the following:

Military exercises by the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) with 22 imaginarily hijacked planes on 9/11/2001, before and simultaneously with the 'real' hijackings. Some of the defense interceptors flew to Alaska, as far as possible from the cities that were being attacked.

The 'hijackings' of four civil aircraft and the substitution of all of the planes that really were used on the real flights to remote-controlled ones. It is certain that an operation this complex and heavy in the preparations of the demolitions is not left to be handled by arabs with carpeting knives. Plissken-Valentine or Pearl are well-assumed estimations on how the aircraft operation was performed. Since the part of airplanes hijacked and flown into buildings was critical to the real aims of the operation there must have been a couple of reserve planes for the USAF Boeing 767's and the Global Hawk. Alternatively, the Boeing 757 shot down in Pennsylvania might have been a remote- controlled reserve plane like those.

The booking of seats on certain flights was artificially kept low; those coast-to-coast flights were booked by 20% instead of the usual 75% in order to minimize deaths, which could cause problems. If the flights were real, the passengers on them had to die (or at least disappear). Two of the flights were probably nothing but fictious, real only on radar screens, which minimized the amount of passengers to be murdered.

There was use of put options with airline stocks and with the re-assurance companies related (American Airlines, United Airlines, Allianz, Munchener Re, Schweizer Re, AXA .. .). Furthermore, the assurance values of the WTC were doubled in July 2001.

The camouflaging of six remote-controlled aircraft in order to make them look like Boeing 767's or 757's. The four planes probably were 2x USAF 767 tankers, a Global Hawk in Pentagon and a 'real' 757 in Pennsylvania.

False tracks leading to 'terrorists' using young moslem looking persons, who take aviation classes in Southern USA and party at night clubs, were created.

The demolition preparations of the wing of the Pentagon that was under reparation. This was supposed to collapse a horseshoe-shaped area of the building, which would seem to be caused by the crash of a Boeing 757 after the Global Hawk attack. This partly failed. There is photographic evidence of a small plane before the actual collapse of the wing of the Pentagon. The structures did not collapse until firefighters sprayed lots of water on the ceiling of the building.

The demolition preparations of the WTC towers and WTC 7 so that it was possible to make them collapse completely. Also the positioning of an electronic homing device in the towers and in Pentagon in order to ensure the accurate hits of the remote-controlled aircraft. Extra napalm for dramatizing the effects of hits of airliners. The WTC buildings could have been exploded down to earth in same way even completely without the airplanes.

Ordering, preparing and transportation of the charges for the demolition of the WTC. Solely for the steel pillars of the outer circle 40 x 240 charges were needed, let's say 10 000 cutting charges each weighing 50 lbs for each tower. For WTC 7 at least 4000 charges were needed. Also at least one small thermonuclear bomb for each of these three buildings.

The locating of critical targets for the conspiracy in the WTC towers. For example, there was a lot of evidence of world-wide economic crimes. The FBI was in WTC 1 in the floors from 22 to 24. (It has been said that one case was the case against Mobil Oil and James Giffen on illegal oil swaps between Iran and Kazakhstan and the evidence in the investigation of gold price fixing stemming from charges brought against Alan Greenspan, Morgan & Company, Goldman Sachs.) It is possible that some targets were attacked because of the unique opportunity exploitable where the human bodies and all evidence of the crimes automatically disappeared when a hydrogen bomb exploded. Explosions heard from the towers before the commencing of the 'collapse' may have been related to these attacks. There is a reason for the huge explosion in the customs building, as well.


1) One needs to find out the right size and the dimensions of suitable cutting charges and then order 24 000 pieces. One must as well order fitting detonators (detonators were needed a lot more). Fitting detonators usually already exist in stores of military forces (or the CIA). Time of delivery is several months in any case. All detonators must be equipped with some kind of safety mechanism, which will be removed by a radio signal at the final moment.

2) After this, the cutting charges are installed in the selected rooms that are not in use. Some of these rooms may as well serve as temporary storages for charges needed elsewhere. After this the apartment is renovated and circulated to the clients in the WTC. One man continuously assembles maybe 5 cutting charges per hour. With 10 assemblers 350 charges are installed a day. As surplus transportations of supplies, renovators and guards. Maybe about 20 people more were needed (5 of them know what is going on, 15 do not). For the installation of the charges this operation takes at least four months with 30 men. Considering step 1), six months are probably needed. The amount of personnel could not have been increased, but probably decreased, if more time was available.

3) To some of the chosen apartments, no one had access. That is why on the weekend on 9/8/2001 and 9/9/2001 it is announced, that floors up from the 40th floor are being equipped with cables and no normal employee has access to the working area there. The installations of explosives are completed and at the same time at least in the charged areas listening devices are set to find out a possible premature discovery of the plan. If someone finds charges the guards are soon on the scene and will deal the situation in one way or another.

4) One completes the area of secret service in WTC 7 so that its demolition operation can be carried out. A military flight beacon is placed there (planes are homing to it from far away). Remote controls for air planes and radio transmitters to be capable of blowing up at least one third of the cutting charges are placed. At this location, the ability to eavesdrop any area of the WTC, for example by a laserbeam, aimed to a selected window, probably already existed.

5) A radio beacon helping the final approach is placed in targeted apartments in the WTC towers. Close to these, remote controlled napalm explosives are placed as well, in order to draw the interest from the planes to fires. The higher in the towers the planes are targeted, the less there will be deaths. (Real terrorists would do exactly the opposite.) Evacuation from lower floors should be possible through the staircases. The target is to create a new reason for odd wars and fascistic laws, not to kill as many Americans as possible. 'A new Pearl Harbor', meaning the death of about 3000 citizens is probably the desired loss of lives.

6) The attack plans are made so that they can be executed during the chaos, for example in the offices of the investigations of the economic crimes by the FBI. (The attackers had already their own men infiltrated in these facilities.) Also in WTC 6

( customs) either a small nuke or a very strong bomb is blown out (which one, depends on whether there was melted steel ponds in the cellar ofWTC 6.) An explosion, of course, hides the loss of any supplies (A nuclear explosion covers up murders, as well.)

7) In the morning of 9/11 the operations are performed after a timetable in which seconds are important. From the command post facilities the actions in towers are monitored. To hide the true nature of the operation, there was probably an agent on call in both towers, who could silence the people finding out too much. (The agent probably did not know what was going to happen.)

It is not likely that all the people, who knew about the demolition charges in the WTC, or those who installed the remote controls of the aircraft or did some camouflage paintings for drones are still are alive and capable of telling about their acts, which changed the world.

8) The mini-nukes are transported to the cellar floors in elevators. After that the elevators are locked down, guarded and monitored - no service repairman will be allowed near these elevators. The thermonuclear device used in WTC 7 was different, its yield was set lower and it was directed in a way better suitable for that building.

9) The explosions have been timed so that 99.9% of people around will look at the top of towers, and perhaps two seconds later the small thermonuclear bomb is exploded in the cellar of the south tower, and again two seconds later another very powerful charge in the WTC 6 customs building while nobody is looking that way. There are also the continuous explosions of the thousands of cutting charges tearing the south tower down at the speed of gravity-driven free fall.

10) The demolition of either of the WTC towers took at least half a year to prepare, including installation of 10 000 cutting charges and the delivery of a thermonuclear device at the last moment. The demolition of those ultra strong steel pillars in the central core using cutting charges only is not possible without waking up unwanted attention. These charges must be in touch of the steel pillars, and there is not enough enclosed space in the central core to hide these biggest possible charges.

11) The demolition operation is finished by destroying WTC 7 using a nuke and completely destroying the op center with its equipment. Concrete evidence like the military flight beacon and the remote control devices for cutting charges and napalm as well as the recordings of eavesdropping devices regarding events within the towers vapourize and vanish without a trace.


Most of the media is controlled by people related to the attack and tell misleading stories only, as if crushing of the airliners or a weak fire could have caused the 'collapse' of the towers. The true attackers are the ones with strong and vigorous broadcasting around their false version of the events which is very different to what really happened.

Until these days, no single newspaper, magazine nor a national tv channel in the western nations have taken a critical view on the so-called truth, according to which the planes and fires caused the WTC towers to collapse. The destruction ofWTC 7, which has no explanation at all, is bypassed without any comments. A huge bomb, explosed in WTC 6 is also bypassed as a non-existing event.

Some things, like the sharply-drawn pictures of the closest seismographs may have been falsified. A Specialist in demolitions, V. Romero, may have been forced to change his original statement. The hoax is completed by Osama Bin Laden, who as a CIA agent' confesses' to have ordered the airliner strikes. The Bin Laden hoax and the suicidal arabs construct a net of lies that catches the most of the mankind.

Laymen have no experience in observing differences in collapses, controlled demolitions and underground nuclear demolitions. Even the destruction of heavy steel constructions or a typical fire damage are far away from their field of experience. These towers were build to take the impacts of hitting Boeing 707's, comparable to Boeing 767's, taking into account the fires caused by the aviation fuel. And the buildings did survive well all that.

The knowledge of relevant advances regarding weapon technology is even rarer. Many of those who are up to date are bound by strict commitment of loyality - that is vigorously looked after. In some cases, they get executed (an' accident' occurs).

The author of this text feels as his duty to spread mainly the advanced knowledge in explosives from a military point of view in public discussion as it is obvious that lacking this information the events observed around 9/11 cannot be explained.

The photographs attached in this non-profit distribution are for securing volatile, important evidence on 9/11 for discussion and education. Author hereby grants full permission to reproduce the drawing 'The Bombs in the WTC' and his writings. You are encouraged to mail, publish and mass produce these documents or your enhanced versions of them.

The Bombs in the WTC

Note: This drawing is schematic only. The actual towers were much taller and the observed arch of destruction of the energydirected thermonuclear device was correspondingly more narrow.

Culting charge exploded / in process of exploding

Arch of Dsslncfion of the thermoruclser devce; Ihe Bomb s 25x more desln..ctive within this arch than spherl:al1y, i.8.1 000 tons tnl1energy Within this arch and 40 tons tnt spherl:ally. aoOJo of energ:y is thermal, rest radioa::thre ... amp and overpressurzed blasl WeNe (lhr'Owingi steels)

Mini hydrogen bomb

:l Ground level

Ii Outer wall steel supporl box columns (60 pcs/side)

\ i\ y{;i Central c~re Thai part of exleriorsleel columns

" flYing superheated (3000C/5400F)

V sidewards a few secondsefler the

,; Ii ~lir' · ~ k iwil 'collapse'commer<:ed, v.pOlJrizing I

t-it--H---fl: -:':--11: I

,t .: ••• :: 1.1 •• 1.11,

l.,.,. 111.,1.1//


I, ~ 1 ~ ~ Floor slabs 1110 pes over ground) I

"'::1. '.1/1, j


lio-l.*I ..... ,"'It' 1-1 .!+ol'off


One of the elevator shaifts.


• \1 " •• ,

• \ it • I

Culling charges for steel box columns, 100000flhem

... :\ .• "I \

Decorafive coveTing lroo~ or cable tray

The Ground Zero here is in the original sense of word, a nuclear blast site. The thermal energy may absorb heat at a rate of 10 E 23 ergs / cm2 sec and near the bomb all surfaces may heat to 4000 °C or 7200 OF igniting or vapourizing violently.

Source: US Department of Defense & US Department of Energy- Glasstone - Dolan: 'The Effects of Nuclear Weapons' (1980).

The thermonuclear bomb used was a 'pure' hydrogen bomb, so no uranium or plutonium at all. The basic nuclear reaction is Deuterium + Tritium> Alpha + n. The ignition of this is the fine part, either with a powerful beam array or antimatter (a very certain way to get the necessary effect of directed energy in order not to level the adjacent blocks of high-rise buildings, as well).

The Development of Bomb Technology Related to the 9/11 Operation

These outlines of developments in military bomb technology have been written to give the layman some idea, why bomb technology has developed into what it is.

A hollow charge made possible a small charge to make a hole in armour plate was invented in Switzerland in 1937. A cutting charge, used in the WTC in tens of thousands of pieces, was an evolunary model of the principles of a hollow charge from 1950's.

A Claymore threw steel balls towards the enemy, but was otherwise harmless even from 5 meters distance, was developed in the USA approximately in 1960.

A flank mine is able to direct a narrow pressure wave through AFV flanks from a distance of 20 meters and was more developed in Finland around 1970. Due to efficiency causes, growing part of military explosives deploy improvements utilizing directed explosion energy.

By controlling several layers of the explosion fronts the size of a nuclear bomb has been minimized during the 1960's (fission - implosion). After that, the control of explosion force in nuclear explosions was developed. Too strong an explosion is sometimes unusable, for example when the enemy have broken too close to friendly cities.

While looking for a bomb with a small size and a strong effect, a pure hydrogen bomb was an obvious solution. When no atomic device is needed for igniting, the size of the hydrogen bomb gets even smaller and the yield ( effect) can be set within a wide range, for example between from 1 to 100. This succeeded in the 1980's, as well as the neutron bomb. which kills only living things and leaves most material untouched.

The former Soviet Union is said to have had more than 500 command centers durable for a small nuke. That led into the developing of different types of bunker busters. A working solution is a nuclear missile that directs 96% of its yield into a thin, all penetrating heat-blast wave forward, tunneling hundreds of meters downwards into solid rock. This type of a hydrogen bomb was developed somewhere in the early 1990's. Nowadays, both the yield and the direction of the destructive force of a small tactical hydrogen bomb can be somewhat controlled. The amount of fusion-able materials control the yield (effect) and the shape of the charge as well as the initiation arrangements impress the direction of the explosion wave.

Observations Suggesting the Use of Small Hydrogen Bombs

1) The concrete pulverized into fine dust, 70 ... 300 micron particles Oust this could take more energy than the total gravitational energy available). See Gehue plates 6 and Z:

Beginning ofwinter in New York? The fine dust from pulverized concrete, asbest and other materials is covering the quarter as a layer of several centimeters. That was not seen with any other

blast before.

Dust clouds energy need

The destrlu::tiio!tll of~hle WIC

The layer of dust

The finer the material is being destroyed the bigger is the energy need for it. You will need ca. 1 kg of explosives for 100 tons steel or concrete with conventional explosions. This is sufficient for destruction into transportable pieces if gravity is used smart enough and gravity delivers

50% of the energy. With pulverization the energy need is 10 times larger.

The help of gravity is almost meaningless in this case.

The complete mass ofWTC 1,2, 3 and 7 was about 1.4 million tons. This results into a need of14 tons of conventional explosives. Modern military explosives are more efficient, of course.

® !'illl Mow:

2) Very energetic - hot - dust after the explosions. (Demolition charges would produce white clouds of dust, which would not move much, and a gravity-driven collapse would produce much less and more coarse dust.)

3) Brown shades of color seen in the air - these are produced by nuclear reactions of a thermonuclear device. The reactions use (gamma radiation caused by free neutrons, N2, 02, H20> nitrid acid, N02, No3). These clouds soon get their usual white color after some minutes as the heat and fast movement of the clouds cease becoming ordinary clouds with some water.

Note: many of the pictures taken regarding the WTC Towers and the clouds seem to have been developed too blue, killing shades of brown. (This may have been an attempt to suppress the evidence.) Also there was supposed to be 200 000+ gallons of water on the roof of each tower - this water was spilled into stairwells etc, but was later all converted into water vapour reducing the brown color.

4) Superheated steel objects, disintegrating into steel vapour. Molten ponds of steel were found in the elevator shafts. There were lots of burned cars in the parking areas of the towers. The fire department did not announce until 12/19 /2001 that the fires under the WTC rubble have been distinguished (more than 3 months after the incident). For more, see Gehue plate 8:

Following fire and explosion damages

Behind the dust cloud more explosions take place and fires are starting. A lot of burned car wrecks can be seen. The dust cloud

out of concrete and asbest had the effect of a giant fire distinguisher. The fires must have started afterwards. The subway tubes have partly crashed on a length up to 500 metres.

On 12-19-2001 the fire department announces that all fires underthe rubble have been distinguished. What has burned there for three months?

location F C name
A 1341 727 WTC7
B 1034 557 WTC7
C 1161 WTC7 WTCl
D 963 627 WTCl
E 819 437 WTC3
F 801 427 WTC2
G 1377 747 WTC2
H 1017 547 WTC4 The thermal survey of the WTC 9/16/2001 (NASA IUS Geological Survey). Despite of fire department having cooled the rubble, aluminium would still be melting in some sites 5 days after the incident.

5) Elevated values of tritium in this area, but not elsewhere in New York. The University of California found elevated values on 9/13/2001 and 9/21/2001 within bounds of the WTC. They found them harmless for health. In pure hydrogen bomb isotopes of hydrogen are fused (D + T > n + a + 17.6 MeV).

6) An EMP-type phenomenon blacked out cellular phones at the moment when the first (southern) tower started to 'fall down', at the exact moment when a small thermonuclear bomb was detonated. Even in electronic cameras and videos a strange afterglow was seen in the late phase of the 'collapse' of both of the towers. See Gehue plate 5:

The destructiiO!lil of U~e WliC

Map with boundaries of power outage

power outage in this area

Also almost all telephone lines were interrupted, likewise fax, email, webcams, etc. The reinstallation took place until December.

On 9-11 the walkie-talkies of the New York fire department didn't work. Therefore it was not possible for the commander to get his men out of the buildings in time. A similiar outage was seen with the bomb attack in 1994.

Lower Manhattan was separated in those hours completely from the outer world.

How could that come?

@ K<.rl Moor

7) A wave of pressure was witnessed in the root of the tower at the moment when the so-called collapse was progressing just about two hundred meters and nothing had fallen down to earth. The blast wave turned over for example a photographer and a fireman close to the entrance, who was taking photos of the dust cloud. The burst of the dust cloud on the root of the tower was photographed as well. In the image at the left below is what probably was the explosion ofWTC 6. The Customs building was deliberately exploded for some reason - it was not damaged because of the falling girders as they had not yet reached the roof of WTC 7 when the photo was taken. A couple of seconds later the clouds of the explosion were already partly above the roof ofWTC 7, which was too energetical to be caused by usual blasting agents. This suggests it was the second hydrogen bomb in the WTC block. The first hydrogen bomb is discharging upwards (pulverized concrete) exactly in the picture, and the steel structures vaporized by the bomb are already falling down 100 meters (approx. 328 ft.) farther down. The mass of cloud, caused by vaporized steel, is seen in the center of the picture and even more clearly in the picture at the right.

8) In the cellar, out of all the 47 ultra strong steel pillars, the steel was melted completely at the length of more than 20 meters (approx. 65 ft). Even cars were melted and burned in the cellar. The pillars were far too thick for thermite, which some have suggested. An explosion of a thermonuclear bomb explains the phenomenon well.

9) Steel columns and pillars were ejected in the surroundings of the building. In the beginning of the so-called collapse, exists no such energy exists that could throw steel pillars outwards from 60 to 175 meters (approx. from 170 to 574 ft.) from trunk. Not even cutting charges can do that. Instead, the blast wave from a nuclear bomb is capable to do that.

View of a Military Expert: Why the Towers of the World Trade Center collapsed

The airplanes did not a have true effect on the destruction of towers; they were needed to give an excuse for odd Orwellian wars at the same time when the USA is turned into a police nation, like the German Third Reich, to some extent. The towers took the impacts of crushing Boeing 76Ts. The towers were originally built to take impacts of Boeing 70Ts, which are approximately of the same size and was widely used in the 1970's.

Fires that kindled from the fuel in the planes were too shortlasting and weak to be able to severely damage the structure of the skyscrapers. Even in the extreme situation, the heat from a kerosene fire cannot threat the durability of a steel trunk. With the temperature of carbohydrate fires that reaches only 825°C (approx. 1517 OF) steel weakens at 800

°C (approx. 1470 OF) and melts at 1585 °C (approx. 2890 OF). In the skyscrapers of the WTC the surroundings were not at all ideal as there were far too many steel columns and they led heat away from the burning area. WTC 1 burned for 102 minutes and WTC 2 for 56 minutes only. A fire burning much longer, from 10 to 20 hours, could slowly increase the burning temperature down to perhaps 1100 °C (approx. 2010 OF). Provided there is more substance to burn, such a fire will damage concrete and irons, but not severely heavy steel

In mid-February in Madrid, the Windsor Tower (see above) burned for over 20 hours, which led to a fire stronger and hotter than that in the WTC, but even the collapses of the Windsor Tower caused by the very strong and longenduring fire were minimal and limited to the upper floors. If either of the WTC tower had started to collapse because of fires the collapse would have been limited to only a few of the floors and then stopped.

The impossibility of a gravitational collapse is closer seen in other documents. A collapse would produce large pieces, and does not explain reports of fine dust from concrete, huge amounts of dust and pieces of steel ejected outwards.

Destruction of the towers by explosions is clear according to the photographs and reports of the eye witnesses. In the picture below; a range of cutting charges have just exploded in the down left sector and a typical white cloud is formed

outwards from the wall. Down right, explosions are seen as

well. Even a flame is seen.

In video tapes taken of the so-called collapses of the WTC, more explosions of these cutting charges can be seen. The explosions advance quickly, with a gap of a couple of floors, cutting the strong steel pillars in the outer wall. The explosions are timed so that it appears that the tower collapses occur in the same timing as in a gravitational collapse. The explosions are not completely synchronized in timing, probably a few charges are triggered by radio, and other charges explode out of the impulses of one of these charges (infrared, pressure wave).

More challenging problems to the demolition men, however, were the central cores of the buildings and the 47 steel pillars more robust than the ones on the outer rounds. The pillars of the central cores were made of steel even 100 + 100 mm thick, thicker than the side arm ours of a battle tank. Cutting those, even with explosives, is extremely difficult. One would need to surround the whole pillars, every single pillar on every floor intended to get blasted, with powerful cutting charges. These charges would have needed to be placed in such a way that the users of the skyscrapers could

not notice these preparations.

As seen in the following pictures, the cores of the towers were not distracted by thousands of powerful cutting charges but by a modern thermonuclear explosive, a small hydrogen bomb. In the picture below, a hydrogen bomb explosion, the bomb having been placed in the cellar and directed to the core, has reached the roof of the tower and the upper parts of the outer walls. On its way up the waves of fire pressure partially penetrated about 100 floors of concrete and steel. Over ten million degrees of heat caused by a hydrogen bomb sublimised all water within the concrete in a moment. Water exploded extremely quickly into lOOO-fold volume and totally pulverized the concrete. Even people and computers that were in the buildings disappeared turning into heat and light. That is why almost nothing of them was found in the ruins.

Burning radiation is absorbed in steel so quickly that steel heats up immediately over its melting point 1585 °C (approx. 2890 OF) and above its boiling point around 3000 C (approx. 5430 OF). In the pictures down below; super hot groups of steel pillars and columns, torn from wall by pressure wave, are sublimized. They immediately turn into a vaporized form, binding heat as quickly as possible. Bursts upwards, even visible in the picture below; are not possible for a gravitational collapse or for cutting charges which are used horizontally.

Storax Sedan 104 Kt shallow underground

In the upper picture the explosion is in theory 100 times stronger than in the picture below, but in practice the difference is only four times due to the capability of direction of the small hydrogen bomb.

'Ii new .explo s IOlrls be I OWHl e I wel110f bl1e:alklng,

Off! the I'efi im~g8' 1hl@ ~plpe~ ~8!rt is ~. ViJhO~18 pli~c~, Seconds la'ler~~e 'IiI~ed posl~i[!n is ~Imfedecl i.Ill_ ~ne' upp"er f;latt liS pU~v'E:!riiZed- tifletll1!M ~hB ~ullVer~lat~on of ~h'e s~a'bliilestaln din:g ~runk fr,om

~ tl'~ve a'~'\MfIlh'a r(jlS Is IgOling ~QI tOilke ~'I :ilce I~~ ('~nti!1!,!~tilgl ~~ eslons • witf1~1j1 am~ preSSIWlwe (,olrm :abo".le belUll!.Ise th e, up per part lhiaa :a~ ready ~8'en p:tJlI@~[dl

In the picture at the right, the brown shades caused by a hydrogen bomb are seen, while the top of the tower that is already collapsing is breaking down and the posture straightens up as the hydrogen bomb pulverized the core and it lost all its resistance. The piles point the blasts of the cutting charges. (Gehue plate 12)

Steel pillars are turned into dust.

Extremely hot, sublimating pieces are not created with many methods.

For comparison, pictures of subterranean nuclear explosions where the explosion is blasting onto surface and into the air:

Ess1.2 Kt


Banberry 10 Kt underground

Radioactivity in air creates shades of brown. (The subterranean nuke in the picture on the right is 10 times stronger than the small nuke on the left.) This is the reason why the FBI did not search the crime scene. Ground zeros of nuclear weapons are a

Evidence of advanced fusion devices at the WTC

1.) Pulverization of 99% of concrete into ultra fine dust as recorded by official studies. Concrete dust was created instantly throughout the towers when the fusion device million degree heat rapidly expanded water vapour lOOO-fold in the concrete floors.

2.) Superheated steels ablating (vaporizing continuously as they fall) as seen in video clips of the towers collapsing. This requires uniform temperatures roughly twice that of thermite. Conventional demolition or explosive charges (thermate, rdx, hdx etc.) cannot transfer heath so rapidly that the steel goes above it's boiling temperature.

3.) 22 ton outer wall steel sections ejected 200 meters into the winter garden. Cutting charges cannot eject heavy steels and throwing charges cannot provide the energy required without heavy, solid surface mounts.

4.) 330 ton section of outer wall columns ripping off side of tower. Cutting charges cannot eject heavy steels linked together and throwing charges cannot provide the energy required without very heavy, solid surfaces to mount those charges.

5.) Molten ponds of steel at the bottom of elevator shafts (WTC1, WTC2, WTC7). Massive heath loads have been present at the lower parts of these high-rise buildings. As one of the witnesses after seeing the flow of metals declared: "no one will be found alive".

6.) The spire behaviour (stands for 20-30 seconds, evaporates and goes down, steel dust remains in the air where the spire was). The spire did not stand because it lost its durability when the joints vaporized.

7.) Sharp spikes in seismograph readings (Richter 2.1 and 2.3) occurred at the beginning of collapse for both towers. Short duration and high power indicate an explosive event.

8.) A press weighting 50 tons disappeared from a basement floor of Twin Towers and was never recovered from debris. Not possible with collapses or controlled demolitions. The press was vaporized or melted totally.

9.) Bone dust cloud around the WTC. This was found not until spring 2006 from the Deutsche Bank building. (In excess of 700 human remains found on the roof and from air vents). See

10.) Fires took 100 days to extinguish despite continuous spraying of water. Thermate would burn out totally and then cool down much faster, just in a few days. This long cooling time means the total heath load being absorbed into the steels of the WTC was massive, far in excess anything found in collapses or typical controlled demolitions.

11.) Brown shades of color in the air due nuclear radiation forming N02, N03 and nitric acid. TV and documentary footage changed the color balance to blue to disguise this fact indicating complicity in the coverup.

12.) Elevated Tritium values measured in the WTC area but not elsewhere in New York. Official studies stated that 8 EXIT signs from two commercial Boeing jets were responsible. The tritium in those EXIT signs is insufficient to explain the measurements (very little tritium is available for measuring after evaporation into air as hydrogen and as tritiated water vapour. This can provide conclusive proof of fusion devices and therefore USjIsraeli military involvement.

13.) Pyroclastic flow observed in the concrete-based clouds. Only found with volcanic eruptions and nuclear detonations. The explosion squibs cool down just a few milliseconds after the explosion or after having reached some 10 meters in the air. Pyroclastic flow will not mix with other clouds meaning very serious heath in those clouds not possible with the conventional demolition or explosive charges. The pyroclastic clouds were cooling down at the WTC but this process took some 30 seconds. See http:j

14.) Huge expanding dust clouds 5 times the volume of the building indicating extreme levels of heat generated far in excess of traditional demolition explosives.

15.) Rubble height was some 10% of the original instead of 33% expected in a traditional demolition. Fusion device removal of underground central steel framework allowed upper framework to fall into this empty space and reduce the rubble height.

16.) No survivors found, except some firefighters in one corner pocket in the rubble who looked up to see blue sky above them instead of being crushed by collapsing debris. Upward fusion flashlight-like beam of destruction missed this pocket but removed debris above those lucky firemen.

17.) 14 rescue dogs and some rescue workers died far too soon afterward to be attributed to asbestos or dust toxins (respiratory problems due to alpha and tritium particles created by fusion are far more toxic)

18.) Record concentrations of near-atomic size metal particles found in dust studies due to ablated steel. Only possible with vaporized (boiling) steels.

19.) Decontamination procedure used at Ground Zero (hi-pressure water spraying) for all steel removed from site. Water spraying contains fusion radioactivity.

20.) No bodies, furniture or computers found in the rubble, but intact sheets of paper covered the streets with fine dust. Items with significant mass absorbed fusion energy (neutrons, x-rays) and were vaporized while paper did not. Paper and powder theory.

21.) 200 000 gallon sprinkler water tanks on the roofs ofWTC1 and WTC2, but no water in the ruins. Heat of fusion devices vaporized large reservoirs of water.

22.) Reports of cars exploding around the WTC and many burned out wrecks could be seen that had not been hit by debris. Fusion energy (heath radiation and the neutrons) caused cars to ignite and burn far from WTC site.

23.) Wide area electrical outage, repairs took over 3 months. Fusion devices cause EM pulse with Compton scattering. See German engineers help the USA plate 5. http:j jhome.debitel.netjuserjandreas.bunkahlejdefaulte.htm

24.) EM pulse was recorded by broadcast cameras with high quality electronic circuitry. This occurred at the same time as the seismic peaks recorded by Lamont Doherty during the beginning of the collapse. This is due to the Compton Effect and resulted in a large area power outage at the WTC.

CRASH COURSE on Hard-to know Military Explosives Details

Why this is necessary? What I see is a systematic attempt to falsify the facts and to mislead the vast nearly-hypnotized audience. Most of the people have not got an opportunity to play with the industry grade explosives, or later have formal training in military explosives and then design and execute ambush, demolition and improved explosive detonation scemes.

Really few have been researching optimal weapons fragmentation or been able to design a new type of weapon and been lucky enough of getting that design into mass production. This is an obvious place where an expert not being a member of some evil cabal needs to speak out. As some have suggested here, it is the future of mankind being moulded here and in several other places, good and evil.

Squibs, "dust ejections"

are dust clouds, which appear when linear shaped charges are used to cut steel, reinfoeced concrete etc. They were present at the WTC. Seen from one side, some six charges misfired, exploded at the wrong time. The vast majority exploded as expected. As the top of the south tower tilted, two rows of squibs are visible in "tilt" pictures on two sides of the tower (you can be sure, that similar rows were on the other sides at the same moment - otherwise there would not be a symmetrical "collapse". The squibs expand just a few meters, after which they are inert, white-grayish dust no longer moving (without the help of the wind). In the WTC those squibs rapidly mixed into adjacent ones and soon the remains looked just like linear, thick clouds on the wall.

Linear Shaped Charges (LSC) see:

Such a cutting charge is not melting the steel; it will buid a huge overpressure into the direction of cut, the gas expands at a rate some 5 miles/second and this pressure changes the local metal into liquid. There needs to be some metal lining with the explosive, and this molten metal hitting the target at some 2 miles/second is then able to blow that already liquified mass being cut away.

The Spire, some central core columns standing while ejecting boiling steel vapours

The spire shows a process of central core steel columns boiling and rapidly loosing their strength. In some 20 seconds the joints break up and those tall vertical stell columns disappear downwards. The evaporatede steel dust remains in the air. This helps you to really see what happened. Many steels falling were also boiling and ejected a thick smoke, but normal people mistook their tails as some kind of "concrete dust".

Such a steel dust has very small particle size and it is able to penetrate the skin. Iron bypassing the digestary system in this way damages the health.

Thermite is a WW2-era incendiary. It is not easy to ignite but when it starts, it will burn at near 3000 C temperature. It is hard to see how one could melt the strong vertical columns of the Twin Towers with this stuff. It will eat itself free of any constrains and fall down, continuing to burn unless it is totally covered by sand (water is wrong stuff here). It also cannot burn many days, it's more like hours only. Basically thermite will easily melt steel directly under it, but this not what steel mills need, they need it hotter, more even and less with extra residues.

Thermate is a more modern military version of silently functioning destructive charge. In practical uses it is built so it creates a very hot cutting spray penetrating even steels. It is much faster than the thermite, an this one could cut the columns of the Twin Towers. But there is no eye wittnesses or photos this actually takingn place in the outer walls. There would have been sparkles of molten steel, red hot and easily recognisable. It is suggested that thermate linear cutting charges are available for controlled demolition purposes, and it makes sense, since they are more safe to use (no actual explosions, just a violent hot spray cutting steels). In explosions there always is a big danger zone.

You could take out the WTC central core columns with these, and it would look like a fire, because only some smoke will be visible within the already-burning building. However, the root of those towers with 5" or 6" huge steel pillars in the basement meeting the bedrock is too much for these charges. I wouldn't try more than 2" steel penetrations with thermate (however, I'm not a thermate designer, so precise limits and the exact stuff mixture being used are unknown -classified?)

Enchanched explosives are WW2-era stuff like TNT, RDX, HDX, PETN .. .in more potent versions today. because it has been invented that by mixing very fine, nano-size particles of aluminium into those explosives a bigger, more potent explosion results. So the charges for a given purpose are today much smaller than they used to be.

Shaped charges, linear cutting charges are very basic thing today. In WW2 it was common to stack huge boxes of explosives in order to blow a bridge. Today small linear charges with nano-enchanched explosives can do the same job in a much more elegant way. You may also have seen door-form linear shaped charges for special police forces (swat teams) -they place it on the wall and blow quickly their extra door into the building using those.

Improved explosive devices are versions of shaped charges designed to destroy vehicles. The US forces in Iraq are nowadays often ambushed with them. Such a weapon can be camouflaged 20 meters off road, and when detonated it still penetrates the APC (or with bigger versions, even a MBT) on the road.

It is built by moulding powerful military explosive into form of a hand-held loudspeaker, placing a copper plate into the "loud-voice end" and igniting it from the "mouthpiece-end". This gives very directed effect - the explosive gasses with molten copper fly straight forwards and not to all directions. It is a very effective shooting weapon, the shot being explosives - copper gasses and it is very destructive in the target. The weapon can be built as remote-controlled or automatic sensortriggered.

Picture: Finnish antitank standoff shaped charge weapon from 1970; these were factory-built but IED:s in Iraq look fairly similar in general

The Neutron bomb is the latest and thus obfuscated invention in the field of nuclear wapons. It is already at least 25 years old invention (and propably more). Unlike in many published articles, it is NOT ignited by an atomic bomb creating all kinds oflong-term troubles (huge minimum yield, heavy radioactive pollution lasting 1000 OOOs of years and so on .. .).

The true neutron bomb is a logical extension of fuel pellets (fusion balls) designed for fusion energy reactors. The plan has been to shoot cherry-size fusion balls into a thermonuclear reactor at a rate of a few balls per second. With almost unlimited funds and the sharpest minds of the known scientific community. do you believe all the universities researching this have continuously failed for some 50 years?

There are some 10 ways to ingnite such a fusion ball besides the atomic bomb which is the only way the audience is generally aware of. Half of these could be useful in weapons applications. I just mention antimatter, nano-enchanced multistage compression explosives and "red mercury" (a secret Soviet-era invention to create a very high ignition temperature). Here Mercury refers to the red-hot planet, not to the element.

What is ignited is fusion-able stuff in very concentrated form. The stuff they use is much like a lithium-ion battery, metallic lithium and metallic hydrogen (deuterium variant of hydrogen) tightly together with some excess deuterium. This is a very small package, smaller than a box of cigarettes, and it is in no way radioactive. Externally it can be made to look excactly like a big lithium-ion battery, being manufactured from the same elements (but usually different isotopes of those elements).

The lithium is a booster to ignite the really reluctant-to-fire primary thermonuclear reaction, which is Deuterium + Tritium. The booster reaction is Deuterium + Lithium, and it will produce thermonuclear grade heath and free Tritium required in the secong stage taking place automatically nanomicroseconds later. The output of the D + T reaction is about ten times more poweful than the initial D + Li booster reaction. Please note that only the lightest elements are participating in these reactions.

Hydrogen in forms of deuterium and tritium, and lithium. The important fusion result will be helium (and a helium nucleus is known as alpha particle when we talk about radiation). After looking some recently declassified US nuclear documents (item V: Nuclear weapons and related tecnology) one could suppose, that using Li(6) isotopes booster produces pure hydrogen bombs and using Li(11) isotopes booster produces the same reaction, but plenty of free neutrons so creating something that is called a "neutron bomb".

The Hydrogen bombs and Neutron bombs can be focused and directed as can most types of energy, if you know how (the Stealth bomber, B-2 is based on carefully directing the radar energy beams -radio wawes- away from the radar transmitter/receiver. The Stealth fighter, F-117 merely is a smaller target and absorbs that energy).

This means thermonuclear shaped charges are possible and do exist. 4th generation thermonuclear weapons and directed energy google (Swiss researcher) Andre Spooner and read all his weapons-related material you can get.

Mini-nukes like those neutron bombs are not monitored internationally. The nuclear explosion tests can be camouflaged so they are indistinguishable from small eartquakes and similar event. Their energy signatures also, while test explosions being made in abandoned old mines are very small. It looks it has been internationally agreed that small nuclear explosions in the class of fusion energy powerplant pellets are called "thermonuclear devices" so the nasty word "bomb" is not uncomforting this reality. And only leading hi-tech nations can produce these "devices". No need to monitor them, right? Still better, no need to publish the whole matter, just cover it up?

Geiger counter, the common method of spotting radioactive residues is useless here. The output of neutron bomb aka thermonuclear device will mostly be neutron and roentgen rays in addition to tritium, alpha radiation (helium nucleus) and some beta radiation (in radioactive decays). Also note that you can absorb much of those residues by simply spraying tons of water on them. Those very light elements will free themselves and float skywards or some will be absorbed into water and then you will get "tritiated water" which was found in several locations at the wtc (but not elsewhere in New York at 9/11 time -see UCLA report on this).

All matter including the air at ground zero will instantly become super-hot-millions of degrees are available, but absorption rates vary and in practice 10.000 C will be enough to disintegrate anything including humans, computers, concrete, steels and so on ... This fireball of millions of degrees C will also have significant secondary effects. It will expand explosively. and it will form longer-wawelength radiation like light and tremondous heath radiation.

The Energy output of different type military weapons is very different. It should be easy to tell, which type of weapon has been exploded. I'm trying to give some outlines here. But please understand, the MSM (Main Stream Media) has been misleading you at least a quarter of a century. Crime scenes have been incompetently investigated, false trails followed up and suitable patsies convicted and executed. I especially loath the Bali and the Beirut Hariri assassinations. In both cases the hole caused by thermonuclear device was quickly filled with water in order to neutralize the vaque radioactive residues. Patsies are arrested. in Lebanon they were the leading generals. in Indonesia they were low-level trouble makers (like a bicycle mechanic).

For an example, if the whole scene of crime is ablaze (22 cars in Beirut), if people were burned to death inside their cars, if some people escaped ablaze from their cars by breaking the window as doors were jammed, and if the titan-steel armour of the target Mercedes has been partially melted, this is not mechanical damage in nature and no conventional explosives military grade or not can cause such a damage. That scene is an obvious ground zero of some type of a new, small thermonuclear weapon.

Industry grade (non-military) explosives don't cause much damage unless they are in enclosed space. These include Amatol, Dynamite and ANFO (ammonium nitrate-fuel oil mixture). This also means there is no wayan ANFO bomb could be able to collapse the federal building (Murrah) at Oklahoma. Crime scene falsified, evidence buried, a patsy (McVeigh) caught and executed.

Military explosives like TNT, RDX, HDX, PETN detonate much faster than the industry grade stuff, typically 5 miles per second and more. They are able to do considerable damage also in open space. They create a huge, sudden overpressure and most of the damage is mechanical in nature. Attached to steels, or used as a shaped charge they are able to "melt steel" at the

Picture: antitank rocket grenade from a LAW (Light Antitank Weapon)

After firing an antitank shaped charge (a LAW weapon, for an example, against a MBT) the armor is penetrated but as soon as you walk to the target the point of penetration is lukewarm and rapidly cooling off. There will be molten fragments inside the MBT re-solidifying rapidly. Of course, if this is a combat situation, there would be dead crew inside due partly molten metal droplets ripped of from the tank and riocheting inside at a speed of 2 miles per second as well as secondary explosions when the powder in primary (main cannon) or secondary (machine guns) ammunitions explode and fuel is ignited and so on. I estimate the energy distribution is 97% blast wave, 3% heat for these.

Explosive cutting charges don't explain any of the "molten metal" referred in the WTC. Not a single still molten droplet, and much less "streams of molten metal". Thermite and thermate could explain the presence of molten metal-for a few hours or a day. perhaps ( if used in huge quantities). The pictures of Twin Towers flowing with steel from the lower mid-section were of course fake, but the indication of thermate remains in some steels is propably valid.

Atomic weapons (fission) use uranium or plutonium squeezing smaller, less radiating pieces into one dense supercritical mass which then instantly detonates. For an example, the MK7 nuclear bomb had 92 squeezing detonators in a ball structure (this information will propably point to the most difficult way imaginable of getting a nuke manufactured). The energy output is heat, overpressure and radioactive radiations.

Much of the radioactivity is in gamma rays easily detectable with cheap Geiger counter and indicator film pieces used in radioactive hazard regions. The energy distribution is 35% thermal, 60% blast wave and 5% ionizing radiation. The radiation is 80% gamma, 20% neutrons. (google Carey Sublette: Effects of Nuclear Expolsions)

Thermonuclear weapons (fission-fusion) from 1950's use an atomic bomb as a trigger to fuse the very light hydrogen elements together. As already explained, the primary reaction here is deuterium-tritium fusion taking place within millions of degrees C of heat. The energy output is mostly heat but huge overpressure will follow (due this bomb being much hotter than the atomic one) as well as radioactive effects mostly based on the atomic bomb, but enchanched with alpha radiation, tritium remains and beta decays. The energy distribution for l-megaton weapon is 45% thermal, 50% blast wave and 5% ionizing radiation.

Mini-nukes aka Neutron bombs (pure fusion weapons aka "devices") Fusion balls and fusion shaped charges as a spinoff of the fusion energy research. I estimate the energy distribution for Neutron bomb is 60% neutrons, 30% roentgen and 10% blast wave. The figures for shorterrange roentgen and the longer-range neutron radiation include a huge secondary thermal load, which forms automatically and which will disintegrate everything but the heaviest structural steels especially in the direction where those neutrons are directed.

Shaped charge neutron bomb at the moment the antimatter fuse fires -almost all of the thermonuclear energy is going to upper left direction (this weapon has not been officially published, but many clues exist)

Suggested schematic WTC tower wiring diagram below:

CuHi ng charge e.xpl 0 ded J in pWC!8SS of explodiog

O'Uh~ir wa~1 steel supporl box coumns (60 pes/side)

Arch of Destrtct:ion of U18 thlBrmonuc~eaw devk:e·~ h e Born b is

) ..

:25x more destructive w~thi n this a roh than sp herbs I~y, j. ie .. 1 000 tons tn~ energy wHhin this arr;h and 40 ions tilt sphef[";al!y. :BD% of energy is thermal,. rest radioocUv0 . ..;, emp and overpressurzed blast WfJ,f8 (lhro\;v~ng steels)

Min~ hydrogen bomb

Gmurld ~e vel

That perl of exlerior steel columns ·nyi ng superheated (3000 C/ 54QDF) sid ewards 8 few seco nds a wter lhe "ccllepse'com merced, v(lpo~rizing

Fbor slabs {11i 0 pes over ground)

C uHing charges for steel box columns, 10000 of lhem

Oecoratilte covering (mofj or can liB tray

Clue: Some force has been able to rip the outer steel column elements away from the walls of the WTC Tower, and has also been able to superheat them; the steels are boiling away from the outer layer of steel columns as fast as they can (the skin cools while evaporating, but the inside excess heat boils it again).

In this picture are some 50+ wall elements visible, most of them boiling and each of them weighting 22 tons apiece. The destructive force has been able to rip these 1100+ tons of steels out of their position as outer wall, threw them outside of the tower footage and superheated them internally into some 5000 C. The boiling temperature of the steel is about 3000 C narrowing possible other explanations.

Clue: The natural balance of elements at the WTC samples has changed into heavier isotopes. Some nuclear force has been able to inject neutrons into the nucleus of various

List of Elements in the USGS analysis of WTC debris that should show readily detectable

Neutron Activation:

Element Isotopes, Isotope Percentages in Nature, Mean Percantage in USGS analysis:

Silicon - 28 Si 92.23%, 29 Si 4.67%, 15% Carbon - 12 C 98.9%, 13 C 1.1% stable, 2% Sulfur - 32 S 95.02%, 33 S 0.075%, 3%

Iron - 56 Fe 91.72%, 57 Fe 2.2%, 58 Fe 0.28%,1.63% Nickel- 58 Ni 68.08%, 59 Ni 1/2 life 7600 years, 60 Ni 26.22%, 61 Ni 1.14%, 37 ppm

Niobium - 93 Nb 100%,94 Nb 1/2 life 20,000 years, 8.3 ppm

Beryllium - 9 Be 100%, 10 Be 1/2 life 1.5 mil years, only 3 ppm

Potassium - 39 K 93.256%, 40 K only plant animal, 1/2%

Titanium - 48 Ti 73.8%,49 Ti 5.5%, 0.25%

Chromium - 52 Cr 83.79%,53 Cr 9.5%,116 ppm

Cobalt - 59 Co 100%,60 Co 1/2 life 5 years, only 6ppm

For an example, Iron is expected to have the Fe(58) isotope, which contains two additional neutrons, 0.28% naturally, but somehow there was 1.63% of these heavier, but still stable iron isotopes in the WTC sample.

Clue: the clouds, or dust being formed in detonations will cool off very quickly. They usually fill about the same volume of space what the building being demolished occupied. The movement of those explosion clouds after this depends on the winds.

At the WTC the clouds were unreal, far too energetic to be normal clounds resulting from explosions. They rapidly expanded into five-fold volume which shows a lot of excess heat energy (pointing to thermonuclear device or hundreds of tons of military explosives like HDX). Those clouds also showed pyroclastic behaviour and those observations of this nature were correct. Even very large conventional explosive stacks blowing up cannot build pyroclastics because this needs really hot stuff, millions and not thousands of degrees C present (in the case of volcanos, large areas of molten magma will suffice, too).

The thin mushroom cloud often points to a micro-nuke; it was very hot at ground zero, but the area covered by a micro weapon remains small. So a small cloud climbs to quite a high altitude. If an ammunition storage with hundreds of tons of explosives blows up, it also will build fairly wide mushroom cloud, because in this case there is not enough cool air available to cool it rapidly off.

Explosives not behaving like shaped charges

Typically low explosives, often defined as detonating with slower speed than 300 meters/second, will blow up like omnidirectional bombs no matter how much one tries to direct those. This needs to be mentioned, because those people carrying out the coverup will boldly claim that thermonuclear weapons also behave this way.

I doubt atomic weapons (Uranium or Plutonium based, fission weapons) can be much directed so those are another exception. Using some kind of Beryllium reflectors some shaping effects could be possible.

Picture: One of the exceptions, low-explosive (powder) inside a fireworks rocket.

Basic principles how wars are being planned - 20. Dec. 2001

Suppose, for a moment, that you are a dictator. You envy or hate some people, or you are very greedy and you think now it is the time to loot that weakly-defended nation. The secretary of state shows you that the estimated incomes make the operation economy wise into a very good business. What are the factors you need to think, if you prefer to stay in power for a looong time (like almost all dictators do)?

First, you will need an excuse. If you just launch an invasion, sooner or later many weaker nations will form a coalition against you in order to maintain peaceful conditions and perhaps to punish the aggressor nation (that will be you). This will be easier, if you have very superior media influence, so whatever you invent, thousands of media outlets will explain it without too critical tone. Some of your nation's young men will die, and basically you cannot just send them abroad and order them to "make a little looting" or to "revenge an insult".

Secondly, you need competent military to execute your plans. You need to have significant force superiority. You should expect the attacking military forces available to the front line will be 5-fold or stronger compared to the victim state. If this is not the case, the attacker may have fallen into some kind of trap, or the situation is desperate for them or in the most common case the information regarding the true attacker is false (a hoax). Wars are winnable with a smaller superiority margin, but they will be so exhausting, that all the participants will be weakened when the war is over. So what you wish will be a nice little war with fast and clean victory -and all the fruits of the conquest.

Thirdly, you need to consider particularly great damages possible. You don't want to see a major power coming to help your victim, because your careful plans and designed force superiority easily goes astray. You don't wish to cause global famine, lack of oil or huge losses into your population due some surprise weapons of mass destruction (wmd's). This wmd consideration is a new one, existing since 1944 or so with recently invented atomic weapons.

Looking back in history, can we see that some of the wars are framed? That some of the wars actually are not fought with just cause? This is an important question, because if the controlling media superiority exists, you will not read the true answer from mainstream news magazine or see it from international TV news.

Actually, most of the wars are framed. The weaker nations never started those wars whatever the media is telling you. Democracies do not start wars (supposing true democracies). Dictators wish to stay in power, so they never start a war against superior forces. The US is able to start wars, because it is a corporate fascist state just posing as a democracy (the change was made at least 100 years ago).

You also need to consider the nature of military operations. If you thought wild Finns with a population of 4 millions attacked the Soviet Union with a population of 200 millions, there could be something not quite matching in this thinking. In 1939 they said Finns shot some artillery shells and killed a few peasants. What a great strategy! To kill a few people from a nation which recently had killed some 20 millions of their own people? And what was our follow-up strategy? Not existing, no other moves ever made.

In real attacks the attacker has an objective and he will deliver a series of attacks aimed to some goals. No nation will ever deliver just a single punch against a strong enemy and then start waiting what the consequences might be.

In these judgements the use of your own brains is mandatory. The Truth is not easily found printed in the magazines. All the mainstream media is owned by our true rulers, and it is being used like a big brainwashing machine. Very little help in that direction. The elected presidents are not the rulers. The men behind them are. Just think a ship. There is a captain in the bridge, but the true commanding power behind him is in the hands of the owner, in the shipping company. The captain is just running things locally on behalf of them.

Historical events actually happened in just one way. Multiple, conflicting explanations are not true. But there is often a very powerful interest to muddle and veil the true events. Let's look at the president Kennedy's assassination 22.11.63. If you were Oswald, and you planned to shoot the president, you would not a) pick a cheap, low-accuracy rifle b) shoot in that difficult target (you would have shot earlier, when the car was still approaching).

The real assassins had better, cross-fire positions like the railway bridge in the front, the grassy knoll and the building frontside of the car's route. And you actually saw, how president's head was violently ejected backwards, and how mrs Kennedy tried to pick parts of his husband's skull in the left rear of the car. So the killing shot clearly came from the right front direction (grassy knoll). Those behind this assassination had a huge interest to

cover up their tracks. This is why you never see the true story published in their controlled media. And they have controlled all the significant media for more than 100 years.

Please notice, just making the claim and using the media will be enough. No one asks painful questions, like what kind of strategy was behind these devious attacks? So you just frame an incident and then blame someone not understanding what is happening. In this Finnish example based on Moscow archives we now know that the Soviets planted a few artillery shells into a field of a border village, and then exploded them with remote control. If you quickly win the ensuing small war, odds are that nobody cares or dares to ask questions, and the new status quo will prevail.

The claim of the truth movement is, that the 9-11 incident was not a terrorist attack using hijacked airliners. And the perpetual "War on Terror" that followed, is not based on terror incidents but rather is based on neocon motives of domination and looting the natural resources of other nations in global scale.

We need to take a quick look into American history to find out, if it is possible that some wars have been fought without the purest of motives in mind. So the question is: are some American wars actually "False Flag" operations, where it just looks that the weaker nation has boldly attacked the U.S.A. without a strategy and without any hope of success?

New insight on some American wars

Very few of those wars are real ones. The American war of Independence, 1776 to 1779 was one. The Americans under the British oppressive rule broke free. The second war of Independence, 1812 to 1814 also was a real one. The British, based on Canada, tried to re-take the U.S.A. but due failed naval battles at Great Lakes they were forced to abandon the re-conquest. The British Empire was still considered the leading super-power for the next hundred years if not longer. The rest of the American wars are not genuine.

There is the takeover of Texas and the Mexican war 1846 to 1848. It is supposed the Mexican military mad some ill-thought moves, but actually it seems Americans built and operated a fortress almost 100 miles behind the Mexican border. The planned clashes of military units led to a general war, in which the still weak Mexican republic lost some 1/3 of it's land areas. These successes are often attributed to president Polk, but I suggest some type of think-tank making longer-span plans behind the known events. This operation spanned some 30 years, starting with Florida and the settlement of the then-Mexican Texas.

1861-1865 commonly known as the American Civil war started with covert outside influence. The British Empire tried once again, but this time as a leader of a coalition. The American Civil war was meant to split America into two weaker, warring nations. Had this happened as planned, those nations could have been played against each other repeatedly. The war was successfully triggered, and the intention was that a coalition of British, French, Spanish and Austro-Hungarians would all diplomatically recognize the Confederation. The British Empire was the ruling naval power, and the French were the second-strongest at sea. The Spanish felt there was something fishy in the way their former-held Mexico lost a third of their lands. It was also the intention to launch a naval embargo against the Union to support the Confederation, which with this help then propably could have been able to enforce the terms or narrowly defeat the Union.

But the Russia intervened. Their Atlantic fleet sailed into New York, and their Pacific fleet sailed into San Francisco (these being the biggest US ports at that time). The Russia also declared 1863 that it would be a casus belli (cause of war) if any of those European powers do recognize the Confederation. Russia was a formidable land power with a population of 100 millions (like the U.S.A.) so the Europeans, which had recently been at war with the Russia backed off and so the US Civil war become quite one-sided with the Union actually blockading the Confederation and not the other way round.

The 1898 US-Spanish war was triggered by an explosion sinking the US battleship Maine into the Havana bay. The Hearst press (leading media at that time) immediately blamed the Spanish. So there was no need to further research the cause of the sinking. The Americans captured many Spanish colonies, and sunk the Spanish navy. Some 5000 American and 15 000 Spanish soldiers died. The conquest of the Philippines still took some 600000 native casualties as the Americans suppressed the freedom-wanting Philippinos. Now we know, after an American admiral Hyman Rickover researched the cause of the Maine explosion, and 1976

published his study, that it was an inside job, either a bomb inside the USS Maine or a coal explosion.

The World War 1 involved the Germany exhausting the French and the British, and defeating the much bigger, 3.6 million size Russian army. The US joined the war based on the Lusitania incident. The Lusitania was torpedoed and sunk by a German submarine blockading the British isles. Some 128 innocent Americans died with some 1000+ people from other nations. But a single torpedo could not actually sink such a huge ocean liner. Now we know, after archived information has been released, that the Lusitania actually was transporting 6 million pounds of artillery shells and rifle ammunition from the US to the British and French forces. The passengers on board did not know this.

It was an inside job again, and a devious one in that. The then-leader of British navy, First Sea lord Winston Churchill ordered a destroyer, Juno, escorting the ocean liner to withdraw. The British also knew that three German submarines patrolled that coastal area. The torpedo explosion triggered a series of secondary explosions as the military load of that blockade-running Lusitania started to explode. Many those survivals told this, but the British successfully suppressed their stories. The US joined into the World War into the British side and decided the outcome.

The World War 2 involved the US again first secretly and later more or less openly helping the British. There was the LendLease agreement with the US hiring British military bases for 99 years. The British got 50 old destroyers, fighters, bombers and tanks and all kinds of military ordnance. There was also much technological co-operation like some co-operation in radars, radio direction finding and code breaking. The US convoy escorts attacked German submarines at sea, but Germany refused to get provoked, and maintained neutral attitude towards the US. Then the US naval intelligence invented an indirect way to get the US involved into the war based on the German alliance with Japan.

Most of the Americans propably don't know the real story of the Pearl Harbor. Only the version given in the media for the purpose of joining the war is known. The US congress looked into the events as recently as 1995 and still found the navy and army commanders at Pearl Harbor incompetent. So even they didn't know the Truth. Actually, there was a long series of acts on purpose manouvering the Japanese into a corner, where they only had a choice either to get deeply humiliated or to go after their own oil sources. Those old big battleships served as a bait just like some US nuclear-powered big carriers do in the Gulf at the moment. Today the Truth is known, and there are many good sources for this complex story.

The top-secret American plan was called "8 insults". It was skilfully executed, and suddenly Japan, an industrialized nation waging war in China found, that American volunteers, like the Flying Tigers volunteers air group were helping the Chinese and there was a total blockade of oil against Japan. The US, the British and the Dutch all refused to deliver oil to Japan which operated millions of cars, thousands of aircraft and a huge navy.

Not surprisingly, the Japanese decided to launch a war of conquest. In order to seize some Asian oil sources (Borneo, Java etc.). This war started with so-called surprise attack against Pearl Harbour followed up by operations suppressing and later conquering the Philippines. In order to make successful conquests it was for the Japanese mandatory first to neutralize the hostile US Pacific area military forces.

In Korea you will find out, that the South initiated the hostilities 1949. Revenge and an attempt of conquest was expected, and the political future of South Korean and Nationalist Chinese leaders depended on it.

In Vietnam you will find out, that the South attacked the North weekly from the sea and just before the Maddox incident the South invaded some North-held islands at sea. The Americans were so eager to get involved into a small local war they didn't really need a provocation. The next day American carrier planes destroyed more than half of the North Vietnamese motor torpedo boats (some 25 of them).

Has something like this ever happened before? - 20. Dec. 2001

Wars where the true attacker is not the nation which looks like an attacker? The exploitation of new technological innovations (like the thermonuclear device here, 50 years more modern than those the layman is aware of)? The answer is affirmative.

Related to these cases with American wars, some of the pre-WW2 unknown facts were, that both Japanese and German military encryptions were broken. The Americans could read the Japanese navy transmissions, and the British could break any German military transmissions where they put their effort in any given day. The western allies knew, what was the next bombing target, what squadrons were ordered to attack and what types of bombs were being loaded. All this before the bombers had taken off. To protect this encryption breakthrough a series of deceptions were used. They claimed that some agents found this information, or that voice direction finding had located those bombers (the radar was also secret). Sometimes a reconnaissance plane was sent to locate something, like a convoy, what already was known to be there.

This code breaking success was first revealed by Winterbotham 1974. The Ultra secret, as it was called, was successfully and tightly held, though some 50 000+ people knew parts about it (the code breaking crew was huge, but most were carefully hand-picked, reliable upper class women). Any book touching strategic warfare aspects in Ww2 and published before 1974 contains mistakes, because the authors didn't have an idea about the depth of allied code breaking success.

The American side has been still more veiled, because the question hangs in the air: if they acted then like this, what are they doing now? Has anything been changed? This is why they have humiliated Pearl Harbor commanders buried in disgrace, the Magic successes hinted some 40 years past the event and continuing difficulties to explain what the "Flying Tigers" were actually doing late 1940 and early 1941. Volunteers helping a just cause are easy to understand, but there is a more difficult question of how 3 squadrons of then-modern P-40Bs happened to be available for these volunteers.

Even the US-Spanish war needs to be veiled again. Some 25 years after the US admiral Hyman Rickover published his findings about the internal explosion of USS Maine, there is a computer simulation claiming that it is within the limits of possible, that an outside mine explosion could cause the damage found at the wreck of Maine. This incident of course could have been settled 100 years ago, but for some reason the reliable research has been waiting. I'm not supporting simulations against admirals, but an interested reader should make his own mind ...

History of American false flag operations - 20. Dec. 2001

WThe leaders of smaller and less industrialised nations are not madmen (whatever the media claims). They also are generally better informed than their citizens. In a war an attacker does not need equal forces compared to the enemy - attacker needs a 5-fold local superiority, or better. No one begins wars without very definite objects and a quick victory in sight. If a war with more even military balance erupts, someone has been mislead and walked into a trap (usually arranged by third party).

After the American war of Independence, 1776-1779, and an English challenge to that independence 1812-1814 no single nation has planned an offensive war against the USA. It is probable that a strong coalition of Anglo-French led European nations planned to split the USA into two states through diplomatic recognition of the Confederate state possibly followed up by naval blockade embargoing the Union. At that time the British was the strongest naval power, and the French the secondstrongest. The events led, however, into the Civil War 1860-1865 and due the Russian intervention 1863 into the Union's side those European plans were quietly abandoned.

Mexican wars 1819, 1846-48

Long series of operations, commencing with the annexion of Florida 1819 and followed by an independence declaration of Texas (from Mexico) 1836. Provocative troop movements near U.S. southern border caused an incident which led to war (it is said the US built a fortification 150 km inside the Mexican border). The annexation of Texas (into USA) and the conquest of California, New Mexico and nearby territories. Mexico had a weak government at that time, because after Napoleon conquered the Spain 1809 their former colonies soon revolted. Mexico had been a colony of Spanish kingdom but now they revolted and went into republic. There was a series of revolts, not just one.

Spanish-American war 1898

The surprise explosion of the battleship Maine at Havana, Cuba. 255 of the crew died. The Hearst press accused the Spanish, claiming a remote-controlled mine under the battleship. The USA declared war on Spain. The US conquered Philippines, Guam and Cuba. Now we know this was an inside job, the explosion was inside the Maine and it was most probably an accident, a coal explosion. Or some type of time bomb inside the battleship. Anyway, the divers got the proof as the armour plates of the ship were blown bending outwards, not inwards.

World War I 1914-1918

The Il-boat torpedo hit ocean liner Lusitania near the Britain and some 1200 people including 128 Americans on board lost their lives. Now we know this was an inside job, the major explosions were inside the Lusitania as it was secretly transporting 6 million pounds of artillery shells and rifle ammunition as well as other explosives on behalf of Morgan banking corporation to help their clients, the Britain and the France. It was actually against the US laws to transport war materials and passengers in the same ship.

World War 21939-1945

The U-boat torpedo hit ocean liner Athenia near the Britain with some 1100 passengers of which 311 were Americans. The sea was calm and only 118 people on board lost their lives.The ship was sunk because it behaved like a military transport, blackened out and zigzagging. This time this incident wasn't enough, and the Germans also refused to get provoked despite many American acts of war. Americans confiscated German merchant ships, Americans started to support the British with various lend-lease items, US volunteer pilots joined the RAF and some RAF pilots were trained in the US, US gave the British 50 old but usable WWl destroyers and 20 modern torpedo boats, tanks, light bombers, fighter aircraft like P-40s and so

on ... American destroyers also escorted the convoys bound to Britain, and attacked German Il-boats even far away from those convoys. The US did not maintain a neutral attitude towards the warring nations.

The US naval intelligence, chief of Japan desk planned and suggested "8 insults", which should bring Japan into war with the US. The president Roosevelt executed this plan immediately and also added some other insults enraging the Japan. The most serious one was a total blockade ofJapanese oil imports, as agreed between Americans, British and the Dutch. The FDR also declared an all-out embargo against the Japan and forbid the use of Panama canal from them (which made Venezuelan oil also less reachable).

The Flying Tigers volunteer air group fighting successfully the Japanese in China with some 90 fairly modern P-40Bs was another effective one and not in the list of naval intelligence. Still today the latest history of this air group fails to mention any air combat action prior to 7th December 1941. But at that time the Japanese already had lost about 100 military aircraft, mostly bombers, to the Tigers. After Pearl Harbor these squadrons were the hardest-hitting ones in the US service.

An attack on Pearl Harbour followed some 6 months later. Having broken the Japanese encryption codes the Americans knew what was going to happen, when and where, but the president did not dispatch this information to Pearl Harbor. Americans even gave their friends the British 3 Magic decrypting machines which automatically opened encrypted Japanese military traffic. But this same information was not available to the commanders of Hawaii. The movement of the fleet was also visible in the very effective radio direction finding network. Japan had an alliance with Germany, and the Germans upheld their promises by declaring the war against the USA right after the Japanese declaration.

Two scapegoats, the navy commander, Admiral Husband Kimmel and the army commander Lt. General Walter Short were found incompetent and reduced in rank as they were allowed to retire. Short died 1949 and Kimmel 1958. Still 1995 the US Congress re-researched this decision and found it a valid one. Then some archive information came into daylight and in 2000 The US Senate passed a resolution where both were observed having served in Hawaii "competently and professionally". 1941 they were denied all vital information, and even on presidential orders mislead on purpose into believing that the Japanese feet could be expected from the southwest. These commanders still today have not been rehabilited by the Pentagon.

Korean War

South Korean incursions (the Tiger regiment etc.) into North Korea 1949 led to contrary claims and into war 1950-53. The cause of this war propably was covert action involving leaders of Taiwan, South Korea and the US military-industrial complex a ohn Foster Dulles as an organizer of the hostilities has been mentioned). After the unpublished hostilities in 1949 also the communist powers were strongly backing the North Korea.

The Chiang Kai Sek was being abandoned, isolated and falling prey to the powerful communist Chinese operations. The right-wing South Korean ruler was expected to loose the soon-to-be-elections. American military-industrial complex went into high gear again, and huge government orders were flowing in.

The American-led UN forces had troubled times early in the war, but after enough forces arrived they advanced victoriously and penetrated again into the North Korea. The strong Chino-Russian intervention into the war once again turned the tides [Chinese with vast armies on ground, Soviets less visibly but in large numbers in the air] and the UN forces almost lost the war. Finally the front stabilised along the original 38th parallel armistice line. The result of this war was 3 million Korean and Chinese dead, and all Korean cities in ruins, but Taiwan in strong American protection and South Korea firmly in the hands of the right-wing president Syngman Rhee. Some 55 000 Americans lost their lives.

Vietnam War

"The Tonkin incident" where American destroyer Maddox was attacked twice by three North Vietnamese torpedo boats 1964 in the Gulf of Tonkin never happened. What was happening were very aggressive South Vietnamese raids against the North in the same general area. Huge American presence wasn't decisive and President Nixon negotiated a peace with honour 1973. This war was lost, when the North Vietnam finally conquered the South Vietnam 1975.

Grenada invasion

The Grenadian leader favouring the left and having invited Cubans to help building the infrastructure (extending airport big enough for long range Soviet aircraft) was replaced at a moment when he was negotiating in the UN, New York for a more open UN UFO policy based on Grenada initiatives. The fake reason for the immediate invasion was that American medical students (becoming doctors much cheaper than in the US) studying in the Grenada were in danger due the Cuban presence. The new leader supported by the US favoured more traditional values and the right.

War on Drugs

The war was launched by Richard M Nixon sometime like June 17,1971. The drug problem was found bad within the army in Viet Nam around 1968 and action was required towards the end of the war. Nowadays it is estimated that the military will never win the War on Drugs. The street prices did not change in the USA despite the military action in foreign drugproducing countries. Colombian experience (local military supported by the US) is that peace is more important than war against drugs. The Colombians have successfully negotiated some 1000s of guerrilla fighters back into the society and out of jungle.

This "war" actually seems to be an excuse to make military invasions into less developed countries, where covert "bad" drug lords on behalf of western intelligence services are producing drugs into US and first world markets. This operation produces huge income, generating black budget money for those intelligence services managing the global drug operations.

Panama invasion

The incident between American and Panamanian troops led into invasion. The leader Noriega was changed and the earlier Carter administration plan to hand the control of the canal over to Panama was cancelled. The strategic importance of the canal has surpassed any more just thinking in the US global domination policy.

US- Israeli sponsored war between Iraq and Iran 1980-1988

The US built a power base into the Middle East area into Iran starting with the CIA-organised coup 1953, where Iranian prime minister Mossadeq was replaced with the Shah of Iran Reza Pahlavi and he by his son Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. Iran was equipped with the best western military equipment including the American F -14 fighters with Phoenix missiles and the British Chieftain MBT:s. Unfortunately there was 1979 a coup of ayatollah Khomeini replacing the Shah and founding an Islamite nation.

After this the US warmed up relations with their good Iraqi friend Saddam Hussein, and started to build a nation capable of challenging the Iranians. The Iraq acquired large numbers of effective weapons including factories able to produce older versions of gas warfare agents (these would later be called wmd:s which these models being the WWl-weapons of course are not).

The war broke out and was fought in exhaustion because third powers, especially the Israel were carefully monitoring the power balance and supplying more weapons to the side which seemed to be loosing. "Too bad they both cannot loose" is how the Kissinger evaluated this situation.

Desert Storm, (First Gulf war, 1991), Iraq

Saddam Hussein asked for permission from the US (via their ambassador April Gillespie) and got an answer that the US does not care Arab quarrels. That was a trap, and after Saddam occupied the Kuwait region George Bush sr. mobilised a coalition of some 40 nations to "liberate the Kuwait" and to smash the recently-built Iraqi military power base. This also involved a media hoax, where the daughter of Kuwaiti US ambassador played nurse in TV and "witnessed" Iraqi soldiers throwing babies out of incubators in Kuwait.

War on Terror

The war was launched by Bush administration October 2001. The war was claimed to be the response on terrorism, especially the 9-11 incidents. Most of the people in the world today know, that these reasons are false and that those events were based on MIH type (make it happen) inside job.

Enduring Freedom (Afghanistan invasion, 07.10.2001)

Without any evidence, the former CIA-asset, a Saudi-Arabian Osama bin Laden was claimed to be the mastermind behind the 9/11 strikes at the WTC and the Pentagon. Such a complex operation, if actually executed - which it was not, in this casewould be much beyond the capabilities of anything in Afghanistan. Only some top ten intelligence services in the world could hope to be successful in such an operation involving forgery, infiltration, living "underground" in a foreign non-Moslem country, coordination of moves, illegal arms, hi-quality flight training, accurate aircraft navigation in no-visibility conditions and so on. Perhaps even less, because the friends of the US (at that time, still most of the world) would also have been interested in stopping the attack.

Enduring Justice (Second Gulf war, 20.03.2003)

Iraq, later known with less irony as Operation Iraqi Freedom

The claimed reason of the attack was that Iraq was a clear and present danger to the US with wmd's available within less than an hour after the decision to assemble them has been made. Since no wmd's were found, and after the Iraqi also scrapped some 800 long range Scud style missiles before the US coalition attack, the reason for the invasion was changed into "bringing the democracy into Iraq".


Why the Pearl Harbor took place:

Robert B. Stinnett: Day of Deceit: the Truth about FDR and Pearl Harbor, 2000

Mark Emerson Wiley: Pearl Harbour - Mother of all conspiracies Cordell Hull's Ultimatum to Japan

What the US usually knew in advance (books):

Fredrick W. Winterbotham: The Ultra secret, 1974 Bradley E Smith: The Ultra-Magic Deals, 1992

EH.Hinsley: British Intelligence in the WW2 (4 large volumes), 1988

How to create innocent-looking wars:

How wars are made Iwars I

Especially these items: World War 1, World War 2, Korean War, The Vietnam War

How to create distant future wars:

The Best Enemy Money Can Buy by Antony C. Sutton

Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution by Antony C. Sutton Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler by Antony C. Sutton

The out-of-print book: From Major Jordan's Diaries (Google this item)

How to dominate as a global superpower:

Nafeez Ahmed: The War on Truth, 2005

Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum a new updated edition published November 2005

See chapter 17: A Concise History of US Global Interventions, 1945--present

Freeing the world to death: Essays on the American Empire by William Blum published September 2004

See chapter 15: Overthrowing other people's governments, the Master List

Alexander James: THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF MONEY & NEW WORLD ORDER USURY SECRETS: REVEALED! 2005 (Google it; it ought to be an 18.6 MB

pdf document)

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful