World Trade Center Demolition

Thursday, December 31, 2009

Permanent Top Post
This site deals primarily with the mechanism of demolition of the WTC and the likelihood of nuclear bombs being used. See "China Syndrome at the WTC" for articles pertaining to the aftermath of the WTC nuclear demolition and the extreme heat phenomena seen at "Ground Zero". Just Published: Limited Edition, Nuclear 9/11 Book by The Anonymous Physicist See www.anonymousphysicist.com or freedomringsnow@gmail.com posted by spooked @ 8:21 PM

Friday, October 23, 2009

Index of Nuke Articles
(click on link to view article) A Brief Summary: WTC Destruction & High Temperature Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and the China Syndrome Fit All the Evidence (by The Anonymous Physicist) 35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC (by Spooked) The Crucial Differences in the Nuclear 9/11 Theories-- A Call To Eliminate Nuclear 9/11 Mis- or Dis-Information & Attain Completeness and Fit all the Known Evidence (by The Anonymous Physicist) On the Issue of Nuclear Demolition of the WTC and Radiation (by The Anonymous Physicist) Original WTC Nuke Thesis from "Anonymous Physicist" (by The Anonymous Physicist) If the WTC Nuclear Destruction Had the China Syndrome Aftermath, Why Didn’t Hiroshima? (by The Anonymous Physicist) WTC7 Demolition: Conventional, or Nuclear After All-- and the Speculative Nuclear Borer Hypothesis (by The Anonymous Physicist) The “China Syndrome” Came to New York City on 9/11 (by The Anonymous Physicist) Hanging Skin and Nuclear Blasts. Where in the World is Felipe David-- and Did He Survive Exposure to Nuclear Radiation? (by The Anonymous Physicist)

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition Eyewitness Testimony of Firefighters Believing They Were Nuked on 9/11 as well as early WTC7 Destruction, EMP, nonimpact plane flyby, and people being pushed out of a WTC tower (by The Anonymous Physicist) More Evidence & Testimony Indicating Nuclear Blasts, Nuclear Radiation, & China Syndrome at the WTC (by The Anonymous Physicist) Proof of the Existence of Mini-Nukes and Micro-Nukes (by The Anonymous Physicist) Brief Summary of Evidence of Nuclear bombs used at the WTC on 9/11/01 (by The Anonymous Physicist) Was the First Atomic Bomb [in modern times] Exploded on an American Town by the American Govt? (by The Anonymous Physicist) Could 9/11 Have Been Done With FAE/Thermobaric Explosives? (by The Anonymous Physicist) Breakthroughs Toward Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11-- The Likelihood of Sabotaged, Fizzled Nukes (by The Anonymous Physicist) Basement Nukes and Top-Down Demolition (by Spooked) Breakthrough: The Story Of Cathy T, & The Large Earthquake That Was Felt One Mile Away When WTC1 Was “Hit”! (by The Anonymous Physicist) More On the Immediate and Continous Radiation Lowering, and Shielding, Techniques Used at the WTC, after 9/11 (by The Anonymous Physicist) The Final Word on The Tritium (by The Anonymous Physicist) Exposing The “Red Mercury” Nuclear Scam, & Its Possible Use In Future Bogus Wars, & Other Crucial Matters On Nuclear 911, and About Mercury (by The Anonymous Physicist) Breakthroughs Towards Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11, and its China Syndrome Aftermath: Part II (by The Anonymous Physicist) On The Existence of Mini- or Micro-Nukes, Fizzled Nukes, 9/11 & The China Syndrome (by The Anonymous Physicist) A Summary of Evidence of EMPs (Electromagnetic Pulses) from the Nukes Used in the WTC on 9/11 (by The Anonymous Physicist) WTC Destruction Theories: "DEW" versus Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate versus MilliNukes/Micro-Nukes (by Spooked) Ground Zero Smoking Cannon: Where Are All the Core Columns and Beams??? (by Spooked) Micro-Nukes in the WTC--Creating The China Syndrome: Important Matters of Completeness & Plausibility (by The Anonymous Physicist) http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition Did Two Nuclear Reactors, not Nuclear Bombs, Destroy the WTC on 9/11? Review of William Tahil’s Book, “Ground Zero: The Nuclear Demolition of the WTC”, and of his Reactor Hypothesis (by The Anonymous Physicist) The Effect of a Low Yield Nuke on a Steel Structure (by Spooked) The Fall of the WTC1 Spire and the Intact WTC1 Stairwell: Proof of Demolition Near Bottom of the Tower (by Spooked) Further Observations on WTC1 Stairwell B-- 1. Did Pasquale Buzzelli Surf Down The “Collapse”—or Do Conflicting Reports Collapse the O.C.T.? 2. Does the Revealed “Upward Wind” During “Collapse” Prove the Final “Cleaner Nuke”? (by The Anonymous Physicist) posted by spooked @ 12:30 PM

Thursday, July 02, 2009

The Final Word on The Tritium
by The Anonymous Physicist

I have written, that after long and careful analyses, the best bet for the main factor that destroyed the WTC on 9/11/01 were numerous, small, fission bombs. Others have claimed that one (hypothetical) 4th generation, pure fusion nuclear bomb destroyed each tower. This is what the anonymous Finnish military expert wrote. And the Finn apparently based his entire 4th generation pure fusion hypothesis on the finding of tritium at the WTC on 9/13/01. Since he was the first person to publish any specific nuclear destruction scenario for 9/11, many others cite his work as being definitive, or such. (He could still be correct, though this is extremely unlikely.) And so many who state that they are proponents of the nuclear destruction hypothesis of the WTC are proponents of the pure fusion mechanism, because the Finn is; and he cited the Tritium found at the WTC on 9/13/01. Or there could be a more sinister reason for these numerous individuals to support the pure fusion scenario. Now the Finn apparently gave overarching consideration to the Tritium found and published in the article, “Study of Traces of Tritium at the World Trade Center” by T.M. Semkow, et al. It was published at the 223rd American Chemical Society National Meeting, Orlando, FL, April 7-11, 2002. The article states that “This work was performed under the auspices of the United States Department of Energy by the University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract No. W-7405-Eng-48.” (Note that this is the same lab that allegedly can create “super nano-composite thermite” that yields “unextinguishable fires,” and thus new laws of chemistry and physics as well as the first equivalent perpetual motion mechanism. [If only.] It’s also the same lab that is remasterminding Kennedy Assassination audio tapes. And I have some suspicions on what the “Eng” might mean.) It should be noted that this paper contains several bogus and ludicrous attempts to account for the tritium at the WTC on 9/13. Mostly they allege that the tritium came from exit signs on the planes that “crashed into the towers.” The paper also alleges that tritium was in the sightings on the guns of police officers killed that day. The first “mechanism” is obviously bogus, as there is not a single video that agrees with reality in that the “planes” are

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition clearly just CGI broadcast on TV, and there was no credible evidence on the ground that any planes had crashed into the towers, and did so with blatantly, obvious impossible crash physics. Sources have also stated that the tritium claim on gun sightings is also bogus, if not totally, then regarding the amount. Being a long-term expert on gov’t conspiracies and crimes, I see the whole tritium matter very deeply. The regime can and does refuse to release anything damning. So why did they release any data showing tritium at all, when they could have kept this under wraps, as I am sure FEMA is doing with WTC radiation readings? One possible answer is that it would provide a ruse for others to later claim the mythical 4th generation pure fusion bomb was used-- thus obviating what was there in NYC for 6 months-- the China Syndrome. And always remember, we are discussing the Lawrence Livermore Labs, designers of humanity-exterminating WMD for more than 60 years, as well as the above nefarious actions, related to the thermite hangout and JFK murder. Now my first articles on my “many small nukes hypothesis” cited evidence for both fission and fusion at the WTC. I too ignored one important factor in these matters for a while-- but I have changed that in later articles and in a larger work-- but have not played this up at this blog, and wish to rectify this now. I have also written that it may be more than coincidence that a 4th generation pure fusion bomb does not allow for what we clearly had at the WTC for up to six months-- the China Syndrome of great heat GENERATION from the remnants of the many fission bombs, as each used only about 1-6% of its fissile material. That is, pure fusion does not allow for the China Syndrome as any remnants of pure fusion components (such as deuterium or tritium) do not allow for this- only Uranium or Plutonium fissioning can. Note that a fission-triggered fusion bomb could still allow for the China Syndrome. Only the pure fusion scenario does not. So it is curious that the Finn immediately went with pure fusion, and not with the possibility of fission-triggered fusion. And the Finn based this on the tritium finding, and either did not know about, or chose to ignore, all the evidence of massive heat generation at the WTC for 6 months, and also the following matter. One factor from nuclear physics has been mostly left out of this “nuclear choice.” This is TERNARY FISSION, and was included in William Tahil’s book. Unfortunately that book was shown by this researcher to be incorrect on several points. These included the “nuclear reactor” hypothesis being thoroughly unnecessary and impossible, as is his and the Finn’s claim that a single nuke destroyed each tower. (Tahil also incorrectly stated that a fission nuke uses up 100% of its fissile material, when it is only 1-6%.) I have also cited much evidence both of a preliminary sub-basement nuke timed with the explosions on top (so-called “plane hits”), and that the final destruction involved numerous small nukes. So the single nuke scenario, from the Finn and Tahil, is untenable. Now most fission reactions of Uranium or Plutonium are binary-- they yield TWO large “daughter elements” (e.g., Barium and Krypton, or Strontium and Xenon), plus 2-3 neutrons, plus energy in the form of gamma rays. But since 1959, it has been publicly known, via this article, that ternary fission yields TRITIUM, along with its THREE daughter elements, plus the excess neutrons, and energy. And thus with the numerous fission bombs that were detonated, and with the additional possible factors of redundancy and fratriciding that my articles have detailed, we can arrive at perhaps the most likely source of tritium in the rubble-- the fission nukes themselves. I have seen estimates for the percentage of tritium production from ternary fission ranging from 1% down to .005%. (There is the possibility of deliberate disinformation, in some matters of nuclear physics, so one cannot often trust public nuclear physics discussions.) Because of this, and not knowing what element(s) were fissioned, nor how much of each, it is impossible to know just how much tritium could have been produced by ternary fission in the numerous micro-nukes used to destroy

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition the WTC. But it appears to be more than would occur from non-existent planes, or gun sightings; and the proven heat generation of the China Syndrome Aftermath belies the use of a mythical 4th generation pure fusion device. The most likely type of nuclear bombs used, was the type that could be made the smallest, and was the simplest, and most proven/dependable (compared to the others). This was the “good old” pure fission form of nuclear bombs. As I have shown, they’re even backpackable. And in the final analysis-- given ternary fission-- there never was any basis for claiming that the nuke(s) used at the WTC had to be 4th generation pure fusion, nor even that there was any fusion at all at the WTC. We may never be able to prove exactly what happened regarding the nuclear destruction of the WTC on 9/11, by the American regime; but we should strive to emphasize the most likely, and the most dependable factors the American regime would have used. And we must realize that the regime wanted to hide the China Syndrome Aftermath, as that poisoned thousands of responders, and to a lesser extent, millions of metro NY residents. So any tritium found on 9/13/01 at the WTC, was most likely from ternary fission, not fusion. But if you want one more, perhaps crucial, plausibility argument, here it is. Fusion bombs have a history of having a yield larger than expected. And the perps strenuously wanted NOT to blow through the building in an obvious nuclear manner. A nuke having a yield larger than needed could not be risked. This would have been visible to thousands, perhaps millions; and such knowledge would have been difficult to contain. (Whereas radiation findings were controlled by FEMA, and the Gestapo regime need only scream “national security” to prevent release of such data-- including the tritium paper, if it had wanted to.) I have emphasized the need not to blow through the building in an obvious nuclear way, since my very first article herein. This is one reason why some conventional explosives may have been used during the destruction scenario, as I have also written. What the nukes were mainly for, in my estimation, was to vaporize INSTANTLY, and definitively, the necessary core structure for the TOWERS’ ENSUING RAPID, APPROXIMATE, FREEFALL RATE OF COLLAPSE! The PTB apparently intended to later push the impossible “gravitational pancaking” ruse, even though it violates numerous laws of Physics, and we can see the outer structure being exploded outward, by the overpressure within. (You can compare what happens during an actual gravitational collapse by seeing this.) The PTB clearly wanted to shove a physically impossible, evidence-opposing destruction "mechanism" down the throats of the masses. They know what it does to many peoples’ psyches. It induces denial, fear, schizoid behavior, and hopelessness-- all good for the coming endless wars, and destruction of the American Constitution. Putting out a physically impossible and evidence-opposing “mechanism” for WTC destruction jibes with other events perpetrated by the American regime. With the American regime’s assassination of the Peace President, John Kennedy, the “official” scenario is that the fatal head shot was fired from behind, even though Kennedy’s body is slammed violently straight back--from the shot fired, from the front, by his Secret Service “protector”/driver. The ludicrous shot from behind violates the simple Law of Conservation of Momentum. As I have written, the WTC bogus scenario entails “pristine pancaking”-- violating Newton’s Laws of Motion. Similarly the JFK Assassination had (future) Senator Specter’s “pristine bullet” that smashed into 5 bones, made turns on its own, hung out for 2 seconds and looked virtually like new-- and violated the Momentum Conservation Law. The PTB want to put out these impossible “mechanisms” to dumb down, shock, or paralyze the people. Most people go into denial, and do not want to think about it, because their subconciousnesses know what is really involved. Those who can think and see, and have combatted the denial, are then further confounded with other limited hangouts put out by the Gestapo Regime’s hidden intel agents posing as “leaders” of the “truth movement.” These WTC hangouts

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition included the evidence-free inanity of DEW, and the “thermite burns forever” impossibility. Both are easily demonstrated to be physically impossible to have caused the WTC destruction, and the CSA. All the regime’s hidden assets earlier inserted at the top of the “alternative” or conspiracy internet media, were then instructed to push these hangouts and avoid mention of the nuking and the China Syndrome Aftermath. Returning now to the fission vs. fusion issue. Blowing through the outer structure of the building with unnecessary fusion--either as the hypothetical pure fusion, or as a fission-fusion bomb-- could not be risked, when pure fission micro-nukes were readily available. Fission nukes have a more "guaranteed" upper bound on their yields, and are more dependable as well, compared to either the alleged pure fusion or the fission-fusion bomb. In the final analysis, the release of the tritium data may have been a clever Intel Op to try to hide the China Syndrome Aftermath, and its nuclear fission cause. If there was tritium at the WTC, its most likely source was ternary fission. posted by spooked @ 5:05 AM

35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC
1) heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome) 2) inability to quench ground zero heat with water 3) red hot/molten steel at ground zero 4) missing core columns from ground zero (vaporized during destruction) 5) spreading of sand at ground zero consistent with attempts to limit radiation 6) washing of steel recovered from pile consistent with radiation decontamination 7) extreme security for ground zero steel shipments consistent with limiting access to radioactive steel 8) extreme security at ground zero, limiting exposure, view of devastation 9) extreme pulverization of WTC concrete into very fine particles 10) disappearance of over one thousand human bodies from WTC debris 11) disappearance of furniture, phones, filing cabinets and computers from WTC debris 12) disappearance of elevator doors, office doors, office cubicle walls, toilets and sinks from WTC debris 13) several floor fragments fused together in “meteorite” object 14) bone fragments sprayed into Bankers Trust upper floor during destruction 15) multiple blast waves during destruction of tower 16) large fireballs during initiation of WTC1 destruction 17) small backpack-sized fission nukes exist 18) fission-nuke technology well-established 19) low efficiency of fission nukes ensures leftover radioactive fragments and China syndrome 20) EMP formation during tower destruction (exploding cars, partial burning) 21) Description of heat in WTC blast cloud 22) Extensive cover-up of ground zero air by EPA 23) High rate of cancers, including thyroid cancer typically associated with radiation exposure, in ground zero responders 24) Melted, hanging skin in WTC survivor Felipe David in absence of fire 25) Vaporized press and crumpled steel door in WTC basement reported by Pecoraro 26) Steel beam bent in U, without cracking, evidence of extreme high temps

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition 27) Steel beam bent in U has layer of molten metal on surface 28) Extreme overall devastation of two massive towers and blasted out Ground Zero aftermath 29) Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical DEW theory by likely govt agents-- uses evidence of nukes (EMP, extreme pulverization of tower into dust) but denies nukes at all costs 30) Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical thermite (super nano-thermite) theory by likely govt agents-- uses evidence of nukes (molten steel, china syndrome) but denies nukes at all costs 31) Small iron microspheres found by Jones et al in WTC dust— evidence of steel vaporization by high temps of nukes 32) Pyroclastic debris cloud during WTC destruction 33) Upwards jutting debris trails reminiscent of debris trails formed during underground nuke test 34) Small bright flashes during destruction of both towers 35) Extremely compacted ground zero debris posted by spooked @ 4:54 AM

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Further Observations on WTC1 Stairwell B
1. Did Pasquale Buzzelli Surf Down The “Collapse”—or Do Conflicting Reports Collapse the O.C.T.? 2. Does the Revealed “Upward Wind” During “Collapse” Prove the Final “Cleaner Nuke”? by The Anonymous Physicist

Pasquale Buzzelli is a structural engineer who was working for the Port Authority in the North Tower on 9/11. Genelle Guzman [McMillan is added now—due to subsequent marriage] was a co-worker of Buzzelli’s at that time. Both would be among only 20 alleged survivors of the “collapse” of the two towers. Curiously all 20 were in the North Tower. Buzzelli would become famous for claims that he, in effect, “surfed” down 22 floors during “collapse” as described here. He was found ATOP the rubble pile, and taken to safety, at least three hours after the “collapse.” Guzman-McMillan, who started out with Buzzelli on the 64th floor, would become famous as the last person rescued alive from beneath the rubble, about 24 hours after the “collapse.” However, Guzman-McMillan’s description of events leads to the collapse of credibility of Buzzelli. As archived here, Guzman-McMillan states that she was on the 13th—not 22nd—floor just before the “Collapse” began; and that Buzzelli was BELOW her. She states that Buzzelli was below her as he led a group of people (including her) down. She does not know, at that point in time, how far below her he was. So this could be but half a flight of stairs, or several flights. But Buzzelli, and his fellow claimants thus lose AT LEAST nine flights of “collapse surfing” from Guzman-McMillan’s account. Also please consider the possible implications in the differences in how they were found. Guzman-McMillan was buried BENEATH some rubble, while Buzzelli was ATOP the rubble pile. Curiously Guzman-McMillan also relates pressure from the Port Authority on its reported orders to Tower workers to stay put after the “plane hits.” The article above states, “On instructions from the Port Authority, McMillan declines to discuss why she stayed [initially].”

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition Guzman-McMillan “felt hot” while awaiting rescue. Reports from the 12 firemen who survived in Stairwell B also have them saying they felt heat in the Stairwell even when initially climbing up. (This fits with my articles on the early sub-basement nuke’s thermal rays that affected many people, including Felipe David.) Indeed I might say that the following report from Rick Cushman is the very first report of what I have lengthily described as the China Syndrome Aftermath. See this blog: wtcchinasyndrome.blogspot.com. Now Rick Cushman was a marketing manager and National Guardsman from Saugus, MA. He rushed to Ground Zero from Massachusetts. For 12 hours he searched for survivors in the rubble. “But he had not seen any — only pieces of bodies. Beneath his boots, heat billowed up through the web of steel.” Then Cushman heard Guzman-McMillan’s shouts and directed rescuers to her. Now this article reveals numerous things. Despite the fact that there was likely a large number of people going down Stairwell B at the moment of collapse— as there were only three stairwells in each tower— people survived only at a few locations along Stairwell B. There are several possibilities, according to my many small nukes hypothesis. As previously hypothesized here, there could have been several failed or fizzled nukes. Or there is the possibility, that at certain intervals, those who were in an effective nodal region— between nukes—may have survived, at least initially. Now Stairwell B contained 14 survivors— including 12 firefighters— who survived the tower’s final destruction. Two others— Buzzelli and GuzmanMcMillan— were on Stairwell B at the onset of “collapse,” but were found elsewhere in the rubble pile. And four others were found in the underground Mall. (This includes the two Port Authority policemen depicted in the Oliver Stone movie.) Again it appears that the South Tower’s “collapse” curiously did not have any such survivors. Now the New York Magazine article indicates again that some of these Stairwell B surviving firemen surmised that they survived a nuclear attack: “[Captain] Jonas and his men, finally freed from their stairwell, looked around at fires and flattened buildings. They thought they were witnessing a nuclear attack.” My articles on the nuclear destruction of the WTC have detailed how many firefighters surmised this. Why? Firefighters are well familiar with heat from fire, but if they feel great heat on their skin and they are nowhere near a fire, they know something very different is going on! Readers of my articles, and of this blog by Spooked, and his 33 blog here can also see the involvement of the PTB, when the article states “When Buzzelli called at 3:30 everything changed, though not as she’d expected. Soon, she’d know that he’d somehow landed safely in the midst of acres of destruction, a lone soul dropped to safety on a concrete slab…” The New York Magazine article has other quizzical matters, and should be read in its entirety. There is the matter of the 12th Floor as depicted here. “Jonas picked up a Mayday from the lieutenant of Ladder Five, who reported that he was in Stairwell B on the 12th floor. Jonas had passed him on the way down, helping a civilian. “I’m trapped and I’m hurt bad,” he said. Jonas, who was on the fourth floor, tried to climb the stairs but couldn’t ascend more than a floor, and in any case, as he’d later learn, the stairwell had no 12th floor. “I’m sorry, I can’t help you,” he radioed back.” The highest-ranking officer on Stairwell B was Chief Richard Picciotto. He later wrote a book, as the article continues: “Picciotto’s Last Man Down became a best-seller. It would also end his friendship with Jonas—“It’s a very bad book,” says Jonas— and whatever camaraderie he shared that day with the others from Ladder Six. “We don’t speak to him,” says Komorowski. “Liar,” Butler wrote in his copy of the book.” ““It was part of my personality to take charge of a situation,” Picciotto writes. “I’d never been the type to sit idly by while someone else called the shots, and I wasn’t about to start now…Picciotto was the highest-ranking

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition guy, but he was not the commanding officer. He was doing nothing. He was balled up in a corner,” says Jonas.” Picciotto’s book says he was on the 7th Floor when the North Tower “collapsed.” These articles indicate that the extant height of Stairwell B, after tower destruction, was five flights. And this should be kept in mind when researching where people were at the moment destruction began, and where they ended up. It appears that each flight had two levels of standard zigzag stairs as depicted here. We must keep in mind that anyone being blasted on the stairwell, but remaining in the stairwell, would have been blasted in a straight line, and shouldn’t have been blasted more than a flight of stairs. This is different from those—like Buzzelli and Guzman-McMillan— who were apparently blasted OUT of the stairwell, at some point, during the tower’s destruction. (And, of course, the stairwell above the fifth floor may have been vaporized, or otherwise destroyed.) With Guzman-McMillan ending up buried under some rubble, and Buzzelli atop the rubble. I also note that there appears to be no pictures that show the very TOP of the extant five-floor Stairwell B section. Could this be because the top contains obvious indications of the great (nuclear) heat of tower destruction? Have these photos been cropped, as many photos were in the Kennedy Assassination? I was the first to note the similarity of the remnant of Stairwell B, and the remnant of the tower from the fizzled Upshot-Knothole Ruth nuclear fission bomb test of 3/31/53. At least the bottom third of the bomb’s tower remained because the nuke had fizzled—it had a yield about 1/15th of what was expected. See here:

Note the date has a 33. The tops of the Ruth test tower and Stairwell B have some similarities as I indicated to Spooked, and as he has in his article at his blog here on 3/12/09. The tops indicate some steel has melted and twisted downward. Finally, I cite the book, Report from Ground Zero: The Story of the Rescue Efforts at the World Trade Center by Dennis Smith [not read by me]. In particular I cite this review by Sterling D. Allan, an apparent alternative energy expert. After reading that book, and Stairwell B’s survivors’ accounts, Allan reveals, “a cohesive conclusion: A POWERFUL WIND WAS GOING UP THE STAIRS AS THE BUILDING WAS

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition COLLAPSING DOWN. This would seem to refute the official pancake theory of collapse in which one floor after another fails as the mass from above comes down.” Allan includes this familiar hypothesis, “One possible explanation for these survivors, in the demolition model, is that explosives that were placed in the vicinity of this stairwell section failed to go off.” Allan however appears to only consider non-nuclear matters, but his review is dated in 2006, before my articles, and that of others, on the nuclear destruction of the WTC appeared. But I conclude with the question—does the now-revealed UPWARD WIND, of final tower destruction, indicate a nuclear blast from the ground, or perhaps more likely from the basement? Is this upward wind another indication of the final cleaner nuke that I have written about for several years now? As I have written, this final cleaner nuke may also have been seen as the so-called “nuclear glow” that TV cameras panned AWAY FROM while purporting to show what was happening at the WTC.

So-- we have seen now that “surfing the collapse” is not as the regime wishes to have it depicted. Many floors of “surfing” are missing, and ending up atop the rubble— with a huge building “collapsing” on top of you— is incredulous. Also we see that firemen’s accounts of the upward wind of final collapse fits well with my nuclear destruction scenario, but it impossible with the OCT, as there would be no wind until the pancaking floors hit that level, and that would have been a downward wind. posted by spooked @ 4:54 AM

Saturday, March 28, 2009

The Fall of the WTC1 Spire and the Intact WTC1 Stairwell: Proof of Demolition Near Bottom of the Tower
After the destruction of WTC1, this stairwell in the core of the building remained-- three to four stories higher than the rest of the rubble pile:

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition

Now remember the "spire" of WTC1 that remained for a few seconds during the destruction of the tower?

It was a good 70 stories high, and was part of the WTC1 core:

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition

The spire didn't topple over, but fell more-or-less STRAIGHT DOWN:

IF THE SPIRE MERELY COLLAPSED, FALLING STRAIGHT DOWN, THE HEAVY CORE COLUMNS SHOULD HAVE OBLITERATED THE STAIRWELL AT THE BASE OF THE CORE! Rather-- the stairwell WOULD survive if the spire was blown with bombs at the base-- a few stories above the stairwell. In this way, the higher spire columns could fall to the side as the base was blasted out. Perhaps several bombs along the base of the core were used to create this result. But it seems clear that a collapse of the spire could not result in this intact stairwell. It also seems likely that this nuclear blasting along the core/spire would account for all the missing WTC1 core columns! Also this:

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition

posted by spooked @ 9:04 AM

The Effect of a Low Yield Nuke on a Steel Structure
The Ruth shot was a fizzle. The predicted yield was 1.5 to 3 kt, while the 200 ton yield was a fraction of that. Especially embarrassing to UCRL was

only the top 100 feet of the 300 foot shot tower was vaporized (though much of the remainder was scattered across the desert) . It was
that

standard practice at that time for each test to totally erase all evidence associated with it (automatically "declassifying" the site), which Ruth failed to do.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition

Hard to tell how tall this tower remnant is but I would guess about 100 feet, if the cross-sections are 10 feet apart (which would fit what looks like a ladder near the base). Compare the above pic to this pic of the WTC1 core remnant (click to enlarge):

Note the wilted pieces of steel dangling down. Note-- this puts the WTC destruction into good perspective. If a 200 ton yield nuke can vaporize 100 feet of steel structure, and destroy 100 feet or more of it, you can imagine the yield nuke that would be required to vaporize the innards of the 208 foot wide WTC while leaving the outer walls more or less intact. What's not clear is if there is a linear correlation between nuke yield and vaporization radius-- I would guess it's not

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition perfectly linear. (thanks to A.P. for the find) posted by spooked @ 8:57 AM

Thursday, October 23, 2008

A Brief Summary: WTC Destruction & High Temperature Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and the China Syndrome Fit All the Evidence
NOTE: PLEASE DISSEMINATE THIS DEFINITIVE SUMMARY ON THE NUKING OF THE WTC AS WIDELY AS POSSIBLE! by The Anonymous Physicist In attempting to ascertain what caused the destruction of the WTC on 9/11/01, and the great heat and molten metal observed for up to six months afterward, one must account for ALL the phenomena involved in WTC destruction, and the aftermath-- and not just one or two factors. Only nuclear bombs and the resulting China Syndrome can account for ALL phenomena observed. The overview and numerous supporting articles on the nuclear destruction of the WTC are here: wtcdemolition.blogspot.com But, at the outset, we should realize that there is an abundance of evidence that the O.C.T. (Official Conspiracy Theory) is quite bogus. For example, sworn testimony from firemen/responders contains their witnessing of loud explosions from the onset of tower destruction. This alone destroys the OCT of gravity-driven, progressive collapse. A brief summary of the nuclear aspects now follows. 1. First, low yield nukes (mini-nukes or micro-nukes) are a proven fact that the U.S Govt has admitted to since the 1950’s with their Davey Crocket rifle, and more recently with a physicist’s testimony to Congress. It is also documented fact that since the 1960’s, and Project Plowshare, low radiation nukes-- and later neutron bombs-- have been available, and were planned for excavation projects and such. My “many small nukes” WTC hypothesis indicates that numerous low yield nukes went off INSIDE (near the center of) the towers. They vaporized anything near them (via million degree temperatures and/or high neutron flux), but the yield of these micro-nukes was deliberately small enough not to vaporize the outer structure. This also ensured that any radiation was contained during detonation. And Plowshare, and neutron bombs, prove low radiation nukes have been available for decades. 2. MASSIVE EVIDENCE of ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSES (EMP) FROM NUKES. This includes the eyewitness, sworn testimony of EMT responder, Patricia Ondrovic (and others). She reported that as WTC1 was beginning to be destroyed, she saw flickering lights in WTC6 lobby where she tried to enter, but was stopped. And just outside at that time, cars caught fire without any visible reason, and one then had its car door explode off of it; and the door hit and injured her as she began to flee the area. Exactly how EMP from nukes did all this is explained here, along with other evidence of EMP during tower destruction from nuclear bombs. 3. DUST PARTICLE SIZE WAS LESS THAN 2.5 MICRONS-- & LIED ABOUT by the Gov’t’s main OCT (Official “Collapse” Theory) engineer/author. You can think of a mortar and pestle, and grinding something large into smaller and smaller pieces. It takes more and more

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition energy input to yield smaller and smaller pieces. A nuclear bomb is known to yield particle sizes down to 10 nanometers. (1 nanometer is 1 billionth of a meter). And Govt scientists had equipment to analyze the WTC dust down to 10-nanometer size, if they wanted to, and should have. Unless they did, and have refused to release this. What they (the U.S. Geological Survey scientists) did was lump together all dust sizes less than 2.5 microns and released this data. (A micron is 1 millionth of a meter, and a thousand times larger than 1 nanometer). Nonetheless, the Govt’s main engineer/author, Z.P. Bazant, numerous times wrote papers that claimed that 10 microns was the smallest sized particles created during WTC destruction, and later collected by USGS scientists. For years he did not cite the work that showed, this. Last year he did cite a reference, and it led back to the 2.5 micron study, NOT to the 10 microns he claimed as the smallest dust particle size! So he flat out committed fraud here. He had to do this as his bogus papers claim that the gravitational potential energy (height times weight) of the towers accounted for the energy needed to create the smallest dust particle size. And there isn’t enough energy from his theory to account for 2.5 micron size dust, let alone the much smaller dust sizes that the USGS did not ascertain or release! The bogus physics and math from Bazant and others is here. 4. MELTED, HANGING SKIN WITHOUT FIRE was reported by at least 4 known WTC survivors. This includes WTC worker Felipe David, whose own words state this occurred without fire, but his story when told by another, has “fire” added. There are also two women who reported (on the “Larry King Show”) that a similar thing happened to them, and they don’t know why, because they too were not in any fire. And there is also a security guard with a similar report. The security guard and Felipe David had this happen to them in the lobby and the sub-basement area of WTC1 respectively. Outside the towers, firemen/responders also felt great heat on their skin without being near any fire DURING TOWER DESTRUCTION. Only the thermal rays of a nuclear bomb can account for this. They go out the farthest when a nuke goes off. And hanging skin was a common occurrence in Hiroshima survivors. Note that the outside firemen feeling heat on their skin (without fire near them) also disproves “DEW”, as they are NOT in the towers nor right under them either, and thus if “directed energy beams did it”, and these must be coherent, they would not diverge and cause heat far from their target! So no “DEW” was involved. 5. SUB-BASEMENT LEVEL, 50-TON STEEL PRESS & HEAVY DOOR VAPORIZED. At the same time as Felipe David’s nightmare was unfolding, and also in the sub-basement, WTC engineer Mike Pecoraro reports going up a level and seeing that a sub-basement level was in shambles and was “just gone.” Also he states a 50ton press has also been apparently vaporized, and a 300 pound steel/concrete door has just been left shriveled up like foil. The only things that could do this are the multi-million degree temperatures, and neutron bombardment, from a nuclear bomb. Coupling this with the four survivors who had melted, hanging skin at this same time, we have evidence of blast, high temperatures, neutron bombardment and thermal rays-- all virtual proof of nuclear bomb use. 6. HEAT GENERATION AT THE WTC FOR UP TO 6 MONTHS AFTER 9/11- -THE CHINA SYNDROME AFTERMATH (CSA) (see http://wtcchinasyndrome.blogspot.com) No heat “lingers” for weeks and months, not alleged jet fuel, not alleged thermite (which would have been used up either in minutes or hours--or during its use as an explosive). We have the documented, witnessed, and well photographed and videotaped great heat and molten metal for weeks, and indeed for up to six months underground at the WTC-- until all radioactive fission fragments were carted away. No heat lingers for that long; this could only have been heat GENERATION. The evidence of great heat throughout much of the rubble pile and even higher temperatures underneath the two towers and WTC7 is massive. It included melted

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition firemen’s boots, even dogs had to wear special boots, a mass of congealed bullets in WTC6 going off weeks later from heat, and many photos of steam emanation from the continual water hosing of the “hotspots” all around the WTC. The China Syndrome HAD TO ARISE because each of the numerous small nukes used up only 1-6% of its fissile material-- which is standard for nukes. The remainder was then available as radioactive fragments, releasing great heat for a long time (until removed), as the half-life of Uranium 235 is 700 million years. And it is likely that there were numerous, redundant nukes employed, and the phenomena of "fratricided" and fizzled nukes may also have occurred as these are common with nuclear detonations. These effects likely further exacerbated the China Syndrome. The radioactive fragments were somewhat dispersed throughout the rubble pile, and in greatest concentration underneath the towers and WTC7-- where water and sand treatments could not readily be employed. Note that the alleged Tritium finding that the Govt released, may be a red herring to fool people to look for top-secret unknown types of nukes, which couldn’t have led to the CSA, which is what clearly occurred. The ludicrous lying (“there never was any heat during or after WTC destruction”) or the poor attempts to create new laws of chemistry and physics by alleged 9/11truthers (“super nanocomposite thermite burns forever”) only shows how desperate the Govt is to hide the China Syndrome Aftermath. 7. THE MISSING PEOPLE, FURNITURE, steel & other contents of the towers. Destruction of the towers vaporized many of the nearly 3,000 people who died, as well as much furniture, steel and other building contents. The medical examiner was unable to find or utilize any strands of DNA for over 1100 people. The rubble pile from the two towers was only a couple of stories high when it should have been several times higher from a “collapse,” or even a conventional demolition. There is much missing mass from the “extraordinarily high temperatures” as fire engineering Professor Barnett declared after examining vaporized steel, that occurred during tower/WTC7 destruction. Nukes vaporize matter near their hypocenter. Thermite, thermobarics, etc. DO NOT. Contrary to what some claim, neither thermite nor thermobarics could vaporize the missing people, furniture, steel and other contents, as detailed here. 8. CLASSICAL GOV’T DISINFO METHODS ENSUED whereby their agents put out supposedly “alternative theories” involving alleged “secret, new technologies” that are either evidence-free and/or impossible. Space Beams/DEW (Directed Energy Weapons), or ludicrous “super nanocomposite thermite burns forever” theories were created by the intel agencies to cover up the nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome Aftermath. (Thermite cools off in minutes or hours.) These “theories” desperately try to claim new phenomena or new laws of physics and chemistry--as does the 9/11 Commission’s ludicrous “findings.” 9. More now on the issue of Radiation: The #1 item above showed that the Govt has had mini-nukes, and micro-nukes for decades, and that lowradiation yielding nukes have also been around for decades as well. On the other hand, the great heat and molten metal at, and under, the WTC for up to six months after 9/11, indicates the existence of the China Syndrome Aftermath at the WTC; whereby many responders and Metro New York residents may have been exposed to some radiation from radioactive fission fragments that resulted from the use of the many micro-nukes. We have much indirect evidence of the effects of radiation poisoning among the 40,000 responders who were at “Ground Zero” in the weeks and months afterwards. There have been hundreds of reported cases of blood, lymph and thyroid cancers among responders. These types of cancers frequently arise from radiation exposure, and are much less likely (unlike lung diseases) to arise from inhalation of toxins. Also, the teeth and hair falling out reported by several responders are also standard illnesses from radiation poisoning. These responders’ doctors and lawyers are not telling these people that radiation may have caused their illnesses,

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition because the China Syndrome Aftermath remains one of the Govt’s most closely guarded secrets. However, we can see that the Govt itself was well aware of what it had caused! Standard radiation-lowering methods were employed beginning the very next morning-- 9/12/01! These included water dilution/hosing down and sand/earth covering (and subsequent removal of this sand/earth) of the rubble pile. These procedures continued for weeks and months precisely because the rubble pile, and undergound areas, were replete with radioactive fission fragments. There is some general information on radiation sources that needs elucidation. Due to absorption and other factors, radiation levels can go down quickly-- unless radioactive fragments (radionuclides) are released to the environment. Unless one is close (like Felipe David, who appears to have received thermal radiation, and not ionizing radiation)-- or the radiation is very intense-- enough distance/air or most materials, will stop most forms of radiation. This assumes one does not inhale or ingest radioactive particles or radionuclides. The underground WTC areas-- which likely had the highest radiation yields (and also heat)-- were off limits to all but a few responders. Also, as Hiroshima studies indicated, it took decades for many cancers and other illnesses to manifest. Note that a Gov’t agency, FEMA, was/is in charge of any radiation data for Ground Zero, and could easily have blocked release of any data that found radiation. The U.S. Gov’t has a long, sordid record of lying about radiation exposure to soldiers and citizens, as noted here when they nuked their own soldiers during “atomic tests”. Honest people, not in DENIAL, must see the analogy to the Reichstag fire set by the German Nazis, in 1933, in Berlin. This was their seat of almost their entire federal gov’t. And this fire/destruction was used as an excuse to destroy their Constitution, and as an excuse for War on “terrorists,” and then all of Europe. There was one difference with the Nazis, however. They waited till the middle of the night, when there were no inhabitants in the Reichstag building! Of course, that German Gov’t did not admit they did it themselves, but that came out after they lost WWII. If U.S. Govt agencies have certain types of proof that they nuked the WTC, and thus its largest city; does any honest person think these Govt agencies would ever release this data--unless a new Gov’t came about? There is reason to believe that other crucial data such as WTC rubble pile temperature (AVIRIS, 2nd set), and WTC destruction seismic recordings were altered. This physicist hypothesizes that WTC responders AND nearby Metro New York residents and workers, that were exposed either the longest or to certain areas with the “hottest”spots face the risk of getting cancer and other immune disorders from radiation exposure in the years and decades to come. Sadly this will prove the China Syndrome Aftermath in the worst possible way. Private persons and institutions are urged to get and keep statistics on this, as the Gov’t will likely cover this up. posted by spooked @ 9:30 AM

Eyewitness Testimony of Firefighters Believing They Were Nuked on 9/11
... as well as early WTC7 Destruction, EMP, non-impact plane flyby, and people being pushed out of a WTC tower.

By The Anonymous Physicist

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition

Reading just a handful out of the 503 9/11 WTC initial responders’ testimonies has proven to be a real eye-opener. These firefighters’ and EMS officers’ depositions provide good corroboration for many of the things I have hypothesized at this blog, including the following: The WTC was demolished via small nuclear bombs, that pre-“collapse” basement nukes were set off in the towers, synchronous with the “plane hit” explosions above, that there likely were EMP’s (Electromagnetic Pulses from nukes), and that WTC7 underwent early explosions, and attempted early demolition.
Firefighter Edward Kennedy here states that he thought a “nuclear bomb” had demolished a tower. “We were on Liberty Street and we came out into there and it just look like something that -- it looked like a bomb, of course, had gone off, almost like a nuclear bomb... “ Here we learn that NYFD Lt. George DeSimone similarly thought the heat-without fire--impinging on him was Hiroshima-like: “I thought it was some kind of thermal explosion where I'm either going to get burnt -- and I had kind of ideas that it was going to be something like Hiroshima where all this heat was coming at me and we were going to get burnt…” Several hours after both tower “collapses”, and despite official regime claims of total military and civilian flight termination, he said: "...We saw jets overhead, commercial airliner, military jets, Air Force jets, and we didn't know what the hell was going on..." Recall I have detailed how a nuke’s thermal rays go farthest out, well beyond its destructive blast radius. Here NYFD Chief Jerry Gumbo’s testimony is one of several I have cited, to say he felt heat far away from any actual fire. He stated: "...At the time of the impact, we were able to feel heat that was generated from the explosion at the command post, which was across West Street, and West is fairly large street with that island in there, and debris was showering all over West Street." I believe this is again indication of the early basement nuke concomitant with the “plane hit” explosion above. Another firefighter who thought the WTC destruction was nuclear is NYFD Lt Richard Smiouskas, whose statement is here. He was an official NYFD photographer, and has some startling testimony, regarding other matters, as well. It appears that with his telefoto lens, he witnessed people being pushed out of tower one. He said: "...I was photographing the fire from the roof. I had a long lens on the camera, and I had people in the windows. It looked like they were being -- they weren't actually jumping. One or two people I saw, they seemed like they were being forced out by the people behind them. There was half a

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition dozen faces. In between the smoke you could see people..." (snip) "I guess they were all trying to get air, and this guy was actually standing in the window, standing in the frame with each hand on each frame and he kind of like got nudged out." In the second sentence, it looks like he just stopped himself from saying “pushed”. The last incident may even indicate the NON-jumper was trying to keep himself from being pushed out! Lt. Smiouskas believed that a nuclear bomb went off, due to the magnitude of Earth shaking that he felt. As a tower is being destroyed he recalls: "It looked like an earthquake. The ground was shaking. I fell to the floor. My camera bag opened up. The cameras went skidding across the floor…I'm thinking maybe a bomb blew up. I'm thinking it could have been a nuclear….” Then he writes of seeing “glitter” through the black smoke, during tower destruction. “Everybody started running north, and this huge volume like ten stories high billowing, pushing black smoke and like a glitter. I guess it was glass that was glitter that was in the cloud of smoke.” I do not believe this “glitter” was glass in the black smoke. Perhaps it is more likely that gamma rays from nuclear explosions which could readily traverse the black smoke, impinged on his retina. This is like the atronauts in earth orbit seeing (retinal) flashes from cosmic rays when they tried to go to a higher earth orbit, and like medical x-rays that go through you and onto a photographic plate. But note how Lt. Smiouskas found the ground shaking was intense enough that he surmised (correctly, IMO) that a nuclear bomb went off. Now, I have been in 5.1 (Richter scale) Earthquakes, and in 2.3’s. The latter I didn’t feel at all, and the 5.1 sounds more like what Lt. Smiouskas (and I) experienced—at least a likely 4.0. I also was at the WTC six weeks after 9/11, and saw many cracked, concrete sidewalks, blocks away from the WTC, (as well as experienced my eyes burning from the hot toxic gases still emitted.) I therefore make the following assertion. It is likely that the “official” 2.1 and 2.3 Richter scale recordings on 9/11 had their spikes cut off! I have even found that NIST asked for a “re-analysis” of seismic data from one observatory before publishing their “findings.” So, just as I hypothesized about the long-delayed second AVIRIS (WTC temperature) data set, the seismic recordings were likely doctored by this regime. And this fire-fighter’s belief that the intense ground shaking was due to a “nuclear bomb” supports this hypothesis. The interview of Dr. Michael Guttenberg, of NYFD’s Office of Medical Affairs, who may have witnessed EMP is here. Just after the second “plane hit” explosion, and before any tower “collapse”, he noted: “…on the EMS radio, there was absolute silence for probably 10 or 15 seconds, you know, which to me, it seemed like 10 to 15 seconds, but it was absolute radio silence for a few seconds…” Questioner: “We were told that the air was so thick with debris that radio waves weren't able to travel.” M.G.:

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition “That was after the towers came down.” Note two things, the radios went dead—likely a sign of EMP, as I have previously described. And see how the questioner attempts to confuse the issue with a double lie. One, that this happened after a tower was destroyed, when instead, this is after the second WTC2 “plane hit” explosion, and before any tower “collapse” as Dr. Guttenberg corrects him. And two, that radio waves would have been blocked by a conventional explosion, when they wouldn’t have been. And note also that this radio blackout occurred after the second “plane hit” explosion. My previous articles contained evidence, and my hypothesis, that the WTC1 “plane hit” explosion was used as cover for a nearly concomitant basement nuclear bomb explosion that vaporized a 50 ton steel press, and a garage level, and also caused phone outage. So we learn now that electronic communications also were affected after the second “plane hit”, which may indicates that they also nuked the basement of WTC2 at that time. I hypothesized that this was done in case the planned, subsequent, intricate, top-down demolition failed. Guttenberg also provides more eyewitness testimony for early WTC7 explosions, as he went to the loading area of WTC7. “…We all stuffed ourselves into this hallway [near the loading dock of WTC7], pulled the door shut, and the noise just got very loud and the room filled with dust. The noise stopped, and we opened up the door, and everything was pitch black. The way we got into the loading dock was not the way we were getting out. It was obstructed.” This appears to be a watered down way of saying WTC underwent internal explosions. This jives with my earlier article citing Deputy Director of the NYC Emergency Services Dept., Barry Jennings, that the WTC7 underwent attempted complete internal destruction at the same time that the first tower (and WTC 3, 4, 5, 6) were demolished. My article, on top here hypothesized that fizzled nukes was the reason WTC7 was not successfully destroyed during this early coordinated attempt, which Jennings stated destroyed much of the lobby, now corroborated by Guttenberg. The last URL also has my earlier articles on nuclear demolition of the WTC. NYFD Lt. Robert Larocco here also noted that tower destruction seemed “nuclear” to him. He said, “Of course the cloud was kind of like a nuclear winter thing. You're walking through fallout.” Near the towers, but BEFORE either tower “collapse”, he noted: “As I started walking onto the side street – actually as I stepped onto the side street, the strangest thing I noticed was there was like three inches of snow on the ground. The snow was probably pulverized concrete, sheetrock, loose tiles, insulation, asbestos or what-have-you.” Now this fine ash or 3 inches of snow-like “pulverized concrete” as he called it would not occur from a “plane hit” or conventional explosives. Could this fine, 3 inches of “snow” be from the early basement nukes I have written about? Like the WTC1 basement blast that vaporized a steel press, and a parking garage level that eyewitnesses said was just “gone.” Now some DEW/OCT disinfo agents claim that the tower destruction was not loud because their hangout was not loud. During the commencement of WTC2 destruction, Lt. Larocco stated: “The next second I heard that loudest noise in the world that I was describing before getting louder and louder.” (snip) “It was the loudest noise I've ever heard in my life. It was in both ears. Kind of like those rockets that they launch the

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition space shuttles with, it was like I had one going off in each ear. When I thought it was the loudest noise I ever heard, every second it was just increasing getting louder and louder and louder.” Lt Larocco also describes very personal feelings of fear of death, and fellow firefighters “crying like babies” during and just after collapse. These revelations prove that the redactions in the published responders’ statements were not because of wanting to hide the most personal of feelings. Lt. Larocco also stated that hours after both towers were destroyed: “…I still really didn't believe that the second tower was hit by a second plane.” At this point, the interviewer, Monte Feiler, says, “Stopping the interview at 1306.” Then, “Resuming the tape at 1308 hours. Same people present.” Now Lt. Larocco says: “ Like I said, the rumors were flying around, and they turned out to be quite factual, about the second tower getting hit. Although at the time I really didn't believe it until I saw it later on television. The thing about the Pentagon, the plane crashing out in Pennsylvania, it was all coming into the picture that this is something major going on.” So we see how something happened during this “time out.” Something he was told and recalling what was “on TV” apparently made him change his mind and believe in the second “plane hit.” This manipulation speaks for itself. And if there really were plane hits, would the PTB need to perform such blatent manipulations of eyewitness testimony? Finally I note that when he was making his way out after “collapse,” Lt. Larocco recalls: “I thought to myself this is a locked exit. That's illegal.” We see, as some survivors have noted, many fire escape exits were locked. Someone--who may have had a master key--apparently locked numerous exits. If such a man is ascertained, and his actions proven to be deliberate, he should be charged with mass murder. My interpretation of EMT Frank Puma’s deposition here indicates that he may have witnessed a FLYBY, and not a “plane impact” regarding the alleged “second hit.” He said: “…I ran down to the corner of Church and Park Place, looked up and I saw the plane shooting out of the top of the towers. That's when I grabbed for my radio and yelled over the air, "1 Adam. A bomb just went off in the Trade Center."... Note that after he witnessed an apparent flyby, HE CALLED IN A BOMB, and NOT a plane impact! In fact, when you couple his statement to the interviewer, with his action of exactly what he called in, it seems clear that he believed the plane he saw bombed the WTC! And this must be considered a possibility. However, all the evidence and the ludicrous “plane-shaped” hole itself indicate shape charges, at that facade, were set off in sync with a flyby (and basement nukes). Finally, for those who grasp the deeper conspiracies I have elucidated here, I note that Firefighter Michael Wernick here stated the number of the Fire Engine that apparently responded first to the WTC, on 9/11. Wernick said, “Engine 33 went first.” As I have written here before, “All things nuclear…”

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition posted by spooked @ 9:24 AM

The Crucial Differences in the Nuclear 9/11 Theories
A Call To Eliminate Nuclear 9/11 Mis- or Dis-Information & Attain Completeness and Fit all the Known Evidence by The Anonymous Physicist Several, differing WTC nuclear destruction scenarios have been put forth by their respective authors. While they all have nuclear explosions in common; they have key differences. These differences must be openly examined, and used to strive towards a final nuclear 911 WTC destruction scenario that fits all the evidence, and is not contraindicated by the Laws of Physics. Nuclear WTC scenarios that do not fit all the evidence, or contain false statements, or are contradicted by physical law need to be abandoned.

1. Within a year or two of 9/11/01 people began to post at physics forums that WTC destruction seemed to involve nuclear bombs. 2. By 2005, the first website appeared which contained a nuclear WTC destruction scenario by an Anonymous Finnish Military Expert. He hypothesized that one upwardly-focused, subbasement shape-charge-like nuke was used to destroy each tower. Tower destruction, he stated, was likely done with the aid of conventional explosives as needed. The Finn also hypothesized that the single nuke was a fourth generation, fission-free thermonuclear (pure fusion) device. He cited the alleged Tritium finding by U.S. Gov’t scientists. Therefore (fusion only), there could be no China Syndrome Aftermath with this theory. 3. In 2006, William Tahil wrote a book and offered it for sale online. (It is now downloadable for free.) Tahil also claimed that one deep underground nuclear explosion per tower occurred, but that they weren’t bombs per se. Rather, he claims, there were two huge, underground, fission nuclear reactors already present, which were made to go supercritical, and explode in a nuclear fashion. Tahil wrote that a China Syndrome Aftermath resulted. 4. In 2007, this Anonymous [American] Physicist offered a detailed, nuclear WTC destruction scenario. Many small nukes were said to have been employed during tower destruction, but some conventional explosives may also have been used to allow the nukes to be small, and not vaporize the outer tower structure. After first incorporating all the “official” evidence, that included findings that supported both fission and fusion; he [I] first wrote that either fission-initiated fusion bombs or tritium-boosted fission bombs were used. But after finding massive, irrefutable evidence of the China Syndrome Aftermath at the WTC for up to six months-- until the fissioning, radioactive fragments were carted away-- and noting that the China Syndrome can supposedly only occur from fissioning remnants, not fusion components, the Anonymous Physicist has stated the following. The alleged Tritium data release to the public may be a clever regime ploy (red herring) to get people to look for the mythical fourth generation nuke precisely because it is fission-free, and therefore you couldn’t have WHAT WE DID HAVE-- THE CHINA SYNDROME AFTERMATH at the

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition WTC. Since the evidence of the China Syndrome of a massive heatgenerating source existed at the WTC for months afterwards, and only fission fragments could cause this heat GENERATION for so long, the bombs likely were fission bombs. The Govt then deliberately released bogus information (Tritium), as covering up the China Syndrome Aftermath was their most crucial Op-Plan after 9/11. The China Syndrome arose, and HAD TO ARISE perforce, because a fission nuke uses only 1-6% of its fissile material. The remainder is left over and will remain fissioning for a long time, as the half-life of Uranium 235 is 700 million years. Also the concepts of redundant nukes, "fratricided" nukes, and fizzled nukes were detailed in my papers, and all lead to a China Syndrome Aftermath. Furthermore, the massive disinfo efforts by the American regime, and its agents, make clear how important it was/is to cover up the nuking, and the China Syndrome Aftermath in NEW YORK CITY. As usual, disinfo agents try too hard. Their M.O. is often clear to see. The hangouts known as the Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT), and “DEW” blatantly lie that there was no heat during or after WTC destruction. And another hangout (thermite) has its proponent admit to the great heat for months, but must lie and claim that “thermite burns forever,” when it actually cools off in minutes or hours. The final step, in the intel agencies’ disinformation scheme--as more and more people see the truth of the nuclear destruction of the WTC, and the China Syndrome Aftermath-- is to plant individuals (mostly online personalities) who will pretend to be pro-nuclear 9/11. All the while everything they write is meant to confuse, confound, and actually belittle the nuclear 9/11 hypothesis with ludicrous or irrelevant claims. They will be easy to spot; they will likely never cite my research and articles on the nuclear destruction of the WTC, and the China Syndrome Aftermath. They will cite the other theories above-- but not mine-- precisely because of the unchanging flaws in the others, as detailed above. So please be aware of new, allegedly nuclear 9/11 proponents who may actually try to confound the issue; and present mis-, or dis-information, or irrelevancies, or pretend it is unknowable, or doesn’t matter. Let us now examine the first two detailed nuclear WTC destruction scenarios listed above. First, let us look at the Finnish military expert’s claims of one sub-basement, pure fusion, shape-charged-like, upwardly focused nuke per tower. This appears to be erroneous in several ways. First the observed, top-down, destruction mechanism, and the earlier, highly likely nuclear sub-basement explosion (see more below) both belie the one nuke per tower hypothesis. The Finn has stated that he is an expert on shape charges, and that the top/down scenario could have been done via nuclear shape charges in the sub-basement. But the website that has his articles says that his translator refused to translate his details of how this could have occurred. But even if theoretically possible, the details of the early likely nuclear, sub-basement explosion (see below) demonstrate that his one nuke per tower scenario is untenable. Likewise, this Anonymous Physicist, has proposed that the hunt for the pure fusion, 4th generation nuke is likely a deliberate, planted red herring precisely because this would obviate what did take place-- the China Syndrome Aftermath. So I contend that the Finnish Military Expert’s hypotheses of 1. Pure fusion nuke, 2. One nuke per tower in the basement are incorrect. The Finn also says that “red mercury” could be one way to attain fusion without prerequisite fission. This is the “red mercury” scam, that I have shown here is physically impossible to cause fusion; and is a British American Regime Psyops. The Finn was given my critique of his hypotheses, by the owner of the site that has his nuclear scenario. There has been no word back from him to my knowledge, but I would still welcome this now. Next I have written what may be the only full review of Tahil’s book here. And this should be read by all, after reading his book. Tahil deserves credit for analyzing the USGS dust/elements study, and concluding that fission likely occurred during the WTC destruction, and even afterwards with secondary fission on some of the samples. But then Tahil’s scenario entails

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition one nuke per tower in the sub-basement again-- but here each one was a fission explosion that arose from making a large, hidden fission reactor explode like a nuclear bomb with upward focusing (as with the Finn). My review makes clear that several aspects are untenable or improbable. First, a nuclear reactor “going super-critical,” and exploding like a nuclear bomb is said to be physically impossible. Then the videoed, top-bottom tower destruction itself makes the one nuke per basement unlikely. Furthermore, my articles have also cited much eyewitness testimony such as from survivor sub-basement nuke survivor, Felipe David, and WTC Engineer Mike Pecoraro. Pecoraro was in a sub-basement level, and went UP a level to see that an earlier blast vaporized a 50 ton steel press and shriveled up a heavy concrete/steel door into foil-like matter. This implies a nuke went off above him, not below him, and so even if a fission reactor could be made to go off like a nuclear bomb (which is stated to be impossible), could the one reactor do this a second time after it would have had its first, chaotic nuclear explosion? So the actual destruction videos and eyewitness testimony further erode some of Tahil’s (and the Finn’s) hypotheses. Finally, numerous crucial statements Tahil wrote are incorrect. His rationale for the massive hidden reactor hypothesis was two-fold. 1. He claims that a fission bomb uses up 100% of its fissile material, when the correct figure is only 1-6%! and 2. Massive amounts of Strontium and other elements found in the dust, he claims, could only mean that two massive fission reactors were already present. My review showed that Strontium occurs in concrete, sometimes not as a tiny component, but as a relatively large percentage, as is known for the concrete used in making the Empire State Building and the Pentagon. All this taken together make his two hidden, massive, reactors hypothesis either physically impossible (to go off as a bomb and/or to subsequently be re-used), unnecessary, or untenable. But again his work is most valuable for demonstrating the likelihood that fission occurred during WTC destruction, and that the China Syndrome resulted. I have had no communications from Tahil after my review and critique of his hypotheses. But I continue to welcome honest criticism of both my critiques of the other nuclear scenarios, and of my own hypotheses. It is hoped that people will examine all the evidence (including survivors’ testimonies, EMP, massive heat, sound, radiation lowering methods used, photos, etc.), and the Physics I have outlined, and that are archived at these two blogs, http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and http://wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com, and stop promoting misinformation or disinformation. I assert this includes the “red mercury” scam, the tritium red herring, and the latter’s implied fission-free pure fusion hangout as well as seeing how massive hidden underground reactors going off as nuclear bombs are improbable if not impossible-- and don’t fit the destruction evidence, and eyewitness testimony. They are not needed when you learn the aspects of my “many small nukes” hypothesis. If you are truly interested in what was perpetrated on 9/11, please read the ENTIRETY of the two blogs that contain my archived nuclear 9/11 articles, and make up your own mind. And if you want to see just how the Official Regime “explanation” for what occurred at the WTC on 9/11/01, (and some of the “alternative” non-nuclear theories) used bogus science and committed outright fraud, there are more articles on this at this site. To sum up, all the evidence of the actual WTC destruction, and the great heat generated there for up to six months indicates that WTC destruction was most likely caused by numerous small nuclear fission bombs (micronukes), not by a single basement nuke, nor by massive hidden reactors that exploded like nuclear bombs. The China Syndrome Aftermath arose, and had to arise, because the fission fragments were contained in the buildings as they were nuked, and ended up all over the rubble pile, and beneath the towers and WTC7. It’s time to promote, or at least publicly discuss, the continual efforts made by this Anonymous [American] Physicist to examine all the evidence of the

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome Aftermath in New York City. Please promote these works both on the net and to friends, family, and neighbors. It is ABSOLUTELY THE MOST CRUCIAL ASPECT OF 911 TRUTH, TO INFORM PEOPLE THAT THE AMERICAN REGIME NUKED ITS OWN MOST POPULOUS CITY, NYC, ON 9/11. If your favorite blog or website ignores-- or blocks-- this most crucial aspect, either post it yourself or tell all your friends, family, etc. And carefully examine the differences in the nuclear 911 hypotheses, and eliminate the impossible, the improbable, the untenable, or what the evidence indicated is incorrect; and promote what fits all the evidence, and is physically tenable-- many small fission nukes were used to destroy the WTC on 9/11/01, and the China Syndrome Aftermath resulted. And the radiation issue is also discussed here. Please promote this, as there isn’t much time left before they pull away the wool from everyone’s eyes. It won’t be pleasant, and must be prevented. Life will not be worth living then. Remember Hiroshima. The survivors there were said to be envious of the dead. This may be what they have planned for all of us, with the American Regime being, as Rev. Martin Luther King said, “the greatest purveyor of evil in the world today.” Indeed, there is much evidence that the American regime nuked its own people at least once before 9/11/01, in the Port Chicago, California incident, as I detailed here. Thus the American regime remains the only regime that has nuked its own people, as well as others, and that fact would likely enrage the American people to act, as nothing else might. posted by spooked @ 6:58 AM

Tuesday, September 09, 2008

Micro-Nukes in the WTC--Creating The China Syndrome: Important Matters of Completeness & Plausibility
by The Anonymous Physicist My “Many Nukes” Hypothesis for the destruction of the WTC on 9/11, perpetrated by the American regime, is detailed here wtcdemolition.blogspot.com. How this led to the China Syndrome is detailed here wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com. To summarize these matters now, I have written how the towers’ destruction entailed numerous micro-nukes detonating in each tower, and furthermore much redundancy was employed to insure that sufficient numbers of these low-yield devices successfully went off as planned. Some of the redundant micro-nukes were impacted by the exploding micronukes, which allowed for the redundant ones’ fissile material to give rise to the China Syndrome. I also explained how some micro-nukes fizzled for various reasons--part of the reason for having so many redundant micronukes present. I listed several factors that could have caused this fizzling, even hypothesizing that the early explosions in the WTC7 were fizzled nukes, that were meant to destroy WTC7 but they did not properly go critical. The reader can read how standard some of these concepts are in the nuclear world. The military and “policy” makers use the term “fratricide” for the occurrence of one nuclear warhead impacting/adversely affecting another one and preventing the latter from going nuclear. Read here, for example. Under the heading of “Nuclear targeting and fratricide,” you will find this: “Historically, analysts have assumed that only 2 nuclear warheads could be used in a short time frame against any target because of a problem called “fratricide.” Assigning multiple warheads to a target requires

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition precise timing to prevent one incoming warhead from destroying others. Furthermore, a nuclear detonation near ground level (which is ideal for destroying hardened silos) would create a debris cloud that could destroy other warheads heading to the same target.” Furthermore, long term storage of nuclear bombs or warheads involves another form of fratricide. This article on the many problems of long-term nuclear warhead storage, describes how nuclear warheads have “vulnerability to fratricide neutrons,” as well as being susceptible to many other problems that could make them fizzle. So you can see that I was correct in writing that impacted and/or fizzled nukes, are problems that could be expected to occur when you have a complicated scenario involving many small nukes going off in a relatively small place-- especially in an enclosed space. And these matters thus could easily explain where the available fissile material to cause the China Syndrome at the WTC came from. Now knowing of these potentially, fratricidal effects on the nukes to be used in the WTC on 9/11, the American perps-- foul physicists, and monstrous military men, much like those involved in nuking their own at Port Chicago, and other innocent humans at Hiroshima and Nagasaki-- did the following. 1. Emplaced many redundant nukes, in each WTC building, and at each level to be nuked. The levels where the nukes were emplaced took fratricidal effects into account, as much as possible. 2. Used (somewhat hardened) sensors that would trigger (sequentially, as needed) redundant nukes at each level that they were to be set off at. 3. Used sensors that themselves would be vaporized, if the first, planned nuke went off properly, so that the redundant ones would not go nuclear. Of course, their fissile material would then be available for the China Syndrome Aftermath. Did all this go off exactly as planned? No. As I have written, the hidden, denied, early WTC7 explosions indicate that the perps failed to properly set off the nukes in WTC7, and took five or more hours to re-do it, later in the afternoon. One possible scenario for the failed, early nuking of WTC7 could be the following. The early nukes in the lobby and basement fizzled (due to fratricidal or other effects). That is, they exploded but either did not attain any criticality (only conventional explosions worked), or else the fissile material had been “weakened” and the resultant nuclear explosion was too small for demolition of WTC7 to occur. The sensor(s) were themselves damaged (from partial explosions), and did not then trigger redundant nukes to go off, or else all redundant nukes fizzled, as Jennings (in the last article) describes several WTC7 explosions. However even a properly functioning nuclear device going off inside a building can lead to its own China Syndrome, as follows. Let us look at the efficiency of nuclear devices historically, as I do not have access to data on the efficiency of the most current nukes. But it would likely be in the same range. The efficiency of a nuclear bomb is the percentage of its total available fissile material (such as Uranium-235 or Plutonium-239) that actually undergoes fission during the criticality stage of implosion/explosion-- roughly one microsecond. The remainder is still highly radioactive and could give rise to a China Syndrome under certain conditions. Peter Vogel’s book, “The Last Wave From Port Chicago" describes on page 13-13 how the Hiroshima “A-Bomb” used only 1.14% of its contained fissile material. The Port Chicago type A-Bomb had even less efficiency-- about 0.5%. More recently, 6% efficiency for updated nuclear bombs is cited here. Such a low efficiency is due to the immense difficulty of having an implosion, and then an explosion, whereby the fissile material has only one microsecond before the imploding, fissioning U-235 critical mass with its tremendous number of released neutrons and subsequent energy release (and great heat and pressure), forces the critical mass to explode outward thus terminating its criticality geometry. What this means is that even a properly functioning, fission bomb will have 94-99% of its highly radioactive, fissile material released into the

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition environment where it will more slowly continue to fission and decay-- and release great heat. Now if a nuclear bomb goes off several thousand feet in the air, a la Hiroshima, the unfissioned U-235 will be widely dispersed and will come down over a huge area. (The heat of the Bomb would even have vaporized the unfissioned U-235, but this will later condense and come down somewhere.) But the micro-nukes--even the properly fissioning ones used inside the WTC-- were, at least partially, contained during the destruction. But as the buildings were being destroyed, even vaporized, the remaining fissile material would be able to reach all around the WTC area, and some would likely reach significantly beyond as well. Some fissile material from the sub-basement nukes, would likely be trapped in the largest concentrations, to be found in the aftermath, in these basement areas. These radioactive fragments would also be inaccessible to the usual radiation-lowering mechanisms that were extensively employed beginning the very next day-- water hosing, and “coating” with sand/earth. To sum up, my “Many Nukes” and resultant China Syndrome Hypothesis, is well supported by the known concepts of nuclear warhead fratricide, and the low (0.5-6.0%) efficiency of fission bombs. Indeed all the facts involving exploding numerous micro-nukes in an enclosed (or partially enclosed) space appears to make the China Syndrome aftermath not only plausible, but inevitable! posted by spooked @ 6:47 AM

Did Two Nuclear Reactors, not Nuclear Bombs, Destroy the WTC on 9/11?
Review of William Tahil’s Book, “Ground Zero: The Nuclear Demolition of the WTC”, and of his Reactor Hypothesis by The Anonymous Physicist

Tahil’s book is now downloadable for free here: http://www.nucleardemolition.com. I welcome Tahil’s comments and corrections, if any, to this review and analysis of his work, via email to Spooked, who will forward to me. Tahil was one of the very first to write and publish on the nuclear demolition of the WTC on 9/11. Also, other than myself, he is the only other scientist, or person, to write about the China Syndrome aftermath. As my illness prevented me from writing on 9/11 until 2007, his 2006 book was the first to correctly attribute the great heat and molten metal that existed at the WTC for months afterwards, to the China Syndrome of still-fissioning material. While I discovered that independently, he was the first to demonstrate this in public writing. He deserves much credit for this. The Finnish military expert, Tahil, and myself, are the three people who have written proposed nuclear demolition schemes. My articles on the nuclear destruction of the WTC are here http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and my articles on the China Syndrome are here http://wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com. The Finn believes a single nuclear bomb was used on each tower, via a focused, nuclear shape charge in the basement. I have stated that numerous mini- or micro-nukes were employed in the towers, and in all the other WTC buildings. I have further highlighted that great redundancy was employed, and that numerous nukes either were sabotaged, fizzled on their own, or were impacted (without being triggered themselves), by other exploding nukes. And so many nukes did not go off as planned, and their unused fissile material later gave rise to the China Syndrome. My article on the early attempted nuking of WTC7, which failed, is good evidence of fizzled, or sabotaged nukes. Thus there were many nukes available,

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition whose fissile material was not employed in the destruction, and which gave rise to the China Syndrome, in my hypothesis. Please read all my articles, including the one on "fratricided" nukes here. Now Tahil is unique among the nuclear 9/11 proponents, in that he alone believes that two nuclear reactors-- not nuclear bombs-- were employed to demolish the two towers. While my 9/11 nuclear scenario is different from Tahil’s, and I have explained in lesser detail before why I think mine is correct, and his is incorrect, I have always stated (and still do) that his work should be read by all, as I could be wrong, and he could be right, or possibly there are elements of truth, where we may both be right. Looking at the different nuclear 9/11 scenarios, the Finn, and I, believe the evidence points to nuclear bombs. The Finn believes a single, fission-free, 4th generation thermonuclear device destroyed each tower. This is based on the govt’s Tritium finding. Tahil does not mention the Tritium evidence, and goes with pure fission at the WTC. I have written several things chronologically as the evidence, and my thinking evolved. First I went with both sets of evidence, namely that either fusion (tritium) enhanced fission bombs, or a fission-triggered fusion bombs, were employed. Later I noted the way the regime has total control of all scientific data, and could block release of the most damning data. I stated that it is possible that the Tritium finding was a red herring to divert people into looking for the fission-less fusion bomb, precisely because this would stop people from realizing there was a "China Syndrome" aftermath, at the WTC-- which the regime wishes to hide at all costs. (Presumably only fission can yield the China Syndrome.) So I have stated it is possible that all nukes employed on 9/11 were fission bombs, and the tritium data is spurious. One of the nuclear 9/11 proponents, William Deagle, M.D., further lends support to my redundant nuclear bomb hypothesis with his direct knowledge of a Fort Collins U.S. Army Forensics Team member who was immediately sent in to the OKC bombing site in 1995. This man told Deagle (his physician) directly, that he and the team brought out two unexploded micro-nuclear bombs, and one unexploded C4 pineapple bomb, from the 10-story Murrah building, after its destruction. This Army man said that the nukes were emplaced by ATF and FBI personnel. He further stated that his Army team was under armed supervision by Wackenhut guards, who tested that they did not remove any radioactive evidence. We can see from this, that great redundancy (extra nuclear bomb emplacement) was employed at OKC. Remember that Murrah was only 10 stories tall, and nowhere near as wide as the towers or WTC7. Consider the total volume of the WTC towers, the 47 story WTC7, and all the other buildings, and you can see how dozens of redundant nukes may have been employed in the nuclear destruction of the entire WTC. If the matter is linear, given the relative volumes, we might even conclude that 50-100 micro-nukes were emplaced, and they gave rise to the China Syndrome, in my hypothesis. For now, let’s examine what Tahil has to say particularly on the subjects of his nuclear reactor hypothesis, and the China Syndrome aftermath. Much of Tahil’s hypothesis rests on his interpretation of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Dust Analysis data here. Tahil seems to view the USGS data, and all govt data/studies at face value. He does not seem to realize the possibility, or likelihood, that errors of omission, or commission, were utilized in various Gov’t studies, whereas I have highlighted this in my articles. Tahil particularly mocks those who state that the Seismic records were doctored-- which includes me. I base my view on several things, including eyewitness testimony of those at Ground Zero, and a friend who lived a mile north, and who described books falling off shelves, at the moment of the first CGI “plane hit,”-- or WTC1 basement (nuclear) explosion. Also we know that the Gov’t actually asked one Seismic Lab to “re-do” their calculations. Let’s get back to the USGS dust study that Tahil uses for much of his hypothesis. I have stated that this study is heavily flawed in many ways.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition Some of my criticisms, I will now list: -- Did not test for (or report findings on) Plutonium. -- Did not look for anything smaller than 2.5 microns, or did not delineate this, when labs had, for years prior, equipment that would have quantified dust down to 10 nanometer size. -- Only looked at a small area, mostly within 0.5 Km from the towers, when the dust settled much further away, and -- A good deal of the dust went up in smoke! Thus the smallest particles ended up far away. See my articles again. -- Samples were taken 5-6 days later, after a rain/wind storm on day 2. -- Did not differentiate differing isotopes of a given element. (Differing isotopes have the same number of protons, but differing numbers of neutrons in their nuclei. Isotopes behave very differently regarding nuclear processes including radiation release, and further fissioning.) I have highlighted the reason the regime prevented, or perhaps more likely ALTERED the data on the smallest sized dust particles. It requires far greater energy (only nukes) to create the tiniest dust particle size. Now Tahil concentrates on the USGS dust study, and in particular its findings regarding the elements Strontium, Barium, Zinc, and several others. He uses the 12-- out of 35-- sample sites that yielded Strontium. He has made some very good findings regarding the near total correlation of Strontium and Barium in the dust samples. This shows a common origin, he asserts, and is likely right. This, he says virtually proves fission occurred as Strontium and Barium are two common “daughter” elements in the fissioning of Uranium. This is likely correct as well. But he also states several things that are not correct. He makes these mistakes throughout the book. He only considers the buildings’ concrete or steel as sources of the dust. This is a serious flaw. The buildings’ entire contents-- from people to furniture, etc., etc.-- must be considered! He also at times, assumes one particular isotope for an element, e.g. Strontium 90, and not its other four naturally occurring isotopes, and its other 15 artificially created isotopes. On page 24, Tahil states, “These elements [Barium and Strontium] simply should not be present in building rubble or building materials in even a valid trace amount, which would be less than 10 ppm…” In succeeding pages, he elaborates that very high levels of Strontium and Barium in the dust study could only have come from the fissile Uranium in two nuclear reactors, very deep underneath the two towers. But, we shall see that Strontium, Barium, and Zinc are NOT to be unexpectedly found in the vaporized rubble, as Tahil states. Thus their source need not be from massive amounts of fissioned Uranium, as Tahil claims. There are many common, known sources of Strontium. A Strontium compound can make up as much as 10% of the mass in toothpaste for “sensitive teeth.” Strontium is a normal component of everyone’s bones and teeth. And Tahil does not take into account the total vaporization of half of the nearly 3000 human victims, and partial vaporization of the others. Other Strontium sources include pottery, color TVs, aerosol paints, drugs for osteoporosis, and other sources. However there is one source of Strontium that has overarching importance here. Tahil ignores the fact that Strontium occurs in Limestone. And Limestone is often the major component of concrete. How much Strontium might there be in the 100,000 tons of concrete in each WTC tower? Let us look at one type of limestone called oolite limestone. Strontium in oolitic limestone can occur at up to 10,800 ppm (parts per million)! This study found a range from 230 to 10,800, with an average of

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition 414 ppm. But is oolitic limestone used in very large structures? Some of the largest buildings ever built have indeed used oolitic limestone. This includes the Empire State Building and the Pentagon! Then there is the issue of Barium. Wiki notes that Barium is a "getter" in vacuum tubes, is used in glassmaking, and is used in a coating for the electrodes in the ubiquitous fluorescent lamps. Furthermore, Wiki says, “Lithopone, a pigment that contains Barium Sulfate and Zinc Sulfide, is a permanent white that has good covering power…” Here wiki indicates that Lithopone may be commonly “used in interior paints and in some enamels.” Thus we see that if this pigment was used in the WTC, we have a Barium/Zinc linkage, without resorting to Uranium fission. But on page 30, Tahil shows that if one sample site were left out, Barium and Zinc have nearly a 100% (96%) correlation. Tahil speculates that this correlation could only be from nuclear fission, and in particular, lesser known “ternary fission.” He might be right, but you see from my Lithopene example, this one correlation could be explained without fission. The Lithopene example does not disprove fission, but it shows that any one of these correlations is not conclusive of anything. They have limitations. Also Barium, some analysts assert, is one of the main ingredients in the ubiquitous, and notorious, Chemtrails. These trails have been seen in the skies for the last 15 years or more. As they stay up for great lengths of time, they may be nanoparticles. It’s even possible that by now, their contents have mixed with the atmosphere, and the entire Earth has been saturated with their contents. Of course, ongoing regions getting this “treatment” will have very high doses for some time. The Hair Mineral Analysis, done on people, has shown a great increase in the levels of Barium, over the last 10 years. This means that some Barium compound has gotten into people. Regarding the USGS dust samples, the relatively large percentage of Barium, in the USGS study, could even have come from the vaporized people, or from significant mixing of the WTC dust with atmospheric Barium, or from some local Chemtrail spraying within the 5-6 days of the WTC destruction, before the samples were collected. If the Barium were ubiquitous, say from the atmosphere--and its adherence to the smoke from the WTC, the WTC dust might come down with much Barium in it. Thus there may have been a significant base level of both Strontium and Barium from common, non-nuclear sources. Zinc is also cited on page 143 when Tahil extrapolates and concludes that a massive amount of Uranium was fissioned on 9/11-- from two reactors. But Zinc is also not rare, as Tahil claims. Zinc is the major metal in pennies and is in batteries, steel, paint pigments, and many other sources. But again Tahil may be right, because I have not proven that Lithopene was used at the WTC, unless it is/was ubiquitous. Nor have I proven what the level of Strontium in the limestone in the concrete was. However, Tahil’s body of evidence, in this book, which includes several correlations of daughter products of fission, his analysis of the dust from the girders whereby Tahil concludes that elements were blasted onto the girders, and were still fissioning when collected on the girders, and all his other findings, indicate that there was fission in the WTC on 9/11/01. But the amount of fissioned Uranium is impossible to find by extrapolation of the dust, because the amounts of Strontium, Barium and Zinc may have been large, in the WTC, as I have shown above. But thanks to Tahil, we can conclude that the search for the “holy grail” of fission-free fusion (as the Finnish Military Expert has done), is likely a fruitless hangout, or red herring, and should be abandoned. The proof of the fission is in the China Syndrome, and the sum of the findings in Tahil’s book. More strongly put, be wary of any alleged Nuclear-9/11 proponents who do not proclaim the China Syndrome Aftermath of 9/11! There are only four proponents of the China Syndrome: Tahil, myself (the “Anonymous Physicist”), Spooked, and recently Deagle. The following is the crux of Tahil’s nuclear reactor hypothesis. On pages

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition 144-145, Tahil claims that there were massive amounts of Strontium and Zinc as radioactive fallout, and that then indicates there was a massive amount of Uranium (nearly 500 tons) that had fissioned. And then that this claim of nearly 500 tons of fissioned Uranium implies to him that only a reactor or two could have been the source of the Uranium. All this rests on the USGS dust study, and Tahil’s extrapolations of its data. Now while I think his earlier near 100% correlation of Strontium and Barium, goes a long way toward proving nuclear fission occurred on 9/11, his calculations leading to 500 tons of Uranium-- and subsequent hypothesis that implies two massive reactors were sent critical is flawed. On page 144, Tahil-- via extrapolation of the amounts of these elements in the USGS dust study-arrives at the estimates of 60 tons of Strontium and 100 tons of Zinc, per tower, in the fallout from the destruction of the WTC. From this, he further estimates that there must have been at least 470 tons of Uranium in each of two reactors deep underground in each tower, that was somehow sent critical, and exploded in nuclear fashion, and caused the destruction of each tower, and gave rise to the China Syndrome. While I, of course, agree with him that the HEAT GENERATION, of up to six months, at the WTC, leaves only the possibility of a China Syndrome, his assumptions and math need scrutiny. 1. I have already pointed out that the USGS is greatly flawed, and likely doctored with numerous errors of omission and commission. See above. 2. He apparently assumes all the Strontium was Strontium 90, and ignores the other isotopes of Strontium, while the USGS study did not differentiate isotopes. 3. He assumes the origin of daughter elements is Uranium, when they could have been fissioned from Plutonium, which was not tested for by the USGS--or else not published 4. He ignores non-nuclear sources for Strontium and Zinc, and assumes all Strontium and Zinc came from nuclear fission. See above where I have strongly disproved this.

So for all these reasons, we arrive at the conclusion that we cannot use the USGS data for a simple weight ratio analysis. Furthermore, Tahil compares his nuclear reactor hypothesis to only one micro-nuclear bomb per tower, and ignores the possibility/probability that 1. Many mini- or micro-nukes were used per tower 2. That the other buildings also were nuked 3. He incorrectly says that a fission nuke has all of its Uranium used up in its use. This is very curious since he cites Peter Vogel’s book, "The Last Wave From Port Chicago." And this book is one source that describes the efficiency of a fission bomb. On page 13-13 Vogel writes that the Hiroshima Atomic Bomb used only 1.14% of its contained fissile material. More recently, 6% efficiency for updated nuclear bombs is cited here. This means that instead of 100% of the U-235 being used up when it goes critical in a bomb, only 1-6% is used up, and thus 94-99% of its U-235 is left over for the China Syndrome! 4. Tahil does not realize other possibilities that I have made original hypotheses on; namely that many redundant nukes were also likely emplaced. And some, or many, of these may have been either sabotaged or fizzled because of various reasons. 5. The actual tower destruction scenario observed, fits the use of numerous small nukes much better than a deep underground set of two massive reactors.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition 6. Officially physicists have claimed that a fission reactor cannot even yield a nuclear explosion. (However, we must take this with a small grain of salt. If a nuclear reactor could yield a full nuclear explosion, like a fission bomb, the PTB would never let this be known.) So from this last list, it is clear that not one, but numerous nukes per tower could have been employed, and the scenarios I have described, could have led to a large amount of still-fissioning Uranium or Plutonium fragments, “left” (after WTC destruction) both near the surface, and deep underground. Now we must analyze the geometry and dynamics of the WTC destruction, to see what fits better: the use of a deep underground nuclear reactor per tower, or numerous small nukes. One problem is the early sub-basement explosions that were timed to go off at the same time as the alleged “plane hits” way above. I have written extensively and cited much evidence, that these were nuclear devices that were exploded and even that EMPs (Electromagnetic Pulses) were yielded at those times. Tahil agrees that these explosions were nuclear. He cites an article that I have cited numerous times written by WTC Engineer Mike Pecoraro. Pecoraro was below the sub-basement C level (presumably at the D level, but not described explicitly), when his colleague saw “flickering lights” (EMP?) and they ascended to the C level. He says, "There was nothing there but rubble, we're talking about a 50 ton hydraulic press gone!" Pecoraro and a co-worker then “made their way to the parking garage, but found that it, too, was gone…” As they then ascended to the B Level, one floor above, they “were astonished to see a steel and concrete fire door that weighed about 300 pounds, wrinkled up like a piece of aluminum foil" and lying on the floor. Now I have asserted, the only thing that could have done these things is neutron bombardment and/or million-degree temperatures, both from a nuke. Tahil says his nuclear reactors were well below the seven known sub-basement levels of the towers. And the reactors were sent critical at WTC destruct time. But he also says he believes the earlier “Pecoraro explosion” was nuclear. Thus we have several problems with the nuclear reactor hypothesis: 1. How does a reactor go critical for the earlier Pecoraro basement, nuclear explosion, and still be capable of being used again--in any coherent fashion? And the destruction of the towers was very well controlled. 2. In this light, how can any reactor being melted down, and going critical, be used in such a controlled, coherent, relatively precise and symmetrical fashion, so many floors below what it is to destroy, when a reactor gone critical implies much chaos? As opposed to numerous, strategically placed small nukes. 3. How can Pecoraro have survived a nuclear explosion from a reactor below his level (and not know that that was what happened), and then go above him to two floors that were nuked? Unless small nuclear bomb(s) were utilized at those levels. 4. Now I can see how the observed deep underground flowing metal, weeks and months later, might possibly be from this deep underground reactor, but what about the hot rubble pile and its fissioning material not far from the surface? 5. What about the possibility of breaking through to the Hudson (if not directly underneath, then just a bit West of the WTC) if the reactor were so far down, and made to explode, nuclear-wise?

My “Many Nukes” hypothesis, which includes my “Many Nukes fizzled/sabotaged/impacted/fratricided” hypothesis, that I have authored--

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition remember the Finn said only one nuke per tower, which thus has some of these same flaws-- seems to fit all that happened to the WTC, on 9/11, better. Numerous redundant, fizzled or sabotaged nukes, higher up may have given rise to the large hot rubble pile. Larger nukes in the subbasement gave rise to the flowing molten metal seen there months later. There may have been many nukes emplaced in the sub-basement that led to events that appear “reactor-like.” Why compare a reactor only to one nuke? And given that only 1-6% of a fission nuke’s fissile material is used in its explosion, and there were many nukes that did go off, this too allows for a China Syndrome at the WTC, even if there were not any redundant nukes present. There are numerous other matters that are incorrect. On page 153, Tahil virtually states that Chernobyl was a nuclear explosion when it was not. It resulted from heat from nuclear fission causing steam expansion, which caused an explosion and the China Syndrome of blasted radioactive fragments releasing great heat where they landed. Earlier in the book, he has it right, that Chernobyl was not a nuclear explosion, but not on page 153. Tahil apparently believes that the “Plane hits” were real, instead of the impossible CGI, they clearly are. He believes that the earlier 1993 WTC explosion was conventional, when I have highlighted the eyewitness testimony of engineer Phil Schneider who said he saw proof that it was nuclear-- I guess things like Pecoraro described. (See my articles.) Tahil often cites new, or hypothesized Physics for some of the phenomena, when this is precarious at best, and makes it look like the ludicrous DEW hangout. E.g., he states that Koenig’s sphere was involved in the WTC destruction as a “neutron reflector/focuser”. After seeing the documentary on Koenig’s sphere, and its maker, and its creation, and how it was moved, and is still there in a nearby public park, I seriously doubt this speculation, if not also on Physics grounds. His website cites a sewer steam explosion in NYC, miles North of WTC, several years after 9/11, as some proof of a massive nuclear reactor underneath Manhattan. But NYC has had such stream explosions for 150 years. Tahil seems to want to think there were massive neutron fluxes all about the WTC during or after the destruction. He states that the strangely damaged cars are proof of large neutron fluxes at those spots. But I have amply demonstrated that the evidence fits EMPs, vastly better than anything else. These are the cars whose boundaries of doors caused only part of the car to have heated up, and caught fire. In my analysis of this, I revealed how only an EMP would cause part of a car to intercept the EMP, which becomes current, and then great heat. But this is only in metal, and the boundaries (air), between car doors, prevents said current from flowing across to the other car door. See especially my analyses of EMT Ondrovic’ experience of EMP causing a car door to explode onto her, and the flickering lights in WTC6, before it was nuked. Neutron fluxes would NOT have caused this, as neutron fluxes would not show a distinction with car door boundaries, as we see with several cars! So Tahil appears to try too hard to see neutrons all about, because he wants to fit this to massive reactors under the WTC, and that area of Manhattan. I think his analysis of his Figure 52, on Page 123, is incorrect. This is not quite like a volcano. Look at the height of the smoke at top, compared to the height of the other extant tower. It has not shot way into the sky yet. Rather it shows that the top part of WTC1 was vaporized. So this could have been from a nuke at the top to start things off. He has, or had, some connection to Alex Jones. His website had said that if you can’t reach him via email, it was NSA interference, and to contact Alex Jones. I have no problem with the NSA inference, but Alex Jones? He has been vehemently anti-nuclear-911, and anti-NPT (the planes were merely CGI). Jones would never have Tahil’s work on his site. Jones was sent in to head the 911truth movement, after the regime assassinated true conspiracy expert Bill Cooper, within two months of 9/11. Why does/did a Nuclear-9/11 proponent have an anti-nuclear-911 person be his contact?

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition On the other hand, numerous things Tahil says are very intelligent and revealing, even bold. First credit goes to him for his finding of near 100% correlation between Strontium and Barium, on page 26. This indicates nuclear fission occurred at the WTC, but is not proof. His ignoring the Tritium finding may ultimately prove to be both bold and wise. While others, like the Finnish military expert, considered only a pure fusion bomb, this then could not have given rise to the China Syndrome of which the HEAT GENERATION evidence is massive and conclusive. I wrote that the Tritium finding-- or more correctly, its release may have been a red herring to get people to look only for nuclear devices that could not have caused the China Syndrome. So Tahil as I indicated, may be both bold and brilliant here. Tahil also reveals, on page 115, evidence of birth defects after 9/11, in NYC, that I have not seen before. His motto on the cover is also good: Salus populi suprema lex esti or "The welfare of the people shall be the supreme law." Tahil, of course, asserts that the American regime has the opposite view. He asserts that there was massive radiation, at the WTC, and he makes the bold assertion that Manhattan should still be evacuated! If he is right, how many American cities may have reactors placed underneath them? Now I still think that if this is the goal--and it wouldn’t surprise me if you have read my “Ultimate Truths” series (anonymous-physicist.blogspot.com)--they could more easily just place nuclear bombs underneath edifices in big cities. Sadly, for reasons my readers may know, I think there is a fair possibility that this could be the case, as above-ground nukes are more easily gauged and intercepted by OTHERS. The Rockefeller owned or controlled WTC land area is far from their only land ownership in this country. Could the Rockefeller-donated United Nations land be next? In this light, and in cohesion with what I wrote above about the OKC bombing, I ask did a China Syndrome result there, if it was nuked? Deagle says his Army agent/patient said that Wackenhut guards measured and prevented anything radioactive from being removed. I trust that means that the regime’s agents removed all things radioactive. How many cancers have there been in OKC responders, or OKC residents, subsequently? How many more buildings or skyscrapers must be nuked before the People wake up?

Then Tahil’s analysis of this photo also appears to be very astute, as far as demonstrating the PTB’s desire to hide the China Syndrome. The photo is of the so-called Light Memorial. This was the extremely bright, doubleblue lights, that were turned on for weeks, a few months after 9/11, from dusk to 11 P.M. Tahil surmises that this began when they finally reached the reactor remnant areas, or large areas of fissioning Uranium. And while they were doing something to it, or carting it away, its blue light of the Cherenkov radiation (from nuclear fission) would have been visible. I have written about this in regards to one photo that Steven Jones “orange-ified,” when responders were peering into something underground at the WTC. I related this to the blue light seen when nuclear fissioning elements (cored out sphere and cylindrical insert) were erroneously kept together for too long a time, during the “tickling the dragon’s tail experiments,” at Los Alamos, that killed two nuclear scientists. Tahil asserts that the reactor remnant was uncovered at that time, so they needed to do the light trick. I would say that large areas of fissioning fragments must have been uncovered, for them to do this. But need it have been a reactor, or its remnants? There could have been many nuclear bombs in the subbasement area that led to a large area, with much fissioning going on. But perhaps this is one item of evidence where his reactor hypothesis may fit better than my many nukes hypotheses. Or could a much smaller reactor have been there, and elements of both hypotheses be true? The blue lights are strictly not proof of anything, we must remember. But this regime does almost everything it does, for a sinister reason. Another photo Tahil uniquely has (page 101) is that of a rescue dog with his responder master walking the WTC grounds. Even the dog is wearing protective boots because of the great heat there and then! Also on page 101, Tahil has a

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition photo of the large congealed mass of bullets from WTC6. He states that 43 days after 9/11 the heat was still so intense, an injury to the face of a responder occurred when at least one of the bullets in the mass discharged. Here is more proof of this great heat weeks and months after 9/11, which the intel agents for “DEW” and the O.C.T. laughably continue to deny.

Thus I conclude this review of Tahil’s book and hypothesis with the following. Tahil deserves much credit for his statistical analysis chapter, which helps demonstrate the likelihood that nuclear fission took place on 9/11 at the WTC, and for first exposing the existence of the China Syndrome at the WTC. His hypothesis that this had to be from two massive, deep underground nuclear fission reactors that were sent critical, and exploded akin to a nuclear fission bomb, is much less compelling, and more evidence fits my “many nukes” hypothesis, with possibly one evidentiary exception. Therefore it is possible that he may still be right, at least in part. For that reason, and other things cited above, I recommend everyone who is not an intel agent, and wishes to know what might have occurred on 9/11, read his book, as well as all my articles. The case for two huge reactors that were made to undergo nuclear explosions has not been made. Neither can we completely rule out that the China Syndrome that existed at the WTC for several months after 9/11/01 was, in part, from a much smaller reactor present. I am not saying I believe this, but that it cannot be excluded. Furthermore, I can even perceive one reason why it would have been there. A breeder reactor could even have produced the fissile material for the coming nuclear bomb destruction of the WTC. Or there could have been both many micro-nukes used, and a fission reactor was also exploded with a micro-nuke at the end. I throw these ideas out for completeness. In conclusion I remain unconvinced that the evidence indicates a large nuclear fission reactor was underneath each of the towers, and suffered a nuclear explosion, as my “Many Nukes” hypothesis appears to better explain the details of the WTC destruction, and the China Syndrome aftermath. I welcome feedback and genuine criticism from Tahil on this review, or of my own nuclear-911 hypotheses, and also the same from any non-intel agent. As Tahil wrote, Salus populi suprema lex esti. posted by spooked @ 6:45 AM

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]

World Trade Center Demolition: A Brief Summary: WTC Destruction & High Temperature Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and the China Syndro...

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Thursday, October 23, 2008

A Brief Summary: WTC Destruction & High Temperature Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and the China Syndrome Fit All the Evidence
NOTE: PLEASE DISSEMINATE THIS DEFINITIVE SUMMARY ON THE NUKING OF THE WTC AS WIDELY AS POSSIBLE! by The Anonymous Physicist In attempting to ascertain what caused the destruction of the WTC on 9/11/01, and the great heat and molten metal observed for up to six months afterward, one must account for ALL the phenomena involved in WTC destruction, and the aftermath-- and not just one or two factors. Only nuclear bombs and the resulting China Syndrome can account for ALL phenomena observed. The overview and numerous supporting articles on the nuclear destruction of the WTC are here: wtcdemolition.blogspot.com But, at the outset, we should realize that there is an abundance of evidence that the O.C.T. (Official Conspiracy Theory) is quite bogus. For example, sworn testimony from firemen/responders contains their witnessing of loud explosions from the onset of tower destruction. This alone destroys the OCT of gravity-driven, progressive collapse. A brief summary of the nuclear aspects now follows. 1. First, low yield nukes (mini-nukes or micro-nukes) are a proven fact that the U.S Govt has admitted to since the 1950’s with their Davey Crocket rifle, and more recently with a physicist’s testimony to Congress. It is also documented fact that since the 1960’s, and Project Plowshare, low radiation nukes-- and later neutron bombs-- have been available, and were planned for excavation projects and such. My “many small nukes” WTC hypothesis indicates that numerous low yield nukes went off INSIDE (near the center of) the towers. They vaporized anything near them (via million degree temperatures and/or high neutron flux), but the yield of these micro-nukes was deliberately small enough not to vaporize the outer structure. This also ensured that any radiation was contained during detonation. And Plowshare, and neutron bombs, prove low radiation nukes have been available for decades. 2. MASSIVE EVIDENCE of ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSES (EMP) FROM NUKES. This includes the eyewitness, sworn testimony of EMT responder, Patricia Ondrovic (and others). She reported that as WTC1 was beginning to be destroyed, she saw flickering lights in WTC6 lobby where she tried to enter, but was stopped. And just outside at that time, cars caught fire without any visible reason, and one then had its car door explode off of it; and the door hit and injured her as she began to flee the area. Exactly how EMP from nukes did all this is explained here, along with other evidence

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/10/brief-new-summary-wtc-destruction-high.html[07.11.2010 14:43:57]

World Trade Center Demolition: A Brief Summary: WTC Destruction & High Temperature Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and the China Syndro... of EMP during tower destruction from nuclear bombs. 3. DUST PARTICLE SIZE WAS LESS THAN 2.5 MICRONS-- & LIED ABOUT by the Gov’t’s main OCT (Official “Collapse” Theory) engineer/author. You can think of a mortar and pestle, and grinding something large into smaller and smaller pieces. It takes more and more energy input to yield smaller and smaller pieces. A nuclear bomb is known to yield particle sizes down to 10 nanometers. (1 nanometer is 1 billionth of a meter). And Govt scientists had equipment to analyze the WTC dust down to 10-nanometer size, if they wanted to, and should have. Unless they did, and have refused to release this. What they (the U.S. Geological Survey scientists) did was lump together all dust sizes less than 2.5 microns and released this data. (A micron is 1 millionth of a meter, and a thousand times larger than 1 nanometer). Nonetheless, the Govt’s main engineer/author, Z.P. Bazant, numerous times wrote papers that claimed that 10 microns was the smallest sized particles created during WTC destruction, and later collected by USGS scientists. For years he did not cite the work that showed, this. Last year he did cite a reference, and it led back to the 2.5 micron study, NOT to the 10 microns he claimed as the smallest dust particle size! So he flat out committed fraud here. He had to do this as his bogus papers claim that the gravitational potential energy (height times weight) of the towers accounted for the energy needed to create the smallest dust particle size. And there isn’t enough energy from his theory to account for 2.5 micron size dust, let alone the much smaller dust sizes that the USGS did not ascertain or release! The bogus physics and math from Bazant and others is here. 4. MELTED, HANGING SKIN WITHOUT FIRE was reported by at least 4 known WTC survivors. This includes WTC worker Felipe David, whose own words state this occurred without fire, but his story when told by another, has “fire” added. There are also two women who reported (on the “Larry King Show”) that a similar thing happened to them, and they don’t know why, because they too were not in any fire. And there is also a security guard with a similar report. The security guard and Felipe David had this happen to them in the lobby and the sub-basement area of WTC1 respectively. Outside the towers, firemen/responders also felt great heat on their skin without being near any fire DURING TOWER DESTRUCTION. Only the thermal rays of a nuclear bomb can account for this. They go out the farthest when a nuke goes off. And hanging skin was a common occurrence in Hiroshima survivors. Note that the outside firemen feeling heat on their skin (without fire near them) also disproves “DEW”, as they are NOT in the towers nor right under them either, and thus if “directed energy beams did it”, and these must be coherent, they would not diverge and cause heat far from their target! So no “DEW” was involved. 5. SUB-BASEMENT LEVEL, 50-TON STEEL PRESS & HEAVY DOOR VAPORIZED. At the same time as Felipe David’s nightmare was unfolding, and also in the sub-basement, WTC engineer Mike Pecoraro reports going up a level and seeing that a sub-basement level was in shambles and was “just gone.” Also he states a 50ton press has also been apparently vaporized, and a 300 pound steel/concrete door has just been left shriveled up like foil. The only things that could do this are the multi-million degree temperatures, and neutron bombardment, from a nuclear bomb. Coupling this with the four survivors who had melted, hanging skin at this same time, we have evidence of blast, high temperatures, neutron bombardment and thermal rays-- all virtual proof of nuclear bomb use. 6. HEAT GENERATION AT THE WTC FOR UP TO 6 MONTHS AFTER 9/11- -THE CHINA SYNDROME AFTERMATH (CSA) (see http://wtcchinasyndrome.blogspot.com) No heat “lingers” for weeks and months, not alleged jet fuel, not alleged thermite (which would have been used up either in minutes or hours--or during its use as an explosive). We have the documented, witnessed, and well photographed and 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/10/brief-new-summary-wtc-destruction-high.html[07.11.2010 14:43:57]

World Trade Center Demolition: A Brief Summary: WTC Destruction & High Temperature Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and the China Syndro... videotaped great heat and molten metal for weeks, and indeed for up to six months underground at the WTC-- until all radioactive fission fragments were carted away. No heat lingers for that long; this could only have been heat GENERATION. The evidence of great heat throughout much of the rubble pile and even higher temperatures underneath the two towers and WTC7 is massive. It included melted firemen’s boots, even dogs had to wear special boots, a mass of congealed bullets in WTC6 going off weeks later from heat, and many photos of steam emanation from the continual water hosing of the “hotspots” all around the WTC. The China Syndrome HAD TO ARISE because each of the numerous small nukes used up only 1-6% of its fissile material-- which is standard for nukes. The remainder was then available as radioactive fragments, releasing great heat for a long time (until removed), as the half-life of Uranium 235 is 700 million years. And it is likely that there were numerous, redundant nukes employed, and the phenomena of "fratricided" and fizzled nukes may also have occurred as these are common with nuclear detonations. These effects likely further exacerbated the China Syndrome. The radioactive fragments were somewhat dispersed throughout the rubble pile, and in greatest concentration underneath the towers and WTC7-- where water and sand treatments could not readily be employed. Note that the alleged Tritium finding that the Govt released, may be a red herring to fool people to look for top-secret unknown types of nukes, which couldn’t have led to the CSA, which is what clearly occurred. The ludicrous lying (“there never was any heat during or after WTC destruction”) or the poor attempts to create new laws of chemistry and physics by alleged 9/11truthers (“super nanocomposite thermite burns forever”) only shows how desperate the Govt is to hide the China Syndrome Aftermath. 7. THE MISSING PEOPLE, FURNITURE, steel & other contents of the towers. Destruction of the towers vaporized many of the nearly 3,000 people who died, as well as much furniture, steel and other building contents. The medical examiner was unable to find or utilize any strands of DNA for over 1100 people. The rubble pile from the two towers was only a couple of stories high when it should have been several times higher from a “collapse,” or even a conventional demolition. There is much missing mass from the “extraordinarily high temperatures” as fire engineering Professor Barnett declared after examining vaporized steel, that occurred during tower/WTC7 destruction. Nukes vaporize matter near their hypocenter. Thermite, thermobarics, etc. DO NOT. Contrary to what some claim, neither thermite nor thermobarics could vaporize the missing people, furniture, steel and other contents, as detailed here. 8. CLASSICAL GOV’T DISINFO METHODS ENSUED whereby their agents put out supposedly “alternative theories” involving alleged “secret, new technologies” that are either evidence-free and/or impossible. Space Beams/DEW (Directed Energy Weapons), or ludicrous “super nanocomposite thermite burns forever” theories were created by the intel agencies to cover up the nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome Aftermath. (Thermite cools off in minutes or hours.) These “theories” desperately try to claim new phenomena or new laws of physics and chemistry--as does the 9/11 Commission’s ludicrous “findings.” 9. More now on the issue of Radiation: The #1 item above showed that the Govt has had mini-nukes, and micro-nukes for decades, and that lowradiation yielding nukes have also been around for decades as well. On the other hand, the great heat and molten metal at, and under, the WTC for up to six months after 9/11, indicates the existence of the China Syndrome Aftermath at the WTC; whereby many responders and Metro New York residents may have been exposed to some radiation from radioactive fission fragments that resulted from the use of the many micro-nukes. We have much indirect evidence of the effects of radiation poisoning among the 40,000 responders who were at “Ground Zero” in the weeks and months afterwards. There have been hundreds of San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/10/brief-new-summary-wtc-destruction-high.html[07.11.2010 14:43:57]

World Trade Center Demolition: A Brief Summary: WTC Destruction & High Temperature Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and the China Syndro... reported cases of blood, lymph and thyroid cancers among responders. These types of cancers frequently arise from radiation exposure, and are much less likely (unlike lung diseases) to arise from inhalation of toxins. Also, the teeth and hair falling out reported by several responders are also standard illnesses from radiation poisoning. These responders’ doctors and lawyers are not telling these people that radiation may have caused their illnesses, because the China Syndrome Aftermath remains one of the Govt’s most closely guarded secrets. However, we can see that the Govt itself was well aware of what it had caused! Standard radiation-lowering methods were employed beginning the very next morning-- 9/12/01! These included water dilution/hosing down and sand/earth covering (and subsequent removal of this sand/earth) of the rubble pile. These procedures continued for weeks and months precisely because the rubble pile, and undergound areas, were replete with radioactive fission fragments. There is some general information on radiation sources that needs elucidation. Due to absorption and other factors, radiation levels can go down quickly-- unless radioactive fragments (radionuclides) are released to the environment. Unless one is close (like Felipe David, who appears to have received thermal radiation, and not ionizing radiation)-- or the radiation is very intense-- enough distance/air or most materials, will stop most forms of radiation. This assumes one does not inhale or ingest radioactive particles or radionuclides. The underground WTC areas-- which likely had the highest radiation yields (and also heat)-- were off limits to all but a few responders. Also, as Hiroshima studies indicated, it took decades for many cancers and other illnesses to manifest. Note that a Gov’t agency, FEMA, was/is in charge of any radiation data for Ground Zero, and could easily have blocked release of any data that found radiation. The U.S. Gov’t has a long, sordid record of lying about radiation exposure to soldiers and citizens, as noted here when they nuked their own soldiers during “atomic tests”. Honest people, not in DENIAL, must see the analogy to the Reichstag fire set by the German Nazis, in 1933, in Berlin. This was their seat of almost their entire federal gov’t. And this fire/destruction was used as an excuse to destroy their Constitution, and as an excuse for War on “terrorists,” and then all of Europe. There was one difference with the Nazis, however. They waited till the middle of the night, when there were no inhabitants in the Reichstag building! Of course, that German Gov’t did not admit they did it themselves, but that came out after they lost WWII. If U.S. Govt agencies have certain types of proof that they nuked the WTC, and thus its largest city; does any honest person think these Govt agencies would ever release this data--unless a new Gov’t came about? There is reason to believe that other crucial data such as WTC rubble pile temperature (AVIRIS, 2nd set), and WTC destruction seismic recordings were altered. This physicist hypothesizes that WTC responders AND nearby Metro New York residents and workers, that were exposed either the longest or to certain areas with the “hottest”spots face the risk of getting cancer and other immune disorders from radiation exposure in the years and decades to come. Sadly this will prove the China Syndrome Aftermath in the worst possible way. Private persons and institutions are urged to get and keep statistics on this, as the Gov’t will likely cover this up. posted by spooked @ 9:30 AM "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/10/brief-new-summary-wtc-destruction-high.html[07.11.2010 14:43:57]

World Trade Center Demolition: A Brief Summary: WTC Destruction & High Temperature Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and the China Syndro...

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/10/brief-new-summary-wtc-destruction-high.html[07.11.2010 14:43:57]

World Trade Center Demolition: A Brief Summary: WTC Destruction & High Temperature Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and the China Syndro...

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/10/brief-new-summary-wtc-destruction-high.html[07.11.2010 14:43:57]

World Trade Center Demolition: 35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Thursday, July 02, 2009

35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC
1) heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome) 2) inability to quench ground zero heat with water 3) red hot/molten steel at ground zero 4) missing core columns from ground zero (vaporized during destruction) 5) spreading of sand at ground zero consistent with attempts to limit radiation 6) washing of steel recovered from pile consistent with radiation decontamination 7) extreme security for ground zero steel shipments consistent with limiting access to radioactive steel 8) extreme security at ground zero, limiting exposure, view of devastation 9) extreme pulverization of WTC concrete into very fine particles 10) disappearance of over one thousand human bodies from WTC debris 11) disappearance of furniture, phones, filing cabinets and computers from WTC debris 12) disappearance of elevator doors, office doors, office cubicle walls, toilets and sinks from WTC debris 13) several floor fragments fused together in “meteorite” object 14) bone fragments sprayed into Bankers Trust upper floor during destruction 15) multiple blast waves during destruction of tower 16) large fireballs during initiation of WTC1 destruction 17) small backpack-sized fission nukes exist 18) fission-nuke technology well-established 19) low efficiency of fission nukes ensures leftover radioactive fragments and China syndrome 20) EMP formation during tower destruction (exploding cars, partial burning) 21) Description of heat in WTC blast cloud 22) Extensive cover-up of ground zero air by EPA 23) High rate of cancers, including thyroid cancer typically associated with radiation exposure, in ground zero responders 24) Melted, hanging skin in WTC survivor Felipe David in absence of fire 25) Vaporized press and crumpled steel door in WTC basement reported by Pecoraro 26) Steel beam bent in U, without cracking, evidence of extreme high temps 27) Steel beam bent in U has layer of molten metal on surface 28) Extreme overall devastation of two massive towers and blasted out Ground Zero aftermath 29) Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical DEW theory by likely govt agents-- uses evidence of nukes (EMP, extreme pulverization of tower into dust) but denies nukes at all costs 30) Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical thermite (super nano-thermite) theory by likely govt agents-- uses evidence of nukes (molten steel, china

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/07/35-reasons-for-many-small-fission-nukes.html[07.11.2010 14:44:45]

World Trade Center Demolition: 35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

syndrome) but denies nukes at all costs 31) Small iron microspheres found by Jones et al in WTC dust— evidence of steel vaporization by high temps of nukes 32) Pyroclastic debris cloud during WTC destruction 33) Upwards jutting debris trails reminiscent of debris trails formed during underground nuke test 34) Small bright flashes during destruction of both towers 35) Extremely compacted ground zero debris posted by spooked @ 4:54 AM

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/07/35-reasons-for-many-small-fission-nukes.html[07.11.2010 14:44:45]

World Trade Center Demolition: 35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/07/35-reasons-for-many-small-fission-nukes.html[07.11.2010 14:44:45]

World Trade Center Demolition: 35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/07/35-reasons-for-many-small-fission-nukes.html[07.11.2010 14:44:45]

World Trade Center Demolition: 35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/07/35-reasons-for-many-small-fission-nukes.html[07.11.2010 14:44:45]

World Trade Center Demolition: 35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/07/35-reasons-for-many-small-fission-nukes.html[07.11.2010 14:44:45]

World Trade Center Demolition: The Crucial Differences in the Nuclear 9/11 Theories

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Thursday, October 23, 2008

The Crucial Differences in the Nuclear 9/11 Theories
A Call To Eliminate Nuclear 9/11 Mis- or Dis-Information & Attain Completeness and Fit all the Known Evidence by The Anonymous Physicist Several, differing WTC nuclear destruction scenarios have been put forth by their respective authors. While they all have nuclear explosions in common; they have key differences. These differences must be openly examined, and used to strive towards a final nuclear 911 WTC destruction scenario that fits all the evidence, and is not contraindicated by the Laws of Physics. Nuclear WTC scenarios that do not fit all the evidence, or contain false statements, or are contradicted by physical law need to be abandoned.

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

1. Within a year or two of 9/11/01 people began to post at physics forums that WTC destruction seemed to involve nuclear bombs. 2. By 2005, the first website appeared which contained a nuclear WTC destruction scenario by an Anonymous Finnish Military Expert. He hypothesized that one upwardly-focused, subbasement shape-charge-like nuke was used to destroy each tower. Tower destruction, he stated, was likely done with the aid of conventional explosives as needed. The Finn also hypothesized that the single nuke was a fourth generation, fission-free thermonuclear (pure fusion) device. He cited the alleged Tritium finding by U.S. Gov’t scientists. Therefore (fusion only), there could be no China Syndrome Aftermath with this theory. 3. In 2006, William Tahil wrote a book and offered it for sale online. (It is now downloadable for free.) Tahil also claimed that one deep underground nuclear explosion per tower occurred, but that they weren’t bombs per se. Rather, he claims, there were two huge, underground, fission nuclear reactors already present, which were made to go supercritical, and explode in a nuclear fashion. Tahil wrote that a China Syndrome Aftermath resulted. 4. In 2007, this Anonymous [American] Physicist offered a detailed, nuclear WTC destruction scenario. Many small nukes were said to have been employed during tower destruction, but some conventional explosives may also have been used to allow the nukes to be small, and not vaporize the outer tower structure. After first incorporating all the “official” evidence, that included findings that supported both fission and fusion; he [I] first wrote that either fission-initiated fusion bombs or tritium-boosted fission bombs were used.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/11/crucial-differences-in-nuclear-911.html[07.11.2010 14:45:52]

World Trade Center Demolition: The Crucial Differences in the Nuclear 9/11 Theories 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

But after finding massive, irrefutable evidence of the China Syndrome Aftermath at the WTC for up to six months-- until the fissioning, radioactive fragments were carted away-- and noting that the China Syndrome can supposedly only occur from fissioning remnants, not fusion components, the Anonymous Physicist has stated the following. The alleged Tritium data release to the public may be a clever regime ploy (red herring) to get people to look for the mythical fourth generation nuke precisely because it is fission-free, and therefore you couldn’t have WHAT WE DID HAVE-- THE CHINA SYNDROME AFTERMATH at the WTC. Since the evidence of the China Syndrome of a massive heatgenerating source existed at the WTC for months afterwards, and only fission fragments could cause this heat GENERATION for so long, the bombs likely were fission bombs. The Govt then deliberately released bogus information (Tritium), as covering up the China Syndrome Aftermath was their most crucial Op-Plan after 9/11. The China Syndrome arose, and HAD TO ARISE perforce, because a fission nuke uses only 1-6% of its fissile material. The remainder is left over and will remain fissioning for a long time, as the half-life of Uranium 235 is 700 million years. Also the concepts of redundant nukes, "fratricided" nukes, and fizzled nukes were detailed in my papers, and all lead to a China Syndrome Aftermath. Furthermore, the massive disinfo efforts by the American regime, and its agents, make clear how important it was/is to cover up the nuking, and the China Syndrome Aftermath in NEW YORK CITY. As usual, disinfo agents try too hard. Their M.O. is often clear to see. The hangouts known as the Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT), and “DEW” blatantly lie that there was no heat during or after WTC destruction. And another hangout (thermite) has its proponent admit to the great heat for months, but must lie and claim that “thermite burns forever,” when it actually cools off in minutes or hours. The final step, in the intel agencies’ disinformation scheme--as more and more people see the truth of the nuclear destruction of the WTC, and the China Syndrome Aftermath-- is to plant individuals (mostly online personalities) who will pretend to be pro-nuclear 9/11. All the while everything they write is meant to confuse, confound, and actually belittle the nuclear 9/11 hypothesis with ludicrous or irrelevant claims. They will be easy to spot; they will likely never cite my research and articles on the nuclear destruction of the WTC, and the China Syndrome Aftermath. They will cite the other theories above-- but not mine-- precisely because of the unchanging flaws in the others, as detailed above. So please be aware of new, allegedly nuclear 9/11 proponents who may actually try to confound the issue; and present mis-, or dis-information, or irrelevancies, or pretend it is unknowable, or doesn’t matter. Let us now examine the first two detailed nuclear WTC destruction scenarios listed above. First, let us look at the Finnish military expert’s claims of one sub-basement, pure fusion, shape-charged-like, upwardly focused nuke per tower. This appears to be erroneous in several ways. First the observed, top-down, destruction mechanism, and the earlier, highly likely nuclear sub-basement explosion (see more below) both belie the one nuke per tower hypothesis. The Finn has stated that he is an expert on shape charges, and that the top/down scenario could have been done via nuclear shape charges in the sub-basement. But the website that has his articles says that his translator refused to translate his details of how this could have occurred. But even if theoretically possible, the details of the early likely nuclear, sub-basement explosion (see below) demonstrate that his one nuke per tower scenario is untenable. Likewise, this Anonymous Physicist, has proposed that the hunt for the pure fusion, 4th generation nuke is likely a deliberate, planted red herring precisely because this would obviate what did take place-- the China Syndrome Aftermath. So I contend that the Finnish Military Expert’s hypotheses of 1. Pure fusion nuke, 2. One nuke per tower in the basement are incorrect. The Finn also says that “red mercury” could be one way to attain fusion without prerequisite fission. This is the “red mercury” scam, that I have

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/11/crucial-differences-in-nuclear-911.html[07.11.2010 14:45:52]

World Trade Center Demolition: The Crucial Differences in the Nuclear 9/11 Theories shown here is physically impossible to cause fusion; and is a British American Regime Psyops. The Finn was given my critique of his hypotheses, by the owner of the site that has his nuclear scenario. There has been no word back from him to my knowledge, but I would still welcome this now. Next I have written what may be the only full review of Tahil’s book here. And this should be read by all, after reading his book. Tahil deserves credit for analyzing the USGS dust/elements study, and concluding that fission likely occurred during the WTC destruction, and even afterwards with secondary fission on some of the samples. But then Tahil’s scenario entails one nuke per tower in the sub-basement again-- but here each one was a fission explosion that arose from making a large, hidden fission reactor explode like a nuclear bomb with upward focusing (as with the Finn). My review makes clear that several aspects are untenable or improbable. First, a nuclear reactor “going super-critical,” and exploding like a nuclear bomb is said to be physically impossible. Then the videoed, top-bottom tower destruction itself makes the one nuke per basement unlikely. Furthermore, my articles have also cited much eyewitness testimony such as from survivor sub-basement nuke survivor, Felipe David, and WTC Engineer Mike Pecoraro. Pecoraro was in a sub-basement level, and went UP a level to see that an earlier blast vaporized a 50 ton steel press and shriveled up a heavy concrete/steel door into foil-like matter. This implies a nuke went off above him, not below him, and so even if a fission reactor could be made to go off like a nuclear bomb (which is stated to be impossible), could the one reactor do this a second time after it would have had its first, chaotic nuclear explosion? So the actual destruction videos and eyewitness testimony further erode some of Tahil’s (and the Finn’s) hypotheses. Finally, numerous crucial statements Tahil wrote are incorrect. His rationale for the massive hidden reactor hypothesis was two-fold. 1. He claims that a fission bomb uses up 100% of its fissile material, when the correct figure is only 1-6%! and 2. Massive amounts of Strontium and other elements found in the dust, he claims, could only mean that two massive fission reactors were already present. My review showed that Strontium occurs in concrete, sometimes not as a tiny component, but as a relatively large percentage, as is known for the concrete used in making the Empire State Building and the Pentagon. All this taken together make his two hidden, massive, reactors hypothesis either physically impossible (to go off as a bomb and/or to subsequently be re-used), unnecessary, or untenable. But again his work is most valuable for demonstrating the likelihood that fission occurred during WTC destruction, and that the China Syndrome resulted. I have had no communications from Tahil after my review and critique of his hypotheses. But I continue to welcome honest criticism of both my critiques of the other nuclear scenarios, and of my own hypotheses. It is hoped that people will examine all the evidence (including survivors’ testimonies, EMP, massive heat, sound, radiation lowering methods used, photos, etc.), and the Physics I have outlined, and that are archived at these two blogs, http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and http://wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com, and stop promoting misinformation or disinformation. I assert this includes the “red mercury” scam, the tritium red herring, and the latter’s implied fission-free pure fusion hangout as well as seeing how massive hidden underground reactors going off as nuclear bombs are improbable if not impossible-- and don’t fit the destruction evidence, and eyewitness testimony. They are not needed when you learn the aspects of my “many small nukes” hypothesis. If you are truly interested in what was perpetrated on 9/11, please read the ENTIRETY of the two blogs that contain my archived nuclear 9/11 articles, and make up your own mind. And if you want to see just how the Official Regime “explanation” for what occurred at the WTC on 9/11/01, (and some of the “alternative” non-nuclear theories) used bogus science and committed outright fraud, there are more articles on this at this site. San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/11/crucial-differences-in-nuclear-911.html[07.11.2010 14:45:52]

World Trade Center Demolition: The Crucial Differences in the Nuclear 9/11 Theories "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

To sum up, all the evidence of the actual WTC destruction, and the great heat generated there for up to six months indicates that WTC destruction was most likely caused by numerous small nuclear fission bombs (micronukes), not by a single basement nuke, nor by massive hidden reactors that exploded like nuclear bombs. The China Syndrome Aftermath arose, and had to arise, because the fission fragments were contained in the buildings as they were nuked, and ended up all over the rubble pile, and beneath the towers and WTC7. It’s time to promote, or at least publicly discuss, the continual efforts made by this Anonymous [American] Physicist to examine all the evidence of the nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome Aftermath in New York City. Please promote these works both on the net and to friends, family, and neighbors. It is ABSOLUTELY THE MOST CRUCIAL ASPECT OF 911 TRUTH, TO INFORM PEOPLE THAT THE AMERICAN REGIME NUKED ITS OWN MOST POPULOUS CITY, NYC, ON 9/11. If your favorite blog or website ignores-- or blocks-- this most crucial aspect, either post it yourself or tell all your friends, family, etc. And carefully examine the differences in the nuclear 911 hypotheses, and eliminate the impossible, the improbable, the untenable, or what the evidence indicated is incorrect; and promote what fits all the evidence, and is physically tenable-- many small fission nukes were used to destroy the WTC on 9/11/01, and the China Syndrome Aftermath resulted. And the radiation issue is also discussed here. Please promote this, as there isn’t much time left before they pull away the wool from everyone’s eyes. It won’t be pleasant, and must be prevented. Life will not be worth living then. Remember Hiroshima. The survivors there were said to be envious of the dead. This may be what they have planned for all of us, with the American Regime being, as Rev. Martin Luther King said, “the greatest purveyor of evil in the world today.” Indeed, there is much evidence that the American regime nuked its own people at least once before 9/11/01, in the Port Chicago, California incident, as I detailed here. Thus the American regime remains the only regime that has nuked its own people, as well as others, and that fact would likely enrage the American people to act, as nothing else might. posted by spooked @ 6:58 AM

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/11/crucial-differences-in-nuclear-911.html[07.11.2010 14:45:52]

World Trade Center Demolition: The Crucial Differences in the Nuclear 9/11 Theories

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/11/crucial-differences-in-nuclear-911.html[07.11.2010 14:45:52]

World Trade Center Demolition: The Crucial Differences in the Nuclear 9/11 Theories

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/11/crucial-differences-in-nuclear-911.html[07.11.2010 14:45:52]

World Trade Center Demolition: On the Issue of Nuclear Demolition of the WTC and Radiation, from "Anonymous Physicist"

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

On the Issue of Nuclear Demolition of the WTC and Radiation, from "Anonymous Physicist"
The “anonymous physicist” has this to say on the issue of radiation during and after the WTC nuclear demolition. We must dispense with any naiveté on this important issue. If the EPA and Whitman had found massive radiation and/or radionuclides (radioactive/decaying elements) at the WTC after 9/11, does anyone believe they would ever release this data to the people? Relatedly, it later became known that they found high levels of (asbestos, mercury and other) toxins shortly after 9/11, and yet told the world, and the responders, that “the “air was safe.” They lied, for quite some time, about what they had found in this sense. Now if the EPA tested for, and found, significant radiation, and/or radionuclides, and failed to tell the responders this; it resulted in the responders not wearing radiationshielding, protective clothing. This would then likely lead to cancer and other illnesses. I note that there has been cancers, in 9/11 responders, and people living nearby; and asbestos is known to usually take far longer for its victims to get cancer. Could these cancers be the result of radiation? Cancer can be caused by even the very lowest levels of radiation. The father of the field of health physics, Dr. Karl Ziegler Morgan, has so stated. The EPA officials and Whitman would be liable for charges of mass murder and treason, just for this cover-up. Also if the government perpetrated 9/11 (and no one else could), would they allow another section of the government to give it all away? Do not the people know how the government lies, in perpetuity, about the Pearl Harbor set-up, the Kennedy assassination, and many more nefarious deeds it has perpetrated? In a similar vein, is anyone foolish enough to trust a certain physicist’s alleged data on his tests of a single steel beam and a friend’s apartment? This is the same physicist whose alleged data shot down the whole field of cold fusion, which might have, by now, obviated some of the need for oil, if this field wasn’t shot down? Could his “data” on cold fusion have been accurate if many scientists around the world (who aren’t govt disinfo agents) continue to publish data showing that cold fusion works? When this same physicist tries to shoot down the fact that mini-nukes were used to demolish the twin towers, he rightly knows that he has to address the issue of the evidence of EMPs (Electromagnetic Pulses). But he barely mentions it, and simply says that other factors could have caused the power outages. No mention of the toasted cars--and not people or paper right next to them. See Ondrovic’s statements already alluded to by me. Read how she was knocked down by the car door right next to her overheating from the EMP and exploding off the car and hitting her. Note that nothing heated her up directly (which also eliminates DEWs). That physicist knows well that there is no other explanation for these events, except EMP, so he does not include this evidence of the toasted cars or Ondrovic’ eyewitness (heavily redacted) testimony. No one knows better than that nuclear physicist that nukes were indeed used to kill nearly 3,000 people on 9/11. That is why his statements are replete with omissions, and

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/06/on-issue-of-nuclear-demolition-of-wtc.html[07.11.2010 14:46:41]

World Trade Center Demolition: On the Issue of Nuclear Demolition of the WTC and Radiation, from "Anonymous Physicist" 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

other falsifications not worthy of a complete rebuttal. Except to say one last thing. When he mentions the high temperatures and molten steel, at the WTC, he bogusly writes about this as if this occurred only during the demolition or just shortly thereafter. He ignores (as he must) the fact that flowing molten steel, and extremely high temperatures were found days, weeks and months after 9/11. Does anyone believe his beloved, bogus thermite was still generating massive heat days, weeks and months later? Any heat generated by thermite would have been gone minutes or hours after the event. Indeed, the heat from the mini-nukes themselves would also have dissipated within a short period of time. There are no reports of molten, flowing metal or high temperatures days, weeks or months after the events of Hiroshima or Nagasaki. This is why I had to propose another cause for this in my nuclear demolition article, other than the nuclear bombs themselves. And also why I included Tahil’s website as his is the only other explanation released about a possible source that could have generated high heat days, weeks and months afterwards. And I think my hypothesis of undetonated “extra” nukes impacted by the exploding nukes and going somewhat critical, is far more likely than his theory of two underground nuclear reactors having been surreptitiously built. But his reference was included by me, as it is not impossible. And someone interested in the truth includes other theories and other facts, and does not try to cleverly suppress them.

Also regarding the radiation issue, in this abstract of an article, a scientist, in 1969, published the following, “Nuclear device characteristics and the factors affecting radionuclide production and distribution are described along with some recent nuclear experiments conducted by the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission for the purpose of providing technical data on cratering mechanisms and special emplacement techniques which could minimize the release of radioactivity to the atmosphere.” This shows, even back in 1969, that the govt experimented with using nukes to construct canals. It shows that they worked on having nukes with blast effect, and little or no radioactive elements created. The article’s abstract hints at two methods for obviating atmospheric release of radioactivity. 1. Steering the device towards low radionuclide production and 2. "special emplacement techniques" which means place it where you won't get much or any radiation released into the air. As this was back in 1969, they likely have perfected very low (or no) radiation nukes. There should be better, more recent articles on this topic, but I didn't find any so far. Maybe I know why?! Could it be because they perfected this, and classified this, as they knew they would be using this on the “home front,” such as on 9/11? Could small nukes to be used for “construction,” have morphed into nukes used for “destruction?” Regarding 9/11, never forget that whatever radionuclides may have been created were sent to China, or otherwise were not allowed to be studied. This remarkable article states that before the steel was shipped to China, it was "first sent to be washed down"— a standard method of decreasing radiation levels! This article also has a top secret demolition expert/geologist saying that even the 1993 WTC bomb was a nuke, and they wanted him to be in charge of "better" nuking of the WTC in the future, and he refused! In this light, I always thought it strange that the govt basically admitted that they were the ones to use actual explosive in 1993 WTC hit. They even had a TV movie made depicting this. Do you recall how their inside man, an Egyptian agent, worked with the FBI? When he allegedly asked the FBI to switch to a non-exploding dud, the FBI allegedly told him to use the actual explosive! Why weren’t these FBI agents charged? Why would the FBI/govt admit to this malfeasance? Now it makes sense-- whenever the regime admits to something really bad, it's usually because the truth is vastly worse still! The same demolition expert said of the 1993 nuke— after he examined the basement of that tower: "The particular type of construction type micronuclear device is mostly

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/06/on-issue-of-nuclear-demolition-of-wtc.html[07.11.2010 14:46:41]

World Trade Center Demolition: On the Issue of Nuclear Demolition of the WTC and Radiation, from "Anonymous Physicist" radiologically clean." So, as I indicated in my WTC nuclear demolition article, recent nuclear devices can be designed to be “steered” towards blast capability, and away from any (significant) radiation release. For completeness, I note that if there was significant radioactivity released, some such elements have short lives both in terms of time and distance. Few, if any "citizens" right there had Geiger counters, most of which have serious limitations. These nukes went off basically inside steel boxes. The government’s own study found significant levels of tritium (a signature of a fusion device, and according to Tahil, if he is honest, even end-products of fission were found). But the govt study notes that they were “unable” to test at numerous places— but especially deep underground, which was where the high temperatures and molten steel were observed! Of course, there is the possibility (since this is the govt), that they did test at these places, and discarded anything that would have proved the case for mini-nukes. With other government “investigations,” whistle-blowers have revealed that often there is much evidence, but it is eliminated. Sometimes absolute proof of nefarious deeds by govt elements is sent to Congress, and they immediately "LOSE" it. The govt has apparently used the most horrific methods to silence a FEMA photographer (Sonnenfeld), one of only two people, the govt allowed to video the WTC site. San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

The bottom line is that the govt is known to have created construction/destruction mini-nukes that likely produce little radiation or radionuclides. The govt’s own WTC study admitted to finding tritium (with a laughable explanation of its possible source) and other elements that could have been from a fusion (or even a fission device according to Tahil). The local govt leader (Giuliani) colluded with the federal perpetrators to cart off the evidence including building components and people’s remains, and disallowed their examination which clearly is obstruction of justice, but which prevented proper radiation studies—except apparently later for one steel beam. Was the latter chosen carefully, if you know what I mean? This govt has repeatedly proven that it would never release any data that would be complete proof that could lead to the prosecution—for mass murder and high treason here—of its officials all the way to the top…whoever that really is. posted by spooked @ 11:21 AM

<< Home

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/06/on-issue-of-nuclear-demolition-of-wtc.html[07.11.2010 14:46:41]

World Trade Center Demolition: On the Issue of Nuclear Demolition of the WTC and Radiation, from "Anonymous Physicist" "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/06/on-issue-of-nuclear-demolition-of-wtc.html[07.11.2010 14:46:41]

World Trade Center Demolition: On the Issue of Nuclear Demolition of the WTC and Radiation, from "Anonymous Physicist"

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/06/on-issue-of-nuclear-demolition-of-wtc.html[07.11.2010 14:46:41]

World Trade Center Demolition: On the Issue of Nuclear Demolition of the WTC and Radiation, from "Anonymous Physicist"

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/06/on-issue-of-nuclear-demolition-of-wtc.html[07.11.2010 14:46:41]

World Trade Center Demolition: WTC Nuke Thesis from "Anonymous Physicist"

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

WTC Nuke Thesis from "Anonymous Physicist"

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities The "Powers That Be" (PTB) knew the “plausible” ruse that they would put out. It would be the pseudo free fall time for the bogus planes/fuel/gravity/pancake hypothesis. The perps desired that WTC1 and 2 have top-down “collapses” to go along with the bogus plane hits. The PTB also always have their disinfo agents waiting in the wings to come out when enough people see that the official ruse is NOT plausible. 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

The “anonymous physicist” has new ideas on the nuclear demolition of the towers of the WTC. In destroying the World Trade Center on 9/11/01, the U.S. regime (and those who control it) once again wanted to employ a plan that allowed for their coveted “plausible deniability.” As an aside, the plausibility is usually for the American masses. Anyone who is able to think and change usually has more than enough clues to get pretty far into the truth. Now only nuclear devices and their concomitant EMPs fit all the evidence—along with conventional explosives used in a subordinate manner. But this ultimate truth must be hidden. Just as the regime still hides the likelihood that it nuked its own sailors in the Port Chicago explosion in 1944.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/05/wtc-nuke-thesis-from-anonymous.html[07.11.2010 14:47:39]

World Trade Center Demolition: WTC Nuke Thesis from "Anonymous Physicist" With the analogous JFK assassination, when enough people saw that the patsy Oswald (himself CIA/ONI) could not be the culprit shooting from behind, as the fatal shot was from the front; the PTB put out a "Babel" of CONTROLLED alternatives: Mafia, LBJ, Cubans, Grassy Knoll, rogue elements, etc (some of which were involved). All of that was to hide the horrifying, ultimate truth that the alleged government protector did it—- as has been discussed by Spooked previously. With 9/11, the Babel of planes/fuel/gravity, thermite/thermate [etc.], DEW, car bombs in the basement, and surely more to come, was waiting when a critical mass of people rejected the (always) ludicrous, official, “investigation” conclusion. The massive, rapid outward—as well as downward and upward—explosions of the two towers, the toasted cars (but not paper), and popping ceiling lights (Ondrovic—see below), the micron-sized dustification of tower contents, the levels of tritium and heavy metals, the underground molten steel and high temperatures weeks and months later, all can only be accounted for by nuclear devices and their EMPs. The fact that the explosions are simultaneously outward, downward and upwards means we have a spherical blast wave, such as occurs with a nuclear device. 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

The anonymous Finnish military expert—- to whom all real 9/11 truth seekers are indebted—- appears to believe that only one fusion device in the 1-kiloton range was used in each tower. This may be so, but it should be debated. I believe the evidence indicates several fusion bombs went off during the destruction of the two towers. In fact, the dimensions of the towers likely required several nukes. The towers are much taller than their other two dimensions. A single large nuclear, spherical blast wave large enough to destroy a tower's complete height would have been too powerful to be contained in its other two dimensions. The results would have been seen and (more) catastrophic. So several smaller nukes likely were needed, and used. I believe also that there is much evidence that WTC 3, 4, 5, 6 also were taken down with internal nuclear devices. WTC7 appears to have been imploded with conventional demolition methods as videos show no concomitant vaporization, nor massive chunks expelled outwards during “collapse,” nor any internal spherical holes as in WTC6 and WTC3 (in between the “collapses” of the two towers).

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/05/wtc-nuke-thesis-from-anonymous.html[07.11.2010 14:47:39]

World Trade Center Demolition: WTC Nuke Thesis from "Anonymous Physicist"

San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 Accurate analysis may forever only be possible by the perps themselves. This is because of many factors including the immense variation in the possible power, number, and type of nuclear devices used, false evidence (doctored videos, photos, witnesses, media, government reports), complexity of a nuclear explosion, inclusion of non-nuke elements in the “collapses” etc. For completeness, I note that William Tahil, a technology consultant, claims that his research leads to the conclusion that each tower had a nuclear fission reactor underneath it that was forced to criticality. He has a free summary, and offers a full report (for purchase) that I have not read. In initiating discussion of the possible details of the nuclear devices used on 9/11, I note that the number and energy release of these devices are perhaps the most relevant parameters. Spooked has published government documentation of nukes as small as just pounds of TNT, or about a millionth of a kiloton. I go along with the Finnish expert that fission-free fusion devices were likely used. The Finnish expert states that a 1 kiloton (TNT equivalent) basement fusion device was used on each tower. I believe that a total of 1/10th of that amount was more than sufficient, including the power needed for vaporization/dustification of each tower’s contents. I believe this 1/10th kt total energy per tower occurred in several blasts (per tower), and in just one per other WTC buildings (possibly 3, 4, 5, 6). I believe that WTC7 did not have a nuclear device used during “collapse,” but could have had one just afterwards to vaporize evidence as all the federal alphabet agencies were in that building, and it would have been a likely planning/command center for 9/11 with a lot of evidence to definitively “lose.” 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine)

What would have been the right range of energy for the desired events while maintaining “plausible deniability?” Or the illusion of that-- many people go into a deep state of denial, just begging for any ludicrous “big lie” from their government (as Hitler noted). Too large a nuke and you would instantly vaporize the towers and maybe surrounding areas (and lose the bogus gravity/pancake theory). Too small a nuke and you wouldn’t have “shock and awe,” nor insure total (pseudo free fall) collapse and

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/05/wtc-nuke-thesis-from-anonymous.html[07.11.2010 14:47:39]

World Trade Center Demolition: WTC Nuke Thesis from "Anonymous Physicist" vaporization of the buildings’ contents which was apparently desired—always destroy the evidence, and kill the witnesses. This was apparently aided by the taking of much (radioactive?) material by China—- a supposed adversary—but another indication of the actual, global control of the PTB. Other material including human remains went into road pavement. Was all this, including the human remains, radioactive? The fission devices that went off at the Trinity/Alamogordo site, and Hiroshima and Nagasaki were said to be of the order of 10-20 kilotons of TNT. Such devices yield great fluxes of neutrons and gamma rays. Also resultant are air pressure blasts, and tremendous heat of the order of 100 million degrees. Modern devices are “steerable” in terms of desired percentages of these output parameters. The “radius of total destruction” in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was about one mile in each city. Total destruction includes vaporization of buildings and people nearer to the hypocenter or ground zero. The fate of buildings and people near the hypocenter of a nuclear device is indicated by this: “The Shima hospital, the hypocenter of the [Hiroshima] atomic bomb was vaporized, along with all her patients.” Farther away from the hypocenter, the so-called shadow people left their shadows on buildings as the people vaporized, but not the buildings. Other people still further away, but not vaporized, were left in a charred condition. Farther away still, survivors had burned, or torn away skin. Are all these reasons why we are not allowed to see any photos of any human remains from 9/11? We cannot expect every single, murdered person to have been completely vaporized. Photos of body parts in morgues have also not been allowed to be seen by the public. Indeed EMT Patricia Ondrovic has seen the body parts in the city morgue. Is this part of the redactions to her statement? Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man

Returning to the parameters of the nukes of 9/11, given the energy, the destruction radius and other parameters of Hiroshima and its comparison to WTC1 or 2, the Finnish expert concluded that a single 1-kiloton, underground nuke was used. I conclude that likely several nukes per tower were used—- but totaling 1/10th of a kiloton per tower. One key in my analysis is the number of times we suddenly see massive chunks of building expelled outwards like the trajectories of large chunks of earth seen in (above-ground) photos of underground test nukes. Remember WTC 1 and 2 destruction events look more like the Nevada nuclear tests than the Hiroshima bomb. This video even appears to show a central mushroom cloud at the end of it. The similarity to underground test nukes means that any and all nukes were set off at least several floors below any extant levels. A nuke per floor was not needed or desired. Rather I see this tremendous outward exploding of large chunks of WTC 1 and 2, about two or three times per tower. But remember, what we see is soon obscured by dust/debris, and that other buildings also prevent us from seeing much of the bottom half of each tower’s destruction. In discussing this aspect, it is important to realize I write now of powerful outward explosions of massive chunks—- often appearing to emanate from the center which indeed was the likely location of the nuke(s). These outward explosions need to be distinguished from the “peeling away”—- and then falling-- of the outer structure (sometimes in very large chunks) of the towers. IMO, this peeling away occurred because there no longer was any inside structure at that level at that time! (The remaining, succeeding, inside top portions looked like the final photos of the inside of WTC6.) There would still be some outward-vectored force all along the outer structure at all times due to heat and over-pressure inside, causing the peeling-away of the outer structure observed. But I refer to the large chunks that suddenly were flung to great distances. The videos seem to indicate that this happened 2-3 times per tower, and again we do not see most of the bottom half. However I note that the well-known collapse/vaporization of the remaining steel core after WTC1 fell is seen at the same time that we see the so-called “nuclear glow.” Notice how this glow from the WTC1 (nuclear) demolition (seen on the left side) causes the

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/05/wtc-nuke-thesis-from-anonymous.html[07.11.2010 14:47:39]

World Trade Center Demolition: WTC Nuke Thesis from "Anonymous Physicist" Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

whole background to brighten at one point, and then how the camera is panned to the right so as to no longer video what they were showing in the first place! Was this a “cleaner nuke”—see below—inadvertently captured because there was no building to contain it? Again it would be good (from the perps’ viewpoint) to vaporize any remaining people and building contents (evidence) just after final “collapse.” So I believe about 4-6 nukes per tower were used. Each one would have a radius of about 10-15 floors, or a diameter of about 20-30 floors. Nukes would be placed strategically (centrally?) to try to vaporize the strong 47 beam steel core—- the sturdiest and most heat-resistant part of the towers’ structure—- and therefore likely the last to get vaporized. However I now make the assertion that completely doing away with the 47 beam steel support core was not necessary! Why? With a nuclear device that vaporizes most of the inside [which will soon be micro-particles floating around outside], there would be little left of the inside to need support! While preferable to do away with as much of this 47 steel beam support as possible without “over-nuking” everything, it was therefore not essential for its entirety to be vaporized. Indeed we may see that some of this support--up to about the 60th floor (the "spire")-- remained after “collapse” of WTC1-- and was then itself likely nuked/vaporized, during the “nuclear glow”. Why was there a need to vaporize the left-over support beams? Because, as my argument above asserts, 100% obliteration of these beams is more necessary for the bogus “collapse” mechanism, than for the actual, nuclear destruction mechanism!

The perps would want maximum use of each nuke for its full diameter. Preplanted conventional explosives (thermite/thermate/other, or very tiny nukes) were used to initiate each tower’s visible collapse, at the appropriate floor (where earlier conventional, shape charges had simulated plane dimensions, and provided initial shock and awe in their fireballs)—for public consumption. A properly, pre-placed nuke subsequently went off in each top part, centered in each separated top part after initial demolition began at the appropriate floor. Remember the floors that were “hit” were in fact just exploded as part of the plan, so nukes were pre-placed in the centers of the pre-known dimensions of the top tower parts for their subsequent vaporization. These nukes and top vaporizations were initiated shortly after the demolitions began at the “plane-hit” levels. This could explain the kinking noted by Spooked in the WTC2 top corner. The nuke has caused some loss of integrity (from neutrons or even direct heat) in the structure at that point (and other less visible points), shortly before vaporization. Kinking is also a sign of wave interference as wave energy builds up at corners, and the kink is near a corner. The fact that there was a 30 story part of the tower that was tilted and about to fall “badly” is part of the “beauty” of the nuking of the towers (from the perps’ viewpoint). This was not likely supposed to happen. But they simply vaporized their error! This is also analogous to the dipping of the radio tower of WTC1 before the top piece accordions into itself, then vaporizes. The radio tower is in the center, and a centrally placed nuke’s spherical blast wave (causing loss of structural integrity) will reach a point directly above it before it would reach all around the building to start the “accordioning” of the entire visible circumferences. This is part of what I call the inside/out effect which occurred along with the top/down effect. Now the two tower tops had vertical lengths of about 18 and 30 floors, not counting the radio tower (very little of which was found at Ground Zero, like a great deal of the towers). A key factor is that the nukes (not counting any underground ones) are always several floors beneath remaining building levels when they go off. Otherwise—if the nuke was at the surface of the remaining building at that time—- building parts would have been expelled to great distances, perhaps many miles away. Also we might have seen more visual evidence of the nuking. Perhaps this is consistent with the “nuclear glow” seen at the end of WTC1 “collapse”, as there was little or no building left (only debris clouds) at that time to obscure this. Was the glow

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/05/wtc-nuke-thesis-from-anonymous.html[07.11.2010 14:47:39]

World Trade Center Demolition: WTC Nuke Thesis from "Anonymous Physicist" from a final nuke that also collapsed/vaporized the remaining/standing steel core? A decision as to whether, or not, to use more nukes towards the end of each tower’s destruction—- when smoke and debris would shield the state of the remaining building could have been facilitated by helicopters, planes, even satellites overhead, which could have scanned the site—using wavelengths that see through smoke—- and directed more nuclear (or conventional?) explosions (especially at the lower levels or ground), as needed.

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Because there was no plane crash excuse for WTC 3, 4, 5, and 6, probably “underpowered nukes” were used inside these buildings. WTC 4, 5, and 6 were each 7-9 stories high. The PTB wanted to claim that these edifices were damaged by falling parts of the two towers. So these buildings were not vaporized in near total fashion, as were the two towers. Their outer shells were left over. But the large, nearly, spherical hole in WTC6, and its deep underground hole, are indications of a likely internal, nuclear spherical blast. In particular, I think that on-scene, EMT, Patricia Ondrovic’s statements to Killtown and her heavily redacted interview with the WTC task force indicate that she saw—- right next to her—- EMP [Electromagnetic Pulse] effects from a nuke set off in or near WTC6. I refer to her observations of ceiling lights popping in the lobby of WTC6, and the cars just outside catching fire at this same time. Indeed the EMP-induced heat on one car door near her, caused it to rapidly expand and explode off the vehicle and hit her. Her interviews indicate that the overheard, commencing, rumbling collapse of WTC2 (further away from her) occurred just as she saw WTC5 and 6 start to explode (”collapse”) right near her. The timing Ondrovic states here indicates that WTC2, WTC5, and WTC6 had nukes go off inside each one simultaneously. Fortunately for her, as I noted above, these (WTC 5, 6) explosions were “underpowered,” and left much outer structure standing, and she was far enough away from WTC2 to be able to run away from the area and survive.

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

WTC7, the possible planning/command center with its plethora of federal agents, was special. No nukes, at least not above ground. I suggest that it was NOT a faux pas that Silverstein, on public TV, admitted they “pulled it” with conventional demolition! But the regime tried to “take it back” when a public outcry began over that admission!

WTC3, the 22-story Marriott Hotel, may have also had a nuke vaporize most of its top floors, or this one may have been destroyed by falling debris? Let us analyze this. A picture of WTC3 after the first WTC2 collapse, but before WTC1 collapse, indicates WTC3 had its own “underpowered” internal nuclear spherical blast wave damage it, a la WTC6:

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/05/wtc-nuke-thesis-from-anonymous.html[07.11.2010 14:47:39]

World Trade Center Demolition: WTC Nuke Thesis from "Anonymous Physicist"

The final state of WTC3 reveals about three floors remaining and does not show the massive parts of WTC2 that allegedly fell on WTC3:

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/05/wtc-nuke-thesis-from-anonymous.html[07.11.2010 14:47:39]

World Trade Center Demolition: WTC Nuke Thesis from "Anonymous Physicist"

Did the nukes going off in WTC 2 vaporize these chunks before they hit WTC3? Did the nukes of WTC1 cause the outer shell of WTC3 to later vaporize? Did after-collapse nukes do this? Should we call these “cleaner nukes” in analogy to how the regime sends in its “cleaners” to remove evidence after one of their agents has performed some nefarious deed?

Now I must include some related and important issues. Were deep underground nukes set off a few seconds before the start of visible “collapse” as audio and video indicates? Included herein is the supposed vaporization of the underground 50 ton steel press. Some of the testimony on this however comes from William Rodriguez who I cannot trust because of his apparent deep background. He was a TV magician cum janitor cum press agent cum janitor—cum hero! And he was not in his usual place (high up) at his usual time that morning.

What happens if a large flux of neutrons, gamma rays, pressure, heat etc. reaches another, unexploded mini-nuke? Will the latter still go off somewhat as planned—- i.e., have its own chain reaction-- or will it fizzle? If it goes off, what percentage of its maximum potential will be realized? Would it at least be interfered with and compromised, probably to a significant level? Or could it have been sufficiently shielded? Is it not likely that only non-interfered, or “virgin” nukes would be used? The perps would want to have things go as much as possible exactly the way they want. This would be unlike conventional charges which could have one trigger the next etc. I would imagine that the placement of mini-nukes would be such that one would be out of the range of affecting the next one. But I cannot know this for sure. But this is what I have assumed in this discussion.

However we need to examine this matter of “left-over” nukes that may have been “compromised.” What if some nukes, maybe even one or more final “cleaner nuke(s)” destroyed the integrity of the shielding of “left-over” nukes? It is indeed possible that sub-critical components subsequently interacted and would then release significant energy for some time! They could well act like the nuclear reactor proposed by William Tahil (above).

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/05/wtc-nuke-thesis-from-anonymous.html[07.11.2010 14:47:39]

World Trade Center Demolition: WTC Nuke Thesis from "Anonymous Physicist" This idea seems to be far more likely (and feasible) than his hypothesis that the perps had surreptitiously built two underground nuclear reactors there. One or more compromised nuclear fusion (or possibly even fission— if Tahil’s take on the government’s report is correct)—- bombs, with their sub-critical, but now interacting, components releasing significant amounts of energy and heat at their locale(s) could indeed be responsible for the high temperatures (and molten steel) seen at the WTC weeks and months after 9/11. This also dovetails with reports of “unexploded micro-nukes” being removed from the Oklahoma City bombing by federal agents—after being placed there and used by other federal agents! Bill Deagle, M.D. has reported that one military agent, and patient of his, told him: “We removed two undetonated softball sized micronuclear bombs [from the Murrah building].”

Perhaps even the “nuclear glow” seen in the CNN footage—which I note is sustained for some time, as the camera pans away from it—- is the initiation of a nuclear reactor-like event (caused by a “cleaner nuke” or earlier demolition nuke, or even conventional explosives) and undergoing a limited criticality event like the “tickling the dragon’s tail” experiments—performed at Los Alamos. Massive visible blue light emission (as well as neutrons and gamma rays) resulted when criticality was attained in this limited fashion. I believe that with all the other materials exploding, some could even have acted as “control rods” yielding a sustained, pseudo-nuclear reactor. And there could have been several unexploded nukes “left-over” in each tower. Or even a single nuclear device could have had its components blasted to several locales. But never forget, the massive heat released when a nuclear reactor goes awry is why they called it the “China Syndrome.” The heat released (in theory) could melt all the way down to China!

The above discussion of possible interactions of pre-planted, mini-nukes leads to the matter of the outer structure demolition. With this aspect, there may well have been interacting conventional (or other) explosives. But before we delve into this, it must be noted that what occurred, or was observed, in this regard was likely done for public consumption. What happened inside was not directly observed—- with the possible exception of some events like the “nuclear glow” that shone through. We must also realize that the videos and photos promulgated of the outer destruction of the two towers may be as doctored, as are nearly all the videos of the two alleged “plane hits.” The regime wanted to make it “plausible” that a rapid, pseudo-free fall, pancaking occurred. People who have analyzed the public videos of WTC 1 and 2 outer structure “collapses”/demolitions report a 10 floor per second “collapse.” This is presumably for that first second. I note that this is much faster than simple, gravitational collapse would allow in that first second (16 feet.) After the initial “collapse” has started, dust and debris and other buildings soon obscure things. Those right there videoing had to stop and leave as fast as they could. But if the times for total collapse of the towers are about 10 or 11 seconds, and we have about 100 floors involved (as I am not counting separated top parts of the towers which seem to be disappearing shortly after initiation of final events.) Thus we apparently have an approximately constant outer floor demolition rate of about 10 floors downward per second throughout.

We need to examine the possible mechanisms for this and how this outer structure demolition dovetails with the inner, nuclear demolition hypothesis. Were pre-planted conventional (or even tinier nukes?) used to blow out the (visible) outer structure of each floor while the inside was being vaporized with nukes? Did these presumably outer building conventional explosives interact with each other, or the nukes? One possibility is that an explosive in the outer structure of the floor above reached, and then triggered, the explosive in the outer structure of the floor just below it, and so on. Could

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/05/wtc-nuke-thesis-from-anonymous.html[07.11.2010 14:47:39]

World Trade Center Demolition: WTC Nuke Thesis from "Anonymous Physicist" these charges have been placed in or at the outer structure soon before 9/11/01, or even when the buildings were erected–- for those who know “ultimate truths”? There are so many possibilities—- including a visible (yet “disconnected”) “standard” demolition for the outer structure. But always remember, my central hypothesis here is that the towers were demolished primarily by hidden, internal, nuclear devices. The outer structure demolition events were created-- or faked-- for public consumption and “plausibility.” One could even argue that this issue is a side-show to distract from the nuking of the towers, and likely several other WTC buildings. There may even have been precedent for this. Dr. Deagle's military expert's revelation to him even indicates that the OKC bombing may have been, in a way, the blueprint for the WTC bombing, as follows: The expert indicated that the truck's conventional bomb went off at the same time the micronukes were detonated, and acted as cover for the micro-nukes. Numerous explosives experts had separately stated that the truck bomb could not have had sufficient explosive power to do the damage observed. My hypothesis for the WTC tower bombings also has conventional explosives being used as cover for more massive damage done by simultaneous nuclear devices. I assert that what was happening inside—- nuclear detonation(s)—- caused the collapses, regardless of what any outer explosions did, or were faked to appear to have done. This may even be consistent with the towers’ demolitions actually beginning with the large explosions-- apparently in the sub-basements of the towers-- recorded several seconds (see above) before the visible “collapses” began near the tops. In the final analysis, I assert—- as per the above detailed nuclear mechanism—that even if there were no outer structure explosions, the outer structure would have “peeled away” anyway because of what was occurring inside.

Finally in writing this WTC nuke hypothesis, I have left it somewhat in the chronological order that it was written. In this light, I have seen video evidence that appears to clearly supersede some of the ideas above. However, I will leave those in, as it is still possible that numerous things were used by the perps to confuse the issue, or for later release when the time suits them, and for completeness for future researchers. But this video —- which also fits the geometry of the situation—- is one of the clearest of the initial destruction of WTC1, and appears to fit a nuclear demolition only —- i.e., conventional explosives appear not to have been needed or used. This video (if genuine) indicates that a central, nuclear, spherical blast occurred at the central level of the bogus plane hit—- about the 98th floor or so. Now imagine many lines (representing blast energy) radiating away from this nuclear bomb center at the same time. The shortest distance—or time—- to the outer structure occurs occurs along the horizontal level with the bomb, which is, as per the above, about the 98th floor. (This can also be imagined as a sphere inside WTC1 whose horizontal diameters just touch the inside of the tower at the 98th floor.) Next to reach the outer structure would be the radii just above and just below this floor. Again, the next radii after this to simultaneously reach the outer structure would be two floors below and two floors above this 98th floor. Thus we would have succeeding downward exploding outer floors at the same time that we would have succeeding upward exploding outer floors. But (rising) smoke, and debris quickly obscure things. As the visible “wave” of exploding outer floors travels downward, the top piece of WTC1 accordions into itself and vaporizes. This accordioning rate appears to be at the same rate as the rate below the “hit” level. Also, gravity would not have much effect on these rapid explosions (and these ideas) if the 10 floors per second “collapse” rate for that first second is accurate. So it appears that no separate nuke was essential for destroying the top pieces. The nuke used at “collapse” initiation was sufficient to both vaporize a significant part of the tower both below and above the “plane hit” level, and the video shows this. As above, this nuke had a diameter of about 30 floors, and likely two more were needed and used, not counting any cleaner nukes. Also I believe “extras” were in place at points along the height of the towers, and near the base for use as needed.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/05/wtc-nuke-thesis-from-anonymous.html[07.11.2010 14:47:39]

World Trade Center Demolition: WTC Nuke Thesis from "Anonymous Physicist"

Summary and Conclusions
This article has attempted to elaborate on how nuclear devices demolished the WTC towers, and to explain related phenomenon observed at that time, and afterwards. While the immense complexity, removal of evidence, and alteration of evidence makes certainty quite impossible, the above analysis indicates the following scenario may be the most likely. Bogus plane hits (perhaps accompanied by genuine plane/missile fly-bys) were really explosions of pre-planted conventional shaped explosive charges simulating plane outlines. After a certain amount of time for (the bogus claim of) melting the steel support, the towers were demolished (as were other WTC buildings with concomitant EMP evidence), with internal nuclear devices, most likely mini-fusion bombs. The demolitions began in each tower with a nuclear device going off at the “plane hit” level. The geometry and the video evidence indicate several more were used per tower, and that a cleaner nuke was used at the end. This article is also perhaps the first to provide a plausible explanation for the remarkable high temperatures and molten steel , observed for weeks and months after 9/11, at the WTC. The explanation given here is that one or more non-exploded, nuclear devices lost their integrity from the effects of other nuclear devices going off. These “affected” nukes attained some criticality akin to a nuclear reactor, and gave off high heat for weeks and months afterwards. This nuclear scenario hypothesis appears to be consistent and complete; and has no need for other things such as thermite (except possibly at the bogus plane hits/explosions), or directed energy beam weapons, or other exotica.

The author hopes that this article will initiate comments, corrections, improvements, and much needed discussion and action. Shills should always remember that the perps who placed the nukes were likely the first to be eliminated on 9/11. The author wishes to thank Spooked for his helpful ideas during the writing of this article, and for posting it.

It is hoped that people never forget that this horrific event was nothing less than a wanton, nuclear holocaust perpetrated against nearly 3,000 people by their so-called government. And used as an excuse to murder countless more thousands of human beings who had nothing to do with the events of 9/11/01. Finally, about the radiation issue, please see this article. posted by spooked @ 8:48 AM

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/05/wtc-nuke-thesis-from-anonymous.html[07.11.2010 14:47:39]

World Trade Center Demolition: If the WTC Nuclear Destruction Had the China Syndrome Aftermath, Why Didn’t Hiroshima?

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Tuesday, September 02, 2008

If the WTC Nuclear Destruction Had the China Syndrome Aftermath, Why Didn’t Hiroshima?
by The Anonymous Physicist The extensive evidence that the World Trade Center area “suffered” from great heat in the rubble pile and beneath the towers, from heat generated by the China Syndrome is here. But if my nuclear fission hypothesis for the destruction of the WTC is correct, why didn’t the fission bomb that destroyed Hiroshima have a known China Syndrome there? The reason is that there are numerous differences between the two events. My “many nukes” hypothesis for WTC destruction contains the concepts of redundant nukes, fratricided and fizzled nukes. Please read the above archived articles to understand just what attempting to explode many small nukes in the enclosed buildings entails, and even my hypothesis that the early explosions in WTC7 likely were fizzled micro-nukes. Now for some specific, relevant differences. Hiroshima was just one fission nuclear bomb, not many as with the WTC. Redundant, fratricided and fizzled nukes are not relevant to the events of Hiroshima, unlike the WTC. Finally, Hiroshima did not have a China Syndrome Aftermath because the A-bomb went off at an altitude of about 1800 feet, and IN OPEN AIR-- NOT IN THE CENTERS OF BUILDINGS NOR THEIR BASEMENTS. The Hiroshima nuke was, of course, much larger than the sum of the numerous micro-nukes employed to destroy the WTC. As I have detailed, a fission nuke uses up only some 1-6% of its fissile material in its chain reactions before the remainder is blown apart from the heat and pressure resulting from the chain reactions. The 80 generations of fission chain reaction take but a total of one microsecond before the bomb’s contents themselves are blown apart. In the open air, much of the micro-fragments of the remainder 94-99% of the fissile material (Uranium-235) were in the fireball, and much of this rose further with the fireball. But these heavy Uranium atoms fell back down. Some dispersed into the upper atmosphere, and would come down around the world. (Note that no Gov’t has released atmospheric radiation data in the days after 9/11/01--this is perhaps both telling [of the worldwide collusion of regimes] and sad.) At Hiroshima, they came down in notorious fashion. Much of the remaining Uranium fissioning atoms came down 30 minutes later in the so-called “Black Rain.” Many more people may have died because they suffered desperate thirst from their dehydrated condition in part from damaged, melted, hanging skin; and they drank the black rain, as there no longer was running water. They thus ingested radioactive particles. (The worst thing they could have done.) There was no known China Syndrome Aftermath at Hiroshima because the Uranium atoms came down over a widely dispersed area; and thus were not concentrated enough to have heat generating effect in any known areas. Note that I have detailed that at Hiroshima, radiation levels on the

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/if-wtc-nuclear-destruction-had-china.html[07.11.2010 14:48:45]

World Trade Center Demolition: If the WTC Nuclear Destruction Had the China Syndrome Aftermath, Why Didn’t Hiroshima? 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

ground were low enough so that American troops were there performing various tasks within a few days. At the WTC, the micro-nukes (emplaced in the centers) were chosen small enough so as to not vaporize the outer structure (and give the Op-Plan away). So as the micro-nukes were going off at each level and in the sub-basement area, the outer structure was still extant for the most part. Also there was no fireball under these conditions that rose to 15,000 feet or so. Just as there were no fireballs seen in all the underground nuclear tests. And there was no rain for several days. The heavy Uranium atoms and fragments, if in the dust, would have come down first, with all the many lighter elements coming down on top of them soon thereafter. This effect may even have provided some radiation shielding. Much of the rubble pile was indeed hot, and led to such phenomena as melted firemen’s and dog’s boots; and the need to hose down the rubble pile for many weeks and months, with countless photos showing the steam emanation that resulted. Fratricided or fizzled nukes and the more totally enclosed sub-basement effect would have left more concentrated fission fragments in some areas and in the former basements. These would later give rise to massive temperatures and molten metal weeks and months later, as detailed in the above-cited archived articles. Indeed, I would assert that the floors that were chosen for the initial explosions, (the “official,” but CGI “plane hit” floors), were chosen precisely because they still provided enough height and building material so that the first nukes going off at their top-most level would not vaporize through to the top! That could have allowed a visible rising fireball that had to be avoided. In other words, if the first nuke, in the top-down demolition, occurred at or near the top floor, it could have vaporized through to the outside air and a visible fireball could have then ensued. So the floors for the “plane hit” explosions were carefully chosen to coincide with the placement of the initial nukes to go off. This logic also dictates that if there were no planes, it is also highly unlikely that missiles hit the towers either. Anything hitting the towers could have jeopardized both the smaller shape charges to go off-- and create the so-called plane-shaped holes; and also if the wrong floor were hit, it could have interfered with the planned start of the top-down nuclear demolition, although some redundancy was probably built in. But we should also never forget at least one similarity between Hiroshima and the WTC. Just as many people close to the Hiroshima hypocenter were vaporized, over 1100 human beings in the WTC towers were so vaporized that no intact strands of DNA could be used for identification. But fortunately there was one major difference in the aftermath, there was no widely dispersed, radioactive “black rain” to ingest or have fall upon people. The people of Japan have never forgotten their “black rain,” nor their Hiroshima that was perpetrated by the same regime, primarily against innocent women, children and old men (despite the American propaganda efforts to imply otherwise). Likewise it must be the task for Americans to learn what this same regime did to the innocent human beings in the World Trade Center and the 40,000 responders, and the many nearby Metro New York residents and workers. The terms Hiroshima and World Trade Center need to become synonymous. And the world needs to come together to counter this same monstrous regime before it kills all or most of humanity! posted by spooked @ 4:37 AM

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/if-wtc-nuclear-destruction-had-china.html[07.11.2010 14:48:45]

World Trade Center Demolition: If the WTC Nuclear Destruction Had the China Syndrome Aftermath, Why Didn’t Hiroshima? San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/if-wtc-nuclear-destruction-had-china.html[07.11.2010 14:48:45]

World Trade Center Demolition: If the WTC Nuclear Destruction Had the China Syndrome Aftermath, Why Didn’t Hiroshima? "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/if-wtc-nuclear-destruction-had-china.html[07.11.2010 14:48:45]

World Trade Center Demolition: If the WTC Nuclear Destruction Had the China Syndrome Aftermath, Why Didn’t Hiroshima?

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/if-wtc-nuclear-destruction-had-china.html[07.11.2010 14:48:45]

World Trade Center Demolition: If the WTC Nuclear Destruction Had the China Syndrome Aftermath, Why Didn’t Hiroshima?

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/if-wtc-nuclear-destruction-had-china.html[07.11.2010 14:48:45]

World Trade Center Demolition: How to Explain the Incredible Symmetrical Destruction of WTC7?

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Sunday, July 01, 2007

How to Explain the Incredible Symmetrical Destruction of WTC7?
WTC7 Demolition: Conventional, or Nuclear After All-- and the Speculative Nuclear Borer Hypothesis By the Anonymous Physicist

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

The "anonymous physicist" writes: I trust you have read my recent articles on the nuclear destruction of the WTC. In that I wrote that the controlled demolition (henceforth abbreviated as CD) of WTC7 appeared to be conventional. I reasoned that videos do not show the massive outward explosions seen during the nuclear destruction of WTC1, 2. And there is the fact that much of WTC1 and 2 was vaporized and is not there in its own rubble (footprint), whereas WTC7 demolition shows numerous "pancaked" floors remaining. But further examining of the evidence requires continued thinking on this question. As always, I caution people to overcome naiveté and inertia; and to realize the possibility that many photos and videos released on all 9/11 skyscrapers' "collapses" may have been altered. We know that most, if not all of the videos of the two "plane hits" of the twin towers have been altered, or are simply computer generated. Having said that, here is a fairly complete set of several videos from different locations and angles showing WTC7 destruction. Can we contrast this with video of a conventional demolition of a similarly shaped wide skyscraper? See this demolition of the 32-storey, "wide-body" Stardust Casino in Las Vegas. Ignore the added Vegas fireworks. Notice how the entire (all the way up to the top) central structure all falls down, from the very onset of demolition, with the sides collapsing on top of this at the end. Notice also that the moving plumes of smoke start after the entire edifice has hit the ground. Contrast the latter with WTC7, which had much larger plumes of smoke flowing certainly at the start of demolition, and perhaps apparently even before (from basement explosions?) But perhaps the most striking difference is in the near perfect, intact, ensemble "sliding down" of the upper floors of WTC7. With the exception of the initial collapse of the central penthouse, and an apparent initial kinking of the top left area of WTC7, we see an almost miraculous, perfectly uniform, even collapse. I assert that this is a demolition unlike any other, for many reasons. But the usual destruction of mere supports does not appear to be involved here. Rather whole levels of structure below the visible top floors appear to have been vaporized-more on this later. Now we appear to see at least the top 20 floors or more just coming down as an intact ensemble. What can account for such near-perfect uniformity? We don't

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/how-to-explain-incredible-symmetrical.html[07.11.2010 14:49:27]

World Trade Center Demolition: How to Explain the Incredible Symmetrical Destruction of WTC7? 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

see this in other CDs of similarly shaped buildings. Indeed, in other CDs, we saw that the initial central collapse followed by the outer portions falling inwards is created by the CD planners for the final footprint result, and occurs at the onset of CD. Assuming the videos are (somewhat) genuine, was the initial, central, rooftop penthouse "collapse" a clever way to get people to think the whole thing was occurring like other controlled demolitions? When the rest of it is not. (Or was the Penthouse coupled to something in the basement, or the lowest floors?) Part of the problem of analyzing the WTC7 CD, is the fact that smoke, and other buildings, obscure what happens to the bottom half. A chemist, Frank Legge, PhD stated that the upper floors of WTC7 came down just slightly slower than freefall speed in a vacuum (6.2 vs. 6.0 sec.). His article is in Steven Jones' "Journal." It concerns itself in proving that fires and gravity could not have caused the WTC7 "collapse," and that conventional CD did. Legge even wrote, in defense of his conventional CD hypothesis, that the bulk of the WTC7 "came straight down with extraordinary precision." To me, all this begs the real question: Was this a conventional CD, or was WTC7 a nuclear CD, like WTC1 and 2? For completeness, I note that others state that the CD of WTC7 was faster than free-fall time, and that a vacuum was created by the explosions that "sucked" the building downwards. Thermobaric, or Fuel-Air Explosives (FAE), are sometimes cited with this hypothesis. A partial vacuum is said to be created with this type of explosive. Of course, even this type of explosive does not vaporize the contents of a building that they might be used in. But these possibilities should be considered. In more detail, we must ask, does nearly the entire visible part of the building, WTC7, just come down AS IS (without any central falling inward) because some of the lower floors are no longer there? Were they vaporized by a nuke, or nukes? Again because of either video doctoring, or smoke and building obscuration, we do not see the bottom floors. We do know that WTC7, and much of the WTC, had hotspots as seen by AVIRIS/NASA plane overflights. For the moment, let us discuss the undergound hotpsots and molten steel in general, regardless of which WTC building these are under; because I will end with an unimpeachable witness to vaporized steel beneath WTC7. Now these AVIRIS overflights took place on 9/16/01 and 9/23/01. Temperatures as high as 1000 degrees Kelvin or 1341 degrees Fahrenheit were found. This article makes clear that these were surface temperatures. Thus, if the heat source was significantly further undergound (as I will demonstrate), the source(s) would likely have been at much higher temperatures. Now, as with the destruction of WTC1 and 2, gravitational pancaking does not allow for 1300 F. degree surface temperature days and weeks later-nor for the much higher temperatures further underground. It is also improbable or impossible that conventional controlled demolition could account for this either. But the "extreme temperatures" of a nuke might, or as I hypothesized, the remnants of unexploded nukes undergoing partial criticality could account for these temperatures. This remarkable photo shows flaming and apparently molten steel (if you look closely) being dug out of the bottom of WTC1 in late October. It is more easily seen here. Indeed the previous link has firefighter Joe O'Toole state that in February of the next year, there still was molten steel at the WTC! Here we have firefighters describing FLOWING molten steel weeks later. It is impossible to explain such high temperatures so long after 9/11 except for the use of nukes, and/or possible heat GENERATION via nuclear criticalities, as previously cited. Now I wish to make a crucial assertion. I may be the first to assert that the second AVIRIS data set is bogus! It claims that nearly all the hot spots were gone by 9/23. The govt's "data" claims that the "over three dozen hot spots [on 9/16]" were reduced to "4 or possibly 5" with greatly reduced temperatures by 9/23. Curiously, the 9/16 data were released two days later on 9/18; but the 9/23 data were not released until 10/12-19 days later!

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/how-to-explain-incredible-symmetrical.html[07.11.2010 14:49:27]

World Trade Center Demolition: How to Explain the Incredible Symmetrical Destruction of WTC7? I believe that honest scientists got the first set out ASAP, but the regime had time to block and alter the second AVIRIS set. And don't forget no further testing--or more likely release--of similar plane or satellite overflights was allowed. What do I base these assertions on? When honest, intrepid firefighters, and other responders state they witnessed molten steel weeks and months later, and when photos show the removal of such molten steel weeks later, I know whom to believe. This is analogous to the Zapruder film of President Kennedy's murder. That film purports to show the limo moving at a steady 10 mph throughout. This despite the fact that numerous eyewitnesses stated that the limo came to a complete halt (so that the driver could do what others had failed to do.) Some of these eyewitnesses soon paid the ultimate price. Zapruder himself at the Garrison trial of Clay Shaw refused to state, under oath, that the version of his film shown in court was the one he had shot! So if I have to choose between intrepid firemen with nothing to gain, versus a President-murdering, Apollo Hoaxing, its own citizen nuking, world destroying regime, the choice is clear to me. All the eyewitnesses and photos demonstrate that the long-delayed release of the 9/23 AVIRIS data is false! The release of an honest set of such data would have shown very high temperatures weeks and months later. This not only would have shot down the official ludicrous "collapse" story, but also the regime's planned release of the shill physicist's termite, er I mean thermite story. The release of honest temperature grids at the WTC, weeks and months later, would have proven the case for nuclear demolition, and/or heat generation by nuclear reacting criticality sites! This had to be avoided at all costs. Now let us return to the demolition of WTC7. Unlike WTC1, 2, which I hypothesized were nuclear CD's, we do not see any great outward explosions with WTC7 because they would be going off in the unseen lower floors, including perhaps most likely the basement floors. WTC7 officially had five basement levels according to one (shill) website. Now any nuke; or nukes, used in WTC7 were either limited to the basement and lowest floors only. But was the "collapse" observed so nearly perfectly even because numerous basement and lower floors had just been vaporized? I think there is a good chance this is what happended. Especially when we also consider what would be revealed underneath WTC7 weeks later. While we must always consider the possibility of fakery with WTC7, let us assume for now that the videos of its unique demolition are genuine. But let us further examine another of my hypotheses, from my previous nuclear demolition article. I made the novel assertion that Larry Silverstein's statement that WTC7 was "pulled", was no slip-up. I believe the PTB have been--from the moment of WTC7's "collapse"--telling the world that WTC7 was brought down by controlled demolition. As it was happening, we had CBS' Dan Rather say "it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television before when a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down." Note the admission/allusion to conventional controlled demolition. We saw that in the assassination of President Kennedy, Dan Rather upon being the only reporter shown the Zapruder film, stated/lied that JFK went forward in the limo, after the fatal head shot, when in fact, he was flung backwards from the frontal shot (driver). Likewise, anything he said at critical 9/11 events was also scripted for him. Then we had, years later, John Kerry "admit" too that WTC7 was imploded by conventional CD. We know that everything Kerry does is also according to his taskmasters. When he was informed that the Ohio 2004 Presidential election was rigged, and that he was really the next president, and could prove it if he wanted to, he then immediately conceded. He acted out his script. So why are the Rathers, the Silversteins, the Kerrys of this country so happy to publicly proclaim a conventional CD for WTC7? One possibility must be that it was a nuclear CD. Recall how I noted that whenever the regime admits to something very bad, the real truth is usually vastly worse. In this light, we must ponder why they needed about six or seven hours to San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/how-to-explain-incredible-symmetrical.html[07.11.2010 14:49:27]

World Trade Center Demolition: How to Explain the Incredible Symmetrical Destruction of WTC7? demolish WTC7, after the others were destroyed? Admittedly WTC7 harbored the FBI, the Secret Service, the CIA, the IRS, the SEC, the Mayor's Command and Control Center, and according to Guiliani, another federal govt agency that he couldn't name. The latter is often code for the NSA, which officially "does not exist (No Such Agency)". And its charter is itself classified as top secret. Of course, there could always have been federal agencies even more secret than the NSA in WTC7. Some have speculated that WTC7 likely was the "command and control center" for the 9/11 op. Therefore there would have been things in WTC7 that were needed for the destruction of the other buildings of the WTC on 9/11! So it couldn't be demolished until after the others were. And perhaps it took some time to 1) get out things they wanted to save, and 2) set things up so as to absolutely guarantee destruction (vaporization?) of certain other things. This apparently took more time than they expected. How do we surmise this? Because we now know that they told the media to announce that WTC7 came down before it actually did! So we can guess that either 1) There was something important to get out that took longer than they planned for, and/or 2) Making certain something would be completely destroyed took longer than they planned for, and/or 3) outside events occurred that precluded the scheduled destruction of WTC7. The last could be something like isolated military commanders tried to counter the events of 9/11 and the regime needed to counter that with the use of something in WTC7. Of course, only the nuking of the contents of WTC7 would guarantee that said contents were totally unrecoverable (vaporized). Now there is a 4th explanation: the remarkable possibility that the federal perps drilled out sub-basement levels on 9/11 itself. See below. So in the analysis of the demolition of WTC7 on 9/11, we must consider 1) The possibility that videos are doctored, and need extensive analysis, as the now-proven bogus "plane hit" videos have been; and 2) The probabilityespecially if the videos are genuine-that WTC7 was demolished through the use of mini-nuke(s) in the lower floors and/or basement levels. Evidence of the unique, ensemble whole (upper) building "collapse" and the very high temperatures and molten steel beneath the rubble of WTC7 for days and weeks afterwards support this nuclear hypothesis. In any case, future inquiry should be directed not to the question of if this was a controlled demolition, but rather whether it was a nuclear demolition, which appears likely. The following section is to be regarded, at this time, as purely speculation, and is not essential to this article on the demolition of WTC7. This speculative hypothesis (apparently published here for the first time) relates to the nuclear demolition of WTC7, and possibly the other WTC buildings. The following speculation could provide for the necessary nuclear reactors which provided either the explosive nuclear material (Tahil hypothesis), or more likely, IMO, the source for heat GENERATION weeks and months later to explain all the hotpsots, and molten steel observed at such later dates-as late as February 2002. Note that this section is not necessary for the whole of my WTC Nuclear CD Theory, as I have already stated that blasted, unexploded mini-nukes could have provided for the nuclear reacting criticality sites, and resultant hotpsots. I write now of the remarkable Nuclear Borer. A photo of which is here- note it states that 42 levels were bored out by the Nuclear Borer. Here is the public patent granted in 1972. A discussion of the Nuclear Borer is here. I am only concerned with what is spoken of at 2:35 seconds in. I will not comment on the rest of this video. I am only concerned with the depiction and knowledge of the Nuclear Borer. Note that the 1972 public patent states, "The heat source can be electrical or nuclear but for deep drilling is preferably a nuclear reactor." We must note that if this remarkable military device had a PUBLIC patent granted in 1972, it must have been used much earlier. And it is highly likely that 30 years later, in 2001, there would have been much faster, more powerful, smaller versions in existence. Other eyewitnesses have stated that this is precisely the case, and they have been used to quickly construct massive, very deep (thousands of feet), underground, connected bases-but "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/how-to-explain-incredible-symmetrical.html[07.11.2010 14:49:27]

World Trade Center Demolition: How to Explain the Incredible Symmetrical Destruction of WTC7?

this is beyond the present discussion. This Nuclear Borer speculative aspect of my WTC nuclear demolition theory perhaps resolves the last piece of the puzzle, as follows. Apparently few people seem to be concerned with the fact that the molten steel at the WTC weeks and months later should require a source for the GENERATION of such heat, weeks and months later. I had hypothesized that these great hotspots (deep) underground were nuclear criticality sites from blasted, but unexploded mini-nukes. But the fact that there are so many of these hotpsots indicates that these may not have been "accidents"/mishaps; rather the resultant hotpsots may have occurred because their source was built into the demolition scheme itself. The nuclear reactors in the Nuclear Borers appear to fill this last piece of the puzzle quite well. But the earlier hypothesis of nukes blasting unexploded other mini-nukes, resulting in nuclear-reacting criticality hotpsots may still hold. In more detail, regarding this Nuclear Borer hypothesis, the requisite 20 or more floors were drilled out in the sub-basement, with stability left in, until that was exploded by the mini-nuke(s) at 5:30. The drilling-out was possibly done that day, after evacuation after the "plane hits". Perhaps this "perfect ensemble collapse" was perpetrated to reinforce the claim that the two towers came down via gravitational pancaking. Maybe the powers that be thought it would be easier for the masses to swallow this, if they "collapsed" at least one of the buildings--which by then had many video cameras trained on it--to look like a gravitational pancaking--which the END result does, as does a superficial understanding/viewing of the WTC7 "collapse" itself. But recall all the chaos in the nuking of WTC 1 and 2. Recall the whole chunks breaking off, and that massive, separated top part of WTC2? Did the WTC1, 2 "collapses" look anything like the perfect ensemble "collapse" of WTC7? Or did WTC7 demolition, look anything like any other demolition? So perhaps the WTC7 demolition fell as such a "perfect ensemble" because it fell into its own perfectly drilled-out footprint! Nukes provide for lots of "uneven" chaos. Perhaps only a perfectly drilledout hole could have accounted for the perfect ensemble collapse--drilled out by the Nuclear Borer (or successor device). Let us look at the history of the WTC, and the nuclear Borer. The WTC was built in the late 60's and early 70's, when the Nuclear Borer had already been used for some time in drilling out underground nuclear bomb cavities. One possibility in my Nuclear Borer Speculation is thus that Nuclear Borer(s) could have been used at the WTC during its construction, and left in place for use during its destruction! Another possibility (as per the above) is that one of them--or a more potent, yet smaller, successor device--was very busy underneath WTC7 for some 6-7 hours, drilling out sufficient subbasement floors to allow the unique ensemble collapse of WTC7 at around 5:30 P.M. This may answer numerous questions: Could this be why they took so long, after the other buildings were destroyed? Could some unexpected problem in the use of the Nuclear Borer be the reason that the PTB gave the media too early a time for the destruction of WTC7? Could the exploded nuclear reactors in several Nuclear Borers, and their still critical components be the underground source for the many hotspots and molten steel weeks and months later? Could the Nuclear Borer's reactors be the fission reactors that William Tahil hypothesized? I always thought his hypothesis had some merit, but didn't quite fit. Unlike Tahil, I believe that mini-nukes (fusion devices) brought down the towers, and possibly all the other WTC buildings and now WTC7 too. And these nukes could have also exploded the reactors in the Nuclear Borers which may have been used to drill out necessary parts of each of the WTC buildings for the other nukes to do their thing. In particular, extensive Nuclear Borer drilling may have occurred some time before WTC7 destruction, perhaps that late morning and afternoon. This allowed for that most unique "falling in its own footprint" "collapse" ever to be seen. WTC7 did fall through its own footprint once demolition began; as many underground floors had been bored out

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/how-to-explain-incredible-symmetrical.html[07.11.2010 14:49:27]

World Trade Center Demolition: How to Explain the Incredible Symmetrical Destruction of WTC7? and a mini-nuke set-off underground or at a lower floor above ground initiated its unique destruction. It then indeed proceeded to fall through its already drilled out footprint-deep underground! This ends the Nuclear Borer Speculative Hypothesis, which is not necessary for this WTC7 nuclear demolition article, as a whole. Finally we have this remarkable WTC7 destruction article, originally in the (formerly lauded) NY Times, no less. For the most part, the article has lie after lie, such as this statement: "[WTC7] burned like a giant torch." Of course, everybody has seen that only a few windows on a couple of floors had relatively minor fires that could easily have been put out. These fires were even on lower floors, allowing for an easier task by fire crews. But the fire department was apparently called off by federal agents. But in the midst of all these now typical NY Times/Regime lies, we have this remarkable slip-up and printing of some truth. Dr. Barnett, a professor of fire protection engineering, said, in speaking of the WTC7 rubble, that the "fire and structural damage would not explain steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated in extraordinarily high temperatures." Here, in effect, the NY Times has allowed to be printed a statement from a fire engineering professor, and witness, that some of the steel of WTC7 was vaporized! And he even admits that any alleged fire and structural damage could not have caused this vaporization of steel. In effect, he is telling the world, that only the "extraordinarily high temperatures" of nuclear demolition allowed for that! For when he cited the vaporization of steel, not merely the melting of steel, he has proven the case for nukes, and at WTC7, no less! For completeness I note that the termites, er I mean thermite, of the disinfo physicist is in no way capable of vaporizing steel. It might barely be capable of melting steel, but probably not, as it barely reaches the temperature needed to do this, but since it is an explosive, it doesn't provide the time to even appreciably melt steel, let alone vaporize it. An explosive that attains vastly higher temperatures, as do nukes (up to 100 million degrees), can and does cause vaporization virtually instantly at or near its hypocenter. The particular WTC 9/11 nuclear demolition hypothesis of the Anonymous Physicist states that what vaporized steel-nuclear fusion bombs, and what caused molten steel up to five months later, according to firefighter/responder Joe O'Toole, were two different mechanisms. The first (vaporized steel) was from nuclear fusion bombs (mini-nukes); and the second (molten steel weeks and months later) was from nuclear criticality sites strewn over the WTC from either damaged, unexploded mini-nukes, or the speculative hypothesis above. So in the final analysis, regarding the hypothesis of nuclear destruction of WTC 1, 2, 5, 6, and now 7, the evidence herein, and in my earlier articles, including the great surface hotspots (implying far greater temperatures below the surface), and the molten steel witnessed and photographed weeks and months later, and the fire professor's admission of vaporized steel in the WTC7 rubble and his admission that the vaporized steel present proved that "extraordinarily high temperatures" could only have caused that; along with the logistics, and other facts previously cited (such as much EMP evidence), prove that only nuclear explosives and/or nuclear reactor criticalities can account for all the above. posted by spooked @ 6:50 AM

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/how-to-explain-incredible-symmetrical.html[07.11.2010 14:49:27]

World Trade Center Demolition: China Syndrome

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Monday, July 09, 2007

China Syndrome
The “China Syndrome” Came to New York City on 9/11 By The Anonymous Physicist Some people may not have not fully grasped the significance, and necessity, of my hypothesis on heat generating criticality sites at the WTC after 9/11. Some shills have actually, and laughably, attempted to claim thermite could have been been responsible for these high temperatures and molten steel. Any attempt to have a complete theory of 9/11 must include the WTC demolition on 9/11 itself, and crucially its aftermath of the great hotpsots and molten steel, up to five months afterwards. The latter being supported by irrefutable, numerous eyewitnesses, and photographs and at least one AVIRIS overflight temperature data set. (With the second, long-delayed release of overflight data likely being bogus, as claimed here.) It is risible that a shill physicist claims this photo, of a crane lifting molten steel weeks after 9/11, as “proof” of thermite use on 9/11. Now while thermite, or other conventional explosive, may have been used in some subsidiary capacity on 9/11, my earlier articles have highlighted how only mini-nukes could have accounted for all the phenomena of the 9/11 WTC demolitions. It is not unexpected, but still sickening, to see how a shill physicist has claimed that the molten steel weeks after 9/11 “proves” thermite alone brought down the WTC towers. He HAS to claim that, for he knows well that the real source of this molten steel, weeks later, is nuclear reactions. I have stated that only nuclear criticality sites could be the source of heat GENERATION weeks, and months after 9/11. You can find, say on Youtube, numerous videos of thermite being used to melt things, yes, including metal— but no vaporization. Note that the thermite is not being used as an explosive when it is seen melting through a car, e.g. But some of those videos clearly show that after just a few minutes, the molten thermite residue cools off and no longer glows. It is highly likely that any thermite at the WTC on 9/11 would have cooled off within hours. Indeed, I have stated that even the momentary maximum temperature of a nuke’s hypocenter (up to 100 million degrees), is known to cool off relatively quickly. You can ascertain this rapid cooling off in regards to the Trinity Site, or Hiroshima or Nagasaki, or even H-Bomb test sites. The temperatures returned to normal at all these sites relatively quickly. Now some claim that oxygen starved fires could allow for vastly longer high temperature fires underground at the WTC. These people don’t seem to realize they have just proven the case ONLY for nuclear chain reactions!! Because only nuclear chain reactions release massive heat almost indefinitely, without needing ANY oxygen whatsoever! This is not the case for any conventional (non-nuclear) fire. This “indefinite” massive heat

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/china-syndrome.html[07.11.2010 14:50:06]

World Trade Center Demolition: China Syndrome source was the basis for the term “China Syndrome” in regards to a nuclear reactor mishap which, in theory (but not really due to other factors), could have massive indefinite heat leading to a nuclear reactor criticality (core) remnant burning all the way through to China. This remarkable article on Chernobyl actually states that the China Syndrome occurred at Chernobyl. It says, “‘China Syndrome’ of meltdown had taken place inside the reactor core. Thermal explosion and outbreak of fires in over thirty places were due to high-temperature and falling uranium core fragments on to the roofs of adjacent buildings.” So here we see learn that the nuclear core had exploded into many pieces of— apparently still critically reacting uranium fragments--with their concomitant high temperatures. But this is just the kind of thing I cited in my WTC 9/11 nuclear demolition hypothesis of nukes exploding either other unexploded mini-nukes, or nukes exploding the reactors in the Nuclear Borers. So perhaps my previous term, “criticality sites” regarding the source of high temperatures and molten steel, weeks and months after 9/11 is too vague. Instead I propose that from now on we think of this aftermath of molten steel, weeks and months after 9/11 as… “The China Syndrome came to New York City on 9/11.” posted by spooked @ 5:14 AM 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/china-syndrome.html[07.11.2010 14:50:06]

World Trade Center Demolition: China Syndrome San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/china-syndrome.html[07.11.2010 14:50:06]

World Trade Center Demolition: China Syndrome "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/china-syndrome.html[07.11.2010 14:50:06]

World Trade Center Demolition: China Syndrome

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/china-syndrome.html[07.11.2010 14:50:06]

World Trade Center Demolition: China Syndrome

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/china-syndrome.html[07.11.2010 14:50:06]

World Trade Center Demolition: Hanging Skin and Nuclear Blasts

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Monday, July 09, 2007

Hanging Skin and Nuclear Blasts
Another remarkable finding from Anonymous Physicist-- the hanging skin of 9/11 casualty Felipe David is a striking piece of evidence indicating a nuclear blast in the basement of the WTC. Where in the World is Felipe David-- and Did He Survive Exposure to Nuclear Radiation? By The Anonymous Physicist Assuming the following tale is not completely psyops, then on 9/11, Felipe David, employed by Aramark Corp., was checking or replenishing vending machines in one of the basement levels of WTC1. (Curiously Aramark Corp has Thomas Kean—Chairman of the 9/11 Commission--as one of its Board Directors since 1994.) The following is supposedly Felipe David’s account of what happened beginning just before the first plane “hit.” "That day I was in the basement in sub-level 1 sometime after 8:30am. Everything happened so fast, everything moved so fast. The building started shaking after I heard the explosion below, dust was flying everywhere and all of a sudden it got real hot. I threw myself onto the floor, covered my face because I felt like I was burned. I sat there for a couple of seconds on the floor and felt like I was going to die, saying to myself 'God, please give me strength.' "When I went in, I told them it was an explosion," said David, who was then helped out of the WTC by Rodriguez and eventually taken by ambulance to New York Hospital. "When people looked at me with my skin hanging, they started crying but I heard others say 'OK, good, good, you made it alive. [This ends the extract from the first URL above.] Now I would like people to note that nowhere in the above quote, allegedly direct from Mr. David, does he mention fire. He states that he felt and heard explosion(s), and then “it got real hot.” He never says he saw any fire. This may be crucial. However when you read of his story through the words of William Rodriguez, “fire” is added into the story. "He had been standing in front of a freight elevator on sub-level 1 about 400 feet from the office when fire burst out of the elevator shaft, causing his injuries." Reports, as we shall see, differ greatly as to how he got to the vicinity of other workers for help, including keymaster William Rodriguez, of whom we have already seen much “coincidence” and strangeness. We have the “most official” story (always the one to be most wary of for those in the know) that he staggered into Rodriguez’ office or area, and Rodriguez helped him outside, and into an ambulance. Some earlier reports even stated that Rodriguez carried Mr. David. The following site no longer works, but I copied the following from google: “Rodriguez carried

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/hanging-skin-and-nuclear-blasts.html[07.11.2010 14:50:51]

World Trade Center Demolition: Hanging Skin and Nuclear Blasts Felipe David out of the building and re-entered it to rescue two men trapped on the elevator who were in danger of ... ” But this Christian organization’s website quotes Mr David saying he ran six blocks for help! "I asked God to give me strength. And I was able to get up and run six blocks to find an exit," Mr. David says. Then we have this remarkable TV interview that morning with Kenny Johannemann. Mr. Johannemann states that he was the one who helped David, “I dragged a guy off. His skin was hanging. I helped him into an ambulance” Note that there is no mention of Rodriguez. Wise individuals have suggested that perhaps no one interviewed on TV on 9/11 was genuine. Notice how the camera angle changes and zooms in on him, just as he is asked about “terrorism.” The regime had long range plans, and a carefully crafted script. Note how Johannemann’s arms flail just like another 9/11 witness that morning who has been shown to be bogus. He, of course, could be telling the truth (and each of you will have to draw your own conclusions), but I cannot find anything on him in recent years. So we have at least four accounts as follows: Rodriquez helped David to an ambulance. Rodriquez carried David to an ambulance. Johannemann helped David to an ambulance. David ran six blocks to an ambulance. Of course, in the shock and excitement of such events, we know that accounts can differ, and we cannot make any definitive conclusions in this regard. Now, let us return to Felipe David’s “hanging skin.” What caused this? It is always possible that some conventional fire or explosives caused his burns and the hanging skin on his face and arms. But we saw that David himself did not mention “fire.” So we may conclude that it wasn’t any direct fire that caused this. A conventional explosive blast could have done this. But this too may not be so likely, as such blasts may be expected to cause different types of wounds deep into the face and arms. But that is still a possibility, as is a fire that he just didn’t see. That brings us to one possible cause of his hanging skin, that indeed he couldn’t possibly have seen! That is radiation from a mini-nuke, which may have just exploded, at that time, in one of the sub-basement levels. One is not capable of seeing the radiation (gamma rays, neutrons) emitted by a nuclear blast. One will just feel the heat, then pain and then the skin will be damaged, and may either be vaporized, charred or hanging—depending on the flux intensity (distance, wavelength/type of the radiation etc. are factors here). This eyewitness account on the survivors of the Hiroshima nuclear attack describes how common was damaged, hanging skin amongst them. (You can use your “find” function and search on “hanging.”) I assert my following interpretation of Mr. David’s words is the most likely account of what happened to Mr. David. He hears and feels explosion(s). He doesn’t see any fire coming at him, but is surprised to feel great heat on his skin, and goes to the floor. He then is further shocked to feel and see his skin burned and hanging. All this is very much like what the burn victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki reported. Now radiation exposure to the skin should result in significant swelling. But we have no photos or videos of Mr. David, until this Youtube video (in Spanish) allegedly three months later, when Mr. Rodriguez visits Mr. David. David’s face does look (still?) a bit swollen, but not much. But this is allegedly three months later, without any allowed record of what his face, arms and legs looked like until that point in time. Why do we not have any photos or video of Mr David until that point in time? Could he have had massive skin swelling, beginning almost immediately after his skin was 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/hanging-skin-and-nuclear-blasts.html[07.11.2010 14:50:51]

World Trade Center Demolition: Hanging Skin and Nuclear Blasts damaged by “something,” possibly radiation from a nuclear blast? Could they have only trotted Mr. David out after his swelling had come down to a “normal” level? Finally I note that there seems to be nothing in the public record on Felipe David for the last five years or so! Even though he “too” could be regarded as a “hero.” Why do we not know where he is, and his status? Hopefully Felipe David is OK. Hopefully he did not get cancer, or other medical problems, or suffer a strange “accident.” Hopefully truly independent researchers will find him, and get his story direct from him, when he wouldn’t be surrounded by any public media, or “handlers” from the government, or any other interference. With the dearth of information forced upon us, we may ask: Where in the world is Felipe David? What has he been doing these last five years or so? And is Felipe David the (only?) radiation survivor of a mini-nuke at the World Trade Center on 9/11? Does he share a kindred experience with those who were in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in those early days of August 1945 that marked the dawn of a new, horrible age? We must recognize that just like the World Trade Center on 9/11, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were also called…Ground Zero. posted by spooked @ 5:15 AM San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

<< Home

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/hanging-skin-and-nuclear-blasts.html[07.11.2010 14:50:51]

World Trade Center Demolition: Hanging Skin and Nuclear Blasts "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/hanging-skin-and-nuclear-blasts.html[07.11.2010 14:50:51]

World Trade Center Demolition: Hanging Skin and Nuclear Blasts

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/hanging-skin-and-nuclear-blasts.html[07.11.2010 14:50:51]

World Trade Center Demolition: Hanging Skin and Nuclear Blasts

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/hanging-skin-and-nuclear-blasts.html[07.11.2010 14:50:51]

World Trade Center Demolition: Eyewitness Testimony of Firefighters Believing They Were Nuked on 9/11

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Eyewitness Testimony of Firefighters Believing They Were Nuked on 9/11
... as well as early WTC7 Destruction, EMP, non-impact plane flyby, and people being pushed out of a WTC tower.

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

By The Anonymous Physicist

Reading just a handful out of the 503 9/11 WTC initial responders’ testimonies has proven to be a real eye-opener. These firefighters’ and EMS officers’ depositions provide good corroboration for many of the things I have hypothesized at this blog, including the following: The WTC was demolished via small nuclear bombs, that pre-“collapse” basement nukes were set off in the towers, synchronous with the “plane hit” explosions above, that there likely were EMP’s (Electromagnetic Pulses from nukes), and that WTC7 underwent early explosions, and attempted early demolition.
Firefighter Edward Kennedy here states that he thought a “nuclear bomb” had demolished a tower. “We were on Liberty Street and we came out into there and it just look like something that -- it looked like a bomb, of course, had gone off, almost like a nuclear bomb... “ Here we learn that NYFD Lt. George DeSimone similarly thought the heat-without fire--impinging on him was Hiroshima-like: “I thought it was some kind of thermal explosion where I'm either going to get burnt -- and I had kind of ideas that it was going to be something like Hiroshima where all this heat was coming at me and we were going to get burnt…” Several hours after both tower “collapses”, and despite official regime claims of total military and civilian flight termination, he said: "...We saw jets overhead, commercial airliner, military jets, Air Force jets, and we didn't know what the hell was going

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/10/eyewitness-testimony-of-firefighters.html[07.11.2010 14:51:31]

World Trade Center Demolition: Eyewitness Testimony of Firefighters Believing They Were Nuked on 9/11 on..." Recall I have detailed how a nuke’s thermal rays go farthest out, well beyond its destructive blast radius. Here NYFD Chief Jerry Gumbo’s testimony is one of several I have cited, to say he felt heat far away from any actual fire. He stated: "...At the time of the impact, we were able to feel heat that was generated from the explosion at the command post, which was across West Street, and West is fairly large street with that island in there, and debris was showering all over West Street." I believe this is again indication of the early basement nuke concomitant with the “plane hit” explosion above. Another firefighter who thought the WTC destruction was nuclear is NYFD Lt Richard Smiouskas, whose statement is here. He was an official NYFD photographer, and has some startling testimony, regarding other matters, as well. It appears that with his telefoto lens, he witnessed people being pushed out of tower one. He said: "...I was photographing the fire from the roof. I had a long lens on the camera, and I had people in the windows. It looked like they were being -- they weren't actually jumping. One or two people I saw, they seemed like they were being forced out by the people behind them. There was half a dozen faces. In between the smoke you could see people..." (snip) "I guess they were all trying to get air, and this guy was actually standing in the window, standing in the frame with each hand on each frame and he kind of like got nudged out." In the second sentence, it looks like he just stopped himself from saying “pushed”. The last incident may even indicate the NON-jumper was trying to keep himself from being pushed out! Lt. Smiouskas believed that a nuclear bomb went off, due to the magnitude of Earth shaking that he felt. As a tower is being destroyed he recalls: "It looked like an earthquake. The ground was shaking. I fell to the floor. My camera bag opened up. The cameras went skidding across the floor…I'm thinking maybe a bomb blew up. I'm thinking it could have been a nuclear….” Then he writes of seeing “glitter” through the black smoke, during tower destruction. “Everybody started running north, and this huge volume like ten stories high billowing, pushing black smoke and like a glitter. I guess it was glass that was glitter that was in the cloud of smoke.” I do not believe this “glitter” was glass in the black smoke. Perhaps it is more likely that gamma rays from nuclear explosions which could readily traverse the black smoke, impinged on his retina. This is like the atronauts in earth orbit seeing (retinal) flashes from cosmic rays when they tried to go to a higher earth orbit, and like medical x-rays that go through you and onto a photographic plate. But note how Lt. Smiouskas found the ground shaking was intense enough that he surmised (correctly, IMO) that a nuclear bomb went off. Now, I have been in 5.1 (Richter scale) Earthquakes, and in 2.3’s. The latter I didn’t feel at all, and the 5.1 sounds more like what Lt. Smiouskas (and I) experienced—at least a likely 4.0. I also was at the WTC six weeks after 9/11, and saw many cracked, concrete sidewalks, blocks away from the 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/10/eyewitness-testimony-of-firefighters.html[07.11.2010 14:51:31]

World Trade Center Demolition: Eyewitness Testimony of Firefighters Believing They Were Nuked on 9/11 WTC, (as well as experienced my eyes burning from the hot toxic gases still emitted.) I therefore make the following assertion. It is likely that the “official” 2.1 and 2.3 Richter scale recordings on 9/11 had their spikes cut off! I have even found that NIST asked for a “re-analysis” of seismic data from one observatory before publishing their “findings.” So, just as I hypothesized about the long-delayed second AVIRIS (WTC temperature) data set, the seismic recordings were likely doctored by this regime. And this fire-fighter’s belief that the intense ground shaking was due to a “nuclear bomb” supports this hypothesis. The interview of Dr. Michael Guttenberg, of NYFD’s Office of Medical Affairs, who may have witnessed EMP is here. Just after the second “plane hit” explosion, and before any tower “collapse”, he noted: “…on the EMS radio, there was absolute silence for probably 10 or 15 seconds, you know, which to me, it seemed like 10 to 15 seconds, but it was absolute radio silence for a few seconds…” Questioner: “We were told that the air was so thick with debris that radio waves weren't able to travel.” M.G.: “That was after the towers came down.” Note two things, the radios went dead—likely a sign of EMP, as I have previously described. And see how the questioner attempts to confuse the issue with a double lie. One, that this happened after a tower was destroyed, when instead, this is after the second WTC2 “plane hit” explosion, and before any tower “collapse” as Dr. Guttenberg corrects him. And two, that radio waves would have been blocked by a conventional explosion, when they wouldn’t have been. And note also that this radio blackout occurred after the second “plane hit” explosion. My previous articles contained evidence, and my hypothesis, that the WTC1 “plane hit” explosion was used as cover for a nearly concomitant basement nuclear bomb explosion that vaporized a 50 ton steel press, and a garage level, and also caused phone outage. So we learn now that electronic communications also were affected after the second “plane hit”, which may indicates that they also nuked the basement of WTC2 at that time. I hypothesized that this was done in case the planned, subsequent, intricate, top-down demolition failed. Guttenberg also provides more eyewitness testimony for early WTC7 explosions, as he went to the loading area of WTC7. “…We all stuffed ourselves into this hallway [near the loading dock of WTC7], pulled the door shut, and the noise just got very loud and the room filled with dust. The noise stopped, and we opened up the door, and everything was pitch black. The way we got into the loading dock was not the way we were getting out. It was obstructed.” This appears to be a watered down way of saying WTC underwent internal explosions. This jives with my earlier article citing Deputy Director of the NYC Emergency Services Dept., Barry Jennings, that the WTC7 underwent attempted complete internal destruction at the same time that the first tower (and WTC 3, 4, 5, 6) were demolished. My article, on top here hypothesized that fizzled nukes was the reason WTC7 was not successfully destroyed during this early coordinated attempt, which Jennings stated destroyed much of the lobby, now corroborated by Guttenberg. The last URL also has my earlier articles on nuclear demolition of the WTC. 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock)

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/10/eyewitness-testimony-of-firefighters.html[07.11.2010 14:51:31]

World Trade Center Demolition: Eyewitness Testimony of Firefighters Believing They Were Nuked on 9/11 NYFD Lt. Robert Larocco here also noted that tower destruction seemed “nuclear” to him. He said, “Of course the cloud was kind of like a nuclear winter thing. You're walking through fallout.” Near the towers, but BEFORE either tower “collapse”, he noted: “As I started walking onto the side street – actually as I stepped onto the side street, the strangest thing I noticed was there was like three inches of snow on the ground. The snow was probably pulverized concrete, sheetrock, loose tiles, insulation, asbestos or what-have-you.” Now this fine ash or 3 inches of snow-like “pulverized concrete” as he called it would not occur from a “plane hit” or conventional explosives. Could this fine, 3 inches of “snow” be from the early basement nukes I have written about? Like the WTC1 basement blast that vaporized a steel press, and a parking garage level that eyewitnesses said was just “gone.” Now some DEW/OCT disinfo agents claim that the tower destruction was not loud because their hangout was not loud. During the commencement of WTC2 destruction, Lt. Larocco stated: “The next second I heard that loudest noise in the world that I was describing before getting louder and louder.” (snip) “It was the loudest noise I've ever heard in my life. It was in both ears. Kind of like those rockets that they launch the space shuttles with, it was like I had one going off in each ear. When I thought it was the loudest noise I ever heard, every second it was just increasing getting louder and louder and louder.” Lt Larocco also describes very personal feelings of fear of death, and fellow firefighters “crying like babies” during and just after collapse. These revelations prove that the redactions in the published responders’ statements were not because of wanting to hide the most personal of feelings. Lt. Larocco also stated that hours after both towers were destroyed: “…I still really didn't believe that the second tower was hit by a second plane.” At this point, the interviewer, Monte Feiler, says, “Stopping the interview at 1306.” Then, “Resuming the tape at 1308 hours. Same people present.” Now Lt. Larocco says: “ Like I said, the rumors were flying around, and they turned out to be quite factual, about the second tower getting hit. Although at the time I really didn't believe it until I saw it later on television. The thing about the Pentagon, the plane crashing out in Pennsylvania, it was all coming into the picture that this is something major going on.” So we see how something happened during this “time out.” Something he was told and recalling what was “on TV” apparently made him change his mind and believe in the second “plane hit.” This manipulation speaks for itself. And if there really were plane hits, would the PTB need to perform such blatent manipulations of eyewitness testimony? Finally I note that when he was making his way out after “collapse,” Lt. Larocco recalls: “I thought to myself this is a locked exit. That's illegal.” "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/10/eyewitness-testimony-of-firefighters.html[07.11.2010 14:51:31]

World Trade Center Demolition: Eyewitness Testimony of Firefighters Believing They Were Nuked on 9/11

We see, as some survivors have noted, many fire escape exits were locked. Someone--who may have had a master key--apparently locked numerous exits. If such a man is ascertained, and his actions proven to be deliberate, he should be charged with mass murder. My interpretation of EMT Frank Puma’s deposition here indicates that he may have witnessed a FLYBY, and not a “plane impact” regarding the alleged “second hit.” He said: “…I ran down to the corner of Church and Park Place, looked up and I saw the plane shooting out of the top of the towers. That's when I grabbed for my radio and yelled over the air, "1 Adam. A bomb just went off in the Trade Center."... Note that after he witnessed an apparent flyby, HE CALLED IN A BOMB, and NOT a plane impact! In fact, when you couple his statement to the interviewer, with his action of exactly what he called in, it seems clear that he believed the plane he saw bombed the WTC! And this must be considered a possibility. However, all the evidence and the ludicrous “plane-shaped” hole itself indicate shape charges, at that facade, were set off in sync with a flyby (and basement nukes). Finally, for those who grasp the deeper conspiracies I have elucidated here, I note that Firefighter Michael Wernick here stated the number of the Fire Engine that apparently responded first to the WTC, on 9/11. Wernick said, “Engine 33 went first.” As I have written here before, “All things nuclear…” posted by spooked @ 9:24 AM

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

<< Home

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/10/eyewitness-testimony-of-firefighters.html[07.11.2010 14:51:31]

World Trade Center Demolition: Eyewitness Testimony of Firefighters Believing They Were Nuked on 9/11

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/10/eyewitness-testimony-of-firefighters.html[07.11.2010 14:51:31]

World Trade Center Demolition: More Evidence & Testimony Indicating Nuclear Blasts, Nuclear Radiation, & China Syndrome at the WTC

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Friday, August 24, 2007

More Evidence & Testimony Indicating Nuclear Blasts, Nuclear Radiation, & China Syndrome at the WTC
By The Anonymous Physicist Sgt. Matthew Tartaglia, a WTC responder, rescue worker, counselor, and FEMA consultant has made many remarkable statements related to the nuking of the WTC, and its China Syndrome aftermath. Tartaglia, said he believes “tactical nukes” took down the towers, and was responsible for the high temperatures weeks and months later (but does not know of the existence of the China Syndrome.) His statements include these: “…There were only certain parts of the site that you could not legally leave without going through decontamination.…They would tackle you and take your camera away. I watched people be tackled.” Most responders couldn’t go “down in the garages…The rescue people – when our clothes got so contaminated, we were told not to bring our clothes off that site. Don’t wear anything on the site you’re not prepared to leave there because it’s contaminated.” Note that “discarding clothing”, and “going through decontamination” are standard nuclear industry methods of dealing with radiation-exposed individuals. I do not know if other industries necessitate the use of these methods as well. In 2005, Sgt. Tartaglia said, “My teeth are falling out.” Like hanging skin resulting from a nuclear bomb, teeth falling out is a common symptom, months or years later, from nuclear radiation exposure. (Other factors can also possibly cause this, but are less likely.) Read about this Army veteran sent to Hiroshima, just days after it was nuked, to bulldoze roads. This was apparently much too soon to send Americans in to Hiroshima, but the PTB apparently cared as much about Americans, as they did about the Japanese women and children who were nuked. I note that after the July 16, 1945 Trinity “A-Bomb” test, Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer and General Leslie Groves did not return to Ground Zero until five weeks later on Sept 11, 1945. Yes, there is 9/11 again. So man did not walk again on the first alleged Ground Zero which resulted from the “Manhattan Project” until 9/11/45. Also read here about 3 veterans of atomic bomb tests in Nevada in the 1950’s who had their teeth fall out within a few years of their radiation exposure. [To quickly find the 3 veterans cited, search on “teeth.”] That article also indicates that the gov’t lied to them as to the amount of radiation they had received. It is excerpted from the book, “They Never Knew: The Victims of Atomic Testing”, [not read here] by Glenn Alan Cheney. See also “The Plutonium Files” by Welsome, and the two books on the “Making of the ABomb”, and the H-Bomb, “Dark Sun”, both by Rhodes--all three read here.

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/08/more-evidence-testimony-indicating.html[07.11.2010 14:52:15]

World Trade Center Demolition: More Evidence & Testimony Indicating Nuclear Blasts, Nuclear Radiation, & China Syndrome at the WTC But please read this (portions of the book, They Never Knew) in its entirety. It includes the following remarkable quote that may be very relevant to 9/11 research. A whistleblower came forward decades later about the actual radiation exposure Army personnel were subjected to. “In 1982, a former Army medic, Van R. Brandon, admitted that he had been ordered to keep two sets of books. "One set was to show that no one received an exposure above the approved dosimeter reading," he said. "The other set of books was to show what the actual reading was. That set of books was brought in a locked briefcase attached to [an officer]'s wrist by a set of handcuffs every morning." Army personnel were denied medical benefits and disability because the regime publicly used the “cooked” book. Do you think this same govt has gotten more or less evil, corrupt, and duplicitous, in the ensuing decades--and in a matter that relates to possibly irradiating tens of thousands of WTC workers, responders, and near-by residents. The statements made by Mike Pecoraro, a WTC1 stationary engineer, and 9/11 survivor, are also remarkable. Pecoraro first knew something was wrong after observing flickering lights (EMP?), and then he ascended to the sub-basement C level, from below. He says, "There was nothing there but rubble, we're talking about a 50 ton hydraulic press gone!" Pecoraro and a co-worker “made their way to the parking garage, but found that it, too, was gone”… As they ascended to the B Level, one floor above, they “were astonished to see a steel and concrete fire door that weighed about 300 pounds, wrinkled up like a piece of aluminum foil" and lying on the floor. Now I assert that this too is a likely sign that a nuclear bomb went off. Perhaps only the multi-million degree temperature at the hypocenter, or neutron bombardment, is capable of doing that to that heavy steel door. The article continues: “"They got us again,"” Mike told his co-worker, referring to the terrorist attack at the center in 1993. Having been through that bombing, Mike recalled seeing similar things happen to the building's structure.” This last statement from Pecoraro, I assert may be corroboration of nuclear engineer/geologist Phil Schneider’s statement that his inspection of the 1993 WTC explosion damage revealed to him that it was a nuclear blast, that may have gone awry, that is, was insufficient. (See my previous articles at wtcdemolition.blogspot.com.) Pecoraro states that as WTC2 “collapsed,” “there was a wind that came through the revolving doors that blew me [in the WTC1 lobby area] 100 feet to the far wall” Was this a nuclear pressure blast? You’ve probably seen the videos of A-bomb test sites, and resultant winds blowing down model houses, and heat causing fires. Like this and this. More evidence of the likely nuking of the WTC, and China Syndrome aftermath, comes from no less than CNN’s Larry King Show. This show aired on 10/6/01, and was taped at the WTC, and a nearby burn unit, in the days prior to the air-date. The transcript is here. Regarding the likely China Syndrome of high heat three weeks later, Thomas Von Essen, NYC Fire Commissioner, says, at the WTC, “…it's so hot, it's a really hot fire. The steel has been hot for three weeks now. Tremendous heat below, you know. It's -- the fire is not out down below.” From my earlier articles, you know that this went on for at least six months after 9/11. At the Weill Burn Center at the Cornell Medical Hospital, Larry King interviews two women who received burns—without any fire--while trying to flee WTC1. King: “So, did you know you were on fire, in a sense?” Yang: “No, I wasn't on fire, I think it was from the heat.“ Mary Jo: “That's what we were told, it was the heat.” So like Felipe David, like the Hiroshima survivors, these two women have http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/08/more-evidence-testimony-indicating.html[07.11.2010 14:52:15] 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

World Trade Center Demolition: More Evidence & Testimony Indicating Nuclear Blasts, Nuclear Radiation, & China Syndrome at the WTC San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

no clue as to why their skin was burned. And who told them “it was from the heat”? And if it was the doctors, who told them to say this to the patients? Note that King says “…fire in a sense.” I assert that that sense is not fire per se, but bombardment by radiation (thermal rays, gamma rays, neutrons) that can cause heat at the skin, and damage the skin--if the flux is large enough (relevant parameters include distance, shielding, intensity and type of radiation). King also interviews burn victim Brian Reeves, a security guard starting his rounds in the lobby of one of the towers. Reeves says: “I don't know when I got burned, but I just know when it knocked me over, there was -- there was something, the windows blew out. And when the windows blew out, I was on the ground, and like I said, there was a gust of wind. And when I opened my eyes, I seen a bright orange light.” Reeves, feeling heat on his back, takes his jacket off and falls on the ground while fleeing. There is the issue of whether his jacket is on fire or not. [Months later, the media would morph the “bright orange light” into “fireball.”] We must ask, did Reeves see the flash of, and receive the radiation, and air pressure blast from, a mini-nuke? Like the Hiroshima victims, he knows there had to be “something” but he/they didn’t see what burned him/them. In this video, months after 9/11, Reeves then says “the fire was this close to my face” (and holds his hand near his face). He did not say any such thing 2-3 weeks after 9/11, when interviewed by King. Getting back to the King show, Dr. Roger Yurt of the Weill Burn Center says, “[Reeve’s] worst burns were on his back, some burns up on his head. Burns on your arms also.” My possible interpretation is the following. Likely his jacket was not on fire (note the burns on his head), and the jacket likely shielded him from receiving even more radiation! The source of which was apparently behind him, as his burns were mostly on his back, but also on his head. But if the flux of radiation is high enough, a person and/or their clothes will catch fire from the radiation. Many Hiroshima victims were immediately killed and left in a charred state. The “bright orange flash” he “saw” may well have been a flux of radiation onto his retina. This kind of thing is again known from Army veterans of the nuclear blasts in Nevada in the 1950’s. In the worst cases, numerous Army personnel were forced to be, in ditches, only a football field away from an atomic bomb going off! But when Brian tells his story months later, the reporter adds “fireball” several times in her telling the story. Even the direction of the alleged fireball is cleverly, and falsely, inserted: “… a fireball that roared down the elevator shaft.” In actuality, from numerous lobby, and sub-basement witnesses, a non-fireball, a likely nuclear detonation, occurred below the lobby, and its effects traveled UP a few floors—and not down some 80-90 floors from the likely conventional explosion above. In any case, Reeves did not observe what may, or may not, have been traversing the elevator shaft. It appears that in the telling of the 9/11 survivors’ accounts, the MSM, and the 911 pseudo-truth media, are doing everything they can to add “fire” and “fireball” to the later retelling of numerous survivors’ tales. And these survivors, who did not report “fire” initially, and not knowing about such things as radiation-induced burns—without any fire—may later start including this in their own accounts, after doctors, or reporters, or hidden (or not so hidden) handlers either keep repeating the “fire” and “fireball” memes to them; or perhaps in some cases threatening/rewarding the survivors to start telling it the way their handlers demand. Never forget how FBI, or secret service agents, both on the scene in Dallas and later during depositions, threatened eyewitnesses to President Kennedy’s assassination, if they either said they clearly saw the Secret Service driver do it, or that there also were shots from the grassy knoll. Experts in eyewitness testimony tell us that the most accurate account is the closest in time to the event. Remember how sub-basement, 9/11 burn victim Felipe David’s own

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/08/more-evidence-testimony-indicating.html[07.11.2010 14:52:15]

World Trade Center Demolition: More Evidence & Testimony Indicating Nuclear Blasts, Nuclear Radiation, & China Syndrome at the WTC accounting never mentions “fire” or “fireball,” but his alleged rescuer, William Rodriquez added fire or fireball to his accounting of David’s experiences. You will have to be the judge after reading survivors’ accounts shortly after the event, and then months later after media/(govt?) interviews. This is a crucial point in the likely tampering of witnesses to a heinous crime. It is particularly odious as this may be ongoing from deep-cover intel assets in the major, AND internet “truth”, media. But if the government/media had nothing to fear, or cover-up, why do they have to change so many burn victims’ testimonies? Likewise they are frequently inserting “plane hits” into statements, when the witness couldn’t possibly have seen that, even if the plane hits were real, instead of CGI. I believe we are only scratching the surface regarding evidence of the use of mini-nukes on 9/11. Many fire and police witnesses fear losing their jobs, or their pensions. Beginning a month after 9/11, NYC Fire Commissioner von Essen’s office took depositions of 503 fire personnel, port authority police and EMT first responders. The report is 12,000 pages long and rarely read [and not read here]. It was deliberately excluded from the 911 Commission, and NIST, reports (scroll down at link). Could they be hiding evidence, not of the widely known explosions/controlled demolition, but specifically of the nuking of the towers and 3000 people? After von Essen’s 503 witness interviews, former CIA director Robert Woolsey, was inserted into this in 2002, as the NYC Fire Department's “Anti-terrorism Consultant.” (It’s interesting that Wikipedia omits this job in his bio.) He issued a gag order, under threat of job loss and worse, down the ranks, under the guise of “anti-terrorism.” This report is the one that includes EMT, Patricia Ondrovic’ [See my articles on her here] heavily redacted, but remarkable interview. Recall my analysis demonstrated she witnessed Electromagnetic Pulse from a nuclear bomb causing flickering lights and making cars catch fire, for no apparent reason (“toasted cars”), right near her, and also jets shooting down other jets in the sky over the Hudson. Was Woolsey in charge of the redacting, of her, and other, testimony? I make the assertion that the very purpose of interviewing these 503 9/11 witnesses and responders was to find out who had witnessed evidence of the nuking of the WTC, and to then threaten, and silence them! Perhaps too many to kill, so first try to silence them! Here are the full 503 interviews. It would be good if some real 911 researcher could read them all or search for when portions are redacted. Note my scanning them indicates that numerous witnesses report “explosions;” this was not reason enough for redaction! There is other eyewitness (or should I say skinwitness) evidence, I believe of the heat, and radiation, wave which emanates outwards from a nuclear blast from numerous people who happened to be in the vicinity of the towers. This article states that “John Axisa, who was getting off a commuter train to the World Trade Center, …[after the alleged first plane hit]… Then there was a second explosion, and he felt heat on the back of [his] neck.” Note the timing of the “second” explosion he heard--nothing from which was seen exiting the building--and yet he felt the heat at that exact time! This again could only be from a nuke, I assert. (The DEW hangout theorists always say their alleged DEW is cold.) Also at a 911 forum, a forum administrator named Quest noted that, “I have an acquaintance who was a NYC cop on 9/11 when the second tower came down. He was 3 blocks away and told me there was "incredible heat" during the "collapse".” Heat indeed is the thing that would be felt furthest out from a nuclear blast. Read this account of physicist, Dr. Phillip Morrison 10 miles from the Trinity nuclear test site. He said, "Suddenly, not only was there a bright light, but where we were, 10 miles away, there was the heat of the sun on our faces.” [This was before the Sun came up.] So we see the similarity of statements, regarding heat during a nuclear blast, made by the Trinity witness, John Axisa, Quest’s policeman, Felipe David, and the three burn victims interviewed by Larry King. I have written that the nukes used on 9/11 were 1/100th to 1/1000th (each) of the intensity of the Trinity blast (with several per tower used, and only one per smaller WTC "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/08/more-evidence-testimony-indicating.html[07.11.2010 14:52:15]

World Trade Center Demolition: More Evidence & Testimony Indicating Nuclear Blasts, Nuclear Radiation, & China Syndrome at the WTC

buildings) and we also have some shielding by the building. So the distance that radiation would be able to propagate would be vastly less than the 10 miles felt by Dr. Morrison (noted above), where the test was in the open air. Those in the towers, and nearby, would indeed be bombarded by the (unseen) radiation from a mini-nuke. Given these ideas from this physicist, who has taught physics at several universities, can Quest please further interview his cop friend, and get back to us here at comments, or via email to Spooked? There has been at least one study published of WTC responders’ medical problems treated on scene, from 9/14/01 to 11/20/1, at the WTC. This was published in May-June, 2005, of “Prehospital and Disaster Medicine,” and was authored by: K.R. Peritt, W.L. Boal, and “The Helix Group, Inc.” This third “author” listed is a media corporation. (I did not know that corporations, per se, could now be authors?) This study related to a 10 week period whereby a Federal govt agency, the “United States Public Health Service (USPHS), deployed Disaster Medical Assistance Teams (DMATs) and the Commissioned Corps to provide on-site, primary medical care to anyone who presented.” The authors conclusion admits, the “USPHS visits probably were skewed to milder complaints when compared to analyses of employer medical department reports or hospital cases…” This appears to mean that the more serious cases went straight to the hospital. There were 9,349 on-site patient visits, which included some surrounding residents. There were 30 cases of nausea and vomiting. Let us look at skin conditions reported. There were 253 1st or 2nd degree burns, of which 107 (42%) were said to be related to equipment use. There is no word on what caused the other 58% of these burns. In addition, there are 132 cases of “other” skin problems reported. There is not a single case of third degree burns (the most serious), and no comment on this lack! Were there people with more serious burns that went straight to the hospital, and thus are not counted? There are some curious statistics: “Other injury or illness: 696 cases,” and “Not classifiable as an injury or illness: 920 cases.” That’s quite a lot of cases that are either “other” or “not classifiable,” about 17%. Why such a high percentage? They’re not “psychological” because they reported 78 cases of this. Is any medical condition being covered up? Did they test for radiation which is not mentioned? And what caused the 146 cases of burns that were not due to equipment handling? And how many people had third degree burns among the responders? Or is this classified information, related to what really was happening at the WTC, even after its demolition? This study is very troubling, and looks very “doctored.” In conclusion now, this article, and my previous articles archived at wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and wtc-ChinaSyndrome.blogspot.com indicate the following. The proven existence of mini-nukes and micro-nukes , the massive outward explosions seen, the vaporization of a steel press, the wrinkling into “foil” of a steel door, spherical blast wave destruction, the “nuclear meteorite,[parts of 4 storeys fused together at extreme temp.,]” the feeling of heat without fire of numerous witnesses, the burned or hanging skin--without fire, the responders’ teeth later falling out, the vaporized building contents, the 1157 vaporized people, the massive evidence of the China Syndrome of resultant nuclear reacting fragments causing the very high heat and molten steel witnessed by many at least six months after 9/11, and photographed, the clothing discarding, and decontamination procedures, my detailed explanation of Ondrovic’ account of Electromagnetic Pulse and resultant car fire, and the door exploding into her as WTC 5, 6, were being exploded from within, near her, the micro- or nano-fine particle size, and much more, all indicate the federal regime set off numerous mini-nuclear bombs in the WTC on 9/11. The witnesses that my articles have cited, included numerous WTC workers, numerous firefighters, EMT worker, responders, stationary engineer, fire engineering professor, top British and American Structural Engineers who have been

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/08/more-evidence-testimony-indicating.html[07.11.2010 14:52:15]

World Trade Center Demolition: More Evidence & Testimony Indicating Nuclear Blasts, Nuclear Radiation, & China Syndrome at the WTC shown “secret” photos denied to the rest of us, NYC Commissioner, NYC Fire Commissioner, policeman, and others. Many (or the vast majority of the 503 who were found) other on-scene witnesses have—for the moment —likely been silenced, as detailed herein—which is witness tampering, and worse. Scientific data have also been cited, including —AVIRIS, LIDAR, seismic readings before “collapse”, Tritium finding (UCAL/Berkeley, and subsequent Tahil study), and the now exploding number of “rare” cancers among responders, including thyroid, leukemia, and lymph cancer—all common among radiation victims. Other data, I have asserted has been altered, or is totally hidden--second long-delayed AVIRIS data set, and the lack of any further AVIRIS released. I assert and accuse— J’Accuse”—that the preponderance of this evidence demonstrates that the federal government of the United States of America did explode nuclear bombs inside most of the WTC buildings on 9/11/01. Furthermore, there was a resultant China Syndrome (through mechanisms detailed here by me previously) of nuclear reacting fragments releasing ionizing radiation, and high heat, for at least six months after 9/11, causing molten steel, and radiation exposure to thousands of responders and NYC residents. This was an act of treason, conspiracy, mass murder, genocide, and a ruse for waging war on innocent peoples around the world—crimes against humanity, and a ruse for blatantly eradicating American citizens freedoms and rights. The 9/11 WTC nuclear holocaust was not likely even the first time the American regime did this to its own citizens! Too few people know of this research into the American government’s probable nuking of American sailors in 1944. The 9/11 perpetrators have used, and are using, limited hangouts and psyops to keep the people from knowing this. These hangouts, ultimately from the U.S. regime’s “intelligence” agencies, include the bogus “theories” of the official planes/fuel/gravity/pancaking nonsense, and also thermite, DEW, and Depleted Uranium [D.U.] (any uranium used on 9/11 at the WTC, and the China Syndrome aftermath, would have been highly enriched, not depleted). The observed American military helicopters and planes directing the initial explosions, and the final nuclear destruction prove that this was not done by Arabs, Muslims, Iranians, Israelis, Russians, or Chinese. As with the Kennedy Assassination, this massive set of actions, and massive cover-up, could only have been perpetrated by the so-called government of the United States, and not by any small “rogue elements” therein. Complicit in the original act, and/or its cover-up, are all the branches of the federal government, its military, and intelligence agencies, and the Main Stream Media, and even much of the so-called alternative or internet media which is also laden with intel agents posing as “truthers,” while pushing the hangouts listed above. The people of the world must get together, in what may be their final hour, and act literally to save themselves from extermination, from the handful of monsters that control humanity. Nature has demonstrated that individuals trained to be fearful can all come together, and overcome this fear, and act and defeat the small number who had previously seemed to be so invincible and bloodthirsty. We are indeed likewise in the jaws of these monsters, and have been for a long time; but likewise again, it is still possible to break free, and be free. We must try. Like this last video, there are so many more of us, than of them. posted by spooked @ 6:34 AM

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/08/more-evidence-testimony-indicating.html[07.11.2010 14:52:15]

World Trade Center Demolition: Proof of the Existence of Mini-Nukes and Micro-Nukes

Proof of the Existence of Mini-Nukes and MicroNukes
From the Anonymous Physicist More and more people are realizing that other theories proposed could not have destroyed the WTC, and are limited hangouts. As more people realize that the WTC was likely demolished via small nuclear bombs (likely with subsidiary conventional explosives), some are now claiming that millinukes (mini-nukes), or micro-nukes don’t even exist. Spooked and I have addressed this issue before. Here first is proof of the “Nuclear rifle” from the 1950’s, no less. The .01 kiloton (kt) TNT equivalent is about 1/1000th of the Hiroshima (20KT) blast. And here is a govt scientist, Peter Leitner, PhD, speaking to a Congressional Committee, in 1998. This is proof of nuclear bombs down into the range of “several pounds of TNT.” He stated, “These experiments involve the ACTUAL TESTING of extremely low-yield fission devices (as low as the equivalent of several pounds of TNT) within a confined environment.” Several pounds of TNT is equivalent to about 1/10,000,000th (one ten millionth) of the Hiroshima blast. Thus the U.S. Govt admitted having micro-nukes, and beyond in 1998. Note that this public admission stated that the testing was done “in a controlled environment.” Clearly, the gov't has had milli-nukes and micro-nukes for some time. posted by spooked @ 7:43 AM

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/08/proof-of-existence-of-mini-nukes-and.html[07.11.2010 14:53:49]

World Trade Center Demolition: Brief Evidence of Nuclear bombs used at the WTC on 9/11/01

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Friday, August 24, 2007

Brief Evidence of Nuclear bombs used at the WTC on 9/11/01
From the Anonymous Physicist, extracted from here. -- the proven existence of mini-nukes and micro-nukes -- massive outward explosions as seen in videos of the towers' "collapses" -- the vaporization of a large steel press in the WTC basement -- the wrinkling into “foil” of a steel/concrete door -- the spherical blast wave destruction -- the “nuclear meteorite” (a chunk of WTC debris with 4 floors fused together) -- the feeling of heat without fire of numerous witnesses -- the burned or hanging skin (Felipe David), without fire, like so many Hiroshima victims -- the responders’ teeth later falling out (Tartaglia), like numerous American Army A-Bomb test veterans/victims -- the missing, presumably vaporized, building contents -- the missing, presumably vaporized 1157 people, unaccounted for at Ground Zero -- the massive evidence of the China Syndrome of resultant nuclear reacting fragments causing the very high heat and molten steel witnessed (and photographed) by so many firefighter and responders at least six months after 9/11 -- the clothing discarding from rescue workers -- the decontamination procedures of rescue workers -- EMT Ondrovic’s account of Electromagnetic Pulse and instantaneous resultant car fire, and the door exploding into her as WTC 5,6, were being exploded from within, near her (explained here) -- the micro- or nano-fine particle debris/dust size -- much more, all indicate the federal regime set off numerous mini-nuclear bombs in the WTC on 9/11.

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/08/evidence-of-nuclear-bombs-used-at-wtc.html[07.11.2010 14:54:10]

World Trade Center Demolition: Brief Evidence of Nuclear bombs used at the WTC on 9/11/01 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

The witnesses for nukes that my articles have cited, included: -- numerous WTC workers, including Felipe David, -- numerous firefighters, including Bronx firefighter Joe O’Toole -- EMT worker Patricia Ondrovic -- numerous first responders, including Sgt. Matthew Tartaglia -- WTC stationary engineer Pecoraro -- fire engineering professor Dr. Barnett -- top British and American Structural Engineers including Keith Eaton, PhD who were shown “secret” molten steel photos denied to the rest of us -- Leslie E. Robertson, {American] Structural Engineer (and partial designer of WTC) -- Kenneth Holden NYC Commissioner -- Thomas von Essen, NYC Fire Commissioner -- policeman: many (or the vast majority of the 503 who were found) -- other on-scene witnesses have—- for the moment—likely have been silenced, as detailed herein—- which is witness tampering, and worse.

Scientific data have also been cited, including — -- AVIRIS, -- LIDAR, -- seismic readings before “collapse”, -- Tritium finding (UCAL/Berkeley, and subsequent Tahil study) -- the now exploding number of “rare” CANCERS among responders, including thyroid, leukemia, and lymph cancer—all common among radiation victims posted by spooked @ 7:48 AM

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/08/evidence-of-nuclear-bombs-used-at-wtc.html[07.11.2010 14:54:10]

World Trade Center Demolition: Brief Evidence of Nuclear bombs used at the WTC on 9/11/01 San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/08/evidence-of-nuclear-bombs-used-at-wtc.html[07.11.2010 14:54:10]

World Trade Center Demolition: Brief Evidence of Nuclear bombs used at the WTC on 9/11/01 "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/08/evidence-of-nuclear-bombs-used-at-wtc.html[07.11.2010 14:54:10]

World Trade Center Demolition: Brief Evidence of Nuclear bombs used at the WTC on 9/11/01

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/08/evidence-of-nuclear-bombs-used-at-wtc.html[07.11.2010 14:54:10]

World Trade Center Demolition: Brief Evidence of Nuclear bombs used at the WTC on 9/11/01

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/08/evidence-of-nuclear-bombs-used-at-wtc.html[07.11.2010 14:54:10]

World Trade Center Demolition: Was the First Atomic Bomb [in modern times] Exploded on an American Town by the American Govt?

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Sunday, June 29, 2008

Was the First Atomic Bomb [in modern times] Exploded on an American Town by the American Govt?
Book Review: "The Last Wave From Port Chicago" by Peter Vogel by The Anonymous Physicist Vogel’s book is freely downloadable here. http://www.portchicago.org/ Port Chicago was a WWII munitions port about 35 miles northwest of San Francisco, traversed through various waterways. The massive explosion that occurred there, at 10:19 P.M. on July 17, 1944 has been the subject of debate ever since. Wikipedia has this summary of the superficial info: “The Port Chicago disaster was a deadly explosion that took place on July 17, 1944 at the Port Chicago Naval Magazine in Port Chicago, California ... killing 320 sailors and civilians, and injuring more than 400 others. Most of the dead and injured were African American recruits, and the continuing unsafe conditions even after the disaster resulted in a number of servicemen refusing to work, known as the Port Chicago Mutiny, a month later ... Two hundred and eight sailors were convicted in summary courtsmartial, and received bad conduct discharges. The remaining 50 men, known today as The Port Chicago 50, were found guilty of mutiny in a subsequent court martial, and were sentenced to dishonorable discharges and prison sentences of 8 and 15 years of hard labor... Thurgood Marshall sued the Navy on behalf of the 50 sailors. Although he was unable to get the convictions overturned, Marshall succeeded in winning clemency for the 50 sailors, but not until after the war in 1946.” In The Last Wave From Port Chicago, author Peter Vogel, details his over 20-year quest to prove that the Port Chicago explosion was a nuclear one. The book attempts to show that Port Chicago was the one and only “proof firing/test” of the Mark II [Uranium Hydride Autocatalytic Lateral Implosion] atomic bomb. Vogel starts off his tale with his own history of being a rebel and being anti-establishment, and even being arrested at a protest rally for assaulting a policeman. He then became a reporter at the “San Francisco Chronicle”, and subsequently an editor for “Electronics” magazine. At the latter, he wrote, or edited, at least one piece on electronic component reliability in ICBMs shot into the Van Allen Radiation belts! Vogel ends up in 1980 in New Mexico, appointed by Governor King to be Secretary of the Board of Directors of NMERDI--the New Mexico Energy Research and Development Institute. He writes that Gov. King liked him so much, that he appointed him to be an honorary Colonel in the NM National Guard. This is how Vogel ended up in New Mexico where, for 25 cents, in 1980, at a Santa Fe Church rummage sale, he purchased a box of donated tools

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/06/was-first-atomic-bomb-in-modern-times.html[07.11.2010 14:55:42]

World Trade Center Demolition: Was the First Atomic Bomb [in modern times] Exploded on an American Town by the American Govt? that had in its bottom, a photocopy of a remarkable document. The document was titled “History of 10,000 ton gadget.” [Gadget was code for the fission bomb.] It included information on “fireball,” “detonation,’ and “radiation.” Vogel traced the document to Paul Masters, who worked at Los Alamos, during the Manhattan Project. Masters was involved with photography and copying. Masters had apparently copied this secret document, and taken it home with him, in his “shirt pocket.” The penalty for doing this was quite severe, and gives pause. Curious also, is the fact that Masters’ wife, Charlie, was in “counterespionage,” and “connected” to the Secret Service! Vogel reads the document and begins researching the Port Chicago explosion, and related Los Alamos matters. One of the first people he interviewed, at Los Alamos, was Dr. Edward Teller. Vogel had actually taken a course from Teller in California years earlier. Teller, of course, is notorious as the right-wing “father of the HBomb.” Except that that claim is false. (See the book, “Dark Sun: The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb” by Richard Rhodes, read here.) Teller was also involved in the so-called SDI or “Star Wars” development of shooting down missiles, high above the Earth. Vogel arranges to meet Teller at Los Alamos--and lies and says the interview will be about the energy crisis-and photographs him, after he surprised Teller with the “History of 10,000 ton gadget” document. This photo shows Teller looking at the document. Teller stops and tells Vogel, “I believe you have a classified document. You should take it immediately to the Classification Office. I will deny I have ever seen this document. I will deny I have ever discussed Port Chicago with you.” The two go off to that office with the document, but Vogel keeps a copy, of the classified document. Shortly after this, as Vogel begins his in-depth research into the possible, deliberate nuking of Port Chicago, by the American gov’t, an important Los Alamos report on Port Chicago gets re-classified, after it had been declassified. Nonetheless, there is a massive store of documents on Port Chicago at Los Alamos. Officially Port Chicago could not be a nuclear explosion, in part, because there was not enough Uranium-235 [U-235] available for this in July, 1944. Vogel attempts to show that this is incorrect, and that every book saying this is wrong. He takes particular aim at Richard Rhodes’ Pulitzer Prize winning book, “The Making of the Atomic Bomb.” (Read here.) Vogel shows numerous errors of commission and omission, and says the book must have won its awards for its mass, not its veracity. Vogel writes that he is told, by physicists, to help prove his case, he should ascertain the amount of U-235 that was available at the time of the Port Chicago blast. This too remains classified, even though this is now six decades later. The book thus has numerous chapters and appendices related to the amount of U-235 the Govt’s labs had produced at different times. Curiously again, Vogel gets two Los Alamos Manhattan Project scientists to tell him the answers to this question. They tell him that there was enough U-235 in July, 1944 for the Port Chicago blast--even though this information is classified, and has serious penalties for Manhattan project scientists to reveal to anyone. (Assuming those scientists’ responses were truthful.) Let me now summarize the findings of this book, and articles by Vogel and others that try to prove that the Port Chicago explosion was a nuclear one, as opposed to an explosion of the munitions at the pier, or on board the two ships (the SS E.A. Bryan and the SS Quinault Victory,) in the water near the pier at Port Chicago. The explosion was massive--the pier was leveled and much of the nearby town was also--and had a large white fireball visible for several hundred miles. People for over 20 miles reported seeing a bright white light as bright as several Suns. Reports state that the column of flame rose to approx. 10,000 feet before the night sky prevented observation of any further rising. The flame from the Trinity test, a year later, also rose to that altitude, with its subsequent mushroom cloud rising to nearly twice that height. The resultant cloud at Port Chicago was described as being a “mushroom cloud”--the first time that term was used in public discourse in the English language. The document Vogel found 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/06/was-first-atomic-bomb-in-modern-times.html[07.11.2010 14:55:42]

World Trade Center Demolition: Was the First Atomic Bomb [in modern times] Exploded on an American Town by the American Govt? San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

which was written after Port Chicago, but before Trinity, correctly predicted the 18,000-foot altitude of the Trinity mushroom cloud “in typical Port Chicago fashion.” Vogel shows these things did not occur in other huge munition ship explosions, that he details in the book. All seismograms were immediately seized, and not allowed to be published for several years. Were they re-done, as I have asserted the WTC seismic recordings were? Eyewitnesses said some of the many missiles that flew to great distances were of various colors indicating they were in a molten state due to what we lately call “extraordinarily high temperatures.” The official report itself says many missiles were molten. The Navy was even there across the pier making a film of the explosion. This was revealed some years later when they began showing a nuclear explosion that some recognized as being of Port Chicago. The military then said this was not an actual film, but was “special effects” [sound familiar?] created much later. Others examined the film itself, and proved that this was false, as the film was made of nitrate that was used in 1944, but was no longer used because of its own flammable nature. Of particular importance is the following: 1. Reports from Los Alamos, and other places, about subsequent fission bomb detonations contain the phrase, “in Port Chicago fashion,” when referring to the rising mushroom cloud or fireball. Even when the British regime exploded its first atomic bomb, in 1952, off the coast of Australia, their report stated, the bomb was placed in a forward hold of the HMS Plym and detonated "Port Chicago style." 2. Crucially, before the Port Chicago explosion, there are Los Alamos reports (at the highest levels--Dr. Conant and General Grove) on the need for a test/proof firing of the Mark II nuclear device--before further development or use of this type of A-bomb. But just after the Port Chicago explosion, Los Alamos reports (between the same top people) state that this is no longer necessary, and that they can go on to other things. 3. Los Alamos scientists were immediately sent to Port Chicago, and the Navy’s three man Court of Inquiry on the matter, which began a few days later, included the brother-in-law (Capt. J.S. Crenshaw) of one of the top Los Alamos people, Captain Parsons. Parsons would fly in the Enola Gay to arm the Bomb before its dropping on Hiroshima. 4. At the time of the Port Chicago blast, Los Alamos physicists thought the bomb to be used on Japan would be too heavy for airborne use, and therefore had to be taken in by ship. 5. There was a massive 800-foot diameter crater created under the S.S. Bryan. Out of 320 dead, only 81 bodies were recovered. Out of these 81, only 30 bodies could be identified. However, we cannot assume any vaporization of people, as these figures could possibly result from conventional explosions in ships. The long lasting effects of the Port Chicago blast are also telling. In 1968, the federal govt bought up all the buildings in Port Chicago, and demolished them, and later erected a monument. There has been a high cancer incidence in Contra Costa County, CA for the last several decades. Curiously, Vogel did not suffer a strange car accident, nor surprise heart attack, nor rapid cancer, nor was he brutally assaulted nor had his home contaminated with a very toxic form of mercury, as was done to me, for just once speaking out on how SS agent Greer shot both Connally and Kennedy. Vogel meets with many Los Alamos scientists and tells each one that he is researching Port Chicago, and that he is trying to prove that the U.S. Govt deliberately nuked this American pier and town, and suffers no harmful consequences for this. There is much else in the book that gives me pause. Much else seems to be establishment dogma. There is the omission of what the Ottawa agreement really was about (British control of American nukes), standard nonsense about Osama bin Laden is thrown in, immense praise for one of the members of NMERDI, Dean McGee, Chairman of Kerr McGee. I have written of the jury verdict against Kerr McGee in the Plutonium poisoning and car ramming murder of Karen Silkwood. There is an establishment view on many things in the book, even saying there was a need to nuke an American town, and American sailors,

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/06/was-first-atomic-bomb-in-modern-times.html[07.11.2010 14:55:42]

World Trade Center Demolition: Was the First Atomic Bomb [in modern times] Exploded on an American Town by the American Govt? to “save 100,000 American lives” in the invasion of Japan. When the truth is that Japan had tried to surrender for months prior to Hiroshima. Some of the reports on Port Chicago at Los Alamos, and other Los Alamos reports, show one parameter the Manhattan Project was always concerned with, was destruction of “dwelling houses.” So the mass murder of innocent civilians was always the goal. Recently I have seen what is likely an intel Hangout regarding Port Chicago. Now it is claimed, by some, that Port Chicago was indeed a nuclear explosion, but it was an accident! All sorts of specious arguments are used. But the history of American nuclear bombs is that, from the outset, various fail-safe mechanisms were employed that made it virtually impossible for an accidental explosion to occur. If the SS E.A. Bryan held an atomic bomb in its hull, it would not have been armed until it was ready to be “proof/test fired” and also studied and filmed at its “anointed place.” A related matter is that I have read another book on some of these matters that has a very different take on them. This book is "Critical Mass: How Nazi Germany Surrendered Enriched Uranium for The United States' Atomic Bomb" by Carter Plymton Hydrick. It may not be readily available, but is highly recommended here. It demonstrates that both the fissile material, and even the advanced detonator mechanism used on Hiroshima were of German origin, and taken from the submarine that officially was intercepted on its way to Japan, which had set sail near the end of Hitler’s reign. I thought the book did a good job of demonstrating its hypotheses. Now the regime’s intel assets have gone crazy both in regards to Hydrick’s book and Vogel’s. (See the use of foul ridicule that would be recognized, even here, as coming from intel entities.) But here you can read how some of the strongest critics of “Critical Mass” changed their minds when presented with the evidence. I have a different take than Hydrick on this, going to my Ultimate Truths here: http://anonymous-physicist.blogspot.com. If the Atomic Bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki had German fissile material and advanced detonators, this wasn’t by accident that this came into the hands of the Manhattan Project people. Rather the PTB intended this destination for these materials, and not Japan. Similarly, the Uranium for the Port Chicago blast may have been delivered from Germany, or elsewhere in 1944, as well. This could be the reason that the American Govt won’t release its 1943-45 Uranium production amounts still, over 60 years later! And the PTB do not want the People to know how they controlled WWII for that purpose--creating nuclear bombs for use on Humanity; and the different “sides” of that war, and all wars, have been a ruse. “Critical Mass” also reveals some strangeness regarding the physicist given credit for the advanced detonators that also had been a great stumbling block to implosion fission devices. This was Luis Alvarez, PhD. Decades later, this Alvarez (who would also receive a Nobel Prize) would write some impossible Physics that President Kennedy’s body could be slammed backward against the incoming momentum of a bullet fired from behind him. Alvarez wrote this claptrap, and got it published in a Physics Journal--shades of Bazant and Seffen--after the Zapruder film was first publicly shown in 1975. It’s a violation of the fundamental Law of Conservation of Momentum. Before this, the regime/media just lied and said Kennedy’s body went forward in the limo. So Hydrick’s book and Vogel’s book are similar, but different. Unlike Hydrick’s book, Vogel’s ignores the issue of the detonation difficulties that also held up testing and use of fission bombs, and asserts that there was enough fissile material (U-235) by July 1944, let alone August 1945. I recommend people read both, and make up their own minds. Vogel shows that the Hiroshima nuke used only 1.14% of its contained fissile material--the rest of the U235 did not undergo fission--due to the geometry and Physics of the implosion/explosion. Thus its efficiency is about 1%. The Port Chicago type A-Bomb had even less efficiency--about 0.5%. More recently, 6% efficiency for updated nuclear bombs is cited. "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/06/was-first-atomic-bomb-in-modern-times.html[07.11.2010 14:55:42]

World Trade Center Demolition: Was the First Atomic Bomb [in modern times] Exploded on an American Town by the American Govt?

This will be important in another (upcoming) article. My conclusion is that there is much circumstantial evidence that the Port Chicago explosion was a nuclear fission explosion that was deliberately perpetrated by the U.S. regime. One could argue that circumstantial evidence is not proof, but trials have resulted in murder convictions based solely on circumstantial evidence. But one could say that there is no absolute proof, unless that film is of the Port Chicago nuking. Or unless some Los Alamos scientists who know the truth, would come forward. Of course, if they did, they could face charges of releasing secret information on the one hand. And on the other hand, they could (if the People ever got control of the regime again) face charges of Mass Murder, Treason, Conspiracy, maybe even genocide of a race, as the use of Afro-Americans, and removing the white Coast Guard detail that night is also telling. So we are not likely to get a confession from the perps. Peter Vogel’s "The Last Wave From Port Chicago" presents much evidence that the July 17, 1944 Port Chicago explosion was a deliberate nuking of our own citizens, and sailors, and an American town and pier, by our own government. It should be read by all. It also fits in with the evidence that the WTC destruction on 9/11/01, was the deliberate nuking of America’s largest city by its own regime, and that the China Syndrome resulted, as detailed here http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and here wtcchinasyndrome.blogspot.com. But going beyond this level, I consider it a strong possibility that the PTB wanted the deliberate nuking of Port Chicago to get out! While they deny it officially for the masses, they want others to know. There is too much “coincidence” here. Vogel’s early anti-establishment, and so much later recitation of establishment dogma, the finding of the document, the strangeness of its owner and his “secret service, counterespionage” wife. The lack of prevention/retribution rained down on Vogel. The two scientists who told him there was sufficient Uranium--IF that is true. We have both too many coincidences, and also many people who could have, and maybe still could, face severe penalties for their parts in this. Would anyone but a spy--or someone starting this “revelation” want to photocopy a top-secret document, and then take it home, and face severe penalties? The document would be available from then on, at such time as the PTB would want to promulgate it. Likewise for the scientists who faced severe penalties for revealing Uranium-235 production amounts. They were not arrested or harmed. But all these “coincidences” in Vogel’s tale may be genuine. Finally, in light of the distinctions of the two above books in regards to available amounts of fissile material and advanced detonators, I can not know for sure which is right. But this is not the main issue. Regardless of whether the Uranium-235, or the detonators, in a nuclear bomb at Port Chicago came from an American lab, or a German lab, or elsewhere, the evidence itself reveals that it is very probable that the American and British regimes ordered the nuking of Port Chicago, in furtherance of its plans for more massive nukings on other civilians in Japan, and so on. Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Did the perps, still at Los Alamos, and Lawrence Livermore observe the nuking of the WTC on 9/11, and say that the rising smoke, photographed going up

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/06/was-first-atomic-bomb-in-modern-times.html[07.11.2010 14:55:42]

World Trade Center Demolition: Was the First Atomic Bomb [in modern times] Exploded on an American Town by the American Govt?

into space, was in ... “Port Chicago fashion”?
IMPORTANT UPDATE: The Pt Chicago date is July 17, 1944. That’s 7/17/1944. Adding up the digits: 7, 1, 7, 1, 9, 4, 4 adds up to 33! All things nuclear! Especially the first one in modern times! posted by spooked @ 7:56 AM

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/06/was-first-atomic-bomb-in-modern-times.html[07.11.2010 14:55:42]

World Trade Center Demolition: Could 9/11 Have Been Done With FAE/Thermobaric Explosives?

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

Could 9/11 Have Been Done With FAE/Thermobaric Explosives?
By The Anonymous Physicist

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

Major breakthroughs on the nuking of the WTC will be coming soon. For now, let us examine the theory that the WTC was demolished solely, or primarily, via thermobaric (Fuel/Air) explosives. Thermobaric or Fuel Air Explosives (FAE) produce great blast and overpressure. Their relatively high temperature (compared to other conventional explosives), and overpressure can cause great damage to structure, and to humans. And I have written (coming soon), they were possibly used in the initial explosions (bogus “plane hits.”) But let us address whether thermobarics could have caused the final WTC demolition we saw, and the China Syndrome aftermath we know came to be.

We know from the towers’ missing mass (debris, rubble), and the dust testing that much steel structure was vaporized. We also have the quote, after examination, from fire engineering professor, Dr. Barnett, about his observing steel beams that he said showed evidence of vaporized steel from “extraordinarily high temperatures”, that led to a laughable “refutation” from a disinfo physicist (scroll down to comments). How anyone could believe anything from either of the two disinfo agents/physicists is beyond me.

Now the best thermobarics reach a temperature of about 2500 to 3000 degrees Celsius. Steel boils (vaporizes) at about 3000 degrees Celsius. I understand that most of the steel structure in the towers was treated with asbestos and other types of fireproofing, which would give it an effective higher vaporization temperature, thus likely beyond the range of even the best thermobaric/FAE explosives. We also have the issue of time, for an explosive that barely, maybe reaches the boiling point of steel, the explosive would not provide enough time to yield what Dr. Barnett saw. Does your water boil instantly, even though your burner has a temperature somewhat beyond water’s boiling point? No, it takes time-- but it would vaporize instantly if it were nuked! The “extraordinarily high temperatures” of a nuke, or neutron bombardment, would vaporize (boil) steel instantly. But even if we give thermobarics the benefit of the doubt; let’s say you wanted to have the rapid, mostly symmetric, virtual free-fall (some say faster than free fall, as this is not in a vacuum), 10-12 second complete destruction of the towers, would you employ an explosive that might possibly, barely vaporize some steel structure; or would you need and use something that instantly, overwhelmingly vaporized it— via multi-million degree temperature, and neutron bombardment?

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/10/could-911-have-been-done-with.html[07.11.2010 14:56:18]

World Trade Center Demolition: Could 9/11 Have Been Done With FAE/Thermobaric Explosives? 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

For completeness now, thermobarics cause great damage to structure and to human beings. “The blast wave destroys UNREINFORCED (get it?) buildings” and the office of the Australian Minister of Defence states “Internal organs that contain air (sinuses, ears, lungs and intestines) are particularly vulnerable to [thermobaric] blast. The whole body may also be thrown by blast wind, which can result in fractures. Besides the obvious blast injuries, recent research has shown that there are neurological, biochemical and blood chemistry changes caused by blast effects.” But at least one thing is clearly missing… VAPORIZATION. As Spooked has posted here after reading Robert Shaler's book on attempted DNA matching of 9/11 victims, "Who They Were", some 1157 tower workers were missing completely and probably vaporized. Instant vaporization of people and structures, I have written, is well known from Hiroshima and Nagasaki to occur at, or near, the hypocenter of a nuke. And I already cited the steel vaporization which is not attainable, or not significantly so, with thermobarics, and less likely with asbestos-treated steel. And you don’t get the China Syndrome aftermath of six month long high temperatures and molten steel— that I have heavily documented with numerous articles here, and ensuing cancer deaths including thyroid, leukemia and lymph cancers— known radiation-induced cancers. Nor would thermobarics provide the responders’ later teeth falling out, or demolition-time burned or hanging skin WITHOUT FIRE, that I have repeatedly highlighted in my previous articles. Nor did we see the fireballs during “collapse” (a la the “plane hits”), that we would have, if thermobarics were employed in any appreciable sense during final demolition. All these missing, but necessary, actual WTC destruction, and aftermath, components prove that the main WTC demolition cause was NOT the hangouts of Nuke-Like, or Nuke-Light, thermobarics, or “DEW”.

In the final analysis, thermobaric explosives may well have been used for the “plane hit" explosions, and possibly also in a subsidiary capacity BEFORE the final destruction-- to allow for the use of what I have called “underpowered” nuke(s). Both the Finnish military expert and myself (months ago, now at www.wtcdemolition.blogspot.com) have basically written that keeping the nuking “under wraps” was much desired. Outer steel support structure would be cut or exploded with conventional explosives or cutting charges. I have written that the “innards” of the towers were vaporized by nukes, allowing the overpressure throughout to help "peel away" the outer structure. The Finnish expert details how this last part was likely assisted with conventional explosives, such as thermate or C4. So we have seen that thermobarics cannot account for the actual WTC destruction and aftermath. What we witnessed on 9/11/01 at the WTC was the dreaded nuking of an American city by its most horrific enemy— its own federal government. More shocking nuclear proof is coming soon. posted by spooked @ 4:25 PM

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/10/could-911-have-been-done-with.html[07.11.2010 14:56:18]

World Trade Center Demolition: Could 9/11 Have Been Done With FAE/Thermobaric Explosives? San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/10/could-911-have-been-done-with.html[07.11.2010 14:56:18]

World Trade Center Demolition: Could 9/11 Have Been Done With FAE/Thermobaric Explosives? "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/10/could-911-have-been-done-with.html[07.11.2010 14:56:18]

World Trade Center Demolition: Could 9/11 Have Been Done With FAE/Thermobaric Explosives?

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/10/could-911-have-been-done-with.html[07.11.2010 14:56:18]

World Trade Center Demolition: Could 9/11 Have Been Done With FAE/Thermobaric Explosives?

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/10/could-911-have-been-done-with.html[07.11.2010 14:56:18]

World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthroughs Toward Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11-- The Likelihood ...

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Monday, November 12, 2007

Breakthroughs Toward Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11-The Likelihood of Sabotaged, Fizzled Nukes
By The Anonymous Physicist This article will include breakthroughs that may provide a complete understanding of all the anomalous matters in the nuclear destruction of the WTC. My previous articles on the WTC nuclear destruction of the WTC, and its aftermath are here and here. There is much evidence that the sub-basement of WTC 1 was hit with a nuclear bomb around the time of the first “plane hit. The accounts (I have previously given) of surviving burn victim Felipe David and stationary engineer Mike Pecoraro, strongly indicate that this sub-basement, massive blast was nuclear. My article on Felipe David made clear that David’s hanging and burnt skin was from the radiation from a nuke. Pecoraro’s account of a vaporized 50 ton hydraulic press, missing parking garage, and the 300 pound steel and concrete door shriveled up “like aluminum foil” also were from this nuke. We also had phone outage from an EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse) that is part of a nuclear bomb’s effects, at this time and long before the tower’s destruction, as you can read here. Perhaps the early-on EMP is why there were so many military helicopters and planes at the towers— possibly even initiating conventional and/or nuclear explosions, including the final nuclear destruction, via direct line-of-sight lasers into the towers, because radio communications either failed or could not be counted upon, after the first nuke (and EMP).

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

Now regarding the nuking of the WTC, let me re-introduce the crucial concept of “redundancy.” When the PTB decide to do something, and that it must not fail, various forms of redundancy are utilized. If a nuke is to go off in the basement, and say on several upper floors, they would likely have emplaced more than one at each of those levels. Why? Because nukes have been known to fail to detonate, or fail to detonate with their maximum potential. To have a nuclear bomb go off with its maximum potential devastation achieved is very complicated and intertwined. Maximizing the nuclear chain reaction— while necessarily minimizing the time interval of the chain reaction, after having a successful, complicated, conventional explosion, involves many things being done near perfectly— including having properly manufactured/enhanced substances, and triggering mechanisms. This can never be 100% guaranteed. (I am assuming that the trigger is conventional explosives, as opposed to possible newer modalities including laser or sound waves.) We also have Bill Deagle relating how an ATF agent from the OKC bombing told him he removed unused extra— i.e. redundant-- micronukes from the Murrah building. If a nuke at a level is crucial for the demolition scenario (including its secondary, fall-back scenarios), there

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/11/breakthroughs-toward-attaining-complete.html[07.11.2010 14:57:14]

World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthroughs Toward Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11-- The Likelihood ... likely was more than one there, in case the first “fizzled.” Because with a fizzled, crucial nuke, the failed remains would provide a giveaway that the regime itself just tried to nuke the WTC. Clearly the plan called for the complete destruction of the WTC, followed by evidence removal. Now, I assert that great redundancy, and the alternative (bottom up) tower destruction mechanism, and “leaning” (recall my John Miller piece) scenarios, were partially employed, or prepared, because this was the first time a top-bottom set of nukes going off vertically, and very complexly, and timed with conventional explosives was done. Indeed the bogus “leaning” was the fall back scenario if the planned nuking scenario proved untenable. And things did not go perfectly at all. There would be numerous “fizzled” nukes! While we can never know with certainty which type(s) of nukes were employed, they would likely have used ones that were likely the most dependable. Now the evidence indicates that both fission and fusion occurred at the WTC. The govt’s publicly released studies found Uranium, and Tritium (fusion source); while Plutonium was never tested for (or such data was not released.) Relatively massive amounts of Strontium and Barium were found in the dust in at least one WTC area, conclusive to William Tahil that a significant amount of fission occurred. So the presence of both tritium and fission by-products (Strontium and Barium are by-products of the fission of Uranium or Plutonium) indicate that fission and fusion took place. Tritium boosting (fusion) has been incorporated into fission bombs. These nukes may have been thought to be the most dependable. “Fusion boosted fission bombs can also be made immune to radiation from nearby nuclear explosions which can cause other designs to predetonate, blowing themselves apart without achieving a high yield. The combination of reduced weight in relation to yield and immunity to radiation means that most modern nuclear weapons are fusion boosted.” But Wikipedia is CIAconnected. And note the conflict between the alleged “immune to radiation” claim and the information, I will reveal shortly, that neutrinos can, in effect, “evaporate” sufficient nuclear material to prevent a full chain reaction. 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

So let us assume this type of nuke was used, and that several of them “fizzled.” First I need to clarify the difference in “fizzling” that I will delve into now, and the fizzled nukes I wrote of in my first articles. The core idea is the same— nuclear bomb fragments gave rise to the "China Syndrome". But earlier I wrote of exploded nukes that impacted unexploded nukes. The latter then giving rise to these fragments, as is, or partially detonating thereafter. But now I will highlight crucial, new evidence that indicates numerous nukes “fizzled” on their own, through likely sabotage, and not from the effects of other nukes. When these nukes that would “fizzle” were triggered, there are several possibilities. If their conventional triggering explosives failed, there would be nothing. If these powerful, conventional explosives went off (and the evidence herein indicates they did), there would be blast from this; and likely some subsequent, partial nuclear criticality would have been attained with some, or all, of these fizzled nukes. But the blast, and neutron, and other, radiation released was a fraction of what was supposed to happen— and insufficient to bring down a building such as WTC7. The result was a (much) smaller nuke going off, and the beginning of the China Syndrome of nuclear reacting fragments exploded about— but perhaps mostly in the basements, if that’s where the first nukes went off, as is probable. These fragments would be the HEAT SOURCE that would give rise to the molten steel at the bottoms of the three WTC skyscrapers in the coming months. The molten steel’s heat source was the remnants from fizzled (likely sabotaged) nukes. These subbasement nuke fragments were unable to be completely removed, according to the evidence and logic I have presented, for six months, or so. Now if a “fizzled” nuke went off high up, in one of the twin towers, it would likely disperse these fragments about the WTC (with much finer “bits”

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/11/breakthroughs-toward-attaining-complete.html[07.11.2010 14:57:14]

World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthroughs Toward Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11-- The Likelihood ... San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

dispersed much farther out), and give rise to more widespread, but lower level of heat that was measured.

How many fizzled nukes were there? I can only surmise. At least two for WTC7 (the first, and at least one redundant one), and one or more per tower. Remember that the three skyscrapers had molten steel underneath them for months. That would be a minimum of four fizzled nukes. If the Murrah/OKC Deagle story is true (ATF agents removed several, unexploded micro-nukes), there may have been significantly more than these four, at the WTC. I believe all the evidence indicates that there were likely more than these four. I also assert that the likely reason there were numerous defective nukes is because they had been sabotaged— and this was not realized by the perps until after the fact! There are numerous possibilities. This could have been performed by elements of the military who tried to save Americans from their fate. Another possibility is that the nukes could have been hidden in place for a long time, and gone bad. (Not probable, IMO.) Sabotage could have been performed by others, even from far away, such as with neutrino beams, even through the Earth. As the end of this article indicates, neutrino-irradiated nukes may act as if they have undergone effective "evaporation of nuclear material.” And this negates the wiki/CIA claim above that these, or any other, nukes are “immune to all radiation.” Here we learn that Japan, in 1999, began through the Earth neutrino beaming, to distant targets. Always remember that with such military and nuclear matters, and technologies, public release of information is often decades after actual military use has gone on. There are other possibilities that could have led to the unknowing emplacement of sabotaged nukes, but that is described elsewhere by me. Successful, redundant or replacement nukes may have been of a different design, or intensity, than the ones that “fizzled”.

Note that the scenario of a small nuke whose core is sabotaged, via removal of sufficient fissile material to prevent complete criticality, and full chain reaction, was depicted in the 1997 Kidman/Clooney movie, “Peacemaker.” This form of sabotage would not likely be relevant here (due to detectability by the perps emplacing them.) More likely is the scenario (neutrinos) described above (or something similar), that would have allowed for having previously, and surreptiously sabotaged numerous nukes. What happened, and didn’t happen, to WTC7 is crucial to this scenario. New information regarding earlier explosions in WTC7 will soon be detailed. Recall the following. I first wrote that WTC7’s demise was a conventional controlled demolition (CD). Then in a later article, I revised this and wrote that I had become certain that WTC7 was a nuclear CD, not a conventional CD. I quoted the unimpeachable source, Fire Engineering Professor, Dr. Barnett who had observed remnants of vaporized steel “from extraordinarily high temperatures” in the WTC7 rubble. I had conclusively proven, by then, that the months long eyewitnessed and photographed high temperatures and molten steel was accurate despite all the desperate disinfo from the OCT and DEW crowd(s). The difference between my earlier WTC7 hypotheses and this article is, in part, due to the well-hidden fact of WTC7 explosions during the time of the towers’ destructions. It is now clear to me that they didn’t demolish WTC7 earlier that morning, because they couldn’t— but not the way I wrote months ago. They couldn’t destroy WTC7 early that morning, because they tried, and it “fizzled.”

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

Let us now examine WTC7 in detail. We have Tris McCall of Jersey City, NJ. on November 24, 2003 stating, “I said I'd talk a little bit more about WTC7…From our vantage point atop the palisade, we could see the top stories of the trapezoidal structure peeking out between the skyscrapers of Battery Park City….Just before the fall of the North Tower,

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/11/breakthroughs-toward-attaining-complete.html[07.11.2010 14:57:14]

World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthroughs Toward Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11-- The Likelihood ... we saw a large explosion coming from the street-level area around World Trade Center 7. …it looked distinctly like a bomb had been detonated underneath the city, and, of course, that's exactly what I thought had occurred.” On 9/11 itself, the major media put this out: “After the initial blast, Housing Authority worker Barry Jennings reported to a command center on the 23rd floor of 7 World Trade Center. He was with Michael Hess, the city's corporation counsel. They were the only ones there. They felt and heard another explosion, probably the collapse of one building. He broke a window and screamed for help. Then they went down a stairwell. "I told Hess, `We've got to try to get out of here."' They got to the lobby, or what was left of it. "I thought I was dead. The whole building shook. ... I looked around, the lobby was gone. It looked like hell. It was like a bad movie. Though covered in soot, Jennings was not physically injured. He said Hess escaped safely as well.” Note how the article tries to claim that the lobby blast was from the collapse of another WTC building. But now we learn that Jennings was the Deputy Director of the Emergency Services Dept. of the NYC Housing Authority, and is now stating he is certain that he heard and felt explosions in WTC7, shortly after 9 A.M. First as he is coming down the stairs at about the eighth floor. Then there is proof of a large explosion that impacts the WTC7 lobby. Jennings first indicates he is sure the “fuel/oil tank explosion” explanation is bogus. Then he says, “I heard explosions… [Note the plural.] The lobby was totally destroyed… They had to take me out through a make-shift hole in the wall the fire dept. had to make to get me out.” Then Alex Jones comes on this Youtube piece and says that all this happened within minutes of the first “plane hit”— before either tower’s “collapse.” Other information is that this happened in between the two tower demolitions. Jones says that Jennings also says (in the full tape) he saw numerous dead bodies, presumably in the lobby, and was told not to look at them. Could the reason Jennings is told not to examine the bodies be that they showed evidence of being nuked? "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

I assert that the explosions Jennings hears, and experiences, in WTC7 were one or more fizzled nukes. What would happen to WTC7 at 5:20 P.M. was actually meant to happen at about the same time as all the other WTC buildings were destroyed! Is it not likely that WTC7 was also planned for simultaneous destruction? I don’t blame Jennings for hiding out, if his story is true, nor for being too scared for six years to tell his more complete story. Now any dead bodies Jennings saw in the WTC7 lobby, were likely from these fizzled nukes. I assert that WTC7 was not demolished early on, with the other buildings, because all its nukes-- including the redundant one(s)-- fizzled, as described above! I further now hypothesize that this matter, fizzled nukes, is likely the reason for the long 7-8 hour delay— even beyond the planned time that the regime errantly pre-told the media— for the WTC7 “collapse.” The perps were likely replacing defective nukes! This would have taken time to get them from wherever they were brought in from. Apparently all nukes in WTC7, despite redundancy, were defective, again, IMO, likely sabotaged. And it took a few hours to get replacements, possibly even needing time to test, or try to test, the new ones before emplacing them in WTC7? Indeed I would hypothesize that perhaps even the errant early notice to the worldwide media that WTC7 HAD ALREADY COLLAPSED, was once again due to another defective nuke unexpectedly “fizzling!” So it seems that my hypothesized scenario of defective, likely sabotaged, nukes and replacing them as needed (WTC7), appears to explain every single anomalous fact on 9/11, and the China Syndrome afterwards.

There are other related anomalous WTC7 matters. We see that WTC7 was ordered evacuated at 9:03. I guess the federal perps knew the end result ahead of time, and ordered their own to leave immediately, while people in WTC1 and 2 were told to stay in, or go back to, their offices!! Maximize the deaths of the citizens, and minimize the deaths of the feds. Some of the 9/11 perps may have been agents working in WTC7,

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/11/breakthroughs-toward-attaining-complete.html[07.11.2010 14:57:14]

World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthroughs Toward Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11-- The Likelihood ...

but the vast majority, I would presume would not know of the matter, or its details. All reports of the earlier explosions in WTC7 would be hidden by the lackey media. During the 7-8 hour interval, firefighters were not allowed to fight the relatively small fires that likely resulted from “fizzled” nukes. You wouldn’t want firefighters to witness many things, including federal perps bringing in the replacement—- “better” nukes! Likely those perps would be wearing radiation-protecting garb. While the WTC7 fires would be “officially” blamed on ejecta from WTC 1 or 2, photos of WTC7 show limited damage to the facade which cannot account for the complete global "collapse" of the tower. Moreover, the lobby of WTC7 was shielded by the presence of WTC6 from any ejecta from WTC1 and 2. The first WTC7 explosions are now said to have occurred before any tower destruction. Now regarding these fires several floors up, there could have been one or more mini-nukes that fizzled therein, or criticality fragments from partially exploded defective nukes could have been blasted up a few floors. Recall the Chernobyl core explosion that blasted off the roof itself and left some 30 criticality fragments burning away on the roofs of adjacent buildings— the China Syndrome. And I trust you know why WTC7 could not get a reprieve? It was even more imperative now for the perps to “eliminate” WTC7, because its lobby, basement and possibly some of the floors where fires were, now contained the proof of one or more fizzled nukes— the nuclear reacting criticality fragments that link back to the U.S. regime, and not 19 Arabs and “plane hits.”

Perhaps all redundant nukes in the towers that finally, successfully exploded were of a different type than the fizzled ones. Redundant nukes that were successfully exploded in the towers’ upper floors, after any initial “fizzled” nukes went off at those levels, would have widely dispersed the fizzled nukes’ contents which had presumably undergone partial criticality (nuclear reacting fragments). Of course, even properly functioning nukes will give off some radioactivity, but Hiroshima, and Nagasaki did not have surface hotspots, for weeks and months. Now, at the WTC, these fragments gave rise to the widespread hotspots all over the WTC, after the “collapses” were over. These areas thus had to be massively, repeatedly washed down, and treated with dirt, that was then removed and carted away (as was the neutron-bombarded metal itself)— this took weeks. Thus we had the high temperatures, melted firemen’s’ boots, etc. from surface hotspots. Fizzled nukes, in the sub-basement levels of the three skyscrapers were entrapped therein, and thus were effectively more concentrated, and nearly impossible to “treat” with dirt or water, and not reachable for months. These deep underground hotspots stayed hot for six months or so (as documented at this blog), giving rise, all the while, to such phenomena as molten steel for six months.

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

To sum up, it appears that this author has herein revealed a consistent scenario that includes the cause of the resultant, and now massively documented, China Syndrome of high temperatures, molten steel, and nuclear irradiation of responders, and NYC residents, and the long WTC7 demolition delay— namely defective, likely sabotaged, nukes and the time interval needed for replacement (WTC7). Possible mechanisms for the hidden nuclear bomb sabotage have also been revealed here. I assert this is now the most consistent, and perhaps the simplest, scenario that includes the most heretofore inexplicable factors— long WTC7 destruction delay, errant WTC7 destruction time given to the media, the WTC7 “preliminary” explosions, and the resultant China Syndrome, with the greatest and longest time-line for very high temperatures and molten metal underneath the three skyscrapers of the WTC, all of which had one or

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/11/breakthroughs-toward-attaining-complete.html[07.11.2010 14:57:14]

World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthroughs Toward Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11-- The Likelihood ... more “fizzled” nukes! This article may have eliminated the last mysteries of the nuking of the WTC on 9/11 by the Federal American regime. It is up to each of you now to promulgate this! The life you save may be your own! posted by spooked @ 9:57 AM

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/11/breakthroughs-toward-attaining-complete.html[07.11.2010 14:57:14]

World Trade Center Demolition: Basement Nukes and Top-Down Demolition

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Monday, December 31, 2007

Basement Nukes and Top-Down Demolition
Various people have suggested that the basement of the WTC was blown with high explosives (even nuked) prior to, and/or concomitant with, the top-down demolition that was performed to obliterate the towers. I have always been somewhat unsure of this idea for the simple reason that it wasn't clear to me how exactly basement bombs/nukes fit in with the topdown demolition-- plus there was the fact that during the demolitions, part of the inner cores for each tower remained standing after the initial demolition phase. However, this post from 911blogger provides more evidence for explosions at the base of the tower concomitant with demolition. Thinking about this some more, I have an idea for how basement bombs would have been used. Here we see the remnants of tower one-- and clearly there is a section of the core remaining in the center of the blasted out debris:

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

(click to enlarge; you can see the people better to give scale) The key here is that IN FACT, only PART of the core is remaining-- what looks like only the very center of the core-- perhaps a dozen columns at most. The core was made of 47 absolutely MASSIVE columns-- just think that the

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/12/basement-nukes-and-top-down-demolition.html[07.11.2010 14:57:51]

World Trade Center Demolition: Basement Nukes and Top-Down Demolition core columns that would make up the core at the base of the tower carried much of the weight of those huge towers above. Clearly, most of these massive columns have been blown away from their original location. Note, it's not like there is debris is covering these columns-- the columns have either been knocked/blown away or they have been blown to pieces. Given that the very center core columns survived the "onslaught" (see the picture), it is not clear why the just as strong outer core columns wouldn't survive-- unless they were literally blown away at the base. What seems plausible-- even likely-- is that several basement nukes took out the core columns at the sides or corners of the core section. A partial dismemberment of the core could conceivably facilitate a top-down collapse by taking away some of the supports between the floors and the core. This would give explosive devices on the upper floors an easier time in peeling the outer walls from the core remnant. Which is really what happened-- the outer walls peeled away from the tower from top to bottom, in an explosive sequence-- leaving an inner core remnant that then must have been blown from below from the lower floors to leave the small column remnants seen in the picture above. But the key here is that basement bombs-- almost certainly nukes-- would be used to take out PART OF THE CORE specifically to facilitate the topdown collapse. posted by spooked @ 11:26 AM 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/12/basement-nukes-and-top-down-demolition.html[07.11.2010 14:57:51]

World Trade Center Demolition: Basement Nukes and Top-Down Demolition San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/12/basement-nukes-and-top-down-demolition.html[07.11.2010 14:57:51]

World Trade Center Demolition: Basement Nukes and Top-Down Demolition "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/12/basement-nukes-and-top-down-demolition.html[07.11.2010 14:57:51]

World Trade Center Demolition: Basement Nukes and Top-Down Demolition

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/12/basement-nukes-and-top-down-demolition.html[07.11.2010 14:57:51]

World Trade Center Demolition: Basement Nukes and Top-Down Demolition

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/12/basement-nukes-and-top-down-demolition.html[07.11.2010 14:57:51]

World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthrough: The Story Of Cathy T, & The Large Earthquake That Was Felt One Mile Away When WTC1 Was “...

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Breakthrough: The Story Of Cathy T, & The Large Earthquake That Was Felt One Mile Away When WTC1 Was “Hit”!
By The Anonymous Physicist Cathy T. who lives, and works, in her apartment, which is about one mile north of the WTC, has this breaking story. Furthermore, the following events were witnessed by two people present with Cathy during these occurrences. Cathy recalls these events occurred between 8:30 and 9 A.M. on 9/11/01 Note that WTC1 was “officially hit” at about 8:46 A.M. Cathy, to the best of her recollection, recalls “about four seismic events” in her apartment— which is between the 10th and 20th floor of her building-with “the first one being the largest”, and “the other three were significantly less intense” and can now be seen to likely be after-shocks, that “came in approx. 30 sec intervals after the main one.” Cathy says she can never forget seeing “books fall off their shelves”, and seeing or feeling the “floor jumping up and down”, and her almost losing her balance at that time between 8:30 and 9.00 A.M. She did not know, at the time about what was happening, or just happened, at the WTC. She says she did not experience these things when the second tower was “hit.” It is also important to note that Cathy T did not experience any Seismic activity during either “collapse’ event. All this indicates the “official” regime Seismic recordings are a farce, as I have previously written and had published here. The Seismic “readings” admittedly are “re-analyses” of data, as requested by the regime. Now according to the US Geological Survey, the “collapse” maxima of 2.1 and 2.3 might not be felt even right where it was occurring, or just barely felt and not cause the effects Cathy felt a mile away from the first “plane hit.” Though I am a physicist and not a geologist, I have been in 5.1 Earthquakes and have done some reading on these matters. IMO, to be transmitted at such a level of intensity one mile north, and possibly further, directly implies a seismic level of at least 4.0, at the origin. There is always the possibility that wave phenomena led to reinforcements at local hotpsots (perhaps anti-nodes) which included her building. The spikes of the two “plane impacts” are “officially” 0.9 and 0.7 respectively. Far greater energy than is contained in quakes of these levels would be needed to cause the events felt by Cathy T, a mile away. Thus, I assert, the “plane hit” spikes in the seismographs were likely greatly truncated! (As were the “collapse” spikes.) Now it is questionable whether a plane hit, or an explosion, high up would transmit much energy to the ground as the energy would likely first be absorbed by the building itself. But if a simultaneous sub-basement nuke was set off, this would likely have a large seismic spike that would need to be “re-analyzed/truncated” as the gov’t requested.

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/02/breakthrough-story-of-cathy-t-large.html[07.11.2010 14:59:17]

World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthrough: The Story Of Cathy T, & The Large Earthquake That Was Felt One Mile Away When WTC1 Was “... So tying the eyewitness report of Cathy T. to my earlier articles, it is likely that in the nuclear demolition of the WTC towers, perhaps the largest nukes employed occurred in the sub-basements, using the “plane hits” as “camouflage.” And that many smaller nukes were used during the actual demolition-- along with some conventional explosives as I have detailed previously. Recall also that earlier I have stated that other regime-released “scientific” data is bogus. This includes the second AVIRIS (ground tempeature) data set; and this has been massively verified by other data and countless eyewitnesses, molten boots and more. And this article I wrote, also has a fireman describing a seismic event during collapse that had to be significantly more than a 2.1 or 2.3. http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/11/eyewitness-testimony-offirefighters.html It also contains: eyewitness testimony of firefighters believing they were nuked on 9/11 from feeling great heat on their skin without any fire near them, as well as early WTC7 destruction, Electromagetic Pulse, non-impact plane flyby, and people being pushed out of a WTC tower. From the timing that Cathy relates, these seismic events appear to have occurred around the time that the first (CGI) plane “impacted” the first tower. This is further support for my hypotheses, appearing in my articles, that each time a CGI plane “hit” a tower, (actually upper explosions set off), the regime also set off a basement nuke. (As I have written, to allow for bottom over collapse, in case the intricate top-bottom collapse--which involved many mini-nukes--failed to occur. I have written herein on the need for redundancy by the regime.) Recall I have quoted engineers that stated that a sub-basement floor and garage were “just gone,” and that a 50-ton steel press was vaporized, and that a steel/concrete door was shriveled up like aluminum foil-- all at the time of the first “plane hit”. (Statements made by Engineer Mike Pecoraro. See: http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/08/by-anonymous-physicistsgt.html and my other nuclear demolition articles at www.wtcdemolition.blogpsot.com) Of course all this, and the now revealed much larger earthquake(s) felt a mile away, can only arise from nukes-- and not from gravitational collapse of pristine pancakes, or evidence-free and cold DEW, or thermite which never vaporized anything let alone whole floors and massive steel presses. Neither does thermite stay hot for months and cause the China Syndrome of radioactive fragments generating high heat for months, and thus the molten metal still seen six months later. See here www.wtcchinasyndrome.blogspot.com So we now have eyewitness testimony that larger earthquakes-- which directly implies nuclear bomb use-- occurred on 9/11, than the regime has allowed to promulgate, via its Goebbels-like MSM, or the intel agencycontrolled “911truth” forums. See who posts this now. Please post this yourselves! posted by spooked @ 5:22 AM 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/02/breakthrough-story-of-cathy-t-large.html[07.11.2010 14:59:17]

World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthrough: The Story Of Cathy T, & The Large Earthquake That Was Felt One Mile Away When WTC1 Was “... San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/02/breakthrough-story-of-cathy-t-large.html[07.11.2010 14:59:17]

World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthrough: The Story Of Cathy T, & The Large Earthquake That Was Felt One Mile Away When WTC1 Was “... "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/02/breakthrough-story-of-cathy-t-large.html[07.11.2010 14:59:17]

World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthrough: The Story Of Cathy T, & The Large Earthquake That Was Felt One Mile Away When WTC1 Was “...

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/02/breakthrough-story-of-cathy-t-large.html[07.11.2010 14:59:17]

World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthrough: The Story Of Cathy T, & The Large Earthquake That Was Felt One Mile Away When WTC1 Was “...

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/02/breakthrough-story-of-cathy-t-large.html[07.11.2010 14:59:17]

World Trade Center Demolition: More On the Immediate and Continous Radiation Lowering, and Shielding, Techniques Used at the WTC, after 9...

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Thursday, March 27, 2008

More On the Immediate and Continous Radiation Lowering, and Shielding, Techniques Used at the WTC, after 9/11
by The Anonymous Physicist Recall I have stated that the acts of trucking in (and out) of sand/earth, that began the very morning after 9/11, were likely done to lower the radiation levels at the WTC. I have hypothesized that Mayor Giuliani got the word from the federal perps to do this after the perps knew of the radiation/China Syndrome at “Ground Zero.” The perps knew this because they knew the types of nukes they had used, and had either agents on the ground assaying radiation levels, or had planes or satellites doing this from above. Hosing down the rubble pile with water also began as soon as they got the trucks and crews down there to this. This continued for months, as the photographic evidence clearly indicates. Now I would like to present to you some corroboration that these two methods are used to lower radiation levels, and /or act as shielding, for people in the vicinity of nuclear radiation.

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile

The Safety Handbook of the Alberta (Canada) Forest Products Association More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide describes what to do in case of various emergencies. In the case of variety of 9/11 sites here for the radiation exposure, it says for “Shielding: Use shielding between yourself purposes of diversity. I leave it up to and the source of radiation. Equipment, concrete blocks, and PILES OF you to judge their content.) DIRT OR GRAVEL often provide makeshift shielding.” http://www.albertaforestproducts.ca/document_library/PPSOHandbook2004.pdf As Judy Wood’s site indicated (for incorrect reasons, of course) General 9/11 Sites http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirt3.html#bucketbrigade 9/11 Blimp trucks began carrying sand/earth in—and out—of the WTC the next 9/11 Busters morning. Carrying away the sand/earth may have had the same purpose as 9/11 CGI Watch selling the WTC steel to China did—to hide the radioactive evidence. 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity Wiki has several articles that are relevant here too. First this article 9/11 Cover-Up http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_shielding“ states how 9/11 Dossier (UK) paper and water can shield people from radiation: “Alpha radiation is the 9/11 Encyclopedia easiest to shield, because the very massive alpha particles can be stopped 9/11 Foreknowledge even with a leaf of paper. Beta radiation (electrons) is more difficult… 9/11 Hoax shielding must be accomplished with low density materials, e.g. plastic, wood, WATER or acrylic glass.” 9/11 Oddities The importance of shielding from beta radiation emitted by fissile material is indicated in another wiki article here http://en.wikipediaorg/wiki/Nuclear_fission “Most nuclear fuels undergo spontaneous fission only very slowly, decaying mainly via an alpha/beta decay…. Fission products tend to be beta emitters…” The following source http://moorcat.com/pragmatic_revolt/2006/04/20/nuclear9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/more-on-immediate-and-continous.html[07.11.2010 14:59:53]

World Trade Center Demolition: More On the Immediate and Continous Radiation Lowering, and Shielding, Techniques Used at the WTC, after 9... power-101/ appears to be written by someone well familiar with the ins and outs of nuclear reactors, and an almost rabid proponent of them—which I am not. He states how well water can reduce radiation levels in a nuclear reactor: “24 inches of water reduces radiation by a factor of 10 -therefore it is called a tenth thickness…” The photos and text from Joel Meyerowitz’ book indicate that the water hosing down of the rubble pile was a massive, continuous effort for months. I would add that water hosing, and the subsequent steam seen emitted many times, also carried away heat as well as lowered radiation. The water’s temperature is raised, and then more energy is used up in the conversion to steam—very much like what happens in a nuclear reactor. Now these sand/earth and water treatments were of limited use against the fissioning fragments at the bottom of the rubble pile, and in the subbasement areas of the towers and WTC7. But here distance and inaccessibility acted as shielding for the vast majority of the responders. Only a few were allowed access to the basement areas, it is known. So it is clear that until carted away, the radioactive fission fragments at the WTC (aka the China Syndrome)--causing the great heat in the rubble pile (for threee months), and the even greater temperatures, and flowing molten metal up to six months, after 9/11, underneath the towers and WTC7--had continuous radiation-lowering, and shielding, methods applied to them. Undoubtedly even more cancers and radiation sicknesses would have resulted among responders, and the local inhabitants, if these sand/earth, and water, measures were not undertaken. These methods lowered the radiation exposure to responders, they provided “makeshift shielding, ” and they also carried away heat. I am not stating this was done out of any concern for the responders, or New York metro area inhabitants; but rather to try to hide the nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome aftermath. But the evidence of all that can be found in the archived articles at wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and wtcchinasyndromeblogspot.com. What we should never forget, at this point, is what was learned in the longterm studies of Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors http://www.ehponline.org/members/2006/9113/9113.html. It took decades for many survivors of those nukes to get cancer or other illnesses. The already known 400 (as of 2006) blood, lymph and thyroid cancers—all common among people exposed to radiation--among 911 responders is likely, and sadly, a drop in the bucket, compared to what may be coming. And, as far as I know, studies to see if there has been an increase of cancer, and/or other immune disorders, among the millions of New York metro inhabitants, since 9/11/01, have not been undertaken. posted by spooked @ 5:40 AM 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/more-on-immediate-and-continous.html[07.11.2010 14:59:53]

World Trade Center Demolition: More On the Immediate and Continous Radiation Lowering, and Shielding, Techniques Used at the WTC, after 9... San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/more-on-immediate-and-continous.html[07.11.2010 14:59:53]

World Trade Center Demolition: More On the Immediate and Continous Radiation Lowering, and Shielding, Techniques Used at the WTC, after 9... "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/more-on-immediate-and-continous.html[07.11.2010 14:59:53]

World Trade Center Demolition: More On the Immediate and Continous Radiation Lowering, and Shielding, Techniques Used at the WTC, after 9...

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/more-on-immediate-and-continous.html[07.11.2010 14:59:53]

World Trade Center Demolition: More On the Immediate and Continous Radiation Lowering, and Shielding, Techniques Used at the WTC, after 9...

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/more-on-immediate-and-continous.html[07.11.2010 14:59:53]

World Trade Center Demolition: The Final Word on The Tritium

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Thursday, July 02, 2009

The Final Word on The Tritium
by The Anonymous Physicist

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

I have written, that after long and careful analyses, the best bet for the main factor that destroyed the WTC on 9/11/01 were numerous, small, fission bombs. Others have claimed that one (hypothetical) 4th generation, pure fusion nuclear bomb destroyed each tower. This is what the anonymous Finnish military expert wrote. And the Finn apparently based his entire 4th generation pure fusion hypothesis on the finding of tritium at the WTC on 9/13/01. Since he was the first person to publish any specific nuclear destruction scenario for 9/11, many others cite his work as being definitive, or such. (He could still be correct, though this is extremely unlikely.) And so many who state that they are proponents of the nuclear destruction hypothesis of the WTC are proponents of the pure fusion mechanism, because the Finn is; and he cited the Tritium found at the WTC on 9/13/01. Or there could be a more sinister reason for these numerous individuals to support the pure fusion scenario. Now the Finn apparently gave overarching consideration to the Tritium found and published in the article, “Study of Traces of Tritium at the World Trade Center” by T.M. Semkow, et al. It was published at the 223rd American Chemical Society National Meeting, Orlando, FL, April 7-11, 2002. The article states that “This work was performed under the auspices of the United States Department of Energy by the University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract No. W-7405-Eng-48.” (Note that this is the same lab that allegedly can create “super nano-composite thermite” that yields “unextinguishable fires,” and thus new laws of chemistry and physics as well as the first equivalent perpetual motion mechanism. [If only.] It’s also the same lab that is remasterminding Kennedy Assassination audio tapes. And I have some suspicions on what the “Eng” might mean.) It should be noted that this paper contains several bogus and ludicrous attempts to account for the tritium at the WTC on 9/13. Mostly they allege that the tritium came from exit signs on the planes that “crashed into the towers.” The paper also alleges that tritium was in the sightings on the guns of police officers killed that day. The first “mechanism” is obviously bogus, as there is not a single video that agrees with reality in that the “planes” are clearly just CGI broadcast on TV, and there was no credible evidence on the ground that any planes had crashed into the towers, and did so with blatantly, obvious impossible crash physics. Sources have also stated that the tritium claim on gun sightings is also bogus, if not totally, then regarding the amount. Being a long-term expert on gov’t conspiracies and crimes, I see the whole tritium matter very deeply. The regime can and does refuse to release anything damning. So why did they release any data showing tritium at all,

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/07/final-word-on-tritium.html[07.11.2010 15:01:22]

World Trade Center Demolition: The Final Word on The Tritium when they could have kept this under wraps, as I am sure FEMA is doing with WTC radiation readings? One possible answer is that it would provide a ruse for others to later claim the mythical 4th generation pure fusion bomb was used-- thus obviating what was there in NYC for 6 months-- the China Syndrome. And always remember, we are discussing the Lawrence Livermore Labs, designers of humanity-exterminating WMD for more than 60 years, as well as the above nefarious actions, related to the thermite hangout and JFK murder. Now my first articles on my “many small nukes hypothesis” cited evidence for both fission and fusion at the WTC. I too ignored one important factor in these matters for a while-- but I have changed that in later articles and in a larger work-- but have not played this up at this blog, and wish to rectify this now. I have also written that it may be more than coincidence that a 4th generation pure fusion bomb does not allow for what we clearly had at the WTC for up to six months-- the China Syndrome of great heat GENERATION from the remnants of the many fission bombs, as each used only about 1-6% of its fissile material. That is, pure fusion does not allow for the China Syndrome as any remnants of pure fusion components (such as deuterium or tritium) do not allow for this- only Uranium or Plutonium fissioning can. Note that a fission-triggered fusion bomb could still allow for the China Syndrome. Only the pure fusion scenario does not. So it is curious that the Finn immediately went with pure fusion, and not with the possibility of fission-triggered fusion. And the Finn based this on the tritium finding, and either did not know about, or chose to ignore, all the evidence of massive heat generation at the WTC for 6 months, and also the following matter. One factor from nuclear physics has been mostly left out of this “nuclear choice.” This is TERNARY FISSION, and was included in William Tahil’s book. Unfortunately that book was shown by this researcher to be incorrect on several points. These included the “nuclear reactor” hypothesis being thoroughly unnecessary and impossible, as is his and the Finn’s claim that a single nuke destroyed each tower. (Tahil also incorrectly stated that a fission nuke uses up 100% of its fissile material, when it is only 1-6%.) I have also cited much evidence both of a preliminary sub-basement nuke timed with the explosions on top (so-called “plane hits”), and that the final destruction involved numerous small nukes. So the single nuke scenario, from the Finn and Tahil, is untenable. Now most fission reactions of Uranium or Plutonium are binary-- they yield TWO large “daughter elements” (e.g., Barium and Krypton, or Strontium and Xenon), plus 2-3 neutrons, plus energy in the form of gamma rays. But since 1959, it has been publicly known, via this article, that ternary fission yields TRITIUM, along with its THREE daughter elements, plus the excess neutrons, and energy. And thus with the numerous fission bombs that were detonated, and with the additional possible factors of redundancy and fratriciding that my articles have detailed, we can arrive at perhaps the most likely source of tritium in the rubble-- the fission nukes themselves. I have seen estimates for the percentage of tritium production from ternary fission ranging from 1% down to .005%. (There is the possibility of deliberate disinformation, in some matters of nuclear physics, so one cannot often trust public nuclear physics discussions.) Because of this, and not knowing what element(s) were fissioned, nor how much of each, it is impossible to know just how much tritium could have been produced by ternary fission in the numerous micro-nukes used to destroy the WTC. But it appears to be more than would occur from non-existent planes, or gun sightings; and the proven heat generation of the China Syndrome Aftermath belies the use of a mythical 4th generation pure fusion device. The most likely type of nuclear bombs used, was the type that could be made the smallest, and was the simplest, and most proven/dependable (compared to the others). This was the “good old” pure fission form of 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/07/final-word-on-tritium.html[07.11.2010 15:01:22]

World Trade Center Demolition: The Final Word on The Tritium nuclear bombs. As I have shown, they’re even backpackable. And in the final analysis-- given ternary fission-- there never was any basis for claiming that the nuke(s) used at the WTC had to be 4th generation pure fusion, nor even that there was any fusion at all at the WTC. We may never be able to prove exactly what happened regarding the nuclear destruction of the WTC on 9/11, by the American regime; but we should strive to emphasize the most likely, and the most dependable factors the American regime would have used. And we must realize that the regime wanted to hide the China Syndrome Aftermath, as that poisoned thousands of responders, and to a lesser extent, millions of metro NY residents. So any tritium found on 9/13/01 at the WTC, was most likely from ternary fission, not fusion. But if you want one more, perhaps crucial, plausibility argument, here it is. Fusion bombs have a history of having a yield larger than expected. And the perps strenuously wanted NOT to blow through the building in an obvious nuclear manner. A nuke having a yield larger than needed could not be risked. This would have been visible to thousands, perhaps millions; and such knowledge would have been difficult to contain. (Whereas radiation findings were controlled by FEMA, and the Gestapo regime need only scream “national security” to prevent release of such data-- including the tritium paper, if it had wanted to.) I have emphasized the need not to blow through the building in an obvious nuclear way, since my very first article herein. This is one reason why some conventional explosives may have been used during the destruction scenario, as I have also written. What the nukes were mainly for, in my estimation, was to vaporize INSTANTLY, and definitively, the necessary core structure for the TOWERS’ ENSUING RAPID, APPROXIMATE, FREEFALL RATE OF COLLAPSE! The PTB apparently intended to later push the impossible “gravitational pancaking” ruse, even though it violates numerous laws of Physics, and we can see the outer structure being exploded outward, by the overpressure within. (You can compare what happens during an actual gravitational collapse by seeing this.) The PTB clearly wanted to shove a physically impossible, evidence-opposing destruction "mechanism" down the throats of the masses. They know what it does to many peoples’ psyches. It induces denial, fear, schizoid behavior, and hopelessness-- all good for the coming endless wars, and destruction of the American Constitution. Putting out a physically impossible and evidence-opposing “mechanism” for WTC destruction jibes with other events perpetrated by the American regime. With the American regime’s assassination of the Peace President, John Kennedy, the “official” scenario is that the fatal head shot was fired from behind, even though Kennedy’s body is slammed violently straight back--from the shot fired, from the front, by his Secret Service “protector”/driver. The ludicrous shot from behind violates the simple Law of Conservation of Momentum. As I have written, the WTC bogus scenario entails “pristine pancaking”-- violating Newton’s Laws of Motion. Similarly the JFK Assassination had (future) Senator Specter’s “pristine bullet” that smashed into 5 bones, made turns on its own, hung out for 2 seconds and looked virtually like new-- and violated the Momentum Conservation Law. The PTB want to put out these impossible “mechanisms” to dumb down, shock, or paralyze the people. Most people go into denial, and do not want to think about it, because their subconciousnesses know what is really involved. Those who can think and see, and have combatted the denial, are then further confounded with other limited hangouts put out by the Gestapo Regime’s hidden intel agents posing as “leaders” of the “truth movement.” These WTC hangouts included the evidence-free inanity of DEW, and the “thermite burns forever” impossibility. Both are easily demonstrated to be physically impossible to have caused the WTC destruction, and the CSA. All the regime’s hidden assets earlier inserted at the top of the “alternative” or conspiracy internet media, were then instructed to push these hangouts and avoid mention of the nuking and the China Syndrome Aftermath. San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/07/final-word-on-tritium.html[07.11.2010 15:01:22]

World Trade Center Demolition: The Final Word on The Tritium Returning now to the fission vs. fusion issue. Blowing through the outer structure of the building with unnecessary fusion--either as the hypothetical pure fusion, or as a fission-fusion bomb-- could not be risked, when pure fission micro-nukes were readily available. Fission nukes have a more "guaranteed" upper bound on their yields, and are more dependable as well, compared to either the alleged pure fusion or the fission-fusion bomb. In the final analysis, the release of the tritium data may have been a clever Intel Op to try to hide the China Syndrome Aftermath, and its nuclear fission cause. If there was tritium at the WTC, its most likely source was ternary fission. posted by spooked @ 5:05 AM "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/07/final-word-on-tritium.html[07.11.2010 15:01:22]

World Trade Center Demolition: The Final Word on The Tritium

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/07/final-word-on-tritium.html[07.11.2010 15:01:22]

World Trade Center Demolition: The Final Word on The Tritium

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/07/final-word-on-tritium.html[07.11.2010 15:01:22]

World Trade Center Demolition: Exposing The “Red Mercury” Nuclear Scam, & Its Possible Use In Future Bogus Wars, & Other Crucial Matters O...

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Exposing The “Red Mercury” Nuclear Scam, & Its Possible Use In Future Bogus Wars, & Other Crucial Matters On Nuclear 911, and About Mercury
by Anonymous Physicist There is a great need to expose all the limited hangouts in the 911truth field, and in the general conspiracy movement. After seeing recently that a scam exists in the nuclear field, I feel compelled to expose it. Now there is much on the net on “pure fusion” nuclear “devices.” This issue, as I have written, may be a red herring to distract from the nuclear fissioning fragments of the China Syndrome, by the release of data by the govt indicating tritium was found at the WTC. Tritium, however, can be a booster for fission reactions, and need not indicate “pure fusion.” Nonetheless, pure fusion devices have been discussed, and will be here. Now the PTB have certainly had enough decades to produce pure fusion, so I am not opposed to their existence, but it seems that the intel assets have been busy with hangouts explaining how this might be accomplished. Theoretically, pure fusion, for a large scale bomb, is a difficult thing to accomplish, because you need three things 1. Tremendous, rapid energy input — other than a fission trigger -- to overcome the forces keeping the nuclei away from each other, 2. Proper spatial configuration, 3. Proper temporal “technique.” The last two are needed so as to control the reaction to maximize a uniform and rapid method of detonation/fusion commencement. Note: Cold fusion is supposedly “pure fusion,” but appears to be unusable for bomb use. Cold fusion appears to be a slow process with insufficient yield for bomb use. But we should never forget the intel asset sent in to destroy cold fusion at its birth, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1vOeKNN2UI. One hangout put out-- as a non-fission trigger for attaining nuclear fusion in a bomb-- is the “red mercury” scam. As usual, the intel agents accomplish several things at once with this scam. The “father” of the “red mercury” scam is none other than the “father” of the neutron bomb, Samuel Cohen, PhD. Now a neutron bomb is described variously as a fission-triggered fusion bomb: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_bomb, or alternatively as a fusion-boosted, fission bomb: http://everything2.com/title/neutron%2520bomb. As an aside, note how the wiki article states that President Kennedy— whom I called the Peacegiver-- and President Carter, halted production of the neutron bomb. I have also seen the neutron bomb described as a “pure fusion” bomb as well, by the Anonymous Finnish Military Expert. Thus we have three very different descriptions of what a neutron bomb is!? But “red mercury” or anti-matter were described as triggers for the alleged pure fusion, in the last description; and with respect, I want to show that

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/exposing-red-mercury-nuclear-scam-its.html[07.11.2010 15:01:51]

World Trade Center Demolition: Exposing The “Red Mercury” Nuclear Scam, & Its Possible Use In Future Bogus Wars, & Other Crucial Matters O... these are unlikely, or impossible. So it is questionable/doubtful that neutron bombs are “pure fusion” bombs though there are other methods that may be used to achieve fusion without a fission trigger— including lasers and sound wave energy. So the Powers That Be (PTB) may well have nonfission-triggered fusion bombs— but their hypothetical existence may have been used as a red herring to divert from the China Syndrome aftermath at the WTC— which arose from fissioning bomb components, as pure fusion in theory can not give rise to a China Syndrome of indefinitely heat releasing radioisotopes. And the “red mercury” scam may have been put out to set up 911 nuclear researchers/proponents. Now the main article on the red mercury scam was written by Sam Cohen and Joe Douglass, titled, “The Nuclear Threat That Doesn't Exist - Or Does It?” Let us now examine “red mercury,” and these two authors putting out this hangout. It was immediately clear to me that this alleged “red mercury” (if it exists at all) could not trigger fusion, for a bomb. Red mercury is allegedly a mercury antimony oxide compound that is either red, or claimed to have been made in the USSR— hence the red or Communist aspect. Red mercury is also said to be a “ballotechnic” compound with “special properties.” Now the Physics of this matter is that any chemical compound, including a “ballotechnical” one, is a million times too weak to initiate fusion reactions. One physicist already had an article demonstrating this. Red mercury is said to be enhanced only via radiation from a nuclear reactor-- thus providing an excuse to deny ownership of nuclear reactors to certain countries— and an excuse for warring with any country that has, or wants one! (Personally I wish all countries did not have nuclear reactors for environmental, and other, reasons. Creating the deadly radioactive wastes that last up to billions of years is an abomination, especially when so many other energy sources abound.) So claims of red mercury are an excuse for conflict and war. And indeed people have been arrested for falling for the scheme, and allegedly trying to buy/obtain red mercury— even though no person anywhere has ever proven either 1. it even exists and/or 2. it can be a trigger for fusion! Let us now examine these two authors, Cohen and Douglass, and the heart of this intel op/hangout. Cohen, wiki demonstrates, has a horrific record as a cold warrior/warmonger/”red” baiter. He called for the USA to nuke Vietnam, with his beloved neutron bombs, during that war of American aggression. (The so-called Gulf Of Tonkin incident never occurred. Just as the American regime, with its perennial wars of aggression, is today perpetrating war on Iraq and Afghanistan, for bogus reasons.) Cohen, in 1979, also gets the “Peace Medal” for creating the neutron bomb, from Pope John Paul II. So we see that the so-called Prince of Peace hands out a “peace medal” to the creator of a bomb that only kills people, and does not appreciably damage property!? Another indication of how London and Rome control mankind, as I have written here numerous times. Cohen has also been ranting more recently on the alleged North Korean nuclear bomb. Note the initial reports of the alleged N. Korean nuclear detonation of 2006, were that it fizzled-- sound familiar?-- and had a very tiny yield, and/or may well not have been a nuke. See, e.g. http://www.defensetech.org/archives/002832.html. But that won’t stop Sam Cohen, or his handlers, from ranting on N. Korea’s alleged nukes. The PTB want excuses for perennial wars. This brings us to Joseph Douglass, Jr., PhD. He has been a government “national security analyst.” I have not been able to find where Douglass worked for the govt. Sometimes this means the NSA, as officially, there is “No Such Agency.” Now the red mercury article by Douglass and Cohen was also used as an excuse for war on Iraq, claiming Saddam Hussein (a CIA asset all his adult life) had obtained/was trying to obtain red mercury and nukes, and was going to use them on America, or its allies. Much of Douglass’ career has also been as a “red baiter.” His earlier book was called “Red Cocaine.” Laughably, it purported to demonstrate that the 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/exposing-red-mercury-nuclear-scam-its.html[07.11.2010 15:01:51]

World Trade Center Demolition: Exposing The “Red Mercury” Nuclear Scam, & Its Possible Use In Future Bogus Wars, & Other Crucial Matters O... San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

American cocaine epidemic was a red/Commie/USSR and Red China op, when any honest researcher knows that the American regime itself brings in, and controls, the drug trade. So Douglass went from his “red” cocaine to “red” mercury. Clearly these two men are intel assets whose life-long M.O. is to blame everything that the American regime, and its masters in London and Rome, and beyond, do on reds/Commies. “Red mercury” appears to be nothing other than a scam; and these two “authors” are scam artists, intel assets, and warmongers. These two are analogous to other intel agents who try to claim all evil, and all nefarious events, come from “Zionists.” These monsters are easy to spot, because of their “broken record” method/orders to keep putting out the very same ludicrous hangout. Again, this is much like the intel assets for the O.C.T., and “DEW” hangouts, who likely have the same intel controllers, as they continue to lie and claim that during and after WTC demolition, “there was no heat, no loud sounds, no explosions, no ground shaking,” etc. This despite my proving these to be lies, numerous times, including here with the sworn statements of the responders: http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/11/eyewitnesstestimony-of-firefighters.html Similarly, we are not likely to see the “red mercury” hangout disappear, as the PTB, and their intel lackeys, apparently think it is a good scheme for red baiting/warmongering/setting up “terrorists” for arrest, even though the thing they might allegedly try to obtain doesn’t even exist. A good way of throwing away the key on someone that was set-up, perhaps because he knows too much truth? The bogus red mercury scam may soon be used to set someone up from Iran, and claim that he was trying to obtain, or create, a nuclear fusion bomb for Iran. Thus providing an excuse for the American regime to start War on Iran. Indeed, the “red mercury” scam even allows the PTB to resurrect the old red/Commie scare if and when it wants to! But just as I have indicated that “Hitler was a British agent” (see http://www.hitlerwasabritishagent.com/), the old USSR/Red Menace was itself also controlled out of London! Indeed this book, just cited, referenced Stalin being trained/tortured/controlled out of London’s Tavistock “Institute,” just a few years before Hitler was there, getting the same “treatment.” So the “red” menace, and “red” mercury will not go away, even though they are indications of far deeper matters. Now anti-matter has also been proposed as a possible triggering source for a “pure fusion,” or fission-less, bomb. I am sure it’s only a matter of time before the PTB create a Matter/Anti-Matter bomb. This may have already occurred. This would be bad news for humanity, as this type of “device” would have approx. 1000x the energy yield of fission or fusion— it could be a country-destroying, or world-destroying weapon, and may never be announced, as its intention would be clear! (See http://anonymousphysicist.blogspot.com/2007/06/ultimate-truth.html) Its great energy arises because 100% of the mass (via E=mc2) of the matter and anti-matter nuclei, in a reaction between them, becomes energy (presumably gamma rays). While in fission or fusion, smaller and larger nuclei are created, respectively, and only less than 1% of the mass of the starting nuclei is converted to energy. A matter/anti-matter bomb does not have the first of the three concerns listed above to make a nuclear bomb— no large repulsive force need be overcome. But instead, it is vastly more difficult to manage the other two factors— spatial and temporal techniques to shield the anti-matter from matter so as to allow a rapid, uniform reaction. Now there are two concerns regarding the possible use of antimatter as a trigger for fusion. 1. It appears extremely difficult to create conditions meeting the two necessary criteria, and 2. If it were possible to use anti-matter as a trigger for fusion, why would you want to? Because if you could control anti-matter to this extent, you would then use it for a pure matter/anti-matter bomb, which would have approx. 1000x the yield, compared to using it to “merely” trigger fusion. So to sum up, “red mercury” as a fusion trigger is impossible, and may not even exist; and the use of

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/exposing-red-mercury-nuclear-scam-its.html[07.11.2010 15:01:51]

World Trade Center Demolition: Exposing The “Red Mercury” Nuclear Scam, & Its Possible Use In Future Bogus Wars, & Other Crucial Matters O... anti-matter as a fusion trigger appears to be improbable or implausible. So we have seen that red mercury is a scam put out by obvious, warmongering intel assets. And a pure matter/anti-matter bomb with its immense yield, which is neutron-free, would also not give rise to the observed China Syndrome of high heat released for months afterwards at the WTC. As I have reported, much eyewitness and material proof of neutron bombardment took place, thus it appears unlikely that a pure matter/anti-matter bomb was used, as this would not release neutrons, to my knowledge. Finally, in addition to deciphering what the evidence indicated happened on 9/11, and its aftermath, I feel compelled to warn what the abundance of intel assets in the 911 community and the larger community will try to pull on 911 nuclear truth advocates. It is crucial to try to predict future ops against the 911 nuclear truth community. I saw recently from the website of nuclear 911 advocate Bill Deagle, M.D. that he stated the following. He had tried to get his WTC sample analyzed. His page states, “After Dr. Deagle MD’s request, Dr. Durakovic's family and Dr. Yamamoto PhD in Japan received death threats for even attempting to perform gamma spectroscopy with germanium detectors & neutron activation studies that require the presence of a neutron source from a nuclear reactor. Testing will proceed despite death threats!” As an expert on the wider conspiracy, and one of the few who was nearly killed myself-- via mercury poisoning of my home, and thus myself-- and one of the few current conspiracy experts who isn’t himself an intel “asset”, I will give you two examples of how the PTB can interfere. First, in the late 1970’s, Marita Lorenz handed in documents to the House of Representatives Committee on Assassinations containing direct proof and evidence of CIA involvement in killing President Kennedy, including the involvement of E. Howard Hunt, Frank Sturgis and others— she had been dragged along with them unknowingly beforehand. The Committee then took a break. (Months earlier, the original Committee Chairman Henry Gonzalez-- a friend/supporter of President Kennedy-- and its first attorney, were both railroaded off the Committee, and CIA stooges had replaced them.) After the break, when Ms. Lorenz referred to the proof/evidence she had just given the Committee, she was told, “What proof, what documentation, what evidence?” It was gone. So much for a Congress, and for Justice in America. So they could have already broken into Deagle’s place where the sample is, and replaced it. They certainly broke into my home numerous times without my knowing it, until later for my revealing that Secret Service Agent William Greer had not only killed President Kennedy, as Bill Cooper had shown, but analysis I showed-- an audio and video version of he Zapruder film-proved Greer fired twice, first hitting Connolly as well. My murderers placed a mercury compound all over my home, that gassed and poisoned me for two years, and destroyed my health, and my life. The federal agents/perpetrators even removed a sample that had the mercury in it from my home that had undergone analysis by a state lab, and was going to be evidence. This time they brazenly removed this evidence from my home, when I said on the phone I was going to have it all investigated. So I never did. After all, who am I going to call for help, when the agencies that should be protecting us, were the ones killing me and interfering with due process. Indeed, they had removed the evidence, which they knew about from tapping my phone calls to police, to the EPA, and to other agencies that wanted to help but were called off, by the Gestapo intel agencies intercepting my calls. So this was my second example— myself. My being massively poisoned, brutally assaulted, car chased, wire-tapped, all for once publicly showing in 1992, an audio as well as video version of the Zapruder film. So I just wish to caution the 911 nuclear truth community about this matter of getting some supposed WTC steel analyzed by some nuclear lab, as it is http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/exposing-red-mercury-nuclear-scam-its.html[07.11.2010 15:01:51] "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

World Trade Center Demolition: Exposing The “Red Mercury” Nuclear Scam, & Its Possible Use In Future Bogus Wars, & Other Crucial Matters O...

so easy to have a set-up. E.g., all it takes is someone at some lab to not reveal such death threats, and pretend to do a scientific analysis say on a different sample surreptitiously given to them by the regime, and report negative nuclear results. Such a bogus “analysis,” unless it were exposed— which would be difficult under the circumstances— would then appear to cause great harm to the 911 nuclear truth community. The point is the PTB will never allow release of direct proof of their nuking the WTC on 9/11, and will resort to any means to prevent such direct proof from being released to the public. And it is very easy to get set-up, in many different ways. They could have already switched the samples. Hint to Bill Deagle: Cuba might, I say might, be the only country not totally controlled by the PTB now, if you actually have a real sample at this point. To the rest of the 911 truth community, I warn you of this turning out to be a set-up against the nuclear truth of 911. This is unfortunately an easy thing to do, via complete interception of all communications by the Gestapo agencies, and the switching or alteration of any samples, possibly even before first handed in. Be wary, be wise, be well. posted by spooked @ 11:00 AM

<< Home Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/exposing-red-mercury-nuclear-scam-its.html[07.11.2010 15:01:51]

World Trade Center Demolition: Exposing The “Red Mercury” Nuclear Scam, & Its Possible Use In Future Bogus Wars, & Other Crucial Matters O...

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/exposing-red-mercury-nuclear-scam-its.html[07.11.2010 15:01:51]

World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthroughs Towards Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11, and its China S...

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Breakthroughs Towards Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11, and its China Syndrome Aftermath: Part II
by The Anonymous Physicist This is part of my continuing efforts to decipher, and expose, the details of the American regime’s nuking of the WTC on 9/11/01, and the China Syndrome aftermath of high heat emitting, radioactive/fissioning fragments at, and under, the WTC. As I have detailed herein (see the archived URL’s noted at the bottom), the China Syndrome documentation includes massive evidence of high temperatures, melted boots, flowing molten metal, and much more. Inherent in this, was the perpetrators’ crucial need to keep the nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome aftermath, hidden from Americans (and the world.) Now any nuke that might be significantly larger than expected, and thus might blow through a building, and be videotaped, had to be prevented, as the nuclear op would be clear to all. Now you might think that if a larger nuke than expected became visible, the regime would just say that Osama bin Laden (aka Tim Osman of the CIA) had obtained nukes after all. But they couldn’t, because they had already put out the (CGI) “plane hits”, and it is not plausible that anyone would go to all the trouble of hijacking planes, and “flying them into the towers”, if they had already planted nukes therein! The perps would lose their coveted “plausible deniability.” So it was crucial to use nukes that might be underpowered, or even fizzle (as this could be [and was] corrected later); and not to use nukes that might have a larger yield than predicted. And better to have many smaller ones— redundancy — which could be corrected as needed— as was WTC7. I have stated that the bogus “towers are leaning,” said on the air by the regime’s intel operators/”reporters” was related to the fall-back position of using larger nukes in the sub-basement of the towers— which would not be visible-- to knock the towers over, if the intricate top to bottom scenario, with many smaller nukes, fizzled completely. In more detail, uncertainty in the lower boundary of destructive nuclear yield, was far more tolerable, than uncertainty was, in the upper boundary of yield. The former is OK, as even fizzling (insufficient yield) could be, and was, “corrected” later— a la WTC7. http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/09/breakthroughstoward-attaining-complete.html How might this relate to the fission vs. fusion issue? Perhaps either fusion bombs cannot be made with very low yield-- or perhaps more likely-- a very low yield cannot be guaranteed for fusion devices, as well as it can be for fission devices. Note the Castle Bravo H-Bomb test of March 1, 1954, where “The 15 megaton [thermonuclear] bomb delivered a

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/breakthroughs-towards-attaining.html[07.11.2010 15:03:21]

World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthroughs Towards Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11, and its China S... force far more powerful than expected”. This leads me to the “official” tritium finding— and release-- from the USGS (aka the UCal/Berkeley/Livermore) study. See also William Tahil’s analysis of this, and his perhaps, crucial findings and analysis of levels found of Strontium, Barium, and other elements, of the fissioning of Uranium or Plutonium. Now regarding the tritium, there are three possibilities: 1. Tritium was used as a booster in fission nukes at the WTC, and/or 2. Tritium was used in fusion nukes at the WTC, or 3. The Tritium finding is bogus, a straw man. Now you might ask why would the federal regime release data that might indicate the use of a fusion device at the WTC? Precisely because of the existence of the China Syndrome aftermath! And stating there was tritium could be a straw man, in the sense that 911 researchers would be diverted into believing that fusion (only) devices were used— including the socalled, hypothetical “pure fusion” nukes, and therefore there could be no China Syndrome aftermath, as that requires fissioning fragments. (At the same time, of course, different intel assets would claim that the tritium finding doesn’t mean anything.) So the pure fusion debate could be a red herring. Recall earlier, I have written that whenever the federal regime releases something that seems very damaging, it will likely turn out that the truth is far worse, and is being hidden. The bottom line is that the federal regime could have easily prevented the release of the tritium finding, if it were genuine. All they had to do is to claim the usual “national security” excuse to censor anything. Recall I have asserted, and demonstrated, that the 2nd AVIRIS WTC ground temperature data is false, as well as the seismic records. Anything that indicated the China Syndrome has been particularly censored. Anything and everything coming from the federal regime must never be taken on face value. Indeed, statistically, one would be better off assuming any statement, assertion, or data regarding any very important issue, is a lie. The regime knew from the outset that the China Syndrome had begun. This was either from knowing this as WTC destruction happened, or from its intel assets on the ground, or from satellites or planes high overhead— assaying heat or radiation spectra. The feds then informed their stooge/mayor, Giuliani, who immediately ordered the trucking in and out of sand/earth, and hosing down of the grounds, to lower the radiation levels. I find it fascinating that one of the proponents of the nuclear WTC hypothesis repeatedly cites the tritium finding, but has never once written the words, “China Syndrome.” We must also be aware of how the regime easily keeps these words from being mentioned in the MSM, and had its assets waiting in the wings with their hangouts to hide this. I refer again to the thermite and “DEW” hangouts. The thermite physicist ludicrously claims that thermite would maintain molten metal temperatures for months. While the DEW engineer claims that each time the firemen/responders hosed down the very hot rubble pile, and steam (photographed) and hissing sounds were emitted, that instead “cold molecular dissociation clouds” appeared, or the latest “New Physics” gibberish (it will never end: the sign of an intel op)-- the “Hutchison effect.” So in trying to obtain a complete understanding of the nuking of the WTC on 9/11, and the China Syndrome aftermath, I can state the following. There is a good probability that numerous low yield (mini- or micro-nuclear) fission bombs were used. There is the possibility that the tritium “finding”, that was released by the govt, may be a straw man to lead researchers to the red herring of “pure fusion”, and away from the evidence of the China Syndrome. In all likelihood, the regime has kept proof of radiation release at the WTC during demolition, and the later China Syndrome from public release. The ludicrous hangouts of thermite and DEW were created to hide the China Syndrome, and the nuking. 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/breakthroughs-towards-attaining.html[07.11.2010 15:03:21]

World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthroughs Towards Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11, and its China S... San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

Some of the people of New York City have learned well the nature of their regime, and have bought Geiger counters (which are of limited use). The regime knows this, and is trying to ban the possession of Geiger Counters by the citizenry. So the citizens are trying to determine directly for themselves if they will be hit with any more nukings of their city. What possible reason would the regime have for denying them this right— other than the obvious, nefarious one? The current NYC stooge/mayor Bloomberg’s own Police “counter-terrorism deputy commissioner,” R.A. Falkenrath, makes it clear with his own words from the last URL. The restriction is so that “we know where these detectors are located…” Translation: They want to make sure that there will be no WORKING Geiger detectors nearby at the time the regime does its next nuking of NYC. Those of you who understand all that I have written here, will realize that “counter-terrorism experts” like former “reporter” John Miller that I exposed herein, are likely long term deep undercover intel “assets.” They are the terrorists themselves, and/or working directly for the regime’s terrorists who have done, and will do, the next nuking— or other use of a WMD against the citizenry. But the people are obviously catching on. And I hope with my articles herein, that we can see more and more clearly exactly what they did on 9/11, and its aftermath. Please post this and my archived articles on the nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome aftermath at wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com at all forums and blogs. And tell your friends and neighbors. The life you save may be your own. While this mass murdering, terrorist regime may desire to ban Geiger counters, and guns, the people have learned that the way to counter this is for everyone to get them now, and never give them up. posted by spooked @ 7:19 AM

<< Home

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/breakthroughs-towards-attaining.html[07.11.2010 15:03:21]

World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthroughs Towards Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11, and its China S... "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/breakthroughs-towards-attaining.html[07.11.2010 15:03:21]

World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthroughs Towards Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11, and its China S...

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/breakthroughs-towards-attaining.html[07.11.2010 15:03:21]

World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthroughs Towards Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11, and its China S...

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/breakthroughs-towards-attaining.html[07.11.2010 15:03:21]

World Trade Center Demolition: On The Existence of Mini- or Micro-Nukes, Fizzled Nukes, 9/11 & The China Syndrome

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

On The Existence of Mini- or Micro-Nukes, Fizzled Nukes, 9/11 & The China Syndrome
by The Anonymous Physicist This author, among a few others, has claimed that numerous mini- or micro-nukes were used to destroy the WTC. There may appear to be a conflict between the “official” listing of minimal critical masses for small nuclear fission bombs, and the claims of very small yield for such nuclear devices. Now we have sources, like this Wiki article state that about 10 kg. (kilogram) for Plutonium, and 15-50 Kg for Uranium are their minimal critical masses. I have seen other sources put 2 Kg for the minimal critical mass for Plutonium. At the same time, we have a gov’t physicist at a Congressional hearing, in 1998, who said, “These experiments involve the actual testing of extremely low yield fission devices (as low as the equivalent of several pounds of TNT) within a confined environment.” Such a very small fission yield directly implies a critical mass far below that claimed to be the minimal critical mass for any fission device; thus there appears to be a conflict. How can it be resolved? Obviously one or the other side may be lying. The official listings and equations for finding the smallest critical mass for a given radionuclide can have been made much larger than they really are—ostensibly to deter nuclear proliferation among “newcomers.” Or the physicist testifying to Congress could have lied to scare people. Although the Congress did pass legislation barring the production of such extremely small yield nukes. Needless legislation was passed, if this were impossible; but this doesn’t prove anything, due to the nature of Congress. Now regarding mini-nukes, as far back as the 1950’s, the USA had the Davy Crockett mini-nuke (fission). It was called a recoilless rifle with a range of 2-4 km. It’s yield was down to 10 tons of TNT. This is 0.01 Kt (kilotons), or about 1/1000 of the Hiroshima blast. Thus it can be called a mini-nuke. Note that this low yield appears to be from less than the “official” minimal critical mass claimed. One would think that with an additional 45 years before 2001, and with the advent of technological breakthroughs, such as nanotechnology--which the military would have had decades before civilian use--ultra-small nukes would be obtainable, unless truly forbidden by the Laws of Physics. The Wiki article admits, at one point, that “critical mass depends inversely on the square of the density.” And there are greater explosives now to implode the material to a greater density, than they did in 1945. As the critical mass equation has the density inversely squared, this could provide for a great shrinkage of the minimal critical mass. There are other relevant things in the wiki article on critical mass. There is the “fudge factor, f”. And they admit that “sophisticated nuclear weapons programs can make a functional device from less material than more primitive weapons programs

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/on-existence-of-mini-or-micro-nukes.html[07.11.2010 15:04:20]

World Trade Center Demolition: On The Existence of Mini- or Micro-Nukes, Fizzled Nukes, 9/11 & The China Syndrome 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

require.” But wiki, which has been called a CIA front, does list the minimal critical masses I cited above. Can these opposing views be reconciled? How could a micro-nuke be made? At first thought, one might conclude that one would indeed use nanotechnology to emplace Uranium or Plutonium atoms one at a time optimally, to obtain as small, and compact, a nuke as possible— and this may be feasible. But then I realized this may be approaching the problem from the wrong direction. Instead of trying to see how that physicist at the Congressional hearing could build a fission bomb, with a yield of only a few pounds of TNT, from a very tiny amount of Uranium or Plutonium, I may have found better ways. Now we know, e.g., that the Hiroshima bomb had 80 generations of neutron capture/emission. One neutron yielding 2-3 neutrons with each successful capture by a Uranium nucleus, and so on. 99% of the 13-15 Kt of TNT release is said to have occurred in the last 10 generations of neutron emission. That is because of the exponential build-up to the massive numbers of neutrons at the end. So instead of thinking very tiny, what is to stop the following? Start with an Hiroshima bomb, or the smaller Davy Crockett nuke. Then stop the last few generations of neutron emission/capture to have either of these bombs have a much lower yield. This can probably be attained in numerous ways. 1. A somewhat hollow core or 2. Emplacing one or more spherical shells (or whatever geometry is required) of a neutron absorbing material, at the appropriate radii, to either terminate criticality near the end (or earlier for a very small yield), or go barely critical (as opposed to the initial super-criticality), or possibly subcritical somewhere in between to halt, or slow, the reaction. 3. Employ ACTIVE nanotech devices to halt a critical reaction, even after it has begun. The first method is somewhat obvious, so let’s examine the second and third methods. Regarding neutron absorbing shells, we know that the properties of neutron absorbing materials are well known from the nuclear reactor industry. In fact, such a tiny nuclear bomb is almost in between a nuke and a nuclear reactor. I think this is very attainable. Now for the third method. As the time scale between each of the 80 generations of neutron capture/emission is said to be 10 nanoseconds, and nanotechnology operates at nanometer distances, it is thus possible that active, not merely passive, means could be employed to act on this related time scale. Thus it may be possible to build in active methods to curtail, or halt, a chain reaction, even after it has begun. As they have nano-engines, they could have nano-lasers that could “de-implode” the critical mass, even after it has begun! Thus no laws of physics would be violated. So it appears likely that there may be numerous ways to attain micro-nukes-- including with the earlier noted increased density—despite official claims that may be highly exaggerated, or outdated, of 2-10 kilogram masses, etc. Indeed these methods may make it easier to produce small yield nukes out of fission only, and not have any fusion. And tiny nukes were needed, at the WTC, so as to not obviously nuke through the whole building at once, or Manhattan for that matter. So if only fission nukes could be made so small, we can see how the redundant emplacement of many of these could have given rise to the China Syndrome, beginning on 9/11. Indeed these small nukes that employ methods to “damp” them down, may be difficult to standardize. That is, a little too much damping, and it stops the chain reaction before any significant yield is attained. Thus I now have a third possible causative factor that may have led to fizzled nukes! E.g., they would have used the lowest yield nukes in the smaller buildings, and possibly many of these same devices were placed in the larger towers—or several larger ones, as I originally wrote. Again, I have asserted, all micronukes in WTC7 fizzled in the morning. See http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/09/breakthroughstoward-attaining-complete.html

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/on-existence-of-mini-or-micro-nukes.html[07.11.2010 15:04:20]

World Trade Center Demolition: On The Existence of Mini- or Micro-Nukes, Fizzled Nukes, 9/11 & The China Syndrome And WTC6, with it’s nearly perfect spherical hole, looks like JUST ONE mini-, or micro-nuke exploded there. If this one had fizzled, they would have had to do a WTC7 later in the day, for WTC6 also! What I am saying is that they likely tried to have several go off (redundancy), but that spherical hole indicates just one went off, and came close to being too large, if you know what I mean. Many smaller ones— to hide the nuking, was the order of the day— if possible. And these methods, to reduce the minimal critical mass, may make these micro-nukes very sensitive to fizzling. So this hypothesis of how to make a micro-nuke, may be coherent with the rest of my hypotheses, including fizzled nukes in WTC7 and the towers, and the subsequent China Syndrome of high heat generating radioactive fragments, and the three month long hot, large, rubble pile, and the six month long very high heat underneath the towers and WTC7. The latter due to insufficiency of the radiation-lowering methods of sand and water. I might even speculate that the fizzled North Korean Nuke (of 2006) may have been given to them by none other than the American regime. And it was one of the WTC-type small nukes— with the same fizzled result! See http://www.defensetech.org/archives/002832.html This is part of the op of having a bogus enemy for a possible bogus future war. So we may have a cohesive body of knowledge tieing together micronukes, fizzled nukes—among the ones that did go off--on 9/11, and the subsequent China Syndrome at New York City’s World trade Center. Unlike Hiroshima, all this arose because the American regime needed to hide the nuking of New York City from its residents! But the nuclear cat is out of the bag, and making its presence more and more known every day. posted by spooked @ 6:48 AM San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

<< Home

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/on-existence-of-mini-or-micro-nukes.html[07.11.2010 15:04:20]

World Trade Center Demolition: On The Existence of Mini- or Micro-Nukes, Fizzled Nukes, 9/11 & The China Syndrome "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/on-existence-of-mini-or-micro-nukes.html[07.11.2010 15:04:20]

World Trade Center Demolition: On The Existence of Mini- or Micro-Nukes, Fizzled Nukes, 9/11 & The China Syndrome

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/on-existence-of-mini-or-micro-nukes.html[07.11.2010 15:04:20]

World Trade Center Demolition: On The Existence of Mini- or Micro-Nukes, Fizzled Nukes, 9/11 & The China Syndrome

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/on-existence-of-mini-or-micro-nukes.html[07.11.2010 15:04:20]

World Trade Center Demolition: A Summary of Evidence of EMPs (Electromagnetic Pulses) from the Nukes Used in the WTC on 9/11

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Friday, May 02, 2008

A Summary of Evidence of EMPs (Electromagnetic Pulses) from the Nukes Used in the WTC on 9/11
by The Anonymous Physicist There is a great need to highlight and summarize the evidence of EMPs, (from nuclear bombs) that occurred in the WTC buildings, on 9/11, from my articles and other sources. The MSM ignores this crucial EMP evidence, and all the intel assets on the web continue to lie and claim, “There’s no evidence of EMP.” Now a nuclear bomb will emit a great flux of gamma rays. These will ionize (expel electrons from) surrounding air molecules. The electrons’ behavior is such that a coherent electromagnetic wave front moves outward. This has been named an Electromagnetic Pulse, or EMP. An EMP will adversely affect any metallic objects that it intersects as it reaches them. A high voltage and current will be induced into the metal, which can cause circuitry, or any metallic parts to melt, catch fire, or explode. Just what an EMP will do to a metallic object is determined in part by the intensity of the EMP, distance to the object, angle, intervening shielding, and other factors. The intensity of an EMP from a nuke is determined by the strength/yield of the nuke, altitude of detonation, its type and design. In general, the smaller the nuke, the smaller the strength and effective range of the EMP it will produce. A multi-megaton nuke exploded in the upper atmosphere can cause a continent-wide EMP. A micro-nuke would yield an EMP of only some fraction of a mile. Possibly only a couple of blocks depending on where it was detonated, shielding etc. In my articles, I have repeatedly highlighted eyewitness accounts of phenomena that appear to ONLY be explainable via EMPs. Note this article on EMP effects states, "The ensuing massive sparking of cable jackets, their contact to frame and the ground, and breakdowns in connectors put the equipment out of action and lead to fires and explosions." For the record, I note that for decades now, first beginning with the military, it has been known how to “harden” planes and helicopters so as to block an EMP’s effects on their electronics. Perhaps the most remarkable are the statements of 9/11 responder, EMT Patricia Ondrovic. She reached the WTC area shortly before tower 1 and WTC 5, 6 (right near her at the time) would be destroyed. She tried to enter WTC6, but was forbidden by guards. But as she looked into the lobby of WTC6 she “saw a series of flashes around the ceiling of the lobby all going off one-by-one like the X-mass lights that chase in pattern." This is best explained by one or more EMPs passing through that area and causing wires or lighting fixtures to “pop.” Furthermore, at that same time, she reports that cars near her, and right outside WTC6, caught fire for no apparent reason. As she started to flee, a car door exploded off a car and hit her and knocked her down and injured her ribs. All this happened as WTC 5, 6 and Tower 1 began to explode. The exploding car door is again only explainable via EMP. As I have explained here, “As the nuke(s)'

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/05/summary-of-evidence-of-emps.html[07.11.2010 15:05:04]

World Trade Center Demolition: A Summary of Evidence of EMPs (Electromagnetic Pulses) from the Nukes Used in the WTC on 9/11 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

concomitant EMP(s) (Electromagnetic Pulse) passed through her immediate vicinity, it intercepted the cars near her. The intense electromagnetic wave induces a great current in metal (and not in “people or paper”). The current becomes great heat, resulting in rapid expansion of said metal. A given car door can only expand so much before its boundary is reached and there is nowhere for the heat or expansion to go, which results in doors or handles (if they are metallic), etc. exploding off. This is why you will see some cars with only their paint vaporized (intercepted only low level EMP due to distance, angle, shielding etc.), and other cars will show a burnt front, but the back half is virtually "normal." The Electromagnetic Field and subsequent current is stopped at the boundaries of the doors.” Ondrovic’ statements also indicate that WTC6 likely was itself destroyed by a micro-nuke which is further evidenced by its one large spherical hole. Note that Ondrovic’ interview with the WTC Commission is heavily redacted. I have noted that by the time it began its interviewing of 503 9/11 surviving responders, traitors from the CIA had been brought in, including former CIA Director, Woolsey. Her interviews are here and here. The statements made by WTC1 engineer, Mike Pecoraro here and in my article here also indicated that he witnessed the effects of a nuclear bomb going off in the sub-basement where he was working. He wrote that he first knew something was wrong after his co-worker tapped him on the shoulder to alert him that he had just seen “the lights flicker”-- as did Ondrovic in the lobby of WTC6. Pecoraro then went up to the C level to assay damage, and I have asserted he has provided some of the strongest statements proving a nuclear blast went off in the sub-basement of tower 1, at the time of the first (CGI) “plane hit” explosion above (used as cover for a subbasement nuke). Pecoraro stated he saw “a 50 ton hydraulic press gone!" “[Pecoraro and a co-worker then] made their way to the parking garage, but found that it, too, was gone”… As they ascended to the B Level, one floor above, they “were astonished to see a steel and concrete fire door that weighed about 300 pounds, wrinkled up like a piece of aluminum foil." To sum up, it appears that Pecoraro’s co-worker first saw the lightflickering effects of an EMP, from a nuke, going off above them, and this was verified by the unique damage they observed at the upper basement levels. The shriveled up, foil-like, former massive steel and concrete door is easily explained to occur from intense neutron bombardment, from a nuclear bomb. The reason Pecoraro’s statements look so different, and more powerful than most others can be explained, as follows. Nearly all eyewitness accounts are in some government commission or investigation body’s reports. All the intel agents in control heavily censor all these. Similarly, the MSM wouldn’t disseminate such an eyewitness account either. Instead of being independent watchdogs, all the MSM have, for many years, been just a branch of the regime. The MSM is controlled by its worst elements: chronologically, first military “intelligence”, then the FBI, then the CIA and the NSA. Pecoraro’s statement appears in the online newsletter of his own Chief Engineers Association, a fraternal or union-like organization. It has apparently not (yet) been infiltrated and controlled by any of the Gestapo agencies. You might want to archive his statements before they disappear. Similarly to Ondrovic’ report of cars catching fire for no apparent reason, is the account of 9/11 responder, Paramedic Robert Ruiz. In my article here, I noted Ruiz’ utter incredulity at watching a car completely catch on fire for no discernible reason. His full statement to the WTC Commission is here. Ruiz just barely escaped WTC2 being destroyed. First he describes the ground near him shaking BEFORE the “collapse” starts. This could be evidence of an underground nuclear bomb going off before the top was brought down. He says, the ground shakes, then WTC2 starts to come down, and he runs and survives under a nearby

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/05/summary-of-evidence-of-emps.html[07.11.2010 15:05:04]

World Trade Center Demolition: A Summary of Evidence of EMPs (Electromagnetic Pulses) from the Nukes Used in the WTC on 9/11 doorway. Ruiz then states, "I was trapped there. Like things weren't bad enough already, the car that's parked right on that corner catches on fire. I don't mean a little fire, the entire thing. Don't ask me how. The entire car caught on fire. You would think maybe just a motor part or just the engine part. But this entire car just goes up in fire." San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

An EMP’s explosive effect on electronic components is demonstrated by an NYPD officer who has only revealed his (supposedly) first name-- Craig. Former NYPD officer “Craig” is now disabled with Pulmonary Fibrosis after working for a month at the WTC site. He was driving in the vicinity of the towers at the moment of the first “plane hit.” He says, "The next thing I remember was a sound, not unlike a serious car accident, just one block west of me on Church Street. My radio exploded just then.” In my article here, I cited the remarkable interview of 9/11 responder, Dr. Michael Guttenberg, of the NYFD’s Office of Medical Affairs. His full WTC Commission interview is here. The following is from his interview. Just after the second “plane hit” explosion, and before any tower “collapse”, he noted: Guttenberg: “…on the EMS radio, there was absolute silence for probably 10 or 15 seconds …” Questioner: “We were told that the air was so thick with debris that radio waves weren't able to travel.” Guttenberg: “That was after the towers came down.” From my article above: “Note two things, the radios went dead—likely a sign of EMP. And see how the questioner attempts to confuse the issue with a double lie. One, that this happened after a tower was destroyed, when instead, this is after the second WTC2 “plane hit” explosion, and BEFORE any tower “collapse” as Dr. Guttenberg corrects him. And two, that radio waves would have been blocked by a conventional explosion, when they wouldn’t have been. And note also that this radio blackout occurred after the second “plane hit” explosion. My previous articles contained evidence, and my hypothesis, that the WTC1 “plane hit” explosion was used as cover for a nearly simultaneous basement nuclear bomb explosion that vaporized a 50 ton steel press, and a garage level, and also caused phone outage. So we learn now that electronic communications also were affected after the second “plane hit”, which may indicates that they also nuked the basement of WTC2 at that time. I hypothesized that this was done in case the planned, subsequent, intricate, top-down demolition failed.” The 911Eyewitness video-- especially the short film entitled “WMD at the WTC” which was never made into a feature length video, though this was promised for September 2007-- shows EMP effects on the video camera at the onset of destruction of a tower. Even Wood and Reynolds had a brief intersection with the truth when they wrote here that "Electrical outage over a wide area with repairs taking over three months, suggesting EM pulses." In this article I cited how a woman emerging from a nearby subway exit just after WTC1 “plane impact” had tried to use nearby phones and said they did not work at that time. Again the most likely cause is a nearby EMP. The original URL is here. The link to Sun News goes to a 2006 article in the Sun News, a Cleveland newspaper, and appears to no longer work at this time.

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/05/summary-of-evidence-of-emps.html[07.11.2010 15:05:04]

World Trade Center Demolition: A Summary of Evidence of EMPs (Electromagnetic Pulses) from the Nukes Used in the WTC on 9/11 Engineer Ted Twietmeyer has written here about the EMP damage to cars on 9/11. His explanation of the shielding effect, and also his simple vector analysis indicates EMP effects originated from above ground locations. This jives with my complete WTC destruction scenario that states a single sub-basement nuke was set off in each tower, in near simultaneity to the bogus “plane hits.” Then during WTC destruction, numerous topbottom smaller nukes were set off in the towers, and in WTC5, 6 and WTC7--whose nukes fizzled, and had to be nuked with (brought in) new nukes, some 5 hours later. "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

For completeness now, I discuss the totality of the matter of damage to cars, and other vehicles, at or near the WTC. There appears to be much misinformation or disinformation in this regard. Many things happened to vehicles near the WTC on 9/11. Some of this is easily explained by conventional forces; but some of this is again only explained by EMPs, or other nuclear phenomena. Some vehicles were likely damaged by fiery debris falling onto them leading to fires and destruction of these vehicles. Similarly, non-fiery, falling debris could have caused gas explosions and/or fires in these vehicles. The explosive blast winds created during nuclear destruction of the WTC were reported to be so intense, by some responders, that they upended vehicles, even firetrucks. Fires and explosions could have ensued from this. This would likely be only a closeby effect. Then there were the pyroclastic clouds--created during the very hot nuclear destruction of the WTC buildings--which could have engulfed numerous vehicles near the WTC. This would have caused “whole vehicle” damage-perhaps causing complete browning of these vehicles. But like the blast effects just noted, this would likely be a close-by effect only. This is because the physics of these pyroclastic clouds would dictate that they would cool down rapidly in terms of distance and time. These clouds cool off quickly as they expand. Within a block or two of their creation, their heat likely killed people, and caused fires or explosions in vehicles, via high temperature. But within a short distance of another block or two, the rapid expansion/cooling effect may have lessened their temperatures so that they would no longer be fatal to people or cause fires, etc. in vehicles. This rapid cooling-off effect is similar to the hypocenter of a nuke itself, which goes from one million degrees to 10,000 degrees in one millisecond (one thousandth of a second). Due to the nukes being only micro-nukes, and the matter of altitude and shielding, their EMPs likely also were significant for only 1-several blocks.

Thus I conclude that the ejecta from the destruction of the towers allows for damage to vehicles at the greatest distance, as compared to the other possible factors above. This is even verified by Ondrovic in her interviews. She reports that when she was taken to the hospital, in an ambulance, WTC2 was being destroyed; and her ambulance was pelted with small debris perhaps a mile away. So larger chunks could have been exploded outward that could have impacted vehicles, say within a half-mile from the WTC. Such larger chunks could have had enough energy to cause a fire or explosion if it hit the vehicle in the right place. But the type of damage to vehicles is the key to noting EMP-caused fires in, or on, these vehicles. When we observe that the only damage is to PART of the vehicle (as opposed to the entire vehicle as would occur in an engulfment by say a pyroclastic cloud), we can conclude that EMP was likely involved. When we observe that only part of a vehicle has had its paint burned off, we can conclude that that part of the vehicle was intercepted by a low level EMP. The current induced was only strong enough to lead to a temperature that was able to burn some paint, and not cause parts of the vehicle to catch fire, or have a door explode off. When we see that great damage and/or fire has occurred again to only part of the vehicle, like this:

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/05/summary-of-evidence-of-emps.html[07.11.2010 15:05:04]

World Trade Center Demolition: A Summary of Evidence of EMPs (Electromagnetic Pulses) from the Nukes Used in the WTC on 9/11

perhaps a stronger EMP is the most likely culprit. Note the back half looks “pristine.” Cars observed only after towing to a distant parking lot, should not enter this (unless a chain of evidence can be proven), as we can’t be sure of anything about these vehicles. But we don’t need ludicrous, evidence-free theories to explain the damage seen on these vehicles. Both conventional forces, and EMP, or blast, from nukes explain all the types of vehicle damage observed.

To sum up, there is much physical evidence and eyewitness testimony, and even some video evidence, for effects that could only have been caused by Electromagnetic Pulses from nuclear devices. This easily explains how cars and not people or paper were adversely affected. Do not be dissuaded by all the intel agents getting paid to lie and say “there was no evidence of EMP,” or that some “new phenomena” could explain any of this. The case for EMPs from nuclear bombs in the WTC buildings, on 9/11, has been proven. Please post this everywhere. The life you save may be your own.
posted by spooked @ 7:48 AM

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

<< Home

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/05/summary-of-evidence-of-emps.html[07.11.2010 15:05:04]

World Trade Center Demolition: A Summary of Evidence of EMPs (Electromagnetic Pulses) from the Nukes Used in the WTC on 9/11

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/05/summary-of-evidence-of-emps.html[07.11.2010 15:05:04]

World Trade Center Demolition: WTC Destruction Theories: "DEW" versus Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate versus Milli-Nukes/Micro-Nukes

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Saturday, July 19, 2008

WTC Destruction Theories: "DEW" versus Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate versus MilliNukes/Micro-Nukes
In theory, all of these may have been used in combination with conventional explosives (e.g. C-4) -- and each of these may also have been used in come combination together. But let's discuss the PRIMARY mechanism used for the WTC tower demolition, since there still is apparent controversy over this. DEW = directed energy weapons; typically described as a powerful beam weapon; type of energy has not been specified; originally proposed by Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate = high temperature incendiary mixture (thermite) and hypothetical explosive variants (thermate and superthermate); originally proposed by Steven Jones Milli-Nukes/Micro-Nukes = explosive nuclear fusion or nuclear fission devices; proposed by several different people: Finnish Military expert (advanced fusion devices only), Ed Ward, Bill Deagle, Anonymous Physicist

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

The complete massive destruction of the WTC towers was characterized by several key features:
1) incredible pulverization/"dustification" of all building contents in a matter of seconds 2) pulverized debris violently bursting outward during the destruction 3) a consecutive series of "explosive" waves traveling down the towers during the demolition 4) disappearance/vaporization of large numbers of interior core columns 5) various odd phenomena-- likely EMP effects on vehicles and some electronic devices, odd holes in the ground and in surrounding buildings, early basement explosions, "hanging skin" in some surviving victims 6) extreme high heat in the ground zero rubble (widely-reported/wellsubstantiated) 7) large number of sicknesses/cancers in ground zero responders 8) suspicious treatment of remaining WTC steel-- washing, extreme security on trucks taking it away, rapid sale to China

I will now go over pros and cons of these hypotheses, focusing solely on the WTC evidence, without any discussion of the character or reliability of the proponents of the various theories. I am taking for granted that the towers were demolished by added energy devices -- not by fires and

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/07/wtc-destruction-theories-dew-versus.html[07.11.2010 15:06:34]

World Trade Center Demolition: WTC Destruction Theories: "DEW" versus Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate versus Milli-Nukes/Micro-Nukes gravitational collapse. Further, I am assuming that there has been some sort of active cover-up of the demolition on the part of the official agencies and the media. -------------------PROS for DEW: 1) malleable nature of the "DEW" can explain everything associated with the tower destruction except the lingering heat at ground zero 2) towers did not need to be pre-loaded with devices CONS for DEW: 1) type of DEW-emitting device and what type of directed energy was used on the WTC is completely unspecified 2) no DEW technology known that can explain the vaporization of steel and the extreme pulverization of concrete and the majority of inner building components-- all in seconds 3) huge amounts of energy required for DEW that can dustify the towers but no source of energy has been specified 4) needs to make the major assumption that the extreme heat at ground zero is a massive lie 5) does not explain the sicknesses/cancers in ground zero responders as easily as radiation from nuclear devices 6) does not explain the suspicious treatment of remaining WTC steel Paper-- I do not think the presence of unburnt sheets of paper in the WTC dust can be construed as evidence for DEW, as the towers were undoubted filled with paper, and it's not at all clear what percentage of paper was destroyed. Paper is also light and some paper would thus would be expected to be blown out and away by explosive blasts, ahead of the highest energy wave. Aluminum versus Steel-- I do not find the argument convincing that aluminum cladding intrinsically avoided destruction whereas the steel columns were vaporized. Lack of bathtub damage and intact shops and tunnels beneath the WTC-any sort of extreme pulverization of the towers from the top-down would lessen the overall impact on the ground of the towers' destruction; it's not clear where the intact shops and tunnels seen in pictures were in relation to the two main destroyed towers, thus this is inconclusive Lack of large explosive sounds-- I do not think there is completely convincing case that can be made for lack of explosive sounds DEW Pro/Con = 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

Negative 4

-------------------------PROS for Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate 1) can explain some of the loss of steel as thermite can melt iron 2) might explain the lingering high heat and reports of molten steel CONS for Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate 1) difficult to imagine an incendiary chemical mixture being used to rapidly demolish a building 2) difficult to imagine how explosive thermite/thermate could be used to vaporize steel columns if the incendiary mixture is being dispersed by exploding at the same time 3) not clear that super thermate can account for the pulverization of the towers or that it even exists 4) not clear that residual thermite/thermate/super thermate can account for the extreme heat that lasted for at least six weeks at ground zero 5) requires massive pre-loading of the towers with large incendiary/explosive devices 6) does not explain the sicknesses/cancers in ground zero responders as

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/07/wtc-destruction-theories-dew-versus.html[07.11.2010 15:06:34]

World Trade Center Demolition: WTC Destruction Theories: "DEW" versus Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate versus Milli-Nukes/Micro-Nukes easily as radiation from nuclear devices 7) does not explain the suspicious treatment of remaining WTC steel Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate Pro/Con= ---------------------------PROS for Milli-Nukes/Micro-Nukes 1) can easily explain all the features of the destruction of the towers 2) powerful, well-known, well-established destructive technology 3) small but extremely powerful and so do not require massive emplacement of devices in the towers CONS for Milli-Nukes/Micro-Nukes 1) cover-up required for radiation at ground zero One common argument I have seen made against nukes is that extremely bright flashes from nuclear explosions are not seen in videos. However this is not a definitive contrary argument as it is not clear what kind of flash would be seen from a very small nuke going off in the middle of steel tower-- especially once the first explosion has occurred and there are massive dust clouds that could shield the flashes of further explosions. Further, for tower 2, definitely, a few small bright flashes can be seen going off coincident with the tower going down. Milli-Nukes/Micro-Nukes Pro/Con= ----------------------Does anyone have a reasonable argument, based on the evidence, not on personalities, to add here? posted by spooked @ 6:17 AM Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions

Negative 4

Positive 2

<< Home

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/07/wtc-destruction-theories-dew-versus.html[07.11.2010 15:06:34]

World Trade Center Demolition: WTC Destruction Theories: "DEW" versus Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate versus Milli-Nukes/Micro-Nukes "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/07/wtc-destruction-theories-dew-versus.html[07.11.2010 15:06:34]

World Trade Center Demolition: WTC Destruction Theories: "DEW" versus Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate versus Milli-Nukes/Micro-Nukes

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/07/wtc-destruction-theories-dew-versus.html[07.11.2010 15:06:34]

World Trade Center Demolition: WTC Destruction Theories: "DEW" versus Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate versus Milli-Nukes/Micro-Nukes

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/07/wtc-destruction-theories-dew-versus.html[07.11.2010 15:06:34]

World Trade Center Demolition: Ground Zero Smoking Cannon: Where Are All the Core Columns and Beams???

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Saturday, August 23, 2008

Ground Zero Smoking Cannon: Where Are All the Core Columns and Beams???
(UPDATED 8/24/08) The destruction of the WTC left basically four major types of large structural debris visible in photos like this:

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

(click to enlarge; this image was cropped from a larger picture taken September 23rd, 2001) There was lots of aluminum cladding (the silvery stuff that spread the farthest and was seen on the rooftops of surrounding buildings), there were sections of the outer wall (these have the characteristic "wheat-chex" appearance, which were groups of columns linked by spandrel plates), there were many small beams of unclear origin (the right size for brokenoff outer columns but could also be floor beams -- many floors of the WTC were supported by beams and not trusses-- or small core cross-beams), and last, there were the huge core columns and core crossbeams (the largest single separate columns that are strewn about like matchsticks in the photo above). The core of the WTC was in fact huge-- in contrast to some conceptions of the core after 9/11, the core structure took up a major amount of the space inside the tower-- it was roughly 80 feet by 130 feet in cross-section, in the 207 by 207 foot cross-section of the tower, and it left about 60 feet of floor

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2006/12/ground-zero-smoking-cannon-where-are.html[07.11.2010 15:08:33]

World Trade Center Demolition: Ground Zero Smoking Cannon: Where Are All the Core Columns and Beams??? on two sides and about 30 feet of floor on the other two sides. The core was composed of 46-47 vertical sets of long columns that went the length of the building, and the core was abundantly cross-braced by steel beams. Additional information on the core structures can be seen here and here and here. In the picture above, you can see that some of the largest core column pieces were close to 100 feet long. In fact, the longest individual core columns were 36 feet long, so the longest columns shown in the photo must be two or three sections welded together that clearly stayed together during the destruction process. Now that we have good information on the precise numbers and sizes of the WTC core columns, it turns out there were approximately 1974 total core column sections, and at least 50% of these were large rectangular box columns, 3 to 4 feet wide (note, this is an underestimation). Thus there were at least 980 of the very large column sections in just ONE tower. These columns would be the prominent ones in the photo. The numbers of steel beams in the cross-bracings was much, much greater. At a minimum of 14 large cross-beams per floor, we're talking over 1500 more large steel beams. All told, we're talking about close to 3500 large steel columns and beams in the core, with 980 of these the massive 3 to 4 feet wide core columns. So this begs the question: how many core columns and core cross-beams are seen in the remnants of a WTC tower, such as in the remains of WTC1 in the photo here: 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

I have marked with a black line anything that could be considered a large core column. Erring on the side of calling everything remotely close to a large steel beam or column, I only count about 200 large core column sections (taking into account the idea that some of these columns are double 36 foot sections). This leaves over 750 HUGE STEEL core columns unaccounted for!***

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2006/12/ground-zero-smoking-cannon-where-are.html[07.11.2010 15:08:33]

World Trade Center Demolition: Ground Zero Smoking Cannon: Where Are All the Core Columns and Beams??? Further, there are still 1500 large core cross-beams and hundreds of remaining substantial core columns unaccounted for, that should be filling the debris pile but are not clearly there. This picture was taken very shortly after 9/11, as the west wall WTC1 is still not cleaned up (lower left foreground), and shows that the large core columns were not moved between 9/11 and 9/23: San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

(click to view separately) Thus, it wasn't that hundreds of the columns were carted away before 9/23 (when the top picture was taken). Further, given the massive size of the large core columns, they would not be able to be lifted out until the outer

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2006/12/ground-zero-smoking-cannon-where-are.html[07.11.2010 15:08:33]

World Trade Center Demolition: Ground Zero Smoking Cannon: Where Are All the Core Columns and Beams??? debris was cleaned up and the cranes could be moved in closer-- which was only just starting to happen on 9/23. Now sure, some core columns and beams are going to be buried under the rubble and not visible. But almost 800 of these monster pieces of steel are buried in a rubble pile that wasn't more than 10 feet deep outside of the footprint of the towers, and no more than 60 feet deep within the footprint of the tower??? I don't think so. Not to mention that the videos showed that much of the core clearly came down last (or at least large sections of it came down at the end), and therefore the core columns and beams should have been at the top of the pile. And certainly, the core being the heaviest part of the building, core columns and beams were not going to fall very far from the foot-print of the tower. So what happened to all the core columns? My guess is the missing columns and beams were vaporized by small nuclear bombs-- mini-nukes emplaced in the center of the core structure. I am open to other suggestions besides nukes, but nukes seems to be the best explanation currently. Further, seeing how the core gets progressively stronger towards the bottom, and the huge difference in strength of the columns from top to bottom, it is impossible for me to imagine that any gravity driven collapse would completely tear apart the lower core down to its base level. Thus, the lack of core columns helps to disprove the official story by itself. "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

***It's possible that I missed counting a few columns/beams in the picture, but I can't see missing more than 20-50. It's probably true I missed a few columns/beams that fell further and were off the bottom edge of the picture-- though looking at other shots of ground zero, I can't have missed more than 20-50 large columns/beams. Even so, we're still talking about over 750 large columns missing (and 2000 smaller columns and beams not readily apparent either)!!! Seriously, where are they? Because if these columns and beams can't be accounted for, it is yet another strong piece of evidence for nukes-- or some even more horrible means of destruction. posted by spooked @ 9:04 AM

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2006/12/ground-zero-smoking-cannon-where-are.html[07.11.2010 15:08:33]

World Trade Center Demolition: Ground Zero Smoking Cannon: Where Are All the Core Columns and Beams???

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2006/12/ground-zero-smoking-cannon-where-are.html[07.11.2010 15:08:33]

World Trade Center Demolition: Ground Zero Smoking Cannon: Where Are All the Core Columns and Beams???

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2006/12/ground-zero-smoking-cannon-where-are.html[07.11.2010 15:08:33]

World Trade Center Demolition: Micro-Nukes in the WTC--Creating The China Syndrome: Important Matters of Completeness & Plausibility

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Tuesday, September 09, 2008

Micro-Nukes in the WTC--Creating The China Syndrome: Important Matters of Completeness & Plausibility
by The Anonymous Physicist My “Many Nukes” Hypothesis for the destruction of the WTC on 9/11, perpetrated by the American regime, is detailed here wtcdemolition.blogspot.com. How this led to the China Syndrome is detailed here wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com. To summarize these matters now, I have written how the towers’ destruction entailed numerous micro-nukes detonating in each tower, and furthermore much redundancy was employed to insure that sufficient numbers of these low-yield devices successfully went off as planned. Some of the redundant micro-nukes were impacted by the exploding micronukes, which allowed for the redundant ones’ fissile material to give rise to the China Syndrome. I also explained how some micro-nukes fizzled for various reasons--part of the reason for having so many redundant micronukes present. I listed several factors that could have caused this fizzling, even hypothesizing that the early explosions in the WTC7 were fizzled nukes, that were meant to destroy WTC7 but they did not properly go critical. The reader can read how standard some of these concepts are in the nuclear world. The military and “policy” makers use the term “fratricide” for the occurrence of one nuclear warhead impacting/adversely affecting another one and preventing the latter from going nuclear. Read here, for example. Under the heading of “Nuclear targeting and fratricide,” you will find this: “Historically, analysts have assumed that only 2 nuclear warheads could be used in a short time frame against any target because of a problem called “fratricide.” Assigning multiple warheads to a target requires precise timing to prevent one incoming warhead from destroying others. Furthermore, a nuclear detonation near ground level (which is ideal for destroying hardened silos) would create a debris cloud that could destroy other warheads heading to the same target.” Furthermore, long term storage of nuclear bombs or warheads involves another form of fratricide. This article on the many problems of long-term nuclear warhead storage, describes how nuclear warheads have “vulnerability to fratricide neutrons,” as well as being susceptible to many other problems that could make them fizzle. So you can see that I was correct in writing that impacted and/or fizzled nukes, are problems that could be expected to occur when you have a complicated scenario involving many small nukes going off in a relatively small place-- especially in an enclosed space. And these matters thus could easily explain where the available fissile material to cause the China Syndrome at the WTC

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/micro-nukes-in-wtc-creating-china.html[07.11.2010 15:09:29]

World Trade Center Demolition: Micro-Nukes in the WTC--Creating The China Syndrome: Important Matters of Completeness & Plausibility came from. Now knowing of these potentially, fratricidal effects on the nukes to be used in the WTC on 9/11, the American perps-- foul physicists, and monstrous military men, much like those involved in nuking their own at Port Chicago, and other innocent humans at Hiroshima and Nagasaki-- did the following. 1. Emplaced many redundant nukes, in each WTC building, and at each level to be nuked. The levels where the nukes were emplaced took fratricidal effects into account, as much as possible. 2. Used (somewhat hardened) sensors that would trigger (sequentially, as needed) redundant nukes at each level that they were to be set off at. 3. Used sensors that themselves would be vaporized, if the first, planned nuke went off properly, so that the redundant ones would not go nuclear. Of course, their fissile material would then be available for the China Syndrome Aftermath. Did all this go off exactly as planned? No. As I have written, the hidden, denied, early WTC7 explosions indicate that the perps failed to properly set off the nukes in WTC7, and took five or more hours to re-do it, later in the afternoon. One possible scenario for the failed, early nuking of WTC7 could be the following. The early nukes in the lobby and basement fizzled (due to fratricidal or other effects). That is, they exploded but either did not attain any criticality (only conventional explosions worked), or else the fissile material had been “weakened” and the resultant nuclear explosion was too small for demolition of WTC7 to occur. The sensor(s) were themselves damaged (from partial explosions), and did not then trigger redundant nukes to go off, or else all redundant nukes fizzled, as Jennings (in the last article) describes several WTC7 explosions. However even a properly functioning nuclear device going off inside a building can lead to its own China Syndrome, as follows. Let us look at the efficiency of nuclear devices historically, as I do not have access to data on the efficiency of the most current nukes. But it would likely be in the same range. The efficiency of a nuclear bomb is the percentage of its total available fissile material (such as Uranium-235 or Plutonium-239) that actually undergoes fission during the criticality stage of implosion/explosion-- roughly one microsecond. The remainder is still highly radioactive and could give rise to a China Syndrome under certain conditions. Peter Vogel’s book, “The Last Wave From Port Chicago" describes on page 13-13 how the Hiroshima “A-Bomb” used only 1.14% of its contained fissile material. The Port Chicago type A-Bomb had even less efficiency-- about 0.5%. More recently, 6% efficiency for updated nuclear bombs is cited here. Such a low efficiency is due to the immense difficulty of having an implosion, and then an explosion, whereby the fissile material has only one microsecond before the imploding, fissioning U-235 critical mass with its tremendous number of released neutrons and subsequent energy release (and great heat and pressure), forces the critical mass to explode outward thus terminating its criticality geometry. What this means is that even a properly functioning, fission bomb will have 94-99% of its highly radioactive, fissile material released into the environment where it will more slowly continue to fission and decay-- and release great heat. Now if a nuclear bomb goes off several thousand feet in the air, a la Hiroshima, the unfissioned U-235 will be widely dispersed and will come down over a huge area. (The heat of the Bomb would even have vaporized the unfissioned U-235, but this will later condense and come down somewhere.) But the micro-nukes--even the properly fissioning ones used inside the WTC-- were, at least partially, contained during the destruction. But as the buildings were being destroyed, even vaporized, the remaining fissile material would be able to reach all around the WTC area, and some would likely reach significantly beyond as well. Some fissile material from the sub-basement nukes, would likely be trapped in the largest concentrations, to be found in the aftermath, in these basement areas. These radioactive fragments would also be inaccessible to the usual radiation-lowering mechanisms that were extensively employed beginning the very next day-- water hosing, and “coating” with sand/earth. 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/micro-nukes-in-wtc-creating-china.html[07.11.2010 15:09:29]

World Trade Center Demolition: Micro-Nukes in the WTC--Creating The China Syndrome: Important Matters of Completeness & Plausibility San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

To sum up, my “Many Nukes” and resultant China Syndrome Hypothesis, is well supported by the known concepts of nuclear warhead fratricide, and the low (0.5-6.0%) efficiency of fission bombs. Indeed all the facts involving exploding numerous micro-nukes in an enclosed (or partially enclosed) space appears to make the China Syndrome aftermath not only plausible, but inevitable! posted by spooked @ 6:47 AM

<< Home

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/micro-nukes-in-wtc-creating-china.html[07.11.2010 15:09:29]

World Trade Center Demolition: Micro-Nukes in the WTC--Creating The China Syndrome: Important Matters of Completeness & Plausibility "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/micro-nukes-in-wtc-creating-china.html[07.11.2010 15:09:29]

World Trade Center Demolition: Micro-Nukes in the WTC--Creating The China Syndrome: Important Matters of Completeness & Plausibility

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/micro-nukes-in-wtc-creating-china.html[07.11.2010 15:09:29]

World Trade Center Demolition: Micro-Nukes in the WTC--Creating The China Syndrome: Important Matters of Completeness & Plausibility

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/micro-nukes-in-wtc-creating-china.html[07.11.2010 15:09:29]

World Trade Center Demolition: Did Two Nuclear Reactors, not Nuclear Bombs, Destroy the WTC on 9/11?

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Tuesday, September 09, 2008

Did Two Nuclear Reactors, not Nuclear Bombs, Destroy the WTC on 9/11?
Review of William Tahil’s Book, “Ground Zero: The Nuclear Demolition of the WTC”, and of his Reactor Hypothesis by The Anonymous Physicist

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

Tahil’s book is now downloadable for free here: http://www.nucleardemolition.com. I welcome Tahil’s comments and corrections, if any, to this review and analysis of his work, via email to Spooked, who will forward to me. Tahil was one of the very first to write and publish on the nuclear demolition of the WTC on 9/11. Also, other than myself, he is the only other scientist, or person, to write about the China Syndrome aftermath. As my illness prevented me from writing on 9/11 until 2007, his 2006 book was the first to correctly attribute the great heat and molten metal that existed at the WTC for months afterwards, to the China Syndrome of still-fissioning material. While I discovered that independently, he was the first to demonstrate this in public writing. He deserves much credit for this. The Finnish military expert, Tahil, and myself, are the three people who have written proposed nuclear demolition schemes. My articles on the nuclear destruction of the WTC are here http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and my articles on the China Syndrome are here http://wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com. The Finn believes a single nuclear bomb was used on each tower, via a focused, nuclear shape charge in the basement. I have stated that numerous mini- or micro-nukes were employed in the towers, and in all the other WTC buildings. I have further highlighted that great redundancy was employed, and that numerous nukes either were sabotaged, fizzled on their own, or were impacted (without being triggered themselves), by other exploding nukes. And so many nukes did not go off as planned, and their unused fissile material later gave rise to the China Syndrome. My article on the early attempted nuking of WTC7, which failed, is good evidence of fizzled, or sabotaged nukes. Thus there were many nukes available, whose fissile material was not employed in the destruction, and which gave rise to the China Syndrome, in my hypothesis. Please read all my articles, including the one on "fratricided" nukes here. Now Tahil is unique among the nuclear 9/11 proponents, in that he alone believes that two nuclear reactors-- not nuclear bombs-- were employed to demolish the two towers. While my 9/11 nuclear scenario is different from Tahil’s, and I have explained in lesser detail before why I think mine is correct, and his is incorrect, I have always stated (and still do) that his work should be read by all, as I could be wrong, and he could be right, or possibly there are elements of truth, where we may both be right. Looking at the different nuclear 9/11 scenarios, the Finn, and I, believe the evidence points to nuclear bombs. The Finn believes a single, fission-free, 4th

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/did-two-nuclear-reactors-not-nuclear.html[07.11.2010 15:10:11]

World Trade Center Demolition: Did Two Nuclear Reactors, not Nuclear Bombs, Destroy the WTC on 9/11? 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

generation thermonuclear device destroyed each tower. This is based on the govt’s Tritium finding. Tahil does not mention the Tritium evidence, and goes with pure fission at the WTC. I have written several things chronologically as the evidence, and my thinking evolved. First I went with both sets of evidence, namely that either fusion (tritium) enhanced fission bombs, or a fission-triggered fusion bombs, were employed. Later I noted the way the regime has total control of all scientific data, and could block release of the most damning data. I stated that it is possible that the Tritium finding was a red herring to divert people into looking for the fission-less fusion bomb, precisely because this would stop people from realizing there was a "China Syndrome" aftermath, at the WTC-- which the regime wishes to hide at all costs. (Presumably only fission can yield the China Syndrome.) So I have stated it is possible that all nukes employed on 9/11 were fission bombs, and the tritium data is spurious. One of the nuclear 9/11 proponents, William Deagle, M.D., further lends support to my redundant nuclear bomb hypothesis with his direct knowledge of a Fort Collins U.S. Army Forensics Team member who was immediately sent in to the OKC bombing site in 1995. This man told Deagle (his physician) directly, that he and the team brought out two unexploded micro-nuclear bombs, and one unexploded C4 pineapple bomb, from the 10-story Murrah building, after its destruction. This Army man said that the nukes were emplaced by ATF and FBI personnel. He further stated that his Army team was under armed supervision by Wackenhut guards, who tested that they did not remove any radioactive evidence. We can see from this, that great redundancy (extra nuclear bomb emplacement) was employed at OKC. Remember that Murrah was only 10 stories tall, and nowhere near as wide as the towers or WTC7. Consider the total volume of the WTC towers, the 47 story WTC7, and all the other buildings, and you can see how dozens of redundant nukes may have been employed in the nuclear destruction of the entire WTC. If the matter is linear, given the relative volumes, we might even conclude that 50-100 micro-nukes were emplaced, and they gave rise to the China Syndrome, in my hypothesis. For now, let’s examine what Tahil has to say particularly on the subjects of his nuclear reactor hypothesis, and the China Syndrome aftermath. Much of Tahil’s hypothesis rests on his interpretation of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Dust Analysis data here. Tahil seems to view the USGS data, and all govt data/studies at face value. He does not seem to realize the possibility, or likelihood, that errors of omission, or commission, were utilized in various Gov’t studies, whereas I have highlighted this in my articles. Tahil particularly mocks those who state that the Seismic records were doctored-- which includes me. I base my view on several things, including eyewitness testimony of those at Ground Zero, and a friend who lived a mile north, and who described books falling off shelves, at the moment of the first CGI “plane hit,”-- or WTC1 basement (nuclear) explosion. Also we know that the Gov’t actually asked one Seismic Lab to “re-do” their calculations. Let’s get back to the USGS dust study that Tahil uses for much of his hypothesis. I have stated that this study is heavily flawed in many ways. Some of my criticisms, I will now list: -- Did not test for (or report findings on) Plutonium. -- Did not look for anything smaller than 2.5 microns, or did not delineate this, when labs had, for years prior, equipment that would have quantified dust down to 10 nanometer size. -- Only looked at a small area, mostly within 0.5 Km from the towers, when the dust settled much further away, and -- A good deal of the dust went up in smoke! Thus the smallest particles

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/did-two-nuclear-reactors-not-nuclear.html[07.11.2010 15:10:11]

World Trade Center Demolition: Did Two Nuclear Reactors, not Nuclear Bombs, Destroy the WTC on 9/11? ended up far away. See my articles again. -- Samples were taken 5-6 days later, after a rain/wind storm on day 2. -- Did not differentiate differing isotopes of a given element. (Differing isotopes have the same number of protons, but differing numbers of neutrons in their nuclei. Isotopes behave very differently regarding nuclear processes including radiation release, and further fissioning.) I have highlighted the reason the regime prevented, or perhaps more likely ALTERED the data on the smallest sized dust particles. It requires far greater energy (only nukes) to create the tiniest dust particle size. Now Tahil concentrates on the USGS dust study, and in particular its findings regarding the elements Strontium, Barium, Zinc, and several others. He uses the 12-- out of 35-- sample sites that yielded Strontium. He has made some very good findings regarding the near total correlation of Strontium and Barium in the dust samples. This shows a common origin, he asserts, and is likely right. This, he says virtually proves fission occurred as Strontium and Barium are two common “daughter” elements in the fissioning of Uranium. This is likely correct as well. But he also states several things that are not correct. He makes these mistakes throughout the book. He only considers the buildings’ concrete or steel as sources of the dust. This is a serious flaw. The buildings’ entire contents-- from people to furniture, etc., etc.-- must be considered! He also at times, assumes one particular isotope for an element, e.g. Strontium 90, and not its other four naturally occurring isotopes, and its other 15 artificially created isotopes. On page 24, Tahil states, “These elements [Barium and Strontium] simply should not be present in building rubble or building materials in even a valid trace amount, which would be less than 10 ppm…” In succeeding pages, he elaborates that very high levels of Strontium and Barium in the dust study could only have come from the fissile Uranium in two nuclear reactors, very deep underneath the two towers. But, we shall see that Strontium, Barium, and Zinc are NOT to be unexpectedly found in the vaporized rubble, as Tahil states. Thus their source need not be from massive amounts of fissioned Uranium, as Tahil claims. There are many common, known sources of Strontium. A Strontium compound can make up as much as 10% of the mass in toothpaste for “sensitive teeth.” Strontium is a normal component of everyone’s bones and teeth. And Tahil does not take into account the total vaporization of half of the nearly 3000 human victims, and partial vaporization of the others. Other Strontium sources include pottery, color TVs, aerosol paints, drugs for osteoporosis, and other sources. However there is one source of Strontium that has overarching importance here. Tahil ignores the fact that Strontium occurs in Limestone. And Limestone is often the major component of concrete. How much Strontium might there be in the 100,000 tons of concrete in each WTC tower? Let us look at one type of limestone called oolite limestone. Strontium in oolitic limestone can occur at up to 10,800 ppm (parts per million)! This study found a range from 230 to 10,800, with an average of 414 ppm. But is oolitic limestone used in very large structures? Some of the largest buildings ever built have indeed used oolitic limestone. This includes the Empire State Building and the Pentagon! Then there is the issue of Barium. Wiki notes that Barium is a "getter" in vacuum tubes, is used in glassmaking, and is used in a coating for the electrodes in the ubiquitous fluorescent lamps. Furthermore, Wiki says, “Lithopone, a pigment that contains Barium Sulfate and Zinc Sulfide, is a permanent white that has good covering power…” Here wiki indicates that Lithopone may be commonly “used in interior paints and in some enamels.” Thus we see that if this pigment was used in the WTC, we have a San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/did-two-nuclear-reactors-not-nuclear.html[07.11.2010 15:10:11]

World Trade Center Demolition: Did Two Nuclear Reactors, not Nuclear Bombs, Destroy the WTC on 9/11? Barium/Zinc linkage, without resorting to Uranium fission. But on page 30, Tahil shows that if one sample site were left out, Barium and Zinc have nearly a 100% (96%) correlation. Tahil speculates that this correlation could only be from nuclear fission, and in particular, lesser known “ternary fission.” He might be right, but you see from my Lithopene example, this one correlation could be explained without fission. The Lithopene example does not disprove fission, but it shows that any one of these correlations is not conclusive of anything. They have limitations. Also Barium, some analysts assert, is one of the main ingredients in the ubiquitous, and notorious, Chemtrails. These trails have been seen in the skies for the last 15 years or more. As they stay up for great lengths of time, they may be nanoparticles. It’s even possible that by now, their contents have mixed with the atmosphere, and the entire Earth has been saturated with their contents. Of course, ongoing regions getting this “treatment” will have very high doses for some time. The Hair Mineral Analysis, done on people, has shown a great increase in the levels of Barium, over the last 10 years. This means that some Barium compound has gotten into people. Regarding the USGS dust samples, the relatively large percentage of Barium, in the USGS study, could even have come from the vaporized people, or from significant mixing of the WTC dust with atmospheric Barium, or from some local Chemtrail spraying within the 5-6 days of the WTC destruction, before the samples were collected. If the Barium were ubiquitous, say from the atmosphere--and its adherence to the smoke from the WTC, the WTC dust might come down with much Barium in it. Thus there may have been a significant base level of both Strontium and Barium from common, non-nuclear sources. Zinc is also cited on page 143 when Tahil extrapolates and concludes that a massive amount of Uranium was fissioned on 9/11-- from two reactors. But Zinc is also not rare, as Tahil claims. Zinc is the major metal in pennies and is in batteries, steel, paint pigments, and many other sources. But again Tahil may be right, because I have not proven that Lithopene was used at the WTC, unless it is/was ubiquitous. Nor have I proven what the level of Strontium in the limestone in the concrete was. However, Tahil’s body of evidence, in this book, which includes several correlations of daughter products of fission, his analysis of the dust from the girders whereby Tahil concludes that elements were blasted onto the girders, and were still fissioning when collected on the girders, and all his other findings, indicate that there was fission in the WTC on 9/11/01. But the amount of fissioned Uranium is impossible to find by extrapolation of the dust, because the amounts of Strontium, Barium and Zinc may have been large, in the WTC, as I have shown above. But thanks to Tahil, we can conclude that the search for the “holy grail” of fission-free fusion (as the Finnish Military Expert has done), is likely a fruitless hangout, or red herring, and should be abandoned. The proof of the fission is in the China Syndrome, and the sum of the findings in Tahil’s book. More strongly put, be wary of any alleged Nuclear-9/11 proponents who do not proclaim the China Syndrome Aftermath of 9/11! There are only four proponents of the China Syndrome: Tahil, myself (the “Anonymous Physicist”), Spooked, and recently Deagle. The following is the crux of Tahil’s nuclear reactor hypothesis. On pages 144-145, Tahil claims that there were massive amounts of Strontium and Zinc as radioactive fallout, and that then indicates there was a massive amount of Uranium (nearly 500 tons) that had fissioned. And then that this claim of nearly 500 tons of fissioned Uranium implies to him that only a reactor or two could have been the source of the Uranium. All this rests on the USGS dust study, and Tahil’s extrapolations of its data. Now while I think his earlier near 100% correlation of Strontium and Barium, goes a long way toward proving nuclear fission occurred on 9/11, his calculations leading to 500 tons of Uranium-- and subsequent hypothesis that implies two massive reactors were sent critical is flawed. On page 144, Tahil-- via extrapolation of the amounts of these elements in the USGS dust study-"Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/did-two-nuclear-reactors-not-nuclear.html[07.11.2010 15:10:11]

World Trade Center Demolition: Did Two Nuclear Reactors, not Nuclear Bombs, Destroy the WTC on 9/11?

arrives at the estimates of 60 tons of Strontium and 100 tons of Zinc, per tower, in the fallout from the destruction of the WTC. From this, he further estimates that there must have been at least 470 tons of Uranium in each of two reactors deep underground in each tower, that was somehow sent critical, and exploded in nuclear fashion, and caused the destruction of each tower, and gave rise to the China Syndrome. While I, of course, agree with him that the HEAT GENERATION, of up to six months, at the WTC, leaves only the possibility of a China Syndrome, his assumptions and math need scrutiny. 1. I have already pointed out that the USGS is greatly flawed, and likely doctored with numerous errors of omission and commission. See above. 2. He apparently assumes all the Strontium was Strontium 90, and ignores the other isotopes of Strontium, while the USGS study did not differentiate isotopes. 3. He assumes the origin of daughter elements is Uranium, when they could have been fissioned from Plutonium, which was not tested for by the USGS--or else not published 4. He ignores non-nuclear sources for Strontium and Zinc, and assumes all Strontium and Zinc came from nuclear fission. See above where I have strongly disproved this. Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

So for all these reasons, we arrive at the conclusion that we cannot use the USGS data for a simple weight ratio analysis. Furthermore, Tahil compares his nuclear reactor hypothesis to only one micro-nuclear bomb per tower, and ignores the possibility/probability that 1. Many mini- or micro-nukes were used per tower 2. That the other buildings also were nuked 3. He incorrectly says that a fission nuke has all of its Uranium used up in its use. This is very curious since he cites Peter Vogel’s book, "The Last Wave From Port Chicago." And this book is one source that describes the efficiency of a fission bomb. On page 13-13 Vogel writes that the Hiroshima Atomic Bomb used only 1.14% of its contained fissile material. More recently, 6% efficiency for updated nuclear bombs is cited here. This means that instead of 100% of the U-235 being used up when it goes critical in a bomb, only 1-6% is used up, and thus 94-99% of its U-235 is left over for the China Syndrome! 4. Tahil does not realize other possibilities that I have made original hypotheses on; namely that many redundant nukes were also likely emplaced. And some, or many, of these may have been either sabotaged or fizzled because of various reasons. 5. The actual tower destruction scenario observed, fits the use of numerous small nukes much better than a deep underground set of two massive reactors. 6. Officially physicists have claimed that a fission reactor cannot even yield a nuclear explosion. (However, we must take this with a small grain of salt. If a nuclear reactor could yield a full nuclear explosion, like a fission bomb, the PTB would never let this be known.) So from this last list, it is clear that not one, but numerous nukes per tower could have been employed, and the scenarios I have described, could have led to a large amount of still-fissioning Uranium or Plutonium

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/did-two-nuclear-reactors-not-nuclear.html[07.11.2010 15:10:11]

World Trade Center Demolition: Did Two Nuclear Reactors, not Nuclear Bombs, Destroy the WTC on 9/11? fragments, “left” (after WTC destruction) both near the surface, and deep underground. Now we must analyze the geometry and dynamics of the WTC destruction, to see what fits better: the use of a deep underground nuclear reactor per tower, or numerous small nukes. One problem is the early sub-basement explosions that were timed to go off at the same time as the alleged “plane hits” way above. I have written extensively and cited much evidence, that these were nuclear devices that were exploded and even that EMPs (Electromagnetic Pulses) were yielded at those times. Tahil agrees that these explosions were nuclear. He cites an article that I have cited numerous times written by WTC Engineer Mike Pecoraro. Pecoraro was below the sub-basement C level (presumably at the D level, but not described explicitly), when his colleague saw “flickering lights” (EMP?) and they ascended to the C level. He says, "There was nothing there but rubble, we're talking about a 50 ton hydraulic press gone!" Pecoraro and a co-worker then “made their way to the parking garage, but found that it, too, was gone…” As they then ascended to the B Level, one floor above, they “were astonished to see a steel and concrete fire door that weighed about 300 pounds, wrinkled up like a piece of aluminum foil" and lying on the floor. Now I have asserted, the only thing that could have done these things is neutron bombardment and/or million-degree temperatures, both from a nuke. Tahil says his nuclear reactors were well below the seven known sub-basement levels of the towers. And the reactors were sent critical at WTC destruct time. But he also says he believes the earlier “Pecoraro explosion” was nuclear. Thus we have several problems with the nuclear reactor hypothesis: 1. How does a reactor go critical for the earlier Pecoraro basement, nuclear explosion, and still be capable of being used again--in any coherent fashion? And the destruction of the towers was very well controlled. 2. In this light, how can any reactor being melted down, and going critical, be used in such a controlled, coherent, relatively precise and symmetrical fashion, so many floors below what it is to destroy, when a reactor gone critical implies much chaos? As opposed to numerous, strategically placed small nukes. 3. How can Pecoraro have survived a nuclear explosion from a reactor below his level (and not know that that was what happened), and then go above him to two floors that were nuked? Unless small nuclear bomb(s) were utilized at those levels. 4. Now I can see how the observed deep underground flowing metal, weeks and months later, might possibly be from this deep underground reactor, but what about the hot rubble pile and its fissioning material not far from the surface? 5. What about the possibility of breaking through to the Hudson (if not directly underneath, then just a bit West of the WTC) if the reactor were so far down, and made to explode, nuclear-wise?

My “Many Nukes” hypothesis, which includes my “Many Nukes fizzled/sabotaged/impacted/fratricided” hypothesis, that I have authored-remember the Finn said only one nuke per tower, which thus has some of these same flaws-- seems to fit all that happened to the WTC, on 9/11, better. Numerous redundant, fizzled or sabotaged nukes, higher up may have given rise to the large hot rubble pile. Larger nukes in the subbasement gave rise to the flowing molten metal seen there months later. There may have been many nukes emplaced in the sub-basement that led to events that appear “reactor-like.” Why compare a reactor only to one nuke? And given that only 1-6% of a fission nuke’s fissile material is used

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/did-two-nuclear-reactors-not-nuclear.html[07.11.2010 15:10:11]

World Trade Center Demolition: Did Two Nuclear Reactors, not Nuclear Bombs, Destroy the WTC on 9/11? in its explosion, and there were many nukes that did go off, this too allows for a China Syndrome at the WTC, even if there were not any redundant nukes present. There are numerous other matters that are incorrect. On page 153, Tahil virtually states that Chernobyl was a nuclear explosion when it was not. It resulted from heat from nuclear fission causing steam expansion, which caused an explosion and the China Syndrome of blasted radioactive fragments releasing great heat where they landed. Earlier in the book, he has it right, that Chernobyl was not a nuclear explosion, but not on page 153. Tahil apparently believes that the “Plane hits” were real, instead of the impossible CGI, they clearly are. He believes that the earlier 1993 WTC explosion was conventional, when I have highlighted the eyewitness testimony of engineer Phil Schneider who said he saw proof that it was nuclear-- I guess things like Pecoraro described. (See my articles.) Tahil often cites new, or hypothesized Physics for some of the phenomena, when this is precarious at best, and makes it look like the ludicrous DEW hangout. E.g., he states that Koenig’s sphere was involved in the WTC destruction as a “neutron reflector/focuser”. After seeing the documentary on Koenig’s sphere, and its maker, and its creation, and how it was moved, and is still there in a nearby public park, I seriously doubt this speculation, if not also on Physics grounds. His website cites a sewer steam explosion in NYC, miles North of WTC, several years after 9/11, as some proof of a massive nuclear reactor underneath Manhattan. But NYC has had such stream explosions for 150 years. Tahil seems to want to think there were massive neutron fluxes all about the WTC during or after the destruction. He states that the strangely damaged cars are proof of large neutron fluxes at those spots. But I have amply demonstrated that the evidence fits EMPs, vastly better than anything else. These are the cars whose boundaries of doors caused only part of the car to have heated up, and caught fire. In my analysis of this, I revealed how only an EMP would cause part of a car to intercept the EMP, which becomes current, and then great heat. But this is only in metal, and the boundaries (air), between car doors, prevents said current from flowing across to the other car door. See especially my analyses of EMT Ondrovic’ experience of EMP causing a car door to explode onto her, and the flickering lights in WTC6, before it was nuked. Neutron fluxes would NOT have caused this, as neutron fluxes would not show a distinction with car door boundaries, as we see with several cars! So Tahil appears to try too hard to see neutrons all about, because he wants to fit this to massive reactors under the WTC, and that area of Manhattan. I think his analysis of his Figure 52, on Page 123, is incorrect. This is not quite like a volcano. Look at the height of the smoke at top, compared to the height of the other extant tower. It has not shot way into the sky yet. Rather it shows that the top part of WTC1 was vaporized. So this could have been from a nuke at the top to start things off. He has, or had, some connection to Alex Jones. His website had said that if you can’t reach him via email, it was NSA interference, and to contact Alex Jones. I have no problem with the NSA inference, but Alex Jones? He has been vehemently anti-nuclear-911, and anti-NPT (the planes were merely CGI). Jones would never have Tahil’s work on his site. Jones was sent in to head the 911truth movement, after the regime assassinated true conspiracy expert Bill Cooper, within two months of 9/11. Why does/did a Nuclear-9/11 proponent have an anti-nuclear-911 person be his contact? On the other hand, numerous things Tahil says are very intelligent and revealing, even bold. First credit goes to him for his finding of near 100% correlation between Strontium and Barium, on page 26. This indicates nuclear fission occurred at the WTC, but is not proof. His ignoring the Tritium finding may ultimately prove to be both bold and wise. While others, like the Finnish military expert, considered only a pure fusion bomb, this then could not have given rise to the China Syndrome of which the HEAT GENERATION evidence is massive and conclusive. I wrote that the Tritium

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/did-two-nuclear-reactors-not-nuclear.html[07.11.2010 15:10:11]

World Trade Center Demolition: Did Two Nuclear Reactors, not Nuclear Bombs, Destroy the WTC on 9/11? finding-- or more correctly, its release may have been a red herring to get people to look only for nuclear devices that could not have caused the China Syndrome. So Tahil as I indicated, may be both bold and brilliant here. Tahil also reveals, on page 115, evidence of birth defects after 9/11, in NYC, that I have not seen before. His motto on the cover is also good: Salus populi suprema lex esti or "The welfare of the people shall be the supreme law." Tahil, of course, asserts that the American regime has the opposite view. He asserts that there was massive radiation, at the WTC, and he makes the bold assertion that Manhattan should still be evacuated! If he is right, how many American cities may have reactors placed underneath them? Now I still think that if this is the goal--and it wouldn’t surprise me if you have read my “Ultimate Truths” series (anonymous-physicist.blogspot.com)--they could more easily just place nuclear bombs underneath edifices in big cities. Sadly, for reasons my readers may know, I think there is a fair possibility that this could be the case, as above-ground nukes are more easily gauged and intercepted by OTHERS. The Rockefeller owned or controlled WTC land area is far from their only land ownership in this country. Could the Rockefeller-donated United Nations land be next? In this light, and in cohesion with what I wrote above about the OKC bombing, I ask did a China Syndrome result there, if it was nuked? Deagle says his Army agent/patient said that Wackenhut guards measured and prevented anything radioactive from being removed. I trust that means that the regime’s agents removed all things radioactive. How many cancers have there been in OKC responders, or OKC residents, subsequently? How many more buildings or skyscrapers must be nuked before the People wake up?

Then Tahil’s analysis of this photo also appears to be very astute, as far as demonstrating the PTB’s desire to hide the China Syndrome. The photo is of the so-called Light Memorial. This was the extremely bright, doubleblue lights, that were turned on for weeks, a few months after 9/11, from dusk to 11 P.M. Tahil surmises that this began when they finally reached the reactor remnant areas, or large areas of fissioning Uranium. And while they were doing something to it, or carting it away, its blue light of the Cherenkov radiation (from nuclear fission) would have been visible. I have written about this in regards to one photo that Steven Jones “orange-ified,” when responders were peering into something underground at the WTC. I related this to the blue light seen when nuclear fissioning elements (cored out sphere and cylindrical insert) were erroneously kept together for too long a time, during the “tickling the dragon’s tail experiments,” at Los Alamos, that killed two nuclear scientists. Tahil asserts that the reactor remnant was uncovered at that time, so they needed to do the light trick. I would say that large areas of fissioning fragments must have been uncovered, for them to do this. But need it have been a reactor, or its remnants? There could have been many nuclear bombs in the subbasement area that led to a large area, with much fissioning going on. But perhaps this is one item of evidence where his reactor hypothesis may fit better than my many nukes hypotheses. Or could a much smaller reactor have been there, and elements of both hypotheses be true? The blue lights are strictly not proof of anything, we must remember. But this regime does almost everything it does, for a sinister reason. Another photo Tahil uniquely has (page 101) is that of a rescue dog with his responder master walking the WTC grounds. Even the dog is wearing protective boots because of the great heat there and then! Also on page 101, Tahil has a photo of the large congealed mass of bullets from WTC6. He states that 43 days after 9/11 the heat was still so intense, an injury to the face of a responder occurred when at least one of the bullets in the mass discharged. Here is more proof of this great heat weeks and months after 9/11, which the intel agents for “DEW” and the O.C.T. laughably continue to deny.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/did-two-nuclear-reactors-not-nuclear.html[07.11.2010 15:10:11]

World Trade Center Demolition: Did Two Nuclear Reactors, not Nuclear Bombs, Destroy the WTC on 9/11? Thus I conclude this review of Tahil’s book and hypothesis with the following. Tahil deserves much credit for his statistical analysis chapter, which helps demonstrate the likelihood that nuclear fission took place on 9/11 at the WTC, and for first exposing the existence of the China Syndrome at the WTC. His hypothesis that this had to be from two massive, deep underground nuclear fission reactors that were sent critical, and exploded akin to a nuclear fission bomb, is much less compelling, and more evidence fits my “many nukes” hypothesis, with possibly one evidentiary exception. Therefore it is possible that he may still be right, at least in part. For that reason, and other things cited above, I recommend everyone who is not an intel agent, and wishes to know what might have occurred on 9/11, read his book, as well as all my articles. The case for two huge reactors that were made to undergo nuclear explosions has not been made. Neither can we completely rule out that the China Syndrome that existed at the WTC for several months after 9/11/01 was, in part, from a much smaller reactor present. I am not saying I believe this, but that it cannot be excluded. Furthermore, I can even perceive one reason why it would have been there. A breeder reactor could even have produced the fissile material for the coming nuclear bomb destruction of the WTC. Or there could have been both many micro-nukes used, and a fission reactor was also exploded with a micro-nuke at the end. I throw these ideas out for completeness. In conclusion I remain unconvinced that the evidence indicates a large nuclear fission reactor was underneath each of the towers, and suffered a nuclear explosion, as my “Many Nukes” hypothesis appears to better explain the details of the WTC destruction, and the China Syndrome aftermath. I welcome feedback and genuine criticism from Tahil on this review, or of my own nuclear-911 hypotheses, and also the same from any non-intel agent. As Tahil wrote, Salus populi suprema lex esti. posted by spooked @ 6:45 AM

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/did-two-nuclear-reactors-not-nuclear.html[07.11.2010 15:10:11]

World Trade Center Demolition: The Effect of a Low Yield Nuke on a Steel Structure

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Saturday, March 28, 2009

The Effect of a Low Yield Nuke on a Steel Structure
The Ruth shot was a fizzle. The predicted yield was 1.5 to 3 kt, while the 200 ton yield was a fraction of that. Especially embarrassing to UCRL was

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

only the top 100 feet of the 300 foot shot tower was vaporized (though much of the remainder was scattered across the desert) . It was
that

standard practice at that time for each test to totally erase all evidence associated with it (automatically "declassifying" the site), which Ruth failed to do.

Hard to tell how tall this tower remnant is but I would guess about 100 feet, if the cross-sections are 10 feet apart (which would fit what looks like a ladder near the base). Compare the above pic to this pic of the WTC1 core remnant (click to enlarge):

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/03/efffect-of-low-yield-nuke-on-steel.html[07.11.2010 15:10:40]

World Trade Center Demolition: The Effect of a Low Yield Nuke on a Steel Structure 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

Note the wilted pieces of steel dangling down. Note-- this puts the WTC destruction into good perspective. If a 200 ton yield nuke can vaporize 100 feet of steel structure, and destroy 100 feet or more of it, you can imagine the yield nuke that would be required to vaporize the innards of the 208 foot wide WTC while leaving the outer walls more or less intact. What's not clear is if there is a linear correlation between nuke yield and vaporization radius-- I would guess it's not perfectly linear. (thanks to A.P. for the find) posted by spooked @ 8:57 AM

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/03/efffect-of-low-yield-nuke-on-steel.html[07.11.2010 15:10:40]

World Trade Center Demolition: The Effect of a Low Yield Nuke on a Steel Structure San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/03/efffect-of-low-yield-nuke-on-steel.html[07.11.2010 15:10:40]

World Trade Center Demolition: The Effect of a Low Yield Nuke on a Steel Structure "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/03/efffect-of-low-yield-nuke-on-steel.html[07.11.2010 15:10:40]

World Trade Center Demolition: The Effect of a Low Yield Nuke on a Steel Structure

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/03/efffect-of-low-yield-nuke-on-steel.html[07.11.2010 15:10:40]

World Trade Center Demolition: The Effect of a Low Yield Nuke on a Steel Structure

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/03/efffect-of-low-yield-nuke-on-steel.html[07.11.2010 15:10:40]

World Trade Center Demolition: Further Observations on WTC1 Stairwell B

Missbrauch melden

Nächstes Blog»

Blog erstellen

Anmelden

world trade center demolition

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Further Observations on WTC1 Stairwell B
1. Did Pasquale Buzzelli Surf Down The “Collapse”—or Do Conflicting Reports Collapse the O.C.T.? 2. Does the Revealed “Upward Wind” During “Collapse” Prove the Final “Cleaner Nuke”? by The Anonymous Physicist

This blog will deal with the the destruction of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked Location: United States The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations. View my complete profile More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.) General 9/11 Sites 9/11 Blimp 9/11 Busters 9/11 CGI Watch 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren) 9/11 Complicity 9/11 Cover-Up 9/11 Dossier (UK) 9/11 Encyclopedia 9/11 Foreknowledge 9/11 Hoax 9/11 Oddities 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Overview Oz (Australian) Plot Proof Research (Jim Hoffman) Resources Review.org Review.com

Pasquale Buzzelli is a structural engineer who was working for the Port Authority in the North Tower on 9/11. Genelle Guzman [McMillan is added now—due to subsequent marriage] was a co-worker of Buzzelli’s at that time. Both would be among only 20 alleged survivors of the “collapse” of the two towers. Curiously all 20 were in the North Tower. Buzzelli would become famous for claims that he, in effect, “surfed” down 22 floors during “collapse” as described here. He was found ATOP the rubble pile, and taken to safety, at least three hours after the “collapse.” Guzman-McMillan, who started out with Buzzelli on the 64th floor, would become famous as the last person rescued alive from beneath the rubble, about 24 hours after the “collapse.” However, Guzman-McMillan’s description of events leads to the collapse of credibility of Buzzelli. As archived here, Guzman-McMillan states that she was on the 13th—not 22nd—floor just before the “Collapse” began; and that Buzzelli was BELOW her. She states that Buzzelli was below her as he led a group of people (including her) down. She does not know, at that point in time, how far below her he was. So this could be but half a flight of stairs, or several flights. But Buzzelli, and his fellow claimants thus lose AT LEAST nine flights of “collapse surfing” from Guzman-McMillan’s account. Also please consider the possible implications in the differences in how they were found. Guzman-McMillan was buried BENEATH some rubble, while Buzzelli was ATOP the rubble pile. Curiously Guzman-McMillan also relates pressure from the Port Authority on its reported orders to Tower workers to stay put after the “plane hits.” The article above states, “On instructions from the Port Authority, McMillan declines to discuss why she stayed [initially].” Guzman-McMillan “felt hot” while awaiting rescue. Reports from the 12 firemen who survived in Stairwell B also have them saying they felt heat in the Stairwell even when initially climbing up. (This fits with my articles on the early sub-basement nuke’s thermal rays that affected many people, including Felipe David.) Indeed I might say that the following report from Rick Cushman is the very first report of what I have lengthily described as the China Syndrome Aftermath. See this blog: wtcchinasyndrome.blogspot.com. Now Rick Cushman was a marketing

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/03/further-observations-on-wtc1-stairwell.html[07.11.2010 15:11:32]

World Trade Center Demolition: Further Observations on WTC1 Stairwell B manager and National Guardsman from Saugus, MA. He rushed to Ground Zero from Massachusetts. For 12 hours he searched for survivors in the rubble. “But he had not seen any — only pieces of bodies. Beneath his boots, heat billowed up through the web of steel.” Then Cushman heard Guzman-McMillan’s shouts and directed rescuers to her. Now this article reveals numerous things. Despite the fact that there was likely a large number of people going down Stairwell B at the moment of collapse— as there were only three stairwells in each tower— people survived only at a few locations along Stairwell B. There are several possibilities, according to my many small nukes hypothesis. As previously hypothesized here, there could have been several failed or fizzled nukes. Or there is the possibility, that at certain intervals, those who were in an effective nodal region— between nukes—may have survived, at least initially. Now Stairwell B contained 14 survivors— including 12 firefighters— who survived the tower’s final destruction. Two others— Buzzelli and GuzmanMcMillan— were on Stairwell B at the onset of “collapse,” but were found elsewhere in the rubble pile. And four others were found in the underground Mall. (This includes the two Port Authority policemen depicted in the Oliver Stone movie.) Again it appears that the South Tower’s “collapse” curiously did not have any such survivors. Now the New York Magazine article indicates again that some of these Stairwell B surviving firemen surmised that they survived a nuclear attack: “[Captain] Jonas and his men, finally freed from their stairwell, looked around at fires and flattened buildings. They thought they were witnessing a nuclear attack.” My articles on the nuclear destruction of the WTC have detailed how many firefighters surmised this. Why? Firefighters are well familiar with heat from fire, but if they feel great heat on their skin and they are nowhere near a fire, they know something very different is going on! Readers of my articles, and of this blog by Spooked, and his 33 blog here can also see the involvement of the PTB, when the article states “When Buzzelli called at 3:30 everything changed, though not as she’d expected. Soon, she’d know that he’d somehow landed safely in the midst of acres of destruction, a lone soul dropped to safety on a concrete slab…” The New York Magazine article has other quizzical matters, and should be read in its entirety. There is the matter of the 12th Floor as depicted here. “Jonas picked up a Mayday from the lieutenant of Ladder Five, who reported that he was in Stairwell B on the 12th floor. Jonas had passed him on the way down, helping a civilian. “I’m trapped and I’m hurt bad,” he said. Jonas, who was on the fourth floor, tried to climb the stairs but couldn’t ascend more than a floor, and in any case, as he’d later learn, the stairwell had no 12th floor. “I’m sorry, I can’t help you,” he radioed back.” The highest-ranking officer on Stairwell B was Chief Richard Picciotto. He later wrote a book, as the article continues: “Picciotto’s Last Man Down became a best-seller. It would also end his friendship with Jonas—“It’s a very bad book,” says Jonas— and whatever camaraderie he shared that day with the others from Ladder Six. “We don’t speak to him,” says Komorowski. “Liar,” Butler wrote in his copy of the book.” ““It was part of my personality to take charge of a situation,” Picciotto writes. “I’d never been the type to sit idly by while someone else called the shots, and I wasn’t about to start now…Picciotto was the highest-ranking guy, but he was not the commanding officer. He was doing nothing. He was balled up in a corner,” says Jonas.” Picciotto’s book says he was on the 7th Floor when the North Tower “collapsed.” These articles indicate that the extant height of Stairwell B, after tower destruction, was five flights. And this should be kept in mind when researching where people were at the moment destruction began, 9/11 Stealth 9/11 Strike 9/11 True Story 9/11 "U" 9/11 Verses Awoken Research Group Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson) Finnish 9/11 Site Finnish 9/11 Site in English Gallerize German Engineers 9/11 site Hybrideb's 9/11 site Icelandic 9/11 site Jane Doe's 9/11 site Juscogen's 9/11 site Killtown Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz) Portland Indy Media 9/11 119 Questions about 9/11 Let's Roll 9/11 Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition Essay Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission Essay Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit) Nerdcities 9/11 Operation 9/11 Planet Quo 9/11 Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness) RINF 9/11 Archive Terrorize (Danish 911 site) The Mysteries of 9/11 THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled by Gerard Holmgren) Shunned Physics 911 Physics 9/11.co.nr Plague Puppy's Cafe Plague Puppy: Alternate Site Question 911 Truth 911 Brad's 911 site Club Ivy's 911 site Brad's old 9/11 site Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links Serendipity (various essays on 9/11) Stop the Lie 9/11 The Strange Images of 9/11/2001 Total 9/11 Info Unanswered Questions Questions Questions The Web Fairy Wing TV 9/11 Activism 9/11 Blogger 9/11 Citizens' Watch 9/11 Skeptics Unite! 911 Truth.org 911 Truth LA.us 911 Truth LA.org 911 Truth Emergence 911 We Know 911 Truth Movement Musings 9-11 Visibility Project 9-11 UK 9/11 Family Steering Committee NY 9/11 Truth

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/03/further-observations-on-wtc1-stairwell.html[07.11.2010 15:11:32]

World Trade Center Demolition: Further Observations on WTC1 Stairwell B and where they ended up. It appears that each flight had two levels of standard zigzag stairs as depicted here. We must keep in mind that anyone being blasted on the stairwell, but remaining in the stairwell, would have been blasted in a straight line, and shouldn’t have been blasted more than a flight of stairs. This is different from those—like Buzzelli and Guzman-McMillan— who were apparently blasted OUT of the stairwell, at some point, during the tower’s destruction. (And, of course, the stairwell above the fifth floor may have been vaporized, or otherwise destroyed.) With Guzman-McMillan ending up buried under some rubble, and Buzzelli atop the rubble. I also note that there appears to be no pictures that show the very TOP of the extant five-floor Stairwell B section. Could this be because the top contains obvious indications of the great (nuclear) heat of tower destruction? Have these photos been cropped, as many photos were in the Kennedy Assassination? I was the first to note the similarity of the remnant of Stairwell B, and the remnant of the tower from the fizzled Upshot-Knothole Ruth nuclear fission bomb test of 3/31/53. At least the bottom third of the bomb’s tower remained because the nuke had fizzled—it had a yield about 1/15th of what was expected. See here: San Francisco 9/11 Truth Scholars for 9/11 Truth Community Currency 9/11 Summer of Truth Proposition 911 Reopen 911 Deception Dollars Justice for 9/11 9/11 Specialty Sites Team 8 Plus Flight 93 Hoax WTC Demolition The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation 9/11 Photo Analysis Evidence of Explosives on 9/11 Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories Flight 77 FOIA site Flight 93 Crash.com Pentagon Research Brad's Pentagon Analysis Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock) 9/11 Flash Movies 9/11 chronology (network footage) Buddy Buddy Pentagon Strike 911 Questions Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites" that question 9/11 Rigorous Intuition Wing TV Xymphora Killtown's Blog The Bulldog Manifesto Center for an Informed America George Washington Centre for Research on Globalization Prison Planet (Alex Jones) Daily Two Minutes of Hate The Emperor's New Clothes Public Action (Carol Valentine) Propaganda Matrix Daniel Hopsicker Cryptome Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News Covert 2 Overt Analysis

Note the date has a 33. The tops of the Ruth test tower and Stairwell B have some similarities as I indicated to Spooked, and as he has in his article at his blog here on 3/12/09. The tops indicate some steel has melted and twisted downward. Finally, I cite the book, Report from Ground Zero: The Story of the Rescue Efforts at the World Trade Center by Dennis Smith [not read by me]. In particular I cite this review by Sterling D. Allan, an apparent alternative energy expert. After reading that book, and Stairwell B’s survivors’ accounts, Allan reveals, “a cohesive conclusion: A POWERFUL WIND WAS GOING UP THE STAIRS AS THE BUILDING WAS COLLAPSING DOWN. This would seem to refute the official pancake theory of collapse in which one floor after another fails as the mass from above comes down.” Allan includes this familiar hypothesis, “One possible explanation for these survivors, in the demolition model, is that explosives that were placed in

Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/03/further-observations-on-wtc1-stairwell.html[07.11.2010 15:11:32]

World Trade Center Demolition: Further Observations on WTC1 Stairwell B the vicinity of this stairwell section failed to go off.” Allan however appears to only consider non-nuclear matters, but his review is dated in 2006, before my articles, and that of others, on the nuclear destruction of the WTC appeared. But I conclude with the question—does the now-revealed UPWARD WIND, of final tower destruction, indicate a nuclear blast from the ground, or perhaps more likely from the basement? Is this upward wind another indication of the final cleaner nuke that I have written about for several years now? As I have written, this final cleaner nuke may also have been seen as the so-called “nuclear glow” that TV cameras panned AWAY FROM while purporting to show what was happening at the WTC. "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 that I have significant issues with What Really Happened From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert) Arctic Beacon Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11 Break for News Tom Flocco Democratic/Progressive News Sites, Blogs and Miscellaneous Links Buzzflash The Raw Story Democratic Underground Progressive Independent Think Progress Citizens for a Legitimate Government Common Dreams Consortium News Center for Cooperative Research Cursor Guerrilla News Online Journal The Memory Hole Information Clearing House Press Action News from Babylon Unknown News TV News Lies After Downing Street Eschaton Daily Kos Talking Points Memo Hullabaloo Billmon The Brad Blog Jesus' General The Rude Pundit The Poor Man Juan Cole (Informed Comment) Today in Iraq Antiwar.com Iraq Coalition Casualties Constant Pated Clusterfuck Nation Donkey Rising Salon Slate My Other Blogs Humint Events Online THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! Bush Administration War Criminals Fake Opposition Democrats Al-CIA-duh Ghost Plane Flight 93 Hoax

So-- we have seen now that “surfing the collapse” is not as the regime wishes to have it depicted. Many floors of “surfing” are missing, and ending up atop the rubble— with a huge building “collapsing” on top of you— is incredulous. Also we see that firemen’s accounts of the upward wind of final collapse fits well with my nuclear destruction scenario, but it impossible with the OCT, as there would be no wind until the pancaking floors hit that level, and that would have been a downward wind. posted by spooked @ 4:54 AM

<< Home

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/03/further-observations-on-wtc1-stairwell.html[07.11.2010 15:11:32]

World Trade Center Demolition: Further Observations on WTC1 Stairwell B

Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11 Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece Flight 93 article and picture gallery Miscellaneous Items of Interest CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops US National Debt Clock The American Taliban Peak Oil and Sustainability/Environmental Sites The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas The Oil Drum Land of Black Gold Flying Talking Donkey Life After the Oil Crash Richard Heinberg Grist

The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/03/further-observations-on-wtc1-stairwell.html[07.11.2010 15:11:32]

World Trade Center Demolition: Further Observations on WTC1 Stairwell B

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/03/further-observations-on-wtc1-stairwell.html[07.11.2010 15:11:32]

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful