The American Standard of Jurisdictional Hierarchy1

FIRST AND FOREMOST:2 CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF RECORD3 SECOND: SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES THIRD: DISTRICT COURT OF UNITED STATES FOURTH: STATE SUPERIOR COURTS FIFTH: MUNICIPAL COURTS

___________________THE SUPREME AUTHORITY__________________ America is the “one Nation under God” and undividable from God, with liberty and justice4 for all.5 The word “America” derives from the Gothic Amalric, which means "Kingdom of Heaven."
1

axiom (plural axioms) 1. (philosophy) A self-evident and necessary truth; a proposition which it is necessary to take for granted; a proposition whose truth is so evident that no reasoning or demonstration can make it plainer. For example, "The whole is greater than a part."

2

--------COURT OF RECORD---------| COMMON LAW | V V STATE INFERIOR SUPREME COURT<----???------FEDERAL SUPREME COURT | | V V STATE INFERIOR APPELLATE COURT FEDERAL APPELLATE COURT | | V V STATE INFERIOR TRIAL COURT FEDERAL TRIAL COURT
3

Even the Supreme Court may not review a Court of Record's decision.

4

Justice is the concept of moral rightness based on ethics, rationality, law, natural law, religion, fairness, or equity 5 Genesis 12:1-3 states, 1 The LORD had said to Abram, “Go from your country, your people and your father’s household to the land I will show you. 2 “I will make you into a great nation, and I will bless you; I will make your name great, and you will be a blessing. 3 I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you.”

America is the God-chosen land for God’s People. Accordingly, America knows no higher authority than the one and only Lord God Almighty, our Creator (“God”). “God’s Law Rules in America!” In God’s Holy Word of Truth, the Bible, “all men are created equal.” This means that all men are equally given liberty to the right of choice. Given the liberty and right to govern one’s self, to choose right from wrong, good over evil, and at the end of his life, to answer to God in judgment of his or her choices made accordingly. The first written Laws by God given to man is the “Ten Commandments”. God is supreme; therefore, the Ten Commandments and all other Laws of God given us in his Holy Bible is the Supreme Law of the Land. God enjoys “Supreme” authority to enter final judgment on man for his or her choices made in his or her life which was provided by God. __SUPERIOR JURISDICTION, de Jure6 ~ The People ~ A Citizen, sui Juris et de Jure__ There are two classes of “citizens” within the several states of the United States. God’s People,7 the Sovereign8 Competent Rulers of the one Nation under God9, America, as the posterity of the “We, the People”, are the “governing authorities”; a race that believes in God; Sovereign; People whose allegiance is to only their Country of the one nation of people that believe in God, America. The “founding fathers” were charged by God to establish the Common Law of the Land10 for the
6 De jure (in Classical Latin de iure) is an expression that means "concerning law", as contrasted with de facto, which means "concerning fact".

Romans 13:1-7 states, “Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves. For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and he will commend you. For he is God's servant to do you good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword for nothing. He is God's servant, an agent of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer. Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also because of conscience. This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God's servants, who give their full time to governing. Give everyone what you owe him: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor.”
8

7

sovereign - greatest in status or authority or power; "a supreme tribunal" God is the Creator of all things, but only Master by choice. A maxim of the law is well defined: "A maxim of law is an established principle or proposition. A principle of law universally admitted, as being just and consonant. They are principles and authorities, and part of the general customs or common law of the land; and are of the same strength as acts of parliament. [or of a legislature.] Maxims of the law

9

10

“governing agencies” to uphold and defend in their sworn duty to serve and to protect the life, liberty and property of the people of this one Nation under God. Accordingly, the “framers” established “regular11 process12” Law, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution for the United States of America and its first ten amendments, the Bill of Rights and all Laws established prior to and through the year of 1861 A.D. In 1861 A.D., the de Jure Congress of the People, de Jure, was removed from office with force by non- de Jure adversaries, the “governing agencies”, de facto, that desired to control America and the American People, the “Governing Authorities” over them. The governing agencies are individuals, persons and citizens, de facto, of inferior jurisdiction, established by the Governing Authorities to serve and to protect the people. However, such adversarial act had no Lawful effect on the status and standing of the American people, the Citizens, de Jure, established by Law. 13 Therefore, the Common Law of the Land is the Supreme Law of the sovereign body governing authorities, God’s People. The People enjoy “Superior” jurisdiction and justice by the Due Process Common Law administered in a Constitutional14 Court of Record,15 the court of justice of the Sovereign, a supreme tribunal. Superior Jurisdiction, de Jure; The Governing Authorities, Competent Rulers established by God
are holden for law, and all other cases that may be applied to them shall be taken for granted. The alterations of any of the maxims of the common law are dangerous." [Emphasis added.] Bouvier’s Law Dictionary. A maxim of law is an established principle or proposition. A principle of law universally admitted, as being a correct statement of the law, or as agreeable to natural reason. Coke defines a maxim to be a ‘conclusion of reason,’ and says that it is so called ‘quia maxima ejus dignitas et certissima auctoritas, et quid maxime omnibus probetur’. Co. Litt. 11a. He says in another place: ‘A maxim is a proposition to be of all men confessed and granted without proof, argument, or discourse’." Id. 67a.
11

Regular. Conformable to law. Not subject to irrational or unexplained variation. – Black’s Law Dictionary 4th ed., p. 1450.
12

Regular process. Such as which emanates, lawfully and in a proper cause, from a court or magistrate processing jurisdiction. –Black’s Law Dictionary 4th ed. P., 1370. 13 The Lawful governing authorities of America, the Naturalized Citizens, de Jure, pursuant to the Law of the Land as defined in the Naturalization Act of 1802.
14

“Constitutional courts exercise the judicial power described in Art. III of the Constitution; legislative courts do not and cannot.” Northern Pipeline Const. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50, 106 (1982) (Justice White dissenting).
15

Article III court (Also called constitutional court). --Random House Webster’s Law Dictionary It is undisputed that a constitutional court is a court that is ESTABLISHED by the National constitution under Article III or perhaps by a valid Organic State Constitution. California courts were established by the state legislature NOT by any Constitution. They are not “unconstitutional,” they are “non-constitutional.” Even U.S. Bankruptcy courts are not Article III “judicial” courts, nor are bankruptcy court judges Article III considered to be “judges.” See Northern Pipeline v. Marathon Pipeline. 458 U.S. 50 (1982), which was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that Article III jurisdiction could not be conferred on non-Article III courts (i.e. courts without the independence and protection given to Article III judges).

___INFERIOR16 JURISDICTION, de facto17 ~ Individuals ~ Persons ~ Citizens of U.S.___ Individuals who claim to be citizens of the United States. All citizens and individual persons that submit to man’s de facto laws, known as public or private statutes,18 codes, ordinances, and regulation, also known as “color of law”, are citizens, de facto. All laws, de facto, established by a de facto Congress post 1861 A.D. and all non-naturalized 14th Amendment19 citizens, de facto. All corporations, agencies and all persons who have sworn an official oath to serve and protect the People and uphold the People’s Constitution for the United States, such official oath possessing the

16

Legislative courts are of an inferior nature and they are administrative agencies NOT judicial bodies: In the Encyclopedia of the American Constitution, UCLA Law Professor Emeritus Kenneth L. Karst writes: “In essence a legislative court is merely an administrative agency with an elegant name. While Congress surely has the power to transfer portions of the business of the federal judiciary to legislative courts, a wholesale transfer of that business would work a fundamental change in the status of our independent judiciary and would seem vulnerable to constitutional attack.” --From the Encyclopedia of the American Constitution, MacMillan Publishing Co. (1986), volume 3, page 1144. Case law confirms: “When enforcing mere statutes, judges of all courts do not act judicially, (and thus are not protected by “qualified” or “limited immunity,”) --SEE: Owen v. City, 445 U.S. 662; Bothke v. Terry, 713 F2d 1404) but merely act as an extension as an agent for the involved agency -- but only in a “ministerial” and not a “discretionary capacity...” Thompson v. Smith, 154 S.E. 579, 583; Keller v. P.E., 261 US 428; F.R.C. v. G.E., 281, U.S. 464. De facto is a Latin expression that means "by [the] fact." In law, it means "in practice but not necessarily ordained by law" or "in practice or actuality, but without being officially established." It is commonly used in contrast to de jure (which means "concerning the law") when referring to matters of law, governance, or technique (such as standards) that are found in the common experience as created or developed without or contrary to a regulation. When discussing a legal situation, de jure designates what the law says, while de facto designates action of what happens in practice.
18 17

"Statutes are public or private. A private statute is one which concerns only certain designated individuals, and effects only their private rights. All other statutes are public, in which are included statutes creating or effecting corporations." C.C.P. 18951899, 1898.
19

Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution (1792): “No person shall ...be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law...” The exact phrase is used in the 14th Amendment, but because of the legitimate suspicions concerning the validity of its ratification then there is no reason to associate it with the organic Constitution or any valid Law of the Land. Law of the Land: Due Process of law. Magna Charta, c. 29... In American law, this has become a common phrase in state constitutions and bills of rights. Its original is the “lex terra” of Magna Charta, which Lord Coke has construed to mean “due process of law;” and this construction seems to have been adopted in the constitution of the United States, in which the latter phrase is used. (Burrill’s Law Dictionary 1851 ed.).

three primary attributes of an official oath.20 All citizens, non-de Jure, that do not meet the Lawful requirements of the Naturalization Act of 1802. All these persons, individuals and citizens of the United States of America have limited21 “Inferior” jurisdiction and are subject to justice in the corporate United States Inferior courts,22 i.e. lower legislative non-justice courts such as municipal, state and district courts23. Inferior Jurisdiction, de facto; ___________________ALIEN24 JURISDICTION, de facto ~ Aliens_________________ All incompetent individuals; Those who reject God, His authority and Governing Authorities and have sworn their allegiance ‘in fact’ to an entity or country other than America. An example would

20

A valid official oath of office possesses three primary attributes: 1) An official oath bears the name of the agency of which you will be employed while providing service to the People. 2) It bears a seal of record, and such record of a third party able to be viewed to evidence the actual date and time the official oath was confirmed by the public servant. 3) It bears the phrase “so help me God”, NOT “so do I affirm”.
21

IX & X Amendments of the Bill of Rights - The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
22 Article I court (Also called legislative court) - a specialized court that is quasijudicial and quasi-administrative in nature, created by Congress as an extension of its legislative power under Article I of the Constitution rather than as an organ of the judicial branch of government under Article III. Examples include the Tax Court, bankruptcy courts, and territorial courts. According to the California Constitution, the district courts are “legislative courts” as defined above, and as such, are inferior, nonconstitutional, non-judicial courts. 23

Case cites in support of the administrative nature of the DISTRICT COURT: "It is well settled in administrative law that: "It is the accepted rule, not only in state courts, but, of the federal courts as well, that when a judge is enforcing administrative law they are described as mere ‘extensions of the administrative agency for superior reviewing purposes’ as a ministerial clerk for an agency..." 30 Cal. 596; 167 Cal 762. "A judge ceases to sit as a judicial officer because the governing principals of administrative law provides that courts are prohibited from substituting their evidence, testimony, record, arguments and rationale for that of the agency. Additionally, courts are prohibited from their substituting their judgements for that of the agency."* AISI v. U.S., 568 F.2d 284. *[This case cite may be erroneous.] ". . . judges who become involved in enforcement of mere statutes (Public or Private, civil or criminal in nature), act as mere "clerks" of the involved agency..." K.C. Davis., ADMIN. LAW, Ch. 1 (CTP. West’s 1965 Ed.)

24

foreigner: a person who comes from a foreign country; someone who does not owe allegiance to your country.

be the members of the British Accreditation Registry 25 (“BAR”) such as magistrates and attorneys.26 When any one submits to be represented by an attorney, that person submits to an alien for representation. Attorneys are not authorized to represent human beings.27 If a human being submits to be “re-presented” by a BAR attorney, such submits himself to the lowest level of jurisdiction possible in America. Another would be entities or persons ‘impersonating a public servant’ absent a valid official oath28 of office possessing the three officially required elements. Others include, but are not limited to, atheists, Satan worshipers and all other anti-God inhabitants residing within the boundaries of America. All aliens are subject to the “Inferior” jurisdiction of the lower administrative / legislative non-justice courts of the corporate United States and States. Alien Jurisdiction, de facto

25

A traitor is a double-crosser: a person who says one thing and does another.

26

In law, treason is the crime that covers some of the more serious acts of betrayal of one's sovereign or nation.
27

It is a clearly established principle of law that an attorney must represent a corporation, it being incorporeal and a creature of the law. An attorney representing an artificial entity must appear with the corporate charter and law in his hand. A person acting as an attorney for a foreign principal must be registered to act on the principal’s behalf. See, Foreign Agents Registration Act (22 USC § 612 et seq.); Victor Rabinowitz et. at. v. Robert F. Kennedy, 376 US 605. Failure to file the "Foreign Agents Registrations Statement" goes directly to the jurisdiction and lack of standing to be before the court, and is a felony pursuant to 18 USC §§ 219, 951. The conflict of law, interest and allegiance is obvious.
28

The maxims of the law included herein ARE the law that public servants are bound by oath to uphold, and as such they are also essential to the due process of law, the People’s right to which they are also bound by oath to the Constitution for the United States of America to uphold under the due process clause of the Fifth and the Fourteenth Amendments. Due process of law. Law in its regular course of administration through courts of justice. Due process of law in each particular case means such an exercise of the powers of the government as the settled maxims of law permit and sanction, and under such safeguards for the protection of individual rights as those maxims prescribe for the class of cases to which the one in question belongs. --Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Ed., page 500: Therefore, when the California Code declares that included in the public statutes are those statutes creating or affecting corporations, it means that those statutes creating or affecting corporations are the ONLY statutes known as public statutes, and that those statutes can create, affect and be applied only to, corporations. Or as the supporting case law confirms, "Where a statute, specifies certain things," such as the statutes creating or affecting corporations, "the designation of such things," the corporate statutes, "excludes all others." According to California law, no other statutes can be contained in the California public statutes than those statutes that create or affect corporations. Nothing more, not one word, can be added to the legislature’s plain language declaring their legislative intent clearly and inclusively. This is known as “Black Letter Law.” And since this conclusive presumption is rooted in a maxim of the law, it is to be granted, accepted and applied without proof, argument or discourse, discourse meaning "conversation" or "talk." The matter is settled and there is nothing to even talk about. Any violation of this proposition would be a violation of the law.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful