Consiliul Naţional de Etică a Cercetării Ştiinţifice, Dezvoltării Tehnologice şi Inovării (CNECSDTI) din România este un organism consultativ, fără personalitate juridică, pe lângă autoritatea de stat pentru cercetare – dezvoltare (art. 5-8 din Legea 206/2004). Secretariatul tehnic al CNECSDTI este asigurat de Ministerul Educației și Cercetării.
CNE are ca atribuţie principală analiza sesizărilor de abateri de la normele de bună conduită în activitatea de cercetare-dezvoltare, şi în cazurile în
Consiliul Naţional de Etică a Cercetării Ştiinţifice, Dezvoltării Tehnologice şi Inovării (CNECSDTI) din România este un organism consultativ, fără personalitate juridică, pe lângă autoritatea de stat pentru cercetare – dezvoltare (art. 5-8 din Legea 206/2004). Secretariatul tehnic al CNECSDTI este asigurat de Ministerul Educației și Cercetării.
CNE are ca atribuţie principală analiza sesizărilor de abateri de la normele de bună conduită în activitatea de cercetare-dezvoltare, şi în cazurile în
Consiliul Naţional de Etică a Cercetării Ştiinţifice, Dezvoltării Tehnologice şi Inovării (CNECSDTI) din România este un organism consultativ, fără personalitate juridică, pe lângă autoritatea de stat pentru cercetare – dezvoltare (art. 5-8 din Legea 206/2004). Secretariatul tehnic al CNECSDTI este asigurat de Ministerul Educației și Cercetării.
CNE are ca atribuţie principală analiza sesizărilor de abateri de la normele de bună conduită în activitatea de cercetare-dezvoltare, şi în cazurile în
wt) MINSTERUL CIRCETARL,NOVARE §DIGITALIZARIL
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARI STINTIFICE, DEZVOLTARIL
TEHNOLOGICE $1 INOVARIL
HOTARARE
Nr. 4 din data de 28.01.2021
Consiliul National de Eticd a Cercetarii Stiintifice, Dezvoltarii Tehnologice si
Inovarii (CNECSDTI);
Avand in vedere prevederile prevederile art. 4? alin. (2) si (7), art. 7 lit. f) si f),
art. 11 alin. (5) si art. 14 din Legea nr. 206/2004 privind buna conduit in cercetarea
stiintificd, dezvoltarea tehnologica si inovare;
in temeiul prevederilor art. 4 lit. (d) si (e) si art. 25-27 din Regulamentul de
organizare si functionare a Consiliului National de Etici a Cercetirii Stiintifice,
Dezvoltirii Tehnologice si Inovarii, aprobat prin Ordinul MEC nr. 5885/2020;
Luand in considerare Raportul Final nr. 4/15.01.2021;
HOTARASTE
Articol unic: Se aprobd Raportul Final nr. 4 din data de 15.01.2021 privind
solutionarea Sesizdrilor inregistrate la CNECSDTI cu nr. 80/20.09.2017 $i
183/7.11.2016, cu Adresa de revenire nr. 738/3.09.2020, de la Revista 22 vs. prof. univ.
dr. Ramona Lile - rector al Universitatii ,,Aurel Viaicu” din Arad, conform Anexei 1
parte integranté din prezenta hotdrdre.
Cu respectarea prevederilor art. 4 lit. (d) si (e) si art. 27 alin. (2) din Regulament,
prezenta hotdrare se transmite in vederea avizarii de catre Compartimentul juridic din
cadrul MCID, in conformitate cu prevederile art.323 alin.(3) din Legea nr.1/2011, si
ulterior se transmite petentului si Universitatii ,,Aurel Vlaicu” din Arad.
De asemenea, prezenta hotdrére se publicd ulterior pe site-ul web
htt cnecsdti.research.gov
Presedinte CNECSDTI,
io
a": i
Dacian Dragoswt) MINSTERUL CIRCETARL,NOVARE §DIGITALIZARIL
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARI STINTIFICE, DEZVOLTARIL
TEHNOLOGICE $1 INOVARIL
Raport final nr. 4/15.01.2021
privind solutionarea Sesizarilor inregistrate la CNECSDTI cu nr. 80/20.09.2017 si
183/7.11.2016, cu Adresa de revenire nr. 738/3.09.2020
de la Revista 22 vs. prof. univ. dr. Ramona Lile - rector al Universitatii ,,Aurel Vlaicu”
din Arad (UAV)
1. Sinteza continutului sesizarilor
Consiliul National de Eticd a Cercetérii Stiintifice, Dezvoltarii Tehnologice si Inovarii
(CNECSDTI) a primit Sesizarea nr. 80/20.09.2017 referitoare la presupuse abateri de la normele
de bund conduita in activitatea de cercetare stiintifica (plagiat) prezentate intr-un numar de 12
lucrari, volume si articole avand ca autor/coautor pe d-na prof.univ.dr. Ramona Lile, rector al
Universitatii , Aurel Viaicu” din Arad.
Sesizarea nr. 80/20.09.2017 este formulata si semnata in calitate de petent de catre
Revista 22, editatd de Grupul pentru Dialog Social din Bucuresti, reprezentatd prin redactor sef
Andreea Pora. Petentul solicit’ informatii despre stadiul Sesizarii nr. 183/7.11.2016 de la
CNECSDTI cu privire la cazul de plagiat multiplu al prof. univ. dr. Ramona Lile , rector al
Universitatii ,,Aurel Viaicu” din Arad.
in Sesizarea nr. 80/20.09.2017 petentul afirma ca in urma anchetelor realizate si
publicate de Revista 22, s-a constatat ci Rectorul Universitatii ,Aurel Viaicu” din Arad - d-na
prof. univ. dr. Ramona Lile a plagiat in cel putin 12 lucrari, volume si articole copiate ,,ad
litteram”. in textul petitiei se face trimitere (pag. 1) la un numar de 12 lucrari, volume gi articole
copiate ,,ad litteram”. Se constat c3 opisul lucrarilor de la pag. 2 si 3 reda ins un numar de
11, din care 4 sunt volume si 7 sunt articole (conform tab. 1). In urma verificarii s-a constatat c&
tot 11 materiale sunt scanate in format pdf. incarcate pe platforma Forum CNECSDTI.
in Sesizarea nr. 80/20.09.2017 se precizeaza cd Rectorul Universitatii ,Aurel Viaicu” din
Arad - prof. univ. dr. Ramona Lile a fost sanctionata de c&tre CNECSDTI in anul 2012 cu
avertisment scris si retragerea unor lucrari, conform Hotdrarii CNE nr. 946/05.09.2012 si
Raportului final 945 din 05.09.2012 _publicate pe site CNECSDTI la
adresa http-//cnecsdti.research.gov.ro/hotarari/.
in Sesizarea nr. 80/20.09.2017, la pag. 3, petentul precizeaza cA, initial, dosarul a fost
depus la CNADTCU (dosar nr. 16.086/2.06.2016), care a comunicat cA acest caz este de
competenta CNECSDTI.
Prin Adresa n. 738/3.09.2020, petenta Revista 22 a revenit asupra SesizSrii nr.
80/20.09.2017 de la Revista 22 vs. prof. univ. dr. Ramona Lile - rector al Universitatii ,,Aurel
2wt) MINSTERUL CARCETARIJNOWARE $ DIGITALIZA
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARI STHNTIFICE, DEZVOLTARIL
TEHNOLOGICE SI INOVARIL
Viaicu” din Arad, mentionand faptul c& la nivelul comisiei de etic’ a UAV sesizarile depuse de
petent’ au fost respinse, aceasteia nepermitandu-i-se accesul la hotirarile si rapoartele
comisiei de eticd a UAV.
in temeiul prevederilor art. 4 din din Anexa 1 din Ordinul MEC nr. 5585/18.09.2020
privind aprobarea Regulamentului de organizare si functionare al Consiliului National de Etic’
a Cercetarii Stiintifice, Dezvoltarii Tehnologice si Inovarii, precum si a componentei nominale a
acestuia, CNECSDTI constata ca obiectul sesizarii, - existenta unei suspiciuni de plagiat
constituie una din atributiile sale legale si are competenta material de solutionare a Sesizarilor
inregistrate la CNECSDTI cu nr. 80/20.09.2017 si 183/7.11.2016 de la Revista 22 vs. prof. univ.
dr. Ramona Lile - rector al Universitatii ,,Aurel Viaicu” din Arad.
2. Analiza informatiilor, documentelor
2.1. Temei legal
jn temeiul prevederilor art. 7 din Legea nr. 206/2004, a art. 4 din Regulamentul de
organizare si functionare al CNECSDTI, aprobat prin Ordinul MEC nr. 5585/2020, si a Deciziei
Presedintelui CNECSDTI nr. 1/18.10.2020 de repartizare a sesizarilor, si a Ghidului de integritate
in cercetarea stiintificd. aprobat de CNECSDTI in data de 12.11.2020, expertii CNECSDT! au
procedat la analiza documentelor primite in cadrul sesizarii
robelor materiale din continutul sesizdrilor
2.2. Documente analizate
jn temeiul prevederilor art. 7 din Legea nr. 206/2004 si a art. 4 din Regulamentul de
organizare si functionare al CNECSDTI aprobat prin Ordinul MEC nr. 5585/2020, expertii
CNECSDTI au procedat la analiza urmatoarelor documente:
- Sesizarea nr. 183/7.11.2016 de la Revista 22 vs. prof. univ. dr. Ramona Lile - rector
al Universitatii ,, Aurel Viaicu” din Arad, cu urmatoarele anexe:
Ramona Lile, Curriculum vitae Europass 2015 (7 pag.);
- Ramona Lile, Activitate stiintifica - Lucrari reprezentative (22 pag.);
- Raport final CNECSDTI nr. 945/05.09.2012 privind solutionarea sesizarilor
574/21.05.2012 si 770/06.06.2012 (4 pag.);
- Hotrarea Senatului nr. 175/25 iulie 2016 privind Raportul Comisiei de Etica nr.
25/22 iulie 2016 si 26/22 iulie 2016;
- Hotrarea Senatului nr. 174/25 iule 2016 privind modificarea componentei
Comisiei de Etica ;
Revista 22 nr. 68/19 aprilie 2016: Andreea Pora, Silvia Simion, Dora Vulcan,
Rectorul Ramona Lile, doctor in plagiat (editia print);
3MINSTERLLCERCETARINOVARE $i DIGITALIZARIL
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARI §THNTIFICE, DEZVOLTARIL
TEHNOLOGICE SI INOVARIL
Revista 22 nr. 72/17 mai 2016: Andreea Pora, Dora Vulcan, Ramona Lile si
managementul plagiatului (editia on-line);
Revista 22 nr. 39/27 septembrie 2016 (editia print);
Volume suspecte de plagiat:
Gheorghe Gh. lonescu, Ramona Lile, Management general, Editura
Universit&tii ,Aurel Viaicu" Arad, 2009, 237 pag. ISBN: 978-973-752-358-
7, copy from Gheorghe Gh. lonescu, Emil Cazacu, Adina Letitia Negrusa,
Management organizational, Tribuna economic’, Bucuresti, 2001, 586
pag., ISBN: 973-8257-42-5;
Ramona Lile, Managementul calitaii si standardizare, Editura Mirton,
Timisoara, 2008, 299 pag., ISBN :978-973-52-0490-7 autocopy;
Ramona Lile, Calitatea si managementul calitétii, Editura Mirton,
Timisoara, 2010, 329 pag. ISBN: 978-973-52-0940-7 autocopy;
Ramona Lile, Adrian Lile, Managementul calitéti, Editura Mirton,
Timisoara, 2011, 329 pag. ISBN:978-973-52-1 181-3 autocopy;
Articole suspecte de plagiat:
Ramona ile, Leonard Balan, Managementul productiei, Editura
Universitatii Aurel Vlaicu", 2008, pp.75-77, copy from Emil Cazan,
Gh.Gh.lonescu, Valentin Munteanu, Adina Letitia Negrusa,
Managementul productiei, vol.1, 2002, pp. 279-281;
Radu Cureteanu, Florin Isac, Ramona Lile, Tendintele inovérii privind
tehnologiile informatiei si comunicérii, Analele Universitatii ,Constantin
Brancusi" Tg.Jiu, Seria Economie, nr.4/2010 pp. 255-260, copy from
Global SWOT Analysis, a report produced for TOUREG Project by the
Department of tourism Management of the Alexander Technological
Educational Institute of Thessaloniki Greece and the Technical University
of Crete, Greece, Oct. 2009, pp.46-59
Leonard Sergiu Balan, Ramona Lile, Organizational Cultures, in
Management agricol, Seria |, voi. XV(2), Banat University of Agricultural
and Veterinary Medicine Timisoara, Editura Agroprint, 2013, pp.257-263,
copy from Diana C.Pheysey, Organizational Cultures, Routledge, London
and New York, 1993, pp.1-64 ;
Ramona Lile, Leonard Balan Sergiu, Total Quality Management and the
Development of Competing Values Framework in Management agricol,
Seria |, voi. XV 1(2), Banat University of Agricultural and Veterinary
4MINSTERLLCERCETARINOVARE $i DIGITALIZARIL
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARI §THNTIFICE, DEZVOLTARIL
TEHNOLOGICE SI INOVARIL
Medicine Timisoara, Editura Agroprint, 2014, pp.229-231, copy from Kim
S. Cameron, Robert E.Quin, Diagnosing and Changing Organizational
Culture, Revised edition, B.Jossey-Bass, a Wiley Imprint, 2006, pp.31-51;
Leonard Sergiu Balan, Ramona Lile, The Relation Between Business Case
and Knowledge Management, Management agricol, vol. XVI (2), Banat
University of Agricultural and Veterinary Medicine Timisoara, Editura
Agroprint, 2014, pp.232-235, copy from Dale Neef, Managing Corporate
Reputation and Risk. A Strategic Approach using Knowledge
Management, Elsevier, 2003, pp.16-135;
Ramona Lile, Adrian Lile, Managing the Innovation, In: Theoretical
Developments in Contemporary Economics, Timisoara, Editura Mirton,
2008, p. 66-76, copy from John Bessant, High-Involvement Innovation,
Building and Sustaining Competitive Advantage through Continuous
Change, Chichester, England, Willey, 2003;
Ramona Lile, Adrian Lile, Organization for Quality. In: Theoretical
Developments in Contemporary Economics, Timisoara, Mirton, 2008.
p.201-208, copy from John S. Oakland, Total Quality Management-text
with cases, Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann-£lsevier, Linacre House,
2003.
- Sesizarea nr. 80/20.09.2017 de la Revista 22 vs. prof. univ. dr. Ramona Lile - rector al
Universit&tii ,,Aurel Viaicu” din Arad, cu urmatoarele anexe:
- Volume suspecte de plagiat:
Gheorghe Gh. lonescu, Ramona Lile, Management general, Editura
Universitatii ,Aurel Vlaicu" Arad, 2009, 237 pag. ISBN: 978-973-752-358-
7, copy from Gheorghe Gh, lonescu, Emil Cazacu, Adina Letitia Negrusa,
Management organizational, Tribuna economic’, Bucuresti, 2001, 586
pag., ISBN: 973-8257-42-5;
Ramona Lile, Managementul calitatii si standardizare, Editura Mirton,
Timisoara, 2008, 299 pag., ISBN :978-973-52-0490-7 autocopy;
Ramona Lile, Calitatea si managementul calitdtii, Editura Mirton,
Timisoara, 2010, 329 pag. ISBN: 978-973-52-0940-7 autocopy;
Ramona Lile, Adrian Lile, Managementul calitdtii, Editura Mirton,
Timisoara, 2011, 329 pag. ISBN:978-973-52-| 181-3 autocopy;
Articole suspecte de plagiat:MINSTERLLCERCETARINOVARE $i DIGITALIZARIL
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARI §THNTIFICE, DEZVOLTARIL
TEHNOLOGICE SI INOVARIL
Ramona Lile, Leonard Balan, Managementul productiei, Editura
Universitatii Aurel Vlaicu", 2008, pp.75-77, copy from Emil Cazan,
Gh.Gh.lonescu, Valentin Munteanu, Adina Letitia Negrusa,
Managementul productiei, vol.1, 2002, pp. 279-281;
Radu Cureteanu, Florin Isac, Ramona Lile, Tendintele inovérit privind
tehnologiile informatiei si comunicérii, Analele Universitatii_,Constantin
Brancusi" Tg.Jiu, Seria Economie, nr.4/2010 pp. 255-260, copy from
Global SWOT Analysis, a report produced for TOUREG Project by the
Department of tourism Management of the Alexander Technological
Educational institute of Thessaloniki Greece and the Technical University
of Crete, Greece, Oct. 2009, pp.46-59
Leonard Sergiu Balan, Ramona Lile, Organizational Cultures, in
Management agricol, Seria |, voi. XV(2), Banat University of Agricultural
and Veterinary Medicine Timisoara, Editura Agroprint, 2013, pp.257-263,
copy from Diana C.Pheysey, Organizational Cultures, Routledge, London
and New York, 1993, pp.1-64 ;
Ramona Lile, Leonard Balan Sergiu, Total Quality Management and the
Development of Competing Values Framework in Management agricol,
Seria |, voi. XV 1(2), Banat University of Agricultural and Veterinary
Medicine Timisoara, Editura Agroprint, 2014, pp.229-231, copy from Kim
S. Cameron, Robert E.Quin, Diagnosing and Changing Organizational
Culture, Revised edition, B.Jossey-Bass, a Wiley Imprint, 2006, pp.31-51;
Leonard Sergiu Balan, Ramona Lile, The Relation Between Business Case
and Knowledge Management, Management agricol, vol. XVI (2), Banat
University of Agricultural and Veterinary Medicine Timisoara, Editura
Agroprint, 2014, pp.232-235, copy from Dale Neef, Managing Corporate
Reputation and Risk. A Strategic Approach using Knowledge
Management, Elsevier, 2003, pp.16-135;
Ramona Lile, Adrian Lile, Managing the Innovation, In: Theoretical
Developments in Contemporary Economics, Timisoara, Editura Mirton,
2008, p. 66-76, copy from John Bessant, High-Involvement Innovation,
Building and Sustaining Competitive Advantage through Continuous
Change, Chichester, England, Willey, 2003;
Ramona Lile, Adrian Lile, Organization for Quality. \n: Theoretical
Developments in Contemporary Economics, Timisoara, Mirton, 2008.
6wt) MINSTERUL CERCETARILINOVARE $i DIGITALIZARIL
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARII STINTIFICE, DEZVOLTARI
TEHNOLOGICE SI INOVARII
p.201-208, copy from John S. Oakland, Total Quality Management-text
with cases, Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann-Elsevier, Linacre House,
2003.
- Adresa CNECSDTI nr. 80/20.09.2017 catre petent Revista 22, prin care se confirma
primirea Sesizarii nr. 80/20.09.2017;
- Adresa CNECSDTI nr. 332/2.08.2018 cétre prof. univ. dr. ec. Ramona Lile — Rector
Universitatea ,,Aurel Viaicu” Arad, prof. univ. dr. Florentina-Daniela Munteanu - Presedinte al
Comisiei de Etic’ -Universitatea ,Aurel Vlaicu” Arad, prof. univ. dr. ing. loan Radu - Presedinte
Senat Universitatea ,Aurel Viaicu” Arad cu privire la Sesizarile inregistrate CNECSDTI cu nr.
80/20.09.2017 si nr. 183/07.11.2016, prin care s-a solicitat: - numirea unei comisii de analiza
care s& poata efectua verificarea existentei presupuselor abateri de plagiat asupra articolelor
din tabelul 1 anexat (A5-A10), in conditii de impartialitate; - transmiterea Raportul Comisiei de
eticd nr. 25/22/07.2016 si Raportul Comisiei de etic nr. 26/22.07.2016; - un punct de vedere
al doamnei prof. univ. dr. ec. Ramona Lile cu privire la materialele vizate in sesizare, inclusiv cu
privire la cele patru volume al cdror format electronic nu este disponibil inc’ membrilor
CNECSDTI.
- Adresa Universit8tii ,Aurel Viaicu” Arad nr. 434/14.12.2018 c&tre CNECSDTI prin care
a trimis atasat urmatoarele documente: - Raportul Comisiei de Eticd nr. 25/22.07.2016; -
Hotdrarea Comisiei de Etic’ nr. 26/22.07.2016; - Hotararea Senatului UAV nr. 175/25.07.2016;
- Raportul Comisiei de Eticd a UAV nr. 45/03.12.2018; - Hotdrarea Comisiei de Eticd a UAV nr.
46/03.12.2018; - Hotdrarea Senatului UAV nr. 67/05.12.2018; - Punctul de vedere al doamnei
prof.univ.dr.ec. Ramona Lile cu privire la materialele vizate in sesizare.
Raportul Comisiei de Eticd nr. 25/22.07.2016, aprobat prin Hotararea Comisiei de Etica
nr. 26/22.07.2016 a Universitatii ,Aurel Viaicu” Arad, cu privire la sesizarile de plagiat din
articolele publicate in "Revista 22" si din Adresa inregistrata la UAV cu nr. 1714/01.06.2016.
2.3. Analiza efectuata
{in baza dispozitiilor art. 4 ? alin. 5 din Legea nr. 206/2004, chiar daca nu exist o
Contestatie la Raportul Comisiei de Eticd nr. 45/03.12.2018, aprobat prin Hotararea Comisiei
de Eticd nr. 46/03.12.2018 a Universitatii ,,Aurel Vlaicu” Arad sila Raportului Comisiei de Etica
nr. 25/22.07.2016, aprobat prin Hotararea Comisiei de Eticd nr. 26/22.07.2016 a Universitatii
Aurel Vlaicu” Arad, prin autosesizare, CNECSDTI retine spre solutionare aspectele invocate
jin Sesizarile inregistrate la CNECSDTI cu nr. 80/20.09.2017 si 183/7.11.2016, cu Adresa de
revenire nr. 738/3.09.2020, de la Revista 22 vs. prof. univ. dr. Ramona Lile - rector alUniversitat
0
MINSTERLLCERCETARINOVARE $i DIGITALIZARIL
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARI STUNTIFICE, DEZVOLTARIL
TEHNOLOGICE SI INOVARIL
»Purel Viaicu” din Arad, care au facut obiectul celor 2 rapoarte ale Comisiei de
Eticd a Universitatii ,Aurel VI
u” Arad.
Constatarile expertilor CNECSDTI au fost urmatoarele:
Constatari ale analizei comparative referitoare la articolele sau volumele suspecte de
plagiat (ASP), conform petentului, evaluate de CNE in raport cu posibilele texte surs de plagiat
(Ao)
“a | Articol sau | Articol sau volum suspect de plagiat (ASP) si rezultate ale analizei
lista volum comparative ASSP -AO
‘siti | original (AO)
potent
5 AOS: Emil | ASPS: Ramona Lile, Leonard Balan, Managementul productiei, Editura
Cazan, Gh. | Universitatii Aurel Viaicu, 2008, pp. 75-77
ae Descriere.Textul suspect de plagiat ASPS cuprinde doua pagini si trei
Munteana, | Sferturi, de aproximativ 137 randuri si 857 cuvinte (conversie din
‘Adina Letitia | document imagine in document word). Mozaicarea nu se face, de
Negrusa, reguld, prin inlocuirea ci prin stergerea unor cuvinte. Textul de la pagina
Management | 75 din ASP contine formularea ,,Dimensionarea consta in determinarea
ul productiei, | celor mai importanti parametrii de functionare:”. in textul original mai
Baer erau doua cuvinte (,si anume”) la sfarsitul formularii. in articolul Lile si
Balan aceste doua cuvinte au disparut. Smilar, in original formulele
aveau o numerotare, dar in ASP aceasta nu mai apare.
Concluzie: ASPS contine cel putin un plagiat de bloc de texte de tip
mozaic, cu foarte putine stergeri sau inlocuiri de cuvinte .
Comentariu: Raportul Comisiei de Etica a Universitatii Aurel Viaicu cu
nr. 45 din 03.12.2018 apreciaza c& cele aproximativ trei pagini posibil-
plagiate din totalul de peste 500 de pagini cate are lucrare reprezint&
un procent foarte mic si, in consecint& lucrarea ASPS nu poate fi
considerat un plagiat.
Prezentul raport evalueazd textele suspecte de plagiat nu prin
raportare la o singura carte, ci prin raportare la cele sapte texte
analizate de articol sau de volum la care prof. Ramona Lile este autor
sau coautor.
80
MINSTERUL CERCETARIJNOWARE$ DIGITALIZARIT
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARI STHNTIFICE, DEZVOLTARIL
TEHNOLOGICE SI INOVARIL
jin plus, mentionam ca expertii CNECSDTI nu au dispus de o copie pdf a
intregului volum semnat de_profesorii Ramona Lile si Leonard Balan.
AO6: Global
SWOT
Analysis, a
report
produced for
TOUREG
Project by the
Departament
of tourism
Management
of the
Alexander
Technologica
1 Educational
Institute of
Thessaloniki
Greece and
Technical
of
Crete,
Greece, oct.
2009, pp. 46-
59
JASP6: Radu Cureteanu, Florin Isac, Ramona Lile, Tendinfele inovarit
privind tehnologiile informatiei si comunicarii, Analele Universit8tii
Constantin Brancusi Tg. Jiu, Seria Economie, nr.4/2010, pp. 255-260
IDescriere. Din cele sase pagini ASP6, aproximativ cinci_ sunt preluare
copy-paste din AO6. Pe fiecare pagin’ de articol sunt cate dou’
coloane, prima cu textul in romana si cea de-a doua cu textul in engleza.
Conf. Ramona Lile apare ca autor trei ,semnatar la inceputul coloanei
de articol in romina, la pag. 255. Deasupra coloanei cu textul in englez~
autorul trei este prof. asociat Adrian Lile, de la Universitatea Aurel
Vlaicu din Arad.
Concluzie: articol plagiat in proportie covarsitoare dup’ un raport de
cercetare din Greci
Comentariu: Articolul este , la data intocmirii acestei evaluari,
28.11.2020, inc disponibil pe site-ul revistei unde a fost publicat, la
https://www.utgiiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2010-
04.1/ 25 RADU CURETEANU.pdf. Raportul Comisiei de Eticd a
Universittii Aurel Viaicu cu nr. 45 din 03.12.2018 apreciaz’ cd ASP6 nu
poate fi considerat plagiat, intre altele, pentru c& fost retras de pe
internet.
Retragerea de pe internet, chiar daca ar fi fost efectiva, desi nu este,
poate reduce din efectele negative ale publicdrii unui material
publicat, dar nu anuleaz& nicicum culpa moral a plagiatului care
revine autorilor articolului.
407; Diana
C. Pheysey,
Organization
al Cultures,
Routledge,
London and
New York,
1993, pp. 1-64
ASP7: Leonard Sergiu Balan, Ramona Lile, Organizational Cultures, in
Management agricol, Seria |, vol. XV (2), Banat University of
Agricultural and Veterinary Medicine Timisoara, Editura Agroprint,
2013, pp. 257-263.
Descriere. Din cinci pagini si jumatate cat contine ASP7, patru si
jumatate sunt preluare de blocuri de texte, fara citarea sursei, din
07.
de citare, din AO7.0
MINSTERUL CERCETARIJNOWARE$ DIGITALIZARIT
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARI STHNTIFICE, DEZVOLTARIL
TEHNOLOGICE $I INOVARIL
Comentariu: in raportul Comisiei de etica de la UAV din 22.06.2018: "Se
constati cd lucrarea este plagiati si nu prezinté caracter de
originalitate si, in urma verificarilor, am constat c& lucrarea nu se mai
regaseste in revista Management Agricol.”
Pentru acest plagiat, Comisia de Etica a UAV sustine ci Leonard
Sergiu Balan si-a asumat vina ca fiind autor unic.
Nu exist, ins’, in documentul transmis la CNECSDTI de la UAV in
2018 nici un document juridic care sa certifice faptul c& un articol
semnat de catre doi autori are , in fapt, un singur autor.
Vezi anexa la raport: Trei exemple de plagiat masiv in cazul sesizarit
80
AO8: Kim S.
‘Cameron,
Robert E.
Qui
Diagnosing
and Changing
Organization
al Culture,
Revised
edition,
B.Jossy-Bass,
a Wily
Imprint,
2006, pp. 31-
51
‘ASP8. Ramona Lile, Leonard Sergiu Balan, Total Quality Management
and the Developement of Competing Values Framework, in
Management agricol, Seria |, vol.XVI (2), Banat University of
Agricultural and Veterinary Medicine Timisoara, Editura Agroprint,
2014, pp. 229-231.
Descriere: Articolul are trei pagini. Exceptand jumatate de pagin’ de
bibliografice, restul de doua pagini si jumatate sunt constituite din
blocuri de text preluate ca atare din AO8.
Concluzie: plagiat masiv, cu blocuri de texte preluate far3 nici un fel
de citare, din AO8.
Comentariu: in raportul Comisiei de etica de la UAV din 22.06.2016 ”
Se constatd cé lucrarea constituie plagiat neprezenténd caracter de
originalitate, si, in urma verificérilor am constat cd lucrarea nu se mai
regdseste in revista Management Agricol.”
Afirmatia nu poate fi sustinut’ atata timp cat si abstractul la articolul
ASP8 si concluziile sunt tot preluare exacta, fara citare din AO8.
Pentru acest plagiat, Comisia de Etica a UAV sustine ci Leonard
Sergiu Balan si-a asumat vina ca fiind autor unic.
Nu exist, ins, in documentul transmis la CNECSDTI de la UAV in
2018 nici un document juridic care s& certifice faptul c& un articol
semnat de catre doi autori are, in fapt, un singur autor.
AO9 ‘Dale
Neef,
Managing
‘ASP9: Leonard Sergiu Balan, Ramona Lile, The Relation Between
Business Case Knowledge Management, in Management agricol,
10MINSTERLLCERCETARINOVARE $i DIGITALIZARIL
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARI §THNTIFICE, DEZVOLTARIL
TEHNOLOGICE SI INOVARIL
Corporate
Reputation
and Risk. A
Strategic
Approach
using
Knowledge
Management,
Elsevier,
2003, pp. 16-
138
Seria |, vol.XVI (2), Banat University of Agricultural and Veterinary
Medicine Timisoara, Editura Agroprint, 2014, pp. 232-235
Descriere. ASP9 contine trei pagini, toate preluate, cu sumar si
concluzii, inclusive din AO9. Tot articolul este un simplu colaj de
paragrafe din Dale Neef 2003, de la paginile 123, 16, 128, 24, 37 (exact
in aceast ordine)
Concluzie: plagiat masiv, cu blocuri de texte preluate fara nici un fel
de citare, din AO9.
Comentariu: ASP7, ASP8, ASP9 au fost publicate in colaborare cu
Leonard Sergiu Balan, lector asociat |a UAV. in raportul Comisiei de
Eticé UAV din 2018 se precizeza ci "Lucrarea “The Relation Between
Business Case and Knowledge Management" (publicaté in
Management Agricol, voi. XVI, no. 2, pp. 232-235, 2014) avénd drept
autori pe Leonard Sergiu Balan si Ramona Lile, contine in proportie de
14% elemente suprapuse (din lucrarea "Managing Corporate
Reputation and Risk - Developing a Strategic Approach to Corporate
Integrity Using K.nowledge Management", Elsevier, 2003). Softul
antiplagiat a fost setat ca sd excludé referintele bibliografice si
cuvintele/frazele intre ghilimele. Se constaté ci elementele ce se
suprapun nu constituie fondul lucrarii semnate de Leonard Sergiu Bélan
si Ramona Lile, deci nu constituie plagiat.”
In realitate, nu numai 14% din textul ASP9 contine cuvinte preluate ca
atare din AOS, ci tot textul. Constituirea sumarului si a concluziilor din
ASP9 numai din paragrafe copiate din AO9 anuleazd orice pretentie c&
ar fi fost plagiate numai elemente lipsite de originalitate. in sumar si in
concluziii de articol stiintific nu se trec formuari lipsite de originalitate
in intentia autorului.
Este suficient a se vedea rezultatul comparatie dintre textul suspect de
plagiat si textul sursa semnat de catre Dale Neef, prezentat in anexa la
raport pentru a avea argumentul clar al plagiatului masiv realizat de
cdtre cei Leonard Balan si Ramona Lile prin acest articol.
Pentru acest text, Comisia de Etica a UAV sustine ci Leonard Sergiu
Balan si-a asumat _vina ca fiind autor unic.
110
MINSTERLLCERCETARINOVARE $i DIGITALIZARIL
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARI STUNTIFICE, DEZVOLTARIL
TEHNOLOGICE SI INOVARIL
Nu exist, insd, in documentul transmis la CNECSDTI de la UAV in
2018 nici un document juridic care s& certifice faptul c& un articol
semnat de ctre doi autori are , in fapt, un singur autor.
Vezi anexa la raport: Trei exemple de plagiat masiv in cazul sesizarii 80
10 | 4010:John ASP10: Ramona Lile, Adrian Lile, Managing the Innovation, In:
Bessant, Theoretical Developments in Contemporary Economics, Timisoara,
High- Editura Mirton, 2008, pp. 66-76
Involvement a a
Innovation, | Descriere. In textul scanat de la petent toate cele 6 pagini ale
Buldinng and | capitolului de carte (de la 66 la 71) sunt preluare de blocuri de text din
Sustaing A010. Lipsesc din scanare 5 pagini.
Competitive | Concluzie: plagiat masiv, cu blocuri de texte preluate fara nici un fel
Advantage de citare, iL
trough ———
Continuous
Change,
Chichester,
England,
Willey, 2003
11 | AO/I: articol | ASP11: Ramona Lile, Adrian Lile, Organization for Quality, In:
original: Theoretical Developments in Contemporary Economics, Timisoara,
Tole S-| Editura Mirton, 2008, pp. 201-208
Oakland, be . le 7 ini din ASP11 cf
Total Quality | Desctiere: toate cele 7 pagini din sunt preluate cuvant cu
Managemen | cuvant din AQ11.
text with | Comentarii: Raportul Comisiei de Etica a UAV din 2016 conchide c&
cases, ,acuzatia de plagiat nu se poate sustine, neintrunindu-se continutul
Oxford: conceptului de plagiat prevazut in Legea nr. 206/2004”.
Butterworth- ‘ aoe s e
eer” | argumentele invocate, insi, in favoarea evaluérii sunt deficitare.
Elsevier, plul fapt cd ASP11 citeaza la bibliografie AO11 nu este o proba de
Linscre citare corect. Absenta citarilor din continutul capitolului care a
House, 2003 | preluat copy-paste pagini intregi fara ghilimele si fara specificarea
paginilor de unde a fost luat textul este prob’ de malpraxis in
domeniu. Comisia nu dispune de niciun argument scris in a dovedi
afirmatia c& autorii au predat editurii timisorene o ciorn’.
Vezi anexa la raport: Trei exemple de plagiat masiv in cazul sesizarii
80.
12wt) MINSTER CERCETARYINOVARL § DIGITALIZARIT
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARII §TINTIFICE, DEZVOLTARI
TEHNOLOGICE $1 INOV ARI
2.4. Concluzii cu privire la existenta unor abateri de la buna conduita, etica si
deontologia in activitatea de cercetare-dezvoltare
2.4.1 Motivarea in fapt
1. In cadrul cercetarii abaterii prezumate s-a urméarit verificarea indeplinirii
jor stabilite in Legea nr. 206/2004 si in Legea nr. 1/2011.
2. In sase din cele sapte texte (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11) analizate au fost constatate
plagieri masive , constituite din blocuri de texte preluate, majoritar, fara modificari
ulterioare si fri citarea de rigoare prin marcare cu ghilimele a textului preluat si
indicare sursei de unde a fost selectat textul.
3. in toate cele sase cazuri, textele preluate fara respectarea normelor de
integritate in cercetarea stiintificS au fost publicate sub semnatura a cel putin dou’
cadre didactice de la Universitatea Aurel Vlaicu (UAV). Din acest punct de vedere este
vorba de sase cazuri de plagiat colectiv. Prof. Ramona Lile semneazé in calitate de
coautor toate cele sase materiale.
4. Patru dintre texte (5, 7, 8,9) sunt semnate de Ramona Lile impreuna cu
Leonard Segiu Balan, dou’ impreuné cu Adrian Lile (10,11) si unul impreuna cu Radu
Cureteanu, Florin Isac (6). in pofida formatiunilor diverse de semnare a materialelor
stilul de plagiat este acelasi: preluare fara citare a unor blocuri masive de text, plasate
uneori chiar si in rezumatul sau concluziile lucrarii; steregerea unor cuvinte de
conexiune din original; absenta unor citri in text; notarea unor referinte la bibliografie
necitate, insa in text; eliminarea graficelor care erau in original. Acest model comun
de plagiere sugereaza ca plagiatul colectiv a avut un numitor comun, fie intr-o
persoand comuni in toate echipele de semnatari, fie in cultura organizational.
5. Dup3 semnalarea in presa de catre Revista 22 a mai multor cazuri de presupus
plagiat sau autoplagiat, in 2016, Comisia de Eticd de la UAV a analizat situatia. Urmare
a sesizarilor facute de c&tre Revista 22 sila CNECSDTI, rezultatele Comisiei de ETICA
UAV din 2016 si din 2018 au ajuns si la CNECSDTI si au fost mentionate in prezentul
raport. Textele plagiate au fost publicate in perioada 2008-2016. Niciuna dintre
persoanele care s-au declarat responsabile de incalcarea deontologiei de autorat nu
s-a declarat ca autor unic al textelor colective dovedite ca plagiat, inainte de
dezvaluirile Revistei 22.
13wt) MINSTER CERCETARYINOVARL § DIGITALIZARIT
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARII §TINTIFICE, DEZVOLTARI
TEHNOLOGICE $1 INOVARI
6. Comisia de Eticé UAV sustine, in urma analizelor efectuate, cd doamna
profesoar’ Ramona Lile a fost trecuta ca autoare, pe majoritatea lucrrilor analizate,
fSr& stiinta domniei sale. in consecint’, nu propune nici o sanctiune pentru domnia sa.
Cu documentele actuale de care se dispune la CNECSDTI, acest punct de vedere nu
poate fi sustinut. Simplele declaratii ale unora dintre semnatarii materialelor marcate
de plagiat nu sunt suficiente. Declaratiile respective pot fi afectate de
interese/conflicte de interese in interiorul UAV.
7. in majoritatea cazurilor, Comisia de Eticé UAV sustine cé abaterile de la
normele de integritate au fost minore pentru cA publicatiile au fost cu scopuri
didactice sau c& textele preluate fara citare corecté aveau un grad redus de
originalitate. Nu exist’, ins3, nici o specificare in Legea nr. 206/2004 sau din Legea nr.
1/2011 prin care s& se specifice faptul cA in lucrarile cu caracter didactic plagiatul este
admis.
8. Dup’ cum s-a indicat in analiza cazuisticd, plagierea a fost facuta si
rezumate de materiale, si in concluzii si a fost atat de extinsa incat nu se mai poate
vorbi de cateva formulari secundare preluate din cunoasterea comuna. Este vorba
de unul dintre cele mai grave cazuri de plagiat din cercetarea academica romaneasca
de dup& 1989. in plus, Legea nr. 206/2004 include in definitia plagiatului nu numai
preluarea frauduloasa de idei si date ci si pe cea de cuvinte.
9. Concluziile la care au ajuns expertii din grupul de lucru 6 din CNE sunt pe
deplin consistente cu concluziile expertilor care au examinat aceleasi cazuri in cadrul
CNE existent in 2019. Analizele au fost intreprinse, de catre ambele echipe ale
CNECSDTI, pe fisierele electronice referitoare la lucrarile originale si la cele presupuse
afi plagiate asa cum au fost primite de la Revista 22.
10. Trei exemple de plagiat dintre cazurile analizate pot fi consultate in fisierul
atasat', Aceste exemple detaliazi modelul de plagiat masiv prin colaj de blocuri de
texte, foarte putin modificate.
*Trei exemple de plagiat masiv in cazul sesizarii 80 referitoare la suspiciuni de plagiat in materiale semnate cu
Ramona Lile drept coautoare. Anexa la raportul CNECSDT
14wt) MINSTERUL CERCETARIJNOWARE$ DIGITALIZARIT
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARI STHNTIFICE, DEZVOLTARIL
TEHNOLOGICE $1 INOVARIL
Luandu-se in calcul faptul cd d-na dr. Ramona Lile a mai fost sanctionata de
catre CNECSDTI in anul 2012 cu avertisment scris $i retragerea unor lucrari, conform
Hotararii CNE nr. 946/05.09.2012 si Raportului final 945 din 05.09.2012 publicate pe
site CNECSDTI la adresa http://cnecsdti.research.gov.ro/hotarari/, CNECSDTI
constata faptul ca aceasta se afla la a doua abatere de la etica.
CNECSDTI constata cd operatiunea de constatare si sanctionare a abaterilor de
la Legea nr. 206/2004 nu este supusd unui termen de prescriptie/decadere,
raspunderea persoanelor vinovate operand indiferent de trecerea timpului, fapt ce
rezulta din dispozitiile art. 14 alin. 1 2 din Legea nr. 206/2004: “indiferent de
momentul la care s-a dovedit ci o persoana a realizat abateri grave de la buna
conduita in activitatea de cercetare-dezvoltare.”
CNECSDTI se autosesizeaz’ si disjunge judecarea aspectelor cu privire la
plagiatul realizat de conf.univ.dr. Leonard-Sergiu Balan Ia ,,Universitatea Aurel
Viaicu” din Arad si cadrul didactic asociat Adrian Lile la Universitatea ,,Aurel Viaicu”
din Arad, conf.univ.dr. Florin-Lucian Isac - cadru didactic la UAV, lect.univ.dr. Radu
Cureteanu — fost cadru didactic la UAV, care va face obiectul unui raport distinct.
2.4.2 Motivarea in drept
Art. 323-324 din Legea nr. 1/2011 a educatiei nationale, cu modificarile si
completirile ulterioare, art. 7 lit. f) si f'), art. 11 alin. (5) si art. 14 din Legea nr.
206/2004 privind buna conduita in cercetarea stiintific3, dezvoltarea tehnologica si
inovare, cu modificarile si completarile ulterioare , si art. 4 lit. (d) si (e) si 25-27 din
Regulamentul de organizare si functionare al CNECSDTI, aprobat prin Ordinul MEC nr.
5585/2020.
3. Sanctiuni
jn conformitate cu prevederile art. 11 alin. 5 din Legea nr. 206/2004
privind buna conduita in cercetarea stiintificé, dezvoltarea tehnologica si
inovare, cu modificarile si completarile ulterioare, se_adi ca_fondata
autosesizarea CNECSDTI cu privire la abaterile de la eticd ale d-nei prof. univ.
dr. Ramona Lile, astfel cum se detaliaza la pct. 2.3 din prezentul raport,
15wt) Ms. RCETA.NOVARH St DIGITALIZARIL
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARI STIINTIFICE, DEZVOLTARI
TEHNOLOGICE $1 INOV ARI
mentionate in cadrul Sesizarilor_inregistrate la CNECSDTI_ cu_nr.
80/20.09.2017 si 183/7.11.2016, cu Adresa de revenire nr. 738/3.09.2020, de
la Revista 22 vs. prof. univ. dr. Ramona Lile - rector al Universitatii_,,Aurel
Vlaicu” din Arad, in lipsa unei contestatii la Rapoartele comisiei de etica a
iversi Aurel Viaicu” Arad.
Se desfiinteaza ca netemeinice concluziile referitoare la d-na prof. univ.
dr. Ramona Lile, astfel cum se detaliaza la pct. 2.3 din prezentul raport, din
cadrul_Raportului_Comisiei_de_Etica_nr. 45/03.12.2018, aprobat_prin
Hotardrea Comi de Eticd nr. 46/03.12.2018 a Universitatii , Aurel Viaicu”
Arad si din cadrul Raportului Comisiei de Eticd nr. 25/22.07.2016, aprobat
prin Hotararea Comisiei_de Eticé nr. 26/22.07.2016 a Universitatii_,Aurel
Viaicu” Arad.
in baza dizpozitiilor art. 2 alin. 1 lit b si art. 2* alin. 2 lit. a din Legea nr.
206/2004 privind buna conduit in cercetarea stiintific’, dezvoltarea
tehnologica si inovare, cu modificdrile si completarile ulterioare, CNECSDTI
constata ca d-na prof. univ. dr. Ramona Lile la Universitatea , Aurel Viaicu din
Arad” este vinovata de savarsirea plagiatului—abatere de la normele de buna
conduita in activitatea de comunicare, publicare, diseminare si popularizare
stiintificd, astfel cum se detaliaza la pct. 2.3 din prezentul raport.
Conform art. 324 alin. 1 lit. b, e sii din Legea nr. 1/2011 a educatiei
nationale, cu modificarile si completarile ulterioare, art. 14 alin. 1 lit. b, e sii
din Legea nr. 206/2004 privind buna conduita in cercetarea stiintifica,
dezvoltarea tehnologica si inovare, cu modificarile si completarile ulterioare,
avand in vedere severitatea plagiatului masiv de blocuri de texte, CNECSDTI
hotaraste si disoune urmatoarele sanctiuni ce urmeaza a fi aplicate pentru
prof. univ. dr. Ramona Lile la Universitatea , Aurel Viaicu din Arad”, conform
legii:
1,_retragerea_si/sau_corectarea_tuturor_lucrarilor_publicate_prin
incalcarea regulilor de buna conduita, astfel cum se detaliaza la pct. 2.3 din
16wt) MINSTERUL CERCETARIJNOWARE$ DIGITALIZARIT
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARI STHNTIFICE, DEZVOLTARIL
TEHNOLOGICE $1 INOVARI
prezentul raport, cu mentiunea explicitd in versiunea on-line a revistelor de
specialitate cd lucrarea respectiva a fost inlaturata/corectaté ca urmare a
Deciziei CNECSDTI de constatare si sanctionare a plagiatului;
2._retrogradarea_de la_gradul de profesor universitar_la_cel de
conferentiar universitar;
3. suspendarea, pe o perioada determinata de timp de 5 ani, a dreptului
de inscriere la un concurs pentru ocuparea unei functii superioare ori a unei
functii de conducere, de indrumare si de control sau ca membru in comisii de
concurs.
Recomandari CNECSDTI pentru Comisia de Etica a Universitatii , Aurel
Viaicu din Arad”:
- respectarea si aplicarea dispozitiilor legale din Legea nr. 206/2004 privind
buna conduita in cercetarea stiintifica, dezvoltarea tehnologicad si inovare, cu
modificarile si completarile ulterioare, fara concesii si fara a permite ingerinte ori
presiuni din partea conducerii institutiei in procesul de analiza a sesizarilor side luare
a deci:
Recomandari CNECSDTI pentru Conducerea (Rector gsi Senat)
Universitatii , Aurel Viaicu din Arad”:
- respectarea si aplicarea dispozitiilor legale din Legea nr. 206/2004 privind
buna conduita in cercetarea stiintifica, dezvoltarea tehnologicd si inovare, cu
modificdrile si completirile ulterioare, fri a manifesta ingerinte ori presiuni in
procesul de analiza a sesizrilor si de luare a deci
17[MNSTERUL CERCETARE,NOVARY § DIGITALIZARIL
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARI STHNTIFICE, DEZVOLTARIL
TEHNOLOGICE §1 INOVARIL
15.01.2021
18wt) MINSTERUL CIRCETARL,NOVARE §DIGITALIZARIL
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARI STINTIFICE, DEZVOLTARIL
TEHNOLOGICE $1 INOVARIL
ANEXA 1 Ia Raport ul final nr. 2/15.01.2021
Trei exemple de plagiat masiv in cazul sesizarii 80 referitoare la suspiciuni de
plagiat in materiale semnate cu Ramona Lile drept coautoare. Anexa la
raportul CNECSDTI
Text I in fisierul pdf, pag. II
Ramona Lile, Adrian Lile, Organization for Quality, In: Theoretical
Developments in Contemporary Economies, Timisoara, Editura Mirton, 2008,
pp. 201-208
Text Il in fisierul pdf, pag X
Leonard Sergiu Balan, Ramona Lile, Organizational Cultures, in Management
agricol, Seria I, vol. XV(2), Banat University of Agricultural and Veterinary
Medicine Timisoara, Editura Agroprint, 2013, pp. 257-263.
Text III in fisierul pdf, pag. XVI
Leonard Sergiu Balan, Ramona Lile, The Relation Between Business Case
Knowledge Management, in Management agricol, Seria I, vol.XVI (2), Banat
[University of Agricultural and Veterinary Medicine Timisoara, Editura Agroprint,
2014, pp. 232-235
Numarul de pagina este cel din lucrarea sursa pentru
plagiat de tip colaj de blocuri de texte.
19/Textul capitolului este, in intregime, un simplu colaj de blocuri de text plagiate din
Oakland, J. S. (2003). Total Quality Management: text with cases . Jordan Hill.
Paragrafele marcate prin umbrire cu galben sunt prealuate copy-paste, fara citare,
Ide la paginile indicate prin initiale autorului de text original JO si pagina p...
ORGANIZATION FOR QUALITY
Ramona Lile*, Adrian Lile
* University “Aurel Vlaicu” of Arad
Abstract: The quality function should be the
ization's focal of the integration of the business interest of
jamers and suppliers into the internal dynamics of the
mnization. In the larger organizations a quality manager will
iribute to the prevention strategy. Smaller organizations may
gint a member of the management team to this task on a part-
basis. An external TOM adviser is usually required.
The quality function and the quality manager
In many organizations management systems are
cd in terms of the internal dynamics between
eting, design, sales, —_ production/operations,
ribution, accounting, etc, A change is required from this
a larger system that encompasses and integrates the
Isiness interests of customers and suppliers. Management
eds to develop an in-depth understanding of these
ationships and how they may be used to cement the
iMtnership concept. The quality function should be the
anization’s focal point in this respect, and should be
ipped to gauge internal and external customers’
ations and degree of satisfaction. It should also
tify quality deficiencies in all business functions, and
womote improvements.
The role of the quality function is to make quality
in inseparable aspect of every employee's performance and
sponsibility, The transition in many companies’ from
lity departments with line functions will require careful
anning, direction, and monitoring. Quality professionals
ve developed numerous techniques and skills, focused on
duct or service quality. In many cases there is a need to
Publicat in Theoretical
[Developments in Contemporary
iEconomics, Mirton, Timisoara, 2008
201adapt these to broader applications. The first objectives for,
many ‘quality managers’ will be to gradually disengage
themselves from line activities, which will then need to be
dispersed throughout the appropriate operating departments.
This should allow quality to evolve into a ‘staff department
at a senior level, and to be concerned with the following
throughout the organization:
* Monitoring and evaluating the progress of quality
improvement.
+ Encouraging and facilitating quality improvement.
* Planning and providing quality training and counseling or
consultancy.
* Giving advice to management on:
(a) Establishment of quality systems and process control.
(b) Relevant statutory/legislation requirements with respect
to quality.
(c) Quality improvement programmers necessary.
(@) Inclusion of quality elements in all job instructions and
procedures.
‘* Promoting the ‘partnership’ in quality, in relations with
customers and suppliers,
* Planning, managing, auditing, and reviewing quality
systems.
Quality directors and managers have an initial task,
however, to help those who control the means to implement
this concept = the leaders of industry and commerce -to
really believe that quality must become an integral part of
all the organization's operations.
In this case has a vision of quality as a strategic
business management function that will help organizations
to change their cultures. To make this vision a reality,
quality professionals must expand the application of quality
concepts and techniques to all business processes and
functions, and develop new forms of providing assurance of
quality at every supplier-customer interface. They will need
JO p276
202know the entire cycle of products or services, from
ncept to the ultimate end user. An example of this was
bserved in the case of a company manufacturing
aceutical seals, whose customer expressed concern
it excess aluminum projecting below and round a
ficular type of seal. This was considered a cosmetic
by the immediate customer, the Health Service, but a
hazard by a blind patient ~ the customer's customer,
learly, the quality professional dealing with this problem
ded to understand the supplier's problems and the
ate customer's needs, in order to judge whether the
oduct was indeed capable of meeting the requirements,
The shift in ‘philosophy’ will require considerable
ff education in many organizations. Not only must people
‘other functions acquire quality related skills, but quality
ersonnel must change old attitudes and acquire new skills =
placing the inspection, calibration, specification-writing
ality and knowledge of defect prevention, wide ranging
lity systems design and audit. Clearly, the challenge for
ny quality professionals is not so much making changes
their organization as recognizing the changes required in
em. It is more than an overnight job to change the
litudes of an inspection police force into those of a
sultative, team-oriented improvement force. This
phasis on prevention and improvement-based systems
vates the role of quality professionals from a technical
to that of general management. A narrow departmental
of quality is totally out of place in an organization
piring to TQM, and typical quality managers will need to
iden their perspective and increase their knowledge to
ncompass all facets of the organization.
To introduce the concepts of operator self-
inspection required for TQM will require not only a
ination to implement change but sensitivity and skills
n industrial relations. This will depend very much of course
203JO p 279
JO p 280
on the climate within the organization. Those whose
management is truly concerned with co-operation and
concerned for the people will engage strong employee
support for the quality manager or director in his catalytic
role in the quality improvement implementation process.
Those with aggressive, confrontational management will
create for the quality professional impossible difficulties in
obtaining support from the 'rank and file’.
Many organizations have realized the importance of
the contribution a senior, qualified director of quality can
make to the prevention strategy. Smaller organizations may
well feel that the cost of employing a full-time quality
manager is not justified, other than in certain very high risk
areas, In these cases a member of the management team
should be appointed to operate on a part-time basis,
performing the quality management function in addition to
his/her other duties, To obtain the best results from a quality
manager, he should be given sufficient authority to take
necessary action to secure the implementation of the |
organization's quality policy, and must have the personality
to be able to communicate the message to all employees,
including staff and management. Occasionally the quality
manager may require some guidance and help on specific
technical quality matters, and one of the major attributes
required is the knowledge and wherewithal to acquire the |
necessary information and assistance.
In large organizations, then, it may be necessary to
make several specific appointments or to assign details to
certain managers. The following actions may be deemed to
be necessary.
TQM manager will be responsible for the planning
and implementation of TQM. He will be chosen first for
project management ability rather than detailed knowledge
of quality assurance matters, Depending on the and
complexity of the organization, and its previous activities in
204uality management, the position may be either full or part-
1¢, but it must report directly to the Chief Executive.
Appoint a quality management adviser was
important because a professional expert on quality
agement will be required to advise on the ‘technical!
pects of planning and implementing TQM. This is a
onsultancy role, and may be provided from within or
ithout the organization, full or part-time. This person
eeds to be a persuader, philosopher, teacher, adviser,
facilitator, reporter and motivator. He must clearly
inderstand the organization, its processes and interfaces, be
onversant with the key functional languages used in the
business, and be comfortable operating at many
izational levels. On a more general level this person
must fully understand and be an effective advocate and
acher of TQM, be flexible and become an efficient agent
of change.
Committees and teams FOR QUALITY
Devising and implementing total _ quality
Ranagement for an organization takes considerable time
bility. It must be given the status of a senior executive
project. The creation of cost effective quality improvement
is difficult, because of the need for full integration with the
Organization's strategy, operating philosophy and
anagement systems. It may require an extensive review
d substantial revision of existing systems of management
und ways of operating. Fundamental questions may have to
asked, such as ‘Do the managers have the necessary
uthority, capability, and time to carry this through?’
Any review of existing management and operating
iystems will inevitably ‘open many cans of worms! and
over problems that have been successfully buried and
smoothed over - perhaps for years, Authority must be given
lo those charged with following TQM through with actionsJO p281
that they consider necessary to achieve the goals, The
commitment will be continually questioned and will be
weakened, perhaps destroyed by failure to delegate
authoritatively.
The following steps are suggested in general terms,
Clearly, different types of organization will have need to
make adjustments to the detail, but the component parts are
the basic requirements.
‘A. disciplined and systematic approach to
continuous improvement may be established in a quality
council, The council should meet at least monthly to review
strategy, implementation progress, and improvement. It
should be chaired by the Chief Executive, who must attend
every meeting - only death or serious illness should prevent
him being there. Clearly, postponement may be necessary
occasionally, but the council should not carry on meeting
without the Chief Executive present. The council members
should include the top management team and the chairmen
of any 'site’ TQM steering committees or process quality
teams, depending the size of the organization. The
objectives of the council are to:
- Provide strategic direction on TQM for the organization.
- Establish plans for TQM on each ‘site’.
~ Set up and review the process quality teams that will own
the key or critical business processes.
~ Review and revise quality plans for implementation.
The process quality teams and any site TQM
steering committees should also meet monthly, shortly
before the council meetings. Every senior manager should
be a member of at least one process quality teams. This
system provides the ' top-down’ support for employee
participation in process management and development,
through either a quality improvement team or a quality
circle programmer, It also ensures that the commitment to
206The three-tier approach of quality council, process
julity teams (process quality teams) and quality
provement teams allows the first to concentrate on
uality strategy, rather than become a senior problem
ving group. Progress is assured if the process quality
sams’ chairmen are required to present a status report at
ich meeting.
The process quality teams or steering committees
control the quality improvement teams and have
nsibility for:
oviding an outline and scope for each project to give to
¢ quality improvement teams.
lonitoring and reviewing the progress and results from
ich quality improvement team project.
The selection of projects for the quality improvement
s.
e appointment of team members and leaders,
As the focus of this work will be the selection of
rajects, some attention will need to be given to the sources
‘nominations. Projects may be suggested by:
Council members representing their own departments,
focess quality teams, their suppliers or their customers,
mal and external.
Quality improvement teams.
= Quality circles (if in existence).
‘Suppliers.
Customers.
The process quality teams’ members must be given
responsibility and authority to represent their part of the
ganization in the process. The members must also feel
it they represent the team to the rest of the organization.
this way the process quality teams will gain knowledge
and respect and be seen to have the authority to act in the
207References
Charles Coates, Management Total, Ed. Teora, 1975
Fiegen Baum , Total Quality Control, 1993
Mac Gregor, Making Profit From Quality, Quality Today,
1983
H. S. Harrington, Management Total, Ed. Teora , 1995
AJ.Murphy, Quality In Practice, 1998
D. Noye, Ghid practic pentru controlul calitafii, Ed. Tebnic
2000
S. Oakland S. J., Total quality management, Butterworth
Heinemann, Oxford, London, 1995,
Al. Redes, V. Petrescu, Calitatea Totala, element de referinja
in noua era a managementului, Bucuresti ASE 1995
John Sabarro and Linda Ahill, Managing Performancs,
Harvard Business Schoo Publishing, Boston 1996
208Plagiat integral din Diana Pheysey ,
Textul plagiat din Diana Pheysey (DP) este marcat prin
199 anizational Cultures. London] Jumbrire cu galben. Pagina din DP de la care a fost plagiat
land 5 ork:Routled gen. cxzvw.soviw 9 “paragraful este notata pe marginea dib stanga, dupa
Plagiat intentional , prin colaj de
lblocuri de texte,semnat de LSB si
RL folosind, fara nici un gen de ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURES
citare, a originalului semnat de DP.
LEONARD SERGIU BALAN’, RAMONA LILE!
‘University “Aurel Viaicu” of Arad, Ronania, leonard_balan@yahoo.com
initialele autoarei_textului original, sursa pentru plagiat DP
a
TT 7
CRAR
DP 16 Abstract: The work of making the product is done by manufacturing: the work of selling
it by sales; the work of obtaining materials by purchasing; the work of monitoring income
and expenditure by accounting, and so on. The word ‘role’, which is used of the culture in
such a business, refers to the way in which the occupant of each position in the firm i:
expected to act. There are usually job descriptions, rules and procedures to govern behavior
and principles for fixing remuneration, A role culture is one which emphasis conformity to
expectations. It is common in government departments as well as large businesses. Suct
organizations can be said to be ‘bounded rational instruments for the achievement o,
specified goals’.
Key words: organizational cultures, economic goals, leader, self-management, manager
INTRODUCTION
DP1 . Organizational behavior can be defined as ‘how enterprises work and how the
lmozaic people associated with them act’. ‘Organizational behavior’ can refer both to the academic
discipline which studies these things and to what is being studied. When the discipline is
meant the abbreviation OB will be used.
OB combines the interests of psychologists, sociologists, political scientists anc
economists. OB theories differ in the emphasis they give to organizations as suct
compared, on the one hand, with the individuals and groups of which they are composed and.
on the other hand, with the wider society of which they are a part
DP2 No organization exists in isolation. It is part of other structures, such as economies.
societies and nation states.
Economic goals are concerned with the supply and demand for goods and services.
China has national plans for agriculture, heavy and light industries, and transport
DP 5-6 Competition is to achieve the targets set. To prevent dependence, the government aims for
self-sufficiency in some sectors, for favorable terms of trade in others. Ideological goals
are linked to moral values.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The authors of the paper were used as methods of work: data collection, processing,
analysis, observation and their interpretation
In China, ‘sharing’ as a goal implies Communist solidarity in ‘serving the masses’
DP 6, In Britain, the monarchy symbolizes shared national traditions. Politicians use normative
mozaic | power to obtain commitment from party members.
The goals described as ‘order’ goals are associated with the roles of the police anc
the military, and of industrial relations managers. There has to be ‘law and order’ in any
society. However, when ‘coercive power’ is used it tends to alienate those subjected to it.
that is, it makes them angry or scared.
A state of harmony around these values might be short-lived as there would be
DPE ]complaints that people were becoming irresponsible in their enjoyment of the more
permissive state of affairs. Stronger leadership would be called for to tighten up on the lax
conditions.
However, leaders who assume too much power are liable to be corrupted by it, and
28297DP8&
juri sunt repetate si la pagina anterioara 257. Par sa fie singurele originale
5 pagini devartioobceri.novive § DIGITALZARI
FACULTATEM DE MANAGEMENT AGRICOL
DP11
mozaic
DP.
12-13
DP 17
DP 26
to attempt to repress opposition. This leads to people ‘taking the law into their own hands’,
and so to demands for more constitutignal methods of control and less personal power for
leaders. In the early stages new conftitutional measures might be approved and the
populace law-abiding, but there is a danger of bureaucratic legalism setting in, so that the
difficulties that people experience with\‘red tape’ result in apathy and poor economic
performance.
The authors of the paper were use
analysis, observation and their interpretation.
At the beginning of each cycle there is therefore a decision to radicalize. This leads
to MOBILIZATION, a phase when technical and social objectives are envisaged, mass
meetings are held and an aura of charisma surrounds the party chain of command. More
and more people are enrolled in collective activity. The policy is to forge ahead. In the
absence of remunerative incentives, commitment to ideology is all important at the HIGH
TIDE phase which follows.
The solidarity of the people as citizens is stressed, with no distinctions betweer
workers, soldiers and peasants. Performance is judged by its ‘socialist correctness’ rathei
than by economic results.
It is only as the feasibility of attaining some of the goals becomes doubtful that
DETERIORATION sets in. The first response is to increase discipline, drawing or
coercive power. Since the economy is growing, the unions change their strategy from one
of relative inactivity to one of actively pressing for their members to have a share in that
growth.
The phenomenon of ‘leap-frogging’ occurs, in which the pay round of one industry
sets off demands from others that match or exceed it. The society can be said to be
economically competitive in the sense that different sectors are competing against each other
for a share in the benefits of growth. Hierarchical divisions are not the only ones; there
are also departmental distinctions.
The Mafia is a Western example of a traditional power culture. It is a criminai
organization which relies to maintain allegiance. Of course, power cultures do not necessarily
rely on brute force or engage in criminal activities. Brimmer (1955) described traditiona
Indian family-owned businesses in a way which suggests they had a recognized powei
culture. The traditional joint family enterprise combined the different enterprises of various
family members under the superintendence of the family head who was responsible for the
social status and financial well-being of the family. In a power culture certain persons are
dominant and others subservient. There is ‘a relatively bounded and stable occurrence 01
social order based on habits of deference to authority’.
In the Power organization at its best, leadership is based on strength, justice anc
paternalistic benevolence.... The leaders are expected to be all-knowing as well as all-
powerful. Subordinates are expected to be compliant and willing.... At its worst, the Power
organization tends towards a rule by fear.
Control by appreciation - this is the preferred method in achievement and suppor
cultures. In practice, all organizations need to use both types of control, but the distinctior
is nevertheless important. Appreciation refers to ‘the selection of what shall be noticed.
how it shall be classified, and the way it shall be valued’. It is part of what Vickers (1965)
calls ‘the Art of Judgement’. Internal and external contingencies tend to be dealt with ir
similar fashion. The main difference is that the people involved in dealing with externa
contingencies are from more than one organization. They may be representatives, or ever
plenipotentiaries, that is, persons given full powers to act as they
methods of work: data collection, processing.
29 258ee ‘MngSTERLL CERCETARL,NOVARH $1 DIGITALIZARIL
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARII STINTIFICE, DEZVOLTARI TEHNOLOGICE $1 INOVARIL
LUCRARI STIINTIFICE, SERIA I, VOL.XV (2)
Cultures and control 27 see fit according to how a situation develops. Planning and
execution tend to be concurrent and to be carried out by the same people.
Often people have been specially trained through craft apprenticeships, or the
qualifying examinations of professional bodies, to exercise appreciation. The responsibility
for the quality of work rests with the person doing the job, not with somebody else.
Finally, under the support culture, we have a consensual form of appreciative control. Here
it is the collective judgement rather than the individual judgement that is exercised.
There is now an attempt to co-ordinate the local operations by standardization 01
procedures and formalizing of communication lines up and down the hierarchy. The
organization is now moving into a role culture, where regulation once more prevails. This.
too, eventually breaks down as it proves insufficiently flexible to adjust rapidly to externa
changes. People operate within their job descriptions, and so if a task is on nobody’s list it
does not get done. This is the ‘crisis of red tape’.
In the early years of an organization the people involved may feel that their views are
The leader may prevent this from gaining strength by a policy of ‘divide and rule’.
Alternatively, the majority may tend to back the leader in his attempt to restore unity by
coercion. This, in turn, becomes oppressive.
The leaders respond by recognizing the opposition and containing it within forma
contractual arrangements which admit sectional interests. Breach of such arrangements is
considered highly ‘irregular’.
This form of integrative control again becomes onerous, and dissent eventually
DP 35 |adequately represented, since they all know each other well. Opposition is considerec
irrational for the business is their own. They have a common stake in it. Nevertheless, ever
with a small group, differences can emerge about the direction to be followed. These
differences may lead to informal alliances among some members to assert their autonomy.
DP 49
leads to the beginnings of a new representation and the cycle repeats itself.
Systems theory suggests that variety and variability in the environment call for
appreciative control, but regulation can be used for units which are relatively closed.
Exchange theory focuses on the part played by reward power in the control of behavior at
work, Other considerations are the leader’s style and the degree to which accuracy is possible
in assessing performance.
The choice between regulation and appreciation is not a choice that is made once
only, however. Methods may alternate between restraint and direction, and so features o1
the four cultures will predominate at different times in the same organization. This is because
new contingencies are constantly arising. Two accounts of control cycles stress recurrent
crises. In one case these crises result from past attempts at control. In the other, contro)
provokes rebellion.
Controlled change may be brought about by mutual consent, by direction from above.
by adopting expert advice or constitutionally through the ballot box. People carrying
out their everyday roles may create evolutionary changes. Boundary roles are particularly
suitable places from which to do this.
Self-management forms - this form of organization is more self-conscious about its
internal structure than is the entrepreneurial. An example is given by Bloor (1986) whe
worked as a novice staff member in a half-way house for disturbed adolescents in the UK.
He says it was permissive and egalitarian.
The owner who manages the small firm may be the sole source of authority. In the
UK most owner-managers are men, but more women are now starting their owr
businesses. By custom and practice ‘bosses’ are able to take all major decisions. Though they
tend to give orders ad hoc problems arise, they can enforce them. There are few rules,
30 259(MnssTeRUL Cicer, Novi $1 DIGITALIZARIL
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARI §TINTIFICE, DEZVOLTARIL TEHNOLOGICE $1 INOVARIL
FACULTATEA DE MANAGEMENT AGRICOL
Dp 4g | but all the subordinates are known to the boss, and the rule of obedience applies to
everyone.
Handy calls this typical power culture structure in a small firm a ‘web’, with the
spider at the centre. Another metaphor is the hub of a wheel from which the spokes radiate
outwards. The most common metaphor for the centralized structure is the pyramid, witk
power at its apex. Where the organization is small enough to be one ‘tribe’, and the
pyramid is relatively flat, such centralization can have a unifying effect. It was common ir
the West until the middle of this century and, according to Lammers and Hickson (1979) anc
to Hofstede (1980a), it is traditional in developing countries.
The associated values are status, obedience and control. By the time the
organization has grown to about a thousand employees, however, the chief executive is likely
to be overloaded, especially if there are external problems demanding attention.
The centralized form keeps internal order through vertical channels 03
communication, concentrated authority and deferential relationships. But the design has the
weakness that a successor to the chief executive may not be found. Managers below the apex
have 50 Organizational cultures been excluded from knowledge of the business as a whole.
They have been confined by the structure to a geographical area, or to one functior
(probably either manufacturing or sales), or to one stage of operations (for example spinning
DP 50 | weaving) or to one product line (for example brand A or brand B). No one but the chairmar
and managing director has the whole picture. Thus, when change is sought,
‘new blood’ may have to be brought in from outside if those below the chief executive are
unwilling to accept increased responsibility. At all events, the design changes to ¢
decentralized form, and the culture changes also.
Aldepartmentydivisiony/subsidiaryjorjany unit defined by a market, or a technique
to serve that market, can be turned into a profit centre with freedom to decide its owr
policy and strategies for reaching given goals.
RESEARCH RESULTS
Cultures and organizational design determine long-term policies for the whole
company, manage corporate finances and arbitrate among profit centre.
DP 51 The scope of the autonomy of each profit centre is limited to its own particulai
operations, but there it can enforce its own decisions and, from the parent business’s point 01
view, those decision sources are dispersed. The advantages of this type of decentralizatior
are as follows:
- top managers are freed from having to make short-term decisions;
provides intrinsic satisfactions to those who head the profit centre;
- it is flexible because it puts decision-making closer to the scene of action.
There are also disadvantages or difficulties, however:
- it requires capable managers;
- the centre head may maximize short-run profits at the expense of corporate long-term
goals;
- provision of support services to each centre may add to administrative costs;
- there are centrifugal tendencies which top management may not be able to curb.
Organizational design is the creation of structures which provide for activities.
DP 63 un . nie —
decision-making authority and relationships at work. To create the type of organizatior
desired (for example one which is externally and internally innovative, productive.
efficient and collaborative) there are four main areas to consider. What is the organization
769
In originalul DP concluziile incep de la paragraful ‘Organizational design....°.pag 63. In articolul plagiat se
retin drept concluzii numai ultimele doua paragrafe, cele care incep cu ‘Th eclasic beurocracy..’ de la pag
164 din DP.i) MNSTERLL CERCETARI,NOVARU $1 DIGITALIZARIL
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARII STINTIFICE, DEZVOLTARI TEHNOLOGICE $1 INOVARIL
LUCRARI STIINTIFICE, SERIA I, VOL.XV (2)
DP 63
DP 64
CONCLUSION
D64
REFERENCES
. ALLEN, D., HUGHES, J.A. (1983) Management for Health Service Administrators,
London: Pitman.
BARTLETT, C.A., DOZ, Y., HEDLUND, G. (1989) Managing the Global Firm,
London: Routledge.
. BERNE E. (1966) The Structure and Dynamics of Organizations and Groups, New
York: Grove Press.
BLAU, P.M., SCHOENHERR, R.A. (1971) The Structure of Organizations, New
York: Basic Books.
CHAMBERS, C. (1990) ‘Changing culture’, Personnel Management22 (3):69.
. CHANDLER, A. (1962) Strategy and Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
CHILD, J. (1984) Organization: a guide to problems and practice, 2nd edn, New York:
Harper & Row.
. HARRISON, E.F. (1975) The Managerial Decision-Making Process, Boston, MA:
Houghton Mifflin.
KATZ, D, KAHN, R.L. (1966) The Social Psychology of Organizations, London:
Wiley.
10. LAWRENCE, P. (1984) Management in Action, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
mae Rw oN
es
°
261
32
IVOLUMUL SURSA PENTRU PLAGIAT DP 1993 nu este trecut la bibliografie, asa cum remarca si
lexpertul din 2016 de la carui verificare initiala am pornit.@ MNSIERLL CERCETARL,NOVARY $V DIGITALZARIL
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARI STINTIFICE, DEZVOLTARII TEHNOLOGICE SI INOVARIL
FACULTATEA DE MANAGEMENT AGRICOL
11. MANT, A. (1976) ‘How To analyse management’, Management Today October: 62-5,
130,132.
12. PERROW, C. (1979) Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay,2nd edn, Glenview,
IL: Scott, Foresman.
13. STOPFORD, J.M., WELLS, L.T. (1972) Managing Multinational Enterprise,
London: Longman.
14. WILLIAMS, A., DOBSON, P.,;WALTERS, M. (1989) Changing Culture: New
Organizational Approaches, London: Institute of Personnel Management.
Din punct de vede tehnic, verificarea plagiatului am realizat-o dupa ce am pus ambele
texte DP 1993 si LSB&RL in doua coloane pe monitorul calculatorului. Ulterior am
identifcat pagina de apartenenta a blocului de text din originalul DP prin cautare
jautomata, urmarind, prin citirea textelor aferente daca plagiatul a fost de tip mozaic sau
bloc de text compact, nemodificat.Concordanta intre evaluarile expertizei de plagiat din
ICNE 2016 si cele facute pentru expertiza de plagiat din decembrie 2020 este deplina.
3962vol.XV!
Plagiat integral de blocuri mari de texte din Dale Neef, 2003,Managing Corporate Reputation and Risk. A
ono using Knowledge Management,Elsevier. Publicat in Management agricol, Seria |,
014 Banabkinuersityrof-Agricultunevand Veterinary Medicine Timisoara, Editura Agroprint
FACULTATEA DE MANAGEMENT AGRICOL
THE RELATION BETWEEN BUSSINESS CASE AND
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT Pagina de la care este luat
paragraful din Dale Neef,
LEONARD BALAN SERGIU, RAMONA LILE 2003 este Notata DN ...
Universitatea “Aurel Viaicu” Arad, Romania
Abstract: For companies, effective risk management is not only dependent upon a strong
IDN 123 ethical framework. It is equally dependent upon a company’s ability to sense potential risk
issues, to analyze the situation using the skills and expertise of its employees and to
respond in a measured and effective way. To do that, a company needs to marshal the
information and knowledge that is available to it, both inside and outside company walls
That process is a knowledge management. Knowledge management is an important area of
focus for many organizations in order to be successful in today’s business environment.
Globalization is one of the most emotional and least well-defined areas of modern debate.
In fact, the concept has become so muddled with broader issues, such as fair trade,
sustainability, and even the HIV/Aids pandemic, that it is difficult to pin down any
boundaries to the debate, The difficulty in establishing a business case for knowledge
‘management programs is really a problem of cause and effect. The importance of
Knowledge Management may be found in many areas and can easily be illustrated with
examples.
Strategia de plagiat:
blocuri mici de text luate
de la pagini foarte
diferite
Key words: business, program, management, environment, process, company.
INTRODUCTION
DN123
Knowledge management is a term that describes the process by which a company
organizes, collects, shares and learns collectively from employees, stakeholders and the outside
world. It is a broad framework for actively managing the information and knowledge
that is available to it.
DN 124
DM21
The importance of the concept of knowledge management is that it makes explicit
many of the things that we know intuitively about the way a company works—that it is the
cooperative application of what employees know that allows a company to create
innovative new products, to solve complex problems, to do things efficiently, and in stage
three and stage four companies, to help sense and respond to risk.
The knowledge management movement, however, has had more than its share of
teething problems, mostly because from the outset a schism developed among those whe
saw knowledge management as primarily a function of collaboration between humans an¢
those who believed that sharing of knowledge was made possible mostly througk
technology.
Whatever else it means though, at the heart of the globalization debate lies the
reality that western corporations are relocating their production and sales capacities
internationally, particularly into developing economies, in order to take advantage ol
emerging consumer markets, a low-cost labor supply, lower tax regimes and lower levels
of environmental and employment oversight.
Even if this trend has not occurred as suddenly or as uniquely as many activists
DN22
would claim, what is undeniably true is that the combination of opportunity an¢
competition has driven companies during the last two decades to either relocate or tc
contract services from factories, call centers and sales offices throughout the developing world.
Data comparatiei plagiat- sursa
3.12.2020
34
2320
DN 16
DN 125
DN 128
DN 14
MNSTERUL CERCETARINOVARY $i DIGITALIZARIL
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARII §TINTIFICE, DEZVOLTARII TEHNOLOGICE $1 INOVARIL
LUCRARI STINTIFICE, SERIA I, VOL.XVI (2) :
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Companies are applying knowledge management techniques that have been
developed over the past few years to actively manage employee and stakeholder
knowledge and experience in a way that contributes to risk prediction and response
analysis. In fact, many experts would contend that risk management is knowledge
management, in that it is only through the knowledge, experience, and skills of employees.
shared collaboratively, that a company can anticipate and react to reputation-threatening
risks. A number of systems and knowledge gathering and sharing techniques, when formalized.
can provide the basis for a constant flow of prioritized information from those who know tc
those who need to know. As part of a formal program of risk and reputation management.
knowledge management techniques can help to ensure that a company becomes aware
of potential hot issues before they get out of control.
This is where knowledge management techniques and systems finally come into the
mainstream of management processes, after struggling in many ways to find operational!
legitimacy for the past several years. For the first time, knowledge management is
something more than a set of practices and systems that simply contributes to greater
company efficiency. A program of integrated knowledge and risk management is essentia)
to good management of a modern organization. In short, “we didn’t know” is no longer ar
acceptable defense. Not having the knowledge management systems in place becomes the
equivalent of negligence.
The final area of focus is the application of new international standards of conduct
for social, environmental, corporate governance, and product safety polices. At the same
time, when integrated well, the very process of applying these standards of conduct at ar
operational level not only helps to avoid potentially damaging incidents but also helps tc
turn early warnings of infringements into productivity improvements.
Knowledge management techniques are widespread and commonplace among
companies today. Today intranets and company portals, complex data mining, knowledge
repositories, groupware and e-mail, skills databases, and knowledge-mapping techniques
are nearly universal among progressive companies.
On the high-touch side, communities of practice, after-event reviews and the
capturing of lessons learned are also commonplace in this type of organization.
Presentations, project plans, and other key documents are sent freely among
employes by e-mail and the intranet itself allows employees to easily access company policies
concerning benefits, ethics codes and other important issues.
In knowledge management, communities of practice are actively identified and¢
members of these networks are encouraged to gather and exchange ideas on a formal basis.
capturing lessons learned, swapping ideas and sharing insight. This formal management ot
an informal process helps an organization to create a company culture in which knowledge
sharing is encouraged and opinions and ideas flow more freely among departments and offices
RESEARCH RESULTS
Obviously, not all multinationals are guilty of these types of incidents, but the
reality is that with relocation to a developing market comes fundamental new problems in
terms of corporate governance and social and environmental behavior.
The arguments for and against globalization are complex and important, bur
whatever your particular position as a corporation, it is important to realize that these anc
similar issues mean that your company will probably be facing a challenging future ir
terms of developing formal social and environmental policies for those overseas
35
233MINISTERUL CERCETARH , INOVARISI DIGITALIZARIL
CONSILIUL NATIONAL DE ETICA A CERCETARIL STLUNTIFICE, DEZVOLTARI
TEHNOLOGICE $I INOVARIT
FACULTATEA DE MANAGEMENT AGRICOL
Plions.
Ultimately, the way a company behaves in these areas is much more important thar
DN 14] donations to local charities and a Web site boasting of good corporate citizenship througt
philanthropy. In short, whatever your position on globalization, the effect on your
company, even companies not directly involved in global affairs, is likely to be a greater
need for an ethical framework, transparency, and non-financial reporting.
‘As companies and cultures are becoming more known the combination of the
Internet and new satellite and cable television technologies has made the distribution oi
information - instantly from virtually anywhere in the world - a part of our day-to-day
lives. The Internet has particularly become a medium for quickly and effectively relaying
information around the world.
Nowhere has the use of these new communication technologies been put to greater
effect than by pressure groups in their prompt and dramatic exposure of corporate offenses.
‘A quick search for “corporate social responsibility” over the web demonstrates how very
effective the Internet has become in this regard.
This ability to name and shame companies, suddenly and forcefully brought about
DN15 | through the Internet and global television coverage, provides companies with a powerful
incentive to protect their reputation through better behavior.
CONCLUSION
DN 135 Finally, if the system fails and a serious incident occurs, the existence of a formal
knowledge management program for identifying and dealing with legal compliance issues
within a company will in itself lessen the likelihood of any legal penalties.
This movement toward greater corporate responsibility has been given a new
impetus by recent corporate scandals, and is in many ways similar to the environmenta)
Imovement that produced stronger regulations and gave rise to new international standards
and Environmental Management Systems.
REFERENCES
1. ALBERS, J. A., “Framework for Implementing Knowledge Management”, Portland
International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology, Portland
Oregon, July, 2003.
2. BEAZLEY, H., BOENISCH, J., HARDEN, D. G., Continuity Management:
Preserving Corporate Knowledge and Productivity when Employees Leave, J. Wiley &
Sons, 2002.
[pNi46 JIM, KARTALIA, “Reputation at Risk,” Risk Management, May 2000.
4, MCELROY, M. W. , The New Knowledge Management: Complexity, Learning, and
Sustainable Innovation, Butterworth-Heinemannn Press, 2003.
5. MILOS, O., CSOSZ, 1, MARTIN, SIMONA CRISTINA, IANOSEVICI, OANA.
Ways to improve the commercial society relations with the Customers, Lucrari
stiintifice Management Agricol, Seria 1, vol. XIV (2), Facultatea de Management
Agricol, USAMVB Timisoara, 20 mai 2012, ISSN 1453-1410, pg.589-596, 2012
DN 146 SIMON, LELIC, “Managing Knowledge to Manage Risk,” Knowledge Management
6, no. (September 2, 2002) from www.kmmagazine.com.
Dale Neef, sursa plagiatului nu este citata
Page 36 of 36