194 views

Uploaded by Osama Dabbas

save

- Layer
- week24-connecting_models_tow.pdf
- CEG 883 Design Sheet1
- Beamsrev.doc
- D4761
- Staad Pro-serie 14.1rayleigh Freqency Method
- 2015 Final Combind Set 120 Prob Sample
- RCC43 Wide Beams (a & D)
- 179938678-result-shear-force-n-bending-moment-docx.docx
- Flexural Behavior of Cantilever Concrete Beams
- Pest r Bridge Design Fall 2011
- Discussion
- 00 Formulas
- Two Way Slab (by Coefficients)
- Copy of Pricelist
- 9
- Ancon windposts
- Beam
- Bracket Rev2
- Lateral Deflection of Multi
- 10.1002@tal.4320010104
- 165023-426027-1-SM
- !! Serviceability deflections and displacements in steel-framed structures.pdf
- Prestressed_Moment_Curvature.pdf
- buckling of strut report
- Article Proof Testing of Reinforced Concrete Bridges 04
- Lecture Notes
- Soil Characterization
- Understanding Overhead Crane Deflection and Criteria
- Bending of beam
- Alkhwarzmi
- Solar System
- laplace
- Laplace

You are on page 1of 9

Crack Width

Cracking in reinforced concrete beams generally start at loads well below service level. As the loads increases above the cracking load, both the number and width of cracks increase, and at service load level a maximum width of crack of about 0.0016in is typical in concrete beams reinforced with Grade 60ksi (414MPa) steel (ACI 318-02 clause R10.6.4). The 1995 ACI 318 Code (Clause 10.6) specifies that to assure protection of reinforcement against corrosion, and for aesthetic reasons, many fine hairline cracks are preferable to a few wide cracks. One variable of importance affecting the width of cracks is the stress in the reinforcement at service load f s . The tensile steel stress, f s , at specified load is computed based on elastic cracked-section analysis as the unfactored moment divided by the product of steel area and internal moment arm (refer to page 4 for more details). Alternatively, and it is permitted that f s may be taken equal to 60 percent of specified yield strength ( 0.6 f y ) according to ACI 318-02 Code clause 10.6.4 and CSA A23.3-04 Clause 10.6.1. In most practical situations, this is a conservative assumption as the actual steel stress at specified load levels will be below this value. The Gergely-Lutz expression could be used in the calculation of the maximum crack width (as given in the ACI 318-95 old code):

w = Cβ f s

3

dc A

where w = the maximum crack width β = ratio of distances to the neutral axis from the extreme tension fibre to that from the centroid of the main reinforcement (= h2 h1 in Figure A). The ACI 318-95 Code allows that an approximate value of 1.2 could used for β. f s = stress in steel at specified load calculated by elastic cracked section theory (straight line theory) d c = is the distance from extreme tension fibre to the centre of the longitudinal bar located closest thereto. A = Ae n = effective tension area of concrete surrounding the main tension reinforcement and having the same centroid as that reinforcement, divided by the number of bars (shown cross-hatched in Figure A) • For a slab: A = 2d c s • For a beam with one layer of steel, all bars of equal size and a cover of 50mm or less to the main reinforcement: A = 2d b n c w • For a beam with two layers of steel: A = 2(h − d )b n = 2d b n w s w d s = distance from the extreme tension fibre t the centroid of the flexural reinforcement (note the difference between d c and d s as shown in Figure 6-12) n = number of bars, taken as total area of tension reinforcement ( AS ) divided by area of largest bar used when bars are of different sizes C = a numerical constant determined from statistical analysis of experimental data. C = 11 × 10 −6 mm 2 / N ENCI 633 Winter 2009 – Dr. R. El-Hacha Page 1 of 9

Control of the maximum crack width can be thus obtained by setting an upper limit on the parameter z. The Gergely-Lutz expression is given in another format in the 1995 ACI 318 code by the quantity z and in the CSA A23.A.3-04 Code (Clause 10. The recommendation ACI Committee 224 recommends tolerable crack widths for reinforced concrete based on the exposure condition. R. b) two layers of reinforcement The acceptable width of flexural cracks in service depends mostly on the conditions of exposure and should be established in view of possibility of corrosion of the reinforcement.1) : 3 w × 10 −3 z = fs d c A × 10 − 3 = Cβ ENCI 633 Winter 2009 – Dr. d h Ae = 2 (h .fc kd N. El-Hacha Page 2 of 9 .6.d) bw h1 h2 ds ds A = Ae / n n = number of bars dc fs / n bw Figure A: Parameters for crack width computation Figure B: Effective tension area for a reinforced concrete beam: a) one layer of reinforcement.

exp.6. limiting crack widths of 0.) ⎨25 kN/mm (ext. on the basis of experience with existing structures.33mm) For epoxy coated bars multiply “ z ” by 1. With these approximations. The Code further assumes.6.2.4mm) z = 25 kN/mm for exterior exposure (corresponding to a crack width of 0.exp. d c in mm N = number of bars effective concrete area surrounding tension bars = 2dc b dc 2dc Figure C: Crack control (CSA A23.3-04 Clause 10.1) ENCI 633 Winter 2009 – Dr.33 mm (0. β is assumed to have a value of 1.3-04 (Clause 10. 10-6) z = 30 kN/mm for interior exposure (corresponding to a crack width of 0.6 f y (MPa). −3 f s 3 d c A × 10 A = 2d c b N 2⎛ N ≥ 2bd c ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ =Z≤ ⎧ 30 kN/mm (int. El-Hacha Page 3 of 9 .2 On this basis.013 in) for interior and exterior exposure.1) in terms of the quantity “z” given below: z = fs where 3 d c A × 10 −3 (CSA A23.40 mm (0. b.3-04 Eq. R.33 for exterior exposure. the crack width limitation is specified in CSA A23.2 11 × 10 0.) ⎩ b f s × 10 Z −3 ⎞ 3 ⎟ ⎟ ⎠ f s ≈ 0. z = × 10 −3 = 25 kN/mm 11 × 10 −6 × 1. z = −6 × 1. the right hand side of the equation reduces to: 0.For general design use.016 in) and 0.40 × 10 −3 = 30 kN/mm for interior exposure. respectively.2.

6 f ). Note that factor 0. the CSA A23. In most practical situations.6. this is a conservative y assumption as the actual steel stress at specified load levels will be below this value. The calculated tensile stress in reinforcement at service (specified) load shall be computed based on elastic crackedsection analysis as the unfactored moment developed in the beam due to service load ( M ) divided by the product of the steel area and the internal moment arm (Figure D).6 has been carried forward from earlier version of A23.38 represents the average load factor ( α D + α L 2 . where 0. R. in lieu of such detailed computations. a • The force in the tension steel: T = A f s s s • Based on equilibrium of the external and internal bending moments: ⎛ ⎛ y⎞ y⎞ M = T ⎜d − ⎟ = A fs ⎜d − ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ a s⎜ s ⎜ 3⎠ 3⎠ ⎝ ⎝ where y is the neutral axis depth of the cracked section M a • The stress is steel: f s = y A ⎛d − ⎞ ⎟ ⎜ s⎝ 3⎠ Figure D: Stress and strain distribution in a cracked reinforced concrete beam at service load Alternatively.3-04 Clause 10.85 1.38 ).85 represents the resistance factor for the reinforcement and 1. ( ) ENCI 633 Winter 2009 – Dr.3 and is approximately ( 0.1 permits the use of 60% of the specified yield strength as an estimate of stress in steel under service loads ( f s = 0. El-Hacha Page 4 of 9 .Stress at Service Load Note that the crack control is checked under service loads.

Δ L = Δ D + L − Δ D . is obtained as the difference between the deflections computed with and without the live load. based on Ig (Ie ) D + L (Ie ) D moment M MD + L based on Icr MD Mcr ΔL 0 Δcr ΔD ΔD + L deflection Δ Figure 2: Moment-deflection curve for short-term loading with I e (Ref. that is. As evident.1) ENCI 633 Winter 2009 – Dr. once cracking has occurred. I e decreases as the loads increases. three different values for EI must be considered (Figure 1): 1) the uncracked (gross) moment of inertia. the respective deflections ( Δ D and Δ D+ L ) should be computed with the I e values for the corresponding total moment levels ( M D and M D + L ) as indicated in Figure 2. El-Hacha Page 5 of 9 . The incremental deflection. such as the part Δ L due to live load.Immediate Deflections For a reinforced concrete member. R. and 3) the transition from uncracked to cracked moment of inertia (at service load). Note: that the larger the flexural stiffness the smaller are the flexural stresses and deflections developed in the member. such as dead load alone or dead load plus live load. Figure 1: Typical load-deflection curve for reinforced concrete beams (Ref 1) 0 Deflection Based on I of grosstransformed section Based on Ig Based on Icr Based on Ie Load Actual (service load level) The value of I e depends on the magnitude of the moment (load). for different load levels. Thus. 2) the fully cracked moment of inertia.

The effective moment of inertia. Procedure for Immediate Deflection Calculation The immediate deflections can be computed by the following procedure: 1. I e . Calculate the moment of inertia of the cracked section ( I cr ). 6. For continuous beams average values of I e based on support moments and midspan moments should be used as explained in the next section. 5. Calculate the gross moment of inertia ( I g ). 3. Deflection due to combined dead and live load ( Δ D+ L ) is calculated based on the I e value corresponding to the total bending moment ( M D + L ). 2. The live load deflection ( Δ L ) is calculated as: Δ L = Δ D + L − Δ D NOTE that the use of Δ D+ L to calculate all deflection terms tends to overestimate the Δ D value and underestimate the Δ L value An important note: always use specified (unfactored) loads and corresponding bending moment for deflection calculations!! ENCI 633 Winter 2009 – Dr. Calculate the effective moment of inertia ( I e ). El-Hacha Page 6 of 9 . should be evaluated based on moment at the support for cantilevers. The dead load deflection ( Δ D ) is calculated based on the I e value corresponding to the dead load bending moment ( M D ). 4. R. and midspan moment for simply supported beams.

The additional long-term deflection may be sh as large as two to three times the immediate deflection.0 for load sustained for 3 months ENCI 633 Winter 2009 – Dr.8. the deflection increases with time. taken as the value at midspan for .8. Long-Term Deflection by CSA Code According to CSA A23.2.4 for load sustained for 12 months = 1.6 in CPCA Handbook) and can be taken as: = 2.5) the additional long-term deflection under sustained loads ( Δ t = Δ cp + Δ ) may be obtained by multiplying the immediate sh S deflection ( Δ i ) due to the sustained load considered. where = immediate deflection due to dead loads Δ iD ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Δ iL = immediate deflection due to live loads = immediate deflection due to sustained portion of live loads Δ iLs s simple and continuous spans and at the support for cantilevers S = the time dependent factor for creep deflections under sustained loads. Δ i includes the immediate deflection due to dead load ( Δ iD ) and due to the portion of live load that is sustained ( Δ iLs ).3-04 (Clause 9. due principally to the effects of creep ( Δ cp ) and shrinkage ( Δ ).Time-Dependent Deflection So far we have considered only immediate deflection since live load is not a sustained load. R. Therefore. the incremental deflection which occurs after partitions are installed is given by: ⎛ S ⎞ ⎟+ Δ −Δ Δ = Δ +Δ ×⎜ incremental iD iLs ⎜ 1 + 50ρ ' ⎟ iL iLs ⎝ ⎠ And the total deflection (immediate and long-term) is given by: ⎛ ⎞ S ⎟+ Δ −Δ Δ = Δ +Δ × ⎜1 + total iD iLs ⎜ 1 + 50ρ ' ⎟ iL iLs ⎝ ⎠ Note. The factor S is given in Figure 3 (similar to Figure N9. if the dead load and the sustained live load are applied at different times.0 for load sustained for 5 years or more = 1. by a factor that accounts 1 + 50ρ ' for the effect of compression reinforcement in reducing long-term deflection as well as for the duration of sustained loading and for the long-term deflections caused by creep and shrinkage. it may be desirable to use different S values for the dead and sustained live load depending on the duration of each.2. El-Hacha Page 7 of 9 ρ ′ = A ′ bd is the compression reinforcement ratio.2 for load sustained for 6 months = 1. ⎛ S ⎞ ⎟ Δ t = Δ cp + Δ = Δ i × ⎜ sh ⎜ 1 + 50ρ ' ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ Also. Under sustained load.

S. El-Hacha Page 8 of 9 . with Load Duration (Ref.Figure 3: Variation of creep deflection factor.6: Variation of Creep Deflection Factor. with load duration Figure N9.2.8. 2) ENCI 633 Winter 2009 – Dr. S. R.

Deflection Control in CSA Code Deflection Limits.8. second print. 2. CPCA Concrete Design Handbook CSA A23. Canadian Standards Association. Kirk D. The deflection shall not exceed the limits stipulated in Table 9-3 expressed as fractions of the clear span length.U.W. "Design of Concrete Structures". l . and Erki M. McGraw-Hill Ryerson. Rexdale.6).3-04. 2006.. ENCI 633 Winter 2009 – Dr.2. R. 3rd edition. 1999.A.. n References 1. Reinforced Concrete Design. the deflections (immediate and long-term) must be calculated and limited to the allowable values (specified maximum permissible) in the Code (Clause 9. El-Hacha Page 9 of 9 . Pillai S. For members not meeting the minimum thickness requirements.

- LayerUploaded bygautam_CV10
- week24-connecting_models_tow.pdfUploaded bytoshugo
- CEG 883 Design Sheet1Uploaded byInemesit Ekop
- Beamsrev.docUploaded bySai Swaroop Goski
- D4761Uploaded byNadya Chandra
- Staad Pro-serie 14.1rayleigh Freqency MethodUploaded byV.m. Rajan
- 2015 Final Combind Set 120 Prob SampleUploaded byWesly Osornio Centerwall
- RCC43 Wide Beams (a & D)Uploaded byLove Semsem
- 179938678-result-shear-force-n-bending-moment-docx.docxUploaded byZulAm
- Flexural Behavior of Cantilever Concrete BeamsUploaded by01010
- Pest r Bridge Design Fall 2011Uploaded bylofus99
- DiscussionUploaded byGowtham Ragunathan
- 00 FormulasUploaded byKory Estes
- Two Way Slab (by Coefficients)Uploaded byWaseem Ahmad
- Copy of PricelistUploaded bySimionAlexandru
- 9Uploaded byKetan Dhameliya
- Ancon windpostsUploaded byVasile Buda
- BeamUploaded byHoàng Tiến Tạ
- Bracket Rev2Uploaded bylimbv
- Lateral Deflection of MultiUploaded byengrrozay
- 10.1002@tal.4320010104Uploaded byHansel Loshaless
- 165023-426027-1-SMUploaded byRagheb Ibrahim Ragheb
- !! Serviceability deflections and displacements in steel-framed structures.pdfUploaded byAnonymous hprsT3WlP
- Prestressed_Moment_Curvature.pdfUploaded byLid Cotrina G
- buckling of strut reportUploaded byEsyad E-chad
- Article Proof Testing of Reinforced Concrete Bridges 04Uploaded byankurshah1986
- Lecture NotesUploaded byAyushika Abrol
- Soil CharacterizationUploaded byJaime Brown
- Understanding Overhead Crane Deflection and CriteriaUploaded byRam Babu
- Bending of beamUploaded byCik Minn