This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Asaf Kleopas Sugih
The author thanks the University of Groningen for the financial support through an Ubbo Emmius Scholarship.
Synthesis and Properties of Starch Based Biomaterials
Proefschrift ter verkrijging van het doctoraat in de Wiskunde en Natuurwetenschappen aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen op gezag van de Rector Magnificus, dr. F. Zwarts in het openbaar te verdedigen op vrijdag 12 december 2008 om 13.15 uur door Asaf Kleopas Sugih geboren op 4 juli 1975 te Bandung, Indonesië
H. dr. dr. dr. ir. Broekhuis Prof. dr. Minnaard Prof.J. A. A. dr.P. L. dr. Heeres Prof. Picchioni Beoordelingscommissie : Prof. L. ir.A.J.M. Moscicki ISBN : 978‐90‐367‐3592‐6 ISBN : 978‐90‐367‐3593‐3 (electronic version) . Promotores : Prof.B. Janssen Prof. F.
and my sister . to: Tresna. my parents.
Thesis Outline 1. Starch‐based blends by in situ polymerization 1. Typical example for the synthesis of polydioxanone end‐capped with 1.4.2. Starch production processes 1. Biomaterials from starch 1.4‐di‐O‐isopropylidene‐α‐D‐galactopyranose (2) 27 28 26 27 27 27 2. Plastic applications and waste issues 1. Starch‐based blends by melt mixing 1. Materials and Methods 2. Cross‐linked starch 18.104.22.168.2.3.3. Product analyses .2.2.2.Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction 22.214.171.124.5. Materials 2. Starch ‐ biopolymer blends and graft co‐polymers 1.2. Biodegradable plastics from starch 1.1. Starch modifications to improve product properties 1.1. Starch 1. Structure and properties of starch 1. Starch Esters 1. Introduction 2.2. The potential of biodegradable plastics 126.96.36.199.2.2. References 2 3 4 5 5 7 9 9 10 11 11 13 14 16 16 17 Chapter 2: Experimental Studies on the Ring Opening Polymerization of p‐dioxanone using an Al(OiPr)3‐ Monosaccharide Initiator System 2.3.3. Methods 188.8.131.52.184.108.40.206.220.127.116.11.4.3. Thermoplasticized starch 18.104.22.168.
4. Results and Discussions 22.214.171.124. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) 3.1. Results and Discussions 3.2.1. Product yield 2. Systematic studies 126.96.36.199. Calculations 3.2. Conclusions 188.8.131.52.184.108.40.206.3. Product analyses 220.127.116.11.2.3. Calculation of average degree of polymerization 18.104.22.168.2.2.1. Nomenclature 2.2. References Chapter 3: Synthesis of Poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone Grafted Starch Co‐polymers by Ring Opening Polymerisation using Silylated Starch Precursors 22.214.171.124.2. De‐silylation of poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone grafted silylated starch co‐polymers 51 51 52 52 52 53 54 48 49 49 50 50 3. Typical example of in situ polymerization of ε‐CL with silylated starch 50 3.1.2. Peracetylation of silylated starch 3. Synthesis of silylated starch viii .4. Methods 126.96.36.199. Materials 3. Materials and Methods 3.2. Typical example of the starch silylation procedure 3. Analytical methods 3. 2. Screening experiments 2.3. Introduction 188.8.131.52.2.4. Mechanistic aspects 2. Effects of process conditions on the average chain length ( X n exp ) and end group distribution 28 29 29 30 36 38 39 40 42 43 44 2.2.1.
1.1. Materials and Methods 184.108.40.206. Results and Discussion 4.3. FT‐IR measurements 4. 1H‐ and 13C‐NMR analyses 4.3. Peracetylation procedure 4. References ix .1.3. Deprotection of silylated‐starch‐g‐PCL 3.3.2. Nomenclature 3.3.3. Effect of the addition of toluene as a co‐solvent 220.127.116.11.2. References Chapter 4: Synthesis of Higher Fatty Acid Starch Esters using Vinyl Laurate and Stearate as Reactants 18.104.22.168. Conclusions 4. Typical example of the synthesis of laurate and stearate esters of corn starch 72 73 74 75 75 76 76 78 79 80 81 81 82 83 84 70 71 71 71 72 4. Product characterisation 4. 3.2.3. Materials 22.214.171.124.4. Determination of the Degree of Substitution (DS) 4.6. Catalysts screening 126.96.36.199.188.8.131.52.3. Introduction 4.5. Effect of vinyl ester to AHG ratio on the product DS 4. Analytical equipment 4.2.2. Exploratory experiments 4. Nomenclature 184.108.40.206. Methods 220.127.116.11.3.2. In situ ring opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone with silylated starch 57 63 64 64 65 3.2.5. Systematic studies 4. Conclusions 3.1.
3.2. Materials 18.104.22.168.22.214.171.124. Materials and Methods 5. Mathematical modelling 5. Analytical Equipment 5.1. Materials 5. Methods 126.96.36.199. Compatibilizer synthesis 6. Nomenclature 188.8.131.52.184.108.40.206.3. References Chapter 6: Synthesis and Properties of Reactive Interfacial Agents for Polycaprolactone‐Starch Blends 6.Chapter 5: Experimental and Modeling Studies on the Synthesis and Properties of Higher Fatty Esters of Corn Starch 5. Conclusions 5. Preparation of PCL‐starch blends with the reactive compatibilisers 110 220.127.116.11.18.104.22.168.22.214.171.124.2. Materials and Methods 6. Introduction 6. Experimental Design 5. Work‐up of PCL‐g‐DEM 108 109 109 109 109 110 110 6. Work‐up of PCL‐g‐GMA products 126.96.36.199.1. Typical example of the preparation of laurate and stearate starch Esters 88 86 87 87 87 88 5.1.2. Results and Discussion 5.2. Peracetylation procedure and Degree of Substitution (DS) determination 88 88 89 92 96 102 102 103 5. Analytical Methods 110 x . Product properties 5. Methods 6. Introduction 188.8.131.52.3.
Thermal properties of the compatibilizers 184.108.40.206.220.127.116.11. Calculation of the Degree of Functionalization (FD) of the reactive compatibilizers 18.104.22.168.3.2. Ternary blends compatibilized with PCL‐g‐GMA 6. Results and Discussions 22.214.171.124. Modeling of the combined effects of the GMA/ DEM and BPO intakes on the FD 111 111 111 116 117 118 120 121 122 123 125 128 128 129 6.3.3. Binary blends of starch and PCL 6. Effect of the BPO intake on the product FD 6.1.3. Conclusions 126.96.36.199.3.6. Ternary blends compatibilized with PCL‐g‐DEM 6.1. Statistical mdeling 6. Synthesis and Properties of Starch‐ PCL Blends 6. Nomenclature 6. Effect of substrate (GMA/DEM) to PCL Ratio on the FD 188.8.131.52. 6.2. Preparation of the ractive compatibilizers 184.108.40.206. References Summary Samenvatting (Dutch Summary) Acknowledgements List of Publications 133 137 141 143 xi .1.2.
. Different routes to modify starch to improve the product properties and to extend the application range will be provided.Chapter 1 Introduction Abstract A general overview of starch properties will be given and the potential use of starch as a starting material for a wide range of green biomaterials will be reviewed and discussed. an outline of this thesis is given. Finally.
sweet potato. The current price of corn starch is around $0. Past.1. Most of the starch produced worldwide is derived from corn.9 ton starch per hectare . potato. and wheat starch are also produced in large amounts [2. or peas) and in tubers or roots (i.Chapter 1 1. but other types of starch such as cassava.e. Plants synthesise and store starch in their structure as an energy reserve. An important polysaccharide is starch. with an average yield of 4. Potato accumulates starch to approximately 75 % of the dry weight in the tubers with a yield up to 21 ton starch per hectare. Most starch crops are very productive.e. wheat. . . Past. maize. rice. 4‐5]. Most of the starch is produced in the USA. barley. The second and third starch producer regions are Europe and Asia [4‐5].1. Starch 75% of all organic material on earth is present in the form of polysaccharides. 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Starch Production (Million Tons) 1995 2000 Year 2005 2010 Figure 1. current and future estimations of worldwide starch production are given in Figure 1.45 (estimated from the total volume and value of the US corn starch export ). while corn seeds consist of 65‐80% starch by weight. It is generally deposited in the form of small granules or cells with diameters between 1‐100 µm . potato or cassava) of the plants [2‐3]. The worldwide production of starch in 2008 is estimated to be around 66 million tons . present and a forecast of starch production  o : Europe □ : USA : Total ∆ : the Rest of the World 2 . sorghum. Starch is found in seeds (i. corn.1.
Introduction 1.b. a typical corn starch production process is given in Figure 1. The low density gluten is separated from the starch suspension by centrifugation.2. the debris is filtered from the slurry. and starch granules are obtained after centrifugation from the suspension. the mixture is fed to a hydrocyclone to separate the germ and the rest of the kernel. Figure 1. As an example. Cross‐sectional view of a corn kernel 3 . The starch is present in the endosperms (floury and horny). Corn starch production  a. Starch production processes Starch is generally extracted from the plant by wet milling processes [9‐10].a. After initial cleaning to remove cob.2. and is embedded in a proteinaceous cellular matrix as is shown in Figure 1. After a coarse milling. gluten.2.1. and starch. which is again fed to a second milling process.1. b. sand. a. The plant material is grounded in water. The resulting suspension from the mills contains fiber. The fiber is removed using washing screens. and other foreign materials. Typical corn‐milling operation b. The resulting starch is further washed in a cyclone and finally dried. the corn kernel is softened by steeping in warm water containing SO2 until the volume of the kernel increases with 55‐65%.
. H2COH H OH H O H H O b. containing periodic branches linked with the backbones through α‐D‐(1. H OH H O H OH H O H H OH H c. The content of amylose and amylopectine in starch varies and largely depends on the starch source.. H2COH H .. The starch granules will swell rapidly to many times of its original volume. The molecular weight of amylopectin is higher than that of amylose and is typically 4‐5 x 108 Da . H OH H2COH H2COH H .2. H2COH H H OH H O H OH O H OH O CH2 H O H H OH H O H OH H O ... Figure 1.. The amylose content of several common starches is given in Table 1. H OH H H2COH H2COH H O H H OH H H2COH H O H H OH H O H OH H O . Chemical Structure of Starch a. Amylose c. Heating a starch solution leads to loss of hydrogen bonding in the interior of the starch granule and the starch will start to gelatinize.a..4)‐glucosidic bonds. but it is very hygroscopic and binds water reversibly.) . Amylopectin is a branched polymer. .. Structure and properties of starch Starch is a polymer consisting of anhydroglucose (AHG) units (see Figure 1.. H . .3.6‐7 x 105 Da .3. Two types of AHG polymers are usually present in starch: amylose and amylopectin [2‐3. the amylose content is between 18‐28% .1. 6]. Amylose is essentially a linear polymer in which AHG units are predominantly connected through α‐D‐(1. Amylopectin Starch is insoluble in cold water... Typically.. a. H O H OH H OH H O H OH O H OH H O . The linear 4 . Each branch contains about 20‐30 anhydroglucose units. Anhydroglucose (AHG) unit b.6)‐ glucosidic bonds ..1.Chapter 1 1.. The molecular weight of amylose is a function of the plant source and processing method. but usually in the range of 1.
The resulting suspension contains a mixture of linear amylose molecules.2. Plastics are used in a wide range of applications and the demand is still increasing every year .7 26 Table 1. Table 1. The first generation of commercial plastics was derived from cellulose nitrate and is known as celluloid [12‐14]. The gelatinization temperature range can be defined as the temperature at which granular swelling begins until the temperature when nearly 100% of the granules are gelatinized .5 25.8 220.127.116.11.8 16. depending on the amount of water present. Amylose content of common starches  Starch Arrowroot Corn Hybrid amylomaize Class V Hybrid amylomaize Class VII Oat Manioc Potato Rice Sago Sweet potato Tapioca Wheat Amylose (%) 20. Cellulose nitrate was first prepared by A. swollen granules. The gelatinization temperature range of various starch sources is given in Table 1.5 28 52 70‐75 27 15. and granule fragments.2. and celluloid was 5 .2. and. Introduction amylose molecules leach out of the granules into the solution. Parker in 1838.7 20 18.5‐70 62‐72 63‐72 58‐64 1. Starch gelatinization temperature range  Starch Potato Tapioca Corn Waxy corn Wheat Gelatinization Temperature Range [o C] 59‐68 58. Biomaterials from starch 1. Plastic Applications and Waste Issues Plastic is the general term for a wide range of synthetic or semisynthetic polymerisation products. will form a thick paste or gel.
and 37% of the total plastics demand in EU  is used as packaging materials. electrical. PA-. space. polystyrene (PS). Worldwide Plastics Production (1950‐2006)  6 . 15].Fibers 150 1989: 100 100 1976: 50 50 1950: 1. discovered by Baekeland in 1907 [12. The latter is important when using the material for packaging purposes to save weight. when polyethylene (PE) was invented. and therefore need less energy to shape it into useful materials .) 250 Included: Thermoplastics. Polyurethanes. and PP-Fibers 2006: 245 2002: 200 200 Plastics Production (Million Tons) Not Included: PET-. While celluloid is derived from a natural polymer (cellulose). Hyatt in 1870 . polypropylene (PP). Coatings. A dramatic increase in demand for plastics began after World War II. the worldwide plastics production has reached 245 million ton per annum  (see Figure 1. Thermosets. the oldest purely synthetic plastic is Bakelite.4. Plastics are also used for building materials and automotive.). Adhesives. About 29% of the total plastics produced in the USA . The production and consumption of plastics has increased significantly with a rate of almost 10% every year since 1950. Elastomers. Sealants.5 0 1950 1960 1970 1980 Year 1990 2000 2010 Figure 1. and consumer products (see Figure 1. polyethylene terephtalate (PET).4. The largest application of plastics is for packaging purposes. They have a low density and can be shaped in thin films while maintaining good properties. Important polymers used for packaging are polyethylene (HDPE and LDPE).Chapter 1 patented by J. In 2006. and PolyAcryl. for instance to be used in packaging and paper coatings . polyvinyl chloride (PVC).5. Plastics have lower melting temperatures compared to glass and metals. PE is a very versatile plastic because it can be shaped easily into various forms. Plastics are very attractive materials. and energy during transportation of goods. and polycarbonates (PC).
however. 6]. Plastics have been polluting sea [1. The volume fraction of plastic in MSW is much larger due to the low density of plastics. Most of the waste is still disposed (50%) by landfill or incinerated to recover the energy (30%) . 16]. which are usually found in waste streams. and accumulation of its residues in soil cause significant reductions in agricultural yields. The potential of biodegradable plastics The application of biodegradable plastics could be an attractive solution for the problems related to the use of conventional plastics (vide infra). hydropower plants operation.5. the amount of plastics in MSW increased from less than 1% in the 1960 to 11. and lakes.7% in 2006 . and is only effective for single plastic sources or simple plastic formulations. and other public works . In Europe (2006). and may be more than twice the weight fraction . The disposal of plastics materials in municipal solid waste (MSW) is a serious issue in many parts in the world. threatening fishery.2. plastics waste was ranked as the second major source of MSW after paper and paperboard. Recycling (part of) the plastics to reduce the amount of MSW also has limitations. Biodegradable plastics are polymeric materials capable of decomposing when given an 7 . In 1996. rivers. It is not applicable for thermoset resins . are not easy to recycle . Introduction Plastic waste. soil. Figure 1. It has a high volume to weight ratio and is resistant to degradation.2. In the USA. irrigation. Plastic litter is hazardous to wildlife [1. Plastic applications and waste treatment in Europe  1. consisting of 25%‐v of the total waste . is causing serious environmental problems. Co‐mingled plastics. only 20% of the plastic is recycled. ship navigation.
because they take part in nature’s cycle of renewal. biopolymers from nature (from plants. and these are shown below: ISO 472: 1998 ‐ A plastic designed to undergo a significant change in its chemical structure under specific environmental conditions resulting in a loss of some properties that may vary as measured by standard test methods appropriate to the plastics and application in a period of time that determines its classification. The price of these biodegradable plastics is expected to be reduced considerably in the next decade . Nowadays new types of biodegradable plastics with improved properties and lower costs have been developed .5/ 8 . and microorganisms) and biodegradable synthetic polymers . Biopolymers are inherently biodegradable.Chapter 1 appropriate environment and sufficient amount of time . and since 2000 they have become competitive with traditional materials in some applications [20‐21]. Japanese Biodegradable Plastic Society draft proposal ‐ Biodegradable plastics are polymeric materials which are changed into lower molecular weight compounds where at least one step in the degradation process is through metabolism in the presence of naturally occurring organisms. The change in chemical structure results from the action of naturally occurring micro‐ organisms. proteins (present abundantly in plants and animals). biological and/or physical forces in the environment at a rate which leads to fragmentation or disintegration of the plastics. ASTM sub‐committee D20.2 working group on biodegradable polymers ‐ Biodegradation of a plastic material is a process leading to naturally occurring metabolic end products. the price of PLA based plastics in 2010 is estimated to be around € 1. animals. Biodegradable plastic waste may be treated in composting facilities. The considerable growth of interest in composting as a means to replace landfill due to the decreasing disposal spaces (especially in Europe) may also help the progress of biodegradable plastics development .96 proposal ‐ Degradable plastics are plastic materials that undergo bond scission in the backbone of a polymer through chemical. Biodegradable plastics may be classified into two general groups. together with food and yard waste as well as paper. Biodegradable plastics have gained considerable interest since the 1980s. Common natural biopolymers are carbohydrates. For instance. The market price of biodegradable plastics (mainly from starch and PLA) has decreased the last years. Several authorities have provided definitions for biodegradable plastics . It may also be treated in sewage sludge water treatment plants or buried in the soil [20‐21]. and polyesters from micro‐organisms . DIN 103.
. Biodegradable plastics are especially very useful for single‐use applications. 1. before they can be applied as biodegradable plastics.50‐4. alone or complexed with natural or synthetic biodegradable polymers) or from polylactic acid which originates from the fermentation of a starch feedstock. blending with other materials. Biodegradable Plastics from Starch Starch is a very attractive source for the development of biodegradable plastics.2‐ 1.4 or $ 1. half of its price in 2003 (around 3 Euro/kg). napkins) . This price is much lower than conventional plastics derived from oil. starch must be modified. 9 . consumer products and food products. Consequently.50/ kg in 2005) is also expected to be lower in the future due to considerable reduction in modification costs . € 1. because the price of oil based polymers may still increase due to the rise in the crude oil prices .8‐ 2. Examples are the use as packaging material for carrier bags. hygienic materials (diapers. either from starch‐based materials (slightly modified starch.3.2. Virgin starch is not suitable as a packaging material. The price of starch‐based biodegradable plastics (€ 1. pots). Starch modifications to improve product properties Several techniques may be applied to develop starch based biomaterials with improved properties. Introduction kg. tensile and flexural strength) and is too sensitive to water [26‐27]. or when environmental impacts have to be minimized. when recycling is not practical or uneconomical [20‐21].4 per kg in 2007‐2008 ).45 per kg . agricultural products (mulch films. either by plasticization. biofillers for tires. such as polyethylene (PE. breathable fabrics. Biodegradable plastics are also used for food servicewares . chemical modification or combinations of them . and chewable items for pets [1. These are summarized briefly in the next sections. 20]. towels. 1. Starch may become an attractive raw material for plastics in the future. The global production capacity of starch‐based bioplastics in 2010 is estimated to increase to 200‐300 kiloton per year from 77‐200 kiloton in 2003 .3. utensils . Bastioli [20‐21] showed that nearly all biodegradable plastics available in the market are derived from starch. It cannot be shaped in films with adequate mechanical properties (high percentage elongation. The price of starch in 2007 was about $ 0.
which still limits their use. Starch can be modified to obtain materials which melt below the decomposition temperature . As the result. and blow moulding [28. plasticized. The plasticized starch properties may be tuned by changing the temperature of processing. 40]. A biodegradation study according to ISO/CEN 14852 and ASTM D5209‐92 standards  on films made from starch–glycerol–water mixtures confirmed that the films are easily biodegradable. such as water and polyols (glycerol. 32. . This problem is mainly caused by the presence of strong inter‐ and intra‐molecular hydrogen bonds between the starch macromolecules [28. The use of water as a plasticizer is not preferable.1. sorbitol. The modification involves break down of the starch granular structure by the use of plasticizers at high temperatures (90‐180 oC) and shear. which will result in a continuous phase in the form of a viscous melt [29‐30. the thermal properties of glycerol‐plasticized starch are a function of water content [31. The thermoplasticization process will decrease the interactions of the molecular chain and destruct the structure of the starch . The brittleness is known to increase in time due to free volume relaxation and retrogradation. et al  discovered that the elongation of break of the thermoplastic starch is significantly improved by plasticization with glycol. For instance. approximately 230 oC) . 33].Chapter 1 1. which results in embrittlement. phase separation may still occur. Although thermoplasticization seems to be a promising method. because the resulting product will be brittle when equilibrated with ambient humidity . resulted in the formation of an amorphous mass [35. Another issue is the poor water resistance and low strength. 30. 32‐ 36]. At intermediate water levels. or melted starch [29. the semicrystalline structure of starch and its granular form are lost and the starch polymers are partially depolymerized. 39]. glycerol. 37]. and hexylene glycol. The plasticizers are also usually hydrophilic and can be 10 .3. and therefore are processable by conventional polymer processing techniques such as injection. extrusion. The modified products are known as thermoplastic. and the properties and amount of plasticizers. destructed. water content. which is even above the thermal degradation temperature. 40]. Thermoplasticized starch Virgin starch is brittle and difficult to be processed into articles due to its relatively high glass transition temperature (Tg. The use of other plasticizers (for example glycerol) results in a rubbery material. There are several substances used as plasticizer for the preparation of thermoplastic starch (TPS). with better properties than virgin starch in various applications. TPS synthesized from polyol and sugar plasticizers have the tendency to re‐crystallize (retrogradation) after being stored for a period of time. glycol. Yu. 35. 30]. sugars) [30.
leading to higher viscosities [42‐43]. Higher processing temperatures generally led to higher cross‐linking levels. especially in the food. resulting in an increase of the Young’s modulus and tensile strength of the products and a decrease in elongation at break.3‐1) are still soluble in water. The cross‐linked products are therefore more rigid (and less elastic) materials than virgin starch . and particularly with acetic acid . Introduction washed out by water . and ethylenic compounds. Schuetzenberger acetylated starch with acetic anhydride . The esterification reaction is catalyzed by H+ and proceeds with the formation of water . The DS is defined as the moles of substituents per mole of AHG units .3. Cross‐linked starch An anhydroglucose molecule of starch contains two secondary and one primary hydroxyl group. Three different types of starch acetates may be distinguished. Solutions to improve the properties of TPS are blending.3. or coating with hydrophobic polymers [33. These hydroxyls can react easily with a wide range of compounds such as acid anhydrides. The most popular starch ester is starch acetate . Substitution of the hydroxyl groups of starch with acetate groups makes the esters more hydrophobic than native starch. epoxy. Chemicals of these classes having two or more of the reactive groups may react with two or more hydroxyls of the starch molecules.01‐0. and adhesive industry. Breakdown of the starch and the formation of low molecular weight products occur to a significant extent . Already in 1865. paper. High DS starch acetate can be easily casted 11 . Silva. As a result. differing in Degree of Substitution (DS). The products are called cross‐linked starches. 46].3. Most studies dealt with the synthesis of starch esters of C1‐C4 carboxylic acids. 1. synthesized by direct addition of formic acid to starch at room temperature. organic chloro‐compounds. 1. Low DS products (0. The simplest starch ester is starch formate (C1). textile. Medium DS starch acetates (0. aldehydes. the use of formyl esters of starch is much lower than that of acetate esters. The cross‐linked starches have found many applications. Cross‐linking results in a reduction of the solubility in water and to thickening. 39].2) are commercially available and used as food additives and in the textile industry.2. Starch Esters The development of starch esters started in the mid 19th century [44. et al  studied the mechanical properties of films from maize starch cross‐linked by sodium trimetaphosphate (SMTP). while highly substituted starch acetate (DS of 2‐3) are soluble in organic solvents.
DMF. The kinetics of the reaction between gelatinized aqueous potato starch and vinyl acetate was studied by De Graaf. Several synthetic routes have been developed for starch esters. Mechanism of starch acetylation using vinyl acetate 12 . hydrogencarbonate. while alkaline catalysts (such as carbonate. Esterification may be performed using acid anhydrides in aqueous media or organic solvents (pyridine.1. Another attractive route involves the use of vinyl esters as reagents . xylene. et al [55‐56]. acetate.Chapter 1 into films using organic solvents. and phosphate) will result in C‐2. Neutral and weak acid/ alkaline catalysts result in regioselective substitution at the C2 hydroxyl groups of starch. or isopropanol) with acidic (hydrochloric or sulfuric acid) or alkaline (NaOH or triethylamine) catalysts . and is shown in Scheme 1. High DS starch acetates are thermoplastic materials suitable to be used as biodegradable plastics .1. allowing the polymer to be produced with a range of hydrophobicities . Acetylation of starch in water and DMSO using vinyl acetate has been studied lately by Mormann and Al‐Higari  as well as Dicke . DMSO. Starch OH + OH - Starch O - + H2O O - O Starch O - + H3C C O CH O H3C C O CH2 H3C C O CH O Starch CH2 H2O O Starch + H3C C H + OH - O H3C C O Starch O - + OH - H3C C O OH Starch H2O O H3C C OH + Starch O - Scheme 1. The degree of acetylation of starch acetates can be easily controlled. Starch esters have also been synthesized using alkanoyl chlorides [49‐53]. but also C‐6 and C‐ 3 substitution . Starch triacetate has been successfully synthesized using acetic anhydride in combination with pyridine‐gelatinized starch .
The fatty acid chloride reactants are. However. If the right combination of chemical groups on the two components is present along the polymers backbone. octadecanoyl) chlorides [49‐53]. relatively expensive and rather corrosive. 1. The second methodology for producing polymer blends involves the in situ polymerization of one component (thus originally present in the blend in monomeric form) in the presence of the second one. Although the in situ polymerization process is not as technologically straightforward and economically convenient as melt‐mixing.61) products could be obtained using this approach.g. Despite this advantage. interfacial agents (e. The introduction of longer acid chain is expected to reduce the brittleness of virgin starch and to increase its hydrophobicity . the latter are mixed together. The use of methyl and glyceryl esters of fatty acid (in the absence of solvent) to synthesize starch fatty acid esters has also been studied . melt‐mixing remains the preferred route to polymer blends mainly because of very practical reasons: low costs. dodecanoyl.34‐0. however. The classical example of such process is represented by the production of High Impact Poystyrene (HIPS) obtained by styrene polymerization in the presence of polybutadiene . but only relatively low‐DS (0. The first involves simple melt mixing of the two components for example by extrusion. it is frequently used in order to chemically graft the polymerized component on the other one (polystyrene on polybutadiene in our example above ). they locate themselves at the interface between the 13 . the two components are chemically linked to each other. As a result. which in turn provide a very strong adhesion at the molecular level between the dispersed phase and the matrix. Introduction The synthesis of long chain fatty acid ester of starch has attracted much interest lately. However. in the simplest case of a binary blend.3.e. Their role is comparable to the one of a surfactant in emulsion formation . in order to achieve also a good molecular adhesion between the phases by melt mixing. a chemical reaction might take place upon processing (reactive extrusion).4. The degree of adhesion (binding) between the dispersed phase and the matrix is dependent on the molcular interactions between the two components and represents a crucial factor in determining the morphology of the blends and eventually the product performance . Two main methodologies are applied for the production of polymer blends. Starch ‐ Biopolymer Blends and Graft Co‐Polymers Blending of different polymers is an established method to obtain products with improved properties. compatibilizers) might be used. availability of mixing equipment and no necessity to use any organic solvent (often employed for the in situ polymerization). polymers are rarely miscible with each other  so that. By working at temperatures above the melting point or glass transition temperature of the two components. Fatty‐acid starch esters have been synthesized using fatty acid (octanoyl. one component will be dispersed into the other. i.
Starch‐based blends by melt mixing Starch‐synthetic polymer blending has been studied as early as in 1973 [64‐65]. 39. 80‐ 81] or food packaging . 64‐98]. Illustration of the role of interfacial agent in compatibilizing blends 1. there have been efforts to blend as well as to graft synthetic polymers onto starch.Chapter 1 two components stabilizing the dispersion (most probably by a steric repulsion mechanism ) and providing an improved adhesion at the interface.6. The uncompatibilized blends of starch and 14 . A suitable interfacial agent for the blends of two polymeric materials is a block copolymer for which the chemical structure of every block is the same (or very similar) to the one of the individual components to be blended  (illustrated in Figure 1.3.). In the past.4. The most often used synthetic polymer for blending with starch is polyethylene [27. The synthesis of compatibilizer and its use for starch/ synthetic polymer blending has also been studied. The starch/polyethylene blends are used for agricultural mulch [27. The blending and grafting of starch with synthetic polymers is usually performed to achieve higher hydrophobicity and to improve the mechanical and thermal properties as well as to obtain cheaper and more biodegradable products. 66‐81]. Matrix Dispersed Phase Figure 1.1. Interfacial agents already available on the market can be used as such or can be produced upon mixing (in situ) by chemical reaction of the two components. The products have been synthesized in the lab as well as on industrial scale [32.6.
As is the case of blends with PE. The mechanical properties of the blend are also improved. the compatibilizer. The use of conventional synthetic polymer such as PE for blending with starch will only result in a partially biodegradable material. poly‐dioxanone. since the conventional synthetic polymers are usually poorly or non‐biodegradable. and of a premade starch‐g‐PCL  for starch/PCL blends resulted in a better dispersion between the phases and in turn in improved mechanical properties compared to the uncompatibilized blends. which both can react in situ with the hydroxyl groups of starch [70. and poly‐caprolactone). Polycaprolactone (PCL) is a well‐known synthetic biodegradable polyester. To obtain completely biodegradable products. 96]. Introduction polyethylene show a coarse phase separation due to differences in polarity of starch (hydrophilic) and polyethylene (hydrophobic). while the tensile strength of the compatibilized ones decreases only slightly with the starch content. PCL‐g‐maleic anhydride (PCL‐g‐MA) [91. The ester bonds of these polymers are susceptible to attack by water and this leads to enhanced biodegradability. poly‐valerolactone. systematic studies on the compatibilizer precursor synthesis as well as on the influence of the chain topology and chemical reactivity (for the in situ compatibilizer formation) have not yet been reported. thus improving the dispersion of starch in the PE matrix. and EVOH . As a result a graft copolymer (PE‐g‐Starch). 84‐98]. The tensile strength of the uncompatibilized blends is drastically reduced when starch content is increased.e. 15 . The use of reactive compatibilizer precursors PCL‐g‐glycidyl methacrylate (PCL‐g‐GMA) [89‐90]. is formed upon mixing. and poly‐lactones (such as poly‐butyrolactone. synthetic biodegradable polymers have been applied. These biodegradable polyesters will finally decompose into non‐toxic products . among which synthetic polyesters are considered very promising materials . PE‐g‐MA contains reactive anhydride sites. which combines excellent biodegradability with acceptable mechanical properties. Polyethylene‐g‐maleic anhydride (PE‐g‐MA) and polyethylene‐g‐glycidyl methacrylate (PE‐g‐GMA) have been used as reactive compatibilizer for starch/PE blends. Examples of these biodegradable polyesters are poly‐glycolide. 72‐73]. i. The mechanical properties of these blends (tensile strength and elongation at break) decrease at higher starch content. the uncompatibilized blends of starch with PCL give coarse phase separation and a reduction in the mechanical properties when the starch content is increased. Despite these good results. Some of these polyesters also have very good mechanical. dextran‐g‐PCL . 39. Studies on the blending of starch with PCL have been already described [32. poly‐lactides. thermal and water/gas permeability properties that are even comparable to bulk non‐biodegradable polymers such as PE and PP. PCL‐g‐pyromellitic anhydride [94‐95]. while PE‐g‐GMA posseses epoxide groups.
4. In this reaction.Chapter 1 1.4. thus resulting eventually in low GE values .3. 1. the synthesis of starch‐g‐PCL is reported. and difficult to handle since it releases ethane. In Chapter 3. and starch‐g‐ biopolymer formation. Thesis Outline The objective of this thesis is to study synthetic pathways to obtain starch derivatives with the potential to be used as bioplastic. leading to formation of PCL homopolymers rather that starch‐g‐PCL. Starch‐based blends by in situ polymerization The synthesis of starch based graft copolymers by in situ polymerization represents not only an alternative route to melt blending (vide supra) for the production of novel biomaterials. defined as the percentage of grafted polyester to starch compared to the total amount of homopolymer and grafted polyester) . starch‐g‐PCL has been synthesized using toxic materials such as isocyanates . Previous studies showed that common ROP catalysts such as tin octoate or aluminium isopropoxide gave low (0‐14%) grafting efficiencies (GE.3.4‐di‐O‐isopropylidene‐α‐D‐galactopyranose) using i Al(O Pr)3 as the catalyst. Another possible cause for the low GE values is the heterogenous nature of the reaction. In the past. Three routes have been studied in detail: starch esterification. Another approach consists of the Ring Opening Polymerization (ROP) of ε‐caprolactone monomer in the presence of starch. The highest GE value (up to 90%) has been achieved when using triethylaluminium as catalyst [97‐98]. but it can also provide an efficient synthetic methodology for the production of a compatibilizer to be used for melt blending of starch with a biopolymer .2. and the presence of liquid‐solid reaction system leads to reduced reaction rates between starch and ε−caprolactone. the hydroxyl groups of starch are supposed to function as initiating sites. The method applied basically consists of three steps (temporary partial protection of starch‐hydroxyl 16 . during the reaction. The water in starch granules competes with the hydroxyl groups of starch in the initiation step of the polymerization reaction. Chapter 2 describes the ROP of p‐dioxanone initiated by a protected monosaccharide (1. The results of this study have been used as input for the synthesis of the starch‐g‐PCL. A new strategy for the in situ ROP of ε−caprolactone on starch with the use of common ROP catalyst is therefore highly desirable. which however is extremely air‐ and water‐sensitive. a very flammable by‐product. Starch is insoluble in the typical organic solvents used for ROP (such as toluene or THF). starch/ biopolymer blending. Starch is a very hydrophilic material that always contains moisture.2.
1. Breed. R. Passchall).html. 1984. ROP of ε−CL on the remaining starch‐hydroxyl groups. O. in Starch: Chemistry and Technology (Ed. Sand Hutton. USA.. . 1986. Aarhus. . UK. J. Based on these preliminary results. 105‐122. Website of International Starch Institute. Inc. The Biocomposites Centre. Corn. Stevens: Green Plastics. Summary Report for the European Union. The use of these compatibilizers in starch/PCL blends.A. addition of co‐solvent. and removal of the silyl groups). 2007 17 .M. 1.N. The model. Corn Refiners Annual Report 2007. Fowler: Industrial markets for starch. USA. An Introduction to the New Science of Biodegradable Plastics. Introduction by trimethylsilyl groups. Washington D. Academic Press.dk/isi/stat/rawmaterial.starch. together with the mechanical and thermal properties of the synthesized starch esters are reported in Chapter 5. . C.5. R. Inc. New Jersey. The synthesis of two interesting compatibilizers (PCL‐g‐GMA and PCL‐g‐DEM) for starch/PCL blends is discussed in Chapter 6. are also reported. starch. . Poirier. Young: Fractionation of starch. London. and application of different catalysts) on starch esterification using vinyl fatty esters (vinyl laurate and vinyl stearate) is provided in Chapter 4. 2004. Bemiller. E. Corn Refiners Association. References . . a systematic experimental study on the effect of the process variables on the starch ester DS has been performed. Y.B. York. in Modified Starches: Properties and Uses (Ed. Denmark: http://www. CRC Press. University of Wales. UK. Holmes: Interactive European Network for Industrial Crops and their Applications.C. A preliminary study on the effect of several process variables (reactant ratio.H.L. O. Central Science Laboratory. Nawrath. Part of A Global Economy. Wurzburg: Introduction. accessed on August 01. E. 2000‐2005. including the mechanical and thermal properties. P. .. Somerville: Mini review: Plant polymers for biodegradable plastics: cellulose. C. Whistler. Gywnedd. Mol. Agricultural and Rural Strategy Group. . and polyhydroxyalkanoates.S.F. 1995. 2002. The results were quantified using a statistical model. Bangor.B. Wurzburg). Boca Raton. C. UK. de Bragança. Princeton University Press.. A. 2005. USA. 2008.
London. Watson: Corn and sorghum starches: production.. accessed on August 19. 23.htm. . .J.J. R. R. 11. Munich.. . Link.gov/garbage/plastic. 1996. . Institute for Prospective Technological Studies and European Science and Technology Observatory. S. A. Applications. B. Angerer: Technical Report Series. Braun: Environmental impacts of biobased/ biodegradable packaging. 27‐40. Munich. J. Brussels. Patel. Ind. Washington DC. in Kirk Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology Volume 22. O. Wolf.B. 105‐109 . Husing. C.E. Schleich.R. in Starch: Chemistry and Technology (Ed. 2008. USA. J. Inc. Rustgi: Biodegradable polymers.A. 53. Lancaster. and Regulations. .J. Bemiller. Cleaner Prod. 2003. Strong: Plastics: Materials and Processing. R.Chapter 1 . Processing. R. Starch/ Starke 2001. demand and recovery for 2006 in Europe.. A. M. USA: http://www. Bastioli: Global status of the production of biobased packaging materials. 53 . Techno‐economic Feasibility of Large‐Scale Production of Bio‐based Polymers in Europe. Ren: Biodegradable plastics: a solution or challenge?. Germany. U. The compelling facts about plastics: An analysis of plastics production. . G. G. Sci. 1273‐1335 . Englewood Cliffs. J. the Food Biopack Conference Proceeding (Ed. Selke. Germany.L. Weber). Department of Dairy and Food Science. E. New Jersey. . 2000. 2000. Properties. J. . Whistler. Fifth Edition (Ed. Whistler. Culter: Plastics Packaging. . 1984. Seidel). Passchall). USA. UK. 1998.F.epa. Eng. Inc.W. Bastioli: Global status of the production of biobased packaging materials. Denmark. 1939. Belgium.M. R.E. S. C. 2005. Ehrenstein: Polymeric Materials: Structure. . Crank. 2008 . J. Starch/ Starke 2001.N. M. Technomic Publishing Company. Selke: Packaging and the Environment. Chandra. S. Hoboken. Hanser Publishers.. Fritz. 1990. F.L. Applications. Weith: Plastics. USA. Inc. John Wiley & Sons. R. . X. Polym. A.351‐355. Daniel: Starch. C. Hanser Publishers. 557‐562. Association of Plastics Manufacturers. Prog. Plastics Europe. Frederiksberg. Properties.M. 31. J. Marscheider‐Weidemann. Hernandez. 2000. Chem. Inc. Prentice‐Hall. Website of Environmental Protection Agency.D. Academic Press. 18 . The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University.
J. Polymer Sci. Seville. Otey. Avérous. Vliegenthart: Interaction between dry starch and plasticisers glycerol or ethylene glycol. Martin. 53.G. T. W. interaction.P. Department of Dairy and Food Science.A. Wang: Properties of starch blends with biodegradable polymers. X.V. L. epoxy functions and stearoyl chloride. 275‐282 19 . A. 1996. and Couturier: Properties of biodegradable multilayer films based on plasticized wheat starch. A Real Case of “Force Majeure” that should be passed through to Packaging Prices Immediately. . 4. C. A. 2003. 62. E. and Olsen. P. Gao. Ind. N. .. K. of concentrated barley starch‐glycerol‐water mixtures. J.K. 2005. X. . Starch/Stärke. Ind. Yang. Mikkilti. 494–504 . Bagdi. Carvalho. 53. van Soest. R. Press Release: Major Price Hikes in Plastics. Weber). Doane: Starch‐based blown films. Physical and mechanical properties of biobased materials – starch.F.M. Spain. report of Food Biopack Project (Ed. Rev. 1980. Yu. Smits. Macromol. Parker: Phase and glass transition behaviour. 43. J. a model for thermoplastic starch. A. 53. Polym.H. Muller. 592‐595. 2005. 2008. Part C: Polym.G. Y. J.M. K. M. 372–380 .J.S. Wang. 2000. Wang. 57. Polym. Introduction European Commission Directorate General of Joint Research Centre. P. Crops Prod. K. Nielsen. measured by differential scanning calorimetry and solid state NMR spectroscopy.H. Eng. Dev. Appl. J. Sci. properties. Ma: The effects of citric acid on the properties of thermoplastic starch plasticized by glycerol. Prod. Petersen. Interfaces 2006. Yu. status and perspectives.L. Curvelo.Lin: Note. polylactate and polyhydroxybutyrate. Gandini: Surface chemical modification of thermoplastic starch: reactions with isocyanates. 356‐361 .. . the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University. G. Y. and Pukanszky: Thermoplastic starch/layered silicate composites: structure. Westhoff. Starch/ Starke 2001. Kruiskamp. J. P. J. Biobased packaging materials for the food industry. 2005. Compos. Res. Chambre Syndicale des Emballages en Matiere Plastique (French Plastic and Flexible Packaging Association). Schwach. Frederiksberg C. 1491‐1494 . Chem. July 15.M.J. O. 1–17 . B. 21. 409–416 . R. J. Carbohydr.F. A. Denmark.B. 13. Starch/ Stärke 2001. Moates. 2003.M. Carbohydr. Forssella. F. 1997. 331–336 . J. 385–409 . Biodegradable thermoplastic starch. P.. 34.
Hulleman. J. Jarowenko: Acetylated starch and miscellanous organic esters.. Ind. Vikman. Degrad. M. Aburto. B. S. 1986.A. F. E. Mullen. 389‐398 . I. . 46–51 . 24. Boca Raton. E. 2594–2604 .D. B. Kontoyiannis. 56. 1997. Prinos. Ind. J. C. . Ribeiro. Appl. Ramsay. Inc. Pilin. B. Grohens: Starch modifications. I. Qiao. 34. Rodriguez‐Gonzalez. J.W. M. 1943. Chem. destructuration and hydrolysis during O‐formylation.. Chem. Thiebaud. Favis: Rheological and thermal properties of thermoplastic with high glycerol content. Inc. T. Levesque. M. Ramsay. Merrill: Properties of fatty‐acid esters of starch. C. Wurzburg: Cross‐linked starches. 1999.J. Eng.B. C. Feller. A. Silva. (editor). USA. Tserki.T. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 1995. 1647‐1656. Polym. 705‐721. chapter 4 in book Modified Starches: Properties and Uses. Sci. C. T. Panayiotou: Processing and characterization of starch/polycaprolactone products. K. Borredon. V. 77. Starch/Stärke 2005.A. Andrade: Reactive processing and mechanical properties of cross‐linked maize starch. Sun: Reinforced thermoplastic acetylated starch with layered silicates. J. . A. E. Wurzburg). 65. 1986. in Modified Starches: Properties and Uses (Ed. A. H. Y. Gattin.A. Y. 381‐384 . P. Coutuier: Comparative biodegradation study of starch‐ and polylactic acid‐based materials. W. Polym. O. R. Polym. F. 2006. J. Carbohydr. . Ind.B. W.Chapter 1 . S. Polym. Favis: High performance LDPE/ thermoplastic starch blends: a sustainable alternative to pure polyethylene. van der Zee. CRC Press. G. Copinet. D. Bertrand. 58 (9).B. 20 .P. Alric. 58. O. 44.W.W.A. Bikiaris.D.C. Polym.F. 1209‐1217.H. Pacsu: Starch studies: Preparation and properties of starch triesters. 1517–1526 .C. 55‐78. Eng. 1. Stab. 11–17. Crops Prod. Divers.J. X. P. J. C. Matzinos. J. Rodriguez‐Gonzalez. USA. Jiang. 1942. Carvalho. Sagar. J. . 57. 17–24 . Ibezim. 2004. E. Appl. 2002. CRC Press. 139–147 . Sci. 581–586 . Wurzburg. Mullen. Polymer 2003.D. Environ. Myllarinen. 35. Boca Raton. 74. Panayiotou: Properties of fatty‐acid esters of starch and their blends with LDPE. Pacsu: Starch studies: Possible industrial utilization of starch esters. E. O.D. 2001. B. 2004. Feil: Morphology and enzymatic degradation of thermoplastic starch– polycaprolactone blends.W.
de Graaf. A.928. . Guegan. 2001. de Graaf: Ph. Aburto. A. B. Cellulose 2004. Macromolecules 1996. Alric. I. 51. 5590‐5598 . 302‐307. 137‐144. 255‐263. D. P. Dubois: Synthesis and characterization of compatibilized poly(ε‐caprolactone)/ granular starch composites. Macosko. Alric. Smith. 51. I. Bikiaris.M. P. C. J. Inc. J. Starch‐Starke 2004. S.C. Borredon. 118‐121. Borredon: Organic solvent‐free transesterification of various starches with lauric acid methyl ester and triacyl glycerides. Alric. W. I. Al‐Higari: Acylation of starch with vinyl acetate in water. Beenackers: The kinetics of the acetylation of gelatinised potato starch. Carbohydr. S. . Introduction.E. W.. W. D. 1960 . Borredon: Preparation of long‐chain esters of starch using fatty acid chlorides in the absence of an organic solvent. J. Borredon: Free‐solvent synthesis and properties of higher fatty esters of starch ‐ Part 2. P. Thiebaud. Degee. Starch‐ Starke 2005. Appl. C. Munich. . 74. G. 1997. C. Rutot. Sci. US Patent 2.K. characterization. Duquesne. . . . A. Prinos. Hanser Publishers.F. Bakker. Bakker and G. Thiebaud. C. 1440‐1451.H. Scott. R. . A. J. 175. J. Starch‐Starke 1999. 132‐135. P.E.Coleman. Thesis.E. E.Stokes. Senocq. Introduction . Hu). Dicke. T. Inoue: Compatibilizers for melt blending: Premade block copolymers. 1991. I. R. USA. Macromol.W. F. . J. Marechal. D. Carbohydr. G. J.Graf.H. Alric. A. Mormann. A. . M. C. in Reactive Polymer Blending (Ed. 34.Fennel Evans: Fundamental of Interfacial Engineering. Polym. Wiley‐VCH. Janssen. Aburto. C. . . Panayiotou: Properties of octanoated starch and its blends with polyethylene. Broekroelofs. Germany. 29. J. 1995.J. D. Mouysset‐Baziard. A. P. H. Technomic Publishing Company. Aburto. and biodegradability of fatty‐acid esters of amylose and starch. 1999. 56. New York. Starch‐Starke 1999. Polym. Nakayama. A. Aburto. M. Khandpur. J. M. L. R. 101‐112. Tuschoff: Acylation of hydroxy compounds with vinyl esters. 145‐152. J. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. Alric. 2001. USA. Prinos. R. E. E. 33‐43 21 .Painter: Specific Interactions and the Miscibility of Polymer Blends. Hu. M. Polym. Symp. Aburto.D. Bikiaris. 28.828. I. Lancaster. 57. A straight way to regioselectively functionalized polysaccharide esters.E. Borredon. Hamaili.V. E. 1997. 11. P. 1996 . E. Panayiotou: Synthesis. E. G.
Tech. Wang.M. Cordi. Polym. Evangelista. E. L. Bikiaris. J.A. Ribes‐Greus: Thermal and viscoelastic properties of some commercial starch products.D. B. 1997. St‐Pierre. Degr. U. Sci. Jane. Nakamura. G. Danjaji. morphology. 2002. Favis. N. Sung. 88. Eng.. J. 1467‐1475. 59. C. 287‐291 . A. Prinos. Duran. Sci. Panayiotou: LDPE/Starch blends compatibilized with PE‐g‐ MA copolymers. N. Bikiaris. Polym. J. L. 34.I. Rosa: Effects of the compatibilizer PE‐g‐GMA on the mechanical. Testing. Mani. Degradation studies and moisture uptake of sago‐starch‐ filled linear low‐density polyethylene composites. Danjaji. Nikolov. A. Y. A. Nawang. Technol. Contat‐Rodrigo. Z. Sci. E. Polymer.A. 1‐9 . and tensile properties of Low‐Density Polyethylene (LDPE) and corn starch blends. 1998. R. 59.G. 1991. Nawang. Ramsay. W. Mohd Ishak: Material behaviour. J. J. Ind. R.J. Rosa: Mechanical. Z. R. Ismail. Almeida. J. Stab. Effect of amylopectin to amylose ratio in starch. Mechanical properties of sago starch‐filled linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) composites. N. Mater. 2003. L. Vouroutzis. thermal and morphological properties of virgin and reprocessed LDPE/corn starch blends.S. D. Res. Frangis. 30. 38.D. W. R.A. 75–81 . M. 2005. Polym. Mohd Ishak: Material properties. N. Appl. Polym. thermal and morphological characterization of recycled LDPE/corn starch blends. Pavlidou. Koutsopoulos. 236–241 . D. Pedroso. Verhoogt: Processing and characterization of thermoplastic starch/polyethylene blends. 88.H. Adv. Effect of compounding and starch modification on properties of starch‐filled Low‐ Density Polyethylene. 16.A. Appl.M.L. D. 1841‐1846 . Bhattacharya: Properties of injection moulded starch/ synthetic polymer blends. L. Z. 167–172 . R. Panayiotou: LDPE/plasticized starch blends containing PE‐g‐MA copolymer as compatibilizer. III. 2003. Polym. Carbohydr.S. B. Liu. 2904–2911. H. K. H. . Polym. Polym. Chem.S.D. 70. 1998. I. 1998. Ismail. J. 1503–1521 . Ishiaku. H. 162–163.‐J. .G. Pedroso. 2005. C. J. Ishiaku. Testing. Sun: Effects of polyethylene‐grafted maleic anhydride (PE‐g‐MA) on thermal properties.G. I. 21. Eur. 1242‐1251 . D. Mei: Study and development of LDPE/starch partially biodegradable compounds. U. 2005. 647‐655 22 . Polym.S.Chapter 1 . Ramsay. Polvm. 310–317 .S. Gelina. Appl. 20. Proc. Z. 2001.
B. Adv. Sci. W. 43. 2004. Polym. 89.C. Polym. M. Calil: Effect of thermal aging on the biodegradation of PCL. John. 23 . Westhoff: Starch‐Based Films. 2002. . Manan. Polym. Averous. K.N. B. 2003. 4157–4167 .H. M. dos Santos Rosa. Albertsson. J.W. 26. U. F. B. R. 157. 1507– 1516. T. Polym. K. Adv.P. cross‐linked and glycerol modified starch. Appl. Park: Modification of aliphatic polyesters and their reactive blends with starch. Otey.M. 1999. Karlsson: Polymers from Renewable Resources. 1139–1148. 2002. J. 179‐187.R. 2004. Adv. Guedes. Y. Moro. L. U. D. Garg. and their blends with starch in soil compost. Tech. 35. Sci. Polym. Chem. 41. Otey. A. M. Appl. Jana: Studies on the properties and characteristics of starch– LDPE blend films using cross‐linked. Dole. 877–884.. M. 267. Manan.M. Stridsberg. Albertsson: Controlled Ring‐Opening Polymerization: Polymers with designed Macromolecular Architecture. Eur. 9177–9190 . T. 2007. S. 40. Park: Reactive blends of gelatinized starch and polycaprolactone‐g‐glycidyl methacrylate.S. Ang. J. Liu. Chem.M. J. 1659‐1663 . E. S. J. Kim.H. Westhoff. 2. Eng. J. H. J. M. A‐C. Azemi: Effect of starch predrying on the mechanical properties of starch/poly(e‐caprolactone) composites. Ishiaku. Ishiaku. 157. Odusanya.K. Fringant: Properties of thermoplastic blends: starch–polycaprolactone. J. PHB‐V. Kammer: On mechanical properties of sago starch/poly(ε‐caprolactone) composites. . 284‐287 . F. S.. Ind.M. Doane: Starch‐based blown films. C. 1987. Res.. Makromol.K. N. 2003. Sen. O. Sankar. C. Polym. in Polym. Chem. 2000. 12. 23. Ind.G. 23. Polymer 2000. Sci. Tang.H. Ranucci. K. P. Sci.Y. Kim. Polym.P. Siddaramaiah. 32–45 . Bhattacharya: Synthesis and characterization of anhydride‐functional polycaprolactone. Prod. Azemi. Yang. S.S. Ryner. 1. 16–19 . 1997. Part A: Polym. Chem. Raj. S. A. Appl.H. C. 3976–3987 .D. Dev. . 87. U. Eng. A. Cho. Eng. Sci. Lindblad. O. D. J. 3539–3546 . R. 139‐161. 1298‐1305. M.‐C. L. M. Low density polyethylene/ starch blend films for food packaging applications. Polym. Odusanya. Kim. Introduction . Bhattacharya Residual stresses and density gradient in injection molded starch/synthetic polymer blends Polymer 2000. Pilot plant investigation for production of the biodegradable film. Maiti: A biodegradable film. Jana. 81. .S. Jung.S. J. B. Environ. A.M. Preliminary diffusion evaluation.F. . glycerol modified. J. Z.K. 41. C. Rodrigues. 1984. 42‐65. Sci. Sci. 2001. . Res. Polym.
24 . Sci. Raimo. 40. . R. Rutot. Rimedio: Polymer communication: Preparation and characterisation of compatibilised polycaprolactone/ starch composites. 127–134. Stab. E. P. M. 2003. . P. 2000. Dubois: Aliphatic polyester‐grafted starch composites by in situ ring opening polymerization. Sadocco: Preparation of biodegradable polyesters/high‐amylose‐starch composites by reactive blending and their characterization. . Composite Interfaces. M. 83. C. D. Narayan: Aliphatic polyester‐grafted starch‐like polysaccharides by ring‐opening polymerization. Wu: Physical properties and biodegradability of maleated‐ polycaprolactone/ starch composite. Dubois. . Tang. Degée. P. M. R. 41. Bhattacharya: Synthesis and characterization of starch‐ graft‐polycaprolactone as compatibilizer for starch/polycaprolactone blends. P. Macromol. 7. 283–286. 1998. Polym. R. Polymer 2000. 80. Rimedio. Appl. M. 215–225. 2002. 175. Degee. Rapid Commun. 3091‐3100.E. D. P. Symp.E. Degrad. Mani. 19. R. Rutot. E. Martuscelli. Krishnan. M. J.S. Macromol. R. Errico. Avella. Duquesne. 33–43 . Avella. M. Polym. 3875–3881 . M. Laurienzo. 2001. Narayan. 1432–1442. Polymer 1999. P. Errico.Chapter 1 . J. and P. Dubois: Synthesis and characterization of compatibilized poly (e‐caprolactone)/ granular starch composites.
also polydioxanone with an OiPr end‐group was formed (20‐30 %). and MALDI‐TOF mass spectrometry. The products were synthesized at 60‐100°C and characterized by 1H‐ and 13C‐NMR.3.4‐di‐O‐isopropylidene‐α‐D‐galactopyranose)/Al(OiPr)3 initiator system to yield polydioxanone with a protected monosaccharide end‐ group is described. with higher temperatures (100°C) leading to lower yields. A statistical model has been developed that successfully describes the experimentally observed relation between the average chain length of the functionalized polymer and reaction parameters. polyesters. Keywords: biodegradable. Besides the desired polydioxanone functionalised with a monosaccharide end‐group.2. The average chain length of the polymers is between 7 and 58 repeating units and may be tuned by the monomer to monosaccharide ratio (at constant Al(OiPr)3 intake).Chapter 2 Experimental Studies on the Ring Opening Polymerization of p‐dioxanone using an Al(OiPr)3‐Monosaccharide Initiator System Abstract The ring opening polymerization (ROP) of p‐dioxanone using a protected monosaccharide (1. ring‐opening polymerization . Systematic studies showed that the polymer yield is a function of the reaction temperature and the reaction time.
accessible by the polymerization of p‐dioxanone (1). Biodegradable aliphatic polyesters end‐capped with sugar molecules have been studied extensively for use in biomedical applications.Chapter 2 2. are interesting polymers because of their good product performance and biodegradability . only limited information about the synthesis and properties of polydioxanone is available in the open literature. The synthesis of protected monosaccharide end‐capped biodegradable polymers is usually performed via Ring Opening Polymerization (ROP). or zinc lactate has been reported. tocopherol. Its melting temperature is close to 110 oC. This chapter describes experimental studies on the catalytic ROP of p‐ dioxanone in the presence of a protected glucose molecule (1.4‐dioxan‐2‐ one)).g. From a biodegradability point of view.2. has interesting product properties compared to other aliphatic polyesters. Introduction Aliphatic polyesters.4‐di‐O‐ isopropylidene‐α‐D‐galactopyranose. reaction of the metal‐alkoxide with an appropriate alcohol allows the synthesis of end‐capped poly‐lactones. which to the best of our knowledge is the first study to functionalise polydioxanone with a monosaccharide. The ring‐opening polymerization (ROP) of p‐dioxanone using metal catalysts such as aluminum isopropoxide [Al(OiPr)3].1. Polydioxanone has a tensile strength close to 48. The alkoxide group will end up as an ester end‐group in the polymer and in this way at least one of the end‐groups may be easily controlled and varied. The catalysts are metal alkoxides with Lewis acidic character [8. testosterone. such as polycaprolactone. and is tougher than polylactides and even HDPE . 2). probably because the p‐dioxanone monomer has become commercially available only recently . whereas the high temperature for polylactides results in thermal degradation and undesirable transfer reactions during synthesis and processing steps . stigmasterol and ergocalciferol)  and also with protected monosaccharides (galactopyranose/ glucofuranose) [6‐7]. The relatively low melting point of polycaprolactone limits its applicability. Several polymers with bioactive alcoholic and phenolic end‐groups of interest for drug‐related applications were synthesized (for example geraniol. Exchange of the alkoxide group by e.3 MPa and an elongation at break of 500‐600%. 9]. particularly for nano‐ encapsulation systems for drug delivery . This melting point is considerably higher than typically found for polycaprolactone (60 oC) and lower than that of polylactides (at least 175°C). polydioxanone also shows good performance. stannous octoate [Sn(Oct)2]. pregnenolone. Despite its good properties.3. Nishida et al  reported that polydioxanone decomposes to non‐toxic gases (CO2 and H2O) by microorganisms. polyglycolide. and polylactides. It is fully degraded in the body within a period of 180 days . which is a unique compromise between application and processing temperature. Polydioxanone (poly(p‐dioxanone) or poly(1. quinine. Besides 26 .
which was pre‐heated till about 60°C to obtain it in a liquid state. Ring Opening Polymerization of p‐dioxanone using an Al(OiPr)3‐Monosaccharide Initiator System potential applications in biomedical products. 8 mmol). poorly soluble heterogeneous systems. part of this solution (350 µl. The hot solution was 27 . the synthetic pathways and the soluble. This stock solution was prepared by adding 4.2. 1. Typical example for the synthesis of polydioxanone end‐capped with 1. heptane (Acros). Next.2. hot dichloroethane (20‐25 ml) was added to completely dissolve the partly solid polymer at room temperature.44 g. grafting efficiencies are difficult to determine in this system by standard analytical techniques (e.8 ml of a solution of an aluminum isopropoxide stock solution was added. Analytical grade dichloroethane (Labscan).3.8 g. The resulting clear solution was stirred for 2 h at 50 oC. Germany) was purified according to the procedure described by Raquez et al [2. 2. To this solution.g. After the pre‐determined reaction time.2. relatively low molecular weight compounds reported in this study may be viewed as model systems for more complex. NMR) due to the poor solubility of the products in standard organic solvents.4‐di‐O‐ isopropylidene‐α‐D‐galactopyranose (2) 2 (1.5 mmol) was dissolved in toluene (1 ml) at 50 oC. 97% (Sigma) and aluminum isopropoxide. Materials p‐Dioxanone monomer (1.3. 2. As such. Toluene (Labscan) was dried and stored on molecular sieves 3 Å (Labscan) under nitrogen.4‐di‐O‐ isopropylidene‐α‐D‐galactopyranose (2). The reaction mixture was clear and colorless during the reaction. and diethylether (Labscan) were used as received. the results of this study are also of interest for the preparation of starch/polydioxanone polymers using ROP. Methods All polymerization experiments were carried out under a protective nitrogen atmosphere using standard Schlenk‐ and glovebox techniques. However.07 g. Subsequently.1. 3].2. the mixture was brought to room temperature and several drops of HCl (1 N) were added to stop the reaction. The polymerization was allowed to proceed for 16 h at 100 oC. 98+% (Aldrich) were used as received. containing 0. 2.2. Boehringer Ingelheim.18.104.22.168 mmol of 2 and 0. CDCl3 was obtained from Sigma and was used as received.08 mmol aluminum isopropoxide) was added to pure 1 (0. (20 mmol) of aluminum isopropoxide to 20 ml of toluene.1. Particularly interesting in this field are starch polymers grafted with polydioxanone. 5. Materials and Methods 2. 0.
The white solid was finally separated from the liquid by decantation and dried in a vacuum oven (5 mbar.Chapter 2 precipitated in a heptane/ ether mixture (300‐400 ml.1. 40 oC) until constant weight. 2D‐NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Unity 500 NMR. it is assumed that all available initiator is used effectively.3. As will be shown later.) H-isopropoxide end group 28 .) H‐NMR was applied to determine the experimental average degree of polymerization. two polymers with different end‐groups are present. If the amount of sugar is in excess with respect to the aluminum catalyst.) Here. 1H‐ and 13C‐NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian AMX 400 NMR. one initiated on a galactopyranose molecule and the other on an isopropoxide group. Processing of the raw data was performed using VNMR software. This leads to the following equation: Xn exp X n exp is = A A H-repeating unit H-galactopyranose end group +A (2. 1 calculated by comparing the peak area of characteristic end‐group protons with that of a proton of the repeating unit in the polymer (A H‐polymer). Product Analyses NMR analyses were performed in CDCl3. 4:1 by volume) at 4‐8 oC. X n theo in terms of number of monomer units is calculated as follows : Xn theo = monomer conversion × [monomer ]0 [total initiator ] [monomer ]0 = monomer conversion × 3[ Al (O i Pr) 3 ] + [ sugar ]0 (2.2. The isolated yield at this condition was 68%. Calculation of Average Degree of Polymerization The Theoretical Average Degree of Polymerization.3.4. X n exp of the product. 2. MALDI‐TOF spectra were recorded on an Applied Biosystems Voyager DE‐PRO machine using dithranol/ NaI as the matrix (linear mode). 2. the above equation simplifies to Xn theo = monomer conversion × [monomer ]0 [ sugar ]0 (2.2.2.
1. the protected mono‐saccharide 2 reacts with Al(OiPr)3 to form the actual catalyst for the polymerization reaction. Ring Opening Polymerization of p‐dioxanone using an Al(OiPr)3‐Monosaccharide Initiator System The NMR peaks of the repeating unit overlap partially with those of the galactopyranose end group.6: 96 was applied. The exchange reaction typically takes place at 50°C for 2 h. CH2OH 6 O 4 H H5 O 3 H O O H 2 O H O 1 α O β O γ Al(OiPr)3 catalyst O O α γ γ' β' β α' H2C O [ C CH2 O CH2 CH2 O ]n C CH2 O CH2 CH2 OH 6 O H O H5 1 4 O H O H 2 3 H O + n+1 (2) (1) (3) Scheme 2.7.6 ppm ] / 6 A 5.5. Typically.2. eq.).).3. To avoid the formation of isopropoxide end groups. is calculated using: R gp = A H − galactopyranose end group H − isopropoxide end group A (2.) 2.) or. In the first step. an excess of monosaccharide 2 on Al was used (see eq.6. Schematic representation of the polymerization reaction including atom numbering scheme 29 .6 ppm A 5.1. To compensate for this effect.7 ppm − 6 × A 5.4.) The ratio of the two different types of polymers (either end‐capped with galactopyranose or an isopropoxide group).4− 4. 2. Screening Experiments Initial experiments to synthesize protected galactopyranose end‐capped polydioxanone (3) were performed using 1.3. in term of the NMR resonances : R gp = A 5. Results and Discussions 2. R gp .1. is rewritten as: Xn exp = [ A 3. The polymerization reaction was performed as a two step process. 2.1 ppm (2.4‐di‐O‐isopropylidene‐α‐D‐ galactopyranose (2) and Al(OiPr)3 as the catalyst precursor (Scheme 2. an Al ‐ monosaccharide 2 ‐ monomer 1 mol ratio of 1: 22.214.171.124 ppm (2.6 ppm + A 5.
Typical isolated product yields are 68% at these conditions.15‐1.67.3. Product analyses The products were analyzed using 1H‐ and 13C‐ NMR and MALDI‐TOF. Proton resonances of the CH3 group of the isopropoxide end‐group.2.1.1. H‐NMR spectra (Figure 2. It confirms that polymer initiation not only occurs with the monosaccharide but also with the remaining isopropoxide group of the catalyst precursor (vide infra). However. respectively.51 ppm.40 ppm) unit are broadened and shifted up to 0. 1 30 .) In the next step. It is difficult to determine the end‐groups of the polymer on the basis of 1H‐NMR. Although the spectra clearly indicate the presence of the monosaccharide 2.1.1 and 2.. of interest is the presence of a small multiplet at about 5. 2. together with the CH3 groups from the protecting groups of the sugar appear in the range 1.Chapter 2 H H CH2OH iPr O Al O iPr iPr O O O H O H H O H O O H O H O O H O Al O CH2 O O H O H H O O H O H H O + O 3 H H2C H2C O H H O H + H O 3 iPr OH O (2. The OiPr : 2 end‐group ratio for the standard experiment was 1: 2. This multiplet is characteristic for the CH proton of an isopropoxide end‐group. The off‐white solid reaction product was collected after a dissolution‐reprecipitation process using dichloroethane and a heptane/ diethyl ether mixture.1 ppm compared to the monomer. Typical 1 H‐ and 13C‐NMR spectra of 3 are shown in Figure 2.7. although it is evident that p‐dioxanone polymerisation occurred. it is not possible to determine whether this is truly an end‐group due to overlapping peaks with protons from the poly(p‐ dioxanone) backbone. the in‐situ formed catalyst was reacted with p‐dioxanone monomer 1 at 100 oC for 16 h. The typical proton resonances of the p‐dioxanone (3.) are not particularly informative.1 ppm.78 to 4.
1. C‐6 is shifted from δ = 62.2 and 96.8. H‐NMR Spectra of: (a).2. Carbon resonances arising from the monosaccharide end‐group are present between δ = 66. 68.4‐di‐O‐isopropylidene‐α‐D‐galactopyranose. characteristic resonances of an ‐O‐C(=O)‐CH2‐O‐CH2‐CH2‐OH end group are present at δ = 126.96.36.199‐di‐O‐isopropylidene‐α‐D‐galactopyranose‐end‐capped polydioxanone.2 ppm in product 3.3 ppm are shifted considerably. Particularly the C2‐C6 carbons in the range δ = 188.8.131.52‐70. Ring Opening Polymerization of p‐dioxanone using an Al(OiPr)3‐Monosaccharide Initiator System Figure 2.52 ppm (β’).2 ppm. 1 (c).17 and 69. For instance.2.) is more informative and clearly shows the presence of a polydioxanone polymer backbone and a monosaccharide end group. p‐dioxanone monomer. 13 31 . 3 1 C‐NMR (Figure 2. In addition to the mono‐saccharide end‐ group.28 ppm in 2 to δ 66.61 (γ’) and 73. The carbon resonances of the polydioxanone backbone are present at δ = 63. 2 (b). 1.2 ppm.
1.73 and 109. An overview of the data is given in Tables 2.4‐di‐O‐isopropylidene‐α‐D‐galactopyranose‐end‐capped polydioxanone.2.76‐25.3. 3 13 Carbon resonances of the isopropoxide groups from the by‐product (isopropoxide end‐capped polydioxanone) are present at δ = 68. 2 32 .Chapter 2 Figure 2.1. and 2.2.1. C‐ NMR Spectra of: (a).70 (>C‐(CH3)2) and between δ = 21. A typical example of a part of the 2D‐NMR spectra is given in Figure 2. p‐dioxanone monomer.2..4‐di‐O‐isopropylidene‐α‐D‐galactopyranose.97 (>C‐(CH3)2).97 ppm (‐CH‐(CH3)2). 1.3. The resonances of the protecting group of the sugar appears at δ = 108.3. D‐NMR (HSQC) was applied for complete peak assignment of the product.48 ppm (‐CH‐ (CH3)2) and between δ = 21.76‐25.2. 2 (b). the numbering scheme of carbons and protons is given in Scheme 2. 1 (c).
732 broad.83 p‐dioxanone Monomer (1) H‐α H‐β H‐γ a 4.32 * 4. 1 H‐NMR peak assignments a Product peaks (ppm) Poly(p‐dioxanone) end‐capped with protected galactopyranose (3) H‐1 H‐2 H‐3 H‐4 H‐5 H‐6 H‐α H‐β H‐β’ H‐γ H‐γ’ H‐OH 5. around 1.26 3. except values with *.17 3. HSQC 13C‐1H spectra of 3 Table 2.3.16* 4.60 4.50 4.78 4.77 3.09 4.31 4.8 Reactant peaks (ppm) Galactopyranose (2) H‐1 H‐2 H‐3 H‐4 H‐5 H‐6 5.40 all values were determined using 1H NMR. Ring Opening Polymerization of p‐dioxanone using an Al(OiPr)3‐Monosaccharide Initiator System Figure 2. which were determined from HSQC spectrum due to overlapping resonances.74 3. 33 .68 4.25 3.301 3.59 4.54 4.00 4.1.
54 166.07 Reactant Peaks (ppm) Galactopyranose (2) C‐1 C‐2 C‐3 C‐4 C‐5 C‐6 96.17 69.2 68.10 71. corresponding with an average number molecular weight (Mn) of about 1600. The product obtained at screening conditions (16 h reaction time at 100°C) contains on average 13 monomer units.75 70. The latter likely stems from the matrix used to ionize the sample. The difference in molecular weight between the main peaks is 102 g/mol. An example of a MALDI‐TOF spectrum of 3 recorded in a dithranol/NaI matrix is given in Figure 2.8.21 70. MALDI‐TOF was also applied to characterize the products. For this purpose.00 171.63 68.61 170.Chapter 2 Table 2. The molecular weight distribution of the major peaks may be represented by the following relation: m / z = 23 + 260 + 102n (2.11/ 170.31 70.28 p‐dioxanone monomer (1) C‐α C‐β C‐γ C‐carbonyl 61.80 61.33 70.57 62.2. the ratio of the intensity of the end groups and the polymer backbone peaks is determined. A typical molecular weight distribution is observed.28 70.09 65.2 73.58 68. A detailed procedure is given in the experimental section.4.92 66. 34 . 13 C‐NMR peak assignments Product Peaks (ppm) Poly(p‐dioxanone) end‐capped with protected galactopyranose (3) C‐1 C‐2 C‐3 C‐4 C‐5 C‐6 C‐α C‐β C‐β’ C‐γ C‐γ’ C‐carbonyl C‐carbonyl‐iPr/gal 96.21 NMR analyses also allow calculation of the molecular weight of the products. which is the molecular weight of a repeating dioxanone unit.) This series represents a dioxanone polymer end capped with 2 and an additional Na ion.92 68.52 63.
9. see Figure 2. Ring Opening Polymerization of p‐dioxanone using an Al(OiPr)3‐Monosaccharide Initiator System 100 90 80 70 60 %-Intensity 50 40 30 20 10 0 600 800 1000 1200 1098.11. for details.5.5.). ionized with either Na+ or H+. This series may be described by the following relation: m / z = 23 + 60 + 102n (2.10.10.) This relation is indicative for the presence of a polydioxanone polymer containing an isopropoxide end‐group. two other distributions are present. These distributions may be represented by equation (2.5 +102 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 Mass (m/z) Figure 2.11. Furthermore. in line with the NMR data.4.) (2.) and imply the presence of dioxanone polymers with carboxylic end groups. although both with a very low intensity (Figure 2. m / z = 23 + 18 + 102n m / z = 1 + 18 + 102n 35 (2.) . Typical MALDI‐TOF spectra of 3 A second molecular weight distribution is also clearly visible when enlarging the spectra.) and (2.
Various samples with. In the first step.1 0 600 700 800 900 Mass (m/z) 1000 1100 1200 Figure 2. low resolution spectra were obtained. [6. small but significant amounts (20‐30%‐mol) of polydioxanone chains with an OiPr end group are present. the catalyst precursor is treated with monosaccharide 2 resulting in an alcohol exchange 36 . although successfully applied for galactopyranose‐end‐capped polycaprolactone .3 10 836. Various other matrices were tested (e. Enlarged MALDI‐TOF spectra for 3 Although MALDI‐TOF clearly demonstrated the presence of various types of end‐groups in the product. is not particularly suitable for polydioxanone.2.g. but in all cases poor quality. The observed differences in the molecular weight distributions of the various samples were only marginal.Chapter 2 50 40 792.5. Most likely the matrix (dithranol/NaI). it proved not suitable to determine the average molecular weight of the products.6. Mechanistic aspects Both NMR and MALDI‐TOF measurements imply that the main product is indeed the desired monosaccharide end‐capped polydioxanone. 2‐(4′‐ hydroxybenzeneazo)benzoic acid (HABA)).13].7 796. A mechanistic proposal for the ROP of p‐dioxanone with Al(OiPr)3 as the catalyst precursor leading to the desired monosaccharide end‐ capped polydioxanone is given in Figure 2. In addition.1.7 %-Intensity 30 20 858.3. different molecular weights were analysed. according to NMR. 2.
Ring Opening Polymerization of p‐dioxanone using an Al(OiPr)3‐Monosaccharide Initiator System reaction and the formation of the desired active catalyst with preferentially all three OiPr exchanged with 2. Irreversible termination of the polymerisation is performed at the end of reaction period by adding dilute acid to the polymerisation mixture. The termination reactions lead to the formation of ‐O‐C(=O)‐CH2‐O‐CH2‐CH2‐OH end groups. termination of the chain growth may occur by reaction with an alcohol. During the reaction. Subsequent coordination and insertion of dioxanone molecules leads to the formation of a polymer chain with a monosaccharide end‐group. The resulting Al‐alkoxide may again initiate a polymerisation reaction. iPr iPr O Al O iPr + R OH (in excess) O O Al O R + O iPr OH O Al O O iPr + O + O O O O n O l O O O Al [O CH2 CH2 O CH2 C ] n OR O O O O Al [O CH2 CH2 O CH2 C ] O n+m OR + m R-OH O + HX (termination) O Al O R O O Al X O O + + O O H [O CH2 CH2 O CH2 C ] l by-product O iPr H [O CH2 CH2 O CH2 C ]n OR H [O CH2 CH2 O CH2 C ] n+m OR product Figure 2.6. Simplified reaction scheme for the ROP of p‐dioxanone catalyzed by Al(OiPr)3. a p‐dioxanone molecule will coordinate to the Lewis acidic aluminium center followed by an insertion step. The termination reaction is known to be reversible and the formed polymer may again react with an aluminum center and continue to grow . Next. (R = monosaccharide 2) 37 .
53 59.1 2.7.29 14.22 57.21 54.6 6.5.3 6.3.6 6. Set Sample S111 S112 S113 S114 S115 S211 S212 S213 S214 S215 S221 S222 S223 S224 S225 Overview of experiments a Processing Condition 2/Al ratio (mol/mol) 6.6 80.16 46.5 T (°C) 100 100 100 100 100 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 dioxanone/ 2 ratio (mol/mol) 3.3 6.5 2.8 2.30 62.3 81. formed in the first step of the polymerisation reaction (eq.). time and the mol ratio of monomer to monosaccharide) on the yield. will be formed when the polymerization starts with an aluminum alkoxide with a remaining Al‐OiPr group (eq.5 67.74 52.3 and 62.6 96.5 1.6 t (h) 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 1.81 16. Chain Length (Xn exp ) Yieldb (%) 30. 2.1 3.1 2.).0 87.8 3. 2.22 13.3 6.6 6. two different reaction times (1.4 2/OiPr ratio Rgp (mol/mol) 2.22 16.Chapter 2 The minor product. the exchange reaction between the catalyst and the protected sugar was performed for 2 hours at 50°C The yield is the isolated yield of product 3 b 38 .85 14. the end group may also be formed by a termination reaction with free isopropanol. An overview of the experiments and the results are given in Table 2.6 6.2 91.7.49 13.3. a (nearly) fixed Al(OiPr)3 : monosaccharide ratio of 1 : 6.4 3.74 18.96 2 3 a For each experiment.36 17.5 92.7 2.28 33.12 42.74 23.9 2.6 6.6 6.5 1.70 58. However.5 1.2.93 8.04 19.1 86.3‐6.5 1.55 Product Properties Avg.6 81.3 3.6 6.6 86. Systematic Studies The effect of important process variables (temperature.50 25. Table 2.6 6.8 2.6 91.5 81.50 35.93 37.3 6.08 30.4 2. A total of 15 experiments were performed at two polymerization temperatures (60 and 100 oC). despite the excess of 2.9 1 7.4 2.6 2.10 15.6 was applied.3 6.6 89. degree of polymerisation of the product and the end group distribution was determined. These may be present in the reaction mixture because the exchange reaction between Al(OiPr)3 and 2 was incomplete.5 hrs and 16 hrs) and a p‐dioxanone to monosaccharide 2 molar ratio ranging between 3.78 10. 2.5 84.3.3 6.11 22. In all cases.45 19. OiPr‐end‐capped poly(p‐dioxanone).
we conclude that equilibrium conversion is achieved after 16 h and that the lower polymer yields at higher temperatures are due to the slight exothermicity of the reaction.3. One of the experiments (S111) resulted in a very low yield (31%) compared to the other reaction.1. It was shown that at lower monomer to catalyst ratios.5 and 16 h reaction time). For instance. The effect of the reaction temperature (60 and 100°C) on the product yield at three different dioxanone: 2 ratios is given in Table 2. Ring Opening Polymerization of p‐dioxanone using an Al(OiPr)3‐Monosaccharide Initiator System 2. To the best of our knowledge. Another possibility is the occurrence of polymer crystallization.).3. the equilibrium conversion of dioxanone at 80oC was about 80%.5 h is higher than the yield at 16 h. a low dioxanone: monosaccharide 2 ratio was applied. et al . which reduced to 75% when increasing the temperature to 120oC. These results were explained by assuming that the reaction is an equilibrium polymerisation and that the equilibrium is shifted to the monomer side at higher temperatures.).3. The latter is due to the slight exothermicity of the reaction . 39 . the yield at 1. see Table 2. leading to a low average chain length of the dioxanone polymer (7. the yields for reactions conducted at 60 oC are always higher than those performed at 100 oC. when the reaction is performed at a low dioxanone: 2 ratio (≅ 16). A more detailed analysis on the actual nature and composition of the polymerization products. Higher polymerisation yields were obtained at lower temperatures. which is expected to be more pronounced at lower temperatures.5 h. and particularly when comparing the data in set 2 and 3 (60oC. the yields are higher when performing the reaction at 16 h reaction times.2. The effect of temperature on the yield of the bulk polymerization of dioxanone using Sn(Oct)2 and Al(OiPr)3 as catalysts (without the use of a second alcohol) has been studied by Nishida et al  and Esteves. the monomer conversion reaches a maximum value before going down to the equilibrium monomer conversion. 1.2. Product yield The isolated yields of the reactions are all but one between 67 and 96% (see Table 2. as suggested by Raquez et al . However. For this particular experiment. On the basis of our experimental data and in line with literature data. Evidently. It is likely that this relatively low molecular weight compound dissolves partly during isolation/ purification procedure leading to lower isolated yields. will be required.3. For the two experiments with a dioxanone: 2 ratio higher than 16 (≅ 23 and 60). no detailed explanation has been put forward to explain this anomalous behaviour. with an enthalpy of polymerization of approximately ‐15 kJ/ mol . Clearly.3. The effect of the reaction time on the product yield may be derived from the data provided in Table 2. equilibrium conversion is not yet achieved within 1. Similar observations were made by Raquez et al  and Kricheldorf et al  for dioxanone polymerisations using Al(OiPr)3 in the absence of a external alcohol or using benzyl alcohol.
A clear trend between R gp and the process conditions (temperature.Chapter 2 2. In Figure 2. time: 1.2. The X n exp increases linearly with respect to the dioxanone : 2 ratio. the X n theo (eq. A possible strategy to increase the Rgp values i.).4 and 3. Most experimental points are scattered along these lines..3.2. time: 16 hr Temperature: 60oC. Effects of process conditions on the average chain length ( X n exp ) and end group distribution The effects of the p‐dioxanone: 2 ratio.e.184.108.40.206. time: 16 hr 50 Temperature: 60oC. Average Chain Length ( X n exp ) of the product as a function of the dioxanone : 2 mol ratio The end group distribution was determined using NMR and is expressed in terms of R gp (eq. and 2.3.) as a function of the dioxanone : 2 ratio at 90% and 100% monomer conversion is also provided. and dioxanone/ 2 mol ratio) is absent. to reduce the number of OiPr endgroups in the product may be the removal of isopropyl alcohol formed in step 40 . reaction time and temperature on the X n exp of the products is shown in Figure 2.6.7. in line with the theoretical predictions. The R gp values (Table 2. as expected for a typical ring opening polymerisation .7. 60 Temperature: 100oC.5 hr Xn theo theo (90%-conversion) (100%-conversion) 40 Xn exp Xn 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 dioxanone : 2 ratio (mol/mol) 60 70 Figure 2. 2. time.) for all experiments are scattered randomly between 2. 2.
4. Table 2.2.974). The analysis of variance for the model is given in Table 2. The low P‐value clearly indicates that the model is statistically significant.6) was too limited to draw sound conclusions. indicating that the model describes the experimental data reasonably well. vacuum distillation before adding the dioxanone monomer .977 (with an adjusted R2 value of 0.12.177 × (t ) − 0. Statistical Data Analysis Quantification of the influence of the experimental factors (temperature. The 2/ Al ratio was not included in the model as the experimental range (6. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for linear model of X n function of experimental parameters SS 4103 93 4010 DF 3 12 15 MS 1337 7.3.854 × (dioxanone : 2 ratio) + 0.3‐6.). 220.127.116.11.) where t and T are respectively the polymerization time and temperature. A linear model proved adequate to describe the effects of the independent variables on the X n exp : Xn exp = 8.703 F 173. 2.7.49 + 0.) from the reaction mixture by e.459*10‐7 41 . The R2 value for the model is 0.543 exp as a Model Error Total P‐value 3. time and dioxanone/ 2 ratio) on the X n exp has been performed by multivariable linear regression  on the data given in Table 2.g.3.097 × (T ) (2. Ring Opening Polymerization of p‐dioxanone using an Al(OiPr)3‐Monosaccharide Initiator System 1 of the polymerisation process (eq. A parity plot of the modeled versus experimental values of the average chain length Xn confirms this statement (Figure 2.
The isolated yields of the off‐white solid products were between 30 and 96%.Chapter 2 60 50 40 Xn model 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 Xn exp 40 50 60 Figure 2. with higher ratios leading to higher molecular weights. Molecular weights (NMR) of the product were between 970 and 6200 and are a clear function of the p‐dioxanone/2 ratio (at constant Al(OiPr)3 intake).4‐di‐O‐ isopropylidene‐α‐D‐galactopyranose. Modeled versus experimental values for the average chain length Xn The model predicts that the X n is a clear function of the p‐dioxanone : 2 mol ratio. 11] and due to the fact that the reaction is an equilibrium polymerization with a slight exothermic effect. 2. the model allows determination of the process variables to obtain a product with the desired degree of polymerization. 17]. 2) with Al(OiPr)3 as the catalyst is reported. the X n exp is negatively influenced by temperature. with high ratios leading to a higher average chain length.8.3. Furthermore. Both NMR and MALDI‐TOF measurements indicate that the products are mixtures of polymers and significant 42 . This is in line with literature data [5.2. 16. Within the experimental ranges. Conclusions The ROP of p‐dioxanone in the presence of a monosaccharide (1. In addition. which is in agreement with the available data on ring opening polymerization [15.4. the model predicts that the X n exp is positively influenced by the polymerization time.
Damrau: Polylactones. Chem. H. 21.g. the findings of this study have proven to be valuable input for synthetic studies on the preparation of novel biodegradable polymers consisting of polydioxanones and polycaprolactones grafted on oligo‐ and polysaccharides (e. Raquez. Phys. P.M. J. Macromol. Grubb: Hydrolytic degradation and morphologic study of poly‐p‐dioxanone. Moreover. 42. 1998.5. Dubois: ʺCoordination‐insertionʺ ring‐ opening polymerization of 1. 27. Lin. J. . H. R. Nomenclature AH A x − y ppm : peak area of certain proton in 1H‐NMR spectra [‐] : peak area of certain peak at x until y ppm in 1H‐NMR spectra [‐] : mol ratio of galactopyranose end‐capped polydioxanone and isopropoxide‐end‐capped polydioxanone [‐] : number of monomer unit in the polymer products [‐] : time [hour] : temperature [oC] : experimental average degree of polymerization the polymer products [monomer units] : theoretical average degree of polymerization of the polymer products [monomer units] R gp n t T X n exp X n theo 2. Narayan. Raquez. P. Macromolecules 2001. Rapid Commun. kinetic. Dubois: Some thermodynamic.6. P. C. 199. P. starch). Mater. Res. Degee. A statistical model has been developed to quantify the effects of process variables (time. 1089‐ 1097. Chu.4‐dioxan‐2‐one and controlled synthesis of diblock copolymers with epsilon‐caprolactone. Ring Opening Polymerization of p‐dioxanone using an Al(OiPr)3‐Monosaccharide Initiator System amounts of p‐dioxanone polymers with an isopropoxide end group (20‐30%) were present.L. R. D. 43 . Zn‐lactate‐catalyzed polymerizations of 1. 1063‐1071. Biomed. Degee.C. and mechanistic aspects of the ring‐opening polymerization of 1.J. References . 153‐166. 2. Narayan. 2000. 34. .4‐dioxan‐2‐one.4‐dioxan‐2‐ one initiated by Al((OPr)‐Pr‐i)(3) in bulk. 8419‐8425. Kricheldorf. D. 1993. . Macromol. These studies will be reported in the next chapter. temperature and monomer: monosaccharide ratio) on the X n exp .O.M.R.
. H. Nishida, M. Yamashita, T. Endo, Y. Tokiwa: Equilibrium polymerization behavior of 1,4‐dioxan‐2‐one in bulk. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 6982‐6986. . T. Hamaide, M. Pantiru, H. Fessi, P. Boullanger: Ring‐opening polymerisation of epsilon‐caprolactone with monosaccharides as transfer agents. A novel route to functionalised nanoparticles. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2001, 22, 659‐663. . K. Bernard, P. Degee, P. Dubois: Regioselective end‐functionalization of polylactide oligomers with D‐glucose and D‐galactose. Polym. Int. 2003, 52, 406‐411. . H.R. Kricheldorf: Syntheses and application of polylactides. Chemosphere 2001, 43, 49‐54. . H.R. Kricheldorf, M. Berl, N. Scharnagl: Poly(lactones). 9. Polymerization mechanism of metal alkoxide initiated polymerizations of lactide and various lactones. Macromolecules 1988, 21, 286‐293. . H.R. Kricheldorf, I. Kreisersaunders: Polylactones. 30. Vitamins, hormones and drugs as co‐Initiators of AlEt3‐initiated polymerizations of lactide. Polymer 1994, 35, 4175‐4180. . L.M. Esteves, L. Marquez, A.J. Muller: Optimization of the coordination‐ insertion ring‐opening polymerization of poly(p‐dioxanone) by programmed decrease in reaction temperatures. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2005, 97, 659‐665. . D.C. Montgomery: Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th Edition, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, USA, 2001. . P. Dubois, R. Jerome, P. Teyssie: Aluminum alkoxides ‐ A family of versatile initiators for the ring‐opening polymerization of lactones and lactides. Makromol. Chem. Macromol. Symp. 1991, 42/43, 103‐116. . A. Duda, A. Kowalski, J. Libiszowski, S. Penczek: Thermodynamic and kinetic polymerizability of cyclic esters. Macromol. Symp. 2005, 224, 71‐84. . A. Kowalski, A. Duda, S. Penczek: Polymerization of L,L‐lactide initiated by aluminum isopropoxide trimer or tetramer. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 2114‐ 2122. . A. Duda, A. Kowalski, S. Penczek, H. Uyama, S. Kobayashi: Kinetics of the ring‐opening polymerization of 6‐, 7‐, 9‐, 12‐, 13‐, 16‐, and 17‐membered lactones. Comparison of chemical and enzymatic polymerizations. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 4266‐4270. . A. Duda: Polymerization of epsilon‐caprolactone initiated by aluminum isopropoxide carried out in the presence of alcohols and diols. Kinetics and mechanism. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 1399‐1406.
Ring Opening Polymerization of p‐dioxanone using an Al(OiPr)3‐Monosaccharide Initiator System
. S. Penczek, T. Biela, A. Duda: Living polymerization with reversible chain transfer and reversible deactivation: The case of cyclic esters. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2000, 21, 941‐950.
polycaprolactone.72. the remainder being homopolymers of ε‐caprolactone. silylation . The DS of the polycaprolactone graft is between 0.21 and 0. Keywords: starch. ε‐ Caprolactone is grafted to silylated starch by a ring‐opening polymerisation catalysed by Al(OiPr)3 in THF at 50oC. Silylated starch with a degree of substitution (DS) between 0. biodegradable polymers. The silylation reaction was performed using hexamethyl disilazane (HMDS) as the reagent in DMSO at 70°C.Chapter 3 Synthesis of Poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone Grafted Starch Co‐polymers by Ring Opening Polymerisation using Silylated Starch Precursors Abstract Poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone grafted corn starch co‐polymers were synthesized using a hydrophobised silylated starch precursor. Removal of the silyl groups of the poly‐(ε)‐ caprolactone grafted starch co‐polymers is possible using a mild acid treatment with diluted hydrochloric acid in THF at room temperature.45‐0. Experiments with native starch under similar conditions do not result in the desired poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone grafted corn starch co‐polymers and unreacted starch was recovered after work‐up. The poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone side chains consist of 40‐55 monomer units and is a function of the reagent intakes. The grafting efficiency varies between 28 and 58%.7 was obtained. grafting.
g.6‐glucosidic bonds besides α‐D‐1. in almost all cases. polyvalerolactone. as starch is highly hydrophilic. which are known to degrade with difficulty and cause serious environmental problems . However. However. the product properties are in most cases still not up to standards and blending with other polymers is required .4‐glucosidic bonds) and amylopectin (a branched polymer with α‐D‐1. Polycaprolactone (PCL) is easily degraded by micro‐organisms . the future generation of packaging materials is highly desirable. Starch modification is therefore needed to meet the product properties in a number of application areas. Chapter 3 3.1. Starch is abundantly available. a natural biopolymer. it is water sensitive. 245 million tons of plastics are produced per year. Well known examples are polyesters derived from cyclic lactones (polycaprolactone. 7]. However. for instance grafting of monomers (like styrene and methyl methacrylate) to the starch backbone [6. The amylose‐amylopectin ratio in native as well as modified starches has a strong impact on the product properties. PCL has gained much interest for possible applications in the medical field as well as in the area of packaging materials [12‐ 13] Several studies to combine the properties of starch and PCL have been performed to obtain fully biodegradable materials with improved product properties. Introduction Worldwide. amylose (a linear polymer of anhydroglucoses with α‐D‐1. Starch has also been thermoplasticized with the help of plasticizers such as glycerol and other polyalcohols . The development of green biodegradable polymers for e. is one of the potential candidates for future biodegradable polymer products. Starch is present in the body of many plants (tubers. There are two types of biopolymer in starch. These plastics are mainly synthetic polymers from fossil resources.4‐ glucosidic bonds). Blends of thermoplastic starch and PCL are not fully miscible. and polybutyrolactone). 5]. Aerobic soil‐burial experiments showed that the mechanical properties of PCL films decreased rapidly in time and were fully degraded after 4 weeks . and the mechanical properties of starch‐based films are generally inferior to those derived from synthetic polymers [4. A wide variety of synthetic biodegradable polymers have been prepared. the used monomers and the corresponding grafted chains are not easily biodegradable. Global production of starch is 60 million ton per year in 2004 . and this value increases with about 10% per year . roots) as granules or cells with typical particle sizes between 1‐100 µm. Various modification strategies have been explored. The content of amylose in starches depends on the plant and typically varies between 18‐28%. The polymeric structure of starch consists of repeating anhydroglucose units. Starch. resulting 48 . Starch films are known to have good oxygen barrier properties.
during the reaction. it has been proposed to chemically graft caprolactone onto the hydroxyl groups of starch using ring‐opening polymerisation . In this chapter. thus to a reduction in the GE. Acros) and methanol (Labscan) were used as received. Another possible cause for the low grafting efficiencies is the heterogenous nature of the reaction. Materials and Methods 3. Aluminium triisopropoxide [Al(OiPr)3] (Acros) was used without further purification. thus leading to the formation of PCL homopolymers rather that starch‐g‐PCL . The highest GE (90%) was achieved using triethylaluminium as catalyst . A stock solution was prepared by dissolving 1. distilled under reduced pressure at 100 oC and stored under a protective nitrogen atmosphere. 0‐14%). Starch is insoluble in the typical organic solvents used for ROP (such as toluene or THF). Materials Corn starch (Sigma) was dried at high vacuum (~1 mbar) at 100 oC for one day before use. This approach has also been applied successfully to graft PCL and polylactide on dextran [19‐20]. In this way. Synthesis of Poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone Grafted Starch Co‐polymers using Silylated Starch Precursors in undesirable phase separation . This is expected to lead to reduced reaction rates between starch and CL compared to CL homopolymerisation. an alternative method to synthesize poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone grafted starch co‐polymers (starch‐g‐PCL) is reported. Hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS. the ring opening polymerisation occurs solely in the liquid phase and this is expected to lead to higher GE values. The starch source is made less hydrophilic and thus more soluble in organic solvents by substituting part of the OH groups of starch by a bulky silyl group [16‐18].2. This is rationalised by assuming that water competes with the hydroxyl groups of starch in the initiation step of the polymerization reaction. Common Ring Opening Polymerization (ROP) catalysts such as tin octoate or aluminium isopropoxide gave low grafting efficiencies (GE. Hydrochloric acid (HCl) 1 N was prepared from Titrisol concentrated hydrochloric acid solution (Merck) and distilled (Milipore) water. a very flammable by‐product.67 gram (8 mmol) Al(OiPr)3 in 50 ml of dry toluene in a glove box. Dry tetrahydrofuran (THF) and toluene for polymerization experiments were obtained in closed vessels from Aldrich and were used as received. This catalyst is extremely air and water sensitive. therefore difficult to handle and releases ethane. DMSO (Acros) and toluene (Labscan) were dried overnight over molecular sieves 3 Å (Merck) and stored under a protective nitrogen atmosphere. All available data indicate that the presence of water reduces the GE. ε‐Caprolactone monomer (Fluka) was dried over Calcium Hydride (CaH2) for 48 h.2. To increase the miscibility of starch and polycaprolactone. leading to a liquid‐solid system.1. 3. 49 .
the silylated starch (1) product was dried in a vacuum oven (~5 mbar.60): 1 H‐NMR (CDCl3. 50 oC): δ 0. silyl‐CH3).2. 1 3. Traces of DMSO trapped in the product were removed by dissolving the product in a small amount of toluene and re‐precipitation in methanol.2. Typical example of the starch silylation procedure The procedure for corn starch silylation was adapted from that published for dextran [19‐23].2.6 mL) at 50 oC (1‐2 h). DS = 0. silyl‐CH3). 3‐6 ppm (m.7‐2. starch). The pre‐determined amount of HMDS (typically 24 ml. After 6 h. The reaction was carried out at 70 oC.111 mol) was added to the gelatinized mixture to initiate the silylation reaction. A mol ratio of ‐OH groups to catalyst of 10:1 was used. Silylated Starch (1. broad peaks. 3. 1. broad peaks.1.2. THF (4. After 24 h. To this homogenous solution.1 mbar.5 (m. After 2 and 4 h reaction time. This procedure was repeated three times. Sample SN‐3. before peracetylation. Subsequently. The white‐to‐transparent solid products were stored under vacuum in a desiccator at 6‐8 oC.60): H‐NMR (CDCl3. Chapter 3 3. 3‐6 ppm (m. For each experiment. another portion of toluene (20 ml) was added. DS = 0.2. acetate‐CH3). a predetermined amount of ε‐caprolactone monomer (molar ratio of monomer to 50 .2. Sample SN‐3. 0.5 ml) and a predetermined amount of the stock solution of Al(OiPr)3 in toluene were added. Silylated Starch (1.12 (m. The mixture was stirred at 50 oC for 4 h to promote the exchange reaction between the isopropoxide groups of Al(OiPr)3 and the free ‐OH groups of starch. The intake of 1 depended on its DS and was adjusted to obtain a solution with 5 x 10‐5 mol free‐OH groups/ml of THF. toluene (40 ml) was added to solubilize the precipitated (partially silylated) starch.12 (m. After removal of the solvents under reduced pressure (0. The samples were characterized by 1H‐NMR. after peracetylation. the solvents were removed from the silylated starch product under reduced pressure (~ 20 mbar) at 70 oC.2. 80 oC). Methods All reactions and manipulations with air‐sensitive materials were carried out under a protective nitrogen atmosphere either using standard Schlenk techniques or in a glove box. pre‐dried corn starch (6 g) and dry DMSO (75 ml) were stirred at 70oC for about 3 h until a clear solution was formed. 40 oC) until constant weight. 50 oC): δ 0. starch). Typical example of in situ polymerization of ε‐CL with silylated starch The silylated product from the first step was dissolved in THF (0.
and 5‐5.68. ε‐PCL).21): H‐NMR (DMSO d‐6. The peracetylation procedure applied in this study was adapted from the literature [24.68. The solid precipitate was filtered and dried under vacuum (~ 5 mbar) at 40 oC for 48 h.5‐3.88 ppm (m.16 (d. Peracetylation of the remaining OH groups of modified starch is a well established procedure to improve characterisation of the products by NMR .) was >99 %. The reaction was stopped by cooling down the mixture to room temperature and the addition of 2‐3 drops of 1 N HCl to deactivate the catalyst. the peracetylating reagents 51 . Silylated Starch‐g‐PCL (2.31 (m.54 (m. Synthesis of Poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone Grafted Starch Co‐polymers using Silylated Starch Precursors OH‐groups was 13 : 1 for a standard experiment) was added and the ring opening polymerization reaction was allowed to proceed for 24 h at 50 oC.12 (s.5. silyl‐CH3). Starch‐g‐PCL (3.75. 4.98 (t.31 (m.4 (m. broad peaks. starch). The samples were characterized by 1H‐NMR. The silyl group was removed by adding a slight excess (with respect to the number of the silyl functionalities) of 1N HCl to a solution of ‐starch‐silylated‐g‐PCL in THF (10 % w/v). The product was collected as a white solid and characterised by 1H‐NMR. DSsilylation = 0. 1 (0. and vacuum dried at 40 oC for 24 h. 1. DSPCL=0.88 ppm (m.2.2. 3. β and δ‐PCL). ‐CH3.1 g) was suspended in THF (4%‐w/v) and stirred at 55 oC until it was fully dissolved (typically 3 h).34): H‐NMR (DMSO. starch).37 (t.3‐4. the desilylated starch‐g‐polycaprolactone product (3) was precipitated using heptane. Peracetylation of silylated starch Characterisation of the silylated starch by NMR proved very difficult due to the presence of very broad and overlapping resonances arising from starch. 4. The yield was measured gravimetrically and is based on the weight of the product and the total weight of reactants charged to the reactor. De‐silylation of poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone grafted silylated starch co‐polymers Desilylation of the 2 was performed using a procedure described by Ydens et al  for desilylation of silylated dextran‐g‐PCL. 4.5‐ 3. broad peaks. 2. DSsilylation = 0.3. β and δ‐ PCL). α‐PCL). 1 3. 3. After stirring for 2 h. 1. 60 oC): δ 1. 1 3.25 (t.2. The silylated starch‐g‐PCL (2) product was precipitated from the solution by the addition of heptane (about 250 ml) at ‐18 o C. γ‐ PCL). 3. 3.3‐4. α‐PCL). iPr). 4. DSPCL=0.37 (t. Subsequently. iPr). 3. ε‐PCL).25 (t. ‐CH. Sample SN1CL1.2. iPr).54 (m.16 (d. ε’‐PCL). γ‐PCL). The total isolated yield at this condition (see Table 3. and 5‐5. 2. 1. 1. 25]. ε’‐PCL). filtrated.75.4 (m.98 (t. Deprotection product of Sample SN1CL2.2.5. Typically. ‐CH3 .4. 1. iPr). 3. ‐CH. 60 oC): δ 0.
it is assumed that the average length of the grafted chain is equal to the chain length of the homopolymer.3.) The degree of substitution of the PCL graft on 2 (DSPCL) is defined as the average number of PCL polymer chains present on an AHG unit of starch.8 ppm (3. The peracetylation reaction was conducted for 7 h at 50 oC. This leads to the following equation: ACL = ACH 2 −ε + ACH 2 −ε ' ACH 2 −ε ' = A3.2. The Average Chain Length (ACL) of the Poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone chain is defined as the average number of CL repeating units in a grafted polymer chain.1.6−0. Calculations The DS of the silylated starch (DSsilylation) is defined as the average number of silyl groups present on an anhydroglucose unit (AHG) of starch. The assumption of high conversions (>95%) was correct for all experiments (see Table 3. The ACL is calculated from 1H‐NMR spectra by comparing the peak area of protons attached to ε‐carbon atoms in a repeating CL unit with that of the characteristic ε’ protons of the last CL unit in a PCL chain  (see Figure 3. Analytical Methods 18.104.22.168. The product was precipitated by the addition of methanol and washed several times with methanol. When assuming that all ε‐CL monomer is converted.4 ppm + 1 (3.2 ppm A3. Chapter 3 (DMAP. acetic anhydride and pyridine in a DMAP : acetic anhydride : pyridine : AHG molar ratio of 1: 10: 22 : 1) were added. 3. In this calculation.3−3.) 52 . Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) H‐ NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 at 50oC or in DMSO d‐6 at 60 oC on a Varian AMX 400 NMR machine.3. DSsilylation may be calculated using 1H‐NMR spectra of the products after peracetylation using eq.8− 4.1. 3.).4. It was finally dried overnight in a vacuum oven at 70 oC and 5 mbar until constant weight.2.2. ACH 3 silyl / 9 1 7 A−0.) where Ax‐y stands for the 1H‐NMR peak area in the range δ x‐y ppm.2.6 ppm DSsilylation = × = × 3 Astarch proton / 7 27 A3−5. the DSPCL may be calculated using eq.3. 3. 1 3.
8− 4 . A3. Although all steps have been investigated.( A3. It is calculated by comparing the area of protons related to the PCL grafted to starch with the area of the protons of all PCL chains present in the product.) The grafting efficiency (GE) is defined as the percentage of PCL grafted to starch compared to the total amount of polymerized CL (grafted and PCL homopolymer).4 − A4 .3−3.4.2 ) ⎤ 1 × ⎢ (3 − DSsilylation )⎥ ⎢ ε .5.8− 4 .8− 4. This leads to the following equation: GE = ACH 2 −ε ' / 2 − ACH −iso ACH 2 −ε ' / 2 × 100 % (3. Results and Discussions The overall procedure to synthesize poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone grafted starch co‐ polymers (3) consists of three steps and includes hydrophobization of starch by silylation of part of the hydroxyl groups of starch using hexamethyl disilazane (HMDS).CL/OH ratio ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ (3. and Vm stands for molar volume.) ⎛ ⎞ ⎞ ⎛ A A = ⎜1 − CH −iso ⎟ × 100 % = ⎜1 − 4.9 ⎟ × 100 % ⎜ ⎜ ⎟ ACH 2 −ε ' / 2 ⎠ A3. The values of ∆Hv and Vm were obtained from the SciFinder Scholar database (American Chemical Society. the focus of this chapter will be on the first two steps of the procedure. followed by an in‐situ Ring Opening Polymerization (ROP) of ε‐ caprolactone monomer on the hydrophobized starch and subsequent silyl group removal by a mild acid treatment. Synthesis of Poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone Grafted Starch Co‐polymers using Silylated Starch Precursors DS PCL = 0.3−3.9 ⎡ 0. T stands for absolute temperature.3. The Hildebrand solubility parameter of HMDS and DMSO were calculated using the following equation : ⎛ ∆H v − RT ⎞ ⎟ δ =⎜ ⎟ ⎜ Vm ⎠ ⎝ 1/ 2 where ∆Hv stands for heat of vaporization.3. 2007) 3.4 + A3.3−3.4 / 2 ⎟ ⎠ ⎝ ⎝ where Ax‐y stands for the peak area in the range δ x‐y ppm. 53 .5.
It is defined as the average number of silyl substituted OH groups on the anhydroglucose (AHG) unit of starch. The silylation procedure was adapted from that previously reported for dextran [19‐23].3.). Using standard conditions (HMDS: AHG molar ratio of 3. The silylated products were characterised by NMR. mixtures of toluene and DMSO were applied to avoid precipitation of the silylated starch during the reaction.1. Chapter 3 3. as suggested by Einfeldt et al .1.a.5.).1. In this way. Very broad peaks of starch protons at δ 3‐5 ppm and a sharp peak of the methyl substituents of the silyl group at about δ 0 ppm were observed (see Figure 3. The 1H‐ NMR peaks from the AHG unit after peracetylation were indeed considerably sharper and allowed more accurate DS calculations (Figure 3.) Instead of using DMSO as solvent. 54 .5. the starch peaks are very broad and this feature hampers accurate determination of the DSsilylation.) shows the presence of silyl groups at about δ 0 ppm.b.1. a product with a DS of 0. Synthesis of Silylated Starch The silylation of corn starch was performed with HMDS as the silylating agent (eq. The degree of substitution of the silyl groups (DSsilylation) was determined by 1H‐ NMR. The 1H‐ NMR spectrum of silylated starch (Figure 3.60 was obtained. 24 h).a. a homogeneous reaction mixture was maintained throughout the reaction. 70 oC. 3. C O H 2OR H 1 + NH3 2 OH H3C [R = H or Si(CH3)3] Starch Hexamethyldisilazane Silylated Starch (1) (3. An additional peracetylation procedure to substitute the free hydroxyl groups with acetate groups was performed to improve the quality of the NMR spectra. However.). 6 H2C OH 4H 3 H5 OH H 6 H2C O R 4H H5 OR 3 H O H 1 H H3C CH3 CH3 CH3 + H3C Si NH Si DMSO 50 deg.
not peracetylated (b). and Figure 3. Synthesis of Poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone Grafted Starch Co‐polymers using Silylated Starch Precursors Figure 3. 50 oC): (a).1. 55 .60. The results are given in Table 3. DSsilylation=0.1.2.5‐4. peracetylated The effect of the HMDS to starch molar ratio (1. in CDCl3. Typical 1H‐NMR Spectra of Silylated Starch (Sample SN3.5) on the product DS was investigated by performing experiments with a constant starch and a variable HMDS intake.
5 Figure 3. a fixed starch intake of 6 g (37 mmol AHG) starch was applied. For all experiments.25 3 4.55 0.5 Product DS (DSsilylation) 0. a positive effect of higher reagent intake on the reaction rate and thus the DS is expected. The silylation reaction 56 .25 cal1/2cm‐3/2) due to the presence of the bulky apolar SiMe3 groups.5:1.68 0.5 3 3. solubility parameter = 11.46 Experiment SN1 SN2 SN3 SN4 a Experiments were performed in DMSO at 70°C. For reactions with an order higher than zero.1.5 HMDS : AHG Ratio [mol/ mol] 4 4.60 0. Chapter 3 0.36 cal1/2cm‐3/2) considerably. the volumetric HMDS intake is about half of the DMSO intake. DS of the silylated products at different HMDS: AHG ratios (DMSO.5 2. the DSsilylation decreases for higher intakes of HMDS.5 0. Surprisingly. Its presence will reduce the polarity of the reaction medium (DMSO. Effect of HMDS: AHG mol ratio on DS of the silylation product a HMDS intake (ml.67 0.4 1. HMDS is a rather apolar compound (Hildebrand solubility parameter of 6. mmol) 12 (56) 18 (83) 24 (111) 36 (167) HMDS: AHG mol ratio 1.45 0.5 2 2.2.6 DSsilylation 0. The experimentally observed lowering at higher HMDS intakes is likely due to a decrease in the polarity of the reaction mixture.65 0. At a mol ratio of HMDS to AHG of 4. 70 oC) Table 3.
0) gave silylated dextran with DS values between 1.6.25‐5.7‐3. 50 oC H CH2 H OR H C (CH2)5 O n H O H OR + H (R = H or Si(CH3)3 Silylated Starch (1) ε-Caprolactone Monomer [R = H or Si(CH3)3 ] Silylated Starch-g-Polycaprolactone (2) (3.6‐glucosidic for dextran). Silylation of starch with HMDS in formamide. and DMSO/pyridine mixtures yielded silylated starch with DS values ranging between 0. white solid products with isolated yield > 96% were obtained. 3. To the best of our knowledge. Synthesis of Poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone Grafted Starch Co‐polymers using Silylated Starch Precursors involves charged‐ionic species  and a reduction in the polarity of the reaction medium is expected to lead to a lowering of the silylation reaction rates. pyridine. The much higher DS values obtained for dextran compared to starch may be related to differences in molecular weights between starch and dextran and the type of AHG linkages (mainly α‐1.3.6. the silylation of starch in pure DMSO using HMDS as the reagent has not been reported to date. The DSsilylation (0. Petzold et al  reported that silylation of starch with trimethylsilylchloride (TMSCl) in pyridine yielded trimethyl‐silyl substituted starch with DS values between 0. DMA/LiCl. O O H2C O R H H OR H O O H OR H O Catalyst: Al(OiPr)3 Toluene. A schematic representation of the reaction is provided in eq.2. sample SN‐1) in THF at 50 oC for 24 h using Al(OiPr)3 as catalyst.1 and 3. 3. Similar reductions in the reaction rates when working at higher reactant intakes were observed for the esterification of starch with vinyl laurate and stearate .) 57 . The products are soluble in DMSO as well as in less‐polar solvent such as chloroform and THF.2. After precipitation with heptane and vacuum drying.0 [18. liquid ammonia. In situ Ring Opening Polymerization of ε‐Caprolactone with Silylated Starch A number of in situ ROP experiments with ε‐caprolactone (CL) were carried out using a typical silylated starch sample (DS=0.3‐2. 29].45‐0. DMF.0 .68.7) of the products is in the range of those published for other starch silylation systems. The use of HMDS to silylate dextran (Mw=6000‐40000) in DMSO (HMDS to OH molar ratio of 0.
3.9 and 1.68. the exchange reaction between Al(OiPr)3 and the OH groups of silylated starch is not quantitative under the conditions applied in this study.4. A typical spectrum is shown in Figure 3. not all of the caprolactone is grafted to starch and large amounts of PCL homopolymers (72%) were formed.8 and 5. The homopolymers are formed by direct polymerization of ε‐CL initiated on isoproproxide moieties attached to the Al catalyst. Chapter 3 The products were characterized using 1H‐NMR analysis in DMSO‐d‐6 as the solvent. as is shown in Figure 3.4‐3. Typical 1H‐NMR spectrum of a silylated starch‐g‐PCL sample. Resonances from the starch peaks are observable as small. Figure 3.2‐4 ppm and imply that the ring‐opening polymerisation reaction of CL indeed occurred.0‐5. This is clearly indicated by resonances of the iPr end‐group of the PCL homopolymer at δ 4.4 ppm. The peaks from the polycaprolactone units are clearly present in the range of δ 1. broad peaks in the region δ 3. 58 . However. Coding of the peaks is given in Figure 3. DSsilylation =0. 26]. DSPCL=0.2 ppm.4. Further process optimization studies allowed the synthesis of products with less than 42% of homopolymers (vide infra). The formation of CL homopolymers for this type of reactions has been observed before [15.3.21) in DMSO‐d6 at 60 oC. Apparently. (Sample SN1CL1.
7.) 59 . Polymerization Reaction: O iPr O Al OH iPr O PCL homopolymer with carboxylic end-group + O O α H β χ δ ε O α' β' χ' δ' ε' [O C CH2 CH2 CH2 CH2 CH2 ]n O C CH2 CH2 CH2 CH2 CH2 OH (3. 1. This leads to the formation of carboxylic end groups (see eq. residual water may also initiate the polymerisation reaction. Product formation for the reaction between silylated starch and ε‐ caprolactone Besides the ‐OH group of starch. Polymerization Reaction: iPr O Al O iPr H2C O O H O H OR H H OR H O O O O α β χ δ ε α' β' χ' δ' ε' H2C [O C CH2 CH2 CH2 CH2 CH2 ]n O C CH2 CH2 CH2 CH2 CH2 OH O O H O H OR H H OR H O [R = H or Si(CH3)3 ] + n+1 Silylated Starch-g-PCL (2) O iPr O Al O iPr iPr O + O n+1 iPr O α β χ δ ε O α' β' χ' δ' ε' [O C CH2 CH2 CH2 CH2 CH2 ]n O C CH2 CH2 CH2 CH2 CH2 OH PCL homopolymer Figure 3. However.7. Exchange Reaction: iPr O Al O iPr H2C OH iPr O Al O iPr iPr O H2C O O O H O H OR H H OR [R = H or Si(CH3)3 ] H O + O H H OH H H OH H O + iPr OH Silylated Starch (1) 2. 3. Synthesis of Poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone Grafted Starch Co‐polymers using Silylated Starch Precursors 1. Exchange Reaction: iPr O Al O iPr iPr O + H2O iPr O iPr O Al OH + iPr OH 2.). peaks arising from a ‐COOH unit could not be detected in 13C‐ NMR spectra (δ 175‐180 ppm).4.
58 0.72 Grafting Efficiency [%] 28 43 48 55 58 All reactions were performed using the same intake of SN1 silylated starch (DS=0.5 and 100%. Determined gravimetrically and defined as the total weight of the isolated product divided by the total intake of reactants (silylated starch and CL).3. The grafting efficiency (GE) for the sample given in Figure 3.34 0. The results are given in Table 3. The ACL of the polymer and the DSPCL increase almost linearly with the ε‐ caprolactone intake (Figure 3. b. units] 40 43 44 49 54 DSPCL 0.2. (SN1CL1) is 28%. The yield of the products was measured gravimetrically and varies between 96.9 ppm).2 Total Yieldb [%] >99 >99 >99 99 96. This indicates that higher ε‐CL concentrations during the reaction lead to longer PCL grafts as well as to higher levels of initiation of the grafting reaction on free hydroxyl group of silylated starch.68) in THF at 50 oC with Al(OiPr)3 as the catalyst (1 mol Al(OiPr)3 per 10 mol‐starch‐OH groups).0 18.3 ppm) should be twice the intensity of the ‐CH‐ proton of the isopropoxide end group (δ 4.47 0. Table 3. Experiment SN1CL1 SN1CL2 SN1CL3 SN1CL4 SN1CL5 a. Chain Length [mon. Five experiments were performed to study the effect of different ε‐CL to silylated starch ratio. the intensity of the resonance ε’ was considerably higher that that of the ‐CH‐ iPr peak. Overview of results for the grafting of ε‐CL on silylated starch a ε‐CL/ OH [mol/ mol] 13. The GE increases with higher ε‐CL intakes. In the case of only homopolymerisation. Chapter 3 The ratio of homopolymerisation versus grafting on starch may be obtained by comparing the integrals of selected peaks in 1H‐NMR spectra.21 0.9 22. in all samples.). This implies that the ε‐CL conversion is essentially quantitative in all cases.5 29.5.5. This implies that grafting of caprolactone to starch also occurs to a significant extent.0 15. and Figure 3.5 Avg. However. and reaches 58% for a ε‐CL to starch–OH ratio of 29. 60 .2. the intensity of the peak from the ‐CH2‐ end group of the homopolymer (ε’ at δ 3.2.
Synthesis of Poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone Grafted Starch Co‐polymers using Silylated Starch Precursors
Average Polymer Length [mon. units]
50 0.7 45 0.6 0.5 40 0.4 35 0.3 0.2 30 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 DSPCL
ε-CL : Starch-OH Ratio [mol/ mol]
Figure 3.5. Average Chain Length (ACL) and the DS for as a function of the CL‐ starch intake. ∆ : Average Chain Length (ACL); □ : DSPCL The mechanism of ROP of cyclic esters such as caprolactone in the presence of an alcohol (ROH, silylated starch in our case) is provided in Scheme 3.1. [30‐31]. Higher monomer intakes are expected to lead to higher polymerization rates as shown in Scheme 3.1.b. This will result in longer PCL chains in the final product, in line with the experimental observations (see Table 3.2. and Figure 3.5.). At higher ε‐caprolactone intakes not only the ACL of the grafted chain increases but also higher values for the DSPCL are observed. This finding may be rationalised by assuming that the rate of chain transfer (Scheme 3.1.c.) with starch is increased at higher ε‐caprolactone intakes. The rate of this reaction is expected to be a function of both the starch and the concentrations of Al‐species with a growing PCL chain. The starch intake for all experiments was equal, meaning that the concentration of Al‐species with a growing PCL chain should be higher at higher ε‐CL intakes. This is indeed predicted by the mechanism given in Scheme 3.1.b.; higher caprolactone intakes will increase the rate of this reaction and lead to higher concentration of Al‐species with a growing PCL chain.
Al O iPr
R OH O O kp kd
Al O R
O Al O [(CH2)5 C O]n R
Al O R
O Al O [(CH2)5 C O]n R + R OH
O Al O R
+ HO [(CH2)5 C O]n R
Scheme 3.1. The observation that a higher monomer to alcohol ratio leads to higher amounts of PCL chains with an alcohol end group and thus a higher DS was also reported for the polymerization of p‐dioxanone with Zn‐lactate as catalyst and α‐tocopherol as the alcohol . To show the potential of our approach to use hydrophobised starch instead of native starch for the ring opening polymerisation of cyclic esters, several ring openings polymerisations of native starch with ε‐CL monomer were performed either in pure ε‐CL or in a mixture of ε‐CL and toluene (80‐100oC, 24 hr). At the start of the reaction, the starch was always insoluble in the reaction medium. After reaction the product was isolated, washed thoroughly with toluene and dried. The weight of the product, however, was very close to the initial starch intake. Examination of the products by FT‐IR does not show the presence of caprolactone vibrations. Thus, it may be concluded that solubilisation of starch is of key importance to obtain poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone grafted starch co‐polymers. These findings are in line with earlier studies on the ROP of ε‐caprolactone on native granular starch using Al(OiPr)3 as catalyst . Here, caprolactone polymerization did not occur after 18‐24 h reaction time and only liquid ε‐CL was recovered. Only when performing the reaction with high concentrations of the aluminium catalyst, a product with a GE of about 13% was obtained. This low GE was explained by assuming that the reaction between starch and Al(OiPr)3 is slow and due to the heterogeneous nature of the reaction mixture. Our study, together with the result of Dubois et al  indicate that homogenous reaction conditions are required for the successful ROP of ε‐CL to obtain poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone grafted starch co‐polymers when using Al(OiPr)3 as the catalyst. When performing the reaction under heterogenous conditions, a high grafting efficiency is only achievable when using triethylaluminium as the catalyst .
Synthesis of Poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone Grafted Starch Co‐polymers using Silylated Starch Precursors
3.3.3. Deprotection of Silylated‐Starch‐g‐PCL A preliminary experiment was performed to remove the silylated groups of the silylated starch‐g‐PCL (eq. 3.8.) using a mild acid treatment with diluted hydrochloric acid in THF at room temperature. All silyl groups were removed successfully, as is clearly seen from an NMR spectrum given in Figure 3.6.
Figure 3.6. H‐ NMR Spectrum of Starch‐g‐PCL (reaction product after desilylation of sample SN1CL2, DSsilylation =0.68, DSPCL=0.34), in DMSO‐d6
O O H2C H H OR H C (CH2)5 O
O H O CH2 H H OH H C (CH2)5 O
O H OR
THF, 2 hr H
O H OH
[R = H or Si(CH3)3 ]
Silylated Starch-g-Polycaprolactone (2)
depending on the ε‐CL‐starch ratio. Nomenclature A : peak area of certain proton in 1H‐NMR spectra [‐] : peak area of certain peak at x until y ppm in 1H‐NMR spectra [‐] : average number of CL repeating units in a grafted polymer chain or homopolymer [monomer units] : Degree of Substitution. Considerable amounts of ε‐CL hompolymers with isopropyl end‐groups were also formed. The grafting efficiency varied between 28‐58%. indicating that homogeneous reaction conditions are favorable for the grafting reaction. Control ROP experiments of ε‐CL with native starch under similar conditions did not produce the desired poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone grafted corn starch co‐polymers. The key feature is the use of a homogeneous reaction mixture for the ROP of starch with ε‐CL. Poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone grafted silylated starch co‐polymers with average chain length of 40‐55 monomer units (polymer molecular weight of 4500‐6300) were obtained.21‐0. This was achieved by making the starch more hydrophobic by partial substitution of the OH groups by trimethylsilyl groups. 3. the highest value was obtained with a ε‐CL‐AHG ratio of 29.72.68) was obtained using a DMSO/toluene mixture as the solvent and HMDS as the silylating agent.2. The ROP with ε‐CL was performed using Al(OiPr)3 as catalyst in THF as the solvent. Chapter 3 3.46‐0.986 cal mol‐1 K‐1 : temperature [K] : R T Vm molar volume [cm3/ mol] 64 . The DS of the PCL chains was between 0. Conclusions The successful synthesis of poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone grafted corn starch co‐ polymers using a three step approach is reported. the percentage of PCL grafted to starch compared to the total amount (grafted and homopolymer) of polymerized CL [%] : gas constant.4. The products may have interesting applications as compatibilizers for starch‐polymer blends. 1.5. average value of mole of substituted –OH per mole of anhydroglucose (AHG) units [‐] A x − y ppm ACL DS DSsilylation : DS of silyl group substituents [‐] DSPCL GE : DS of PCL chain substituents [‐] : Grafting Efficiency. Silylated starch with a low‐medium DS (0.
L. 61‐74. Polym. accessed on August 01. Chandra. R. 51. Sci. Sci. Denmark.C. 1273‐1335. Sci. 1998. Environ. Department of Dairy and Food Science. J. A. Rustgi: Biodegradable polymers. . De Mulder‐Johnston: Edible and biodegradable polymer films: Challenges and opportunities. R. 1251‐1253. Polym. 65 . 1997. 3. D. Solaro: Biodegradable polymeric materials. Aarhus. W. Degrad. 23. 305‐313. 52. 2003. Denmark: http://www. J. .A. Wang. R. . . 1998.K. Aly. S. Wang: Properties of starch blends with biodegradable polymers. Abdel‐Mohdy: Grafting of poly(methacrylic acid) on starch and poly(vinyl alcohol). Macromol. Food Technol. 2003.dk/isi/stat/rawmaterial. Environmen. Russell: Graft copolymers of polysaccharides with thermoplastic polymers ‐ new type of filled plastic. C.B. . Prog. Synthesis of Poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone Grafted Starch Co‐polymers using Silylated Starch Precursors Greek symbols: ∆H v : heat of vaporization [kJ/mol] : δ Hildebrand solubility parameter [cal1/2cm‐3/2] 3. A. Polym. 2008. H. The compelling facts about plastics: An analysis of plastics production.starch.R. Belgium. Rev. Y. 61‐67. status and perspectives. . 53‐57. References . 38.M. report of Food Biopack Project (Ed. Linke: Water vapor sorption determination of starch based porous packaging materials. Fanta. Association of Plastics Manufacturers. E. 407‐412. 17. R. Adv. C. .Sci. A.html. X. Chiellini. . Krochta. 56.. 1977. 11. Eng. of . Website of International Starch Institute.A. Beliakova. C. J. M.A. . Polym. demand and recovery for 2006 in Europe. Polym. 2000. 311‐316. Doane. J. 1996. Eng. Brussels. Biobased packaging materials for the food industry. Weber). . Babac: Preparation and biodegradation starch/polycaprolactone films. the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University. 107‐113. 2008. E. Starch‐Starke 2000. K. Bagley. G. 1995. J.F. 8. Starch‐Starke 2004. Burr. Goldberg: Review of the biodegradability and utility of poly(caprolactone). 385–409 . Karlsson. Tsiapouris.M. Yavuz. Frederiksberg C. Yang. Plastics Europe. F. 43.6. Part C: Polym.. Mater.C. Albertsson: Biodegradable polymers and environmental interaction. C.
Symp. 561‐566. Biomacromolecules 2003. Averous. 42. Six: Controlled synthesis of amphiphilic biodegradable polylactide‐grafted dextran copolymers. P. Kussler. J. Dubois. 2001. . Petzold. J. Duquesne. . 1443‐1450. 2. E.L. Nouvel. regioselectivity. 73. Macromolecules 2000. Polym. . C. W. 1735‐ 1743. Klemm. P. Degrad. Gunther. M. I. P. and chemical stability of silylated dextrans. Dubois. P. 10. D. Stein. 2004. Dubois. B. Chem. Des. 2001. . D. K. 965‐969. Hamaide. E. . C. Sci. 341‐347. . Fessi. Moro. A. K. J.. T. Polymer 2000. M. Klemm. L. Petzold. Nouvel. D. Pantiru. Dellacherie. Einfeldt. high value applications. D. Gunther. I. 33. 415‐426. D. A. I. Rutot. P. Part A: Polym. Biosci.L. Stein. Dubois. Six: Silylation reaction of dextran: Effect of experimental conditions on silylation yield. Biomacromolecules 2001. 4157‐4167. Einfeldt: Structure design of polysaccharides: novel concepts. Gunther: Synthesis and NMR characterization of regiocontrolled starch alkyl ethers. 2002. Dole. 1.L. 41. C. 6713‐ 6721. K. selective syntheses. Cellulose 2003. A. Klemm: Regioselective functionalization of starch: Synthesis and 1H NMR characterization of 6‐O‐ silyl ethers. P. . W. Dubois: Aliphatic polyester‐ based biodegradable materials: new amphiphilic graft copolymers. Petzold. 2577‐2588. Narayan: Aliphatic polyester‐grafted starch‐like polysaccharides by ring‐opening polymerization. A. E. W. K. Dellacherie. 43. 35‐47. Fringant: Properties of thermoplastics blends: starch‐polycaprolactone. Klemm. Einfeldt. P. Boullanger: Ring‐opening polymerisation of epsilon‐caprolactone with monosaccharides as transfer 66 . Macromol. Ydens. and subsequent reactions. Monomers Polym. 5. . D. Polymer 1999. L. 4. H. Dubois: Controlled synthesis of poly(epsilon‐caprolactone)‐grafted dextran copolymers as potential environmentally friendly surfactants. Dellacherie. Stein. Six: Partial or total silylation of dextran with hexamethyldisilazane. Degee. structure analysis. E. L. D. P. Rutot. Stab. Krishnan. P. L. . Ydens. . Klemm: Preparative and 1H NMR investigation on regioselective silylation of starch dissolved in Dimethyl Sulfoxide. Polymer 2002. M. J. J. Polym. Ydens. Nouvel. Koschella. P. . Petzold. P. 163. Degee. 251‐269.L. Heublein: Silylation of cellulose and starch ‐ selectivity. Degee. 40. 2001. 3091‐3100. E. Six. Chapter 3 . L. R. D. Dellacherie. . Macromol.
Janssen. Macromol. D. Phys. R. 1978. Penczek.L. Kinetics and mechanism. 2001.J. Macromol Chem. Hertz Jr. T. Macromolecul. Synthesis of Poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone Grafted Starch Co‐polymers using Silylated Starch Precursors agents. Picchioni. Mexico City. H. L. Lehmann: Selective 6‐O‐acetylation of amylose. F. H. 22. . Horton. Rapid Commun. Rapid Commun. Heeres: Synthesis of higher fatty acid starch esters using vinyl laurate and stearate as reactants.O. Sugih. L. . . 29. 1399‐1406. . Kricheldorf. 941‐950. J. A.: Solubility parameter concepts – a new look. 1989 . . Carbohydr.B. accepted for publication in Starch‐Starke. 21. Manurung. Macromolecules 1996. A. Biela.4‐ dioxan‐2‐one. A novel route to functionalised nanoparticles. 2008. D. presented at ACS Rubber Division meeting. 553‐556. Duda: Polymerization of ε‐caprolactone initiated by aluminum isopropoxide carried out in the presence of alcohols and diols. S. Duda: Living polymerization with reversible chain transfer and reversible deactivation: the case of cyclic esters.P. 659‐663. Res.M. Damrau: Zn‐lactate catalyzed polymerizations of 1. 67 . D. 1998. 61. 2000. 1089‐1097.K.R. Junistia. A. 199.
Chapter 4 Synthesis of Higher Fatty Acid Starch Esters using Vinyl Laurate and Stearate as Reactants Abstract This chapter describes the synthesis of long fatty esters of corn starch (starch‐ laurate and starch‐stearate) with a broad range in degree of substitution (DS= 0. presumably due to a reduction of the polarity of the reaction medium. K2CO3. K2CO3. vinyl laurate. an increase in the vinyl‐ester concentration leads to higher product DS values. and Na‐acetate are superior catalysts with respect to activity compared to Na2HPO4 and products with DS values close to 3 were obtained. When performing the reactions using Na2HPO4 as the catalyst.24 ‐ 2. At higher ratios. vinyl ester to starch ratio and the type of catalyst.96). the DS decreases. Keywords: corn starch. The fatty esters were prepared by reacting the starch with vinyl laurate or vinyl stearate in the presence of basic catalysts (Na2HPO4. the DS for the starch‐laurate compounds is higher than for the corresponding starch‐ stearates. and Na‐acetate) in DMSO at 110°C. The yellowish products were characterized by 1 H‐. For low vinyl‐ester to starch ratios. 13C‐NMR and FT‐IR. vinyl stearate . esterification. The DS of the products is a function of the carbon number of the fatty acid chain.
the use of native starch for packaging materials is limited due to its low moisture resistance.61) products were obtained using this approach. and incompatibility with hydrophobic polymers. The first paper on the acetylation of starch was already published in 1865 .1. Introduction Green biodegradable polymers derived from natural resources are potentially very interesting substitutes for non‐biodegradable petroleum‐based polymers. Their 70 . An alternative method using methyl and glyceryl laurate esters in the absence of solvent has been recently developed . However. even after the addition of plasticizers . and consequently. To improve the mechanical properties. cellulose or proteins are potentially very interesting starting materials for biodegradable packaging materials. Relatively low‐DS (0. defined as the moles of substituents per mole of anhydroglucose (AHG) units) . the fatty ester substituents [1. the mechanical properties of high‐ DS starch derivatives of low chain carboxylic acids still need considerable improvements before large scale application as packaging materials becomes within reach. which are relatively expensive and rather corrosive . and particularly acetic acid derivatives (C2) [2‐4]. 5]. The hydrophobicity increases with the degree of acetate substitution (DS. poor processibility (high viscosity). more water‐resistant products may be obtained [3‐4]. high brittleness. 5]. 7]. An attractive field of application for these polymers is the use as packaging materials. For the current petrochemical based products recycling is often neither practical nor economically feasible . Natural polymers such as starch. 5‐6] were introduced using fatty acid chloride reagents. In particular starch is attractive as it is relatively cheap and abundantly available. resulting in products with DS values up to 2. However.7 [1. The major obstacle is the pronounced brittleness of the materials. higher molecular weight carboxylic starch esters (C4‐C6) . The introduction of acetate groups on starch makes the product more hydrophobic. Recently Mormann et al  explored the possibility of using vinyl esters and particularly vinylacetate as reagents for the preparation of starch esters. The mechanical properties and hydrophobicity of the products were significantly improved when using these longer chain fatty acid precursors [1.34‐0. Further modification of starch is therefore required to introduce hydrophobicity and to improve mechanical and moisture barrier properties. However. However. Esterification of starch with low molecular weight fatty acid derivatives is one of the oldest modification technologies to improve starch properties. most of the studies performed to date use short chain carboxylic acids (C1‐C4).Chapter 4 4. and even fatty acid derivatives (C12‐C18) have been used in the modification reaction [5.
4‐N. leading to a moisture content of 2 %‐wt (measured gravimetrically). leading to higher reaction rates. to the best of our knowledge.01 when using vinyl‐laurate. IR spectra were recorded on a Spectrum 2000 FT‐IR Spectrometer (Perkin Elmer).N‐dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP). The maximum attainable DS of starch acetate in water was below 1 and limited to 0. The synthesis of starch stearate esters using vinyl ester reagents has. and tetrahydrofuran (THF) were supplied by Acros (Belgium) and were also used as received. The spectra were recorded at 50 oC.1. Materials Corn starch (approx. The effects of the starch to vinylester ratio on the reaction rates and DS have been explored.6 for starch acetate ester) were obtained. starch esters with a substantially higher DS value (up to 1. Materials and Methods 4. Synthesis of Higher Fatty Acid Starch Esters using Vinyl Laurate and Stearate as Reactants research focused on the synthesis of starch acetates and only two examples with a higher molecular weight fatty acid vinyl ester were reported. the Netherlands). 4. The effect of the addition of a non‐polar solvent (toluene) to the reaction medium to solubilise the products and thus to enhance the reaction rates has also been studied. the use of basic catalysts other than Na2HPO4 has been investigated. Germany) and disodium hydrogenphosphate (Merck. We here report an investigation on the synthesis of higher fatty acid esters of starch with an emphasis on the introduction of laurate and stearate ester side chains.2. ~1 mbar). The reactions were either performed in water or in DMSO using a basic catalyst (Na2HPO4). sodium acetate (Merck.2. In addition. In DMSO. Analytical Equipment H‐ and 13C‐NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 on a 400 MHz Varian AMX NMR machine.2. vinyl laurate (Fluka. not been reported to date. 73% amylopectine and 27% amylose) was purchased from Sigma (Germany). Germany) and acetic anhydride (Merck. Germany) were used without further purification. Technical grade dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). as recommended by Laignel et al . Germany) were used as received. The products were placed directly on the diamond plate and 50 scans with a resolution of 4 cm‐1 were recorded. This solvent effect is likely caused by the higher solubility of the vinyl esters in DMSO compared to water. The starch was dried before use for 48 h at 105 oC under vacuum (approx. 4.2. Analytical grade vinyl stearate (Aldrich. Potassium carbonate (Boom. 1 71 . Japan).
3‐6 ppm (m. Subsequently. 2H. 2.. Table 4. 172‐174 ppm (C=O. 31. 1230 (C‐O stretching). 1. the product was dried in a vacuum oven (70 oC. 22. 1. broad peaks. and O‐C6S).2. broad peaks. the product was precipitated using methanol (100 ml) and separated from the liquid phase by decantation.1. C2). broad peaks. C3). 1410 (C‐H bending). (13C‐NMR) and Figure 4. vinyl laurate or vinyl stearate (3 mol/mol AHG units in starch) and potassium carbonate catalyst (2 %‐wt with respect to starch) were added and the mixture was stirred at 110 oC for 24 h.2. 5S). After cooling. Finally. Starch‐stearate (Sample 19. 1 H‐NMR (after peracetylation. 3‐6 ppm (m. 1740 (C=O). 1370 (C‐H bending). Starch‐laurate (Sample 17. 2. attached to O‐C2S. The samples were characterized by 1H‐ and 13C‐NMR and FT‐IR. CDCl3): δ 0. 68‐74 (broad.1 (m.1 (C11).9 (t.52): H‐NMR (before peracetylation. C4‐11). 13 FT‐IR (cm‐1): 2920 (C‐H stretching). 760. CDCl3): δ 0. 1020 (C‐O stretching). typical spectra are given in Figure 4.9 (C3).3 (m.5 g) was first gelatinized in DMSO (5 ml) at 70 oC for 3 h. 935 (C‐O stretching). 2H. 7H. 1. 3H.9 (C10). 28‐32 (C4‐9). 1. C2). C1S).5 (m..1. C1S‐6S). C1S‐6S). 3‐6 ppm (m. 61. C2). C2’). 3H. 1 C‐NMR (before peracetylation. C2S. CDCl3): δ 14. C18). 3H. Typical example of the synthesis of laurate and stearate esters of corn starch Corn starch (0.9 (t. 1.8‐2. 24. 1.3. 2850 (C‐H stretching). 1455 (CH2). 1295. broad peaks. overlap with CDCl3 (C4S).9 (t.. (1H‐NMR). Methods 4. 95.2. DS = 2. broad peaks.1. C3). Figure 4. O‐C3S. 7H. 2H. broad peaks. 1.0 (m. The product was washed twice with methanol (50 and 25 ml. respectively). 2H.3 (m. The atom numbering scheme is given in Figure 4. 16H.9 (broad. 76‐78 ppm. 28H. DS = 2. C12). C4‐C17). approximately 5 mbar) for 24 h until constant weight.6 (m.4 (broad.5 (m.1. C4‐11). 7H. 12).5 (m. 2.4 (m.3. 2H. 3S. 720. broad peaks. C6S). 2H. 1350 (C‐H bending). C3). 1150 (C‐O stretching).7 (C11).4.3 (m. C1S‐6S) 1 72 .0 (C12). (FT‐IR).96) H‐NMR (before peracetylation.3. 3H. broad peaks. 34. Table 4. 1110 (C‐O stretching).Chapter 4 4. CDCl3): δ 0. resulting in the formation of a homogenous transparent solution. 16H.
7 (C17).2.3 (m. 1150 (C‐O stretching). 1350 (C‐H bending).7 (C4S). 75. 2H. C1S‐6S) 1 C‐NMR (before peracetylation.4 (m. 7H. 22.1.2 (C2). C18). 34.5 (broad. 720. C2S. O‐C3S. 2850 (C‐H stretching). 2. C3). 68‐74 (broad. C4‐C17).5 (m. 1295. 26‐32 (C4‐15). broad peaks.0 (C18). A peracetylation reaction to substitute all of the remaining 73 . 25. 3S. 5S). 3‐6 ppm (m.3. broad peaks. 32. CDCl3): δ 0. attached to O‐C2S. 95. 6S O R 5S O R O 4S O 1S 2S 1 3S O O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 CH3 Starch-Laurate O 1' 6S O CH3 2' O O R O 4S 5S O 1S 2S 3S O O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 CH3 Starch-Laurate peracetylated 6S 4S O O R 5S O R O O 1S 2S 3S O O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 CH3 Starch-Stearate O Figure 4.4 (broad. C1S). 1740 (C=O). 1.0 (C3). Peracetylation procedure The presence of remaining hydroxyl groups in the products resulted in broad and overlapping starch resonances in 1H‐NMR spectra  and hampered calculation of the DS. 1.9 (t.0 (C16). Synthesis of Higher Fatty Acid Starch Esters using Vinyl Laurate and Stearate as Reactants H‐NMR (after peracetylation. 1100 (C‐O stretching). 1. and O‐ C6S) 13 FT‐IR (cm‐1): 2920 (C‐H stretching).8‐2. 1020 (C‐O stretching). 865. C6S). C2). Numbering scheme for carbon atoms of products 4. 172‐174 ppm (C=O. C2’). CDCl3): δ 14. 3H. 61. 1410 (C‐H bending).6 (m. 2H. 1370 (C‐H bending). 28H. 950 (C‐O stretching). 3H. 1455 (CH2).2. 760.
5.6.8− 2.: DSacetate = AH − acetate AH − starch A3. AH − acetate = A1.) (4.4.6−5.5.1.) AC 2 = 2 × AH − fattyester The AC2 values of both the laurate and stearate side chains were calculated from the peak intensity in the range δ 0. 4.6‐5. Determination of the Degree of Substitution (DS) The DS of the product was calculated using 1H‐NMR spectra of the products after peracetylation. the peractylating reagents (DMAP.4.) AH − starch = (4. Typically. DS fatty ester = 3 − DS acetate (22.214.171.124.3. The peracetylation procedure by Einfeldt et al  was applied.: 74 . acetic anhydride and pyridine in a DMAP : acetic anhydride : pyridine : AHG molar ratio of 1: 10: 22 : 1) were added.3.6 ppm). the starch ester (0. Subsequently.). The product was precipitated by the addition of methanol and washed several times with methanol.8 ppm (protons attached to the fatty acid carbons C3‐C12 for laurate and C3‐C18 for stearate) using eq.2. and 4.6 7 (4.Chapter 4 hydroxyl groups with acetate groups was applied to obtain reliable DS data. The DS of the fatty acid esters was calculated from the DS of the products after peracetylation (eq 4.1. 4. It was finally dried overnight in a vacuum oven at 70oC and 5 mbar until constant weight. 4.6 ppm range) and a correction has to be made (eq 4.). and 4.) Determination of the unit area of the acetate H‐atoms (AH‐acetate) is hampered by peak overlap with the H‐atoms attached to C2 (AC2) of the fatty acid chains (δ 1.3.6 − AC 2 3 (4.1 g) was suspended in THF (4%‐w/v) and stirred at 55 oC until the starch was fully dissolved (typically 3 h).5‐1.) The DS of the acetate groups of the products may be calculated by comparing the unit area of the acetate protons (AH‐acetate) to the unit area of the starch protons (calculated from the intensity of the starch peaks at δ 3.2. The peracetylation reaction was conducted for 7 h at 50 oC.8‐2. The procedure was described earlier by Elomaa et al  and the relevant equations are shown in equation 4..
6. The products of these exploratory reactions are insoluble in water and DMSO..3. The reaction was performed in two discrete steps.5−1. Exploratory Experiments A number of exploratory experiments were carried out with vinyl‐laurate and vinyl stearate (vinyl ester: AHG molar ratio of 1 : 3) at 110°C for 24 h in DMSO using K2CO3 as the catalyst. the starch was gelatinised in DMSO at 70°C for 3 h to make the hydroxyl groups of starch more accessible for reaction. A schematic representation of the esterification reaction of starch with the vinyl esters is provided in Scheme 4. the esterified starch started to separate from the medium in the form of a gel. OH O HO OH O OH + R O CH2 O HO O R + n H3C H O n O (1) R = laurate (C12) (2) R = stearate (C18) Scheme 4. 4.3.8 = (laurate) 21 21 AC 3−C18 A0. After 24 h.1. while ACx‐Cy is the area of the H‐atoms attached to carbons in the range Cx‐Cy (carbon numbering scheme is given in Figure 4. but swell in organic solvents such as toluene and THF.7.) (4. 75 .1. Initially. light yellow solid. the brownish gel was precipitated with methanol and the product was collected after vacuum drying in the form of a transparent.‐4.7. Results and Discussion 4.5−1. Ax‐y stands for the peak area in the range δ x‐y ppm. After 2‐3 h.3. Subsequently. 4.8 = (stearate) 33 33 (4.) In eq. the vinylester and the catalyst were added and the reaction mixture was heated to 110°C. Synthesis of Higher Fatty Acid Starch Esters using Vinyl Laurate and Stearate as Reactants AH − fattyester = AH − fattyester = AC 3−C12 A0.1.1).
) in CDCl3 at 50oC. a product DS of 2. For atom numbering scheme: see Figure 4. 4.52 (Sample 17.) in CDCl3 at 50oC.2.Chapter 4 The DS of the products was determined by using NMR (vide infra).3. Higher DS products have a higher solubility in CDCl3 and good quality 1H‐ and 13C‐NMR spectra could be obtained (Figure 4.1.52 was obtained. DS = 2. (c) peracetylated starch laurate. Table 4. even at higher temperatures (50 oC). Figure. and 4.3.).2. (b) starch laurate.96.3.2. 76 . Medium DS starch laurate and starch stearate (1 < DS < 2) dissolve poorly in DMSO‐d6 and CDCl3. 1H‐ and 13C‐NMR analyses The solubility of the products in common NMR solvents (DMSO‐d6 or CDCl3) is a function of the product DS.1.2. DS = 2.1. When using a vinyl‐laurate : AHG molar ratio of 3 and K2CO3 as the catalyst. 4. A reaction with vinylstearate at similar conditions resulted in a stearate starch ester with a DS of 2. Product Characterisation 4.52 (Sample 17. Typical 1H‐NMR spectrum of: (a) native starch in DMSO d‐6 at 60oC.1. Table 4.
NMR spectra of the peracetylated products are considerably improved in terms of peak resolution and allow a more reliable calculation of the DS.8‐2.96 (Sample 19) in CDCl3 at 50oC. are together with the CH2 groups of the acid chain adjacent to the ester moiety in the range δ 1.3 ppm. DS = 2.1.3. in DMSO d‐6 at 60oC. Two of the carbon resonances (1S and 4S) are considerably shifted compared to native starch. and therefore a peracetylation procedure to substitute all of the remaining OH groups with acetate groups was applied [8. Typical 13C‐NMR spectra of the products are given in Figure 4.3. Typical 13C‐NMR spectra of: (a) native starch. Figure 4. 10‐11]. (b) starch laurate. The same 77 .5 ppm). (c) starch stearate. The resonances arising from the anhydroglucose unit of starch are broadened. The 1H‐NMR spectrum of a typical peracetylated starch laurate is shown in Figure 4.2. For atom numbering scheme: see Figure 4.8‐2. required for DS determinations. The proton signals of the acetate methyl group. This feature hampers the DS determination by NMR.2.c.5 ppm) are broad and overlapping . The starch peaks (δ 3‐5.52 (Sample 17) in CDCl3 at 50oC. Synthesis of Higher Fatty Acid Starch Esters using Vinyl Laurate and Stearate as Reactants A typical 1H‐NMR spectrum of starch laurate is shown in Figure 4. Clearly visible are the peaks arising from starch and the aliphatic hydrogen atoms of the fatty acid chain (δ 0. Clearly visible are the carbon resonances of the fatty ester chains (δ 10‐35 ppm) and C atom of the ester group (δ 170‐175 ppm). DS = 2.
4.4. The shift of the starch peaks and the presence of peaks arising from the fatty ester chains clearly indicate that the esterification reaction with vinyl laurate and vinyl stearate was successful. The near absence of remaining hydroxyl 78 . native starch -OH C-H 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Wavenumber (cm-1) Figure 4.c.) and native starch FT‐IR spectra of both starch laurate and starch stearate (Figure 4. 4. c.1. and 4.) show characteristic bands of the carbonyl group of the fatty esters in the 1750‐1700 cm‐1 region.Chapter 4 phenomenon was observed by Dicke for starch acetate .a. starch stearate (DS= 2. Table 4. starch laurate C-H C=O C-O C-O a. Table 4.2.c.52.1.).4. For comparison.96.2.4. the C‐H stretching vibrations of the alkyl groups of the fatty ester chain are clearly present at 2920 and 2850 cm‐1. FT‐IR Spectra of starch laurate (DS= 2. Sample 17. Sample 19. Characteristic peaks of the polysaccharide backbone are visible in the 1250‐900 cm‐1 region (C‐O stretching) .b.4.b.4.) is also included. starch stearate C-H C=O C-O Absorbance b. In addition.4.3. FT‐IR measurements The FT‐IR spectra of starch laurate and starch stearate are shown in Figure 4. and 4. a spectrum of native starch (Figure 4.
05 0. Table 4.57 0. in line with the NMR data.96 2.52 2. type of catalyst and the effect of the addition of co‐solvents on the product DS was studied in more detail.60 1.90 1.91 0.68 0. Most of the experiments (14) were performed using Na2HPO4 as the catalyst. Synthesis of Higher Fatty Acid Starch Esters using Vinyl Laurate and Stearate as Reactants vibrations in the range 3000‐3600 cm‐1 and at 1640 cm‐1 indicates that the DS of the product is high.13 1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 a Vinyl Ester laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate laurate laurate stearate stearate All experiments were performed at 24 h at 110°C in DMSO with a catalyst intake of 2 wt% based on starch.1. In addition. Overview of the esterification of starch using vinyl‐esters and basic catalysts a Catalyst Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 K2CO3 CH3COONa K2CO3 CH3COONa Vinyl Ester: AHG ratio [mol/ mol] 2 3 6 2 3 6 2 3 4 6 2 3 4 6 3 3 3 3 Amount of Toluene added [ml] ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 5 5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 5 5 5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ DS 1.54 2. four experiments were performed with two alternative basic catalysts (K2CO3 and Na‐acetate).2. Systematic Studies The effect of important process variables like the vinyl‐ester to AHG ratio.24 2.3.07 0. The results are shown in Table 4. 79 .1.01 0.23 0.08 1.90 0.44 Exp. 4.99 1.
A further increase in the vinyl ester intake leads to a reduction in the DS. The DS values are increasing with higher vinyl‐ ester/AHG molar ratio until a certain maximum. 2 wt% catalyst intake on starch). The results are presented in Figure 4.3. Higher concentrations of vinyl esters are expected to lead to higher esterification reaction rates. At low to medium vinyl ester/AHG ratios (0‐3). 7‐10).23 for vinyl‐laurate at an intermediate vinyl‐ester‐AHG ratio of 3.3.5 0 0 1 2 3 4 Vinyl Ester: AHG Starch Ratio [mol/mol] 5 6 Figure 4.5. At a ratio of 1:126.96.36.199 Degree of Substitution (DS) 1 0. 110 oC. 1.1. This reduced polarity is expected to lead to ○ : starch‐laurate □ : starch stearate (lines for illustrative purposes only) 80 . This behaviour is likely the result of two opposing effects. This is likely due to a reduction of the polarity of the reaction medium. Effect of vinyl ester to AHG ratio on the product DS The effect of the vinyl‐ester to AHG molar ratio on the product DS was determined for both types of vinyl‐esters with Na2HPO4 as catalyst (samples 1‐ 3. this positive effect dominates the reaction rate and the DS of the products will therefore increase at higher vinyl ester intakes. DS of the product as a function of the type of vinyl ester and the vinyl ester‐starch ratio (24 h reaction time. The DS of the products is a clear function of the vinyl laurate and stearate ester intakes (Figure 4.Chapter 4 4. The highest DS value was 1.). A further increase leads to a reduction in the DS. the ester intake is equal on a weight basis to the DMSO intake.
1. These negative effects dominate the reaction performance at higher vinyl ester/AHG ratios and lead to a reduction in the DS values.3. et al  for the silylation of starch.5.6. et al  reported the synthesis of fatty esters of starch using alkanoyl chloride reactants (C8‐C18) with reactant ratio of 6 mol alkanoyl chloride/mol AHG. For starch 81 . the addition of co‐solvents (toluene/ THF) led to an increase in the DS. When using Na2HPO4 as the catalyst. 4. This effect is particularly evident at higher vinyl ester/ AHG ratios (>3) (Figure 4. K2CO3 and Na‐ acetate were tested. A similar trend in reactivity pattern was observed in this study and the DS decreased from 1. Aburto. Although toluene may positively effect the reaction by (partly) re‐dissolving starch ester precipitates. the reactions were initiated in DMSO and toluene was added after 12 h reaction time to re‐dissolve the poorly soluble partially‐esterified starch products (entry 4‐6. It is clear that Na‐acetate and K2CO3 are considerably more active than Na2HPO4 and products with a significantly higher DS were obtained. it also results in a dilution of the reaction mixture and a reduction in the polarity.3. In this case. Catalysts screening A number of alternative basic catalysts for Na2HPO4. 4. leading to enhanced reactivity. i.). The latter factors appears to have a strong effect on reaction rates (vide supra).2.1. The results are given in Table 4. the DS of the product is also a function of the chain length of the fatty acid. The products have about the same DS value for vinyl‐laurate when using only DMSO and even reduced DS values for vinyl‐stearate (see Table 4.3. Here. 11‐14 in Table 4. the starch laurate esters display higher DS values than the starch stearates.7 for lauroyl chloride to 0. These findings were rationalised by assuming that the co‐solvents increase the solubility of the silylated products. The difference was explained by assuming that the reaction rate is reduced for larger reagents due to steric effects and this explanation likely also holds for the reactions with the vinylesters .).1.3.). with high carbon numbers leading to a reduction in the DS. Effect of the addition of toluene as a co‐solvent A number of reactions were performed using a co‐solvent.8 for stearoyl chloride. and illustrated in Figure 4. Synthesis of Higher Fatty Acid Starch Esters using Vinyl Laurate and Stearate as Reactants a lowering of the reaction rates due to a reduction of the solubility and degree of ionization of the starch reactant as well as the base catalysts. The addition of toluene for the esterification of starch with vinyl‐esters surprisingly did not lead to improved DS values.e. with reductions in polarity leading to lower reaction rates. A similar procedure was proposed by Nouvel. Thus.3.
5 0 Laurate Vinyl-Ester Stearate Figure 4.o. However. Thus. 3 2. The yellow products were characterized by 1H‐ and 13C‐NMR.5 were obtained. gray: Na2HPO4 black: K2CO3 white: Na‐acetate 4. and FTIR and confirm the presence of chemically bound fatty acid chains.6. in line with the findings for NaH2PO4. Apparently.4. the DS for the laurate ester is lower than the stearate ester. 82 .1. and Na‐acetate). The DS of the products is a clear function of the chain length of the fatty ester and the type of catalyst. K2CO3.5 1 0. the statement that the DS for the laurate esters is always higher than for the stearate esters is not generally valid and a. DMSO).44).5 Degree of Substitution 2 1. catalyst amount = 2%‐w.6. and Figure 4.96) compared to Na‐acetate (DS=2. For starch stearate. function of the type of catalyst.). the two catalysts are equally effective and products with a DS of about 2. Conclusions A study on the synthesis of corn starch fatty acid esters with high DS values is reported. when using K2CO3 as the catalyst. 110oC. The products were synthesised in DMSO using vinyl‐esters in the presence of basic catalysts (Na2HPO4. K2CO3 and Na‐acetate are superior with respect to activity when compared with Na2HPO4. The DS of the laurate ester when using Na‐acetate is higher than for the stearate ester (Table 4. the DS of the product is also tunable by proper catalyst selection. K2CO3 gave products with a significantly higher DS (2. Comparison of DS values with different catalysts (Vinylester: AHG molar ratio = 3:1.Chapter 4 laurate esterification.
and P. Mullen and E. the DS of the product increases at higher vinyl ester intakes. . Polym. 4. 83 . average value of mole of substituted –OH per mole of anhydroglucose (AHG) units [‐] DS DS fatty ester : DS of fatty ester (laurate or stearate) group substituents [‐] DSacetate : DS of acetate group substituents after peracrtylation [‐] 4. presumably due to a reduction of the polarity of the reaction medium. K. 2005. J. At low vinyl ester/ AHG ratio. Alric. 1997. E.W. Panayiotou: Synthesis. . Appl. Thiebaud. Panayiotou: Properties of fatty‐acid esters of starch and their blends with LDPE. J. S. 58. 1942. References . characterization. 1440‐1451. A. C. thermal characteristics and biodegradability of extruded starch acetate foams. Y. W. J. J. products with a DS > 2. 54. Alric. 21. 1647‐1656. S. Crops Prod. J. Sagar. Synthesis of Higher Fatty Acid Starch Esters using Vinyl Laurate and Stearate as Reactants With these catalysts. Gatenholm: Surface octanoylation of high‐ amylose potato starch films. Koch. Appl. I. Sci. Ind. Aburto. Bikiaris. Higher ratios led to a reduction in the DS. Ind. Aburto. . Appl. Pacsu: Starch Studies: Preparation and Properties of Starch Triesters. 1995.5. A maximum was observed at a vinyl ester: AHG ratio between 2 and 4. E. 361‐368. D. Bengtsson. Xu. Borredon. M. Prinos. Sci.4 could be obtained for both laurate and stearate esters. D. Prinos. Carbohydr. Dzenis. 1‐11. Polym. Bikiaris. 1208‐1217. Important product properties will be described in the next chapter. . 1999. I. Thiebaud. E. J. 705‐721. Hanna: Water solubility. J. J. 74. 34. 2003. Borredon.6. The DS of the products may also be tuned with the vinyl ester/AHG molar ratio. Nomenclature A A x − y ppm : peak area of certain proton in 1H‐NMR spectra [‐] : peak area of certain peak at x until y ppm in 1H‐NMR spectra [‐] : Degree of Substitution. A. Polym. Y. 65. Chem. D. Polym. Eng. and biodegradability of fatty‐acid esters of amylose and starch. M. X. C. Merrill: Properties of Fatty‐Acid Esters of Starch. . Sci.
255‐263. Mater.L. Carbohydr. C. P. R. 1. 56. M. Einfeldt. . A.. 2001. Starch‐Starke 2005. . . W. I. I. Mater.Chapter 4 . E. 51. F. J. Kussler. J. Starch‐Starke 1999. Stein. Six: Partial or total silylation of dextran with hexamethyldisilazane. 118‐121. Elomaa. 145‐152. Aburto. Hyvarinen. A. Nouvel. Aburto. Med. Carbohydr. Al‐Higari: Acylation of starch with vinyl acetate in water. L. Nuzillard: Proton NMR spectroscopy assignment of D‐glucose residues in highly acetylated starch. Macromol. E. 1997. 2004. 11. Petzold. Polymer 2002. Dellacherie. Massiot. Cellulose 2004. Koniarova. C. J. Res. Mano. Peltonen. J. D. and E. 1735‐1743. Borredon: Free‐solvent Synthesis and Properties of Higher Fatty Esters of Starch – Part 2. Polym. Degee. Laatikainen. G. Alric. Gunther. G. L. P.F. Dubois. Reis: Thermal properties of thermoplastic starch/synthetic polymer blends with potential biomedical applicability. M. 2003. 14(2) 127‐135. Starch‐Starke 2004. P. Klemm: Preparative and H‐1 NMR investigation on regioselective silylation of starch dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide. S. B. Sci. R. Laignel. W. . I. J. M. 341‐347. Urtti: Determination of the degree of substitution of acetylated starch by hydrolysis. T. H‐1 NMR and TGA/IR. Mormann. K. Hamaili. D. Asplund. H. . Mouysset‐Baziard. 251‐260. 43. 302‐307. Biosci. Soininen. 84 . R. Dicke: A straight way to regioselectively functionalized polysaccharide esters. S. Borredon: Organic solvent‐free transesterification of various starches with lauric acid methyl ester and triacyl glycerides. . Ydens. 261‐267. Senocq. . 57. J. Alric. M. 298. 57. Bliard. .
catalyst intake.26‐2.39) are totally amorphous whereas the low‐DS ones (DS= 1.Chapter 5 Experimental and Modeling Studies on the Synthesis and Properties of Higher Fatty Esters of Corn Starch Abstract This chapter describes a systematic study on the synthesis of higher fatty esters of corn starch (starch‐laurate and starch‐stearate) by using the corresponding vinyl esters. High‐DS products (DS= 2. vinyl laurate. The reactions were carried out in DMSO using basic catalysts (Na2HPO4. reaction temperature and type of the catalyst) on the Degree of Substitution (DS) of the starch laurate and starch stearate esters was determined by performing a total of 54 experiments.75) are still partially crystalline. The thermal and mechanical properties of some representative product samples were determined. The basicity of the catalyst and the reaction temperature have the highest impact on the product DS. The effect of the process variables (vinyl ester to starch ratio. trans‐esterification.5 MPa.45‐1. Mechanical tests show that the products have tensile strength (stress at break) between 2. elongation at break of 3‐26%. K2CO3. The results were adequately modeled using a non‐linear multivariable regression model (R2≥0.96). The thermal stability of the esterified products is higher than that of native starch. vinyl stearate . and Na‐acetate). Keywords: starch esters. and modulus of elasticity of 46‐113 MPa.7‐3.
Mullen and Pacsu [11.65) . 12] studied the synthesis and properties of of C1‐C6 esters of starch. however. The products were biodegradable. The products were hydrophobic and the mechanical properties were considerably improved compared to native starch. packaging material. The high DS esters showed interesting properties. However. Most early studies mainly focused on the use of short‐chain carboxylic acid (C1‐C4). Thiebaud. et al [15‐19] synthesized longer chain fatty esters (C8‐C18) of potato starch and corn amylose using fatty acid chlorides and pyridine. and this causes serious environmental problems [1. The use of methyl and glyceryl esters to prepare starch laurate (C12) ester was investigated but only yielded products with relatively low DS values (max. 3‐4]. and incompatibility with hydrophobic polymers . however. Two examples using higher vinyl esters (vinyl laurate) were reported by Mormann. However. The development of novel biodegradable plastic materials capable of decomposing when given an appropriate environment and time is of utmost importance . and particularly on the synthesis of starch acetate (C2) [11‐12]. and food service‐ware . the physicochemical properties of the products were not mentioned. Sagar and Merill  studied the synthesis and properties of C4‐C6 esters of high amylose starch. most of the plastic waste is not biodegradable. Unfortunately. Starch is an attractive feedstock for the synthesis of novel biodegradable plastics. It is cheap and abundantly available . 86 . The limited use is mainly because of a number of unfavourable properties of starch such as low moisture resistance. The use of vinylesters has also been explored [20‐22]. Introduction Plastics are very useful materials and are used in large amounts (245 million ton per annum) [1‐2]. the research activities were mainly limited to the use of vinylacetate.1. et al  and Aburto. The largest application area of plastics is the use as packaging material (37%) .Chapter 5 5. Chemical or physical modification is required for successful applications as biodegradable polymers. The global starch production was estimated at 60 million tons in 2004 . Alternative routes to avoid the use of acid‐chloride/pyridine combinations have been developed. the mechanical properties were still not satisfactorily. 0. et al . is rather limited to date. Typical examples are blending with polyvinyl alcohol . Examples are agricultural mulch . high brittleness. polyethylene  and polycaprolactone  and chemical modification by esterification with organic acids [11‐19]. Esterification is one of the oldest methods used to improve starch properties . The use of native starch as a building block for novel biodegradable polymers. The mechanical properties of products with longer ester chains (C4 and C6) products and plasticized acetate esters were considerably improved compared to native starch.
pyridine.96) were prepared by reacting the starch with vinyl laurate or vinyl stearate in the presence of basic catalysts in DMSO. In addition. Experimental and Modeling Studies on the Synthesis and Properties of Higher Fatty Esters of Corn Starch We have recently performed exploratory studies on the synthesis of starch esters of higher fatty acids using vinyl laurate and vinyl stearate as the reagents .N‐ dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP).2. Germany). Analytical grade methanol. This chapter describes systematic studies using Design of Experiments (DOE) to gain insights in the effect of process variables (temperature. the Netherlands). and disodium hydrogenphosphate dodecahydrate (both Merck. The catalysts for the esterification reaction were analytical grade potassium carbonate (Boom. TGA measurements were performed using a Perkin Elmer TGA 7 Thermogravimetric Analyzer.1. catalyst type and intake) on the DS of the products. Materials Corn starch (approx. each sample was cooled to ‐50°C and then heated again to 200 oC (heating rate 10 oC/min). DSC analyses were performed on a TA Instruments DSC 2920. T‐Bones samples (with thickness of 2 mm) for determination of the tensile properties were prepared using a melt press 1 87 . The experiments were modeled using non‐linear multivariable regression. After a first heating run from room temperature up to 200 oC to delete the thermal history of the material. Long fatty esters of corn starch with a broad range in degree of substitution (DS= 0. The thermal properties (Tm. Technical grade dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Tc. Analytical grade vinyl stearate (Aldrich. the thermal and mechanical properties of representative examples of the highly hydrophobic materials are described and discussed. and acetic anhydride (Merck. Materials and Methods 5. and tetrahydrofuran (THF) were supplied by Acros (Belgium). Analytical Equipment H‐ and 13C‐NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 on a 400 MHz Varian AMX NMR machine. Germany).2.2. 73% amylopectine and 27% amylose) was purchased from Sigma (Germany). and toluene were obtained from Labscan (Ireland). vinyl ester to anhydroglucose ratio. 5. The spectra were recorded at 50 oC. The samples (about 10 mg) were placed in sealed aluminum cells. and Tg) of each sample were determined from the spectra related to the cooling run and the second heating one.2. sodium acetate. All these chemicals were used as received. It was dried for 48 hour at 105 oC under vacuum (~1 mbar) to reduce the moisture content below 2 % before use. 4‐N.24 ‐ 2. vinyl laurate (Fluka. The samples were heated to 700 oC in a nitrogen atmosphere with a heating rate of 10°C/min. as recommended by Laignel et al . Japan). 5. Germany) were used without further purification.
apparatus (Fontijne, Holland), operated at 150 oC and 150 bar for 3 minutes. The tensile tests were performed using an Instron Series IX Automated Materials Testing System 1.09 at 20oC and a crosshead speed of 30 mm/min. 5.2.3. Methods 188.8.131.52. Typical example of the preparation of laurate and stearate starch esters The corn starch (0.5 g) was gelatinized in DMSO (5 ml) at 70oC for 3 h. After the mixture became a homogenous, colourless solution, vinyl laurate or vinyl stearate (3‐5 mol/mol with respect to the AHG units) and the catalyst (potassium carbonate, or sodium acetate, or disodium hydrogenphosphate, 2‐5%‐w with respect to starch) were added. The reactor content was kept at 80‐110oC for 24 h. The product was precipitated using methanol (100 ml), and the liquid phase was removed by decantation. This precipitation‐decantation procedure was repeated twice using 50 and 25 ml of methanol, respectively, to purify the reaction product. Finally, the product was dried in a vacuum oven (70oC, 5 mbar) for 24 h or until constant weight. 184.108.40.206. Peracetylation procedure and Degree of Substitution (DS) determination The presence of un‐substituted hydroxyl groups in the products resulted in broad and overlapping starch resonances in 1H‐NMR spectra. A peracetylation reaction to substitute all of the remaining hydroxyl groups with acetate groups was therefore applied to obtain reliable DS values. Typically, the starch ester (0.1 g) was added to THF (4%‐w/v) and stirred at 55 oC until dissolution (typically 3 h). Subsequently, the peracetylating reagent (1 mol DMAP, 10 mol acetic anhydride, and 22 mol pyridine per mol AHG units) were added. The peracetylation reaction was conducted for 7 h at 50 oC. The product was precipitated by the addition of methanol and washed several times with methanol before finally dried overnight in a vacuum oven at 70oC and 5 mbar. The DS of the products was calculated using a procedure given in previous work . 5.2.4. Experimental Design The experiments were carried out in 6 blocks. The three variables used in each block were the vinyl ester to AHG starch mol ratio ( x1 ), catalyst intake ( x 2 ), and reaction temperature ( x3 ). All experiments in a block were conducted using a 3‐ variable, 2‐level Full‐Factorial Experimental Design with one center point, giving a total of 23+1 = 9 experiments per block. For each block, a given type of catalyst (Na2HPO4, K2CO3 or Na‐acetate) and vinyl ester (either vinyllaurate or vinylstearate) was applied. This gave a total of 54 experiments (2 types of vinyl
Experimental and Modeling Studies on the Synthesis and Properties of Higher Fatty Esters of Corn Starch
esters x 3 types of catalysts x 9 experiments per block). In a later stage, the type of catalyst was quantified using the pKb of the catalyst ( x 4 ). The ranges for the individual variables ( x1 ‐ x 4 ) are shown in Table 5.1. The mathematical analysis of the experimental data was performed with the software package “Matchad 13” (Mathsoft). The response (y, DS of the products) was modelled using the following expression:
y = β 0 + ∑ β i xi + ∑ β ii xi2 + ∑∑ β jk x j x k
i i j k≠ j
Here, βi, βii and βjk are the regression coefficients obtained by a multiple 2 regression procedure. One of the terms, namely x 4 , caused singularity of the matrix used for the modelling, and was therefore excluded. A t‐statistic was used to rank the individual regression coefficients (βi, βii, or βjk) according to their relative importance . An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to check the adequacy of the model. The applied procedure is well described in the literature  and consists of calculating the sum of squares (SS) for the model and the error, together with the total sum of squares. In combination with the relative degrees of freedom (DF) it is possible to calculate the mean square (MS) for the model and the corresponding error. On the basis of the latter values, the F‐value for the model is calculated. With this information the P‐value for the model is determined. The latter value is related to the statistical significance of the model.
5.3. Results and Discussion
A schematic representation of the esterification reaction of starch with a vinyl ester is provided in eq. 5.2. The starch was gelatinized before the addition of the vinylester to make the starch OH groups more accessible for reaction. The reactions were carried out in DMSO for 24 h using three different basic salts (Na2HPO4, K2CO3, or Na‐acetate) as the catalysts. The products of the reaction were brownish gels which became lighter in colour after product precipitation and washing with methanol. After drying, the products were isolated as transparent, yellowish solids. The products were soluble in organic solvents such as toluene and THF.
OH O HO OH
R O CH2
O HO O R O
(1) R = laurate (C12) (2) R = stearate (C18)
The products were characterized by 1H‐NMR in CDCl3. The peaks of starch (δ 3‐ 5.5 ppm) and aliphatic hydrogen atoms of the fatty acid chain (δ 0.8‐2.5 ppm) were clearly present. The starch peaks were broad and overlapping, and only after the starch esters were peracetylated, the resolution of these peaks was considerably improved. The DS of the products was determined by using 1H‐NMR spectra of the peracetylated starch esters. The effect of three reaction parameters (molar ratio of vinyl ester to AHG units of starch x1 , catalyst intake x2 , and reaction temperature x3 ) on the DS of starch was studied using a full factorial experimental design with one center point. The ranges of the values of the independent variables ( x1 ‐ x3 ) are shown in Table 5.1. An additional variable x 4 (related to the basicity of the catalyst) was also included in order to obtain a general model for starch esterification. A total of 54 experiments were conducted. Table 5.1. Experimental Design Variables
Independent Variables Full Factorial Variables Vinyl ester to AHG‐ starch ratio [mol/mol] Catalyst intake [%‐w]a Reaction temperature [°C] Additional Variable Catalyst basicity (pKb)b
Low (‐1) Middle (0) High (+1)
2.0 3.5 5.0
80 95 110
K2CO3 (3.66) Na2HPO4 (6.8) CH3COONa (9.25)
3 4 5
in %‐wt based on starch intake, in the model (eq. 5.3.) it is transformed to 105 x catalyst mol amount. taken from ref .
The results of the experiment are given in Table 5.2.
00 5.00 5.00 5.00 3.00 5.35 0.00 4.00 5.50 2.00 5.09 0.00 5.00 Catalyst Temperature [%‐w] [˚C] 2.00 5.00 5.00 3.00 2.28 2.00 2.11 2.00 3.07 0.00 5.59 2.88 2.24 2.00 5.00 3.12 2.50 2.27 0.00 5.75 1.00 4.00 5.00 3.00 4.47 1.96 0.78 2.00 5.67 2.00 2.00 3.87 1.00 5.00 5.00 2.00 3.94 2.00 5.00 2.50 0.23 2.27 1.00 5.53 1.32 1.00 5.00 3.00 3.00 5.00 2.00 2.00 5.00 3.48 0.00 80 80 110 110 80 80 110 110 95 80 80 110 110 80 80 110 110 95 80 80 110 110 80 80 110 110 95 80 80 110 110 80 80 110 110 95 80 80 110 110 80 80 110 110 DS 0.00 5.40 1.84 2.00 2.50 2.00 4.82 2.00 5.42 2.00 2.62 0.00 5.00 5.00 2.00 3.54 2.00 5.00 5.12 0.44 2.00 5.41 1.52 2.00 5.00 5.00 2.00 5.00 5.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.70 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.79 Experiment Vinyl Ester 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate laurate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate 91 .00 5.54 2.00 5.44 2. Experimental and Modeling Studies on the Synthesis and Properties of Higher Fatty Esters of Corn Starch Table 5.00 3.00 5.46 1.00 2.00 3.00 3.56 1.00 5.50 2.00 3.00 2.72 2.00 5. Overview of experimental data Catalyst Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 CH3COONa CH3COONa CH3COONa CH3COONa CH3COONa CH3COONa CH3COONa CH3COONa CH3COONa K2CO3 K2CO3 K2CO3 K2CO3 K2CO3 K2CO3 K2CO3 K2CO3 K2CO3 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 Na2HPO4 CH3COONa CH3COONa CH3COONa CH3COONa CH3COONa CH3COONa CH3COONa CH3COONa Vinyl : AHGa [mol/mol] 3.27 1.00 5.00 3.52 2.93 0.17 2.2.
00 2.50 2.) Table 5.1748 0.59 2.6939 0. The type of catalyst was quantified using the basicity constant (pKb) in water [26‐27].00 5.0010 ‐0.90 2.Chapter 5 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 a.0470 0.0027 ‐0. The experimental data for both starch laurate and starch stearate esterification are best described with a quadratic model including interaction terms (eq.0857 ‐0.1104 ‐0.0023 0.00 5.1.21 2.64 2.50 95 80 80 110 110 80 80 110 110 95 1.0327 ‐2.1947 β0 β1 β2 β3 β4 β5 β6 β7 β8 β9 β10 β11 β12 β13 92 .The modelled values for βij for the two esters are given in Table 5.1.0003 0.1568 ‐2.5650 0.00 3.3.0011 0.2183 0.3.64 2.00 2.00 5.41 mol ratio of the vinyl ester to AHG units of starch 5.).0016 0.00 5.1979 Starch Stearate 17.0006 ‐0.0008 0. stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate stearate CH3COONa K2CO3 K2CO3 K2CO3 K2CO3 K2CO3 K2CO3 K2CO3 K2CO3 K2CO3 4.0001 0.00 5.00 3.24 2.0017 0.00 5. Mathematical Modeling Modelling of the DS data for both vinylesters was performed using non‐linear multivariable regression based on the 4 independent variables (Table 5.98 2.3.00 5.3.00 3.0120 0.1082 ‐0.0249 ‐0. DS = β 0 + β1 x1 + β 2 x 2 + β 3 x3 + β 4 x 4 + β 5 x1 x 2 + β 6 x1 x3 + β 7 x1 x 4 + β 8 x 2 x3 + β 9 x 2 x 4 2 2 2 + β10 x3 x 4 + β11 x 2 + β12 x3 + β13 x 4 (5. 5.55 2.00 2. Values for the coefficients of the DS model for starch laurate and stearate Coefficient Starch Laurate 9.00 3.00 3.00 3.0732 ‐0.0009 0.).96 2.0008 ‐0.0066 0.00 5.3.00 4.
875 Starch Stearate Model Error Total SS 20.3399 0.970 (starch laurate) and 0.5 3 a. The parity plots of both models are given in Figure 5.1.5 0 0 0.5 0.4. The R2 values for the models are 0.939 0.6118 0.4. starch laurate b. which represents an “internal” validation method for the model.96 x 10‐8 R2 values R2 R2adjusted R2press 0.5 3 0 0 0. and confirm this statement.9531 0.805 3 3 2.970 0.5 2 DS predicted DS predicted 2 1.2569 0.0356 F 35.5 DS actual 2 2. Table 5. Experimental and Modeling Studies on the Synthesis and Properties of Higher Fatty Esters of Corn Starch The result of the analysis of variance is given in Table 5.0583 F 27.7699 DF 13 14 27 MS 1.4.026 x 10‐7 R2 values R2 R2adjusted R2press 0. Analysis of variance for DS models for starch esterification Starch Laurate Model Error Total SS 16. The very low P‐ values indicate that the models are statistically significant.5 2.967 0. starch stearate Figure 5.5 1 1 0. Finally.5 1.805‐0.4986 16.875) indicate that the model correctly predict the 93 .2903 P‐value 1.8167 21.945 0. Parity plots of the DS models for starch laurate and stearate Moreover.1. which indicate  that all significant variables are included in the model. the adjusted‐R2 values are very close to the R2 ones. respectively and it may be concluded that the models describe the experimental data well.967 (starch stearate).5 1 1. we also performed a PRESS analysis  (see corresponding R2 values in Table 5.629 P‐value 1. Also in this case the reasonable R2 values (0.5 1 1.).8386 DF 13 14 27 MS 1.5 DS actual 2 2.
Dicke  showed that Na2HPO4 has a strong tendency to selectively deprotonate the OH group at the C2 position of starch leading to C2 substituted acetate esters.18) and CH3COONa (1. whereas catalyst performance is considerable lower. K2CO3 is a stronger base (pKb 3. It is assumed that the first step in the reaction sequence is activation of the starch OH groups by deprotonation by a base [21. The pKb for the latter (6.8) is intermediate between that of the other two catalysts. However. A possible explanation of this peculiar behaviour of Na2HPO4 is the fact that the pKb values in water are used for quantification whereas the actual solvent for the reaction is DMSO.2. The highest product DS values were obtained using K2CO3. The resulting anion will react with the vinyl ester to from the product.66) than CH3COONa (pKb 9. two plots showing the dependence of the DS on reaction temperature and catalyst amount (in %‐w). for both starch laurate and starch stearate are given in Figure 5.25) and this leads to higher product DS values for K2CO3. 22]. such as carbonate or acetate salts leading to higher DS esters. Of all the variables studied. This was not the case for alkaline catalysts. A similar trend was observed by Dicke  for the acetylation of Hylon VII starch using vinylacetate. The explanation for the high preference of C2 substitution for the Na2HPO4 catalyst is not yet known and needs to be established by mechanistic studies. 94 .Chapter 5 products DS as function of the process variables within the range of experimental variables. These results may be rationalised by considering the role of the catalyst in the modification reaction. Unfortunately. the performance of Na2HPO4 does not follow this trend. the base strengths of the catalysts in DMSO are not known. the type of catalyst has the largest effect on the product DS for both the laurate and stearate esters (Figure 5.82). Another explanation may be related to the regio‐chemistry of the reaction. To evaluate the effect of each variable on the product DS. The product DS for Na2HPO4 was considerably lower (1. Catalyst performance of CH3COONa was slightly less than for K2CO3 whereas the lowest DS products were produced when using Na2HPO4 as the catalyst. On the basis of the sequence.). This is indeed the case when comparing the performance of K2CO3 with CH3COONa.2.00) than for K2CO3 (2. it can be rationalised that the rate of the reaction (and thus the product DS) will be higher when using a stronger base.
2. 3D contour plot of the DS as a function of reaction temperature and catalyst intake (at constant vinylester to AHG mol ratio of 4) Besides the type of catalyst.2. As expected and in 95 . Experimental and Modeling Studies on the Synthesis and Properties of Higher Fatty Esters of Corn Starch a. starch laurate b. the catalyst intake and reaction temperature also affect the product DS (Figure 5.). although to a lesser extent. starch stearate Figure 5.
5.39) 96 . the vinyl ester to AHG ratio has the smallest effect on the product DS. DSC analysis of starch stearate esters ( ) DS 1.Chapter 5 line with studies on starch acetates .) DS ( 2. Product Properties The thermal and mechanical product properties for two starch‐laurate and stearate samples with medium (DSlaurate = 1. DSstearate = 2.45 (. and the results for all samples are summarised in Table 5. . 5. Of all variables studied. heating Exothermic Tm = 21 oC cooling Endothermic Tc = 12 oC -20 -10 0 10 Temperature ( C) o 20 30 40 Figure 5.75. DSstearate = 1. Representative DSC spectra for the starch stearate are given in Figure 220.127.116.11.26. .45) and high DS values (DSlaurate = 2.3.39) were determined. higher reaction temperatures and catalyst intakes lead to higher product DS values.
4.d. close to the value obtained in our study for the medium DS starch stearate (21 °C). crystallization.26 1. In particular the behaviour at relatively high temperatures (>0 oC) is further discussed. In any case. Melting point (Tm) and crystallization temperature (Tc) of representative starch laurate and stearate samples Starch ester Starch laurate Starch laurate Starch stearate Starch stearate DS 2. This clearly indicates that the observed thermal transitions are not only determined by the side chains but are an interplay between that of the starch backbone and ester side chains.a 22 n. these are the first examples of completely amorphous starch esters.8 . Thermal transitions at relatively high temperature (melting. 40‐42 oC. However. 17]. To the best of our knowledge.). implying that these products are fully amorphous. Changes in the transition temperatures of native starch by esterification have been reported in the literature [13‐14. in the present work. Unfortunately the thermal transitions for the virgin material lie above the degradation temperature and can therefore not be accurately determined .39 1. or glass transition above 0 oC) were even absent for the high DS products.a 12 a. 97 .5.a 21 Tc [˚C] n. These values are reduced considerably compared to virgin corn starch. especially in the amylopectin part [15. the Tm for the medium DS starch laurate (27 oC) is much higher than the corresponding side chain model compounds (‐10 oC for dodecane and 5 oC for methyl laurate). The melting point of the potato starch stearate was close to that of model compounds for the stearate side chains (methyl stearate.d.75 2. Experimental and Modeling Studies on the Synthesis and Properties of Higher Fatty Esters of Corn Starch Table 5.d. For instance a Tm of 32 oC was reported for a potato starch stearate ester with a DS of 1. octadecane.d. TGA analysis was performed to study the thermal degradation behavior of the starch laurate and stearate samples (Figure 5. n.45 Tm [˚C] n. 28‐30 oC) and the authors concluded that the transition temperatures are solely determined by the side chain without any significant contribution of the starch backbone.d.a 27 n.= not detectable The thermal behavior of the products is a strong function of the DS. esterification of starch with vinyl laurate and stearate reduces the crystallinity of the starch considerably and leads to a lowering of the transition temperatures. At moderate DS values the products still display a melting temperature (at 20‐30 oC) and a crystallization temperature (at 10‐25 oC). which is known to contain crystalline areas. 22].
). Native corn starch degrades at lower onset temperatures (250‐300 oC) than the corresponding esters (300‐350 oC). TGA analysis of various starch samples.) curves clearly show starch esterification with either laurate or stearate results in products with enhanced thermal stability. Similar trends were reported for amylose octanoate‐ stearate‐laurate esters  and potato starch octanoate‐ laurate esters .4. .): starch stearate (DS 2.6.39) The TGA (Figure 5. .26) (.4. 98 . The mechanical properties (stress at break. The difference in thermal stability between the laurate and stearate sample is limited. elongation at break and elasticity modulus) of the products were determined (Table 5.Chapter 5 100 80 %-weight 60 40 20 0 20 100 200 300 400 o 500 600 700 Temperature ( C) Figure 5. ( ): native starch ( ): starch laurate (DS 2.
This is in agreement with previous studies regarding the mechanical properties of starch esters with different chain length of the fatty acid moiety [13.5.e. and modulus of elasticity between 46‐113 MPa.7 ± 14.6.45) displays a very similar behavior with respect to the laurate samples (i.9 ± 14.8 Starch Ester Starch laurate Starch laurate Starch stearate Starch stearate All materials generally show tensile strengths between 2.05 for both laurate samples. but higher elongation at break.1 Elongation at break [%] 26.0 ± 2. Mechanical properties of the starch esters DS 2. however.39 1.7 ± 1. Both starch laurate samples display.7‐3. a clear plastic behavior with a maximum in the stress‐strain curves. This product is more rigid compared to the product with medium DS value (higher tensile strength and elasticity modulus.2 2. thus indicating a relatively more rigid material with respect to all other samples.7 ± 4.025) lies still in the typical range of engineering polymers but also close to that typical of composite materials .0 112.1 ± 1.5 ± 1. The values of the yield strain. is roughly 0. Starch stearate with a relatively low DS (1.1 Modulus [MPa] 59.39) does not show any plastic behavior but only an elastic one. starch stearate at relatively high DS values (2. 99 .05).2 8. Experimental and Modeling Studies on the Synthesis and Properties of Higher Fatty Esters of Corn Starch Table 5.26 1. For starch laurate.1 ± 15. On the other hand. calculated as the ratio between the stress at yield (σy.45 Stress at break [MPa] 3.3 ± 2. observed for the high DS starch stearate sample.0 3. an increase in product DS results in lower tensile strengths and modulus of elasticity.9 46.0 3. An inverse behaviour is.5 MPa.3 21.2 ± 0. plastic deformation and yield strain of about 0.3 3.7 ± 3. The corresponding yield strain (roughly 0.75 2. A deeper understanding of the mechanical behavior can be gained by investigating the shape of the stress‐strain curves (typical examples in Figure 5.7 ± 4. 17]. and lower elongation at break). determined from the stress‐strain curves as the stress at which the material ceases to be linearly elastic) and the modulus.1 82. This indicates that their mechanical behavior is comparable to that of typical engineering polymers . elongation at break between 3‐26%. independently of the DS values. These considerations strongly point out the fact that the mechanical behavior can be coarsely (plastic vs elastic behavior) but also finely (stress and strain at break but also modulus values) tuned by the chemical structure of the fatty acid chains as well as the DS values.).
26) (. ‐): starch stearate (DS 2.): starch stearate (DS 1.7.45) (‐ . ( ): starch laurate (DS 1.Chapter 5 6 5 4 stress (MPa) 3 2 1 0 0 5 10 15 20 strain (%) 25 30 35 Figure 5. Although there are many differences in the synthetics methods as well as in testing conditions and procedures.).75) ( ): starch laurate (DS 2.39). . a rough comparison can be made between the mechanical properties of the esters described in this chapter and those for reported for related starch esters synthesized with alkanoyl chloride as reagent and pyridine as catalyst  (Table 5. Stress‐strain curves for starch esters. 100 . .5.
75) 3.39) 2. n. but the interplay between those factors. In agreement with our own data. confirms that the corn starch esters synthesized in our research are relatively rigid materials as compared to the potato starch esters.7.7 ±1.0 3. They related this inverse property of starch stearate to crystallization of C18 side chains. Here. this comparison also confirms our conclusion derived from the analysis of thermal properties (vide supra): it is not only the individual factors (kind of starch and fatty acid.). In this respect the difference in stress and elongation at break for the high‐DS starch laurate sample is striking.4 1500 ±8.2 8.a.a. Moreover.7. an unexpected behavior was also observed for the mechanical properties of the starch esters from potato starch. DS) which mainly determines the thermal and mechanical behaviour. for potato starch exactly the opposite is observed: relatively low stress (0.1 21.2 MPa for corn starch esters.9 ±0.3 Potato Starch Stearate Ester Low DS (1.a. The same considerations are valid for starch stearate at high DS values (higher stress and lower elongation when using corn starch instead of potato one).7 ±0. 3.3 10 ±2 Property Low DS (1.2 Stress at Break [MPa] Elongation at Break [%] a.26) relatively high stress at break (3. the high DS material is still more rigid.= not available Inspection of the mechanical properties of the starch esters as shown in Table 5. High DS (2.6 Corn Starch Stearate Ester Low DS (1. as confirmed by DSC.45) 3.7) 0. n. we show that although no crystallization of C18 occurred (see DSC data of the high DS material in Table 5.5 MPa) is coupled with a low elongation (26 %). Their medium or high DS stearate esters of potato starch are more rigid compared to the starch esters from lower chain fatty acids (octanoate and laurate) .7 ±0.7 ±4.2 ±0.7 MPa) coupled with a significant (1500%) elongation.5.1 ±15.6 9 ±2 High DS (2. On the other hand at low DS values comparable stress at break (3.a.1 High DS (2.8) 3. Comparison with the literature data implies that the mechanical behaviour of starch esters of higher fatty acids is also a clear function of the type of starch used. merely because of the structural property of the C18 side chain with respect to the starch backbone.7 MPa for potato starch ones) are coupled with significant differences in the elongation (22% for corn starch esters.0 ±2.3 High DS (2. While for corn starch (DS 2.5 ±1.7) 1.a. Experimental and Modeling Studies on the Synthesis and Properties of Higher Fatty Esters of Corn Starch Table 5.1 ±1. 9% for potato starch).7 ±3.0 26. 101 .26) 3. Comparison of the mechanical properties of corn starch ester (this study) with potato starch ester  Corn Starch Laurate Ester Potato Starch Laurate Ester Low DS n.
9 for starch laurate. the chemical composition of the starting materials (either starch or the ester precursor) as well as the processing parameters affect the final product DS values and as such provide an effective toolbox to modulate the desired product properties for a given application. The use of K2CO3 and CH3COONa catalysts resulted in medium‐high DS products (2. Reaction temperature and catalyst intake also affect the product DS although to a lesser extent than the type of catalyst.96 and P‐value of ≤10‐7) second‐order mathematical models correlating the effect of process variables (vinyl to AHG‐starch mol ratio.Chapter 5 5. Thus. while the use of Na2HPO4 resulted in low‐medium DS products (0. Nomenclature β : regression coefficients obtained by a multiple regression procedure [various units. 5. depend on the unit of related variable x] : constant regression coefficients obtained by a multiple regression procedure [‐] : regression coefficients of variable xi obtained by a multiple regression procedure [various units] : regression coefficients of quadratic variable xi2 obtained by a multiple regression procedure [various units] : regression coefficients of interaction variable xjxk obtained by a multiple regression procedure [various units] DS β0 βi β ii β jk : Degree of Substitution. The models may be used to determine the appropriate process conditions to obtain a product with a pre‐defined DS.3‐1.4. Statistically adequate (R2 ≥0. catalyst intake.5 for starch laurate. on the synthesis of corn starch esters with long chain fatty acids is described. Comparison with literature data indicates that the properties may be (fine) tuned also by the starch source. 1.5. 0. The DS of the products is a strong function of the basicity of the catalyst. average value of mole of substituted –OH per mole of anhydroglucose (AHG) units [‐] 102 .07‐1. Thermal and mechanical behaviour of the samples of different DS values clearly shows that the DS represents one of the crucial factors affecting the final product properties.4‐3 for starch stearate). and Na‐acetate). Conclusions A systematic study.1‐2. The starch esters were synthesized by reacting gelatinized starch with vinyl laurate or vinyl acetate in DMSO in the presence of basic catalysts (Na2HPO4. including statistical modelling. and catalyst basicity) to the DS of the starch ester products were developed.5 for starch stearate). K2CO3. reaction temperature.
S. Eng. . References . M. 2000.J. Hanser Publishers. R. Properties. E. Denmark: http://www. F. . C. Glasgow. 27‐29 August 2000 (Ed. Association of Plastics Manufacturers. Department of Dairy and Food Science. J. Conference Proceedings. Brussels.html. Selke. A. E. Plastics Europe. M. Hanser Publishers. J. The compelling facts about plastics: An analysis of plastics production. . Bastioli: Global Status of the Production of Biobased Packaging Materials. Applications. . 19. 2008. Denmark. Otey. New Jersey. An Introduction to the New Science of Biodegradable Plastics.6. Res. W. Denmark. Stevens: Green Plastics. Doane: Starch‐based blown films. S. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University. UK. G. 103 . Prod. 2008 . in Packaging in the Environment (Ed. 2000. Website of International Starch Institute. Levy). . 2002. Princeton University Press. 2000. 1986. Ehrenstein: Polymeric Materials. USA. accessed on August 01. G. M. 1980. D. Hernandez. Packaging. Chem. Processing. Culter: Plastics Packaging. Copenhagen. Aarhus. Structure – Properties ‐ Applications. Munich. H.starch. R. demand and recovery for 2006 in Europe.dk/isi/stat/rawmaterial. Munich. P. Marsden: The challenge of domestic waste disposal. C. Belgium. Ind. Westhoff. Frederiksberg C. and Regulations. in The Food Biopack Conference: Foodstuffs. Dev. Weber). Germany. Blackie Academic & Professional.W. Germany. and Biopolymers. Experimental and Modeling Studies on the Synthesis and Properties of Higher Fatty Esters of Corn Starch DS fatty ester : DS of fatty ester (laurate or stearate) group substituents [‐] pKb T : base dissociation constant [‐] : temperature [oC] : crystallization temperature [oC] : melting temperature [oC] : experimental variables used for mathematical modelling using multiple regression procedure [various units] Tc Tm xi Greek symbols: σy : stress at yield [MPa] 5. 592‐595. .
J. 1209‐1217. M. S. 1997. E. S. Starch‐ Starke 2005. Bikiaris. I. J. E. S. . J. I. D. Thiebaud. L. Panayiotou: Synthesis. E.. J. G. Prinos. C. Mouysset‐Baziard. Aburto. A. Denmark. Yang. 51. 1995. 1997. Alric. Broekroelofs. D. Sci. status and perspectives. 705‐721. J. 381‐384. A. . 34. . Chem. Borredon: Organic solvent‐free transesterification of various starches with lauric acid methyl ester and triacyl glycerides. I. Eng. Aburto. Z. Borredon: Preparation of long‐chain esters of starch using fatty acid chlorides in the absence of an organic solvent. 101‐112. . J. 56. Borredon: Free‐solvent synthesis and properties of higher fatty esters of starch ‐ Part 2. Carbohydr. J. E. Alric. 132‐135. 118‐121. C. Polym. Panayiotou: Properties of octanoated starch and its blends with polyethylene. 2000. Thesis. Beenackers: The kinetics of the acetylation of gelatinised potato starch. M. Aburto. 1996 104 . Bikiaris. 1995. K. 302‐307. 65. I. Aburto. R. I. Part C: Polym. Janssen. 1440‐1451. W. Panayiotou: Properties of fatty‐acid esters of starch and their blends with LDPE. R. J. Bikiaris. Al‐Higari: Acylation of starch with vinyl acetate in water. 2003. H. Senocq. Hamaili.. Eng. E. J. Thiebaud. Polym. 35. Aburto. I. B. . Pacsu: Starch studies: preparation and properties of starch triesters. . J. Alric. Sagar. Aburto. Rev. de Graaf: Ph. Carbohydr. 1942. 51. J. E. Polym. Alric. Alric. Ind. Starch‐Starke 1999. J. C. Thiebaud. Biobased packaging materials for the food industry. the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University. M. E. Mormann. . . D. . C43. de Graaf. 385– 409. J. Frederiksberg C. W.Chapter 5 . W. Polym. . Mullen. X. C. Borredon. Macromol. Starch‐Starke 1999. and biodegradability of fatty‐acid esters of amylose and starch. G. Wang. W. 28. . A. Y. D. 1999.D. A. A. 58. Appl. E. Weber). 74. 34. Polym. Borredon. C. 1943. A. Pacsu: Starch studies: possible industrial utilization of starch esters. report of Food Biopack Project (Ed. Wang: Properties of starch blends with biodegradable polymers. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. Starch‐Starke 2004. Appl. L. Chem. J. K. E. Appl. Sci. Prinos. J. Sci. Prinos. Ind. characterization. 1647‐1656. Sci. J. Alric. . 57. Borredon. Merrill: Properties of fatty‐acid esters of starch. . P. Mullen. Department of Dairy and Food Science. 137‐144. F. 145‐152.
11. Ashby. H. 2001. P. Amsterdam. 255‐263. USA. L. 1997. C. Janssen. Massiot. Sugih. Carbohydr. D. R. Cebon.. G. 1986. John Wiley & Sons Inc. C. . D. Science. Materials: Engineering. Experimental and Modeling Studies on the Synthesis and Properties of Higher Fatty Esters of Corn Starch . R. L. M. Prentice‐Hall. B. Processing and Design. Manurung. R. B. Dicke. J. A. Picchioni. . H. K. A. 298. Res. M. Shercliff. 251‐260. Nuzillard: Proton NMR spectroscopy assignment of D‐glucose residues in highly acetylated starch. Underwood: Quantitative Analysis 5th edition. accepted for publication in Starch‐Starke. M. Bliard. USA. A. L. . Cellulose 2004. New York. Junistia. Day. 105 . . . F. Butterworth‐Heinemann. J. Laignel. New Jersey. 2007. the Netherlands. A straight way to regioselectively functionalized polysaccharide esters. 2008. A. Heeres: Synthesis of higher fatty acid starch esters using vinyl laurate and stearate as reactants. Montgomery: Design and Analysis of Experiments 5th edition.
Both act as compatibilizers for PCL/starch blends by improving the interfacial adhesion between the starch particles and the PCL matrix. grafting . As a result. glycidyl methacrylate. PCL‐g‐ glycidyl methacrylate (PCL‐GMA) and PCL‐g‐diethyl maleate (PCL‐g‐DEM) is decribed. PCL‐g‐DEM has at least a comparable performance with respect to PCL‐g‐GMA. This discrepancy could be explained on the basis of the functional groups (GMA or DEM) distribution along the PCL backbone. At relatively low starch intakes. The FD values for PCL‐g‐DEM were considerably lower (up to 7 %). Keywords: starch‐PCL blend. despite the expected differences (favorable to PCL‐g‐GMA) in the in situ formation of the compatibilizers. In particular the elastic modulus for the compatibilized blends is significantly higher than that of uncompatibilized ones. Highest values of the FD (up to 45 %) were observed for PCL‐g‐GMA. The effect of important process variables (intiator and monomer intakes as well as estimated solubility of the monomer in molten PCL) on the degree of grafting (FD) of the GMA and DEM units to the PCL backbone was explored in detail and quantified using multivariable linear regression. diethyl maleate.Chapter 6 Synthesis and Properties of Reactive Interfacial Agents for Polycaprolactone‐Starch Blends Abstract The synthesis of two reactive interfacial agents for starch‐PCL blends. at relatively high GMA and BPO intakes. The reactive interfacial agents were tested for their performance in PCL‐starch blends. compatibilizer. the mechanical behavior of the compatibilized blends is in general different from that of pure PCL and of the corresponding uncompatibilized blends. The compounds were prepared by reacting a low molecular weight PCL (Mw 3000) with glycidyl methacrylate or diethyl maleate in the presence of benzoylperoxide at 130°C.
Starch modifications to improve the product properties like enhanced hydrophobicity and mechanical properties were already reported in the early 19th century [1. the native material is very hydrophilic and important mechanical properties are inferior compared to most synthetic polymers and this hampers its direct use as packaging materials. to an ideal compatibilizer having both PCL and starch blocks. polyesters are considered very promising alternatives . Unfortunately. To overcome this issue. However.e. an interfacial agent) may be used to improve the interfacial association between the two polymer phases. This leads. It must be stressed here that the word “compatibilizer” is correctly used only when the block copolymer is actually able to significantly influence the dispersion of the polymers to be mixed (most probably through a steric stabilization mechanism ). Among these. is known to be degraded with ease by microorganisms widely distributed in nature . it would be actually more accurate to define the block copolymer as an “interfacial agent”. The ester bonds are susceptible to attack by water and this leads to enhanced biodegradability. When using ungelatinized starch as a component in the blend. The latter displays the presence. PCL has gained considerable interest for possible applications in the fields of packaging materials and medical applications [10‐11].e. as in this study. Introduction Starch is a cheap and abundantly available natural polymer with very good application perspectives in the area of biodegradable plastics.Chapter 6 6. these synthetic polymers are poorly or non‐biodegradable. 2]. upon mixing) by using a functionalized PCL. One of the well known modification strategies is blending the starch with polymers displaying a stronger hydrophobic character and better mechanical properties. In general a compatibilizer is a block‐copolymer where each block displays a chemical structure equal or very similar to that of the polymers to be mixed. blends of hydrophilic starch and hydrophobic biodegradable polyesters exhibit phase separation  due to differences in polarity of the building blocks. A well‐known biodegradable polyester. polycaprolactone (PCL). 108 . To reduce the tendency for phase separation. Blending of starch and synthetic biodegradable polyesters has been widely applied for the synthesis of fully‐biodegradable products. Such structure is rather difficult to achieve by simple copolymerization methods and it is usually prepared in situ (i.1. synthetic biodegradable polymers have been applied. of polar groups (usually epoxides or anhydrides [13‐18]) able to react with the – OH groups along the starch backbone. a compatibilizer (i. along the backbone. such as polyethylene (PE) or polystyrene (PS) [3‐6]. This phenomenon is highly undesirable and limits the application range considerably . As a consequence. for starch/PCL blends. Unfortunately. Aerobic soil‐burial experiments showed that the mechanical properties of PCL films decrease rapidly in time .
6. This chapter describes a systematic study on the synthesis of two reactive interfacial agents for starch‐PCL systems. PCL‐g‐glycidyl methacrylate (PCL‐g‐ GMA) and PCL‐g‐diethyl maleate (PCL‐g‐DEM). Belgium. >99%) was obtained from Acros.1. The synthesis and application of PCL‐g‐DEM is. Germany and methanol (99. diethyl maleate ≥97% purity (Fluka). Corn starch (with approx.2.2. 6. Synthesis and Properties of Reactive Interfacial Agents for Polycaprolactone‐Starch Blends which is able to mainly improve the interfacial adhesion between the polymer and starch itself. Intakes for each experiment are given in Table 1 and 2. Glycidyl methacrylate 97% purity (Aldrich). This low molecular weight PCL grade was used without further purification.2.1.2. systematic studies and subsequent quantification of the functionalization reaction has not been reported to date. UK. xylene (99. Compatibilizer synthesis The compatibilizers were prepared in a Brabender Plasticorder PL2000 batch‐ kneader (chamber volume 35 cm3). a solution of BPO in GMA or DEM was added drop by drop over a period of 5 minutes. 16].8%) from Merck. Ireland. UK was used for the preparation of the interfacial agents. The kneader was heated to 130 oC and PCL (CAPA 2304) was added while maintaining a rotational speed of 80 rpm.2.8%) from Labscan. 73% amylopectin and 27% amylase) was obtained from Sigma and high molecular weight PCL (CAPA 6503. Mw=3000 from Solvay Caprolactones. Materials and Methods 6. Germany) were used as received. ~1 mbar) prior to use. The effect of important process variables on the degree of grafting of the GMA and DEM units to the PCL backbone has been explored in detail and quantified using multivariable linear regression. Materials Polycaprolactone (PCL) CAPA 2304. After the PCL was melted (1‐2 minutes). The various compatibilizers have been tested for their performance in PCL‐starch blends.2. to the best of our knowledge. The starch was dried for at least 24 h at 110oC under vacuum (approx. Exploratory studies on the synthesis of PCL‐g‐GMA and its applications for starch/PCL blends have been published [13. after which the equipment was stopped and the chamber was opened to collect the samples. however. Methods 6. The materials were mixed for another 5 minutes. an absolute novelty of the present research. The intake of reagents was maximally 75‐80% of the volumetric volume to ensure proper mixing. and benzoyl peroxide 75% (Merck. Tetrahydrofuran (THF. 109 . Mw=50000) from Solvay Caprolactone.
Aldrich) as the solvent.2. Preparation of PCL‐starch blends with the reactive compatibilisers The PCL‐starch blends were prepared in a Brabender Plasticorder PL2000 batchkneader (chamber volume 35 cm3). The resulting suspension was filtered and precipitated using methanol (450 mL) at 6‐8°C. Digital Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) measurements were performed using a Q1000 TA Instruments equipped with a TA Instruments DSC cooling system.2.2. The solvent was decanted and the solid product was dried in a vacuum oven (40 oC.4. PCL‐g‐DEM (5 g) was dissolved in xylene and refluxed at 150 oC for 2 h.2. Tensile tests were performed using an Instron 4301 1 110 . created using a Cressington 208 sputter coater. The solvent was decanted and the solid product was dried in a vacuum oven (40 oC. Each sample was first heated from 0 oC to 100 oC (heating rate 10 oC/min) to remove the thermal history of the material.2. Work‐up of PCL‐g‐DEM products Purification of the PCL‐g‐DEM product was performed according to a modified procedure for PCL‐g‐maleic anhydride . PCL‐g‐GMA (5 g) was dissolved in 50 ml THF. 5 mbar). 6. Analytical Methods H‐NMR measurements were performed using a 400 MHz Varian AMX Oxford NMR apparatus with CDCl3 (99.2. 6.3. 5 mbar).2. The transition temperatures of each sample were further determined by first cooling down the samples from 100 oC to 0 oC and subsequently heating up back to 100 oC (cooling and heating rate were 10 oC/min).8%. and then filtered. Before analysis. Work‐up of PCL‐g‐GMA products  To remove unreacted GMA monomer and GMA homopolymer. and the product was precipitated at 6‐8 oC. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was performed using a Jeol 6320 F Scanning Electron Microscope. stirred for 1. An operation temperature of 170°C and a rotation speed of 80 rpm were applied . Subsequently. 6. the chamber was opened and the resulting material was collected. Methanol (450 mL) was added to the filtrate.3.2. The content was blended for 15 minutes. the samples were covered with a paladium/platinum conductive layer of 3 µm thickness.5 h. The error on the transition temperature is assumed to be ± 1 oC and 5 % of the calculated values for the corresponding enthalpies.Chapter 6 6. Infrared spectra were collected with a FT‐IR apparatus in the ATR mode using a Spectrum 2000 instrument from Perkin Elmer. PCL was added to the chamber followed by the addition of the starch and the reactive compatibilizer.
1. strain at break (ε). On the basis of the latter values. Table 3). it is possible to calculate the mean square (MS) for the model and the error. 111 .3.0 ppm [13.) The FD was calculated using 1H‐NMR by comparing the area of protons belonging to the GMA (‐CH< proton at δ 3. 6. leading to a 10% relative error in the FD values. For every T‐bone.2 ppm) side chains with that of a characteristic proton resonance of the PCL backbone (‐CH2‐ protons at δ 4.4. 8 different T‐bones were used. As a result we were able to obtain a model for the FD of the reaction. The corresponding value for every blend was calculated as an average of the 8 measurements while the standard deviation was taken as absolute error on the average values.2. 6. The latter is a measure of the statistical significance of the model. The FD is defined as: FD = number of moles of GMA/DEM attached to PCL (mol) × 100% number of repeating units of the PCL backbone (mol) (6.1. Statistical Modeling The influence of different processing parameters on the FD values has been determined by performing a multivariable regression procedure on the available data. Synthesis and Properties of Reactive Interfacial Agents for Polycaprolactone‐Starch Blends machine.2 ppm) or DEM (‐CH2‐ protons at δ 4. The validity of the model was determined by performing an analysis of variance (ANOVA. When the relative degrees of freedom (DF) are known. For a given sample/blend. This procedure is described in detail in the literature  and consists of calculating the sum of squares (SS) for the model and the error.2. the F‐ value for the model is determined followed by the P‐value. 19]. 15‐16. A 5% relative error in the peak area of the NMR spectra was assumed. stress at break (σ) and modulus (E) were measured. Calculation of the Degree of Functionalization (FD) of the reactive compatibilizers The number of moles of GMA or DEM present on the PCL backbone was quantified using the degree of functionalisation (FD). The T‐bone samples were prepared using a Fontijne Holland TH 400 hot‐ press.
Preparation of the Reactive Compatibilizers Twelve compatibilizers were prepared by either reacting glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) or diethyl maleate (DEM) with low molecular PCL as the starting polymer and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) as the radical initiator (Scheme 6.3. Functionalization reactions (only showing reactivity for the >CH2 in α position on PCL backbone) Typical 1H‐NMR spectra for the products are shown in Figure 6.1.1. COOEt COOEt * O O n DEM BPO n * PCL-g-DEM * O O * GMA BPO * O O O O O n * PCL-g-GMA Scheme 6.).Chapter 6 6.3. Results and Discussions 6.1. 112 .1.
Synthesis and Properties of Reactive Interfacial Agents for Polycaprolactone‐Starch Blends
Figure 6.1. Typical 1H‐NMR spectra of PCL‐g‐GMA (top) and PCL‐g‐DEM (bottom) Peak assignments were based on available data reported for related products [13, 15‐16, 20]. The FD values and the thermal properties of the products are shown in Table 6.1. (PCL‐g‐GMA) and Table 6.2. (PCL‐g‐DEM).
Overview of experiments for the PCL‐g‐GMA compatibilisers a
Intake FD (%) ‐ 5.7 15.2 27.9 3.2 45.2 c 6.3 T cryst. ( C)
(%‐mol) b GMA BPO ‐ 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.3 1.1 0.3
ΔH cryst. (J/ g‐PCL) 75 72 68 67 73 66 71
T melt. ( C)
ΔH melt. (J/ g‐PCL) 79 72 69 68 73 68 67
PCL PCL‐g‐GMA 1 PCL‐g‐GMA 2 PCL‐g‐GMA 3 PCL‐g‐GMA 4 PCL‐g‐GMA 5 PCL‐g‐GMA 6
‐ 12 24 36 6 24 12
27 22 19 29 25 20 28
51 47 47 48 47 46 47
Experiments were carried out at 130 °C. %‐mol with respect to the CL repeating units in the PCL c based on the soluble fraction of the compatibilizer
Table 6.2. Overview of experiments for the PCL‐g‐DEM compatibilisers a
Intake Sample (%‐mol) b DEM PCL PCL‐g‐DEM 1 PCL‐g‐DEM 2 PCL‐g‐DEM 3 PCL‐g‐DEM 4 PCL‐g‐DEM 5 PCL‐g‐DEM 6
FD (%) ‐ 3.5 2.1 7.2 3.6 6.5 0.9
T cryst. ( C)
ΔH cryst. (J/ g‐PCL) 75 70 68 64 61 63 70
T melt. ( C)
ΔH melt. (J/ g‐PCL) 79 72 62 66 60 66 69
BPO ‐ 0.6 0.6 0.6 1.1 1.1 0.3 27 27 30 21 26 25 30 51 44 47 45 42 41 47
‐ 15 30 45 30 60 7.5
Experiments were carried out at 130 °C %‐mol with respect to the CL repeating units in the PCL
One of the PCL‐g‐GMA compatibilizers (PCL‐g‐GMA 5, see Table 6.1.), was only partly soluble in CDCl3, and therefore the FD is based on the soluble fraction of the compatibilizer only. The presence of an insoluble fraction, combined with a relatively broad molecular weight distribution (as shown by GPC, but not shown here for brevity), suggests that cross‐linking occurred during this experiment. In general, the FD of the PCL‐g‐GMA (3.2‐45.2%) products is much higher than those of PCL‐g‐DEM (0.9‐7.2%). This difference may be either due to the difference in mutual solubility of the GMA and DEM in PCL or differences in the molecular
Synthesis and Properties of Reactive Interfacial Agents for Polycaprolactone‐Starch Blends
mechanism of the grafting reaction. The mutual solubility may be expressed in terms of the differences of solubility parameters of PCL and the reagents . The difference between the solubility parameters of GMA and PCL is 0.29 cal1/2cm‐3/2, while it is much higher (6.3 cal1/2cm‐3/2) for DEM and PCL . Thus, GMA is likely better soluble in PCL, leading to higher values for FD of the products, as confirmed by our experiments. However, the higher experimental grafting efficiencies for PCL‐GMA may also be rationalised by considering the reaction mechanism for the preparation of the compatibilisers. GMA molecules may either react directly with a radical at the PCL backbone or with a radical present on an already coupled GMA molecule. The latter leads to longer GMA grafts on a PCL backbone . A simplified representation of the reactivity of GMA is shown in Figure 6.2.
O (CH2)4 CH2 C O + RO
O (CH2)4 CH
+ GMA O (CH2)4 CH H2C H3C C
C O CH2 HC O O
Termination + H or + R or + RO (CH2)4
+ k GMA O CH C O
H2C H3C C
C O CH2 HC O O
Figure 6.2. Simplified scheme of the GMA Grafting Reaction Mechanism  The reactivity of DEM in radical reactions is expected to be different from that of GMA. Previous studies on maleic anhydride (MA), a compound resembling the
Effect of substrate (GMA/DEM) to PCL ratio on the FD The effect of the substrate (GMA or DEM) to PCL ratio on the FD was studied by changing the GMA/DEM intake at different BPO amounts. The results are graphically provided in Figure 6. Hence. BPO=1.3. showed that MA reacts easily with a radical on the PCL backbone. 30 25 20 FD (%) GMA. BPO=0. Thus an increase in the GMA intake will provide more monomer available for the growing of the grafted chains leading to higher FD values. 22]. the length of a MA graft is always unity whereas longer grafts are possible for GMA.). However.3% mol/mol-CL units DEM. This trend is independent of the BPO amount and matches with data reported by other groups [13. It is most probably related to the fact that GMA is able to propagate to longer grafted chains when reacted with PCL (Figure 6. BPO=0. Our experimental findings. subsequent reactions of MA to an already grafted MA molecule hardly occur. higher FD values for GMA than for DEM are in line with this explanation and support the proposed molecular reaction mechanisms.3. 6.3. BPO=0. 130°C) Higher GMA intakes lead to higher FD values.1.Chapter 6 chemical structure of DEM.6% mol/mol-CL units DEM.2.1% mol/mol-CL units 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Substrate Intake (mol% on CL units) Figure 6.e. i.6% mol/mol-CL units 15 GMA. Effect of GMA and DEM to CL‐units ratio (mol/mol) on the FD of the products (constant PCL intake. 116 .1.
The FD values are within a rather narrow range.5 0. 17]. These results are in line with earlier work [15. DEM=30% mol/mol-CL units 0. Synthesis and Properties of Reactive Interfacial Agents for Polycaprolactone‐Starch Blends The experimental trend for DEM is different. no detectable influence of the BPO amount on the FD is observed (Figure 6. 50 45 40 35 30 FD (%) 25 20 15 10 5 0 0. GMA=12% mol/mol-CL units DEM. 6.4.). at relatively lower GMA intakes.1 1.8 0.3 0. doubling the amount of initiator results in considerable higher product FD.4. Such discrepancy is probably related to the relatively low intake of DEM as well as to the different reactivity of DEM compared to MA .3. The use of higher initiator concentrations will result in an increase in the number of formed radicals. Effect of the BPO intake on the product FD (130°C.). for which a levelling off and eventually a decrease of the FD values for relatively higher MA amounts has been observed.4 0. Such behavior is slightly in contrast to what observed for maleic anhydride [13.2 BPO Intake (mol% on CL units) Figure 6. Apparently. there 117 .7 0. This will lead to a higher proportion of PCL radicals by hydrogen abstraction from the polymer backbone and thus to higher FD values.1.9 1 1. 15.6 0.2 GMA. GMA=24% mol/mol-CL units GMA. although a slight increase in the FD values might be appreciated. However.4. Effect of the BPO intake on the product FD The effect of the BPO intake on the FD was studied by using different intakes of BPO (Figure 6.2. constant substrate to PCL ratio) For high GMA to CL ratio (24%‐mol/ mol CL units). 17].
3. The model provided in eq. as well as several transfer reactions might be responsible for the observed trend . 6. the possibility of side reactions will become significant. δ ) (6. The data for PCL‐g‐DEM shows a similar trend as for the experiments with a high GMA to CL ratio (24%‐mol/ mol CL units).e.1.2.3. In addition. defined as the difference in solubility parameters between PCl and the substrates. 6.3. Here. The effect is however much less pronounced than for GMA. If many macroradicals are created in the system (relatively high BPO intakes) at low GMA intake. The results described in the previous paragraph imply that the mutual interaction between these variables and not the absolute value itself determines the final FD values to a great extent. ni the molar amount of initiator in the feed and δ the difference in solubility parameters calculated using group contributions .5431niδ + 1.1. This leads to the following equation: FD = f (nm .3.2729nm niδ (6. recombination of (macro) radicals.2. 17]. This phenomenon is likely related to the different nature of the radical grafting mechanism of GMA and DEM on PCL as mentioned before. the BPO and monomer intakes are considered as independent parameters. and 6. gives the best description of the experimental data: FD = −1. Modeling of the combined effects of the GMA/ DEM and BPO intakes on the FD Previous studies showed the importance of the initiator to monomer ratio on the FD values [15.6022nm ni − 0. a statistical model has been developed by performing a multivariable linear regression on the data reported in Table 6.Chapter 6 is an optimum ratio between the BPO concentration and available monomer (GMA in this case) on the FD.) where nm is the molar amount of monomer in the feed. namely an increase in the BPO intake results in higher product FD.0325nmδ + 0.8875 + 0. A doubling of the initiator intake for PCL‐g‐DEM only results in a 70% increase in the FD (compared to 300% for PCL‐g‐GMA). the mutual solubility of DEM in PCL and DMA in PCL was included in the model by using a parameter δ. In particular the occurrence of “cage effects”. these investigations focused on a better understanding of the individual variables by studying the effect of higher peroxide and monomer intakes while keeping for example their ratio constant.) 118 . ni . However. To quantify synergic effects of monomer and initiator molar intakes on the FD of GMA and DEM on the PCL backbone. i.
4 0.3. 3D plot. The very low P‐value implies that the model is statistically significant.8 0. SS 1828 81.9 60 70 40 50 80 BPO Intake (mol% on CL units) 0.928 P‐value <10‐9 The value of the coefficients in the model imply that the FD is positively influenced by the interaction between monomer and initiator intake ( nm ni ).6 0.358 1909. respectively.17 F 44. b. This was also confirmed by inspection of the residue distribution by a normal probability plot (not reported here for brevity) .8 0. Figure 6. Contour plot. 119 .358 DF 4 8 12 MS 456.3.5 0. Synthesis and Properties of Reactive Interfacial Agents for Polycaprolactone‐Starch Blends The analysis of variance data are given in Table 6. and Figure 6.957) and its closeness to the adjusted R2 (0. Graphical representation of the FD models for PCL‐g‐GMA and PCL‐g‐DEM are given in Figure 6.5. 1 0.6 20 10 20 40 50 30 60 FD (%) 40 FD (%) 30 40 20 0 1 0. the interaction between (PCL‐monomer) intake and solubility parameter difference ( nmδ ) and the interaction between the latter factor and the initiator intake ( ni δ )..3 10 10 20 30 20 0.3.7 0.941) also suggests that all important variables have been included in the model. b. The R2 value for the model (0. a.6. Table 6.5. Graphical representation of the FD model for PCL‐g‐GMA.908 10.2 10 20 GMA Intake (mol% on CL units) 40 30 50 0.4 BPO Intake (mol% on CL units) 0.2 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 GMA Intakes (mol% on CL units) 45 50 a. Model Error Total Analysis of variance for the FD model provided in eq 6.
a higher BPO intake leads to a reduction of the FD values while an opposite trend is observed at lower DEM intakes. Graphical representation of the FD model for PCL‐g‐DEM. Thermal properties of the compatibilizers The thermal properties (Table 6. the melting temperature and the relative enthalpy decrease with respect to pure PCL.1.6 0.Chapter 6 1 0. radical initiator and PCL intakes). Furthermore.) of the compatibilizers were determined by DSC.2 10 20 DEM Intake (mol% on CL units) 40 30 50 6 0. a. 3D plot. and 6.2 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 DEM Intake (mol% on CL units) 45 7 a. although both properties are significantly lower than those of pure PCL.4. The random behavior of the Tc as function of the FD values is probably the result of two concurring effects: the presence of irregularities.2. the statistical model provides besides a reliable description of the experimental data also a good mathematical description to modulate the FD values of the two substrates by changing the chemical composition (monomer.8 0. 6. These differences in dependency of the FD values on the DEM and GMA intakes may be explained on the basis of the different grafting mechanisms as previously discussed. Such changes in the thermal properties compared to pure PCL may be caused by the introduction of grafts on the PCL chains.1. b. This induces irregularities and is expected to result in a lowering of the Tc and the Tm. et al  working with PCL‐g‐GMA.6 2 FD (%) 5 2 0 1 0. and a favored nucleation 1 2 50 120 . Remarkable is once more the different trends for the two substrates. for DEM a clear transition is observed.4 0. Similar observations have also been made by Kim.9 4 5 8 BPO Intake (mol% on CL units) 0.3 5 6 0. the crystallization temperature and enthalpy are not a clear function of the FD values.4 BPO Intake (mol% on CL units) 0. b.5 0.8 0. For all samples.6. While for GMA an increase in BPO or monomer intakes invariably leds to higher FD values.7 3 4 6 FD (%) 4 0. which is expected to lead to a Tc reduction. For relatively high DEM intakes (> 30 % mol/mol). 7 6 3 3 4 Figure 6. From a more practical point of view. Contour plot.3.
0 430.5 7. Table 6. Synthesis and Properties of Starch‐ PCL Blends The two compatibilizers (PCL‐g‐GMA and PCL‐g‐DEM) were further used as interfacial agents in blends of PCL with starch.1 13.8 384.2 343.8 371.4 230.6 5.1 10.6 11.2.2 9. 6.7 %.5 ε (%) 640.6 168.5 425. Thermal and mechanical properties of starch/PCL blends a Sample PCL S/PCL 10/90 S/PCL 20/80 S/PCL 30/70 S/PCL/PCL‐g‐DEM 20/80/1 S/PCL/PCL‐g‐DEM 20/80/2 S/PCL/PCL‐g‐DEM 20/80/5 S/PCL/PCL‐g‐GMA 20/80/1 S/PCL/PCL‐g‐GMA 20/80/2 S/PCL/PCL‐g‐GMA 20/80/5 S/PCL/PCL‐g‐GMA 20/80/10 S/PCL/PCL‐g‐GMA 10/90/2 S/PCL/PCL‐g‐GMA 30/70/2 a σ (MPa) 16. An overview of all prepared blends together with their thermal and mechanical (tensile tests) properties is given in Table 6.6%. a series with PCL‐g‐DEM (different intakes of the latter at fixed starch/PCL ratio) and two series with PCL‐g‐GMA (one with different intakes of PCL‐g‐GMA at a fixed starch/PCL ratio and one with a fixed compatibilizer intake at three different starch/PCL ratios).8 372.0 341.9 E (MPa) 270. Our experimental design allows comparisons of thermal and mechanical properties as function of the starch content for binary blends (no compatibilizer) and intake of PCL‐g‐DEM and of PCL‐g‐GMA.2 342.5 357.3 380.1 11.8 329.9 424. A total of 12 blends were prepared: a series of binary ones (not containing any compatibilizers) constituting our reference points.0 401.7 10. The lower crystallization and melting enthalpy of the compatibilizers compared to virgin PCL is possibly caused by the presence of side chains on the PCL backbone which are expected to have a negative effect on the crystallinity of the products.2 321.0 9. 121 .3 18.104.22.168 386.0 332.4.4 431.5 489.2 337.3 10.3 Tc (oC) 35 36 36 36 30 30 30 29 31 30 29 28 29 ∆Hc (J/gPCL) 55 69 51 40 52 54 55 53 58 57 63 54 55 T m (oC) 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 58 57 57 58 56 ∆Hm (J/gPCL) 62 68 53 43 46 50 52 51 54 50 60 51 48 PCL‐g‐DEM has an FD of 1.9 11. PCL‐g‐GMA has an FD of 9.6 305.9 368.9 379. Synthesis and Properties of Reactive Interfacial Agents for Polycaprolactone‐Starch Blends of the PCL chains in the compatibilizers compared to virgin PCL (higher Tc) induced by the presence of polar groups.
8 MPa) clearly indicates that the rigidity of the blends increases at higher starch contents.8 % at 30 % starch content. Melting and crystallization enthalpy as function of the starch content for binary blends with PCL.2 MPa up to 341. The two trends are remarkably mirroring each other and are both characterized by an increase of ∆Hm and ∆Hc with respect to pure PCL at 10 % starch content followed by a monotonous decrease of both quantities as function of the starch intake. The thermal and mechanical properties indicate no or very little interaction of the starch particles with the PCL ○ : ∆Hc □ : ∆Hm 122 .1 MPa and 341. 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 ∆ H (J/ g-PCL) 0 5 10 15 20 Starch content (%) 25 30 Figure 6.5 % for pure PCL to 7.2.3. This is in agreement with the data previously reported on PCL/starch blends and related to the lack of interfacial adhesion between the starch particles and the PCL matrix . The thermal behavior is characterized by no significant changes in the Tm and Tc values but unreported trends of the corresponding enthalpies as function of the starch content (Figure 6.Chapter 6 6.7. Binary blends of starch and PCL For binary blends (no compatibilizer is added) a monotonous decrease of the stress and strain at break is observed as function of the starch intake. respectively from 16.43 MPa and 640. This is most probably due to a nucleation effect of the starch on PCL as observed also for other kinds of polymer blends .1. The simultaneous increase in the modulus (from 270.7.).
This is visually confirmed by the morphology of the prepared blends (Figure 6.). Evaporation of the water during blend preparation.2. for which a 6 oC drop is observed when using PCL‐g‐DEM.8. The latter trend is also valid for the corresponding enthalpies: i. Ternary blends compatibilized with PCL‐g‐DEM PCL‐g‐DEM.). Thus. The thermal behavior is characterized (Table 6. b. 123 . a. was used as compatibilizer for the preparation of ternary blends with starch and PCL. the corresponding binary blend (S/PCL 20/80) contitutes a better reference point compared to pure PCL.9. whose synthesis is described for the first time in this work. the starch particles are simply inserted into voids of the PCL matrix.3. Figure 6. Morphology of starch/PCL binary blends. This is confirmed by examination of the blend morphology by SEM (Figure 6. a decrease with respect to pure PCL is observed and then a substantial invariance as function of the PCL‐g‐DEM content. In this respect the thermal properties remain substantially unchanged with the exception of the Tc. As consequence one might expect a slight different structure of these ternary blends as compared to the corresponding binary one.) by constant values of the Tm (with respect to pure PCL) while the Tc is slightly lower (30 vs 35 oC) than that of pure PCL and it is independent of the compatibilizer content. Synthesis and Properties of Reactive Interfacial Agents for Polycaprolactone‐Starch Blends matrix. 26] and explained by assuming that the voids are formed by water in the starch.e. and the lack of interface adhesion cause void formation.8.4. in order to fully understand the role of PCL‐g‐DEM. either by heating or in combination with mechanical stress . (a) S/PCL 10/90 (b) S/PCL 20/80 (c) S/PCL 30/70 Indeed starch particles are clearly dispersed in the PCL matrix but no interaction (adhesion) between the two phases is actually detected. The presence of these voids was also observed for sago starch/PCL blends [25. However. Such behavior is consistent with the hypothesis that the starch particles hinder the melting and crystallization processes of the PCL chains.2. 6. c.
9. At higher PCL‐g‐DEM intakes the lower average molecular weight of the compatibilizer as compared to the one of the unmodified PCL used in the blends (3000 vs 50000) is probably responsible for the observed decrease in the E values. b. which will hinder the flowability and fibre forming ability of PCL matrix under cold drawing.). At 1 %‐wt of PCL‐g‐DEM in the blends the modulus increases with respect to the binary blend (0 %‐wt compatibilizer in Figure 6.10. The stress and strain at break remain constant as function of the compatibilizer intake while the modulus display an optimum as function of the compatibilizer intake (Figure 6. This can be explained by the improved interfacial adhesion  between PCL and starch. As a result of the different morphology also the mechanical behavior display differences with the virgin PCL and the binary blend. Indeed starch particles in the ternary blends display a smoother interface with the PCL matrix compared to the corresponding binary blends (Figure 6.). c. Morphology of ternary blends compatibilized with PCL‐g‐DEM. Figure 6.). A closer inspection of the SEM pictures reveals that the starch particles are clearly embedded in the PCL matrix with almost no void spaces at the interface. (a) S/PCL/PCL‐g‐DEM 20/80/1 (b) S/PCL/PCL‐g‐DEM 20/80/2 (c) S/PCL/PCL‐g‐DEM 20/80/5 124 . resulting in more rigid material with higher modulus.10.9.Chapter 6 a.
The first comparison as function of the PCL‐g‐GMA intake (ternary blends with starch/PCL ratio of 20/80) results in quite similar considerations as the ones made for PCL‐g‐DEM.3.e. at all PCL‐g‐GMA contents) there is a clear increase of the modulus with respect to the 125 . in all cases (i. by taking as reference the corresponding binary blend (S/PCL 20/80). Ternary blends compatibilized with PCL‐g‐GMA When using PCL‐g‐GMA as compatibilizer two possible comparisons can actually be made: one at fixed starch/PCL ratio and changing the amount of PCL‐ g‐GMA and one at different starch/PCL ratios but with fixed amount of PCL‐g‐ GMA (2 %‐wt). the stress and strain at break are lowered and hardly a function of the PCL‐g‐GMA amount. the modulus is higher and hardly a function of the compatibilizer amount. However. the crystallization temperature experiences a drop of about 5‐6 oC. In particular also in the case of PCL‐g‐GMA. 6.3. Synthesis and Properties of Reactive Interfacial Agents for Polycaprolactone‐Starch Blends 390 380 370 360 E (MPa) 350 340 330 320 0 1 2 3 PCL-g-DEM amount (wt%) 4 5 Figure 6. 2) 3) 4) Remarkable is that in the case of PCL‐g‐GMA no optimum is found in the modulus as function of the compatibilizer intake.2. it can be observed that: 1) the melting temperature as well as the crystallization and melting enthalpies do not change significantly (discrepancies in the values are within the boundary defined by the experimental error).10. Modulus of ternary blends S/PCL/PCL‐g‐DEM as function of PCL‐g‐ DEM amount.
presence of voids. and 6. despite a much more favourable FD value for PCL‐g‐GMA with respect to PCL‐g‐ DEM and even despite a relative low reactivity of ester groups towards the –OH groups on starch and nucleophilic groups in general [27. c. These differences in compatibilizing effect are not yet fully understood. (left) the structure of PCL‐g‐GMA is inhomogeneous at the molecular level with long poly(GMA) branches pending from the PCL backbone. 28.8 % for PCL‐g‐GMA against 1.11. clearly indicating that also PCL‐g‐GMA (like PCL‐g‐DEM) acts as compatibilizer in the blends Such hypothesis is partially and qualitatively confirmed by the blends morphology (Figure 6. Morphology of ternary blends S/PCL/PCL‐g‐GMA. a. 29]. As given schematically in Figure 6. b.Chapter 6 binary blend.).12. Thus. partial interfacial adhesion) which render these ternary blends a kind of “intermediate” case between the binary ones and those compatibilized with PCL‐g‐DEM. 126 .11. PCL‐g‐DEM is at least as active as compatibilizer (compare modulus values in Table 6. upon reaction of PCL‐g‐GMA with one of the –OH groups on the surface of the starch particles the remaining GMA groups are actually scarcely available for further reaction with other –OH groups spatially distant from the reacted one. (a) S/PCL/PCL‐g‐GMA 20/80/1 (b) S/PCL/PCL‐g‐GMA 20/80/2 (c) S/PCL/PCL‐g‐GMA 20/80/3 In this case we observe structural features (partially smooth interface between the components. and morphologies in Figures 6.7 % for PCL‐g‐DEM.11. Figure 6.4. one might speculate that the longer length of the GMA grafts compared to DEM (vide supra) plays a negative role in the in situ formation of the compatibilizer. However. This confines all reactive GMA groups in relatively “isolated” spots along the PCL backbone. As a result.9.) than PCL‐g‐GMA for blends containing 20 %‐wt of starch. This is surprising if one takes into account the different FD values: 9.
Moreover. the stress and strain at break decrease while the modulus is unchanged at low starch contents and increases significantly for S/PCL blends with 30 %‐wt starch. 20 and 30 %‐wt respectively). the Tc decreases (with respect to the corresponding binary blends) while all other factors (Tm and enthalpies) remain virtually unchanged with respect to the binary blends and also as function of the starch intake. Indeed. The latter result (from a modulus of 341.) for further reaction. Concerning the thermal behavior (Table 6. As consequence.3 MPa for S/PCL/PCL‐g‐GMA 30/70/2) clearly indicates that the efficiency of PCL‐g‐GMA as compatibilizer becomes more relevant at relatively higher starch contents (>30 %) . The proposed explanation implies however that at relatively higher starch contents (> 20 %‐wt) the segregation of the poly(GMA) chains in “isolated” spot along the PCL backbone would become less important. the distribution of the reactive group along the PCL backbone is more “homogenous”. once PCL‐g‐DEM has reacted with one –OH groups on the starch particle.). This is in agreement with the hypothesis made above (Figure 6. for all starch amounts (Table 6. when comparing ternary blends (compatibilized with PCL‐g‐ GMA) with the binary ones.4. In order to check this we compared blends with the same amount of PCL‐g‐GMA (2 %‐wt) but with different starch intakes (10.8 MPa for S/PCL 30/70 up to 430. thus probably ensuring a better coverage of the surface. at higher starch contents more –OH groups would be available for reaction with the GMA groups. We can therefore conclude that the efficiency of PCL‐g‐GMA in the 127 .12. Schematic representation of the in situ reaction between functionalized PCL and starch. Synthesis and Properties of Reactive Interfacial Agents for Polycaprolactone‐Starch Blends PCL-g-DEM PCL-g-GMA OH O OH O OH Starch particle OH Starch particle Figure 6. On the other hand (right of Figure 6.12.12.) PCL‐g‐DEM has much less reactive groups (lower FD) than PCL‐g‐GMA.12.). thus attenuating the effect discussed above.4. but since DEM is preferentially grafted as monomer. other groups will presumably remain available (arrows in Figure 6.) and relating the “coverage” of the starch particle surface upon reaction with PCL‐g‐GMA with the compatibilization efficiency.
moles of GMA or DEM present per mole of CL repeating units : : ni nm amount of initiator intake [mol% on CL units] amount of monomer GMA or DEM intake [mol% on CL units] 128 . The latter hypothesis is indirectly confirmed by the observation that PCL‐g‐GMA becomes more efficient at relatively higher starch contents in the blends. The PCL‐g‐GMA and PCL‐g‐DEM compatibilizers display lower melting temperatures and melting enthalpies compared to virgin PCL. including statistical modeling. This is in contrast with chemical reactivity and amount of chemical groups along the PCL backbone (both factors favorable to GMA as compared to DEM) but it is explainable on the basis of the group distribution along the PCL backbone. 6.5. has been performed on the synthesis of two reactive compatibilisers. can replace PCL‐g‐GMA as compatibilizer at relatively low starch contents offering at the same time the advantage of a less pronounced modification of the polymer backbone and a reduced consumtpion of polar groups to be grafted on PCL. Nomenclature E FD : initial modulus [MPa] : functionalization degree. PCL‐g‐glycidyl methacrylate (PCL‐g‐ GMA) and PCL‐g‐diethyl maleate (PCL‐g‐DEM). Conclusions A systematic study. From a more practical point of view it can be concluded that the newly synthesized PCL‐g‐DEM. 6. This represents an unreported mathematical confirmation of the fact that these kinds of functionalization reactions are mainly governed by the synergy between the different process variables and only slightly by their individual values. mutual solubility of the monomer into the molten polymer) on the FD adequately described the experimental results (R2=0. The most important variable for the final product FD is the interaction between the amount of monomer and initiator used. The proposed model to quantify the effects of process variables (monomer and initiator intake. At a fixed starch content (20 %‐wt) PCL‐g‐DEM seems to have sligthly more efficient compatibilizing effect than PCL‐g‐GMA as shown by blends morphology and elastic modulus values. firstly reported in this work. P‐value ≤10‐9).4. The reactive compatibilizers were used in blends of starch with PCL.957.Chapter 6 compatibilization of starch/PCL blends can be significantly improved by changing the blend composition.
227‐242. B. Sci. M.6. A. B. Bhattacharya: Properties of injection moulded starch/ synthetic polymer blends – IV.A. . M. Y. Karlsson: Polymers from Renewable Resources. CRC Press. . . Wurzburg). wheat starch and soluble starch for food packaging applications. 2002.Eng. E. Mullen. Polymer 2003. Eng. Ogawa. Carbohydr. N. J. F. Ioannis. Eur. 1998. E. 33.Chem. 1467‐1475. Eur. Psomiadou. . Liu. 1998. Jarowenko: Acetylated starch and miscellanous organic esters. R.J. C. References . Pacsu: Starch Studies: Preparation and properties of starch triesters. Mani. A‐C.D. O. Inc. Adv. Effect of amylopectin to amylase ratio in starch. J. Albertsson: Biodegradable Polymers and Environmental Interaction. 129 . Polym. USA.G. 38. Ranucci.. 34. 139‐161. 44. 1477‐1487. Davis: High performance LDPE/ thermoplastic starch blend: a sustainable alternative to pure polyethylene. J. H. S.B. Bhattacharya: Properties of injection moulded starch/ synthetic polymer blends – III. 1998. M. A‐C. Thermal and morphological properties. . 1997. Synthesis and Properties of Reactive Interfacial Agents for Polycaprolactone‐Starch Blends T : temperature [oC] : crystallization temperature [oC] : melting temperature [oC] Tc Tm Greek symbols: ∆Hc ∆Hm : enthalpy of crytallization [J/g‐PCL] : enthalpy of melting [J/g‐PCL] : solubility parameter [cal1/2cm‐3/2] : stress at break [MPa] : strain at break [%] δ σ ε 6.S. Sci. 34. 1517‐1526. 34. 1986. in Modified Starches: Properties and Uses (Ed. Mani. Polym. E. Boca Raton. S. 157. . R. Ramsay. Polym. . 1251‐1253. W. Albertsson. Polym. Ind. Part 2. 1942. Kawasaki: Biodegradable films made from low density polyethylene (LDPE). 1209‐1217. Lindblad. Karlsson. Polym. Rodriguez‐Gonzales.W. Biliaderis.
Polym.K. Nakayama.H. 2004. Avella. Macromolecules 1996. Kim. Marrucci. 127–134. 127.S. Sci. E. R. 5590‐5598. 37. Mani. Cho. Montgomery: Design and Analysis of Experiments 5th edition. Errico. Painter: Specific Interactions and the Miscibility of Polymer Blends. E. Adv. . C.. 80. E. 1693‐1702. M.Y. . Sci. Moro. Park: Grafting of glycidyl methacrylate onto polycaprolactone: preparation and characterization. 2003. Jung. J. L. K. . . 91‐95. Environ. USA. K. Polym. R. Chem. Goldberg: A review of the biodegradability and utility of poly(caprolactone). J. Sci. Environ. 4157‐4167. 3875‐3881. P. . Tang. Degrad. Khandpur. C. 1997. Chem. 1139‐1148. Marechal. M. 35. Park: Modification of Aliphatic Polyesters and Their Reactive Blends with Starch. Tang: Functionalization of polyesters with maleic anhydride by reactive extrusion. 130 . D. 41. 61‐67.S. Park: Reactive blends of gelatinized starch and polycaprolactone‐g‐glycidyl methacrylate. Part A: Polym. 305‐313. 2001. 1997. Chim. Mater. M. Polym.K. C. Kim. . C. A.M. A. Guegan. L. Fringant: Properties of thermoplastic blends: starch‐polycaprolactone. J.. 1995. J. . Kim. R. 2001. Coleman.K. R. Bhattacharya: Synthesis and characterization of anhydride‐functional polycaprolactone. J. Aglietto: Chemical reactions affecting the free‐radical grafting of diethyl maleate onto ethylene polymers. K.C.M.. M. J. Solaro: Biodegradable polymeric materials.Y. Passaglia. Ruggeri. Pennsylvania. G. Laurienzo. J. D. Polym.H. Graf. Polymer 2000. 42. 3. USA. T. Polym. 1998. Chiellini. 1999. Z. Sci.H. Yang. C. Polymer 2000. John. 8. Degrad. Gazz. Cho. Dole. Part A: Polym. Wu: Physical properties and biodegradability of maleated‐ polycaprolactone/ starch composite. 1507‐ 1516. It. P. Appl. 41. M.K. J. Rimedio: Preparation and characterization of compatibilised polycaprolactone/ starch composites. Raimo.E. . M. Technomic Publication. 23.W. C. J. John Wiley & Sons Inc. 1273‐1335. J. New York. Polymer 2001.Chapter 6 . . M.F. 1991. Macosko. . 1996. R. Bhattacharya. Martuscelli. . 179‐187. Inoue: Compatibilizers for melt blending: Premade block copolymers. P. . P. 81. J. Stab. 12. Prog. Rustgi: Biodegradable polymers. Polym. 5135‐ 5142. Kim. Polym. Averous. 29. . M. C. J. J. P. Chandra. .
38.S. B. Polym. 877‐884. . Appl. U. Bull.N. 87.W. Azemi: Effect of starch predrying on the mechanical properties of starch/ poly(ε‐caprolactone) composites. Azemi. A. Sci. O. G. Aglietto. U.M. .M. 293‐304.Safa.S.W.Nasirtabrizi: Ring opening reactions of glycidyl methacrylate copolymers to introduce bulky organosilicon side chain substituents. Odusanya.N.M. Eng. 273‐281.S.S. 2002. D. 131 . Adv. M. U.M. D. Synthesis and Properties of Reactive Interfacial Agents for Polycaprolactone‐Starch Blends . Ishiaku. R. Sci. Eur. Lee. Ishiaku. S.S. Pang. Ruggeri. F. 2000. 9. Ishiaku.D.A. K. W. 57. Picchioni: Formation and compatibilizing effect of the grafted copolymer in the reactive blending of 2‐ diethylsuccinate containing polyolefins with poly‐ε‐caprolactam (nylon‐6). 1298‐1305. M. Manan. . B. 21.B. 2006. Ishak: Mechanical properties and enzymic degradation of thermoplastic and granular sago starch filled poly(ε‐ caprolactone).V. Polym. K. Technol. 2003.H. 393‐401. 11‐15.A. Nachtigall. . Polym.M. Polym. Polym.S. J. Odusanya. Polym. Manan. E. S. 40. O. 1998. Barbosa. R. H. 2002. Passaglia. Mauler: Comparative study of PP‐MA and PP‐GMA as compatibilizing agent on polypropylene/nylon 6 blends. Test. . J. Kammer: On mechanical properties of sago starch/ poly(ε‐caprolactone) composites. M. Tedesco.
To gain insight in the potential of this approach. There are several starch modification methods available.4)‐glucosidic bonds. The synthesis of such grafted products by the in situ ring opening polymerization (ROP) of the monomers on the hydroxyl groups of starch is unfortunately not very straightforward. The application of a number of prospective methods for developing starch‐based biomaterials will be described in this thesis. plastics may end up in the environment and cause serious environmental problems. Starch is a polymer consisting of anhydroglucose (AHG) units.o oil and gas) are very attractive materials for a broad range of applications. For instance. Starch is also too sensitive to water. After use. The application of an alternative method involving hydrophobisation of starch by the introduction of large hydrophobic SiMe3 groups followed by a ROP with a polyester precursor and subsequent removal of the SiMe3 groups is expected to result in higher grafting efficiencies. Chemical grafting of biodegradable polyesters on the starch backbone is expected to result in less hydrophilic and thus less water sensitive materials with improved mechanical properties. chemical modification or combinations thereof. Starch is relatively cheap and available from a broad range of plants. Starch must therefore be modified before it can be applied as a biodegradable plastic. The content of amylose and amylopectine in starch varies and largely depends on the starch source. The main reasons are the water sensitivity of common catalysts and the fact that starch is poorly or even insoluble in the common organic solvents used for ROP. it has a high volume to weight ratio and is generally resistant to degradation. with a rate of almost 10% every year. there is a strong need for renewable alternatives for plastics from fossil resources. while amylopectin is branched polymer. Its production has increased significantly since 1950. The use of virgin starch for packaging materials is restricted because it cannot be shaped to films with adequate mechanical properties (high percentage elongation. Starch‐based biodegradable materials are considered interesting candidates to replace certain types of conventional plastics. Amylose is essentially a linear polymer in which AHG units are predominantly connected through α‐D‐(1. blending with other materials. tensile and flexural strength). There are two types of polymers present in starch: amylose and amylopectin. In combination with the current high prices for petrochemical products.6)‐glucosidic bonds. we have . such as thermoplasticization. containing periodic branches linked with the backbones through α‐D‐(1. Examples are the use as packaging and construction materials.Summary Plastics made from fossil resources (a.
The results are described in detail in Chapter 3.3. with higher temperatures (100°C) leading to lower yields.4‐di‐O‐isopropylidene‐α‐D‐galactopyranose ratio (at constant Al(OiPr)3 intake).4‐di‐O‐isopropylidene‐α‐D‐ galactopyranose) using Al(OiPr)3 as the catalyst. The polymerizations were performed at 60‐100°C. Silylated starch with a low to medium DS (0. depending on the ε‐CL to starch ratio.Summary initially performed research on the ROP with a simpler model system involving a simple protected mono‐saccharide instead of starch. are described in Chapter 2. and subsequent removal of the silyl groups. The use of higher carboxylic (fatty) acid to esterify starch resulted in products with significantly improved 134 . The DS of the PCL chains was between 0.21‐0. The results for the model system involving the ROP of p‐dioxanone initiated by hydroxyl groups of a protected monosaccharide (1.2.3. and off‐white solid products with isolated yields of 30‐96% were obtained. with higher ratios leading to higher molecular weights. Considerable amounts of ε‐CL homopolymers with isopropyl end‐groups were also formed. The synthetic procedure may be divided into three steps: hydrophobisation of starch by the introduction of SiMe3 groups followed by in situ ROP.68) was obtained. Average molecular weights of the products were between 970 and 6200 (7 – 58 monomer units) and were a clear function of the p‐ dioxanone/ 1. The hydrophobicity of starch acetates is higher than virgin starch.46‐0. The silylation reaction was performed using hexamethyl disilazane (HMDS) in DMSO/ toluene mixtures at 70°C.72. even in the presence of plasticizers. The silyl groups of the poly‐(ε)‐caprolactone grafted starch co‐polymers were finally successfully removed using a mild dilute hydrochloric acid treatment in THF at room temperature. Poly‐(ε)‐ caprolactone grafted silylated starch co‐polymers with average chain length of 40‐ 55 monomer units (molecular weight of 4500‐6300) were obtained. Esterification of starch with carboxylic acid derivatives is one of the oldest strategies to improve starch properties. but the products are still very brittle. The grafting of ε‐caprolactone to the silylated starch by a ring‐opening polymerisation catalysed by Al(OiPr)3 was performed in THF at 50oC. Characterization of the products using 1H‐ and 13C‐NMR as well as MALDI‐TOF mass spectrometry showed the presence of significant amounts of p‐dioxanone polymers with an isopropoxide end group (20‐30%) The knowledge obtained from the model system was applied for the synthesis of starch‐g‐poly‐ε‐caprolactone using hydrophobised silylated starch. A statistical model has been developed to quantify the effects of process variables (time. and particularly acetic acid derivatives (C2) have received considerable attention. Most of the previous starch esterification studies involved the use of short chain carboxylic acids (C1‐C4).2. The grafting efficiency for the desired reaction was 28‐58%. The yield of the polymers was a function of the reaction temperature and the reaction time. temperature and monomer: monosaccharide ratio) on the average degree of polymerization.
The yellowish products were characterized by 1H‐.07‐1. 0. K2CO3. The thermal stability of the esterified products is higher than that of native starch. and Na‐ acetate).96 and P‐value of ≤10‐7) second‐order mathematical models correlating the effect of process variables (vinyl to AHG‐ starch mol ratio. High‐DS products (DS= 2. Summary mechanical properties and hydrophobicities. and Na‐acetate) in DMSO at 110°C. The products have a broad range of degree of substitution (DS = 0. 13C‐NMR and FT‐IR.24 ‐ 2. an alternative method for higher fatty starch esters by using fatty vinyl esters is reported. K2CO3. and modulus of elasticity of 46‐113 MPa.4 could be obtained for both laurate and stearate esters. while the use of K2CO3 and CH3COONa catalysts resulted in medium‐high DS products (2.7‐3. In Chapter 4‐5. catalyst intake. and the type of catalyst.45‐1. The DS of the products is a strong function of the basicity of the catalyst. the synthesis of two polycaprolactone (PCL)‐based reactive interfacial agents. products with a DS > 2. reaction temperature.1‐2. presumably due to a reduction of the polarity of the reaction medium. With these catalysts. Statistically adequate (R2≥0.9 for starch laurate. The DS of the products was a clear function of the chain length of the fatty ester.5 for starch stearate). The last part of this thesis deals with reactive blending of starch and biodegradable polymers using reactive interfacial agents. In Chapter 6. Chapter 4 describes the results of a preliminary study on the synthesis of long fatty esters of corn starch (starch‐laurate and starch‐stearate) using vinyl fatty esters. an increase in the vinyl‐ester concentration led to higher product DS values. PCL‐g‐ 135 . a systematic study. Reaction temperature and catalyst intake also affect the product DS but only to a lesser extent. elongation at break of 3‐26%.75) are still partially crystalline.26‐2. In Chapter 5.3‐1.4‐3 for starch stearate). including statistical modelling on the synthesis of long fatty esters of corn starch (starch‐laurate and starch‐stearate) using corresponding vinyl fatty esters is reported. and catalyst basicity) to the DS of the starch ester products were developed. the DS decreased.39) are totally amorphous whereas the low‐DS ones (DS= 1.96). The synthesis of these fatty starch esters is. For low vinyl‐ester to starch ratios. usually performed using fatty acid chlorides which are relatively expensive and rather corrosive. The thermal and mechanical properties of some representative product samples are also described. vinyl ester to starch ratio. The starch esters were prepared by reacting starch with vinyl laurate or vinyl stearate in the presence of basic catalysts (Na2HPO4. K2CO3 and Na‐acetate are superior with respect to activity when compared with Na2HPO4. The use of methyl and glyceryl esters results in products with only relatively low DS.5 MPa.5 for starch laurate. 1. Mechanical tests show that the products have tensile strength (stress at break) between 2. At higher ratios. The starch esters were synthesized by reacting gelatinized starch with vinyl laurate or vinyl acetate in DMSO in the presence of basic catalysts (Na2HPO4. however. The use of Na2HPO4 resulted in low‐medium DS products (0.
PCL‐g‐DEM seems to have slightly more efficient compatibilising effect than PCL‐g‐GMA as shown by blends morphology and elastic modulus values. As the result. The PCL‐based compatibilisers were prepared by reacting a low molecular weight PCL (Mw 3000) with glycidyl methacrylate or diethyl maleate in the presence of benzyolperoxide initiator at 130°C. Both of the PCL‐based compatibilisers improve the interfacial adhesion between the starch particles and the PCL matrix in starch/ PCL blends. The FD values for PCL‐g‐DEM were considerably lower (up to 7 %). Highest values of the FD (up to 45 %) were observed for PCL‐g‐GMA. at relatively high GMA and BPO intakes. 136 . P‐value ≤10‐9) has been developed to quantify the effects of process variables (monomer and initiator intake. A statistically adequate model (R2=0. This is in contrast with chemical reactivity and amount of chemical groups along the PCL backbone (both factors favorable to GMA as compared to DEM) but it is explainable on the basis of the group distribution along the PCL backbone. and their use in compatibilising starch‐PCL blends is described.Summary glycidyl methacrylate (PCL‐GMA) and PCL‐g‐diethyl maleate (PCL‐g‐DEM). In particular the elastic modulus for the compatibilised blends is significantly higher (reaching up to 430 MPa) than that of uncompatibilised ones (320‐340 MPa).957. The latter hypothesis is indirectly confirmed by the observation that PCL‐g‐GMA becomes more efficient at relatively higher starch contents in the blends. the mechanical behavior of the compatibilised blends is in general different from that of pure PCL and of the corresponding uncompatibilised blends. At a fixed starch content (20 %‐wt). mutual solubility of the monomer into the molten polymer) on the functionalisation degree (FD) of the GMA and DEM units to the PCL backbone.
De AHG eenheden kunnen op een aantal manieren aan elkaar gekoppeld worden. Voorbeelden zijn thermo‐ plastificatie. Amylose is een lineair polymeer waarin de AHG eenheden hoofdzakelijk via α‐D‐(1.v. Zetmeel is relatief goedkoop en te winnen uit een breed scala aan planten. heeft geleid tot een grote interesse voor biologisch afbreekbare alternatieven gemaakt uit hernieuwbare grondstoffen. Het zetmeel is daarnaast ook erg gevoelig voor water. De synthese van dergelijke producten met een in situ katalytische ringopening polymerisatie (ROP) van geschikte monomeren als b. De verhouding amylose en amylopectine in zetmeel varieert en hangt grotendeels af van de plant waaruit het zetmeel gewonnen wordt. De belangrijkste redenen zijn de watergevoeligheid van de katalysatoren en het feit dat zetmeel slecht of zelfs onoplosbaar is in de typische organische oplosmiddelen die voor de ROP gebruikt worden. De toepassing van een alternatieve methode waarbij zetmeel eerst minder hydrofiel gemaakt wordt door de introductie van grote hydrofobe SiMe3 groepen.Samenvatting Kunststoffen gemaakt van fossiele grondstoffen als olie en gas zijn zeer aantrekkelijke materialen voor een breed scala aan toepassingen. Zetmeel is een polymeer bestaande uit anhydroglucose (AHG) eenheden.4)‐glucoside bindingen verbonden zijn. menging met andere materialen. Het gebruik van zetmeel voor verpakking materialen is momenteel beperkt. Na gebruik kunnen de materialen in het milieu eindigen en grote problemen veroorzaken. ε‐caprolactone op de hydroxy‐groepen van zetmeel is helaas niet eenvoudig. mede omdat het niet mogelijk is om films met goede mechanische eigenschappen te maken.6)‐glucoside bindingen met de hoofdketen zijn verbonden. Dit. chemische modificaties en combinaties van deze methoden. Dit proefschrift beschrijft een aantal methodes om nieuwe polymere materialen op basis van zetmeel te maken. De productie van kunststoffen is sinds 1950 met bijna 10% per jaar gestegen. gevolgd door de ROP met een polyester precursor en verwijdering van de SiMe3 groepen . Modificatie van zetmeel kan het aantal toepassingen sterk vergroten. in combinatie met de huidige hoge prijzen voor de grondstoffen. Er zijn verschillende methodes beschikbaar om zetmeel te modificeren. Het chemisch grafting van biologisch afbreekbare polyesters op de zetmeel ketens zou kunnen leiden tot minder hydrofiele en dus minder water gevoelige materialen met betere mechanische eigenschappen. Twee type polymeren zijn dominant aanwezig in zetmeel: amylose en amylopectine. Biologisch afbreekbare polymeren op basis van zetmeel kunnen mogelijk bepaalde conventionele kunststoffen vervangen. Het amylopectine is een vertakt polymeer waarbij de vertakkingen via α‐D‐(1.
gevolgd door in situ ROP met ε‐ caprolacton en daarna de verwijdering van de silyl groepen. De polycaprolacton eenheden (PCL) van het verkregen poly‐ε‐caprolactone gesilyleerde zetmeel hadden een gemiddelde ketenlengte van 40‐55 monomeereenheden (molecuul massa 4500‐6300). De silyl groepen van het poly‐ε‐caprolactone gesilyleerde zetmeel werden uiteindelijk succesvol verwijderd door middel van een milde behandeling met verdund zoutzuur in THF bij kamertemperatuur. DS = 0. De opbrengst van de polymeren was een functie van de reactietemperatuur en de reactietijd.2. De resultaten worden in Hoofdstuk 3 in detail beschreven. Een hogere verhouding leidde tot hogere molecuul massa’s.46‐0. De grafting efficiency van de gewenste reactie was 28‐58%. Karakterisering van de producten met 1 H‐ en 13C‐NMR en MALDI‐TOF massaspectrometrie toonden de aanwezigheid aan van de gewenste producten en daarnaast significante hoeveelheden van p‐ dioxanone polymeren met een isopropoxide eindgroep (20‐30%). De kennis verkregen met het modelsysteem is toegepast om ε‐caprolactone te graften op zetmeel.2. De grafting van ε‐ caprolactone aan het gesilyleerde zetmeel werd in THF bij 50°C uitgevoerd met Al(OiPr)3 als katalysator. De silylerings reactie werd bij 70°C uitgevoerd met hexamethyl disilazane (HMDS) in DMSO/tolueen mengsels. Om inzicht in het potentieel van deze benadering te krijgen is onderzoek verricht naar de ROP met een eenvoudig modelsysteem bestaande uit een beschermde mono‐saccharide in plaats van zetmeel.3. De polymerisaties werden tussen 60‐100°C uitgevoerd en leverde vaste producten in geïsoleerde opbrengsten tussen de 30 en 96%. waarin hogere temperaturen (100°C) tot lagere opbrengsten leiden. De resultaten voor het modelsysteem waar de ROP van p‐dioxanone wordt geïnitieerd door de hydroxy‐groepen van een beschermde mono‐saccharide (1.4‐di‐O‐isopropylidene‐α‐D‐galactopyranose) met Al(OiPr)3 als katalysator worden in Hoofdstuk 2 beschreven.72 en was afhankelijk van de ε‐caprolacton/zetmeel verhouding. De substitutiegraad van de SiMe3 groepen varieerde van laag tot middelhoog (degree of substitution.Samenvatting zou in theorie moeten leiden tot een hogere grafting efficiency. De effecten van procesvariabelen (tijd. De gevolgde procedure bestaat uit drie stappen: hydrofobisering van het zetmeel door de introductie van SiMe3 groepen. 138 .21‐0.68). De DS van de PCL ketens lag tussen de 0. Er werden ook aanzienlijke hoeveelheden homopolymeer van ε‐ caprolacton met isopropyl eindgroepen gevormd. temperatuur en monomeer: monosaccharide verhouding) op de gemiddelde polymerisatie graad zijn gekwantificeerd met een statistisch model.4‐di‐O‐isopropylidene‐α‐D‐galactopyranose (bij constante i Al(O Pr)3 concentratie). De gemiddelde molecuul massa van de producten lag tussen de 970 en 6200 (7 ‐ 58 monomeereenheden) en was een functie van de verhouding p‐ dioxanone/1.3.
Het gebruik van methyl en glyceryl esters resulteert in producten met een lage substitutiegraad. zelfs in aanwezigheid van plastificeermiddelen. naar de synthese van lange vetzuur esters uit maïszetmeel (zetmeel laureaat en zetmeel stearaat. 0. vermoedelijk als gevolg van een verlaging van de polariteit van het reactiemengsel. K2CO3 en Na‐acetaat vertonen superieure activiteiten vergeleken met Na2HPO4. Met deze katalysatoren worden voor zowel de laureaat als stearaat esters producten met een DS van boven de 2. De zetmeel esters werden bereid door het zetmeel met vinyl laureaat of vinyl stearaat in aanwezigheid van basische katalysatoren (Na2HPO4. wordt een alternatieve methode voor de synthese van zetmeel esters met lange vetzuren beschreven.96. In Hoofdstuk 4‐5. inclusief statistische modellering. De temperatuur en de katalysator concentratie beïnvloeden de DS ook maar in mindere mate. Echter. De thermische en mechanische eigenschappen van sommige representatieve producten zijn uitgebreid bepaald. Samenvatting De esterificatie van zetmeel met carbonzuur derivaten is één van de oudste strategieën voor het verbeteren van zetmeeleigenschappen.3‐1. K2CO3. katalysator concentratie en katalysator basiciteit) op de DS zijn gekwantificeerd met een statistisch model (R2 ≥ 0. De effecten van belangrijke procesvariabelen (vinyl ester/zetmeel molverhouding. Bij lage vinyl‐ester/zetmeel verhoudingen leidde een verhoging van de vinyl‐ester concentratie in eerste instantie tot hogere DS waarden. en in het bijzonder azijnzuur derivaten (C2).5 voor zetmeel laureaat. In Hoofdstuk 5. 13C‐NMR en FT‐IR gekarakteriseerd. bij verdere verhoging van de verhouding verminderde de DS. reactietemperatuur. en Na‐acetaat) te laten reageren. terwijl het gebruik van de K2CO3 en Na‐acetaat katalysatoren 139 . Het gebruik van hogere (vet‐) zuren resulteerde in producten met beduidend betere mechanische eigenschappen en hydrofobiciteit. De producten werden met 1H‐.96 en P‐ waarde van ≤ 10‐7). de vinyl‐ ester/zetmeel verhouding en het type katalysator. Echter de producten zijn nog steeds zeer bros. Hoofdstuk 4 beschrijft de resultaten van een voorstudie naar de synthese van lange vetzuur esters uit maïszetmeel (zetmeel laureaat en zetmeel stearaat) met de vinyl esters van de vetzuren al reagens.4 verkregen. De zetmeel esters werden bereid door zetmeel met vinyl laureaat of vinyl stearate in DMSO in de aanwezigheid van basische katalysatoren (Na2HPO4. De DS van de producten is een sterke functie van de basiciteit van de katalysator.24 tot 2. De substitutiegraad varieert van 0. De acetaat esters zijn in het algemeen minder hydrofiel dan zetmeel. De DS van de producten was een duidelijke functie van de keten lengte van de vetzure vinylester. Het gebruik van Na2HPO4 resulteerde in producten met een laag tot middelhoge DS (0. De synthese van deze esters wordt in het algemeen uitgevoerd met vetzuurchloriden die vrij duur en sterk corrosief zijn.07‐1.5 voor zetmeel stearaat). K2CO3 en Na‐acetaat) in DMSO bij 110°C te laten reageren. In de meeste zetmeel esterificatie studies wordt gebruikt gemaakt van kleine carbonzuren (C1‐C4). wordt een systematische studie.
en een elasticiteit modulus van 46‐113 MPa. 1. De FD waarden voor PCL‐g‐DEM waren aanzienlijk lager (tot 7%).0 voor zetmeel stearaat). Mechanische tests tonen aan dat de producten een treksterkte hebben variërend van 2. 140 . PCL‐g‐glycidyl methacrylaat (PCL‐GMA) en PCL‐g‐diethyl maleaat (PCL‐g‐DEM). De producten met een hoge DS (2. gebruikt.7‐3. De synthese van deze verbindingen wordt uitgebreid beschreven.39) zijn volledig amorf terwijl de producten met een DS van 1. wederzijdse oplosbaarheid van het monomeer in het gesmolten polymeer) op de functionalisatie graad (FD) van de GMA en DEM eenheden aan de PCL keten adequaat gekwantificeerd kunnen worden.45‐1. Dit leidt tot verschillen in mechanische eigenschappen tussen gecompatibiliseerde mengsels en van de niet‐ gecompatibiliseerde mengsels van zetmeel en PCL. De thermische stabiliteit van de geësterificeerde producten is hoger dan die van zetmeel.26‐2.Samenvatting resulteerde in producten met een middelhoog tot hoge DS waarden (2. Het laatste hoofdstuk van dit proefschrift (Hoofdstuk 6) behandelt de menging van zetmeel en biologisch afbreekbare polymeren met reactieve compatibilisers. De PCL gebaseerde compatibilisers werden bereid door reactie van laag moleculair PCL (Mw 3000) met glycidyl methacrylaat of diethyl maleaat in de aanwezigheid van een benzyolperoxide initiator bij 130°C. Er is een statistisch model (R2 =0. een uitrekking tot breuk van 3‐26%.75 nog gedeeltelijk kristallijn zijn. Als reactieve compatibilisers zijn twee polycaprolactone derivaten. Beide reactieve compatibilisers verbeteren de interactie tussen de zetmeeldeeltjes en de PCL matrix. De hoogste FD waarden (tot 45%) werden gevonden voor PCL‐g‐GMA bij relatief hoge GMA en BPO concentraties.5 MPa. Zo is bijvoorbeeld de elastische modulus van de gecompatibiliseerde mengsels beduidend hoger (tot 430 MPa) dan die van niet‐gecompatibiliseerde mengsels (320‐340 MPa).1‐2.9 voor zetmeel laureaat.957 en P‐ waarde van ≤ 10‐9) ontwikkeld waarmee de effecten van procesvariabelen (monomeer en initiator concentratie.4‐3.
A. and for always encouraging me to finish this thesis. and Prof. Broekhuis. Erik Heeres.J. I want to thank Francesco Picchioni for being always there when I needed him to discuss anything. and Laurens Bosgra for being always helpful with technical issues and Jan Henk Marsman for the help with analytical equipment. Thank you Erik. for the inspiring ideas during the discussions. and for helping me arranging many things when I was not able to do it from Indonesia. for her hospitality and solving administrative matters. who was my first daily supervisor for about two months. Francesco Picchioni. the raw material for fossil derived plastics. Leon Janssen. for your consistent support. Mosiscki. People from other groups have also been very kind and supportive to my research. A. I want to thank my three promoters. Prof. since the mechanical properties as well as hydrophobicity of this starting material is relatively poor. I also want to give my deep appreciation to my reading committee. Minnaard. Prof. Prof. which improved the quality of this thesis. for valuable discussions during my early PhD period and for handing me over to the right hands. not in the last place because of the problems related with conventional plastics. I want to thank the persons of Building 18 in Nijenborgh 4 for making me feel at home in Groningen and for their help during my research. Erwin Wilbers. He has also been a good friend and always supported me during the hard times. I found out that developing a better fully‐biodegradable‐material from starch is not an easy job. for upgrading my writing quality. These include the current high oil prices. I want to thank Marya van der Duin‐de Jonge. Marcel de Vries. I also want to thank Ineke Ganzeveld. Although it is indeed a very interesting topic. Anno Wagenaar and Wim Kruizinga taught me how to operate the NMR machines and to interpret the spectra. Gert Alberda van Ekenstein and Harry Nijland helped me a lot with mechanical and thermal property measurements. Thank you very much for spending your valuable time reading my thesis and for the constructive comments and corrections you have made. L. This thesis is a summary of my research on developing novel biodegradable polymers from starch. Anne Appeldoorn. Anno was also always there when . for his efforts to make every foreign students feel at home in Groningen. as well as taking the SEM pictures. A. together with difficulties in managing plastic waste. First of all. I want to thank Erik Heeres for being more than a good supervisor. Prof. especially on his opinions about the statistical modelling and mechanical properties. I want to thank Leon Janssen for his hospitality. and Prof.Acknowledgements The synthesis of biodegradable materials is currently receiving a lot of attention.
and many others for the good old times! Thank you Tante Ietje. You all have always been my inspiration and motivation. Marcel Wiegman. Bima and Wisnu (also my paranymph). Many master and PhD students. Farchad H. Tante Caroline. Agnes R. R. and passion. Gerard Kraai. M. Francesca Fallani. in the lab. our memories will never fade away. mas Pandu. Abdul Osman. Francesca Gambardella. 142 . bu Ida Susanti. Ais Jenie. My special thanks are for Laura Junistia and Jan‐Pieter Drijfhout. Niels van Vegten. Vincent Nieborg and Fesia Lestari. Zhang Youchun. spring and autumn in Groningen. Anneke Toxopeus. and the ISD staff helped me a lot with visum and residence permit arrangements as well as tax papers. Puspita Kencana. Ignacio Melian Cabrera. Taufik. mbak Mia. and Iwan Kustiawan for becoming my family. kak Roga. Ita. Wita Sondari. C. Anna Nizniowska. support. patience. Hofman. Jaap Bosma. and for my wife and family. Mahfud. Yao Jie. August Kurniawan. Thyara. and helpful. Yongki. Boelo Schuur. Albert Kieviet helped me with the MALDI‐TOF measurements. Thank you God. Ronny Sutarto. Arjan Kloekhorst. Patrick and Oppie. Thank you AW. Kuslan. for never leaving me alone. for your never‐ending blessings. Teguh. and Tante Alma for being like my parents and family in Groningen. Tante Oppie. master students who worked with me. The chemical and glassware magazijn as well as the FWN library personnel were always patient. Asal Hamarneh. Wahyudin. Groningen is also a place where I found true friendship. Dado. Samuel. Judy Retti Witono. Erna Subroto. for your love. Thank you Tresna. Diana Santangelo. Teddy. Taufik. and although we seldom met afterwards. Nidal Hammoud Hassan. visiting researchers. mbak Ika. Rasrendra.B. Thank you my parents and sister. Wangsa. pak Harry. Wuri Raspati. Tante Smith. A lot of thanks for Henk Stegeman and Poppy Sutanto. I have met a lot of Indonesian students in Groningen. in the office. and assistant professors have shared the days with me in Groningen. Jasper Huijsman. Sari Fabianti. Iwan Harsono. Egi. for everything. Endy. Louis Daniel. Hans Heeres. I want to thank Edwin A. Henky Muljana (my paranymph) and Anindhita Widyadhana. Buana Girisuta and Rina Karina. Tiara. and Mahesa for being my brothers and sisters in Groningen. and on many occassions. Chalid. Mita. Thanks also for Marcel and Connie. Ardiyanti. and Henk van de Bovenkamp for cheering my days and being my friends during summer and winter. kak Atha. friendly. Tenny. Jelle Wildschut. Our collaboration has also become part of this thesis.Acknowledgements I had questions or needed specific equipments. Annette Korringa. Nadia Gozali. Togi. Diana Jirjis. Oscar Rojas.
F. J. A. Broekhuis.K.J.J. Sugih. L. A.P. H. 9th National Conference organized by the Society for Polymer Science. Picchioni. and F. H. A.10. Drijfhout. Heeres. Bratislava (Slovak Republic). and H. Sugih. Manurung. 2008 (submitted to Carbohydr. Drijfhout. A. H.K.K.).eurpolymj. Heeres.P. Picchioni. Heeres. Heeres: Synthesis and properties of novel green biopolymers derived from starch and fatty acids. Picchioni: Functionalization and blending of polycaprolactone. DOI: 10. A. Mumbai (India).J.P. F. Picchioni. H.P.J. Eur. Polym. A. 5. A. F.K. 2008 (accepted for publication in Starch‐ Starke). 2008 (accepted for publication in Starch‐Starke).List of Publications 1. Junistia. Heeres: Synthesis of higher fatty acid starch esters using vinyl laurate and stearate as reactants. . Appl.J. J. Junistia.Drijfhout. South China University of Technology. L. 8. Sugih. Guangzhou (China). presented in the 1st International Symposium on Sustainable Chemical Product and Process Engineering. F.2008. 2.Janssen. J. Polym.B. Experimental Studies on the ring opening polymerization of p‐dioxanone using an Al(OiPr)3‐monosaccharide initiator system.Picchioni. 17‐20 December 2006 (oral presentation). Janssen. Manurung.K.J. Heeres. Experimental and modeling studies on the synthesis and properties of higher fatty esters of corn starch. Janssen. A. 3. India. 2008.M Janssen and H. starch‐based innovative product: The synthesis of grafted polycaprolactone‐starch by ring opening polymerisation. Pune Chapter. A. L. L. L. Sugih.M. and F.M. Synthesis of poly‐ (ε)‐caprolactone grafted starch co‐polymers by ring‐opening polymerisation using silylated starch precursors.K. 2008 (submitted to J. Heeres: Green.010). presented in International Workshop: “From Polymer Modification to Multicomponent Polymer Systems”. L. (in press. Picchioni. Broekhuis. Picchioni: Biodegradable polymer materials based on polyesters and starch/proteins.A. R.B.A. 26‐28 November 2006 (oral presentation).P. Synthesis and properties of reactive interfacial agents for polycaprolactone‐starch blends. L.) 6.J. 4. Junistia. F. Sugih. H. Polym. Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia).B.M. presented in “Polymers for Advanced Technologies”.K.J. Sugih. 27‐30 August 2006 (oral presentation) 7.P. F.K. H. Sci. A. Heeres. F.Heeres. Sugih. L. Junistia.K. J. 9. R. Sugih. 25‐28 September 2007 (oral presentation). A.P. and H.B. Picchioni. Sugih.J.1016/j. presented in 11th Asia Pacific Confederation of Chemical Engineering (APCChE) Congress. Picchioni.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.