Fair Trade Marketing and Its Impacts on Producers and Their Organizations

Master Thesis

Presented to Prof. Dr. Gräbener International Management, MBA University of Business and Environment Nürtingen – Geislingen

By Israel Bekele from Ethiopia (Wollega)
Nütingen, Summer Semester 2010

Table of Contents Abbreviation................................................................................................................ iii Preface ....................................................................................................................... iv 1 Introduction and Historical Development of Fair Trade ....................................... 1 1.1 Historical Background of Fair Trade .............................................................. 1 1.2 Definition and Delimitation of Fair and Free Trade ........................................ 3 1.2.1 Definition of Fair Trade ........................................................................... 3 1.2.2 Definition of Free Trade .......................................................................... 4 1.3 Fair Trade in Comparison with Other Ideologies ........................................... 5 1.3.1 Fair Trade and Anti-globalization ............................................................ 5 1.3.2 Fair Trade and Ethical Sourcing.............................................................. 6 1.4 Developmental Paths of Fair Trade Marketing .............................................. 7 1.5 Problems of Fair Trade Marketing ............................................................... 10 1.5.1 Organization-related Problems ............................................................. 10 1.5.2 Market-related Challenges (and Problems) .......................................... 12 2 Fair Trade Organizations and Corporate Strategy ............................................. 13 2.1 Fair Trade Organizations (FTOs)................................................................. 13 2.1.1 Fair Trade Labeling Organization (FLO) ............................................... 14 2.1.2 International Fair Trade Association (IFAT) .......................................... 16 2.1.3 European Fair Trade Association (EFTA) ............................................. 17 2.1.4 Network of European World Shops and Fair Trade Federation ............ 18 2.2 Fair Trade Standards................................................................................... 18 2.2.1 Certification and Labeling in Fair Trade ................................................ 21 2.2.2 Fair Trade Monitoring System ............................................................... 22 2.3 Fair Trade and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) ............................... 23 3 Global Marketing Orientation of Fair Trade ....................................................... 25 3.1 Globalization and Imperfect Market ............................................................. 26 3.2 Fair Trade Marketing Orientation and Process ............................................ 27 3.2.1 Conventional (Traditional) Marketing .................................................... 28 3.2.2 Non-profit Organization Marketing ........................................................ 29 3.2.3 Fair Trade Marketing............................................................................. 29 3.3 Global Supply Chain and Network of Fair trade .......................................... 30 3.3.1 Producers and Classical (Alternative) Traders ...................................... 31 3.3.2 Producers and Conventional Outlets .................................................... 33 4 Marketing of Fair Trade ..................................................................................... 35 4.1 Objective of Fair Trade Marketing Mix ......................................................... 35 4.2 Marketing Mix of Fair Trade ......................................................................... 36 4.2.1 Product Design ..................................................................................... 37 4.2.2 Pricing Strategy..................................................................................... 39 4.2.3 Distribution Strategy.............................................................................. 40 4.2.4 Promotion Strategy ............................................................................... 41 4.3 Product Mix ................................................................................................. 43 4.4 Developing Brands ...................................................................................... 45 5 Impact of Fair Trade Marketing ......................................................................... 47 5.1 Introduction to Impact Evaluation ................................................................ 47 5.2 Overview of Selected Case Studies ............................................................ 49 5.3 Direct Impact of Fair Trade .......................................................................... 52 5.3.1 Direct Impact on Producers .................................................................. 53 5.3.1.1 Increment in Household Income ..................................................... 53 5.3.1.2 Female Empowerment ................................................................... 55 i

5.3.1.3 Improved Education ....................................................................... 56 5.3.1.4 Preserving indigenous cultures ...................................................... 56 5.3.1.5 Financial and non-financial support for producer organization ....... 57 5.3.1.6 Financial and Non-financial support for co-operatives .................... 57 5.4 Indirect Impact of Fair Trade ....................................................................... 58 5.4.1 Indirect Impact on Producers ................................................................ 59 5.4.2 Indirect Impact on Producer Organizations ........................................... 60 5.5 Impacts of Fair Trade on Non-Participants .................................................. 61 5.6 Emerging Impact Analysis Methods ............................................................ 62 5.6.1 Qualitative Approaches ......................................................................... 63 5.6.1.1 Triple Bottom Line .......................................................................... 63 5.6.1.2 Social Accounting ........................................................................... 63 5.6.1.3 Balanced Scorecard ....................................................................... 64 5.6.2 Quantitative Method: Social Return on Investment ............................... 66 6 Conclusion......................................................................................................... 69 7 References ........................................................................................................ 72 Appendix Table of Figures Figure 1.1: Influences on the development of the UK Fair Trade market ................... 9 Figure 2.1: FLO governance structure ...................................................................... 16 Figure 3.1: Market intermediary model ..................................................................... 26 Figure 3.2: The coffee commodity supply chain ....................................................... 31 Figure 3.3: Classical Fair Trade Supply chain .......................................................... 32 Figure 3.4: Fair Trade labelling systems ................................................................... 34 Figure 4.1: Conventional business price reduction ................................................... 40 Figure 4.2: Cafédirect advertisement ........................................................................ 42 Figure 4.3: World Fair Trade Day ............................................................................. 43 Figure 4.4: Fairtrade Tram in Melbourne, Australia .................................................. 43 Figure 4.5: Coffee branding process ........................................................................ 46 Figure 5.1: Classification of Fair Trade impacts........................................................ 49 Figure 5.3: The Balanced scoredcard for not-for-profits ........................................... 65 Figure 5.4: The Balanced Scorecard for Fair Trade ................................................. 66 Figure 5.5: Impact Value Chain ................................................................................ 68 List of Tables Table 2.1: Major Fair Trade organizations (associations) ............................................... 14 Table 3.1 Fair Trade marketing process ............................................................................ 27 Table 4.1: The Fair Trade marketing mix........................................................................... 37 Table 4.2:Length and Width of Fair Trade Product Mix .................................................. 44 Table 5.1 Overview of case studies.................................................................................... 50 Table 5.2: Case Study organizations in Mexico and Central America .......................... 51 Table 5.3: CooCafé and Co-operatives in Costa Rica..................................................... 52 Table 5.4:Fairtrade Premium spent SPO: total - data 99% complete .......................... 54 Table 5.5: Fairtrade Premium spent HLO: total - data 100% complete ........................ 54 Table 5.6:Number and percentage of male and female members and workers ......... 55 Table 5.7: Number and percentage of male and female members and workers ........ 55

ii

Abbreviation
ATO: Alternative Trade Organization CAPM: Capital Asset Pricing Model CIM: Chartered International Marketer COFTA: Cooperation for Fair Trade in Africa CSR: Corporate Social Responsibility EFTA: European Fair Trade Association FINE: FLO, IFAT, NEWS!, EFTA FLO: Fairtrade Lebelling Organizations International FTF: Fair Trade Federation FTO: Fairtrade Organization IFAT: International Fair Trade Association ISEA: Institute for Social and Ethical Accounting MCC: Mennonite Central Committee NEF: New Economic Foundation NEWS! Network of European Worldshops NFP: Not-For-Profit NGO: Non-Governmental Organization NI: National Initiative SIA: Social impact assessment SROI: Social Return on Investment UNCTAD: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development WFTO: World Fair Trade Organization WTO: World Trade Organization

iii

The research also discusses some of the problems that Fair Trade is confronting with in adapting to mainstream marketing. The marketing mix emphasize on the producers. The fifth chapter focuses on the Fair Trade marketing impacts on the producing nations in global South and their organization. What is the direct and indirect impact Fair Trade has on the producers of Southern nations? How did it affect the non-Fair Trade producers of those nations compared to Fair Trade producers? How can we iv . cooperatives organizations and Fair Trade organizations. various institutions. basically. introduces selected Fair Trade organizations and their functions in Fair Trade system. This thesis focuses mainly on analyzing the marketing and impact of Fair Trade model on producers and their organizations. The introduction of the Fair Trade thus has implications on producers. The first chapter deals with the historical background of Fair Trade movement and analysis the definitional spectrum to distinctively understand the subject matter.Preface Fair Trade is a dynamic social enterprise that emerged over last four decades to tackle the negative impact of globalization namely. which is Fair Trade marketing mix. not-for-profit and Fair Trade marketing processes will be presented. market or trade inequality. The fourth chapter committed the central theme of this thesis. The relevance of FLO standards. Then continue to sketch the various developmental stages of Fair Trade and the problems encountered in various stages. consumers and many other interested groups. How does Fair Trade model related to the corporate social responsibility? The third chapter focuses on the explanation of Fair Trade marketing orientation through its interrelation with social enterprise (social marketing). The second chapter. The orientation is then described in terms of Fair Trade marketing approach and supply chain. In addition. It explains the objectives of Fair Trade marketing and emphasis particularly on the Fair Trade marketing mix contents. Short distinction between conventional. certification and monitoring will be addressed. Their commitment and contribution to the development of Fair Trade marketing (in actively supporting Southern producers and educating Northern consumers) will be outlined. Fair Trade product mix and brand development will be discussed.

v . Therefore. this thesis is purely based on the theoretical analyses of the all information available.measure those impacts on the producers? Final section contains the summary for the points addressed in this thesis and personal reflection on the Fair Trade marketing development. the emerged problems and possible recommendation suggestions.

2002: 5). 2007: 12. in 2008 Fair Trade sales were grown by 22% (FLO.Year of publication is not indicated and Birgit Schößwender is editor. Africa and Latin-American (Schößwender. philanthropic organizations that work with producers (farm workers) and disadvantaged communities of developing nations. 2007: 1). she took some items to Mennonite world conference in Switzerland and sold them there (FTH). 2007: 4). In addition. a short description of the encountered problems will be presented.1 Introduction and Historical Development of Fair Trade Globally. 1. This thesis focuses mainly on analyzing the marketing and impacts of Fair Trade model on producers and their organizations. In 1946 together with her colleagues. It is striving to create awareness among Northern consumers about the inequality in international trade and to combat this problem using market-based strategies and through empowering the Southern producers and workers (Murray and Raynolds. Despite their hard-work most of them live on less than 2 dollar per day (Ibid. 2009c: 2). 1 . she had Palestinian and Haitian handcrafts in her inventory. more than 2 million people are living under the poverty (mostly of Asia. Fair Trade is the fastest growing initiatives. it has benefited numerous smallholder farmers and producers of developing countries. Redfern and Snedker. handicrafts or plantation workers by multinational business companies along the supply chain and the imbalance market-power between the trade partners in international market place. Although Fair Trade accounts for about 0. Based on this development. One of the main problems is the exploitation of small farmers. Edna Ruth Byler. the financial crisis that struck the world economy. started selling handcrafts from Puerto Rican out of her Pennsylvania home (Jaffee. This chapter particularly focuses on the historical aspect of the Fair Trade movement and the developmental phases.). 11)1. Notwithstanding. Among the recently emerged ethical trading.01% of total trade (Becchetti and Huybrechts. Fair Trade is a movement initiated by Northern activists.1 Historical Background of Fair Trade Fair Trade movement began in the 1940 in North America when the first Fair Trader. In 1950‟s the movement has attracted Alternative Trade Organizations (ATOs) such as Ten Thousand Villages and SERRV International 1 “Der Faire Handel in Deutschland”.

2008: 20. Soon the Max Havelaar initiative for Fair Trade became prevalent in several European countries‟ and North American markets under different name. and different name in other countries (Nicholls and Opal. In 1988 the “Max Havelaar Foundation” created the Max Havelaar label to identify a fairly traded coffee (Krier. In the 1960‟s and 1970‟s. Austria. to verify that producer groups are in compliance with FLO‟s standards (Krier. One of the leading mottos associated with the Fair Trade movement and revealed the essence of Fair Trade in pointing out the defects of international trade. Transfair (in Germany. Following the development and acceptance the Fair Trade across many countries.Cert. 2007: 42). FLO-Cert is responsible for the certification process and annual monitoring inspections of each producer group. 2 . In the 1960‟s. 2007: 29). recognizing the need to assist disadvantaged producers by cutting out the middlemen in the marketplace. Canada and Japan). 2008: 20). Luxemburg. in 1988 an independent organization by name Fairtrade Labelling Organization (FLO) was established in Bonn. FLO serves as an umbrella organization to create a common ground for various initiative schemes proposed by FLO organizations in different countries. and individual groups got involved in this alternative trade concept. Italy. and Oxfam UK in Europe (Nicholls and Opal. For instance. FLO members consist of four groups: traders.S.were selling handicrafts in the U. Denmark. additional ATOs. FLO. p. “Fairtrade Mark” (in the UK and Ireland). Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). Norway and France). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) adapted the “Trade Not Aid” motto that was addressed in the conference (Fridell. 2007. Switzerland. Besides. also referred to as Labeling Initiatives. similar logo was referred as “Max Havelaar” (in Belgium. 2008: 11). producers.30 cited by Nicholls and Opal. 2007). c. it coordinates and harmonizes Fair Trade general standards for certification and facilitates methods of inspection after certification. These organizations started trading these products to ethically-conscious consumers and to secure fair prices to the producers. In 2004 FLO created an independent entity. Germany. experts and National Initiatives (NIs). the United States.f Jaffee.

and credit resources. Wynne outlines Fair Trade as “an alternative trade model developed to help disadvantaged producers in developing countries by improving their quality of life through trading partnerships. philanthropic organization activists and various scholars differently.2. environmental care and social polices in supply chains of certified goods” (2008: 19). to groups of citizens in developing nations” (2007: 2). equality for all. These partnerships address trade inequities in the global marketplace” (2008: 1). The trade inequities mentioned here does not only indicate lack of access to markets and market information. market or trade is emphasized as a medium for social and environmental improvement. democratically organized workplaces. Ruben explains Fair Trade as “an organized social movement which promotes standards for production practices and delivery procedures. technical assistance.1. trust and environmental protection” (COFTA). but also to the technology. Center for Fair and Alternative Trade (CFAT) is an internationally recognized research facility dedicated to the rapidly growing field of market-based social change and environmental protection. CFAT defines Fair Trade as “…market-based approaches to alleviating 3 .1 Definition of Fair Trade Fair Trade has been defined by different interest groups: political initiative groups. Nevertheless. social programming. In a closely related manner Hiscox describes Fair Trade as a movement organized in “a form of social entrepreneurship aimed at creating trade relationships that bring specific improvements in labor and environmental standards. transparency. working conditions and labor remuneration. and health and education. knowledge of best business and environmental practices. a network of Fair Trade producer organizations in Africa defines Fair Trade as “a sustainable system that endeavors to empower disadvantaged producers through payment of a fair price. The Cooperation for Fair Trade in Africa (COFTA). Here. in order to capture the relevant notions that explain the concept of the Fair trade. it is important to consider the various definitions of Fair Trade and contemplate on the common facets prevalent in most of the explanations.2 Definition and Delimitation of Fair and Free Trade 1.

alleviating poverty and creating market-based socioeconomic improvement and environmental sustainability in developing nations. improving working conditions. This term is widely applied in a network organization. FLO-Cert and its labeling initiatives (Krier. Neoliberal politicians use the concept of Fair Trade as an alternative term for free trade in order to give more emphasis to their argument for abolishing trade barriers. the central (most relevant) notions outlined are avoiding trade inequality among trading partners. Regardless of the origins of definitions given. Fair Trade is a broader concept that involves all kinds of activities which can be subsumed under Fair Trade standards (principles) issued by all Fair Trade Organizations. and securing the rights of. defines Fair Trade as a “trading partnership. and the European Fair Trade Association (EFTA)]. the International Federation for Alternative Trade (IFAT). It contributes to sustainable development by offering better trading conditions to. 2007: 26. Fair Trade definition can be found on their websites.poverty and promoting environmental sustainability through innovative business models spanning production.2. 4 . The classical free trade concept is based on Adam Smith‟s and David Ricardo‟s 2 FINE is formed through the informal co-operation between Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International (FLO). transparency and respect that seek greater equity in international trade. the term Fair Trade and Fairtrade are sometimes used in different contexts and demands short distinctive explanations. distribution. FLO. 2007a: 35). especially FINE as indicated in the above definition. Furthermore. as agreed by FINE2. is sometimes used within different context than it is usually intended to be. 2002: 11). 1. based on dialogue. for instance. In this paper the term Fair Trade is the one mostly used and thus. marginalized producers and workers in the South” (Krier. Fairtrade refers solely to activities such as standards setting.2 Definition of Free Trade The term Fair Trade. Redfern and Snedker. and consumption” (CFAT). as already mentioned. The internationally and widely recognized definition of Fair Trade. even though the latter gives less relevance to the social justice and environmental sustainability (Murray and Raynolds. Fairtrade is only used in connection with some FLO activities and as a result of quotation from old literatures. 2007: 23. certification systems and labeling scheme and products promoted under such activities which are mainly developed by FLO. 2007: 4). Network of European World Shops (NEWS). EFTA.

This free trade ideology is propagated by the World Trade Organization (WTO) and has encountered opposition from developing countries. They disregard the international trading regime and the supporting organizations. “countries export what they relatively good at producing and they import what they cannot produce sufficiently” (Nicholls and Opal.).theories of comparative advantage. there are also ideologies that they do not share. Based on the free trade approaches Germany and Ethiopia are better off and thus. While there are some common drives that unite both. Fair Trade. 2008: 17) International economics). services and finance between nations as effective business model (Ibid. For instance.1 Fair Trade and Anti-globalization Fair Trade and anti-globalization are both dynamic movement instigated by different interest groups. free trade has been there for long time and the benefited nations are handful and certainly failed to function for the majority. from its side. Opening up countries to international trade allows Germany machinery producers to import coffee from Ethiopia and Ethiopian coffee producers to import machinery from Germany. However. gender equality and environmental protection. Both fair traders and anti-globalists groups are characterized as idealist and utopians. attempts to achieve economic development using North-South trade relationship than the classical development aid. 1. Despite the fact that free trade does not benefit all the trading partners proportionally. According to Witkowski‟s (2005: 25) both ideologies show great concern for the disadvantaged producers. 2005: 25). WTO had encountered oppositions in different cities led by both of these movements (Jaffee.). Unlike anti5 . one can disclose that international trade creates a win-win situation for both parties (Ibid.3. different political movements or groups around the globe including Fair Trade activist groups. the advocators support the movement of goods.3 Fair Trade in Comparison with Other Ideologies 1. Witkowski. Germany manufactures machinery products and Ethiopia grows high-quality coffee. For instance. 2007: 21. Witkowski continued to differentiate the different approaches underlying both movements.

globalization approaches. 2004: 16. Furthermore.2 Fair Trade and Ethical Sourcing Fair Trade and ethical sourcing are related ideologies that are focused on improving the lives of the weaker partners (primary producers or workers) along the supply chain in international market (Redfern and Snedker. However. they had developed ethical codes of conduct which. Fair Trade uses various elements of marketing such as branding and marketing mix (see chapter 4. unfair wages and working conditions. 2002: 13). In order to accomplish that Fair Trade groups support producers. Similarly. on the ground that large corporations‟ minimal commitments to Fair Trade might be used as a cover to continue exploiting and marginalizing the poor producers in south (Witkowski. 2002: 13). 2005: 27). discrimination.3. transparency and mutual respect (according to the above definition).).1) and consumer education programs. ethical sourcing (or trading) shows the commitment of transnational companies (from one end of supply chain) to take the responsibility for the social and environmental performance at the side of primary producers (Blowfield.2. 2007: 10). For that matter. Both fields are following implicit principles which are complementary and distinctive in their application. child labor.2) and builds product value through certification (see chapter 2. antiglobalization criticizes Fair Trade for partnering with large corporations. 2002: 12). 2005: 24. Fair Trade creates a trading partnership between marginalized producers in developing countries and consumers in developed nations which are based on dialogue. workers abuse in any form and many more (Redfern and Snedker. states against forced labor. Hiscox. Fair Trade has developed similar principles and working to improve the social and environmental settings of producers. 1. the dissimilarity of Fair Trade and ethical trading principles could be explained by the business drives innate to both (Redfern and Snedker. cf. Fair Trade partnering with large corporations to support the growth of Fair Trade market beyond the alternative or ethical market niche and to use the profit accrues from this operation for social and development purposes (Ibid. Most of these companies are brand owner and concerned about their brand image. 6 . In contrast. create awareness and campaign for changes in the rules of conventional market (Redfern and Snedker. Witkowski. 2002: 14). permanent employment. for example.

The first Fair Trade was developed by charitable Christian organizations which were not based on some commercial principles. 2008: 20) using business concepts (for example. ethical sourcing charges low prices and the return to the producers is not significant and therefore criticized as still exploitive (Witkowski. During this time. sells in catalogues and world shops) to emphasizing on the social and environmental issues linked to producing communities. 2008: 19-20) and created the so-called “goodwill trade” initiated by NGOs (Tallontire. 2008: 5) which led to the creation of alternative trade model. yet it has relevance in development of Fair Trade business model. Although. 1. The essence of these distinctive approaches is not to highlight the historical context of the movement. it was not commercialized at this level. Nicholls and Opal.Especially. 7 . 2000: 167). While Fair Trade is charging higher price which in turn accrued to producers‟ income. These organizations.4 Developmental Paths of Fair Trade Marketing The growth of Fair trade marketing could be described in four different and consecutive streams of business approaches. They set up a programme namely SelfHelp Crafts (Redfern and Snedker. 2002: 5. it helps to track the business implication and influence on the advancement of Fair Trade marketing and the consequential impact on the producers and producer-owned organizations. ATOs preventing the middlemen from supply chain started working as “social entrepreneurs” (Nicholls and Opal. the Alternative trading organizations (ATOs) such as Traidcraft in Britain and Gepa in Germany were not only supplying products from developing countries to Northern consumers. 2005: 27). The second approach was based on the good-will trading relationships and developed to “solidarity trade” (Low and Davenport. Moreover. both are working to improve income and livelihoods of the workers and producers. but to outline the Fair Trade model growth to business. but the strategies applied are different. product quality and consumer-centered marketing approach were at a far distant. but also begun to search for new producers. particularly. At this stage. Oxfam in Western Europe and Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) in the USA imported handicrafts made in Eastern Europe and Latin America respectively.

Soon after. one could state that the incidence of labeling mark of Fair Trade gave guarantee to the consumers about the product quality.The third approach could aptly be characterized as a development of mutuality in trading relationship. 2000: 167). such as Costa Coffee. This new approach of ATOs involved sympathetic retail businesses and promoted Fair Trade products to large conventional supermarkets. led ATOs to develop brands such as Cafédirect and Divine Chocolate (Nicholls and Opal. 168). ATOs moved from selling commodity ingredients to composite products (Redfern and Snedker. This success has encouraged market entry of conventional outlets. ATOs struggled and some even went bankruptcy. marking increased commercial awareness” (Ibid. Currently. 2008: 20). 2008: 20). academic. Sara Lee and many more (Ibid. This process led to the distinction of Fair Trade products from conventional commodities. but rather were interdependent on one another toward creating an understanding of the value of Fair Trade in the North. In line with. Nicholls and Opal describe some of the driving factors which influenced the growth under four main headings: “political. which means. Starbucks. Fair Trade products are traded everywhere on the globe and in recent years the markets for Fair Trade products has been increasing and diversified internationally. 8 .). This in turn. and product quality all became important concerns of ATOs. growing out of important cultural and informational changes in developed countries (Ibid. product development. higher prices in return for the quality products (Tallontire. cultural and informational” (2008: 20). Then developing “consumer marketing. Sainsbury‟s. Due to the quality problems and consumer ignorance. 2002: 8) and solidified their growth in the mainstream markets (Nicholls and Opal. Perhaps the most significant influence has been the emergence of ethical consumerism and the mass-market associated with it. None of these mentioned influences worked independently. The fourth business phase could be described as the development of Fair Trade certification process and labeling of the products.).

Cultural and informational influence 9 .Figure 1. The concern of trade inequality between the developed nations and developing nations has driven many political initiative groups. in UK several academic institutions are developing business ethics courses and modules that incorporate ethical consumerism and influence the corporate behavior (Nicholls and Opal. 2008: 22). This indicates the shift of values toward relevance of development issues (Nicholls and Opal 2008). 2007: xii) by producers and consumers groups is shifting the route to the alleviation of poverty in the developing countries. Academic influence The academic context of the Fair Trade is intensively developing in recent years. For instance. 2008: 22) by development workers and the demand for “fair trade.1: Influences on the development of the UK Fair Trade market Source: Nicholls and Opal. Some countries are supporting Ethical Trading Initiative and creating public awareness of ethical trading and initiating retailers to promote Fair Trade products. and the social and environmental issues connected to the movement. philanthropic organizations and national and international campaigners to improve the political context of international trade. not free trade” (Jaffee. Many scholars are attracted toward the debate of the ethical trading. (2008: 20) Political impact The political framework of the alternative trade has significantly changed in the Northern nations in the last ten years. The increasing cry for “trade not aid” (Nicholls and Opal. in particular. in general.

unethical corporate behavior has encouraged ethically sensitive consumers to focus on the production and supply chain and not only on the value the product and service package can generate (ibid. The majority of the farmers and producers organization can not comply with the standards due to technical. Due to this consumers demand for the ethical products. namely mainstreaming of the Fair Trade products.1 Organization-related Problems Driven the by the desire for market development. coinciding with the increasing awareness of consumerism.In different countries the numbers of consumers which identify themselves as ethical consumers are increasing. Fair Trade organizations are putting pressure on the producer organizations by setting high-quality standards. 2008: 230-231). building Fair Trade brands and the prevalent problems connected to these marketing approaches. The cultural shift has been considerably caused by the accessible information about global social and environmental issues. 24). 10 . the significance of niche market has increased and led to diversified range of products to meet the consumers‟ demand. The strategic development of Fair Trade marketing in the developed countries can be seen as three distinctive stages: grassroots. The media engagement with broad subjects and growth of internet in publishing and dispersing information on. Of course. financial and organizational problems. 1.5 Problems of Fair Trade Marketing The central problem related to fair trade is the growing marketing strategies. 1. These problems could be further categorized as organizational and marketing concept-oriented (or underpinning) problems and challenges. Thus.5. there is a discrepancy between what most of the consumers claim to be and their real behavior. 23). the problems and challenges intended to be addressed in this paper is associated to each individual development stage of the market of Fair trade. new Institutions and mainstreaming (Nicholls and Opal. such as Fair Trade or organic products. This is made possible because of the improved information flow concerning the supply chain of Fair Trade business model. The consumers‟ culture has shifted from price and value-driven imperatives towards the values that communicate the brands relevance in terms of moral or ethical consumerism (Ibid.

Whereas the market actors are the group of individuals recruited by FLO-I run the increasingly complex and technical certification and monitoring schemes (Ibid. 231). The market-driven actors. all the national labeling organizations and certification groups are consolidated into this macro-level organization. on the one hand. FLO International. Many Fair Trade activists perceived the problem at this stage as information problem.). The main driver for these organizations‟ arrival is the range of national labeling and certification initiatives that begun to appear in different countries. compared to that of conventional marketing target groups.1. this FLO-I and others are encountering various challenges from the Grassroots activists of Fair Trade. typically feel that the move to mainstream contains the risk of deviating from the original values and purpose of fair trade (Ibid. The move to the mainstream marketing brought polarized tension between the movement and market actors. in order to avoid the inconsistence in the application of Fair Trade mark and misunderstanding of the underlying concept (Ibid. The movement actors are the so-called Grassroots activists as described above.) have launched Fair Trade involvement with more conventional marketing. believe that the move to mainstream has highly contributed to the growth of Fair Trade market beyond the core consumer segment or so-called ethical consumers. These organizations could only reach ethical consumers. In fact. for instance. ATOs and NGOs played significant role in raising awareness toward trade injustice and contributed to a lot in educating the ethical consumers. New Institution. Nicholls and Opal (2008) describes as a demand-driven rather 11 .At a Grassroots level. The macro-level organizations and other strategic groups (chapter 2.). on the other hand. As a result. Contrary to the previous stage. Fair Trade products were sold by few alternative trade organizations (ATOs) like Oxfam und world shops. Consequently. which confused ethical consumers and debilitated their reliance on the Fair Trade marks and the message communicated with it. Nicholls and Opal (2008: 230) describe it as a process-focused and supply-driven rather than consumer demand-driven marketing. can be described as the emergence of international Fair Trade organizations. a very small fraction of consumers. Fair Trade Labeling Organizations International (FLO). The second stage. The movement actors.

Nicholls and Opal criticize that the development of Fair Trade brands has largely been decentralized and creating a problem for strategic marketing promotion. the collaboration of Fair Trade with other transnational companies (with negative image) and co-branding of product cause them to lose ethical consumers.than supply-driven approach. this brand is trying to develop another brand within Fair Trade products. which is mainstreaming. Currently.2 Market-related Challenges (and Problems) The third stage. In addition to that. Fair Trade was offered as a brand to the market. 2008: 231).5. it is focusing on Northern consumers demand rather than the Southern producer organizations offer. has its base on the previous stage. This is followed by Fair Trade cooperation with the large-scale business and the development of a broad range supermarket own-level products and the idea of co-branding products (for example. though it has later developed a brand through certification mark. In other words. The engagement of Fair Trade with the mainstream markets has grown in many Northern markets. 12 . The shift of Fair Trade from supply-oriented to demand-oriented marketing is signaling that Fair Trade is deviating from its original objectives. as in the case of Traidcraft and the Co-operative Group) can lead to numerous problems (Nicholls and Opal. 1. Initially.

in order to realize the core objectives of this movements. functions and contributions are closely considered. therefore. These organizations are involved in certification process. 13 . In the following sections some of these organization structures. Network of European World Shops (NEWS). this section demonstrates the influences that these organizations have toward achieving social and marketing objectives of Fair Trade. That means. Addressing the objectives.2 Fair Trade Organizations and Corporate Strategy The major contention underlying this chapter is the presentation of the organizations and their operational position within the Fair Trade system. European Fair Trade Association (EFTA) and Fair Trade Foundation (FTF). independent and non-profit organizations. functions and operational strategies of these organizations are. monitoring and promoting the operation of Fair Trade producer organizations. traders and other similar partners. More precisely.1 Fair Trade Organizations (FTOs) The rapid growth of the Fair Trade movement contributed to the establishment of the national and international. until EFTA changed its name to World Fair Trade Organization (WTO). International Fair Trade Association (IFTA). Some of the major organizations are namely Fair Trade Labeling Organization International (FLO). 2. advocating for Fair Trade to the global community. the relationship they have to producers and the strategies employed to expand the market for Fair Trade products and to create awareness among consumers. Most of Fair Trade product producers‟ and traders‟ organizations are members of one of these national or international organizations. The first four are used to be known as FINE collectively. very relevant as they are bridging the gap between the producers and the consumers and furthermore.

many other National Initiatives (NIs) were created in different countries across Europe. an independent company to provide support in certification and monitoring process of producers and traders (for example. note that the figures indicated on this table might show discrepancy if compared to other publications due to the gap in time. 2007: 2). Latin A. The primary objective of this umbrella organization was to develop a widespread and consistent standards and the certification process. America. America North organizations International (FLO) International Trade (IFAT) Fair Association Africa. North Asia. 14 . 3 Please. manufacturers) (Hiscox. These NIs and other Fair Trade actors agreed to create an umbrella organization called Fair Trade Organizations International. 3 of Major regions of operations members of members Europe. Raynolds and Long.1.1 Fair Trade Labeling Organization (FLO) After launching Max Havelaar coffee in 1988. Federation (FTF) Source: Adapted from Krier (2007: 24). The latter task was later delegated to FLO-Cert.Table 2. FLO-I (Redfern and Snedker. America Network European of World 1994 National world shops 2.1: Major Fair Trade organizations (associations) Associations1 Established Types of Number members /member countries Fairtrade Labelling 1997 National labeling 19 in 21 countries 1989 Alternative trading 280 members in 62 countries Europe.500 members in 13 countries 11 in 9 countries members Europe Shops (NEWS!) European Fair Trade Association (EFTA) 1987 Alternative trading Europe Fair Trade 1994 Alternative trading 300 members in 14 countries North Asia America. (2007: 16) 2. 2002: 18). exporters. importers.

Cf. These standards facilitate a set of criteria that was determined to monitor the organizations‟ compliance with minimum standards of FLO and that control their improvements perpetually. 15 . higher prices and the Fair Trade investment premium. the producer organization is guaranteed the resulting benefit of Fair Trade market sales. FLO issues license to individual Fair Trade companies and traditional market players to use Fair Trade mark. including democratic organization. FLO has also the right to de-certify those individual producers or organizations that deviate from maintaining the defined standards. 2008: 10): (1) guaranteeing the integrity of the Fair Trade mark and certification process. they permit the system to function harmoniously and consistently in many different countries and markets. financial transparency. After proving the outlined requirements. This function of FLO is central in substantiating the process of perpetual improvement. adequate working conditions and progress in social and community development goals” (2008: 8). the FLO strategic objective was broadened and covers the following aspects (Nicholls and Opal. and (3) offering producer support and consultancy to improve their business strategy. According to Nicholls and Opal understanding “FLO inspects producer groups to certify them for compliance with the Fair Trade standards. (2) facilitating the business of Fair Trade by helping to match supply and demand. that is.Establishing standards are fundamental to the Fair Trade certification system and labeling process. Besides. 2008: 8. Meanwhile. By doing this. It is the duty and responsibility of FLO to monitor compliance and issue audit reports to the traders perpetually. which signifies that for a given product the Fair Trade standards have been met and therefore could be marketed under the system. In short. Setboonsarng.

(2008: 130) Finally. importers. It contains about 300 organizations in more than 70 countries and most of the members are consisted of “…producer-cooperatives and associations. national and regional Fair Trade networks and Fair Trade Organizations” (Krier.1. The Board of Director is comprised of six National Initiatives (NIs) delegates. it has once again renamed itself as World Fair Trade Organization. retailers. Recently.1. four regional producer representatives. The former International Federation of Alternative Trade (IFAT) has changed its name to International Fair Trade Association (IFTA). it has structured itself as shown on Figure 2. IFAT was established in 1989. exporter marketing companies. 2008: 130). IFAT brings together ATOs from North and producer organizations from the South.1: FLO governance structure Source: Nicholls and Opal. one ATO and one mainstream business representative (Nicholls and opal. FLO having its origin as consumer organization seeking to affiliate the producers and consumers. IFAT is international trade essentially a global trade association for Fair Trade producers and traders of both FLO-certified products and non-certified goods. 2007: 30). Membership is open to both trading 16 . 2.2 International Fair Trade Association (IFAT) Initiated by several prominent European ATOs and NGOs.Figure 2.

1. 2007: 16). It provides information to members. Spain. Switzerland and the United Kingdom. 2008: 9. Moreover.1. Similar to FLO. COFTA (Cooperation for Fair Trade in Africa) and Asociacion Latinoamericana de Comercio Justo. The organization structure consists of Executive Committee. 5) Empowering the regions. Traidcraft. As indicated in the above Table 2. The monitoring process increases the members‟ credibility. 2) Build trust in Fair Trade. Raynolds and Long. Nicholls and Opal. 3) Advocating for Fair Trade. which not supposed to compete with FLO certification mark (Nicholls and Opal. mutual review between commercial partners and external verification. 17 . IFAT launched Fair Trade organization mark for its members in 2004. The three IFAT‟s regional representative in South are AFTF (Asia Fair Trade Forum). 2007: 30-31. Germany. France. Italy. and current members span all continents. 2008: 9). IFAT members are required to pay memberships fees and to be transparent. Belgium. an appointed Secretariat and the membership. 2. This association makes researches on the Fair Trade development being based in the Netherlands (Head Office) and Belgium (Advocacy Office).3 European Fair Trade Association (EFTA) The European Fair Trade Association (EFTA) is one the advocacy groups closely working with Fair Trade producers. organize workshops and serve as information point.and non-trading organizations that satisfy the basic Fair Trade criteria. it organizes World Fair Trade Day annually. IFAT linking and strengthening organizations prefer alternative and fair global trade practices (Redfern and Snedker. the Netherlands. The central major of IFAT is helping with the accomplishment of the Fair Trade objectives (Krier. Finally. EFTA was established in 1990 and is a network of eleven Fair Trade organizations in nine European countries: Austria. and Gepa (Nicholls and Opal. Members include Oxfam. IFAT has organized the so-called Global journey in 2004 to communicate the message of Fair Trade and draw attention to unfair international trade. IFAT runs a monitoring system consisting of selfassessment against Fair Trade standards. The specific objectives are: 1) Developing the market for fair Trade. 4) Providing networking opportunities. 2008: 8-9). 2002: 18).

The Network is committed to “promote Fair Trade by stimulating. This is the only Fair Trade organization outside Europe with the focus on USA and Canada.4 Network of European World Shops and Fair Trade Federation The Network of European World Shops (NEWS) was established in 1994.1. FTF is also actively involved gathering data on the diverse markets in North America and Pacific Rim. Fair Trade Federation (FTF) is an international Fair Trade network of wholesalers. 2.2 Fair Trade Standards The rapid growth of market in several countries and the widespread of national Fair Trade initiatives forced the establishment of common standards and principles 18 . 2008: 9): 1) “To make Fair Trade importing more efficient and effective. Currently. website. all together representing about 2. 3) Moreover. It also organizes campaigns to raise consumers‟ awareness. It is facilitates cooperation and networking by providing information (NEWSletter. Generally. 9). and publishes three times a year. 2) “To promote Fair Trade to commercial and political decision-makers.EFTA has two main objectives (Nicholls and Opal. EFTA has been making enormous contribution by publishing Fair Trade figures and analysis for Europe biannually” (Ibid). 2007: 33. retailers and producers.500 World Shops in Europe (Nicholls and Opal. 2008: 10).) and organizing conferences (Krier. 2008: 10). it also contributes significantly to research and advocacy document once a year: the EFTA Yearbook and update members with important information (Ibid. 2. supporting and linking world shops in Europe that retail Fair trade products” (Nicholls and Opal. EFTA builds networks of producers and support groups to encourage and facilitate the exchange of information and best practice” (Ibid). 2007: 32). 2008:10). EFTA coordinates campaigns and lobbying activities and publishes data to support the Fair Trade case. Nicholls and Opal. workshops etc. it has roofed 15 national World Shops in 13 different countries. It was founded in 1994 and in 2008 it has already 300 members‟ organizations in 14 countries (Krier.

cf. Setboonsarng. traders and experts (Setboonsarng. generic standards specify two different requirements for producer cooperatives or organizations. are distinctively applicable to 1) small–scale farmers cooperatives or organizations organized with democratic. 2008. 2008: 10).applicable throughout FLO and other supporting organizations. 2009 – SPO). the generic standards. guidelines or characteristics for products or related processes and production methods” (FLO. FLO. 2007a: 36). Finally. 2009 – HLS). standard facilitates principal guidelines for monitoring and governing producers. Moreover. 2009 – SPO. 2009: 3 – HLS) and trade standards (Nicholls and Opal. On the one hand. 2008). product-specific standards (FLO. “standard is a set of defined criteria giving the requirements which must be attained. Nicholls and Opal state that these standards contain environmental standards which prohibit certain chemicals and land over-use affecting sustainable production. FLO. The standards are set by FLO Standards Committee which includes producers‟ networks. 2009 – HLS). On the other hand. According to FLO explanations. A standard provides. labeling initiatives. rules. Hence. certain pesticides classified as harmful 19 . The product-specific standards or sustainable production requirements are targeting at certain products that means the application of these standards varies from product to product (Nicholls and Opal. There are several standards applicable in Fair Trade system. FLO has three separate sets of Fairtrade standards known as generic standards. 2008). producer (cooperatives) and traders of Fair Trade commodities. Setboonsarng. FLO. 2008. 2008: 10. the progress requirements contain conditions that should be met gradually by producers after joining Fair Trade system (Setboonsarng. For instance. 2008. for common and repeated use. namely minimum and progressive requirements. participative structure and transparent accounting for the distribution of income (Nicholls and Opal. and 2) hired labor on large plantations or in factories organized into a democratically elected workers‟ union responsible for the distribution of income (Nicholls and Opal. The generic standards are comprehensive and apply to all product groups produced within the FLO geographical scope. 2008. FLO. also called producer organizational requirements. compliance with the minimum requirements is expected at the moment the company join Fair Trade and facilitates producers to be Fairtrade certified.

The trade standards. The significance of the standards is contained within the following core points. 20 . 2008: 53). 4.must not be allowed for the producers groups to use it. Pre-financing arrangement: The credit-provision for commodity producers guarantees sustainable and quality production. In general. Fair Trade products. This floor price varies from product to product and region to region based on the classification. Fair and stable prices: Producers must receive a minimum floor price for their products that covers the average costs of sustainable production (Redfern and Snedker. therefore. 2002: 45). establish the regulations that govern the relations amongst Fair Trade producer. 1. The importers of Fair Trade products are required to pre-finance up to 60 per cent of seasonal crops (ibid. and enhancing the reliance of ethical consumers on. the generic standards supersede the product-specific standards. smallholder farmers and their community (Nicholls and Opal.). Long-term trading relationships: Fair Trade product importers should enter into direct long-term trade relationship with producers. exporters and importers (Nicholls and Opal. Fair Trade standards were established to empower producers in the global south and to promote the market for. The long-term trading relationship enables producers to plan for the future production. 3. Fair Trade Premium: The additional payment (also social premium) granted are intended to be invested in social and environmental development projects and to improve the well-being of farm workers. Provision of market access: Small farmers‟ organized in democratic and participative structure into co-operatives can access information and market and learn about quality requirements. 2008). It is guaranteed regardless of the fluctuation of world commodity prices. 5. 2.

2002: 7). labeling initiatives. 2007a: 36). retailers and consumers are supposed to identify the various symbols associated with Fair Trade products. However. Jaffee (2007: 208). These symbols could then be presented as logos. a multi-stakeholder association including producer networks. Fair Trade commodities manufacturers and importers should go through the rule-based certification system in order to market products with Fair Trade label on to retailers and consumers (Redfern and Snedker. the quantities are accurate and there is no mixing of certified and uncertified products (Jaffee. Thus.These are the summarized presentation of the Fair Trade standards and the underlying concepts which was developed by FLO. and experts” (Setboonsarng. 2. emphasizes the Fair Trade seal (Transfair label) and the certification on which it rests as being significant and the primary mechanism for consumers‟ 21 . 2007: 208). 2009: 35).1 Certification and Labeling in Fair Trade Fair Trade certification is developed by “Fair Trade Lebelling Organization (FLO) International. and to ensure that at each point where the commodity changes hands. the role FLO-Cert “[…] is to document the „chain of custody‟ followed by a product. for instance. FLO has delegated the certification process to FLO-Cert which is an independent company. Moreover. According to FLO explanation. amend or void standards (FLO. This certification process is an important operational component. This same body has the author to introduce new. Prior to acquired certification. Low and Davenport state that “Fair trade certification and labeling was essential for the commercialization of the movement‟s food products because labels offer consumers a guarantee that the product conforms to specific standards for production” (2008: 5). “certification is a process carried out by a recognized body.2. 2008: 10). which demonstrates that a product or organization complies with the requirements defined in the Standards or technical specifications” (FLO. Jaffee adds that monitoring of the licensees. because it guarantees Fair Trade consumers that the producers of the products are complying with the standards set by FLO International. inspecting their facilities and punishing incompliance to the standards are falling in the range of certifier‟s responsibilities. traders. independent from interested parties. The same organization had developed Fair Trade standards which are fundamental for the certification and labeling process. labels or marks which communicate product attributes. Thus. benefits and values inherent with them.

the combined certification of producer and importer facilitates a simplified mechanism to track back the origin of the product along the supply chain and recognize the benefit margin accrue to the producers. The fact that ATOs are facing high competition from conventional retailers could also be negatively attributed to the certification scheme introduced. So far. their participation in marketing Fair Trade products could adversely affect Fair Trade brands. The introduction of fee has brought criticism against the certifying body. major mainstream outlets are attracted to Fair Trade products because of the third party certification program and the resulted improvement in the products quality. Especially.recognition of Fair Trade products in the United States. in the face of other growing social certification system and labels. the Fair Trade certified operators are automatically subjected to the regular monitoring scheme. Especially. the Grassroots activist‟s are blaming this process because of the high certification fee demanded and not simply affordable by most disadvantaged famers. plantation workers and their local communities. producers and traders have been inspected based on these standards to prove their compliance and the certification Committee issues certificate. Despite their contribution to the growth of Fair Trade market. One of the arguments is the skepticism that traditional market outlets are only persuaded by corporate profit maximization than the social and environmental values inherent within the Fair Trade objectives. Monitoring refers to “measuring a set of indicators that are tracked over time to identify trends.2. some of these companies have bad reputation for their social irresponsibility in the past and consequentially.2 Fair Trade Monitoring System Once the standards have been set. In fact. The influence that these multinational companies have may negatively affect the fundamental principles of Fair Trade in the long-run. 2008: 133). most of certified products are carrying these symbols. Finally. More importantly. 2. The information is used to 22 . Monitoring of Fair Trade operators is a challenging process carried on along the supply chain. since 2004 FLO-Cert is charging fees that should cover the costs of the certification process (Nicholls and Opal. the certification system developed by Fair Trade organization is believed to benefit small producers.

2007: 5). monitoring is serving as important tool to ensure the producers and retailers are keeping the quality of the products. In another words. ensure accountability and provide a basis for evaluation and learnings” (FLO. the company-funded ventures lost their relevance in accomplishing the communal development objectives. This created asymmetrical relationship between companies and the beneficiary communities. 2008: 208). the implementation of projects that accord with its particular vision of development” (Rajak. Based on this definition. 2. Accordingly. business companies have replaced traditional donations and were engaged in communal partnership and empowerment. With the advent of CSR. negatively affected the development project. then they will be decertified. even though it involves tangible elements and because the producers in the South are located far from and the consumers in North product-quality confirmation highly cost intensive (Bacchetti and Huybrechts. in return. The company demands. 2007a: 36). if during monitoring a producer organization and commercial agents deviate from keeping the standards. 23 . which in turn. FLO-Cert (certifier) is. business companies had been promoting community development through philanthropic donations.assist timely decision making. Thus in respect to that. 297). responsible to make sure that the product is produced according to the set standards. therefore. this concept can be described as corporate integration of the social and environmental accounting into their business operations and demonstrating their responsibility to the stakeholders.3 Fair Trade and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Long before corporate social responsibility (CSR) was introduced. However. and social investment and environmental protection (Ibid. Fair Trade product has a characteristic of „trust good‟. “the funding provided by the company is bound by conditionality and brings with it the coercive powers of patronage. The intersection of the CSR and Fair Trade is due to the interrelation of ethical and commercial elements underpinning both concepts. Consequently. monitoring serves different purposes than just a mere control mechanism employed to prove producer and wholesaler consistent compliance to Fair Trade principles.

whereas Fair Trade model is targeting to benefit marginalized producers by using commercial approach. 24 . Fair Trade can provides a better model for dealing with economic. Fair Trade standard-setting involves all the partners along the supply chain. whereas Fair Trade is basically addressing the international trade inequality. social and environmental impacts of their business operations.)4 differentiate both approaches following ways: 1) CSR is engaged in voluntary development activities and hard to challenge this corporate objectives. Compare with “Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Does it make any difference? (2004) and no Contributor indicated. 4) The practices CSR can lead to further marginalization of small businesses that are considered threat to the businesses. both have different approaches toward their objectives. 4 Fiona Gooch of Traidcraft and Stefan Chrobok of EFTA had written under the title of “Fair Trade provides models for Corporate Social Responsibility”. In line with the summarized points. whereas Fair Trade is working to improve the participation and the livelihoods of small producers and farmers. Fair Trade concerns transcend the mere legal compliance and criticize the weak regulatory system that does not favor the all parties in international business practices. 3) CSR strives to keep its compliance toward the international convention and government-established regulatory frameworks for business practices (Redfern and Snedker. The year of this publication is not indicated. social and environmental impacts of businesses. Gooch and Chrobok (n. CSR is basically conceptualized by profit-driven entities and highly dependent on the profitability of the company.Despite their effort to improve the economic.a. 2) CSR is the dominant party along the supply chain actors and can easily enforce the compliance to standards. 2002: 35).

). market access. or cooperatives). This kind of social enterprise model. Its mission focuses on facilitating clients‟ financial security by helping them develop and sell their products in high-value markets. However. Most of the social enterprises have combined-objectives focusing on the social and economical value creation (Alter. The social enterprise purchases the client-made products in high-value markets. Hence. “the market intermediary model of social enterprise provides product development. 2006: 216). similar to Fair Trade organizations. mission strengthening. and self-financing. Its 25 . a “market-reform” device or a “market-access” instrument (2007: 26). 2007: 2). purchases the producers products at fair prices. The market intermediary model is an embedded model: the social programme is the business. The mixedform organizations have not only multiple dimensions but also involves different types of actors (Becchetti and Huybrechts. Jaffee (2007) describes the different views participants have about the Fair Trade movement based on its ideology. and then sells the products at a margin (Ibid. social impact. According to Altar‟s description. one of the models that fit to the Fair Trade concept is the “market intermediary model”. commissions or mark-up added to the products improve the income to the enterprise which in turn used to cover production and program costs.3 Global Marketing Orientation of Fair Trade Fair Trade organizations are designed as a mixed-form of market which is similar to social enterprise model. “The advantages of the market intermediary model are its potential for scalability. Alter (2006: 216) introduces various forms of social enterprise models. identifying the orientation of the Fair Trade marketing is significant to understand the concept behind it.” (2006: 216-217). But other participants believe that the central value of Fair Trade is not to change the logic of markets rather addressing and correcting the market failures and international trade inequality. and credit services to its target population: small producers (individuals. Some consider Fair Trade as a “market-breaking” force. firms.

Fair Trade movement has of course limited power to make significant changes at once. WTO policies were established to benefit all the trade partners and not to favor only few of trade partners. the social enterprise may sacrifice scale to clients. eco-labeling in timber. 3.1 Globalization and Imperfect Market Several dynamic movements. But even though multiple campaigns have 26 .1: Market intermediary model Source: Adapted from Alter. 2007: 4). agriculture. (2006: 216) Figure 3. and initiatives with the wide ranges of objectives have emerged addressing the negative impacts of globalization. Frequently. However. Especially. quality requirements for marketable products cannot be supported through the market intermediary‟s decentralized production. Fair Trade in agricultural food and other commodities were among the many that seek to create sustainable and social justice in the globe (Murray and Raynolds. Fair Trade focused on reshaping the practices of international trade and targeting at failure around corporate expansion in a global economy. and handcraft groups) using the described market intermediary model of social enterprise (Ibid. 217). it has never ceased to criticize the regulatory instances like World Trade Organization (WTO). thus. and difficulties can arise in finding markets for client-made products due to market saturation.application is limited to producers. campaigns. For instance. and commodity products. Anti-sweatshop movement in garments. converting it into an employment model” (Ibid: 216).1 presents the marketing supply cooperatives (Fair Trade organizations. Figure 3. poor or inconsistent quality.

the Fair Trade marketing approach is complex and mixed with other sectors‟ marketing trends. Fair Trade is using the market itself to combat the international trade injustice at the marketplace. 2007: 4). and maintaining stable market) to improve smallholder farmers and workers livelihoods and support for their producer organizations and communities are central to the objectives (Murray and Raynolds. Select target markets and Select target audience positioning strategy 3. illustrates the distinction between conventional. Manage marketing effort 5. granting better price. it has never been successful so far.1 Fair Trade marketing process Conventional marketing Non-For-Profit marketing Fair Trade marketing 1.tried to communicate the message of trade inequality between the international trade players. Table 3.1. This unique objective of Fair Trade should be specified in order to understand the organizational structure and market dynamics of the Fair Trade. 2008: 157).2 Fair Trade Marketing Orientation and Process Based on its objective. Seek advantage Develop NFP marketing Develop mix Managing marketing effort Fair Trade marketing mix Manage marketing effort Encourage competition competitive Adopting competition 27 . Unlike other social enterprises (like NGOs). Fair Trade marketing has similarities and differences with the other sectors‟ marketing orientation. Fair Trade has therefore high possibility of alleviating poverty in the global South through a market-based strategy (enabling direct sales.The alleviation of poverty had been tried by non-trade strategy. 2002: vii). for instance. Analyze opportunities market Analyze potential behavior Analyze market failures to promote Select suppliers/producers most affected by market failures 2. 3. predominantly through Northern aid. The following points on Table 3. Develop marketing mix 4. Fair Trade is seeking to provide an equitable and sustainable market opportunity for marginalized producers (Redfern and Snedker. Fair Trade and not-for-profit marketing (Nicholls and Opal.

promotes private ownership. 2008: 156). the extended marketing mix such as people. place and promotion (Ibid.. 157). Andreasen and Kotler state the marketing management “as he process of planning and executing programs designed to influence the behavior of target audiences by creating and maintaining beneficial exchanges for the purpose of satisfying individual and organizational objectives” (2008: 36) . for example. 3. 2008: 156). 2005: 26). considering these marketing approaches are also relevant. “…marketers then selects the most appropriate and profitable target markets and develops a positioning strategy for business communication that maximizes competitive advantage” (Nicholls and Opal. price. (2002: 6) For the sake of better understanding of Fair Trade marketing. This comparison intends to provide a brief explanation of and interrelationship between the three different selected sectors‟ marketing approaches. 2005: 26). Kotler et al. product. Additionally. This marketing believes in consumer sovereignty and strives for consumer‟s satisfaction (Witkowiski. process and physical evidence is applicable to service rendering business. The marketing mix is conceptualized to address the four P-elements. Fair Trade system focuses on a communal development that demands networks and cooperation of the stakeholders (Witkowski. Based on the identified market opportunity. With their focal point on strong customer relationship and continuous innovations. Moreover. the marketing theory assumes individualism.Source: Adapted from Nicholls and Opal (2008: 157). The analysis is preliminary to any kind of business activities.2. similar to social enterprise or Fair Trade. The traditional marketing involves the managing of marketing effort. and seeks competitive advantage.1 Conventional (Traditional) Marketing The conventional business marketing process begins with the analysis of “market opportunities centered on consumer demand and competitor activity” (Kotler et al. 1999 cited in Nicholls and Opal. 28 . traditional marketing develops a strategic marketing mix as a tool. Where as.

Similar to other sector marketing. Affecting behavioral change of a selected target groups or society can. Roberto and Lee define social marketing as “the use of marketing principles to influence a target audience to voluntarily accept. In fact. what make NFP marketing different form conventional and Fair Trade marketing is that it deals more with services and ideas than tangible products.2. for instance. help to the improve health. Kotler. process and physical evidence (CIM. is targeting the social issues and other matters within the society. Despite the features of the products offered. prevent social injustice. there are still distinctive differences between them. Especially. tools and techniques. 3. or abandon a behavior for the benefit of individuals.3 Fair Trade Marketing Fair Trade marketing can be seen through the lens of ethical and social marketing as well as conventional marketing. This marketing model also requires the marketing management effort and adoption of concepts used in competition. the marketing orientation of both sectors has some common elements. This marketing concept first of all analyzes the potential behavior that is needs to changed or removed. NFP marketing uses traditional marketing concepts. 2007: 12). This is the linking concept to outline the approaches of the not-for-profit marketing.2 Non-profit Organization Marketing Non-For-Profit (NFP) marketing is also one of the social enterprise marketing branches just like Fair Trade marketing. Although. Fair Trade marketing has developed into mixed-form of marketing which employs social and conventional marketing tools. Fair Trade follows specific process.2. protecting the environment. Moreover. 2002: 5). in general. Social marketing.3. Fair Trade organizations are focusing on the market failures. Marketing mix instrument developed similar to conventional business but with extended marketing mix such as people.). groups. Contrary to the conventional marketing. reject. modify. or contributing to the community (Ibid. This is also called Social Marketing. contrary to conventional marketing. or society as a whole” (2002: 5). in which primary beneficiaries are shareholders. a group or society as a whole (Kotler et al. not-for-profit marketing primary beneficiaries can be an individual. Originating from social marketing. Fair Trade criticizes corporate 29 .

Large business companies driven by their cost reduction objective and supported by their easy access to information have been maximizing the portion of their profit at the expense of the poor producers under the poor working terms and conditions. Fair Trade is targeting to empower the producers of the South by connecting them to the consumers of the North. On the one hand. Thus. “the main ethical objections to global trade between North and South centre on the drive towards maximizing end margins via a leveraging of enormous power and information asymmetries between developed world corporate buyers and developing world producers/manufacturers” (2005: 55). This concept is mainly backed by long-established NGOs in the South and concerned consumers of the North and devoted to address the problematic issues along the supply chain.businesses‟ exploitive position in global supply chain and abusive international trading policies in the marketplace. Nicholls & Opal state that “despite the fact that Fair Trade marketing centres on explicitly ethical issues. Fair Trade is a movement that addresses this problem. On the other hand. Further discussion on marketing mix is given in chapter 4. 3. due to mainstream outlets interest in Fair Trade products competition becoming indispensible.2 of this paper. According to Nicholls and Opal. it needs to be seen as quite distinct from either cause-related marketing or what is broadly known as socially responsible marketing” (2005: 153). similar to the conventional marketing mix instrument. Moreover. Fair Trade has long been addressing this inequality in international trade system. initiated by the traditional activists such as NGOs and ATOs.3 Global Supply Chain and Network of Fair trade The global supply chain scandals by multinational companies have led to the emergence of the new ethical trading concept. In line with that Fair Trade organizations are strongly devoted to manage the marketing processes. it created a platform for the ethical consumers to use their purchasing power to react against the 30 . workers and producers of the South at the outset of supply chain. The main concerns about the grassroots and consumer activists are directed towards the farmers. The marketing focal points are Fair Trade products producers. Fair Trade has its own marketing mix.

this paper note the significance of the Fair Trade and Fair Trade organizations whose effort is to cut the long supply chain. Most of the commodities have long and complex supply chain. The involvement of Fair Trade in the supply chain can be described as depicted on Figure 3. who transport the unprocessed coffee to processing plant. The primary producers sell to private intermediaries. Thus.1 Producers and Classical (Alternative) Traders The historical background confirms that Fair Trade supply chain and networks have been dominated by Alternative Trade Organizations (ATOs) that were engaged in 31 . 3.2.irresponsibility of the businesses companies.2: The coffee commodity supply chain Source: Adapted from Milford. (2004: 6) In line with this process. 2004: 5). forming a sound supply chain that benefits all the stakeholders is significant international trade.3. Figure 3. Figure 3. For instance. The processed coffee is sold by local exporter to international trader.2 shows the simplified form of coffee supply chain. coffee bean as the most marketable commodity can change hands more than 150 times from producer to consumer (Milford.

in alternative markets producers were paid a higher and unique price which is above the conventional market price. but also organized campaigns to create awareness and win more ethical consumers. ATOs and their local agents gathered the commodities directly from southern producers and sell them in their outlets.3. That is main reason why some ATOs with not-for-profit structures adapted for-profit organizations structures.direct and fair trading relationship with producers. namely world shops. Figure 3. That means. 32 . Traidcraf (is this the real name or typing mistake) and NGOs like Oxfam. (2004: 8) In contrast to the coffee commodity supply chain presented above on Figure 3. The flow of classical Fair Trade supply chain can be described as shown on Figure 3. Because of that supply-driven traders could not survive in the market for long period. Milford (2004: 8) claims ATOs had created a niche market known as alternative markets in which the rules of conventional markets were not applied. By then. Alternative trading organizations (ATOs) like Traidcraft in Britain and Gepa in Germany emerged with the aim of offering producers the opportunity to trade with the developed world for the first time.3: Classical Fair Trade Supply chain Source: Own construction based on Milford. However. without the control of middlemen who would inevitably squeeze prices at the beginning of the supply chain. the classical supply chain was wholly operated and controlled by these organizations. ATOs strategy was mainly focused on the producer supply rather than on consumer demand. the concern of ATOs was to protect the weakest supply chain actors (producers) from the exploitation of greedy middlemen and large companies in international trade. distribution and sale of the products.2. equal exchange. They were responsible for the importing. These organizations had not only merchandised the products.

current market opportunities in other categories such as fish. they will start to use their unchallengeable market powers to influence changes in the 33 . on the one hand.2 Producers and Conventional Outlets For several years. it is used to regain their distorted image in the face of consumer. Fair Trade sales could not grow faster with the only effort of these classic supply chain actors. Fair Trade product suppliers enjoy a direct trading relationship with some of the mainstreams outlets. Today. Nevertheless. a number of issues have arisen for the future. spirits and rice may well be missed (2007: 271). Figure 3. And yet this success is not without disadvantages. However. Tesco plans to expand its own label offer…but is constrained by the relative slowness of Fairtrade Labeling Organizations‟ international certification process.3. ATOS. ATOs have operated under the third sector status as nonprofit organization and co-operatives (Becchetti and Huybrechts. Fair Trade labeling system has proven the benefits to marginalized producers and workers of global South by eliminating price-squeezers from the supply chain. the supply-driven approach has not attracted the consumer-oriented supermarkets. Bowes and Croft (2007: 271) states that the mainstream outlets participation in Fair Trade system is driven by their anticipation of future growth than the ethical message it holds. This direct trade relationship is initiated and controlled by FLO and national initiatives. Nicholls and Opal (2005 cited in Bowes and Croft. Thus. Thus.3. As soon so supermarkets are deep-rooted themselves in the Fair Trade business. Thus. unlike the most conventional supermarkets suppliers. on the other hand. However. commercial-driven in perceiving a chance to attract ethical consumers and. their commitment sustains not longer enough to benefit the producers. 2007: 6) with less focus on the product quality. 2007: 271) express their concerns by saying that “Tesco clearly views the expansion its Fair trade range as a success. Thus far.4 presents the autonomous controlling mechanism of both the NIs and FLO-I. investor and campaigning communities that they are taking their corporate responsibilities seriously. with the introduction of FLO certification mark the focus on the product quality changed and consequently attracted the conventional outlets. The supermarket involvement in Fairtrade is.

Similarly. setting higher product quality standards and so on affects the producers directly. Sally (2008: 4-5) states that various literatures in UK are pointing to the increasing tension between the values of Fair Trade and the commercial principles and practices in supermarkets‟ global value chains.heart of Fair Trade principles. (2004: 9) 34 . For instance. The impact of these changes directly affects the weakest supply chain partners (producers and workers).4: Fair Trade labelling systems Source: Adapted from Milford. Flexibility in pricing strategy. Figure 3.

4 Marketing of Fair Trade The marketing approach of Fair Trade is quite different than the cause-related marketing or socially responsible marketing. In addition. from conventional marketing practices.1 Objective of Fair Trade Marketing Mix Social marketing has borrowed.). Weinreich. This way the supply chain can be shortened and the benefit proposed to generate be enlarged. that is. marketing mix.5. Fair Trade marketing can help to meet the immediate demand of consumers and attain a market growth in the log-run through education and campaigning. Finally. it is devoted to empower the social and economic interrelation between the producers and consumers. the relationship should be based on partnership exchange that lasts for long term and create connectivity between producers and consumers. Moreover. Fair Trade marketing is not conceptualized to improve or present a new model of corporate social responsibility (for distinction see chapter 2. Fair Trade marketing is positively contributing to the social and environmental issues. 2008: 80). Fair Trade system which is also categorized under social marketing use the same techniques marketing mix to address the ethical consumerism (Nicholls and Opal. 2005: 153. Nicholls and Opal (2005: 153) confirm that building a value based and profitable supplier-consumer relationship is central to Fair Trade marketing. 2005: 175. Therefore. Although. Social Marketing. In the conventional business arena developing the Marketing Mix is vital to the implementation of the competitive 35 . cf. The most challenge in Fair Trade marketing is reaching the mass consumers beyond the ethical consumers and gain mainstream acceptance for their products (see Nicholls and Opal. 2005: 153). 1999). This should be grounded on the concept of fairness which encompasses both producers and consumers. 4. increasing consumer education and innovative marketing that builds Fair Trade brands and creating “a set of values around the Fair Trade mark that are both ethical and quality-based are very significant for development of Fair Trade” (Nicholls and Opal. Klebe.

The focal point of Fair Trade marketing mix is laying on the ethical and economic value of the products. The marketing mix refers to the combination of instruments a producers organizations (with the support of FTOs) may blend together to address the ethical and economical value of Fair Trade product (Nicholls and Opal. is an instrument that can produce a desired reaction through a combination of behavior and mental effects (Ibid. The following Table 4. However. Hence. to use their purchasing power to bring changes in the social life and environment of producers and workers in developing countries. the development of Fair Trade marketing mix is an important instrument that is used to communicate the value of Fair Trade products to these ethical consumers and conventional consumers. In order to motivate consumers to participate in Fair Trade model. these core issues must be communicated effectively. 4. similar to the conventional marketing.2 Marketing Mix of Fair Trade Fair Trade marketing centers distinctively on ethical issues. 158). unlike the traditional marketing approach. Klebe. Fair Trade marketing mix. The reaction triggered by the marketing mix is direct or indirect and it can immediately or later and positive or negative influence. 2008: 157. This marketing instrument is targeting at convincing ethical consumers in particular and mass consumers in general. the development of Fair Trade marketing mix plays an important role for fast growing fair Trade market. 2005: 175).1 presents the distinction between conventional and Fair Trade marketing mixes. the content of Fair Trade marketing mix focuses on the producers‟ organizations rather than the consumers (Nicholls and Opal.marketing strategy. Similarly. 36 . 2008: 80).

Features could be added or subtracted without changing the other elements of core product.Table 4. For example. quality Social premium „Fair‟ supply chain Ethical issues/education Identifiable producers Developmental focus Fair Trade mark Source: Adapted from Nicholls and Opal. 2008: 195) are becoming prevalent in Fair Trade core product design. Fair Trade products featured with producers‟ details. A thorough consideration should be given to these elements of marketing mix when developing Fair Trade marketing. The difference between both sectors will be addressed in the following sections. A non-ethical consumer who does not know what Fair Trade stands for can only notice a Fair Trade labeled product in mainstream supermarkets if the design of the product is appealing to her or him. 4. in Kaufland (German supermarket) the following description is written at the back of the product. In fact. this strategy is taking an important position in Fair Trade marketing approach. For instance. 37 .1: The Fair Trade marketing mix Conventional marketing Product Price Place Promotion People Process Physical evidence Fit with target segment Minimize cost price Efficient logistics Competitive positioning Customer interface Customer service Branding Fair Trade marketing Uniqueness. Fair Trade product designing has already started to consider these perspectives. ATOs were less concerned about Fair Trade product design but today due to the increasing demand for quality product by mainstream supermarkets. (2008: 157). styling. At a Grassroots level. ethical consumers desire to acquire product that corresponding value to the price they paid. packaging and brand name (Andreasen and Kotler. Accordingly. quality. supporting elements such as features.1 Product Design The product design aspect of Fair Trade marketing mix plays a significant role in communicating the objective of Fair Trade to the consumers.2.

by purchasing this product consumers are contributing to betterment of livelihoods and working conditions of the small farm holders of Malawi and to the support of environmental protection. dass dieses Produkt die internationalen Standards für Fairen Handel erfüllt. 2008: 10). Therefore. In like manner.„Das unabhängige FAIRTRADE-Siegel gibt Ihnen die Sicherheit. Similar information could be taken from www. 2008: 81. Especially. most of handcrafts and clothes have distinctive look because of their designs and embroideries which in turn point to their origin. in the “progress requirements” specified in generic standards by the organization. In addition. Due consideration should be given to the uniqueness of the design and quality of Fair Trade products. a continuous improvement of product quality is demanded from producers (Setboonsarng. Mit dem Kauf dieses Produktes leisten Sie einen Beitrag zur Verbesserung der Lebensund Arbeitsbedingungen der Kleinbauern aus Malawi und zur Förderung des Umweltschutzes. Another important aspect of Fair Trade product is implicated by the Fairtrade mark (in UK) and Transfair seal (in German and USA). with the involvement of conventional traders the issue of quality has increased.org as indicated on the cover. Previously.”5 This is intended to assure ethical consumers of the origin of the product. 38 . In spite of the long process and time needed to acquire it. Once the product is labeled with the Fairtra de mark it takes a special position in views of consumers as well as producers (Klebbe. More specifically. Nicholls and Opal. Styling of Fair Trade products is similarly important as in that of conventional product. 5 This information was taken from the back of product‟s (sugar) cover in Kaufland supermarket. These goods carry distinctive cultural elements with them and consequently can impart certain feelings to consumers. it states that “the independent Fairtrade Seal guarantees that this product is produced according to the international standards of Fair Trade. In fact.“ In short. It is an assurance that the product is complying with the Fair Trade standards. however with the introduction of certification process by FLO more and more emphasis was given to product quality.transfair. cf. Fairtrade mark has significant value in the market. to this aspect less consideration had been given by ATOs. 2005). the importance of product quality is increasing in Fair Trade model.

Therefore. cost-based pricing also refers to the cost of production in a more detailed manner. the ethical value or message incorporated into the physical product is used to determine the pricing strategy. More importantly. In contrary. In handling pricing issues the two determining factors are. more than anything else.2. Hence. first of all in developing a price the organization should set clear objective of what it wants to achieve. “With the price element of the marketing mix.. 2008: 238). The second determinant element is the pricing strategy which is based on cost. non-ethical consumer can see the premium price as disincentivization and get discouraged to buy the product (Andreasen and Kotler 2008: 238). 2005: 158). That message can convince the ethical consumers and influence them to affect changes in small producers‟ livelihoods using their purchasing power. communicating the intrinsic ethical value of Fair Trade product is significant to influence the target audiences. 2008: 195).the eco-friendly product packaging style of Fair Trade also adds psychological value and affects important behavioral change (Andreasen and Kotler. 4. As already mentioned in the determination of pricing objective. market size maximization. Nicholls and Opal. It is probably the most difficult element that needs a thorough consideration. The other pricing objectives that are not frequently practiced in Fair Trade are intentionally ignored to limit the scope of this paper. pricing objective and pricing strategy (Andreasen and Kotler.2 Pricing Strategy The determinant element of marketing mix in the Fair Trade model is pricing.” (Nicholls and Opal. value and competition. Moreover.. a combined cost and value based strategies should be applied to determine the price. Fair Trade again stresses the producer by highlighting both the fair original commodity price and the social premium. In the case of Fair Trade. 39 . social equity and market disincentivization” (2008: 238). Admittedly. 2008: 158). Fair Trade model is not driven by profit maximization per se. Andreasen and Kotler distinguish between the following pricing objectives: “surplus maximization. cost recovery. However. the objective is to recover the cost of production (cost recovery) through the floor price paid to the product and to charge for social premium (surplus maximization and social equity) that goes to the social and environmental projects (cf.

other Fair Trade actors support the move to conventional outlets grounded on the strategic advantage it entailed.2. Although. Kotler. the combination of price and product leadership (Klebbe. Access to the products should be made convenient in the longrun.5) of this paper.3 Distribution Strategy The most important aspect in Fair Trade marketing is the arrangement of the product distribution channel.1: Conventional business price reduction Source: New Internationalist (2005) The pricing strategy of Fair Trade is facing a challenge in connection to the move to mainstream supermarkets. Conversely. This insert can be removed as it is not adding much value to the academic paper Figure 4. Such a problem might greatly affect Fair Trade market as the classical Fair Trade activists suspected and hence. Besides the problem of sinking price. It is the problem that can be considered in combination to the one addressed in chapter one (section 1. 2008: 82). Fair Trade product is labeled in many of these conventional outlets.Traditional supermarkets will soon start to reduce Fair Trade products’ price to attract customers. Roberto and Lee emphasize on 40 . These conventional business outlets want to reduce the price as much as possible to attract the consumers. This section addresses the numerous access strategies that has been used and should be introduced and developed to reach the mass consumers beyond the ethical ones. supermarkets are developing their own Fair Trade labels which challenge the original Fair Trade products. 4. opposed the involvement of mainstream players. The distribution of the Fair Trade products was started by a single person and recently extended to conventional market outlets in several countries. That is. its survival with the higher price compared to the ever reducing conventional product price is questionable.

“increasing the number and location of outlets; moving the world shops closer to target audiences; providing mobile units that come to neighborhoods or worksites; offering the option of purchasing on-line, over the phone, or through mail; providing pickup and delivery services to homes or offices; extending hours and days of the week; improving ambiance of a location; reducing wait time; improving parking; and increasing prominence of products displayed on aisles and shelves” (2002: 244).

Fair Trade classic outlets (such as world shops, Gepa) just like most of the social enterprises (NGOs) are inconveniently situated and dispersed in many cities. According to Kotler et al. some of the major problems that raised criticism against social marketing (enterprises) are “high costs of distribution, high advertising and promotion costs and excessive mark-ups” involved in their marketing practices (2008: 67). The high distribution costs that they referred to is that the “greedy intermediaries‟ mark-up prices beyond the value of their products or services” (Ibid.). For instance, consumers and their advocates blame that too many intermediaries or that intermediaries are inefficient or that they provide duplicated services or products (Ibid.). Consequently, the price charged for the products or services is excessive than its value. Fair Trade marketing has developed a strategy that tackles this problem by eliminating the unnecessary long supply chain. Of course, the distribution of the products follows through different trade channels, especially, since Fair trade has moved out of niche markets to mainstream distribution channels. This is only the case for some of Fair Trade products, for instance, banana, coffee, tea and the like (Farnworth and Goodman, 2008: 6).

4.2.4 Promotion Strategy
There are different ways of communicating the target groups, most importantly, the ethical consumers. Developing persuasive communication strategies, incorporating meaningful messages, involving key actors and choosing the proper communication channels are extremely significant for the growth of Fair Trade market (Kotler, Roberto and Lee, 2002: 268). Due to the growing ethical consumerism and related public campaigns, educational activities and awareness-creating actions, Fair Trade has been using this distinctive message that is attributable to its objectives. In practice, the message has been presenting the marginalized producers, social and 41

environmental issues which are relevant to the target audience, ethical consumers. In all the promotion activities the emphasis should incorporate individual stories about producers (farmers and workers). For instance, photos, stories and facts about individual producers can motivate the public to react positively toward these items (Lamb, 2007: 79). So far, these strategies have been widely used by Fair Trade.

The message has been carried by classical actors and advocacy groups such as ATOs, NGOs, FLO, and WFTO and recently by conventional retailers. Especially, ATOs and NGOs have contributed a lot by disseminating information and motivating the ethically-conscious consumers. Promotional material used included internets, brochures, annual reports, magazines and newspaper from the national Fair Trade organizations (Transfair in Germany and the Fair Trade Foundation FTF in the UK) and alternative trading organizations (Divine, Traidcraft, and Cafédirect in the UK, Gepa and the Weltladendachverband in Germany). For example, picture 4.2 shows how Cafédirect discloses the individual producer stories connected to the products.

Figure 4.2: Cafédirect advertisement

Source: Cafédirect6 Currently, Fair Trade town‟s movements have already widespread in many countries through the efforts of local networks, development organizations, world shops, churches, schools and other sectors. Fair Trade towns (picture 4.4), Fair Trade Fortnight, World Fair Trade Day (picture 4.3), etc. are playing significant role in promoting Fair Trade products and moreover educating consumers the importance of using their purchasing power.

6

http://brewing.cafedirect.co.uk/

42

On May 8, Fair Trade supporters around the globe will be celebrating World Fair Trade Day.

Figure 4.3: World Fair Trade Day

Source: FLO-I7

In Australia, Melbourne Fair Trade Tram is already actively advertising. This can stay coz its in line with the photo

Figure 4.4: Fairtrade Tram in Melbourne, Australia

Source: FLO, (2009c: 14)

4.3 Product Mix
Four decades ago Fair Trade commodity was consisting out of only handicrafts produced in different countries of South (when started by Edna Ruth Byler). Several years later, Coffee was launched by Max Havelaar in 1988. The agricultural food commodity which started with coffee expanded to tropical fruits and several new products have been included (i.e. cocoa, textiles, tea, quinoa, nuts, wine, etc) (Krier, 2007: 27). The introduction of new product into Fair Trade system has continued as means of including marginalized producers and diversifying products offering. Currently, different assortments of goods are passing through Fair Trade network channels and markets. Based on the Fair Trade standards and certification process, there are certified and non-certified products. Moreover, Fair Trade products could further be distinguished as organic and conventional certified Fair Trade products.

7

Fairtrade Labeling Organization International (FLO-I): http://www.fairtrade.net/events.html#c5806

43

However, the main product mix could be presented, as shown on the table 4.2., food, non-food and beverages (Farnworth and Goodman, 2008: 4).

Table 4.2: Length and Width of Fair Trade Product Mix
Product Line length

Food products/ commodities Coffee Tea
Product Line width

Non-food goods

Beverages

Sport-balls Jewelries Cotton products/clothing Home wares Cloth toys Flower s …

Wine Bear Juices Ice Coffee Ice tea

Bananas Cocoa/Chocolate Sugar Rice Fresh/Dried fruits Cakes & Snacks Muesli …

Source: Adapted from Andreasen and Kotler, (2008: 196); Sahota, (2007: 26)

As market grow and conventional traders are involved in distributing Fair Trade commodities, FLO broad varieties of products were developed and mixed based on the demand of consumers. FLO has developed some guidelines for composite products. For instance, liquid composite products will carry a Fairtrade Certification Mark or label “…if more than 50% of its volume is sourced from Fairtrade-certified producer organizations” (FLO, 2007b: 2). Earlier Fair Trade has never developed 44

and reflecting organizational mission and values. on the one hand. These brands contain Fairtrade mark but do not reflect the message behind in its entirety (Nicholls and Opal. The development of Fair Trade brand can help to operate competitively within commercial enterprise. Mihaljevich (2008: 174) stresses that brand demonstrates the advantages of „value added‟ marketing and once established supports profits generation. Tesco. among the extended marketing mix. Nicholls and Opal (2005: 158) criticized Fair Trade brand for being decentralized and not having strategic process. Bowes and Croft suggest that “…their [profitoriented businesses added] commitment to these sectors [organic and Fair Trade added] is likely to be sustained for as long as they are in vogue and for not minute longer” (2007: 271). In the views of Andreasen and Kotler (2008: 171). The national labeling initiatives (Fairtrade foundations. 4. proving a guarantee to targeted consumers and stakeholders. Firstly. label and certification process. Bowes and Croft. the conventional outlets are also creating their own-label products. In this sense. 2007: 270) and feared to lack integrity with FLO‟s set of standards.4 Developing Brands Branding. an organization‟s branded product could be perceived as a product making unique social contribution. However. However. 2005: 158). Transfair) awarded the certification mark to fairly position their products in the market. the launching of own brands by Fair Trade companies and conventional outlets could be seen. Murray. Divine Chocolate or Agrofair have introduced their own brand values which compete in mainstream markets (Hutchens. Cafédirect. 2007: 5). the more new partners and corporate agents are joining Fair Trade system the more they influence the standards of the Fair Trade. Fair Trade product has been offered to market as a brand based on the certification mark which has series of complex process. These problems are caused by a number of reasons. Thirdly. 2007: 4. Secondly. Similarly. Starbucks and Nestlé and others (Hutchens. for examples. is becoming an important marketing instrument and gain more relevance in the Fair Trade market as it has been in conventional businesses. individual Fair Trade operators such as Equal Exchange. as addressing 45 .composite products. Raynolds and Taylor (2003: 24) believe that corporate commitment to Fair Trade might be a temporary strategy and lasts until they develop their own criteria.

Figure 4.the limitations of FLO‟s certification system. the development of standardized brand is relevant to solidify the empowerment of producers in developing countries and to control the quality of the product that influences the purchasing behavior of consumers.5. it can widely contribute to ineffective marketing communication under Fair Trade model. Fair Trade coffee is the widely developed brand than any other product.5: Coffee branding process Source: Adapted from Hutchens. because brand owners might deviate from the requirements as they gain control over Fair Trade markets. Beyond the increased income returns to the producers. It is the fast growing brand and boosting the income of producers. On the other hand. For instance. The flow of coffee brand is indicated on Figure 4. (2007: 11). most of the branding businesses are co-owned with producers which give them higher sense of ownership. This poses a potential risks for FLO. 2007: 11). Therefore. In reality. 46 . Fair Trade brands have more advantages than product certification marks in conventional markets (Hutchens.

But in order to measure the impact. (5) improving working and living conditions and (6) enhancing environmental protection” (2008: 21). Or else the studies have not incorporated the non-financial and immaterial benefits accrued to Fair Trade producers. Most of the case studies focus on the impact (outcomes or effects) on the producers and producer co-operatives and organizations. The developmental impact on the producers should be demonstrated otherwise Fair Trade movement will lose credibility from the side of supporters and consumers. several studies have been conducted in different settings. 5.1 Introduction to Impact Evaluation The studies conducted on Fair Trade impacts earlier did not compare the change in the livelihoods of Fair Trade producers to other similar non-Fair Trade producers. it is relevant to know the guiding principles or the drivers behind the Fair Trade model. On the other hand. (2) strengthening farmers‟ organization and capacities. which can be realized by working with profit-driven businesses. Ruben outlines the following underlying principles: “(1) creating better income opportunities for economically disadvantaged producers. Thus demonstrating the developmental impact of Fair Trade. Generally.5 Impact of Fair Trade Marketing The analysis of Fair Trade movement (marketing) impact on the disadvantaged producers and their cooperative organizations has significant implication on the future growth of Fair Trade market. Nicholls and Opal summarize the concept behind Fair Trade as the need to secure sustainable economy. on the one hand. (4) promoting gender equity. and the need to have developmental (especially social and environmental) impact on the producers (Nicholls and Opal. Recently. it proves that Fair Trade model is a better approach to address the global market failure and consequently offers an alternative trading solution to the producers and farm workers of southern nations. to confirm this claim made by the Fair Trade actors. case studies are showing the focus on both financial and non-financial benefits generated from Fair Trade model (Nicholls 47 . (3) payment of a fair price. secures the consumer brand loyalty in the Fair Trade market. 2005: 201). Fair Trade consumers (the socalled ethical consumers) want to see the improvement that their purchasing power can make in the socio-economic environment of the poor producers in the developing countries.

These methods are 1) monitoring and evaluation system. In his case. including both primary and long-term implications. These results can be seen to be part of a chain: output leads to outcome and outcome leads to impact. FLO.). and 2) case study approach for assessing the long-term impact of Fair Trade (Ibid. the other approaches to impact studies are also valuable and equally considered in the scope of this paper. before discussing in detail the impact analysis. although. a due consideration should be given to the term impact and its wider usage in this study. short-term 48 . 2005: 204). financial and non-financial. Output results are defined as increased capacities of partner organizations to deliver outcomes at the level of target group. Basically. Ronchi (2002) and Ruben (2008) explanations contain most the relevant components of impact analysis: positive and negative effects. Similarly. 2002: 6). sustainable change in the lives and environment of people and groups for which a direct or indirect chain of causality can be established with the development initiative (CIEDEL. direct and indirect effects as well as intended and unintended outcomes” (2008: 23).and Opal. FLO has employed two different methodologies for the assessment of results and effects that lead to changes in producer‟s life and community at large. Ronchi explains that impact “…includes the effect of Fair Trade relations on their financial. The main reason for this preference lies on the wide range of possible impact assessment factors covered within this. outcome and impact level. However. Outcome results are defined as increased capacities of the target group to improve their living conditions. Ruben explains the impact assessment approach to several case studies as follows: “Program evaluations commonly distinguish between results on output. Nevertheless. the impact assessments are based on the documentation and survey data collected during the fieldwork. Ruben‟s chain of output-outcome-impact analysis is more appealing. Impact is defined as the (positive or negative) changes in living conditions of the target group. organizational and institutional development” (2002: 7). 1999 cited in FLO. 2007a: 35). Furthermore. The data includes primary documents and interviews with General Manager and members of staff (Ronchi. FLO defined impact “as a new situation created by a set of results and effects that induce significant.

This case study-collection not only embraces more than one 49 . for instance.1. summarize the impact as direct and indirect impacts of Fair Trade on the producers and their cooperatives or organizations as shown on Figure 5.2 Overview of Selected Case Studies In this section some of the selected case studies on beneficial impacts and its limitations are presented. it is very consequential. Ronchi (2002). More importantly. the behavioral parameters associated to their involvement in Fair Trade system. the impact indicates the differences in the major socio-economic changes observed on Fair Trade producer and their organizations as compared to the non-Fair Trade ones and moreover. and intended and unintended consequences. individual and communal benefits. direct and indirect effects.1 were compiled by Ruben (2008) and other authors and contains the wide range of examples on fair trade and their methodologies.1: Classification of Fair Trade impacts Source: Ronchi (2002: 3) 5. The first case studies presented in Table 5. Figure 5.and log-term implications. Especially to explain intra-relational impact between Fair Trade Organization. The case studies were conducted in different continents and different countries and on few products that passed through Fair Trade market. producers (cooperatives) organizations and producers. This classification helps to track the different stakeholders involved in and influenced by Fair Trade system.

CAC Pangoa. 241 13 >500 50 110 40 CAC Ubiriki CAC Tahuan. the case studies are not only limited to CAC Ubiriki and CAC Tahuantinsuyo but also enterprises like CAC La Florida.d 430 N.d 80 80 80 Fruit (outgrower) 1991 n.d N. Rica 1977 1975 274 233 60 60 Coopetrabasur Finca San Pablo 1980 1968 70+100 200 50 50 Coopemontes de Oro R.d 9 8 Establishment date Families Sample Sizes APVC APBOS Individual Producers 2002 2003 n. CAC Sangareni and Ass.d.A 1984 2004 286 600 50 50 Volta River Estates Golden Exotics 1988 2003 560 800 240(50) 50 400 >500 57 63 8 In Peru.d 30+30 30+30 El Guabo Independent farmers 1998 n. Moreover.) Peru (coffee) FT Non-FT Costa (bananas) FT Non-FT Costa Rica (coffee) FT Non-FT Ghana (bananas) FT Non-FT Ecuador (bananas) FT Non-FT Kenya (herbs) FT Non-FT Meru herbs Only &… Peru (artisanal) FT FT Minka (Juliaca) Allpa (Chulucanas) 1979 1981 60 groups 100 groups Non-FT Mexico (coffee) Juliaca & Chulucanas n.continent but also conducted on the varieties of products traded based on Fair Trade market requirements.d = no data available 50 . it had been conducted on both Fair Trade and nonFair Trade co-operative organizations to make a clear distinction. 9 Note that n.L Café de Altura S. Table 5.1 Overview of case studies Country Organizations (Product) Peru (bananas) FT Non-FT -(organic) Non-FT (conv. Productores Pichanaki.

076 1. 51 . Mexico Chiapas. the observation has relevant implications with regard to the involvement in Fair Trade. Coocafé). Mexico Year Founded 1989 Number of members 41 organizations 16.2: Case Study organizations in Mexico and Central America Name CEPCO Location Oaxaca. (2003: 4) The third case study category present on Table 5.2 below were conducted in Mexico and Central America.000. Mexico Guatemala 1981 1983 1976 1992 Late 70s 1997 1980 2. Despite the fact that. Raynolds and Taylor. Mexico Chiapas.3 was conducted only in Costa Rica and on coffee producers. Co-operative is formed by two or more members (primary level) and numbers of co-operatives form a producer organization (secondary level. Table 5. the findings on the impacts are solely associated to coffee producers. farmer‟s households and community and producer organization. (2008: 29) The second case studies shown in Table 5. co-operatives and cooperatives consortium. Mexico Chiapas.000 UCIRI Majomut La Selva Tzotzilotic La Voz APECAFE Las Colinas El Sincuyo Oaxaca. Here.Country (Product) FT Non-FT Organizations Establishment date Families Sample Sizes Michiza Cooperative Unorganized Fraternal & CNC 1986 n.000 26 25 Source: Adapted from Ruben. The number of members included in the study ranges from 28 to 16.500 943 840 116 11 cooperatives 99 28 El Salvador 2000 Source: Murray. These case studies focused on the impact of coffee on its individual producers. cooperatives and organizations. It shows the different levels of organizations involved in Fair Trade market. the central issue is to summarize the impact of Fair Trade system.100 >5. and thus can not ideally attributable to other products of Fair Trade.d 1.

The focus here is predominantly on the direct impact which can be further distinguished as 1) the financial impact measured in terms of the minimum fair price and social premium payment to producers. Because coffee is the most wanted and marketed products many case studies are focused on coffee producers. technical assistance and consultation from FLO or NGOs and finally moves on to explore the direct effects or 10 The year indicated here refers to the time when co-operatives joined Fair Trade consortium. the focus is also to find the contributions that this model has made to the existence of these social systems. However. tea. products like banana. These two categories should make the direct impacts demonstrable benefits of involvement in Fair Trade. For the sake of convenience. CooCafe. beverages and others that have gained a well established Fair Trade markets are also delivering similar positive results from the impact analysis conducted. 2002: 3). Costa Rica 1988 1989 some months Source: Based on Ronchi. The most significant contribution of fair trade is the increased prices where the producers are paid higher than the conventional market price for their coffee.3 Direct Impact of Fair Trade Fair Trade has made significant contributions to livelihoods of small farmer workers of the southern nations.Table 5. (2002: 5-6). In line with the mentioned beneficial impacts. and 2) the financial and non-financial benefits captured through Fair Trade system by producer organizations (Ronchi. 5. 52 . The impact analyses for many other Fair Trade products are still underway. then continue to outline organizational benefits in terms capacity building. the analyses begins with the obvious benefits of the higher price captured by Fair Trade producers.3: CooCafé and Co-operatives in Costa Rica Name cooperative of Organization (consortium) Year joined Fair Trade10 1988 Number members 138 529 400 509 of Coope Cerro Azul Coopeldos Coope Sarapiqui Coope Bonito Llano Coocafé.

Producers receive a minimum of US $1. 4) preserving indigenous cultures. and organizational levels (Murray. I prefer summarizing all listed impacts under Ronchi‟s (2002) financial and nonfinancial categories.other significant benefits that accrue at the individual producer households. coffee crisis in 1989) and as a result guarantees producer a stable income to cover the cost of production.21 plus social premium US $0. so-called floor price. Some of these impacts on the producers will be closely elucidated in the following section.3. 2003: 6). 2003: 6). For instance. The second significant benefit comes from Fair Trade premium price (also known as social premium) as mentioned in Fair Trade standards. communal. The two distinctive prices need to be considered are the floor price and premium price that the producers receive for their products. Raynolds and Taylor. sense of ownership. Raynolds and Taylor. Ruben (2008) outlined direct impacts such as job security and satisfaction.15 for certified organic coffee (Murray. 3) female empowerment. The social premium is paid 53 .1 Increment in Household Income Producer members of the co-operatives selling to the Fair Trade market through producer organizations receive a higher and stable price than any conventional market price.1. 5.1 Direct Impact on Producers The most well-known direct impact of Fair Trade on producers can be explained in terms of 1) increased income. Fair Trade organizations set a stable price. 2005: 204). The minimum (floor) price is paid by the consumers even when the market price is less. Thus. Similarly. for each product based on the average costs of production. With respect to that guaranteeing floor price is extremely valuable for smaller producers.3. Fair Trade coffee is the most marketed commodity compared to any other commodities. 5. corporate identification and others in addition to income. and 5) psychological effects such as producer empowerment and its effects on civic participation (Nicholls and Opal. 2) improved education.05 per pound and an additional US $0. One of the negative impacts that moving to the mainstream marketing impose on Fair Trade system is the perceived mainstream negotiating power to manipulate the unique pricing strategy of Fair Trade. This unique Fair Trade price reduces the effects of the volatility and fluctuations in commodity prices (for example.

522 3% 886. used in acquiring environment-friendly processing plant. invest in facilities for production of organic fertilizer.750 5.574 1. which in turn.944.268.205.extra above the Fair Trade product‟s value and is mainly used to invest in social and environmental projects. Table 5.263 100% Education 2 Health 4 Other use 7 Grand Total EUR Percent -tage 3.004 50% 81. Ronchi states that from Fair trade premiums earned 30% are invested in capitalization funds and 70% are allocated to producers‟ fund for distribution by the co-operatives (2002: 7).105 2% Source: FLO.117 1.).222. Or at times this premium serves as a social capital fund for co-operative.012 12. For example. (2007a: 34) Despite of the unattainable systematic economic data on accumulated household income for most case studies. benefits the producers in the log run.608 42% 20% 2% 7% 24% <1% 4% <1% 100% Source: FLO. the premium is a substantial supplement to producer‟s income. on the one hand.508 11.925 24% 872.723 6% 420.832 351.4:Fairtrade Premium spent SPO: total .635 112.844.5: Fairtrade Premium spent HLO: total . it is allocated to Social Capital Fund of the co-operative which is used to run the projects (for instance. Thus.014 1% 1. etc.010 6% 6.data 99% complete and Business production 5 premium project Not specific 8 Women‟s programmes 6 Environment 3 Community 1 premium 13.961 7% 294. cooperative like spent Clear Total 7 Not 3 5 54 .342.062.181 198. (2007a: 34) Table 5. some case studies indicated that there is significant improvement to the overall income of the household.002. On the other hand.data 100% complete premium use Community 1 Development Environment programmes Education 2 project Women‟s specific 8 Total spent premium Health 4 6 Other Grand Total EUR Percent -tages 2.

2003: 9). One remarkable achievements of Fair Trade in the social environment is the engagement and empowerment of the women. Table 5.1. in Small Producer Organizations women represented less than 25% of all members. Only 61% of the data was acquired to assess the gender issues in Small Producer Organization (FLO.7 (in the period between 2007 and early 2009).7: Number and percentage of male and female members and workers Number workers Female: Male: Total: 39395 56599 95994 of Data completion 99% of Percentage workers the 41% 59% 100% of population Source: FLO.6:Number and percentage of male and female members and workers Number of workers Female Male Total 83370 260030 343400 Data completion Extrapolated to 100% 61% of the 166.6 and 5.Majomut reported a 100-200 percent increase in income (Perezgrovas and Cervantes. In Hired Labour Organizations. female those who earn enough income could send their children to school.000 525. Generally. 2002 cited in Murray. 5. (2007a: 20) Although the percentage of female involved in Fair Trade activities are relatively less than that of male. (2007a: 20) Table 5. As result.2 Female Empowerment Involvement in Fair Trade is frequently advocated because of its expected implications for greater gender empowerment and improved environmental care. several Fair Trade handcraft projects focus on female producers and they are also a direct income beneficiaries.000 692. According to FLO findings indicated in Tables 5. 2007a: 20). reduces children‟s 55 .065 Percenta ge of workers 24% 76% 100% population Source: FLO. women are accounted for 41% of the work force.3. in both organizations women participation is limited to certain types of products (Ibid.). which in turn. Raynolds and Taylor.

Oaxaca.. enabling the children of producers or farm workers and of the local community to gain access to primary or secondary school (FLO.3. Most of the co-operatives are organized together and formed a foundation that support or even run schools in their communities. 2003: 9). 2003: 9). Lyon (2002 cited in Murray et al. Further educational benefits were also perceived in other case studies. Similarly. 2003: 11) noted that La Voz members in Guatemala are recuperating the ancestral farming practices. For example. UCIRI. on the one hand. the handcrafts. For instance.1. Raynolds and Taylor. Finally. the nine co-operatives (organized under producer organization – Coocafé) in Costa Rica had established a foundation and run three student-support programs: “Secondary School Scholarships.3 Improved Education Producers from many co-operatives reported about their access to training and enhanced ability to improve the quality of the production in different case studies (Murray. Especially. Raynolds and Taylor (2003: 11). 5. clothing and accessories were portrayed with the unique designs and embroideries of different cultures.1. it is contributing to cultural revival of some indigenous communities. Raynolds and Taylor. FLO confirms that significant amount of premium money is invested for educational purposes. which led to a 56 . in terms of projects implemented and services rendered to the co-operatives and producers‟ organization. 5. On the other hand. 2002: 8). helping consumers to broaden their horizon concerning foreign artifacts. 2007a: 33). For Fair Trade marketing those articles means. Weltladen) contain diversified cultural products imported from different countries. University Scholarships and an Educational Extension Fund aimed at bridging the enormous gap between the quality and accessibility of urban versus rural education” (Ronchi.4 Preserving indigenous cultures Most of world shops (German alternative.3.participation hired labor to contribute to the household income at the expense of going to school. Similar claim is made by members of La Voz in Guatemala that the improving children‟s education has been impacted by the involvement in Fair Trade (Murray. The most far-reaching impacts of Fair Trade. as described by Murray. reported the contribution of Fair Trade Direct Impact on Producers‟ (Co-operative) Organizations.

have provided most of producer organizations a capacity-building assistance with quality control processes and information about the market. CooCafé) as being channeled by 1) generating large sum of revenue through delivering its products to Fair Trade markets from its inception. 5. Based on that. as mentioned above. For instance. A well established producer organization can partially or fully trade their products through Fair Trade markets.tremendous organizational capacity building and empowerment. Murray. receives minimum price and social premium set by FLO.). especially ATOs. Ronchi (2002: 13-14) explains the direct financial impact of Fair Trade on producer organization (for example. “agricultural co-operatives (also 57 . and 3) the financial intermediation and interest revenue through the investment of social premium into available capital funds. This is fundamental to sketch the degrees to which Fair Trade has supported the survival and the growth of these producer organizations. CooCafé of Costa Rica export department reported the positive impact that the assistance of ATOs had in successful production and access to full coffee marketing chain and in product diversification scheme (Ibid.1. The product that is sold through Fair Trade market networks.5 Financial and non-financial support for producer organization Most of the producers‟ organizations export their products to Fair Trade markets. the support given to producer cooperatives and organizations can be grouped as financial and non-financial and further elaborated in the following section. The process of applying for certification and undergoing periodic compliance audits push organizations to improve their administrative capacity” (2007: 12).3. the financial and non-financial impact of Fair Trade on producers‟ co-operative is significant.3.6 Financial and Non-financial support for co-operatives In a similar way. Raynolds and Taylor (2003) wrote that the “…participation in Fair Trade has strengthened the overall ability of the organizations to serve their members. 2) the exportation of diversified products such as roasted and green coffee to Fair Trade markets. But before mentioning about the direct impact of Fair Trade on co-operatives organization characterizing of co-operative is worthwhile to understand. According to Milford description. 5.1. Fair Trade supporters.

direct trade and credit provision. Fair Trade played an important role in overcoming the capital constraints for most co-operatives compared to non-Fair Trade co-operatives. These are the types of co-operatives that operate in Fair Trade system. These benefits are even more valuable the than the mere income stated above. In short. The support of producer organizations will ultimately benefit the producers which belong to the organization itself. 2002: 17). lack of market information and various other reasons. the ultimate benefit of supporting the organizations accrues to the producers. 5.$70. Members in such a co-operative organization have shared-voting right and uniform membership contribution fee. Fair Trade is providing co-operatives with services and educational programs directly or indirectly (producer organization). For example. In reality. in 1995 the Costa Rican government passed legislation that demanded the use of „Clean Technology‟ to protect the environment. Nicholls and Opal explain that “Fair Trade producers gain value from long-term relationships. In contrary.4 Indirect Impact of Fair Trade Unlike the direct impact study. The non-financial impact of Fair Trade can be expressed in terms of support to cooperatives. the continuous survival of co-operatives is an indicator of the positive financial impact of being in Fair Trade system taking into consideration the possible market inefficiency and harsh government regulations. Several co-operatives used Fair Trade premium-funded Social Capital fund to meet their financial needs and comply with the new legislation (Ibid. For example. This program is financed directly by producer organization (Coocafé) or indirectly through Coocafé by Fair Trade.000 (Ronchi.). Many coffee producing cooperatives (of non-Fair Trade) were closed due to the capital constraints. coffee producing co-operatives in many countries are democratically organized. all of which help them in their non-Fair Trade sales 58 . The costs of conversion to the Clean Technology were between US$38. 000 . indirect impact deals with the various services and programs offered by the Fair Trade producer organizations and other member organizations and the consequent impacts of these services (Ronchi.sometimes referred to as marketing co-operatives or service co-operatives) buy the agricultural produce of their members and distribute it to the final market. owned and run by members. Most of the member co-operatives conduct educational programs on the benefits of being organized into co-operative. 2002: 2). usually after processing the product” (2004: 11).

it is important to take the indirect impact of Fair Trade into account. Remarkably. this is due to the increased organization‟s credibility which resulted from their participation in Fair Trade market system. That means the support of Fair Trade to producer organization non-financially. Thus. Thus. Nicholls and Opal mention the “1) positive externalities which drives from support for co-operatives and progressive plantations. access to different credit sources enable the members to invest in small 59 . 5. on producers and on their organizations. they are observable in the livelihoods of producers. These could further be elaborated by the following points. in the long run. one could call it organizational impacts on producers or farm workers. also extends to the support of co-operatives and. however. Raynolds and Taylor. 2003: 7). other traditional credit institutions (such as banks and development agencies) have opened their doors to Fair Trade certified famers because of their improved image (Murray. Most of these benefits can not directly be quantified or monetized.1 Indirect Impact on Producers Having discussed the direct impact of Fair Trade on both producers and their (cooperative) organizations. Among the perceived indirect impacts on the producers. especially within Fair Trade.4. Based on the field studies conducted on producers. Consequently. Ronchi (2002: 19-23) found that the non-financial impacts of Fair Trade on producers could be recognized by the services rendered to them by their cooperatives and/or organizations. and 2) benefits accrued to Fair Trade groups through direct trade relationships” (2005: 204). Even self-esteem and self-confidence are improved as Fair Trade farmers identify with an international alternative trading movement” (2005: 202). The communities in which Fair Trade producers operate benefit from development projects funded by Fair Trade cooperatives and farm workers organizations. 1) The financing conditions arranged by the cooperatives and producer organizations charges lower interest rates for credit facilities over the last ten years.negotiations. the remaining two avenues are analyzing the impact of those producer organizations. As some co-operatives reported. benefits individual producers.

has strong influences on the income of producers in the long run. social network is considered as indirect impact of participation in Fair Trade. This kind of assistance from Fair Trade organization. and educational session on organic production enabled to enhance the portfolio of their products (Ronchi. 3) As noted earlier in chapter two. in Costa Rica) on the cooperatives (Coope Cerro Azul or others). 2003: 8). Raynolds and Taylor. some of the Fair Trade organizations are committed in networking Fair Trade producer and their organization. Similarly. the participation in Fair Trade could be seen as an apprenticeship for quality-related techniques and enhancing production and commercialization. In line with this effort. the existence of the producer organizations in one community has an impact on the community beyond the immediate impact cooperatives. in turn. 2002). harvesting techniques and other quality-related procedures” (Perezgrovas and Cervantes. On the other hand. benefits the nonmembers those who can not establish such small businesses because of the financial constraints they have. for example.4. 5. provide members with a minimum of six training courses yearly in coffee tree management. 2) Members‟ participation in environment educational activities helps to reduce the usage of herbicides and pesticides.2 Indirect Impact on Producer Organizations The intention underlying in this section is to detect the impact of producers‟ organization or consortium (for example. these organizations have contributed to the development of networks s among the participants. These. Thus. 2008: 8). Although. Coocafé. According to Mendez (2002: 22 cited in Murray et al. the indirect beneficial impact is the union of different members of cooperatives under the umbrella of Fair Trade for the purpose of communal development. soil fertility and conservation. 2002: 17 cited in Murray. Fair Trade producer organizations are 60 . “Majomut‟s technical advisors. pest management. the financing of developmental activities heavily dependent on Fair Trade social premium. the interaction of different Fair Trade participants facilitated the building of social networks which led to collective action toward developmental activities in the community. directly and indirectly.businesses on their own land and homes.

For example. The collaboration of Fair Trade producer with non-Fair Trade helps “many groups learn about Fair Trade from other producer organizations and. economically stronger. Some of the significant impacts can be described in the followings. receive assistance from these other groups. 2) Ronchi emphasize “the impact of consortium via its wider co-operative actions. the meeting of technical advisors or human resource personals of different co-operatives supported by consortium has a significant impact on education and implementation of diversified projects benefiting various target groups. social-politically representative and commercially competitive. For example. policies and regulations enacted by local authorities could not threaten the existence of co-operatives because of the representative position and participative action of consortium.structurally higher. 5. These specific characteristics capacitate them to occupy higher position and play key roles in the Fair Trade business. Fair Trade registered cooperatives have facilitated the entry of other non-Fair Trade groups into the Fair Trade networks and markets. Firstly. “…the information-sharing processes have benefited the co-operatives in terms of administrative efficacy and human resource training” (Ibid: 24). in the process of certification and decertification. Fair 61 . 3) Based on the consortium initiative program for interaction and information interchange among the different co-operatives. and it also facilitated support in consultation and technical assistance from external agency such as NGOs and ATOs. its representative role on a national level and the opportunities it facilitates for its members provide important indirect impacts of Fair Trade” (2002: 23). in some cases. due to growth in Fair Trade markets and demand from consumers. That means. 1) Producer organization or consortium takes advocating position within the Fair Trade system.5 Impacts of Fair Trade on Non-Participants The impacts of Fair Trade extended beyond the Fair Trade producer and their organizations and affected non-Fair Trade producers and organizations positively. Their functions can further be understood under the listed points below.

Raynolds and Taylor. The implication is that the most marginalized population has no chance at all to participate and enjoy the benefit of Fair Trade due to the noted problem. Secondly.Trade pioneer UCIRI helped draw La Selva into the Fair Trade coffee market in 1990. 5. Fair Trade system has impacted non-Fair Trade producers through the strength and activity of primary level co-operatives. the following impact analyses were given a short consideration by Nicholls and Opal (2008: 216-225). 62 . it is observable how the standards and the related certification process may affect the cooperatives negatively and limit the benefits that Fair Trade has on the poorest producers (Nicholls and Opal. Especially. that is. 2008: 214). Similarly. Furthermore. Majomut then assisted Tzotzilotic in selling Fair Trade coffee for the fi rst time in 2001” (Murray. Ronchi claims that this model has a ratcheting effect. 2003: 20). 19). La Selva and Tzotzilotic of Chiapas. Moreover. the existing co-operatives are also forced to improve their compliance with the set of standards. Raynolds and Taylor.6 Emerging Impact Analysis Methods Different metrical methods of social impacts have been introduced to describe the social impacts of Fair Trade. they noted that this process has contributed to the improvement of the cooperative participation and reinforced the transparency of cooperative management and decision-making (Ibid). Alarmed from the decertification of other co-operatives. a short-term credit services available to non-members for their basic needs become relevant in improving the image of Fair Trade (Ibid. Mexico) that FLO decertified because of their incompliance with the Fair Trade standards are now working hard to avoid administrative weaknesses and other failures to regain their status as Fair Trade co-operatives (Murray. La Selva in turn facilitated Majomut‟s entry into Fair Trade in 1993-1994. the wage and price standards of Fair Trade cooperatives forced other non-Fair Trade cooperatives to improve for all producers (2002: 20). 2003: 13). Finally. previous Fair Trade co-operative organizations (for example.

4) 63 . social and environmental audits are partial. The social impact measurement is targeting at “…capturing specific. However. Unlike for the profit-driven commercial organizations. Nicholls and Opal stipulates that such metrical approach based human observation of individual or communal level changes or developments and therefore mostly incomparable. This qualitative model attempts to measure these values by combining the financial performance from company‟s accounting system with the social and environmental audits (Nicholls and Opal 2008). 2004: 34). 2004: 34). Therefore. are the vital in dealing with this method (Richardson. Richardson.6. which are economic. contrary to the financial performance. Fair Trade system is also seeking commercial returns. capturing the three pillars of sustainable development. however. subjective and not quantifiable and consequently. 5.1 Qualitative Approaches There are several metrical models employed to measure the social impacts of businesses.2 Social Accounting The second qualitative method is social accounting approach.1. 2008: 217). social and environmental capitals. 3) completeness. 2008: 216). These are 1) inclusivity. 2004: 34). and often partial. Thus. 2) comparability. 5. intrinsically it is concerned with generating social and environmental outcomes (Nicholls and Opal. The following four approaches are specifically related to them. applying TBL model to assess the full impact of Fair Trade system on producers and their organization is not the best possible option.1 Triple Bottom Line The triple bottom line (TBL) concept was introduced by John Elkington and developed to measure business companies economic value added and the impact on social and environmental value added (Richardson.1. descriptive outcomes of strategic action” (Nicholls and Opal.5. Of course. 2008: 217) outlined eight guiding principles.6. the TBL is less valuable for Fair Trade model.6. 2008: 217. This approach is more detailed and systematic means of social impact measurement than the TBL approach. Zadek (1998: 1436-8 cited in Nicholls and Opal. controversy still rages over the financial valuation of social and environmental impacts (Nicholls and Opal.

2002: 9).regularity and evolution. Traidcraft PLC in collaboration with New Economic Foundation (NEF) conducted social accounting and published the audit report in 1993 (Nicholls and Opal. 2001: 134-5. The “ISEA‟s goal is to promote best practice in social and ethical accounting. where the customers both pays for the services and receives the services. 6) communication. Currently. This method was first developed for profit-driven business organization and then adapted for public and nonprofit organizations. These principles provide valuable information about individual actions and objectives and can be used to indicate the development in the long-run (Ibid. Nicholls and Opal argue that it is largely an internally driven marketing strategy for stakeholders lacking comparative value and as a result declines to present the full impacts measurement. Nicholls and Opal. Traidcraft. 64 . For instance. auditing and reporting and to develop standards and accreditation procedures for professionals in the field” (Redfern and Snedker. using the conventional businesses audit practices. The nonprofit organization mission should be featured and measured by setting organizational objectives based on various stakeholders involved in the business analysis which encompasses internal business processes and organizational learning (Kaplan and Norton. Because of the two different parties involved the organizations should consider the donor and receiver perspectives in the arrangement of their balanced Scorecard. 2002: 9). 2008: 219). 2001: 134-5). 7) externally verified and 8) continuous improvement. Though social accounting is more appropriate indicator of social impacts than the former TBL. Thus the Balanced Scorecard for nonprofit is organized according to the one indicated on Figure 5. 2008: 217.1. Some Fair Trade organizations have adapted this approach. Contrary to the former organization.6. 5.3 Balanced Scorecard Nicholls and Opal continued to consider further qualitative approach known as Balanced Scorecard.). Redfer and Snedker. in a nonprofit organizations financial providers (donors) pay for the services and the target group or customers receive the services (Kaplan and Norton.6. NEF and others established Institute for Social and Ethical Accounting (ISEA). 5) embeddedness.

As it is shown on Figure 5. In practice. 2008: 220).Figure 5. 2002 cited in Nicholls and Opal (2008: 220) The application of Balanced Scorecard into the Fair Trade presupposes the understanding of multiple missions that is involved in fair Trade model. These are maximization of commercial returns to producers and denouncing the international trade inequality (Nicholls and Opal. 65 . The organizational learning aspect focuses on the various networks within Fair Trade which provide information flows and motivate innovations (ibid.3. Nicholls and Opal have further modified nonprofit organization Balanced Scorecard to fit it into Fair Trade system. internal business processes stipulate FTO to jointly devise commercial capacity as well as developing strategies for campaigning and raising awareness. They replaced customers by producers with the developmental objectives and investors by consumers with sales and awareness raising objectives. Thus. the advocacy groups such as FLO members.2: The Balanced scoredcard for not-for-profits Source: adapted from Kaplan. IFAT and EFTA are supporting the advocating objectives and the commercial operators like Traidcraft. 220). and People Tree are focused on the commercial growth. Cafédirect.

2008: 221-227). 2002 cited in Nicholls and Opal (2008: 221 5. 66 . According to NEF comment: “Social Return on Investment (SORI) mirrors the standard financial measure of economic return but shows how organizations of all kinds create value beyond the economic. they may or may not achieve similar levels of financial return. the value to society of the social or environmental returns that they create may well be equal or higher.Figure 5. This is particularly true for those organizations in the social economy that may search for either economic or just social value. government agencies and other social enterprises) and designed to measure the impacts of social projects. Thus.2 Quantitative Method: Social Return on Investment The most complex and advanced quantitative approach to social impact measurement is called Social Return on Investment (SROI) (Nicholls and Opal. private business. SROI methodology works across different sectors (for instance. environmental and economic impacts in this section. (2004b: 3 cited in Nicholls and Opal.3: The Balanced Scorecard for Fair Trade Source: adapted from Kaplan. SROI is favorable to demonstrate the combined impacts of all the three objectives. nonprofit organizations.6. but even if they do not. The term social impact stands for social. When compared to mainstream businesses. 2008: 222).

Nicholls et al. Eilis Lawlor. identifying the main stakeholders and specifying key social objectives are relevant (Nicholls and Opal. Inputs are resources invested in the social projects. 6) demonstrating transparency and 7) validating the results. SIA. 3) valuing the things that matter. Nicholls et al. a. but it has been written by Jeremy Nicholls. The impact value chain indicated on Figure 5. and edited by Sally Cupitt. For instance. outputs. 2008: 223. Based on these principles. Outputs are the direct and tangible products from the activity. increased household income. These principles can be explained as 1) Involving stakeholders. judgment plays a significant role in SROI analysis. Impacts are outcomes less an estimate what would have happened without the social projects activities (Nicholls and Opal. 2) understanding the changes taken place. The analysis of SROI involves various other issues that should be taken into consideration. 67 . 9). for instance. establishing the organizational boundaries of the social projects. 4) including what is material. outcomes and impacts. Eva Neitzert and Tim Goodspeed.)11 claim that SROI was developed from social accounting and cost-benefit analysis and supported by seven principles for its application. for example.(Not available) . Outcomes are changes to target group (Fair Trade producers and communities) resulting from the activity. Firstly. establishing impact map gives guidance to how social impact is intended to be achieved. 11 n. (2003: 18). Secondly. a careful judgment is required about the materiality of information to avoid the misrepresentation of the organization‟s activities. a. 5) avoiding over-claim.5 presents the linkage of inputs.The year of edition for “A guide to social return on investment” is not available. Fair Trade products sales. 2008: 223. (n.

the CAPM should also reflect these factors. the impact of technical assistance. Since Fair Trade business is retail in nature and small in size. The enterprise value can be acquired using the conventional business project valuation approach. 225). the calculation of SROI demands Cost Benefit Analysis tools. the quantified social purpose value will be discounted to a present value and represents the project outcome (Ibid.4: Impact Value Chain Source: SIA.Figure 5. For Fair Trade business. it can be divided into three steps (detailed elaboration of the steps on Appendix 1). For example. different developmental impacts are required to be valued. pre-financing and education programs should be carefully monetized. 68 . The second step the social purpose value of the given project should then incorporate various factors and be calculated for all factors. The last step is calculating a blended value of enterprise and social purpose values. The first step calculates the blended value (enterprise and social purpose value) of social project. The discount rate is calculated using the financial model known as Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) which calculates risk project. Similar to that of enterprise value. 2008: 223).). present value of the total future cash flows will be discounted by a risk premium (Nicholls and Opal. According to Nicholls and Opal (2008). The SROI is calculated based on the total investment in a project and also discounted by the weighted average discount rate of the enterprise and social purpose values (Ibid. (2003: 18) Finally. That is.

came to existence. Some of these organizations are advocator and campaigners. FLO. The ATOs having the legal status of nonprofit organization were not based on commercial principles rather on the solidarity trade principles. producers and commercial operators. and the introduction country-based Fair Trade seals (marks) created among the ethical consumers.and demand-driven marketing approaches. an independent umbrella organization. Originating from the criticism of prevalent failures in international trade liberalization to benefit disadvantaged trade partners. Although Fair Trade has both political and economical motives. Moreover. This phenomenon led to the formation of National Initiatives as controlling bodies. the once ethical consumers became commercial operators and focused on the consideration of both supply. Several commercialized ATOs started to join the Fair Trade system in different countries. commercial operator. the primary goal of Fair Trade is to integrate the marginalized producers in global South into international trade. The slowed down growth of Fair Trade system was primarily due to the grassroots traders (ATOs) focus on supply-sided approaches to the market and thus neglect of the consumers demand. The diversified application of Fair Trade standards and principles across different countries. The absence of commercial orientation delayed the fast transformation of this social enterprise to a competitive business model. Consequently. NEWS and FTF. power of Transnational Corporation and many other phenomena triggered the formation of many political movements in this era of globalization. Fair Trade became the consumers-backed support for ethically sourcing of agricultural commodity and various other products. Fair Trade being an alternative market within the free market system has attracted and served the ethical consumers only and consequently lingered to reach the mass of consumers for several years. fast market expansion. migration of labor. It also works in harmony with other Fair Trade organizations such as IFAT. FLO has developed general standards under which Fair Trade producer-suppliers and commercial agents should operate in the Fair Trade market. For that matter.6 Conclusion The international trade liberalization. WFTO. networking and market facilitators. This international organization roofed several NIs. movement of capital. it 69 .

Due to the growing demand for quality in return to the higher price paid for Fair Trade commodities. In line with this growth. The marketing mix elements: product. However. The pricing scheme has been addressing to the uniqueness of the product. several producers have started supply their products directly to conventional or traditional outlets. price. Especially. As a focal point of the marketing instrument. The FLO-Cert (certifier) proves product and producer organization and issues certification mark for the compliance. All together. Fair Trade marketing mix has focused on the producers (producer co-operatives or organization). certification process and monitoring system has given a guarantee for consumers to use their purchasing power to improve the livelihoods of small farmers and workers of global south. FLO brought a random monitoring system to sustain the perpetuity of the compliance. it has moved the Fair Trade commodities out of a niche market to mainstream outlets. Although Fair Trade marketing process shares some similar qualities with the social and conventional marketing approaches. place and promotion have been designed to communicate this specific message to the target audience. Fair Trade products‟ design has incorporated the ethical message and economic value inherent to it. the combined economic. despite the celebrated success of the move to mainstream markets. The dominance of traditional supermarkets along the Fair Trade supply chain has improved the fast distribution of Fair Trade products beyond the niche markets. The mainstream supermarkets interest in Fair Trade commodities has increased over last ten years and boosted the Fair Trade sales turnover. principle-driven Fair Trade activists are skeptic about the commitment of these new Fair Trade partners.conceived a certification process to make sure the compliance to established standards. it is unique and contains special value for the customers. social and environmental values attached to the product has been a unique vehicle in communicating the ethical consumers in the face of growing concern for social problems triggered by trade inequality. Especially. Fair Trade commercial operators (as producers‟ partners) have also emphasized their marketing concept on producers. the application of standards. The distribution of Fair Trade products has not been successful due to the incontinently located World shops and other Fair Trade outlets. Central to the growth of Fair Trade market can special be perceived as the marketing effort of the international Fair Trade organizations. Promotion of the Fair Trade 70 .

Especially. Some were only focused on specified products which can not be representative for many other Fair Trade products.products has been made possible through increased campaigning strategies of Fair Trade organizations. Fair Trade market has grown and benefited several producers. Nevertheless. the impacts Fair Trade on the livelihoods of producers and the large community have not been monitored and evaluated metrically. however. Finally. The impact of Fair Trade has been demonstrated by various case studies conducted in different regions. However. The beneficiaries are ranging from individual producers and their families.) has started to develop their own brands that is co-owned with the producer organizations. Finally. producers‟ organizations and the immediate communities. However. farm workers and their immediate communities in global south. the non-financial impacts of Fair Trade have been presented wholly and lacked the fair presentation of Fair Trade potential. For example. The beneficiaries of Fair Trade represent very small percentage of large disadvantaged communities from inequalities of international trade. Others did not capture and present the full Fair Trade impact on the producers. Fair Trade has just started the road to poverty reduction through a market-based strategy. because of the mainstream business involvement in the Fair Trade product outlets. 71 . etc. Until recently. there have been growing tendencies to develop convincing and accurate assessment methodologies that can capture the social and economical impacts. compared to the global population of marginalized communities. The development of Fair Trade marketing and the participation of the conventional outlets increased the demand for diversified Fair Trade products. most of the case studies conducted were on fair Trade coffee producers. the impact analyses reported have some problems. Due to this phenomenon several small producers and plantations have been impacted. Consequently. Fair Trade commercial operators (Cafédirect. It will take a while to disclose the full impact of Fair Trade. The researches conducted also outlined the direct and indirect impacts on producers. the accomplishment of Fair Trade can not be underestimated. Traidcraft. Fair Trade products neglected the product innovation and brand development. financial and non-financial benefits.

M. The Benefits of Fairtrade: A Monitoring and Evaluation Report of Fairtrade Certified Producer Organisations for 2007.iscom. M. K.html: 12) FLO (Fair Trade Labelling Organization International) (2009). Nicholls (Ed.pdf 4) Blowfield. 2010 from: http://www.cesulg. (2006). R.pdf 10) FLO (Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International) (2007a).nl/publicaties/gmi43blo%5B1%5D. Social Enterprise Models and Their Mission and Money Relationships. (2008).asp 9) Farnworth.fairtrade. & Kotler.worldbank.net/standards.). Growing Ethical Networks: the Fair Trade Market for Raw and Processed Agricultural Products.org/INTWDR2008/Resources/27950871191427986785/FarnworthC&GoodmanM_GrowingEthicalNetworks%5B1%5 D.cofta.pdf 5) Bowes. Retrieved December 08. Generic Fairtrade Standards for Small Producers‟ Organizations (SPO). D. 2) Andreasen. P.be/fileadmin/cesfiles/pdfs/Publications/2007/Becchetti___Huybrechts__2007___The_dynamics _of_Fair_Trade_as_a_mixed-form_market. (2004). McCrea (Eds. 11) FLO (Fair Trade Labelling Organization International) (2009). 2009 from: http://www. In S. Organic and Fair Trade Crossover and Convergence. A. (2008). 7th Ed. 2010 from: http://www. J.fairtrade. C. Oxford: Blackwell publishing Ltd. BBP Learning Media. (2007). Oxford University Press. The book of organic and Fair Trade food marketing (pp. In A. Retrieved February 15.edu/about-us/ 7) CIM Professional Post-Graduate Diploma in Marketing (2007). Social Entrepreneurship. The Dynamics of Fair Trade as a Mixed-Form Market. Generic Fairtrade Standards for Hired Labour (HLS). 8) COFTA (Cooperation for Fair Trade in Africa). Retrieved November 09. Paper 9: Analysis and Evaluation. 3) Becchetti.org/en/en/fairtrade. 2009 from: http://siteresources. 6) CFAT (Center for Alternative Trade). Retrieved March 12.cfat. 2010 from: http://www. for Exams in December 2007 & June 2008. Retrieved November 24. Retrieved February 15. With Associated Case Studies on Africa and Latin America. Ethical Supply Chain in Cocoa. Pearson education.262-283).).7 References 1) Alter. S. Strategic Marketing for Nonprofit Organizations. 2009 from: http://www. L. Wright & D. & Huybrechts. B. Coffee and Tea Industries. Oxford. Retrieved March 11. (2007).colostate. 2010 from: http://www. & Goodman. New Jersey. New Models of Sustainable Social Change (205-232).html: 72 .net/standards. and Croft.

edu/~smeunier/Hiscox_Fair%20Trade%20and%20Glob alization. (2007). A. (2001).php 19) Gooch.pdf 15) Fairtrade Labeling Organization International (FLO. Sustainability. Retrieved February 10. A.co.. Retrieved March 10. R. (2002). (year – not available) Fair Trade provides models for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Fair Trade as an Approach to Managing Globalization.pdf: 20) Jaffee. S. USA: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation. (2008).au/menus/workingpapers. Social Marketing: Improving the quality of life. 2010 from: http://www. Retrieved November 20. University of California Press.fairtrade. 23) Kotler. F.pdf 16) Lamb. Retrieved February 08. In S. D. Oxford: Blackwell publishing Ltd. 2010 from: http://cgkd.traidcraft. Harvard University Memo prepared for the conference on Europe and the Management of Globalization. H. (Eds. (2008).com/history-of-fair-trade. Brewing Justice: Fair-trade coffee. 2009 from: http://www. The Organic Consumer. working paper: December 2007. N. Ltd. Armstrong. 2009c): Fairtrade Leading the Way. V. London & Delhi. (2007). 2010 from:http://www. & Chrobok.13) FTH (Fair Trade Hub): History of Fair Trade. 17) Hiscox. 2010 from: http://www. Wong. Mainstreaming Fair Trade: Fair trade brands and the problem of ownership. P. 2010 from: http://www. M. Annual Report 2008-09. and Survival.54-84). & Saunders.fair-trade-hub. Retrieved January 10.net/fileadmin/user_upload/content/2009/products/C omposite_Policy.. Diplomica Verlag GmbH. McCrea (2007).anu.uk/Resources/Traidcraft/Documents/PDF/tx/policy_m odels_for_CSR. G.. California. 2nd Ed. 21) Kaplan. 2007b): Guidelines for the Fairtrade-labelling of composite food products.. N. Marketing und Monitoring von Fairtrade: Informationsprobleme in Ethischen Handelsbeziehungen. J. 24) Kotler. by Sage Publications Ltd..) The book of organic and Fair Trade food marketing (p.edu. Wright & D. Centre for governance of knowledge and development. & Lee. 22) Klebe. (2007). & Norton.net/fileadmin/user_upload/content/2009/resources/FLO_ ANNUAL_REPORT_08-09. P. J.html 14) Fairtrade Labeling Organization International (FLO.fairtrade.princeton. P. Princeton University. The Strategy-focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment.pdf 18) Hutchens. Roberto. Hamburg. D. Principles of 73 . (2007). Retrieved January 06. S.

Retrieved March 14. The book of organic and Fair Trade food marketing (pp. 35) Rajak. Wilkinson (Eds). A Report on Fair Trade in 33 consumer countries. Guide to Social Return on Investment (SROI).newint.cmi. Ethics and the Challenges of Marketing Fair and Ethical Trade. C. Chr.a. Coffee. (2007).L. D. the ideas. 2010 from: http://www.pdf 28) Mihaljevich. Netherlands. 2010 from: http://www. 25) Krier. Globalization and its antinomies: Negotiating a Fair Trade movement. SAGE Publications Ltd: London. „Uplift and Empower‟: The Market. 2010 from: http://www. California & New Dehli.. & Taylor. Retrieved March 10. Retrieved February 28. In S.Marketing. In L.htm 32) Nicholls et al. A. (2004). L. DAWS – Dutch Association of Worldshops. 1-14). T.). Murray and J. & Opal. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.ca/NR/rdonlyres/D7FFAB47-FC93-48BB-8825BA75B83F070D/0/jbusethics. E.no/publications/file/1802-coffee-co-operatives-andcompetition. (2008). & Raynolds. Printed and bound by Rotolito Lombarda. W.royalroads. 2010 from: http://www. Fair Trade Market-Driven Ethical Consumption. McCrea (Eds.org/files/A_guide_to_Soci al_Return_on_Investment_1. Retrieved January 10. C.pdf: 33) Nicholls. D.-M. A. L. and Davenport. Retrieved February 28. P. (2007).pdf 26) Low. L. 2010 from: http://www. Fair Trade Research Group. Case History: Duchy Originals.T.org/sites/neweconomics. 5th European edition.). A. Co-operatives and Competition: The Impact of Fair Trade. 29) Murray. T. Wright & D. Michelsen Institute Development Studies and Human Rights. 2010 from: http://www. the actions in the fight for global justice (April 2005). Journal of Business Ethics _ Springer 2008. (2008). (n. L. (2008). Fair Trade Market-Driven Ethical Consumption. J. Organizational Leadership. Oxford: Blackwell publishing Ltd.org/issue377/essay.edu/Depts/Sociology/FairTradeResearchGrou 31) New Internationalist: The people. One Cup at a Time: Poverty Alleviation and Fair Trade Coffee in Latin America. Fair Trade 2007: New Facts and Figures from an ongoing success Story. D.neweconomics. Morality and Corporate 74 . Italy.fairtradeadvocacy. California & New Dehli. Raynolds.colostate. D.org/images/stories/FairTrade2007_newfactsandfigures. Raynolds. SAGE Publications Ltd: London.173197). Norway. 30) Murray. Retrieved February 28.pdf 27) Milford. (2003). P. & Opal. 34) Nicholls. Fair Trade: The challenges of transforming globalization (pp. (2008). (2005). Colorado State University.

pdf 43) Schößwender. (2008). SEED Working Paper No. 100% Fair. McCrea (Eds. Richardson (Eds. Wilkinson (Eds). A.sussex. 2009 from: www.pdf: 46) Tollontire. 2010 from: http://www. T. UK. ADB Institute Discussion Paper No. 1st Ed. Accounting for Sustainability: Measuring Quantities or Enhancing Qualities? In A. Wirkungen. 115. 297-311). Murray and J. Publication from World shop (Weltladen).Responsibility on South Africa‟s Platinum Belt. & Snedker.fairtrade. Wood (Eds. (n.riseproject. A. R. Retrieved October 30. (2000).uk/Units/PRU/wps/wp11. (2002). (2008).) The book of organic and Fair Trade food marketing (p. a. Brighton BN1 9RE. 2010 from: Retrieved October 14. S. Retrieved February 28. 42) Sally. M. The Triple Bottom Line: Does it All Add Up? Assessing the sustainability of Business and CSR (pp. 41) Sahota. 2009 from: http://www. The impact of fair trade on producers and their organisations: a case study with Coocafé in Costa Rica. For love or money? Fairtrade business models in the UK supermarket sector.1-28). UK.). J. & Long.org/Social%20Impact%20Assessment. Luetchford. Grundsätze. Raynolds.sussex. Uk. A. Partnerships in fair trade: reflections from a case study 75 . L. Can Ethical Trade Certification Contribute to the Attainment of the Millennium Development Goals? A Review of Organic and Fair-trade Certification.certification/ 45) SIA (Social impact assessment) (2003). 44) Setboonsarng.org/discussionpaper/2008/08/25/2675. 15-32).adbi. Creating Market Opportunities for Small Business Enterprises: Experience of the Fair Trade Movement. Akteure. 30. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. A. Pratt & D. P.). London: Earthscan. University of Sussex. L. Paper no: 78 Institute of Development Studies. Retrieved October 14. Der Faire Handel in Deutschland. (2007).ac.34-44).org/content/download/2385/26427/file/COM78_Smith. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. The impact of Fair Trade. Wright & D. S.uk/Units/PRU/wps/wp11. Neve. B. Poverty Research Unit at Sussex University. (2002). Oxford: Blackwell publishing Ltd.ac. P. Hidden Hands in the Market: Ethnographies of Fair Trade. Ethical Consumption (pp. Retrieved April 14. D. In L.organic. In S. 2010 from: http://www. T. D. 39) Ronchi L. Fair Trade: The challenges of transforming globalization (pp. In G. Fair/Alternative Trade: historical and empirical dimensions. PRUS Working Paper No. (2004).pdf 38) Richardson. Washington: Washington Academic Publishers. Henriques and J.ftis2008. J. C. 11. (2008). 37) Redfern. Retrieved March 11. 2009 from: http://www. (2007). 36) Raynolds.pdf 40) Ruben. The International Market for Organic Fair Trade Food and Drink. International Labor Office Geneva.).

of Cafedirect. 2010 from: http://www. California State University. London & New Delhi: Sage Publications. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. Fair Trade Marketing: An Alternative System for Globalization and Development. 48) Witkowski. Retrieved February 28. (2005). Retrieved February 28. Vermont.sandywynne.com/thesis. S. (2008).pdf 49) Wynne. Inc.pdf 76 . 2010 from: http://www. California. 2010 from: http://www.qmulfairtradeproject. N. T.fairtrademarketing2.edu/~witko/jmtp. K. (1999).org/openaccess/Tallontire%202000%20Partnerships%20in% 20Fair%20Trade%20(2). Colchester.csulb. H.pdf 47) Weinreich. A thesis/major paper submitted to the faculty of the program in Administration of Saint Michael‟s College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Administration. Hands-On Social Marketing: A Step – by – Step Guide. Fall 2005. Retrieved March 14. Long Beach. The Challenges of Marketing Fair Trade.

but not all. taking into account the WACC. where relevant o Calculate and blended value  Add enterprise and social venture values together To measure investment: o Calculate the total cost of supporting the social venture (in many. cases this is a philantropic grant or donation)  Discount this figure by the weighted average of the discount rates for the enterprise and social venture values already worked out To measure return: o Calculate the enterprise index of return  Divide the enterprise value by the total investment o Calculate the social purpose index of return  Divide the social purpose value by the total investment o Calculate the blended index of return  Divide the blended value by the total investment 77 . taking into account the direct social costs of the project  Discount this figure by an appropriate rate.Appendix 1. where relevant o Calculate the monetized social purpose value. Appendix: The steps of SROI calculation For a given project SROI will be calculated as follows: To measure value: o Calculate the enterprise value  Discount this figure by an appropriate rate. taking into account the WACC.

Dass ich die Übernahme wörtlicher Zitate aus der Literatur (auch aus dem Internet) sowie die Verwendung der Gedanken anderer Autoren an den entsprechenden Stellen innerhalb der Arbeit gekennzeichnet habe. 2. 4 SPO (§ 13 Abs. 4 SPO) ausgeschlossen werden und dadurch die Zulassung zum Studiengang verlieren kann. dass ich der Ableistung weiterer Prüfungsleistungen nach § 15 Abs.EHRENWÖRTLICHE ERKLÄRUNG Ich erkläre hiermit ehrenwörtlich: 1.04.2010 Unterschrift 78 . ______________________ Nürtingen. Ich bin mir im Weiteren darüber im Klaren. dass die Unrichtigkeit dieser Erklärung zur Folge haben kann. Dass ich meine Masterarbeit selbständig und ohne fremde Hilfe angefertigt habe. 23.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful