Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

941 views

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- Friction Lab Report
- Television is the Leading Cause of Violence in Today's Society
- Friction
- What Are the Ways to Show Patriotism
- SPH4U SOLUTIONS (UNIT 3)
- Sample Physics Lab Report
- Answers to Grade 12U Physics Key Questions Unit 1
- Physics Lab Report 2
- Lab Report Acid Base
- Friction
- Potentiometer.pdf
- Static & kinetic Friction.ppt
- Chemistry Lab Experiment 4
- Homesickness
- Potentiometer
- Physics Lab Report Format
- Physics Experiment
- Static & Kinetic Friction Exprement
- 09 Static and Kinetic Friction
- equilibrium

You are on page 1of 3

Part A:

12. Determine the slope of the graph – what does the slope represent? Is it similar to the

average value of F friction/F normal calculated above? The slope of the graph, as found in the

graph of F applied vs. F normal, is around 0.21. The slope represents the coefficient of static

friction found by the equation F friction/ F normal. The slope of the graph is very similar to the

average value of F friction/F normal calculated in the data table. This is because they both

represent the slope of the graph. However they are not the same because the calculated value for

the average F friction/F normal ratio is an average taken from four coefficient of static friction

where as the slope of the graph is calculated from the line of best fit of the data points. Also,

there may have been minor experimental errors which are unavoidable.

Part C:

3. If the brush is sliding down the slope at constant velocity, how must the Fg component

down the incline (FgsinO) compare to Ffk? If the brush is sliding down the slope at constant

velocity, it must have an acceleration of zero. In order for the acceleration to be zero, the net

force acting on the brush also has to be zero. Since FgsinO and Ffk have opposite directions, the

magnitude of these forces should be the same to result in having a net force of zero. Therefore,

the Fg component down the incline should be equal to Ffk except for the difference in their

direction.

Conclusions:

1. Why is the normal force equal to mg in Part A, but not in Parts B and C? Explain

using a FBD. The normal force is equal to mg in Part A because since the ramp is at a

zero degree angle, the normal force is towards the opposite direction of the force of

gravity. The magnitude of the normal force is equal to the magnitude of the gravitational

force only when they are facing the opposite directions, having an angle of 180 degrees in

between them. That is why in Parts B and C, where the board was slanted, the normal

force did not equal to the force of gravity which is calculated by mass times the gravity.

2. What does the slope of the graph in Part A represent? How do you know? The slope of

the graph in Part A represents the coefficient of static friction because on the graph, F

friction represents the y-axis and F normal represents the x-axis. The slope of a line is the

change in y-coordinates divided by the change in x-coordinates. According to the graph,

the slope is then calculated by F friction divided by F normal. This equation is also used

when the coefficient of static friction is calculated and therefore the slope of the graph in

Part A represents the coefficient of static friction. As one can see, the difference between

our slope of the graph and the coefficient of static friction is minimal and the difference

that exists is only because of minor experimental errors. The slope of the graph was

around 0.21 and the average coefficient of static friction was around 0.25.

3. Does the mass affect amount of friction? Force of friction equals to µ multiplied by

normal force. Therefore it is right to say that the force of friction is dependent on the

value of the normal force. Since mass affects the normal force, the amount of friction will

also be affected by the change in mass. The higher the mass, the higher the normal force

which will increase the force of friction. The lower the mass, the lower the normal force,

which will decrease the force of friction.

4. Does the mass affect the coefficient of kinetic friction? Mass does not affect the

coefficient of kinetic friction because the coefficient of kinetic friction can be found by

the equation, Ffk/Fn. Ffk is mgsinO and Fn is mgcosO. When Ffk is divided by Fn, the

mg in both forces will cancel out and therefore the coefficient of kinetic friction will be

tanO. Mass would not affect the coefficient of kinetic friction because if there is a change

in the mass, it would change the Fn as well as the Ffk because Ffk is basically FgsinO.

The force of normal and the force of kinetic friction will show the same ratio no matter

what change is made to the mass.

5. Use a FBD and your data from Part B to derive the equation tanO = µs.

6. Is the coefficient of static friction from Part B larger or smaller than the coefficient of

kinetic friction from Parts A and C? The coefficient of static friction from part B is

larger than the coefficient of kinetic friction from Parts A and C because the angle of the

ramp in part B was the greatest. In part A the angle was 0 degrees, in part B the angle was

16 degrees, and in part C the angle was 15 degrees. The coefficient of friction found in

parts A,B, and C are 0.25, 0.29, and 0.27, respectively. Since the coefficient of friction is

calculated using tanO, the greater the angle, the greater the coefficient of friction.

Part A:

- When the mass was pulled across the ramp, the force applied was not always constant

because it was very difficult to pull the mass for a fair amount of distance with constant

force.

- The surface of the ramp was not very smooth and some parts were rougher than the

other. This caused the force applied to be unstable.

Part B:

- When we were lifting the ramp, the lift was not very smooth. Sometimes the ramp

was a bit shaky which caused the mass to move at one point and stop at another point.

- It was difficult to hold the ramp at the same angle when the mass was sliding down

the ramp. This caused a slight deficiency in the data collected.

Part C:

- Sometimes when we applied a push to the mass to make it slide down the ramp, the

force we applied to push the mass was not always constant.

- When the mass was sliding down the ramp, sometimes it started slow and sped up

towards the end, showing acceleration. This was due to a slight change in the angle of

the ramp.

- Friction Lab ReportUploaded byFang Ying Tee
- Television is the Leading Cause of Violence in Today's SocietyUploaded byCarlos Felipe
- FrictionUploaded byReincarnation Anukriti Nandan
- What Are the Ways to Show PatriotismUploaded byHoney Mawar
- SPH4U SOLUTIONS (UNIT 3)Uploaded byVoormila Nithiananda
- Sample Physics Lab ReportUploaded byTaehyun Chang
- Answers to Grade 12U Physics Key Questions Unit 1Uploaded byDomenico Barillari
- Physics Lab Report 2Uploaded byBen
- Lab Report Acid BaseUploaded byxuni34
- FrictionUploaded byKiara De Leon
- Potentiometer.pdfUploaded bystevenspillkumar
- Static & kinetic Friction.pptUploaded byWirote Dewilai
- Chemistry Lab Experiment 4Uploaded bydecandana
- HomesicknessUploaded byyoucanalwaysgofaster
- PotentiometerUploaded byAbdallah Nah D
- Physics Lab Report FormatUploaded byjames
- Physics ExperimentUploaded byRose Anne Evangelista Acedera
- Static & Kinetic Friction ExprementUploaded byBishoy Girgis
- 09 Static and Kinetic FrictionUploaded byWanda Astari
- equilibriumUploaded byUgur ASİT
- FrictionUploaded bymajji satish
- Rate of ReactionUploaded bylamdamu
- PotentiometerUploaded byammuluhai333
- Static FrictionUploaded byRacquel Nacino
- CybercrimeUploaded byMaralto Maraltoo
- Static and Kinetic FrictionUploaded byBaltazar Marcos
- Rates of Reaction Experiment v.1.02Uploaded byMuhammad Bilal Anwar
- Error in physicsUploaded byliciawinata
- Rate of Reaction Bwat SendiriUploaded byNor Ashikin Ismail
- CLIENT SERVER COMPUTINGUploaded byhifzan786

- Fujitsu Ary30!36!45luan Aoy30!36!45lmawlUploaded byCallany Anycall
- Helicopter Physics Courswork FinalUploaded byAhmed Abokor
- Group-7 (1)Uploaded byRalph Carlo Evidente
- Vapor Liquid Equilibrium GraphsUploaded byMd. Hasib Al Mahbub
- Some Properties of Solid Liquid Composite Dielectric Systems ParkmanUploaded bydennisroldan
- 1Uploaded byKali Charan Pradhan
- ANSI-C-37-32Uploaded byblem_0075
- Effective MassUploaded byagnirailways
- Bulk Density and Specific GravityUploaded byGranita Muhaxheri
- Linear+Absorption+CoefficientUploaded byFilip Angelovski
- Assignment - Module 3Uploaded byDr. Pradeep Kumar Sharma
- WorkAndEnergy(2)Uploaded byRavi Lall
- Electri TheoryUploaded byFatima Khan
- PE Lab Mannul St.martin's CollegeUploaded bydiwakar
- Mod Phy - Coulumb's Law - Coulumbs LawUploaded byapi-3723453
- SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTORSUploaded byscardig
- Heat Pipe Final2..Uploaded byOmi Tare
- Joule Thief Detailed ConstructionUploaded byLăcătuş Daniel
- solar pvUploaded byShivinder Garg
- Periodical Test in Science 8Uploaded byEileen Joy Noceda
- Testing and Commissioning of Metal-Clad SwitchgearUploaded byMahmod Mohamed
- CondensationEvaporation_2013.pdfUploaded byShams Shams
- 1-IEC List 2014Uploaded byact_rahul53
- 10 High-Temperature Low-Sag ConductorsUploaded byRazvan Mares
- Prasai ETDUploaded bydigital2000
- US Army: crd c37Uploaded byArmy
- [IJET-V1I4P1] Authors :T.S.Geetha , Dr.S.SelvakumarRajaUploaded byInternational Journal of Engineering and Techniques
- Vibration and Monitoring Terms GlossaryUploaded byyaniprasetyo12
- MA_VD4G(EN)-_1VCD601473 - 03.2017Uploaded byPapun Scribd
- Fluid DynamicsUploaded byAlberto Icazatti

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.