19 views

Uploaded by Frederick Ofori-Mensah

- Mod 1 - TVM - Intuition Discounting - Problem Set 1
- Finance
- BF
- debt and equity funds in India
- Stuff Added things
- New Text Document (2)
- histretSP
- Ch 8 Solutions Final
- Chapter 8 - ROR Analysis for Multiple Alternatives
- McConnell
- Finacial Planning Beaumont Resident 16
- Ch8_RateofReturnMultipleAlternatives
- Suring Basa SaFilipino
- Chapter 8 - ROR Analysis for Multiple Alternatives
- Chapter 11 Slides
- Inflation Linked Instruments
- Mail
- dividendyieldstocks_040908
- Financial Management (1)
- US Treasury: ps-1993-q2

You are on page 1of 4

(202) 906-5729

statement states: “The agencies [i.e.,

the expected return of fixed-income

securities. In evaluating the expect-

the FRB, FDIC, OCC, OTS, and ed return of an individual fixed-

Last year, both the Federal Financial NCUA] agree that the concept of income security, or portfolio of

Institutions Examination Council total return can be a useful way to fixed-income securities, investors

(FFIEC) and the Office of Thrift analyze the risk and return tradeoffs typically use internal rates of return,

Supervision (OTS) issued policy for an investment. This is because such as yield to maturity or yield to

guidance that recommends institu- the analysis does not focus exclu- call, as selection criteria. These two

tions conduct a total return analysis sively on the stated yield to maturi- yield measures, however, are unlike-

in assessing the effects of interest ty. Total return analysis, which ly to reflect the correct expected

rate changes on the returns associat- includes income and price changes investment return. Instead, total

ed with investment securities and over a specified investment horizon, return provides a better measure of

financial derivatives prior to taking is similar to stress testing securities prospective investment return.

a position in these financial instru- under various interest rate scenarios.

The agencies’ supervisory emphasis

on stress testing has, in fact, implic-

itly considered total return. Conventional

Measures of

Therefore, the agencies endorse the

Risk Management Division use of total return analysis as a use-

ful supplement to price sensitivity

analysis for evaluating the returns

Investment Return

Director, Risk Management for an individual security, the invest-

ment portfolio, or the entire institu- The price of a bond is equal to the

Sarah Bryant, Ph.D. tion.” In Thrift Bulletin 13a, issued present value of the bond’s expected

Donald Edwards last year, OTS states: “Management cash flows. By definition, the yield,

Radu Filimon, Ph.D. should exercise diligence in assess- or internal rate of return, is that

Eberhard Irmler ing the risks and returns (including interest rate that equates the present

Cezary M. Jednaszewski expected total return) associated value of a bond’s cash flows to its

Jonathan D. Jones, Ph.D. with investment securities and current market price. Yield to matu-

financial derivatives.” rity (YTM) and yield to call (YTC)

Office of Thrift Supervision are two frequently used measures of

1700 G Street, N.W. This Risk Management Release dis- return (or yield) on fixed-income

Washington, D.C. 20552 cusses total return analysis and securities. YTM is used to price and

shows how it can be used to measure trade non-callable bonds, while

June 1999

Office of Thrift Supervision

YTC is used to price and trade n Capital gain or loss when a bond where r and h are defined as above,

callable bonds. matures, is sold, or called, and and

YTM is the internal rate of return on n Income from reinvestment of Total future dollars =

a non-callable bond that is held until coupon interest payments (inter-

maturity. In using this yield mea- est-on-interest income). Coupon payments

sure, one assumes that the security is + Interest-on-interest income

held until maturity and that all cash Therefore, to calculate the total + Sales price.1

flows can be reinvested at the same return for a non-callable bond, an

constant YTM. YTC is the internal investor chooses an investment hori-

rate of return on a callable bond that zon or holding period, a reinvest-

is held until either the first call or ment rate, and a selling price for the Total Return

Analysis in Practice

first par call date. In using this yield bond at the end of the investment

measure, one assumes that the secu- horizon (i.e., end-of-period required

rity is held until being called by the return). Based on the values chosen

issuer and that all cash flows can be for these parameters, the total return There are several different

reinvested at the same constant calculation is straightforward. First, approaches that could be used to

YTC. total coupon payments plus interest- calculate total return. First, an

on-interest income are calculated for investor, or portfolio manager, could

Both of these return measures have the assumed reinvestment rate over calculate total return on the basis of

several important drawbacks. First, the given investment horizon using subjective forecasts of the reinvest-

investors typically do not hold the following expression: ment rate and required yield at the

fixed-income investments until end of the investment horizon.

these investments mature or are where Second, implied forward rates from

called. Second, interim cash flows the yield curve (e.g., U. S. Treasury

cannot be reinvested at the assumed Coupon plus interest-on-interest = or LIBOR yield curves) could be

constant yields. Finally, it is not used to determine the reinvestment

possible to compare the likely (1+r)h - 1 rates and the yield on a bond at the

Coupon

returns on investments with differ- r end of the investment horizon. This

ent maturities or more complex approach to total return analysis

return/risk profiles. h = length of investment horizon, produces what is called an arbitrage-

and free total return because the calcula-

r = assumed reinvestment rate. tion is based on the market’s

expectations of the reinvestment

Total Return rate and end-of-period required

Analysis in Theory

Second, the predicted sales price of yield. Finally, scenario analysis

the bond at the end of the investment could be used to calculate total

horizon is calculated. Third, total return. Scenario analysis involves

Total return analysis avoids the future dollars derived from the bond specifying different possible values

shortcomings associated with using over the holding period are calculat- for the reinvestment rate and the

the two conventional yield mea- ed by summing total coupon pay- required yield at the end of a given

sures, YTM and YTC, and provides ments, reinvestment income, and the investment horizon, and then calcu-

an investor with a better measure of predicted sales price. Finally, this lating the total return associated

the expected return on fixed-income value is substituted into the follow- with each scenario.

investments. The total return (also ing expression to obtain the total

known as the horizon or total hold- return: Of the three approaches, total return

ing-period return) accounts for the analysis based on scenario analysis

three sources of potential dollar is the best approach because it

return on a bond: 1/h allows an investor, or portfolio man-

Total future dollars

yh = -1 ager, to measure how sensitive a

n Coupon interest payments, Purchase price of bond bond’s expected performance is to

1 This discussion draws on material from Frank J. Fabozzi, editor, The Handbook of Fixed Income Securities, 5th Edition, 1997, Chapter 4.

See this chapter for further discussion of the total return concept.

page 2

Risk Management Series

differing reinvestment rates and As shown in the tables, there are The second example compares the

end-of-period required yields. Total three different reinvestment rates, 4, total returns for two bonds of differ-

return analysis can also be used to 5, and 6 percent, and three different ent maturities. The first bond, Bond

compare the expected returns of a end-of-period required yields, 6, 8, A, is the same bond used in the pre-

bond for investment horizons of and 10 percent. In both tables, for vious example. The second bond,

varying lengths. In the two exam- each combination of reinvestment Bond B, is a 7.25 percent coupon,

ples that follow, scenario analysis is rate and end-of-period yield, there is 14-year non-callable bond with a

used to compare: (1) the total a total return estimate for Bond A. current market price of $94.55 and a

returns for a bond using two differ- yield to maturity of 7.9 percent.

ent investment horizons, and (2) the As shown in the two tables, the total (This example is adapted from

total returns for two bonds of differ- return estimates vary substantially Fabozzi, The Handbook of Fixed

ent maturities. across the two investment horizons. Income Securities, 5th Edition,

The differences in the total return pages 72-75.) In comparing the

To assess the effect on a bond’s total estimates illustrate the effect that the total returns for the two bonds

return of varying the length of the choice of investment horizon has on below, the investment horizon is set

investment horizon using scenario a bond’s expected return since the to three years. On the basis of yield

analysis, assume a bond, say Bond relative importance of the reinvest- to maturity, Bond A appears to be a

A, is a 9 percent coupon, 20-year ment rate and end-of-period better investment than Bond B

non-callable bond with a current required yield is related to invest- because of Bond A’s higher yield to

market price of $109.90 and a yield ment horizon. For short investment maturity. However, as the example

to maturity of 8 percent. Tables 1 horizons, for example, reinvestment shows convincingly, yield to maturi-

and 1A show various scenarios for income is small, but it increases in ty is not a reliable measure of

the reinvestment rate and end-of- size as the investment horizon expected investment return.

period required yields for Bond A lengthens.

for a three-year and ten-year invest- Table 1 (left) and Table 2 (page 4)

ment horizon, respectively. show various scenarios for the rein-

vestment rate and end-of-period

required yields for Bond A and

Table 1. Scenario Analysis for Bond A’s Total Return Bond B, respectively. There are

Required Yield at End of

three different reinvestment rates, 4,

3-Year Investment Horizon (%)

5, and 6 percent, and three different

end of period required yields, 6, 8,

6.0 8.0 10.0 and 10 percent. These are the same

Reinvestment Rate (%) values used in the previous example.

4.0 13.36 7.78 3.06 The total return estimates for both

5.0 13.44 7.87 3.16 bonds vary substantially across the

6.0 13.53 7.97 3.26 different rate scenarios. For Bond A,

these estimates range from a maxi-

mum value of 13.53 percent to a

minimum value of 3.06 percent. For

Bond B, these estimates range from

Table 1A. Sensitivity of Bond A’s Total Return a maximum value of 12.16 percent

to Investment Horizon to a minimum value of 3.48 percent.

Required Yield at End of This example shows the high degree

10-Year Investment Horizon (%) of sensitivity of a bond’s expected

return to different values for rein-

6.0 8.0 10.0 vestment rates and end-of-period

Reinvestment Rate (%) required yields.

4.0 7.59 6.88 6.24 If a portfolio manager currently

5.0 7.85 7.16 6.53 owned Bond B, the higher yield to

6.0 8.11 7.43 6.82 maturity on Bond A might induce

page 3

Office of Thrift Supervision

Bond B in a pure yield pickup swap Table 2. Scenario Analysis for Bond B’s Total Return

transaction. However, Tables 1 and

2 show that the likely returns on Required Yield at End of

both bonds are sensitive to what 3-Year Investment Horizon (%)

happens to interest rates, despite the 6.0 8.0 10.0

higher promised yield to maturity

for Bond A. To see this more clear- Reinvestment Rate (%)

ly, Table 3 shows the total return for 4.0 12.00 7.50 3.48

Bond A minus the total return for 5.0 12.08 7.58 3.57

Bond B in basis points.

6.0 12.16 7.67 3.67

Table 3 shows that for required

yields of 6 and 8 percent, Bond A’s

total return exceeds that of Bond B’s

for all three reinvestment rates. Table 3. Bond A’s Total Return Minus Bond B’s Total Return

However, for a required yield of 10 (in Basis Points)

percent, the situation reverses dra-

Required Yield at End of

matically, with Bond B’s total return

3-Year Investment Horizon (%)

exceeding that of Bond A. These

results suggest that investment deci- 6.0 8.0 10.0

sions based only on stated yield to Reinvestment Rate (%)

maturity will not produce the best

total returns as interest rates change. 4.0 136 28 - 42

The results of this simple example 5.0 137 29 - 41

demonstrate the importance of con- 6.0 137 30 - 41

ducting a stress test over various

interest rate scenarios when evaluat-

ing the expected return on invest-

ment securities prior to taking

positions in these financial instru- portfolio of fixed-income securities, total returns depending on changes

ments. some investors use promised yield in reinvestment rates, end-of-period

to maturity or yield to call as selec- required yields, and length of the

tion criteria. These yield measures, investment horizon. However, there

however, are unlikely to reflect the is an important caveat. In comput-

Conclusion correct expected investment return ing total returns based on scenario

as interest rates change and invest- analysis, investors should be aware

ments are sold prior to maturity. that total return estimates will only

This Risk Management Release has Instead, total return provides a better reflect expected investment returns

shown how total return calculations measure of expected investment if expectations regarding reinvest-

based on scenario analysis can be return. ment rates and end-of-period yields

used to measure the expected return turn out to be correct.

of fixed-income securities. In evalu- In summary, investment decisions

ating the likely return of an individ- made on the basis of YTM or YTC

ual fixed-income security, or can lead to investments with lower

page 4

- Mod 1 - TVM - Intuition Discounting - Problem Set 1Uploaded byNatarajan Rajasekaran
- FinanceUploaded byHelpline
- BFUploaded byMuhammad Awais
- debt and equity funds in IndiaUploaded byNikki_707
- Stuff Added thingsUploaded bySaraNowak
- New Text Document (2)Uploaded byAbhishek Kumar
- histretSPUploaded byfgpapa
- Ch 8 Solutions FinalUploaded byangel_0717
- Chapter 8 - ROR Analysis for Multiple AlternativesUploaded byBich Lien Pham
- McConnellUploaded bygreg
- Finacial Planning Beaumont Resident 16Uploaded byrentedmule00
- Ch8_RateofReturnMultipleAlternativesUploaded byEngku Khairi
- Suring Basa SaFilipinoUploaded byBenevolent Castillo
- Chapter 8 - ROR Analysis for Multiple AlternativesUploaded byDejene Hailu
- Chapter 11 SlidesUploaded byEmily Merten
- Inflation Linked InstrumentsUploaded bymarif79
- MailUploaded byTushar Pawar
- dividendyieldstocks_040908Uploaded byjpsmu09
- Financial Management (1)Uploaded byMuhammad Ayub
- US Treasury: ps-1993-q2Uploaded byTreasury
- InvestmentUploaded byJason Crow
- 2016 TO WITNESS THE UPRISING OF TIER 2 CITIESUploaded byHarday Gupta
- Ch8_RateofReturnMultipleAlternatives.pptUploaded byquik silva
- 00sf021_3Uploaded byPrince McGershon
- Bond CaseUploaded byIntan Renita
- US Treasury: ps-1991-q1Uploaded byTreasury
- ParityUploaded byPulkit Gupta
- Pages After IndexUploaded byravikumarreddyt
- SPL PresentationUploaded byjashim_fuchs
- Enter Data HereUploaded byJay Upadhyay

- Aching Shaiza OutlineUploaded byFrederick Ofori-Mensah
- per09-03Uploaded bydurgeshnandan6002
- Pension Fund Presentaion_Group4Uploaded byFrederick Ofori-Mensah
- Wasif Concept CocumentUploaded byFrederick Ofori-Mensah
- ILPA Private Equity Principles 2.0Uploaded byFrederick Ofori-Mensah
- Pegasus Account FinalUploaded byFrederick Ofori-Mensah
- Petroleum CommissionUploaded byFrederick Ofori-Mensah
- Ghana-Local Content PolicyUploaded byFrederick Ofori-Mensah
- A Worker's Guide to Private Equity-eUploaded byparitoshagarwal
- SSRN-id993945Uploaded byFrederick Ofori-Mensah
- Information Memorandum, US$, Pre-IPO Capital Raising - Feb'11Uploaded byFrederick Ofori-Mensah

- Why Participatory Notes Are DangerousUploaded bypulkitaquarian
- TESCO Financial AnalysisUploaded byIdrees Sheikh
- Chapter6E2010-3Uploaded byJorgeBravoSoto
- Institutional Support to SSI FinalUploaded byRijurahul Agarwal Singh
- Managerial Finance McGrawHill ConnectUploaded byJohn Nuggent
- GAIL-AR-2004-05Uploaded bySunil Kumar Dwivedi
- Aptitude Test Sample QuestionsUploaded byrishabhdost
- Brookings Metro Rankings 2014Uploaded byrickmoriarty
- BULATS Standard Test Sample.docUploaded byAnonymous MVbaaUBSZT
- Literature Review for RETAILING_2Uploaded byashishtrivedi91
- Education Technology - US Market SnapshotUploaded byAbhinav Prakash
- Anthony s. Yu,Et Al, V. Joseph s. Yukayguan Et Al.,Uploaded byCoco Loco
- Insurance Outline 2015Uploaded byCharm Pedrozo
- Money Market InstrumentsUploaded byPooja Chavan
- 18611cp9 Pcc Compsuggans TaxationUploaded bycyclone2k
- ec521Uploaded bySudha Sivadas
- Schneider Electric Annual Report 2010Uploaded byALBERTO GUAJARDO MENESES
- Del Castillo List of Cases 2013_January_April_July_OctoberUploaded byIELTS
- A Financial Analysis of Monetary SystemsUploaded bywm
- dimitrios siskos - unit 4Uploaded byapi-207179647
- Convertible and Non-Convertible Debentures_ Multiple Nuances In Tax Treatment.pdfUploaded byAbhimanyu Jayakanth
- Department of Labor: PFSUploaded byDepartment of Labor
- Check With Bomi 2Uploaded bybianca8abraham
- Project Cost Management QuestionsUploaded bymaninambiram
- Cap_6(1)Uploaded byBia Sertório
- Sector Development StrategyUploaded byJigmet Angchuk
- Bill Ackman Presentation on HKDUploaded byLeo Chou
- Nbfc Pooja Jaiswar 5Uploaded byNandini Jagan
- Literature ReviewUploaded bykictodd
- Flint City Council Finance Committee Agenda for March 23, 2017Uploaded byNicole Davis