You are on page 1of 33

Ivan Katchanovski is a falsifier of the Maidan massacre and contemporary history of Ukraine

http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/

1.
MAR

25

Twelve automatic rifles of the Berkut police unit were implicated in the
Maidan Massacre, but this information was ignored and omitted in Ivan
Katchanovski's "research"
From the moment of 1:20:50 of the court trial video on June 21,
2016 ( https://youtu.be/KfHQLOp5PlE?t=4850 ) prosecutor
Psyuk pointed out that, according to the results of forensic
examinations, at least twelve (12) automatic rifles, AKMS, of
the Berkut police unit were involved in the Maidan massacre on
February 20, 2014. Bullets were extracted from bodies of killed
and wounded Maidan protesters, and forensic examinations
proved that these bullets were shot from automatic rifles of the
the Berkut police during Maidan events. He also said that
maidan protester Maksym Shymko was killed from from the
AKMS with the number of GU3557, and this AKMS was
assigned to court tried Berkut police member Zinchenko.
According to his words, bullets extracted from the bodies of
maidan protesters of Kolesnikov, Kemskyy, Dziavulskyy, and
Kovalchuk were shot from the AKMS with the number of
703087, and this AKMS was assigned to court tried Berkut
police member Abroskin. Both Zinchenko and Arbroskin, the
members of the Berkut police unit implicated in the Maidan
massacre, were present during court trial on June 21, 2016
( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfHQLOp5PlE )

Other prosecutor from the moment of 1:24:19 of court trial


video https://youtu.be/KfHQLOp5PlE?t=5059 states that
forensic examinations proves that the Berkut police unit
automatic rifles, AKMS, with the numbers of 493077, 517560,
599158, 600741, 864113, 866843, 513800, 493749, 511709,
864438 were involved in murders and wounding of Maidan
protesters during Maidan massacre on February 20, 2014 year.

From the moment of 1:03:10 of the court trial video


of https://youtu.be/KfHQLOp5PlE?t=3790 the judge starts
reading the forensic investigation reports on bullets taken from
the bodies of murdered maidan protesters and from the bodies of
wounded maidan protesters during medical service. From the
moment of 1:11:12 of the court trial
video https://youtu.be/KfHQLOp5PlE?t=4271 , he pronounces
the numbers ( 493077, 517560, 599158, 600741, 703877,
703087, 864113, 866843, 513800, 493749, 551709, 864438,
813913, GU3557 ) of AKMS of members of the Berkut police
unit involved in the shootings during Maidan massacre.

There are many internet publications on shootings of Maidan


protesters by the Berkut police unit from the concrete barricade.
They were automatically approximately translated and archived.
For example:

«Examination confirmed the participation of the Berkutovets in


the killings on the Maidan - GPU»

http://archive.fo/ujKWH (scroll down to read the full page)

«Examination confirmed participation of berkutovtsy in murders


on the Maidan, - GPU»
http://archive.fo/f2Zkr (scroll down to read the full page)

«GPU: From the official weapons of the Berkutovtsy Abroskin


and Zinchenko killed three maydanovtsev»

http://archive.is/qRLQr (scroll down to read the full page)

There is a collection of translated and archived Ukrainian news


websites about the involvement of the Berkut police in the
Maidan massacre:

https://rassian-fakes.livejournal.com/8414.html

Ivan Katchanovski on purpose ignored and omitted this


information about shootings of maidan protesters by Bercut
police unit in his papers despite he used this court trial video
( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfHQLOp5PlE ) on page
31 of his “research paper” titled “The Maidan Massacre in
Ukraine: Revelations from Trials and Government
Investigations” to claim that one forensic examination based on
“IBIS-TAIS system” proves that government police was not
involved in the shootings of maidan protesters. 

https://rassian-fakes.livejournal.com/8586.html

However, there are two internet publications explaining


deficiencies of this forensic examination:

http://archive.is/Zxkkj
http://archive.is/t8iBt

                                  (To be continued)

Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's


falsifications:  https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-is-
a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-history-of-Ukraine-
1449195048708622/

(TO BE CONTINUED) 
Posted 25th March 2019 by Ivan Iva
Labels: Euromaidan Ivan Katchanovski Ivan Katchanovski falsifier Maidan Maidan Massacre Иван
Качановский
 

Ivan Katchanovski is a falsifier of the Maidan massacre and contemporary history of Ukraine
http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/

2.
OCT

The maidan protesters of Pankiv, Baidovsky, Dziavulsky, and Varenytsia


were killed by the Berkut police unit, but this information was ignored and
omitted by Ivan Katchanovski
Like the court trial video from June 30,
2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iFGip3tB3k 
provides strong evidences on the involvement of the Berkut
police unit in the murder of seven maidan protesters http://ivan-
katchanovski.blogspot.com/2018/08/the-maidan-protesters-of-
dmytriv.html , the court trial video from July 5,
2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RL5zSVAB5FM prov
ides strong evidences that the maidan protesters of Pankiv,
Baydovskyy, Dzyavulskyy, Varenytsya were also killed by the
Berkut police unit.  Bullets were found and removed from the
bodies of Pankiv, Baidovsky, Dziavulsky, and Varenytsia, and
forensic examinations of these bullets prove that these protesters
were murdered by the Berkut police unit during the Maidan
massacre on Febuary 20, 2014 year.

From the court video moment of 5 minutes and 50 second (5:50)


of  https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=348 , the judge begins
reading the forensic examination report on the bullet removed
from the body of Pankiv .  The prosecutor on 10:52
of https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=652 stated that the bullet
from the Pankiv's body was identified as the bullet that was fired
from the AKMS rifle with number 600741 that belonged to the
Berkut police member  who is currently at large and being
wanted by the Ukrainian authorities.

From the moment of 1:04:43 of the court trial video


of  https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=1194 , the judge starts
reading the forensic investigation report on bullet taken from the
body of Baidovsky. The prosecutor on 26:30 
 of https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=1590 noted that the
bullet taken out of the Baidovsky's body was identified as the
bullet that was fired from the AK rifle numbered by 517560 of
the Berkut police member who currently being at large and
wanted. Defense attorney Varfolomeyev
stated https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=1630 that evidences
of the previous  forensic examination report from 12.16 
supports the evidences of this forensic examination that
Baidovsky, Saienko and Ikiv were wounded from the same
piece  of the weapon.
From the moment of 32:20 of the court trial
video https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=1926 , the judge
begins reading the forensic investigation reports on the two
bullets removed from the body of Dziavulsky. The prosecutor on
40:30 of https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=2429 said that one
bullet taken out of the Dziavulsky's body was identified as the
bullet that was shot from the AKMS rifle with number 703087
which was assigned to court tried Berkut police member
Abroskin. The forensic examination proves that the second
bullet was fired from the AKMS rifle with number 513800 of
Sadovnik, the commander of Berkut police unit, who fled to
Russia. The second prosecutor
emphasized https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=2490 that two
bullets found in the Dziavulsky's body were shot by Sadovnik
and court tried Abroskin, the member of the same Berkut police
unit, and they acted in a coherent manner in one police unit
during the Maidan massacre on February 20, 2014 year.

From the moment of 47:30 of the court trial


video https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=2850 the judge begins
reading the forensic investigation reports on the bullet extracted
from the Varenytsia's body. The prosecutor on 
50:57  https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=3057 noted that the
bullet extracted from the Varenytsia's body was identified as the
bullet that was fired from the AK rifle with the number of
866843, and this AK rifle was used by a Berkut police member
who currently being wanted. 

All these above described and important but inconvenient for


Katchanovski "research" evidences were omitted and ignored by
Ivan Katchanovski despite he used this court trial video from
July 5, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=RL5zSVAB5FM in his "research paper" named The Maidan
Massacre in Ukraine: Revelations from Trials and
Government Investigations on page
28 https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/50218
/original.jpg  in the sentence: "Four other of these protesters
(Panteleev, Shymko, Solchanyk, and Tarasiuk) were shot either
by military grade bullets or by expanding hunting bullets of the
same caliber"
                                   (To be continued)

Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's


falsifications:  https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-is-
a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-history-of-Ukraine-
1449195048708622/

(TO BE CONTINUED)

Posted 8th October 2018 by Ivan Iva


Labels: Euromaidan Ivan Katchanovski Ivan Katchanovski falsifier Maidan Massacre
 

Ivan Katchanovski is a falsifier of the Maidan massacre and contemporary history of Ukraine
http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/

3.
AUG

31

The maidan protesters of Dmytriv, Zhalovaha, Ilkiv, Kemsky, Poliansky,


Saienko, Smolensky were killed by the Berkut police unit, but this
information was ignored and omitted by Ivan Katchanovski
The court video from June 30,
2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iFGip3tB3k 
provides solid evidences that the maidan protesters of Dmytriv,
Zhalovaha, Ilkiv, Kemsky, Poliansky,  Saienko, Smolensky were
killed by the members of the Berkut police unit from the Berkut
police concrete barricade.  Bullets were found and extracted
from the bodies of Dmytriv, Zhalovaha, Ilkiv, Kemsky,
Poliansky,  Saienko, Smolensky, and forensic investigations
prove that these protesters were murdered by the Berkut police
unit during the Maidan massacre on Febuary 20, 2014 year.

From the court video moment of 49 minutes and 10 second


49:10 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=2950 and 
49:44 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=2984 , the judge starts
reading the forensic investigation report on the bullet removed
from the body of Dmytriv.  The prosecutor on
56:18 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=3348 emphasized that the
bullet from Dmytriv's body was identified as the bullet that was
fired from the AK rifle of Berkut police member Semysyuk.

From the court video moment of 1:04:43


of https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=3882 , the judge starts
reading the forensic investigation report on the bullet removed
from the body of Zhalovaha.  The prosecutor on 1:08:51
of https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=4131 said that the bullet
taken out of the Zhalovaha's body was identified as the bullet
that was shot from the AK rifle  numbered 864113 of one Berkut
police member.

From 1:12:40 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=4320 the judge


starts reading the forensic investigation report on the bullet
removed from the body of Ilkiv.  The prosecutor on 1:15:34   
https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=4532   noted that the bullet
taken out of Ilkiv's body was identified as the bullet that was
fired from the AKMS rifle with the number of 517560, and this
AKMS rifle was assigned to Berkut police member Devyatko
who currently being at large and wanted by Ukrainian
authorities. Also, the prosecutor said that the bullet removed
from the Ilkiv's body is identical with the bullets extracted from
the bodies of Saienko and Baidovsky.

From 1:20:25 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=4825 the judge


starts reading the forensic investigation report on the bullet
removed from the body of Kemsky.  The prosecutor on
1:25:16 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=5086  said that the
bullet removed from the Kemsky's body was identified as the
bullet that was shot from the AKMS rifle  numbered by
703087 of court tried Berkut police member Abroskin .
Abroskin was present on this court session on June 30, 2016.

From 1:38:51 of https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=5931 the judge


starts reading the forensic investigation report on the bullet
removed from the body of Poliansky.  The prosecutor on
1:41:45 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=6100 noted that the
bullet taken out of the Polyansky's body was identified as the
bullet that was fired from the AK rifle with number 513800, and
this AK rifle was used by commander Sadovnyk of the Berkut
police unit during the Maidan massacre on Febuary 20, 2014
year. The attorney of the tried Berkut police members on
1:42:11 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=6131  noted that from
this AK weapon were wounded eight other Maidan protesters.
From the court video moment of
2:32:40 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=9160 , the judge starts
reading the forensic investigation report on the bullet removed
from the body of Sayenko.  The prosecutor on 2:37:30
of https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=9434  said that the bullet
taken out of the Sayenko's body was identified as the bullet that
was shot from the AK rifle with number 517560, and this AK
rifle was assigned to Berkut police member who is at large and
wanted by Ukrainian authorities.
From the court video moment of
2:43:15 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=9795 the judge starts
reading the forensic investigation report on the bullet removed
from the body of Smolensky.  The prosecutor on the video
moment of 2:46:20 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=9975 said
that the bullet extracted from the Smolyanskyy's body was
identified as the bullet that was fired from the AKMS rifle  of a
Berkut police member.

All these evidences were omitted and ignored in the


Katchanovski research though Ivan Katchanovski used five
times this court trial video from June 30,
2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iFGip3tB3k in his
research paper named The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine:
Revelations from Trials and Government
Investigations: https://rassian-
fakes.livejournal.com/7109.html
(To be continued)
 Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's
falsifications:  https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-is-a-falsifier-of-the-
contemporary-history-of-Ukraine-1449195048708622/

(TO BE CONTINUED)
Posted 31st August 2018 by Ivan Iva
Labels: Euromaidan Ivan Katchanovski Ivan Katchanovski falsifier Maidan Massacre
 

Ivan Katchanovski is a falsifier of the Maidan massacre and contemporary history of Ukraine
http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/

4.
JUL

15

Ivan Katchanovski falsified the murder of Anatoliy Zhalovaha


Ivan Katchanovski on pages 45 and 46 of his “research” paper
of "The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine: Revelations from Trials
and Government Investigations" states that the photo of
Anatoliy Zhalovaha helmet shows an entry bullet hole in the
right back area of the helmet. 
https://rassian-fakes.livejournal.com/6722.html .  
Actually, this photo http://wiadomosci.gazeta.pl/wiadomosci/51,114871,15935825.html?
i=0 shows bullet hole at the middle of the helmet forehead. If
anyone closely scrutinizes and compares the enlarged Anatoliy
Zhalovaha’s helmet on the photo with example helmets, he or
she would see the front of the Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s helmet with
bullet hole at the middle of the forehead. There are areas circled
and numbered by “1, 2, 3, 4 , 5” on the Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s
helmet and example helmets: 
https://rassian-fakes.livejournal.com/6327.html

The area with the distinctive snakelike helmet rim curvature


close to the helmet front and circled by blue and red circles and
marked by blue “5” number and red “2” number on the helmet
pictures indicates the front part of the Anatoliy Zhalovaha
helmet on the photo:
https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/42737/42737_900.jpg    
https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/46070/46070_900.jpg

https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/40730/40730_900.jpg

Ivan Katchanovski failed to explain how this allegedly entry


bullet hole is located at the middle of the forehead on the photo
if it entered, according to the Katchanovski “research”, behind
the Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s right ear.  Had this bullet hole was the
entry bullet hole behind the Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s right ear, it
would have been located somewhere near right bottom of the
helmet at the spot circled by blue and red circles and marked by
blue “5” number and red “2” on the helmet pictures, not at the
middle top part of the helmet.

Moreover, the Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s father in his testimony


during court trial told that this photo contains the front of the
Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s helmet with the bullet hole in the middle
of the forehead. The Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s father pointed out
that the bullet hole is concave, bulging inside the helmet, and it
means that Anatoliy Zhalovaha was hit at the middle of his
forehead ( https://youtu.be/4n0BFF8ZLxg?t=16053   4:27:33 – 4:29:20 ).
According to the Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s father testimony, there
was a small entry bullet hole at the Anatoliy Zhalovaha forehead
and a big exit hole at the back of Anatoliy Zhalovaha head.
( https://youtu.be/4n0BFF8ZLxg?t=18875 , 5:14:35 – 5:15:20 ) Neither
attorneys of five tried Berkut police members, no Berkut police
members objected or questioned the Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s father
testimony that this photo shows the front part of Anatoliy
Zhalovaha’s helmet with the bullet hole at the middle of the
forehead. But Ivan Katchanovski omitted this very important but
inconvenient for his “research” testimony though he used this
court trial video in his paper. 

Ivan Katchanovski also omitted testimonies of prosecutors and a


defense attorney. According to their testimonies, bullet that
killed Anatoliy Zhalovaha was found, and a forensic
investigation determined that this bullet was shot from the AK
rifle of a Berkut police member who now is at large and wanted
by Ukrainian authorities: ( https://youtu.be/4n0BFF8ZLxg?t=18172  5:02:52 –
5:04:40 ) The defense attorney Varfolomeyev of tried Berkut
police members said that from this weapon of the Bercut police
member were shot ten maidan protesters, including Anatoliy
Zhalovaha ( https://youtu.be/4n0BFF8ZLxg?t=18377  5:06:18 –
5:08:06 , 5:07:10 ) But Ivan Katchanovski on pages 34, 35 of his
research falsely states that these ten maidan protesters ( Kemsky,
Korneev, Saienko, Zhalovaha, Shymko, Dmytriv, Ilkiv,
Poliansky, and Smolensky ) were shot from the Hotel Ukraina.

(To be continued)
 Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's
falsifications:  https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-is-
a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-history-of-Ukraine-
1449195048708622/
(TO BE CONTINUED)
Posted 15th July 2018 by Ivan Iva
Labels: Euromaidan Ivan Katchanovski Ivan Katchanovski falsifier Maidan Massacre
 

Ivan Katchanovski is a falsifier of the Maidan massacre and contemporary history of Ukraine
http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/

5.
JUL

11
Ivan Katchanovski fake invention on shootings of maidan protesters by
"maidan snipers" from the Bank Arkada the Museum Lane or an Ivan
Katchanovski's attempt to whitewash fled corrupted president Viktor
Yanukovich and his criminal, kleptocratic government
Ivan Katchanovski  in his “research”  publications and video
appendices falsely claims that many maidan protesters were shot
by  the "maidan snipers" from the direction of the Bank Arkada
and the Museum Lane even though these locations were under
control of the government police and security forces during the
Maidan massacre and there are no any available evidences that
Maidan protesters approached even close to these locations
during the Maidan massacre.

There are no any publically available videos and any other


evidences that the Bank Arkada and the Museum Lane were
under control by the Katchanovski’s mysterious “maidan
snipers” ( The “maidan snipers” were earlier invented by
Russian propaganda and supported later by Katchanovski
himself in his "study" on the Maidan massacre). Neither Ivan
Katchanovski provided any these evidences in his papers and
video appendices on the Maidan massacre in Ukraine. Only Ivan
Katchanovski in his “study” of the Maidan massacre in Ukraine
falsely  claims that the Bank Arkada like the Museum Lane were
under control by the misterious “maidan snipers” during the
Maidan Massacre. In fact, as it was proved in the previous posts
( http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/2015/05/ivan-
katchanovski-falsifier-of.html ), the Bank Arkada and the
Museum Lane were controlled by the government police and
security forces during the Maidan Massacre.  Ivan Katchanovski
solely invented this “defence” for the Berkut government police
for the purpose to whitewash corrupted president Viktor
Yanukovych and his criminal government.
Even during the court trial  of  five Berkut policemen located on
the  Berkut police concrete barricade the same issue that the
Bank Arkada and the Museum Lane were controlled by “maidan
snipers”  was never introduced by any parts of the court trial
despite  five court tried Berkut policemen and their defense
attorneys used  shootings from the adjacent buildings located
near the Berkut police concrete barricade as a defense that these
shots from the adjacent buildings have nothing to do with
criminal charges of  five Berkut policemen during the court trial.
To defend in court five members of Berkut police unit, their
defense attorneys claim that other government security force
units like Omega and Alfa shot maidan protesters from the
adjacent buildings and why five court tried Berkut police
members who were on the concrete barricade during the
massacre are not responsible for these shots. Ivan Katchanovski
did not mentioned about these inconvenient evidences ( like he
omitted and ignored other inconvenient evidences on shootings
of maidan  protesters by government police and security ) in his
"research" publications and videos.

This issue how Ivan Katchanovski attributes killing and


wounding of maidan protesters from the Bank Arkada and the
Museum Lane to the mysterious “maidan snipers” demonstrates
the Ivan Katchanovski attempt to whitewash fled corrupted
president Viktor Yanukovich and his criminal, kleptocratic
government.  (To be continued)

 Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's


falsifications:  https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-is-
a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-history-of-Ukraine-
1449195048708622/
(TO BE CONTINUED)
Posted 11th July 2018 by Ivan Iva
Labels: Euromaidan Ivan Katchanovski Ivan Katchanovski falsifier Maidan Massacre
 

Ivan Katchanovski is a falsifier of the Maidan massacre and contemporary history of Ukraine
http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/

6.
JUN

13

Ivan Katchanovski falsified the shooting of Trapezun, Ushnevych, and Tityk.


Part 1
Ivan Katchanovski on pages 35, 36, 47 of The “Snipers’
Massacre” on the Maidan in Ukraine https://rassian-
fakes.livejournal.com/5177.html and page 62 of The Maidan
Massacre in Ukraine: Revelations from Trials and Government
Investigations https://rassian-fakes.livejournal.com/5562.html fa
lsely states that Ushnevych, Trapezun and Tityk were shot from
the direction of the Hotel Ukraina. However, according the
testimonies of the court trial video from October 17,
2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gI2eS5Xfwt0 ,
Trapezun, Ushnevych, and Tityk were shot by the same bullet
fired from the direction of the government Berkut police
barricade. This bullet was extracted from the Tityk body, and
forensic investigation found that the bullet was shot from the
rifle of Berkut policeman Shpylovyy who fled to Russia.
Trapezun, Ushnevych, and Tityk were shot at the moment when
both Trapezun and Tityk were holding and carrying wounded
Ushnevych by his hands to save his life. Trapezun, Ushnevych,
and Tityk were located on the line from the Berkut police
barricade and the bullet struck through Trapezun and
Ushnevych, and stuck in the Tityk body. The moment when
Trapezun, Ushnevych, and Tityk were shot by the same bullet is
presented schematically on the pictute: 
https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/38735/38
735_900.jpg
These court trial testimonies were reported by Ukrainian
media https://rassian-fakes.livejournal.com/5654.html and
Maidan lawyer
Zakrevskaya https://www.facebook.com/eugeniyazz/posts/1626
829984023461 , http://archive.is/Ju8nM , but like other
inconvenient testimonies they were omitted and silenced by Ivan
Katchanovski in his “research”.     ( To be continued )
Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski falsifications:
https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-is-a-falsifier-of-
the-contemporary-history-of-Ukraine-1449195048708622/    
                                                                                          ( To be continued )
Posted 13th June 2018 by Ivan Iva
Labels: Euromaidan Ivan Katchanovski Ivan Katchanovski falsifier Ivan Katchanovski falsifier of Maidan
Massacre Ivan Katchanovski is falsifier of Maidan Massacre in Ukraine
 

Add a comment

7.
APR

Vasyl Halamai was shot by Berkut police


Ivan Katchanovski on  page 52 https://rassian-fakes.livejournal.com/4747.html of
his “research” titled Snipers Massacre on the Maidan in Ukraine claims that Vasyl
Halamai was wounded from the direction of the Bank Arkada though the Bank
Arkada was under control of the government police and security forces during
massacre.  On page 62 https://rassian-fakes.livejournal.com/5051.html of  the next
paper named The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine: Revelations from Trials and
Government Investigations  Ivan Katchanovski   used the court trial
video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJBd3OypMDw as the source to inform
that a Maidan protester aimed a hunting rifle at the direction of Berkut police
member Symysiuk. But neither in his papers nor in his facebook posts Ivan
Katchanovski mentioned that almost entire court trial
video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJBd3OypMDw tells that Vasyl Hamalai
was wounded during Maidan Massacre from the direction of the Berkut police
barricade and a bullet was shot from the rifle of a Berkut policeman who fled to
Russia.  Also, there are internet resources that Vasyl Halamay was shot by one of
Berkut Police members.  For example:
http://lenta.lviv.ua/other/2016/12/02/113195.html , https://archive.li/kFtS9

The google translation and the archived copies of the google translation of this
page:

<<The investigation established which machine was fired from the bullet and even
found out to whom this weapon was issued. However, it is still unknown who made
the shot.

Prosecutor Roman Psyuk noted: "The bullet that was extracted from the victim's
body is 7.62. This bullet is identified as such, which was released from the
machine of one of the fighters of "Berkut", which is wanted for this time. They
were all wearing masks, only a few people identified. ">>
https://translate.google.com/translate?
hl=en&sl=ru&u=http://lenta.lviv.ua/other/2016/12/02/113195.html&prev=search 
   ,    https://archive.is/YT4sd ,       https://archive.is/YT4sd#selection-2651.1-2687.61
There are many other news reports on how Vasyl Halamai was shot by one of the
Berkut policeman who fled to Russia: https://rassian-
fakes.livejournal.com/4445.html

This issue with Vasyl Halamai in Katchanovski “research” demonstrates how


Katchanovski unscientifically and unscrupulously deals with sources in his
“research” on the Maidan Masacre in Ukraine since he used the small episode in
the court trial video https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=JJBd3OypMDw lasting less than minute about the killing of police member
Symysiuk while he omitted  more than three hours main story of the video
about wounding Vasyl Halamai by police on which he dwelt in his previous
paper. This case shows how, in addition to outright falsifications, manipulations,
and distortions, Ivan Katchanovsky in his “study” silences, suppresses, and
stonewalls evidences on shootings of Maidan protesters  by government police and
security forces.
  Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's falsifications:
https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-is-a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-history-of-Ukraine-
1449195048708622/

Posted 9th April 2018 by Ivan Iva


Labels: Euromaidan Ivan Katchanovski Ivan Katchanovski falsifier Ivan Katchanovski falsifier of Maidan
Massacre Ivan Katchanovski is falsifier of Maidan Massacre in Ukraine
 


Ivan Katchanovski is a falsifier of the Maidan massacre and contemporary history of Ukraine
http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/

8.
MAR

Problems with Katchanovski “witness testimonies” in his Video Appendix B


The absolute majority of Katchanovski "witnesses" of snipers in his Video
Appendix B https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MU0jxKJ4LaY are not witnesses
by definition since witnesses by definition are people who directly and
immediately saw and heard witnessed events. During Maidan events, people used
to retell other people stories and rumors which Katchanovski misrepresented them
as original witness accounts in this Video Appendix
B: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MU0jxKJ4LaY . Katchanovski must look
up the definition of words “witness testimony”, and, to be honest researcher, he
must give an advance notice in his Video Appendix B that the retold stories and
rumors of other people actually are not witness testimonies.

One of the big problems with Ivan Katchanovski “research” is the intentional
omitting and ignoring of opposite evidences and testimonies about bullets fired
from the area controlled by government police and security forces. For example,
Katchanovski refers to Trapezun testimony during an investigative experiment on
7:15 minutes of his Video Appendix B. However, Trapezun in the court changed
his opinion about the bullet direction. Starting on 1:07 minutes of court
video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gI2eS5Xfwt0 , he explained that he
initially imagined the Maidan protesters were fired from the Hotel Ukraina, and he
later became sure about killing Maidan protesters from the police barricade after
the performance of the investigative experiment. Trapezun said he did not see a
moment of firing and he only initially imagined the bullet direction from the Hotel
Ukraina. After the investigative experiment he changed his opinion. Katchanovski
dishonestly omitted this critical episode from his “research” and Video Appendix
B.

During the Maidan masacre, people looking at direction of the police front line,
heard reflected gunshot sounds from the Hotel Ukraina and other buildings located
in the Maidan area that why these gunshot sound reflections from buildings walls
made the impression of gunshots fired from the Hotel Ukraina and  other buildings
under Maidan control : https://archive.is/wrPqw#selection-1281.0-1281.278
Many spoken stories of Katchanovski Video Appendix B refer to shootings from
the Bank Arkada, Museum Lane, Cabmin and Kyivmiskbud. However, according
to numerous publicly available videos and other evidences, Maidan protesters
never approached these locations which were firmly under control of the
government police and security forces during the Maidan massacre. Also, it must
be noted that Cabmin and Kyivmiskbud were located deep in the rear of the front
line of government police and security forces during the massacre.

Ivan Katchanovski also mistranslated the spoken stories on his Video Appendix B.
For example, on 21:15 minutes of Video Appendix B a policeman said that police
saw people without weapons on building roofs and police only assumed that other
people on building roofs have weapons. Ivan Katchanovski mistranslated this
episode that people on building roofs have weapons.  
 ( To be continued ) 

Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's falsifications:


https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-is-a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-
history-of-Ukraine-1449195048708622/

 ( To be continued )

Posted 1st March 2018 by Ivan Iva


Labels: Euromaidan Ivan Katchanovski Ivan Katchanovski falsifier Ivan Katchanovski falsifier of Maidan
Massacre Ivan Katchanovski is falsifier of Maidan Massacre in Ukraine Ivan Katchnovski falsifier of
contemporary history of Ukraine Kiev Maidan Maidan Massacre Revolution of dignity Sniper Massacre on
Maidan in Ukraine Ukraine Іван Качановський Иван Качановский
 

Ivan Katchanovski is a falsifier of the Maidan massacre and contemporary history of Ukraine
http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/
9.
AUG

27

The new untruth of Ivan Katchanovski on the murder of Ustym Holodnyuk


In his new version of his "scientific research" named The Maidan Massacre in
Ukraine: Revelations from Trials and Government
Investigations, Ivan Katchanovski acknowledges that Ustym Holodnyuk was
murdered from opposite direction, from the Museum Lane, not from the Hotel
Ukraina, how he stated earlier.

 Without any evidences, Ivan Katchanovski lies that the Museum Lane was under
control of Maidan protesters.  

  (TO BE CONTINUED)

Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's falsifications:

https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-is-a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-
history-of-Ukraine-1449195048708622/

  (TO BE CONTINUED)
Posted 27th August 2017 by Ivan Iva
Labels: Euromaidan Ivan Katchanovski Ivan Katchanovski falsifier Ivan Katchanovski falsifier of Maidan
Massacre Ivan Katchanovski is falsifier of Maidan Massacre in Ukraine Ivan Katchnovski falsifier of
contemporary history of Ukraine Kiev Maidan Maidan Massacre Revolution of dignity Sniper Massacre on
Maidan in Ukraine Ukraine Іван Качановський Иван Качановский
 

Ivan Katchanovski is a falsifier of the Maidan massacre and contemporary history of Ukraine
http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/

10.
JUN

23

Ivan Katchanovski's lies about the killing of Ustym Holodniuk


Ivan Katchanovski falsified the circumstances of the killing of Ustym Holodniuk
who died from a bullet of government security forces on February 20, 2014.  In his
deceptive and bogus paper of "The “Snipers’ Massacre” on the Maidan in
Ukraine",  which he proudly and pompously call  “scientific research”, Ivan
Katchanovski falsely states   “exit bullet hole in the left side of his blue helmet and
his position at the moment of this shot in the Svoboda activist video indicate that
Ustym Holodniuk was killed at 9:54am from the direction of the Hotel Ukraina,
which was on the opposite side from the Berkut and Omega-manned barricade.”
 http://www.academia.edu/8776021/The_Snipers_Massacre_on_the_Maidan_in_U
kraine
In the same way, Ivan Katchanovski  misrepresented  the killing of Ustym
Holodnyuk  in his misleading Facebook  posts 
( https://www.facebook.com/ivan.katchanovski/posts/1055703501126202 (see
comments ) ,   http://archive.is/1U2S7    ,    http://archive.is/RiPxq   ) ,  dishonestly
asserting that he was shot from the direction of the Hotel Ukraina and there is exit
bullet hole in the left side of his blue helmet.  However, as could be supported by
the overwhelming majority of internet sources, Ustym Holodniuk was murdered
from a direction of a government controlled area, which is located somewhere in
between the east and southeast directions from the Hotel Ukraina. At the moment
of murder, Ustym Holodniuk was facing  Arkhitektora Horodetskoho street, and a
bullet entered the back of his blue helmet and exited his head above his right
eye ( http://archive.is/pEi6x  ,       http://archive.is/jLiLN   ,
http://archive.is/k8xxp  ,       http://archive.is/hMG4W   ,   http://archive.is/DZjnR  
,         http://archive.is/z1ikZ   ,       http://archive.is/mbTDO    ,  
https://youtu.be/B_NupW7xvRo (39:44-39:50) , http://archive.is/h9nQO    ,     
http://archive.is/ctrZ7   , 
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Hotel+Ukraine/@50.4482369,30.5266935,17
z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0x71aa7c1dce2058dc!8m2!3d50.4486024!4d30.5272406  
 ,    http://archive.is/zifhh   ). Katchanovski lied in his publications about the
murder of Ustym Holodniuk since the left side of the blue helmet back contains
entrance bullet hole, NOT exit bullet hole, and Ustym Holodnyuk actually was
killed from a government controlled direction, not from the direction of the Hotel
Ukraina. Also, GPU denied that killing of any of maidan protesters occurred from
the Hotel Ukraina:  http://archive.is/2D7YN . Furthermore, the father of Ustym
Holodnyuk never confirmed that his son was shot from the Hotel Ukraina how
Ivan Katchanovski lied in his text http://archive.is/cTSKl . Initially, the father of
Ustym Holodnyuk assumed his son was killed from Zhovtnevyi Palace.  After he
viewed the video https://youtu.be/B_NupW7xvRo  (39:44 – 39:50 ) , he figured
out that his son was killed from a government controlled location
( http://archive.is/useRV  ) .

  (TO BE CONTINUED)

Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's falsifications:


https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-is-a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-
history-of-Ukraine-1449195048708622/

Posted 23rd June 2017 by Ivan Iva


Labels: Euromaidan Ivan Katchanovski Ivan Katchanovski falsifier Ivan Katchanovski falsifier of Maidan
Massacre Ivan Katchanovski is falsifier of Maidan Massacre in Ukraine Ivan Katchnovski falsifier of
contemporary history of Ukraine Kiev Maidan Maidan Massacre Revolution of dignity Sniper Massacre on
Maidan in Ukraine Ukraine Іван Качановський Иван Качановский
 

Ivan Katchanovski is a falsifier of the Maidan massacre and contemporary history of Ukraine
http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/

11.
JUN

22

Striking revelation about Ivan Katchanovski’s falsifications


Ivan Katchanovski continues to lie, misrepresent, and falsify evidences of the
Maidan massacre in Ukraine. For example, he insists that a bullet hit the tree from
a direction of the Hotel Ukraina, referring to incorrect testimonies of the Belgian
reporter and Ukrainian deputy

( https://www.facebook.com/ivan.katchanovski/posts/1257445174285366  

http://archive.is/MQJEq

https://www.facebook.com/ivan.katchanovski/posts/1222181027811781 

http://archive.is/HbSa7  )

 who are not forensic experts and who never examined the entrance and exit bullet
holes on the tree from a close distance. Unfortunately for this Katchanovski
falsification, there are many photographs shot from various directions and angles
which vividly show the entrance and exit bullet holes on this tree , including the
pictures of the entrance bullet hole which determinedly indicate that bullet was
fired from the Berkut police barricade. For example:

http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/1472/1472_original.jpg
http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/22878/22878_original.jpg

http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/19098/19098_original.jpg

http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/26452/26452_original.jpg

Also, there is the gallery of the other photos of the entrance and exit bullet holes on
this tree with the internet sources of these pictures:

http://rassian-fakes.livejournal.com/734.html   

According to these photos, a bullet fired from a direction of the Berkut police
barricade and from a shallow angle created the small entrance bullet hole and big
exit bullet hole on this tree. In addition, this
video https://ok.ru/video/11099769456  from 4:00 minutes clearly explains how a
bullet fired from the Berkut police barricade made the entrance and exit bullet
holes on this tree.   

Does Ivan Katchanovski know about these photos? Yes, of course!!! He was aware
about these pictures since he utilized the photos source websites in his bogus
research for other purposes.  Ivan Katchanovski should have presented these
photos in his paper, indicating the bullet direction from the Berkut police
barricade. He must have told the truth that bullet hit this tree from a direction of the
Berkut police barricade. Instead, Ivan Katchanovski blatantly lied to his readers
and to his fellow scientists that a bullet was fired from a direction of the Hotel
Ukraina. To uphold this falsification, he cited the erroneous non-expert testimonies
of the Belgian journalist and Ukrainian deputy who are not forensic experts and
who never examined the entrance and exit bullet holes on the tree from any close
distance. Katchanovski also lied about an official investigation of GPU as though
GPU concluded that a bullet hit the tree from a direction of the Hotel Ukraina.
GPU never made such conclusion!                    

   (TO BE CONTINUED)

Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's falsifications:

https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-
history-of-Ukraine-1449195048708622/
                                                            ( To be continued  )     

Posted 22nd June 2017 by Ivan Iva


Labels: Euromaidan Ivan Katchanovski Ivan Katchanovski falsifier Ivan Katchanovski falsifier of Maidan
Massacre Ivan Katchanovski is falsifier of Maidan Massacre in Ukraine
 

Ivan Katchanovski is a falsifier of the Maidan massacre and contemporary history of Ukraine
http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/

12.
MAY

20

Ivan Katchanovski is a falsifier of the Maidan massacre in Ukraine and


contemporary history of Ukraine
Ivan Katchanovski is a falsifier of the Maidan massacre in Ukraine and
contemporary history of Ukraine 
https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-
history-of-Ukraine-1449195048708622/

 Ivan Katchanovski produced the pseudo-scientific paper named "The “Snipers’


Massacre” on the Maidan in Ukraine" which is based on the deliberate
falsifications of the Maidan events. Everyone who closely scrutinizes his paper
sources and other videos about the Maidan in Ukraine will come to conclusions
that the Ivan Katchanovski's paper The “Snipers’ Massacre”    on the Maidan" is a
total falsification.  Particularly, Ivan Katchanovski on purpose ignores the
overwhelming majority of shootings on many videos where people were killed
from  the direction of the police "Berkut" barricade on Instituska street in Kiev. If
everyone closely examines Ivan Katchanovski's source videos which he utilized in
his paper named  "The “Snipers’ Massacre” on the  Maidan in  Ukraine", everyone
will notice many shootings into Maidan protesters from the direction of police on
Institutska street in Kiev. 

There are  can not be downplayed or discounted a few episodes on videos where a
few bullets might be shot at the back of protesters. However, it is very hard to
judge without forensic investigations that these shootings were actually made from
the behind of protesters. 

The Ivan Katchanovski's sources and videos used in his fake paper named "The
“Snipers’ Massacre” on the Maidan in Ukraine" do NOT corroborate his
conclusions in his  false research that Maidan protesters were shot from the
locations controlled by Maidan forces. 

 To support his claim that Maidan protesters were shot at their backs, Ivan
Katchanovski refers to the video episode showing a bullet hit a tree as  the proof
that this bullet was fired from the hotel under control of protesters. In realty, this
bullet was fired from  the opposite direction -- the direction of the police barricade
on Institutska street.  The video shows  the moment when bullet exited  from the
opposite side of the tree. The small fountain on  the tree from hitting bullet on the
video  indicates that this video  episode demonstrates the leaving bullet from the
opposite side of the tree.

On this video ( 60 Ibid; https://www.youtube.com/watch?


v=0DxkDiAcSF8  ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBZKrUYCPxg  ))   
Berkut police fire bullets from the location of the  Berkut police barricade at the
advancing up Maidan protesters. One bullet hit  through the trunk of tree and came
out from the side of the tree facing camera and the Hotel of “Ukraine” (00:18 and
2:42 minutes)
http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/slavw_posts/67622866/44854/44854_900.jpg
The direction of bullet is indicated by the red arrow on the picture:
http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/slavw_posts/67622866/44411/44411_900.jpg
In addition, this video ( 60 Ibid; https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=0DxkDiAcSF8  ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBZKrUYCPxg  ))
demonstrates  falling back protesters being struck by bullets that were fired by
Berkut police from
 the Berkut police barricade next to the blue building by the address: #7 Institutska
street:
( 35 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vs_4skLIqns  , see 30:42 minute )
( 56 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2zZiZhajzw   , see 00:05 minute )
 ( 48 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsE7lYVa5kk  , see 20:00 and 25:02—
25:25 minutes )
The above videos were used by Ivan Katchanovski in his fake research.

These videos prove the fact that bullets were fired from the police barricade at the
protesters alongside the Institutska street:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aImKlhOpBI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRllGrhXpxo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAMgCOR-ps8 ( bullet holes on poles, trees


and stones alongside Institutska street )
56 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2zZiZhajzw
( holes from bullets on shield are seen on 6:30 – 7:20 minutes )
35 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vs_4skLIqns (holes from bullets on the
shield and the hotel wall on 25:35—27:20 minutes )
The last two videos were utilized by Ivan Katchanovski in his fake study.

The mass murder of Maidan protesters by government police from the Berkut
police barricade and other locations controled by government police and security
forces is evidenced by the pattern of bullet holes on poles, trees, the stone flower
box and  hotel walls that were created by bullets fired from the directions of
government police and security. The spatial pattern of bullet holes and traces
alongside Institutska street also proves the fact that Berkut police targeted and shot
advancing Maidan protesters, not fired warning shots, since the  spatial pattern of
bullet holes and traces coincides with  positions of Maidan protesters on many
photos and videos. Had any Katchanovski's mysterious “Maidan snipers” shot at
protesters (how Ivan Katchanovski falsely claims in his fake research),  these shots
would have created many bullet holes and traces from the directions of Maidan
controlled locations alongside the Institutska street on an overwhelming majority
photos and videos.  However, there are no bullet holes and traces on numerous
pictures and videos from the directions of Maidan controlled locations. Aforesaid
circumstances  proof the fact of the mass murder of Maidan protesters by Berkut
police from the directions of police locations. As was many times reiterated,
Maidan protesters seized a few firearms from  local police and security facilities,
and used them only against Berkut police, not other friendly Maidan protesters.

According to the narrative on  34 , 37, 38  - 45 , 52  pages of Katchanovski’s


research, many shots were fired from the roof of the Bank Arkada. However, Ivan
Katchanovski did not explain how his “Maidan snipers” broke through the armed
security of the Bank Arkada. Ivan Katchanovski pretends as though he is unaware
about the existence of an armed security of the Bank Arkada, and the fact that
every bank employs an armed security to guard bank money and valuables against
potential armed bank robbers. Had Katchanovski's mysterious "Maidan snipers"
attempted to enter the Bank Arkada building, they would have encountered armed
resistance of the Bank Arkada security. However, there are no available  evidences
of any attempts to fight or compromise the Bank Arkada security by Maidan
protesters. Under the Ukrainian legal system, only the government police and
security has legal right to enter any privately guarded premises and locations,
including banks, and the guardians ( private security ) of such premises and
locations must yield to lawful demand of the government police and security.
Therefore, only government snipers had real chance to enter the guarded Bank
Arkada and shoot at Maidan protesters. In addition, the entrance of the Bank
Arkada is located on the Olhyns'ka  street which,  according to the map on the 18-
th page of  Katchanovski’s "research"
( http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/25082/25082_900.jpg ) ,
was  under control of the Berkut police.  Also, Ivan Katchanovski circled on the
map by the purple line the area  controlled by Maidan protesters, including   the
part  of the Bank Arkada , the adjacent buildings on the Horodestsky Street and
Hrushevsky Street. However, Katchanovski does not provide any proofs that this
area was under control of the Maidan. Actually, this territory was rather under
control of the government police and security as this territory contains roads and
other approaches leading to the positions of Berkut police, government security,
and government buildings. Therefore, only government snipers could shot at
protesters from this area, not any Katchanovski's mysterious "Maidan snipers" how
he falsely states in his pseudo-scientific research.     
According to numerous photos, videos, and publications, the actual maidan
controlled territory was much smaller than the maidan territory outlined by
Katchanovski on his map by the purple line
( http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/25775/25775_900.jpg)
 , and the Bank Arkada was under control of the government police and
security forces.          ( To be continued  )
          

Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's falsifications:

https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-
history-of-Ukraine-1449195048708622/

                                                            ( To be continued  )                                                 

Іван Качановський ( Ivan Katchanovski ) - обличчя хруня або фальсифікації розстрілу "Небесної сотні"

https://www.facebook.com/ivan.katchanovski

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxx5W--cymI

Щоб побачити, як справді виглядає типовий хрунь, треба час від часу перечитувати дописи в інтернеті
такого собі канадського "дослідника" українського походження Івана Качановського ( Ivan
Katchanovski )  . Він не пропускає нагоди, щоб майже кожний раз, коли є відповідна ситуація в
Українській державі та українському суспільстві, плюнути на   українських патріотів та на українську
владу:

https://www.facebook.com/ivan.katchanovski
Серед його маразматичної писанини найбільшу увагу заслуговує "наукова праця", в якій він
послуговуючись фальсифікаціями, намагається "доказати", що не снайпери "Беркуту" та СБУ стріляли
та вбивали прихильників Майдану, а наче якісь  снайпери зі сторони Майдану самі розстрілювали
майданівців і, мовляв, такий розстріл своїх був вигідний прихильникам Майдану, щоб скинути
демократично вибрану владу януковича:
The “Snipers’ Massacre” on the Maidan in Ukraine
https://www.academia.edu/8776021/The_Snipers_Massacre_on_the_Maidan_in_Ukraine

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxx5W--cymI

Мені важко зрозуміти, чому Канада притягує різних хрунів на зразок "істориків" Віктора Поліщука,
Івана-Павла Химку (Гимку) та тепер - "політолога"  Івана Качановського, які, вдаючись до
недобросовісної та вигідної селекції фактів, тенденційних пояснень разом з фальсифікаціями, шкодять
Україні та українцям.

Якимось дивним чином Іван Качановський не помічає на відео, які він використав у своїй "науковій
праці", численні випадки стрільби та попадання в майданівців зі сторони снайперів "Беркуту", в
напрямку яких  по Інститутській вулиці  йшли неозброєнні прихильники Євромайдану.  Натомість
послуговується плітками та своїми суб'єктивними та тенденційними судженнями в оцінках подій на
відео. Численні випадки подадання в прихильників майдану спереду з напрямку Беркуту та численні
сліди від куль, які вказують, що їх було випущено зі сторони силовиків, можна побачити на багатьох
відео. Наприклад:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qSvj8F_Br4M
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLxSlq_hJu8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqxWQa8Hl50
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAMgCOR-ps8
І навіть ці попадання спереду в майданівців з позиції "Беркута" можна побачити на відео, які Іван
Качановський використовує в якості джерел для свого "наукового дослідження":
https://www.academia.edu/8776021/The_Snipers_Massacre_on_the_Maidan_in_Ukraine

Очевидно, що російські ЗМІ не могли не використати "наукову працю" Івана Качановського, яка
характеризується вигідною селективністю фактів, замовчуванням невигідних фактів, тенденційною їх
інтерпретацією разом з потрібними  фальсифікаціями:
Иван Качановский. «Резня на Майдане»: дело о киевских снайперах | IGCP
Иван Качановский: за убийство более 100 человек на киевском Майдане 20 февраля ответственен сам
Майдан | OSTKRAFT
Канадская версия: «Небесную сотню» расстреляли сторонники Майдана

Ivan Katchanovski чомусь до уваги не бере численні факти на відео, коли в наступаючих по
Інститутській вулиці прихильників Євромайдану снайпери попадали з фронту і прихильники
Євромайдану падали і котилися назад. Розповіді людей про наче попадання куль в бік чи в спину
прихильників Євромайдану  - не можуть бути надійними доказами, оскільки такі попадання
могли відбутися в момент, коли люди були повернуті до снайперів Беркуту на вулиці Інституській
боком або спиною. Епізоди з численних відео не дають підстав  однозначно стверджувати,  що
майданівцям стріляли в спину, чи в бік. Без відповідних експертиз неможливо стверджувати, що в
майданівців стріляли з боку чи майданівцям стріляли в спину. Постріл в дерево на відео насправді був
зроблений зі сторони снайперів "Беркуту", а не з готелю, і на відео зображено не попадання кулі в
дерево, а виліт кулі з дерева, яка попала в дерево зі сторони стрільби  снайперів міліції та СБУ.  Ivan
Katchanovski не бере до уваги,  що записані радіопереговори працівників "Беркуту" та СБУ не можуть
бути підтвердженням того,  що команда розстрілювати прихильників   Євромайдану НЕ могла бути
виданою в останній  момент перед їх  розстрілом та НЕ всі переговори силовиків могли бути
перехоплені та повністю записані. Дуже ймовірно, НЕ всі радіопереговори  були перехоплені та
записані та (або) команда розстрілювати євромайданівців поступила майже перед самим початком
розстрілів на вулиці Інститутській. Прихильники Євромайдану ніколи не  заперечували, що в них була
якась невелика кількість зброї, але це не означає, що майданівці стріляли один в одного, як це
намагається сфальсифікувати Іван Кочановський та інші подібні
йому фальсифікатори.

Але Іван Кочановський не є оригінальним у своєму "науковому дослідженні" - вже через два тижні
після розстрілів на Євромайдані в інтернет було викинуто відео
"викриття" української версії рострілів прихильників Євромайдану:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLxSlq_hJu8

, на якому автор цього відео намагався так само, як Іван Кочановський "доказати", що прихильники
Майдану "стріляли один в одного". Тим не менше,
автор цього викриття ( попри недобросовісне  та вигідне для власної версії подій вибирання та
пояснювання фактів разом з фальсифікаціями ) є дещо чеснішим та поряднішим від
Івана Кочановського, і він стверджує, що снайпери також стріляли  ( див.
відео https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLxSlq_hJu8 на 6:51 та 10:12 хвилинах ) з будинку під номером
4  на картинці з відео ( позначений номером чотири на відео ) за адресою: Київ. Інститутська 7, але
ЦЕЙ СИНІЙ БУДИНОК НАСПРАВДІ ЗНАХОДИВСЯ  В ТИЛУ "БЕРКУТУ", і на ньому аж ніяк не  
могли бути  якісь "свої снайпери з Майдану".  Сайпер, який  на будинку ( позначений номером чотири
на відео )  ( див. відео на  10:12 хвилині), насправді мав би бути на малюнку відео як такий, що
розвернутий в протилежну сторону -- в сторону  наступу прихильників Євромайдану.   Кожен може на
численних відео побачити, де знаходились прихильники Євромайдану, снайпери  "Беркуту" та цей
синій будинок за адресою Інститутська 7. Також кожен може зробити  віртуальний тур між частиною
вулиці Інститутської, де найбільше розстрілювали майданівців, та до синього  будинку за адресою
Інститутська 7, який  знаходився біля базування снайперів  "Беркуту" і в тилу позиції "Беркуту", який,
як видно з численних відео, стріляв в прихильників Майдану:

https://www.google.com/maps/@50.4488395,30.5278894,3a,75y,195.11h,74.9t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!
1siqoWoZDBj31T4QpXg1dX7g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

https://www.google.com/maps/@50.448677,30.5280443,3a,75y,195.11h,74.9t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!
1s1Ey6ABN4zHl2FNGE9_BSaw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

https://www.google.com/maps/@50.448433,30.528272,3a,75y,206.39h,85t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!
1s_uYAVNU3L-I74JTEd7UecA!2e0
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.448349,30.528356,3a,75y,213.57h,76.95t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!
1ssUa4bioYZpya1HXArhRBBQ!2e0
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.448236,30.528488,3a,75y,171.34h,82.03t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!
1sint9GkqjpHjAkh2beIdGeA!2e0
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.448236,30.528488,3a,75y,153.1h,84.97t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!
1sint9GkqjpHjAkh2beIdGeA!2e0
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.448091,30.528689,3a,75y,153.1h,84.97t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!
1swGLXUyUOEIQrMeoyO93h2A!2e0
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.447976,30.528925,3a,75y,131.83h,85.35t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!
1sM2R96D7YL4S8B1vmqT5tLw!2e0
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.447844,30.52923,3a,75y,131.83h,85.35t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!
1sDZIwj5rKu5H-8nZq--jdRg!2e0
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.447752,30.529453,3a,75y,110.63h,85.45t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!
1s84dbEknCMewlOAv6fZ7jJw!2e0
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.44765,30.529717,3a,75y,81.46h,89.15t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!
1spmcSkNyOPyTpSClpJ1JxwQ!2e0
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.447602,30.52984,3a,75y,38.7h,90t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!
1snKpNlN67_gvXKCyJf5QVaA!2e0

https://www.google.com/maps/@50.4477037,30.5295783,3a,75y,91.83h,79.11t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!
1s7QJ4s3oJ7zZI-3P7cq0z-Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

https://www.google.com/maps/@50.4476568,30.5296988,3a,75y,49.72h,79.59t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!
1stpZFi0L7gPdiVv_7rOgG8Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

Цей же  синій будинок будинок за адресою Інститутська 7 видно на 10:53 хвилині відео

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqgeJLnS-14  ( назва відео : "Видео расстрела Институтской, снятое


со стороны Беркута 20 02 2014" )   з базування "Беркуту" на перехресті
вулиці Інститутської та вулиці Банкової (
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.4470717,30.5304751,3a,75y,336.96h,76.82t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s2NP-
dOPAtkrBAJRZcIxn1g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

https://www.google.com/maps/@50.4471692,30.5305478,3a,75y,336.96h,76.82t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!
1sUdba9h9ugiKf9O5wMas0ag!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

https://www.google.com/maps/@50.4472585,30.5306145,3a,75y,336.96h,76.82t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!
1spJfi9qhx6dwmWFOCOZBPww!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

 https://www.google.com/maps/@50.447075,30.530478,3a,75y,287.51h,77.06t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sPKq-
2qM07bdc2CA3-O9XEQ!2e0 )

А позиція, на якій утворена барикада "Беркуту", знаходиться дещо попереду на


відео: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plnMKLOSYjk

На 7:21 хвилині цього відео:   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plnMKLOSYjk видно,  що прямо біля


будинку за адресою Інститутська 7 стоять БТРи "Беркуту".
А на 12:30 -- 12:36 хвилинах цього відео: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plnMKLOSYjk  , видно, як
беркутівці влаштували свою позицію біля входу у цей синій будинок за адресою
Інститутська 7. На 12:31- 12:33 хвилиннах цього ж відео  видно, що барикада "Беркуту" знаходиться
декілька метрів попереду від входу до синього будинку:
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.447507,30.530085,3a,75y,315.16h,83.57t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!
1szXOYt4BRqq1rHAnoTpRzQw!2e0
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.447555,30.529961,3a,75y,3.85h,73.65t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!
1seRKJmP9BRPFVIeaDw8PkSw!2e0
Фактично цей синій будинок за адресою  Інститутська 7 знаходився  під контролем працівників
"Беркуту".

На відміну від автора цього "викриття", Іван Кочановський стверджує, що з напряму синього будинку
за адресою адресою Інститутська 7, тобто з напряму беркутівців, ніхто не стріляв у  прихильників
Майдану. Але це твердження Івана Кочановському ( як і твердження  цього автора ) базується лише на
потрібному йому ігноруванні числених попадань в прихильників  Майдану з переду, з фронту,  коли
майданівці наступали по вулиці Інститутській до позицій працівників "Беркуту". На численних відео
можна побачити, як в прихильників Майдану стріляють  з фронту, тобто з напряму працівників
Беркуту, і вони падають та котяться назад, що свідчить про стрільбу з фронту, з напряму працівників
Беркуту. Якщо хтось не може побачити та зрозуміти,  що в наступаючих  прихильників Майдану
стріляють з переду - з позицій "Беркуту", то йому треба ще раз повторити розділ механіки шкільної
фізики, який називаєтсься "Імпульс. Закон збереження імпульсу"

Автор  "викриття", яке з'явилося на ютюбі майже приблизно через  два тижні  після розстрілу
прихильників Майдану, старається ввести в оману глядача, що синій будинок за адресою Інститутська
7  знаходився під контролем прихильників Майдану . Але він же сам на 2:30 хвилині цього
відео https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLxSlq_hJu8 показує, що синій будинок за адресою
Інститутська 7 знаходиться в тилу "Беркуту". Тому його твердження,  що в цьому будинку були
"снайпери з Майдану", які стріляли в прихильників Майдану, - розраховано на ідіотів,  що собою
представляють прихильники
януковича і путіна. Тільки ідіоти могли побачити  на 2:30 хвилині  цього самого  відео, що цей синій
будинок за адресою Інститутська 7 знаходився в тилу "Беркуту",  та пізніше на 7:10 та 8:46 хвилинах
повірити, що з цього синього будинку стріляли "снайпери з Майдану". "Беркутовці" стріляли в
прихильників Майдану або з цього будинку, який  знаходився під  їхнім контролем, або  загородження,
яке,  як показано на відео, знаходилося попереду від  цього будинку на вулиці Інститутській. Іван
Кочановский, який, йомовірно, сплагіатив в цього автора інші ідеї ( попадання в дерево, в спину та бік,
відсутність  команди рострілювати в радіопереговорах ),  брехливо заявляє, що зі сторони "Беркуту"
взагалі не було пострілів в прихильників Майдану.

Відповідно до звіту Ради Європи щодо розслідування подій на Майдані, висновки якого
підтверджується балістичними експертизами, майже всі постріли в прихильників Майдану, які
наступали по вулиці Інститутській в напрямку "Беркуту", були зроблені з напрямку позицій "Беркуту":
http://www.eurointegration.com.ua/articles/2015/03/31/7032435/

Цитувати
"В ході розслідування за допомогою аналізу траєкторії куль було встановлено, що понад 30 осіб було
застрелено з-поза бетонної барикади біля виходу зі станції метро "Хрещатик" на вулиці Інститутській,
що співвідноситься з численними записами в мережі інтернет, на яких видно, як співробітники
"Беркуту" в уніформі з жовтими пов'язками стріляють з цього місця", - наводяться у звіті МДГ дані
офіційного розслідування, які досі не публікувалися.
http://www.eurointegration.com.ua/news/2015/03/31/7032449/

http://www.eurointegration.com.ua/news/2015/03/31/7032436/
http://www.eurointegration.com.ua/news/2015/03/31/7032447/

Але Іван Качановський далі продовжує тупо наполягати, що представники Євромайдану стріляли самі
в себе:

Цитувати
Ivan Katchanovski:
A report of the International Advisory Panel, set up by the Council of Europe, presents new evidence
corroborating my study conclusions that the investigation of the "snipers' massacre" on the Maidan is
deliberately and systematically falsified and stonewalled at the highest level in Ukraine, in particular by the
Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Prosecutor General office, as a part of the cover-up. This panel was tasked
with assessing the government investigation, and it did not conduct its own investigation. Therefore, this report
contains summary of the main findings and evidence by the Ukrainian investigation. The report reveals that
contrary to the public statements, the official investigation has no evidence implicating government snipers but
has evidence of "shooters" killing protesters from the Maidan-controlled Hotel Ukraina, Music Conservatory,
and other buildings and that the version of Maidan shooters is not pursued. This is an important official
admission which corroborates my findings of Maidan shooters killing the protesters from these locations. Such
my findings were previously dismissed or ignored, and I came under various personal attacks for making such
conclusion.
The government investigation determined that Berkut special company members killed the absolute majority
from 49 protesters because the majority of victims were killed by 7.62x39 caliber bullets, their trajectories
indicate that more than 30 protesters were killed from the Berkut barricade, and because videos show the
Berkut members shooting from similar caliber Kalashnikov rifles from this barricade. This conclusion means
that the investigation deliberately ignores videos and eyewitness testimonies about Maidan shooters having and
firing at both the protesters and the police from the Kalashnikov assault rifles of the same caliber from the
Hotel Ukraina, Zhovtnevyi Palace, and the conservatory building and a GPU’s own suppressed statement
about protesters being killed from the Hotel Ukraina from a Simonov carbine of the same caliber. Furthermore,
the report omits official admissions by the investigators that at least 17 protesters were killed with pellets, one
by a 9mm bullet from a Makarov gun, and six by other ammunition, such as hunting bullets.My study cites
videos and eyewitness testimonies about Maidan shooters possessing and firing at both the protesters and the
police from hunting shotguns and rifles from the hotel, conservatory and other Maidan-controlled buildings.
My analysis of killings of specific protesters, specifically videos synchronized with a precision to a second,
bullet trajectories, and directions of entry wounds, shows that the absolute majority of the protesters in front of
the Berkut barricade were killed from the same Maidan controlled buildings, while the Berkut members shot at
these buildings. But wounding or killing of some of the protesters by the Berkut cannot be completely ruled
out because of the lack of specific information in a small number of cases. But such continuing suppression of
the crucial information by the government of Ukraine is consistent with its deliberate cover-up of this mass
killing in which far right and oligarchic parties and top government officials were involved.
https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?
documentId=09000016802f038b
https://www.facebook.com/ivan.katchanovski/posts/1000424019987484

Про об'єктивність цього "дослідника" можна навіть судити з деяких інших дописів його блогу:
Цитувати
Ivan Katchanovski
March 26 at 4:29pm ·
Poroshenko follows Stalin in claiming that 80% the Ukrainian State Security service members, or some two
dozen thousands officers, were Russian FSB agents during the Yanukovych presidency when Poroshenko
served as his minister. Scale of political terror in Ukraine also has reached now levels last seen in Ukraine
during Stalin's
rule. http://www.ukrinform.ua/rus/news/tri_goda_nazad_sbu_na_80_sostoyala_iz_agentov_fsb___poroshenko
_1728724
https://www.facebook.com/ivan.katchanovski/posts/997434276953125
                                                                                       
Наступні дописи щодо фальсифікацій Івана Качановского:

https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-history-of-Ukraine-
1449195048708622/
                                       
                                                                                                       
(  ДАЛІ   БУДЕ )

Ivan Katchanovski is a falsifier of the Maidan massacre and contemporary history of Ukraine

http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/

You might also like