Bin Laden’s Henchmen: Al Qa’ida’s Commanding Officers who are Leading the Global Jihad

Sarah Catanzaro Professor Martha Crenshaw, Advisor Interschool Honors Program in International Security Studies Center for International Security and Cooperation Stanford University


Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………...4 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………....5 Chapter 1: Building a Complex Organization………………………………………....6 I. II. III. IV. Evolution of Al Qa’ida’s Organizational Structure…………………………………..7 A Description of Complex Organizations………………………………...…………..12 The Role of “Mergers and Acquisitions”………………………..…………………...13 Initial Thoughts on Policy Implications……………………………………………….15

Chapter 2: Literature Review………………………………………………………….17 I. II. Literature on Al Qa’ida’s Foreign Affiliates…………………………………………17 Literature on Joining Radical Movements……………………………………………20 A. Ideological motivations………………………………………………20 B. Psychosocial motivations…………………………………………….22 C. Strategic/opportunistic motivations………………………………….23 Literature on Terrorist Leadership…………………………………………………….25 A. The personality of terrorist leaders…………………………………..25 B. Targeting leadership………………………………………………….26


Chapter 3: Methodology………………………………………………………………..28 I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. Background……………………………………………………………………………….28 Assessing Q1……………………………………………………………………………...30 Assessing Q2……………………………………………………………………………...38 Developing the Universe of Cases……………………………………………………..40 Selection of Study Subjects……………………………………………………………...42 Problems Regarding Information Gathering…………………………………………43 Case Study………………………………………………………………………………...44 Relevance………………………………………………………………………………….44

Chapter 4: Universe of Cases…………………………………………………………..46 I. II. III. IV. Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: An Evolving Network…………………………………………46 Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: The Geographic Distribution………………………………..53 Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: Mergers? Partnerships? Or Collaborations?...................57 Summary of Findings…………………………………………………………………….59

Chapter 5: Results of Statistical Hypothesis Testing…………………………………60 I. II. Data Analysis and Results for Q1: What motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida’s and its pan-Islamic agenda?.......................................................60 Data Analysis and Results for Q2: What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible affiliates with Al Qa’ida……………………………………………………………….. 61


Chapter 6: Al Qa’ida in the Maghreb and Abdelmalek Droukdal – A Well Executed Merger…………………………………………………………………………………64 I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. The Origins of Islamic Violence in Algeria after the War of Independence……...64 The Birth of the Salvation Islamic Front……………………………………………...65 The Beginnings of the GIA and the Onset of an Epoch of Violence……………….66 An Alternative Emerges: The Origins of the GSPC…………………………………67 Fissions Form Within the GSPC……………………………………………………….67 The Rise of Droukdal…………………………………………………………………….71 Droukdal’s Program: Toward Global Jihad……………………………...………….73 The Announcement of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb………………..………...77 A New Organization……………………………………………………………………..78 Final Observations………………………………………………………………………80

Chapter 7: Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya: The Unrealized Merger………………………83 I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. The Emergence of the GAI from the Ashes of the Muslim Brotherhood………….83 The Sadat Assassination………………………………………………………………...84 Crackdown under Mubarak…………………………………………………………….84 Campaign of Terror……………………………………………..………………………85 Collapse of an Armed Group…………………………………………………………...86 Reconciliation…………………………………………………………………………….88 Explaining the Decision not to Affiliate with Al Qa’ida…………………………….89 Final Observations………………………………………………………………………91

Chapter 8: Conclusion and Discussion – Al Qa’ida’s Commanding Officers: A Skilled Management Team……………………………………………………………………..93 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………...107 Appendix I: List of Terrorist Groups………………………………………………..115 Appendix II: Sources by Terrorist Group…………………………………………...116 Appendix III: Commanding Officer Attribute Codebook……………………….....135 Appendix IV: Commanding Officer Attributes……………………………………..136 Appendix V: Data on Universe of Cases……………………………………………..138 Appendix VI: Data on Q1…………………………………………………………….139 Appendix VII: Data on Q2……………………………………………………………140


only in recent years. This paper examines first the motivations of local jihadist groups who associate with Al Qa’ida to understand the transformation that Al Qa’ida has achieved. The conclusion of this paper finds that while opportunistic. rather than ideological concerns are the primary motivating factors for joining Al Qa’ida. shared visions become essential. this paper offers some broad recommendations regarding the future conduct of the Global War on Terror (GWOT). has Osama Bin Laden increasingly relied upon these franchises to prosecute his panIslamic struggle. Based on this analysis. It then focuses on the role that local jihadist leaders play in the aftermath of the affiliation to shed further light on Al Qa’ida’s current strategy and operations.Abstract: Al Qa’ida has allied with indigenous terrorist groups for over a decade. after these affiliations occur. The local jihadist leaders who become Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers ensure ideological alignment with Al Qa’ida. However. 4 .

I would also like to thank my brother. Through the CISAC seminars. I would like to thank Colonel Joseph Felter and Jarrett Brachman who introduced me to several primary and secondary documents. Admiration should be earned. both personal and intellectual is more important than can adequately be acknowledge in such a brief note. Port Washington. Despite his youth. and more recently into the making of this thesis. I have benefited particularly from communications with Professor Martha Crenshaw. Professor Crenshaw helped answer my questions promptly. Acts of kindness and heroism became increasingly visible in my community as people mobilized to help one another. I hope that a general acknowledgement here of the wisdom and understanding may be counted to me for righteousness. There were cars parked at our train station that were never recovered and fathers and mothers who never returned from work. I would have been hardpressed to get this project done in anything like a timely fashion had it not been for this program. Since my sophomore year at Stanford. Thank you so much for your patience. a traditionally male-dominated discipline. objectivity. These sources proved to be a treasure-chest indeed. 5 . he continues to inspire me every day with his thoughtfulness and intelligence. Professors Stockton and May helped me clarify and expand my views about this project on numerous occasions. New York which was tragically impacted by the September 11. how friends and neighbors had disappeared and presumably perished during this devastating attack on America’s soil. at length. I am also grateful to Dara Kay Cohen.Acknowledgements: The ideas of more people than I can possibly mention have affected my thinking about terrorist organizations and Al Qa’ida over the years. Without a doubt. I distinctly remember the sense of dissociation and unreality as we struggled to understand how our beloved Twin Towers were destroyed. who is currently a junior in high school. and Professor Crenshaw most certainly earned mine through her impressive career. I have had the opportunity to try out some of my ideas and receive valuable criticism from my peers. and with enthusiasm. not given. Their constant support. Moreover. I want to recognize my community. It gives me great pleasure to thank Professors Paul Stockton and Michael May for the opportunity to participate in the CISAC Interschool Honors Program. and coaching. the members of my community began to dig themselves literally and metaphorically from the ruins of the 9/11 disaster. I would be remiss not to acknowledge my parents. This solidarity and resiliency consolidated my faith in humanity and sparked my interest in homeland security studies. I have been so fortunate to benefit from their generosity and acumen. 2001 terrorist attack on the Twin Towers. this project would have been poorer without her invaluable comments. I was so fortunate to have had Dara around as an academic example and important mentor. Yet despite a pervasive sense of insecurity. I dedicate my thesis to the population of Port Washington. for whom I would also like to show gratitude. Moreover. Finally. but most importantly for serving as an incredible mentor. who listened to my presentations with great attention and offered so many thoughtful suggestions and useful comments. She also put at my disposal her insights on numerous topics. Thus. she has offered me practical and affectionate support. In addition. Professor Crenshaw lives as a role model for the next generation of female investigators researching international security.

An organization characterized by “loose coupling” has cells that are relatively autonomous and independent. While each perspective has its merits. and to dispatch operatives worldwide. all oversimplify the command configuration utilized by Al Qa’ida. Ronfeldt 2005. 2001 attacks. Dishman 2005). The first maintains that Al Qa’ida Central Command retains ideological and operational control over the organization and preserves a certain degree of tactical influence. since the onset of the Global War on Terror (GWOT). Thus. Al Qa’ida’s structure and degree of centralization may fluctuate within a period of months or weeks. Moreover. Al Qa’ida was a relatively centralized organization that used Afghanistan as a base from which to strategize. In contrast. Al Qa’ida utilizes a mix of both loose and tight coupling to attain a remarkable degree of adaptability. Although most scholars perceive Al Qa’ida as an organization in stasis. One can 6 . However.Stern 2003). Al Qa’ida has transformed into a more ambiguous entity that scholars cannot easily define.Chapter 1: Building a Complex Organization Prior to the September 11. Others suggest that Al Qa’ida has become a decentralized network of individualized and local cells bound together exclusively by common beliefs (Diebert and Stein 2003. and depend upon each other. Currently. Gunaratna 2004). Some scholars even contend that the main threat no longer emanates from Al Qa’ida but from unassociated radicalized individuals and groups who meet and plot in their neighborhoods and on the Internet (Sageman 2008. most fail to assess the exchange relationships that distinguish Al Qa’ida. to plan attacks. an organization characterized by “tight coupling” includes cells that associate intimately. A few dominant camps have emerged within this scholarly debate. they fail to acknowledge that this combination of loose and tight coupling has enabled Al Qa’ida to become a modern hydra that readily adapts to changes in its environment. communicate often.

recently. each led by a commanding officer). This study will examine the incentives and role of former local jihadist group leaders who now serve as Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. this study may affect the allocation of resources in Washington for counterterrorism efforts. Ayman Zawahiri and the core of Al Qa’ida. Evolution of Al Qa’ida’s Organizational Structure: 7 . I.therefore classify Al Qa’ida as a complex organization a concept that will be elaborated in this chapter (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2003). since the onset of the Global War on Terror. Al Qa’ida has affiliated with indigenous terrorist groups for almost twenty years. Although Al Qa’ida has cooperated with local jihadist groups for years. This study will draw upon open source and primary source information to understand why and how Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers promote the pan-Islamic agenda. It is important to analyze these individuals because they have assumed more authority since September 11. By defining the new structure of Al Qa’ida (characterized by loosely integrated and operationally attached subunits. these external relationships enabled Al Qa’ida to transform into a complex organization. 2001. However. characterized by an efficient blend of both tight and loose coupling. One method whereby Al Qa’ida achieves such adaptability is by merging or partnering with local jihadist groups. Moreover. the conclusions drawn from this analysis may present policymakers with new and novel ways of targeting Al Qa’ida and its partners. distinguishing the groups with which Al Qa’ida is strongly associated. and identifying and assessing the role of the commanders who interact with Osama Bin Laden. Al Qa’ida has begun to depend on these affiliates to obtain organizational flexibility to a considerable extent.

procuring. established an office in Peshawar. In the Sudan. and launching support and military operations. it was not until the summer of 1988. The finance committee oversaw and developed financial resources. a multimillionaire from a wealthy Saudi family. The Services Bureau (“Maktab al Khadamat”) provided travel funds and guesthouses in Pakistan for recruits and volunteers to facilitate the struggle against the Soviet forces. an Islamic scholar and founding member of the Kashmiri jihadist group Lashkar-e-Taiba. However. The organization was centered upon the “shura” (i. Pakistan to serve as a hostel for Arabs coming to fight the Soviets and as a press agency to produce propaganda to promote jihad. most of whom he knew since his formative days in Afghanistan. advisory council) consisting of Bin Laden’s closest associates. Bin Laden returned to Saudi Arabia as a hero of jihad. a large number of jihadists from the Middle East traveled to Afghanistan to combat the Soviet Union. He relocated to the Sudan at the invitation of the government of Hassan Turabi and the National Islamic Front. The religious committee justified Al 8 .e. Bin Laden was disenchanted with his native Saudi Arabia. developing a membership roster and establishing a hierarchical arrangement to guide and oversee its functions (Riedel 2008). after the liberation of Kuwait from Saddam Hussein by the American-led multinational army. At the conclusion of the Soviet-Afghan war. Osama bin Laden. The shura majilis (consultative assembly) received information from four subordinate committees designed to direct specific segments of planning and operations. This council promoted common goals.In the 1980s. Bin Laden expanded the Al Qa’ida organization. that Bin Laden began calling his cadre al Qaeda al Askariya (“the military base”) and developing a greater organizational structure (Riedel 2008). in 1991. coordinated targets. However. The military committee was responsible for recruiting. and authorized asset sharing for terrorist operations. which had rebuffed his offer to defend the kingdom. training. and Abdullah Azzam.

Bin Laden was able to forge his closest alliance yet with the Taliban by providing it with significant financial and human resources to support the ongoing war against other factions in northern Afghanistan. The plot to attack the United State began in 1999 after Al Qa’ida executed the simultaneous bombings of the American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Thus. and Libya. all three of which faced indigenous terrorist groups supported by Bin Laden.Qa’ida’s actions and operations within the theological parameters of Al Qa’ida model of Islam. Once a specific operation was decided upon. Bin Laden left the Sudan to return to Afghanistan as a result of combined pressure from the United States. in its earlier incarnation. In May 1997. Finally. 2001 attacks reveal the former nature of Al Qa’ida’s decision-making apparatus. Saudi Arabia. and the Capitol Building. Afghanistan’s lack of central government provided Bin Laden with greater leeway to pursue his agenda and centralize his operations. Al Qa’ida could be classified as a centralized organization. the media committee produced propaganda intended to generate Muslim support for the organization and its objectives (Harmony Database Released Documents: Al Qa'ida Goals and Structure 2006). Moreover. In May 1996. Al Qa’ida’s former propaganda chief. 2001 attacks against the United States (Bergen 2002). other western governments. Bin Laden personally recruited the plot’s 9 . thereby strengthening Al Qa’ida Central Command and forming a close-knit group of jihadists uniquely capable of executing terror operations like the September 11. the Pentagon. although Al Qa’ida also assisted two other Salafi terrorist groups during this formative period in the Sudan. it would be assigned to a carefully selected cell headed by a senior Al Qa’ida operative who reported personally to Bin Laden (Wright 2007). Egypt. Bin Laden cemented his ties to Ayman Zawahiri. hatched the plan to target the Twin Towers. Bin Laden and Khalid Sheikh Mohammad. the last emir of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad. The September 11.

the attacks precipitated the Global War on Terror (GWOT). Al Qa’ida allegedly convened a strategic summit in northern Iran at which the shura recognized that Al Qa’ida could no longer function as a hierarchy. Mullah Omar in the preparation (Riedel 2008). Mohammed Atta as well as the fifteen operatives who would intimidate the passengers during the airline hijackings. which used Afghanistan as a base from which to carry out major operations against American targets and did not significantly depend upon its affiliates to support its operations in the Middle East. Prior to 9/11. Captives revealed the names of their commanders and associates thereby highlighting the need for loose coupling between local operatives and Al Qa’ida’s executive leadership in order to evade government interference and limit the consequences of any further compromises. In November 2002. for instance. Nevertheless. When operations are so decentralized. were instructed to develop their own organizational structures. composed of less than ten operatives. they established their own individual plans (Felter et al. many Al Qa’ida leaders were imprisoned. networked terrorist organizations would be less vulnerable to traditional counterterrorism measures used by hierarchically organized security forces. individual cells. he personally handled other elements of the conspiracy. Al Qa’ida was a centralized organization. These arrests led to subsequent arrests of other senior officers. After the first year of the GWOT and the ouster of the Taliban from Afghanistan.tactical leader. Although Bin Laden and Al Qa’ida considered 9/11 an astonishing success. detached from Al Qa’ida Central Command and other cells. it becomes particularly difficult to maintain 10 . he engaged the Taliban and its leader. Al Qa’ida soon learned that there are limitations to a strictly decentralized structure. 2006). While they operated in support of centralized directives. Additionally. The shura concluded that a decentralized. From this point forward.

Thus. Brachman. complex organization. Within a decentralized framework. after five Kashmiri terrorists attacked Lok Sabha. Al Qa’ida leadership found itself cornered along the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan and unable to coordinate its low-level operatives. these low-level operatives sought more violence than was useful due to the cognitive dynamics of an underground organization. In 2002 and 2003. and their own talent at conducting aggressive attacks (Shapiro 2007). Bramlett. who espoused different personal preferences. Al Qa’ida faced challenges when Central Command was forced to delegate certain duties to low level operatives. However. prior to the invasion of Iraq. Al Qa’ida can rely upon closer relations with its commanding officers (the former leaders of indigenous terrorist groups).S. the U. Al Qa’ida could not effectively monitor its agents’ activities. decision to go to war with Iraq and the Pakistani decision to provoke a crisis with India allowed Al Qa’ida to survive by regaining a degree of centralization. the US allowed Al Qa’ida to reconstitute itself in the tribal areas of Pakistan. thereby provoking Pakistan to divert to the east troops that were needed in the west. competition for prominence within the movement. rather than consolidating its victory in Afghanistan. and Fishman 2006). Perkins. Invading Iraq diverted troops from the mission of finding Al Qa’ida’s leadership. These commanding officers ensure that preference divergence does not result in the loss of 11 . who are the most important link in the formation of a resilient. Often. Moreover. nor could it punish renegade agents (Felter. Al Qa’ida was able to reestablish some of its pre-9/11 operational capabilities by exploiting Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Riedel 2008).situational awareness and control the use of violence to achieve specific political ends. India began to mobilize along the border. the lower house of India’s parliament in New Delhi. Like most other organizations. As the result of restoration of central control.

qualified by tightly coupled systems or exclusively decentralized organizations. This flexible structure allows the Central Command to maintain control over specifically identified strategic operations through its commanding officers while enabling cells to maintain their autonomy in local and regional operations (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2006). Al Qa’ida is a true “complex organization”). A Description of Complex Organizations: As this history indicates. qualified by loosely coupled systems. Complex organizations are composed of a diversity of agents. today. Empowered by the establishment of its safe haven in Pakistan and increased reliance upon its commanding officers. Although a decentralized organization form was more appropriate and prudent after 9/11. Unlike strictly centralized organizations. By contrast. and large size dictated its organizational decisions. the relationship between Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers and central authorities are moderately coupled (thus. intricate nature of resource gathering and allocation. the relationships between cells and between operatives and Al Qa’ida Central Command are loosely coupled. Al Qa’ida was effectively a decentralized network). Before Al Qa’ida Central Command reorganized itself in the tribal areas of Pakistan. the relationship between its commanding officers and central authorities were also loosely coupled (thus. While it is difficult to 12 .operational success or security. highly visible organizational personnel. Al Qa’ida continues to morph into a complexly structure organization (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2006). Al Qa’ida now relies heavily upon semiautonomous cells found in operational territories that are horizontally and vertically integrated into the centralized command structure. complex organizations can exploit a diversity of systems (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2001). Al Qa’ida’s demand for operational secrecy. who interact with and mutually affect one another. it was not very efficient. While the relationships within the cells are tightly coupled. II.

determine if Al Qa’ida assumed this structure by conscious design or coincidence. Moreover. these commanding officers are effective because they can develop mature relationships with their operatives. Since they are already closely coupled to their agents. These relationships are characterized by a high degree of leader-member exchange and commitment that was impossible to achieve between Al Qa’ida Central Command executives and operatives due to their lack of physical proximity. He observed that a dearth of such leaders reduces the maximum level of control Al Qa’ida could exert thereby undermining the potential for political impact (Felter. III. now when Al Qa’ida merges. they can build differentiated relationships with their rapports rather than espousing an “average” leadership style. Perkins. the extensive negotiations that continue to occur between Al Qa’ida and its affiliates suggest that Al Qa’ida has consciously utilized these arrangements to remain resilient. Previously. Bramlett. and Fishman 2006). Bin Laden did not seek to exert strategic or operational control over the leaders of its regionally based affiliates. it employs the groups’ leaders as its commanding officers and integrates them into Al Qa’ida Central Command by establishing communication channels and by offering financial and technological resources to these leaders for their local outlets with stipulations. interactive communication 13 . However. Communication frequency. or collaborates with a local jihadist groups. Al Qa’ida has achieved an optimal combination of coupling. partners. These commanding officers can serve a crucial role since they are better able to monitor the behavior of their agents and can punish and reward them for their performance. The Role of “Mergers and Acquisitions:” By affiliating with local jihadist movements. Al Qa’ida theorist Abu Musab al-Suri noted the importance of a highly trained cadre of senior commanding officers. Brachman.

Al Qa’ida Central Command can rely upon its commanding officers to handle finance and logistic tasks and to engage in auditing strategies. these new. 14 . decision influence. ensuring that relationships that could dilute commitment are avoided and those that enhance commitment are strengthened(Brachman and McCants 2006). cohesive units can innovate and adapt to the demands of the environment because they do not need to conform to a strict set of guidelines passed down from Central Command.patterns. The moderate coupling between Al Qa’ida Central Command and local leaders is essential to the performance of the organization. and member affect are all key in this dyadic relationship (Graen and Uhl-Bien 1995). Al Qa’ida can ensure that strategic and tactical differences between it and its commanding officers are reconciled. Studies from the corporate world as well as observations by Al Qa’ida theorists reveal that when agents develop high quality relationships with their leaders. Perkins. Bramlett. Moreover. relying on lower-level operatives (who are often less committed. leader-member value agreement. their performance. and their overall unit performance improves (Graen and Uhl-Bien 1995). Because affiliations are often preceded by several months of bargaining and negotiations. Commanding officers now serve an important role as interlocutors with Al Qa’ida Central Command. subordinate loyalty. Jarrett Brachman. Thus. and Fishman 2006). Providing funds on a need-to-have basis to smaller groups of operatives is a risky strategy because each additional transfer entails communications and financial transactions. since the most devoted operatives are obliged to engage in riskier or inherently fatal assignments) is a more hazardous strategy (Felter. Moreover. There is a positive correlation between the level of ideological indoctrination of cell members and the degree of control a leader exerts. which can be tracked by counterterrorist forces. Local leaders can also effectively monitor operative’s personal and social network.

Initial Thoughts on Policy Implications: 15 . this study compiles the biographies of over forty Al Qa’ida commanding officers. press and scholarly articles. obligations to Al Qa’ida Central Command. Drawing upon documents and transcripts of legal proceedings involving global Salafi mujahedin and their organizations. at present. up-to-date.By allowing its commanding officers to retain significant freedom to interact with other local leaders and with resource providers. thereby allowing Al Qa’ida to maintain ideological and operational control over the organization and by closely interacting with local operatives. this study provides valuable insight into the transformation that these leaders undergo when they become Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers by looking at their responsibilities before and after they affiliate with Al Qa’ida. local leaders-cum-commanding officers perform a crucial function by liaising with Al Qa’ida Central Command. they are given latitude to exploit their specific environment. duty of care to their agents. thereby ensuring the unity. and equipment. Moreover. efficiency. information between operatives and Al Qa’ida authorities (McAllister 2004). transmitting new. accountability for operation effectiveness. scrutinizing their stories for patterns to determine their motivation. they act as a hub of communication. and powers including discipline and punishment of their agents) no researcher has analyzed their role or background. these commanding officers can ensure the dissemination of innovation and information by acting as an intermediary between their cell members and Al Qa’ida Central Command. government documents. Although these commanding officers have significant responsibilities (for example. and competence of local cells. Thus. IV. the use of force. This is the first study that pinpoints the organizations with which Al Qa’ida has affiliated and identifies their leaders (who subsequently become Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers). Moreover. and Internet articles. Currently. finances.

Government efforts to degrade Al Qa’ida’s capacity should focus on undermining its security environment, minimizing the degree to which it can control operations, and abort its ability to fund its activities. By identifying the crucial role played by commanding officers in sustaining Al Qa’ida, this study will suggest additional means of undermining Al Qa’ida. The government should increase dissension between local leaders and Al Qa’ida Central Command. The US government should publicly recognize and highlight the differences between the acquired groups, who originally espouse ambitions such as regime overthrow and Al Qa’ida, which is committed to a pan-Islamic program. Moreover, the government can disrupt communications channels between local leaders and Al Qa’ida central command by utilizing misinformation and flooding information channels, thereby forcing the commanding officers to communicate more frequently with Al Qa’ida Central Command, possibly revealing crucial information. There may be “psychological” tactics that can be employed to generate dissension, to exploit certain aspects of human or group dynamics that would lead to competition, or rebellion. Moreover, there may be certain personality characteristics of the types of individuals employed at each level of organization that can be manipulated. Finally, government efforts should deny jihadist groups the benefit of security vacuum in vulnerable areas; thereby barring the emergence of potential Al Qa’ida partners. Through troop deployment, the US government can deny terrorists the use of vulnerable countries as staging grounds for the attacks in the West.


Chapter 2: Literature Review
Recently, counterterrorist agents and military officers have mounted efforts to combat Al Qa’ida and Bin Laden supporters. However, there is considerable controversy among scholars regarding the structure of Al Qa’ida and therefore, how best to target this formidable foe. The debate regarding the nature of Al Qa’ida’s threat will inevitably impact upon the allocation of influence and resource by the U.S. federal government in the Global War on Terror (GWOT) embarked upon following the September 11, 2001 attacks. The outcome of the bureaucratic turf wars over funding for programs under the new Obama administration will surely define future directions and strategies to confront Al Qa’ida specifically and global terrorism in general. In the introductory chapter, I highlighted the newfound importance of Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers, which lead the groups with which Al Qa’ida has recently merged or with whom it remains associated. Although Al Qa’ida retains its core group and a well-trained terrorist cadre, it has become increasingly engaged with regional affiliates in Egypt, the Sinai Peninsula, Indonesia, and other sites in franchise operations. I. Literature on Al Qa’ida’s Foreign Affiliates Several scholars have investigated the process whereby Al Qa’ida has achieved a broader geographic and operational reach by employing local jihadist groups. These researchers confirm my commentary that such partnerships can provide Al Qa’ida with increased flexibility and offer advantages in stimulating tactical level innovation within particular environments when they are astutely directed by Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. In a report prepared for the Combat Studies Institute, Kalic describes Al Qa’ida as a “modern hydra.” He observes that before the onset of the GWOT, Al Qa’ida functioned as a regional indoctrination and training center for Islamic terrorist organizations. However, he


corroborates my observation that because of the loss of support and training centers in Afghanistan due to Operation Enduring Freedom, Bin Laden was obliged to rely upon outside groups in order to perpetuate Al Qa’ida’s agenda. Kalic suggests that Al Qa’ida’s alliances with Abu Sayyaf, Egyptian Islamic Jihad, Tunisian Combatant Group, and Libyan Islamic Fighting Group have enabled Al Qa’ida to expand its geographic influence and diffuse its organizational structure. He describes the process whereby Al Qa’ida supports local “walk in” Islamic groups that pitch their plans to Al Qa’ida for financial support. These radical groups provide additional reach to Al Qa’ida and expand its operational capability for minimal investment because they can develop indigenous plans and operations based on local situations and observations. Moreover, they allow Al Qa’ida to minimize exposure of its central command structure (Kalic 2005) In a similar vein, Takeyh and Gvosdev have observed that after the destruction of its sanctuary in Afghanistan, Al Qa’ida has remained buoyant by forging foreign alliances. Through this strategy, Al Qa’ida has established a presence in failed states where it believes the US will opt not to risk significant losses associated with urban/guerilla warfare. Al Qa’ida no longer needs a strong state for funding and supplies since it can rely on its franchises in countries like Kashmir, Kosovo, Chechnya, and Palestine (Takeyh and Gvosdev 2002). Riedel avows that the US invasion of Iraq and subsequent efforts to quell sectarian unrest have allowed Al Qa’ida to regroup in the tribal areas of Pakistan, where it has established a new base of operations. Now, Al Qa’ida is once again focused on enlarging its network. Consequently, Al Qa’ida has developed a closer relationship with Kashmiri terrorist groups, like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Muhammad that have a presence there. Moreover, while Al Qa’ida has failed to topple the governments of Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, its attacks against these


with Shia organizations (like Hezbollah). She maintains that many organizations will form alliances with groups that have ideologies different from their own. Al Qa’ida remains associated with these groups as long as they cannot operate independently. she suggests that both Egyptian Islamic Jihad and the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan compromised their original mission when they joined forces with Al Qa’ida. Mishal and Rosenthal describe Al Qa’ida as a “dune organization” that employs other loosely affiliated organizations to carry out its missions. In a similar vein. Al Qa’ida can forge broad. Finally. she avows that Bin Laden has adjusted his objectives over time and describes Al Qa’ida as a “flexible group of ruthless warriors ready to fight on behalf of multiple causes. The affiliated groups may employ a modus operandi. Moreover.” Due to the adaptability of its mission. 19 . the plot to destroy ten commercial airliners en route from the United Kingdom to the United States. when they prove that they no longer need Al Qa’ida’s material or normative support to conduct independent maneuvers. and revivalist organizations (like Tablighi Jamaat) (Stern 2003). Al Qa’ida need not maintain constant supervision or control over the activities of its old affiliate’s operatives (Mishal and Rosenthal 2005).regimes demonstrate its expanded influence throughout the Middle East. Stern observes that terrorist groups’ objectives have evolved to ensure their survival. Al Qa’ida finds another organization that can attain its other goals and leaves this former associate to continue the war on its own. foiled in 2006. However. or Lebanon in the near future (Riedel 2007). obliging both entities to adapt. and sometimes unlikely alliances with other jihadist groups (like Jemaah Islamiyah). Africa. which is not identical to Al Qa’ida’s tactics. Riedel suggests that Al Qa’ida may seek a foothold in Gaza. thus. indicates that Al Qa’ida has established connections in Europe. For instance. with traditional organized crime groups (like Artab Ansari’s [an Indian gangster] network).

Literature on Incentives for Joining Radical Movements A. offering only its name. They analyze several possible arrangements. including “licensing agreements. They avow that terrorist groups cannot be self-sustaining and must “engage in the fundamentals of established economic practices” to furnish protection from outside threats.Fishman is less worried about Al Qa’ida franchises than other scholars. Desouza and Hengsen provide the most comprehensive analysis of Al Qa’ida’s collaborative activities. reputation. They contend that these interactions are the most complex form of equity engagements that terrorist groups develop to survive in competitive environments and suggest that mergers/acquisitions allow terrorist groups to consolidate their assets to compete more successfully or exploit resources held by other parties (Desouza and Hengsen 2007). He avers that Al Qa’ida offers these franchises few benefits. Finally. whereby Al Qa’ida combines with or subsumes another organization. or personnel for a specific purpose and duration and “minority equity investments. 20 . equipment. and ideology. He offers Al Qa’ida in Iraq as an example of a group which compromised Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic mission by attacking Muslim civilians and engaging in conflict with other Iraqi insurgent groups (Fishman 2008). II.” whereby Al Qa’ida finances terrorist groups with the intention of influencing their strategic activity. they describe mergers and acquisitions. they do not reveal why local jihadist groups choose to align with Al Qa’ida.” whereby Al Qa’ida allows other groups to use its facilities. He contends that Al Qa’ida’s franchises are likely to commit rash. strategic mistakes and are more susceptible to counterterrorism offensives than their mother organization. Ideological motivations While these studies analyze Al Qa’ida’s strategy and explain why Al Qa’ida has pursued such arrangements. Many groups that merge or partner with Al Qa’ida adhere to a program based on the ethnic.

They observe that although Al Qa’ida was initially devoted to fighting the Soviet forces it now espouses more internationalist objectives. Unfortunately. She maintains that political organizations often orient their ideology to support recruitment. Like Stern. Upon allying with Al Qa’ida. she proposes that ideology is a strategic choice made by the organization. Consequently. She observes that the attention groups pay to adjusting their ideology to circumstance is revealed when they explain and justify their strategies. and Weeding validate this line of thought. Della Porta suggests that individuals are persuaded to enlist in underground organizations when they are enticed by its ideology. They contend that Al 21 . many groups grapple with contradictions between national and supranational aims. One could also envisage that Al Qa’ida is promoting its pan-Islamic vision because it is aware of the magnetism of this dream. Consequently. Based on her interpretation. enemies and allies are described in different terms at different times (Della Porta 1995). Jones. Smith. Studies regarding why individuals join radical movements may inform our understanding of the motivations of local terrorists leaders who connect with Al Qa’ida’s global enterprise. one might expect that local jihadist leaders subscribe to Al Qa’ida’s global jihad because the idea of establishing an Islamic Caliphate throughout the world is attractive to them. In fact. it is a tool for enlarging the potential supporters of the organization. Al Qa’ida can co-opt local struggles into an evolving network of worldwide jihad by asserting its dedication to an international agenda. they must forsake their indigenous agendas to support the global pan-Islamic movement.sectarian. few studies investigate the incentives of the local jihadist leaders who adopt Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program and transform their organization into part of Al Qa’ida’s system. linguistic. and state boundaries in which they arose.

Moreover. and Denny interviewed 35 incarcerated Middle Eastern extremists from Hamas. they 22 . They noticed that these terrorists exhibited a higher rate of religious education. Islamic Jihad. Sprinzak. Gunaratna 2002). Perliger. Al Qa’ida successfully transformed the parochial thinking of these groups through a sophisticated propaganda campaign to orient them towards global. Gunaratna also supports this argument. Pedahzur. Similarly. Psychosocial motivations Conversely. As a result. Consequently. They offer Jemaah Islamiyah as an example of an organization that was seduced by Al Qa’ida’s discussion of a pan-Islamic caliphate (Jones. they concluded that income and/or educational inequalities do not account for terrorism. Smith. and Weinberg observed 80 Palestinian suicide terrorists from 1973 to 2002. and Denny 2003). B. They observed that most had a high school education and some had additional schooling and that most came from respected families that supported their activism. rather than local jihad. other studies suggest that individuals join terrorist networks for psychosocial reasons. and Hezbollah. He avows that traditionally. Al Qa’ida anti-Western curriculum is increasingly alluring (R. However. As a consequence of the GWOT and the war in Iraq.Qa’ida has improved its media wing to appeal to local jihadist groups in their native language and honor regional customs. membership in fundamentalist organizations and repeat terrorist acts. global events have provided the context for the new generation to gain exposure to significant ideological training and indoctrination. Post. They deduced that peer influence and increased social standing were major reasons for joining a terrorist group (Post. and Weeding 2003). Sprinzak. Islamist groups fought secular Muslim governments either to replace them or to form a separate state. as well as 14 secular terrorists from Fatah al-Islam.

spirituality and concern for their communities. Sagemen found no evidence of pathological narcissism or paranoid personality disorder amongst those who he surveyed. terrorist leaders may have opportunistic motives for securing a spot under Al Qa’ida’s umbrella. Although his research was biased towards leaders who have come to the public attention. calculated decision to execute a particular type of action. educated young men from caring and religious families. Each mode of operation has a per-unit price that 23 . and Al Qa’ida. which they perceive to be the optimum strategy to accomplish a sociopolitical goal. He observed that members of terrorist organizations were generally middle-class. he found that social bonds were the critical element in the process of joining jihad and he suggested that such connections precede ideological commitment (Sageman 2004). Understanding Terror Network is particularly revealing. the GSPC. and Weinberg 2003). He sample included expatriate leaders of the Egyptian Islamic Group. On the contrary.proposed that the terrorists acted out of altruistic motives (devotion to a religious community) and deduced that recruitment could be based on a network of shared social values(Pedahzur. Sageman compiled data from public sources on 172 individuals who he identified as members of a global Salafi mujahedeen. Moreover. Sandler and Enders contend that terrorists must choose between different strategies and modes of attack based on their perception of “prices” associated with alternative operations. These participants in jihad grew up with strong positive values of religion. Perliger. Jemaah Islamiyah. C. rational. Marc Sageman’s book. Strategic/opportunistic motivations Alternatively. members of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad. Several academics believe that terrorist action derives from a conscious.

Thus. access to training facilities. Based on these observations he suggests that several local jihadist outlets need the Al Qa’ida imprimatur to raise money. he mentions that the Iraq war has sapped local jihadist groups of their most active militants. while incarcerated together. He further notes that local jihadist cells shed their outlaw status within radical Muslim circles when they have Al Qa’ida’s backing. In joining Al Qa’ida. by extension. resources and anticipated outcome. Based on these accounts. local jihadist leaders may confederate with Al Qa’ida due to psychosocial influences. while training together. It is possible that these groups take the transnational jihadist challenge seriously because the idea of creating a single Islamic state or reviving the united Caliphate of earlier times is captivating.includes the value of time. these local jihadist leaders may seek concrete benefits such as the provision of financial resources. Alternatively. one can imagine three different rationales why local jihadist group leaders would affiliate with Al Qa’ida. He remarks upon long running government offensives that have nearly crushed several terrorist groups. Finally. may unite with Al Qa’ida to guarantee organizational survival. the United States and its allies. Finally. In this context. any act executed by a terrorist organization can be perceived as a rational choice (Sandler and Enders 2004). local jihadist group leaders may be lured by Al Qa’ida’s ideology. etc. local jihadist leaders. These local jihadist leaders may have developed relationships with Al Qa’ida officials during the Soviet-Afghan war. First. These affinities may compel local jihadist leaders to liaise with their old compatriots and mutually assist each other in their subsequent struggles. and association with the Al Qa’ida label. Hoffman notes that approximately 90 percent of all terrorist groups collapse within a year and only half of the remainder survives another decade. 24 . embracing global jihad may be perceived as a way to control and recruit new group members (Bruce Hoffman 2004). who might otherwise be contained or co-opted by local regimes and.

III. Literature on Terrorist Leadership A. The personality of terrorist leaders While these studies enlighten the discussion regarding incentives for merging or partnering with Al Qa'ida, very little literature directly addresses the role that local jihadist leaders play before or after a merger. However, some researchers have attempted to identify personality traits that enable leaders to attract and maintain large followings. In the 1920s, German sociologist Max Weber defined charismatic leadership as “resting on devotion to the exceptional sanctity, heroism, or exemplary character of an individual person, and of the normative patterns or order revealed or ordained by him.” He suggested that charisma was a personality trait by virtue of which a leader appeared endowed with exceptional power or superhuman competencies. Charismatic leaders gained authority through qualities unique their own, not through positions that they occupied (Weber 1968). Kostrzebski applied Weber’s theory of charismatic authority to examine leadership in the context of Islamic tradition. He contends that a certain model of charismatic politico-religious leadership, first exemplified by Mohammed, the prophet and founder of Islam, is prominent in Islamic history. He notices that in the Islamic world, religious and political leadership is usually embodied in the persona of a single charismatic individual. He cites Mahdi of Sudan, Ayatollah Khomeini, and Osama bin Laden as examples of this archetype. Furthermore, he predicts that this type of charismatic politico-religious leader will appear with greater frequency in the future (Kostrzebski 2002). Similarly, Bergen contends that Bin Laden’s charisma helped fuel an influx of recruits and attracted aspiring jihadists to Afghanistan from Western countries. Moreover, he avows that Bin Laden’s cult of personality prompted various militant Islamic groups to affiliate with Al


Qa’ida. He notes that Bin Laden left operational planning to trusted lieutenants and stood above the fray. Consequently, few operatives received personal audience with him. However, those who went through the vetting procedures and gained access to Bin Laden describe their encounters with the legendary terrorist leader as “beautiful” (Bergen 2006). B. Targeting leadership While these studies suggest that a leader’s charisma can inspire a devoted following, they do not address the role that such leaders play within an organizational framework. While research addressing this topic has been extremely sparse, some scholars have discussed how the arrest or neutralization of a terrorist leader can affect the group’s performance. In a Joint Special Operations University report, Turbiville perceives that the United States has emphasized targeting and eliminating key terrorist leadership since 9/11. He describes the diverse experience of foreign operations against insurgent and terrorist high value targets. Based on several case studies, he concludes that leadership targeting can be effective, particularly when a group depends heavily on a charismatic leader. However, he cautions that operations which target leadership must be integrated into an overall and effective counterinsurgency and counterterrorist strategy and warns that abuses of national and international law and human rights committed in terrorist leadership targeting programs have a negative impact on larger counterinsurgency goals (Turbiville 2007). Langdon, Sarapu, and Wells examined 35 leadership crises to determine what happens to terrorist movements after the loss of a leader. Although they predicted that the assassination of a leader would cause a dramatic change in ideology leading to increased violence, they found that the assassination of a leader often causes the group to fail or disband. Moreover, they observed that the assassination of a leader is more likely to devastate a terrorist group than an arrest. They


suggest that arrested leaders may continue to play an important ideological role by guiding their group from their prison cell (Langdon, Sarapu, and Wells 2004). These studies suggest that targeting leadership could damage a terrorist group by depriving it of effective direction and demoralizing its rank and file members. However, while these analyses intimate that terrorist leaders play an important role in ensuring organizational survival, they do not expose the particular function that terrorist leaders must execute. Thus, this study is valuable since its looks at both the motivations and specific responsibilities of Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers.


Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are held responsible for its success or failure in their region. As centralized communication nodes within their system. Its terrorist activity. I. moderately coupled network of individuals united by a common need and ultimately aligned behind an emergent leader. conducted by operatives capable of inflicting maximum civilian and economic damages on both local and distant targets in pursuit of their extremist goals. they have become the main link between Al Qa’ida Central Command and the organization’s operative units. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the motivations and responsibilities of Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. Background: The introductory chapter explained how and why Al Qa’ida relies extensively upon the leaders of regionally focused groups. recently. In fact. Al Qa’ida has expanded its reach through its affiliations so that it is uniquely positioned to target the West through spectacular attacks designed to inflict mass casualties and damage to the global economy. Currently. Osama bin Laden. By depending upon its commanding officers (the former leaders of local jihadist groups). Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers have the ultimate authority over their region and are given wide latitude to run their units within the boundaries of Al Qa’ida’s doctrines. we must understand the strength that resides in its leaders. During negotiations between Al Qa’ida and 28 . Moreover. As such. remains an important security threat. In order to understand why Al Qa’ida is such a forceful and resilient organization. Al Qaida’s ability to mete out devastating destruction worldwide has increased as cells have become progressively armed with modern technology.Chapter 3: Methodology Al Qa’ida has clearly transformed and evolved in ways described in the introduction. Al Qa’ida has become a flexible. who serve as Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers.

researchers have overlooked them. Past studies have ignored important hierarchical considerations. do not adequately explain why certain terrorists leaders affiliate with Al Qa’ida and its program of global jihad nor do they reveal the precise role that these officers serve within the Al Qa’ida network once affiliated. so too must the commanding officers that merge their organization with Al Qa’ida prepare accordingly (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2006). because academic studies to date have not focused on Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. plan ahead. The previous chapter revealed that literature on the role of leadership in terror networks has remained limited in scope. motivations. commanding officers are influential arbitrators. Commanding officers also ensure that an operative’s incentives to supply effort are not diminished and mediate conflict within their unit when the affiliation begins and as it matures. it will contribute to the bank of information and stimulate vital discourse on the composition and function of Al Qa’ida today. Finally. communicate often and address everyone involved in the deal. Negotiations are often lengthy processes. This study is the first to comprehensively examine Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. Unfortunately. Thus. I theorized that by examining the demographic characteristics of Al 29 . focusing primarily on principals like Osama bin Laden. they help stimulate interdependency and interaction among their units and other branches of Al Qa’ida. little is known about the characters. which consider categories of influence factors and their effect on an individual’s decision to join an Islamic fundamentalist terrorist organization. Although these commanding officers play a vital role in expanding the agenda of Al Qa’ida and adding legitimacy to its international campaign. The surveys reviewed. involving discussions regarding financial and capital resources and tactics. or credentials of these officials. Just as managers from the corporate arena trying to integrate newly acquired companies and divisions.the potential affiliate.

Qa’ida’s operatives, such as age, educational background, years of religious training, religious affiliation, and by evaluating these operatives for their military backgrounds (e.g. war experiences/participation in the Afghanistan conflict), incarceration/prison time, migration patterns etc, I would be able to detect recognizable patterns that characterize these terrorist executives. The patterns that I observed would help me answer two critical questions: 1) What motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida’s and its pan-Islamic agenda? 2) What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible affiliates with Al Qa’ida?

II. Assessing Q1: The previous chapter outlined three explanations for why individuals join terrorist organizations. Some researchers suggest that terrorists follow a strategic logic and are inspired by opportunism; they perceive armed combat at the most effective way to generate significant governmental concessions (Sandler and Enders 2004, Bruce Hoffman 2004). Others scholars suggest that ideology plays an important role in pushing militants of some militants toward terrorism (Della Porta 1995, Jones, Smith, and Weeding 2003, R. Gunaratna 2002). Finally, some academics claim that individuals join terrorist organizations due to strong solidarity bonds derived from interpersonal relations (Post, Sprinzak, and Denny 2003, Pedahzur, Perliger, and Weinberg 2003, Sageman 2004). Since prior studies have not discussed what incentives provoke local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida, I assumed that the motivations for local jihadist leaders to join Al Qa’ida’s global jihad were similar to the motivations for individuals to


join terrorist movements. Thus, to address my first question, I developed the following hypotheses: H11. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to opportunistic motives H21. Al Qa’ida commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to ideological motives H31. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due psychosocial motives H11 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers aligned with Al Qa’ida due to opportunistic motives) reflects the observation that relatively undersized, less powerful indigenous assemblies of terrorists can invigorate their organization by aligning with Al Qa’ida. In recent years, Al Qa’ida has demonstrated unusual resilience and international reach. It has exhibited a complexity, agility, and global scope that is unrivaled by any previous terrorist organization. Its fluid operational style, based on a common mission statement and shared objectives rather than standard-operating procedures has ensured its success (Stern 2003). Al Qa’ida has a remarkable ability to attract membership by relying upon a web of informal relations with various Islamic groups to gain access to operational collaborators and individuals to execute attacks. Currently, Al Qa’ida’s recruitment process seems to be more a matter of joining than being solicited. Moreover, the Salafi message, which has been disseminated over the Internet by Al Qa’ida’s media division, has attracted numerous members of alienated diasporas (sometimes second and third generation immigrants) who feel isolated from their communities and seek to belong to a group (Bruce Hoffman 2003). By associating with Al Qa’ida, local jihadist groups can shore up popular support and amp up recruitment.


Al Qa’ida’s strength may also lie in its impressive coffers; Al Qa’ida has amassed billions of dollars by building a strong network of financiers and operatives who are frugally minded and business savvy. Moreover, Al Qa’ida’s finances are often hidden in legitimate and illegitimate businesses; Bin Laden is reputed to own approximately eighty companies around the world. Al Qa’ida has learned to effectively leverage the global financial system of capital markets by utilizing small financial transfers, under regulated Islamic banking networks and informal transfer systems throughout the world. Thus, it is difficult to choke off funds destined for Al Qa’ida (Basile 2004). Consequently, Al Qa’ida can grant money to local terrorist groups that present promising plans for attacks that serve Al Qa’ida’s general goals. All terrorist organizations must engage in attacks to maintain support, to buttress their organizational integrity, and to foster their continued existence. Associating with Al Qa’ida ensures that a group has access to the necessary financial resources to conduct attacks. In a sense, Al Qa’ida operates like a large multi-national company and the “product” that it exports is terrorism. One must acknowledge the economic principles that underlie Al Qa’ida’s success, that of supply and demand, limited resources, productivity etc. Finally, Al Qa’ida has successfully exploited the technological tools of globalization to communicate with various audiences. Al Qa’ida has launched an effective advertising campaign worldwide using the latest technology and psychology to reach their desired addressees. Al Qa’ida uses mobile phones, text messaging, instant messaging, websites, email, blogs, and chat rooms for administrative tasks, fund-raising, research, logistical coordination of attacks, and recruitment. When Al Qa’ida’s media division airs its hostage videos and films of terrorist attacks or their aftermath, it provides the organization with the oxygen of publicity necessary to sustain itself. Unless civilian populations are made aware of terrorist acts and cowed into fear by


the founding. I developed timelines for each organization included in this study. the Council of Foreign Relations. I searched for evidence of terrorist group decline based on Cronin’s criteria. the beginning of a government offensive.g. the onset of series of attacks. Terrorist groups that align with Al Qa’ida can benefits from Al Qa’ida’s media and propaganda expertise. Moreover. 90% of terrorist organizations have a life span of less than one year. the Institute for Conflict Management in New Delhi. To do so. Al Qa’ida cannot influence the governments that it targets. If there was 33 . the Jamestown Foundation. In fact. if there was strong evidence that the group was in a state of imminent decline immediately prior to its merger with A Qa’ida. The timelines featured important events in their life cycle (e. Information was gathered from various international security think tanks including the Center for Defense Information. etc. Cronin lists seven broad explanations for the decline and ending of terrorist groups: 1) the capture or killing of the leader 2) failure to transition to the next generation 3) achievement of the group’s aims 4) transition to a legitimate political process 5) undermining of popular support 6) repression 7) transition from terrorist to other forms of violence. most modern terrorist groups do not last long.such assaults. Consequently. would affiliate with Al Qa’ida if he desperately needed to give his organization a second wind. and the NEFA foundation. More than one dynamic can be responsible for their decline (Cronin 2006). as a rational actor. it is important to remember that Al Qa’ida is a unique terrorist organization. to assess H11. In considering this hypothesis. these materials are seen by potential sympathizers who may be brought into the folds of terrorism itself (Blanchard 2006). spectacular attacks. I assumed that opportunism was the primary motivation for merging with Al Qa’ida (coded as 2). Consequently.). I judged that the local jihadist leader.

some data that suggested that the group had experienced minor setbacks. To perform this appraisal. and statements.”(Al Qa’ida is an anti-Western organization) 2) Al Qa’ida aims to establish a caliphate based on an extreme interpretation of Sunni Islam. To assess H21 (Al Qa’ida commanding officers were inspired by Al Qa’ida’s ideology). religious education. (Al Qa’ida is anti-Shia) (Al Qaida's Ideology) Thus. the UK’s security intelligence agency. Al Qa’ida strongly opposes Western influences and ideologies that it perceives as “un-Islamic. to evaluate H21. I considered the assessment of Al Qa’ida’s ideology published by MI5. I determined if the local jihadist leaders who affiliated with Al Qa’ida espoused anti-Western. Al Qa’ida’s ideology is centered upon three key points: 1) Al Qa’ida attributes the obstacles encountered by the Islamic world to the JewishChristian apostate Muslim alliance. I relied predominantly upon newspaper articles published in both the domestic and international 34 . I considered the leader’s prior involvement in Islamic societies. pan-Islamic. the largest denomination and is violently opposed to other Islamic denominations that it regards as “infidel. Al Qa’ida’s supports a narrow interpretation of Sunnism. which they had published regarding their ideology. I determined that opportunism was the secondary motivation for merging with Al Qa’ida (coded as 1). or anti-Shia agendas. To execute this assessment. Al Qa’ida would like to replace all existing governments with a supranational caliphate and impose a strict and exclusive government based on their interpretation of Sunni Islam. (Al Qa’ida is a pan-Islamic organization) 3) Al Qa’ida promotes violence against other Muslim denominations as well as nonMuslims.” most notably Shiite sects. More information on statistical hypothesis testing follows in the chapter on data analysis and results. According to MI5.

the Pakistani government ordered the closure of Arab mujahedeen offices in the country and threatened official deportation to any illegal foreign fighters who attempted to remain in Pakistan. speeches and other primary source materials authored by the leaders and. pan-Islamic. Countless numbers of Afghanis joined the Islamic resistance. Pakistan. yet also expressed anti-Western. Finally. where available. to assess H31 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to prior social network affiliations). operatives from foreign countries began trickling into Pakistan. In December 1979. or antiShia sympathies. which was organized into several native mujahedeen organizations with headquarters in Peshawar. I concluded that ideological alignment was a secondary motivation (coded as 1). Soon thereafter. Abdullah Azzam and the Saudi billionaire. fearing the collapse of communism in Central Asia. pan-Islamic. if the leader seemed more committed to local programs. Osama bin Laden. I resolved that ideological alignment was the primary motivation for joining Al Qa’ida (coded as 2). If I found that the leader placed more emphasis on anti-Western. I considered operatives’ involvement in four episodes that served to rally jihadists around Al Qa’ida principals and fostered the development of social bonds between mujahedeen figures. Thus countless numbers of mujahedeen veterans who had formed tight bonds with their fellow fighters returned to locations in the Middle East. communiqués. and elsewhere 35 . While some arrived to provide money and weapons to support the fight. or anti-Shia goals than regional initiatives. others enlisted in the growing corps of “holy warriors” under the lead of the legendary Palestinian Sheikh Dr. However in January 1993. However. the Soviet Union launched a military invasion to restore Soviet control over neighboring Afghanistan. statements. eager to put the Afghan jihad in the past. North Africa.

who became a spokesman for the defendants because of his eloquence and knowledge of foreign languages.” these former combatants may have opted to rejoin Al Qa’ida.(Wright 2007). The events that unfolded subsequent to the assassination of Anwar Sadat may have played a similar role in forging social bonds amongst jihadists. Following President Sadat's assassination. despite the prosecution demand of 299 death sentences the judges gave out none. President Sadat of Egypt died after being shot by gunmen who opened fire as he watched an aerial display at a military parade. and agriculture (Gunaratna 36 . In prison. The first was held in camera and consisted of 24 suspects directly involved in the assassination. After being released. he was treated as a special guest. who appeased his hosts by mobilizing construction equipment and bankrolling construction projects. where the new regime had raised an Islamic banner. The second trial consisted of 302 defendants charged with conspiracy and being members of the illegal Tanzim al-Jihad. Osama bin Laden journeyed to the Sudan. Two trials took place. Most jihadists rallied around Ayman alZawahiri. Many focused on mobilizing the population to overthrow the government. in subsequent years. more than 700 people were rounded up. However. Moreover. farming. several former prisoners left Egypt (Wright 2007). In the Sudan. he convinced several Saudi businessmen to invest in Sudan and several of his brothers and Jeddah merchants did invest in Sudanese real estate. When presented with the opportunity to reunite with their “brethren. After the Soviet-Afghan War. they may have decided to reunite with Zawahiri and the other jihadists with whom they were imprisoned. In 1981. Only 58 sentences were given and most of the defendants were released after three years in prison. these jihadists developed strategies for establishing an Islamist state and established important personal connections. Ultimately.

As ethnic Pashtuns. L.2002). In the years after departing from the Sudan. Finally. Bin Laden set up numerous training camps in the region. However. requiring women to wear head-to-toe veils. Thus. a precondition which set the stage for the merger). By September 1996. they do not explain why these particular leaders aligned with Al Qa’ida. 37 . or spent time in the Sudan before 1996 or Afghanistan during the reign of the Taliban. while social affiliations may animate a small minority to engage in Al Qa’ida’s program of global jihad. disillusioned with existing ethnic Tajik and Uzbek leaders.S. he established residency in Afghanistan. a large part of the Taliban’s support came from Afghanistan's Pashtun community. and embarked upon his jihad against America. During this time he established links to Sudanese Islamists as well as fundamentalists in Somalia and Yemen. Before its ouster by U.e. and jailing men whose beards were deemed too short. His second presence in Afghanistan attracted many mujahedeen to return there (P. the Taliban had captured Afghanistan’s capital. When considering the relevance of social network affiliations. I assumed that social network affiliation was a permissive factor (i. The bonds that these jihadists formed prior to the US invasion may have sparked their cooperation with Al Qa’ida after the onset of the Global War on Terror. I determined whether the group member was involved in the Soviet-Afghan war. although subject to the same or similar influences. he could rekindle these ties.-led forces in 2001. participated in the Sadat trial. Bergen 2001). This treatment was based upon my observation that not every participant in these episodes. became an Al Qa’ida associate. Kabul. The Taliban rule was characterized by a strict form of Islamic law. local jihadist leaders may have established social connections with Bin Laden in Afghanistan before the 9/11 attacks and the Global War on Terror. the Taliban controlled some 90 percent of Afghanistan's territory. After Bin Laden fled the Sudan in 1996 as a result of international pressure. Subsequently. banning television.

ideological/media leaders are responsible for expressing the organizational culture and philosophy of their group through media activity and possibly fatwa as well as personal interactions with their operatives. Assessing Q2: To answer my second question (What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible merges or partners with Al Qa’ida?). Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly operational role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida H22. and running training camps. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly logistical role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida H32. They have military experience or formation and/or expertise in weapons or explosives. I developed another three hypothesis: H12. I considered social network affiliation to be a secondary motivation rather than a primary motivation. They have vocational. Finally. or legal expertise. Operational commanders are primarily responsible for conducting operations (including “spectacular attacks”). or ideological. They direct the group’s bureaucratic development and organize recruitment drives. Logistical leaders are accountable for the administrative and financial activities of their units. I posited that Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers would fall into one of three primary leadership categories after the affiliation occurred: operational. or foreign language competencies. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly ideological role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida. Consequently. financial.Unless the local jihadist leader was clearly not incentivized by opportunism or ideological concerns. They 38 . developing military tactics. logistical. III.

I coded him as an average operational leader 39 .and post-merger. considered the following variables: Type of leader Operational Logistic Ideological Media activity Military/Front line experience Administrative/financial activities Weapons/explosives training Indications Training camp participation Recruitment experience Organizational restructuring Media innovations Involvement in ideological transitions Operational innovations Involvement in major attacks Vocational skills Language skills Fatwa issues Documented political or religious guidance proffered to operatives After analyzing these variables. I coded him as a strong operational leader (3). I did not compare leadership performance across categories because different measures were used to evaluate leadership faculty for each category. logistic. this estimation would have been biases. and released audio or videotapes. published books or articles. Thus. and ideological leadership abilities before and after the merger. To determine the role played by the commanding officer. I assessed the commanding officer’s operational. I compared leadership performance pre. Instead. If he demonstrated one of the factors in this category. If the leader demonstrated at least two of the factors in the operational leadership category.have granted interviews.

the Library of Congress. a business and technology consultancy. including reports available through the Jamestown Foundation. If the leader was not involved with the organization at the time. which is now available to the public through an agreement between MIPT. to collect information on terrorist groups and key leaders of terrorist groups. However. I used the same secondary and primary source materials listed earlier in this chapter. I eliminated several from my study based on the following criteria using open source materials. I used the Terrorist Organization Profiles (TOPs) Database included on the website of the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terror (START).(2). MIPT collaborated with Detica. I also used these sources to determine the date that the affiliation commenced. From 2004 to 2008 the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security funded the creation and maintenance of the Terrorism Knowledge Base. and START (About START). I conducted further analyses to determine its accuracy by confirming with at least two separate. DHS. If he exhibited none of these factors. To perform this evaluation. developed by the Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT). The International Herald Tribune. since START has not evaluated this data and cannot assure the reliability of the information provided. 40 . I coded him as a weak operational leader (1). the Federation of American Scientists. the Council on Foreign Relations. and The Washington Post. I coded him as such (0). IV. Although the TOPs database listed thirty-six Al Qa’ida allies. A discussion of the comparison of leadership performance pre-and post-merger follows in Chapter 5. Developing the Universe of Cases To develop my universe of cases. I considered two questions: 1) With whom has Al Qa’ida affiliated? 2) Who led these organizations? To answer the first question. I used the same criteria to assess logistic and ideological leadership. The New York Times. non-partisan sources.

1) The group must have been engaged in operations independently of Al Qa’ida (the group must not be a front for Al Qa’ida My study considers the deliberate decision to affiliate with Al Qa’ida. informants. 2) The group must not have renounced violence I did not include political movements that supported Al Qa’ida’s aims because armed groups operate differently than other clandestine non-violent organizations. I separately examined al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya 41 . a strong affiliation (partnership). thereby potentially compromising their local agenda. Those groups that I coded as weak affiliates received financing or training from Al Qa’ida. an official denial of connections with Al Qa’ida should induce caution (and invoke more thorough analysis of the relationship) Based on my evaluation. Al Qa’ida aided the local organization. or opportunities for training. I determined that twenty-one groups conformed to these the above standards. contact with its network of financiers. I coded each affiliation as a merger. In return. To qualify as a strong affiliation. for example by contributing to its recruitment efforts or operations in Afghanistan or Iraq. Leaders who head front organizations for Al Qa’ida do not make a pre-meditated choice to cooperate with Al Qa’ida. or logisticians. or a weak affiliation (collaboration). To qualify as a merger. Finally. the group must have formally announced that this arrangement existed through a communiqué broadcast to a wide audience. but did not actively conduct operations outside their region nor did they contribute to Al Qa’ida’s other initiatives in any meaningful way. the organization must have developed a symbiotic relationship with Al Qa’ida. perhaps by providing access to operatives. and media specialists. After performing this assessment. assets. 3) While not grounds for immediate disqualification. whereby they supported Al Qa’ida. intelligence.

V. Selection of Study Subjects My prior discussion focused on terrorist organizations that are overtly in pursuit of Salafi objectives. Jemaah Islamiya. Asbat al-Ansar). Thus. Al Qa’ida in Iraq). and activities. I made this distinction because I was interested in investigating the motivations and role of those leaders who came from outside Al Qa’ida’s orbit but became involved in its program later in their career. Some organizations had more than one nominal chief at times. I did not consider Al Qa’ida’s regional staff officers. I used open source materials including reports by non-partisan research institutions and newspaper articles. I considered all of the commanding officers of each group from the onset of their relationship with Al Qa’ida to the present. operations. Selection of my study subjects/study 42 . I identified the leaders (past and present) of each of these 21 groups. it is equally important to comprehend what deters other groups from associating with Al Qa’ida. but who never had a vested interest in a particular local jihadist group. While some groups did not experience any leadership transitions after they partnered with Al Qa’ida (ex. I generated a list of 41 Al Qa’ida field commanders as study subjects. a group that did not affiliate with Al Qa’ida as a control group. in which case I treated both as leaders. both past and present. the Taliban. In order to understand what motivates certain groups to align with Al Qa’ida. I included a detailed investigation of the GAI in Chapter 7. Based on this data. namely the establishment of an Islamic state.(GAI). In a few instances. I included a leader who was had not actively cooperated with Al Qa’ida if this leader had communicated with Al Qa’ida Central Command and if his successors vigorously pursued relations after his term. In performing this assessment. who coordinate and supervise the execution of plans. others experienced numerous leadership transitions (ex. Next.

For instance. the data from this study is inevitably biased towards information about those organizations and individuals who are regarded as more visible and who appear publicly with greater frequency. I chose to limit my sample to in order to reveal certain patterns that might not have otherwise emerged with less stringent exclusion criteria. and political grievances and who may be less committed to the principles of Salafism and thus. Although I eliminated all non-Muslim terrorists from the study sample. Because clandestine organizations are often very secretive about their members and operations. I did not include the amorphous social movement. terrorist organizations will not take credit for successful operations for fear of provoking the government to conduct a counterterrorism response. Often. less magnetized by Al Qa’ida pan-Islamic agenda.sample was based on demonstrated and documented overt commitment to the principles of Salafism and all of the organizations that I studied were well defined with leadership that supported terrorist operations. This grouping is just an assemblage of small illegal clusters centered around charismatic preachers. which exists in Morocco. Problems Regarding Information Gathering To conduct this assessment. VI. economic. I used sources from the public domain. I did not include Palestinian groups. Moreover. who are fighting a jihad that involves complex social. Salafia Jihadia. there may have been ascertainment bias introduced by the difficulties accurately assessing leaders’ competence in organizing and conducting important attacks. Moreover. I did include many groups that were deeply invested in domestic uprising and urban warfare against their own governments. In contrast. bias was introduced by the actual leader interviews and communications that can be considered well-orchestrated propaganda 43 . In addition. I included Muslims fighting for the liberation of Kashmir and those fighting an internal insurgency in Central Asia.

I considered the source of information and its degree of reliability. These sources included: government documents. I used the materials available to me to try to best collect information about and understand the leaders and organizations that I profiled. formerly the Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat (GSPC). These concerns withstanding. With the aforementioned limitations in mind. I investigated Abdelmalek Droukdal. As a result. I considered Droukdal’s prior experiences and the history of the GSPC to determine why he embraced Al Qa’ida’s internationalist agenda rather than remaining committed strictly to jihad in Algeria. VII. My observations regarding 44 . and how they aligned their own local jihadist group with Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program. press and scholarly articles. Next. I arrived at a better understanding of how to recognize and predict who may become Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers and how to anticipate and counter their efforts. who merged his organization with Al Qa’ida despite the objections of the GSPC’s former leader Hassan AlBanna (Guidère 2007). and Internet articles. Case Study Finally. a comparison of leadership performance across categories was impossible.exercises that may not appropriately reflect the leader’s true motivations and ideology. Relevance By seeking to understand who Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are. When assessing the data. empirical data about Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers was collected and analyzed. what motivates them. as mentioned earlier. I assessed the role he played before and after aligning with Al Qa’ida. leader of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb. I completed one comprehensive case study (in addition to my detailed discussion of the GAI). VIII.

The fundamentalists who form interpersonal bonds through these venues may be persuaded by Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic partisans to become the next-generation of Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers in locations scattered across the globe. we can better allocate resources to address this threat. are they focused on promoting their message through propaganda or are they intent on conducting more attacks?).g. if proven. my analyses may suggest that our battles in the Middle East and our policies regarding imprisonment are creating gathering places for global Salafi jihadists. has strong implications for US foreign policy in the post 9/11 era and greater attention should be paid to identifying such settings. by understanding the role that Al Qa’ida commanding officers play. we can better understand Al Qa’ida’s overall strategy (e. 45 . Based on our knowledge of Al Qa’ida’s strategy. First. This realization. they will help develop a model to identify local jihadist leaders who may merge or partner with Al Qa’ida in the future. Secondly.motivations will serve two purposes. Finally.

and Saudi Arabia. Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: An Evolving Network Although the purpose of my study was to investigate Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. Al Qa’ida has transformed into an international enterprise with like-minded local representatives loosely connected to a central ideological base (Riedel 2007). First. as well as name recognition 46 . who diluted relations with Al Qa’ida). Most of researchers who I discussed in my literature review perceive Al Qa’ida’s strategy of franchising as a new development. I also observed noticeable patterns while developing my universe of cases. They contend that after September 11. surprising. they argue. lost several of its top officials. To address this concern. Jordan. I have classified the affiliation according to its current state. I determined the year that the group first received or conveyed assistance to Al Qa’ida. that a cumulative effect occurs. the evidence indicates that Al Qa’ida’s strategy is not new: it has operated like an international franchise by providing financial and logistical support. and Abu Sayyaf. I considered the development of Al Qa’ida’s affiliation over a period of time from 1991 until 2005 (Table 1). this relationship has perpetuated to the present day. in every case.Chapter 4: Universe of Cases I. In many instances. who consolidated relations with Al Qa’ida. since a group does not merely affiliate with Al Qa’ida and then sever all relations. Although I have recorded the first year in which the group cooperated with Al Qa’ida. The investigation of Al Qa’ida’s patterns of affiliation with respect to time is very interesting and indeed. Since 2001. therefore. It is important to keep in mind. Al Qa’ida was deprived of a “state within a state” in Afghanistan. Despite the popularity of this argument. 2001. and failed to overthrow the governments in Egypt. the relationship between Al Qa’ida and its affiliate has strengthened or weakened (such is the case with the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. To assess the date of the affiliation.

Eritrea. Somalia. for years. thereby threatening the security of Saudi Arabia. Chechnya. oil rich state of Kuwait on August 1. Turabi and Bin Laden engaged in a convenient symbiotic relationship. he departed for the Sudan. Bin Laden had the opportunity to interact with other terrorist units to expand Al Qa’ida’s reach. In this year. This relationship strengthened throughout the nineties. Kashmir and Iraq. 47 . when one considers the historical context. 1990. Consequently. 1990. He was able to send Al Qa’ida operatives to Somalia in 1991-1992 to liaise with their leaders and then help AIAI organize itself militarily. the first US troops were dispatched to Saudi Arabia as part of Operation Desert terrorist groups operating in such diverse places as the Philippines. this observation is not nearly as stunning. Bin Laden could operate freely in the Sudan and in return he would invest millions of dollars in the desperately poor country. However. Al Qa’ida linked up with Al-Ittihaad al-Islami (AIAI) and Abu Sayyaf. during his time in the Sudan. Afghanistan. the leader of the National Islamic Front. Al Qa’ida first seriously affiliated with other terrorist organizations in 1991. As a result of the Sudanese government’s hospitality and support. For Bin Laden. Yemen. Tajikistan. While Bin Laden was situated in the Sudan. Bin Laden perceived this intrusion as part of a larger Western design to dominate the whole Arab and Muslim world. Bin Laden organized training camps at which hundred of his followers were tutored in paramilitary tactics as revealed in the previous chapter. On August 7. effectively put him under house arrest. Bin Laden had immediately volunteered his services and those of his holy volunteers but the Saudis did not take this offer seriously (Gunaratna 2002). where he was warmly welcomed by Hassan al-Turabi. After Hussein’s forces invaded the small. After the Saudi government. tired of Bin Laden’s critiques. These operatives also offered advice to their Somali counterparts on how to set up social services for the local population. Algeria. this was as perturbing and foreboding an event as the Russian invasion of Afghanistan that had occurred a decade earlier.

Bin Laden focused his efforts on other missions like determining how best to attack US forces in Somalia. After associating with these groups. including some of his brothers. to invest in the country’s moribund financial institutions. From 1991 to 1996. Concurrently. between a thousand and two thousand 48 . my data indicates that Al Qa’ida did not engage another affiliate until 1996. he attempted to centralize the core of Al Qa’ida’s operations and develop its human resources as discussed in Chapter 1. Bin Laden convinced several Saudi businessmen. Moreover. which sought to pursue a more fundamentalist battle against the Philippine authorities than the Moro National Liberation Front. Moreover a number of ASG members had fought in Afghanistan in the 1980s (Rogers 2004). Instead.Bin Laden ramped up his assistance to the Somali terrorists after the Bush administration sent US peacekeeping troops to Somalia in 2002. By 1991. the US military. while residing in the Sudan. Thus. he persuaded his brother in law. Muhammad Jamal Khalifah to support the Abu Sayyaf Group. many of whom would be employed by these Arabic executives. he broadcast a fatwa in which he avowed that having already taken over the Persian Gulf area and now encroaching upon Somalia. would next march into Southern Sudan and then into other Islamic countries(Gunaratna 2002). if successful. Bin Laden exploited a cache of trustworthy warriors who he could rely upon to cultivate his vision of global jihad. which would elicit support from the Sudanese population. While occupied with these financial negotiations. Soon thereafter. their parent organization. Al Qa’ida was preoccupied with other pursuits and could not devote energy towards developing such high-maintenance relations. where their transactions would go unnoticed and in its infrastructure projects. Bin Laden probably saw the struggle in the Philippines as an opportunity to open a second front for his organization without becoming embroiled in the conflicts in the Middle East.

no affiliations were observed between 1991 and 1996. Bin Laden had set up a number of military camps in the north. which became the modern world’s first jihadist state. Having obtained sanctuary. who left the Sudan to return to his familiar stamping grounds in Afghanistan.members of Al Qa’ida converged upon the Sudan and within three years. a multi-volume series detailing everything the Afghan Arabs had learned in the jihad against the Soviets. hundreds of Afghan Arabs engaged in fighting in Bosnia (P. attracting Muslim militants to a country. Bin Laden knew Afghanistan well and greatly admired the Taliban religious warriors who had taken control over much of the country. Bin Laden began to focus. Mullah Muhammad Omar sent a delegation to assure Bin Laden that the Taliban would be honored to protect him because of his role in the jihad against the Soviets (Gunaratna 2002). once again. During this time. intense pressure had been placed on the Sudanese government by the United States and Egypt to expel Bin Laden. Given this stable and secure environment. He turned his attention to exotic weaponry and weapons of mass destruction. Bin Laden was able to function unimpeded. Bin Laden issued a slew of radical pronouncements beginning with a call to arms against the continued American military presence in Arabia on August 23. By 1996. 1996. it is not surprising that between 1996 and 2001. Bergen 2001). As a result of this multitude of tasks. on widening his movement. Al Qa’ida engaged 15 of its 21 affiliates. To 49 . These communiqués served to attract the attention of various local jihadist leaders. Thus. Bin Laden and his cadre were engrossed by other concerns and did not focus on developing external relations with other jihadist groups. He also sought to acquire weapons for these militants. From Afghanistan. Finally. Upon Bin Laden’s arrival. Simultaneously some members of the group undertook the massive task of writing the Encyclopedia of the Afghan Jihad. L.

2001 attacks. he probably did not rely extensively upon the leaders of these organizations. Harkat-ul-Mujahideen. and the head of Bangladesh’s Jihad Movement. Later the IIF was expanded to include the Pakistani jihadist organizations Lashkar-eTaiba. before 2001. Laden convened conferences of several Afghan ulema. Thus. However. we hereby give all Muslims the following judgment: the judgment to kill and fight Americans and their allies. According to this Word Islamic Front manifesto.supplement this strategy. The clerics who Bin Laden summoned also had acquaintances with jihadists beyond Afghanistan who they could introduce to Bin Laden (Bergen 2001). In addition to Bin Laden and EIJ’s Ayman al-Zawahiri. 50 . one observes a surge of new Al Qa’ida affiliates. in 1998. In addition to its formal alliances through the IIF. in the years before the September 11. In part.” Based on this quotation. whether civilians or military. members included the head of the violent faction of Egypt’s Gama’a al Islamiyya. While Bin Laden was well read in the Koran. this is due to the fact that in 1998 Bin Laden created the International Islamic Front for Jihad against the Jews and Crusaders (IIF). Bin Laden’s organization nurtured ties with a variety of other armed jihadist groups. is an obligation for every Muslim who is able to do so in any country. an anti-Shia sectarian party (Carafano 2005). the establishment of the IIF can clearly be interpreted as an effort by Al Qa’ida to expand its battle against Western influence. Amidst this background. and Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan. the secretary general of the Pakistani religious party known as the Jamiat-ul-Ulema-e-Islam. he was not a religious scholar. These sequential steps were part of Bin Laden’s plan to expand his multi-national terrorist campaign. he needed the backing of religious scholars and the clerical cover to call for a real global jihad. “in order to obey the Almighty.

Al Qa’ida has not enlisted many new affiliates. from an actual center to a virtual network) (Bruce Hoffman 2004). Aggressive US and allied efforts impeded Al Qa’ida’s ability to do anything. operational bases. Osama Bin Laden was compelled to makeover his organization. Thus. Firstly. be it to plan attacks or to align with other jihadist groups. As elaborated upon in Chapter 1. the dearth of new Al Qa’ida affiliates seems puzzling given what scholars perceive to be Al Qa’ida’s organizational strategy. temporarily crippling it. infrastructure. near bureaucratic entity to a fluid movement tenuously bound by a loosely networked transnational constituency (i. partnerships. After 2001. 51 . Bin Laden elected to strengthen existing affiliations rather than pursue new ones. Groups such as the Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat and Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad were brought further into Al Qa’ida’s folds. and command-and-control nucleus in Afghanistan were destroyed and uprooted. complex organizations. are built up through mergers. As stated in the introduction. Bin Laden had to engineer a colossal transformation of his organization from a more or less unitary. Al Qa’ida aims to establish itself as a complex organization with a flexible structure in order to preserve control over specifically identified strategic operations while offering cells a degree of autonomy in local and regional operations. To more easily engineer this metamorphosis. characterized by semiautonomous cells that are horizontally and vertically integrated into the centralized command structure. few can deny the United States and its allies achieved progress in the first phase of the Global War on Terror. Whereas before Al Qa’ida had a distinct center of gravity. Al Qa’ida’s training camps. and collaborations (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2006).e. after 9/11. There are two explanations for this observation.Contrary to popular belief. after 2001 and the onset of the Global War on Terror.

However. began to instruct Zarqawi regarding tactics and specific theater-of-war concerns. terror attacks 52 . prior to 2005. and lack of concern for public support. Jordan. including Shias. Lebanon. “Iraq’s preeminent utility has been a useful side show” – an effective means to sidetrack American military forces and divert US attention while Al Qa’ida and its affiliates make inroads and strike elsewhere. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Ayman Zawahiri. who had become his commanding officers.Moreover. Bruce Hoffman has suggested that for Al Qa’ida. he urged Zarqawi to prepare for a precipitous American military withdrawal from Iraq. and for maintaining the momentum of an Islamist victory by expanding operations into Syria. Zawahiri reprimanded al-Zarqawi for indiscriminate attacks on Shias. Moreover. who had become Bin Laden’s second-in command. Bin Laden and Al Qa’ida Central Command relied more heavily and interacted more frequently with the leaders of these groups. Another observable and notable trend is that the number of affiliates that Al Qa’ida enrolled has increased since the onset of the war in Iraq in 2003. the Uzbek fighters associated with the Islamic Jihad Union have supported fighting in South Waziristan against the Pakistani government and US forces hunting Al Qa’ida fugitives (Steinberg 2008). Additionally. Al Qa’ida has exploited the Iraqi occupation for rousing propaganda and as a recruitment tool for the global jihadist cause. for establishing a post-US Islamist emirate governed by a coalition of Islamic groups. was responsible for developing his own strategy and operations. In fact. 2005. Al Qa’ida and its affiliates can conduct attacks in countries that are venerable sources of Bin Laden’s antagonism or where an opportunity has presented itself. For instance. For example. beheading of hostages. For instance. and Egypt (Michael 2007). Nowadays. in a letter dated July 9. Al Qa’ida now teams up with terrorist groups who can send foreign jihadists to Iraq where they conduct guerilla warfare against the America and British troops. Israel. in 2004. the leader of Tawhid.

Lebanon. the 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot to detonated liquid explosive carried on board from the United Kingdom to the US and Canada. France fought a war in Algeria and British and French forces invaded Egypt. The warfare between Arabs and the West culminated in 1990 when the United States sent a massive army to the Persian Gulf to defend some Arab countries against aggression by Saddam Hussein The Gulf War left some Arabs feeling humiliated and resentful of the West’s military presence in the Persian Gulf (Huntington 1992). include the 2004 bombings against Madrid’s commuter trains. The smaller clusters come from Southeast Asia and Northeast Africa. Afghanistan. In the aftermath of this transition. One can anticipate that the majority of affiliates would hail from the Core Arab states and Maghreb Arab states. For instance. conflicts along the fault line between western and Arab Islamic civilizations frequently erupted. and the 2007 terrorist attacks in Algiers (Bruce Hoffman 2004). Samuel Huntington observed that after World War II.around the world tripled in 2004. Arab nationalism and then Islamic fundamentalism strongly manifested. Later. the 2005 bombings against London’s public transport system. Notable incidents conducted by or with the assistance of Al Qa’ida’s affiliates since the beginning of the Iraq war. Tunisia) and Southern Asia (namely. Pakistan). Considering the sample as a whole. These regions have a history of conflict with the West. Egypt Uzbekistan. The other large clusters come from the Maghreb (Morocco. it is interesting to consider the geographic distribution of Al Qa’ida’s affiliates (Figure 2). 53 . Libya. and Yemen). when colonial empires began to retreat. the American forces went into Lebanon. according to statistics released by the US government’s National Counterterrorism Center. II. over forty percent of the 21 affiliates are based in the Core Arab states (Iraq. Algeria. Al Qa’ida Affiliates: The Geographic Distribution Having assessed the development of Al Qa’ida’s affiliations over time.

Turkmenistan and Tajikistan. and Uzbekistan. Turkmenistan. There is also a simpler explanation to account for the plethora of Al Qa’ida affiliates hailing from the Core Arab states. Islam can provide a medium of cultural nationalism that is defiant and self-assuring. one of the masterminds behind the assassination attempt against Uzbek President Islam A. He maintains that most Islamic revolutions evolve from movements for indigenous self-assertion. Tahir Yuldashev. Secular prescriptions (whether nationalist or leftist) are regarded as unsuccessful European importations introduced by intellectuals exposed to French and Italian cultures. Kyrgystan. Al Qa’ida has appealed to militants in the four neighboring former Soviet Central Asian republics. the Taliban controlled the Afghan territory bordering Uzbekistan. Thus.These struggles had a profound effect on the development of jihadist outlets. Al Qa’ida and the Taliban could facilitate the transportation of militants moving back and forth across the borders. Tajikistan. Furthermore. and leader of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan. For those countries resisting foreign dominance. weak security apparatuses and crisis-torn economies. Additionally. just a few miles from the border (Luong and Weinthal 2002). fled to Afghanistan where he set up a military training camp. whereas the religious-framed prescriptions of Arabia Islam have a thirteen century-old legacy (Ayubi 1980). These states have porous borders. for years. Ayubi suggests that the general Islamic resurgence that one observes today represents a reaction to alienation and a quest for authenticity by disaffected Muslims who resent Western participation in their lands. all of which are in immediate proximity to Afghanistan. Karimov. at the present time operatives from these organizations can assist the Al Qa’ida- 54 . Since 1996. For instance. they could permit leaders of these jihadist groups to establish training camps without fear of government intervention. Moreover.

With the assistant of Al Qa’ida’s Algerian affiliates. Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri are now believed to be in Pakistan’s rugged tribal areas. after the September 2001 attacks. The conflict between Muslims and Hindus in the subcontinent manifests itself in the rivalry between Pakistan and India. offered to President Bush Pakistan’s unqualified cooperation in the fight against terrorism. thousands of Muslim extremists were detained. President Musharraf. affiliates from these nations are particularly desirable. quickly granted this concession in return for safe haven. these groups help Al Qa’ida attack coalition troops in Afghanistan and then escape across the Pakistani frontier (Fair 2004). under strong US diplomatic pressure. eager to regroup in Pakistani cities where police control was more negligible. should be expected. Pakistan has allowed the US military to use bases within the country. and has helped to tighten the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan. However. these militants can stage local campaigns due to their recently acquired front line experience (Boudali 2007). fighters transit through Syria. has helped to identify and detain extremists. Upon returning to the Maghreb. Consequently. This too. Separatist violence in India’s Muslim majority Jammu and Kashmir state has continued unabated since 1989. Conservative estimates suggest that at least several hundred North African volunteers have traveled to Iraq. Similarly. In the wake of these changes. terrorist operatives in the Maghreb move easily across international borders. thus. where Islamabad exercises limited authority. Al Qa’ida. I also observed that a large percentage of the groups that merged with Al Qa’ida hailed from Pakistan (20%). In addition.supported insurgency in Afghanistan. 55 . several Kashmiri separatist terrorist groups turned to Al Qa’ida for support.

and the fragility of local democracy. Indonesia. many Islamic organizations in Southeast Asia genuinely oppose Al Qa’ida and most are nonviolent. the depth of its involvement with terrorists is constrained by the very disorder seen as a classical setting for terrorism. The largest and most influential are either political parties or revivalist organizations. and two other mostly Muslim states. hostility from indigenous religious authorities may also impede the growth of Wahabism (Dickson 2005). where the other major Abrahamic faiths dominate. Again. In Singapore. the rise of political Islam can be linked principally to the collapse of Suharto's regime. Moreover.Within my sample. Although Muslims represent a majority in countries like Somalia and Eritrea. Also. Muslims are a minority. Unlike Eastern European countries. There are almost no legitimate terrorist targets and terrorists themselves can be subject to extortion in largely lawless settings. it has not emerged as such. such as the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF). Thailand. Political organizations representing modernist Muslims were 56 . in general Muslims are a minority in East Africa. Additionally. in which there is just enough government control and economic security to provide an adequate target for terrorist groups. and the Philippines. while Somalia has served as a transit route for terrorists. Despite the fact that Southeast Asia seems like a good candidate for the second front in the US campaign since it is home to the world’s most populous Muslim-majority country. the nation's continuing economic crisis. in East Africa. Malaysia and Brunei. this can be easily explained. the profound ethnic and religious diversity (including in the practice of Islam) that characterizes the area militates against the establishment of a fundamentalist hegemony by any one group. most visibly Al Qa’ida. In fact. there were fewer groups from the Eastern African region and from the Southeast Asian region. a central government with even rudimentary influence has yet to emerge. In Indonesia. while Buddhism and Roman Catholicism are dominant respectively.

banned from the 1950s to the 1980s. While Al 57 . mergers. III. Additionally. the highest order form of equity-based engagement. Mergers were much less common (approximately 17%). the group that Al Qa’ida subsumes must be capable of completely integrating Al Qa’ida’s methods and approaches into their repertoire. and distracts the enemy while Central Command plans for more detailed attacks elsewhere. While the relationships within the cells are tightly coupled. Both partnerships and collaborations permit Al Qa’ida to structure itself as a complex organization. Although this type of arrangement allows Al Qa’ida and the merged group to consolidate their assets so that they can compete more successfully. and many of their leaders were imprisoned. This sort of arrangement is convenient when Al Qa’ida wants to spread its radical ideas and has financial resources but does not necessarily care for the local politics in the region. the relationships between cells and between operatives in Al Qa’ida central command are loosely coupled. By contrast. causes havoc. more extremist forms of Islamism still remain at the fringes (Gershman 2002). Through partnership and collaborations. Through partnerships and collaborations. The preponderance of affiliations (over 70%) could be classified as partnerships or collaborations. Al Qa’ida achieves the ideal mix of tightly and loosely coupled systems. they forfeit a degree of control. described in the first chapter. Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: Mergers? Partnerships? Or Collaborations? Finally it is important to consider distribution by type of affiliation (Figure 3). were much less common. Al Qaida can provide financial or logistic support to other terrorist groups with the intention of influencing their strategic activities. Supporting local terrorist groups in this manner makes noise. Although such groups have since become a major political force in recent years. it is difficult to cut off centralized funding due to the complex nature of Al Qa’ida’s financial network. When a group merges with Al Qa’ida.

which the merged group must obey. groups that merge officially with Al Qa’ida may risk alienating the local population. Such blocking actions are a critical tool in combating the financing of terrorism (Mayer and Price 2002). most prominently. the United States. they may split their own ranks and upset surrounding communities. who have no interest in establishing a global Islamic caliphate. and strategies. 58 . they often become the targets of counterterrorist offensives by foreign governments. For instance. designation under the UN Security Council’s 1267 Committee’s consolidated list will trigger international obligations on all member countries. supporters of terrorism are publicly identified thereby providing warning to other entities that they are prohibited from doing business with the Al Qa’ida affiliate (Uruena 2008). which should be addressed when discussing mergers. mergers often end up splintering as a result of differences of ideologies. but are more interested in deposing their current government. goals. requiring them to take steps to prevent designated individuals and entities from continuing to fund or otherwise support terrorism. operatives are estranged when Al Qa’ida takes credit for the operation and they are forced to assume a more “behind-the-scenes” role (Desouza and Hengsen 2007). In addition. Moreover. the United States government may block the assets of individuals and entities providing support. Executive Order 13224 provides the means to disrupt the support network that funds terrorism. Through this measure.Qa’ida Central Command does not usually plan operations. Finally. they can “offer” tactical advice. When a group commits to jihad against the far enemy. as observed with the Zarqawi-Zawahiri letter referenced earlier. Under this order. Oftentimes. financial or otherwise. to designated terrorists and terrorist organizations. when groups officially merge with Al Qa’ida. There are other practical difficulties.

while Al Qa’ida’s affiliates are concentrated in the Core Arab and Maghreb states. Moreover. organizations must have the patience and resolve to work through issues. it is also important to acknowledge that organizational issues must be addressed up front when a merger is negotiated since this type of affiliation is a longterm contract. several groups have announced a formal merger with Al Qa’ida. Summary of Findings Although Al Qa’ida’s policy of pursuing affiliations with local jihadist groups is not a new development. Al Qa’ida may be seeking to expand into other Muslim-dominated territories. IV. such as Western Africa. Thus. since they offer increased organizational flexibility and operational reach. Al Qa’ida may have several mergers in the works that have not yet been publicly announced. As the example of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb. mergers only occur when terrorist groups have developed a close relationship and realize the mutual value of working together. provided in Chapter 6 proves. 59 . While in recent years. evidence suggests that Al Qa’ida will continue to pursue such relations and will rely upon them more heavily. the data demonstrates that Al Qa’ida may be more likely to pursue lower-order affiliations. Like corporations settling a merger.Given these considerations.

” and “social network affiliation” respectively.146E-09.e. All three statistics are significant with a p-value less than 0.” Each subject was rated 0-2 for each scale. To assess the effects of motivational factors contributing to individual terrorist's decision to affiliate with Al Qa’ida. the null hypothesis was rejected. in each case. 2 = primary motivation (for a more detailed explanation regarding coding. By comparison. and 1. Statistically significant differences among subjects were evaluated using a chi-squared test statistic for variation within each scale.606E-06 for “opportunistic motives.0188. 0.” “ideological alignment. 60 . The null hypothesis tested for each scale was that there was no difference in the frequency of incidence of each level of motational factor. one can conclude that opportunistic motives. known or suspected terrorists). ideological alignment appears to be of less powerful significance as a motivating factor for local jihadist leaders. Based on this analysis. and social network affiliation all motivate local jihadist leaders to an extent. 1= secondary motivation. each subject was rated on one of three scales: "opportunist motives. when three scales were used. corresponding to 0= not a motivation. ideological alignment. please refer to Chapter 3 on Methodology).” "ideological alignment. although the smaller values of p for “opportunistic motives” and for “social network affiliation” suggest that these incentives are more robust.” and "social network affiliations. This analysis yielded the results contained in Table 1. The chi-squared test yielded pvalues of 1.Chapter 5: Results of Statistical Hypothesis Testing I. thus. Data Analysis and Results for Q1: What motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida’s and its pan-Islamic agenda? Data were collected on 41 individual subjects (i.05.

H11 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to opportunistic motives) is proven. tested for both scales.e. The p-value for opportunistic motives permits us to reject the null hypothesis of no effect. However. This analysis produced the results recorded in Table 2. The p-value associated with social network affiliation also allows us to reject the null hypothesis. It is of note that the statistical significance for social network affiliation is far less impressive than that for opportunistic motives.” while score 2 was considered as "motivation.” and “social network affiliation” respectively. H21 (Al Qa’ida commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to ideological motives) is rejected. scores 0 and 1 were combined into a single scale "not a motivation. H31 ( Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due psychosocial motives) requires further investigation.042 for “opportunistic motives. This implies that opportunism is the primary motivation among the variables considered in this study for affiliating with Al Qa’ida. II.” The null hypothesis. social affiliations) have some influence on the decision to associate with Al Qa’ida. In contrast.639.” “ideological alignment. 0. The p-values associated with the chi-squared test statistic were 1.289E-06. Based on this analysis. the effect of ideological alignment does not even reach statistical significance.To supplement this analysis and clarify the relative impact of each incentive. Data Analysis and Results for Q2: What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible affiliates with Al Qa’ida? 61 . and 0. the data suggests that psychosocial motive(i. was that there was no difference in the frequency of incidence of each level of motivational factor. thereby suggesting that this particular factor is not a significant motivating variable for local jihadist leaders in this sample.

the p-value for overall leadership performance was borderline (p=0. pre and post merger.” “Ideological. the paired signed test rejected the null hypothesis for ideology (p=0. compared to pre-merger. The chi-squared test statistic was used to evaluate the overall difference in performance in each of the three categories post-versus pre-merger. thus based on this statistical test.015).” and “Logisitic” on a scale of 0-3. The Wilcoxon statistic was negative for all groups. as well as the simpler paired sign test (Table 5).there was no statistic difference between the pre. we could not reject the null hypothesis for any category. Results are presented in Table 3. which suggests that leadership performance may generally improve as well.0501). Additionally.and post-merger score for any category. However. which utilizes both the direction and magnitude of the change. The null hypothesis tested in this analysis is that there is no difference in each category post-merger. 62 . These included the Wilcoxon statistic (Table 4).Subjects were evaluated on their performance in each of three categories: “Operational. Paired statistics were then applied to compare the scores for each individual terrorist. Accordingto this test. This suggests that ideological leadership performance does actually improve after a merger. which considers only the direction of change. across all terrorists considered as a group. The null hypothesis tested in this analysis is that there is no difference in each category post-merger. pre. across all terrorists considered individually. compared to premerger.and postmerger.

after mergers with Al Qa’ida occur. Moreover. Generally.e. ideological performance improved. Effectively what we are observing from this study’s data analysis is that while ideological concerns do not appear to be primary motivating factors for joining Al Qa’ida. the variability among subjects in the magnitude of the changes may have affected the results. however. This analysis allows us to accept H32 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officer play an increasingly ideological role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida). demonstrates that each group had a similar number of “no change” results (i. a plot of the distribution of scores. there were a few changes in the opposite direction in particular subjects that were large. for the ideological performance. Figures 4-5 demonstrate that for ideological performance. 63 .The results obtained through the paired sign test suggest that the direction of the change for ideological performance was significant. it lets us to reject both H12 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly operational role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida) and H22 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly logistical role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida). a pre-post score of 0). Moreover. However. shared ideological views become important. this was clearly most prevalent and only statistically significant for the ideology category. however. and these swamped the overall effect. Figure 6. most changes were positive. thereby hindering us from rejecting the null hypothesis using the Wilcoxon statistic. there were the fewest number of negative changes post-merger. whether they were categorized as only positive or positive plus no change. Most frequently. The operational category had the largest number of “-3” results and “+3” results. there was a tendency to improve scores post-merger. for all three categories.

While the first official communiqué of the GSPC appeared in September 1998.Chapter 6: Al Qa’ida in the Maghreb and Abdelmalek Droukdal – A Well Executed Merger On September 11. 2006. to Al Qa’ida. I. whereupon Ahmed Ben Bella was elected the first president of Algeria. However. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. The Origins of Islamic Violence in Algeria after the War of Independence The GSPC was founded with a regional focus: it sought to establish an Islamic state in Algeria and rejected the legitimacy of secular democratic governance. this metamorphosis of a relatively smaller. He accomplished this revitalization and expansion of goals and activities by providing compelling ideological leadership and by organizing sophisticated public relations and media campaign both locally and globally. After the merger of the GSPC with Al Qa’ida. Three months later. Algeria achieved independence from France in 1962. However. less powerful Algerian indigenous assembly of terrorists would not have been possible without the leadership of Abdelmalek Droukdal. the Islamic movement in Algeria originated in the 1960s. Defense Minister Houari Boumedienne staged a bloodless coup to remove Ben Bella from power. He then adopted an 64 . the only remaining armed terrorist group in Algeria. in 1965. the new organization radically changed its tactics: the series of suicide bombings and violent attacks executed in 2007 by Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) operatives demonstrated this strategic evolution. the leader of Al Qa’ida in Iraq announced the allegiance of the Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat (Salafist Group for Call and Combat or GSPC). Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb was born. Abdelmalek Droukdal served as the commanding officer of Al Qa’ida in the Maghreb region and directed the internationalization of the former GSPC's war in order to revitalize a movement that was slowly dying in Algeria.

However. II. This socialist government's repressive secularism and one party rule were oppressive for many people in Algeria and helped fuel a fundamentalist backlash when Islamic leaders branded the government as “a band of atheists” and called for a return to an Islamic government (Johnson 2006). not an armed group that sought to reverse the economic decline in Algeria by implementing Sharia. The FIS became popular amongst the Algerian population who supported the group financially and politically. one-party. which he codified in the Algerian constitution in 1976. In 1991. nationalist. The Birth of the Salvation Islamic Front In 1989. Unlike the MAIA. the Algerian Islamic movement was centrist. Thus. under Boumedienne’s chosen successor Colonel Chadli Benjedid the right to establish political parties was accorded in Algeria and with this decision. in response to the dictatorial and exclusionary policies proffered by the Socialist party. the FIS was a political organization. Before the independence. during the 1970s. 65 . socialist political system. directed by Abdallah Djaballah. This political platform resonated with the Algerians. The MAIA sought to resolve the social and economic injustices that had emerged in Algeria by forcible means if necessary (Johnson 2006). Islamic religious law. Mustapha Bouyali. and maintained an affirmative orientation towards Western learning and culture. the weak alliance between the secular and religious groups (the Ulama and the academic elite who led the liberation movement against the French) collapsed. the fundamentalist Islamic movement became increasingly radicalized in response to President Boudemedienne’s abortive leftward shift in economic and cultural policies. the Salvation Islamic Front (FIS) was formed.authoritarian. a fundamental Islamic preacher established the Armed Islamic Algeria Movement (MAIA) in 1982 to establish an Islamic state. disgruntled by the failure of Socialist economic policies.

He repelled most members of the GIA when he issued a fatwa condemning the entire Muslim population of 66 . Many Islamists became increasingly interested in radical approaches. A High Committee was established with Mohammed Boudiaf named as president. However. After subsequent leadership transitions. the GIA quickly alienated itself from other Algerian Islamic activities by adopting stringent interpretations of Islamic law. The GIA was formed from a collection of Algerian militant groups who had been executing a series of significant military operations against government targets in an attempt to overthrow the secular government in Algeria. which lasted until his violent death in February 2002. However. He was an illiterate criminal and his reign. with the prospect of the FIS in control of the parliament. and suspended parliament. The new regime calculated that the repression of the FIS would ignite a wave of extremist fundamentalist violence. The Beginnings of the GIA and the Onset of an Epoch of Violence As the new regime predicted. Thus. GIA supreme commander Saifullah Ajffar ordered the assassination of over 90 innocent civilians and eventually forced a mass European exodus from Algeria. In an effort to racially purify the country. it dissolved the FIS (Celso 2008). the secular and military elite forced Benjedid's resignation. less militant Muslim clerics and political leaders whom it designated heretics. halted the electoral process. 1996.the FIS achieved a victory in national elections. several Islamists became disenchanted with the political process and defected from the FIS to form armed splinter groups. was marked by barbaric methods and attacks against entire civilian communities. The GIA was responsible for the murder of over 2000 schoolteachers guilty of “taming the youth” and more than 100 other competing. Antar Zouabri became the head of the GIA on July 18. which would divide and alienate the FIS’s many Algerian supporters. after the cancellation of the 1992 general elections in Algeria. III.

Fissions Form Within the GSPC 67 . and Martínez 2007). he rejected the policy of terror executed by the GIA under Zouabri and enforced symbiosis with the local population. apostates. While he preferred not to engage in force-on-force confrontations with the Algerian military to avoid depleting his cadre. ambushes. and hypocrites” for “not supporting them in their struggle against the government” (Blom. clearly articulated the narrow agenda of the GSPC. He depicted the Algerian government as a postcolonial lackey at war with Islam. bombings. who were left without an ideological umbrella. and incursions on towns to steal saleable goods (Guidère 2007). Hassan Hattab. the GSPC denounced the massacres that the GIA had committed and entered the international arena with the goal of restoring the credibility of armed groups in Algeria and attracting embittered Algerian youths for whom the ideology of Islamic guerilla war had lost its appeal. Bucaille. the decision to establish the GPSC was the direct result of the GIA’s strategic impasse. a former GIA commander. and gendarmerie through the use of false roadblocks. IV. military. The first prominent leader of the GSPC. police. He asserted that the GSPC sought to overthrow the government in Algiers and to install an Islamic regime in Algeria. the GSPC was able to amass hundred of defectors from the FIS and the GIA (Guidère 2007).Algeria as “kuffar. However. However. he encouraged operatives to target Algerian government officials. Zouabri’s attacks on innocent Muslims estranged many former GIA military commanders. In 1998. V. Consequently. these officers founded the GSPC as a military organization dedicated to the Salafist creed and the battle against the Algerian regime to restore the Caliphate and implement Sharia. An Alternative Emerges: The Origins of the GSPC The GSPC was not set up as a pan-Islamic movement.

and could even participate in the fight against the remaining active terrorist groups. the organization was plagued by internal rivalry. Thus. In July 1999. The law set a deadline of January 13. the katibats were responsible for supplying and funding their own operations. The issue of whether or not to accept the terms of the Civil Harmony Law created considerable dissension within the GSPC. it was difficult for the local leadership to coordinate or control the activity of its fighters since attempts to communicate could result in discovery or interception by security services. A study conducted at the Naval Postgraduate School determined that although the probability of defection by GSPC members was less than 10 68 . Imprisonment sentences were reduced. Hattab provided religious guidance. Several GSPC cadres were killed or captured by Algerian security services following leads provided by rival GSPC elements (Celso 2008). Consequently. Nevertheless. By the end of the twentieth century. Algerians had become less tolerant to the violence of the GSPC. Each of the regional groups. the Algerian government implemented a law that offered amnesty to the combatants who capitulated. controlled a territory that roughly aligned with the governments’ own military districts. Although as supreme emir.The GSPC was originally organized as a loose confederation of regional divisions under a supreme emir who supervised the organization. This law declared that citizens not involved in massive killings. death penalty and life imprisonment were commuted to a maximum of eight years imprisonment for individuals under probation. bombing of public places. the Civil Harmony Law was adopted and overwhelmingly endorsed in a national referendum the following September 2000. katibats. or sexual crimes would be placed under probation for a period ranging from 3 to 5 years. These fault-lines were exacerbated by external events that occurred soon after the founding of the GSPC. 2000 for members and supporters of armed groups to surrender to the authorities (Black 2007).

” This 69 . reasserting their dedication to avoiding civilian atrocities. 2001. They suggested that courting Al Qa’ida would enable the organization to maintain its relevancy and shore up declining recruitment. The September 11. Fifteen days after the attacks. certain members of the GSPC dissented. They were devoted to regime change and preferred not to actively support the “Muslim brothers. the probability of defection reached a high of 60 percent during the Civil Concord period (Gyves and Wyckloff 2006). 23 people were killed. on September 26. The GSPC denied involvement. However. and 9 were injured in a massacre that occurred in the Algerian town of Al-Abri. This became a point of friction between Hattab and the younger members of the GSPC and two dominant camps emerged within the organization. the GSPC’s operational reach diminished. It was thus effectively limited in scope by the Algerian government. believing that it would be better to take credit for the attack and thereby imply GSPC’s collusion with Al Qa’ida. 2001 attacks were another defining moment for the GSPC. which resulted in the demobilization of hundreds of militants from both the GIA and the GSPC.percent before the implementation of the law. Due to this amnesty program. The pan-Islamists encouraged solidarity with their “brothers in Islam” (Al Qa’ida agents) while the Islamo-nationalists were preoccupied with Algerian politics and the installation of an Islamic state there. They accused the Algerian secret service of executing the attack to isolate the GSPC from its popular base amongst the Algerian people and of attempting to align the existing Algerian governmental agency with the intelligence services of the United States in the Global War on Terror. Members of this organization realized that a merger with Al Qa’ida could have both political and financial benefits to GSPC (Guidère 2007).

the many GSPC fighters sought to engage in the struggle in Iraq.minority faction opposed such a merger and preferred to remain like a small. the war in Iraq further exacerbated the debates that were occurring within the GSPC concerning the strategies to adopt with regards to Al Qa’ida. independently operated company that could focus on their own regional national agenda (Guidère 2007). Thus. in July 2003. the GSPC was forced to retreat from urban areas (Ellis 2004). which stated that the objectives of armed conflict should be to fight the Algerian regime and not other governments. However. Observing the images of Iraqi soldiers and citizens humiliated by the American invaders. Chad. Moreover. the majority of the local emirs seated on the GSPC’s shura believed that the war in Algeria was lost. Although the GSPC was able to recover from the infighting provoked after 9/11 and aggressive counter-terror measures. As a result of hard-hitting endeavors by these transnational partnerships. Algeria. Hattab refused to send Algerian combatants to Iraq to battle the Americans because he predicted that doing so would deprive the GSPC of its best combatants when they joined the insurgency. Chad. Niger. The United States also provided support for the war on terrorism in North and West Africa and in the Sahara desert through the Pan Sahel Initiative (PSI). its next iteration was expanded to include Algeria. Although Hattab invoked the original Charter of the GSPC. implemented in November 2003. others within the GSPC did not share this perspective. and Mauritania in an effort to improve border security and counterterrorism capacity. the Pan Sahel Initiative consisted of training regional military units by soldiers from the US Special Forces in Niger. Mali. Moreover. thereby joining both sides of the Sahara in a complex map of security arrangements. the organization should 70 . and Nigeria signed a co-operation agreement on counterterrorism. Funded by the United States State Department. The PSI was judged to be a success by US officials and local participants. thus. his efforts were in vain.

Nevertheless. he did not yet possess an adequate network of fighters. However. When the shura of the GSPC voted to actively support the “Iraqi brothers. Soon thereafter. the old guard members who espoused a nationalist orientation were expelled from the GSPC (Guidère 2007). They also believed that participation in the war in Iraq would enable the GSPC to establish connections with other jihadist groups in North Africa and introduce them to new strategies and tactics. he fostered pan-Islamic solidarity and internationalism in order to reestablish a sense of unity amongst GSPC operatives. they could use the war in Iraq to attract new recruits who believed that they would be sent to Iraq after basic training in Algeria. who succeeded Hattab in 2003. but who would. asserting his will to establish a community of Muslims dedicated to the creation of a Caliphate and calling upon GSPC members to attack all foreigners who supported the war in Iraq. This was the first strong sign of official will to establish a relationship between the GSPC and Al Qa’ida and the beginning of three years of efforts to prove the GSPC’s will and commitment to Al Qa’ida.” Hassan was obliged to resign. He continued to make entreaties to Al Qa’ida. VI. Although he wanted to eventually establish his group as some sort of training authority. Abou Ibrahim Mustapha. in fact be absorbed into the GSPC’s domestic campaign. Finally. The Rise of Droukdal 71 . for instance. sought to actively support the Iraqi insurgents in order to gain credibility for the GSPC.focus on preserving the honor of the Iraqis. the 2nd anniversary of September 11. he issued a communiqué of support for Al Qa'ida in which he criticized Hattab’s position and extolled bin Laden. his career was cut short when he was killed in a skirmish with the Algerian army in the Béjaïa region in June 2004 (Antil 2006). On September 2003.

by supporting a cause that was seen to benefit the global community of Muslims. from 1990 to 1993. the GSPC would gain access to a network of financiers. In 1996. As a youth. he was promoted to chief bomb maker for one of the most important GIA 72 . he hoped to study engineering. Droukdal sought to provide a new focal point for his members by participating in the global jihad. intelligence. the GSPC could more easily recruit operatives. Droukdal was recognized as an exceptional student. Droukdal realized that in order to maintain support. By affiliating with Al Qa’ida. he pursued a degree in technology from the University of Blida. Abdelmalek Droukdal immediately assumed control of the GSPC. like the majority of young Muslim students. After losing combatants due to the amnesty program announced by the Bouteflika regime. Said Makhloufi. and media specialists who could reinforce the group’s capabilities and help it lead operations. As a member of the clandestine ranks of the FIS. Thus. 1970 in the small village of Zayan. and logisticians. he was enthused when an officer of the FIS and a former member of the Algerian army. In 1992. Additionally. Nevertheless. Born on April 20. the GSPC was struggling to fill its ranks with recruits. he officially joined the organization and in December 1993. informants. a merger with Al Qa’ida was particularly appealing to Droukdal (Johnson 2006). One year later. the GSPC needed to achieve a certain number of visible successes to appear active and successful. situated near Mifan in the Blida region.Upon Mustapha’s death. he was attracted to the FIS and actively sought to get close to its leaders. who easily obtained his baccalaureate in 1989 in mathematics. Thus. assets. recruited him. He continued to hold this role when he enlisted with the GIA from 1993 to 1996. he went underground at the age of 23 (Guidère 2007). he was assigned the mission of fabricating explosives due to his scientific background and knowledge of chemical bases and mechanical processes.

His aspiration was to link his organization to the wider Islamist campaign as represented by Al Qa’ida in order to reinvigorate the group after government crackdowns and legislation had reduced its numbers. he nominated Droukdal as the director of the consultative council. Droukdal’s Program: Toward Global Jihad Upon assuming power. Thus. with his inauguration. After Mustapha assumed power. one year later. Chechnya. Soon thereafter. he allegedly opposed the massacres conducted by the organization in the late 1990s. when Hassan Hattab was forced to resign. Although he served the GIA in a military capacity. Hattab selected Droukdal as a member of his consultative council and made him a regional commander for the GSPC. Finally.battalions. He occupied this position until 2003. VII. he commenced a policy of internationalization. sought to align with other jihadist groups. instructing his followers in the ways of global jihad. While he was involved in planning a limited number of attacks. Libya. he had not yet had any contact with Al Qa’ida (Guidère 2007). and the Sudan. he conducted a nuanced public relations campaign and comprehensive media reform. he seized to opportunity to serve as chief military sergeant for the GSPC. In 2001. Upon his appointment as emir of the GSPC. incentivized by his opportunistic desire to revive the demoralized GSPC. Somalia. he was promoted to the position of supreme emir of the GSPC after Mustapha’s death. In order to accomplish this feat. Instead of concentrating media attention on local attacks. he was selected to command the Al-Quds Brigade (Abu Bakr alSiddiq Brigade) at the behest of the leader of the GIA (Guidère 2007). he served the GSPC as an ideological figurehead. he frequently issued communiqués 73 . Thus. which had been created in 1998. Droukdal sought to inscribe the actions of the GSPC in an international context by publicizing the GSPC’s activities in Afghanistan. Droukdal.

he issued a communiqué addressed to the leaders meeting in Algiers. in Morocco. For instance. the crisis in Iraq. the President of the Chechen Republic in May 2004. It included articles on Salafism. which was inspired by that of Al Qa’ida in Iraq. This communiqué. The communiqués included messages with international themes. Droukdal sought to align the GSPC theoretically with Al Qa’ida and express his obeisance to Bin Laden and Zarqawi (Guidère 2007). These initiatives allowed him to transmit his message to operatives across the Maghreb region. which took place from March 22-24. In response to this event.S. thereby promulgating Al Qa’ida’s anti-Western program. For instance. Finally. which were still committed to local initiatives. he urged jihad as a way to defend Muslim honor. The communiqués published in conjunction with the operation in Mauritania demonstrated Droukdal’s commitment to a pan-Islamic program and desire to indoctrinate his operatives in the ways of global jihad. a more “global” goal. He criticized the Arab leaders who allegedly embraced communism and capitalism and were becoming increasingly sensitive to the JudeoChristian coalition. Later. The first operation undertaken by the GSPC outside its borders occurred in Mauritania in June 2005.-led military exercises in northern Africa dubbed 74 . Droukdal’s media strategy became clear after the Summit of the Arab League in Algiers. Droukdal launched a magazine for the GSPC. In publishing this document. and other international themes (Guidère 2007). 2005. which was broadcast to a large audience of operatives and supporters. in Chechnya.regarding international politics and events affecting the Middle East and the Maghreb. was a reprisal of themes elucidated by Al Qa'ida. a GSPC statement posted by Droukdal on the Internet defending the raid indicated that the attack was in response to U. He derided these leaders as puppets of the American government. he circulated a communiqué congratulating the Chechen mujahedeen for the assassination of Ahmed Kadirov.

S. The communiqué ended by urging the Islamic youth throughout North Africa to join the Algerian cause (Lecocq and Schrijver 2007). Droukdal realized that he could encourage internationalization by amending his membership roster. Droukdal sought to encourage Maghreb jihadists to join the Algerians in their struggle. This was the first time that Droukdal actively sought to recruit from outside the Algerian ranks. Shortly thereafter. This recognition was particularly meaningful for the Algerian operatives because it made them feel more “secure” in their ventures.the “Flintlock Plan” by military officials. In fact. this was the first time Al Qa’ida had congratulated another group not affiliated with their organization. leaders from Al Qa’ida and the GSPC signed a pact of fraternity (Jebnoun 2007). counterterrorism campaign in Africa. including Algerian. This operation provoked the first official reaction of Al Qa'ida to the GSPC. 75 . He began to recruit several operatives from abroad and encouraged his agents to train abroad and engage in jihadist activities in other nations in an effort to expand the GSPC’s global profile. the director of the media division of Al Qa’ida in Iraq issued a communiqué congratulating the GSPC. These exercises were part of a broader U. The statement also denounced the recent arrests and trials by Mauritanian authorities of dozens of Islamic extremists accused of having links to the GSPC.. in 2005. Mauritanian and Chadian troops. Malian. knowing that they had Al Qa’ida’s support. a long video filming the combatants who had participated in the operation was broadcast over the Internet in jihadist forums. Using this video. Droukdal began filming all operations conducted by the GSPC and distributing these clips online in the same manner as Zarqawi (Guidère 2007). Furthermore. Moreover. One week after the attack.

Droukdal launched a systematic communications reform to improve the image of the GSPC amongst Algerians and the international Islamic community and to enable him to preach pan-Islamic sermons to his operatives.. Prior to this effort. 2005). the GSPC’s communications were characterized by a general cacophony and ataxia. Moreover. During the summer of 2005. Thus. First of all. he murdered the hostages. Algerian security services contributed to this information overflow by distributing false reports on the GSPC’s channels. he sought to centralize the GSPC’s communications.In July 2005. Those communiqués not approved by this committee could be regarded as unauthentic. Upon taking these hostages he promised to execute them unless the Algerian government withdrew its support for the war in Iraq. he sought to bracket the Algerian operations. including the attack in Mauritania and the execution of the Algerian diplomats with other attacks that occurred during the same time period (including the coordinated suicide bomb attacks on London’s public transport system that occurred on July 7. When the Algerian government failed to respond. As a result. Droukdal’s leadership during this time period was primarily ideological in nature. This system enabled the GSPC to elucidate several ambiguous arguments and clarify dubious information(Gray and Stockham 2008). Droukdal proposed a system of transmitting information whereby a central media committee would transmit all communiqués. each GSPC katibat possessed its own media bureau and published its own communications regarding its operations and successes within its territory. Consequently. Droukdal responded by issuing a communiqué in which he thanked Zarqawi and extolled Al Qa’ida in Iraq (Guidère 2007). there were numerous GSPC media outlets transmitting information simultaneously. Zarqawi signaled his complicity with the GSPC by seizing two Algerian diplomats. as evidenced by the frequency of his declarations and interchanges and his efforts to improve the 76 .

Droukdal personally supervised all the preparations (Moss 2008). the deputy leader of Al Qa’ida. on the fifth anniversary of the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks.” He spoke of the need to suppress national borders in order to establish an Islamic caliphate and urged the immediate union of the nations of North Africa under Islamic law. one cannot ignore the fact that prior to the official announcement of the merger of Al Qa’ida and the GSPC. overall his leadership performance improved during this time period. under Droukdal. Two days later. The attack involved immaculate planning: the GSPC had surveyed the location for weeks and the day before. However.GSPC’s reception nationally and internationally. The Announcement of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb Finally. Moreover. It is important to note that this announcement came one year after Droukdal had made his first forays to Al Qa’ida. VIII. thereby crystallizing the relationship. His discourse supported pan-Islamic notions and highlighted the necessity of creating an “Islamic United States. he expressed the 77 . two bombs exploded in the port de Delis. This was the first time that the GSPC had led an attack against a maritime target. on September 11. Droukdal also directed several tactical changes to prepare his organization for international jihad. On December 22. Al Qa’ida Central Command had stalled the merger for one year. His communiqué was particularly revelatory because it reflected the alleged changes in the official ideology of the GSPC. Droukdal’s role as an ideological leader steering the GSPC’s internationalization through an assertive public relations drive continued after this announcement. 2005. could positively contribute to Al Qa’ida’s ideological appeals and combat operations. intent on ensuring that the GSPC’s membership. announced the merger of Al Qa’ida and the GSPC. 2006. he published a communiqué affirming the GSPC’s allegiance to Al Qa’ida and bin Laden. a group of combatants had penetrated the highly protected port. Therefore. Ayman al-Zawahiri.

Approximately six months later. Spain. Droukdal expressed concern about projecting a certain image of his organization to his base as well as the international community. AQIM conducted an attack against a bus transporting employees from Brown & Root-Condor. however. and the Algerian stateowned oil company. In changing the name of the GSPC to Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb. Zawahiri himself refused to allow the group to call itself “Al Qa’ida in Algeria” since this name seemed too “local” and did not reflect the transnational and pan-Islamic agenda of Al Qa’ida (Guidère 2007). he wanted to highlight its role in global jihad. a few recent attacks indicate otherwise. thereby easing the qualms of his subordinates (Guidère 2007). Droukdal issued another claim in which he suggested that after pledging allegiance to Islam and demonstrating his faith in Bin Laden. KBR. nine of whom were wounded. Droukdal and his operatives began to target foreigners who continued to support secular regimes and proselytize their culture (specifically the United States. A New Organization In the months after the name change. He expressed confidence in the specific competencies and ideological underpinning of Al Qa’ida’s leadership. For instance. a joint venture between a Halliburton subsidiary. This change would demonstrate the solidarity of Al Qa’ida and the GSPC. Some scholars have suggested that AQIM remains sharply focused on its Kabylia strongholds despite Droukdals’s global rhetoric (Filiu 2009). Al Qa’ida in the Maghreb (AQIM). and France). IX. in an elaborate roadside bombing. in December 2006.sentiment that Al Qa’ida was the only group that could unite all Islamic combatants and steer the battle against the Coalition forces. Sonatrach. it was now time for him to change the name of his organization. including 78 . The bomb attack killed an Algerian driver in a convoy transporting the workers. Moreover.

Droukdal disclosed a communiqué. Some specialists fear that AQIM could severely damage the energy sector in the Niger delta (Moss 2008). emulated the propaganda materials of Al Qa’ida in Iraq (Jebnoun 2007). 2007 demonstrated Droukdal’s new tactics. three cars driven by suicide bombers blew up in Algiers. Recent reports express fear that AQIM will be able to increased recruitment in Mauritania or Nigeria. However. He encouraged his operatives to executed attacks inspired by the Iraqi model. This video. the surveillance and lookout. attention should be paid to the tactical changes that he implemented. detailing the fabrication of the bombs. and train potential terrorists. While Droukdal’s role was primarily ideological. indoctrinate. The attacks that occurred on April 11. recruit. Droukdal encouraged the evolution from guerilla-oriented operations such as armed assaults to terror-oriented operations such as bombings. Chechnya. One bomber drove into the guard post at the government building housing the offices of the prime minister and the Interior Ministry. Afghanistan. in which AQIM admitted to the attack. Two other cars were detonated beside a police station in the east of the Algerian capital (one at the seat of Interpol and the other at the 79 . Originally. the use of firearms plummeted while the use of explosives augmented (Gyves and Wyckloff 2006). Always attentive to public reaction. As a result of Droukdal’s press campaign. killing at least 33 people and injuring others. Iraq and training camps in the Sahel to pursue international jihad. and the explosions was also transmitted. AQIM was able to establish communities in Europe to provide money. Under his leadership.four Britons and one American. On this day. These recruits were then dispatched to Kashmir. in online jihadist forums about one month later. intended to galvanize combatants and attract recruits. A lengthy film of the operation. the GSPC was engaged in a war of attrition whereby combatants would descend from the mountains and attack the armed forces.

Droukdal criticized the adoption of an anti-Islamic policy allegedly championed by the Americans in their war against terrorism. They also demonstrated the professionalization of AQIM’s services. Final Observations 80 . To capitalize upon his operatives’ anti-colonialist concerns. The second justification for the attacks was the Algerian government’s military cooperation with the American forces. Droukdal suggested that this was the beginning of a foreign occupation and deemed it necessary to combat the Western presence in Algeria. Through this rhetoric. thereby cementing the link between the two organizations (Guidère 2007). and sustainable fighting force. X. In doing so. Such spectacular attacks could also appeal to younger sympathizers (Algeria: Violence Returns 2007). this method consisted of engaging in spectacular attacks with a symbolic dimension that could destabilize the regime. His communiqué suggested that the April 11 attacks were executed in response to a concession agreement with the United States. of the special forces of the police in Bab Ezzouar). which could allow the Western power to use petroleum in Algeria for 100 years. Finally. Droukdal positioned his group as the defender of the riches of Muslim countries faced with avarice and imperialism of the West. remote detonation. This also permitted AQIM officers to move from the periphery of Algeria back into its urban centers. Moreover. rigged vehicles. an effective propaganda and selective recruitment were employed to make AQIM a formidable. Droukdal was compelled to publish a communiqué to outline his intentions and defuse criticism. simultaneous explosions. As always. kamikaze fighters. he expressed a message frequently articulated by Al Qa’ida. These attacks utilized remote explosives and were thus less costly in human lives.

he reflected AQIM’s international focus and the growing ratio of attacks against foreign targets into an emphasis on international issues and threats against Western countries in AQIM’s statements.To this day. he directed an ideological shift – from a philosophy based on regional preoccupations to a more internationally oriented perspective. AQIM continues to conducted several suicide attacks and roadside bombings. He incited the organization to expand by attacking foreign targets. After the ranks of his organization had been depleted at the turn of the twenty-first century. Droukdal advanced the goal of undermining the secular Algerian regime while damaging the interests of Western nations (Black 2007). The US invasion of Iraq and media coverage of American detention and interrogation policies lent credence to the Qa’ida narrative that 81 . Droukdal recognized that by aligning itself with Al Qa’ida. Droukdal sought to effectively straddle the divide between local and international Islamic terrorism. each accompanied by a revealing and incantatory communiqué. By uniting radical Islamists to attack Americana and French targets in northwestern Africa. which had dramatically expanded since the September 11. and its success. Droukdal recognized the global appeal of Al Qa’ida message. The most powerful French AQIM cell to date was dismantled in September 2005. Moreover. attacks. The merger. can only be explained by highlighting Droukdal’s ideological leadership and the major shifts that he pioneered on the propaganda front. Thus. Through his communications. most particularly French interests. the GSPC could render itself capable of operating in the context of global jihad. he effectively brought the Algerians insurgents out of isolation so they could work more closely with international Islamic networks to promote Islam. when French police thwarted a series of bombings set to occur in Paris as Algerians voted on the National Charter for Peace and Reconciliation. rather than confining itself to local activity.

Having formulated an appropriate ideological stance. Al Qa’ida’s global ideology intersected with local anger directed at the undemocratic regime would encourage jihadists’ activity in the Maghreb. ready-made networks that could be internationalized. A current of cultural Islamization was created that has increased Al Qa’ida’s attraction. he successfully aligned with Al Qa’ida to co-opt and exploit local. He saw clearly an opportunity for synergy.portrayed isolated American actions as a coordinated war against Islam. Droukdal capitalized upon these trends by highlighting the importance of solidarity among the mujahedeen in face of Western aggression against Islam. Thus. 82 . he was able to tap into local grievances and tie them to the global jihad against the west.

the Egyptian Islamic Jihad members joined forced with Al Qa’ida. Why did GAI repudiate terrorism rather than affiliate with Al Qa’ida to continue its brutal campaign? I. an Egyptian fundamentalist writer and educator. The Emergence of the GAI from the Ashes of the Muslim Brotherhood Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya (GAI) was formally organized as an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood in 1973 in the Upper Nile regions of Al-Minya.Chapter 7: Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya: The Unrealized Merger In the early 1970s. Egyptian President Anwar Sadat gave the group’s members free reign. Both collaborated on the assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat in 1981 and both fell victims to the bitter campaign of state violence. Both broke with the Muslim Brotherhood over the latter’s commitment to nonviolence. In contrast. the GAI rejected the Muslim Brotherhood’s gradualist approach to change. in the late 1990s. covertly supplying them with arms with which to defend themselves against potential attacks by Marxists or Nasserites. Qina. renounced violence. and denounced Al Qa’ida. However. GAI recruited more indigent. Both campaigned to overthrow the secular Egyptian government and to replace it with an Islamic regime. his rivals. Moreover. However. members of Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya apologized for the group’s involvement in the Sadat assassination. and instead based their ideology on the principles articulated by Sayyid Qutb. mass arrests. GAI quickly gained strong support among the university students in both Cairo and Alexandria by recruiting mid-level leaders from the ranks of the unemployed university students who were disillusioned by Egypt’s lack of economic opportunities. and financial crackdowns during much of the 1990s. Upon its birth. Asyu’. two prominent Salafi jihadist groups operated in Egypt: Al-Gama’a alIslamiyya (GAI) and Egyptian Islamic Jihad. In addition. and Sohaj. uneducated individuals from 83 .

Al-Rahman issued a fatwa that provided the religious justification for the assassination of President Sadat in 1981.the southern rural regions of Assiuet and Minya to further populate their rank and file (Keats 2002). Sheikh Omar Abdel Al–Rahman assumed the mantle as spiritual leader for the group during its infancy. He began rounding up several Islamic militants and placing them in jail. Al-Rahman fled Egypt and toured the neighboring Arab countries. During Al-Rahman’s time abroad. The Sadat Assassination Upon returning to Egypt in 1980. “A need [had] arisen for a military force for us to defend [themselves]” (Carmon. II. As a result of his role in the assassination. AlRahman served six months in an Egyptian prison. GAI leaders decided. they established a branch devoted to jihad and began to execute increasingly violent operations. As a result of his policies. Fearing harsh repression (like that which the Muslim brotherhood has experienced under former Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser). avoiding a sterner sentence on a technicality (Keats 2002). Feldner. He provided the moral justifications for the group’s moneymaking attacks on Christian shopkeepers and small-business owners by his issuing fatwa – religious rulings that justify actions normally outlawed by the Koran (Abdel Maguid 2003). The GAI and Egyptian Islamic Jihad allegedly cooperated in this conspiracy. Sadat changed his political strategies to combat internal unrest in the mid 1970s. including Saudi Arabia. where he found and developed financial supporters. III. and Lav 2006). Crackdown under Mubarak 84 . clashes between Egyptian security forces and Islamic movements in the universities increased. Perturbed by the rapid development and mobilization of the Salafi organizations in Egypt. Consequently.

Hosni Mubarak began a brutal campaign against Egypt’s militant groups that lasted throughout the 1980s. many fighters moved on to combat the Serbian forces that were decimating Bosnian Muslims in Yugoslavia. a leading member of the GAI. where they were active in the jihad against the Soviet Union. Al-Rahman. Some. During the 1990s. Several were implicated in numerous plots directed against American diplomatic and military targets in the Balkans and other parts of Europe. like Mustafa Hamza. IV. In Afghanistan. such as Osama Bin Laden. who continued to struggle under high unemployment(Gerges 2000). His methods included false arrests. many GAI members continued or commenced their training in Al Qa’ida facilities in the Sudan and Afghanistan. who had immigrated to the United States by this time. again provided the religious justification for these attacks by arguing that tourism in Egypt fostered poor morals. even worked for businesses owned by Osama bin Laden in Somalia (Carmon. they carried out a number of attacks on tourists that killed dozens of people. 85 . Campaign of Terror After the Soviet-Afghan war. following the Soviet withdrawal. Moreover. many GAI members and leaders fled to Afghanistan. and Lav 2006).Sadat’s successor. Although fairly successful at curbing the number of violent attacks. some GAI members returned to Egypt where they initiated a campaign against the influences of Western culture. Feldner. During these years. Between 1992 and 1993. torture. and spread diseases such as AIDS (Stacher 2002). this crackdown further radicalized the university-educated population. and executions. they trained and fought alongside al-Zawahiri’s Egyptian Islamic Jihad and other Afghan Arabs.

Yet despite his arrest. the group allegedly collaborated with the Egyptian Islamic Jihad in a failed assassination attempt on President Hosni Mubarak in Addis Ababa. and a stop to agitation to commit attacks. 36 of whom were Swiss) (Keats 2002). signed by six of the organization's leaders. and banks. GAI announced a unilateral initiative of conciliation with the Egyptian regime. 86 . he and nine other operatives were convicting for conspiring to destroy New York City landmarks. the group killed 63 people at a tourist site in Luxor (including four Egyptians and 59 foreign tourists. GAI continued to attack tourists throughout the 1990s and began targeting Egyptian business establishments as well. In 1993. In 1996. This prompted some influential militants to reconsider their strategy and tactics and some GAI leaders renounced violence. In 1996. including the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels. when the Luxor attack occurred. which declared a halt to all armed operations within and outside Egypt. Ethiopia. On July 5. arresting thousands of suspected terrorists and executing or killing others during police raids. 1997. Collapse of an Armed Group As a result of GAI’s campaign in the late 1990s. Al-Rahman was arrested in the United States in connection with the first World Trade Center bombing. Two months later. he and nine other operatives were convicted for conspiring to destroy New York City landmarks. The group bombed theaters. Al-Rahman was arrested in the United States in connection with the first World Trade Center bombing. V. bookstores. During a court hearing.In 1993. militants killed nine German tourists and their driver in front of the Egyptian Museum in Cairo. including the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels. Thus. In September 1997. several GAI leaders immediately conveyed their disgust. a GAI member read aloud a communiqué. In 1995. Cairo clamped down on both the GAI and Egyptian Islamic Jihad even more.

insisting that the operation was not executed by the GAI. it needed a publicity boost if it was to continue functioning as a viable terrorist organization. supported non-violence and the ceasefire. In 1997. as a result of increased governmental scrutiny. Taha signed Bin Laden’s 1998 Declaration of War against the “Jews and Crusaders. The Luxor attack and the reports of mutilation of the victims’ bodies had sparked public repulsion at GAI. moderate one. Moreover. Rifai Ahmad Taha courted bin Laden by making trips to Afghanistan and even appeared sitting next to him and Egyptian Islamic Jihad leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in a videotape released in September 2000 that threatened US interests. the GAI was weakened both operationally and financially by the aftermath effects of the attack.” thereby becoming a signatory to the International Islamic Front. Zawahiri's organization experienced a major upset when in 1998 Albania agreed to extradite 12 members of EIJ to Egypt 87 . while the smaller. the GAI spokesman Osama Rushdie. After the schism. or simply saw the financial and organizational advantages that Al Zawahiri had reaped from making the decision to join Al Qa’ida. Therefore. Moreover. the larger. For instance. Consequently. a Netherlands resident announced his resignation (Cohen 2003). he was unable to recruit many of his cadres to support Bin Laden and a minimal number joined the global jihad (Botha 2006). the group split into two factions. Yet despite his efforts. more radical faction. It is unclear whether Taha actually agreed with bin Laden’s views. The GAI had witnessed how the Egyptian Islamic Jihad had suffered significant setbacks because of its decision to join Al Qa’ida. led by Rifai Ahmad Taha deplored the ceasefire as cowardly and called for a return to armed operations. organized by Mustafa Hamza. wanted to seize power in the GAI. but rather by a breakaway faction (Ghadbian 2000).

in the case known as the “Returnees from Albania” (Aboul-Enein 2004) Consequently. stressed that significant differences in philosophy exist between the GAI and Al Qa’ida. despite widespread skepticism in Egypt and abroad about the nature of its true 88 . most members of GAI preferred to go underground until the group regained its strength and influence rather than align with Al Qa’ida and risk further setbacks. agreed to this measure. a self-proclaimed leader of the underground group. the historic leadership of the GAI has published a series of books. a senior leader and chief ideological theorist for the GAI. announced that the GAI had merged with Al Qa’ida. VI. in August 2006. Nageh Ibrahim. The GAI has not conducted a terrorist attack either inside or outside Egypt since August 1998. In doing so. known as the “Concept Correction Series” in which they renounce indiscriminate violence and extremist interpretations of Islam. Dr. by then the closest associate of Osama bin Laden. Karam Zuhdi. and our aim is Islam. Since this time. In 2002." he maintained. Nevertheless. Reconciliation In 1999. “Their aim is jihad. Ayman al-Zawahiri. Ibrahim challenged Al Qa’ida’s Islamic credentials by emphasizing its dependence on violent struggle as a means to further its goals and suggested that Al Qa’ida was propagating a false definition of jihad. even said the GAI owes the Egyptian people "an apology for the crimes which [the group] has committed against Egypt. despite their proclamations in favor of non-violence. who remained the group’s spiritual leader. Since this time. He asserted that Al Qa’ida’s aggressive tactics have failed Muslims. During his interview with Asharq al-Awsat. We are even thinking of paying blood money to the victims” (Halawi 2002). Even Al-Rahman. GAI leadership in Egypt quickly rejected this claim. the group’s historic leadership declared a unilateral ceasefire. the leadership issued a statement reaffirming its commitment to end violence.

Moreover. secular institutions. when their group was in a state of imminent decline. 2006). evidence suggests that this choice was strategic. GAI was well established and active prior to Al Qa’ida’s emergence in the international arena. police. VII. They attacked Coptic Christians. tourists. primarily to the establishment of an Islamic state in Egypt (Rabasa et al. and the economy 89 . GAI interpreted their jihad much more narrowly than groups affiliated or associated with Al Qa’ida. its leaders were convinced that they could accomplish in Egypt what the mujahedeen had achieved in Afghanistan. and the media with the goal of undermining Egyptian state power. While this decision may seem counterintuitive. banks. They believed that their main foe was the Egyptian state and that the near enemy was more worthy of fighting than the distant enemy. they perceived their struggle as regionally confined to the Egyptian territory. the ouster of the “illegitimate” governing power. they decided to renounce violent activity rather than appeal for Al Qa’ida for assistance to continue their existence as a terrorist group.intentions. however. Consequently. who were not already entrenched in Salafi jihadist circles. which gave precedence to doctrinal correctness above all other issues. and exhibited strong anti-Western proclivities. GAI’s theoretical and operational priorities were the product of a literal reading of the Quranic and prophetic texts. GAI members were less receptive to Al Qa’ida’s ideology of global jihad than other groups that have emerged since that time. the GAI has concentrated its efforts on revising its former extremist worldview and distinguishing itself from Qa’ida (Zambelis 2006). politicians. While they attacked Western targets. Explaining the Decision not to Affiliate with Al Qa’ida The leadership of the GAI had longstanding connections with Al Qa’ida. When GAI reemerged in the early 1990s with a renewed sense of purpose after the return of its members from the Afghan jihad.

Thus. a former leader of GAI. in the late 1990s. even with Al Qa’ida’s backing. and Lav 2006) It is possible that in mid-1997. He attempted to rationalize this earlier aggression by suggesting that adopting violence in 1992 " was mainly a reaction to what we saw as the suppression and killing of our brothers” (Carmon. admitted that the group was in a stronger position before it started attacking the government. Osama Rushdie. the security establishment facilitated meetings between the group’s leader and members in Egyptian prisons to ensure that the group honored this commitment.” Between arrests. During their time in prison. wider reading and understanding is evident in the sources on which the leadership relied to compose the revisionist books that they published (Halawi 2002). the ranks of the leadership and general membership were decimated. reunite the groups’ ranks. However.and creating the perception that the Egyptian government could not protect its citizens (Keats 2002). by the turn of the century the group realized that it was useless to try to topple a powerful regime by force. this may have been a maneuver to buy time. after its initiative to end the violence. the relative success of the government’s security policy obligated the group to concede to what its leaders called “military defeat. and severe treatment in prisons and detention facilities. Additionally. 90 . Feldner. the groups’ leaders acquainted themselves with other schools of Islamic thought. In fact. GAI were compelled to shift strategies as a political tactic. Nevertheless. This exceedingly severe security strategy disrupted the ranks and cohesion of GAI prompting the group’s leaders to reconsider its acts and concepts. stiff sentences that included dozens of executions. the effect of their new. and prepare for a new offensive. when several leaders of GAI announced its cease-fire initiative. Reflecting on the seven years of GAI violence between 1992 and 1997. deaths in armed clashes.

GAI would not have been able to defeat the Egyptian government. GAI used terrorism to influence political behavior by devaluing the state in the eyes of its citizens. Terrorist organizations engage in a process of constant adaptation to the strategic environment and are apt to respond to policy-induced changes to their constraints since. Acts of terror induce psychological effects. the bulk of which may be able to make a reasonable calculation that they are not a risk. Thus. it was meant to produce a change in the Egyptian government’s political position. terrorists groups must conduct a sequence of directed attacks that creates a sufficient sense of threat for it to be understood that the campaign will continue unless and until there is a change in state policy (Freedman 2007). A constant failure to achieve its stated goals led to internal strife and its ultimate collapse as a terrorist group. Even with some assistance from Al Qa’ida. Crenshaw’s description of the instrumental approach to assessing terrorist violence is useful for understanding GAI’s rationale. one must note that terrorism depends on the ability to generate the appropriate level of terror and anxiety. nor did GAI members have any interest in targeting the “far enemy.VIII. the group abandoned its violent 91 . The costs of executing attacks became too high and the consequences of adopting a nonviolent position seemed promising (Crenshaw 1987). which must fan out among a possibly substantial population. they lack resources. GAI acted on the basis of its calculation of the benefit to be gained from violent action. Final Observations For GAI. terrorism was a means to a political end.” When GAI was unable to achieve its political goal through terrorism. the costs of attempting violent attacks and of these attacks failing. by definition. However. they changed their strategic tactics. not to destroy the government’s military potential. the consequences of adopting a nonviolent position and the probability of achieving its political goals through terrorist undertakings. Accordingly.

strategy. GAI now appears to be concerned with carving out some political space to operate in Egypt. For GAI. terrorism was merely a means to an end and substitutes were available. 92 .

social bonds served as a “permissive factor”).e. his loosely affiliated. the commanding officers that direct Al Qa’ida’s affiliates.Chapter 8: Conclusion and Discussion – Al Qa’ida’s Commanding Officers: A Skilled Management Team To understand terrorist organizations. In the first chapters. interventions may need to be focused at understanding and disrupting Al Qa’ida’s mid-level management. 93 . or social bonds could motivate local jihadist leaders to enroll in Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program. It is naïve to focus on chief executives. it is necessary to examine the staff that operates at each level of the hierarchy within the system. while social bonds facilitated the process of affiliating (i. While Osama bin Laden’s capture or death would be an important psychological blow to those vested in his invincibility. broad-based Al Qa’ida network augmented by affiliations with various groups has durability that will surpass his mortality. Abdelmalek Droukdal whose desire to revive his group inspired him to associate with Al Qa’ida while the examination of Al Gama’a al-Islamiyya demonstrates why strategic calculations can rouse other organizations to eschew violence and rebuff Al Qa’ida’s forays. Recent studies indicate that strategies aimed at enabling stringent police techniques and punitive military action will not succeed in deterring the Al Qa’ida suicide bombers(Atran 2003). The data collected in this survey and analysis of Al Qa’ida’s leadership has significantly demonstrated that leaders were strongly incentivized by opportunism. the analysis of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb provides an example of an intelligent and shrewd local jihadist leader. Consequently. like Osama bin Laden or Ayman Zawahiri or to concentrate on the suicide bombers who conduct operations. ideology. I posed the question: what motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida? I hypothesized that opportunism. Moreover.

the type of regime against which they are fighting. My data analysis and case studies support these conclusions. Moreover. Psychological surveys indicate that terrorists are not psychologically deviant or ideologically blinded(Sageman 2004). it is not surprising that local jihadist group leaders have opportunistic motives for joining Al Qa’ida. and counterinsurgency tactics” (Laitin and Jacob Shapiro 2008) Like individual terrorists. wish to enhance and promote the organizations that they direct since their personal ambitions are tied to the organization’s viability (Cronin and Ludes 2004).Previous studies depict terrorists as rational actors seeking to maximize political goals (Lake 2003). as was the case with the GSPC (Sederberg 1995). organizations must attract and retain members. Leaders. the fundamental purpose of any political organization is to maintain itself. in particular. there may be a divergence of opinion on precisely what objectives should be 94 . or both. In order to survive. popular support. when the costs of other forms of violence increase. But what are these motives? In fact. Conciliation programs can be a successful counter-terrorism strategy when amnesty is offered to operatives who renounce violence. Factionalism is also common amongst terrorist organizations. groups may lose members to other terrorist groups when a competing group can put together a package of purposive goals and selective incentives that is more appealing than that of the first organization. competition against other rebel groups. One should consider terrorism as “one of a set of rebel tactics that is consciously selected in response to changes in funding. Within the larger understanding of a terrorist group’s political aims. Counterterrorism efforts aimed at winning battles and capturing terrorist actors deplete the ranks of terrorist organizations by physically eliminating combatants. insurgent groups should also be perceived as rational entities that are more likely to adopt terrorist tactics when the benefits of other forms of violence decrease. Since they are rational actors.

However. many groups may choose to align with Al Qa’ida to remain salient. their public image shifts from well-intentioned revolutionaries to common delinquents.pursued. including suicide bombers. Thus. When this occurs. combatants. Bin Laden and Al Qa’ida’s elite cadre have convinced many volunteers to fulfill the duty of jihad and to thus respond to “the call of Allah. 95 . especially in less democratic nations. For example. transforming from an armed group into a political party is no easy feat. Recruiters for Al Qa’ida reportedly told researchers that volunteers were “beating down their doors” to join (Atran 2004). groups may alienate the communities in which they operate by conducting particularly violent or poorly executed operations (Crenshaw 1991).” While it is impossible to know precisely the size of Al Qa’ida due to the decentralized structure of its organization. When loss of membership occurs. when they occupy a “moral high ground”). some groups may find it beneficial to renounce violence and enter the political arena. making recruitment amongst these communities increasingly difficult. Al Qa’ida trained over 5. This divergence compels operatives to defect. In recent years.000 militants in camps in Afghanistan. security sources in Algeria said that the Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb offensive in August 2008 reflected the recruitment of scores of operatives. Al Qa’ida’s recruitment has picked up in 30-40 countries.e. Groups only enjoy popular support when the population believes their actions are justified under the political conditions of the country (i. Al Qa’ida probably has several thousand members and associates. Al Qa’ida can easily dispatch a few combatants to assist local groups in desperate need of increased membership and expertise. Since the 1980s. and those with inside knowledge of the military and police(Gray and Stockham 2008). like the GAI. Al Qa’ida can transfer operatives to help support the local jihadist group since Al Qa’ida’s own recruitment is accelerating. Finally. Thus.

they are perceived as legitimate actors. Al Qa’ida raises awareness amongst Muslims of the grievances that gave rise to its birth. These journalists present Al Qa’ida to the outside world in a supportive manner. their social status is enhanced.e. To complement this strategy. striving for global jihad. In doing so.” To supplement recruitment. as discussed in Chapter 3. of coalition soldiers shooting wounded insurgents inside a mosque. Therefore. Recognizing the powerful potential of the media. Al Qa’ida is a high-value global brand that is esteemed amongst the Salafi community. Before joining forces with Al Qa’ida. For instance. In fact. By aligning with Al Qa’ida. Al Qa’ida encourages potential operatives to follow in the footsteps of their pious predecessors (i. upon aligning with Al Qa’ida. Al Qa’ida established a communications committee to promote this representation through a well-executed publicity campaign. depicting its operatives as “freedom fighters. groups gain credibility and respect that can be effectively leveraged to increase recruitment. Al Qa’ida has substantially promoted and publicized its image throughout the globe. primarily by means of the Qatari television station al-Jazeera. Al Qa’ida uses propaganda to foster its positive public image as the defender of Islam. or of occupation forces stepping with their boots on the backs of Arabic men that have just been bound 96 . However.Additionally. the Muslim warriors of the crusader period) by establishing a territorial base for Islam and by protecting those who are oppressed by foreign domination(Henzel 2005). many terrorist groups are compared to criminal gangs. Through a program of propaganda and indoctrination. recruits are shown provocative photos of Iraqi women and children killed or bloodied by Western bombardment. Al Qa’ida also selects sympathetic journalists to whom it grants interviews (Schweitzer 2008). which produces the professional tapes and promotional film clips disseminated throughout the Arab and Western world. Bin Laden has created a company called al-Sahab.

Al Qa’ida is infamous for providing terrorist training and for establishing sites and camps where recruits are educated.000 of Al Qa’ida seed money (Ward 2005). and mentored. it effectively encourages redemption through faith and sacrifice. Finally. Abdelmalek Droukdal certainly modeled his publicity efforts on that of Al Qa’ida and benefited from advice from Al Qa’ida’s media branch. 97 . physical environment. known as Hambali and Ali Gufron. and weapons. Thus. For instance. financial services. Al Qa’ida’s veterans can offer groups tactical and strategic advice.000 to $600. equipment. tyrants gained dominance over the Muslims in every aspect and every land”(Calvert 2004). Al Qa’ida can offer groups financial resources. For example. nature of the military and intelligence services. According to several reports. Al Qa’ida can help groups conduct attacks. helped Jemaah Islamiyah plan and execute the 2002 Bali bombing that killed more than 2000 people (Abuza 2003). etc. Riduan Isamuddin. Because of that. Al Qa’ida established numerous local military training facilities in Mindanao and Indonesia in the last two decades. due to its exceptional intelligence-gathering skills. even death. Moreover. Ansar al-Islam was started with $300. known as Muklhas. It can also offer groups information on the government. Such emotional narratives highlight the theme of humiliation at the hand of callous and arrogant Western powers(Hafez 2007). indoctrinated. Al Qa’ida’s affiliates learn from Al Qa’ida how to conduct comparable propaganda campaigns in their home countries to attract and enhance their own recruitment efforts. Al Qa’ida also attributes Muslim societies’ “greatest misfortune and decadence to their abandonment of jihad due to the love of this world and abhorrence of death.and forced to the ground with black sacks over their faces. both alumni of the Afghan jihad.

but also create and promote “heroes” that represent the organization. By joining Al Qa’ida. demonstrate that the organization has a loyal and impassioned following. rather than abandon their mission. local jihadist leaders are presented with appealing and cost effective opportunities to bolster their own recruitment and ensure organizational survival and their ability to achieve their political aims without abandoning arms and investigating political avenues. Since Al Qa’ida provides local jihadist group leaders with numerous opportunities to stimulate and expand their organizations. local jihadist group leaders are positioned to seek assistance from their colleagues when decline within their own organizations seems imminent. in particular. Efforts should ensure that the necessary resources (both human and 98 . Suicide attacks. Moreover.Conducting attacks connotes a high degree of devotion and strength to potential recruits. it may be futile for counterterrorist forces to discourage local jihadist group leaders from soliciting Al Qa’ida. just as a conventional military organization might glamorize its heroes to inspire others to volunteer for field military actions. Instead. While not a precipitant cause for an affiliation. social networks can be thought of as a stipulation that pre-structures and facilitates the merger process. Due to these associations. Also. thereby making such affiliations more problematic and risky. the results of this study suggest that most local jihadist group leaders have already established significant social bonding and networking with members of Al Qa’ida Central Command. Such missions create publicity events that effectively advertise the organization and psychologically appeal to individual needs to feel important and meaningful through membership in a “higher” movement (Atran 2003). martyrdom operations not only produce spectacular incidents of large-scale destruction. and because such affiliations are not difficult to initiate due to the existence of prior social connections. strategies should be developed to isolate these groups from Al Qa’ida.

This system is also used to store and disseminate information on extradition. terrorists have learned how to make legal immigration channels and legitimate immigrant communities serve their lethal jihadist ends. To thwart Al Qa’ida’s connections with local jihadist groups. In the age of globalization. and illegal migrants” (Ross 2003). border control measures must be established to prevent the movement of terrorists and terror-related materials. If groups are precluded from affiliating with Al Qa’ida. third-country nationals refused entry to the EU and individuals 99 . Unilateral approaches to border control will leave a mismatch of contradictory national policies. especially Muslim. stolen cars and other stolen property as well as biometric data. Bin Laden has devoted less attention and resources to AQIM. state borders were opened to international trade flows. Throughout the 1990s. former Secretary of Homeland Security. it is necessary to treat carefully because restrictive “fortress” responses and sweeping immigrant surveillance hinder cooperation with key immigrant. portrayed US borders as “conduits for terrorists. Tom cannot be exchanged between Al Qa’ida and its weaker partner. The new Schengen Information System computer database contains information on criminals on the run. A model system is that which is utilized in the European Union. some suggest that AQIM’s globalization process has been impeded by the expulsion of AL Qa’ida in Iraq (AQI) from Baghdad in 2008. In areas like the Core Arab states and the Maghreb. For instance. they are less likely to survive or recuperate from setbacks. which features a common visa policy and region-wide fingerprint or iris photography database. communities. previous asylum applications. governments should implement a networked border monitoring and border control system. Since the Iraqi branch of Al Qa’ida suffered this setback. Thus. weapons of mass destruction. However. thereby crippling its ability to supersede a regional dimension (Filiu 2009).

The United States can provide assistance to foreign governments to enhance operational capacity to tighten border controls. After the merger. and aviation security capacity (Kagwanja 2006). While there were no significant patterns in the data on the operational and logistic role of the leaders profiled. an understanding might be developed of what government initiatives trigger terrorist organizations to seek partnerships with Al Qa’ida and of the strength of the alliance that materializes as a result. These predictive models could be used in order to develop strategies for a pre-emptive counter-response. The second question that I sought to answer involved the type of role local jihadist leaders played within Al Qa’ida. etc. By understanding what function local jihadist leaders play. granted more interviews. it appears that most leaders took on an increasingly ideological role after the merger. the leaders issued more communiqués.subject to a European arrest warrant or under surveillance for criminal activity(One Single EU Border 2005) A system for region-wide arrests would also be useful in areas where terrorist activity is high. 100 . counterterrorist forces can better undermine these leaders. Future research will center on the development of predictive models based on emerging patterns among terrorist groups that align with Al Qa’ida. Future research may also focus on how alliances mature and evolve over time since this article focuses on aspects of maturity among terrorist groups who have engaged in networking with Al Qa’ida. police training. whereby $50 million for security programs administered by the US Department of Defense was offered to East African states to provide for military training for border control and security of the coastline. gave more speeches. For example. One impressive program was the East Africa Counter Terrorism Initiative. I considered leadership roles before and after the affiliation to uncover trends.

Siad Barre. These groups enjoyed popularity in Somalia in the 60s due to their attempts to regain lost Somali land after independence and to their resistance to dictator. The roots of most of the terrorist networks included in this study can be traced to geographically separate. interactive communication patterns. a high degree of decision influence. Central to Al Qa’ida’s vision is the awakening of the Muslim ummah. al-Ittihad al-Islami was established in the 1980s through the merger of Salafi groups. they gained the support of the Somali people through nationalist causes more than through a common affinity for Salafism. leader-member value agreement. one must consider the philosophy and ambitions of local jihadist groups compared to Al Qa’ida. an ideology that was widely unpopular in the country in previous years (West 2006). Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are uniquely positioned to persuade uncommitted followers that Al Qa’ida has a better ideology. As mentioned in earlier chapters. he demands that his commanding officers convince their operatives to adopt and accept Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are tightly coupled to their operatives. unified struggle that transcends local. ethno-religious struggles. and regional concerns. state. the worldwide community of believers(Sutton and Vertigans 2006). In contrast. When local jihadist leaders are not interested in promoting this agenda. and subordinate loyalty. an affiliation will not occur. The dyadic relationship between these leaders and their followers is characterized by high quality leader-member exchange resulting from frequent communication. Consequently. effective influence tactics. For example. Although Bin Laden wants to align with local militant groups with country-specific grievances to increase his global reach and influence. The leaders of local jihadist groups develop differentiated relationships with their 101 . as was the case with the GAI.To understand why this increase in evangelizing and political activity of these leaders occurs. Al Qa’ida conceives its resistance as a single.

through their ideological operations. Thus. In doing so. Like Al 102 . and interviews. followers trust their leaders and can be persuaded to engage in activities that they otherwise would not and can be encouraged to move beyond their own self-interest to focus on larger mutual interests(Graen and Uhl-Bien 1995). Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers correspond with their cohorts through communiqués. in which they clarify their vision. operatives must also integrate new tactics and strategies into their repertoire. When a group first affiliates with Al Qa’ida. Due to such high quality leader-member exchange. In addition to accepting Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program. When the security situation does not permit direct communications. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers can convince their operatives to integrate their previous regional ambitions with a wider transnational Islamic agenda. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers can ground their message in the narrative elements most likely to resonate with this target group. For instance. culture shock is inevitable. rather than using an average leadership style. as Droukdal did on numerous occasions. they subordinate their radical group to Al Qa’ida’s strategic goals and move their localized Islamic resistance beyond sovereign state boundaries to transcend provincial frames of reference. Moreover. they can apply effective message management.rapports. rhetoric. and spin. Valuable insights can be gained by considering the role that managers play when two companies merge in order to understand the role that Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play in mitigating culture shock and encouraging integration. speeches. followers are encouraged to take personal initiative and exercise personal leadership to make their unit more effective. the GSPC was encouraged to engage in suicide and arson attacks(Guidère 2007). Because they know their audience well. Based on these motivational communications. due to their close relationship with operatives.

often accompanied by frustration and depression. Although some of the groups that Al Qa’ida merges with have less than five hundred operatives. a corporation may encourage teamwork while the venture it subsumes may be more oriented towards individual initiatives. This can only be achieved by providing ideological guidance through leadermember exchanges and through public communications and appearances. patterned.” For example. major change and generate a great deal of uncertainty due to the fact that organizational cultures are underpinned by deep assumptions that are constant. These are identical to Dr. Employees’ reactions most often pass through four distinct stages.Qa’ida’s commanding officers. mergers represent sudden. In addition. When corporate mergers occur. and shared. next emotional bargaining begins. The threat to old corporate values and organizational lifestyle leaves organizational members in a state of defensiveness accentuated by low levels of trust within the institution. For Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers and corporate transition managers. Helen Kubler-Ross’s four stages of bereavement or 103 . Droukdal issued a communiqué explaining and justifying this repositioning. one of the most common difficulties that arise during the merger is “cultural differences. transition managers must make the case for integration to large numbers of employees. They commence with disbelief and denial and pass into anger and then rage and resentment. shared vision of future organizational arrangements (Marks and Mirvis 2000). the burden of responsibility still rests on the commanding officers to assuage their followers after the affiliation with Al Qa’ida commences. transition mangers assume full-time responsibility and accountability for making integration work. Both transition managers and Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers must be skilled in relinquishing and helping others relinquish past values and practices that are not in tune with the current. finally acceptance occurs. Soon after the GSPC announced its merger with Al Qa’ida.

transition managers (and Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers) must define the new “combination” goals. Moreover. 1997). Finally. Leaders hoping to initiative organizational change and general follower acceptance face a daunting task.grief. When a merger occurs. they must inspire hope. and desired end state. principles. Finally. they should clarify critical success factors for the merger. successfully promote change by implementing and campaigning for a unique vision of the organization through a publicity campaign. and support necessary changes in behaviors and culture to successfully realize the post-combination organization. optimism. A wide range of factors affect organizational change as produced during a merger. and a sense that the future will be better than the past through their speeches and other outreach activities. Leaders. like Droukdal. What the operative grapples with is akin to the “death” of the previous organization and the letting go of this relationship (Cartwright and Cooper 1990). promote. Effective leaders possess powerful persuasive personal characteristics and execute actions designed to change internal organizational culture and substance. It is their responsibility to define. anticipate the impact of change. In this context. 104 . Communication should be their major priority throughout the merger process. they should serve as role models on how to “work together” for the goals of the organization. These initiatives can only be achieved by assuming an ideological role (Kavanagh and Ashkanasy 2006). and address inconsistencies between the espoused operating principles and actual management of change. They must assuage their followers’ fears and convince them of the saliency and relevance of the new program through constant communication. leadership can be viewed as the art of mobilizing others to want to struggle for shared aspirations (Covin et al.

Proxies must manage from affair and this sort of counter-terrorism publicity campaign. Counterterrorist forces can also harness the power of the “Shayma effect” (which refers to an incident where an Egyptian schoolgirl was killed in a jihadist attack) by broadcasting images off jihadist attacks that have killed Muslim children. like the GAI. It is important to remember that some groups. especially religious ones. another principle Islamist militant group in Egypt. Thus. authorities can publicize the rejection of Al Qa’ida by credible local figures. This program should expose tension between Al Qa’ida leadership and supporters. For example. do opt to renounce violence.Understanding Al Qa’ida’s commanding officer’s role as transition managers during a merger is important when designing initiatives to undermine their efforts. Approaching communications in this manner ensures that the government avoids exacerbating feelings of alienation within Muslim communities. government communications strategy should build an attractive alternative to the Al Qa’ida worldview by appealing to a sense of deracinated nationalism. several leaders of GAI and Al-Jihad al-Islami. counterterrorist units should channel messages through volunteers in Internet forums(Brachman and McCants 2006). For 105 . For instance. Counterterrorism units can use media organizations to launch global propaganda pushes that will taint the Al Qa’ida brand and make it even less attractive to local militants. In fact. Moreover. My data indicates that these commanding officers are leading Al Qa’ida’s growing media offensive. The media has become a crucial battlefield in the current conflict against radical Islamic terrorism (Blanchard 2006). Such propaganda will appeal to communities anxious to retain their cultural heritage and religious integrity. messaging should refute the imputation of malign Western intention in the Muslim world and undermine the notion that terrorism is authentically Islamic. have taken steps to promote peaceful co-existence with the government and society(Gunaratna and Ali 2009).

Ayman Al Zawahiri acknowledges that the struggle between the secular governments in the West and the militant jihadists of Al Qa’ida is a “battle of ideologies. and a war with no truce” (Payne 2009). a struggle for survival. Ed Husain and Shiraz Maher were two young British Muslims who became involved with radical Islamist politics with Hizb ut-Tahir before renouncing their affiliation and speaking out publicly about the dangers of intolerant Islamism (MacEoin 2007). Our government should also realize this truism. along with their PCS and data files. the government should continue to capture Al Qa’ida news and production staff. courage and commitment in countering al-Qaida propaganda and recruitment activity. 106 . Salafi and Islamist communities in London have consistently demonstrated skill. The leaders of the Western world should follow suit. This study indicates that Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are playing an increasingly ideological role. Moreover.instance. The collapse of Al Qa’ida’s propaganda operations will also cause the Arab media to move towards more coverage of the legitimate Iraqi government.

“Egypt's Gama'ah Islamiyah: The Turnabout and its Ramifications.” Al-Ahram Center for Political & Strategic Studies. L. 2001. Inc.” Science 299(5612): 1534-1539. The Threats.17049. Atran. 2006.” Politique Étrangère 3. 1st ed. Bergen. Mark. Available at: http://acpss. Scott. “The Political Revival of Islam: the Case of Egypt. Holy War. 2007. National Consortium for the Study of terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. 2004. Black. “The Reconstituted Al-Qaeda Threat in the Maghreb. 2009]. Algeria: Violence Returns. Youssef.start. New York: Simon & Schuster. Aboul-Enein.BIBLIOGRAPHY: Abdel [Accessed May 14. Andrew. Peter. 2004.mi5. 2009]. P. Peter. Free Press. Available at: http://www. “Going to the Source: Why Al Qaeda’s Financial Network Is Likely to Withstand the Current War on Terrorist Al Qaida's Ideology. “L’Afrique et la «Guerre Contre la Terreur».: Inside the Secret World of Osama bin Laden. New York: Free Press. 2007. Antil.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 25(2): 169-200. Zachary. 107 . Ayubi. About START. Available at: http://www. [Accessed January 1. Airforce University Maxwell. Bergen. Bergen.” The Washington Quarterly 27(3): 67-90. Abuza. Ayman Al-Zawahiri: The Ideologue of Modern Islamic Militancy. 2009]. 2003. Holy war.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 27: 169-185. “Genesis of Suicide Terrorism. 2002. 1980. Inc.” International Journal of Middle East Studies: 481-499.ahram. “Mishandling Suicide Terrorism. Alain.” Terrorism Monitor 5(2): 7-12. Wahid.html [Accessed May 14. 2004. Scott.: inside the secret world of Osama bin Laden. The Osama bin Laden I know: an oral history of al Qaeda's leader. Basile. Nazih. 2006. African Research Bulletin (23): 17045 . 2003.umd. “Funding Terrorism in Southeast Asia: The Financial Network of Al Qaeda and Jemaah Islamiya.

“Al Qaeda in the Maghreb: The" Newest" Front in the War on Terror. “The Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions on People at Work: Existing Research and Issues. and Cary Cooper. 1990. The GSPC: Newest Franchise in al-Qa'ida's Global Jihad. 1987. 2004. Martha. 2006. Washington. Calvert. Crenshaw. Blom. Politics and Terrorism: An Assessment of the Origin and Threat of Terrorism in Egypt. and Louis Martínez. “Leadership Style and Post-Merger Satisfaction.” International Security 31(1): 7-48. K. Crenshaw.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 29(4): 309-321. Anthony.” In 2005 Index of Economic Freedom. L. Carmon. 11. Laetitia Bucaille. “Al Qaeda: Statements and Evolving Ideology. Anneli. 2003. The Middle East Media Research Institute. 2006. The Enigma of Islamist Violence. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies. 2007. Sue. 2008. Christopher.” Comparative Strategy 22(3): 207-221.: The Heritage Foundation. Martha.” Terrorism and political violence 3(1): 6987. Boudali.” Journal of Strategic Studies 10(4): 13-31.” Mediterranean Quarterly 19(1): 80. Covin. J. Audrey. Storming Media.” Journal of Management Development 16(1): 22-33.” British Journal of Management 1(2): 65-76. The Al-Gama'a Al-Islamiyya Cessation of Violence: An Ideological Reversal. Ariel. 2005. Cartwright. “How Terrorism Declines. London: C Hurst & Co Publishers Ltd.” In Al-Qaeda: An Organization to be Reckoned With. Jarret. 2007. Carafano. “The Mythic Foundations of Radical Islam. 2006.C. and William McCants. “How Al-Qaida ends: The decline and demise of terrorist groups. 2006. J. “Promoting Freedom and Democracy: Fighting the War of Ideas Against Islamic Terrorism. “Theories of Terrorism: Instrumental and Organizational Approaches. Cohen. Available at: http://memri. Y. “Stealing Al Qaeda's Playbook. “Global Terrorism and the Global Economy: Unpeaceful Coexistence.cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA30906 [Accessed February 3. Amelie. Nova Publishers. Cronin. Brachman. Botha. D. p. 108 .Blanchard. 2009]. Teresa et al.” Orbis 48(1): 29-41. Y Feldner. John. 2006. 1991. 1997. and D Lav.

and J. Graen.Cronin. “Political Islam and violence.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 30(7): 593-613. Fawaz. “Militant Recruitment in Pakistan: Implications for Al Qaeda and Other Organizations. Felter. Washington. “Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Fishman. Fair. Christine.” Foreign Affairs 81(4): 60-74. Gershman. Harmony and Disharmony: Exploiting al-Qa'ida's Organizational Vulnerabilities.” Government and Opposition 42(3): 314339.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 27(6): 489-504. Joe et al. “Terrorism as a Strategy.” African Affairs 103(412): 459-464. Available at: http://oai. Dickson. 1995. 2007. 1995. 2003. Stephen. George B.. Brian. 2002. 2004. “The Leaderless Nexus: When Crime and Terror Converge. Najib. and Tobin Hengsen. “Hacking Networks of Terror. 2004. 2007. Donatella. D. 9 [Accessed December 4.” New Political Science 22(1): 77-88. Desouza. 2000.” Dialogue IO 1(01): 1-14. 2000. Ellis. Stein. “Is Southeast Asia the Second Front?. Political Islam in Sub-Saharan Africa. 2004.C. 2005. Kevin.dtic. Dishman.” The Leadership Quarterly 6(2): 219247. “Left-Wing Terrorism in Italy. and Mary Uhl-Bien. David. and James Ludes. 2005..” In Terrorism in Context. Ghadbian. Freedman. 2006.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 28(3): 237-252. R. Gerges. Attacking Terrorism: Elements of a Grand Strategy. 109 . “Using the Mistakes of al Qaeda's Franchises to Undermine Its Strategies. Counterterrorism Center. G. Lawrence. “Connectivity among Terrorist Groups: A Two Models Business Maturity Approach. Audrey. Diebert.” The Middle East Journal: 592-612. Della Porta. 2008]. J. Chris. 2008. “The End of the Islamist Insurgency in Egypt?: Costs and Prospects.: United States Institute for Peace. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 618(1): 46. “Briefing: the Pan-Sahel Initiative.

2003. 110 .asp [Accessed December 6. “The Origins of al Qaeda’s Ideology: Implications for US Strategy.ahram. Hoffman. Jebnoun. 2009].” Parameters 35(1): 69-80. 2nd ed. 2009. 2007.” Strategic Insights 5(8). H. Trends in Terrorism. D. Mathieu. Available at: http://ctc. Harmony Database Released Documents: Al Qa'ida Goals and Structure.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 27(4): 549-560.” Terrorism and Political Violence 19: 95-115. 2007.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 26(6): 429-442. “Martyrdom Mythology in Iraq: How Jihadists Frame Suicide Terrorism in Videos and Biographies. “Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb: the evolution from Algerian Islamism to transnational terror. Hafez. Rohan.” African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 2(4): 091-097.htm [Accessed May 19. “The Post-Madrid Face of Al Qaeda. Rohan. and Chris Wyckloff. 2002. 2005. Columbia University Press. Gyves. 2006. Gunaratna. and Mbin Ali. Hoffman. Mohammed. 2006. Cliff. 2007. Halawi. Inside Al Qaeda: Global Network of Terror. Inside Terrorism. Georgetown University: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies.” Foreign Affairs 72(3): 22-49. GSPC): An Operational Analysis. Hoffman. 2004. and Future Potentialities: An Assessment. “De-Radicalization Initiatives in Egypt: A Preliminary Insight. Noureddine. Gunaratna. Christopher. Combating Terrorism Center: . Samuel. Guidère. B. 2008]. Stockham. Henzel. “Time for a Historic Reconciliation?.” Al-Ahram Weekly On-line. Is the Maghreb the “Next Afghanistan"?: Mapping the Radicalization of the Algerian Salafi Jihadist Movement. Gunaratna. Al-Qaïda à la Conquête du Maghreb : Le Terrorisme aux Portes de l'Europe. Jailan.usma.” The Washington Quarterly 27(3): 91-100. Bruce.Gray. R. “The Clash of Civilizations?. Available at: http://weekly. 2006. Editions du Rocher. “Algerian Groupe Salafiste de la Predication et le Combat (Salafi Group for Call and Combat. and E. “Al Qaeda. 2002. Columbia University Press. Bruce. 2004.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 32(4): 277-291. “The Changing Face of Al Qaeda and the Global War on Terrorism.

Islamic Group. Weeding. Schrijver. Available at: http://www. Thomas H. and P.cdi. 2003.” Journal of Contemporary African Studies 25(1): 141-166. M. 2003. “New friends. The Hijacking of British Islam. Luong. “Rational Extremism: Understanding Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century. Denis. Combating a Modern Hydra Al Qaeda and the Global War on Terrorism. Smith. and Organizational Sources of Terrorism. 2002. Keats. E. “In the Spotlight: Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya . old strategies.M. Economic Development.” Institute for Security Studies. Kostrzebski. and M. “The Shadow of Muhammad: Developing a Charismatic Leadership Model for the Islamic World. MacEoin... Ashkanasy. Marion. W. “The Impact of Leadership and Change Management Strategy on Organizational Culture and Individual Acceptance of Change during a Merger.Johnson.cfm [Accessed May 19. Wells. and Jacob Shapiro. “The Political. David. Anthony. Pauline. Kagwanja. Laitin. 2007. and Erika Weinthal.” Terrorism. “Counter-terrorism in the Horn of Africa: New security frontiers. “Looking for the Pattern: Al Qaeda in Southeast Asia--The Genealogy of a Terror Network. Peter. B. Economic.” Journal of Public and International Affairs 15. Lake. J. Policy Exchange.. 2004.L. Marie” Foreign Affairs 81(2): 61-70. 2006. Kansas: Combat Studies Institute. new fears in Central Asia. and Mary Uhl-Bien. 2008.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 26(6): 443-457. Kavanagh.R. “The War on Terror in a Haze of Dust: Potholes and Pitfalls on the Saharan Front. 2007.” : 73.” Dialogue IO 1(01): 15-29. D. 2002. L.. Kalic. 2006. 2006. Fort Leavenworth.” British Journal of Management 17(S1): S81-S103. and Political Openness: 209. Sarapu. 2005. David.” Emergence 5(1): 54-76.” Center for Defense Information. 111 . “Targeting the Leadership of Terrorist and Insurgent Movements: Historical Lessons for Contemporary Policy Makers.” Strategic Insights 5(8). 2009]. and Neal M. African Security Review 15(3). Langdon. Russ. “An Introduction to a Special Issue of Strategic Insights: Analyses of the Groupe Salafiste pour la Prédication et le Combat (GSPC) . and M. “Complexity theory and Al-Qaeda: Examining complex leadership. 2003. Jones. A. Lecocq. Sean. 2002.

” Defense Studies 7(3): 338-357. 2002. Michael.euractiv. and Maoz Rosenthal.iht. “Leadership in complex organizations. “Altruism and fatalism: The characteristics of Palestinian suicide terrorists. and Phillip Mirvis. Rabasa. “Complexity Theory and Al-Qaeda: Examining Complex Leadership . E. Russ. and L. Shaul. A. Kenneth. and Mary Uhl-Bien. 2003. 112 .php?page=2 [Accessed March 17. “The Legend and Legacy of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. “Al Qaeda as a Dune Organization: Toward a Typology of Islamic Terrorist Organizations. 2005.” International Herald Tribune. Denny. and Alliances: Creating an Effective Transition Structure. and “Winning the Battle of Ideas: Propaganda. insurgents gain a lifeline from Al Qaeda .” Riedel. 2003. M.” Emergence 5(1): 54-76. Acquisitions. Euractiv. 2004. 2000. Angel et al. Mitchell. Bruce. Moss. “Beyond Al Qaeda: Part 2. 2001.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 32(2): [Accessed May 18. 1949-99. A. and Kevin Price. 2005. M. Sprinzak. Perliger. 2007. “Al Qaeda Strikes Back. Weinberg.” Deviant Behavior 24(4): 405-424. and Terror.” Terrorism and Political Violence 15(1): 171-184.” Organizational Dynamics 28(3): 35-47. “In Algeria.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 27(4): 2006. 2009]. Post. “ Al Qaeda and the Innovative Firm: Demythologizing the Network. Mishal. Payne. “Managing Mergers. “Unilateral presidential powers: Significant executive orders. Ideology. One Single EU Border. 2009]. George.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 32(2): 109-128. Pedahzur. “The terrorists in their own words: Interviews with 35 incarcerated Middle Eastern terrorists. McAllister. Bruce. The Outer Rings of the Terrorist Universe.” The Leadership Quarterly 12(4): 389-418.Emergence. 2006.. 2009. 2007. and Mary Uhl-Bien.Marion. Kenneth. Mayer..” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 28(4): 275-293. Russ. Marks.” Foreign Affairs 86(3): 24-40. Marion. Available at: http://www. 2008. Available at: http://www. J. Michael.

Joshua. 2002. David. 2004. Schweitzer. Ross. Sederberg. and Nikolas Gvosdev. Guido. Sandler. Steven. 2004. 2007. Bruce.. “Al Qaeda and its affiliates: A global tribe waging segmental warfare?. Enders. Sageman. Securitizing Migration after 11 March. 2003. Sutton. and Future. Stacher. Marc. Steinberg. T. “Protean Enemy. 2003. Graham. 2008. and Stephen Vertigans. Sageman. Shapiro. Jessica. and W. Hunting Leadership Targets in Counterinsurgency and Counterterrorist Operations. James. Joint Special Operations University. 2008. The Terrorist's Challenge: Security. 2008. “An economic perspective on transnational terrorism. 2005. Takeyh. J. Peter. N. Yamatz.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 11(1): 101-115. Efficiency. Phillip. “Post-Islamist Rumblings in Egypt: The Emergence of the Wasat party.” First Monday 10(3). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. University of Pennsylvania Press. Stern. Rogers. Marc. “A Turkish al-Qaeda: The Islamic Jihad Union and the Internationalization of Uzbek Jihadism. “Istishad as an Ideological and Practical Tool in the Hands of AlQaeda. 2004. 113 . 1995. Stanford University: Center for International Security and Cooperation. Leaderless Jihad: Terror Networks in the Twenty-First Century. “Beyond the Abu Sayyaf.” Strategic Insights. The.” European Journal of Political Economy 20(2): 301-316. Brookings Institution Press. Turbiville. 2007. Al-Qa'ida and Social Movement Theory.” Journal of Peace Research: 295-312.” Foreign Affairs 82(4): 27-40. “Conciliation as Counter-Terrorist Strategy. Understanding Terror Networks.Riedel. Ray. Ideology.” The Washington Quarterly 25(3): 97-108. 2008. 2006. Ronfeldt.” The Middle East Journal: 415-432.” Journal of National Defense Studies 6: 25. 2002.” Foreign Affairs 83(1): 15-21. Real Instituto El Cano. “Do Terrorist Networks Need a Home?. Control. The Search for al Qaeda: Its Leadership. “Islamic "New Social Movements"? Radical Islam.

2006.Uruena. Wright. United States Air Force Counterproliferation Center. West. 114 . “International Law as Administration: The UN's 1267 sanctions Committee and the Making of the War on terror. Vintage. 2007. “Somalia’s ICU and Its Roots in al-Ittihad al-Islami. Rene. Osama's Wake: The Second Generation of Al Qaeda. Max. ews%5BbackPid%5D=239&no_cache=1 [Accessed January 1. Lawrence. Chris. Blake . Zambelis. 2008. Terrorism Monitor 4: 15. Available at: http://www. 2006. 2009].” International Organizations Law Review 4(2): 321-342. The Looming Tower: Al Qaeda and the Road to 9/11. 1968. “Egyptian Gama'a al-Islamiyya's Public Relations Campaign . Weber. 2005. On Charisma and Institution Building.” Jamestown Foundation. University of Chicago Press.” Terrorism Focus 3(35). Ward.jamestown.

Appendix I: List of Terrorist Groups Merger al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at al-Tawhid walJihad) Egyptian Islamic Jihad al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat) Libyan Islamic Fighting Group Partnership Ansar al-Islam/Jund alIslam/Ansar al-Sunnah Asbat al-Ansar Taliban Islamic Jihad Union Lashkar-e-Jhangvi Lashkar-e-Taiba Tunisian Combatant Group Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group Jemaah Islamiya Abu Sayyaf Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahidin Jaish-e-Mohammad al-Ittihaad al-Islami Eritrean Islamic Jihad Movement Collaboration Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan Yemen Islamic Jihad Aden Abyan Islamic Army Unaffiliated (Control) Al-Gama’a alIslamiyya 115 .

“Shadowy Trail of al-Qaida in Iraq Leader. Peter L. Available at: http://www. 2009].com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2006/06/12/iraq_mulls_talks_with_rebels/ [Accessed January 3. Parker. “Masri Now Leads Iraq Al Qaeda. Gregory. Available at: http://www.S.cjtf7.125. 2006. 2009].ece [Accessed March 4. Available at: http://www. 2009]. 2007. and Ibon Villelabeitia. 2006a.cnn. Wolf. “Maliki Aide Who Discussed Amnesty Leaves II: Sources by Terrorist Group Al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at alTawhid wal-Jihad) Benson. Smith.132/search?q=cache:74UX2mQ_i-0J:www.html [Accessed January 2. 2009].mnfiraq. Available at: http://74. Jim. Available at: [Accessed March 4.html [Accessed January 2.Iraq.” The Times of London. New Al-Qaida in Iraq Leader Reported .” The Washington Post: A01.” The Washington Post.pdf+khalid+almashadani&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=24&gl=us&client=firefox-a [Accessed January [Accessed January 2.capture/index. Knickmeyer. Multinational Force .army. 2006. 2009].com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/02/AR2007050202036.” Operation Iraq Freedom: Official Website of the Multi-National Force .” Backgrounder. Rutenberg.”” Boston. 2009].” The Situation Room. “President Links Qaeda of Iraq to Qaeda of 9/11. Amit.washingtonpost. “The Mysterious Heir to al-Zarqawi . 2009].uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article674098. 2008.Iraq. and Jonathan Finer. Blitzer. 2009].aspx?briefingslideid=309 [Accessed January 2. Kathy. Available at: http://www.msnbc.timesonline. Available at: http://www.” New York Times. “Abu Hamza al-Muhajir. The Osama Bin Laden I Available at: http://transcripts. Gannon. “Insurgent Leader Al-Zarqawi Killed in Iraq.html [Accessed March [Accessed March 4. 2009].” The Washington Post. Department of MSNBC. Ellen. 2006. “Al-Qaeda in Iraq Update. 2009]. New York: Free Press.45. 2009]. Coalition Officials Say. Knickmeyer. DoD News Briefing. Ned.02. 2007. Paley. Bergen. and Rana Gargour-Sabbagh. Bergner.cfr. 2007.: Senior al Qaeda in Iraq Leader Held. 116 . 2006b. Pam. Garamone.washingtonpost. 2008. Karouny.msn. Kaplan.nytimes. Available at: Eben.S. “Al Qaeda in Iraq Chooses Zarqawi Successor. 2007.aspx?id=16029 [Accessed January 3. Available at: http://www. MNF-I Press Brief – Operational Update . and Jonathan Finer.” The Washington Post: A22. Kevin. Jim.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=16576&Itemid=131 [Accessed January 2. 2009]. 2006. 2007.defenselink.html [Accessed March 3. 2007. “U. 2009]. and Mark Mazzetti. Zarqawi's Mysterious Successor (aka Abu Ayub al-Masri) . Available at: http://www. Mariam. “Starr Reports Live from Ramadi Iraq.” CNN. Available at: http://www. “Al-Qaeda in Iraq Leader May Be in Afghanistan. Department of Available at: http://www.

“The Reconstituted Al-Qaeda Threat in the Maghreb. “Terrorist’s Odyssey: Saga of Dr. 2007.” Time. A. Higgins. Available at: http://www. Andrew. 2009b. Raphaeli.” Wall Street Journal.” Council on Foreign Relations. “Profile: Ayman al-Zawahiri. 2009]. Antil. New York: Taylor & Francis. Hudson Teslik.asp?id=5832 [Accessed January 14.html [Accessed April 8. and A. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. Available at: http://www.cfr. Available at: http://www.” The New Yorker. David.” The Telegraph. Wright.php?storyId=12060238 [Accessed January 2.” Council on Foreign Relations. New York: Broadway.17049. David.cfr. Says al Qaeda in Iraq Leader Not Captured.Council on Foreign Relations. Zawahiri. “Ayman Muhammad Rabi’Al-Zawahiri: The Making of an Arch-Terrorist. 2009]. “Al-Qaeda Founder Launches Fierce Attack on Osama bin Laden . Laura. Available at: http://www.html [Accessed January 14.alqaedafree/index. Alain. 2003. Mohammed et al. Wertheimer. “Profile: Abu Musab al-Zarqawi . Lee Hudson.start.telegraph. Cairo: Dar AlHamrousa.html [Accessed March 4. M.time. Bjorgo. Bergen. CNN Programs.” Terrorism Monitor 5(2): 7-12. African Research Bulletin (23): 17045 . Black. 2005. 2009] “Al-Qaeda Founder Launches Fierce Attack on Osama bin Laden.” Politique étrangère 3. 2009]. [Accessed March 11. L. “Al-Qaida in Iraq Figure in Custody : NPR. 2007.Tawfeeq.telegraph. Ibrahim.npr. Available at: http://www.1187180. Cullison. 2006.00. 2002. 2008.” CNN. Available at: 2009]. Ayman Al Zawahiri. Egyptian Islamic Jihad. Available at: Peter. 2009].” The Telegraph. 2009]. 2009].org/publication/9866/ [Accessed March 3. Leaving Terrorism Behind. 117 . The Al Qaeda Reader. Tore.html [Accessed January 14.umd. 2002.9171. “Ayman al-Zawahiri. His Own Words: A Translation of the Writings of Dr.” National Public Radio. 2006. 2009].” Terrorism and Political Violence 14(4): 1-22. Mansfield.html [Accessed March 12. 2002. and John Burnett. 2009a. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www. Raymond. Nimrod. “The Rebellion Within. Ayman al-Zawahiri. Ayman Al-Zawahiri Kamaa Aaraftu/Ayman Al-Zawahiri As I Knew Him. 2006. “U. Lee. “L’Afrique et la «guerre contre la terreur». Egyptian Islamic Jihad Al-Zayat. TLG Publications. Blair.cnn. Al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat) Algeria: Violence Returns. Linda.cnn. Teslik. 2006.

2004. Kepel. Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam. 2007. Henzel.” BBC News. Laetitia Bucaille. Amelie.html?_r=1 [Accessed March 5.” New York Times . Ib tauris. 2006. Is the Maghreb the “Next Afghanistan"?: Mapping the Radicalization of the Algerian Salafi Jihadist Movement. Available at: http://www. 2008. The Enigma of Islamist Ellis.” New York Times. and Chris Wyckloff. 2006. Mohammed. 2008. “Ragtag Insurgency Gains a Lifeline . Jean Pierre. and E. 2007.iht. Anthony. 2007. Hanna. London: C Hurst & Co Publishers Ltd.” Strategic Insights 5(8). 2008. Noureddine. 2006. “Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb: the Evolution from Algerian Islamism to Transnational Terror. “The War on Terror in a Haze of Dust: Potholes and Pitfalls on the Saharan Front. 2008. Kagwanja. Boudali. A. Stockham. Now. 2009]. Gray. 2005.” African Affairs 103(412): 459-464. 118 . Georgetown University: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies.. 2006.nytimes. Gyves.” The Middle East Journal 63(2): 213-226. Available at: http://news. Peter. 2009]. Mohamed arezki. Hegghammer. 2008. “Global Jihadism After the Iraq War. Lecocq. West Point Military Academy.” Parameters 35(1): 69-80.php?ac=view_report&report_id=641&language_id=1 [Accessed March 5. Rogan. “Briefing: the Pan-Sahel Initiative. “Algerian Groupe Salafiste de la Predication et le Combat (Salafi Group for Call and Combat. “The Local and Global Jihad of al-Qa ‘ida in the Islamic Maghreb. Hafez.. 2007. Available at: http://www.” Middle East Journal 60(1): 11. The GSPC: Newest Franchise in al-Qa'ida's Global Jihad. and D. 2007.stm [Accessed March 5. Droukdal. “Counter-Terrorism in the Horn of Africa: New Security Squad et Jebnoun. Thomas H. Stephen. GSPC): An Operational Analysis. Celso. Old Strategies. Moss. Schrijver. “Al Qaeda in the Maghreb: The" Newest" Front in the War on Terror. 2006.pinr. 2006. 2007. 2009. “Martyrdom Mythology in Iraq: How Jihadists Frame Suicide Terrorism in Videos and Biographies. African Security Review 15(3). and P. Liane Kennedy.” Strategic Insights 5(8). “An Introduction to a Special Issue of Strategic Insights: Analyses of the Groupe Salafiste pour la Prédication et le Combat (GSPC) . H. Mekhennet. 2009].Blom.” Terrorism and Political Violence 19: 95-115.php?page=2 [Accessed March 17. Cliff. 2009].” International Herald Tribune. Himeur. Power and Interest News Report. Filiu. D.” Institute for Security Studies. Gilles.” Journal of Contemporary African Studies 25(1): 141-166. Michael.” Mediterranean Quarterly 19(1): 80. Available at: http://www. Norwegian Defence Research Establishment. insurgents gain a lifeline from Al Qaeda .uk/2/hi/africa/3635470. Jihadism Online: A Study of how Al-Qaida and Radical Islamist Groups Use the Internet for Terrorist Purposes. T. and Louis Martínez. 2004. “New Chief for Algeria's Islamists. “In Algeria. Johnson.” African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 2(4): 091-097. “An Interview with Abdelmalek Droukdal. “The Origins of al Qaeda’s Ideology: Implications for US Strategy. Intelligence Brief: Al-Qaeda's New Strategy in North Africa.

Lebanon's Fatah al-Islam leadership & Organization. Libyan Islamic Fighting Group [Accessed January 23. 2007. “Libya: Reforming the Impossible?.” Counterterrorism Blog. Al-Qa'ida and Social Movement Theory. 2009].php [Accessed February 27. 2007.php [Accessed February 27. Blake . 2005. and I.” Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 12(1): 7-20. John. Gambil. 2009]. 2006. Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. Annual Threat Assessment of the Director of National Intelligence for the Senate Select Committee on Gary. Negroponte. Yamatz. 2006.asp?id=5862 [Accessed January 26. Osama's Wake: The Second Generation of Al Qaeda. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. 2009].” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 11(1): 101-115. Evan. Pargeter. Available at: http://www.” Center for Defense Information. Pargeter. 2008. Werenfels. 2007. and Carol Volk. 2009]. Al-Qa'ida's Foreign Fighters in Iraq: A First Look at the Sinjar Records. Available at: http://www. “$50. and Stephen Vertigans. Ya Libnan. Sutton. 2009]. “Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism.” Journal of National Defense Studies 6: 25. Joseph. “Libya: The Conversion of a ‘Terrorist State’. New York: Columbia Univ Press. 2009]. 2006a. Available at: http://counterterrorismblog. 1996. Goolsby. Olivier. Available at: http://yalibnan.umd. 2006b.jamestown. Martí [Accessed January 23. “North African immigrants in Europe and political violence. 119 . The Libyan Paradox.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 29(8): 731-747.” Mediterranean Politics 11(2): 151-165. Felter.” Review of African Political Economy 33(108): 219235. Available at: http://www. G. National Intelligence Council. Ward. Kohlmann. Luis. Ansar al-Islam/Jund al-Islam/Ansar al-Sunnah Ansar al-Islam.cfm?DocumentID=2836&IssueID=56&StartRow=1&ListRows=10&ap pendURL=&Orderby=DateLastUpdated&ProgramID=39&issueID=56 [Accessed May 20. “In the Spotlight: The Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG). “Istishad as an Ideological and Practical Tool in the Hands of Al-Qaeda. Counterterrorism Center. “Islamic "New Social Movements"? Radical Islam. Luis. United States Air Force Counterproliferation Center. 2007. “Between the ‘Near’ and the ‘Far’ Enemy: Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb. Available at: http://www. Steinberg.umd.. 2005. “Combating Terrorist Networks: An Evolutionary Approach. Michael. 2007. Martinez. Phillip.start. Alison.” Mediterranean Politics 12(3): 407-413. The Failure of Political Islam. Rebecca.000 Reward Announced for Ansar al-Sunnah Commander in Iraq. Boston: Harvard University Press. 2006. and John King.” Terrorism Monitor 3(6). Schweitzer. and Brian Fishman.

Available at: http://www.html [Accessed March 10.aph.” The Jawa Report: . Gary. Gambill. Available at: http://www.” Perspectives on World History and Current Evens. Press Room . “Ansar al-Islam: Back in Iraq . Schanzer.US Department of the Treasury. 2004.85.html [Accessed February 27. Available at: http://www. “Description des groupes terroristes criminalisés par le Canada. “Mullah Krekar Profile.pdf+Asbat+al-Ansar+AND+leadership&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=15&gl=us&client=firefox-a [Accessed January 26. 2009]. “Mullah Omar in Pakistan .gov/press/releases/js2206. “Asbat al-Ansar . Taliban Bergen. Available at: http://mypetjawa.Jane's World Insurgency and Terrorism. al Qaida. 2009]. Available at: http://www.cnn. 2005.ciaonet.nsf/Page/What_Governments_are_doing_Listing_of_T errorism_Organisations_Asbat_al-Ansar [Accessed May 19.mullahomar/index.” American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy subs/sub5. 2009]. [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://www. 2003. Available at: http://www. 2009] Anderson Cooper. Shackleford.173. Jonathan. 2002. 2009]. 2009]. 120 . “Ahmad Abd al-Karim [Accessed February 28.” he Investigative Project on Terrorism. 2004.treas. 2006. 2009].” Équipe de recherche sur le terrorism et l'antiterrorisme. Available at: http://www. 2005. Ansar Al-Islam: Postmortem or Prelude to More Attacks? The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Stanley. Peter. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www. 2009]. “Salafi-jihadism in Lebanon. 2006. 2009].htm [Accessed February 28. Available at: http://209. Pike. Treasury Designates Individual Financially Fueling Iraqi Insurgency. 2009].stm [Accessed May [Accessed May 19. ASIS & DSD . 2009]. and Charlie Moore. “Army of Ansar al-Sunnah Website Update. BBC. 2009]. 2009].htm [Accessed May [Accessed January Gregory. US Department of State.html [Accessed January 26. Schanzer.globalpolitician.ertatcrg.” Middle East Quarterly 11(1).janes.meforum.” Global Politician. Available at: http://news. 2006. Available at: [Accessed May 19. 2009]. Rubin. 2009. 2009].132/search? Gomez del Prado.” Available at: http://www. Parliamentary Joint Committee on Asbat al-Ansar Asbat Al Ansar.” CNN. John. “Ansar al-Sunna. [Accessed February 27. Maclean's 115(34): 12. Trevor. Asbat al-Ansar (Lebanon) . Courting Public court rejects mullah [Accessed May 19. 2006. Available at: http://nationalsecurity.

co. Gunaratna. Jaffrelot. Sullivan. Kartha. Negroponte. Kashmir Herald. Guido. p. 2002. “The Taliban Papers. Guido. Islamist Terrorism in Greater Central Asia: The" Al-Qaedaization" of Uzbek Jihadism. D. “Counterinsurgency. BBC News. p. Congressional Research Service. 2008. 131-152. “Islam's Medieval Outposts.southasianmedia.html [Accessed March 10. 1998. 2009]. “Who is the Real Mullah Omar?. Available at: http://news. Behuria. “Al-Qaeda 2. Rohan. Steinberg. Lashkar-e-Jhangvi.” The Christian Science Monitor. Profile: Mullah Mohammed Omar. Mexico: World Scientific. 2009. 2005.” In National Intelligence Council. Pantucci.” Orbis 51(1): 71-89.csmonitor. Available at: http://www. Michael. “Indo-Pak Détente: Sustainable Ambiguity. “Al Qaeda in the Tribal Areas of Pakistan and Beyond. A Turkish al-Qaeda: The Islamic Jihad Union and the Internationalization of Uzbek Jihadism. 2001. “Understanding the Taliban and Insurgency in Afghanistan.” The Telegraph. Lashkar-e-Jhangvi Ahmed. 2009]. “The Reclusive Ruler who Runs the Taliban . Marquand. 2009]. Didier. 2001.” In Proceedings of the Forty-eighth Pugwash Conference on Science and World Affairs. “Annual Threat Assessment of the Director of National Intelligence for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Counterterrorism. Center for Contemporary Conflict. Available at: http://www. 2004.htm. 187. State-building and Security Cooperation in Central Asia. and Anders Nielsen. 2006. . Robert. Available at: http://www.” Etudes 399(2003/7): 9-16. 2006. “Sunni-Shia relations in Pakistan: The widening divide.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 31(9): 775-807. 121 . Madrid: Fundación José Ortega y Gasset.stm [Accessed March 10. Thomas. Central Asia: Regional Developments and Implications for US Interests.” South Asia Journal.” Journal of Peace Research 44(1): 93.” Strategic Analysis 28(1): 157-176.” Survival 50(6): 183-192. P.php?t=TP&st=D&no=4 [Accessed May 19. Mihalka. Husain. 2002.Haqqani. “The Long Roads to Peace.” In The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly. Spark. Jurica. and Fuel: The Mysterious Rise of the Taliban.” Survival 44(1): 69-80.telegraph. D.html [Accessed March 10. Available at: http://kashmirherald. Paris: Institut Français des Relations and Chris Mason. Nichol. 2008. Oxygen.0. Christina.” Foreign Policy: 58-64. Ashok. Tim. Johnson. 2003. Washington. Islamic Jihad Union Chaudet. “Tinder. Jim. Tara. 2007. “Musharraf et les islamistes. JIhadist Terrorism in Turkey. Raffaello. 2009]. 2005. K. Steinberg.C. 2008. 2001.

Available at: http://news. “Regional Implications of Shi'a Revival in S. 2009]. “The Two Faces of Lashkar-e-Taiba . “Humanization of education in Pakistan through Freire’s Concept of Literacy.” Asia Pacific Education Review 6(1): 1-6. Nikolas. 2005. 85-114. BBC.” The Guardian Online. John. 2008. Farooq. Roul. R.stm [Accessed May 19. “Islam. and S. Abou [Accessed May 19. Atul. 2005. 2002 “The regional dimension of sectarian conflicts in Pakistan. the State.” Terrorism Monitor 3(4). Even Al-Qaeda'. 2001.” Police Practice and Research 6(2): 141-164. 2005. Zed Books. “Lashkar-e-Toiba: new Threats Posed by an Old Organization. Umer. Shah. 2004. Realistically. The ISI. Available at: http://www. Vali. 2002. Available at: http://abcnews.htm [Accessed January 28.” The Washington Quarterly 27(3): 7-24.memri. p. [Accessed January 29. Lashkar-e-Taiba Bharadwaj. Key Figures in Kashmir Uprising. “Islamic Radicalism in Afghanistan and Pakistan. 2009]. Raja. Lee. John. 2002. “Defeating Terrorism: A Study of Operational Strategy and Tactics of Police Forces in Jammu & Kashmir (India). 115. 2009]. 122 .jamestown.” The Good Society 14(3). 2009]. Available at: http://www. Jafa. 2009]. ABC News.” Asharq Alawsat [Accessed May 2008. Nazir. 2005. Olivier. 2009].” Strategic Analysis 26(1): 170-173. Wilson. Roy. “Can Pakistan be ‘neutral’in the war against terrorism?. 2008. Kalyanaraman.” Terrorism Monitor 3(11).com/english/news. 2005. and the Rise of Sectarian Militancy in Pakistan. 2007. [Accessed May 19. New Delhi: Pentagon Press.aawsat.” In Pakistan: Nationalism without a Nation. Mehtab Ali. Available at: http://www. “Sectarianism—A threat to human security: A case study of The Middle East Media Research Institute.” The Round Table 94(382): 2009]. “Achieving a Global Community. 2009].org/single/?no_cache=1&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=27599 [Accessed May 19. Zed Books. Available at: Pakistan Freezes Militant Funds.” In Pakistan: Nationalism without a Nation. Nasr.jamestown.asp?section=3&id=14953 [Accessed January 29. “Pakistan police detain founder of Lashkar-e-Taiba militant group | World news | guardian. The General and Jihad. Glendinning. 2002. Available at: http://www. p.” Writenet for UNHCR. Gvosdev. Yateendra. Available at: http://www. Nasr. “Lashkar-e-Jhangvi: Sectarian Violence in Pakistan and Ties to International Terrorism. Jamaatud Dawa Leader: 'Indians Will Continue to Mislead the World Community By Linking Us to Lashkar[-e Taiba]. Terrorist Group of Pakistan.

C. Available at: http://news.” Boukhars. Tunisian Combatant Group. Washington.: RAND Corporation. Available at: http://www. “Changing Course of Kashmiri Struggle: From National Liberation to Islamist Jihad?. Yoginder. “Variations on a Theme: Radical Violent Islamism and European North African Radicalization. Sanchez. Juan Jose Escobar. 2004. 2002. New York Times. Federation of American Scientists. 2006. Stephen. [Accessed May 20. 2004.” Economic and Political Weekly: 218-227. “Tunisia: Trading Freedom for Stability May Not Last–An International Security Perspective. 2006. Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group Botha. Anthony H. The Politics and Economics of Organized Crime and Terrorism in Europe.Sengupta. Blake Mobley. 2009].cdi. Available at: http://www. El Guerbouzi . Karthala Editions. Benjamin. 2005.An Apology. Darif. “Middle East Salafism’s Influence and the Radicalization of Muslim Communities in Europe. Available at: http://www. Jonathan. Keating. 2005. Ahmed.” Defence Studies 9(1): 85-92. 2004. 2002. 2009]. 2007. 2006. 2009]. Mohamed. “Non African Involvement in Transnational Terror Networks: Terrorism in the Maghreb .” The Middle East Review of International Affairs 10(3). BBC. 215. 2001.htm [Accessed May 20. John. “Tunisian Government Threatened by Islamist Group. Analisis del Real Instituto. Clark. 2008. Greenwood Publishing Group. “The Origins of Militancy and Salafism in Morocco.globalsecurity. The Moroccan Combatant Group. Tunisian Combatant Group Assets of Tunisia Group Are Frozen. The Tunisian Combatant Group (TCG). and Erin Rosenbach.ustreas. Available at: http://www. Hudson Institute.stm [Accessed May 19.” The Independent.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41(01): 19-24. PO-3380: The United States and Italy Designate Twenty-Five New Financiers of Terror.html [Accessed May 19. 2008. Anouar. Global Security. 2008. Stemmann.cfm [Accessed May 19. 2005.fas. 2009]. 2004. p.” Center for Defense Center for Policing Terrorism . The Military Balance in the Middle East./index. 2003.” In The Practice of War: Production. GSPC Dossier. “Terrorist Outlaws – or a Group with Friends in High Places? .cfm?DocumentID=2227&from_page=. Reproduction and Communication of Armed Violence. Alejandro. 2004. US Department of the Treasury. Available at: http://www. Ulph. 2009] D. La Mouvance Islamiste au Maroc: du 11 Septembre 2001 aux Attentats de Casablanca du 16 Mai 2003.htm [Accessed May 20.” Terrorism Focus 2(6).. Chaarani. Anneli. “Islamist Militancy in Kashmir: The Case of Lashkar-i-Tayyeba. Githens-Mazer. 2009]. “In the Spotlight: Moroccan Combatant Group (GICM). 123 .” Terrorism Monitor 3(12): June 17. Kim.

Democracy isn’t Enough.” The New York Times. Jemaah Islamiyah Abuza.Leiken. Middle East Online. Atran. [Accessed May 19. “Abu Dujana. 2009]. 2006. Raymond. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. Available at: http://www. Emmers. “How did Europe's Global Jihadis Obtain Training for their Militant Causes?. Available at: http://www. The Mediterranean Region and International Terrorism: A New Framework for Cooperation. Available at: http://abcnews. 2009]. Ranstorp. 2002. 2005.S.ABC News.htm [Accessed January 26. Van Biezen.html?_r=1&scp=4&sq=Abu+Bakar+Bashir&st=nyt [Accessed May 19. Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group. Ingrid. Peter. Available at: http://www. Pressure to Hold Militant Sets Off Outcry in Indonesia. “U. “In Indonesia.nytimes. 2009. Magnus. 2007.asp?id=4341 [Accessed January 28.” Southeast Asian Affairs: 123-145. John. Gelling.” Terrorism and Political Violence 20(2): 234-256. The London bombings and the broader strategic context. The Insider: Daily Terrorism Report . Robert. 2004. Reinares.umd. 2008.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 24(3): 427-466. Gelling.” Newsweek. “Indonesia Reports the Arrest of a 2nd Top Terrorism Suspect. Scott. Zachary. and Stryker McGuire. R. 2008. “Europe's Angry Muslims. Moroccan Group "Derivative Structure" of Al Qaeda.” Foreign Affairs 84(4): 120-35. 2009]. “Indonesia's Year of Living Normally.” New York 2005. Evan. 2005. Indonesian Police Confirm. Available at: http://www.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 56(3): [Accessed May 19.homelandsecurityus.” The New York Times. “ Southeast Asian Terrorist Leader Is Under Arrest. “Terrorism and Democratic Legitimacy: Conflicting Interpretations of the Spanish Elections.go. 2009]. Madrid: Real Institute Elcano. “Radical Cleric in Indonesia Is Acquitted of Terrorism. 2004. “Islam and society in South-East Asia after 11 September. 124 . Thomas. Greg. Zachary.html [Accessed May 19.” Mediterranean Politics 10(1): 99-108. Abuzza. 2006. “Comprehensive Security and Resilience in Southeast Asia: ASEAN's Approach to Terrorism and Sea Piracy.” New York Times.” New York Times.” New York Times. 2005. but Support Could Be Bonner.start. 2005.Net.. 2008. Peter. Real Instituto Elcano. Barry. “Is Southeast Asia the Second Front?. Fernando. Bonner. “Terror at Rush Hour. Gershman. 2009]. 2002. Available at: http://www. Gelling.nytimes.” The Pacific Review 22(2). “Freed Cleric Is Hailed by Students. Barton.” HomelandSecurityUS. 2005.middleeast-online.” Foreign Affairs 81(4): 60-74. 2006. 2009]. 2002. Raymond. “Tentacles of Terror: Al Qaeda's Southeast Asian Network. Desker. P.

2006. 125 . R. 2006. Singh. Washington. 2009]. Petter.Hainsworth. and Thomas Hegghammer.” Fragility and Crisis: Kingsbury. Tomsa. “The Challenge of Militant Islam and Terrorism in Indonesia. “Terrorism in the Southern Philippines: Contextualizing the Abu Sayyaf Group as an Islamist Secessionist Organization. Damien.umd. Pavlova. Geoffrey. 2005. Anti-Corruption. Harvey. Council on Foreign Relations.k. Elmer. “Rule of Law. Dillon.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 30(9): 777-800. Anti-Terrorism and Militant Islam: Coping with Threats to Democratic Pluralism and National Unity in Indonesia. Jemaah Islamiyah (a. Jemaah Islamiah) . Charles. Abuza.C. Available at: http://www.” Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict 99999(1): 1-17. Elena.” Asia Pacific Viewpoint 48(1): 128-144.. BBC. 2009]. “Jihadism in Western Europe After the Invasion of Iraq: Tracing Motivational Influences from the Iraq War on Jihadist Terrorism in Western Europe.” Sudostasia 26(5): 73-84.” In the Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia. Nagma. Bill. Rachel. 2004. “The State-Moro Armed Conflict in the Philippines Unresolved National Question or Question of Governance?. 2008. Available at: http://www. Disarming the Bearer of the Sword: Delinking the Abu Sayyaf From the Global Insurgency. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. 2007. Donnelly. Lia. 2006. Nesser. Dirk. 2009]. Forvarets Forskninginstittut. Available at: Strategic Studies Institute.” Asian Survey 48(1): 38-46. Buendia.asp?id=6370 [Accessed January 21. Despite Improvement. Available at: http://news. Southeast Asia and the War Against Terrorism. Zachary. FFI explains al-Qaida document. 2004. The Heritage Foundation. Brynhar. 2009].org/publication/8948/ [Accessed January 22. “Jemaah Islamiyah's Radical Madrassah New York: CRC Press. Available at: http://news. “From a Counter-Society to a Counter-State Movement: Jemaah Islamiyah According to PUPJI. Bali-terrorism: the return of the Abu Sayyaf.stm [Accessed May Lloyd's MIU handbook of maritime security. 2008. 2008.” Asian Journal of Political Science 13(1): 109-138. 2001.” BBC. 2003.start. 2009]. Zachary. J. 2004.longwarjournal.stm [Accessed May 19. Naval War College. 2007. D. “The War on Terrorism in Southeast Asia. “ In Pictures: Jemaah Islamiyah's Leadership. Bilveer. 2005. and Paolo Pasicolan. Magouirk.a.” The Long War Journal. Jemaah Islamiyah.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 29(4): 323-342. Espin-Digon. G.cfr. and Scott Atran. and Nick Grace. Roggio. and (US). .html [Accessed January 22. 2008. “Islam's role in Indonesia. Abu Sayyaf Abuza. Profile: Abu Bakar Ba'asyir. “Jemaah Islamiyah after the Recent Wave of Arrests: How Much Danger Remains? . Julio et al. “Indonesia in 2007: Unmet Expectations.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 58(1): 47-68.

htm [Accessed April 9.” New Zealand International Review 27(6): 24-29.Filler. 2004. Schwarz. 2000. Nathan.htm [Accessed April 9. Available at: “The Alliance System of the Abu Sayyaf. 1993. Torres. “Contemporary History of the Philippines. Terrorism and Violence in Southeast Asia. “Central Asia: More than Islamic Extremists. “Abdurajak Janjalani Killed. Gunter.. Lumpkin. Anthony.htm&no=34 [Accessed April 9.satp. Available at: http://www.pia. “Philippines: Abu Sayyaf Group . Larry. 1993–2000. 2009]. GMA News. “Moving Out of Moscow's Orbit: the Outlook for Central Asia.” Philippine Information Agency. Hyman. “The Abu Sayyaf Group: A Growing Menace to Civil Society. “Religion. Anthony. Available at: http://www. “The Continuation of Civil Unrest and Poverty in Mindanao. 2009].mtholyoke. 2002. Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan. Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan Cornell. John.. Available at: http://www.” South Asian Terrorism Portal. Eduardo. Svante.” SAIS Review 21(2): 65-90. Alfredo. 2007. [Accessed April 9. Australian National Security . 2008. Quimpo.” The Washington Quarterly 25(1): 193-206. 2002.” Terrorism in the Philippines. 2002.gmanews. 2009].ph/?m=12&fi=p070903. D. “The US and the Southern Philippines’ Quagmire. Daniel Joseph.C. Jose.htm [Accessed April 9.” Global Security.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 31(2): 125-144. Rogers. Paul J. Sahni. 2009. and security in Central Asia.rms-gs. 2002. Shireen. “What's Next for Abu Sayyaf?. “Abdurakjak Janjalani. Abu Sayyaf: Target of Philippine-US Anti-Terrorism Cooperation. Steven.: Congressional Research Service. Available at: http://www.” GMA News. 2009]. Available at: http://www.gmanews.html [Accessed April [Accessed April 9. Available at: Ugarte.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 24(1): 33-50. 2007. 2008.” Foreign Affairs 83(1): 2002. 2009].org/security/profiles/abdurajak_janjalani_killed. 2009]. 2001.” RMS & GS. Smith. Wencesiao. New York: ME Sharpe.” Terrorism and Political Violence 14(4): 131-162.” International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-): 289-304. 2002. Smith. Available at: Niksch.globalsecurity. and Rosalinda Morgado-Schwarz.The Heat is On. A. Yasser Igasan Succeeds Janjalani as Abu Chief . 2004. Menardo. “The Southern Philippines: Conflict and Co-operation: Anthony Smith Backgrounds the Separatist Conflict That Has Wracked the Southern Philippines and Discusses the US Military Involvement in the Area. 126 .E. “Beyond the Abu Sayyaf.nsf/Page/What_Governments_are_doing_Listing_of_Terrorism_ Organisations_Islamic_Movement_of_Uzbekistan [Accessed January 21. politics.” Ringuet. and Regine Spector. 2009]. Ajai. 2009]. “The Abu Sayyaf and Khadaffy Janjalani. Washington. Taliban behind the Waziristan Accord. [Accessed March 12.longwarjournal. et al.” Strategic Analysis 16(2) “The Islamic Movement Of Uzbekistan: A Resurgent IMU?. 2009].php?id=1595 [Accessed January 21.Ru Information agency.nefafoundation. Tazmini. Ferghana.” Spiegel Online. Available at: http://enews. CBS News.shtml [Accessed May 20.” World Policy Journal 18(1): 45-55. 2009]. Mite. Radical Islam in Central Asia: between Pen and Rifle. Leader of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan Tahir Yuldashev Threatens Presidents Karimov. “Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan: Will it Strike Back?. Ahmed. “Militant Islam in Central Asia: The Case of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan. 2003. Available at: http://www1. Islamic Jihad.” Global Security. 2008. United Press International. Available at: http://www. “Police Arrest Members of Alleged Jihadi Financing Network. “The Growth of Radical Islam in Central Asia. Available at: http://www. 2009]. 2008. Press TV. Messages From Terrorist Leaders. V. 266.ferghana. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. 2004. Novak. Rashid.gulfnews. Roggio. 2002.highbeam. Mann.ciaonet.Ru Information Agency. 2009].” Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies. Poonam. 2008.php [Accessed January 21. “On Visualizing Heterogeneous Semantic Networks from Multiple Data Sources.” In Digital Libraries: Universal and Ubiquitous Access to Information. Yemen Islamic Jihad Analysis: Yemen.1518. 2009].jamestown.” Central Asian Survey 20(1): 63-83. 2009]. 2008.presstv. Available at: http://enews.00.globalsecurity. Jane.Kimmage. Valentinas. 2000. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www.aspx?id=68033&sectionid=351020206 [Accessed May 20.” The Long War Journal.html [Accessed March 2007. 2009].com/news/gulf/yemen/10245698. “The Islamic Revival in Central Asia: a Potent Force or a Misconception?.html [Accessed January 21. Available at: Available at: http://www. Presumably. 2003. Yassin. “Pakistan: Offensive Against Suspected Militants in South Waziristan Ends. Naumkin. Maureen.html [Accessed January 26. 2004. Available at: http://www. The NEFA Foundation . Available at: http://www. 2008. “US Embassy in Yemen Targeted in Complex 2009]. Who Is The Yemeni Islamic Jihad Group? .html [Accessed May 20.htm [Accessed April 8. Indonesia: Springer-Verlag New York Inc.html [Accessed May 20. Bakiyev. “The Fires of Faith in Central Asia.php?id=1864 [Accessed January 21.atimes. and Rakhmonov. Naumkin. V.” The Long War Journal. Gulf News. Rotar. p.” Terrorism Monitor 1(8). 2008. 2001. 2009].html [Accessed April 8. Uzbek islamists’ Leader Tahir Yuldashev has been Arrested . Vitaly.” Asia Times Online. Ghonchen. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www. 2009]. S. 127 . Bali. 2005. bin Laden and Iran's hardliners. “al Qaeda.553745. Ferghana. 2009]. 2009]. 2006. Group Threatens Attack on UAE Embassy in Yemen. 2009]. Yemeni Islamic Jihad Leader Arrested.

2009].” New York Times Magazine” Business Line.hinduonnet. 2008. Ashok. “Inside Jihad U.” Middle East Quarterly 14(3): 3-10. 2006. B. 2009]. 2000. Available at: http://news.AMNESTY. Attack on USS Cole: Background. and Kyle Dabruzzi. Available at: http://www. UN Regufee Agency.longwarjournal. Novak. 2009]. West. 2007. 2009]. “Dwindling Expectations (vs. Library of Congress.php [Accessed April 9. Jeffrey. 2000. Aden Abyan Islamic Army. “Sects Within Sect: The Case of Deobandi–Barelvi Encounter in Pakistan. 2009]. Available at: &no_cache=1 [Accessed February 4. Available at: http://www.adl. et 2006. B.start.” Strategic Analysis 32(1): 57-80. “Aden-Abyan Islamic Army.. 2008.YEM. 2009. 2006. 2005.” Science.html [Accessed May 19. Yemeni Militant's Supporters Vow Revenge. Sunguta. 'Londonistan. Stratfor.html [Accessed May 19. Yemen: High-Profile Militants Killed and the Yemeni Power Structure . K. 1999. A. Behuria.” The Long War Journal. Daveed.” Global Security. “Khalid al-Nabi John.: The Education of a Holy Warrior. Raman. Available at: http://www. Islamic Army of Aden (IAA) . The Investigative Project on Terrorism. 2009].stratfor.” Global Security. GST Presented Evidence against Claims. Available at: http://www. Cronin. “Attack on USS Cole: Who engineered it?. Stratfor. 2009]. 2009]. The War on Poverty). 128 . Available at: http://www. 2009].htm [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://www. Anti-Defamation League. 2005. Available at: http://www.umd. 2009].htm [Accessed May 19.globalsecurity. Available at: http://www. Lumpkin. 1999. [Accessed May 19.” Terrorism Monitor 4(15). Available at: http://www.asp [Accessed May 19. Links to Osama bin Laden and Islamic Jihad. Pike. 2009]. Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahideen Atran.' Al Qaeda and the Finsbury Park Mosque . Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. “Jihad's New Leaders. 2009]. Goldberg. BBC.globalsecurity. Available at: http://www. Raman. “Somalia's ICU and its Roots in al-Ittihad al-Islami .3ae6aa106b. 2009] [Accessed April 9. “Foreign Terrorist Organizations. John.” In Congressional Research 2004.Aden Abyan Islamic Army Amnesty International Report 2000 .com/londonistan_al_qaeda_and_finsbury_park_mosque [Accessed May 19. “Yemen: New Terror Camps as a City Falls to Jihadists.Yemen.htm [Accessed May [Accessed May 19.asp?id=4 [Accessed January 31. India: South Asia Analysis Group. Available at: http://www.

Profiles in Terror. Swami. Jessica.” Strategic Analysis 24(12): 2179-2198. “Pakistan's jehadi apparatus: Goals and methods.132/search? Pike. 2009].globalpolitician. Terrorism . 2002. Australian National Security. Goel. Kumar. Stern.indianexpress. Pakistan Security Research Unit. Sunita. Sunita.125. 2005. Saldhanha. “This is not Islam. and D.aspx?sectionName=indiasectionpage&id=1d0f988f-debe4d6e-b285-188cc397c5f2&Headline=A+profile+of+Maulana+Masood+Azhar [Accessed May 19. 2009]. Sahni. 2001. “In the Spotlight: Harakat ul-Mujaheddin (HuM).cdi. Roman & Littlefield. Indian Express. lami. Available at: http://www. “The Jihadist Threat to Pakistan. Aaron. “Nexalities: What. Howenstein. 1997. 2008.” Center for Defense Information. Available at: http://www. “Harakat ul-Mujahedin.cfm [Accessed January 28. John. 2001.” India Review 2(3): 55-88.cfm [Accessed April 9. 2003. Available at: http://www.htm [Accessed January 2009]. 2003. S.” Asia Times Online. Ajai.” Global Security. Available at: http://www.atimes. Stephen.” The Washington Quarterly 26(3): 7-25. 2009]. 2009]. D. Hindustan Times. Mir. “The Maoist Insurgency and Nepal-India Relations: Contemplating the 2009].” Pakistan: nationalism without a nation?: 115.p df+the+jihadi+terrain+in+pakistan&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a [Accessed April 9. Available at: http://www. Jaish-e-Mohammad A profile of Maulana Masood Azhar.” An Indian Perspective: 256.nsf/Page/What_Governments_are_doing_Listing_of_Terrorism_ Organisations_Jamiat_ul-Ansar [Accessed January Paramhans. 2009].” The Maoist Insurgency and Nepal-India Relations: 213. Cohen.satp. 2005. Dan.htm [Accessed January 28. Available at: http://74. Available at: Available at: http://www.95. 2002. Jamiat ul-Ansar. 2009].hindustantimes. “Terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir in theory and practice. 2001.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 57(1): 42-50. South Asia Terrorism [Accessed May 19. “Understanding the Militant Mind: Can Psychiatry Help?. The Jihadi Terrain in Pakistan.satp.html [Accessed April 9. Mannes. Abou Zahab. “Meeting with the Muj. Available at: http://www. 2004.” Global Politician. Mariam. ul-Ansar. ISI Fixed Meetings for Hostages' Wives with Harkat.. 2009].html [Accessed January 28. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www. “The Jihad Lives On. Paul. Me Worry?.In the Spotlight: Harakat ul-Mujaheddin (HuM).htm [Accessed January 28. “The regional dimension of sectarian conflicts in Pakistan. 129 .globalsecurity. 2009].” South Asia Intelligence Review 3(29). 2008. 2009].

php [Accessed January 29. 2000. John.” Middle East Quarterly 14(3): 3-10. Praveen.htm [Accessed May 19. Islamic Army of Aden (IAA) . N.stm [Accessed May 19. P.asp [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www.3ae6aa106b. 2009]. Kamath. Roggio.start. 2009. Available at: http://www. UN Regufee Agency.htm [Accessed May 19. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. Available at: http://www. India: South Asia Analysis Washington.southasiaanalysis.php [Accessed April 9.. Available at: http://news. Available at: http://www. 2004. Jaish-e-Mohammed (JEM).org/archives/2008/12/jaishemohammed_leade.html [Accessed May 19. BBC. Available at: http://www. 2009].adl.unhcr. Najum.: Center for Strategic and International Studies. “Pakistan: Moderate jihad?.org/papers2/paper152. 1999.htm [Accessed May 19. Al-Ittihaad al-Islami Amnesty International Report 2000 . 2006. “Attack on USS Cole: Who engineered it?. 2009. 2009]. Jessica. B. 2000.html [Accessed May 19. “Aden-Abyan Islamic Army. Attack on USS Cole: Background. 2009]. 2008. “Yemen: New Terror Camps as a City Falls to Jihadists. 2009.globalsecurity.satp. Swami. John. 2006.” Global Security.C. Raman.” The Long War D.investigativeproject. 2002.YEM.htm [Accessed January 29.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 57(1): 42-50. “Jaish-e-Mohammed leader placed under ‘house arrest’.org/Terror/focus/ “Terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir in theory and practice. M. Aden Abyan Islamic Army. 2007. “Terrorists’ Modus Operandi in Jammu and 2006.” Business Line. 2009]. and Kyle Dabruzzi. Available at: http://www.” Strategic Analysis 25(9): 1081-1987. 130 .org/irp/world/para/jem. S. “Terrorism and Governance in Kashmir.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 56(4): 15-16. “Terrorism in India: Impact on national security. Mushtaq. Gartenstein-Ross. B. Available at: http://www. Links to Osama bin Laden and Islamic Jihad. 2009]. Profile: Maulana Masood Azhar. Sondhi.htm [Accessed January 29.” Strategic Analysis 27(3): 382-403.longwarjournal.globalsecurity. 2009]. Bill. “Khalid al-Nabi al-Yazidi. Lumpkin. Available at: http://www. 2009].org/security/profiles/khalid_al-nabi_al-yazidi. Daveed.Jaish-e-Mohammad Mujahideen E-Tanzeem. Mandavi. 2001. The Investigative Project on [Accessed May 19.” Global Novak. South Asian Terrorism Portal.hinduonnet. Available at: http://www. 2009].” Journal of Conflict Studies 24(2). Sunil.fas. Available at: http://www. 2005.AMNESTY. Jamwal. Anti-Defamation League. Available at: http://www.longwarjournal. 2009]. 2009].” The Long War Journal. 2001. 2003.” India Review 2(3): 55-88. and Teresita Schaffer. 2009].org/military/world/para/aden-abyan. Raman. 2000. 2009]. Islam in Pakistan: Unity and Contradictions. “Jihad's New Leaders. em. Jane.0. Pike.asp?id=4 [Accessed January 31. 2002. Federation of American Scientists. “Meeting with the Muj.

1946-2004. R. [Accessed April 9. Available at: http://news. State Formation and the Public Sphere: Eritrea 1991– [Accessed May 19. Yemen: High-Profile Militants Killed and the Yemeni Power Structure . 2007. and Peter Wallensteen. 1997. SITE Institute. “The Politics of Cultural Pluralism in Ethiopia and Eritrea: Trajectories of Ethnicity and Constitutional Experiments. 2009]. Iyob. 1999.” Foreign Affairs 86(2): 59-74. Shifting Terrain: Dissidence versus Terrorism in Eritrea. Jane's World Intelligence and Insurgency. 2004. and Colin Thomas-Fensen. John. Ruth. “Armed conflict and its international dimensions.” Review of African Political Economy 30(97): 435-444. 2005.” From Nida'ul Islam.html [Accessed January 27. 1998.HTM [Accessed January 1. Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya Abdel Maguid. Lotta. 2009]. Available at: http://www. 1996. Prendergast.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 21(6): 1056-1073. Hedru. BBC.fas. 2003. 2008. “The Nationalist Revolution in eritrea. “The Eritrean Experiment: A Cautious Pragmatism?.” Available at: http://www. “Nationalism. 131 . 2008. Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. 2009]. Bariagaber. Assefaw.ahram. 2004. “Interview With the Deputy Amir of the Eritrean Islamic Jihad Movement. Eriksson. Available at: http://www. 2009]. 1991-2003. 2007.janes. Eritrean Islamic Salvation Movement .jamestown. Hassan Salman.” Journal of Peace Research 42(5): Shaikh Khalil Mohammed Amer. Iyob. 2009]. 2004. “Armed Conflict. 2006. 2009]. Mikael. Abul Bara'. Sunguta. Yemeni Militant's Supporters Vow Revenge. 2009].awate. Available at: http://www.htm [Accessed January 27. 2009]. “Somalia's ICU and its Roots in al-Ittihad al-Islami .” Terrorism Monitor 4(15). 1998. “Eritrea: transition to dictatorship. John. Available at: http://www.” Al-Ahram Center for Political & Strategic &no_cache=1 [Accessed February 4. Fouad. Eritrean Islamic Jihad Movement A Military Statement of the Islamic Eritrean Reform Movement to the Islamic Nation and a List of Five Operations Executed in Eritrea.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 26(1): 51-70.West. “Egypt's Gama'ah Islamiyah: The Turnabout and its Ramifications. 1998. Markakis. Available at: http://www. Debessay.” Review of African Political Economy 23(70): 475-497.stm [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://acpss.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 35(04): 647-673. “Blowing the Horn. Stratfor.stratfor.” Journal of Peace Research 41(5): 625.umd. Khalil Mohammed. “Eritrean Islamic Salvation and Peter Wallensteen.asp?id=6274 [Accessed May 1989-2003.

Ashour.” Journal of Strategic Studies 10(4): 13-31. Cohen. Available at: http://memri. Thomas. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies. 2006. Inside Al Qaeda: Global Network of Terror. 2006. 2002. Omar. Borger. Multimedia Counterterrorism Calendar. Cole. “New Approach of Egypt´s Gama´a Islamiya Group \. “Political Islam and violence.iht. Cornell. Julian. Khaled Dawoud. 2009].php?page=2 [Accessed February 24. Available at: http://www.html?res=9F05E4DA1031F935A15753C1A9669C8B63 [Accessed February 24. “Yemen Reports Arrests of Foreign-Born Arabs in Cole Attack .terrorism4 [Accessed January 1.lebanonwire. 2004.” The Guardian. Available at: http://www. 2008].php?option=com_rokzine&view=article&id=39&Itemid=54 [Accessed February 13. Lawrence. and D Lav. John.html [Accessed December 28. Fred. 2000.” The New York Times. Ayman Al-Zawahiri: The Ideologue of Modern Islamic Militancy. Burton.html [Accessed February 24. “Doomed Arab units prepare for final battle against the odds.” Government and Opposition 42(3): 314-339. Available at: 2009]. “Pursuing bin Laden: Driving Al Qaeda:Religious Decree. Airforce University Maxwell. “Terrorism as a Strategy.nytimes. “ Al Qaeda's Egyptian Bet. Abu Jihad al-Masri.asp?ID=5166&Lang=E&Press=Show&System=PressR&zPage=Syste ms [Accessed January 1.cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA30906 [Accessed February” Comparative Strategy 22(3): The Al-Gama'a Al-Islamiyya Cessation of Violence: An Ideological Reversal. Freedman. 2009]. Y. 2006. Youssef. 2009]. Ghadbian.juancole.” South Atlantic Quarterly 101(2): 325-336. Available at: http://www. 2000. “De-Radicalization of Jihad? The Impact of Egyptian Islamist Revisionists on Al-Qaeda. Available at: http://www. 1970].terrorismanalysts. Martha. Available at: http://query. The Middle East Media Research Institute. 2002. Ariel. Crenshaw. “The End of the Islamist Insurgency in Egypt?: Costs and Prospects. Gunaratna. 1987. 2000.nctc. 2009].” International Herald Tribune. Burns. “Promoting Freedom and Democracy: Fighting the War of Ideas Against Islamic Terrorism.” The Middle East Journal: 592-612.” Lebanonwire. Carmon. Farrag Ismali. 132 . Alarbya. “Informed Comment. 2009].Aboul-Enein. Fuller. Gerges. Available at: http://www. 2002. Juan. Botha.muslimbrotherhood. 2007. and Nicholas 2009]. Anneli. “Theories of Terrorism: Instrumental and Organizational Approaches. Columbia University” More on the split among radical Islamists.” Perspectives on Terrorism 2(5). 2001. Y Feldner.asp [Accessed February 24. Politics and Terrorism: An Assessment of the Origin and Threat of Terrorism in Egypt.” The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Available at: http://www. “A Muslim to Muslims: Reflections after September R. 2003.” New Political Science 22(1): 77-88.

2009]. Angel et 1996. 2009]. 2002. Chris.125. Arabicnews. In the Name of Osama Bin Laden: Global Terrorism and the Bin Laden Brotherhood.egoplex. Roland. “Egypt attacks: A Closer 1998. 2009]. Ahmed. Berkeley: University of California Jailan.” Al-Ahram Weekly On-line. The New Frontiers of Jihad: Radical Islam in Europe.” Center for Defense Information. “Time for a Historic Reconcilliation?. The Outer Rings of the Terrorist Universe.nytimes. Diaa. “Defendant Tells of His Role in Edict Urging Killing of Jews. 2009]. 2008.” Rashwan.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=11783544&Itemid=361 [Accessed February 2004. 2006. 2003. Joshua. Preston. “Makram Mohammed Ahmed interviews the historic leadership of alGama’a al-Islamiyya inside the “Scorpion” prison. Leadership of al-Gama'a Available at: http://weekly. Available at: http://intelfiles. and Jon Rothschild. U.ahram. 2009]. Muslim Extremism in Egypt. Weaver. Moussa.html [Accessed January 1. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://travelvideo. Bill. 2006. 2004. 1997. Islamism. “Egyptian Gama'a al-Islamiyya's Public Relations Campaign . Gilles.ahram. v.theatlantic.htm [Accessed February 18.” Available at: 2002. 2009]. Pargeter.” The Middle East Journal: 415-432. 2002. Jacquard. Anthony. Available at: http://www.stanford. Zambelis.” Al Ahram Weekly Online.” Al-Ahram Weekly On-line.htm [Accessed January 1. Available at: Available at: Available at: http://www. In Aftermath of Luxor Massacre: Doubtful Initiative to Stop Violence. “Blowback. 1970]. Stacher. 2009] Rabasa.” Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. 2002. Keats. Omar Abdel Rahman et al.html?scp=8&sq=Rifai%20Ahmed%20Taha%20&st=cse [Accessed February 24. “The Taliban Connection.” Al-Ahram Weekly Online. and Terrorism.ahram. “In the Spotlight: Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya . University of Pennsylvania Press. [Accessed May 19. Available at: 133 . M.htm [Accessed January 1. “Bin Laden.defenddemocracy.” Travel Video Television News.Halawi. “Militants Duke University Press.htm [Accessed December 28.” The Atlantic Online.” New York Times. Julia. 2009]. 1970].htm [Accessed May 19. 2005. 2002. Mary Anne.htm [Accessed February 18. “Post-Islamist Rumblings in Egypt: The Emergence of the Wasat Available at: http://weekly. 2009]. Kepel. Nevine. Roggio. “Senior al Qaeda Leader Thought Killed in North Waziristan Strike.” Society 42(5): Available at: http://weekly.45.arabicnews.” Terrorism Focus 3(35). 2005. Khalil. “A New Rapprochement?. Southern District of New York: Intelwire. “Beyond Al Qaeda: Part 2.Islamic Group. 2008]. Sentencing Statements. Available at: http://www.php?id=A6130_0_1_0_M [Accessed January 1.cdi. 2008. Hazel. &ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=us&client=firefox-a [Accessed January 1.

134 .org/programs/gta/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=900&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=239 &no_cache=1 [Accessed January 1. 2009].http://www.jamestown.

Appendix III: Commanding Officer Attribute Codebook Type of merger Formal merger Strong affiliation (partnership) Loose affiliation (collaboration) No affiliation Primary motive Secondary motive Not a motive Primary motive Secondary motive Not a motive Primary motive Secondary motive Not a motive Strong leadership Average leadership Weaker leadership Not applicable (Was not active in the organization at the time) 4 3 2 1 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 3 2 1 Opportunism Pan-Islamic ideology Social network Operational leadership Ideological leadership Logistic leadership 0 135 .

Appendix IV: Leadership Attributes Organization name Ansar al-Islam/Jund alMullah Krekar Islam/Ansar al-Sunnah Ansar al-Islam/Jund alAbdullah Shafi Islam/Ansar al-Sunnah al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at Abu Musab al-Zarqawi al-Tawhid wal-Jihad) al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at Abu Ayub Al-Masri al-Tawhid wal-Jihad) al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at Abu Khalil al-Souri al-Tawhid wal-Jihad) Abu Muhjin Asbat al-Ansar Mohammed Omar Taliban Ayman Al Zawahiri Egyptian Islamic Jihad Sayyed Imam Al-Sharif Egyptian Islamic Jihad Islamic Movement of Tahir Yuldashev Uzbekistan Islamic Movement of Juma Namangani Uzbekistan Najmiddin Jalolov Islamic Jihad Union Tariq al-Fasdli Yemen Islamic Jihad Zein al-Abideen alAden Abyan Islamic Mehdar Army Aden Abyan Islamic Khalid al-Nabi al-Yazidi Army Maulana Saadatullah Khan Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahidin Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahidin Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahidin Leader name Organization type Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Organization Date of Ideological country or foundin Date of Type of Opportunistic Alignment Social network origin g affiliation affiliation motives? ? affiliations? Iraq Iraq 2001 2001 2001 2001 3 3 2 2 0 0 1 1 Ideological Logistic Operational leadership leadership leadership preprepre-merger merger? merger? 1 0 3 0 3 0 Operational leadership postmerger? 1 3 Ideological leadership postmerger? 3 2 Logistic leadership postmerger? 2 1 Core Arab Cluster Iraq 1999 2004 4 2 0 1 3 2 3 3 3 2 Core Arab Cluster Iraq 1999 2004 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 2 Core Core Core Core Core Arab Arab Arab Arab Arab Cluster Cluster Cluster Cluster Cluster Iraq Lebanon Afghanistan Egypt Egypt Uzbekistan Uzbekistan Uzbekistan Yemen Yemen Yemen 1999 1986 1994 1987 1987 1998 1998 2002 1990 1990 1990 2004 2000 1996 1998 1998 1998 1998 2005 1992 1998 1998 4 3 3 4 4 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 3 3 1 2 3 3 3 2 2 0 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 3 2 3 0 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 2 3 3 3 3 2 1 1 3 3 0 3 1 2 3 3 3 1 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 3 2 2 Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Southern Asian cluster Pakistan 1985 1998 2 2 1 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 Fazlur Rehman Khalil Southern Asian cluster Pakistan 1985 1998 2 1 2 1 1 2 3 2 3 3 Farooq Kashmiri Khalil Riaz Basra Akram Lahori Hafiz Mohammad Saeed Maulana Abdul Wahid Kashmiri Maulana Masood Azhar Sheikh Ali Warsame Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys Hassan Abdullah Hersi al-Turki Sheikh Khalil Mohammed Amer Lashkar-e-Jhangvi Lashkar-e-Jhangvi Lashkar-e-Taiba Lashkar-e-Taiba Jaish-e-Mohammad al-Ittihaad al-Islami al-Ittihaad al-Islami al-Ittihaad al-Islami Eritrean Islamic Jihad Movement Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster African cluster African cluster African cluster African cluster Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan Somalia Somalia Somalia Eritrea 1985 1996 1996 1990 1990 2000 1984 1984 1984 1988 1998 1999 1999 2001 2001 2000 1991 1991 1991 1998 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 1 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 1 3 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 3 3 1 1 2 0 3 0 2 0 3 3 2 1 1 3 2 3 1 3 2 2 3 3 2 1 3 2 3 1 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 136 .

Hassan Hattab al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la prédication et le combat) Maghreb Arab cluster al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la prédication et le combat) Maghreb Arab cluster al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la prédication et le combat) Libyan Islamic Fighting Group Tunisian Combatant Group Tunisian Combatant Group Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group Jemaah Islamiya Jemaah Islamiya Jemaah Islamiya Abu Sayyaf Abu Sayyaf Abu Sayyaf Algeria 1996 2005 4 2 0 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 Nabil Sahraoui Algeria 1996 2005 4 2 1 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 Abdelmalik Droukdal Anas Sebai Tarek Ben Habib Maaroufi Saifallah Ben Hassine Mohammed Al Karbouzi Taeb Bentizi Abu Bakar Bashir Abu Rusdan Abu Dujana Abdurajak Janjalani Khadaffy Janjalani Yasser Igasan Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Algeria Libya Tunisia Tunisia Morocco Morocco Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Philippines Philippines Philippines 1996 1995 2000 2000 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1991 1991 1991 2005 1997 2000 2000 2001 2001 1998 1998 1998 1991 1991 1991 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 2 3 1 2 1 2 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 2 3 3 1 3 1 3 3 2 3 3 3 1 1 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 137 .

Appendix V: Data on Universe of Cases Figure 1: Number of Affiliations by Year Number of Affiliations by Year 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year Figure 2: Distribution by Type of Affiliation Figure 3: Distribution by Region 138 .

5 0.639411853 Social Network Affiliation 14 27 20.5 20.67 13.5 20.28936E-06 Ideological Alignment 22 19 20.67 13.018767854 27 0 13.67 1.5 1.67 0.67 13.14786E-09 11 8 13.67 13.5 0.67 13.5 20.67 13.Appendix VI: Data on Q1 What motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida’s and its pan-Islamic agenda? Table 1: Chi-Squared Test (Three Scales) Opportunistic Motive Total 0 (Not a motivation) Total 1 (Secondary motivation) Total 2 (Primary motivation) Expected Total 0 Expected Total 1 Expected Total 2 P Value 5 Ideological Alignment 22 Social Network Affiliation 14 3 33 13.67 1.60648E-06 Table 2: Statistical Significance Testing (Two Scales) Opportunistic Motive Not a motivation Motivation Expected (Not a motivation) Expected (Motivation) P Value 5 36 20.042330234 139 .

5 9.5 10.5 9.5 7.021962838 5 5.5 5 5. ideological.5 14 16.5 5.5 10.5 0.Appendix VII: Data on Q2 What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible affiliates with Al Qa’ida? Table 3: Chi-Squared Test (Strength of operational.5 18.5 17 5 8.256764552 5 8.5 7. and logistic leadership before and after the merger) Operational Before Total Not active (0) Total Weak (1) Total Average (2) Total Strong (3) Total Expected Not active Expected Weak Expected Average Expected Strong 7 10 After Sum 4 5 11 15 Ideological Before 6 7 After Sum 4 10 10 17 Logistic Before 6 8 After Sum 4 3 10 11 7 17 41 12 20 41 19 37 82 16 12 41 5 22 41 21 34 82 11 16 41 17 17 41 28 33 82 5.262682055 P Value 140 .5 14 16.5 18.5 17 0.5 0.

466 0.421 6 108 18 Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for Logistic Leadership Performance (pre-post) 15 2 -1.5 16.614 10 162.0562 22 365.5 14.1425 -1.95 Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for Overall Leadership Performance (pre-post) 9 5 -1.0501 141 .25 # Ranks <0 # of Ranks >0 Table 5: Paired Sign Test (Strength of operational.3269 Paired Sign Test for Ideological Leadership Performance (pre-post) 19 6 16 0. ideological.Table 4: Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test (Strength of operational.91 0.1742 -1.3269 Paired Sign Test for Overall Leadership Performance (prepost) 10 22 9 0.2 Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for Ideological Leadership Performance (pre-post) 16 3 -1.161 16 229 14.5 16.422 0.0146 Paired Sign Test for Logistic Leadership Performance (pre-post) 10 16 15 0.359 0. and logistic leadership before and after the merger) Paired Sign Test for Operational Leadership Performance (pre-post) # Differences >0 # of Differences <0 # Differences =0 P-Value 10 16 15 0.1549 -1.313 10 122 12. and logistic leadership before and after the merger) Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for Operational Leadership Performance (pre-post) # of 0 Differences # of Ties Z-Value P-Value Tied ZValue Tied PValue Count Sum of Ranks Mean Rank Count Sum of Ranks Mean Rank 15 3 -1.469 10 119.0577 -1.1269 19 217 11.898 0.477 0.1397 16 231.5 11.382 0.526 0. ideological.

Figures 4-6: Paired Sign Test Results 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Operational Ideologigcal Logistic Total Score Difference (Post-Pre) Improved or no change Declined 25 20 Score Difference (Post-Pre) 15 Improved Declined 10 5 0 Operational Ideologigcal Logistic Total 142 .

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful