Bin Laden’s Henchmen: Al Qa’ida’s Commanding Officers who are Leading the Global Jihad

Sarah Catanzaro Professor Martha Crenshaw, Advisor Interschool Honors Program in International Security Studies Center for International Security and Cooperation Stanford University


Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………...4 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………....5 Chapter 1: Building a Complex Organization………………………………………....6 I. II. III. IV. Evolution of Al Qa’ida’s Organizational Structure…………………………………..7 A Description of Complex Organizations………………………………...…………..12 The Role of “Mergers and Acquisitions”………………………..…………………...13 Initial Thoughts on Policy Implications……………………………………………….15

Chapter 2: Literature Review………………………………………………………….17 I. II. Literature on Al Qa’ida’s Foreign Affiliates…………………………………………17 Literature on Joining Radical Movements……………………………………………20 A. Ideological motivations………………………………………………20 B. Psychosocial motivations…………………………………………….22 C. Strategic/opportunistic motivations………………………………….23 Literature on Terrorist Leadership…………………………………………………….25 A. The personality of terrorist leaders…………………………………..25 B. Targeting leadership………………………………………………….26


Chapter 3: Methodology………………………………………………………………..28 I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. Background……………………………………………………………………………….28 Assessing Q1……………………………………………………………………………...30 Assessing Q2……………………………………………………………………………...38 Developing the Universe of Cases……………………………………………………..40 Selection of Study Subjects……………………………………………………………...42 Problems Regarding Information Gathering…………………………………………43 Case Study………………………………………………………………………………...44 Relevance………………………………………………………………………………….44

Chapter 4: Universe of Cases…………………………………………………………..46 I. II. III. IV. Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: An Evolving Network…………………………………………46 Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: The Geographic Distribution………………………………..53 Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: Mergers? Partnerships? Or Collaborations?...................57 Summary of Findings…………………………………………………………………….59

Chapter 5: Results of Statistical Hypothesis Testing…………………………………60 I. II. Data Analysis and Results for Q1: What motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida’s and its pan-Islamic agenda?.......................................................60 Data Analysis and Results for Q2: What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible affiliates with Al Qa’ida……………………………………………………………….. 61


Chapter 6: Al Qa’ida in the Maghreb and Abdelmalek Droukdal – A Well Executed Merger…………………………………………………………………………………64 I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. The Origins of Islamic Violence in Algeria after the War of Independence……...64 The Birth of the Salvation Islamic Front……………………………………………...65 The Beginnings of the GIA and the Onset of an Epoch of Violence……………….66 An Alternative Emerges: The Origins of the GSPC…………………………………67 Fissions Form Within the GSPC……………………………………………………….67 The Rise of Droukdal…………………………………………………………………….71 Droukdal’s Program: Toward Global Jihad……………………………...………….73 The Announcement of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb………………..………...77 A New Organization……………………………………………………………………..78 Final Observations………………………………………………………………………80

Chapter 7: Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya: The Unrealized Merger………………………83 I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. The Emergence of the GAI from the Ashes of the Muslim Brotherhood………….83 The Sadat Assassination………………………………………………………………...84 Crackdown under Mubarak…………………………………………………………….84 Campaign of Terror……………………………………………..………………………85 Collapse of an Armed Group…………………………………………………………...86 Reconciliation…………………………………………………………………………….88 Explaining the Decision not to Affiliate with Al Qa’ida…………………………….89 Final Observations………………………………………………………………………91

Chapter 8: Conclusion and Discussion – Al Qa’ida’s Commanding Officers: A Skilled Management Team……………………………………………………………………..93 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………...107 Appendix I: List of Terrorist Groups………………………………………………..115 Appendix II: Sources by Terrorist Group…………………………………………...116 Appendix III: Commanding Officer Attribute Codebook……………………….....135 Appendix IV: Commanding Officer Attributes……………………………………..136 Appendix V: Data on Universe of Cases……………………………………………..138 Appendix VI: Data on Q1…………………………………………………………….139 Appendix VII: Data on Q2……………………………………………………………140


after these affiliations occur. Based on this analysis.Abstract: Al Qa’ida has allied with indigenous terrorist groups for over a decade. It then focuses on the role that local jihadist leaders play in the aftermath of the affiliation to shed further light on Al Qa’ida’s current strategy and operations. this paper offers some broad recommendations regarding the future conduct of the Global War on Terror (GWOT). The conclusion of this paper finds that while opportunistic. The local jihadist leaders who become Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers ensure ideological alignment with Al Qa’ida. 4 . rather than ideological concerns are the primary motivating factors for joining Al Qa’ida. This paper examines first the motivations of local jihadist groups who associate with Al Qa’ida to understand the transformation that Al Qa’ida has achieved. has Osama Bin Laden increasingly relied upon these franchises to prosecute his panIslamic struggle. shared visions become essential. only in recent years. However.

Without a doubt. and with enthusiasm. Professors Stockton and May helped me clarify and expand my views about this project on numerous occasions. Port Washington. not given. a traditionally male-dominated discipline. the members of my community began to dig themselves literally and metaphorically from the ruins of the 9/11 disaster. and coaching. This solidarity and resiliency consolidated my faith in humanity and sparked my interest in homeland security studies. at length. Moreover. I hope that a general acknowledgement here of the wisdom and understanding may be counted to me for righteousness. I would also like to thank my brother. New York which was tragically impacted by the September 11. These sources proved to be a treasure-chest indeed. Yet despite a pervasive sense of insecurity. Their constant support. Professor Crenshaw helped answer my questions promptly. Moreover. who listened to my presentations with great attention and offered so many thoughtful suggestions and useful comments. Despite his youth. Professor Crenshaw lives as a role model for the next generation of female investigators researching international security. she has offered me practical and affectionate support. She also put at my disposal her insights on numerous topics. both personal and intellectual is more important than can adequately be acknowledge in such a brief note. I have benefited particularly from communications with Professor Martha Crenshaw. Admiration should be earned. I have had the opportunity to try out some of my ideas and receive valuable criticism from my peers. he continues to inspire me every day with his thoughtfulness and intelligence. Finally. I would have been hardpressed to get this project done in anything like a timely fashion had it not been for this program. objectivity. 2001 terrorist attack on the Twin Towers. It gives me great pleasure to thank Professors Paul Stockton and Michael May for the opportunity to participate in the CISAC Interschool Honors Program. how friends and neighbors had disappeared and presumably perished during this devastating attack on America’s soil. Acts of kindness and heroism became increasingly visible in my community as people mobilized to help one another. In addition. I was so fortunate to have had Dara around as an academic example and important mentor. who is currently a junior in high school. Through the CISAC seminars. I am also grateful to Dara Kay Cohen. Thus. I distinctly remember the sense of dissociation and unreality as we struggled to understand how our beloved Twin Towers were destroyed. and Professor Crenshaw most certainly earned mine through her impressive career. 5 . I want to recognize my community. but most importantly for serving as an incredible mentor. this project would have been poorer without her invaluable comments. for whom I would also like to show gratitude. I would be remiss not to acknowledge my parents. I would like to thank Colonel Joseph Felter and Jarrett Brachman who introduced me to several primary and secondary documents. Since my sophomore year at Stanford. I have been so fortunate to benefit from their generosity and acumen. I dedicate my thesis to the population of Port Washington. and more recently into the making of this thesis.Acknowledgements: The ideas of more people than I can possibly mention have affected my thinking about terrorist organizations and Al Qa’ida over the years. There were cars parked at our train station that were never recovered and fathers and mothers who never returned from work. Thank you so much for your patience.

Al Qa’ida was a relatively centralized organization that used Afghanistan as a base from which to strategize. communicate often. While each perspective has its merits. Al Qa’ida’s structure and degree of centralization may fluctuate within a period of months or weeks. Currently. In contrast.Chapter 1: Building a Complex Organization Prior to the September 11. Although most scholars perceive Al Qa’ida as an organization in stasis. Thus. A few dominant camps have emerged within this scholarly debate. Gunaratna 2004). and depend upon each other. an organization characterized by “tight coupling” includes cells that associate intimately. Some scholars even contend that the main threat no longer emanates from Al Qa’ida but from unassociated radicalized individuals and groups who meet and plot in their neighborhoods and on the Internet (Sageman 2008. since the onset of the Global War on Terror (GWOT). Dishman 2005). Ronfeldt 2005. However. and to dispatch operatives worldwide. Others suggest that Al Qa’ida has become a decentralized network of individualized and local cells bound together exclusively by common beliefs (Diebert and Stein 2003. 2001 attacks. all oversimplify the command configuration utilized by Al Qa’ida. to plan attacks. they fail to acknowledge that this combination of loose and tight coupling has enabled Al Qa’ida to become a modern hydra that readily adapts to changes in its environment. Al Qa’ida utilizes a mix of both loose and tight coupling to attain a remarkable degree of adaptability. Al Qa’ida has transformed into a more ambiguous entity that scholars cannot easily define.Stern 2003). Moreover. One can 6 . An organization characterized by “loose coupling” has cells that are relatively autonomous and independent. The first maintains that Al Qa’ida Central Command retains ideological and operational control over the organization and preserves a certain degree of tactical influence. most fail to assess the exchange relationships that distinguish Al Qa’ida.

One method whereby Al Qa’ida achieves such adaptability is by merging or partnering with local jihadist groups. Al Qa’ida has begun to depend on these affiliates to obtain organizational flexibility to a considerable extent. characterized by an efficient blend of both tight and loose coupling. Although Al Qa’ida has cooperated with local jihadist groups for years. Moreover. I. each led by a commanding officer). By defining the new structure of Al Qa’ida (characterized by loosely integrated and operationally attached subunits.therefore classify Al Qa’ida as a complex organization a concept that will be elaborated in this chapter (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2003). Al Qa’ida has affiliated with indigenous terrorist groups for almost twenty years. this study may affect the allocation of resources in Washington for counterterrorism efforts. 2001. distinguishing the groups with which Al Qa’ida is strongly associated. these external relationships enabled Al Qa’ida to transform into a complex organization. since the onset of the Global War on Terror. This study will draw upon open source and primary source information to understand why and how Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers promote the pan-Islamic agenda. This study will examine the incentives and role of former local jihadist group leaders who now serve as Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. Ayman Zawahiri and the core of Al Qa’ida. and identifying and assessing the role of the commanders who interact with Osama Bin Laden. However. recently. It is important to analyze these individuals because they have assumed more authority since September 11. Evolution of Al Qa’ida’s Organizational Structure: 7 . the conclusions drawn from this analysis may present policymakers with new and novel ways of targeting Al Qa’ida and its partners.

In the 1980s. This council promoted common goals. However. and Abdullah Azzam. most of whom he knew since his formative days in Afghanistan. Pakistan to serve as a hostel for Arabs coming to fight the Soviets and as a press agency to produce propaganda to promote jihad. The shura majilis (consultative assembly) received information from four subordinate committees designed to direct specific segments of planning and operations. established an office in Peshawar. The religious committee justified Al 8 . Bin Laden expanded the Al Qa’ida organization. procuring. At the conclusion of the Soviet-Afghan war. The organization was centered upon the “shura” (i. it was not until the summer of 1988. a large number of jihadists from the Middle East traveled to Afghanistan to combat the Soviet Union. developing a membership roster and establishing a hierarchical arrangement to guide and oversee its functions (Riedel 2008). and launching support and military operations. He relocated to the Sudan at the invitation of the government of Hassan Turabi and the National Islamic Front. training. a multimillionaire from a wealthy Saudi family. coordinated targets. advisory council) consisting of Bin Laden’s closest associates. The military committee was responsible for recruiting. and authorized asset sharing for terrorist operations. The finance committee oversaw and developed financial resources. In the Sudan. after the liberation of Kuwait from Saddam Hussein by the American-led multinational army.e. Bin Laden was disenchanted with his native Saudi Arabia. which had rebuffed his offer to defend the kingdom. in 1991. However. Osama bin Laden. that Bin Laden began calling his cadre al Qaeda al Askariya (“the military base”) and developing a greater organizational structure (Riedel 2008). The Services Bureau (“Maktab al Khadamat”) provided travel funds and guesthouses in Pakistan for recruits and volunteers to facilitate the struggle against the Soviet forces. an Islamic scholar and founding member of the Kashmiri jihadist group Lashkar-e-Taiba. Bin Laden returned to Saudi Arabia as a hero of jihad.

In May 1996. the Pentagon. hatched the plan to target the Twin Towers. Afghanistan’s lack of central government provided Bin Laden with greater leeway to pursue his agenda and centralize his operations. and Libya. The September 11. Al Qa’ida’s former propaganda chief. 2001 attacks against the United States (Bergen 2002). Moreover. and the Capitol Building. Al Qa’ida could be classified as a centralized organization. Bin Laden and Khalid Sheikh Mohammad. although Al Qa’ida also assisted two other Salafi terrorist groups during this formative period in the Sudan. thereby strengthening Al Qa’ida Central Command and forming a close-knit group of jihadists uniquely capable of executing terror operations like the September 11. Egypt. Bin Laden was able to forge his closest alliance yet with the Taliban by providing it with significant financial and human resources to support the ongoing war against other factions in northern Afghanistan. Thus. Saudi Arabia. Bin Laden left the Sudan to return to Afghanistan as a result of combined pressure from the United States. Bin Laden personally recruited the plot’s 9 . 2001 attacks reveal the former nature of Al Qa’ida’s decision-making apparatus. Once a specific operation was decided upon. other western governments. the media committee produced propaganda intended to generate Muslim support for the organization and its objectives (Harmony Database Released Documents: Al Qa'ida Goals and Structure 2006). Finally. in its earlier incarnation. The plot to attack the United State began in 1999 after Al Qa’ida executed the simultaneous bombings of the American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. In May 1997. Bin Laden cemented his ties to Ayman Zawahiri.Qa’ida’s actions and operations within the theological parameters of Al Qa’ida model of Islam. all three of which faced indigenous terrorist groups supported by Bin Laden. it would be assigned to a carefully selected cell headed by a senior Al Qa’ida operative who reported personally to Bin Laden (Wright 2007). the last emir of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad.

they established their own individual plans (Felter et al. After the first year of the GWOT and the ouster of the Taliban from Afghanistan. Al Qa’ida was a centralized organization. When operations are so decentralized. Captives revealed the names of their commanders and associates thereby highlighting the need for loose coupling between local operatives and Al Qa’ida’s executive leadership in order to evade government interference and limit the consequences of any further compromises. Prior to 9/11. The shura concluded that a decentralized. Al Qa’ida soon learned that there are limitations to a strictly decentralized structure. Although Bin Laden and Al Qa’ida considered 9/11 an astonishing success. individual cells. many Al Qa’ida leaders were imprisoned. which used Afghanistan as a base from which to carry out major operations against American targets and did not significantly depend upon its affiliates to support its operations in the Middle East.tactical leader. Mullah Omar in the preparation (Riedel 2008). These arrests led to subsequent arrests of other senior officers. While they operated in support of centralized directives. In November 2002. for instance. Nevertheless. he personally handled other elements of the conspiracy. he engaged the Taliban and its leader. Al Qa’ida allegedly convened a strategic summit in northern Iran at which the shura recognized that Al Qa’ida could no longer function as a hierarchy. the attacks precipitated the Global War on Terror (GWOT). composed of less than ten operatives. were instructed to develop their own organizational structures. Additionally. Mohammed Atta as well as the fifteen operatives who would intimidate the passengers during the airline hijackings. detached from Al Qa’ida Central Command and other cells. 2006). From this point forward. networked terrorist organizations would be less vulnerable to traditional counterterrorism measures used by hierarchically organized security forces. it becomes particularly difficult to maintain 10 .

rather than consolidating its victory in Afghanistan. In 2002 and 2003. and Fishman 2006). Al Qa’ida could not effectively monitor its agents’ activities. thereby provoking Pakistan to divert to the east troops that were needed in the west. these low-level operatives sought more violence than was useful due to the cognitive dynamics of an underground organization. who are the most important link in the formation of a resilient. Moreover. competition for prominence within the movement. Al Qa’ida faced challenges when Central Command was forced to delegate certain duties to low level operatives. Like most other organizations. Thus. However. Al Qa’ida can rely upon closer relations with its commanding officers (the former leaders of indigenous terrorist groups). nor could it punish renegade agents (Felter. the US allowed Al Qa’ida to reconstitute itself in the tribal areas of Pakistan. after five Kashmiri terrorists attacked Lok Sabha. Brachman. complex organization. who espoused different personal preferences. These commanding officers ensure that preference divergence does not result in the loss of 11 . the lower house of India’s parliament in New Delhi. India began to mobilize along the border. Perkins.S. and their own talent at conducting aggressive attacks (Shapiro 2007). Bramlett. prior to the invasion of Iraq. Within a decentralized framework. Al Qa’ida was able to reestablish some of its pre-9/11 operational capabilities by exploiting Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Riedel 2008). the U. decision to go to war with Iraq and the Pakistani decision to provoke a crisis with India allowed Al Qa’ida to survive by regaining a degree of centralization. Al Qa’ida leadership found itself cornered along the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan and unable to coordinate its low-level operatives.situational awareness and control the use of violence to achieve specific political ends. Often. Invading Iraq diverted troops from the mission of finding Al Qa’ida’s leadership. As the result of restoration of central control.

Complex organizations are composed of a diversity of agents. the relationship between Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers and central authorities are moderately coupled (thus. it was not very efficient. Empowered by the establishment of its safe haven in Pakistan and increased reliance upon its commanding officers. highly visible organizational personnel. today. II. the relationship between its commanding officers and central authorities were also loosely coupled (thus. Al Qa’ida is a true “complex organization”). Although a decentralized organization form was more appropriate and prudent after 9/11. Al Qa’ida was effectively a decentralized network). While the relationships within the cells are tightly coupled. Al Qa’ida’s demand for operational secrecy. While it is difficult to 12 . Before Al Qa’ida Central Command reorganized itself in the tribal areas of Pakistan. Unlike strictly centralized organizations. and large size dictated its organizational decisions. Al Qa’ida continues to morph into a complexly structure organization (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2006). complex organizations can exploit a diversity of systems (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2001). who interact with and mutually affect one another. the relationships between cells and between operatives and Al Qa’ida Central Command are loosely coupled. qualified by loosely coupled systems.operational success or security. By contrast. Al Qa’ida now relies heavily upon semiautonomous cells found in operational territories that are horizontally and vertically integrated into the centralized command structure. intricate nature of resource gathering and allocation. qualified by tightly coupled systems or exclusively decentralized organizations. A Description of Complex Organizations: As this history indicates. This flexible structure allows the Central Command to maintain control over specifically identified strategic operations through its commanding officers while enabling cells to maintain their autonomy in local and regional operations (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2006).

partners. interactive communication 13 . Since they are already closely coupled to their agents. III. Al Qa’ida has achieved an optimal combination of coupling. Al Qa’ida theorist Abu Musab al-Suri noted the importance of a highly trained cadre of senior commanding officers. Brachman. He observed that a dearth of such leaders reduces the maximum level of control Al Qa’ida could exert thereby undermining the potential for political impact (Felter. However. Bramlett. it employs the groups’ leaders as its commanding officers and integrates them into Al Qa’ida Central Command by establishing communication channels and by offering financial and technological resources to these leaders for their local outlets with stipulations. Perkins. now when Al Qa’ida merges. Moreover. Previously. these commanding officers are effective because they can develop mature relationships with their operatives. they can build differentiated relationships with their rapports rather than espousing an “average” leadership style. The Role of “Mergers and Acquisitions:” By affiliating with local jihadist movements. or collaborates with a local jihadist groups. and Fishman 2006). Bin Laden did not seek to exert strategic or operational control over the leaders of its regionally based affiliates. the extensive negotiations that continue to occur between Al Qa’ida and its affiliates suggest that Al Qa’ida has consciously utilized these arrangements to remain resilient.determine if Al Qa’ida assumed this structure by conscious design or coincidence. Communication frequency. These commanding officers can serve a crucial role since they are better able to monitor the behavior of their agents and can punish and reward them for their performance. These relationships are characterized by a high degree of leader-member exchange and commitment that was impossible to achieve between Al Qa’ida Central Command executives and operatives due to their lack of physical proximity.

Studies from the corporate world as well as observations by Al Qa’ida theorists reveal that when agents develop high quality relationships with their leaders. subordinate loyalty. cohesive units can innovate and adapt to the demands of the environment because they do not need to conform to a strict set of guidelines passed down from Central Command. Al Qa’ida can ensure that strategic and tactical differences between it and its commanding officers are reconciled. Local leaders can also effectively monitor operative’s personal and social network. Because affiliations are often preceded by several months of bargaining and negotiations. Providing funds on a need-to-have basis to smaller groups of operatives is a risky strategy because each additional transfer entails communications and financial transactions. these new. relying on lower-level operatives (who are often less committed. Thus. and member affect are all key in this dyadic relationship (Graen and Uhl-Bien 1995). ensuring that relationships that could dilute commitment are avoided and those that enhance commitment are strengthened(Brachman and McCants 2006). leader-member value agreement. which can be tracked by counterterrorist forces. Commanding officers now serve an important role as interlocutors with Al Qa’ida Central Command. decision influence. Moreover. Perkins. The moderate coupling between Al Qa’ida Central Command and local leaders is essential to the performance of the organization. Moreover. their performance. Jarrett Brachman.patterns. Bramlett. 14 . since the most devoted operatives are obliged to engage in riskier or inherently fatal assignments) is a more hazardous strategy (Felter. Al Qa’ida Central Command can rely upon its commanding officers to handle finance and logistic tasks and to engage in auditing strategies. and their overall unit performance improves (Graen and Uhl-Bien 1995). and Fishman 2006). There is a positive correlation between the level of ideological indoctrination of cell members and the degree of control a leader exerts.

up-to-date. and competence of local cells. transmitting new.By allowing its commanding officers to retain significant freedom to interact with other local leaders and with resource providers. obligations to Al Qa’ida Central Command. Thus. Currently. and Internet articles. efficiency. press and scholarly articles. government documents. information between operatives and Al Qa’ida authorities (McAllister 2004). thereby ensuring the unity. finances. Drawing upon documents and transcripts of legal proceedings involving global Salafi mujahedin and their organizations. Initial Thoughts on Policy Implications: 15 . Moreover. they act as a hub of communication. Although these commanding officers have significant responsibilities (for example. this study provides valuable insight into the transformation that these leaders undergo when they become Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers by looking at their responsibilities before and after they affiliate with Al Qa’ida. thereby allowing Al Qa’ida to maintain ideological and operational control over the organization and by closely interacting with local operatives. at present. and equipment. they are given latitude to exploit their specific environment. this study compiles the biographies of over forty Al Qa’ida commanding officers. This is the first study that pinpoints the organizations with which Al Qa’ida has affiliated and identifies their leaders (who subsequently become Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers). scrutinizing their stories for patterns to determine their motivation. IV. and powers including discipline and punishment of their agents) no researcher has analyzed their role or background. local leaders-cum-commanding officers perform a crucial function by liaising with Al Qa’ida Central Command. Moreover. these commanding officers can ensure the dissemination of innovation and information by acting as an intermediary between their cell members and Al Qa’ida Central Command. duty of care to their agents. the use of force. accountability for operation effectiveness.

Government efforts to degrade Al Qa’ida’s capacity should focus on undermining its security environment, minimizing the degree to which it can control operations, and abort its ability to fund its activities. By identifying the crucial role played by commanding officers in sustaining Al Qa’ida, this study will suggest additional means of undermining Al Qa’ida. The government should increase dissension between local leaders and Al Qa’ida Central Command. The US government should publicly recognize and highlight the differences between the acquired groups, who originally espouse ambitions such as regime overthrow and Al Qa’ida, which is committed to a pan-Islamic program. Moreover, the government can disrupt communications channels between local leaders and Al Qa’ida central command by utilizing misinformation and flooding information channels, thereby forcing the commanding officers to communicate more frequently with Al Qa’ida Central Command, possibly revealing crucial information. There may be “psychological” tactics that can be employed to generate dissension, to exploit certain aspects of human or group dynamics that would lead to competition, or rebellion. Moreover, there may be certain personality characteristics of the types of individuals employed at each level of organization that can be manipulated. Finally, government efforts should deny jihadist groups the benefit of security vacuum in vulnerable areas; thereby barring the emergence of potential Al Qa’ida partners. Through troop deployment, the US government can deny terrorists the use of vulnerable countries as staging grounds for the attacks in the West.


Chapter 2: Literature Review
Recently, counterterrorist agents and military officers have mounted efforts to combat Al Qa’ida and Bin Laden supporters. However, there is considerable controversy among scholars regarding the structure of Al Qa’ida and therefore, how best to target this formidable foe. The debate regarding the nature of Al Qa’ida’s threat will inevitably impact upon the allocation of influence and resource by the U.S. federal government in the Global War on Terror (GWOT) embarked upon following the September 11, 2001 attacks. The outcome of the bureaucratic turf wars over funding for programs under the new Obama administration will surely define future directions and strategies to confront Al Qa’ida specifically and global terrorism in general. In the introductory chapter, I highlighted the newfound importance of Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers, which lead the groups with which Al Qa’ida has recently merged or with whom it remains associated. Although Al Qa’ida retains its core group and a well-trained terrorist cadre, it has become increasingly engaged with regional affiliates in Egypt, the Sinai Peninsula, Indonesia, and other sites in franchise operations. I. Literature on Al Qa’ida’s Foreign Affiliates Several scholars have investigated the process whereby Al Qa’ida has achieved a broader geographic and operational reach by employing local jihadist groups. These researchers confirm my commentary that such partnerships can provide Al Qa’ida with increased flexibility and offer advantages in stimulating tactical level innovation within particular environments when they are astutely directed by Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. In a report prepared for the Combat Studies Institute, Kalic describes Al Qa’ida as a “modern hydra.” He observes that before the onset of the GWOT, Al Qa’ida functioned as a regional indoctrination and training center for Islamic terrorist organizations. However, he


corroborates my observation that because of the loss of support and training centers in Afghanistan due to Operation Enduring Freedom, Bin Laden was obliged to rely upon outside groups in order to perpetuate Al Qa’ida’s agenda. Kalic suggests that Al Qa’ida’s alliances with Abu Sayyaf, Egyptian Islamic Jihad, Tunisian Combatant Group, and Libyan Islamic Fighting Group have enabled Al Qa’ida to expand its geographic influence and diffuse its organizational structure. He describes the process whereby Al Qa’ida supports local “walk in” Islamic groups that pitch their plans to Al Qa’ida for financial support. These radical groups provide additional reach to Al Qa’ida and expand its operational capability for minimal investment because they can develop indigenous plans and operations based on local situations and observations. Moreover, they allow Al Qa’ida to minimize exposure of its central command structure (Kalic 2005) In a similar vein, Takeyh and Gvosdev have observed that after the destruction of its sanctuary in Afghanistan, Al Qa’ida has remained buoyant by forging foreign alliances. Through this strategy, Al Qa’ida has established a presence in failed states where it believes the US will opt not to risk significant losses associated with urban/guerilla warfare. Al Qa’ida no longer needs a strong state for funding and supplies since it can rely on its franchises in countries like Kashmir, Kosovo, Chechnya, and Palestine (Takeyh and Gvosdev 2002). Riedel avows that the US invasion of Iraq and subsequent efforts to quell sectarian unrest have allowed Al Qa’ida to regroup in the tribal areas of Pakistan, where it has established a new base of operations. Now, Al Qa’ida is once again focused on enlarging its network. Consequently, Al Qa’ida has developed a closer relationship with Kashmiri terrorist groups, like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Muhammad that have a presence there. Moreover, while Al Qa’ida has failed to topple the governments of Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, its attacks against these


Al Qa’ida finds another organization that can attain its other goals and leaves this former associate to continue the war on its own. Al Qa’ida can forge broad.” Due to the adaptability of its mission. which is not identical to Al Qa’ida’s tactics. obliging both entities to adapt. the plot to destroy ten commercial airliners en route from the United Kingdom to the United States. 19 . The affiliated groups may employ a modus operandi. Moreover. Al Qa’ida remains associated with these groups as long as they cannot operate independently. with Shia organizations (like Hezbollah). In a similar vein. and revivalist organizations (like Tablighi Jamaat) (Stern 2003). Mishal and Rosenthal describe Al Qa’ida as a “dune organization” that employs other loosely affiliated organizations to carry out its missions. or Lebanon in the near future (Riedel 2007). She maintains that many organizations will form alliances with groups that have ideologies different from their own. thus. Al Qa’ida need not maintain constant supervision or control over the activities of its old affiliate’s operatives (Mishal and Rosenthal 2005). For instance. and sometimes unlikely alliances with other jihadist groups (like Jemaah Islamiyah). when they prove that they no longer need Al Qa’ida’s material or normative support to conduct independent maneuvers. she avows that Bin Laden has adjusted his objectives over time and describes Al Qa’ida as a “flexible group of ruthless warriors ready to fight on behalf of multiple causes. she suggests that both Egyptian Islamic Jihad and the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan compromised their original mission when they joined forces with Al Qa’ida. Stern observes that terrorist groups’ objectives have evolved to ensure their survival. Africa. foiled in 2006. Finally. However. Riedel suggests that Al Qa’ida may seek a foothold in Gaza. indicates that Al Qa’ida has established connections in Europe.regimes demonstrate its expanded influence throughout the Middle East. with traditional organized crime groups (like Artab Ansari’s [an Indian gangster] network).

or personnel for a specific purpose and duration and “minority equity investments. He offers Al Qa’ida in Iraq as an example of a group which compromised Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic mission by attacking Muslim civilians and engaging in conflict with other Iraqi insurgent groups (Fishman 2008). Many groups that merge or partner with Al Qa’ida adhere to a program based on the ethnic. they do not reveal why local jihadist groups choose to align with Al Qa’ida. reputation. He contends that Al Qa’ida’s franchises are likely to commit rash. They avow that terrorist groups cannot be self-sustaining and must “engage in the fundamentals of established economic practices” to furnish protection from outside threats. Finally.Fishman is less worried about Al Qa’ida franchises than other scholars. they describe mergers and acquisitions. including “licensing agreements.” whereby Al Qa’ida finances terrorist groups with the intention of influencing their strategic activity.” whereby Al Qa’ida allows other groups to use its facilities. Desouza and Hengsen provide the most comprehensive analysis of Al Qa’ida’s collaborative activities. They contend that these interactions are the most complex form of equity engagements that terrorist groups develop to survive in competitive environments and suggest that mergers/acquisitions allow terrorist groups to consolidate their assets to compete more successfully or exploit resources held by other parties (Desouza and Hengsen 2007). He avers that Al Qa’ida offers these franchises few benefits. whereby Al Qa’ida combines with or subsumes another organization. II. strategic mistakes and are more susceptible to counterterrorism offensives than their mother organization. Ideological motivations While these studies analyze Al Qa’ida’s strategy and explain why Al Qa’ida has pursued such arrangements. equipment. Literature on Incentives for Joining Radical Movements A. and ideology. They analyze several possible arrangements. offering only its name. 20 .

She maintains that political organizations often orient their ideology to support recruitment. Based on her interpretation. many groups grapple with contradictions between national and supranational aims. Della Porta suggests that individuals are persuaded to enlist in underground organizations when they are enticed by its ideology. and Weeding validate this line of thought. few studies investigate the incentives of the local jihadist leaders who adopt Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program and transform their organization into part of Al Qa’ida’s system. They observe that although Al Qa’ida was initially devoted to fighting the Soviet forces it now espouses more internationalist objectives. Unfortunately. Upon allying with Al Qa’ida. Consequently. Like Stern. She observes that the attention groups pay to adjusting their ideology to circumstance is revealed when they explain and justify their strategies. Al Qa’ida can co-opt local struggles into an evolving network of worldwide jihad by asserting its dedication to an international agenda. Studies regarding why individuals join radical movements may inform our understanding of the motivations of local terrorists leaders who connect with Al Qa’ida’s global enterprise. One could also envisage that Al Qa’ida is promoting its pan-Islamic vision because it is aware of the magnetism of this dream. In fact. it is a tool for enlarging the potential supporters of the organization. Smith. she proposes that ideology is a strategic choice made by the organization.sectarian. Consequently. Jones. they must forsake their indigenous agendas to support the global pan-Islamic movement. one might expect that local jihadist leaders subscribe to Al Qa’ida’s global jihad because the idea of establishing an Islamic Caliphate throughout the world is attractive to them. enemies and allies are described in different terms at different times (Della Porta 1995). linguistic. They contend that Al 21 . and state boundaries in which they arose.

Gunaratna also supports this argument. Pedahzur. Similarly.Qa’ida has improved its media wing to appeal to local jihadist groups in their native language and honor regional customs. they 22 . They observed that most had a high school education and some had additional schooling and that most came from respected families that supported their activism. and Weinberg observed 80 Palestinian suicide terrorists from 1973 to 2002. B. Smith. Al Qa’ida anti-Western curriculum is increasingly alluring (R. and Hezbollah. other studies suggest that individuals join terrorist networks for psychosocial reasons. He avows that traditionally. Perliger. as well as 14 secular terrorists from Fatah al-Islam. As a result. Post. Consequently. rather than local jihad. They noticed that these terrorists exhibited a higher rate of religious education. They deduced that peer influence and increased social standing were major reasons for joining a terrorist group (Post. Gunaratna 2002). and Weeding 2003). Al Qa’ida successfully transformed the parochial thinking of these groups through a sophisticated propaganda campaign to orient them towards global. Sprinzak. and Denny interviewed 35 incarcerated Middle Eastern extremists from Hamas. Moreover. membership in fundamentalist organizations and repeat terrorist acts. Islamist groups fought secular Muslim governments either to replace them or to form a separate state. Sprinzak. They offer Jemaah Islamiyah as an example of an organization that was seduced by Al Qa’ida’s discussion of a pan-Islamic caliphate (Jones. global events have provided the context for the new generation to gain exposure to significant ideological training and indoctrination. Psychosocial motivations Conversely. However. As a consequence of the GWOT and the war in Iraq. they concluded that income and/or educational inequalities do not account for terrorism. Islamic Jihad. and Denny 2003).

Marc Sageman’s book. Although his research was biased towards leaders who have come to the public attention. which they perceive to be the optimum strategy to accomplish a sociopolitical goal. the GSPC. educated young men from caring and religious families. On the contrary. spirituality and concern for their communities. Understanding Terror Network is particularly revealing. Several academics believe that terrorist action derives from a conscious. he found that social bonds were the critical element in the process of joining jihad and he suggested that such connections precede ideological commitment (Sageman 2004). Strategic/opportunistic motivations Alternatively. Each mode of operation has a per-unit price that 23 . C. Jemaah Islamiyah. Sageman compiled data from public sources on 172 individuals who he identified as members of a global Salafi mujahedeen. He observed that members of terrorist organizations were generally middle-class. terrorist leaders may have opportunistic motives for securing a spot under Al Qa’ida’s umbrella. These participants in jihad grew up with strong positive values of religion. Sagemen found no evidence of pathological narcissism or paranoid personality disorder amongst those who he surveyed.proposed that the terrorists acted out of altruistic motives (devotion to a religious community) and deduced that recruitment could be based on a network of shared social values(Pedahzur. Sandler and Enders contend that terrorists must choose between different strategies and modes of attack based on their perception of “prices” associated with alternative operations. He sample included expatriate leaders of the Egyptian Islamic Group. Perliger. members of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad. and Weinberg 2003). calculated decision to execute a particular type of action. and Al Qa’ida. rational. Moreover.

by extension. In joining Al Qa’ida. the United States and its allies. access to training facilities. local jihadist leaders may confederate with Al Qa’ida due to psychosocial influences. he mentions that the Iraq war has sapped local jihadist groups of their most active militants. who might otherwise be contained or co-opted by local regimes and. embracing global jihad may be perceived as a way to control and recruit new group members (Bruce Hoffman 2004). Based on these accounts. These affinities may compel local jihadist leaders to liaise with their old compatriots and mutually assist each other in their subsequent struggles. local jihadist leaders. while incarcerated together. etc. local jihadist group leaders may be lured by Al Qa’ida’s ideology. one can imagine three different rationales why local jihadist group leaders would affiliate with Al Qa’ida. Finally. Hoffman notes that approximately 90 percent of all terrorist groups collapse within a year and only half of the remainder survives another decade. Finally. resources and anticipated outcome. any act executed by a terrorist organization can be perceived as a rational choice (Sandler and Enders 2004). These local jihadist leaders may have developed relationships with Al Qa’ida officials during the Soviet-Afghan war. Thus. 24 . and association with the Al Qa’ida label.includes the value of time. Based on these observations he suggests that several local jihadist outlets need the Al Qa’ida imprimatur to raise money. First. He remarks upon long running government offensives that have nearly crushed several terrorist groups. while training together. In this context. Alternatively. He further notes that local jihadist cells shed their outlaw status within radical Muslim circles when they have Al Qa’ida’s backing. It is possible that these groups take the transnational jihadist challenge seriously because the idea of creating a single Islamic state or reviving the united Caliphate of earlier times is captivating. these local jihadist leaders may seek concrete benefits such as the provision of financial resources. may unite with Al Qa’ida to guarantee organizational survival.

III. Literature on Terrorist Leadership A. The personality of terrorist leaders While these studies enlighten the discussion regarding incentives for merging or partnering with Al Qa'ida, very little literature directly addresses the role that local jihadist leaders play before or after a merger. However, some researchers have attempted to identify personality traits that enable leaders to attract and maintain large followings. In the 1920s, German sociologist Max Weber defined charismatic leadership as “resting on devotion to the exceptional sanctity, heroism, or exemplary character of an individual person, and of the normative patterns or order revealed or ordained by him.” He suggested that charisma was a personality trait by virtue of which a leader appeared endowed with exceptional power or superhuman competencies. Charismatic leaders gained authority through qualities unique their own, not through positions that they occupied (Weber 1968). Kostrzebski applied Weber’s theory of charismatic authority to examine leadership in the context of Islamic tradition. He contends that a certain model of charismatic politico-religious leadership, first exemplified by Mohammed, the prophet and founder of Islam, is prominent in Islamic history. He notices that in the Islamic world, religious and political leadership is usually embodied in the persona of a single charismatic individual. He cites Mahdi of Sudan, Ayatollah Khomeini, and Osama bin Laden as examples of this archetype. Furthermore, he predicts that this type of charismatic politico-religious leader will appear with greater frequency in the future (Kostrzebski 2002). Similarly, Bergen contends that Bin Laden’s charisma helped fuel an influx of recruits and attracted aspiring jihadists to Afghanistan from Western countries. Moreover, he avows that Bin Laden’s cult of personality prompted various militant Islamic groups to affiliate with Al


Qa’ida. He notes that Bin Laden left operational planning to trusted lieutenants and stood above the fray. Consequently, few operatives received personal audience with him. However, those who went through the vetting procedures and gained access to Bin Laden describe their encounters with the legendary terrorist leader as “beautiful” (Bergen 2006). B. Targeting leadership While these studies suggest that a leader’s charisma can inspire a devoted following, they do not address the role that such leaders play within an organizational framework. While research addressing this topic has been extremely sparse, some scholars have discussed how the arrest or neutralization of a terrorist leader can affect the group’s performance. In a Joint Special Operations University report, Turbiville perceives that the United States has emphasized targeting and eliminating key terrorist leadership since 9/11. He describes the diverse experience of foreign operations against insurgent and terrorist high value targets. Based on several case studies, he concludes that leadership targeting can be effective, particularly when a group depends heavily on a charismatic leader. However, he cautions that operations which target leadership must be integrated into an overall and effective counterinsurgency and counterterrorist strategy and warns that abuses of national and international law and human rights committed in terrorist leadership targeting programs have a negative impact on larger counterinsurgency goals (Turbiville 2007). Langdon, Sarapu, and Wells examined 35 leadership crises to determine what happens to terrorist movements after the loss of a leader. Although they predicted that the assassination of a leader would cause a dramatic change in ideology leading to increased violence, they found that the assassination of a leader often causes the group to fail or disband. Moreover, they observed that the assassination of a leader is more likely to devastate a terrorist group than an arrest. They


suggest that arrested leaders may continue to play an important ideological role by guiding their group from their prison cell (Langdon, Sarapu, and Wells 2004). These studies suggest that targeting leadership could damage a terrorist group by depriving it of effective direction and demoralizing its rank and file members. However, while these analyses intimate that terrorist leaders play an important role in ensuring organizational survival, they do not expose the particular function that terrorist leaders must execute. Thus, this study is valuable since its looks at both the motivations and specific responsibilities of Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers.


Currently. Background: The introductory chapter explained how and why Al Qa’ida relies extensively upon the leaders of regionally focused groups. During negotiations between Al Qa’ida and 28 . Moreover. Al Qa’ida has become a flexible. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the motivations and responsibilities of Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. Al Qaida’s ability to mete out devastating destruction worldwide has increased as cells have become progressively armed with modern technology. As such. Its terrorist activity. Al Qa’ida has expanded its reach through its affiliations so that it is uniquely positioned to target the West through spectacular attacks designed to inflict mass casualties and damage to the global economy. we must understand the strength that resides in its leaders. recently. In fact. moderately coupled network of individuals united by a common need and ultimately aligned behind an emergent leader.Chapter 3: Methodology Al Qa’ida has clearly transformed and evolved in ways described in the introduction. who serve as Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. By depending upon its commanding officers (the former leaders of local jihadist groups). I. conducted by operatives capable of inflicting maximum civilian and economic damages on both local and distant targets in pursuit of their extremist goals. Osama bin Laden. they have become the main link between Al Qa’ida Central Command and the organization’s operative units. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers have the ultimate authority over their region and are given wide latitude to run their units within the boundaries of Al Qa’ida’s doctrines. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are held responsible for its success or failure in their region. As centralized communication nodes within their system. In order to understand why Al Qa’ida is such a forceful and resilient organization. remains an important security threat.

researchers have overlooked them. focusing primarily on principals like Osama bin Laden. Just as managers from the corporate arena trying to integrate newly acquired companies and divisions. motivations. little is known about the characters. communicate often and address everyone involved in the deal. Past studies have ignored important hierarchical considerations. do not adequately explain why certain terrorists leaders affiliate with Al Qa’ida and its program of global jihad nor do they reveal the precise role that these officers serve within the Al Qa’ida network once affiliated. because academic studies to date have not focused on Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. I theorized that by examining the demographic characteristics of Al 29 . they help stimulate interdependency and interaction among their units and other branches of Al Qa’ida. Unfortunately. Although these commanding officers play a vital role in expanding the agenda of Al Qa’ida and adding legitimacy to its international campaign. Negotiations are often lengthy processes. which consider categories of influence factors and their effect on an individual’s decision to join an Islamic fundamentalist terrorist organization. Thus. Finally. plan ahead. so too must the commanding officers that merge their organization with Al Qa’ida prepare accordingly (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2006). The surveys reviewed.the potential affiliate. Commanding officers also ensure that an operative’s incentives to supply effort are not diminished and mediate conflict within their unit when the affiliation begins and as it matures. involving discussions regarding financial and capital resources and tactics. or credentials of these officials. it will contribute to the bank of information and stimulate vital discourse on the composition and function of Al Qa’ida today. This study is the first to comprehensively examine Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. commanding officers are influential arbitrators. The previous chapter revealed that literature on the role of leadership in terror networks has remained limited in scope.

Qa’ida’s operatives, such as age, educational background, years of religious training, religious affiliation, and by evaluating these operatives for their military backgrounds (e.g. war experiences/participation in the Afghanistan conflict), incarceration/prison time, migration patterns etc, I would be able to detect recognizable patterns that characterize these terrorist executives. The patterns that I observed would help me answer two critical questions: 1) What motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida’s and its pan-Islamic agenda? 2) What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible affiliates with Al Qa’ida?

II. Assessing Q1: The previous chapter outlined three explanations for why individuals join terrorist organizations. Some researchers suggest that terrorists follow a strategic logic and are inspired by opportunism; they perceive armed combat at the most effective way to generate significant governmental concessions (Sandler and Enders 2004, Bruce Hoffman 2004). Others scholars suggest that ideology plays an important role in pushing militants of some militants toward terrorism (Della Porta 1995, Jones, Smith, and Weeding 2003, R. Gunaratna 2002). Finally, some academics claim that individuals join terrorist organizations due to strong solidarity bonds derived from interpersonal relations (Post, Sprinzak, and Denny 2003, Pedahzur, Perliger, and Weinberg 2003, Sageman 2004). Since prior studies have not discussed what incentives provoke local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida, I assumed that the motivations for local jihadist leaders to join Al Qa’ida’s global jihad were similar to the motivations for individuals to


join terrorist movements. Thus, to address my first question, I developed the following hypotheses: H11. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to opportunistic motives H21. Al Qa’ida commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to ideological motives H31. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due psychosocial motives H11 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers aligned with Al Qa’ida due to opportunistic motives) reflects the observation that relatively undersized, less powerful indigenous assemblies of terrorists can invigorate their organization by aligning with Al Qa’ida. In recent years, Al Qa’ida has demonstrated unusual resilience and international reach. It has exhibited a complexity, agility, and global scope that is unrivaled by any previous terrorist organization. Its fluid operational style, based on a common mission statement and shared objectives rather than standard-operating procedures has ensured its success (Stern 2003). Al Qa’ida has a remarkable ability to attract membership by relying upon a web of informal relations with various Islamic groups to gain access to operational collaborators and individuals to execute attacks. Currently, Al Qa’ida’s recruitment process seems to be more a matter of joining than being solicited. Moreover, the Salafi message, which has been disseminated over the Internet by Al Qa’ida’s media division, has attracted numerous members of alienated diasporas (sometimes second and third generation immigrants) who feel isolated from their communities and seek to belong to a group (Bruce Hoffman 2003). By associating with Al Qa’ida, local jihadist groups can shore up popular support and amp up recruitment.


Al Qa’ida’s strength may also lie in its impressive coffers; Al Qa’ida has amassed billions of dollars by building a strong network of financiers and operatives who are frugally minded and business savvy. Moreover, Al Qa’ida’s finances are often hidden in legitimate and illegitimate businesses; Bin Laden is reputed to own approximately eighty companies around the world. Al Qa’ida has learned to effectively leverage the global financial system of capital markets by utilizing small financial transfers, under regulated Islamic banking networks and informal transfer systems throughout the world. Thus, it is difficult to choke off funds destined for Al Qa’ida (Basile 2004). Consequently, Al Qa’ida can grant money to local terrorist groups that present promising plans for attacks that serve Al Qa’ida’s general goals. All terrorist organizations must engage in attacks to maintain support, to buttress their organizational integrity, and to foster their continued existence. Associating with Al Qa’ida ensures that a group has access to the necessary financial resources to conduct attacks. In a sense, Al Qa’ida operates like a large multi-national company and the “product” that it exports is terrorism. One must acknowledge the economic principles that underlie Al Qa’ida’s success, that of supply and demand, limited resources, productivity etc. Finally, Al Qa’ida has successfully exploited the technological tools of globalization to communicate with various audiences. Al Qa’ida has launched an effective advertising campaign worldwide using the latest technology and psychology to reach their desired addressees. Al Qa’ida uses mobile phones, text messaging, instant messaging, websites, email, blogs, and chat rooms for administrative tasks, fund-raising, research, logistical coordination of attacks, and recruitment. When Al Qa’ida’s media division airs its hostage videos and films of terrorist attacks or their aftermath, it provides the organization with the oxygen of publicity necessary to sustain itself. Unless civilian populations are made aware of terrorist acts and cowed into fear by


spectacular attacks. the onset of series of attacks. Consequently. In fact.such assaults. if there was strong evidence that the group was in a state of imminent decline immediately prior to its merger with A Qa’ida. Information was gathered from various international security think tanks including the Center for Defense Information. the Jamestown Foundation. etc. the founding. Cronin lists seven broad explanations for the decline and ending of terrorist groups: 1) the capture or killing of the leader 2) failure to transition to the next generation 3) achievement of the group’s aims 4) transition to a legitimate political process 5) undermining of popular support 6) repression 7) transition from terrorist to other forms of violence. most modern terrorist groups do not last long. Terrorist groups that align with Al Qa’ida can benefits from Al Qa’ida’s media and propaganda expertise. I developed timelines for each organization included in this study. If there was 33 . I searched for evidence of terrorist group decline based on Cronin’s criteria. as a rational actor. would affiliate with Al Qa’ida if he desperately needed to give his organization a second wind. the Institute for Conflict Management in New Delhi. I judged that the local jihadist leader. to assess H11. I assumed that opportunism was the primary motivation for merging with Al Qa’ida (coded as 2). 90% of terrorist organizations have a life span of less than one year. it is important to remember that Al Qa’ida is a unique terrorist organization. the beginning of a government offensive. The timelines featured important events in their life cycle (e. Moreover. More than one dynamic can be responsible for their decline (Cronin 2006).). the Council of Foreign Relations. In considering this hypothesis. Consequently. these materials are seen by potential sympathizers who may be brought into the folds of terrorism itself (Blanchard 2006). and the NEFA foundation.g. Al Qa’ida cannot influence the governments that it targets. To do so.

To execute this assessment. To assess H21 (Al Qa’ida commanding officers were inspired by Al Qa’ida’s ideology). the UK’s security intelligence agency. To perform this appraisal.some data that suggested that the group had experienced minor setbacks. which they had published regarding their ideology. I considered the leader’s prior involvement in Islamic societies. (Al Qa’ida is a pan-Islamic organization) 3) Al Qa’ida promotes violence against other Muslim denominations as well as nonMuslims. I determined that opportunism was the secondary motivation for merging with Al Qa’ida (coded as 1).” most notably Shiite sects. the largest denomination and is violently opposed to other Islamic denominations that it regards as “infidel. and statements. Al Qa’ida strongly opposes Western influences and ideologies that it perceives as “un-Islamic.”(Al Qa’ida is an anti-Western organization) 2) Al Qa’ida aims to establish a caliphate based on an extreme interpretation of Sunni Islam. pan-Islamic. According to MI5. or anti-Shia agendas. Al Qa’ida’s ideology is centered upon three key points: 1) Al Qa’ida attributes the obstacles encountered by the Islamic world to the JewishChristian apostate Muslim alliance. (Al Qa’ida is anti-Shia) (Al Qaida's Ideology) Thus. to evaluate H21. More information on statistical hypothesis testing follows in the chapter on data analysis and results. I determined if the local jihadist leaders who affiliated with Al Qa’ida espoused anti-Western. Al Qa’ida’s supports a narrow interpretation of Sunnism. Al Qa’ida would like to replace all existing governments with a supranational caliphate and impose a strict and exclusive government based on their interpretation of Sunni Islam. religious education. I relied predominantly upon newspaper articles published in both the domestic and international 34 . I considered the assessment of Al Qa’ida’s ideology published by MI5.

statements. if the leader seemed more committed to local programs. speeches and other primary source materials authored by the leaders themselves. However. pan-Islamic. Countless numbers of Afghanis joined the Islamic resistance. or anti-Shia goals than regional initiatives. If I found that the leader placed more emphasis on anti-Western. Pakistan. Soon thereafter. North Africa. communiqués. or antiShia sympathies. Abdullah Azzam and the Saudi billionaire. However in January 1993. yet also expressed anti-Western. Thus countless numbers of mujahedeen veterans who had formed tight bonds with their fellow fighters returned to locations in the Middle East. where available. In December 1979. I considered operatives’ involvement in four episodes that served to rally jihadists around Al Qa’ida principals and fostered the development of social bonds between mujahedeen figures. While some arrived to provide money and weapons to support the fight. the Pakistani government ordered the closure of Arab mujahedeen offices in the country and threatened official deportation to any illegal foreign fighters who attempted to remain in Pakistan. and elsewhere 35 . to assess H31 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to prior social network affiliations). pan-Islamic. Finally. I resolved that ideological alignment was the primary motivation for joining Al Qa’ida (coded as 2). others enlisted in the growing corps of “holy warriors” under the lead of the legendary Palestinian Sheikh Dr. Osama bin Laden. the Soviet Union launched a military invasion to restore Soviet control over neighboring Afghanistan. I concluded that ideological alignment was a secondary motivation (coded as 1). operatives from foreign countries began trickling into Pakistan. eager to put the Afghan jihad in the and. which was organized into several native mujahedeen organizations with headquarters in Peshawar. fearing the collapse of communism in Central Asia.

The second trial consisted of 302 defendants charged with conspiracy and being members of the illegal Tanzim al-Jihad. In 1981. where the new regime had raised an Islamic banner. President Sadat of Egypt died after being shot by gunmen who opened fire as he watched an aerial display at a military parade. In the Sudan. Ultimately. who became a spokesman for the defendants because of his eloquence and knowledge of foreign languages. The first was held in camera and consisted of 24 suspects directly involved in the assassination. The events that unfolded subsequent to the assassination of Anwar Sadat may have played a similar role in forging social bonds amongst jihadists. Only 58 sentences were given and most of the defendants were released after three years in prison. and agriculture (Gunaratna 36 . When presented with the opportunity to reunite with their “brethren.(Wright 2007). In prison. Many focused on mobilizing the population to overthrow the government. several former prisoners left Egypt (Wright 2007). Following President Sadat's assassination. After the Soviet-Afghan War. Two trials took place. who appeased his hosts by mobilizing construction equipment and bankrolling construction projects. farming. However. despite the prosecution demand of 299 death sentences the judges gave out none. Osama bin Laden journeyed to the Sudan. they may have decided to reunite with Zawahiri and the other jihadists with whom they were imprisoned. Moreover. these jihadists developed strategies for establishing an Islamist state and established important personal connections. more than 700 people were rounded up.” these former combatants may have opted to rejoin Al Qa’ida. he was treated as a special guest. Most jihadists rallied around Ayman alZawahiri. in subsequent years. he convinced several Saudi businessmen to invest in Sudan and several of his brothers and Jeddah merchants did invest in Sudanese real estate. After being released.

while social affiliations may animate a small minority to engage in Al Qa’ida’s program of global jihad. became an Al Qa’ida associate. However. During this time he established links to Sudanese Islamists as well as fundamentalists in Somalia and Yemen.2002). Kabul. a precondition which set the stage for the merger). requiring women to wear head-to-toe veils. I determined whether the group member was involved in the Soviet-Afghan war. Finally. This treatment was based upon my observation that not every participant in these episodes. L. local jihadist leaders may have established social connections with Bin Laden in Afghanistan before the 9/11 attacks and the Global War on Terror. disillusioned with existing ethnic Tajik and Uzbek leaders. When considering the relevance of social network affiliations. the Taliban controlled some 90 percent of Afghanistan's territory. and jailing men whose beards were deemed too short.S.-led forces in 2001. Before its ouster by U. the Taliban had captured Afghanistan’s capital. The Taliban rule was characterized by a strict form of Islamic law. 37 . In the years after departing from the Sudan. participated in the Sadat trial. they do not explain why these particular leaders aligned with Al Qa’ida. As ethnic Pashtuns. By September 1996. and embarked upon his jihad against America. a large part of the Taliban’s support came from Afghanistan's Pashtun community. Subsequently. His second presence in Afghanistan attracted many mujahedeen to return there (P. he established residency in Afghanistan. Bergen 2001). I assumed that social network affiliation was a permissive factor (i.e. After Bin Laden fled the Sudan in 1996 as a result of international pressure. he could rekindle these ties. Thus. or spent time in the Sudan before 1996 or Afghanistan during the reign of the Taliban. The bonds that these jihadists formed prior to the US invasion may have sparked their cooperation with Al Qa’ida after the onset of the Global War on Terror. although subject to the same or similar influences. Bin Laden set up numerous training camps in the region. banning television.

Unless the local jihadist leader was clearly not incentivized by opportunism or ideological concerns. I posited that Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers would fall into one of three primary leadership categories after the affiliation occurred: operational. financial. Consequently. and running training camps. They direct the group’s bureaucratic development and organize recruitment drives. Logistical leaders are accountable for the administrative and financial activities of their units. logistical. I developed another three hypothesis: H12. I considered social network affiliation to be a secondary motivation rather than a primary motivation. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly ideological role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida. developing military tactics. or legal expertise. They have vocational. Assessing Q2: To answer my second question (What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible merges or partners with Al Qa’ida?). III. Operational commanders are primarily responsible for conducting operations (including “spectacular attacks”). They have military experience or formation and/or expertise in weapons or explosives. or ideological. or foreign language competencies. ideological/media leaders are responsible for expressing the organizational culture and philosophy of their group through media activity and possibly fatwa as well as personal interactions with their operatives. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly operational role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida H22. They 38 . Finally. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly logistical role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida H32.

and ideological leadership abilities before and after the merger. Thus. I compared leadership performance pre. logistic.and post-merger. Instead. considered the following variables: Type of leader Operational Logistic Ideological Media activity Military/Front line experience Administrative/financial activities Weapons/explosives training Indications Training camp participation Recruitment experience Organizational restructuring Media innovations Involvement in ideological transitions Operational innovations Involvement in major attacks Vocational skills Language skills Fatwa issues Documented political or religious guidance proffered to operatives After analyzing these variables. If the leader demonstrated at least two of the factors in the operational leadership category.have granted interviews. I assessed the commanding officer’s operational. I coded him as a strong operational leader (3). this estimation would have been biases. published books or articles. To determine the role played by the commanding officer. I coded him as an average operational leader 39 . I did not compare leadership performance across categories because different measures were used to evaluate leadership faculty for each category. If he demonstrated one of the factors in this category. and released audio or videotapes.

the Council on Foreign Relations.(2). From 2004 to 2008 the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security funded the creation and maintenance of the Terrorism Knowledge Base. including reports available through the Jamestown Foundation. MIPT collaborated with Detica. 40 . since START has not evaluated this data and cannot assure the reliability of the information provided. To perform this evaluation. developed by the Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT). to collect information on terrorist groups and key leaders of terrorist groups. A discussion of the comparison of leadership performance pre-and post-merger follows in Chapter 5. I considered two questions: 1) With whom has Al Qa’ida affiliated? 2) Who led these organizations? To answer the first question. I used the same secondary and primary source materials listed earlier in this chapter. If the leader was not involved with the organization at the time. a business and technology consultancy. which is now available to the public through an agreement between MIPT. and START (About START). the Federation of American Scientists. I used the same criteria to assess logistic and ideological leadership. DHS. I also used these sources to determine the date that the affiliation commenced. IV. I eliminated several from my study based on the following criteria using open source materials. Although the TOPs database listed thirty-six Al Qa’ida allies. I conducted further analyses to determine its accuracy by confirming with at least two separate. non-partisan sources. The New York Times. the Library of Congress. I coded him as a weak operational leader (1). The International Herald Tribune. I coded him as such (0). and The Washington Post. Developing the Universe of Cases To develop my universe of cases. However. I used the Terrorist Organization Profiles (TOPs) Database included on the website of the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terror (START). If he exhibited none of these factors.

Leaders who head front organizations for Al Qa’ida do not make a pre-meditated choice to cooperate with Al Qa’ida. Al Qa’ida aided the local organization. Finally. an official denial of connections with Al Qa’ida should induce caution (and invoke more thorough analysis of the relationship) Based on my evaluation. or a weak affiliation (collaboration). the organization must have developed a symbiotic relationship with Al Qa’ida. To qualify as a merger. contact with its network of financiers. the group must have formally announced that this arrangement existed through a communiqué broadcast to a wide audience. assets. intelligence. but did not actively conduct operations outside their region nor did they contribute to Al Qa’ida’s other initiatives in any meaningful way. informants. for example by contributing to its recruitment efforts or operations in Afghanistan or Iraq. or opportunities for training.1) The group must have been engaged in operations independently of Al Qa’ida (the group must not be a front for Al Qa’ida My study considers the deliberate decision to affiliate with Al Qa’ida. Those groups that I coded as weak affiliates received financing or training from Al Qa’ida. To qualify as a strong affiliation. or logisticians. a strong affiliation (partnership). I determined that twenty-one groups conformed to these the above standards. thereby potentially compromising their local agenda. perhaps by providing access to operatives. I coded each affiliation as a merger. I separately examined al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya 41 . and media specialists. After performing this assessment. 2) The group must not have renounced violence I did not include political movements that supported Al Qa’ida’s aims because armed groups operate differently than other clandestine non-violent organizations. 3) While not grounds for immediate disqualification. whereby they supported Al Qa’ida. In return.

I generated a list of 41 Al Qa’ida field commanders as study subjects. a group that did not affiliate with Al Qa’ida as a control group. operations. and activities. Based on this data. Jemaah Islamiya. I identified the leaders (past and present) of each of these 21 groups. V. While some groups did not experience any leadership transitions after they partnered with Al Qa’ida (ex. both past and present. Thus. but who never had a vested interest in a particular local jihadist group. In order to understand what motivates certain groups to align with Al Qa’ida. in which case I treated both as leaders. I considered all of the commanding officers of each group from the onset of their relationship with Al Qa’ida to the present. Al Qa’ida in Iraq). I included a leader who was had not actively cooperated with Al Qa’ida if this leader had communicated with Al Qa’ida Central Command and if his successors vigorously pursued relations after his term. Selection of Study Subjects My prior discussion focused on terrorist organizations that are overtly in pursuit of Salafi objectives. I included a detailed investigation of the GAI in Chapter 7. I used open source materials including reports by non-partisan research institutions and newspaper articles. In performing this assessment. others experienced numerous leadership transitions (ex. who coordinate and supervise the execution of plans. the Taliban. In a few instances. Asbat al-Ansar). Some organizations had more than one nominal chief at times. Selection of my study subjects/study 42 . I made this distinction because I was interested in investigating the motivations and role of those leaders who came from outside Al Qa’ida’s orbit but became involved in its program later in their career. Next. it is equally important to comprehend what deters other groups from associating with Al Qa’ida. namely the establishment of an Islamic state.(GAI). I did not consider Al Qa’ida’s regional staff officers.

This grouping is just an assemblage of small illegal clusters centered around charismatic preachers. Salafia Jihadia. I used sources from the public domain. less magnetized by Al Qa’ida pan-Islamic agenda. I included Muslims fighting for the liberation of Kashmir and those fighting an internal insurgency in Central Asia. the data from this study is inevitably biased towards information about those organizations and individuals who are regarded as more visible and who appear publicly with greater frequency. In addition. which exists in Morocco. I did not include the amorphous social movement.sample was based on demonstrated and documented overt commitment to the principles of Salafism and all of the organizations that I studied were well defined with leadership that supported terrorist operations. and political grievances and who may be less committed to the principles of Salafism and thus. Moreover. Although I eliminated all non-Muslim terrorists from the study sample. terrorist organizations will not take credit for successful operations for fear of provoking the government to conduct a counterterrorism response. bias was introduced by the actual leader interviews and communications that can be considered well-orchestrated propaganda 43 . I did include many groups that were deeply invested in domestic uprising and urban warfare against their own governments. VI. For instance. Because clandestine organizations are often very secretive about their members and operations. who are fighting a jihad that involves complex social. economic. I chose to limit my sample to in order to reveal certain patterns that might not have otherwise emerged with less stringent exclusion criteria. In contrast. there may have been ascertainment bias introduced by the difficulties accurately assessing leaders’ competence in organizing and conducting important attacks. I did not include Palestinian groups. Moreover. Often. Problems Regarding Information Gathering To conduct this assessment.

a comparison of leadership performance across categories was impossible. I considered Droukdal’s prior experiences and the history of the GSPC to determine why he embraced Al Qa’ida’s internationalist agenda rather than remaining committed strictly to jihad in Algeria. I considered the source of information and its degree of reliability. I assessed the role he played before and after aligning with Al Qa’ida. as mentioned earlier. leader of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb. As a result. Next. who merged his organization with Al Qa’ida despite the objections of the GSPC’s former leader Hassan AlBanna (Guidère 2007). and Internet articles. what motivates them. VII. These concerns withstanding. press and scholarly articles. Case Study Finally. I completed one comprehensive case study (in addition to my detailed discussion of the GAI). When assessing the data.exercises that may not appropriately reflect the leader’s true motivations and ideology. empirical data about Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers was collected and analyzed. I arrived at a better understanding of how to recognize and predict who may become Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers and how to anticipate and counter their efforts. These sources included: government documents. With the aforementioned limitations in mind. formerly the Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat (GSPC). Relevance By seeking to understand who Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are. VIII. My observations regarding 44 . I used the materials available to me to try to best collect information about and understand the leaders and organizations that I profiled. I investigated Abdelmalek Droukdal. and how they aligned their own local jihadist group with Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program.

has strong implications for US foreign policy in the post 9/11 era and greater attention should be paid to identifying such settings. First. are they focused on promoting their message through propaganda or are they intent on conducting more attacks?). Based on our knowledge of Al Qa’ida’s strategy. The fundamentalists who form interpersonal bonds through these venues may be persuaded by Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic partisans to become the next-generation of Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers in locations scattered across the globe. my analyses may suggest that our battles in the Middle East and our policies regarding imprisonment are creating gathering places for global Salafi jihadists. we can better allocate resources to address this threat. This realization. Secondly.motivations will serve two purposes. if proven. by understanding the role that Al Qa’ida commanding officers play. they will help develop a model to identify local jihadist leaders who may merge or partner with Al Qa’ida in the future. Finally. we can better understand Al Qa’ida’s overall strategy (e.g. 45 .

the evidence indicates that Al Qa’ida’s strategy is not new: it has operated like an international franchise by providing financial and logistical support. Jordan. and Abu Sayyaf. I also observed noticeable patterns while developing my universe of cases. that a cumulative effect occurs.Chapter 4: Universe of Cases I. 2001. in every case. Most of researchers who I discussed in my literature review perceive Al Qa’ida’s strategy of franchising as a new development. Despite the popularity of this argument. Since 2001. To assess the date of the affiliation. I determined the year that the group first received or conveyed assistance to Al Qa’ida. therefore. First. It is important to keep in mind. and failed to overthrow the governments in Egypt. surprising. Although I have recorded the first year in which the group cooperated with Al Qa’ida. who diluted relations with Al Qa’ida). as well as name recognition 46 . this relationship has perpetuated to the present day. they argue. who consolidated relations with Al Qa’ida. Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: An Evolving Network Although the purpose of my study was to investigate Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. and Saudi Arabia. Al Qa’ida has transformed into an international enterprise with like-minded local representatives loosely connected to a central ideological base (Riedel 2007). Al Qa’ida was deprived of a “state within a state” in Afghanistan. The investigation of Al Qa’ida’s patterns of affiliation with respect to time is very interesting and indeed. They contend that after September 11. I considered the development of Al Qa’ida’s affiliation over a period of time from 1991 until 2005 (Table 1). To address this concern. the relationship between Al Qa’ida and its affiliate has strengthened or weakened (such is the case with the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. lost several of its top officials. In many instances. since a group does not merely affiliate with Al Qa’ida and then sever all relations. I have classified the affiliation according to its current state.

For Bin Laden. 47 . Somalia. tired of Bin Laden’s critiques. Al Qa’ida first seriously affiliated with other terrorist organizations in 1991. Algeria. After the Saudi government. when one considers the historical context. Bin Laden organized training camps at which hundred of his followers were tutored in paramilitary tactics as revealed in the previous chapter. On August 7. Kashmir and Iraq. this observation is not nearly as stunning. he departed for the Sudan. Eritrea. the first US troops were dispatched to Saudi Arabia as part of Operation Desert Shield. Bin Laden could operate freely in the Sudan and in return he would invest millions of dollars in the desperately poor country. As a result of the Sudanese government’s hospitality and support. He was able to send Al Qa’ida operatives to Somalia in 1991-1992 to liaise with their leaders and then help AIAI organize itself militarily. oil rich state of Kuwait on August 1. the leader of the National Islamic Front. Bin Laden perceived this intrusion as part of a larger Western design to dominate the whole Arab and Muslim world. Chechnya. While Bin Laden was situated in the Sudan. In this year. during his time in the Sudan. for terrorist groups operating in such diverse places as the Philippines. This relationship strengthened throughout the nineties. Consequently. Afghanistan. this was as perturbing and foreboding an event as the Russian invasion of Afghanistan that had occurred a decade earlier. effectively put him under house arrest. Tajikistan. Bin Laden had the opportunity to interact with other terrorist units to expand Al Qa’ida’s reach. where he was warmly welcomed by Hassan al-Turabi. 1990. However. Turabi and Bin Laden engaged in a convenient symbiotic relationship. After Hussein’s forces invaded the small. Bin Laden had immediately volunteered his services and those of his holy volunteers but the Saudis did not take this offer seriously (Gunaratna 2002). Al Qa’ida linked up with Al-Ittihaad al-Islami (AIAI) and Abu Sayyaf. thereby threatening the security of Saudi Arabia. 1990. Yemen. These operatives also offered advice to their Somali counterparts on how to set up social services for the local population.

Instead. would next march into Southern Sudan and then into other Islamic countries(Gunaratna 2002). Al Qa’ida was preoccupied with other pursuits and could not devote energy towards developing such high-maintenance relations. their parent organization. many of whom would be employed by these Arabic executives. where their transactions would go unnoticed and in its infrastructure projects. Bin Laden focused his efforts on other missions like determining how best to attack US forces in Somalia. he persuaded his brother in law. which sought to pursue a more fundamentalist battle against the Philippine authorities than the Moro National Liberation Front. if successful. Concurrently. the US military. which would elicit support from the Sudanese population. including some of his brothers. between a thousand and two thousand 48 . From 1991 to 1996. By 1991. Moreover a number of ASG members had fought in Afghanistan in the 1980s (Rogers 2004). Soon thereafter. After associating with these groups. Thus. while residing in the Sudan. Muhammad Jamal Khalifah to support the Abu Sayyaf Group. my data indicates that Al Qa’ida did not engage another affiliate until 1996. Bin Laden exploited a cache of trustworthy warriors who he could rely upon to cultivate his vision of global jihad. Bin Laden convinced several Saudi businessmen.Bin Laden ramped up his assistance to the Somali terrorists after the Bush administration sent US peacekeeping troops to Somalia in 2002. Moreover. While occupied with these financial negotiations. Bin Laden probably saw the struggle in the Philippines as an opportunity to open a second front for his organization without becoming embroiled in the conflicts in the Middle East. to invest in the country’s moribund financial institutions. he broadcast a fatwa in which he avowed that having already taken over the Persian Gulf area and now encroaching upon Somalia. he attempted to centralize the core of Al Qa’ida’s operations and develop its human resources as discussed in Chapter 1.

He turned his attention to exotic weaponry and weapons of mass destruction. Bin Laden and his cadre were engrossed by other concerns and did not focus on developing external relations with other jihadist groups. Bin Laden issued a slew of radical pronouncements beginning with a call to arms against the continued American military presence in Arabia on August 23. Bin Laden was able to function unimpeded. which became the modern world’s first jihadist state. Having obtained sanctuary. By 1996. no affiliations were observed between 1991 and 1996. Bergen 2001). attracting Muslim militants to a country. He also sought to acquire weapons for these militants. Simultaneously some members of the group undertook the massive task of writing the Encyclopedia of the Afghan Jihad. These communiqués served to attract the attention of various local jihadist leaders. During this time. Thus. once again. Given this stable and secure environment. Bin Laden had set up a number of military camps in the north. who left the Sudan to return to his familiar stamping grounds in Afghanistan. Finally.members of Al Qa’ida converged upon the Sudan and within three years. hundreds of Afghan Arabs engaged in fighting in Bosnia (P. To 49 . Bin Laden began to focus. on widening his movement. it is not surprising that between 1996 and 2001. L. Al Qa’ida engaged 15 of its 21 affiliates. Upon Bin Laden’s arrival. Mullah Muhammad Omar sent a delegation to assure Bin Laden that the Taliban would be honored to protect him because of his role in the jihad against the Soviets (Gunaratna 2002). From Afghanistan. a multi-volume series detailing everything the Afghan Arabs had learned in the jihad against the Soviets. intense pressure had been placed on the Sudanese government by the United States and Egypt to expel Bin Laden. As a result of this multitude of tasks. Bin Laden knew Afghanistan well and greatly admired the Taliban religious warriors who had taken control over much of the country. 1996.

According to this Word Islamic Front manifesto. Amidst this background.” Based on this quotation. this is due to the fact that in 1998 Bin Laden created the International Islamic Front for Jihad against the Jews and Crusaders (IIF). “in order to obey the Almighty. in the years before the September 11.supplement this strategy. 2001 attacks. Bin Laden’s organization nurtured ties with a variety of other armed jihadist groups. is an obligation for every Muslim who is able to do so in any country. The clerics who Bin Laden summoned also had acquaintances with jihadists beyond Afghanistan who they could introduce to Bin Laden (Bergen 2001). and Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan. the establishment of the IIF can clearly be interpreted as an effort by Al Qa’ida to expand its battle against Western influence. Laden convened conferences of several Afghan ulema. Thus. whether civilians or military. Harkat-ul-Mujahideen. we hereby give all Muslims the following judgment: the judgment to kill and fight Americans and their allies. the secretary general of the Pakistani religious party known as the Jamiat-ul-Ulema-e-Islam. one observes a surge of new Al Qa’ida affiliates. In addition to its formal alliances through the IIF. he was not a religious scholar. he needed the backing of religious scholars and the clerical cover to call for a real global jihad. in 1998. he probably did not rely extensively upon the leaders of these organizations. However. Later the IIF was expanded to include the Pakistani jihadist organizations Lashkar-eTaiba. an anti-Shia sectarian party (Carafano 2005). members included the head of the violent faction of Egypt’s Gama’a al Islamiyya. While Bin Laden was well read in the Koran. and the head of Bangladesh’s Jihad Movement. In addition to Bin Laden and EIJ’s Ayman al-Zawahiri. before 2001. These sequential steps were part of Bin Laden’s plan to expand his multi-national terrorist campaign. In part. 50 .

complex organizations. after 2001 and the onset of the Global War on Terror. To more easily engineer this metamorphosis. There are two explanations for this observation. Bin Laden had to engineer a colossal transformation of his organization from a more or less unitary. are built up through mergers. Bin Laden elected to strengthen existing affiliations rather than pursue new ones. Al Qa’ida has not enlisted many new affiliates. Thus. temporarily crippling it.e. and command-and-control nucleus in Afghanistan were destroyed and uprooted. 51 . near bureaucratic entity to a fluid movement tenuously bound by a loosely networked transnational constituency (i. from an actual center to a virtual network) (Bruce Hoffman 2004). the dearth of new Al Qa’ida affiliates seems puzzling given what scholars perceive to be Al Qa’ida’s organizational strategy. Whereas before Al Qa’ida had a distinct center of gravity. As stated in the introduction. partnerships. be it to plan attacks or to align with other jihadist groups. As elaborated upon in Chapter 1. Al Qa’ida’s training camps. Aggressive US and allied efforts impeded Al Qa’ida’s ability to do anything. operational bases. Al Qa’ida aims to establish itself as a complex organization with a flexible structure in order to preserve control over specifically identified strategic operations while offering cells a degree of autonomy in local and regional operations. Osama Bin Laden was compelled to makeover his organization. characterized by semiautonomous cells that are horizontally and vertically integrated into the centralized command structure. Firstly. infrastructure. Groups such as the Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat and Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad were brought further into Al Qa’ida’s folds. after 9/11. After 2001. few can deny the United States and its allies achieved progress in the first phase of the Global War on Terror.Contrary to popular belief. and collaborations (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2006).

Additionally. Al Qa’ida has exploited the Iraqi occupation for rousing propaganda and as a recruitment tool for the global jihadist cause. Another observable and notable trend is that the number of affiliates that Al Qa’ida enrolled has increased since the onset of the war in Iraq in 2003. in 2004. For instance. Nowadays. was responsible for developing his own strategy and operations. For example. the Uzbek fighters associated with the Islamic Jihad Union have supported fighting in South Waziristan against the Pakistani government and US forces hunting Al Qa’ida fugitives (Steinberg 2008). However. for establishing a post-US Islamist emirate governed by a coalition of Islamic groups. and for maintaining the momentum of an Islamist victory by expanding operations into Syria. who had become his commanding officers. Jordan. who had become Bin Laden’s second-in command. Al Qa’ida and its affiliates can conduct attacks in countries that are venerable sources of Bin Laden’s antagonism or where an opportunity has presented itself. began to instruct Zarqawi regarding tactics and specific theater-of-war concerns. the leader of Tawhid. Bin Laden and Al Qa’ida Central Command relied more heavily and interacted more frequently with the leaders of these groups. and Egypt (Michael 2007). prior to 2005. In fact.Moreover. in a letter dated July 9. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Ayman Zawahiri. For instance. Zawahiri reprimanded al-Zarqawi for indiscriminate attacks on Shias. and lack of concern for public support. “Iraq’s preeminent utility has been a useful side show” – an effective means to sidetrack American military forces and divert US attention while Al Qa’ida and its affiliates make inroads and strike elsewhere. including Shias. Israel. he urged Zarqawi to prepare for a precipitous American military withdrawal from Iraq. Al Qa’ida now teams up with terrorist groups who can send foreign jihadists to Iraq where they conduct guerilla warfare against the America and British troops. Bruce Hoffman has suggested that for Al Qa’ida. Lebanon. beheading of hostages. Moreover. 2005. terror attacks 52 .

Pakistan). 53 . Tunisia) and Southern Asia (namely. Lebanon. Egypt Uzbekistan. II. Al Qa’ida Affiliates: The Geographic Distribution Having assessed the development of Al Qa’ida’s affiliations over time. the 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot to detonated liquid explosive carried on board from the United Kingdom to the US and Canada. In the aftermath of this transition. For instance. over forty percent of the 21 affiliates are based in the Core Arab states (Iraq. when colonial empires began to retreat. The other large clusters come from the Maghreb (Morocco. Later. the 2005 bombings against London’s public transport system. The smaller clusters come from Southeast Asia and Northeast Africa. These regions have a history of conflict with the West. it is interesting to consider the geographic distribution of Al Qa’ida’s affiliates (Figure 2). The warfare between Arabs and the West culminated in 1990 when the United States sent a massive army to the Persian Gulf to defend some Arab countries against aggression by Saddam Hussein The Gulf War left some Arabs feeling humiliated and resentful of the West’s military presence in the Persian Gulf (Huntington 1992). Arab nationalism and then Islamic fundamentalism strongly manifested. France fought a war in Algeria and British and French forces invaded Egypt. Algeria. and Yemen). One can anticipate that the majority of affiliates would hail from the Core Arab states and Maghreb Arab states. according to statistics released by the US government’s National Counterterrorism Center. Libya. the American forces went into Lebanon. and the 2007 terrorist attacks in Algiers (Bruce Hoffman 2004). Considering the sample as a whole. Afghanistan. Samuel Huntington observed that after World War II. include the 2004 bombings against Madrid’s commuter trains.around the world tripled in 2004. conflicts along the fault line between western and Arab Islamic civilizations frequently erupted. Notable incidents conducted by or with the assistance of Al Qa’ida’s affiliates since the beginning of the Iraq war.

weak security apparatuses and crisis-torn economies. for years. These states have porous borders. Turkmenistan. Al Qa’ida has appealed to militants in the four neighboring former Soviet Central Asian republics. whereas the religious-framed prescriptions of Arabia Islam have a thirteen century-old legacy (Ayubi 1980). Turkmenistan and Tajikistan. For instance. Kyrgystan. Tajikistan. There is also a simpler explanation to account for the plethora of Al Qa’ida affiliates hailing from the Core Arab states. just a few miles from the border (Luong and Weinthal 2002). Islam can provide a medium of cultural nationalism that is defiant and self-assuring.These struggles had a profound effect on the development of jihadist outlets. one of the masterminds behind the assassination attempt against Uzbek President Islam A. all of which are in immediate proximity to Afghanistan. Additionally. Karimov. and leader of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan. the Taliban controlled the Afghan territory bordering Uzbekistan. Thus. He maintains that most Islamic revolutions evolve from movements for indigenous self-assertion. fled to Afghanistan where he set up a military training camp. Since 1996. and Uzbekistan. at the present time operatives from these organizations can assist the Al Qa’ida- 54 . Secular prescriptions (whether nationalist or leftist) are regarded as unsuccessful European importations introduced by intellectuals exposed to French and Italian cultures. Furthermore. For those countries resisting foreign dominance. Tahir Yuldashev. Ayubi suggests that the general Islamic resurgence that one observes today represents a reaction to alienation and a quest for authenticity by disaffected Muslims who resent Western participation in their lands. they could permit leaders of these jihadist groups to establish training camps without fear of government intervention. Moreover. Al Qa’ida and the Taliban could facilitate the transportation of militants moving back and forth across the borders.

In the wake of these changes. under strong US diplomatic pressure. The conflict between Muslims and Hindus in the subcontinent manifests itself in the rivalry between Pakistan and India. 55 . Conservative estimates suggest that at least several hundred North African volunteers have traveled to Iraq. Al Qa’ida. Consequently. Pakistan has allowed the US military to use bases within the country. offered to President Bush Pakistan’s unqualified cooperation in the fight against terrorism. With the assistant of Al Qa’ida’s Algerian affiliates. where Islamabad exercises limited authority. Similarly. Upon returning to the Maghreb. and has helped to tighten the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan. terrorist operatives in the Maghreb move easily across international borders. eager to regroup in Pakistani cities where police control was more negligible. thousands of Muslim extremists were detained. Separatist violence in India’s Muslim majority Jammu and Kashmir state has continued unabated since 1989. Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri are now believed to be in Pakistan’s rugged tribal areas. President Musharraf. fighters transit through Syria. several Kashmiri separatist terrorist groups turned to Al Qa’ida for support. affiliates from these nations are particularly desirable. In addition. I also observed that a large percentage of the groups that merged with Al Qa’ida hailed from Pakistan (20%). This too. quickly granted this concession in return for safe haven. these groups help Al Qa’ida attack coalition troops in Afghanistan and then escape across the Pakistani frontier (Fair 2004). should be expected. thus. has helped to identify and detain extremists. However. these militants can stage local campaigns due to their recently acquired front line experience (Boudali 2007). after the September 2001 attacks.supported insurgency in Afghanistan.

Unlike Eastern European countries. the depth of its involvement with terrorists is constrained by the very disorder seen as a classical setting for terrorism. There are almost no legitimate terrorist targets and terrorists themselves can be subject to extortion in largely lawless settings. Although Muslims represent a majority in countries like Somalia and Eritrea. The largest and most influential are either political parties or revivalist organizations. In Indonesia. in which there is just enough government control and economic security to provide an adequate target for terrorist groups. In Singapore. and two other mostly Muslim states. such as the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF). most visibly Al Qa’ida. Additionally.Within my sample. Again. it has not emerged as such. in general Muslims are a minority in East Africa. and the fragility of local democracy. Muslims are a minority. where the other major Abrahamic faiths dominate. while Somalia has served as a transit route for terrorists. Malaysia and Brunei. Despite the fact that Southeast Asia seems like a good candidate for the second front in the US campaign since it is home to the world’s most populous Muslim-majority country. the profound ethnic and religious diversity (including in the practice of Islam) that characterizes the area militates against the establishment of a fundamentalist hegemony by any one group. many Islamic organizations in Southeast Asia genuinely oppose Al Qa’ida and most are nonviolent. Political organizations representing modernist Muslims were 56 . Also. while Buddhism and Roman Catholicism are dominant respectively. the rise of political Islam can be linked principally to the collapse of Suharto's regime. a central government with even rudimentary influence has yet to emerge. Indonesia. this can be easily explained. Moreover. hostility from indigenous religious authorities may also impede the growth of Wahabism (Dickson 2005). In fact. the nation's continuing economic crisis. Thailand. in East Africa. and the Philippines. there were fewer groups from the Eastern African region and from the Southeast Asian region.

By contrast. they forfeit a degree of control. and many of their leaders were imprisoned. Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: Mergers? Partnerships? Or Collaborations? Finally it is important to consider distribution by type of affiliation (Figure 3). Through partnership and collaborations. III. While Al 57 . and distracts the enemy while Central Command plans for more detailed attacks elsewhere.banned from the 1950s to the 1980s. Mergers were much less common (approximately 17%). the highest order form of equity-based engagement. Although such groups have since become a major political force in recent years. The preponderance of affiliations (over 70%) could be classified as partnerships or collaborations. Both partnerships and collaborations permit Al Qa’ida to structure itself as a complex organization. Supporting local terrorist groups in this manner makes noise. causes havoc. more extremist forms of Islamism still remain at the fringes (Gershman 2002). When a group merges with Al Qa’ida. While the relationships within the cells are tightly coupled. Although this type of arrangement allows Al Qa’ida and the merged group to consolidate their assets so that they can compete more successfully. Additionally. the group that Al Qa’ida subsumes must be capable of completely integrating Al Qa’ida’s methods and approaches into their repertoire. This sort of arrangement is convenient when Al Qa’ida wants to spread its radical ideas and has financial resources but does not necessarily care for the local politics in the region. it is difficult to cut off centralized funding due to the complex nature of Al Qa’ida’s financial network. the relationships between cells and between operatives in Al Qa’ida central command are loosely coupled. mergers. were much less common. Through partnerships and collaborations. Al Qa’ida achieves the ideal mix of tightly and loosely coupled systems. Al Qaida can provide financial or logistic support to other terrorist groups with the intention of influencing their strategic activities. described in the first chapter.

For instance. who have no interest in establishing a global Islamic caliphate. the United States. to designated terrorists and terrorist organizations. There are other practical difficulties. but are more interested in deposing their current government. which the merged group must obey. the United States government may block the assets of individuals and entities providing support. Through this measure. Such blocking actions are a critical tool in combating the financing of terrorism (Mayer and Price 2002). groups that merge officially with Al Qa’ida may risk alienating the local population. Oftentimes. Moreover. they can “offer” tactical advice. they may split their own ranks and upset surrounding communities. mergers often end up splintering as a result of differences of ideologies. goals. Finally. operatives are estranged when Al Qa’ida takes credit for the operation and they are forced to assume a more “behind-the-scenes” role (Desouza and Hengsen 2007). and strategies.Qa’ida Central Command does not usually plan operations. most prominently. Executive Order 13224 provides the means to disrupt the support network that funds terrorism. 58 . designation under the UN Security Council’s 1267 Committee’s consolidated list will trigger international obligations on all member countries. when groups officially merge with Al Qa’ida. requiring them to take steps to prevent designated individuals and entities from continuing to fund or otherwise support terrorism. financial or otherwise. When a group commits to jihad against the far enemy. they often become the targets of counterterrorist offensives by foreign governments. which should be addressed when discussing mergers. Under this order. supporters of terrorism are publicly identified thereby providing warning to other entities that they are prohibited from doing business with the Al Qa’ida affiliate (Uruena 2008). as observed with the Zarqawi-Zawahiri letter referenced earlier. In addition.

organizations must have the patience and resolve to work through issues. IV. mergers only occur when terrorist groups have developed a close relationship and realize the mutual value of working together. it is also important to acknowledge that organizational issues must be addressed up front when a merger is negotiated since this type of affiliation is a longterm contract. Al Qa’ida may be seeking to expand into other Muslim-dominated territories. since they offer increased organizational flexibility and operational reach. several groups have announced a formal merger with Al Qa’ida. the data demonstrates that Al Qa’ida may be more likely to pursue lower-order affiliations. Like corporations settling a merger. 59 .Given these considerations. Al Qa’ida may have several mergers in the works that have not yet been publicly announced. As the example of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb. evidence suggests that Al Qa’ida will continue to pursue such relations and will rely upon them more heavily. Moreover. While in recent years. such as Western Africa. Summary of Findings Although Al Qa’ida’s policy of pursuing affiliations with local jihadist groups is not a new development. Thus. provided in Chapter 6 proves. while Al Qa’ida’s affiliates are concentrated in the Core Arab and Maghreb states.

in each case.” and “social network affiliation” respectively. The null hypothesis tested for each scale was that there was no difference in the frequency of incidence of each level of motational factor. 2 = primary motivation (for a more detailed explanation regarding coding. 60 .” Each subject was rated 0-2 for each scale. when three scales were used.0188.Chapter 5: Results of Statistical Hypothesis Testing I. the null hypothesis was rejected.” “ideological alignment. Data Analysis and Results for Q1: What motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida’s and its pan-Islamic agenda? Data were collected on 41 individual subjects (i.606E-06 for “opportunistic motives. although the smaller values of p for “opportunistic motives” and for “social network affiliation” suggest that these incentives are more robust. please refer to Chapter 3 on Methodology).” and "social network affiliations. and 1. The chi-squared test yielded pvalues of 1. known or suspected terrorists). 0. corresponding to 0= not a motivation.e.146E-09. By comparison. each subject was rated on one of three scales: "opportunist motives. To assess the effects of motivational factors contributing to individual terrorist's decision to affiliate with Al Qa’ida. ideological alignment appears to be of less powerful significance as a motivating factor for local jihadist leaders. This analysis yielded the results contained in Table 1. one can conclude that opportunistic motives. Based on this analysis.” "ideological alignment. Statistically significant differences among subjects were evaluated using a chi-squared test statistic for variation within each scale. All three statistics are significant with a p-value less than 0. thus. 1= secondary motivation.05. and social network affiliation all motivate local jihadist leaders to an extent. ideological alignment.

II. the data suggests that psychosocial motive(i. the effect of ideological alignment does not even reach statistical significance. 0. was that there was no difference in the frequency of incidence of each level of motivational factor.e. Data Analysis and Results for Q2: What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible affiliates with Al Qa’ida? 61 . H11 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to opportunistic motives) is proven. tested for both scales.639. The p-values associated with the chi-squared test statistic were 1.” “ideological alignment.” and “social network affiliation” respectively. scores 0 and 1 were combined into a single scale "not a motivation. The p-value associated with social network affiliation also allows us to reject the null hypothesis.” The null hypothesis. In contrast. It is of note that the statistical significance for social network affiliation is far less impressive than that for opportunistic motives. H31 ( Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due psychosocial motives) requires further investigation. This analysis produced the results recorded in Table 2.042 for “opportunistic motives. The p-value for opportunistic motives permits us to reject the null hypothesis of no effect.289E-06. social affiliations) have some influence on the decision to associate with Al Qa’ida. Based on this analysis. and 0.To supplement this analysis and clarify the relative impact of each incentive. H21 (Al Qa’ida commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to ideological motives) is rejected. thereby suggesting that this particular factor is not a significant motivating variable for local jihadist leaders in this sample. However. This implies that opportunism is the primary motivation among the variables considered in this study for affiliating with Al Qa’ida.” while score 2 was considered as "motivation.

and postmerger. which utilizes both the direction and magnitude of the change.015). pre. These included the Wilcoxon statistic (Table 4). The chi-squared test statistic was used to evaluate the overall difference in performance in each of the three categories post-versus pre-merger. This suggests that ideological leadership performance does actually improve after a merger. The null hypothesis tested in this analysis is that there is no difference in each category post-merger. thus based on this statistical test. Accordingto this test.” and “Logisitic” on a scale of 0-3.0501).” “Ideological. Results are presented in Table 3. across all terrorists considered as a group. compared to pre-merger. However. pre and post merger. Paired statistics were then applied to compare the scores for each individual terrorist. Additionally. the paired signed test rejected the null hypothesis for ideology (p=0. which suggests that leadership performance may generally improve as well.and post-merger score for any category. across all terrorists considered individually. as well as the simpler paired sign test (Table 5).there was no statistic difference between the pre. The null hypothesis tested in this analysis is that there is no difference in each category post-merger.Subjects were evaluated on their performance in each of three categories: “Operational. the p-value for overall leadership performance was borderline (p=0. we could not reject the null hypothesis for any category. compared to premerger. which considers only the direction of change. The Wilcoxon statistic was negative for all groups. 62 .

for all three categories. it lets us to reject both H12 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly operational role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida) and H22 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly logistical role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida). 63 . demonstrates that each group had a similar number of “no change” results (i. Moreover. this was clearly most prevalent and only statistically significant for the ideology category. and these swamped the overall effect. however. the variability among subjects in the magnitude of the changes may have affected the results. ideological performance improved. however.e. for the ideological performance. there were a few changes in the opposite direction in particular subjects that were large. Generally. after mergers with Al Qa’ida occur. whether they were categorized as only positive or positive plus no change. a plot of the distribution of scores. Figures 4-5 demonstrate that for ideological performance. thereby hindering us from rejecting the null hypothesis using the Wilcoxon statistic. most changes were positive.The results obtained through the paired sign test suggest that the direction of the change for ideological performance was significant. However. Effectively what we are observing from this study’s data analysis is that while ideological concerns do not appear to be primary motivating factors for joining Al Qa’ida. there were the fewest number of negative changes post-merger. shared ideological views become important. Figure 6. The operational category had the largest number of “-3” results and “+3” results. there was a tendency to improve scores post-merger. Most frequently. a pre-post score of 0). Moreover. This analysis allows us to accept H32 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officer play an increasingly ideological role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida).

the new organization radically changed its tactics: the series of suicide bombings and violent attacks executed in 2007 by Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) operatives demonstrated this strategic evolution. Abdelmalek Droukdal served as the commanding officer of Al Qa’ida in the Maghreb region and directed the internationalization of the former GSPC's war in order to revitalize a movement that was slowly dying in Algeria. the only remaining armed terrorist group in Algeria. Three months later. the leader of Al Qa’ida in Iraq announced the allegiance of the Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat (Salafist Group for Call and Combat or GSPC). After the merger of the GSPC with Al Qa’ida. this metamorphosis of a relatively smaller. 2006. He accomplished this revitalization and expansion of goals and activities by providing compelling ideological leadership and by organizing sophisticated public relations and media campaign both locally and globally. The Origins of Islamic Violence in Algeria after the War of Independence The GSPC was founded with a regional focus: it sought to establish an Islamic state in Algeria and rejected the legitimacy of secular democratic governance. the Islamic movement in Algeria originated in the 1960s. However. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. I. Algeria achieved independence from France in 1962. While the first official communiqué of the GSPC appeared in September 1998. in 1965. Defense Minister Houari Boumedienne staged a bloodless coup to remove Ben Bella from power. whereupon Ahmed Ben Bella was elected the first president of Algeria.Chapter 6: Al Qa’ida in the Maghreb and Abdelmalek Droukdal – A Well Executed Merger On September 11. However. to Al Qa’ida. less powerful Algerian indigenous assembly of terrorists would not have been possible without the leadership of Abdelmalek Droukdal. Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb was born. He then adopted an 64 .

the Salvation Islamic Front (FIS) was formed. under Boumedienne’s chosen successor Colonel Chadli Benjedid the right to establish political parties was accorded in Algeria and with this decision. Thus. one-party. 65 . This socialist government's repressive secularism and one party rule were oppressive for many people in Algeria and helped fuel a fundamentalist backlash when Islamic leaders branded the government as “a band of atheists” and called for a return to an Islamic government (Johnson 2006). The Birth of the Salvation Islamic Front In 1989. Islamic religious law. during the 1970s. nationalist.authoritarian. Before the independence. II. in response to the dictatorial and exclusionary policies proffered by the Socialist party. disgruntled by the failure of Socialist economic policies. The MAIA sought to resolve the social and economic injustices that had emerged in Algeria by forcible means if necessary (Johnson 2006). which he codified in the Algerian constitution in 1976. and maintained an affirmative orientation towards Western learning and culture. In 1991. the weak alliance between the secular and religious groups (the Ulama and the academic elite who led the liberation movement against the French) collapsed. a fundamental Islamic preacher established the Armed Islamic Algeria Movement (MAIA) in 1982 to establish an Islamic state. the fundamentalist Islamic movement became increasingly radicalized in response to President Boudemedienne’s abortive leftward shift in economic and cultural policies. the FIS was a political organization. This political platform resonated with the Algerians. socialist political system. the Algerian Islamic movement was centrist. However. Unlike the MAIA. not an armed group that sought to reverse the economic decline in Algeria by implementing Sharia. Mustapha Bouyali. The FIS became popular amongst the Algerian population who supported the group financially and politically. directed by Abdallah Djaballah.

it dissolved the FIS (Celso 2008). The new regime calculated that the repression of the FIS would ignite a wave of extremist fundamentalist violence. However. after the cancellation of the 1992 general elections in Algeria. 1996. The Beginnings of the GIA and the Onset of an Epoch of Violence As the new regime predicted. with the prospect of the FIS in control of the parliament. Many Islamists became increasingly interested in radical approaches. which would divide and alienate the FIS’s many Algerian supporters. The GIA was responsible for the murder of over 2000 schoolteachers guilty of “taming the youth” and more than 100 other competing. GIA supreme commander Saifullah Ajffar ordered the assassination of over 90 innocent civilians and eventually forced a mass European exodus from Algeria. Thus. After subsequent leadership transitions. and suspended parliament. the secular and military elite forced Benjedid's resignation. Antar Zouabri became the head of the GIA on July 18. A High Committee was established with Mohammed Boudiaf named as president. the GIA quickly alienated itself from other Algerian Islamic activities by adopting stringent interpretations of Islamic law. The GIA was formed from a collection of Algerian militant groups who had been executing a series of significant military operations against government targets in an attempt to overthrow the secular government in Algeria. halted the electoral process. less militant Muslim clerics and political leaders whom it designated heretics. III. several Islamists became disenchanted with the political process and defected from the FIS to form armed splinter groups.the FIS achieved a victory in national elections. However. which lasted until his violent death in February 2002. He repelled most members of the GIA when he issued a fatwa condemning the entire Muslim population of 66 . In an effort to racially purify the country. was marked by barbaric methods and attacks against entire civilian communities. He was an illiterate criminal and his reign.

Fissions Form Within the GSPC 67 . and gendarmerie through the use of false roadblocks. clearly articulated the narrow agenda of the GSPC. Bucaille. and incursions on towns to steal saleable goods (Guidère 2007). An Alternative Emerges: The Origins of the GSPC The GSPC was not set up as a pan-Islamic movement. bombings. a former GIA commander. Hassan Hattab. While he preferred not to engage in force-on-force confrontations with the Algerian military to avoid depleting his cadre. and Martínez 2007). V. military. police. who were left without an ideological umbrella. IV. and hypocrites” for “not supporting them in their struggle against the government” (Blom. However. the GSPC was able to amass hundred of defectors from the FIS and the GIA (Guidère 2007). However. Consequently.Algeria as “kuffar. he encouraged operatives to target Algerian government officials. these officers founded the GSPC as a military organization dedicated to the Salafist creed and the battle against the Algerian regime to restore the Caliphate and implement Sharia. In 1998. apostates. The first prominent leader of the GSPC. He depicted the Algerian government as a postcolonial lackey at war with Islam. the GSPC denounced the massacres that the GIA had committed and entered the international arena with the goal of restoring the credibility of armed groups in Algeria and attracting embittered Algerian youths for whom the ideology of Islamic guerilla war had lost its appeal. ambushes. Zouabri’s attacks on innocent Muslims estranged many former GIA military commanders. he rejected the policy of terror executed by the GIA under Zouabri and enforced symbiosis with the local population. the decision to establish the GPSC was the direct result of the GIA’s strategic impasse. He asserted that the GSPC sought to overthrow the government in Algiers and to install an Islamic regime in Algeria.

Each of the regional groups. A study conducted at the Naval Postgraduate School determined that although the probability of defection by GSPC members was less than 10 68 . This law declared that citizens not involved in massive killings. Hattab provided religious guidance. the katibats were responsible for supplying and funding their own operations. The issue of whether or not to accept the terms of the Civil Harmony Law created considerable dissension within the GSPC. Thus. Although as supreme emir.The GSPC was originally organized as a loose confederation of regional divisions under a supreme emir who supervised the organization. it was difficult for the local leadership to coordinate or control the activity of its fighters since attempts to communicate could result in discovery or interception by security services. Imprisonment sentences were reduced. death penalty and life imprisonment were commuted to a maximum of eight years imprisonment for individuals under probation. In July 1999. Several GSPC cadres were killed or captured by Algerian security services following leads provided by rival GSPC elements (Celso 2008). By the end of the twentieth century. Algerians had become less tolerant to the violence of the GSPC. Consequently. Nevertheless. The law set a deadline of January 13. the organization was plagued by internal rivalry. 2000 for members and supporters of armed groups to surrender to the authorities (Black 2007). controlled a territory that roughly aligned with the governments’ own military districts. bombing of public places. These fault-lines were exacerbated by external events that occurred soon after the founding of the GSPC. and could even participate in the fight against the remaining active terrorist groups. the Algerian government implemented a law that offered amnesty to the combatants who capitulated. katibats. or sexual crimes would be placed under probation for a period ranging from 3 to 5 years. the Civil Harmony Law was adopted and overwhelmingly endorsed in a national referendum the following September 2000.

certain members of the GSPC dissented. reasserting their dedication to avoiding civilian atrocities. 23 people were killed. They accused the Algerian secret service of executing the attack to isolate the GSPC from its popular base amongst the Algerian people and of attempting to align the existing Algerian governmental agency with the intelligence services of the United States in the Global War on Terror.” This 69 . They were devoted to regime change and preferred not to actively support the “Muslim brothers. on September 26. The GSPC denied involvement. Fifteen days after the attacks. the probability of defection reached a high of 60 percent during the Civil Concord period (Gyves and Wyckloff 2006). believing that it would be better to take credit for the attack and thereby imply GSPC’s collusion with Al Qa’ida. 2001.percent before the implementation of the law. This became a point of friction between Hattab and the younger members of the GSPC and two dominant camps emerged within the organization. The September 11. Members of this organization realized that a merger with Al Qa’ida could have both political and financial benefits to GSPC (Guidère 2007). 2001 attacks were another defining moment for the GSPC. They suggested that courting Al Qa’ida would enable the organization to maintain its relevancy and shore up declining recruitment. and 9 were injured in a massacre that occurred in the Algerian town of Al-Abri. However. the GSPC’s operational reach diminished. The pan-Islamists encouraged solidarity with their “brothers in Islam” (Al Qa’ida agents) while the Islamo-nationalists were preoccupied with Algerian politics and the installation of an Islamic state there. Due to this amnesty program. It was thus effectively limited in scope by the Algerian government. which resulted in the demobilization of hundreds of militants from both the GIA and the GSPC.

Funded by the United States State Department. the many GSPC fighters sought to engage in the struggle in Iraq. Although Hattab invoked the original Charter of the GSPC. The PSI was judged to be a success by US officials and local participants. and Nigeria signed a co-operation agreement on counterterrorism. which stated that the objectives of armed conflict should be to fight the Algerian regime and not other governments. Moreover. its next iteration was expanded to include Algeria. and Mauritania in an effort to improve border security and counterterrorism capacity. The United States also provided support for the war on terrorism in North and West Africa and in the Sahara desert through the Pan Sahel Initiative (PSI). implemented in November 2003. Moreover. independently operated company that could focus on their own regional national agenda (Guidère 2007). in July 2003. As a result of hard-hitting endeavors by these transnational partnerships. However. thereby joining both sides of the Sahara in a complex map of security arrangements. the war in Iraq further exacerbated the debates that were occurring within the GSPC concerning the strategies to adopt with regards to Al Qa’ida. Thus. Hattab refused to send Algerian combatants to Iraq to battle the Americans because he predicted that doing so would deprive the GSPC of its best combatants when they joined the insurgency.minority faction opposed such a merger and preferred to remain like a small. the GSPC was forced to retreat from urban areas (Ellis 2004). others within the GSPC did not share this perspective. Chad. Chad. Although the GSPC was able to recover from the infighting provoked after 9/11 and aggressive counter-terror measures. Niger. Mali. Observing the images of Iraqi soldiers and citizens humiliated by the American invaders. the organization should 70 . thus. the majority of the local emirs seated on the GSPC’s shura believed that the war in Algeria was lost. Algeria. his efforts were in vain. the Pan Sahel Initiative consisted of training regional military units by soldiers from the US Special Forces in Niger.

When the shura of the GSPC voted to actively support the “Iraqi brothers. for instance.focus on preserving the honor of the Iraqis. they could use the war in Iraq to attract new recruits who believed that they would be sent to Iraq after basic training in Algeria. the 2nd anniversary of September 11. Although he wanted to eventually establish his group as some sort of training authority. VI. asserting his will to establish a community of Muslims dedicated to the creation of a Caliphate and calling upon GSPC members to attack all foreigners who supported the war in Iraq.” Hassan was obliged to resign. He continued to make entreaties to Al Qa’ida. Soon thereafter. This was the first strong sign of official will to establish a relationship between the GSPC and Al Qa’ida and the beginning of three years of efforts to prove the GSPC’s will and commitment to Al Qa’ida. he fostered pan-Islamic solidarity and internationalism in order to reestablish a sense of unity amongst GSPC operatives. However. but who would. he did not yet possess an adequate network of fighters. sought to actively support the Iraqi insurgents in order to gain credibility for the GSPC. Abou Ibrahim Mustapha. Nevertheless. On September 2003. Finally. in fact be absorbed into the GSPC’s domestic campaign. The Rise of Droukdal 71 . who succeeded Hattab in 2003. he issued a communiqué of support for Al Qa'ida in which he criticized Hattab’s position and extolled bin Laden. They also believed that participation in the war in Iraq would enable the GSPC to establish connections with other jihadist groups in North Africa and introduce them to new strategies and tactics. his career was cut short when he was killed in a skirmish with the Algerian army in the Béjaïa region in June 2004 (Antil 2006). the old guard members who espoused a nationalist orientation were expelled from the GSPC (Guidère 2007).

Nevertheless. Said Makhloufi. informants. In 1992. he was assigned the mission of fabricating explosives due to his scientific background and knowledge of chemical bases and mechanical processes. a merger with Al Qa’ida was particularly appealing to Droukdal (Johnson 2006). Born on April 20. he officially joined the organization and in December 1993. Thus. situated near Mifan in the Blida region. After losing combatants due to the amnesty program announced by the Bouteflika regime. By affiliating with Al Qa’ida. the GSPC was struggling to fill its ranks with recruits. Droukdal was recognized as an exceptional student. the GSPC could more easily recruit operatives. by supporting a cause that was seen to benefit the global community of Muslims. from 1990 to 1993. and media specialists who could reinforce the group’s capabilities and help it lead operations. he went underground at the age of 23 (Guidère 2007).Upon Mustapha’s death. As a youth. he was promoted to chief bomb maker for one of the most important GIA 72 . As a member of the clandestine ranks of the FIS. like the majority of young Muslim students. who easily obtained his baccalaureate in 1989 in mathematics. Droukdal sought to provide a new focal point for his members by participating in the global jihad. Additionally. the GSPC would gain access to a network of financiers. He continued to hold this role when he enlisted with the GIA from 1993 to 1996. he pursued a degree in technology from the University of Blida. he was enthused when an officer of the FIS and a former member of the Algerian army. intelligence. In 1996. and logisticians. assets. he hoped to study engineering. 1970 in the small village of Zayan. the GSPC needed to achieve a certain number of visible successes to appear active and successful. Droukdal realized that in order to maintain support. he was attracted to the FIS and actively sought to get close to its leaders. One year later. recruited him. Thus. Abdelmalek Droukdal immediately assumed control of the GSPC.

VII. Instead of concentrating media attention on local attacks. he nominated Droukdal as the director of the consultative council. Thus. and the Sudan. he had not yet had any contact with Al Qa’ida (Guidère 2007).battalions. which had been created in 1998. instructing his followers in the ways of global jihad. he served the GSPC as an ideological figurehead. Thus. he conducted a nuanced public relations campaign and comprehensive media reform. he frequently issued communiqués 73 . he was selected to command the Al-Quds Brigade (Abu Bakr alSiddiq Brigade) at the behest of the leader of the GIA (Guidère 2007). Finally. when Hassan Hattab was forced to resign. After Mustapha assumed power. he commenced a policy of internationalization. he allegedly opposed the massacres conducted by the organization in the late 1990s. Chechnya. Droukdal sought to inscribe the actions of the GSPC in an international context by publicizing the GSPC’s activities in Afghanistan. with his inauguration. Hattab selected Droukdal as a member of his consultative council and made him a regional commander for the GSPC. In 2001. Somalia. Droukdal. Libya. His aspiration was to link his organization to the wider Islamist campaign as represented by Al Qa’ida in order to reinvigorate the group after government crackdowns and legislation had reduced its numbers. sought to align with other jihadist groups. Although he served the GIA in a military capacity. one year later. incentivized by his opportunistic desire to revive the demoralized GSPC. Droukdal’s Program: Toward Global Jihad Upon assuming power. Soon thereafter. Upon his appointment as emir of the GSPC. he was promoted to the position of supreme emir of the GSPC after Mustapha’s death. While he was involved in planning a limited number of attacks. he seized to opportunity to serve as chief military sergeant for the GSPC. He occupied this position until 2003. In order to accomplish this feat.

regarding international politics and events affecting the Middle East and the Maghreb. Later. In response to this event. which was broadcast to a large audience of operatives and supporters. The communiqués included messages with international themes. Droukdal launched a magazine for the GSPC.S. For instance. which were still committed to local initiatives. In publishing this document. was a reprisal of themes elucidated by Al Qa'ida. He derided these leaders as puppets of the American government. and other international themes (Guidère 2007). a more “global” goal. he issued a communiqué addressed to the leaders meeting in Algiers. For instance. the President of the Chechen Republic in May 2004. in Morocco. which took place from March 22-24. It included articles on Salafism. The first operation undertaken by the GSPC outside its borders occurred in Mauritania in June 2005. These initiatives allowed him to transmit his message to operatives across the Maghreb region. Droukdal’s media strategy became clear after the Summit of the Arab League in Algiers. thereby promulgating Al Qa’ida’s anti-Western program.-led military exercises in northern Africa dubbed 74 . Finally. Droukdal sought to align the GSPC theoretically with Al Qa’ida and express his obeisance to Bin Laden and Zarqawi (Guidère 2007). the crisis in Iraq. which was inspired by that of Al Qa’ida in Iraq. He criticized the Arab leaders who allegedly embraced communism and capitalism and were becoming increasingly sensitive to the JudeoChristian coalition. he circulated a communiqué congratulating the Chechen mujahedeen for the assassination of Ahmed Kadirov. This communiqué. 2005. in Chechnya. a GSPC statement posted by Droukdal on the Internet defending the raid indicated that the attack was in response to U. he urged jihad as a way to defend Muslim honor. The communiqués published in conjunction with the operation in Mauritania demonstrated Droukdal’s commitment to a pan-Islamic program and desire to indoctrinate his operatives in the ways of global jihad.

knowing that they had Al Qa’ida’s support.. Malian. including Algerian.the “Flintlock Plan” by military officials. This was the first time that Droukdal actively sought to recruit from outside the Algerian ranks. in 2005. The statement also denounced the recent arrests and trials by Mauritanian authorities of dozens of Islamic extremists accused of having links to the GSPC. This recognition was particularly meaningful for the Algerian operatives because it made them feel more “secure” in their ventures. Furthermore. counterterrorism campaign in Africa. Mauritanian and Chadian troops.S. Droukdal realized that he could encourage internationalization by amending his membership roster. Moreover. Using this video. Droukdal sought to encourage Maghreb jihadists to join the Algerians in their struggle. He began to recruit several operatives from abroad and encouraged his agents to train abroad and engage in jihadist activities in other nations in an effort to expand the GSPC’s global profile. Shortly thereafter. Droukdal began filming all operations conducted by the GSPC and distributing these clips online in the same manner as Zarqawi (Guidère 2007). One week after the attack. a long video filming the combatants who had participated in the operation was broadcast over the Internet in jihadist forums. This operation provoked the first official reaction of Al Qa'ida to the GSPC. These exercises were part of a broader U. the director of the media division of Al Qa’ida in Iraq issued a communiqué congratulating the GSPC. In fact. this was the first time Al Qa’ida had congratulated another group not affiliated with their organization. The communiqué ended by urging the Islamic youth throughout North Africa to join the Algerian cause (Lecocq and Schrijver 2007). leaders from Al Qa’ida and the GSPC signed a pact of fraternity (Jebnoun 2007). 75 .

Upon taking these hostages he promised to execute them unless the Algerian government withdrew its support for the war in Iraq. there were numerous GSPC media outlets transmitting information simultaneously. Droukdal launched a systematic communications reform to improve the image of the GSPC amongst Algerians and the international Islamic community and to enable him to preach pan-Islamic sermons to his operatives. First of all. Algerian security services contributed to this information overflow by distributing false reports on the GSPC’s channels.. Those communiqués not approved by this committee could be regarded as unauthentic. Droukdal’s leadership during this time period was primarily ideological in nature. Droukdal responded by issuing a communiqué in which he thanked Zarqawi and extolled Al Qa’ida in Iraq (Guidère 2007).In July 2005. Consequently. When the Algerian government failed to respond. he murdered the hostages. as evidenced by the frequency of his declarations and interchanges and his efforts to improve the 76 . As a result. Droukdal proposed a system of transmitting information whereby a central media committee would transmit all communiqués. Moreover. Zarqawi signaled his complicity with the GSPC by seizing two Algerian diplomats. the GSPC’s communications were characterized by a general cacophony and ataxia. This system enabled the GSPC to elucidate several ambiguous arguments and clarify dubious information(Gray and Stockham 2008). he sought to bracket the Algerian operations. During the summer of 2005. Prior to this effort. 2005). he sought to centralize the GSPC’s communications. Thus. including the attack in Mauritania and the execution of the Algerian diplomats with other attacks that occurred during the same time period (including the coordinated suicide bomb attacks on London’s public transport system that occurred on July 7. each GSPC katibat possessed its own media bureau and published its own communications regarding its operations and successes within its territory.

on the fifth anniversary of the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks. Droukdal personally supervised all the preparations (Moss 2008). Two days later. Al Qa’ida Central Command had stalled the merger for one year. Droukdal’s role as an ideological leader steering the GSPC’s internationalization through an assertive public relations drive continued after this announcement. The attack involved immaculate planning: the GSPC had surveyed the location for weeks and the day before. Droukdal also directed several tactical changes to prepare his organization for international jihad. he expressed the 77 . he published a communiqué affirming the GSPC’s allegiance to Al Qa’ida and bin Laden. On December 22. VIII. a group of combatants had penetrated the highly protected port.” He spoke of the need to suppress national borders in order to establish an Islamic caliphate and urged the immediate union of the nations of North Africa under Islamic law. under Droukdal. It is important to note that this announcement came one year after Droukdal had made his first forays to Al Qa’ida. one cannot ignore the fact that prior to the official announcement of the merger of Al Qa’ida and the GSPC. could positively contribute to Al Qa’ida’s ideological appeals and combat operations. announced the merger of Al Qa’ida and the GSPC.GSPC’s reception nationally and internationally. 2005. Moreover. intent on ensuring that the GSPC’s membership. overall his leadership performance improved during this time period. thereby crystallizing the relationship. The Announcement of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb Finally. Ayman al-Zawahiri. the deputy leader of Al Qa’ida. two bombs exploded in the port de Delis. However. This was the first time that the GSPC had led an attack against a maritime target. Therefore. His communiqué was particularly revelatory because it reflected the alleged changes in the official ideology of the GSPC. His discourse supported pan-Islamic notions and highlighted the necessity of creating an “Islamic United States. 2006. on September 11.

Zawahiri himself refused to allow the group to call itself “Al Qa’ida in Algeria” since this name seemed too “local” and did not reflect the transnational and pan-Islamic agenda of Al Qa’ida (Guidère 2007). Droukdal issued another claim in which he suggested that after pledging allegiance to Islam and demonstrating his faith in Bin Laden. thereby easing the qualms of his subordinates (Guidère 2007). Droukdal expressed concern about projecting a certain image of his organization to his base as well as the international community. in an elaborate roadside bombing. a joint venture between a Halliburton subsidiary. Sonatrach. in December 2006. however. The bomb attack killed an Algerian driver in a convoy transporting the workers. IX. He expressed confidence in the specific competencies and ideological underpinning of Al Qa’ida’s leadership. A New Organization In the months after the name change. Al Qa’ida in the Maghreb (AQIM). Moreover. Some scholars have suggested that AQIM remains sharply focused on its Kabylia strongholds despite Droukdals’s global rhetoric (Filiu 2009). For instance. KBR. including 78 . Spain. AQIM conducted an attack against a bus transporting employees from Brown & Root-Condor. In changing the name of the GSPC to Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb. and the Algerian stateowned oil company. and France). he wanted to highlight its role in global jihad. Droukdal and his operatives began to target foreigners who continued to support secular regimes and proselytize their culture (specifically the United States. a few recent attacks indicate otherwise.sentiment that Al Qa’ida was the only group that could unite all Islamic combatants and steer the battle against the Coalition forces. This change would demonstrate the solidarity of Al Qa’ida and the GSPC. it was now time for him to change the name of his organization. Approximately six months later. nine of whom were wounded.

and the explosions was also transmitted. A lengthy film of the operation. and train potential terrorists. Originally.four Britons and one American. in which AQIM admitted to the attack. Always attentive to public reaction. Some specialists fear that AQIM could severely damage the energy sector in the Niger delta (Moss 2008). Chechnya. the GSPC was engaged in a war of attrition whereby combatants would descend from the mountains and attack the armed forces. However. killing at least 33 people and injuring others. On this day. recruit. AQIM was able to establish communities in Europe to provide money. He encouraged his operatives to executed attacks inspired by the Iraqi model. This video. The attacks that occurred on April 11. Recent reports express fear that AQIM will be able to increased recruitment in Mauritania or Nigeria. Iraq and training camps in the Sahel to pursue international jihad. intended to galvanize combatants and attract recruits. Droukdal encouraged the evolution from guerilla-oriented operations such as armed assaults to terror-oriented operations such as bombings. Under his leadership. Afghanistan. the surveillance and lookout. detailing the fabrication of the bombs. 2007 demonstrated Droukdal’s new tactics. These recruits were then dispatched to Kashmir. One bomber drove into the guard post at the government building housing the offices of the prime minister and the Interior Ministry. indoctrinate. Droukdal disclosed a communiqué. the use of firearms plummeted while the use of explosives augmented (Gyves and Wyckloff 2006). attention should be paid to the tactical changes that he implemented. in online jihadist forums about one month later. three cars driven by suicide bombers blew up in Algiers. emulated the propaganda materials of Al Qa’ida in Iraq (Jebnoun 2007). As a result of Droukdal’s press campaign. Two other cars were detonated beside a police station in the east of the Algerian capital (one at the seat of Interpol and the other at the 79 . While Droukdal’s role was primarily ideological.

Final Observations 80 . Such spectacular attacks could also appeal to younger sympathizers (Algeria: Violence Returns 2007). This also permitted AQIM officers to move from the periphery of Algeria back into its urban centers. In doing so. Droukdal was compelled to publish a communiqué to outline his intentions and defuse criticism. Moreover. Through this rhetoric. Droukdal criticized the adoption of an anti-Islamic policy allegedly championed by the Americans in their war against terrorism. remote detonation. an effective propaganda and selective recruitment were employed to make AQIM a formidable. These attacks utilized remote explosives and were thus less costly in human lives. Now. this method consisted of engaging in spectacular attacks with a symbolic dimension that could destabilize the regime. To capitalize upon his operatives’ anti-colonialist concerns. As always. rigged vehicles. thereby cementing the link between the two organizations (Guidère 2007). The second justification for the attacks was the Algerian government’s military cooperation with the American forces. Droukdal positioned his group as the defender of the riches of Muslim countries faced with avarice and imperialism of the West. simultaneous explosions. he expressed a message frequently articulated by Al Qa’ida. Finally. which could allow the Western power to use petroleum in Algeria for 100 years. His communiqué suggested that the April 11 attacks were executed in response to a concession agreement with the United States. kamikaze fighters. Droukdal suggested that this was the beginning of a foreign occupation and deemed it necessary to combat the Western presence in Algeria. X. and sustainable fighting force. They also demonstrated the professionalization of AQIM’s of the special forces of the police in Bab Ezzouar).

Droukdal sought to effectively straddle the divide between local and international Islamic terrorism. Droukdal recognized that by aligning itself with Al Qa’ida. can only be explained by highlighting Droukdal’s ideological leadership and the major shifts that he pioneered on the propaganda front. he directed an ideological shift – from a philosophy based on regional preoccupations to a more internationally oriented perspective. most particularly French interests. each accompanied by a revealing and incantatory communiqué. which had dramatically expanded since the September 11. The US invasion of Iraq and media coverage of American detention and interrogation policies lent credence to the Qa’ida narrative that 81 . Thus. he reflected AQIM’s international focus and the growing ratio of attacks against foreign targets into an emphasis on international issues and threats against Western countries in AQIM’s statements. Moreover. Droukdal advanced the goal of undermining the secular Algerian regime while damaging the interests of Western nations (Black 2007). rather than confining itself to local activity. Through his communications. The most powerful French AQIM cell to date was dismantled in September 2005. The merger. he effectively brought the Algerians insurgents out of isolation so they could work more closely with international Islamic networks to promote Islam. He incited the organization to expand by attacking foreign targets. By uniting radical Islamists to attack Americana and French targets in northwestern Africa.To this day. the GSPC could render itself capable of operating in the context of global jihad. when French police thwarted a series of bombings set to occur in Paris as Algerians voted on the National Charter for Peace and Reconciliation. Droukdal recognized the global appeal of Al Qa’ida message. After the ranks of his organization had been depleted at the turn of the twenty-first century. attacks. and its success. AQIM continues to conducted several suicide attacks and roadside bombings.

82 . he was able to tap into local grievances and tie them to the global jihad against the west. ready-made networks that could be internationalized. He saw clearly an opportunity for synergy. he successfully aligned with Al Qa’ida to co-opt and exploit local. Al Qa’ida’s global ideology intersected with local anger directed at the undemocratic regime would encourage jihadists’ activity in the Maghreb. A current of cultural Islamization was created that has increased Al Qa’ida’s attraction. Droukdal capitalized upon these trends by highlighting the importance of solidarity among the mujahedeen in face of Western aggression against Islam.portrayed isolated American actions as a coordinated war against Islam. Having formulated an appropriate ideological stance. Thus.

GAI quickly gained strong support among the university students in both Cairo and Alexandria by recruiting mid-level leaders from the ranks of the unemployed university students who were disillusioned by Egypt’s lack of economic opportunities. and instead based their ideology on the principles articulated by Sayyid Qutb. in the late 1990s. In contrast. Qina. Asyu’. renounced violence. uneducated individuals from 83 . Both broke with the Muslim Brotherhood over the latter’s commitment to nonviolence. and financial crackdowns during much of the 1990s. Egyptian President Anwar Sadat gave the group’s members free reign. his rivals. covertly supplying them with arms with which to defend themselves against potential attacks by Marxists or Nasserites.Chapter 7: Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya: The Unrealized Merger In the early 1970s. the GAI rejected the Muslim Brotherhood’s gradualist approach to change. members of Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya apologized for the group’s involvement in the Sadat assassination. Moreover. and Sohaj. Both collaborated on the assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat in 1981 and both fell victims to the bitter campaign of state violence. In addition. the Egyptian Islamic Jihad members joined forced with Al Qa’ida. However. Both campaigned to overthrow the secular Egyptian government and to replace it with an Islamic regime. GAI recruited more indigent. Upon its birth. Why did GAI repudiate terrorism rather than affiliate with Al Qa’ida to continue its brutal campaign? I. However. an Egyptian fundamentalist writer and educator. two prominent Salafi jihadist groups operated in Egypt: Al-Gama’a alIslamiyya (GAI) and Egyptian Islamic Jihad. and denounced Al Qa’ida. mass arrests. The Emergence of the GAI from the Ashes of the Muslim Brotherhood Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya (GAI) was formally organized as an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood in 1973 in the Upper Nile regions of Al-Minya.

Sadat changed his political strategies to combat internal unrest in the mid 1970s. where he found and developed financial supporters. II. He provided the moral justifications for the group’s moneymaking attacks on Christian shopkeepers and small-business owners by his issuing fatwa – religious rulings that justify actions normally outlawed by the Koran (Abdel Maguid 2003). Crackdown under Mubarak 84 . He began rounding up several Islamic militants and placing them in jail. “A need [had] arisen for a military force for us to defend [themselves]” (Carmon. and Lav 2006). The GAI and Egyptian Islamic Jihad allegedly cooperated in this conspiracy. The Sadat Assassination Upon returning to Egypt in 1980. As a result of his policies. Perturbed by the rapid development and mobilization of the Salafi organizations in Egypt. As a result of his role in the assassination. Sheikh Omar Abdel Al–Rahman assumed the mantle as spiritual leader for the group during its infancy. GAI leaders decided. Fearing harsh repression (like that which the Muslim brotherhood has experienced under former Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser).the southern rural regions of Assiuet and Minya to further populate their rank and file (Keats 2002). Consequently. III. During Al-Rahman’s time abroad. AlRahman served six months in an Egyptian prison. clashes between Egyptian security forces and Islamic movements in the universities increased. Al-Rahman issued a fatwa that provided the religious justification for the assassination of President Sadat in 1981. they established a branch devoted to jihad and began to execute increasingly violent operations. avoiding a sterner sentence on a technicality (Keats 2002). including Saudi Arabia. Feldner. Al-Rahman fled Egypt and toured the neighboring Arab countries.

Campaign of Terror After the Soviet-Afghan war. they carried out a number of attacks on tourists that killed dozens of people. many fighters moved on to combat the Serbian forces that were decimating Bosnian Muslims in Yugoslavia. this crackdown further radicalized the university-educated population. a leading member of the GAI. again provided the religious justification for these attacks by arguing that tourism in Egypt fostered poor morals. such as Osama Bin Laden. Although fairly successful at curbing the number of violent attacks. following the Soviet withdrawal. many GAI members and leaders fled to Afghanistan. like Mustafa Hamza. and spread diseases such as AIDS (Stacher 2002). they trained and fought alongside al-Zawahiri’s Egyptian Islamic Jihad and other Afghan Arabs.Sadat’s successor. even worked for businesses owned by Osama bin Laden in Somalia (Carmon. some GAI members returned to Egypt where they initiated a campaign against the influences of Western culture. and Lav 2006). torture. During these years. where they were active in the jihad against the Soviet Union. In Afghanistan. who continued to struggle under high unemployment(Gerges 2000). Some. Several were implicated in numerous plots directed against American diplomatic and military targets in the Balkans and other parts of Europe. Between 1992 and 1993. many GAI members continued or commenced their training in Al Qa’ida facilities in the Sudan and Afghanistan. During the 1990s. Al-Rahman. IV. Moreover. 85 . Feldner. who had immigrated to the United States by this time. His methods included false arrests. Hosni Mubarak began a brutal campaign against Egypt’s militant groups that lasted throughout the 1980s. and executions.

the group killed 63 people at a tourist site in Luxor (including four Egyptians and 59 foreign tourists. bookstores. In 1996. Yet despite his arrest. 1997. including the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels. when the Luxor attack occurred. 36 of whom were Swiss) (Keats 2002). 86 . In 1995. several GAI leaders immediately conveyed their disgust. militants killed nine German tourists and their driver in front of the Egyptian Museum in Cairo. Two months later. This prompted some influential militants to reconsider their strategy and tactics and some GAI leaders renounced violence. arresting thousands of suspected terrorists and executing or killing others during police raids. In September 1997. During a court hearing. Collapse of an Armed Group As a result of GAI’s campaign in the late 1990s. Al-Rahman was arrested in the United States in connection with the first World Trade Center bombing. signed by six of the organization's leaders. he and nine other operatives were convicted for conspiring to destroy New York City landmarks. Cairo clamped down on both the GAI and Egyptian Islamic Jihad even more. GAI continued to attack tourists throughout the 1990s and began targeting Egyptian business establishments as well. which declared a halt to all armed operations within and outside Egypt. including the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels. GAI announced a unilateral initiative of conciliation with the Egyptian regime. The group bombed theaters. In 1996. Al-Rahman was arrested in the United States in connection with the first World Trade Center bombing. he and nine other operatives were convicting for conspiring to destroy New York City landmarks. In 1993. Thus. and a stop to agitation to commit attacks. a GAI member read aloud a communiqué. On July 5. Ethiopia. the group allegedly collaborated with the Egyptian Islamic Jihad in a failed assassination attempt on President Hosni Mubarak in Addis Ababa.In 1993. V. and banks.

moderate one. supported non-violence and the ceasefire. organized by Mustafa Hamza. but rather by a breakaway faction (Ghadbian 2000). a Netherlands resident announced his resignation (Cohen 2003). while the smaller.insisting that the operation was not executed by the GAI. as a result of increased governmental scrutiny. the GAI was weakened both operationally and financially by the aftermath effects of the attack. Moreover. the larger. Moreover. Therefore. Consequently. the GAI spokesman Osama Rushdie.” thereby becoming a signatory to the International Islamic Front. The GAI had witnessed how the Egyptian Islamic Jihad had suffered significant setbacks because of its decision to join Al Qa’ida. or simply saw the financial and organizational advantages that Al Zawahiri had reaped from making the decision to join Al Qa’ida. Zawahiri's organization experienced a major upset when in 1998 Albania agreed to extradite 12 members of EIJ to Egypt 87 . he was unable to recruit many of his cadres to support Bin Laden and a minimal number joined the global jihad (Botha 2006). led by Rifai Ahmad Taha deplored the ceasefire as cowardly and called for a return to armed operations. it needed a publicity boost if it was to continue functioning as a viable terrorist organization. the group split into two factions. For instance. more radical faction. wanted to seize power in the GAI. The Luxor attack and the reports of mutilation of the victims’ bodies had sparked public repulsion at GAI. In 1997. Yet despite his efforts. After the schism. Taha signed Bin Laden’s 1998 Declaration of War against the “Jews and Crusaders. It is unclear whether Taha actually agreed with bin Laden’s views. Rifai Ahmad Taha courted bin Laden by making trips to Afghanistan and even appeared sitting next to him and Egyptian Islamic Jihad leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in a videotape released in September 2000 that threatened US interests.

in August 2006. even said the GAI owes the Egyptian people "an apology for the crimes which [the group] has committed against Egypt. Ayman al-Zawahiri. a self-proclaimed leader of the underground group. Nevertheless. stressed that significant differences in philosophy exist between the GAI and Al Qa’ida." he maintained. GAI leadership in Egypt quickly rejected this claim. Reconciliation In 1999. announced that the GAI had merged with Al Qa’ida. who remained the group’s spiritual leader. by then the closest associate of Osama bin Laden. We are even thinking of paying blood money to the victims” (Halawi 2002). During his interview with Asharq al-Awsat. a senior leader and chief ideological theorist for the GAI. despite widespread skepticism in Egypt and abroad about the nature of its true 88 . Even Al-Rahman. In doing so. known as the “Concept Correction Series” in which they renounce indiscriminate violence and extremist interpretations of the case known as the “Returnees from Albania” (Aboul-Enein 2004) Consequently. most members of GAI preferred to go underground until the group regained its strength and influence rather than align with Al Qa’ida and risk further setbacks. Dr. and our aim is Islam. The GAI has not conducted a terrorist attack either inside or outside Egypt since August 1998. the historic leadership of the GAI has published a series of books. the leadership issued a statement reaffirming its commitment to end violence. In 2002. Since this time. VI. He asserted that Al Qa’ida’s aggressive tactics have failed Muslims. Since this time. the group’s historic leadership declared a unilateral ceasefire. Nageh Ibrahim. “Their aim is jihad. agreed to this measure. Karam Zuhdi. Ibrahim challenged Al Qa’ida’s Islamic credentials by emphasizing its dependence on violent struggle as a means to further its goals and suggested that Al Qa’ida was propagating a false definition of jihad. despite their proclamations in favor of non-violence.

Moreover. GAI members were less receptive to Al Qa’ida’s ideology of global jihad than other groups that have emerged since that time. they decided to renounce violent activity rather than appeal for Al Qa’ida for assistance to continue their existence as a terrorist group. which gave precedence to doctrinal correctness above all other issues. police. the GAI has concentrated its efforts on revising its former extremist worldview and distinguishing itself from Qa’ida (Zambelis 2006). primarily to the establishment of an Islamic state in Egypt (Rabasa et al. politicians. secular institutions. tourists. GAI was well established and active prior to Al Qa’ida’s emergence in the international arena. They attacked Coptic Christians.intentions. When GAI reemerged in the early 1990s with a renewed sense of purpose after the return of its members from the Afghan jihad. banks. however. they perceived their struggle as regionally confined to the Egyptian territory. who were not already entrenched in Salafi jihadist circles. and the economy 89 . and exhibited strong anti-Western proclivities. Explaining the Decision not to Affiliate with Al Qa’ida The leadership of the GAI had longstanding connections with Al Qa’ida. evidence suggests that this choice was strategic. GAI interpreted their jihad much more narrowly than groups affiliated or associated with Al Qa’ida. and the media with the goal of undermining Egyptian state power. GAI’s theoretical and operational priorities were the product of a literal reading of the Quranic and prophetic texts. 2006). VII. While this decision may seem counterintuitive. While they attacked Western targets. the ouster of the “illegitimate” governing power. its leaders were convinced that they could accomplish in Egypt what the mujahedeen had achieved in Afghanistan. when their group was in a state of imminent decline. They believed that their main foe was the Egyptian state and that the near enemy was more worthy of fighting than the distant enemy. Consequently.

He attempted to rationalize this earlier aggression by suggesting that adopting violence in 1992 " was mainly a reaction to what we saw as the suppression and killing of our brothers” (Carmon.” Between arrests. reunite the groups’ ranks. the security establishment facilitated meetings between the group’s leader and members in Egyptian prisons to ensure that the group honored this commitment. GAI were compelled to shift strategies as a political tactic. even with Al Qa’ida’s backing. after its initiative to end the violence. and Lav 2006) It is possible that in mid-1997. the ranks of the leadership and general membership were decimated. Feldner. admitted that the group was in a stronger position before it started attacking the government. Thus. However. Additionally. deaths in armed clashes. and prepare for a new offensive. the relative success of the government’s security policy obligated the group to concede to what its leaders called “military defeat. stiff sentences that included dozens of executions. and severe treatment in prisons and detention facilities.and creating the perception that the Egyptian government could not protect its citizens (Keats 2002). Osama Rushdie. This exceedingly severe security strategy disrupted the ranks and cohesion of GAI prompting the group’s leaders to reconsider its acts and concepts. Reflecting on the seven years of GAI violence between 1992 and 1997. this may have been a maneuver to buy time. the groups’ leaders acquainted themselves with other schools of Islamic thought. by the turn of the century the group realized that it was useless to try to topple a powerful regime by force. During their time in prison. wider reading and understanding is evident in the sources on which the leadership relied to compose the revisionist books that they published (Halawi 2002). 90 . Nevertheless. a former leader of GAI. In fact. the effect of their new. in the late 1990s. when several leaders of GAI announced its cease-fire initiative.

Accordingly. Acts of terror induce psychological effects. terrorism was a means to a political end. not to destroy the government’s military potential. which must fan out among a possibly substantial population. the group abandoned its violent 91 . Final Observations For GAI. Terrorist organizations engage in a process of constant adaptation to the strategic environment and are apt to respond to policy-induced changes to their constraints since. they lack resources. they changed their strategic tactics. GAI would not have been able to defeat the Egyptian government. Crenshaw’s description of the instrumental approach to assessing terrorist violence is useful for understanding GAI’s rationale. Even with some assistance from Al Qa’ida. The costs of executing attacks became too high and the consequences of adopting a nonviolent position seemed promising (Crenshaw 1987). Thus. A constant failure to achieve its stated goals led to internal strife and its ultimate collapse as a terrorist group. one must note that terrorism depends on the ability to generate the appropriate level of terror and anxiety. the costs of attempting violent attacks and of these attacks failing. terrorists groups must conduct a sequence of directed attacks that creates a sufficient sense of threat for it to be understood that the campaign will continue unless and until there is a change in state policy (Freedman 2007). nor did GAI members have any interest in targeting the “far enemy. However.” When GAI was unable to achieve its political goal through terrorism. GAI used terrorism to influence political behavior by devaluing the state in the eyes of its citizens. it was meant to produce a change in the Egyptian government’s political position. GAI acted on the basis of its calculation of the benefit to be gained from violent action.VIII. the bulk of which may be able to make a reasonable calculation that they are not a risk. by definition. the consequences of adopting a nonviolent position and the probability of achieving its political goals through terrorist undertakings.

92 . For GAI.strategy. GAI now appears to be concerned with carving out some political space to operate in Egypt. terrorism was merely a means to an end and substitutes were available.

93 . Consequently. like Osama bin Laden or Ayman Zawahiri or to concentrate on the suicide bombers who conduct operations. Moreover.Chapter 8: Conclusion and Discussion – Al Qa’ida’s Commanding Officers: A Skilled Management Team To understand terrorist organizations. it is necessary to examine the staff that operates at each level of the hierarchy within the system. the commanding officers that direct Al Qa’ida’s affiliates. his loosely affiliated. the analysis of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb provides an example of an intelligent and shrewd local jihadist leader. broad-based Al Qa’ida network augmented by affiliations with various groups has durability that will surpass his mortality. Abdelmalek Droukdal whose desire to revive his group inspired him to associate with Al Qa’ida while the examination of Al Gama’a al-Islamiyya demonstrates why strategic calculations can rouse other organizations to eschew violence and rebuff Al Qa’ida’s forays. or social bonds could motivate local jihadist leaders to enroll in Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program. While Osama bin Laden’s capture or death would be an important psychological blow to those vested in his invincibility. social bonds served as a “permissive factor”). It is naïve to focus on chief executives. while social bonds facilitated the process of affiliating (i. ideology. interventions may need to be focused at understanding and disrupting Al Qa’ida’s mid-level management. Recent studies indicate that strategies aimed at enabling stringent police techniques and punitive military action will not succeed in deterring the Al Qa’ida suicide bombers(Atran 2003). In the first chapters.e. I posed the question: what motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida? I hypothesized that opportunism. The data collected in this survey and analysis of Al Qa’ida’s leadership has significantly demonstrated that leaders were strongly incentivized by opportunism.

groups may lose members to other terrorist groups when a competing group can put together a package of purposive goals and selective incentives that is more appealing than that of the first organization. competition against other rebel groups. organizations must attract and retain members. there may be a divergence of opinion on precisely what objectives should be 94 . the type of regime against which they are fighting. Counterterrorism efforts aimed at winning battles and capturing terrorist actors deplete the ranks of terrorist organizations by physically eliminating combatants. or both. it is not surprising that local jihadist group leaders have opportunistic motives for joining Al Qa’ida. Leaders. Factionalism is also common amongst terrorist organizations. But what are these motives? In fact. the fundamental purpose of any political organization is to maintain itself. One should consider terrorism as “one of a set of rebel tactics that is consciously selected in response to changes in funding. in particular. wish to enhance and promote the organizations that they direct since their personal ambitions are tied to the organization’s viability (Cronin and Ludes 2004). Conciliation programs can be a successful counter-terrorism strategy when amnesty is offered to operatives who renounce violence. My data analysis and case studies support these conclusions. In order to survive. when the costs of other forms of violence increase. popular support. and counterinsurgency tactics” (Laitin and Jacob Shapiro 2008) Like individual terrorists.Previous studies depict terrorists as rational actors seeking to maximize political goals (Lake 2003). Moreover. as was the case with the GSPC (Sederberg 1995). Psychological surveys indicate that terrorists are not psychologically deviant or ideologically blinded(Sageman 2004). Within the larger understanding of a terrorist group’s political aims. insurgent groups should also be perceived as rational entities that are more likely to adopt terrorist tactics when the benefits of other forms of violence decrease. Since they are rational actors.

transforming from an armed group into a political party is no easy feat. combatants. Groups only enjoy popular support when the population believes their actions are justified under the political conditions of the country (i. Recruiters for Al Qa’ida reportedly told researchers that volunteers were “beating down their doors” to join (Atran 2004). Al Qa’ida can transfer operatives to help support the local jihadist group since Al Qa’ida’s own recruitment is accelerating. their public image shifts from well-intentioned revolutionaries to common delinquents. including suicide bombers. Finally.e. For example. Since the 1980s.” While it is impossible to know precisely the size of Al Qa’ida due to the decentralized structure of its organization. This divergence compels operatives to defect. Thus. many groups may choose to align with Al Qa’ida to remain salient. when they occupy a “moral high ground”). In recent years. security sources in Algeria said that the Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb offensive in August 2008 reflected the recruitment of scores of operatives. especially in less democratic nations. Al Qa’ida probably has several thousand members and associates. 95 .000 militants in camps in Afghanistan. Al Qa’ida can easily dispatch a few combatants to assist local groups in desperate need of increased membership and expertise. making recruitment amongst these communities increasingly difficult. like the GAI. When this occurs.pursued. Al Qa’ida’s recruitment has picked up in 30-40 countries. When loss of membership occurs. groups may alienate the communities in which they operate by conducting particularly violent or poorly executed operations (Crenshaw 1991). Thus. Al Qa’ida trained over 5. However. Bin Laden and Al Qa’ida’s elite cadre have convinced many volunteers to fulfill the duty of jihad and to thus respond to “the call of Allah. some groups may find it beneficial to renounce violence and enter the political arena. and those with inside knowledge of the military and police(Gray and Stockham 2008).

many terrorist groups are compared to criminal gangs. Al Qa’ida also selects sympathetic journalists to whom it grants interviews (Schweitzer 2008). the Muslim warriors of the crusader period) by establishing a territorial base for Islam and by protecting those who are oppressed by foreign domination(Henzel 2005). primarily by means of the Qatari television station al-Jazeera. To complement this strategy. groups gain credibility and respect that can be effectively leveraged to increase recruitment.” To supplement recruitment. Al Qa’ida raises awareness amongst Muslims of the grievances that gave rise to its birth. In doing so. their social status is enhanced. Through a program of propaganda and indoctrination. Al Qa’ida is a high-value global brand that is esteemed amongst the Salafi community. they are perceived as legitimate actors. Al Qa’ida established a communications committee to promote this representation through a well-executed publicity campaign. of coalition soldiers shooting wounded insurgents inside a mosque. These journalists present Al Qa’ida to the outside world in a supportive manner. Before joining forces with Al Qa’ida. which produces the professional tapes and promotional film clips disseminated throughout the Arab and Western world. upon aligning with Al Qa’ida. or of occupation forces stepping with their boots on the backs of Arabic men that have just been bound 96 . as discussed in Chapter 3. However. striving for global jihad. Therefore. depicting its operatives as “freedom fighters. Al Qa’ida encourages potential operatives to follow in the footsteps of their pious predecessors (i. Bin Laden has created a company called al-Sahab. Al Qa’ida uses propaganda to foster its positive public image as the defender of Islam. Recognizing the powerful potential of the media.e. By aligning with Al Qa’ida. recruits are shown provocative photos of Iraqi women and children killed or bloodied by Western bombardment. Al Qa’ida has substantially promoted and publicized its image throughout the globe. In fact.Additionally. For instance.

For example. Al Qa’ida’s veterans can offer groups tactical and strategic advice. Al Qa’ida established numerous local military training facilities in Mindanao and Indonesia in the last two decades. even death. Thus. Al Qa’ida is infamous for providing terrorist training and for establishing sites and camps where recruits are educated. known as Hambali and Ali Gufron. etc. Al Qa’ida’s affiliates learn from Al Qa’ida how to conduct comparable propaganda campaigns in their home countries to attract and enhance their own recruitment efforts. equipment. financial services. and mentored.and forced to the ground with black sacks over their faces. According to several reports.000 to $600. due to its exceptional intelligence-gathering skills. Because of that. helped Jemaah Islamiyah plan and execute the 2002 Bali bombing that killed more than 2000 people (Abuza 2003). it effectively encourages redemption through faith and sacrifice. and weapons. 97 . Ansar al-Islam was started with $300. Al Qa’ida can offer groups financial resources. It can also offer groups information on the government. Riduan Isamuddin. Finally. physical environment. both alumni of the Afghan jihad. For instance. tyrants gained dominance over the Muslims in every aspect and every land”(Calvert 2004). Abdelmalek Droukdal certainly modeled his publicity efforts on that of Al Qa’ida and benefited from advice from Al Qa’ida’s media branch. nature of the military and intelligence services. indoctrinated. Al Qa’ida also attributes Muslim societies’ “greatest misfortune and decadence to their abandonment of jihad due to the love of this world and abhorrence of death. Al Qa’ida can help groups conduct attacks. Such emotional narratives highlight the theme of humiliation at the hand of callous and arrogant Western powers(Hafez 2007). known as Muklhas.000 of Al Qa’ida seed money (Ward 2005). Moreover.

martyrdom operations not only produce spectacular incidents of large-scale destruction. Suicide attacks. Instead. Efforts should ensure that the necessary resources (both human and 98 . local jihadist group leaders are positioned to seek assistance from their colleagues when decline within their own organizations seems imminent. local jihadist leaders are presented with appealing and cost effective opportunities to bolster their own recruitment and ensure organizational survival and their ability to achieve their political aims without abandoning arms and investigating political avenues. strategies should be developed to isolate these groups from Al Qa’ida. just as a conventional military organization might glamorize its heroes to inspire others to volunteer for field military actions. the results of this study suggest that most local jihadist group leaders have already established significant social bonding and networking with members of Al Qa’ida Central Command. Since Al Qa’ida provides local jihadist group leaders with numerous opportunities to stimulate and expand their organizations. demonstrate that the organization has a loyal and impassioned following. By joining Al Qa’ida. and because such affiliations are not difficult to initiate due to the existence of prior social connections. rather than abandon their mission. While not a precipitant cause for an affiliation. Moreover. Such missions create publicity events that effectively advertise the organization and psychologically appeal to individual needs to feel important and meaningful through membership in a “higher” movement (Atran 2003). in particular. but also create and promote “heroes” that represent the organization. thereby making such affiliations more problematic and risky. it may be futile for counterterrorist forces to discourage local jihadist group leaders from soliciting Al Qa’ida.Conducting attacks connotes a high degree of devotion and strength to potential recruits. social networks can be thought of as a stipulation that pre-structures and facilitates the merger process. Also. Due to these associations.

Thus. For instance. which features a common visa policy and region-wide fingerprint or iris photography database. state borders were opened to international trade flows. previous asylum applications. communities. Bin Laden has devoted less attention and resources to AQIM. If groups are precluded from affiliating with Al Qa’ida. Tom Ridge. third-country nationals refused entry to the EU and individuals 99 . especially Muslim. The new Schengen Information System computer database contains information on criminals on the run. weapons of mass destruction. some suggest that AQIM’s globalization process has been impeded by the expulsion of AL Qa’ida in Iraq (AQI) from Baghdad in 2008. In the age of globalization. former Secretary of Homeland Security. However. it is necessary to treat carefully because restrictive “fortress” responses and sweeping immigrant surveillance hinder cooperation with key immigrant. they are less likely to survive or recuperate from setbacks. border control measures must be established to prevent the movement of terrorists and terror-related materials. Throughout the cannot be exchanged between Al Qa’ida and its weaker partner. To thwart Al Qa’ida’s connections with local jihadist groups. stolen cars and other stolen property as well as biometric data. This system is also used to store and disseminate information on extradition. portrayed US borders as “conduits for terrorists. and illegal migrants” (Ross 2003). Since the Iraqi branch of Al Qa’ida suffered this setback. Unilateral approaches to border control will leave a mismatch of contradictory national policies. terrorists have learned how to make legal immigration channels and legitimate immigrant communities serve their lethal jihadist ends. governments should implement a networked border monitoring and border control system. In areas like the Core Arab states and the Maghreb. A model system is that which is utilized in the European Union. thereby crippling its ability to supersede a regional dimension (Filiu 2009).

whereby $50 million for security programs administered by the US Department of Defense was offered to East African states to provide for military training for border control and security of the coastline. etc. counterterrorist forces can better undermine these leaders. These predictive models could be used in order to develop strategies for a pre-emptive counter-response. After the merger. and aviation security capacity (Kagwanja 2006). police training. granted more interviews. For example. One impressive program was the East Africa Counter Terrorism Initiative. While there were no significant patterns in the data on the operational and logistic role of the leaders profiled. it appears that most leaders took on an increasingly ideological role after the merger. 100 . I considered leadership roles before and after the affiliation to uncover trends.subject to a European arrest warrant or under surveillance for criminal activity(One Single EU Border 2005) A system for region-wide arrests would also be useful in areas where terrorist activity is high. The United States can provide assistance to foreign governments to enhance operational capacity to tighten border controls. Future research will center on the development of predictive models based on emerging patterns among terrorist groups that align with Al Qa’ida. The second question that I sought to answer involved the type of role local jihadist leaders played within Al Qa’ida. Future research may also focus on how alliances mature and evolve over time since this article focuses on aspects of maturity among terrorist groups who have engaged in networking with Al Qa’ida. gave more speeches. an understanding might be developed of what government initiatives trigger terrorist organizations to seek partnerships with Al Qa’ida and of the strength of the alliance that materializes as a result. By understanding what function local jihadist leaders play. the leaders issued more communiqués.

as was the case with the GAI. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are tightly coupled to their operatives. an ideology that was widely unpopular in the country in previous years (West 2006). an affiliation will not occur. they gained the support of the Somali people through nationalist causes more than through a common affinity for Salafism. These groups enjoyed popularity in Somalia in the 60s due to their attempts to regain lost Somali land after independence and to their resistance to dictator. unified struggle that transcends local. one must consider the philosophy and ambitions of local jihadist groups compared to Al Qa’ida. the worldwide community of believers(Sutton and Vertigans 2006). The leaders of local jihadist groups develop differentiated relationships with their 101 . Al Qa’ida conceives its resistance as a single. ethno-religious struggles. al-Ittihad al-Islami was established in the 1980s through the merger of Salafi groups. For example. In contrast. a high degree of decision influence. state. Central to Al Qa’ida’s vision is the awakening of the Muslim ummah. he demands that his commanding officers convince their operatives to adopt and accept Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program. Consequently. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are uniquely positioned to persuade uncommitted followers that Al Qa’ida has a better ideology. The dyadic relationship between these leaders and their followers is characterized by high quality leader-member exchange resulting from frequent communication. When local jihadist leaders are not interested in promoting this agenda. and regional concerns. Although Bin Laden wants to align with local militant groups with country-specific grievances to increase his global reach and influence. Siad Barre. leader-member value agreement. and subordinate loyalty.To understand why this increase in evangelizing and political activity of these leaders occurs. interactive communication patterns. As mentioned in earlier chapters. effective influence tactics. The roots of most of the terrorist networks included in this study can be traced to geographically separate.

rather than using an average leadership style. Valuable insights can be gained by considering the role that managers play when two companies merge in order to understand the role that Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play in mitigating culture shock and encouraging integration. speeches. When a group first affiliates with Al Qa’ida. Like Al 102 . For instance. in which they clarify their vision. Based on these motivational communications. rhetoric. followers trust their leaders and can be persuaded to engage in activities that they otherwise would not and can be encouraged to move beyond their own self-interest to focus on larger mutual interests(Graen and Uhl-Bien 1995). Thus. due to their close relationship with operatives. Due to such high quality leader-member exchange. Because they know their audience well. and interviews. Moreover. they can apply effective message management. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers correspond with their cohorts through communiqués. through their ideological operations. When the security situation does not permit direct communications. and spin. In doing so. they subordinate their radical group to Al Qa’ida’s strategic goals and move their localized Islamic resistance beyond sovereign state boundaries to transcend provincial frames of reference. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers can ground their message in the narrative elements most likely to resonate with this target group. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers can convince their operatives to integrate their previous regional ambitions with a wider transnational Islamic agenda. followers are encouraged to take personal initiative and exercise personal leadership to make their unit more effective. culture shock is inevitable. the GSPC was encouraged to engage in suicide and arson attacks(Guidère 2007). as Droukdal did on numerous occasions. operatives must also integrate new tactics and strategies into their repertoire. In addition to accepting Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program.rapports.

shared vision of future organizational arrangements (Marks and Mirvis 2000). patterned. Both transition managers and Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers must be skilled in relinquishing and helping others relinquish past values and practices that are not in tune with the current. They commence with disbelief and denial and pass into anger and then rage and resentment. These are identical to Dr. The threat to old corporate values and organizational lifestyle leaves organizational members in a state of defensiveness accentuated by low levels of trust within the institution. one of the most common difficulties that arise during the merger is “cultural differences. mergers represent sudden. and shared. Helen Kubler-Ross’s four stages of bereavement or 103 . Although some of the groups that Al Qa’ida merges with have less than five hundred operatives. Soon after the GSPC announced its merger with Al Qa’ida. major change and generate a great deal of uncertainty due to the fact that organizational cultures are underpinned by deep assumptions that are constant. finally acceptance occurs. When corporate mergers occur. transition mangers assume full-time responsibility and accountability for making integration work. For Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers and corporate transition managers. This can only be achieved by providing ideological guidance through leadermember exchanges and through public communications and appearances.Qa’ida’s commanding officers. a corporation may encourage teamwork while the venture it subsumes may be more oriented towards individual initiatives. In addition. the burden of responsibility still rests on the commanding officers to assuage their followers after the affiliation with Al Qa’ida commences. Droukdal issued a communiqué explaining and justifying this repositioning. transition managers must make the case for integration to large numbers of employees. Employees’ reactions most often pass through four distinct stages.” For example. next emotional bargaining begins. often accompanied by frustration and depression.

These initiatives can only be achieved by assuming an ideological role (Kavanagh and Ashkanasy 2006). Leaders hoping to initiative organizational change and general follower acceptance face a daunting task. leadership can be viewed as the art of mobilizing others to want to struggle for shared aspirations (Covin et al. 1997). Communication should be their major priority throughout the merger process. and support necessary changes in behaviors and culture to successfully realize the post-combination organization. Effective leaders possess powerful persuasive personal characteristics and execute actions designed to change internal organizational culture and substance. successfully promote change by implementing and campaigning for a unique vision of the organization through a publicity campaign. like Droukdal. and address inconsistencies between the espoused operating principles and actual management of change. anticipate the impact of change. Moreover. and desired end state. they must inspire hope. Finally. Finally. When a merger occurs. 104 .grief. they should serve as role models on how to “work together” for the goals of the organization. It is their responsibility to define. transition managers (and Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers) must define the new “combination” goals. principles. Leaders. promote. and a sense that the future will be better than the past through their speeches and other outreach activities. In this context. optimism. What the operative grapples with is akin to the “death” of the previous organization and the letting go of this relationship (Cartwright and Cooper 1990). A wide range of factors affect organizational change as produced during a merger. They must assuage their followers’ fears and convince them of the saliency and relevance of the new program through constant communication. they should clarify critical success factors for the merger.

like the GAI. Thus. messaging should refute the imputation of malign Western intention in the Muslim world and undermine the notion that terrorism is authentically Islamic. In fact. another principle Islamist militant group in Egypt. Such propaganda will appeal to communities anxious to retain their cultural heritage and religious integrity. authorities can publicize the rejection of Al Qa’ida by credible local figures. Proxies must manage from affair and this sort of counter-terrorism publicity campaign. This program should expose tension between Al Qa’ida leadership and supporters.Understanding Al Qa’ida’s commanding officer’s role as transition managers during a merger is important when designing initiatives to undermine their efforts. Counterterrorism units can use media organizations to launch global propaganda pushes that will taint the Al Qa’ida brand and make it even less attractive to local militants. It is important to remember that some groups. For 105 . Counterterrorist forces can also harness the power of the “Shayma effect” (which refers to an incident where an Egyptian schoolgirl was killed in a jihadist attack) by broadcasting images off jihadist attacks that have killed Muslim children. Approaching communications in this manner ensures that the government avoids exacerbating feelings of alienation within Muslim communities. My data indicates that these commanding officers are leading Al Qa’ida’s growing media offensive. counterterrorist units should channel messages through volunteers in Internet forums(Brachman and McCants 2006). several leaders of GAI and Al-Jihad al-Islami. especially religious ones. Moreover. government communications strategy should build an attractive alternative to the Al Qa’ida worldview by appealing to a sense of deracinated nationalism. The media has become a crucial battlefield in the current conflict against radical Islamic terrorism (Blanchard 2006). do opt to renounce violence. For example. have taken steps to promote peaceful co-existence with the government and society(Gunaratna and Ali 2009). For instance.

Ed Husain and Shiraz Maher were two young British Muslims who became involved with radical Islamist politics with Hizb ut-Tahir before renouncing their affiliation and speaking out publicly about the dangers of intolerant Islamism (MacEoin 2007).instance. a struggle for survival. Ayman Al Zawahiri acknowledges that the struggle between the secular governments in the West and the militant jihadists of Al Qa’ida is a “battle of ideologies. The collapse of Al Qa’ida’s propaganda operations will also cause the Arab media to move towards more coverage of the legitimate Iraqi government. The leaders of the Western world should follow suit. Our government should also realize this truism. Salafi and Islamist communities in London have consistently demonstrated skill. Moreover. courage and commitment in countering al-Qaida propaganda and recruitment activity. 106 . along with their PCS and data files. and a war with no truce” (Payne 2009). This study indicates that Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are playing an increasingly ideological role. the government should continue to capture Al Qa’ida news and production staff.

Peter. Scott. Algeria: Violence Returns. Holy [Accessed May 14. “The Reconstituted Al-Qaeda Threat in the Maghreb.17049.” Science 299(5612): 1st ed. Airforce University Maxwell. Zachary. Nazih. Available at: http://www. Mark. “Going to the Source: Why Al Qaeda’s Financial Network Is Likely to Withstand the Current War on Terrorist Financing. 2004. Aboul-Enein.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 27: 169-185.ahram. Peter.” International Journal of Middle East Studies: 481-499. Inc. About START. Bergen. 2001. The Threats. P. Bergen.” Al-Ahram Center for Political & Strategic Studies.umd. 2002. Al Qaida's Ideology.html [Accessed May 14. Abuza.: inside the secret world of Osama bin Laden. Alain. African Research Bulletin (23): 17045 . “Egypt's Gama'ah Islamiyah: The Turnabout and its Ramifications. Black. Wahid. 2009].HTM [Accessed January 1. “Genesis of Suicide Terrorism. Youssef. Bergen. 2006.mi5. Available at: http://acpss.” Terrorism Monitor 5(2): 7-12. Available at: http://www. 2009]. New York: Simon & Schuster.start.” Politique Étrangère 3. “Funding Terrorism in Southeast Asia: The Financial Network of Al Qaeda and Jemaah Islamiya. Ayubi. Andrew. L.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 25(2): 169-200. 107 .: Inside the Secret World of Osama bin Laden. “The Political Revival of Islam: the Case of Egypt. 2003. Free Press. 2004.” The Washington Quarterly 27(3): 67-90. The Osama bin Laden I know: an oral history of al Qaeda's Abdel Maguid. Atran. 2009]. 2006. Atran. “Mishandling Suicide Terrorism. 2003. Scott. 2003. Holy War. New York: Free Press. Inc. Antil. Ayman Al-Zawahiri: The Ideologue of Modern Islamic Basile. 1980. National Consortium for the Study of terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. 2007. “L’Afrique et la «Guerre Contre la Terreur». 2007.

Carmon. “How Al-Qaida ends: The decline and demise of terrorist groups. L. Crenshaw. 2006. Anneli.” Journal of Management Development 16(1): 22-33. Carafano. “Promoting Freedom and Democracy: Fighting the War of Ideas Against Islamic Terrorism.” Journal of Strategic Studies 10(4): 13-31. Blom. Celso.: The Heritage Foundation. 2004. Calvert. 2007. D. Politics and Terrorism: An Assessment of the Origin and Threat of Terrorism in Egypt. Y Feldner. p. 2006. 1987. Sue. Audrey. Ariel. Cronin. Cartwright. 108 . Cohen. Laetitia Bucaille.” British Journal of Management 1(2): 65-76. J. and D Lav. Crenshaw. Y. Anthony. Storming Media. “How Terrorism Declines.Blanchard. 2009]. and William McCants. Washington. Christopher. 1991. “Al Qaeda: Statements and Evolving Ideology. Amelie. J. Brachman. and Cary Cooper.” Orbis 48(1): 29-41. “Leadership Style and Post-Merger Satisfaction.” Comparative Strategy 22(3): 207-221.cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA30906 [Accessed February 3. 1997. Nova Publishers. 2006. The Al-Gama'a Al-Islamiyya Cessation of Violence: An Ideological Reversal. The Middle East Media Research Institute. Boudali. 2006. Jarret.” Terrorism and political violence 3(1): 6987. “The Mythic Foundations of Radical Islam. London: C Hurst & Co Publishers Ltd. “The Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions on People at Work: Existing Research and Issues.” Mediterranean Quarterly 19(1): 80. K. The GSPC: Newest Franchise in al-Qa'ida's Global Jihad. “Al Qaeda in the Maghreb: The" Newest" Front in the War on Terror. 2003. “Global Terrorism and the Global Economy: Unpeaceful Coexistence. Martha. “Stealing Al Qaeda's Playbook. “Theories of Terrorism: Instrumental and Organizational Approaches. 11. The Enigma of Islamist Violence. and Louis Martínez. 2005.” In Al-Qaeda: An Organization to be Reckoned With. Teresa et al. Available at: http://memri. 1990. 2008.” In 2005 Index of Economic Freedom. Covin.” International Security 31(1): 7-48. Martha. John. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies. 2007. Botha.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 29(4): 309-321.

“Political Islam and violence. “Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective.” The Middle East Journal: 592-612. Chris.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 618(1): 46. 2007. Dishman. 9 [Accessed December 4. G. “Using the Mistakes of al Qaeda's Franchises to Undermine Its Strategies. 2004. and Mary Uhl-Bien. Counterterrorism Center. Harmony and Disharmony: Exploiting al-Qa'ida's Organizational Vulnerabilities. “Is Southeast Asia the Second Front?.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 30(7): 593-613. “Terrorism as a Strategy. John. and J. 1995.. George B. Available at: http://oai. Graen. J. Gershman.” Foreign Affairs 81(4): 60-74.” New Political Science 22(1): 77-88. “The Leaderless Nexus: When Crime and Terror Converge. 2004. 2008]. 2005.” Government and Opposition 42(3): 314339. 2005. 2000. 1995. and James Ludes. Fair. Lawrence. “Hacking Networks of Terror. Ellis. Dickson. and Tobin Hengsen. Donatella. Joe et al. Fawaz. Attacking Terrorism: Elements of a Grand Strategy. “The End of the Islamist Insurgency in Egypt?: Costs and Prospects. Felter. 2000. “Connectivity among Terrorist Groups: A Two Models Business Maturity Approach. 2002. Freedman. 2003. Political Islam in Sub-Saharan Africa. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.” In Terrorism in Context. 2006. David.. Brian. “Briefing: the Pan-Sahel Initiative.dtic. Fishman. Desouza.” African Affairs 103(412): 459-464. 2008. Najib.” Dialogue IO 1(01): 1-14. Stein. Gerges. Diebert. 2007. Ghadbian. D. 2004.” The Leadership Quarterly 6(2): 219247. 109 .Cronin. Kevin. Christine. Washington.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 27(6): 489-504. Della Porta.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 28(3): 237-252.: United States Institute for Peace. “Left-Wing Terrorism in Italy. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press. R. Audrey. “Militant Recruitment in Pakistan: Implications for Al Qaeda and Other Organizations.

“Algerian Groupe Salafiste de la Predication et le Combat (Salafi Group for Call and Combat. Hoffman. “The Post-Madrid Face of Al Qaeda.” Terrorism and Political Violence 19: 95-115. Rohan. and Future Potentialities: An Assessment.” Al-Ahram Weekly On-line. Henzel. GSPC): An Operational Analysis. 2004.asp [Accessed December 6. and E. 2009]. Inside Terrorism. Bruce. Halawi. Huntington.htm [Accessed May 19. Rohan. 2007. Combating Terrorism Center: . Hoffman.ahram. Mathieu. Hafez. 2006. Trends in Terrorism. Editions du Rocher. Noureddine. R. “The Changing Face of Al Qaeda and the Global War on Terrorism. 2008. H.Gray. Jebnoun.. Gunaratna. 2008]. Mohammed. Is the Maghreb the “Next Afghanistan"?: Mapping the Radicalization of the Algerian Salafi Jihadist Movement. “Time for a Historic Reconciliation?. Bruce. and Mbin Ali. Guidè” Foreign Affairs 72(3): 22-49. “The Origins of al Qaeda’s Ideology: Implications for US Strategy. Christopher.” African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 2(4): 091-097. “De-Radicalization Initiatives in Egypt: A Preliminary Insight. 2007. 2002. Samuel. Columbia University Press.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 32(4): 277-291.” Parameters 35(1): 69-80. Gunaratna. Cliff. Harmony Database Released Documents: Al Qa'ida Goals and Structure. 2006. 2009. Columbia University Press. 2005. D. “Martyrdom Mythology in Iraq: How Jihadists Frame Suicide Terrorism in Videos and Biographies. Gyves. Inside Al Qaeda: Global Network of Terror. Jailan. 2002. 110 . Stockham. 2007. “The Clash of Civilizations?. “Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb: the evolution from Algerian Islamism to transnational terror.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 27(4): 549-560. Georgetown University: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies. 1992. Al-Qaïda à la Conquête du Maghreb : Le Terrorisme aux Portes de l'Europe. Available at: http://ctc. 2nd ed.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 26(6): 429-442. Available at: http://weekly. B. “Al Qaeda. Hoffman. and Chris Wyckloff.usma.” The Washington Quarterly 27(3): 91-100. 2006. Gunaratna.” Strategic Insights 5(8).

Marie H. “Complexity theory and Al-Qaeda: Examining complex leadership.cdi. Combating a Modern Hydra Al Qaeda and the Global War on Terrorism. B. W. Economic Development. E. “The Political. 2006. Marion. M. “New friends. 2008.. “Counter-terrorism in the Horn of Africa: New security frontiers.Johnson. 2002. and M. 2009]. and Neal M.” Strategic Insights 5(8). “Rational Extremism: Understanding Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century. 2005.” Journal of Public and International Affairs 15. 2002. “Targeting the Leadership of Terrorist and Insurgent Movements: Historical Lessons for Contemporary Policy Makers. Schrijver. Luong. Kostrzebski. “The War on Terror in a Haze of Dust: Potholes and Pitfalls on the Saharan Front.” British Journal of Management 17(S1): S81-S103. “In the Spotlight: Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya . Sarapu... and Erika Weinthal.” Foreign Affairs 81(2): 61-70. 2002.” Emergence 5(1): 54-76. “The Shadow of Muhammad: Developing a Charismatic Leadership Model for the Islamic World. and Organizational Sources of Terrorism. 2003. Peter.” Journal of Contemporary African Studies 25(1): 141-166. Sean. Weeding.L. Fort Leavenworth. “Looking for the Pattern: Al Qaeda in Southeast Asia--The Genealogy of a Terror Network. and Political Openness: 209.” Terrorism. Economic.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 26(6): 443-457.cfm [Accessed May 19. 2004. Jones. 2003. and P. Ashkanasy. Keats. and Mary Uhl-Bien. and M. Denis.” Center for Defense Information. Wells. MacEoin. “An Introduction to a Special Issue of Strategic Insights: Analyses of the Groupe Salafiste pour la Prédication et le Combat (GSPC) . Available at: http://www. Russ. Thomas H. D. 2007.R. Langdon. 2006. Kalic. David. Anthony. Kansas: Combat Studies Institute.M. 2003. Kavanagh. J. Lecocq. old strategies. Lake. 2006.” Institute for Security Studies.” Dialogue IO 1(01): 15-29.” : 73. 2007.. A. David. The Hijacking of British Islam. Policy Exchange. “The Impact of Leadership and Change Management Strategy on Organizational Culture and Individual Acceptance of Change during a Merger. new fears in Central Asia. Kagwanja. Laitin. and Jacob Shapiro.Islamic Group. L. 111 . Smith. African Security Review 15(3).

2006. Marks.. Post. and Mary Uhl-Bien. 2001. “Unilateral presidential powers: Significant executive orders. “ Al Qaeda and the Innovative Firm: Demythologizing the Network. and Kevin Price. “Altruism and fatalism: The characteristics of Palestinian suicide terrorists.” Foreign Affairs 86(3): 24-40. 2002. and L. “The Legend and Legacy of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Sprinzak. Moss. The Outer Rings of the Terrorist Universe. 2007. J.Emergence. Rabasa. 2007. [Accessed May Pedahzur. and Maoz Rosenthal. 2005. Russ.” International Herald Tribune. Bruce. 2009. Shaul.iht. Weinberg.” Riedel. and Alliances: Creating an Effective Transition Structure. “The terrorists in their own words: Interviews with 35 incarcerated Middle Eastern terrorists. “Beyond Al Qaeda: Part 2. Payne. “Winning the Battle of Ideas: Propaganda. “Al Qaeda Strikes Back. McAllister. 1949-99. Michael.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 27(4): 297-319.euractiv.” Emergence 5(1): 54-76. Angel et al. Available at: http://www. One Single EU Border. insurgents gain a lifeline from Al Qaeda . Bruce. 2003. and Terror. 112 . “In Algeria. Available at: http://www. Kenneth. M.. Denny.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 32(2): 109-128. A. 2006.Marion. “Complexity Theory and Al-Qaeda: Examining Complex Leadership . 2005. M. Acquisitions. Michael. Euractiv. Perliger.” Terrorism and Political Violence 15(1): 171-184. 2009]. E. Russ. Mayer. “Leadership in complex organizations. and Phillip Mirvis. Marion.php?page=2 [Accessed March 17. and L.” The Leadership Quarterly 12(4): 389-418.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 32(2): 367-386. 2008. 2000. Mitchell. “Managing Mergers. 2009].” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 28(4):” Defense Studies 7(3): 338-357. and Mary Uhl-Bien. 2003. 2004. Ideology. Kenneth.” Organizational Dynamics 28(3): 35-47. Mishal.” Deviant Behavior 24(4): 405-424. “Al Qaeda as a Dune Organization: Toward a Typology of Islamic Terrorist Organizations. A.

and Future. Shapiro. Ross. Rogers. and Stephen Vertigans. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 2003.” Strategic Insights. Peter. Ray. David. Enders. “Beyond the Abu Sayyaf. “A Turkish al-Qaeda: The Islamic Jihad Union and the Internationalization of Uzbek Jihadism. Sageman. Guido. 113 . The Search for al Qaeda: Its Leadership. Jessica. Securitizing Migration after 11 March. Schweitzer. 2004.” European Journal of Political Economy 20(2): 301-316. T. Control. Steven. Sutton. Hunting Leadership Targets in Counterinsurgency and Counterterrorist Operations. Sederberg. 2007.” The Washington Quarterly 25(3): 97-108. “Al Qaeda and its affiliates: A global tribe waging segmental warfare?.” The Middle East Journal: 415-432. Sandler. University of Pennsylvania Press. Marc. “Conciliation as Counter-Terrorist Strategy. 2007.” First Monday 10(3). Joint Special Operations University. Turbiville. 2002. Al-Qa'ida and Social Movement Theory. Ronfeldt. “Istishad as an Ideological and Practical Tool in the Hands of AlQaeda. The. Steinberg. Leaderless Jihad: Terror Networks in the Twenty-First Century. 2002.Riedel. Bruce. Marc. and Nikolas Gvosdev. “Post-Islamist Rumblings in Egypt: The Emergence of the Wasat party.” Journal of Peace Research: 295-312.” Journal of National Defense Studies 6: 25.” Foreign Affairs 83(1): 15-21.” Foreign Affairs 82(4): 27-40. “Islamic "New Social Movements"? Radical Islam. 2005. The Terrorist's Challenge: Security. Real Instituto El Cano. Stern. Efficiency. Phillip. Takeyh. James.. 2008. and W. Yamatz. Graham. Ideology. 2003. 1995.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 11(1): 101-115. Joshua. 2008. “Protean Enemy. Understanding Terror Networks. Brookings Institution Press. 2008. J. N. Sageman. “An economic perspective on transnational terrorism. “Do Terrorist Networks Need a Home?. 2008. 2006. Stacher. 2004. 2004. Stanford University: Center for International Security and Cooperation.

2007.Uruena. Blake . Rene. Zambelis. 2009].jamestown. Weber. The Looming Tower: Al Qaeda and the Road to 9/11. Wright. “Egyptian Gama'a al-Islamiyya's Public Relations Campaign . “International Law as Administration: The UN's 1267 sanctions Committee and the Making of the War on terror. Ward. On Charisma and Institution Building. 2006. 114 . Osama's Wake: The Second Generation of Al Qaeda. 2006. University of Chicago Press.” International Organizations Law Review 4(2): 321-342.” Jamestown Foundation. United States Air Force Counterproliferation Center. Terrorism Monitor 4: 15. 2008. 2005. Chris. “Somalia’s ICU and Its Roots in al-Ittihad al-Islami. Lawrence. Available at: ews%5BbackPid%5D=239&no_cache=1 [Accessed January 1. Sunguta. West. 1968. Max.” Terrorism Focus 3(35). Vintage.

Appendix I: List of Terrorist Groups Merger al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at al-Tawhid walJihad) Egyptian Islamic Jihad al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat) Libyan Islamic Fighting Group Partnership Ansar al-Islam/Jund alIslam/Ansar al-Sunnah Asbat al-Ansar Taliban Islamic Jihad Union Lashkar-e-Jhangvi Lashkar-e-Taiba Tunisian Combatant Group Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group Jemaah Islamiya Abu Sayyaf Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahidin Jaish-e-Mohammad al-Ittihaad al-Islami Eritrean Islamic Jihad Movement Collaboration Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan Yemen Islamic Jihad Aden Abyan Islamic Army Unaffiliated (Control) Al-Gama’a alIslamiyya 115 .

Mariam. 2007. Available at: http://www. “U. Bergen. Department of Defense. Parker.Iraq. 2007. [Accessed March 4.aspx?id=16029 [Accessed January 3.125. and Jonathan Finer.” The Washington Post: A01. Ellen.defenselink.” U.timesonline. 2009]. DoD News Briefing.cfr. New York: Free Press. 2009].washingtonpost. Available at: http://www.cnn. 2009]. Available at: http://74.” New York Times.pdf+khalid+almashadani&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=24&gl=us&client=firefox-a [Accessed January Multinational Force .html [Accessed January 2.html [Accessed January 2. 116 . “Insurgent Leader Al-Zarqawi Killed in Iraq.” The Times of London.ece [Accessed March 4. Wolf. “Masri Now Leads Iraq Al Qaeda. 2006a. The Osama Bin Laden I Know. “Maliki Aide Who Discussed Amnesty Leaves Job.Appendix II: Sources by Terrorist Group Al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at alTawhid wal-Jihad)” Boston.washingtonpost. “President Links Qaeda of Iraq to Qaeda of 9/11.132/search?q=cache:74UX2mQ_i-0J:www. Knickmeyer. Jim. Coalition Officials Say. “Al Qaeda in Iraq Chooses Zarqawi Successor. 2008. and Ibon Villelabeitia.S.” Backgrounder.” Operation Iraq Freedom: Official Website of the Multi-National Force .com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/08/AR2006060800114.html [Accessed March 4.cjtf7. “Al-Qaeda in Iraq Leader May Be in MNF-I Press Brief – Operational Update .com. 2006b.capture/ [Accessed January 3. Available at: 2009]. “Al-Qaeda in Iraq Update. Ned. Amit. Available at: http://transcripts.” The Washington MSNBC. Blitzer. Jim. 2006a. 2009]. Bergner. Available at: http://www. 2009]. “Abu Hamza al-Muhajir. Available at: http://www. Pam. Paley.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=16576&Itemid=131 [Accessed January 2.nytimes. Available at: http://www. Kathy. “Starr Reports Live from Ramadi Iraq. and Jonathan Finer. Available at: http://www.html [Accessed March 3.” The Washington Post: A22. Available at: http://www. 2009]. 2009].S. 2007. 2009]. Gregory. 2006. 2009]. Department of Defense. New Al-Qaida in Iraq Leader Reported .html [Accessed January 2.mnfiraq. 2007.Iraq. 2006. 2009]. Karouny. 2009].com. 2007.” The Washington Post. “The Mysterious Heir to al-Zarqawi . Peter and Rana Gargour-Sabbagh. U. and Mark Mazzetti. Ellen.msnbc.: Senior al Qaeda in Iraq Leader Held. 2006.02.aspx?briefingslideid=309 [Accessed January 2.” The Situation Room. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www.” CNN. Available at: http://www. Smith. Zarqawi's Mysterious Successor (aka Abu Ayub al-Masri) . “Shadowy Trail of al-Qaida in Iraq Leader. 2007. 2006. 2009]. [Accessed March 4. Rutenberg.

“L’Afrique et la «guerre contre la terreur». 2008. Available at: http://www. Blair.cfr. Ayman Al Zawahiri. Egyptian Islamic Jihad Al-Zayat. His Own Words: A Translation of the Writings of Dr. Ibrahim. M. 2007. Bergen.html [Accessed January 14.cnn. 2006.9171. “Ayman Muhammad Rabi’Al-Zawahiri: The Making of an Arch-Terrorist. Tore. 2009]. Antil. 2006. 2003. Cullison.” CNN. Available at: http://www. 2008. 2008. Alain. A. Mansfield. Ayman Al-Zawahiri Kamaa Aaraftu/Ayman Al-Zawahiri As I Knew Him. “Terrorist’s Odyssey: Saga of Dr. Blair. and 2007. CNN Programs.” Wall Street Journal. 2009]. New York: Taylor & Francis. Bjorgo. [Accessed January 14. 2009]. [Accessed January 14. “Ayman al-Zawahiri. Black.html [Accessed April 8. Wertheimer. “Profile: Ayman al-Zawahiri. Raphaeli. Lee. Mohammed et al. “Al-Qaida in Iraq Figure in Custody : NPR. “ [Accessed March 11. Study of Terrorism and Response to” The Telegraph. Al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat) Algeria: Violence Returns.” Council on Foreign [Accessed January 2.. “Al-Qaeda Founder Launches Fierce Attack on Osama bin Laden. Says al Qaeda in Iraq Leader Not Captured. Egyptian Islamic Jihad. and John Burnett. “The Rebellion Within.telegraph. 2009a. 2009].17049. David. Teslik. New York: Broadway. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www.” Time.” The Telegraph.” Council on Foreign Relations. 2006. Linda. 2009b.alqaedafree/index.” Politique étrangère 3. Cairo: Dar AlHamrousa. “Al-Qaeda Founder Launches Fierce Attack on Osama bin Laden . Ayman al-Zawahiri.npr. Nimrod.1187180. Available at: http://www. African Research Bulletin (23): 17045 .00. L. Raymond.telegraph. TLG Publications. Lee Hudson. 2009]. Leaving Terrorism Behind.” Terrorism Monitor 5(2): 7-12. David. 2007. Laura. 2005. 2007. Andrew. 2009]. 2006. Available at: http://www. 2009]. 117 . Available at: http://www. The Al Qaeda Reader. Hudson Teslik. Available at: http://www.Tawfeeq.umd. [Accessed March 4. “The Reconstituted Al-Qaeda Threat in the Maghreb.cfr. 2009].” National Public Radio.S.html [Accessed March 12. “Profile: Abu Musab al-Zarqawi .Council on Foreign Zawahiri. [Accessed March 3.” The New Yorker. Available at: http://www.” Terrorism and Political Violence 14(4): 1-22. 2009].

and P.” Strategic Insights 5(8). 2005. Stockham.” International Herald Tribune. 2008. Michael. Jebnoun. Gilles. 2006. Now. B. Is the Maghreb the “Next Afghanistan"?: Mapping the Radicalization of the Algerian Salafi Jihadist Movement. Ellis.” Strategic Insights 5(8). Filiu. 2007. Himeur. and Chris Wyckloff. Gyves. 2008. 118 . Boudali. 2007. Mohamed arezki.. Hegghammer. London: C Hurst & Co Publishers Ltd.” African Affairs 103(412): 459-464.php?ac=view_report&report_id=641&language_id=1 [Accessed March 5. Celso. 2006. 2006. The Enigma of Islamist Violence. 2009. Stephen. 2009]. Hafez. Available at: http://www.” BBC 2009]. Jihadism Online: A Study of how Al-Qaida and Radical Islamist Groups Use the Internet for Terrorist Purposes. Gray.” The Middle East Journal 63(2): 213-226. Schrijver. Old Strategies. 2004. Jean Pierre. 2007.” African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 2(4): 091-097. Henzel. 2009]. Hanna.nytimes. “The Local and Global Jihad of al-Qa ‘ida in the Islamic Maghreb. Squad et al. Available at: http://www. 2007.” Parameters 35(1): 69-80. T. 2006. Peter. “An Introduction to a Special Issue of Strategic Insights: Analyses of the Groupe Salafiste pour la Prédication et le Combat (GSPC) .. “Algerian Groupe Salafiste de la Predication et le Combat (Salafi Group for Call and Combat. Kagwanja.html?_r=1 [Accessed March 5. 2006. D. “Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb: the Evolution from Algerian Islamism to Transnational Terror. “Counter-Terrorism in the Horn of Africa: New Security Frontiers.pinr.” Terrorism and Political Violence 19: 95-115. “Briefing: the Pan-Sahel Initiative. Available at: http://www. Mohammed. 2007. Anthony. Amelie. Cliff.php?page=2 [Accessed March 17.” New York Times . Kepel. Droukdal. Rogan.iht. Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam. African Security Review 15(3). “The Origins of al Qaeda’s Ideology: Implications for US Strategy. “Martyrdom Mythology in Iraq: How Jihadists Frame Suicide Terrorism in Videos and Biographies.” Mediterranean Quarterly 19(1): 80.Blom. “New Chief for Algeria's Islamists. Ib tauris. and Louis Martínez. Noureddine. 2009]. 2006.” Middle East Journal 60(1): 11. 2004. and D.” Journal of Contemporary African Studies 25(1): 141-166. Mekhennet. Christopher. 2008. “The War on Terror in a Haze of Dust: Potholes and Pitfalls on the Saharan Front. Liane Kennedy. “Ragtag Insurgency Gains a Lifeline . 2008.stm [Accessed March 5.” Institute for Security Studies. insurgents gain a lifeline from Al Qaeda . Power and Interest News Report. The GSPC: Newest Franchise in al-Qa'ida's Global Jihad. “In Algeria. West Point Military Academy. Available at: http://news. Georgetown University: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies. “An Interview with Abdelmalek Droukdal. GSPC): An Operational Analysis. Thomas H. A. Laetitia Bucaille. and Lecocq. Norwegian Defence Research Establishment. Intelligence Brief: Al-Qaeda's New Strategy in North Africa. “Global Jihadism After the Iraq War.” New York Times. 2007. “Al Qaeda in the Maghreb: The" Newest" Front in the War on Terror.

Pargeter. The Failure of Political Islam. Martínez. Libyan Islamic Fighting Group Clark. Joseph. Kohlmann. and Brian Fishman.” Mediterranean Politics 12(3): 407-413. Available at: http://counterterrorismblog.start.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 11(1): 101-115. 2005. 2009]. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. Luis.. Alison. “$50.” Review of African Political Economy 33(108): 219235. 2007. 2007. Sutton. Available at: http://yalibnan. Negroponte.php [Accessed February 27. Steinberg. and Stephen Vertigans.cdi. Felter. The Libyan Paradox. “Islamic "New Social Movements"? Radical Islam.jamestown. “Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. Available at: http://www. 2009].asp?id=5862 [Accessed January 26. “North African immigrants in Europe and political violence.umd.start.php [Accessed February 27. Luis. Rebecca. Annual Threat Assessment of the Director of National Intelligence for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Goolsby. 2006.cfm?DocumentID=2836&IssueID=56&StartRow=1&ListRows=10&ap pendURL=&Orderby=DateLastUpdated&ProgramID=39&issueID=56 [Accessed May 20. Ya Libnan. 2006a. Olivier. 2007. Schweitzer. “In the Spotlight: The Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG). Phillip. Available at: http://www. 2009]. New York: Columbia Univ Press. Lebanon's Fatah al-Islam leadership & Organization. Gambil. Alison. Werenfels. United States Air Force Counterproliferation Center. 2009]. National Intelligence “Combating Terrorist Networks: An Evolutionary Approach. Al-Qa'ida and Social Movement Theory. Evan. Yamatz. “Between the ‘Near’ and the ‘Far’ Enemy: Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb. Available at: http://www. Osama's Wake: The Second Generation of Al Qaeda. Martinez.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 29(8): Boston: Harvard University Press. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. “Libya: Reforming the Impossible?. 2006. 2006b. 2006. 119 . 2009]. Available at: http://www. and I. and Carol Volk.asp?id=4400 [Accessed January 23.” Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 12(1): 7-20. 2009]. “Istishad as an Ideological and Practical Tool in the Hands of Al-Qaeda.umd.” Center for Defense Information. 1996. 2007.000 Reward Announced for Ansar al-Sunnah Commander in Iraq. Gary.” Terrorism Monitor 3(6). John. 2005. G. Counterterrorism Center. Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. Ward. Pargeter. Ansar al-Islam/Jund al-Islam/Ansar al-Sunnah Ansar al-Islam. 2006.Roy. Blake .” Journal of National Defense Studies 6: [Accessed January 23. Al-Qa'ida's Foreign Fighters in Iraq: A First Look at the Sinjar Records.” Counterterrorism Blog.” Mediterranean Politics 11(2): 151-165. “Libya: The Conversion of a ‘Terrorist State’. 2005. and John King.

pwhce. [Accessed May 19.investigativeproject. Courting Public [Accessed February Anderson Cooper. Available at: http://www.meforum. 2004. 2009].US Department of the Treasury.” Perspectives on World History and Current Evens. 2009].com/articles/Janes-World-Insurgency-and-Terrorism/Asbat-al-Ansar-Lebanon.pdf+Asbat+al-Ansar+AND+leadership&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=15&gl=us&client=firefox-a [Accessed January 26. al Qaida. Schanzer.html [Accessed January Rusty.” Available at: http://www. “Description des groupes terroristes criminalisés par le 2003. Available at: http://www. Peter.ciaonet.” American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.globalpolitician. Gregory. Press Room . 2009]. Available at: http://www. “Salafi-jihadism in Lebanon. Available at: http://www. BBC.Jane's World Insurgency and Terrorism.” Global Politician.” Équipe de recherche sur le terrorism et l'antiterrorisme. Available at: http://www. 2009]. Available at: “Ahmad Abd al-Karim subs/sub5.htm [Accessed May” Middle East Quarterly 11(1). 2009]. Available at: http://209. 2006. Jonathan. Asbat al-Ansar (Lebanon) . “Mullah Krekar Profile. Gary.html [Accessed May 19.htm [Accessed February 28.aei.” he Investigative Project on Terrorism. 2006.nsf/Page/What_Governments_are_doing_Listing_of_T errorism_Organisations_Asbat_al-Ansar [Accessed May 19. 2009]. 2004.stm [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://www. [Accessed May 19. Taliban Stanley. “Asbat al-Ansar . 2009]. 2008.173. 2009].org/groupes/groupes_description. Parliamentary Joint Committee on ASIO.” CNN. Maclean's 115(34): 12.globalsecurity.Oslo court rejects mullah release. Gambill. Ansar Al-Islam: Postmortem or Prelude to More Attacks? The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 2005. “Ansar [Accessed February 28. Available at: http://www.html [Accessed February 27. 2009].gov. Available at:” The Jawa Report: . 2008. Treasury Designates Individual Financially Fueling Iraqi Insurgency. 2009]. “Mullah Omar in Pakistan .com. Rubin.treas. Available at: http://news. 2002. . and Charlie Moore.85. 2005. Asbat al-Ansar Asbat Al Ansar. 2009].132/search?q=cache:PNdZs5NZnv0J:www. Available at: http://www. “Ansar al-Islam: Back in Iraq .ertatcrg. 2006. US Department of State. Michael. Available at: http://nationalsecurity.htm [Accessed May 19. Pike.php [Accessed January 26.aph. Gomez del Prado. 120 . Schanzer. ASIS & DSD . Trevor. 2006. 2004. Shackleford. 2005. 2009]. Available at: http://www. 2009]. “Army of Ansar al-Sunnah Website Update.html [Accessed March 2009]. 2009].

Islamist Terrorism in Greater Central Asia: The" Al-Qaedaization" of Uzbek Jihadism.southasianmedia. Thomas.html [Accessed March 10.” Orbis 51(1): 71-89.csmonitor. “Musharraf et les islamistes. 1998. p. 2007. Congressional Research Service. 2001. 2006. Lashkar-e-Jhangvi. Available at: http://kashmirherald.Haqqani.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 31(9): 775-807. P. Available at: http://www. 2009].com/main. Jaffrelot.” South Asia Journal.stm [Accessed March 10. Washington. Sullivan. 2009. Available at: http://www. “The Reclusive Ruler who Runs the Taliban . Gunaratna. 2001.” Survival 50(6): 183-192. Johnson. Ashok.” In Proceedings of the Forty-eighth Pugwash Conference on Science and World Affairs. “Sunni-Shia relations in Pakistan: The widening” The Christian Science Monitor. Lamb. 2006. D. 2004. Profile: Mullah Mohammed Omar. John. Paris: Institut Français des Relations Internationales. and Anders Nielsen. 2005. Steinberg. 121 .html [Accessed March 10. Tim. Kartha. D. Rohan. Madrid: Fundación José Ortega y Gasset. Central Asia: Regional Developments and Implications for US Interests. Marquand.” The Telegraph. Nichol. 2008. Available at: http://www.” In The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly. Tara. Raffaello. Negroponte. Pantucci. 2009].co. 2008. Michael. “Indo-Pak Détente: Sustainable Ambiguity. . 2003.” Strategic Analysis 28(1): 157-176. “The Long Roads to Peace. State-building and Security Cooperation in Central Asia.telegraph. Christophe. 2002. “Al-Qaeda 2. Spark. 131-152.php?t=TP&st=D&no=4 [Accessed May 19. Jim. Steinberg. “Counterinsurgency. 2005. Mexico: World Scientific.” Etudes 399(2003/7): 9-16. p. and Chris Mason. “Tinder.” Foreign Policy: 58-64. Guido. “Islam's Medieval 2008. K.C. Islamic Jihad Union Chaudet. Lashkar-e-Jhangvi Ahmed. Christina. and Fuel: The Mysterious Rise of the Taliban. “Understanding the Taliban and Insurgency in Afghanistan. 2002. “Al Qaeda in the Tribal Areas of Pakistan and Beyond. Counterterrorism. Jurica.” Survival 44(1): 187. Judah. Didier. Center for Contemporary Conflict. A Turkish al-Qaeda: The Islamic Jihad Union and the Internationalization of Uzbek Jihadism. 2009]. “Annual Threat Assessment of the Director of National Intelligence for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. 2007. Behuria. Guido. BBC News.htm. “The Taliban Papers. Oxygen.0. Available at: http://news. 2001. Kashmir Herald. JIhadist Terrorism in Turkey. 2009]. “Who is the Real Mullah Omar?.” In National Intelligence Council.” Journal of Peace Research 44(1): 93. Robert.

2002. Farooq. 2005.” Terrorism Monitor 3(11). 2005. Olivier. Abou Zahab.htm [Accessed January 28. Raja. “Pakistan police detain founder of Lashkar-e-Taiba militant group | World news | guardian. Jafa.” Writenet for UNHCR. 2009]. Terrorist Group of Pakistan. The ISI. R. 2005. 2009]. BBC. Kalyanaraman. 2008. John. The Middle East Media Research Institute. Even Al-Qaeda'. p. Available at: http://www. 2009]. 2004.asp?section=3&id=14953 [Accessed January 29.aawsat.Lashkar-e-Jhangvi.memri. “Defeating Terrorism: A Study of Operational Strategy and Tactics of Police Forces in Jammu & Kashmir (India). Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www. the [Accessed January 29.” The Good Society 14(3).org/satporgtp/countries/pakistan/terroristoutfits/Lej. Available at: http://www. 2002 “The regional dimension of sectarian conflicts in Pakistan. 2002. 2009].jamestown. V. Animesh.cgi?Area=sd&ID=SP214308&Page=archives [Accessed May 19. “Achieving a Global Community. Yateendra. “Lashkar-e-Jhangvi: Sectarian Violence in Pakistan and Ties to International Terrorism. New Delhi: Pentagon Press. Lee. and S. Nikolas. Glendinning. “Can Pakistan be ‘neutral’in the war against terrorism?.” Police Practice and Research 6(2): 2009].go.stm [Accessed May 19. “Islam. Mariam.” Terrorism Monitor 3(4). and the Rise of Sectarian Militancy in Pakistan. 2002. [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://www. 115. “Humanization of education in Pakistan through Freire’s Concept of Literacy.” In Pakistan: Nationalism without a Nation. Available at: http://www. Wilson.” The Guardian Online. “Islamic Radicalism in Afghanistan and Pakistan.” The Washington Quarterly 27(3):” Asharq Alawsat Newspaper.” In Pakistan: Nationalism without a Nation. John. 2005. Jamaatud Dawa Leader: 'Indians Will Continue to Mislead the World Community By Linking Us to Lashkar[-e Taiba]. 85-114. Available at: http://abcnews. 122 . p. Available at: http://news. Zed Books. The General and [Accessed May 19. 2005. 2009]. 2009]. Roul. 2008. Nasr. Pakistan Freezes Militant Funds. Nasr. 2007. Zed [Accessed May 19. Key Figures in Kashmir Uprising.” Asia Pacific Education Review 6(1): 1-6. Nazir. Umer. “Lashkar-e-Toiba: new Threats Posed by an Old Organization. Lashkar-e-Taiba Bharadwaj. 2009]. ABC News. “The Two Faces of Lashkar-e-Taiba .co. Vali. S. “Sectarianism—A threat to human security: A case study of Pakistan. Realistically.satp. 2008. Mehtab Ali. 2001.” Strategic Analysis 26(1): 170-173. Gvosdev. “Regional Implications of Shi'a Revival in Iraq.” The Round Table 94(382): 613-628.

uk/newswatch/ifs/hi/newsid_4960000/newsid_4968400/4968438. The Military Balance in the Middle East. Ahmed. D. John. Available at: http://www.. Yoginder. Global Security. Greenwood Publishing Group. Chaarani.ustreas.” In The Practice of War: Production. The Moroccan Combatant Group.stm [Accessed May 19. 2009]. The Tunisian Combatant Group (TCG). Stephen. Available at: http://www. “Non African Involvement in Transnational Terror Networks: Terrorism in the Maghreb . Darif. Blake Mobley. Clark. The Politics and Economics of Organized Crime and Terrorism in Europe. BBC. 2005. Reproduction and Communication of Armed Violence. Sikand. Cordesman.” Boukhars. 2004. 2008. 2001. and Erin Rosenbach. Center for Policing Terrorism .cfm?DocumentID=2227&from_page=. 123 . “In the Spotlight: Moroccan Combatant Group (GICM).” Economic and Political Weekly: 218-227. 2009]. Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group Botha. Benjamin. Yoginder. 2004. 2006. p. 2008.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41(01): 19-24.Sengupta. Available at: http://www.” Center for Defense Information. 2009].: RAND Corporation. Sikand. La Mouvance Islamiste au Maroc: du 11 Septembre 2001 aux Attentats de Casablanca du 16 Mai 2003. Anneli. 2005. Githens-Mazer. Stemmann. Washington.cdi.htm [Accessed May “Tunisia: Trading Freedom for Stability May Not Last–An International Security Perspective. “Middle East Salafism’s Influence and the Radicalization of Muslim Communities in Europe.” The Independent. 2009]. Alejandro. Anthony H./index. 2004.” Terrorism Monitor 3(12): June 17.” Terrorism Focus 2(6). 2006. “Islamist Militancy in Kashmir: The Case of Lashkar-i-Tayyeba.globalsecurity. 2004. “Tunisian Government Threatened by Islamist Group. Ulph. Tunisian Combatant “Changing Course of Kashmiri Struggle: From National Liberation to Islamist Jihad?. Juan Jose Escobar.independent. Tunisian Combatant Group Assets of Tunisia Group Are Frozen.” The Middle East Review of International Affairs 10(3). Kim. Keating. Sanchez. Karthala Editions. New York Times. 2009]. Available at: http://www.htm [Accessed May 20. US Department of the Treasury. Jonathan. 2003. 2002. 2005. Analisis del Real Instituto. Mohamed.cfm [Accessed May 19.An Anouar. Available at: http://www. 2007.htm [Accessed May 20.” Defence Studies 9(1): 85-92. El Guerbouzi . 215. Hudson Institute. 2009].org/security/profiles/tunisian_combatant_group. 2002. Federation of American Scientists. “Variations on a Theme: Radical Violent Islamism and European North African Radicalization. “Terrorist Outlaws – or a Group with Friends in High Places? .uk/news/world/asia/terrorist-outlaws-ndash-or-a-group-with-friends-in-high-places1042724. PO-3380: The United States and Italy Designate Twenty-Five New Financiers of Terror.html [Accessed May 2004. GSPC Dossier. Available at: http://news. 2006. “The Origins of Militancy and Salafism in Morocco.

com/english/?id=9727 [Accessed May 19. “Terror at Rush Hour.” Foreign Affairs 81(4): Emmers. Fernando. Ingrid.” “U. 2002.htm [Accessed January 26.” Terrorism and Political Violence 20(2): 234-256. Bonner. Atran.umd. 2002.Net.middleeast-online. The Mediterranean Region and International Terrorism: A New Framework for Cooperation. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. Thomas. 2006. Magnus. [Accessed May 19. 2006. “Abu Dujana.” The New York Times. Zachary. “Radical Cleric in Indonesia Is Acquitted of Terrorism.. but Support Could Be Waning.” New York Times. Raymond. 2002.” Foreign Affairs 84(4): 120-35. The London bombings and the broader strategic context.homelandsecurityus. Available at: http://www. 2004.” Southeast Asian Affairs: 123-145. Available at: http://www.” Mediterranean Politics 10(1): 99-108. Available at: http://www. “ Southeast Asian Terrorist Leader Is Under Arrest. Zachary. 2009].” Contemporary Southeast Asia 24(3): 427-466. “Is Southeast Asia the Second Front?. Peter. “Indonesia's Year of Living Normally.go. Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group.ABC News. Available at: http://abcnews.” The New York Times.S. 2006. Peter. Gelling. Available at: http://www. Real Instituto Elcano. “Comprehensive Security and Resilience in Southeast Asia: ASEAN's Approach to Terrorism and Sea Piracy. “Islam and society in South-East Asia after 11 September.nytimes.nytimes. 2009].asp?id=4341 [Accessed January 28. “Indonesia Reports the Arrest of a 2nd Top Terrorism Suspect.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 56(3): 383-394. Barry. 2005. Van Biezen. 2009]. Middle East Online.html?_r=1&scp=4&sq=Abu+Bakar+Bashir&st=nyt [Accessed May 19. and Stryker McGuire. Scott. 2005. R.Leiken..html [Accessed May 19. Peter. Jemaah Islamiyah Abuza. Reinares. Desker. John. Gelling. “How did Europe's Global Jihadis Obtain Training for their Militant Causes?. 2009]. 2008.” Newsweek. 2005. Indonesian Police Confirm. Raymond. Bonner. Ranstorp. “Freed Cleric Is Hailed by Students. Evan. 2005. 2007. Gershman. Abuzza. 2005. Democracy isn’t Enough. Barton. “Terrorism and Democratic Legitimacy: Conflicting Interpretations of the Spanish Elections. “Tentacles of Terror: Al Qaeda's Southeast Asian” The Pacific Review 22(2). 124 . 2008. Moroccan Group "Derivative Structure" of Al Qaeda. 2009]. 2008. Pressure to Hold Militant Sets Off Outcry in Indonesia. Gelling. 2004. 2007. The Insider: Daily Terrorism Report . Available at: http://www.start. “In “Europe's Angry Muslims. 2005. 2009]. P. Nesser. Robert. Greg.” New York Times.” New York Times.” New York Times. Madrid: Real Institute Elcano.

” Asian Survey 48(1): 38-46.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 58(1): 47-68.. 2009]. 2007. 2007. Southeast Asia and the War Against Terrorism. Strategic Studies Institute. “Terrorism in the Southern Philippines: Contextualizing the Abu Sayyaf Group as an Islamist Secessionist Organization. Geoffrey. Espin-Digon. Damien.” Asian Journal of Political Science 13(1): 109-138. Despite Improvement. Available at: http://www.html [Accessed January “The War on Terrorism in Southeast Asia. Nagma. Elena. New York: CRC Press.: The Heritage Foundation. Jemaah Islamiyah (a. 2009].” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 29(4): 323-342.umd. D. Jemaah Islamiyah. Singh. Jemaah Islamiah) . and Nick Grace. Zachary. 2006. 2006. Dirk. Bilveer. “Jemaah Islamiyah after the Recent Wave of Arrests: How Much Danger Remains? . Julio et al. Bali-terrorism: the return of the Abu Sayyaf. Nesser. “ In Pictures: Jemaah Islamiyah's Leadership. Bill. J. Available at: http://news.k. “Jemaah Islamiyah's Radical Madrassah Networks.” In the Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia. Dillon. Available at: http://news.” The Long War Journal.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 30(9): 777-800.longwarjournal. Naval War College. 2008. Abuza. 2001. and Paolo Pasicolan. 2004.” BBC. Buendia. Anti-Terrorism and Militant Islam: Coping with Threats to Democratic Pluralism and National Unity in Indonesia.stm [Accessed May 19. BBC.” Sudostasia 26(5): 73-84. and (US). Dana. 2006. Available at: http://www. [Accessed January 22. 2008.” Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict 99999(1): 1-17. 2009]. Council on Foreign Relations. 2008.start. Elmer. “Islam's role in Indonesia. Pavlova. 2009].” Asia Pacific Viewpoint 48(1): 128-144. Rachel. 2005. “Rule of Law.stm [Accessed May 19. 2003.Hainsworth. 2008. Donnelly. Disarming the Bearer of the Sword: Delinking the Abu Sayyaf From the Global Insurgency. Kingsbury. “Indonesia in 2007: Unmet Expectations. “The State-Moro Armed Conflict in the Philippines Unresolved National Question or Question of Governance?. Lloyd's MIU handbook of maritime security. Harvey. Brynhar. . Forvarets Forskninginstittut. 2009]. 2004. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. Available at: http://www. “The Challenge of Militant Islam and Terrorism in Indonesia.asp?id=6370 [Accessed January 21.” Fragility and Crisis: 320-363. Tomsa. Anti-Corruption. and Scott Atran. “From a Counter-Society to a Counter-State Movement: Jemaah Islamiyah According to FFI explains al-Qaida document. Roggio. Profile: Abu Bakar Ba' “Jihadism in Western Europe After the Invasion of Iraq: Tracing Motivational Influences from the Iraq War on Jihadist Terrorism in Western Europe. and Thomas Hegghammer. 2004. Abu Sayyaf Abuza. 125 . 2008. 2005. 2007. Lia. Washington.cfr.

” RMS & GS. “The US and the Southern Philippines’ Quagmire. Alfredo.” GMA News.” The Washington Quarterly 25(1): 193-206.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 24(1): 33-50.htm&no=34 [Accessed April 9. “The Alliance System of the Abu Sayyaf.mtholyoke. Eduardo. 1993–2000. Larry. Quimpo.satp. Lumpkin.pia.gmanews. GMA News.E.” South Asian Terrorism Portal. “Abdurajak Janjalani Killed.htm [Accessed April 9. Rogers. Available at: http://www.The Heat is On. Available at: http://www.” Foreign Affairs 83(1): 15-21.” International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-): 289-304. Steven. 2009]. “Contemporary History of the Philippines. 2002. A. Available at: http://www.” New Zealand International Review 27(6): [Accessed April 9. Hunter. Available at: [Accessed April 9. 2009]. “Moving Out of Moscow's Orbit: the Outlook for Central 2000. 2007. Paul J. politics. 2009]. “Philippines: Abu Sayyaf Group . 2004. 2002. “Beyond the Abu Sayyaf. Yasser Igasan Succeeds Janjalani as Abu Chief . 2006. Australian National Security .” Global Security. Smith. “ 2009].globalsecurity. “The Abu Sayyaf and Khadaffy Janjalani.. Niksch. and security in Central Asia. 2009]. 2009] Hyman. Anthony. Ajai. Gunter. 2009].gmanews. Available at: http://www. Schwarz. Available at: 1993. 2002. D. “The Abu Sayyaf Group: A Growing Menace to Civil Society. “Central Asia: More than Islamic Extremists. Shireen.htm [Accessed April 9.Filler.. 2009. John.nsf/Page/What_Governments_are_doing_Listing_of_Terrorism_ Organisations_Islamic_Movement_of_Uzbekistan [Accessed January 21. “The Southern Philippines: Conflict and Co-operation: Anthony Smith Backgrounds the Separatist Conflict That Has Wracked the Southern Philippines and Discusses the US Military Involvement in the Area. Nathan. Torres.htm [Accessed April 9. Ugarte. Available at: http://www. Svante. Wencesiao.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 31(2): 125-144. 2007. Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan. Abu Sayyaf: Target of Philippine-US Anti-Terrorism Cooperation. Washington.rms-gs. Anthony. Jose. 2002. Terrorism and Violence in Southeast Asia. “The Continuation of Civil Unrest and Poverty in Mindanao. Frazie.html [Accessed April 2008.: Congressional Research Service. Sahni.” Ringuet. 2002. “What's Next for Abu Sayyaf?. 2002. 2001. Daniel Joseph. Smith.” SAIS Review 21(2): 65-90. Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan Cornell.” Philippine Information Agency.” Terrorism and Political Violence 14(4): 131-162.C. New York: ME Sharpe. and Regine Spector. 2009]. 2008. and Rosalinda Morgado-Schwarz. 2004. 126 .edu/~aefrazie/world%20politics116/terrorist_groups/abu_sayyaf/Janjalani. Available at: http://www.” Terrorism in the Philippines. “Abdurakjak Janjalani.

“On Visualizing Heterogeneous Semantic Networks from Multiple Data Sources. Taliban behind the Waziristan Accord. Vitaly. Bill.553745. Yemeni Islamic Jihad Leader Arrested. Valentinas.shtml [Accessed May 20. 2009].” Strategic Analysis 16(2). Who Is The Yemeni Islamic Jihad Group? . Ghonchen.html [Accessed May 20. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www1. 2008. Maureen. 2000. 2001. 2003. 2008.” Central Asian Survey 20(1): 63-83.php [Accessed January 21. 2009]. 2006. 2009]. 2008. 127 . Gulf News. CBS News. Available at: [Accessed March 12.” Global United Press International. 2008. bin Laden and Iran's hardliners. Ahmed.ferghana.” World Policy Journal 18(1): 45-55. Yassin. 2009]. Available at: http://www.html [Accessed January 26. Leader of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan Tahir Yuldashev Threatens Presidents Karimov.presstv. Indonesia: Springer-Verlag New York Inc. Igor. Rotar.nefafoundation. 2009]. 2009]. 2009].” Spiegel Online. 2004. Naumkin. 2004. Uzbek islamists’ Leader Tahir Yuldashev has been Arrested .org/multimedia-speeches. 2009].htm [Accessed April 8.” Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies. Available at: http://www. “Pakistan: Offensive Against Suspected Militants in South Waziristan Ends. Islamic Jihad. 2009]. “The Islamic Revival in Central Asia: a Potent Force or a Misconception?.” Terrorism Monitor 1(8).Ru Information “Police Arrest Members of Alleged Jihadi Financing Network. 2002. 2009].org/military/library/news/2004/03/mil-040330-rferl04. 2001. 2008.cbsnews. Available at: http://www. et al. Radical Islam in Central Asia: between Pen and Rifle. Presumably. “Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan: Will it Strike Back?. Daniel. Jane. Group Threatens Attack on UAE Embassy in” The Long War Journal. Tazmini.” The Long War Journal. Available at: http://www.Ru Information 2009]. Yemen Islamic Jihad Analysis: Yemen. 2009]. Poonam. “The Islamic Movement Of Uzbekistan: A Resurgent IMU?. p. Mann. Available at: http://www. Messages From Terrorist Leaders.html [Accessed May 20. 2009]. Available at: http://www. “Militant Islam in Central Asia: The Case of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan. Novak. Naumkin. “The Growth of Radical Islam in Central Asia. Rashid. “US Embassy in Yemen Targeted in Complex Assault.” In Digital Libraries: Universal and Ubiquitous Access to 266.atimes. “The Fires of Faith in Central Asia. Available at: http://enews.html [Accessed April 8. Musharbash.php?id=1864 [Accessed January 21.html [Accessed January 21. Bakiyev. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www.Kimmage. Ferghana. Available at: http://enews. Roggio. and Rakhmonov. “al Qaeda. 2008. The NEFA Foundation V. 2005. Press TV.longwarjournal. 2008. S.html [Accessed March 12. Mite.php?id=1595 [Accessed January 21.” Asia Times Online. A.aspx?id=68033&sectionid=351020206 [Accessed May 20. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Attack on USS Cole: Background.: The Education of a Holy Warrior.globalsecurity. Stratfor. Behuria. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://news. Islamic Army of Aden (IAA) . Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. “Somalia's ICU and its Roots in al-Ittihad al-Islami . 2007. Available at: Raman. “Aden-Abyan Islamic Army. 2006. Available at: http://www.southasiaanalysis. Daveed.globalsecurity. Goldberg. Library of Congress. 2006. 2009]. et al. “Attack on USS Cole: Who engineered it?. Sunguta. 2008. Yemen: High-Profile Militants Killed and the Yemeni Power Structure .org/security/profiles/khalid_al-nabi_al-yazidi.html [Accessed May 19. 2009].YEM.umd. Available at: http://www.” In Congressional Research Service. 2000. 2009]. GST Presented Evidence against Claims.htm [Accessed May 19.stratfor. 2009].' Al Qaeda and the Finsbury Park Mosque . Stratfor.” Business 2009]. 2005. [Accessed May 19. Links to Osama bin Laden and Islamic Jihad. 2005. Aden Abyan Islamic 2009].org/refworld/publisher. 1999. Raman. John. Gartenstein-Ross.investigativeproject. 2009].Yemen. 2009]. 2009].uk/2/hi/middle_east/478046.asp?id=4 [Accessed January 31. [Accessed May 19.html [Accessed May 19.start.” Global Security.” Strategic Analysis 32(1): 57-80. 2004. 2000.longwarjournal.3ae6aa106b. 1999. 2009].com/analysis/yemen_high_profile_militants_killed_and_yemeni_power_structure [Accessed April 9.” The Long War Journal. Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahideen Atran. 2009].edu/data/tops/terrorist_organization_profile. UN Regufee Agency. Anti-Defamation 2000. John.stratfor. Pike. Available at: http://www. and Kyle Dabruzzi. K.php [Accessed April [Accessed May 19. “Dwindling Expectations (vs.” Science. 2009. “Foreign Terrorist Organizations. Available at: http://www. Jane. B.” New York Times Magazine 25.htm [Accessed May 19. “Jihad's New Leaders. India: South Asia Analysis Group.” Terrorism Monitor 4(15).asp [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://www.AMNESTY. B. Available at: http://www.. Yemeni Militant's Supporters Vow Revenge.jamestown. “Sects Within Sect: The Case of Deobandi–Barelvi Encounter in Pakistan. The Investigative Project on Terrorism.unhcr. 2009].org/programs/gta/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=854&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=181 &no_cache=1 [Accessed February 4. Available at: http://www. BBC. Scott. “Yemen: New Terror Camps as a City Falls to Jihadists.hinduonnet. The War on Poverty). Ashok. Lumpkin. 'Londonistan. 2009]. A.” Middle East Quarterly 14(3): 3-10. Available at: http://www. 2006. Jeffrey. 2008. “Khalid al-Nabi al-Yazidi. 128 . Available at: http://www. 2009.htm [Accessed May 19. “Inside Jihad U.Aden Abyan Islamic Army Amnesty International Report 2000 .” Global Security. Available at:

org/satporgtp/sair/Archives/3_29. Mannes.satp.” An Indian Perspective: 256.globalpolitician. Abou Zahab.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 57(1): 42-50.p df+the+jihadi+terrain+in+pakistan&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a [Accessed April 9.cdi.” Global Politician. Amir. Dhungana. Paul. Ajai. “Pakistan's jehadi apparatus: Goals and” Global Security. Sunita. Available at: http://www.” Strategic Analysis 24(12): 2179-2198. Jessica. Goel. 2003. Pakistan Security Research Unit. Mariam.95. Nicholas.indianexpress. 2009].Harkat ul-Ansar.atimes. 2001. Me Worry? Kumar. Howenstein. “This is not Islam. Hindustan Times. Available at: http://www. 2009]. Available at: http://www. Profiles in Terror. Sunita. “In the Spotlight: Harakat ul-Mujaheddin (HuM). “The regional dimension of sectarian conflicts in Pakistan. The Jihadi Terrain in Pakistan.html [Accessed April 9.htm [Accessed January 28. 2008.htm [Accessed January 28. 2009]. 2009]. Mir.brad. 129 . Available at: [Accessed January 28. 2005.cfm [Accessed April” The Maoist Insurgency and Nepal-India Relations: 213. “The Maoist Insurgency and Nepal-India Relations: Contemplating the Future. Paramhans. Swami. 2001. “The Jihad Lives On.” The Washington Quarterly 26(3): 7-25.” Center for Defense Information. and D. 1997. 2009]. lami. Cohen. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www. 2002. S. Rothem. 2003. Dan. 2001. 2009]. Terrorism . John. “Meeting with the” India Review 2(3): 55-88.htm [Accessed January 28. 2005. Sahni. 2009]. “Terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir in theory and practice. ISI Fixed Meetings for Hostages' Wives with Harkat. Stern.In the Spotlight: Harakat ul-Mujaheddin (HuM). Stephen.” Pakistan: nationalism without a nation?: 115. Available at: http://74.aspx?sectionName=indiasectionpage&id=1d0f988f-debe4d6e-b285-188cc397c5f2&Headline=A+profile+of+Maulana+Masood+Azhar [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://www. Jamiat ul-Ansar. 2008. Australian National 2002. “The Jihadist Threat to Pakistan.132/search? Available at: http://www. “Nexalities: What.” South Asia Intelligence Review 3(29). Jaish-e-Mohammad A profile of Maulana Masood Azhar. 2008. 2009].globalsecurity. Available at: http://www. 2004. S.125. Indian Express. South Asia Terrorism Portal.nsf/Page/What_Governments_are_doing_Listing_of_Terrorism_ Organisations_Jamiat_ul-Ansar [Accessed January [Accessed May 19. “Understanding the Militant Mind: Can Psychiatry Help?. 2009]. Aaron.. Available at: http://www. 2009]. Saldhanha. 2009]. “Harakat ul-Mujahedin. Roman & Littlefield.” Asia Times Online.cfm [Accessed January 28. 2008.

Sondhi. Available at: http://www. 2005. Available at: http://www.start. Attack on USS Cole: Background. 2009].” Business Line.hinduonnet.” Global N. Mushtaq. 2000. 2009].AMNESTY. 2009]. Praveen. 2009]. Available at: http://www. 130 . 2001. UN Regufee Agency. 2009]. and Teresita Schaffer.” Strategic Analysis 27(3): 382-403. India: South Asia Analysis Group.unhcr.satp. B. Lumpkin. Gartenstein-Ross.globalsecurity.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 56(4): 15-16.investigativeproject. 2009].org/irp/world/para/jem. Available at: http://www. John. Stern. 2003. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. 2006. Jaish-e-Mohammed (JEM). 2001. Links to Osama bin Laden and Islamic Jihad.” Journal of Conflict Studies 24(2).: Center for Strategic and International Studies.Jaish-e-Mohammad Mujahideen E-Tanzeem. Bill. and Kyle Dabruzzi. Roggio. 2009].org/security/profiles/khalid_al-nabi_al-yazidi. 2009]. Available at: http://www. Daveed. 2009]. [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://www. S. Available at: http://www.” Global Security. “Yemen: New Terror Camps as a City Falls to Jihadists. 2009. Federation of American Scientists. 2009.adl. Available at: http://www. 2002. 2009]. “Attack on USS Cole: Who engineered it?. John. Profile: Maulana Masood Azhar. “Terrorism and Governance in Kashmir. Anti-Defamation em. Najum. Islamic Army of Aden (IAA) .org/archives/2008/12/jaishemohammed_leade.C.longwarjournal.umd. Available at: http://www.globalsecurity.html [Accessed May 19. B.htm [Accessed May Washington. 2007. 2000. “Aden-Abyan Islamic Army.3ae6aa106b. 2006.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 57(1): 42-50.” India Review 2(3): 55-88. Sunil. 2000. Al-Ittihaad al-Islami Amnesty International Report 2000 [Accessed January 31.. Mehta. Raman.” Middle East Quarterly 14(3): 3-10. Jamwal. Available at: http://www. Novak. Available at: http://www. “Terrorists’ Modus Operandi in Jammu and Kashmir.htm [Accessed January 29. Available at: http://news.stm [Accessed May 19. “Khalid al-Nabi al-Yazidi. Pike.htm [Accessed May 19.htm [Accessed May 19.” The Long War Journal. D. “Jaish-e-Mohammed leader placed under ‘house arrest’. 2009].uk/2/hi/south_asia/578369. Jessica. South Asian Terrorism Portal. 2009]. 2002.0. “Jihad's New Leaders.asp [Accessed May 19. Kamath.southasiaanalysis. Available at: http://www.” Strategic Analysis 25(9): 1081-1987. 2009]. 2009. “Terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir in theory and practice. Aden Abyan Islamic Army. P. “Pakistan: Moderate jihad?.html [Accessed May [Accessed January 29. 2004. Raman. 2003. “Meeting with the Muj. Jane. “Terrorism in India: Impact on national security.” The Long War Journal. 2006. The Investigative Project on Terrorism. [Accessed April 9. Islam in Pakistan: Unity and Contradictions.php [Accessed January 29.YEM.

1991-2003. Iyob. SITE Institute. 2008. R.” Foreign Affairs 86(2): 59-74. and Peter” The Journal of Modern African Studies 26(1): 51-70. 2005.asp?id=6274 [Accessed May 19. 2003. “The Nationalist Revolution in “Blowing the Horn. “The Politics of Cultural Pluralism in Ethiopia and Eritrea: Trajectories of Ethnicity and Constitutional Experiments. 2009].” Terrorism Monitor 4(15). Abul Bara'.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 21(6): 1056-1073. 2009]. Available at: http://www. Eriksson. “ [Accessed April Yemeni Militant's Supporters Vow Revenge.html [Accessed January 27.” Journal of Peace Research 42(5): 623. Shifting Terrain: Dissidence versus Terrorism in Eritrea.janes. 1999. 2004. Bariagaber.jamestown.fas. Lotta. Iyob.ahram. Available at: http://acpss. Eritrean Islamic Jihad Movement A Military Statement of the Islamic Eritrean Reform Movement to the Islamic Nation and a List of Five Operations Executed in Eritrea. 2009]. “Eritrean Islamic Salvation Front. 2009].umd.htm [Accessed January 27. Sunguta. 2008.” Review of African Political Economy 23(70): 475-497. 2007. 1989-2003. 2006. Wahid. 2009].org/programs/gta/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=854&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=181 &no_cache=1 [Accessed February 4. Jane's World Intelligence and Insurgency. BBC. 2009].com/portal/content/view/2744/11/ [Accessed May 19. 2007.” Review of African Political Economy 30(97): 435-444. 1998.” From Nida'ul Islam. 2009]. Debessay. John. 1997.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 35(04): 647-673. Mikael.stm [Accessed May 19. 1996. Eritrean Islamic Salvation Movement . Stratfor. Harbom. “Armed Conflict. Makki. Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. 2004. Khalil Mohammed. Available at: http://www. Hedru. 2005.West. 2009]. Markakis. 2004. Assefaw.” Journal of Peace Research 41(5): 625. Yemen: High-Profile Militants Killed and the Yemeni Power Structure . “Armed conflict and its international dimensions.stratfor. Amer. “Interview With the Deputy Amir of the Eritrean Islamic Jihad 1998. and Colin Thomas-Fensen. and Peter Wallensteen. “The Eritrean Experiment: A Cautious Pragmatism?. Prendergast. Available at: http://www.awate. John. 131 . Fouad.start.” Available at: http://www. Shaikh Khalil Mohammed Amer.” Al-Ahram Center for Political & Strategic Studies. Available at: http://news. Available at: Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya Abdel “Egypt's Gama'ah Islamiyah: The Turnabout and its Ramifications.HTM [Accessed January 1. 1998. Available at: http://www. 2003. “Somalia's ICU and its Roots in al-Ittihad al-Islami . Hassan Salman. State Formation and the Public Sphere: Eritrea 1991–96. “Eritrea: transition to dictatorship.

cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA30906 [Accessed February 3. “Terrorism as a Strategy. “Political Islam and violence. Columbia University Press. 2000. “Informed Comment. 2009].com. Carmon.” South Atlantic Quarterly 101(2): 325-336. Available at: http://www.lebanonwire. Gunaratna. Cohen. Y Feldner. “Doomed Arab units prepare for final battle against the odds. 2009]. Lawrence. 2000. 2008].guardian. Youssef. The Al-Gama'a Al-Islamiyya Cessation of Violence: An Ideological Reversal.terrorismanalysts.nctc.” The New York Times. 2009].asp [Accessed February 24. Available at: http://query. Available at: http://www. 2002. Ashour. The Middle East Media Research Institute. 2004. Multimedia Counterterrorism Calendar. Najib. R. Fuller.muslimbrotherhood. 2002. Farrag Ismali. “Yemen Reports Arrests of Foreign-Born Arabs in Cole Attack . “A Muslim to Muslims: Reflections after September 11. “De-Radicalization of Jihad? The Impact of Egyptian Islamist Revisionists on Al-Qaeda. “Promoting Freedom and Democracy: Fighting the War of Ideas Against Islamic Terrorism. 2003. Vincent.html [Accessed December 28. Juan. Crenshaw.” New Political Science 22(1): 77-88. Julian. and D Lav. 2009].uk/world/2001/nov/20/ Inside Al Qaeda: Global Network of Terror. Borger. 2002.” Journal of Strategic Studies 10(4): 13-31.asp?ID=5166&Lang=E&Press=Show&System=PressR&zPage=Syste ms [Accessed January 1. Khaled Dawoud. 2007. Gerges. 1970]. 132 .” Comparative Strategy 22(3): 207-221. Y.Aboul-Enein. “New Approach of Egypt´s Gama´a Islamiya Group \.” Perspectives on Terrorism 2(5). Abu Jihad al-Masri. Burns. 2006. Available at: http://www. “Theories of Terrorism: Instrumental and Organizational Approaches. Cornell. Ghadbian. Politics and Terrorism: An Assessment of the Origin and Threat of Terrorism in Egypt. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies.” The Guardian. “ Al Qaeda's Egyptian Bet. 2000.” More on the split among radical Islamists.” Lebanonwire.iht. Anneli.” The Middle East Journal: 592-612. Airforce University Maxwell.” Government and Opposition 42(3): 314-339.” International Herald Tribune.html [Accessed February 24.terrorism4 [Accessed January 1.” The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website. Ayman Al-Zawahiri: The Ideologue of Modern Islamic Militancy.html?res=9F05E4DA1031F935A15753C1A9669C8B63 [Accessed February 24. Omar. Available at: http://www.php?page=2 [Accessed February 24. Burton. “Pursuing bin Laden: Driving Al Qaeda:Religious Decree. 2009].nytimes. Cole. Martha. 2009]. “The End of the Islamist Insurgency in Egypt?: Costs and Prospects. 1987. 2009]. Fawaz. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://memri. Available at: and Nicholas Watt. Ariel.php?option=com_rokzine&view=article&id=39&Itemid=54 [Accessed February 13. John. Available at: http://www. Botha.

htm [Accessed January 1. Pargeter. 2008]. Islamism. Available at: http://intelfiles.egoplex.html [Accessed January 1. 2004. 1997.132/search?q=cache:1JlCz_Djb9wJ:www.cdi. 2009].125. “The Taliban Connection. Zambelis. 2009]. 2005. M. U. Khalil. Available at:” Foundation for the Defense of [Accessed February 18. 2002. 1998. Mary Anne. Available at: http://weekly. “Militants freed. 1970]. 2005.” Travel Video Television News. “Egypt attacks: A Closer Look.” Center for Defense Information. Nevine. “Beyond Al Qaeda: Part 2. Preston. Available at: http://www. Available at: 133 . Available at: http://weekly.” Society 42(5): 2002. 2003. Southern District of New York: Intelwire. Sentencing and Jon Rothschild. “Makram Mohammed Ahmed interviews the historic leadership of alGama’a al-Islamiyya inside the “Scorpion” prison.htm [Accessed May 19. “Senior al Qaeda Leader Thought Killed in North Waziristan Strike. Leadership of al-Gama'a” Al-Ahram Weekly [Accessed February 24. Joshua. Duke University Press.Islamic Group. 2008.” Available at: http://74.htm [Accessed December 28.” Rashwan. Muslim Extremism in 2009]. 2002. “In the Spotlight: Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya . 2009].” Al-Ahram Weekly On-line. Weaver. v. 2008. Diaa. Available at: http://www. 2009]. Julia. 2004.” Al-Ahram Weekly On-line. University of Pennsylvania Press. 2002. “A New Rapprochement?.htm [Accessed January 1.” Al Ahram Weekly Online. Available at: http://weekly. In the Name of Osama Bin Laden: Global Terrorism and the Bin Laden Brotherhood.stanford. 2001. and Terrorism. “Egyptian Gama'a al-Islamiyya's Public Relations Campaign . 2009] Rabasa.arabicnews. “Bin Laden.htm [Accessed February 18. The Outer Rings of the Terrorist Universe.” Terrorism Focus 3(35). Anthony. Available at: http://www. 2002. 2009]. 2009]. 1970].nytimes. Angel et al. “Time for a Historic Reconcilliation?.pdf+Nageh+Ibrahim&hl=en &ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=us&client=firefox-a [Accessed January 1.45. The New Frontiers of Jihad: Radical Islam in Europe. “Blowback.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=11783544&Itemid=361 [Accessed February 24.ahram. 2006. Omar Abdel Rahman et al. Chris. Alison.ahram. Stacher. “Defendant Tells of His Role in Edict Urging Killing of Jews. Moussa.cfm [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://www. Hazel. Mozaffari.” The Atlantic Online. Gilles. Keats. Berkeley: University of California Press. Jacquard. In Aftermath of Luxor Massacre: Doubtful Initiative to Stop Violence. “Post-Islamist Rumblings in Egypt: The Emergence of the Wasat Available at: http://www.” The Middle East Journal: 415-432.” New York Times. Ahmed. 2009]. 2006. Roggio.php?id=A6130_0_1_0_M [Accessed January 1. Available at: http://travelvideo.

2009]. 134 &no_cache=1 [Accessed January 1.http://www.

Appendix III: Commanding Officer Attribute Codebook Type of merger Formal merger Strong affiliation (partnership) Loose affiliation (collaboration) No affiliation Primary motive Secondary motive Not a motive Primary motive Secondary motive Not a motive Primary motive Secondary motive Not a motive Strong leadership Average leadership Weaker leadership Not applicable (Was not active in the organization at the time) 4 3 2 1 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 3 2 1 Opportunism Pan-Islamic ideology Social network Operational leadership Ideological leadership Logistic leadership 0 135 .

Appendix IV: Leadership Attributes Organization name Ansar al-Islam/Jund alMullah Krekar Islam/Ansar al-Sunnah Ansar al-Islam/Jund alAbdullah Shafi Islam/Ansar al-Sunnah al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at Abu Musab al-Zarqawi al-Tawhid wal-Jihad) al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at Abu Ayub Al-Masri al-Tawhid wal-Jihad) al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at Abu Khalil al-Souri al-Tawhid wal-Jihad) Abu Muhjin Asbat al-Ansar Mohammed Omar Taliban Ayman Al Zawahiri Egyptian Islamic Jihad Sayyed Imam Al-Sharif Egyptian Islamic Jihad Islamic Movement of Tahir Yuldashev Uzbekistan Islamic Movement of Juma Namangani Uzbekistan Najmiddin Jalolov Islamic Jihad Union Tariq al-Fasdli Yemen Islamic Jihad Zein al-Abideen alAden Abyan Islamic Mehdar Army Aden Abyan Islamic Khalid al-Nabi al-Yazidi Army Maulana Saadatullah Khan Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahidin Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahidin Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahidin Leader name Organization type Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Organization Date of Ideological country or foundin Date of Type of Opportunistic Alignment Social network origin g affiliation affiliation motives? ? affiliations? Iraq Iraq 2001 2001 2001 2001 3 3 2 2 0 0 1 1 Ideological Logistic Operational leadership leadership leadership preprepre-merger merger? merger? 1 0 3 0 3 0 Operational leadership postmerger? 1 3 Ideological leadership postmerger? 3 2 Logistic leadership postmerger? 2 1 Core Arab Cluster Iraq 1999 2004 4 2 0 1 3 2 3 3 3 2 Core Arab Cluster Iraq 1999 2004 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 2 Core Core Core Core Core Arab Arab Arab Arab Arab Cluster Cluster Cluster Cluster Cluster Iraq Lebanon Afghanistan Egypt Egypt Uzbekistan Uzbekistan Uzbekistan Yemen Yemen Yemen 1999 1986 1994 1987 1987 1998 1998 2002 1990 1990 1990 2004 2000 1996 1998 1998 1998 1998 2005 1992 1998 1998 4 3 3 4 4 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 3 3 1 2 3 3 3 2 2 0 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 3 2 3 0 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 2 3 3 3 3 2 1 1 3 3 0 3 1 2 3 3 3 1 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 3 2 2 Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Southern Asian cluster Pakistan 1985 1998 2 2 1 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 Fazlur Rehman Khalil Southern Asian cluster Pakistan 1985 1998 2 1 2 1 1 2 3 2 3 3 Farooq Kashmiri Khalil Riaz Basra Akram Lahori Hafiz Mohammad Saeed Maulana Abdul Wahid Kashmiri Maulana Masood Azhar Sheikh Ali Warsame Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys Hassan Abdullah Hersi al-Turki Sheikh Khalil Mohammed Amer Lashkar-e-Jhangvi Lashkar-e-Jhangvi Lashkar-e-Taiba Lashkar-e-Taiba Jaish-e-Mohammad al-Ittihaad al-Islami al-Ittihaad al-Islami al-Ittihaad al-Islami Eritrean Islamic Jihad Movement Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster African cluster African cluster African cluster African cluster Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan Somalia Somalia Somalia Eritrea 1985 1996 1996 1990 1990 2000 1984 1984 1984 1988 1998 1999 1999 2001 2001 2000 1991 1991 1991 1998 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 1 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 1 3 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 3 3 1 1 2 0 3 0 2 0 3 3 2 1 1 3 2 3 1 3 2 2 3 3 2 1 3 2 3 1 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 136 .

Hassan Hattab al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la prédication et le combat) Maghreb Arab cluster al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la prédication et le combat) Maghreb Arab cluster al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la prédication et le combat) Libyan Islamic Fighting Group Tunisian Combatant Group Tunisian Combatant Group Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group Jemaah Islamiya Jemaah Islamiya Jemaah Islamiya Abu Sayyaf Abu Sayyaf Abu Sayyaf Algeria 1996 2005 4 2 0 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 Nabil Sahraoui Algeria 1996 2005 4 2 1 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 Abdelmalik Droukdal Anas Sebai Tarek Ben Habib Maaroufi Saifallah Ben Hassine Mohammed Al Karbouzi Taeb Bentizi Abu Bakar Bashir Abu Rusdan Abu Dujana Abdurajak Janjalani Khadaffy Janjalani Yasser Igasan Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Algeria Libya Tunisia Tunisia Morocco Morocco Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Philippines Philippines Philippines 1996 1995 2000 2000 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1991 1991 1991 2005 1997 2000 2000 2001 2001 1998 1998 1998 1991 1991 1991 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 2 3 1 2 1 2 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 2 3 3 1 3 1 3 3 2 3 3 3 1 1 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 137 .

Appendix V: Data on Universe of Cases Figure 1: Number of Affiliations by Year Number of Affiliations by Year 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year Figure 2: Distribution by Type of Affiliation Figure 3: Distribution by Region 138 .

67 13.67 13.5 20.67 13.5 0.60648E-06 Table 2: Statistical Significance Testing (Two Scales) Opportunistic Motive Not a motivation Motivation Expected (Not a motivation) Expected (Motivation) P Value 5 36 20.5 0.67 13.5 20.67 1.14786E-09 11 8 13.5 20.28936E-06 Ideological Alignment 22 19 20.042330234 139 .67 0.67 13.67 1.018767854 27 0 13.67 13.Appendix VI: Data on Q1 What motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida’s and its pan-Islamic agenda? Table 1: Chi-Squared Test (Three Scales) Opportunistic Motive Total 0 (Not a motivation) Total 1 (Secondary motivation) Total 2 (Primary motivation) Expected Total 0 Expected Total 1 Expected Total 2 P Value 5 Ideological Alignment 22 Social Network Affiliation 14 3 33 13.5 1.639411853 Social Network Affiliation 14 27 20.

5 0.5 7.262682055 P Value 140 .5 10.5 18.5 5 5.021962838 5 5.5 0.5 5.5 18.5 10.5 14 16.5 17 0. ideological.Appendix VII: Data on Q2 What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible affiliates with Al Qa’ida? Table 3: Chi-Squared Test (Strength of operational. and logistic leadership before and after the merger) Operational Before Total Not active (0) Total Weak (1) Total Average (2) Total Strong (3) Total Expected Not active Expected Weak Expected Average Expected Strong 7 10 After Sum 4 5 11 15 Ideological Before 6 7 After Sum 4 10 10 17 Logistic Before 6 8 After Sum 4 3 10 11 7 17 41 12 20 41 19 37 82 16 12 41 5 22 41 21 34 82 11 16 41 17 17 41 28 33 82 5.5 9.5 14 16.256764552 5 8.5 7.5 17 5 8.5 9.

422 0.1549 -1. ideological.359 0.421 6 108 18 Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for Logistic Leadership Performance (pre-post) 15 2 -1.382 0.25 # Ranks <0 # of Ranks >0 Table 5: Paired Sign Test (Strength of operational.5 14. ideological.526 0.5 11.0577 -1.466 0.1425 -1.1397 16 231.477 0.2 Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for Ideological Leadership Performance (pre-post) 16 3 -1.898 0.1742 -1.3269 Paired Sign Test for Ideological Leadership Performance (pre-post) 19 6 16 0. and logistic leadership before and after the merger) Paired Sign Test for Operational Leadership Performance (pre-post) # Differences >0 # of Differences <0 # Differences =0 P-Value 10 16 15 0.0501 141 .95 Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for Overall Leadership Performance (pre-post) 9 5 -1.5 16.469 10 119.0146 Paired Sign Test for Logistic Leadership Performance (pre-post) 10 16 15 0.0562 22 365.5 16.313 10 122 12.91 0.Table 4: Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test (Strength of operational.161 16 229 14. and logistic leadership before and after the merger) Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for Operational Leadership Performance (pre-post) # of 0 Differences # of Ties Z-Value P-Value Tied ZValue Tied PValue Count Sum of Ranks Mean Rank Count Sum of Ranks Mean Rank 15 3 -1.1269 19 217 11.614 10 162.3269 Paired Sign Test for Overall Leadership Performance (prepost) 10 22 9 0.

Figures 4-6: Paired Sign Test Results 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Operational Ideologigcal Logistic Total Score Difference (Post-Pre) Improved or no change Declined 25 20 Score Difference (Post-Pre) 15 Improved Declined 10 5 0 Operational Ideologigcal Logistic Total 142 .

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful