Bin Laden’s Henchmen: Al Qa’ida’s Commanding Officers who are Leading the Global Jihad

Sarah Catanzaro Professor Martha Crenshaw, Advisor Interschool Honors Program in International Security Studies Center for International Security and Cooperation Stanford University


Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………...4 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………....5 Chapter 1: Building a Complex Organization………………………………………....6 I. II. III. IV. Evolution of Al Qa’ida’s Organizational Structure…………………………………..7 A Description of Complex Organizations………………………………...…………..12 The Role of “Mergers and Acquisitions”………………………..…………………...13 Initial Thoughts on Policy Implications……………………………………………….15

Chapter 2: Literature Review………………………………………………………….17 I. II. Literature on Al Qa’ida’s Foreign Affiliates…………………………………………17 Literature on Joining Radical Movements……………………………………………20 A. Ideological motivations………………………………………………20 B. Psychosocial motivations…………………………………………….22 C. Strategic/opportunistic motivations………………………………….23 Literature on Terrorist Leadership…………………………………………………….25 A. The personality of terrorist leaders…………………………………..25 B. Targeting leadership………………………………………………….26


Chapter 3: Methodology………………………………………………………………..28 I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. Background……………………………………………………………………………….28 Assessing Q1……………………………………………………………………………...30 Assessing Q2……………………………………………………………………………...38 Developing the Universe of Cases……………………………………………………..40 Selection of Study Subjects……………………………………………………………...42 Problems Regarding Information Gathering…………………………………………43 Case Study………………………………………………………………………………...44 Relevance………………………………………………………………………………….44

Chapter 4: Universe of Cases…………………………………………………………..46 I. II. III. IV. Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: An Evolving Network…………………………………………46 Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: The Geographic Distribution………………………………..53 Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: Mergers? Partnerships? Or Collaborations?...................57 Summary of Findings…………………………………………………………………….59

Chapter 5: Results of Statistical Hypothesis Testing…………………………………60 I. II. Data Analysis and Results for Q1: What motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida’s and its pan-Islamic agenda?.......................................................60 Data Analysis and Results for Q2: What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible affiliates with Al Qa’ida……………………………………………………………….. 61


Chapter 6: Al Qa’ida in the Maghreb and Abdelmalek Droukdal – A Well Executed Merger…………………………………………………………………………………64 I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. The Origins of Islamic Violence in Algeria after the War of Independence……...64 The Birth of the Salvation Islamic Front……………………………………………...65 The Beginnings of the GIA and the Onset of an Epoch of Violence……………….66 An Alternative Emerges: The Origins of the GSPC…………………………………67 Fissions Form Within the GSPC……………………………………………………….67 The Rise of Droukdal…………………………………………………………………….71 Droukdal’s Program: Toward Global Jihad……………………………...………….73 The Announcement of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb………………..………...77 A New Organization……………………………………………………………………..78 Final Observations………………………………………………………………………80

Chapter 7: Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya: The Unrealized Merger………………………83 I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. The Emergence of the GAI from the Ashes of the Muslim Brotherhood………….83 The Sadat Assassination………………………………………………………………...84 Crackdown under Mubarak…………………………………………………………….84 Campaign of Terror……………………………………………..………………………85 Collapse of an Armed Group…………………………………………………………...86 Reconciliation…………………………………………………………………………….88 Explaining the Decision not to Affiliate with Al Qa’ida…………………………….89 Final Observations………………………………………………………………………91

Chapter 8: Conclusion and Discussion – Al Qa’ida’s Commanding Officers: A Skilled Management Team……………………………………………………………………..93 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………...107 Appendix I: List of Terrorist Groups………………………………………………..115 Appendix II: Sources by Terrorist Group…………………………………………...116 Appendix III: Commanding Officer Attribute Codebook……………………….....135 Appendix IV: Commanding Officer Attributes……………………………………..136 Appendix V: Data on Universe of Cases……………………………………………..138 Appendix VI: Data on Q1…………………………………………………………….139 Appendix VII: Data on Q2……………………………………………………………140


after these affiliations occur. The conclusion of this paper finds that while opportunistic. only in recent years.Abstract: Al Qa’ida has allied with indigenous terrorist groups for over a decade. has Osama Bin Laden increasingly relied upon these franchises to prosecute his panIslamic struggle. Based on this analysis. It then focuses on the role that local jihadist leaders play in the aftermath of the affiliation to shed further light on Al Qa’ida’s current strategy and operations. The local jihadist leaders who become Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers ensure ideological alignment with Al Qa’ida. this paper offers some broad recommendations regarding the future conduct of the Global War on Terror (GWOT). shared visions become essential. However. 4 . This paper examines first the motivations of local jihadist groups who associate with Al Qa’ida to understand the transformation that Al Qa’ida has achieved. rather than ideological concerns are the primary motivating factors for joining Al Qa’ida.

These sources proved to be a treasure-chest indeed. Moreover. Thus. I have benefited particularly from communications with Professor Martha Crenshaw. I distinctly remember the sense of dissociation and unreality as we struggled to understand how our beloved Twin Towers were destroyed. I have had the opportunity to try out some of my ideas and receive valuable criticism from my peers. who is currently a junior in high school. I have been so fortunate to benefit from their generosity and acumen. In addition. who listened to my presentations with great attention and offered so many thoughtful suggestions and useful comments. Port Washington. the members of my community began to dig themselves literally and metaphorically from the ruins of the 9/11 disaster. he continues to inspire me every day with his thoughtfulness and intelligence. how friends and neighbors had disappeared and presumably perished during this devastating attack on America’s soil. not given. Thank you so much for your patience. Through the CISAC seminars. Professor Crenshaw lives as a role model for the next generation of female investigators researching international security. Admiration should be earned. I am also grateful to Dara Kay Cohen. I would be remiss not to acknowledge my parents. for whom I would also like to show gratitude.Acknowledgements: The ideas of more people than I can possibly mention have affected my thinking about terrorist organizations and Al Qa’ida over the years. Acts of kindness and heroism became increasingly visible in my community as people mobilized to help one another. 2001 terrorist attack on the Twin Towers. both personal and intellectual is more important than can adequately be acknowledge in such a brief note. 5 . this project would have been poorer without her invaluable comments. Professors Stockton and May helped me clarify and expand my views about this project on numerous occasions. There were cars parked at our train station that were never recovered and fathers and mothers who never returned from work. a traditionally male-dominated discipline. and with enthusiasm. I would have been hardpressed to get this project done in anything like a timely fashion had it not been for this program. objectivity. and more recently into the making of this thesis. and Professor Crenshaw most certainly earned mine through her impressive career. she has offered me practical and affectionate support. Professor Crenshaw helped answer my questions promptly. I was so fortunate to have had Dara around as an academic example and important mentor. Without a doubt. but most importantly for serving as an incredible mentor. Despite his youth. Yet despite a pervasive sense of insecurity. I dedicate my thesis to the population of Port Washington. Moreover. I hope that a general acknowledgement here of the wisdom and understanding may be counted to me for righteousness. I want to recognize my community. I would also like to thank my brother. at length. Finally. She also put at my disposal her insights on numerous topics. I would like to thank Colonel Joseph Felter and Jarrett Brachman who introduced me to several primary and secondary documents. New York which was tragically impacted by the September 11. and coaching. Since my sophomore year at Stanford. Their constant support. It gives me great pleasure to thank Professors Paul Stockton and Michael May for the opportunity to participate in the CISAC Interschool Honors Program. This solidarity and resiliency consolidated my faith in humanity and sparked my interest in homeland security studies.

In contrast. While each perspective has its merits. an organization characterized by “tight coupling” includes cells that associate intimately. Al Qa’ida utilizes a mix of both loose and tight coupling to attain a remarkable degree of adaptability. Thus. Although most scholars perceive Al Qa’ida as an organization in stasis. Al Qa’ida has transformed into a more ambiguous entity that scholars cannot easily define. The first maintains that Al Qa’ida Central Command retains ideological and operational control over the organization and preserves a certain degree of tactical influence.Chapter 1: Building a Complex Organization Prior to the September 11. A few dominant camps have emerged within this scholarly debate. One can 6 . Gunaratna 2004). since the onset of the Global War on Terror (GWOT). 2001 attacks.Stern 2003). most fail to assess the exchange relationships that distinguish Al Qa’ida. all oversimplify the command configuration utilized by Al Qa’ida. Moreover. Al Qa’ida was a relatively centralized organization that used Afghanistan as a base from which to strategize. Dishman 2005). communicate often. However. Others suggest that Al Qa’ida has become a decentralized network of individualized and local cells bound together exclusively by common beliefs (Diebert and Stein 2003. Al Qa’ida’s structure and degree of centralization may fluctuate within a period of months or weeks. An organization characterized by “loose coupling” has cells that are relatively autonomous and independent. Ronfeldt 2005. Currently. they fail to acknowledge that this combination of loose and tight coupling has enabled Al Qa’ida to become a modern hydra that readily adapts to changes in its environment. and depend upon each other. to plan attacks. and to dispatch operatives worldwide. Some scholars even contend that the main threat no longer emanates from Al Qa’ida but from unassociated radicalized individuals and groups who meet and plot in their neighborhoods and on the Internet (Sageman 2008.

One method whereby Al Qa’ida achieves such adaptability is by merging or partnering with local jihadist groups. Al Qa’ida has affiliated with indigenous terrorist groups for almost twenty years. each led by a commanding officer). this study may affect the allocation of resources in Washington for counterterrorism efforts. and identifying and assessing the role of the commanders who interact with Osama Bin Laden. This study will examine the incentives and role of former local jihadist group leaders who now serve as Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. recently. I. Although Al Qa’ida has cooperated with local jihadist groups for years. However. 2001. since the onset of the Global War on Terror. these external relationships enabled Al Qa’ida to transform into a complex organization. the conclusions drawn from this analysis may present policymakers with new and novel ways of targeting Al Qa’ida and its partners.therefore classify Al Qa’ida as a complex organization a concept that will be elaborated in this chapter (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2003). It is important to analyze these individuals because they have assumed more authority since September 11. Ayman Zawahiri and the core of Al Qa’ida. This study will draw upon open source and primary source information to understand why and how Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers promote the pan-Islamic agenda. characterized by an efficient blend of both tight and loose coupling. Moreover. Evolution of Al Qa’ida’s Organizational Structure: 7 . By defining the new structure of Al Qa’ida (characterized by loosely integrated and operationally attached subunits. distinguishing the groups with which Al Qa’ida is strongly associated. Al Qa’ida has begun to depend on these affiliates to obtain organizational flexibility to a considerable extent.

The military committee was responsible for recruiting. and Abdullah Azzam. and authorized asset sharing for terrorist operations. procuring. and launching support and military operations. However. a multimillionaire from a wealthy Saudi family. after the liberation of Kuwait from Saddam Hussein by the American-led multinational army. an Islamic scholar and founding member of the Kashmiri jihadist group Lashkar-e-Taiba. established an office in Peshawar. it was not until the summer of 1988. The finance committee oversaw and developed financial resources. The shura majilis (consultative assembly) received information from four subordinate committees designed to direct specific segments of planning and operations. which had rebuffed his offer to defend the kingdom. In the Sudan. Bin Laden returned to Saudi Arabia as a hero of jihad. developing a membership roster and establishing a hierarchical arrangement to guide and oversee its functions (Riedel 2008). Pakistan to serve as a hostel for Arabs coming to fight the Soviets and as a press agency to produce propaganda to promote jihad. coordinated targets. This council promoted common goals. The religious committee justified Al 8 . in 1991. advisory council) consisting of Bin Laden’s closest associates. that Bin Laden began calling his cadre al Qaeda al Askariya (“the military base”) and developing a greater organizational structure (Riedel 2008). Bin Laden was disenchanted with his native Saudi Arabia. The organization was centered upon the “shura” (i. most of whom he knew since his formative days in Afghanistan. Bin Laden expanded the Al Qa’ida organization. The Services Bureau (“Maktab al Khadamat”) provided travel funds and guesthouses in Pakistan for recruits and volunteers to facilitate the struggle against the Soviet forces. Osama bin Laden. However. a large number of jihadists from the Middle East traveled to Afghanistan to combat the Soviet Union. training.In the 1980s. He relocated to the Sudan at the invitation of the government of Hassan Turabi and the National Islamic Front.e. At the conclusion of the Soviet-Afghan war.

although Al Qa’ida also assisted two other Salafi terrorist groups during this formative period in the Sudan. 2001 attacks against the United States (Bergen 2002). In May 1997. it would be assigned to a carefully selected cell headed by a senior Al Qa’ida operative who reported personally to Bin Laden (Wright 2007). Moreover. the last emir of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad. and Libya. Thus. Al Qa’ida’s former propaganda chief. all three of which faced indigenous terrorist groups supported by Bin Laden. Afghanistan’s lack of central government provided Bin Laden with greater leeway to pursue his agenda and centralize his operations. Bin Laden and Khalid Sheikh Mohammad. Bin Laden left the Sudan to return to Afghanistan as a result of combined pressure from the United States. hatched the plan to target the Twin Towers. and the Capitol Building. in its earlier incarnation. The plot to attack the United State began in 1999 after Al Qa’ida executed the simultaneous bombings of the American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. In May 1996. Bin Laden personally recruited the plot’s 9 . Finally. the media committee produced propaganda intended to generate Muslim support for the organization and its objectives (Harmony Database Released Documents: Al Qa'ida Goals and Structure 2006). The September 11. the Pentagon. Saudi Arabia.Qa’ida’s actions and operations within the theological parameters of Al Qa’ida model of Islam. Egypt. thereby strengthening Al Qa’ida Central Command and forming a close-knit group of jihadists uniquely capable of executing terror operations like the September 11. Al Qa’ida could be classified as a centralized organization. Once a specific operation was decided upon. Bin Laden cemented his ties to Ayman Zawahiri. Bin Laden was able to forge his closest alliance yet with the Taliban by providing it with significant financial and human resources to support the ongoing war against other factions in northern Afghanistan. other western governments. 2001 attacks reveal the former nature of Al Qa’ida’s decision-making apparatus.

When operations are so decentralized. Captives revealed the names of their commanders and associates thereby highlighting the need for loose coupling between local operatives and Al Qa’ida’s executive leadership in order to evade government interference and limit the consequences of any further compromises. were instructed to develop their own organizational structures. detached from Al Qa’ida Central Command and other cells. the attacks precipitated the Global War on Terror (GWOT). Additionally. 2006). Al Qa’ida allegedly convened a strategic summit in northern Iran at which the shura recognized that Al Qa’ida could no longer function as a hierarchy. Nevertheless. The shura concluded that a decentralized. Mullah Omar in the preparation (Riedel 2008). he personally handled other elements of the conspiracy. While they operated in support of centralized directives. many Al Qa’ida leaders were imprisoned. Although Bin Laden and Al Qa’ida considered 9/11 an astonishing success. they established their own individual plans (Felter et al. Prior to 9/11. composed of less than ten operatives. individual cells.tactical leader. After the first year of the GWOT and the ouster of the Taliban from Afghanistan. for instance. These arrests led to subsequent arrests of other senior officers. Al Qa’ida was a centralized organization. Mohammed Atta as well as the fifteen operatives who would intimidate the passengers during the airline hijackings. From this point forward. it becomes particularly difficult to maintain 10 . In November 2002. which used Afghanistan as a base from which to carry out major operations against American targets and did not significantly depend upon its affiliates to support its operations in the Middle East. he engaged the Taliban and its leader. networked terrorist organizations would be less vulnerable to traditional counterterrorism measures used by hierarchically organized security forces. Al Qa’ida soon learned that there are limitations to a strictly decentralized structure.

nor could it punish renegade agents (Felter. These commanding officers ensure that preference divergence does not result in the loss of 11 . Al Qa’ida faced challenges when Central Command was forced to delegate certain duties to low level operatives. Invading Iraq diverted troops from the mission of finding Al Qa’ida’s leadership. decision to go to war with Iraq and the Pakistani decision to provoke a crisis with India allowed Al Qa’ida to survive by regaining a degree of centralization. who are the most important link in the formation of a resilient. Al Qa’ida leadership found itself cornered along the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan and unable to coordinate its low-level operatives. However. Brachman. the US allowed Al Qa’ida to reconstitute itself in the tribal areas of Pakistan. Al Qa’ida could not effectively monitor its agents’ activities. thereby provoking Pakistan to divert to the east troops that were needed in the west. rather than consolidating its victory in Afghanistan. Thus. who espoused different personal preferences. India began to mobilize along the border. the U. and Fishman 2006). the lower house of India’s parliament in New Delhi. As the result of restoration of central control.S. Al Qa’ida can rely upon closer relations with its commanding officers (the former leaders of indigenous terrorist groups). Perkins. Al Qa’ida was able to reestablish some of its pre-9/11 operational capabilities by exploiting Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Riedel 2008). prior to the invasion of Iraq. competition for prominence within the movement. and their own talent at conducting aggressive attacks (Shapiro 2007). these low-level operatives sought more violence than was useful due to the cognitive dynamics of an underground organization. Like most other organizations. Often. after five Kashmiri terrorists attacked Lok Sabha. complex organization.situational awareness and control the use of violence to achieve specific political ends. Within a decentralized framework. Bramlett. In 2002 and 2003. Moreover.

Although a decentralized organization form was more appropriate and prudent after 9/11. Unlike strictly centralized organizations. it was not very efficient.operational success or security. Complex organizations are composed of a diversity of agents. Before Al Qa’ida Central Command reorganized itself in the tribal areas of Pakistan. A Description of Complex Organizations: As this history indicates. today. complex organizations can exploit a diversity of systems (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2001). Al Qa’ida continues to morph into a complexly structure organization (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2006). Empowered by the establishment of its safe haven in Pakistan and increased reliance upon its commanding officers. While the relationships within the cells are tightly coupled. who interact with and mutually affect one another. Al Qa’ida was effectively a decentralized network). Al Qa’ida now relies heavily upon semiautonomous cells found in operational territories that are horizontally and vertically integrated into the centralized command structure. Al Qa’ida’s demand for operational secrecy. This flexible structure allows the Central Command to maintain control over specifically identified strategic operations through its commanding officers while enabling cells to maintain their autonomy in local and regional operations (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2006). and large size dictated its organizational decisions. While it is difficult to 12 . the relationship between its commanding officers and central authorities were also loosely coupled (thus. Al Qa’ida is a true “complex organization”). intricate nature of resource gathering and allocation. the relationships between cells and between operatives and Al Qa’ida Central Command are loosely coupled. qualified by loosely coupled systems. qualified by tightly coupled systems or exclusively decentralized organizations. the relationship between Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers and central authorities are moderately coupled (thus. II. highly visible organizational personnel. By contrast.

These relationships are characterized by a high degree of leader-member exchange and commitment that was impossible to achieve between Al Qa’ida Central Command executives and operatives due to their lack of physical proximity. Al Qa’ida has achieved an optimal combination of coupling. interactive communication 13 . III. Previously. He observed that a dearth of such leaders reduces the maximum level of control Al Qa’ida could exert thereby undermining the potential for political impact (Felter. Perkins. Communication frequency. These commanding officers can serve a crucial role since they are better able to monitor the behavior of their agents and can punish and reward them for their performance. the extensive negotiations that continue to occur between Al Qa’ida and its affiliates suggest that Al Qa’ida has consciously utilized these arrangements to remain resilient. or collaborates with a local jihadist groups. Moreover. now when Al Qa’ida merges. Bramlett. Bin Laden did not seek to exert strategic or operational control over the leaders of its regionally based affiliates. Brachman. these commanding officers are effective because they can develop mature relationships with their operatives.determine if Al Qa’ida assumed this structure by conscious design or coincidence. they can build differentiated relationships with their rapports rather than espousing an “average” leadership style. However. Since they are already closely coupled to their agents. The Role of “Mergers and Acquisitions:” By affiliating with local jihadist movements. partners. it employs the groups’ leaders as its commanding officers and integrates them into Al Qa’ida Central Command by establishing communication channels and by offering financial and technological resources to these leaders for their local outlets with stipulations. Al Qa’ida theorist Abu Musab al-Suri noted the importance of a highly trained cadre of senior commanding officers. and Fishman 2006).

their performance. ensuring that relationships that could dilute commitment are avoided and those that enhance commitment are strengthened(Brachman and McCants 2006). Studies from the corporate world as well as observations by Al Qa’ida theorists reveal that when agents develop high quality relationships with their leaders. leader-member value agreement. Perkins. Jarrett Brachman. decision influence. relying on lower-level operatives (who are often less committed. Bramlett. The moderate coupling between Al Qa’ida Central Command and local leaders is essential to the performance of the organization. subordinate loyalty. Commanding officers now serve an important role as interlocutors with Al Qa’ida Central Command. 14 . and Fishman 2006). these new. and member affect are all key in this dyadic relationship (Graen and Uhl-Bien 1995). Al Qa’ida can ensure that strategic and tactical differences between it and its commanding officers are reconciled. Local leaders can also effectively monitor operative’s personal and social network. Thus. since the most devoted operatives are obliged to engage in riskier or inherently fatal assignments) is a more hazardous strategy (Felter. Providing funds on a need-to-have basis to smaller groups of operatives is a risky strategy because each additional transfer entails communications and financial transactions. Moreover. which can be tracked by counterterrorist forces.patterns. cohesive units can innovate and adapt to the demands of the environment because they do not need to conform to a strict set of guidelines passed down from Central Command. Moreover. There is a positive correlation between the level of ideological indoctrination of cell members and the degree of control a leader exerts. Because affiliations are often preceded by several months of bargaining and negotiations. Al Qa’ida Central Command can rely upon its commanding officers to handle finance and logistic tasks and to engage in auditing strategies. and their overall unit performance improves (Graen and Uhl-Bien 1995).

By allowing its commanding officers to retain significant freedom to interact with other local leaders and with resource providers. at present. accountability for operation effectiveness. and competence of local cells. Moreover. thereby ensuring the unity. scrutinizing their stories for patterns to determine their motivation. they act as a hub of communication. Initial Thoughts on Policy Implications: 15 . and equipment. they are given latitude to exploit their specific environment. and Internet articles. local leaders-cum-commanding officers perform a crucial function by liaising with Al Qa’ida Central Command. Although these commanding officers have significant responsibilities (for example. this study provides valuable insight into the transformation that these leaders undergo when they become Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers by looking at their responsibilities before and after they affiliate with Al Qa’ida. transmitting new. up-to-date. thereby allowing Al Qa’ida to maintain ideological and operational control over the organization and by closely interacting with local operatives. information between operatives and Al Qa’ida authorities (McAllister 2004). this study compiles the biographies of over forty Al Qa’ida commanding officers. This is the first study that pinpoints the organizations with which Al Qa’ida has affiliated and identifies their leaders (who subsequently become Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers). Currently. Drawing upon documents and transcripts of legal proceedings involving global Salafi mujahedin and their organizations. these commanding officers can ensure the dissemination of innovation and information by acting as an intermediary between their cell members and Al Qa’ida Central Command. Moreover. Thus. finances. efficiency. government documents. obligations to Al Qa’ida Central Command. IV. the use of force. duty of care to their agents. press and scholarly articles. and powers including discipline and punishment of their agents) no researcher has analyzed their role or background.

Government efforts to degrade Al Qa’ida’s capacity should focus on undermining its security environment, minimizing the degree to which it can control operations, and abort its ability to fund its activities. By identifying the crucial role played by commanding officers in sustaining Al Qa’ida, this study will suggest additional means of undermining Al Qa’ida. The government should increase dissension between local leaders and Al Qa’ida Central Command. The US government should publicly recognize and highlight the differences between the acquired groups, who originally espouse ambitions such as regime overthrow and Al Qa’ida, which is committed to a pan-Islamic program. Moreover, the government can disrupt communications channels between local leaders and Al Qa’ida central command by utilizing misinformation and flooding information channels, thereby forcing the commanding officers to communicate more frequently with Al Qa’ida Central Command, possibly revealing crucial information. There may be “psychological” tactics that can be employed to generate dissension, to exploit certain aspects of human or group dynamics that would lead to competition, or rebellion. Moreover, there may be certain personality characteristics of the types of individuals employed at each level of organization that can be manipulated. Finally, government efforts should deny jihadist groups the benefit of security vacuum in vulnerable areas; thereby barring the emergence of potential Al Qa’ida partners. Through troop deployment, the US government can deny terrorists the use of vulnerable countries as staging grounds for the attacks in the West.


Chapter 2: Literature Review
Recently, counterterrorist agents and military officers have mounted efforts to combat Al Qa’ida and Bin Laden supporters. However, there is considerable controversy among scholars regarding the structure of Al Qa’ida and therefore, how best to target this formidable foe. The debate regarding the nature of Al Qa’ida’s threat will inevitably impact upon the allocation of influence and resource by the U.S. federal government in the Global War on Terror (GWOT) embarked upon following the September 11, 2001 attacks. The outcome of the bureaucratic turf wars over funding for programs under the new Obama administration will surely define future directions and strategies to confront Al Qa’ida specifically and global terrorism in general. In the introductory chapter, I highlighted the newfound importance of Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers, which lead the groups with which Al Qa’ida has recently merged or with whom it remains associated. Although Al Qa’ida retains its core group and a well-trained terrorist cadre, it has become increasingly engaged with regional affiliates in Egypt, the Sinai Peninsula, Indonesia, and other sites in franchise operations. I. Literature on Al Qa’ida’s Foreign Affiliates Several scholars have investigated the process whereby Al Qa’ida has achieved a broader geographic and operational reach by employing local jihadist groups. These researchers confirm my commentary that such partnerships can provide Al Qa’ida with increased flexibility and offer advantages in stimulating tactical level innovation within particular environments when they are astutely directed by Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. In a report prepared for the Combat Studies Institute, Kalic describes Al Qa’ida as a “modern hydra.” He observes that before the onset of the GWOT, Al Qa’ida functioned as a regional indoctrination and training center for Islamic terrorist organizations. However, he


corroborates my observation that because of the loss of support and training centers in Afghanistan due to Operation Enduring Freedom, Bin Laden was obliged to rely upon outside groups in order to perpetuate Al Qa’ida’s agenda. Kalic suggests that Al Qa’ida’s alliances with Abu Sayyaf, Egyptian Islamic Jihad, Tunisian Combatant Group, and Libyan Islamic Fighting Group have enabled Al Qa’ida to expand its geographic influence and diffuse its organizational structure. He describes the process whereby Al Qa’ida supports local “walk in” Islamic groups that pitch their plans to Al Qa’ida for financial support. These radical groups provide additional reach to Al Qa’ida and expand its operational capability for minimal investment because they can develop indigenous plans and operations based on local situations and observations. Moreover, they allow Al Qa’ida to minimize exposure of its central command structure (Kalic 2005) In a similar vein, Takeyh and Gvosdev have observed that after the destruction of its sanctuary in Afghanistan, Al Qa’ida has remained buoyant by forging foreign alliances. Through this strategy, Al Qa’ida has established a presence in failed states where it believes the US will opt not to risk significant losses associated with urban/guerilla warfare. Al Qa’ida no longer needs a strong state for funding and supplies since it can rely on its franchises in countries like Kashmir, Kosovo, Chechnya, and Palestine (Takeyh and Gvosdev 2002). Riedel avows that the US invasion of Iraq and subsequent efforts to quell sectarian unrest have allowed Al Qa’ida to regroup in the tribal areas of Pakistan, where it has established a new base of operations. Now, Al Qa’ida is once again focused on enlarging its network. Consequently, Al Qa’ida has developed a closer relationship with Kashmiri terrorist groups, like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Muhammad that have a presence there. Moreover, while Al Qa’ida has failed to topple the governments of Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, its attacks against these


when they prove that they no longer need Al Qa’ida’s material or normative support to conduct independent maneuvers. Moreover. indicates that Al Qa’ida has established connections in Europe. with traditional organized crime groups (like Artab Ansari’s [an Indian gangster] network). Al Qa’ida finds another organization that can attain its other goals and leaves this former associate to continue the war on its own.” Due to the adaptability of its mission. Al Qa’ida remains associated with these groups as long as they cannot operate independently. In a similar vein. she avows that Bin Laden has adjusted his objectives over time and describes Al Qa’ida as a “flexible group of ruthless warriors ready to fight on behalf of multiple causes. obliging both entities to adapt. However. with Shia organizations (like Hezbollah). and sometimes unlikely alliances with other jihadist groups (like Jemaah Islamiyah).regimes demonstrate its expanded influence throughout the Middle East. thus. Africa. the plot to destroy ten commercial airliners en route from the United Kingdom to the United States. Mishal and Rosenthal describe Al Qa’ida as a “dune organization” that employs other loosely affiliated organizations to carry out its missions. she suggests that both Egyptian Islamic Jihad and the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan compromised their original mission when they joined forces with Al Qa’ida. or Lebanon in the near future (Riedel 2007). For instance. Riedel suggests that Al Qa’ida may seek a foothold in Gaza. Al Qa’ida can forge broad. She maintains that many organizations will form alliances with groups that have ideologies different from their own. 19 . The affiliated groups may employ a modus operandi. which is not identical to Al Qa’ida’s tactics. Finally. Al Qa’ida need not maintain constant supervision or control over the activities of its old affiliate’s operatives (Mishal and Rosenthal 2005). Stern observes that terrorist groups’ objectives have evolved to ensure their survival. foiled in 2006. and revivalist organizations (like Tablighi Jamaat) (Stern 2003).

II. reputation. equipment.” whereby Al Qa’ida finances terrorist groups with the intention of influencing their strategic activity. they do not reveal why local jihadist groups choose to align with Al Qa’ida. They analyze several possible arrangements. They avow that terrorist groups cannot be self-sustaining and must “engage in the fundamentals of established economic practices” to furnish protection from outside threats. and ideology.” whereby Al Qa’ida allows other groups to use its facilities. offering only its name. strategic mistakes and are more susceptible to counterterrorism offensives than their mother organization. or personnel for a specific purpose and duration and “minority equity investments. Many groups that merge or partner with Al Qa’ida adhere to a program based on the ethnic.Fishman is less worried about Al Qa’ida franchises than other scholars. Desouza and Hengsen provide the most comprehensive analysis of Al Qa’ida’s collaborative activities. including “licensing agreements. He avers that Al Qa’ida offers these franchises few benefits. whereby Al Qa’ida combines with or subsumes another organization. He contends that Al Qa’ida’s franchises are likely to commit rash. He offers Al Qa’ida in Iraq as an example of a group which compromised Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic mission by attacking Muslim civilians and engaging in conflict with other Iraqi insurgent groups (Fishman 2008). 20 . They contend that these interactions are the most complex form of equity engagements that terrorist groups develop to survive in competitive environments and suggest that mergers/acquisitions allow terrorist groups to consolidate their assets to compete more successfully or exploit resources held by other parties (Desouza and Hengsen 2007). Literature on Incentives for Joining Radical Movements A. they describe mergers and acquisitions. Finally. Ideological motivations While these studies analyze Al Qa’ida’s strategy and explain why Al Qa’ida has pursued such arrangements.

They contend that Al 21 . Consequently. she proposes that ideology is a strategic choice made by the organization. few studies investigate the incentives of the local jihadist leaders who adopt Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program and transform their organization into part of Al Qa’ida’s system. One could also envisage that Al Qa’ida is promoting its pan-Islamic vision because it is aware of the magnetism of this dream. Studies regarding why individuals join radical movements may inform our understanding of the motivations of local terrorists leaders who connect with Al Qa’ida’s global enterprise. Della Porta suggests that individuals are persuaded to enlist in underground organizations when they are enticed by its ideology. Jones.sectarian. Unfortunately. many groups grapple with contradictions between national and supranational aims. Consequently. it is a tool for enlarging the potential supporters of the organization. Smith. linguistic. They observe that although Al Qa’ida was initially devoted to fighting the Soviet forces it now espouses more internationalist objectives. She maintains that political organizations often orient their ideology to support recruitment. they must forsake their indigenous agendas to support the global pan-Islamic movement. Al Qa’ida can co-opt local struggles into an evolving network of worldwide jihad by asserting its dedication to an international agenda. Like Stern. and state boundaries in which they arose. She observes that the attention groups pay to adjusting their ideology to circumstance is revealed when they explain and justify their strategies. one might expect that local jihadist leaders subscribe to Al Qa’ida’s global jihad because the idea of establishing an Islamic Caliphate throughout the world is attractive to them. and Weeding validate this line of thought. Upon allying with Al Qa’ida. enemies and allies are described in different terms at different times (Della Porta 1995). In fact. Based on her interpretation.

they concluded that income and/or educational inequalities do not account for terrorism. Sprinzak. Sprinzak. and Weeding 2003). Moreover. They offer Jemaah Islamiyah as an example of an organization that was seduced by Al Qa’ida’s discussion of a pan-Islamic caliphate (Jones. Similarly. Post. rather than local jihad. Al Qa’ida successfully transformed the parochial thinking of these groups through a sophisticated propaganda campaign to orient them towards global. They noticed that these terrorists exhibited a higher rate of religious education. as well as 14 secular terrorists from Fatah al-Islam. They deduced that peer influence and increased social standing were major reasons for joining a terrorist group (Post. other studies suggest that individuals join terrorist networks for psychosocial reasons. He avows that traditionally. Smith. and Denny interviewed 35 incarcerated Middle Eastern extremists from Hamas. and Denny 2003). Islamist groups fought secular Muslim governments either to replace them or to form a separate state. Psychosocial motivations Conversely. Islamic Jihad. Gunaratna also supports this argument. membership in fundamentalist organizations and repeat terrorist acts. and Weinberg observed 80 Palestinian suicide terrorists from 1973 to 2002. Gunaratna 2002). However. As a result. As a consequence of the GWOT and the war in Iraq. They observed that most had a high school education and some had additional schooling and that most came from respected families that supported their activism. they 22 .Qa’ida has improved its media wing to appeal to local jihadist groups in their native language and honor regional customs. and Hezbollah. Al Qa’ida anti-Western curriculum is increasingly alluring (R. Pedahzur. Perliger. global events have provided the context for the new generation to gain exposure to significant ideological training and indoctrination. Consequently. B.

which they perceive to be the optimum strategy to accomplish a sociopolitical goal. Jemaah Islamiyah. the GSPC. He observed that members of terrorist organizations were generally middle-class. and Weinberg 2003).proposed that the terrorists acted out of altruistic motives (devotion to a religious community) and deduced that recruitment could be based on a network of shared social values(Pedahzur. terrorist leaders may have opportunistic motives for securing a spot under Al Qa’ida’s umbrella. Each mode of operation has a per-unit price that 23 . Sagemen found no evidence of pathological narcissism or paranoid personality disorder amongst those who he surveyed. Several academics believe that terrorist action derives from a conscious. and Al Qa’ida. Sandler and Enders contend that terrorists must choose between different strategies and modes of attack based on their perception of “prices” associated with alternative operations. he found that social bonds were the critical element in the process of joining jihad and he suggested that such connections precede ideological commitment (Sageman 2004). calculated decision to execute a particular type of action. Moreover. He sample included expatriate leaders of the Egyptian Islamic Group. educated young men from caring and religious families. These participants in jihad grew up with strong positive values of religion. spirituality and concern for their communities. Strategic/opportunistic motivations Alternatively. On the contrary. rational. Understanding Terror Network is particularly revealing. C. Although his research was biased towards leaders who have come to the public attention. members of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad. Sageman compiled data from public sources on 172 individuals who he identified as members of a global Salafi mujahedeen. Perliger. Marc Sageman’s book.

local jihadist group leaders may be lured by Al Qa’ida’s ideology. First.includes the value of time. the United States and its allies. may unite with Al Qa’ida to guarantee organizational survival. 24 . local jihadist leaders may confederate with Al Qa’ida due to psychosocial influences. access to training facilities. and association with the Al Qa’ida label. while incarcerated together. Hoffman notes that approximately 90 percent of all terrorist groups collapse within a year and only half of the remainder survives another decade. Finally. In this context. he mentions that the Iraq war has sapped local jihadist groups of their most active militants. He further notes that local jihadist cells shed their outlaw status within radical Muslim circles when they have Al Qa’ida’s backing. Thus. who might otherwise be contained or co-opted by local regimes and. one can imagine three different rationales why local jihadist group leaders would affiliate with Al Qa’ida. embracing global jihad may be perceived as a way to control and recruit new group members (Bruce Hoffman 2004). In joining Al Qa’ida. Based on these accounts. these local jihadist leaders may seek concrete benefits such as the provision of financial resources. while training together. local jihadist leaders. He remarks upon long running government offensives that have nearly crushed several terrorist groups. any act executed by a terrorist organization can be perceived as a rational choice (Sandler and Enders 2004). These local jihadist leaders may have developed relationships with Al Qa’ida officials during the Soviet-Afghan war. Based on these observations he suggests that several local jihadist outlets need the Al Qa’ida imprimatur to raise money. Alternatively. Finally. It is possible that these groups take the transnational jihadist challenge seriously because the idea of creating a single Islamic state or reviving the united Caliphate of earlier times is captivating. These affinities may compel local jihadist leaders to liaise with their old compatriots and mutually assist each other in their subsequent struggles. resources and anticipated outcome. by extension. etc.

III. Literature on Terrorist Leadership A. The personality of terrorist leaders While these studies enlighten the discussion regarding incentives for merging or partnering with Al Qa'ida, very little literature directly addresses the role that local jihadist leaders play before or after a merger. However, some researchers have attempted to identify personality traits that enable leaders to attract and maintain large followings. In the 1920s, German sociologist Max Weber defined charismatic leadership as “resting on devotion to the exceptional sanctity, heroism, or exemplary character of an individual person, and of the normative patterns or order revealed or ordained by him.” He suggested that charisma was a personality trait by virtue of which a leader appeared endowed with exceptional power or superhuman competencies. Charismatic leaders gained authority through qualities unique their own, not through positions that they occupied (Weber 1968). Kostrzebski applied Weber’s theory of charismatic authority to examine leadership in the context of Islamic tradition. He contends that a certain model of charismatic politico-religious leadership, first exemplified by Mohammed, the prophet and founder of Islam, is prominent in Islamic history. He notices that in the Islamic world, religious and political leadership is usually embodied in the persona of a single charismatic individual. He cites Mahdi of Sudan, Ayatollah Khomeini, and Osama bin Laden as examples of this archetype. Furthermore, he predicts that this type of charismatic politico-religious leader will appear with greater frequency in the future (Kostrzebski 2002). Similarly, Bergen contends that Bin Laden’s charisma helped fuel an influx of recruits and attracted aspiring jihadists to Afghanistan from Western countries. Moreover, he avows that Bin Laden’s cult of personality prompted various militant Islamic groups to affiliate with Al


Qa’ida. He notes that Bin Laden left operational planning to trusted lieutenants and stood above the fray. Consequently, few operatives received personal audience with him. However, those who went through the vetting procedures and gained access to Bin Laden describe their encounters with the legendary terrorist leader as “beautiful” (Bergen 2006). B. Targeting leadership While these studies suggest that a leader’s charisma can inspire a devoted following, they do not address the role that such leaders play within an organizational framework. While research addressing this topic has been extremely sparse, some scholars have discussed how the arrest or neutralization of a terrorist leader can affect the group’s performance. In a Joint Special Operations University report, Turbiville perceives that the United States has emphasized targeting and eliminating key terrorist leadership since 9/11. He describes the diverse experience of foreign operations against insurgent and terrorist high value targets. Based on several case studies, he concludes that leadership targeting can be effective, particularly when a group depends heavily on a charismatic leader. However, he cautions that operations which target leadership must be integrated into an overall and effective counterinsurgency and counterterrorist strategy and warns that abuses of national and international law and human rights committed in terrorist leadership targeting programs have a negative impact on larger counterinsurgency goals (Turbiville 2007). Langdon, Sarapu, and Wells examined 35 leadership crises to determine what happens to terrorist movements after the loss of a leader. Although they predicted that the assassination of a leader would cause a dramatic change in ideology leading to increased violence, they found that the assassination of a leader often causes the group to fail or disband. Moreover, they observed that the assassination of a leader is more likely to devastate a terrorist group than an arrest. They


suggest that arrested leaders may continue to play an important ideological role by guiding their group from their prison cell (Langdon, Sarapu, and Wells 2004). These studies suggest that targeting leadership could damage a terrorist group by depriving it of effective direction and demoralizing its rank and file members. However, while these analyses intimate that terrorist leaders play an important role in ensuring organizational survival, they do not expose the particular function that terrorist leaders must execute. Thus, this study is valuable since its looks at both the motivations and specific responsibilities of Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers.


The purpose of this study is to evaluate the motivations and responsibilities of Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. As centralized communication nodes within their system. we must understand the strength that resides in its leaders. moderately coupled network of individuals united by a common need and ultimately aligned behind an emergent leader. conducted by operatives capable of inflicting maximum civilian and economic damages on both local and distant targets in pursuit of their extremist goals. By depending upon its commanding officers (the former leaders of local jihadist groups). As such. During negotiations between Al Qa’ida and 28 . Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are held responsible for its success or failure in their region. they have become the main link between Al Qa’ida Central Command and the organization’s operative units. Currently. Al Qa’ida has become a flexible. recently. Moreover. I. Al Qaida’s ability to mete out devastating destruction worldwide has increased as cells have become progressively armed with modern technology. Al Qa’ida has expanded its reach through its affiliations so that it is uniquely positioned to target the West through spectacular attacks designed to inflict mass casualties and damage to the global economy. In fact.Chapter 3: Methodology Al Qa’ida has clearly transformed and evolved in ways described in the introduction. who serve as Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. In order to understand why Al Qa’ida is such a forceful and resilient organization. remains an important security threat. Background: The introductory chapter explained how and why Al Qa’ida relies extensively upon the leaders of regionally focused groups. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers have the ultimate authority over their region and are given wide latitude to run their units within the boundaries of Al Qa’ida’s doctrines. Its terrorist activity. Osama bin Laden.

I theorized that by examining the demographic characteristics of Al 29 . involving discussions regarding financial and capital resources and tactics. Just as managers from the corporate arena trying to integrate newly acquired companies and divisions. commanding officers are influential arbitrators. little is known about the characters. Although these commanding officers play a vital role in expanding the agenda of Al Qa’ida and adding legitimacy to its international campaign. or credentials of these officials. Thus. communicate often and address everyone involved in the deal. do not adequately explain why certain terrorists leaders affiliate with Al Qa’ida and its program of global jihad nor do they reveal the precise role that these officers serve within the Al Qa’ida network once affiliated. they help stimulate interdependency and interaction among their units and other branches of Al Qa’ida. This study is the first to comprehensively examine Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. which consider categories of influence factors and their effect on an individual’s decision to join an Islamic fundamentalist terrorist organization.the potential affiliate. Negotiations are often lengthy processes. focusing primarily on principals like Osama bin Laden. The previous chapter revealed that literature on the role of leadership in terror networks has remained limited in scope. it will contribute to the bank of information and stimulate vital discourse on the composition and function of Al Qa’ida today. Finally. because academic studies to date have not focused on Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. researchers have overlooked them. The surveys reviewed. so too must the commanding officers that merge their organization with Al Qa’ida prepare accordingly (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2006). plan ahead. Past studies have ignored important hierarchical considerations. Unfortunately. Commanding officers also ensure that an operative’s incentives to supply effort are not diminished and mediate conflict within their unit when the affiliation begins and as it matures. motivations.

Qa’ida’s operatives, such as age, educational background, years of religious training, religious affiliation, and by evaluating these operatives for their military backgrounds (e.g. war experiences/participation in the Afghanistan conflict), incarceration/prison time, migration patterns etc, I would be able to detect recognizable patterns that characterize these terrorist executives. The patterns that I observed would help me answer two critical questions: 1) What motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida’s and its pan-Islamic agenda? 2) What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible affiliates with Al Qa’ida?

II. Assessing Q1: The previous chapter outlined three explanations for why individuals join terrorist organizations. Some researchers suggest that terrorists follow a strategic logic and are inspired by opportunism; they perceive armed combat at the most effective way to generate significant governmental concessions (Sandler and Enders 2004, Bruce Hoffman 2004). Others scholars suggest that ideology plays an important role in pushing militants of some militants toward terrorism (Della Porta 1995, Jones, Smith, and Weeding 2003, R. Gunaratna 2002). Finally, some academics claim that individuals join terrorist organizations due to strong solidarity bonds derived from interpersonal relations (Post, Sprinzak, and Denny 2003, Pedahzur, Perliger, and Weinberg 2003, Sageman 2004). Since prior studies have not discussed what incentives provoke local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida, I assumed that the motivations for local jihadist leaders to join Al Qa’ida’s global jihad were similar to the motivations for individuals to


join terrorist movements. Thus, to address my first question, I developed the following hypotheses: H11. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to opportunistic motives H21. Al Qa’ida commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to ideological motives H31. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due psychosocial motives H11 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers aligned with Al Qa’ida due to opportunistic motives) reflects the observation that relatively undersized, less powerful indigenous assemblies of terrorists can invigorate their organization by aligning with Al Qa’ida. In recent years, Al Qa’ida has demonstrated unusual resilience and international reach. It has exhibited a complexity, agility, and global scope that is unrivaled by any previous terrorist organization. Its fluid operational style, based on a common mission statement and shared objectives rather than standard-operating procedures has ensured its success (Stern 2003). Al Qa’ida has a remarkable ability to attract membership by relying upon a web of informal relations with various Islamic groups to gain access to operational collaborators and individuals to execute attacks. Currently, Al Qa’ida’s recruitment process seems to be more a matter of joining than being solicited. Moreover, the Salafi message, which has been disseminated over the Internet by Al Qa’ida’s media division, has attracted numerous members of alienated diasporas (sometimes second and third generation immigrants) who feel isolated from their communities and seek to belong to a group (Bruce Hoffman 2003). By associating with Al Qa’ida, local jihadist groups can shore up popular support and amp up recruitment.


Al Qa’ida’s strength may also lie in its impressive coffers; Al Qa’ida has amassed billions of dollars by building a strong network of financiers and operatives who are frugally minded and business savvy. Moreover, Al Qa’ida’s finances are often hidden in legitimate and illegitimate businesses; Bin Laden is reputed to own approximately eighty companies around the world. Al Qa’ida has learned to effectively leverage the global financial system of capital markets by utilizing small financial transfers, under regulated Islamic banking networks and informal transfer systems throughout the world. Thus, it is difficult to choke off funds destined for Al Qa’ida (Basile 2004). Consequently, Al Qa’ida can grant money to local terrorist groups that present promising plans for attacks that serve Al Qa’ida’s general goals. All terrorist organizations must engage in attacks to maintain support, to buttress their organizational integrity, and to foster their continued existence. Associating with Al Qa’ida ensures that a group has access to the necessary financial resources to conduct attacks. In a sense, Al Qa’ida operates like a large multi-national company and the “product” that it exports is terrorism. One must acknowledge the economic principles that underlie Al Qa’ida’s success, that of supply and demand, limited resources, productivity etc. Finally, Al Qa’ida has successfully exploited the technological tools of globalization to communicate with various audiences. Al Qa’ida has launched an effective advertising campaign worldwide using the latest technology and psychology to reach their desired addressees. Al Qa’ida uses mobile phones, text messaging, instant messaging, websites, email, blogs, and chat rooms for administrative tasks, fund-raising, research, logistical coordination of attacks, and recruitment. When Al Qa’ida’s media division airs its hostage videos and films of terrorist attacks or their aftermath, it provides the organization with the oxygen of publicity necessary to sustain itself. Unless civilian populations are made aware of terrorist acts and cowed into fear by


spectacular attacks.such assaults. I assumed that opportunism was the primary motivation for merging with Al Qa’ida (coded as 2). I searched for evidence of terrorist group decline based on Cronin’s criteria. The timelines featured important events in their life cycle (e. Consequently. Al Qa’ida cannot influence the governments that it targets. and the NEFA foundation.). I judged that the local jihadist leader. it is important to remember that Al Qa’ida is a unique terrorist organization. If there was 33 . Moreover. would affiliate with Al Qa’ida if he desperately needed to give his organization a second wind. etc. In considering this hypothesis. the Institute for Conflict Management in New Delhi. to assess H11. Terrorist groups that align with Al Qa’ida can benefits from Al Qa’ida’s media and propaganda expertise. the founding.g. Information was gathered from various international security think tanks including the Center for Defense Information. the onset of series of attacks. these materials are seen by potential sympathizers who may be brought into the folds of terrorism itself (Blanchard 2006). if there was strong evidence that the group was in a state of imminent decline immediately prior to its merger with A Qa’ida. In fact. Consequently. the Council of Foreign Relations. 90% of terrorist organizations have a life span of less than one year. most modern terrorist groups do not last long. Cronin lists seven broad explanations for the decline and ending of terrorist groups: 1) the capture or killing of the leader 2) failure to transition to the next generation 3) achievement of the group’s aims 4) transition to a legitimate political process 5) undermining of popular support 6) repression 7) transition from terrorist to other forms of violence. To do so. the beginning of a government offensive. as a rational actor. I developed timelines for each organization included in this study. the Jamestown Foundation. More than one dynamic can be responsible for their decline (Cronin 2006).

I considered the assessment of Al Qa’ida’s ideology published by MI5. and statements. I relied predominantly upon newspaper articles published in both the domestic and international 34 .” most notably Shiite sects. More information on statistical hypothesis testing follows in the chapter on data analysis and results. the largest denomination and is violently opposed to other Islamic denominations that it regards as “infidel. To perform this appraisal. To execute this assessment. which they had published regarding their ideology.”(Al Qa’ida is an anti-Western organization) 2) Al Qa’ida aims to establish a caliphate based on an extreme interpretation of Sunni Islam. Al Qa’ida’s ideology is centered upon three key points: 1) Al Qa’ida attributes the obstacles encountered by the Islamic world to the JewishChristian apostate Muslim alliance. I determined that opportunism was the secondary motivation for merging with Al Qa’ida (coded as 1). Al Qa’ida would like to replace all existing governments with a supranational caliphate and impose a strict and exclusive government based on their interpretation of Sunni Islam.some data that suggested that the group had experienced minor setbacks. I considered the leader’s prior involvement in Islamic societies. the UK’s security intelligence agency. or anti-Shia agendas. (Al Qa’ida is a pan-Islamic organization) 3) Al Qa’ida promotes violence against other Muslim denominations as well as nonMuslims. Al Qa’ida’s supports a narrow interpretation of Sunnism. religious education. to evaluate H21. pan-Islamic. I determined if the local jihadist leaders who affiliated with Al Qa’ida espoused anti-Western. (Al Qa’ida is anti-Shia) (Al Qaida's Ideology) Thus. According to MI5. Al Qa’ida strongly opposes Western influences and ideologies that it perceives as “un-Islamic. To assess H21 (Al Qa’ida commanding officers were inspired by Al Qa’ida’s ideology).

press and. communiqués. pan-Islamic. Countless numbers of Afghanis joined the Islamic resistance. statements. While some arrived to provide money and weapons to support the fight. which was organized into several native mujahedeen organizations with headquarters in Peshawar. yet also expressed anti-Western. if the leader seemed more committed to local programs. eager to put the Afghan jihad in the past. In December 1979. and elsewhere 35 . fearing the collapse of communism in Central Asia. Finally. I considered operatives’ involvement in four episodes that served to rally jihadists around Al Qa’ida principals and fostered the development of social bonds between mujahedeen figures. where available. the Pakistani government ordered the closure of Arab mujahedeen offices in the country and threatened official deportation to any illegal foreign fighters who attempted to remain in Pakistan. Thus countless numbers of mujahedeen veterans who had formed tight bonds with their fellow fighters returned to locations in the Middle East. However. to assess H31 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to prior social network affiliations). I resolved that ideological alignment was the primary motivation for joining Al Qa’ida (coded as 2). Soon thereafter. or antiShia sympathies. the Soviet Union launched a military invasion to restore Soviet control over neighboring Afghanistan. Abdullah Azzam and the Saudi billionaire. If I found that the leader placed more emphasis on anti-Western. operatives from foreign countries began trickling into Pakistan. I concluded that ideological alignment was a secondary motivation (coded as 1). or anti-Shia goals than regional initiatives. speeches and other primary source materials authored by the leaders themselves. others enlisted in the growing corps of “holy warriors” under the lead of the legendary Palestinian Sheikh Dr. However in January 1993. Osama bin Laden. North Africa. pan-Islamic. Pakistan.

Only 58 sentences were given and most of the defendants were released after three years in prison. Most jihadists rallied around Ayman alZawahiri. he was treated as a special guest. and agriculture (Gunaratna 36 . President Sadat of Egypt died after being shot by gunmen who opened fire as he watched an aerial display at a military parade. several former prisoners left Egypt (Wright 2007). Moreover. they may have decided to reunite with Zawahiri and the other jihadists with whom they were imprisoned. who became a spokesman for the defendants because of his eloquence and knowledge of foreign languages. Following President Sadat's assassination.” these former combatants may have opted to rejoin Al Qa’ida. he convinced several Saudi businessmen to invest in Sudan and several of his brothers and Jeddah merchants did invest in Sudanese real estate. The events that unfolded subsequent to the assassination of Anwar Sadat may have played a similar role in forging social bonds amongst jihadists. However. After being released. where the new regime had raised an Islamic banner. In prison. The second trial consisted of 302 defendants charged with conspiracy and being members of the illegal Tanzim al-Jihad. Osama bin Laden journeyed to the Sudan. Many focused on mobilizing the population to overthrow the government. Two trials took place. in subsequent years. The first was held in camera and consisted of 24 suspects directly involved in the assassination. When presented with the opportunity to reunite with their “brethren. despite the prosecution demand of 299 death sentences the judges gave out none. these jihadists developed strategies for establishing an Islamist state and established important personal connections. In the Sudan. After the Soviet-Afghan War. In 1981. who appeased his hosts by mobilizing construction equipment and bankrolling construction projects. farming.(Wright 2007). Ultimately. more than 700 people were rounded up.

Bin Laden set up numerous training camps in the region. or spent time in the Sudan before 1996 or Afghanistan during the reign of the Taliban. His second presence in Afghanistan attracted many mujahedeen to return there (P.e. This treatment was based upon my observation that not every participant in these episodes. requiring women to wear head-to-toe veils. By September 1996. I assumed that social network affiliation was a permissive factor (i. Before its ouster by U. banning television. 37 . L. local jihadist leaders may have established social connections with Bin Laden in Afghanistan before the 9/11 attacks and the Global War on Terror. The Taliban rule was characterized by a strict form of Islamic law. he could rekindle these ties. and embarked upon his jihad against America. disillusioned with existing ethnic Tajik and Uzbek leaders. Subsequently. a precondition which set the stage for the merger). During this time he established links to Sudanese Islamists as well as fundamentalists in Somalia and Yemen.2002). and jailing men whose beards were deemed too short. participated in the Sadat trial. he established residency in Afghanistan.-led forces in 2001.S. became an Al Qa’ida associate. Finally. they do not explain why these particular leaders aligned with Al Qa’ida. The bonds that these jihadists formed prior to the US invasion may have sparked their cooperation with Al Qa’ida after the onset of the Global War on Terror. Kabul. the Taliban had captured Afghanistan’s capital. while social affiliations may animate a small minority to engage in Al Qa’ida’s program of global jihad. When considering the relevance of social network affiliations. although subject to the same or similar influences. a large part of the Taliban’s support came from Afghanistan's Pashtun community. Bergen 2001). As ethnic Pashtuns. the Taliban controlled some 90 percent of Afghanistan's territory. However. I determined whether the group member was involved in the Soviet-Afghan war. Thus. After Bin Laden fled the Sudan in 1996 as a result of international pressure. In the years after departing from the Sudan.

Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly logistical role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida H32. financial. or legal expertise. Operational commanders are primarily responsible for conducting operations (including “spectacular attacks”).Unless the local jihadist leader was clearly not incentivized by opportunism or ideological concerns. They have vocational. They direct the group’s bureaucratic development and organize recruitment drives. developing military tactics. Logistical leaders are accountable for the administrative and financial activities of their units. They 38 . Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly ideological role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida. I developed another three hypothesis: H12. or foreign language competencies. or ideological. Assessing Q2: To answer my second question (What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible merges or partners with Al Qa’ida?). ideological/media leaders are responsible for expressing the organizational culture and philosophy of their group through media activity and possibly fatwa as well as personal interactions with their operatives. Finally. and running training camps. I considered social network affiliation to be a secondary motivation rather than a primary motivation. I posited that Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers would fall into one of three primary leadership categories after the affiliation occurred: operational. III. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly operational role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida H22. They have military experience or formation and/or expertise in weapons or explosives. Consequently. logistical.

I assessed the commanding officer’s operational.have granted interviews. published books or articles. this estimation would have been biases. I coded him as a strong operational leader (3). and released audio or videotapes. If the leader demonstrated at least two of the factors in the operational leadership category. If he demonstrated one of the factors in this category.and post-merger. I did not compare leadership performance across categories because different measures were used to evaluate leadership faculty for each category. Instead. logistic. To determine the role played by the commanding officer. I compared leadership performance pre. and ideological leadership abilities before and after the merger. Thus. considered the following variables: Type of leader Operational Logistic Ideological Media activity Military/Front line experience Administrative/financial activities Weapons/explosives training Indications Training camp participation Recruitment experience Organizational restructuring Media innovations Involvement in ideological transitions Operational innovations Involvement in major attacks Vocational skills Language skills Fatwa issues Documented political or religious guidance proffered to operatives After analyzing these variables. I coded him as an average operational leader 39 .

since START has not evaluated this data and cannot assure the reliability of the information provided. Developing the Universe of Cases To develop my universe of cases. If he exhibited none of these factors. I conducted further analyses to determine its accuracy by confirming with at least two separate. I used the same secondary and primary source materials listed earlier in this chapter. If the leader was not involved with the organization at the time. To perform this evaluation. However. I coded him as a weak operational leader (1). a business and technology consultancy. The International Herald Tribune. I coded him as such (0). and The Washington Post. IV. developed by the Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT). The New York Times. I eliminated several from my study based on the following criteria using open source materials. and START (About START).(2). which is now available to the public through an agreement between MIPT. including reports available through the Jamestown Foundation. I considered two questions: 1) With whom has Al Qa’ida affiliated? 2) Who led these organizations? To answer the first question. the Library of Congress. the Federation of American Scientists. to collect information on terrorist groups and key leaders of terrorist groups. A discussion of the comparison of leadership performance pre-and post-merger follows in Chapter 5. the Council on Foreign Relations. I used the same criteria to assess logistic and ideological leadership. 40 . From 2004 to 2008 the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security funded the creation and maintenance of the Terrorism Knowledge Base. I used the Terrorist Organization Profiles (TOPs) Database included on the website of the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terror (START). non-partisan sources. MIPT collaborated with Detica. I also used these sources to determine the date that the affiliation commenced. DHS. Although the TOPs database listed thirty-six Al Qa’ida allies.

a strong affiliation (partnership). Those groups that I coded as weak affiliates received financing or training from Al Qa’ida.1) The group must have been engaged in operations independently of Al Qa’ida (the group must not be a front for Al Qa’ida My study considers the deliberate decision to affiliate with Al Qa’ida. In return. contact with its network of financiers. for example by contributing to its recruitment efforts or operations in Afghanistan or Iraq. thereby potentially compromising their local agenda. whereby they supported Al Qa’ida. or a weak affiliation (collaboration). Al Qa’ida aided the local organization. I separately examined al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya 41 . and media specialists. perhaps by providing access to operatives. assets. After performing this assessment. but did not actively conduct operations outside their region nor did they contribute to Al Qa’ida’s other initiatives in any meaningful way. the organization must have developed a symbiotic relationship with Al Qa’ida. or opportunities for training. 2) The group must not have renounced violence I did not include political movements that supported Al Qa’ida’s aims because armed groups operate differently than other clandestine non-violent organizations. I coded each affiliation as a merger. 3) While not grounds for immediate disqualification. or logisticians. Leaders who head front organizations for Al Qa’ida do not make a pre-meditated choice to cooperate with Al Qa’ida. I determined that twenty-one groups conformed to these the above standards. an official denial of connections with Al Qa’ida should induce caution (and invoke more thorough analysis of the relationship) Based on my evaluation. informants. To qualify as a merger. intelligence. the group must have formally announced that this arrangement existed through a communiqué broadcast to a wide audience. To qualify as a strong affiliation. Finally.

I generated a list of 41 Al Qa’ida field commanders as study subjects. others experienced numerous leadership transitions (ex. I included a detailed investigation of the GAI in Chapter 7. Al Qa’ida in Iraq). and activities. In a few instances. In order to understand what motivates certain groups to align with Al Qa’ida. I did not consider Al Qa’ida’s regional staff officers. I made this distinction because I was interested in investigating the motivations and role of those leaders who came from outside Al Qa’ida’s orbit but became involved in its program later in their career. Selection of Study Subjects My prior discussion focused on terrorist organizations that are overtly in pursuit of Salafi objectives. Based on this data. in which case I treated both as leaders. operations. who coordinate and supervise the execution of plans. Next. I considered all of the commanding officers of each group from the onset of their relationship with Al Qa’ida to the present. Selection of my study subjects/study 42 . Thus. I included a leader who was had not actively cooperated with Al Qa’ida if this leader had communicated with Al Qa’ida Central Command and if his successors vigorously pursued relations after his term. namely the establishment of an Islamic state. Jemaah Islamiya. I used open source materials including reports by non-partisan research institutions and newspaper articles. V. Some organizations had more than one nominal chief at times. both past and present.(GAI). In performing this assessment. Asbat al-Ansar). the Taliban. While some groups did not experience any leadership transitions after they partnered with Al Qa’ida (ex. but who never had a vested interest in a particular local jihadist group. a group that did not affiliate with Al Qa’ida as a control group. I identified the leaders (past and present) of each of these 21 groups. it is equally important to comprehend what deters other groups from associating with Al Qa’ida.

Problems Regarding Information Gathering To conduct this assessment. VI. Although I eliminated all non-Muslim terrorists from the study sample. terrorist organizations will not take credit for successful operations for fear of provoking the government to conduct a counterterrorism response. bias was introduced by the actual leader interviews and communications that can be considered well-orchestrated propaganda 43 . I included Muslims fighting for the liberation of Kashmir and those fighting an internal insurgency in Central Asia. I did include many groups that were deeply invested in domestic uprising and urban warfare against their own governments. there may have been ascertainment bias introduced by the difficulties accurately assessing leaders’ competence in organizing and conducting important attacks. This grouping is just an assemblage of small illegal clusters centered around charismatic preachers. who are fighting a jihad that involves complex social. Often. Moreover. which exists in Morocco. and political grievances and who may be less committed to the principles of Salafism and thus. I did not include the amorphous social movement. I did not include Palestinian groups. economic. In addition. the data from this study is inevitably biased towards information about those organizations and individuals who are regarded as more visible and who appear publicly with greater frequency. For instance. Moreover. less magnetized by Al Qa’ida pan-Islamic agenda. I used sources from the public domain.sample was based on demonstrated and documented overt commitment to the principles of Salafism and all of the organizations that I studied were well defined with leadership that supported terrorist operations. Because clandestine organizations are often very secretive about their members and operations. In contrast. Salafia Jihadia. I chose to limit my sample to in order to reveal certain patterns that might not have otherwise emerged with less stringent exclusion criteria.

what motivates them. I assessed the role he played before and after aligning with Al Qa’ida. My observations regarding 44 .exercises that may not appropriately reflect the leader’s true motivations and ideology. who merged his organization with Al Qa’ida despite the objections of the GSPC’s former leader Hassan AlBanna (Guidère 2007). These sources included: government documents. Case Study Finally. and Internet articles. Relevance By seeking to understand who Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are. I arrived at a better understanding of how to recognize and predict who may become Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers and how to anticipate and counter their efforts. When assessing the data. press and scholarly articles. I completed one comprehensive case study (in addition to my detailed discussion of the GAI). Next. VII. as mentioned earlier. As a result. formerly the Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat (GSPC). leader of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb. I investigated Abdelmalek Droukdal. empirical data about Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers was collected and analyzed. and how they aligned their own local jihadist group with Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program. I used the materials available to me to try to best collect information about and understand the leaders and organizations that I profiled. I considered the source of information and its degree of reliability. These concerns withstanding. VIII. I considered Droukdal’s prior experiences and the history of the GSPC to determine why he embraced Al Qa’ida’s internationalist agenda rather than remaining committed strictly to jihad in Algeria. With the aforementioned limitations in mind. a comparison of leadership performance across categories was impossible.

This realization.motivations will serve two purposes.g. Based on our knowledge of Al Qa’ida’s strategy. Secondly. my analyses may suggest that our battles in the Middle East and our policies regarding imprisonment are creating gathering places for global Salafi jihadists. The fundamentalists who form interpersonal bonds through these venues may be persuaded by Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic partisans to become the next-generation of Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers in locations scattered across the globe. by understanding the role that Al Qa’ida commanding officers play. Finally. they will help develop a model to identify local jihadist leaders who may merge or partner with Al Qa’ida in the future. has strong implications for US foreign policy in the post 9/11 era and greater attention should be paid to identifying such settings. we can better allocate resources to address this threat. are they focused on promoting their message through propaganda or are they intent on conducting more attacks?). if proven. we can better understand Al Qa’ida’s overall strategy (e. 45 . First.

lost several of its top officials. Most of researchers who I discussed in my literature review perceive Al Qa’ida’s strategy of franchising as a new development. I have classified the affiliation according to its current state. Jordan. the evidence indicates that Al Qa’ida’s strategy is not new: it has operated like an international franchise by providing financial and logistical support. To assess the date of the affiliation. Despite the popularity of this argument. 2001. in every case. I considered the development of Al Qa’ida’s affiliation over a period of time from 1991 until 2005 (Table 1). that a cumulative effect occurs. The investigation of Al Qa’ida’s patterns of affiliation with respect to time is very interesting and indeed. Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: An Evolving Network Although the purpose of my study was to investigate Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. Since 2001. the relationship between Al Qa’ida and its affiliate has strengthened or weakened (such is the case with the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.Chapter 4: Universe of Cases I. and failed to overthrow the governments in Egypt. who consolidated relations with Al Qa’ida. They contend that after September 11. and Abu Sayyaf. I determined the year that the group first received or conveyed assistance to Al Qa’ida. It is important to keep in mind. First. who diluted relations with Al Qa’ida). and Saudi Arabia. Although I have recorded the first year in which the group cooperated with Al Qa’ida. since a group does not merely affiliate with Al Qa’ida and then sever all relations. Al Qa’ida has transformed into an international enterprise with like-minded local representatives loosely connected to a central ideological base (Riedel 2007). Al Qa’ida was deprived of a “state within a state” in Afghanistan. they argue. therefore. I also observed noticeable patterns while developing my universe of cases. To address this concern. this relationship has perpetuated to the present day. surprising. as well as name recognition 46 . In many instances.

Al Qa’ida first seriously affiliated with other terrorist organizations in 1991. thereby threatening the security of Saudi Arabia. oil rich state of Kuwait on August 1. For Bin Laden. tired of Bin Laden’s critiques. 47 . Somalia. when one considers the historical context. Bin Laden had the opportunity to interact with other terrorist units to expand Al Qa’ida’s terrorist groups operating in such diverse places as the Philippines. However. Kashmir and Iraq. This relationship strengthened throughout the nineties. 1990. After the Saudi government. These operatives also offered advice to their Somali counterparts on how to set up social services for the local population. Algeria. this observation is not nearly as stunning. during his time in the Sudan. Turabi and Bin Laden engaged in a convenient symbiotic relationship. Al Qa’ida linked up with Al-Ittihaad al-Islami (AIAI) and Abu Sayyaf. where he was warmly welcomed by Hassan al-Turabi. Consequently. Bin Laden could operate freely in the Sudan and in return he would invest millions of dollars in the desperately poor country. While Bin Laden was situated in the Sudan. Tajikistan. Yemen. Afghanistan. 1990. Eritrea. this was as perturbing and foreboding an event as the Russian invasion of Afghanistan that had occurred a decade earlier. Bin Laden had immediately volunteered his services and those of his holy volunteers but the Saudis did not take this offer seriously (Gunaratna 2002). After Hussein’s forces invaded the small. he departed for the Sudan. On August 7. Bin Laden perceived this intrusion as part of a larger Western design to dominate the whole Arab and Muslim world. effectively put him under house arrest. He was able to send Al Qa’ida operatives to Somalia in 1991-1992 to liaise with their leaders and then help AIAI organize itself militarily. As a result of the Sudanese government’s hospitality and support. Chechnya. the first US troops were dispatched to Saudi Arabia as part of Operation Desert Shield. for years. Bin Laden organized training camps at which hundred of his followers were tutored in paramilitary tactics as revealed in the previous chapter. In this year. the leader of the National Islamic Front.

including some of his brothers. where their transactions would go unnoticed and in its infrastructure projects. By 1991. if successful. the US military. while residing in the Sudan.Bin Laden ramped up his assistance to the Somali terrorists after the Bush administration sent US peacekeeping troops to Somalia in 2002. between a thousand and two thousand 48 . my data indicates that Al Qa’ida did not engage another affiliate until 1996. which sought to pursue a more fundamentalist battle against the Philippine authorities than the Moro National Liberation Front. Soon thereafter. Bin Laden convinced several Saudi businessmen. While occupied with these financial negotiations. Moreover. many of whom would be employed by these Arabic executives. would next march into Southern Sudan and then into other Islamic countries(Gunaratna 2002). he broadcast a fatwa in which he avowed that having already taken over the Persian Gulf area and now encroaching upon Somalia. which would elicit support from the Sudanese population. Moreover a number of ASG members had fought in Afghanistan in the 1980s (Rogers 2004). Thus. After associating with these groups. Instead. Muhammad Jamal Khalifah to support the Abu Sayyaf Group. their parent organization. he persuaded his brother in law. From 1991 to 1996. Bin Laden exploited a cache of trustworthy warriors who he could rely upon to cultivate his vision of global jihad. Al Qa’ida was preoccupied with other pursuits and could not devote energy towards developing such high-maintenance relations. Bin Laden probably saw the struggle in the Philippines as an opportunity to open a second front for his organization without becoming embroiled in the conflicts in the Middle East. Bin Laden focused his efforts on other missions like determining how best to attack US forces in Somalia. Concurrently. he attempted to centralize the core of Al Qa’ida’s operations and develop its human resources as discussed in Chapter 1. to invest in the country’s moribund financial institutions.

Bergen 2001). once again. Al Qa’ida engaged 15 of its 21 affiliates. Mullah Muhammad Omar sent a delegation to assure Bin Laden that the Taliban would be honored to protect him because of his role in the jihad against the Soviets (Gunaratna 2002). L. He turned his attention to exotic weaponry and weapons of mass destruction.members of Al Qa’ida converged upon the Sudan and within three years. Bin Laden was able to function unimpeded. Bin Laden began to focus. Finally. 1996. He also sought to acquire weapons for these militants. These communiqués served to attract the attention of various local jihadist leaders. Having obtained sanctuary. Given this stable and secure environment. Thus. Bin Laden and his cadre were engrossed by other concerns and did not focus on developing external relations with other jihadist groups. Bin Laden issued a slew of radical pronouncements beginning with a call to arms against the continued American military presence in Arabia on August 23. no affiliations were observed between 1991 and 1996. who left the Sudan to return to his familiar stamping grounds in Afghanistan. Simultaneously some members of the group undertook the massive task of writing the Encyclopedia of the Afghan Jihad. on widening his movement. By 1996. which became the modern world’s first jihadist state. Bin Laden knew Afghanistan well and greatly admired the Taliban religious warriors who had taken control over much of the country. hundreds of Afghan Arabs engaged in fighting in Bosnia (P. attracting Muslim militants to a country. To 49 . a multi-volume series detailing everything the Afghan Arabs had learned in the jihad against the Soviets. As a result of this multitude of tasks. From Afghanistan. During this time. it is not surprising that between 1996 and 2001. Bin Laden had set up a number of military camps in the north. Upon Bin Laden’s arrival. intense pressure had been placed on the Sudanese government by the United States and Egypt to expel Bin Laden.

he probably did not rely extensively upon the leaders of these organizations. in the years before the September 11. According to this Word Islamic Front manifesto. is an obligation for every Muslim who is able to do so in any country. In addition to Bin Laden and EIJ’s Ayman al-Zawahiri. in 1998. and Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan. 2001 attacks. Thus. he needed the backing of religious scholars and the clerical cover to call for a real global jihad. While Bin Laden was well read in the Koran. members included the head of the violent faction of Egypt’s Gama’a al Islamiyya. the establishment of the IIF can clearly be interpreted as an effort by Al Qa’ida to expand its battle against Western influence. Amidst this background. Laden convened conferences of several Afghan ulema.supplement this strategy. whether civilians or military. In addition to its formal alliances through the IIF. 50 . The clerics who Bin Laden summoned also had acquaintances with jihadists beyond Afghanistan who they could introduce to Bin Laden (Bergen 2001). However. and the head of Bangladesh’s Jihad Movement. In part. before 2001. we hereby give all Muslims the following judgment: the judgment to kill and fight Americans and their allies. These sequential steps were part of Bin Laden’s plan to expand his multi-national terrorist campaign. Later the IIF was expanded to include the Pakistani jihadist organizations Lashkar-eTaiba. one observes a surge of new Al Qa’ida affiliates. he was not a religious scholar. this is due to the fact that in 1998 Bin Laden created the International Islamic Front for Jihad against the Jews and Crusaders (IIF). the secretary general of the Pakistani religious party known as the Jamiat-ul-Ulema-e-Islam. an anti-Shia sectarian party (Carafano 2005). “in order to obey the Almighty. Bin Laden’s organization nurtured ties with a variety of other armed jihadist groups. Harkat-ul-Mujahideen.” Based on this quotation.

partnerships. 51 . Firstly. Bin Laden had to engineer a colossal transformation of his organization from a more or less unitary. Whereas before Al Qa’ida had a distinct center of gravity. near bureaucratic entity to a fluid movement tenuously bound by a loosely networked transnational constituency (i. and command-and-control nucleus in Afghanistan were destroyed and uprooted. after 9/11. After 2001. There are two explanations for this observation. Bin Laden elected to strengthen existing affiliations rather than pursue new ones. As elaborated upon in Chapter 1.e. As stated in the introduction. are built up through mergers. Aggressive US and allied efforts impeded Al Qa’ida’s ability to do anything. temporarily crippling it. characterized by semiautonomous cells that are horizontally and vertically integrated into the centralized command structure. To more easily engineer this metamorphosis. after 2001 and the onset of the Global War on Terror. Groups such as the Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat and Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad were brought further into Al Qa’ida’s folds. few can deny the United States and its allies achieved progress in the first phase of the Global War on Terror. Osama Bin Laden was compelled to makeover his organization. infrastructure. from an actual center to a virtual network) (Bruce Hoffman 2004). operational bases. Al Qa’ida aims to establish itself as a complex organization with a flexible structure in order to preserve control over specifically identified strategic operations while offering cells a degree of autonomy in local and regional operations. complex organizations.Contrary to popular belief. Thus. be it to plan attacks or to align with other jihadist groups. and collaborations (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2006). Al Qa’ida has not enlisted many new affiliates. the dearth of new Al Qa’ida affiliates seems puzzling given what scholars perceive to be Al Qa’ida’s organizational strategy. Al Qa’ida’s training camps.

However. began to instruct Zarqawi regarding tactics and specific theater-of-war concerns.Moreover. he urged Zarqawi to prepare for a precipitous American military withdrawal from Iraq. Lebanon. prior to 2005. who had become his commanding officers. Zawahiri reprimanded al-Zarqawi for indiscriminate attacks on Shias. Nowadays. “Iraq’s preeminent utility has been a useful side show” – an effective means to sidetrack American military forces and divert US attention while Al Qa’ida and its affiliates make inroads and strike elsewhere. For instance. For instance. in 2004. Israel. For example. and Egypt (Michael 2007). terror attacks 52 . for establishing a post-US Islamist emirate governed by a coalition of Islamic groups. 2005. the Uzbek fighters associated with the Islamic Jihad Union have supported fighting in South Waziristan against the Pakistani government and US forces hunting Al Qa’ida fugitives (Steinberg 2008). Ayman Zawahiri. In fact. Bruce Hoffman has suggested that for Al Qa’ida. Moreover. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. beheading of hostages. Al Qa’ida and its affiliates can conduct attacks in countries that are venerable sources of Bin Laden’s antagonism or where an opportunity has presented itself. in a letter dated July 9. who had become Bin Laden’s second-in command. was responsible for developing his own strategy and operations. Additionally. Al Qa’ida has exploited the Iraqi occupation for rousing propaganda and as a recruitment tool for the global jihadist cause. the leader of Tawhid. Another observable and notable trend is that the number of affiliates that Al Qa’ida enrolled has increased since the onset of the war in Iraq in 2003. Bin Laden and Al Qa’ida Central Command relied more heavily and interacted more frequently with the leaders of these groups. including Shias. Al Qa’ida now teams up with terrorist groups who can send foreign jihadists to Iraq where they conduct guerilla warfare against the America and British troops. and lack of concern for public support. Jordan. and for maintaining the momentum of an Islamist victory by expanding operations into Syria.

In the aftermath of this transition. include the 2004 bombings against Madrid’s commuter trains. the 2005 bombings against London’s public transport system. it is interesting to consider the geographic distribution of Al Qa’ida’s affiliates (Figure 2). the American forces went into Lebanon. Pakistan). France fought a war in Algeria and British and French forces invaded Egypt. Egypt Uzbekistan. These regions have a history of conflict with the West. Tunisia) and Southern Asia (namely. when colonial empires began to retreat. according to statistics released by the US government’s National Counterterrorism Center. II. Algeria. Lebanon. One can anticipate that the majority of affiliates would hail from the Core Arab states and Maghreb Arab states.around the world tripled in 2004. over forty percent of the 21 affiliates are based in the Core Arab states (Iraq. Afghanistan. Samuel Huntington observed that after World War II. For instance. and the 2007 terrorist attacks in Algiers (Bruce Hoffman 2004). Notable incidents conducted by or with the assistance of Al Qa’ida’s affiliates since the beginning of the Iraq war. The warfare between Arabs and the West culminated in 1990 when the United States sent a massive army to the Persian Gulf to defend some Arab countries against aggression by Saddam Hussein The Gulf War left some Arabs feeling humiliated and resentful of the West’s military presence in the Persian Gulf (Huntington 1992). The other large clusters come from the Maghreb (Morocco. the 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot to detonated liquid explosive carried on board from the United Kingdom to the US and Canada. Al Qa’ida Affiliates: The Geographic Distribution Having assessed the development of Al Qa’ida’s affiliations over time. Libya. 53 . Later. conflicts along the fault line between western and Arab Islamic civilizations frequently erupted. The smaller clusters come from Southeast Asia and Northeast Africa. Arab nationalism and then Islamic fundamentalism strongly manifested. Considering the sample as a whole. and Yemen).

For those countries resisting foreign dominance. Since 1996. Turkmenistan. Islam can provide a medium of cultural nationalism that is defiant and self-assuring.These struggles had a profound effect on the development of jihadist outlets. These states have porous borders. Secular prescriptions (whether nationalist or leftist) are regarded as unsuccessful European importations introduced by intellectuals exposed to French and Italian cultures. Moreover. Kyrgystan. all of which are in immediate proximity to Afghanistan. the Taliban controlled the Afghan territory bordering Uzbekistan. There is also a simpler explanation to account for the plethora of Al Qa’ida affiliates hailing from the Core Arab states. He maintains that most Islamic revolutions evolve from movements for indigenous self-assertion. Additionally. Turkmenistan and Tajikistan. Ayubi suggests that the general Islamic resurgence that one observes today represents a reaction to alienation and a quest for authenticity by disaffected Muslims who resent Western participation in their lands. For instance. weak security apparatuses and crisis-torn economies. Tahir Yuldashev. Tajikistan. they could permit leaders of these jihadist groups to establish training camps without fear of government intervention. one of the masterminds behind the assassination attempt against Uzbek President Islam A. Al Qa’ida and the Taliban could facilitate the transportation of militants moving back and forth across the borders. at the present time operatives from these organizations can assist the Al Qa’ida- 54 . just a few miles from the border (Luong and Weinthal 2002). for years. Karimov. Furthermore. and Uzbekistan. fled to Afghanistan where he set up a military training camp. and leader of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan. Thus. Al Qa’ida has appealed to militants in the four neighboring former Soviet Central Asian republics. whereas the religious-framed prescriptions of Arabia Islam have a thirteen century-old legacy (Ayubi 1980).

With the assistant of Al Qa’ida’s Algerian affiliates. should be expected. affiliates from these nations are particularly desirable. This too. The conflict between Muslims and Hindus in the subcontinent manifests itself in the rivalry between Pakistan and India. after the September 2001 attacks. In the wake of these changes. Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri are now believed to be in Pakistan’s rugged tribal areas.supported insurgency in Afghanistan. Upon returning to the Maghreb. has helped to identify and detain extremists. these militants can stage local campaigns due to their recently acquired front line experience (Boudali 2007). quickly granted this concession in return for safe haven. thousands of Muslim extremists were detained. these groups help Al Qa’ida attack coalition troops in Afghanistan and then escape across the Pakistani frontier (Fair 2004). under strong US diplomatic pressure. fighters transit through Syria. and has helped to tighten the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan. In addition. Al Qa’ida. Conservative estimates suggest that at least several hundred North African volunteers have traveled to Iraq. eager to regroup in Pakistani cities where police control was more negligible. where Islamabad exercises limited authority. Consequently. several Kashmiri separatist terrorist groups turned to Al Qa’ida for support. President Musharraf. Separatist violence in India’s Muslim majority Jammu and Kashmir state has continued unabated since 1989. thus. 55 . terrorist operatives in the Maghreb move easily across international borders. Pakistan has allowed the US military to use bases within the country. I also observed that a large percentage of the groups that merged with Al Qa’ida hailed from Pakistan (20%). However. Similarly. offered to President Bush Pakistan’s unqualified cooperation in the fight against terrorism.

Malaysia and Brunei.Within my sample. Indonesia. Muslims are a minority. many Islamic organizations in Southeast Asia genuinely oppose Al Qa’ida and most are nonviolent. such as the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF). In Indonesia. and the Philippines. in which there is just enough government control and economic security to provide an adequate target for terrorist groups. The largest and most influential are either political parties or revivalist organizations. Also. There are almost no legitimate terrorist targets and terrorists themselves can be subject to extortion in largely lawless settings. a central government with even rudimentary influence has yet to emerge. while Buddhism and Roman Catholicism are dominant respectively. while Somalia has served as a transit route for terrorists. Unlike Eastern European countries. in East Africa. Moreover. most visibly Al Qa’ida. hostility from indigenous religious authorities may also impede the growth of Wahabism (Dickson 2005). Political organizations representing modernist Muslims were 56 . in general Muslims are a minority in East Africa. where the other major Abrahamic faiths dominate. the depth of its involvement with terrorists is constrained by the very disorder seen as a classical setting for terrorism. Despite the fact that Southeast Asia seems like a good candidate for the second front in the US campaign since it is home to the world’s most populous Muslim-majority country. Although Muslims represent a majority in countries like Somalia and Eritrea. there were fewer groups from the Eastern African region and from the Southeast Asian region. Additionally. Thailand. this can be easily explained. In fact. the profound ethnic and religious diversity (including in the practice of Islam) that characterizes the area militates against the establishment of a fundamentalist hegemony by any one group. the rise of political Islam can be linked principally to the collapse of Suharto's regime. the nation's continuing economic crisis. and the fragility of local democracy. Again. it has not emerged as such. In Singapore. and two other mostly Muslim states.

When a group merges with Al Qa’ida. Additionally. By contrast. The preponderance of affiliations (over 70%) could be classified as partnerships or collaborations. Al Qa’ida achieves the ideal mix of tightly and loosely coupled systems. Al Qaida can provide financial or logistic support to other terrorist groups with the intention of influencing their strategic activities. Through partnerships and collaborations. Although this type of arrangement allows Al Qa’ida and the merged group to consolidate their assets so that they can compete more successfully. the highest order form of equity-based engagement. described in the first chapter. While the relationships within the cells are tightly coupled. mergers. Supporting local terrorist groups in this manner makes noise. more extremist forms of Islamism still remain at the fringes (Gershman 2002). Mergers were much less common (approximately 17%). Although such groups have since become a major political force in recent years. and many of their leaders were imprisoned. III. While Al 57 . they forfeit a degree of control. Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: Mergers? Partnerships? Or Collaborations? Finally it is important to consider distribution by type of affiliation (Figure 3). causes havoc. Through partnership and collaborations. Both partnerships and collaborations permit Al Qa’ida to structure itself as a complex organization. the group that Al Qa’ida subsumes must be capable of completely integrating Al Qa’ida’s methods and approaches into their repertoire. it is difficult to cut off centralized funding due to the complex nature of Al Qa’ida’s financial network.banned from the 1950s to the 1980s. the relationships between cells and between operatives in Al Qa’ida central command are loosely coupled. were much less common. This sort of arrangement is convenient when Al Qa’ida wants to spread its radical ideas and has financial resources but does not necessarily care for the local politics in the region. and distracts the enemy while Central Command plans for more detailed attacks elsewhere.

financial or otherwise. which the merged group must obey. Through this measure. they may split their own ranks and upset surrounding communities. When a group commits to jihad against the far enemy. Oftentimes. but are more interested in deposing their current government. In addition. most prominently. when groups officially merge with Al Qa’ida. Such blocking actions are a critical tool in combating the financing of terrorism (Mayer and Price 2002). and strategies. Moreover. mergers often end up splintering as a result of differences of ideologies. requiring them to take steps to prevent designated individuals and entities from continuing to fund or otherwise support terrorism. they can “offer” tactical advice. 58 .Qa’ida Central Command does not usually plan operations. Finally. the United States government may block the assets of individuals and entities providing support. goals. designation under the UN Security Council’s 1267 Committee’s consolidated list will trigger international obligations on all member countries. they often become the targets of counterterrorist offensives by foreign governments. groups that merge officially with Al Qa’ida may risk alienating the local population. the United States. as observed with the Zarqawi-Zawahiri letter referenced earlier. Under this order. There are other practical difficulties. Executive Order 13224 provides the means to disrupt the support network that funds terrorism. For instance. operatives are estranged when Al Qa’ida takes credit for the operation and they are forced to assume a more “behind-the-scenes” role (Desouza and Hengsen 2007). supporters of terrorism are publicly identified thereby providing warning to other entities that they are prohibited from doing business with the Al Qa’ida affiliate (Uruena 2008). to designated terrorists and terrorist organizations. which should be addressed when discussing mergers. who have no interest in establishing a global Islamic caliphate.

While in recent years. Thus.Given these considerations. Al Qa’ida may have several mergers in the works that have not yet been publicly announced. IV. evidence suggests that Al Qa’ida will continue to pursue such relations and will rely upon them more heavily. 59 . provided in Chapter 6 proves. mergers only occur when terrorist groups have developed a close relationship and realize the mutual value of working together. while Al Qa’ida’s affiliates are concentrated in the Core Arab and Maghreb states. Summary of Findings Although Al Qa’ida’s policy of pursuing affiliations with local jihadist groups is not a new development. the data demonstrates that Al Qa’ida may be more likely to pursue lower-order affiliations. such as Western Africa. organizations must have the patience and resolve to work through issues. Like corporations settling a merger. several groups have announced a formal merger with Al Qa’ida. it is also important to acknowledge that organizational issues must be addressed up front when a merger is negotiated since this type of affiliation is a longterm contract. since they offer increased organizational flexibility and operational reach. Moreover. As the example of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb. Al Qa’ida may be seeking to expand into other Muslim-dominated territories.

All three statistics are significant with a p-value less than 0. please refer to Chapter 3 on Methodology). The null hypothesis tested for each scale was that there was no difference in the frequency of incidence of each level of motational factor. ideological alignment. Data Analysis and Results for Q1: What motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida’s and its pan-Islamic agenda? Data were collected on 41 individual subjects (i.” "ideological alignment.” and “social network affiliation” respectively.0188. To assess the effects of motivational factors contributing to individual terrorist's decision to affiliate with Al Qa’ida. thus.e. 60 . 0. The chi-squared test yielded pvalues of 1. By comparison. and 1. corresponding to 0= not a motivation. This analysis yielded the results contained in Table 1.05. ideological alignment appears to be of less powerful significance as a motivating factor for local jihadist leaders. known or suspected terrorists).” and "social network affiliations. Based on this analysis. 1= secondary motivation.” Each subject was rated 0-2 for each scale. in each case. 2 = primary motivation (for a more detailed explanation regarding coding. each subject was rated on one of three scales: "opportunist motives.606E-06 for “opportunistic motives. Statistically significant differences among subjects were evaluated using a chi-squared test statistic for variation within each scale. the null hypothesis was rejected. when three scales were used. and social network affiliation all motivate local jihadist leaders to an extent.Chapter 5: Results of Statistical Hypothesis Testing I.” “ideological alignment. one can conclude that opportunistic motives. although the smaller values of p for “opportunistic motives” and for “social network affiliation” suggest that these incentives are more robust.146E-09.

042 for “opportunistic motives. The p-values associated with the chi-squared test statistic were 1. scores 0 and 1 were combined into a single scale "not a motivation. H31 ( Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due psychosocial motives) requires further investigation.” “ideological alignment. However. thereby suggesting that this particular factor is not a significant motivating variable for local jihadist leaders in this sample. 0. H11 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to opportunistic motives) is proven. was that there was no difference in the frequency of incidence of each level of motivational factor.” The null hypothesis. Data Analysis and Results for Q2: What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible affiliates with Al Qa’ida? 61 .” and “social network affiliation” respectively. In contrast.e. II.” while score 2 was considered as "motivation. The p-value associated with social network affiliation also allows us to reject the null hypothesis.639. It is of note that the statistical significance for social network affiliation is far less impressive than that for opportunistic motives. social affiliations) have some influence on the decision to associate with Al Qa’ida. This analysis produced the results recorded in Table 2. The p-value for opportunistic motives permits us to reject the null hypothesis of no effect. This implies that opportunism is the primary motivation among the variables considered in this study for affiliating with Al Qa’ida. Based on this analysis. tested for both scales. and 0.289E-06. H21 (Al Qa’ida commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to ideological motives) is rejected. the data suggests that psychosocial motive(i.To supplement this analysis and clarify the relative impact of each incentive. the effect of ideological alignment does not even reach statistical significance.

we could not reject the null hypothesis for any category. which suggests that leadership performance may generally improve as well. across all terrorists considered individually.0501). the p-value for overall leadership performance was borderline (p=0. the paired signed test rejected the null hypothesis for ideology (p=0. which considers only the direction of change.and postmerger. However. Additionally.” and “Logisitic” on a scale of 0-3. Accordingto this test. as well as the simpler paired sign test (Table 5). pre and post merger. This suggests that ideological leadership performance does actually improve after a merger.and post-merger score for any category. Results are presented in Table 3.there was no statistic difference between the pre. The Wilcoxon statistic was negative for all groups. which utilizes both the direction and magnitude of the change. compared to premerger. Paired statistics were then applied to compare the scores for each individual terrorist.015). The null hypothesis tested in this analysis is that there is no difference in each category post-merger. compared to pre-merger. pre. The null hypothesis tested in this analysis is that there is no difference in each category post-merger.” “Ideological.Subjects were evaluated on their performance in each of three categories: “Operational. 62 . thus based on this statistical test. The chi-squared test statistic was used to evaluate the overall difference in performance in each of the three categories post-versus pre-merger. across all terrorists considered as a group. These included the Wilcoxon statistic (Table 4).

However. whether they were categorized as only positive or positive plus no change. a pre-post score of 0).e. Figure 6. the variability among subjects in the magnitude of the changes may have affected the results. however. it lets us to reject both H12 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly operational role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida) and H22 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly logistical role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida). This analysis allows us to accept H32 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officer play an increasingly ideological role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida). there were the fewest number of negative changes post-merger. The operational category had the largest number of “-3” results and “+3” results. there was a tendency to improve scores post-merger. however. Moreover. there were a few changes in the opposite direction in particular subjects that were large. after mergers with Al Qa’ida occur. for all three categories. 63 . Effectively what we are observing from this study’s data analysis is that while ideological concerns do not appear to be primary motivating factors for joining Al Qa’ida. Most frequently. demonstrates that each group had a similar number of “no change” results (i. Figures 4-5 demonstrate that for ideological performance. this was clearly most prevalent and only statistically significant for the ideology category. for the ideological performance. Generally. a plot of the distribution of scores. most changes were positive. thereby hindering us from rejecting the null hypothesis using the Wilcoxon statistic. Moreover. and these swamped the overall effect. shared ideological views become important. ideological performance improved.The results obtained through the paired sign test suggest that the direction of the change for ideological performance was significant.

the leader of Al Qa’ida in Iraq announced the allegiance of the Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat (Salafist Group for Call and Combat or GSPC). Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb was born. While the first official communiqué of the GSPC appeared in September 1998. Three months later. whereupon Ahmed Ben Bella was elected the first president of Algeria. I. less powerful Algerian indigenous assembly of terrorists would not have been possible without the leadership of Abdelmalek Droukdal. The Origins of Islamic Violence in Algeria after the War of Independence The GSPC was founded with a regional focus: it sought to establish an Islamic state in Algeria and rejected the legitimacy of secular democratic governance. to Al Qa’ida. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. After the merger of the GSPC with Al Qa’ida. However. He accomplished this revitalization and expansion of goals and activities by providing compelling ideological leadership and by organizing sophisticated public relations and media campaign both locally and globally. He then adopted an 64 .Chapter 6: Al Qa’ida in the Maghreb and Abdelmalek Droukdal – A Well Executed Merger On September 11. Defense Minister Houari Boumedienne staged a bloodless coup to remove Ben Bella from power. However. this metamorphosis of a relatively smaller. the new organization radically changed its tactics: the series of suicide bombings and violent attacks executed in 2007 by Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) operatives demonstrated this strategic evolution. Abdelmalek Droukdal served as the commanding officer of Al Qa’ida in the Maghreb region and directed the internationalization of the former GSPC's war in order to revitalize a movement that was slowly dying in Algeria. Algeria achieved independence from France in 1962. 2006. in 1965. the Islamic movement in Algeria originated in the 1960s. the only remaining armed terrorist group in Algeria.

socialist political system. 65 . the Salvation Islamic Front (FIS) was formed. during the 1970s. The Birth of the Salvation Islamic Front In 1989. This socialist government's repressive secularism and one party rule were oppressive for many people in Algeria and helped fuel a fundamentalist backlash when Islamic leaders branded the government as “a band of atheists” and called for a return to an Islamic government (Johnson 2006). under Boumedienne’s chosen successor Colonel Chadli Benjedid the right to establish political parties was accorded in Algeria and with this decision. Mustapha Bouyali. one-party. However. Before the independence. II. which he codified in the Algerian constitution in 1976. the FIS was a political organization. In 1991.authoritarian. The FIS became popular amongst the Algerian population who supported the group financially and politically. the Algerian Islamic movement was centrist. Unlike the MAIA. The MAIA sought to resolve the social and economic injustices that had emerged in Algeria by forcible means if necessary (Johnson 2006). nationalist. the fundamentalist Islamic movement became increasingly radicalized in response to President Boudemedienne’s abortive leftward shift in economic and cultural policies. directed by Abdallah Djaballah. the weak alliance between the secular and religious groups (the Ulama and the academic elite who led the liberation movement against the French) collapsed. a fundamental Islamic preacher established the Armed Islamic Algeria Movement (MAIA) in 1982 to establish an Islamic state. This political platform resonated with the Algerians. Thus. disgruntled by the failure of Socialist economic policies. in response to the dictatorial and exclusionary policies proffered by the Socialist party. Islamic religious law. and maintained an affirmative orientation towards Western learning and culture. not an armed group that sought to reverse the economic decline in Algeria by implementing Sharia.

which lasted until his violent death in February 2002. several Islamists became disenchanted with the political process and defected from the FIS to form armed splinter groups. GIA supreme commander Saifullah Ajffar ordered the assassination of over 90 innocent civilians and eventually forced a mass European exodus from Algeria. However. However. The GIA was formed from a collection of Algerian militant groups who had been executing a series of significant military operations against government targets in an attempt to overthrow the secular government in Algeria.the FIS achieved a victory in national elections. The GIA was responsible for the murder of over 2000 schoolteachers guilty of “taming the youth” and more than 100 other competing. Antar Zouabri became the head of the GIA on July 18. the GIA quickly alienated itself from other Algerian Islamic activities by adopting stringent interpretations of Islamic law. after the cancellation of the 1992 general elections in Algeria. A High Committee was established with Mohammed Boudiaf named as president. and suspended parliament. the secular and military elite forced Benjedid's resignation. with the prospect of the FIS in control of the parliament. Many Islamists became increasingly interested in radical approaches. III. 1996. After subsequent leadership transitions. was marked by barbaric methods and attacks against entire civilian communities. halted the electoral process. He repelled most members of the GIA when he issued a fatwa condemning the entire Muslim population of 66 . In an effort to racially purify the country. Thus. it dissolved the FIS (Celso 2008). The Beginnings of the GIA and the Onset of an Epoch of Violence As the new regime predicted. The new regime calculated that the repression of the FIS would ignite a wave of extremist fundamentalist violence. less militant Muslim clerics and political leaders whom it designated heretics. He was an illiterate criminal and his reign. which would divide and alienate the FIS’s many Algerian supporters.

he encouraged operatives to target Algerian government officials. the GSPC denounced the massacres that the GIA had committed and entered the international arena with the goal of restoring the credibility of armed groups in Algeria and attracting embittered Algerian youths for whom the ideology of Islamic guerilla war had lost its appeal. a former GIA commander. While he preferred not to engage in force-on-force confrontations with the Algerian military to avoid depleting his cadre. V. and Martínez 2007). the decision to establish the GPSC was the direct result of the GIA’s strategic impasse. However. clearly articulated the narrow agenda of the GSPC.Algeria as “kuffar. The first prominent leader of the GSPC. An Alternative Emerges: The Origins of the GSPC The GSPC was not set up as a pan-Islamic movement. the GSPC was able to amass hundred of defectors from the FIS and the GIA (Guidère 2007). Hassan Hattab. He asserted that the GSPC sought to overthrow the government in Algiers and to install an Islamic regime in Algeria. apostates. ambushes. and incursions on towns to steal saleable goods (Guidère 2007). military. However. bombings. Zouabri’s attacks on innocent Muslims estranged many former GIA military commanders. Bucaille. and hypocrites” for “not supporting them in their struggle against the government” (Blom. he rejected the policy of terror executed by the GIA under Zouabri and enforced symbiosis with the local population. He depicted the Algerian government as a postcolonial lackey at war with Islam. who were left without an ideological umbrella. In 1998. police. Fissions Form Within the GSPC 67 . IV. these officers founded the GSPC as a military organization dedicated to the Salafist creed and the battle against the Algerian regime to restore the Caliphate and implement Sharia. and gendarmerie through the use of false roadblocks. Consequently.

the organization was plagued by internal rivalry. and could even participate in the fight against the remaining active terrorist groups. These fault-lines were exacerbated by external events that occurred soon after the founding of the GSPC. 2000 for members and supporters of armed groups to surrender to the authorities (Black 2007). Algerians had become less tolerant to the violence of the GSPC. The issue of whether or not to accept the terms of the Civil Harmony Law created considerable dissension within the GSPC. the katibats were responsible for supplying and funding their own operations. By the end of the twentieth century. This law declared that citizens not involved in massive killings. death penalty and life imprisonment were commuted to a maximum of eight years imprisonment for individuals under probation. Each of the regional groups. Several GSPC cadres were killed or captured by Algerian security services following leads provided by rival GSPC elements (Celso 2008). Hattab provided religious guidance. Consequently. Nevertheless. In July 1999. The law set a deadline of January 13. bombing of public places.The GSPC was originally organized as a loose confederation of regional divisions under a supreme emir who supervised the organization. A study conducted at the Naval Postgraduate School determined that although the probability of defection by GSPC members was less than 10 68 . Although as supreme emir. the Civil Harmony Law was adopted and overwhelmingly endorsed in a national referendum the following September 2000. the Algerian government implemented a law that offered amnesty to the combatants who capitulated. Thus. katibats. it was difficult for the local leadership to coordinate or control the activity of its fighters since attempts to communicate could result in discovery or interception by security services. controlled a territory that roughly aligned with the governments’ own military districts. Imprisonment sentences were reduced. or sexual crimes would be placed under probation for a period ranging from 3 to 5 years.

However. The pan-Islamists encouraged solidarity with their “brothers in Islam” (Al Qa’ida agents) while the Islamo-nationalists were preoccupied with Algerian politics and the installation of an Islamic state there. Members of this organization realized that a merger with Al Qa’ida could have both political and financial benefits to GSPC (Guidère 2007). which resulted in the demobilization of hundreds of militants from both the GIA and the GSPC. They accused the Algerian secret service of executing the attack to isolate the GSPC from its popular base amongst the Algerian people and of attempting to align the existing Algerian governmental agency with the intelligence services of the United States in the Global War on Terror. certain members of the GSPC dissented. They were devoted to regime change and preferred not to actively support the “Muslim brothers. the probability of defection reached a high of 60 percent during the Civil Concord period (Gyves and Wyckloff 2006). the GSPC’s operational reach diminished. believing that it would be better to take credit for the attack and thereby imply GSPC’s collusion with Al Qa’ida. and 9 were injured in a massacre that occurred in the Algerian town of Al-Abri. This became a point of friction between Hattab and the younger members of the GSPC and two dominant camps emerged within the organization. It was thus effectively limited in scope by the Algerian government. 23 people were killed. reasserting their dedication to avoiding civilian atrocities. Due to this amnesty program. Fifteen days after the attacks. They suggested that courting Al Qa’ida would enable the organization to maintain its relevancy and shore up declining recruitment. The September 11.percent before the implementation of the law. on September 26. The GSPC denied involvement.” This 69 . 2001 attacks were another defining moment for the GSPC. 2001.

Hattab refused to send Algerian combatants to Iraq to battle the Americans because he predicted that doing so would deprive the GSPC of its best combatants when they joined the insurgency. Although Hattab invoked the original Charter of the GSPC. Chad. its next iteration was expanded to include Algeria. in July 2003.minority faction opposed such a merger and preferred to remain like a small. implemented in November 2003. thus. Funded by the United States State Department. and Mauritania in an effort to improve border security and counterterrorism capacity. the Pan Sahel Initiative consisted of training regional military units by soldiers from the US Special Forces in Niger. Thus. others within the GSPC did not share this perspective. Chad. Mali. the GSPC was forced to retreat from urban areas (Ellis 2004). Moreover. the war in Iraq further exacerbated the debates that were occurring within the GSPC concerning the strategies to adopt with regards to Al Qa’ida. which stated that the objectives of armed conflict should be to fight the Algerian regime and not other governments. independently operated company that could focus on their own regional national agenda (Guidère 2007). thereby joining both sides of the Sahara in a complex map of security arrangements. However. and Nigeria signed a co-operation agreement on counterterrorism. Observing the images of Iraqi soldiers and citizens humiliated by the American invaders. Moreover. As a result of hard-hitting endeavors by these transnational partnerships. the many GSPC fighters sought to engage in the struggle in Iraq. Although the GSPC was able to recover from the infighting provoked after 9/11 and aggressive counter-terror measures. the majority of the local emirs seated on the GSPC’s shura believed that the war in Algeria was lost. The United States also provided support for the war on terrorism in North and West Africa and in the Sahara desert through the Pan Sahel Initiative (PSI). his efforts were in vain. The PSI was judged to be a success by US officials and local participants. the organization should 70 . Niger. Algeria.

he did not yet possess an adequate network of fighters. When the shura of the GSPC voted to actively support the “Iraqi brothers. but who would. asserting his will to establish a community of Muslims dedicated to the creation of a Caliphate and calling upon GSPC members to attack all foreigners who supported the war in Iraq. who succeeded Hattab in 2003.” Hassan was obliged to resign. they could use the war in Iraq to attract new recruits who believed that they would be sent to Iraq after basic training in Algeria.focus on preserving the honor of the Iraqis. Abou Ibrahim Mustapha. in fact be absorbed into the GSPC’s domestic campaign. Soon thereafter. This was the first strong sign of official will to establish a relationship between the GSPC and Al Qa’ida and the beginning of three years of efforts to prove the GSPC’s will and commitment to Al Qa’ida. his career was cut short when he was killed in a skirmish with the Algerian army in the Béjaïa region in June 2004 (Antil 2006). He continued to make entreaties to Al Qa’ida. However. They also believed that participation in the war in Iraq would enable the GSPC to establish connections with other jihadist groups in North Africa and introduce them to new strategies and tactics. The Rise of Droukdal 71 . the 2nd anniversary of September 11. for instance. sought to actively support the Iraqi insurgents in order to gain credibility for the GSPC. VI. he issued a communiqué of support for Al Qa'ida in which he criticized Hattab’s position and extolled bin Laden. he fostered pan-Islamic solidarity and internationalism in order to reestablish a sense of unity amongst GSPC operatives. Although he wanted to eventually establish his group as some sort of training authority. Finally. Nevertheless. On September 2003. the old guard members who espoused a nationalist orientation were expelled from the GSPC (Guidère 2007).

he hoped to study engineering.Upon Mustapha’s death. the GSPC would gain access to a network of financiers. who easily obtained his baccalaureate in 1989 in mathematics. Abdelmalek Droukdal immediately assumed control of the GSPC. the GSPC could more easily recruit operatives. assets. recruited him. Born on April 20. In 1992. and media specialists who could reinforce the group’s capabilities and help it lead operations. Thus. a merger with Al Qa’ida was particularly appealing to Droukdal (Johnson 2006). As a youth. Droukdal was recognized as an exceptional student. the GSPC was struggling to fill its ranks with recruits. and logisticians. Additionally. he was assigned the mission of fabricating explosives due to his scientific background and knowledge of chemical bases and mechanical processes. Nevertheless. he was enthused when an officer of the FIS and a former member of the Algerian army. he was promoted to chief bomb maker for one of the most important GIA 72 . Said Makhloufi. By affiliating with Al Qa’ida. like the majority of young Muslim students. 1970 in the small village of Zayan. Droukdal sought to provide a new focal point for his members by participating in the global jihad. In 1996. the GSPC needed to achieve a certain number of visible successes to appear active and successful. from 1990 to 1993. Droukdal realized that in order to maintain support. informants. he went underground at the age of 23 (Guidère 2007). he was attracted to the FIS and actively sought to get close to its leaders. he officially joined the organization and in December 1993. situated near Mifan in the Blida region. he pursued a degree in technology from the University of Blida. intelligence. After losing combatants due to the amnesty program announced by the Bouteflika regime. One year later. He continued to hold this role when he enlisted with the GIA from 1993 to 1996. Thus. by supporting a cause that was seen to benefit the global community of Muslims. As a member of the clandestine ranks of the FIS.

Soon thereafter. he conducted a nuanced public relations campaign and comprehensive media reform. Upon his appointment as emir of the GSPC. one year later. he was selected to command the Al-Quds Brigade (Abu Bakr alSiddiq Brigade) at the behest of the leader of the GIA (Guidère 2007).battalions. Libya. VII. Instead of concentrating media attention on local attacks. In 2001. which had been created in 1998. he nominated Droukdal as the director of the consultative council. Although he served the GIA in a military capacity. In order to accomplish this feat. he was promoted to the position of supreme emir of the GSPC after Mustapha’s death. he frequently issued communiqués 73 . instructing his followers in the ways of global jihad. Droukdal. While he was involved in planning a limited number of attacks. with his inauguration. when Hassan Hattab was forced to resign. sought to align with other jihadist groups. Somalia. and the Sudan. Thus. he served the GSPC as an ideological figurehead. He occupied this position until 2003. he commenced a policy of internationalization. Droukdal sought to inscribe the actions of the GSPC in an international context by publicizing the GSPC’s activities in Afghanistan. Finally. After Mustapha assumed power. Droukdal’s Program: Toward Global Jihad Upon assuming power. he allegedly opposed the massacres conducted by the organization in the late 1990s. His aspiration was to link his organization to the wider Islamist campaign as represented by Al Qa’ida in order to reinvigorate the group after government crackdowns and legislation had reduced its numbers. Thus. he seized to opportunity to serve as chief military sergeant for the GSPC. incentivized by his opportunistic desire to revive the demoralized GSPC. he had not yet had any contact with Al Qa’ida (Guidère 2007). Hattab selected Droukdal as a member of his consultative council and made him a regional commander for the GSPC. Chechnya.

These initiatives allowed him to transmit his message to operatives across the Maghreb region. He criticized the Arab leaders who allegedly embraced communism and capitalism and were becoming increasingly sensitive to the JudeoChristian coalition. It included articles on Salafism. In response to this event. the President of the Chechen Republic in May 2004. in Morocco. Droukdal sought to align the GSPC theoretically with Al Qa’ida and express his obeisance to Bin Laden and Zarqawi (Guidère 2007). 2005. the crisis in Iraq. in Chechnya. which took place from March 22-24. Finally. thereby promulgating Al Qa’ida’s anti-Western program. he circulated a communiqué congratulating the Chechen mujahedeen for the assassination of Ahmed Kadirov. he issued a communiqué addressed to the leaders meeting in Algiers.-led military exercises in northern Africa dubbed 74 . In publishing this document. The communiqués published in conjunction with the operation in Mauritania demonstrated Droukdal’s commitment to a pan-Islamic program and desire to indoctrinate his operatives in the ways of global jihad. For instance. a GSPC statement posted by Droukdal on the Internet defending the raid indicated that the attack was in response to U.S. He derided these leaders as puppets of the American government.regarding international politics and events affecting the Middle East and the Maghreb. Droukdal’s media strategy became clear after the Summit of the Arab League in Algiers. which were still committed to local initiatives. he urged jihad as a way to defend Muslim honor. and other international themes (Guidère 2007). which was inspired by that of Al Qa’ida in Iraq. Droukdal launched a magazine for the GSPC. For instance. This communiqué. a more “global” goal. which was broadcast to a large audience of operatives and supporters. The first operation undertaken by the GSPC outside its borders occurred in Mauritania in June 2005. Later. was a reprisal of themes elucidated by Al Qa'ida. The communiqués included messages with international themes.

including Algerian.the “Flintlock Plan” by military officials. Furthermore. In fact.S. Moreover. 75 . Droukdal realized that he could encourage internationalization by amending his membership roster. He began to recruit several operatives from abroad and encouraged his agents to train abroad and engage in jihadist activities in other nations in an effort to expand the GSPC’s global profile. knowing that they had Al Qa’ida’s support. Droukdal began filming all operations conducted by the GSPC and distributing these clips online in the same manner as Zarqawi (Guidère 2007). One week after the attack. Droukdal sought to encourage Maghreb jihadists to join the Algerians in their struggle. Malian. leaders from Al Qa’ida and the GSPC signed a pact of fraternity (Jebnoun 2007). Mauritanian and Chadian troops.. counterterrorism campaign in Africa. in 2005. The communiqué ended by urging the Islamic youth throughout North Africa to join the Algerian cause (Lecocq and Schrijver 2007). the director of the media division of Al Qa’ida in Iraq issued a communiqué congratulating the GSPC. This recognition was particularly meaningful for the Algerian operatives because it made them feel more “secure” in their ventures. This was the first time that Droukdal actively sought to recruit from outside the Algerian ranks. Shortly thereafter. Using this video. The statement also denounced the recent arrests and trials by Mauritanian authorities of dozens of Islamic extremists accused of having links to the GSPC. this was the first time Al Qa’ida had congratulated another group not affiliated with their organization. a long video filming the combatants who had participated in the operation was broadcast over the Internet in jihadist forums. These exercises were part of a broader U. This operation provoked the first official reaction of Al Qa'ida to the GSPC.

When the Algerian government failed to respond. he sought to centralize the GSPC’s communications. Algerian security services contributed to this information overflow by distributing false reports on the GSPC’s channels. he murdered the hostages. Consequently. Zarqawi signaled his complicity with the GSPC by seizing two Algerian diplomats. This system enabled the GSPC to elucidate several ambiguous arguments and clarify dubious information(Gray and Stockham 2008). the GSPC’s communications were characterized by a general cacophony and ataxia. there were numerous GSPC media outlets transmitting information simultaneously. First of all. During the summer of 2005. Droukdal launched a systematic communications reform to improve the image of the GSPC amongst Algerians and the international Islamic community and to enable him to preach pan-Islamic sermons to his operatives. each GSPC katibat possessed its own media bureau and published its own communications regarding its operations and successes within its territory. 2005). Droukdal’s leadership during this time period was primarily ideological in nature. Thus. Droukdal proposed a system of transmitting information whereby a central media committee would transmit all communiqués. Those communiqués not approved by this committee could be regarded as unauthentic. As a result. Droukdal responded by issuing a communiqué in which he thanked Zarqawi and extolled Al Qa’ida in Iraq (Guidère 2007). Moreover. Upon taking these hostages he promised to execute them unless the Algerian government withdrew its support for the war in Iraq.In July 2005. as evidenced by the frequency of his declarations and interchanges and his efforts to improve the 76 .. he sought to bracket the Algerian operations. including the attack in Mauritania and the execution of the Algerian diplomats with other attacks that occurred during the same time period (including the coordinated suicide bomb attacks on London’s public transport system that occurred on July 7. Prior to this effort.

Two days later. he published a communiqué affirming the GSPC’s allegiance to Al Qa’ida and bin Laden. one cannot ignore the fact that prior to the official announcement of the merger of Al Qa’ida and the GSPC. Therefore. Droukdal also directed several tactical changes to prepare his organization for international jihad. VIII. on September 11. he expressed the 77 . His discourse supported pan-Islamic notions and highlighted the necessity of creating an “Islamic United States. It is important to note that this announcement came one year after Droukdal had made his first forays to Al Qa’ida. two bombs exploded in the port de Delis. Moreover. the deputy leader of Al Qa’ida. could positively contribute to Al Qa’ida’s ideological appeals and combat operations. This was the first time that the GSPC had led an attack against a maritime target.” He spoke of the need to suppress national borders in order to establish an Islamic caliphate and urged the immediate union of the nations of North Africa under Islamic law. His communiqué was particularly revelatory because it reflected the alleged changes in the official ideology of the GSPC. On December 22. Droukdal personally supervised all the preparations (Moss 2008). a group of combatants had penetrated the highly protected port. Ayman al-Zawahiri. However.GSPC’s reception nationally and internationally. intent on ensuring that the GSPC’s membership. on the fifth anniversary of the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks. overall his leadership performance improved during this time period. The Announcement of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb Finally. Droukdal’s role as an ideological leader steering the GSPC’s internationalization through an assertive public relations drive continued after this announcement. announced the merger of Al Qa’ida and the GSPC. Al Qa’ida Central Command had stalled the merger for one year. thereby crystallizing the relationship. The attack involved immaculate planning: the GSPC had surveyed the location for weeks and the day before. under Droukdal. 2006. 2005.

Moreover. Spain. Zawahiri himself refused to allow the group to call itself “Al Qa’ida in Algeria” since this name seemed too “local” and did not reflect the transnational and pan-Islamic agenda of Al Qa’ida (Guidère 2007). however. and France). Droukdal issued another claim in which he suggested that after pledging allegiance to Islam and demonstrating his faith in Bin Laden. nine of whom were wounded. Droukdal and his operatives began to target foreigners who continued to support secular regimes and proselytize their culture (specifically the United States. AQIM conducted an attack against a bus transporting employees from Brown & Root-Condor. IX. Some scholars have suggested that AQIM remains sharply focused on its Kabylia strongholds despite Droukdals’s global rhetoric (Filiu 2009). he wanted to highlight its role in global jihad. He expressed confidence in the specific competencies and ideological underpinning of Al Qa’ida’s leadership. a joint venture between a Halliburton subsidiary. KBR. it was now time for him to change the name of his organization. including 78 . in an elaborate roadside bombing. Droukdal expressed concern about projecting a certain image of his organization to his base as well as the international community. Approximately six months later. This change would demonstrate the solidarity of Al Qa’ida and the GSPC. Al Qa’ida in the Maghreb (AQIM). Sonatrach. thereby easing the qualms of his subordinates (Guidère 2007).sentiment that Al Qa’ida was the only group that could unite all Islamic combatants and steer the battle against the Coalition forces. For instance. A New Organization In the months after the name change. and the Algerian stateowned oil company. a few recent attacks indicate otherwise. in December 2006. In changing the name of the GSPC to Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb. The bomb attack killed an Algerian driver in a convoy transporting the workers.

Recent reports express fear that AQIM will be able to increased recruitment in Mauritania or Nigeria. A lengthy film of the operation. While Droukdal’s role was primarily ideological. the surveillance and lookout. emulated the propaganda materials of Al Qa’ida in Iraq (Jebnoun 2007). Iraq and training camps in the Sahel to pursue international jihad. the GSPC was engaged in a war of attrition whereby combatants would descend from the mountains and attack the armed forces. 2007 demonstrated Droukdal’s new tactics. Two other cars were detonated beside a police station in the east of the Algerian capital (one at the seat of Interpol and the other at the 79 . three cars driven by suicide bombers blew up in Algiers. in which AQIM admitted to the attack. in online jihadist forums about one month later. killing at least 33 people and injuring others. AQIM was able to establish communities in Europe to provide money. This video. Originally. indoctrinate.four Britons and one American. intended to galvanize combatants and attract recruits. recruit. The attacks that occurred on April 11. Chechnya. detailing the fabrication of the bombs. Always attentive to public reaction. On this day. Under his leadership. Droukdal encouraged the evolution from guerilla-oriented operations such as armed assaults to terror-oriented operations such as bombings. Some specialists fear that AQIM could severely damage the energy sector in the Niger delta (Moss 2008). attention should be paid to the tactical changes that he implemented. However. As a result of Droukdal’s press campaign. and train potential terrorists. and the explosions was also transmitted. One bomber drove into the guard post at the government building housing the offices of the prime minister and the Interior Ministry. Droukdal disclosed a communiqué. He encouraged his operatives to executed attacks inspired by the Iraqi model. the use of firearms plummeted while the use of explosives augmented (Gyves and Wyckloff 2006). These recruits were then dispatched to Kashmir. Afghanistan.

Droukdal was compelled to publish a communiqué to outline his intentions and defuse criticism. this method consisted of engaging in spectacular attacks with a symbolic dimension that could destabilize the regime. Now. They also demonstrated the professionalization of AQIM’s services. kamikaze fighters. This also permitted AQIM officers to move from the periphery of Algeria back into its urban centers. In doing so. Droukdal criticized the adoption of an anti-Islamic policy allegedly championed by the Americans in their war against of the special forces of the police in Bab Ezzouar). Droukdal positioned his group as the defender of the riches of Muslim countries faced with avarice and imperialism of the West. and sustainable fighting force. Moreover. The second justification for the attacks was the Algerian government’s military cooperation with the American forces. Droukdal suggested that this was the beginning of a foreign occupation and deemed it necessary to combat the Western presence in Algeria. he expressed a message frequently articulated by Al Qa’ida. rigged vehicles. Finally. X. simultaneous explosions. As always. His communiqué suggested that the April 11 attacks were executed in response to a concession agreement with the United States. These attacks utilized remote explosives and were thus less costly in human lives. Final Observations 80 . thereby cementing the link between the two organizations (Guidère 2007). Through this rhetoric. an effective propaganda and selective recruitment were employed to make AQIM a formidable. remote detonation. To capitalize upon his operatives’ anti-colonialist concerns. which could allow the Western power to use petroleum in Algeria for 100 years. Such spectacular attacks could also appeal to younger sympathizers (Algeria: Violence Returns 2007).

Moreover.To this day. most particularly French interests. Thus. Through his communications. Droukdal sought to effectively straddle the divide between local and international Islamic terrorism. and its success. each accompanied by a revealing and incantatory communiqué. The merger. he reflected AQIM’s international focus and the growing ratio of attacks against foreign targets into an emphasis on international issues and threats against Western countries in AQIM’s statements. By uniting radical Islamists to attack Americana and French targets in northwestern Africa. when French police thwarted a series of bombings set to occur in Paris as Algerians voted on the National Charter for Peace and Reconciliation. the GSPC could render itself capable of operating in the context of global jihad. Droukdal advanced the goal of undermining the secular Algerian regime while damaging the interests of Western nations (Black 2007). He incited the organization to expand by attacking foreign targets. rather than confining itself to local activity. can only be explained by highlighting Droukdal’s ideological leadership and the major shifts that he pioneered on the propaganda front. AQIM continues to conducted several suicide attacks and roadside bombings. Droukdal recognized the global appeal of Al Qa’ida message. he directed an ideological shift – from a philosophy based on regional preoccupations to a more internationally oriented perspective. The US invasion of Iraq and media coverage of American detention and interrogation policies lent credence to the Qa’ida narrative that 81 . The most powerful French AQIM cell to date was dismantled in September 2005. Droukdal recognized that by aligning itself with Al Qa’ida. which had dramatically expanded since the September 11. After the ranks of his organization had been depleted at the turn of the twenty-first century. he effectively brought the Algerians insurgents out of isolation so they could work more closely with international Islamic networks to promote Islam. attacks.

Having formulated an appropriate ideological stance. Al Qa’ida’s global ideology intersected with local anger directed at the undemocratic regime would encourage jihadists’ activity in the Maghreb.portrayed isolated American actions as a coordinated war against Islam. A current of cultural Islamization was created that has increased Al Qa’ida’s attraction. he was able to tap into local grievances and tie them to the global jihad against the west. ready-made networks that could be internationalized. he successfully aligned with Al Qa’ida to co-opt and exploit local. Droukdal capitalized upon these trends by highlighting the importance of solidarity among the mujahedeen in face of Western aggression against Islam. Thus. 82 . He saw clearly an opportunity for synergy.

In contrast. and Sohaj. Asyu’. covertly supplying them with arms with which to defend themselves against potential attacks by Marxists or Nasserites. Both broke with the Muslim Brotherhood over the latter’s commitment to nonviolence. Qina. Both campaigned to overthrow the secular Egyptian government and to replace it with an Islamic regime. In addition. an Egyptian fundamentalist writer and educator. Both collaborated on the assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat in 1981 and both fell victims to the bitter campaign of state violence. Moreover. However. Why did GAI repudiate terrorism rather than affiliate with Al Qa’ida to continue its brutal campaign? I. Upon its birth. the GAI rejected the Muslim Brotherhood’s gradualist approach to change. However. and denounced Al Qa’ida. two prominent Salafi jihadist groups operated in Egypt: Al-Gama’a alIslamiyya (GAI) and Egyptian Islamic Jihad. The Emergence of the GAI from the Ashes of the Muslim Brotherhood Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya (GAI) was formally organized as an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood in 1973 in the Upper Nile regions of Al-Minya. the Egyptian Islamic Jihad members joined forced with Al Qa’ida. members of Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya apologized for the group’s involvement in the Sadat assassination. and instead based their ideology on the principles articulated by Sayyid Qutb. GAI quickly gained strong support among the university students in both Cairo and Alexandria by recruiting mid-level leaders from the ranks of the unemployed university students who were disillusioned by Egypt’s lack of economic opportunities. and financial crackdowns during much of the 1990s. uneducated individuals from 83 . mass arrests. his rivals. Egyptian President Anwar Sadat gave the group’s members free reign. GAI recruited more indigent.Chapter 7: Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya: The Unrealized Merger In the early 1970s. renounced violence. in the late 1990s.

clashes between Egyptian security forces and Islamic movements in the universities increased. Sadat changed his political strategies to combat internal unrest in the mid 1970s. where he found and developed financial supporters. AlRahman served six months in an Egyptian prison. As a result of his policies. they established a branch devoted to jihad and began to execute increasingly violent operations. Al-Rahman fled Egypt and toured the neighboring Arab countries. Perturbed by the rapid development and mobilization of the Salafi organizations in Egypt. avoiding a sterner sentence on a technicality (Keats 2002). The Sadat Assassination Upon returning to Egypt in 1980. Sheikh Omar Abdel Al–Rahman assumed the mantle as spiritual leader for the group during its infancy. and Lav 2006). Feldner. Fearing harsh repression (like that which the Muslim brotherhood has experienced under former Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser). Al-Rahman issued a fatwa that provided the religious justification for the assassination of President Sadat in 1981. GAI leaders decided. Crackdown under Mubarak 84 . As a result of his role in the assassination. “A need [had] arisen for a military force for us to defend [themselves]” (Carmon.the southern rural regions of Assiuet and Minya to further populate their rank and file (Keats 2002). He began rounding up several Islamic militants and placing them in jail. The GAI and Egyptian Islamic Jihad allegedly cooperated in this conspiracy. He provided the moral justifications for the group’s moneymaking attacks on Christian shopkeepers and small-business owners by his issuing fatwa – religious rulings that justify actions normally outlawed by the Koran (Abdel Maguid 2003). During Al-Rahman’s time abroad. II. Consequently. III. including Saudi Arabia.

many fighters moved on to combat the Serbian forces that were decimating Bosnian Muslims in Yugoslavia. and spread diseases such as AIDS (Stacher 2002). During these years. they trained and fought alongside al-Zawahiri’s Egyptian Islamic Jihad and other Afghan Arabs. IV. and Lav 2006). who continued to struggle under high unemployment(Gerges 2000). like Mustafa Hamza. Some. who had immigrated to the United States by this time. following the Soviet withdrawal. 85 . this crackdown further radicalized the university-educated population. Campaign of Terror After the Soviet-Afghan war. Between 1992 and 1993. a leading member of the GAI. where they were active in the jihad against the Soviet Union. During the 1990s. In Afghanistan. they carried out a number of attacks on tourists that killed dozens of people. Al-Rahman. His methods included false arrests. Hosni Mubarak began a brutal campaign against Egypt’s militant groups that lasted throughout the 1980s. many GAI members and leaders fled to Afghanistan.Sadat’s successor. such as Osama Bin Laden. many GAI members continued or commenced their training in Al Qa’ida facilities in the Sudan and Afghanistan. Several were implicated in numerous plots directed against American diplomatic and military targets in the Balkans and other parts of Europe. again provided the religious justification for these attacks by arguing that tourism in Egypt fostered poor morals. Moreover. even worked for businesses owned by Osama bin Laden in Somalia (Carmon. some GAI members returned to Egypt where they initiated a campaign against the influences of Western culture. Although fairly successful at curbing the number of violent attacks. Feldner. and executions. torture.

Thus. including the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels. 1997. In 1996. Al-Rahman was arrested in the United States in connection with the first World Trade Center bombing. Cairo clamped down on both the GAI and Egyptian Islamic Jihad even more. and banks. GAI announced a unilateral initiative of conciliation with the Egyptian regime. Collapse of an Armed Group As a result of GAI’s campaign in the late 1990s. V. This prompted some influential militants to reconsider their strategy and tactics and some GAI leaders renounced violence. including the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels. During a court hearing. Yet despite his arrest. he and nine other operatives were convicted for conspiring to destroy New York City landmarks. militants killed nine German tourists and their driver in front of the Egyptian Museum in Cairo. arresting thousands of suspected terrorists and executing or killing others during police raids. when the Luxor attack occurred. 36 of whom were Swiss) (Keats 2002). bookstores. several GAI leaders immediately conveyed their disgust. which declared a halt to all armed operations within and outside Egypt. the group allegedly collaborated with the Egyptian Islamic Jihad in a failed assassination attempt on President Hosni Mubarak in Addis Ababa. In 1996. The group bombed theaters. a GAI member read aloud a communiqué. GAI continued to attack tourists throughout the 1990s and began targeting Egyptian business establishments as well. On July 5. 86 . Al-Rahman was arrested in the United States in connection with the first World Trade Center bombing. and a stop to agitation to commit attacks. In September 1997. Ethiopia. In 1993. signed by six of the organization's leaders. the group killed 63 people at a tourist site in Luxor (including four Egyptians and 59 foreign tourists.In 1993. Two months later. In 1995. he and nine other operatives were convicting for conspiring to destroy New York City landmarks.

or simply saw the financial and organizational advantages that Al Zawahiri had reaped from making the decision to join Al Qa’ida. After the schism. led by Rifai Ahmad Taha deplored the ceasefire as cowardly and called for a return to armed operations. but rather by a breakaway faction (Ghadbian 2000). while the smaller.insisting that the operation was not executed by the GAI.” thereby becoming a signatory to the International Islamic Front. it needed a publicity boost if it was to continue functioning as a viable terrorist organization. Moreover. moderate one. Consequently. supported non-violence and the ceasefire. organized by Mustafa Hamza. For instance. the group split into two factions. Zawahiri's organization experienced a major upset when in 1998 Albania agreed to extradite 12 members of EIJ to Egypt 87 . Rifai Ahmad Taha courted bin Laden by making trips to Afghanistan and even appeared sitting next to him and Egyptian Islamic Jihad leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in a videotape released in September 2000 that threatened US interests. In 1997. he was unable to recruit many of his cadres to support Bin Laden and a minimal number joined the global jihad (Botha 2006). the GAI spokesman Osama Rushdie. wanted to seize power in the GAI. a Netherlands resident announced his resignation (Cohen 2003). Therefore. Yet despite his efforts. as a result of increased governmental scrutiny. more radical faction. The Luxor attack and the reports of mutilation of the victims’ bodies had sparked public repulsion at GAI. the larger. Taha signed Bin Laden’s 1998 Declaration of War against the “Jews and Crusaders. Moreover. The GAI had witnessed how the Egyptian Islamic Jihad had suffered significant setbacks because of its decision to join Al Qa’ida. the GAI was weakened both operationally and financially by the aftermath effects of the attack. It is unclear whether Taha actually agreed with bin Laden’s views.

by then the closest associate of Osama bin Laden. agreed to this measure. despite their proclamations in favor of non-violence. even said the GAI owes the Egyptian people "an apology for the crimes which [the group] has committed against Egypt. During his interview with Asharq al-Awsat. known as the “Concept Correction Series” in which they renounce indiscriminate violence and extremist interpretations of Islam. who remained the group’s spiritual leader. Ibrahim challenged Al Qa’ida’s Islamic credentials by emphasizing its dependence on violent struggle as a means to further its goals and suggested that Al Qa’ida was propagating a false definition of jihad. Ayman al-Zawahiri. In doing so. Dr. despite widespread skepticism in Egypt and abroad about the nature of its true 88 . in August 2006. and our aim is Islam. VI." he maintained. In 2002. the historic leadership of the GAI has published a series of books. Even Al-Rahman. GAI leadership in Egypt quickly rejected this claim. We are even thinking of paying blood money to the victims” (Halawi 2002). the group’s historic leadership declared a unilateral ceasefire. Reconciliation In 1999. Karam Zuhdi. The GAI has not conducted a terrorist attack either inside or outside Egypt since August the case known as the “Returnees from Albania” (Aboul-Enein 2004) Consequently. Nageh Ibrahim. Since this time. the leadership issued a statement reaffirming its commitment to end violence. Nevertheless. a self-proclaimed leader of the underground group. announced that the GAI had merged with Al Qa’ida. He asserted that Al Qa’ida’s aggressive tactics have failed Muslims. most members of GAI preferred to go underground until the group regained its strength and influence rather than align with Al Qa’ida and risk further setbacks. Since this time. “Their aim is jihad. stressed that significant differences in philosophy exist between the GAI and Al Qa’ida. a senior leader and chief ideological theorist for the GAI.

primarily to the establishment of an Islamic state in Egypt (Rabasa et al. police. however. when their group was in a state of imminent decline. GAI interpreted their jihad much more narrowly than groups affiliated or associated with Al Qa’ida. secular institutions. evidence suggests that this choice was strategic. While they attacked Western targets. which gave precedence to doctrinal correctness above all other issues. Consequently. When GAI reemerged in the early 1990s with a renewed sense of purpose after the return of its members from the Afghan jihad. GAI was well established and active prior to Al Qa’ida’s emergence in the international arena. tourists. They believed that their main foe was the Egyptian state and that the near enemy was more worthy of fighting than the distant enemy. GAI members were less receptive to Al Qa’ida’s ideology of global jihad than other groups that have emerged since that time. they decided to renounce violent activity rather than appeal for Al Qa’ida for assistance to continue their existence as a terrorist group. banks. they perceived their struggle as regionally confined to the Egyptian territory. politicians. and the economy 89 . the ouster of the “illegitimate” governing power. Moreover. They attacked Coptic Christians. and exhibited strong anti-Western proclivities. Explaining the Decision not to Affiliate with Al Qa’ida The leadership of the GAI had longstanding connections with Al Qa’ida. GAI’s theoretical and operational priorities were the product of a literal reading of the Quranic and prophetic texts. While this decision may seem counterintuitive. the GAI has concentrated its efforts on revising its former extremist worldview and distinguishing itself from Qa’ida (Zambelis 2006). who were not already entrenched in Salafi jihadist circles. VII. and the media with the goal of undermining Egyptian state power. its leaders were convinced that they could accomplish in Egypt what the mujahedeen had achieved in Afghanistan. 2006).intentions.

” Between arrests. the effect of their new. by the turn of the century the group realized that it was useless to try to topple a powerful regime by force. a former leader of GAI. the relative success of the government’s security policy obligated the group to concede to what its leaders called “military defeat. and severe treatment in prisons and detention facilities. wider reading and understanding is evident in the sources on which the leadership relied to compose the revisionist books that they published (Halawi 2002). This exceedingly severe security strategy disrupted the ranks and cohesion of GAI prompting the group’s leaders to reconsider its acts and concepts. Thus. deaths in armed clashes. admitted that the group was in a stronger position before it started attacking the government. when several leaders of GAI announced its cease-fire initiative. even with Al Qa’ida’s backing. GAI were compelled to shift strategies as a political tactic. 90 . During their time in prison. the ranks of the leadership and general membership were decimated. and Lav 2006) It is possible that in mid-1997. and prepare for a new offensive. Nevertheless. in the late 1990s. Additionally. Osama Rushdie.and creating the perception that the Egyptian government could not protect its citizens (Keats 2002). the groups’ leaders acquainted themselves with other schools of Islamic thought. the security establishment facilitated meetings between the group’s leader and members in Egyptian prisons to ensure that the group honored this commitment. In fact. Reflecting on the seven years of GAI violence between 1992 and 1997. reunite the groups’ ranks. However. this may have been a maneuver to buy time. Feldner. He attempted to rationalize this earlier aggression by suggesting that adopting violence in 1992 " was mainly a reaction to what we saw as the suppression and killing of our brothers” (Carmon. stiff sentences that included dozens of executions. after its initiative to end the violence.

one must note that terrorism depends on the ability to generate the appropriate level of terror and anxiety. it was meant to produce a change in the Egyptian government’s political position. the consequences of adopting a nonviolent position and the probability of achieving its political goals through terrorist undertakings. the bulk of which may be able to make a reasonable calculation that they are not a risk. Final Observations For GAI. they lack resources. the costs of attempting violent attacks and of these attacks failing. nor did GAI members have any interest in targeting the “far enemy. Acts of terror induce psychological effects.VIII. Even with some assistance from Al Qa’ida. by definition. which must fan out among a possibly substantial population. A constant failure to achieve its stated goals led to internal strife and its ultimate collapse as a terrorist group. Thus. The costs of executing attacks became too high and the consequences of adopting a nonviolent position seemed promising (Crenshaw 1987). Terrorist organizations engage in a process of constant adaptation to the strategic environment and are apt to respond to policy-induced changes to their constraints since. they changed their strategic tactics. the group abandoned its violent 91 . not to destroy the government’s military potential. GAI used terrorism to influence political behavior by devaluing the state in the eyes of its citizens. terrorism was a means to a political end. Accordingly. GAI acted on the basis of its calculation of the benefit to be gained from violent action. However.” When GAI was unable to achieve its political goal through terrorism. terrorists groups must conduct a sequence of directed attacks that creates a sufficient sense of threat for it to be understood that the campaign will continue unless and until there is a change in state policy (Freedman 2007). Crenshaw’s description of the instrumental approach to assessing terrorist violence is useful for understanding GAI’s rationale. GAI would not have been able to defeat the Egyptian government.

strategy. terrorism was merely a means to an end and substitutes were available. For GAI. GAI now appears to be concerned with carving out some political space to operate in Egypt. 92 .

ideology. social bonds served as a “permissive factor”). the analysis of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb provides an example of an intelligent and shrewd local jihadist leader. 93 . The data collected in this survey and analysis of Al Qa’ida’s leadership has significantly demonstrated that leaders were strongly incentivized by opportunism. Consequently. Recent studies indicate that strategies aimed at enabling stringent police techniques and punitive military action will not succeed in deterring the Al Qa’ida suicide bombers(Atran 2003). Moreover.e.Chapter 8: Conclusion and Discussion – Al Qa’ida’s Commanding Officers: A Skilled Management Team To understand terrorist organizations. it is necessary to examine the staff that operates at each level of the hierarchy within the system. In the first chapters. I posed the question: what motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida? I hypothesized that opportunism. like Osama bin Laden or Ayman Zawahiri or to concentrate on the suicide bombers who conduct operations. broad-based Al Qa’ida network augmented by affiliations with various groups has durability that will surpass his mortality. It is naïve to focus on chief executives. the commanding officers that direct Al Qa’ida’s affiliates. or social bonds could motivate local jihadist leaders to enroll in Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program. while social bonds facilitated the process of affiliating (i. interventions may need to be focused at understanding and disrupting Al Qa’ida’s mid-level management. While Osama bin Laden’s capture or death would be an important psychological blow to those vested in his invincibility. Abdelmalek Droukdal whose desire to revive his group inspired him to associate with Al Qa’ida while the examination of Al Gama’a al-Islamiyya demonstrates why strategic calculations can rouse other organizations to eschew violence and rebuff Al Qa’ida’s forays. his loosely affiliated.

Factionalism is also common amongst terrorist organizations. Psychological surveys indicate that terrorists are not psychologically deviant or ideologically blinded(Sageman 2004). My data analysis and case studies support these conclusions. when the costs of other forms of violence increase. But what are these motives? In fact. there may be a divergence of opinion on precisely what objectives should be 94 . the type of regime against which they are fighting. Counterterrorism efforts aimed at winning battles and capturing terrorist actors deplete the ranks of terrorist organizations by physically eliminating combatants. organizations must attract and retain members. Within the larger understanding of a terrorist group’s political aims. wish to enhance and promote the organizations that they direct since their personal ambitions are tied to the organization’s viability (Cronin and Ludes 2004). insurgent groups should also be perceived as rational entities that are more likely to adopt terrorist tactics when the benefits of other forms of violence decrease. the fundamental purpose of any political organization is to maintain itself. in particular. and counterinsurgency tactics” (Laitin and Jacob Shapiro 2008) Like individual terrorists. groups may lose members to other terrorist groups when a competing group can put together a package of purposive goals and selective incentives that is more appealing than that of the first organization.Previous studies depict terrorists as rational actors seeking to maximize political goals (Lake 2003). or both. Leaders. One should consider terrorism as “one of a set of rebel tactics that is consciously selected in response to changes in funding. Conciliation programs can be a successful counter-terrorism strategy when amnesty is offered to operatives who renounce violence. popular support. In order to survive. Since they are rational actors. it is not surprising that local jihadist group leaders have opportunistic motives for joining Al Qa’ida. Moreover. as was the case with the GSPC (Sederberg 1995). competition against other rebel groups.

When loss of membership occurs. Recruiters for Al Qa’ida reportedly told researchers that volunteers were “beating down their doors” to join (Atran 2004). combatants. 95 . Thus. and those with inside knowledge of the military and police(Gray and Stockham 2008). However. This divergence compels operatives to defect. Al Qa’ida can easily dispatch a few combatants to assist local groups in desperate need of increased membership and expertise. Since the 1980s. security sources in Algeria said that the Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb offensive in August 2008 reflected the recruitment of scores of operatives.pursued. many groups may choose to align with Al Qa’ida to remain salient. groups may alienate the communities in which they operate by conducting particularly violent or poorly executed operations (Crenshaw 1991). when they occupy a “moral high ground”). including suicide bombers.e.” While it is impossible to know precisely the size of Al Qa’ida due to the decentralized structure of its organization. Finally. Al Qa’ida trained over 5. Al Qa’ida probably has several thousand members and associates. Bin Laden and Al Qa’ida’s elite cadre have convinced many volunteers to fulfill the duty of jihad and to thus respond to “the call of Allah. especially in less democratic nations. like the GAI. transforming from an armed group into a political party is no easy feat. Al Qa’ida’s recruitment has picked up in 30-40 countries. For example. In recent years. some groups may find it beneficial to renounce violence and enter the political arena. When this occurs. their public image shifts from well-intentioned revolutionaries to common delinquents. Al Qa’ida can transfer operatives to help support the local jihadist group since Al Qa’ida’s own recruitment is accelerating. Thus. making recruitment amongst these communities increasingly difficult.000 militants in camps in Afghanistan. Groups only enjoy popular support when the population believes their actions are justified under the political conditions of the country (i.

Al Qa’ida uses propaganda to foster its positive public image as the defender of Islam. depicting its operatives as “freedom fighters. the Muslim warriors of the crusader period) by establishing a territorial base for Islam and by protecting those who are oppressed by foreign domination(Henzel 2005). To complement this strategy. Therefore. Al Qa’ida is a high-value global brand that is esteemed amongst the Salafi community. of coalition soldiers shooting wounded insurgents inside a mosque.Additionally. groups gain credibility and respect that can be effectively leveraged to increase recruitment. primarily by means of the Qatari television station al-Jazeera. upon aligning with Al Qa’ida.e. In fact. Al Qa’ida has substantially promoted and publicized its image throughout the globe. striving for global jihad. For instance. which produces the professional tapes and promotional film clips disseminated throughout the Arab and Western world. or of occupation forces stepping with their boots on the backs of Arabic men that have just been bound 96 . Through a program of propaganda and indoctrination. Al Qa’ida also selects sympathetic journalists to whom it grants interviews (Schweitzer 2008). Before joining forces with Al Qa’ida. Al Qa’ida established a communications committee to promote this representation through a well-executed publicity campaign. However. as discussed in Chapter 3. they are perceived as legitimate actors. Bin Laden has created a company called al-Sahab. By aligning with Al Qa’ida. Al Qa’ida encourages potential operatives to follow in the footsteps of their pious predecessors (i. Recognizing the powerful potential of the media. These journalists present Al Qa’ida to the outside world in a supportive manner. recruits are shown provocative photos of Iraqi women and children killed or bloodied by Western bombardment. In doing so. their social status is enhanced. many terrorist groups are compared to criminal gangs.” To supplement recruitment. Al Qa’ida raises awareness amongst Muslims of the grievances that gave rise to its birth.

it effectively encourages redemption through faith and sacrifice. Al Qa’ida can help groups conduct attacks. Thus.000 of Al Qa’ida seed money (Ward 2005). tyrants gained dominance over the Muslims in every aspect and every land”(Calvert 2004). indoctrinated. etc. Al Qa’ida’s affiliates learn from Al Qa’ida how to conduct comparable propaganda campaigns in their home countries to attract and enhance their own recruitment efforts. Such emotional narratives highlight the theme of humiliation at the hand of callous and arrogant Western powers(Hafez 2007). Al Qa’ida is infamous for providing terrorist training and for establishing sites and camps where recruits are educated. equipment. Abdelmalek Droukdal certainly modeled his publicity efforts on that of Al Qa’ida and benefited from advice from Al Qa’ida’s media branch. Finally. Because of that. Al Qa’ida’s veterans can offer groups tactical and strategic advice. both alumni of the Afghan jihad. known as Muklhas. For example.and forced to the ground with black sacks over their faces. Ansar al-Islam was started with $300. Al Qa’ida established numerous local military training facilities in Mindanao and Indonesia in the last two decades. even death. and weapons. and mentored. For instance. nature of the military and intelligence services. due to its exceptional intelligence-gathering skills. Moreover. financial services. Al Qa’ida can offer groups financial resources. known as Hambali and Ali Gufron. physical environment. Al Qa’ida also attributes Muslim societies’ “greatest misfortune and decadence to their abandonment of jihad due to the love of this world and abhorrence of death. Riduan Isamuddin. According to several reports. It can also offer groups information on the government.000 to $600. 97 . helped Jemaah Islamiyah plan and execute the 2002 Bali bombing that killed more than 2000 people (Abuza 2003).

social networks can be thought of as a stipulation that pre-structures and facilitates the merger process. Since Al Qa’ida provides local jihadist group leaders with numerous opportunities to stimulate and expand their organizations. and because such affiliations are not difficult to initiate due to the existence of prior social connections. Such missions create publicity events that effectively advertise the organization and psychologically appeal to individual needs to feel important and meaningful through membership in a “higher” movement (Atran 2003). While not a precipitant cause for an affiliation. in particular. local jihadist leaders are presented with appealing and cost effective opportunities to bolster their own recruitment and ensure organizational survival and their ability to achieve their political aims without abandoning arms and investigating political avenues. local jihadist group leaders are positioned to seek assistance from their colleagues when decline within their own organizations seems imminent. Due to these associations. but also create and promote “heroes” that represent the organization. the results of this study suggest that most local jihadist group leaders have already established significant social bonding and networking with members of Al Qa’ida Central Command. rather than abandon their mission.Conducting attacks connotes a high degree of devotion and strength to potential recruits. Also. just as a conventional military organization might glamorize its heroes to inspire others to volunteer for field military actions. it may be futile for counterterrorist forces to discourage local jihadist group leaders from soliciting Al Qa’ida. demonstrate that the organization has a loyal and impassioned following. strategies should be developed to isolate these groups from Al Qa’ida. Moreover. Instead. Suicide attacks. Efforts should ensure that the necessary resources (both human and 98 . thereby making such affiliations more problematic and risky. martyrdom operations not only produce spectacular incidents of large-scale destruction. By joining Al Qa’ida.

In areas like the Core Arab states and the Maghreb. thereby crippling its ability to supersede a regional dimension (Filiu 2009). However. Thus. some suggest that AQIM’s globalization process has been impeded by the expulsion of AL Qa’ida in Iraq (AQI) from Baghdad in 2008. In the age of globalization. Unilateral approaches to border control will leave a mismatch of contradictory national policies. Bin Laden has devoted less attention and resources to AQIM. To thwart Al Qa’ida’s connections with local jihadist groups. and illegal migrants” (Ross 2003). A model system is that which is utilized in the European Union. Tom Ridge. which features a common visa policy and region-wide fingerprint or iris photography database. If groups are precluded from affiliating with Al Qa’ida. state borders were opened to international trade flows. weapons of mass destruction. Since the Iraqi branch of Al Qa’ida suffered this setback. portrayed US borders as “conduits for terrorists. they are less likely to survive or recuperate from setbacks. For instance. former Secretary of Homeland Security. communities. third-country nationals refused entry to the EU and individuals 99 . governments should implement a networked border monitoring and border control system. The new Schengen Information System computer database contains information on criminals on the run. previous asylum applications. stolen cars and other stolen property as well as biometric cannot be exchanged between Al Qa’ida and its weaker partner. This system is also used to store and disseminate information on extradition. it is necessary to treat carefully because restrictive “fortress” responses and sweeping immigrant surveillance hinder cooperation with key immigrant. terrorists have learned how to make legal immigration channels and legitimate immigrant communities serve their lethal jihadist ends. especially Muslim. Throughout the 1990s. border control measures must be established to prevent the movement of terrorists and terror-related materials.

the leaders issued more communiqués. and aviation security capacity (Kagwanja 2006). The second question that I sought to answer involved the type of role local jihadist leaders played within Al Qa’ida. police training. The United States can provide assistance to foreign governments to enhance operational capacity to tighten border controls. granted more interviews. etc. an understanding might be developed of what government initiatives trigger terrorist organizations to seek partnerships with Al Qa’ida and of the strength of the alliance that materializes as a result. For example. One impressive program was the East Africa Counter Terrorism Initiative. While there were no significant patterns in the data on the operational and logistic role of the leaders profiled. counterterrorist forces can better undermine these leaders. These predictive models could be used in order to develop strategies for a pre-emptive counter-response. 100 . it appears that most leaders took on an increasingly ideological role after the merger.subject to a European arrest warrant or under surveillance for criminal activity(One Single EU Border 2005) A system for region-wide arrests would also be useful in areas where terrorist activity is high. After the merger. I considered leadership roles before and after the affiliation to uncover trends. Future research may also focus on how alliances mature and evolve over time since this article focuses on aspects of maturity among terrorist groups who have engaged in networking with Al Qa’ida. whereby $50 million for security programs administered by the US Department of Defense was offered to East African states to provide for military training for border control and security of the coastline. gave more speeches. By understanding what function local jihadist leaders play. Future research will center on the development of predictive models based on emerging patterns among terrorist groups that align with Al Qa’ida.

a high degree of decision influence. an affiliation will not occur. Consequently. he demands that his commanding officers convince their operatives to adopt and accept Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are uniquely positioned to persuade uncommitted followers that Al Qa’ida has a better ideology. In contrast. ethno-religious struggles. As mentioned in earlier chapters. These groups enjoyed popularity in Somalia in the 60s due to their attempts to regain lost Somali land after independence and to their resistance to dictator. interactive communication patterns. leader-member value agreement. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are tightly coupled to their operatives. unified struggle that transcends local. The leaders of local jihadist groups develop differentiated relationships with their 101 . as was the case with the GAI. and regional concerns. they gained the support of the Somali people through nationalist causes more than through a common affinity for Salafism. the worldwide community of believers(Sutton and Vertigans 2006). Although Bin Laden wants to align with local militant groups with country-specific grievances to increase his global reach and influence. Siad Barre. al-Ittihad al-Islami was established in the 1980s through the merger of Salafi groups. When local jihadist leaders are not interested in promoting this agenda.To understand why this increase in evangelizing and political activity of these leaders occurs. an ideology that was widely unpopular in the country in previous years (West 2006). The roots of most of the terrorist networks included in this study can be traced to geographically separate. state. Central to Al Qa’ida’s vision is the awakening of the Muslim ummah. Al Qa’ida conceives its resistance as a single. one must consider the philosophy and ambitions of local jihadist groups compared to Al Qa’ida. effective influence tactics. The dyadic relationship between these leaders and their followers is characterized by high quality leader-member exchange resulting from frequent communication. and subordinate loyalty. For example.

and spin. When the security situation does not permit direct communications. In doing so. Due to such high quality leader-member exchange. due to their close relationship with operatives. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers correspond with their cohorts through communiqués. Like Al 102 . Based on these motivational communications.rapports. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers can convince their operatives to integrate their previous regional ambitions with a wider transnational Islamic agenda. followers trust their leaders and can be persuaded to engage in activities that they otherwise would not and can be encouraged to move beyond their own self-interest to focus on larger mutual interests(Graen and Uhl-Bien 1995). through their ideological operations. speeches. operatives must also integrate new tactics and strategies into their repertoire. Because they know their audience well. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers can ground their message in the narrative elements most likely to resonate with this target group. in which they clarify their vision. they can apply effective message management. Thus. and interviews. For instance. When a group first affiliates with Al Qa’ida. Valuable insights can be gained by considering the role that managers play when two companies merge in order to understand the role that Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play in mitigating culture shock and encouraging integration. In addition to accepting Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program. rather than using an average leadership style. rhetoric. Moreover. the GSPC was encouraged to engage in suicide and arson attacks(Guidère 2007). they subordinate their radical group to Al Qa’ida’s strategic goals and move their localized Islamic resistance beyond sovereign state boundaries to transcend provincial frames of reference. followers are encouraged to take personal initiative and exercise personal leadership to make their unit more effective. culture shock is inevitable. as Droukdal did on numerous occasions.

transition managers must make the case for integration to large numbers of employees. finally acceptance occurs. For Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers and corporate transition managers. and shared. major change and generate a great deal of uncertainty due to the fact that organizational cultures are underpinned by deep assumptions that are constant. Although some of the groups that Al Qa’ida merges with have less than five hundred operatives. patterned. In addition. shared vision of future organizational arrangements (Marks and Mirvis 2000). a corporation may encourage teamwork while the venture it subsumes may be more oriented towards individual initiatives. often accompanied by frustration and depression.” For example. The threat to old corporate values and organizational lifestyle leaves organizational members in a state of defensiveness accentuated by low levels of trust within the institution. transition mangers assume full-time responsibility and accountability for making integration work. Helen Kubler-Ross’s four stages of bereavement or 103 . one of the most common difficulties that arise during the merger is “cultural differences. the burden of responsibility still rests on the commanding officers to assuage their followers after the affiliation with Al Qa’ida commences. These are identical to Dr. Droukdal issued a communiqué explaining and justifying this repositioning. Soon after the GSPC announced its merger with Al Qa’ida. Employees’ reactions most often pass through four distinct stages. When corporate mergers occur.Qa’ida’s commanding officers. mergers represent sudden. Both transition managers and Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers must be skilled in relinquishing and helping others relinquish past values and practices that are not in tune with the current. next emotional bargaining begins. They commence with disbelief and denial and pass into anger and then rage and resentment. This can only be achieved by providing ideological guidance through leadermember exchanges and through public communications and appearances.

Leaders. Finally. 104 . principles. 1997). Leaders hoping to initiative organizational change and general follower acceptance face a daunting task. and a sense that the future will be better than the past through their speeches and other outreach activities. They must assuage their followers’ fears and convince them of the saliency and relevance of the new program through constant communication. and support necessary changes in behaviors and culture to successfully realize the post-combination organization. like Droukdal. It is their responsibility to define. and desired end state. promote. Communication should be their major priority throughout the merger process. optimism. anticipate the impact of change. and address inconsistencies between the espoused operating principles and actual management of change. they must inspire hope. What the operative grapples with is akin to the “death” of the previous organization and the letting go of this relationship (Cartwright and Cooper 1990). Effective leaders possess powerful persuasive personal characteristics and execute actions designed to change internal organizational culture and substance.grief. In this context. These initiatives can only be achieved by assuming an ideological role (Kavanagh and Ashkanasy 2006). successfully promote change by implementing and campaigning for a unique vision of the organization through a publicity campaign. When a merger occurs. leadership can be viewed as the art of mobilizing others to want to struggle for shared aspirations (Covin et al. Finally. transition managers (and Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers) must define the new “combination” goals. A wide range of factors affect organizational change as produced during a merger. Moreover. they should clarify critical success factors for the merger. they should serve as role models on how to “work together” for the goals of the organization.

For instance. Thus. counterterrorist units should channel messages through volunteers in Internet forums(Brachman and McCants 2006). For example. My data indicates that these commanding officers are leading Al Qa’ida’s growing media offensive. messaging should refute the imputation of malign Western intention in the Muslim world and undermine the notion that terrorism is authentically Islamic. government communications strategy should build an attractive alternative to the Al Qa’ida worldview by appealing to a sense of deracinated nationalism. This program should expose tension between Al Qa’ida leadership and supporters. Counterterrorism units can use media organizations to launch global propaganda pushes that will taint the Al Qa’ida brand and make it even less attractive to local militants. like the GAI.Understanding Al Qa’ida’s commanding officer’s role as transition managers during a merger is important when designing initiatives to undermine their efforts. Counterterrorist forces can also harness the power of the “Shayma effect” (which refers to an incident where an Egyptian schoolgirl was killed in a jihadist attack) by broadcasting images off jihadist attacks that have killed Muslim children. have taken steps to promote peaceful co-existence with the government and society(Gunaratna and Ali 2009). Moreover. authorities can publicize the rejection of Al Qa’ida by credible local figures. Such propaganda will appeal to communities anxious to retain their cultural heritage and religious integrity. The media has become a crucial battlefield in the current conflict against radical Islamic terrorism (Blanchard 2006). It is important to remember that some groups. especially religious ones. In fact. another principle Islamist militant group in Egypt. do opt to renounce violence. For 105 . Proxies must manage from affair and this sort of counter-terrorism publicity campaign. Approaching communications in this manner ensures that the government avoids exacerbating feelings of alienation within Muslim communities. several leaders of GAI and Al-Jihad al-Islami.

Moreover. Ayman Al Zawahiri acknowledges that the struggle between the secular governments in the West and the militant jihadists of Al Qa’ida is a “battle of ideologies. Our government should also realize this truism. The collapse of Al Qa’ida’s propaganda operations will also cause the Arab media to move towards more coverage of the legitimate Iraqi government. a struggle for survival. The leaders of the Western world should follow suit.instance. Ed Husain and Shiraz Maher were two young British Muslims who became involved with radical Islamist politics with Hizb ut-Tahir before renouncing their affiliation and speaking out publicly about the dangers of intolerant Islamism (MacEoin 2007). the government should continue to capture Al Qa’ida news and production staff. along with their PCS and data files. This study indicates that Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are playing an increasingly ideological role. and a war with no truce” (Payne 2009). courage and commitment in countering al-Qaida propaganda and recruitment activity. 106 . Salafi and Islamist communities in London have consistently demonstrated skill.

” International Journal of Middle East Studies: 481-499. Free Press.ahram.” Al-Ahram Center for Political & Strategic Studies. Abuza. “Funding Terrorism in Southeast Asia: The Financial Network of Al Qaeda and Jemaah Islamiya. Peter. “Going to the Source: Why Al Qaeda’s Financial Network Is Likely to Withstand the Current War on Terrorist Financing. Antil.” Science 299(5612): 1534-1539. P. Youssef. New York: Simon & Schuster.17049. Bergen.: inside the secret world of Osama bin Laden. Wahid. 2003.html [Accessed May 14. 2009]. Alain. Aboul-Enein. 2003. 2003. 107 . Bergen. “The Political Revival of Islam: the Case of Egypt. New York: Free Press.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 27: 169-185. 2004. Atran. National Consortium for the Study of terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. Atran. Al Qaida's Ideology.HTM [Accessed January 1. “The Reconstituted Al-Qaeda Threat in the Maghreb. [Accessed May 14. L.umd. Bergen. 2002. 2009]. Peter. 2007. Andrew. 2004. Black.” Terrorism Monitor 5(2): 7-12. Available at: http://www. The Osama bin Laden I know: an oral history of al Qaeda's leader. Holy War. Scott. 2006.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 25(2): 169-200.start. 1980. About START.BIBLIOGRAPHY: Abdel Maguid. Mark. Inc. Ayman Al-Zawahiri: The Ideologue of Modern Islamic Airforce University Maxwell. The Threats. Nazih. “Mishandling Suicide Terrorism. Inc. “Genesis of Suicide Terrorism. 1st ed. “L’Afrique et la «Guerre Contre la Terreur». 2009]. Algeria: Violence Returns.mi5. “Egypt's Gama'ah Islamiyah: The Turnabout and its Ramifications. 2001. Scott. Ayubi. Zachary. Available at: http://www. Holy war.” The Washington Quarterly 27(3): 67-90.: Inside the Secret World of Osama bin Laden.” Politique Étrangère 3. African Research Bulletin (23): 17045 . Available at: http://acpss.

Blanchard. 2006. John. Washington.” British Journal of Management 1(2): 65-76. London: C Hurst & Co Publishers Ltd. Y. p. Calvert. “How Terrorism Declines. Carafano. Jarret.” Journal of Management Development 16(1): 22-33. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies. Teresa et al. Amelie. 1990. 2009]. Anneli.: The Heritage Foundation. and William McCants. Crenshaw. “Theories of Terrorism: Instrumental and Organizational Approaches. The Enigma of Islamist Violence. 2006.” International Security 31(1): 7-48. and Cary Cooper. Nova Publishers. J.” Comparative Strategy 22(3): 207-221. and Louis Martínez.” In Al-Qaeda: An Organization to be Reckoned With. J. Laetitia Bucaille.” In 2005 Index of Economic Freedom. “Promoting Freedom and Democracy: Fighting the War of Ideas Against Islamic Terrorism. “The Mythic Foundations of Radical Islam. 2006. Martha. Cartwright.C. 2005. Botha. 108 . “Al Qaeda in the Maghreb: The" Newest" Front in the War on Terror. Y Feldner.cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA30906 [Accessed February 3. Audrey. Covin. Carmon. Cohen. 1991. 1997. and D Lav. 11. 2007. Cronin.” Mediterranean Quarterly 19(1): 80. Christopher. Storming Media. “Leadership Style and Post-Merger Satisfaction. The GSPC: Newest Franchise in al-Qa'ida's Global Jihad. “Stealing Al Qaeda's Playbook. “Al Qaeda: Statements and Evolving Ideology. 2006. 2006. Boudali. 2007. “How Al-Qaida ends: The decline and demise of terrorist groups. “The Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions on People at Work: Existing Research and Issues. 2004. Politics and Terrorism: An Assessment of the Origin and Threat of Terrorism in Egypt. Ariel. Sue. The Al-Gama'a Al-Islamiyya Cessation of Violence: An Ideological Reversal. Crenshaw. 2003. The Middle East Media Research Institute. Anthony.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 29(4): 309-321. 1987.” Orbis 48(1): 29-41.” Terrorism and political violence 3(1): 6987. Celso. L. Martha. D.” Journal of Strategic Studies 10(4): 13-31. Blom. “Global Terrorism and the Global Economy: Unpeaceful Coexistence. Available at: http://memri. 2008. Brachman.

Stephen. Fawaz.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 28(3): 237-252. Desouza. Harmony and Disharmony: Exploiting al-Qa'ida's Organizational Vulnerabilities. Graen. 2008]. “Left-Wing Terrorism in Italy. Lawrence. 109 .: United States Institute for Peace. 2008.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 618(1): 46.” New Political Science 22(1): 77-88. “The Leaderless Nexus: When Crime and Terror Converge. 2003. Freedman. “Political Islam and violence. Kevin. Gerges.dtic. Ellis. “Hacking Networks of Terror.” The Middle East Journal: 592-612.C. “Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. D.” Foreign Affairs 81(4): 60-74. David.” Dialogue IO 1(01): 1-14. and James Ludes. “Militant Recruitment in Pakistan: Implications for Al Qaeda and Other Organizations..” African Affairs 103(412): 459-464. Joe et al. Felter. “Using the Mistakes of al Qaeda's Franchises to Undermine Its Strategies. 2004. Dishman. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press. 2005. Ghadbian. Gershman. Political Islam in Sub-Saharan Africa. Attacking Terrorism: Elements of a Grand Strategy. Dickson. and Mary Uhl-Bien. John. 2002. 2005. 2007. 2000. Najib.” The Leadership Quarterly 6(2): 219247. George B. 1995. 2004. “Briefing: the Pan-Sahel 9 [Accessed December 4. “Is Southeast Asia the Second Front?. Available at: http://oai. “Terrorism as a Strategy.Cronin. R. Chris. Brian. J. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press. Christine. Washington. Fair. and Tobin Hengsen. “Connectivity among Terrorist Groups: A Two Models Business Maturity Approach. Diebert. G.. 2006. and J. Stein.” In Terrorism in Context. Fishman. Donatella. 1995. 2004. “The End of the Islamist Insurgency in Egypt?: Costs and Prospects. 2000.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 30(7): 593-613. 2007.” Government and Opposition 42(3): 314339. Audrey. Della Porta. Counterterrorism Center.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 27(6): 489-504.

“Al Qaeda. Gunaratna. 2008.” Terrorism and Political Violence 19: 95-115. Georgetown University: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies. and Future Potentialities: An Assessment. 2007. “The Clash of Civilizations?.” Foreign Affairs 72(3): Hoffman. Bruce. Trends in Terrorism. Is the Maghreb the “Next Afghanistan"?: Mapping the Radicalization of the Algerian Salafi Jihadist Movement. and Chris Wyckloff.” Strategic Insights 5(8). “Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb: the evolution from Algerian Islamism to transnational terror. GSPC): An Operational Analysis. 2009. Stockham.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 32(4): 277-291.. Jailan. and Mbin Ali. Al-Qaïda à la Conquête du Maghreb : Le Terrorisme aux Portes de l'Europe. Available at: http://weekly.asp [Accessed December 6. Hafez.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 26(6): 429-442. Cliff. Jebnoun. Henzel.” Parameters 35(1): 69-80. “Martyrdom Mythology in Iraq: How Jihadists Frame Suicide Terrorism in Videos and Biographies.usma. Available at: http://ctc. “The Changing Face of Al Qaeda and the Global War on Terrorism. Samuel. Rohan. 2nd ed. “De-Radicalization Initiatives in Egypt: A Preliminary Insight. Columbia University Press. Columbia University Press. Gyves. Inside Al Qaeda: Global Network of Terror. 2006. 2007. 2006. Noureddine.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 27(4): 549-560. Halawi.htm [Accessed May 19. “Algerian Groupe Salafiste de la Predication et le Combat (Salafi Group for Call and Combat. Editions du Rocher. 2002. Guidère. “The Origins of al Qaeda’s Ideology: Implications for US 1992. 2007. H. 2008]. 2004.ahram. and E.Gray. “The Post-Madrid Face of Al Qaeda. “Time for a Historic Reconciliation?. 110 . 2006. 2004. 2003.” The Washington Quarterly 27(3): 91-100.” African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 2(4): Bruce. D. Combating Terrorism Center: . Gunaratna.” Al-Ahram Weekly On-line. Huntington. Mohammed. Mathieu. Hoffman. Hoffman. Inside Terrorism. Rohan. B. 2002. 2005. Harmony Database Released Documents: Al Qa'ida Goals and Structure. Gunaratna. 2009]. Christopher. R.

” Emergence 5(1): 54-76. “The Political.” Terrorism. 2003. and Neal M. Denis.Johnson. “Rational Extremism: Understanding Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century. Anthony.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 26(6): 443-457. Sarapu. Laitin. Wells. 2005. 2002.” Strategic Insights 5(8). and Erika Weinthal. 2006.cfm [Accessed May 19. Jones.. 2002.” Institute for Security Studies.Islamic Group. 111 .R. Luong. African Security Review 15(3). Smith. “The Impact of Leadership and Change Management Strategy on Organizational Culture and Individual Acceptance of Change during a Merger.” : 73. “Targeting the Leadership of Terrorist and Insurgent Movements: Historical Lessons for Contemporary Policy Makers. and M. Lake.cdi. Economic. Keats. “Counter-terrorism in the Horn of Africa: New security frontiers. Schrijver. B. and Mary Uhl-Bien. 2006. Russ. Lecocq. Kavanagh. 2009]. “An Introduction to a Special Issue of Strategic Insights: Analyses of the Groupe Salafiste pour la Prédication et le Combat (GSPC) . and Organizational Sources of Terrorism.” Journal of Public and International Affairs 15. MacEoin. Peter. and Jacob Shapiro. Kalic.” Center for Defense Information.” Foreign Affairs 81(2): 61-70. L... Thomas H.” Journal of Contemporary African Studies 25(1): 141-166. 2007. and P. 2007. E. D. Kostrzebski. 2004.L. “New friends. W. Weeding. Available at: http://www. 2002. Langdon. “In the Spotlight: Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya . Pauline. 2003. Fort Leavenworth. David. old strategies. David. Economic Development. “The Shadow of Muhammad: Developing a Charismatic Leadership Model for the Islamic World. and M. Kansas: Combat Studies Institute.M. Marion. Policy Exchange. 2003. Sean. 2008. Kagwanja. Ashkanasy. 2006. and Political Openness: 209. Combating a Modern Hydra Al Qaeda and the Global War on Terrorism.. new fears in Central Asia. Marie J. The Hijacking of British Islam. “Looking for the Pattern: Al Qaeda in Southeast Asia--The Genealogy of a Terror Network.” British Journal of Management 17(S1): S81-S103. A. “Complexity theory and Al-Qaeda: Examining complex leadership. M.” Dialogue IO 1(01): 15-29. “The War on Terror in a Haze of Dust: Potholes and Pitfalls on the Saharan Front.

The Outer Rings of the Terrorist Universe.” Terrorism and Political Violence 15(1): 171-184. George. and Kevin Price. Mishal.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 32(2): 109-128. 2005. 112 . and Mary Uhl-Bien. “Al Qaeda Strikes Back. 2006. Acquisitions. Russ. J. “Winning the Battle of Ideas: Propaganda. and L. Euractiv. Available at: http://www. Post. and Maoz Rosenthal. Perliger. “Altruism and fatalism: The characteristics of Palestinian suicide terrorists. and Alliances: Creating an Effective Transition Structure. “The terrorists in their own words: Interviews with 35 incarcerated Middle Eastern terrorists.. Pedahzur.iht.euractiv. 2008. and Terror. Bruce.php?page=2 [Accessed March 17. 2009]. Sprinzak.” Defense Studies 7(3): 338-357. Kenneth.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 28(4): 275-293.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 27(4): 297-319. Moss. E. Bruce.” Riedel.” Deviant Behavior 24(4): 405-424. 2005. “Complexity Theory and Al-Qaeda: Examining Complex Leadership . Shaul. 2007. Mayer.” Organizational Dynamics 28(3): 35-47. 1949-99.. and Mary Uhl-Bien. Available at: http://www.” Emergence 5(1): 54-76. “ Al Qaeda and the Innovative Firm: Demythologizing the Network. Ideology. A. 2009. Marks. insurgents gain a lifeline from Al Qaeda . Michael. 2009]. One Single EU Border. 2003.” International Herald Tribune. 2003. Weinberg. Marion. Denny.” Foreign Affairs 86(3): 24-40. Michael. “Managing Mergers. and Phillip Mirvis. “Al Qaeda as a Dune Organization: Toward a Typology of Islamic Terrorist Organizations. 2006. 2007. M.Marion. Mitchell. Kenneth.Emergence. McAllister. Payne.” The Leadership Quarterly 12(4): 389-418. “The Legend and Legacy of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. M. Russ. “Beyond Al Qaeda: Part 2. 2001. “Leadership in complex organizations. 2000. Angel et al.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 32(2): 367-386. “In Algeria. Rabasa. “Unilateral presidential powers: Significant executive orders. and L. [Accessed May 18.

2002. 2005. University of Pennsylvania Press. Understanding Terror Networks. 2004. Ideology. “Istishad as an Ideological and Practical Tool in the Hands of AlQaeda. Steven. 2008. Efficiency. and Nikolas Gvosdev. “Post-Islamist Rumblings in Egypt: The Emergence of the Wasat party. Ray. Hunting Leadership Targets in Counterinsurgency and Counterterrorist Operations. “Conciliation as Counter-Terrorist Strategy. 2004. David. 2008.” The Middle East Journal: 415-432. 2007. The. Ross. Sageman. 2003.” First Monday 10(3). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. N. Al-Qa'ida and Social Movement Theory.” Foreign Affairs 82(4): 27-40. J. and Future. 2008.” Strategic Insights. “An economic perspective on transnational terrorism. Turbiville. Leaderless Jihad: Terror Networks in the Twenty-First Century. 2007. Steinberg. Enders. Phillip. Marc. Yamatz. T. “Do Terrorist Networks Need a Home?. 2006.Riedel. 2003. “Beyond the Abu Sayyaf. The Search for al Qaeda: Its Leadership. Shapiro. 2008. Schweitzer. “A Turkish al-Qaeda: The Islamic Jihad Union and the Internationalization of Uzbek Jihadism. “Islamic "New Social Movements"? Radical Islam. Guido. Graham. Bruce. and Stephen Vertigans. Stern.” Foreign Affairs 83(1): 15-21. 2004. Stacher. Sandler. Real Instituto El Cano. 2002. 1995. Securitizing Migration after 11 March.” Journal of National Defense Studies 6: 25. Marc.” European Journal of Political Economy 20(2): 301-316.” Journal of Peace Research: 295-312. The Terrorist's Challenge: Security. “Protean Enemy. Rogers. Control. 113 . Brookings Institution Press. Sederberg.. Jessica. James. Sageman. Peter. Takeyh. Stanford University: Center for International Security and Cooperation. Sutton. Joint Special Operations University.” The Washington Quarterly 25(3): 97-108. and W. “Al Qaeda and its affiliates: A global tribe waging segmental warfare?.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 11(1): 101-115. Ronfeldt. Joshua.

” Jamestown Foundation. 1968. Osama's Wake: The Second Generation of Al Qaeda. United States Air Force Counterproliferation Center. Available at: http://www. 2009]. 2006. Sunguta. ews%5BbackPid%5D=239&no_cache=1 [Accessed January 1.Uruena.jamestown. Terrorism Monitor 4: 15. Max. Wright. Blake . 2006. University of Chicago Press. 2005. Rene. West. “International Law as Administration: The UN's 1267 sanctions Committee and the Making of the War on terror. “Somalia’s ICU and Its Roots in al-Ittihad al-Islami. On Charisma and Institution Building.” Terrorism Focus 3(35). Weber. The Looming Tower: Al Qaeda and the Road to 9/11. Ward. “Egyptian Gama'a al-Islamiyya's Public Relations Campaign .” International Organizations Law Review 4(2): 321-342. Vintage. 2007. 114 . Chris. Zambelis. Lawrence.

Appendix I: List of Terrorist Groups Merger al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at al-Tawhid walJihad) Egyptian Islamic Jihad al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat) Libyan Islamic Fighting Group Partnership Ansar al-Islam/Jund alIslam/Ansar al-Sunnah Asbat al-Ansar Taliban Islamic Jihad Union Lashkar-e-Jhangvi Lashkar-e-Taiba Tunisian Combatant Group Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group Jemaah Islamiya Abu Sayyaf Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahidin Jaish-e-Mohammad al-Ittihaad al-Islami Eritrean Islamic Jihad Movement Collaboration Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan Yemen Islamic Jihad Aden Abyan Islamic Army Unaffiliated (Control) Al-Gama’a alIslamiyya 115 .

mil/news/newsarticle. Ellen.msnbc.” Boston. “Al-Qaeda in Iraq Update. Smith. 2008. Department of Defense. 2009]. and Rana Gargour-Sabbagh.” New York Times.capture/index. Wolf.” Backgrounder. Gregory. “U.aspx?briefingslideid=309 [Accessed January 2. Paley.” CNN. Kathy.defenselink. 2009]. “The Mysterious Heir to al-Zarqawi . [Accessed March 4.washingtonpost. “Abu Hamza al-Muhajir.cfr.defenselink. 2009].S.html [Accessed January 2. “Shadowy Trail of al-Qaida in Iraq Leader. and Mark Mazzetti. “Insurgent Leader Al-Zarqawi Killed in Iraq. Available at: http://www. “Starr Reports Live from Ramadi 2007. 2007.cnn. [Accessed March 4.: Senior al Qaeda in Iraq Leader Held.html [Accessed March 3. Eben. Knickmeyer. “Maliki Aide Who Discussed Amnesty Leaves Job. 2009]. DoD News Briefing. and Ibon Villelabeitia. 2009]. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www. Peter L. Available at: http://www.cjtf7. New York: Free Press. MSNBC.” U. “Al-Qaeda in Iraq Leader May Be in Afghanistan. 2006. Ned.132/search?q=cache:74UX2mQ_i-0J:www. 2009]. 2009].45. 2006a.pdf+khalid+almashadani&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=24&gl=us&client=firefox-a [Accessed January 2. 2006a.” The Washington” The Washington Post: A22.mnfiraq. Available at: Karouny.html [Accessed March 4. Gannon. 2009].Iraq. Available at: http://www. Knickmeyer. Multinational Force . MNF-I Press Brief – Operational Update .msn. Coalition Officials Say. Available at: http://www.ece [Accessed March 4. 2009]. 2008. “President Links Qaeda of Iraq to Qaeda of 9/11. The Osama Bin Laden I Know.Appendix II: Sources by Terrorist Group Al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at alTawhid wal-Jihad) Benson.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=16576&Itemid=131 [Accessed January 2. Kaplan. Amit. 2007. 2007. 2009].washingtonpost. Available at: Kevin.” The Washington Post. “Masri Now Leads Iraq Al Qaeda.html [Accessed January 2. 2009]. Available at: http://www.nytimes. Zarqawi's Mysterious Successor (aka Abu Ayub al-Masri) .timesonline. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www.” The Washington Post: A01. and Jonathan “Al Qaeda in Iraq Chooses Zarqawi Successor. and Jonathan Finer.html [Accessed January 2. Pam. 2006.Iraq. Blitzer.” The Times of London.” Operation Iraq Freedom: Official Website of the Multi-National Force . [Accessed January 3.aspx?id=16029 [Accessed January 3. 116 .” The Situation Room. 2006b. Department of Defense. 2009]. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www. U. New Al-Qaida in Iraq Leader Reported . Mariam. Rutenberg. 2009].S. Parker.

“Terrorist’s Odyssey: Saga of Dr. “Al-Qaida in Iraq Figure in Custody : NPR. 2009]. Wright. Mansfield. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. TLG on Foreign Relations. His Own Words: A Translation of the Writings of Dr. 2007. Blair. Ibrahim. A.” Wall Street Journal. 2009]. David. Available at: http://www. Ayman Al Zawahiri. Available at: http://www.” The Telegraph. Available at: Raymond. 2009b. Leaving Terrorism Behind. 117 . Wertheimer. “Ayman al-Zawahiri. The Al Qaeda Blair.php?storyId=12060238 [Accessed January 2. Available at: http://www. 2002. David. 2009]. and John [Accessed March 3. L. Available at: http://www. “Al-Qaeda Founder Launches Fierce Attack on Osama bin Laden . “Profile: Ayman al-Zawahiri. 2006.1187180. Al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat) Algeria: Violence Returns.” The New Yorker. CNN Programs. 2009]. 2007. “U. Andrew. 2006. Mohammed et al. 2009a. Tore. “Ayman Muhammad Rabi’Al-Zawahiri: The Making of an Arch-Terrorist.Tawfeeq. Available at: http://www. Egyptian Islamic Jihad.00. Ayman Al-Zawahiri Kamaa Aaraftu/Ayman Al-Zawahiri As I Knew Him.S. Teslik. Laura.cnn. and A. Raphaeli.html [Accessed March 4. 2008. Hudson Teslik. Cairo: Dar AlHamrousa.” Council on Foreign Relations. Alain.. Zawahiri. “Al-Qaeda Founder Launches Fierce Attack on Osama bin Laden.” National Public Radio. African Research Bulletin (23): 17045 .html [Accessed January 14.” Time.telegraph. Lee. New York: Broadway. 2007.npr.telegraph.” Politique étrangère 3. Says al Qaeda in Iraq Leader Not Captured. 2009]. “The Reconstituted Al-Qaeda Threat in the Maghreb. Cullison. Black.” Council on Foreign Relations. Lee Hudson. Ayman al-Zawahiri. “L’Afrique et la «guerre contre la terreur». 2009]. Peter. 2006.html [Accessed January 14.” CNN. “Profile: Abu Musab al-Zarqawi .umd. 2003. 2008. Available at: Linda.cfr. M. 2009].org/publication/9750 [Accessed March” The Telegraph.start. Bergen.” Terrorism and Political Violence 14(4): 1-22. 2005. Egyptian Islamic Jihad Al-Zayat.” Terrorism Monitor 5(2): 7-12. 2007. 2006. 2009].alqaedafree/index. 2009].9171.html [Accessed April 8. “The Rebellion Within. 2002. Available at: http://www. New York: Taylor & Francis. Antil. 2008.asp?id=5832 [Accessed January 14.html [Accessed March 12. Higgins. Available at: http://www.

Celso. Henzel. Intelligence Brief: Al-Qaeda's New Strategy in North Africa.iht. and P. 2006. Ellis. “Algerian Groupe Salafiste de la Predication et le Combat (Salafi Group for Call and Combat. Lecocq. and Louis Martínez..php?ac=view_report&report_id=641&language_id=1 [Accessed March 5. Old Strategies. 2006. Gilles.” New York Times .” Institute for Security Studies. Laetitia Bucaille. Cliff. Stephen. 2006. 2007. and D. and E. Michael.stm [Accessed March 5.pinr. 2008. 2008. “Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb: the Evolution from Algerian Islamism to Transnational Terror. Available at: http://www. Hegghammer.nytimes. “Al Qaeda in the Maghreb: The" Newest" Front in the War on Terror.” Middle East Journal 60(1): 11. Rogan.” The Middle East Journal 63(2): 213-226. Ib tauris. Anthony.” Journal of Contemporary African Studies 25(1): 141-166. GSPC): An Operational Analysis.” Parameters 35(1): 69-80. 2007. 2009]. “New Chief for Algeria's Islamists. Droukdal. 2007. Available at: http://news. B. 2006. Liane Kennedy. “Counter-Terrorism in the Horn of Africa: New Security Frontiers. Filiu. Squad et al. Moss. “An Interview with Abdelmalek Droukdal. H. Hafez. 2009.” Mediterranean Quarterly 19(1): 80. and Chris Wyckloff. 2009]. 2005.. 2009]. “Ragtag Insurgency Gains a Lifeline . Boudali.” BBC News. “Martyrdom Mythology in Iraq: How Jihadists Frame Suicide Terrorism in Videos and Biographies. Mohammed. 2007. Available at: http://www. Noureddine. “The Origins of al Qaeda’s Ideology: Implications for US Strategy. Amelie. Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam. Jean Pierre. Jihadism Online: A Study of how Al-Qaida and Radical Islamist Groups Use the Internet for Terrorist Kepel. Mohamed arezki. London: C Hurst & Co Publishers Ltd. 2009]. Now. Is the Maghreb the “Next Afghanistan"?: Mapping the Radicalization of the Algerian Salafi Jihadist Movement. “An Introduction to a Special Issue of Strategic Insights: Analyses of the Groupe Salafiste pour la Prédication et le Combat (GSPC) . Power and Interest News Report.” Strategic Insights 5(8). Hanna. insurgents gain a lifeline from Al Qaeda . “The Local and Global Jihad of al-Qa ‘ida in the Islamic Maghreb. Mekhennet. 2007.” African Affairs 103(412): 459-464. 2006. 2007. “In” African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 2(4): 091-097. Jebnoun. “Briefing: the Pan-Sahel Initiative. Norwegian Defence Research Establishment. Kagwanja. Gray. 2008. “Global Jihadism After the Iraq War. “The War on Terror in a Haze of Dust: Potholes and Pitfalls on the Saharan Front. Thomas H. T. Georgetown University: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies. Christopher. 2008.” New York Times.Blom. African Security Review 15(3).com/articles/2008/07/01/africa/01algeria. 118 . Stockham. The GSPC: Newest Franchise in al-Qa'ida's Global Jihad. 2006.” Strategic Insights 5(8). West Point Military Academy.html?_r=1 [Accessed March 5. Himeur. 2008. Schrijver. The Enigma of Islamist Violence. Peter. 2004. Johnson.php?page=2 [Accessed March 17. A.” International Herald Tribune. D. Available at:” Terrorism and Political Violence 19: 95-115.

org/program/issue/” Terrorism Monitor 3(6). Goolsby. Kohlmann. “Between the ‘Near’ and the ‘Far’ Enemy: Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb. 2007.” Journal of National Defense Studies 6: 25.” Mediterranean Politics 11(2): 151-165. Steinberg. “Libya: The Conversion of a ‘Terrorist State’. and Carol Volk. Available at: http://yalibnan. Rebecca. 2009]. New York: Columbia Univ Press. Gambil. “North African immigrants in Europe and political Blake .php [Accessed February 27. Alison. 2008. 119 .” Center for Defense Information. Available at: http://counterterrorismblog. Yamatz. 2005. 2005.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 11(1): 101-115. Luis. Pargeter.start. 2006b. Counterterrorism Center. and Stephen Vertigans. 2009]. Pargeter.asp?id=5862 [Accessed January 26. 2007. and John King.” Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 12(1): 7-20. 2006.” Counterterrorism Blog. Boston: Harvard University Press. Alison. Michael. “Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. “Istishad as an Ideological and Practical Tool in the Hands of Al-Qaeda. Werenfels. 2006a. 2009]. 2009]. Schweitzer. Libyan Islamic Fighting Group Clark. National Intelligence Council.000 Reward Announced for Ansar al-Sunnah Commander in Iraq.Roy. Martínez.start. Sutton. [Accessed January 23.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 29(8): 731-747. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. Phillip. 2005.umd. The Failure of Political Islam. Negroponte. 2009]. and Brian Fishman. 2007. 1996. Ansar al-Islam/Jund al-Islam/Ansar al-Sunnah Ansar al-Islam. Ya Libnan.asp?id=4400 [Accessed January 23. 2007. Joseph. 2006. Lebanon's Fatah al-Islam leadership & Organization.php [Accessed February 27.umd.” Mediterranean Politics 12(3): 407-413. United States Air Force Counterproliferation Center. Olivier..jamestown. Al-Qa'ida and Social Movement Theory. G. “$50. Felter.cfm?DocumentID=2836&IssueID=56&StartRow=1&ListRows=10&ap pendURL=&Orderby=DateLastUpdated&ProgramID=39&issueID=56 [Accessed May 20. 2006. and I. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. Evan. Osama's Wake: The Second Generation of Al Qaeda. The Libyan Paradox. “In the Spotlight: The Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG). Martinez. Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. “Combating Terrorist Networks: An Evolutionary Approach. Available at: http://www.” Review of African Political Economy 33(108): 219235. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www.cdi. 2006. Al-Qa'ida's Foreign Fighters in Iraq: A First Look at the Sinjar Records. John. “Libya: Reforming the Impossible?. “Islamic "New Social Movements"? Radical Islam. 2009]. Annual Threat Assessment of the Director of National Intelligence for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. 2007.

Peter. 2005. Available at: http://news. 2006. 2009] .85. 2008. Available at: http://www.html [Accessed May 19.132/search?q=cache:PNdZs5NZnv0J:www. 2009]. “Asbat al-Ansar . “Ansar al-Islam: Back in Iraq .org/groupes/groupes_description.US Department of the Treasury. Available at: http://www. 2005.nsf/Page/What_Governments_are_doing_Listing_of_T errorism_Organisations_Asbat_al-Ansar [Accessed May 19.pdf+Asbat+al-Ansar+AND+leadership&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=15&gl=us&client=firefox-a [Accessed January 26. 2006.investigativeproject. Gregory. Asbat al-Ansar (Lebanon) . John. Press Room .stm [Accessed May 19. Parliamentary Joint Committee on ASIO. 2009]. Rubin. Available at: http://www. “Ansar al-Sunna. Courting Public Opinion. Ansar Al-Islam: Postmortem or Prelude to More Attacks? The Washington Institute for Near East Policy.” Équipe de recherche sur le terrorism et l'antiterrorisme. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www. “Mullah Omar in Pakistan . Asbat al-Ansar Asbat Al Ansar.” CNN. court rejects mullah release.” Global Politician. 120 . and Charlie Moore.globalsecurity. 2004.ertatcrg. Available at: http://mypetjawa. Available at: http://www. 2004. 2009].” Available at: http://www. “Army of Ansar al-Sunnah Website Update. 2009]. Shackleford.mullahomar/index. Gomez del Prado. US Department of State.globalpolitician. BBC. Available at: http://www. 2009. 2009]. 2009].htm [Accessed February 28.” Middle East Quarterly 11(1). Pike. Available at: http://209. Jonathan.aei. 2009]. Available at: http://nationalsecurity. Anderson Cooper. [Accessed May [Accessed February Maclean's 115(34): [Accessed February 28.htm [Accessed May” Perspectives on World History and Current Evens.aph. 2003.php [Accessed January 26. 2009].” he Investigative Project on Terrorism. “Description des groupes terroristes criminalisés par le Canada. subs/sub5.” The Jawa Report: . 2009].Jane's World Insurgency and Terrorism. “Salafi-jihadism in Lebanon.html [Accessed March 10. Gary.htm [Accessed May 19.” American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Treasury Designates Individual Financially Fueling Iraqi Insurgency. Michael. Available at: http://www. “Mullah Krekar Profile.pwhce. ASIS & DSD .ciaonet. Rusty. Taliban Bergen. 2009]. 2004. 2009]. al Qaida.html [Accessed February Schanzer. 2009].janes. 2009]. Available at: [Accessed May 19.html [Accessed January 26. 2006. 2009].treas. “Ahmad Abd al-Karim al-Sadi.

1998. Judah.telegraph.” Foreign Policy: 58-64. “Musharraf et les islamistes.” Survival 44(1): and Anders Nielsen. “Counterinsurgency.” Orbis 51(1): 71-89. Sullivan. “Annual Threat Assessment of the Director of National Intelligence for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. 2008. and Fuel: The Mysterious Rise of the Taliban. Tara. 2009]. Thomas. 2005.0. P. Jaffrelot. 2002. Lashkar-e-Jhangvi. 2009. Oxygen. Islamic Jihad Union Chaudet. Husain. Christophe. 2006. “Understanding the Taliban and Insurgency in Afghanistan. Jim. “The Long Roads to Peace. Central Asia: Regional Developments and Implications for US Interests.Haqqani. JIhadist Terrorism in Turkey. “Al-Qaeda 2.html [Accessed March 10. Behuria. Paris: Institut Français des Relations Internationales. “Sunni-Shia relations in Pakistan: The widening divide. Kartha. 2009]. 2009]. K. Washington. Available at: http://www. Marquand. Tim. Congressional Research Service. Ashok. “Who is the Real Mullah Omar?. Guido. “Tinder. 2003. 2009]. Didier. Mexico: World Scientific. Steinberg. D. Islamist Terrorism in Greater Central Asia: The" Al-Qaedaization" of Uzbek Jihadism. 2007.” Etudes 399(2003/7): 9-16.C. 2001. Michael. Lamb.php?t=TP&st=D&no=4 [Accessed May 19.” The Spark.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 31(9): 775-807. 121 . Johnson. “The Reclusive Ruler who Runs the Taliban .stm [Accessed March 10. A Turkish al-Qaeda: The Islamic Jihad Union and the Internationalization of Uzbek Jihadism.” In National Intelligence Council.html [Accessed March 10. Kashmir Herald. State-building and Security Cooperation in Central” Journal of Peace Research 44(1): 93.htm. 187. “Indo-Pak Détente: Sustainable Ambiguity. Lashkar-e-Jhangvi Ahmed. 2008. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://kashmirherald. and Chris Mason.” The Christian Science Monitor. “Al Qaeda in the Tribal Areas of Pakistan and Beyond.southasianmedia.” In Proceedings of the Forty-eighth Pugwash Conference on Science and World Affairs.” In The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly. Rohan. “The Taliban Papers. Robert. John. 2001. Available at: http://news. Center for Contemporary Conflict. BBC News.” Strategic Analysis 28(1): 157-176. Christina. Mihalka. 2006.” Survival 50(6): 183-192. Madrid: Fundación José Ortega y Gasset. 2001. 2004. 2005. Counterterrorism. Negroponte.csmonitor. Jurica. D. Gunaratna. Steinberg. Pantucci. Guido. . Profile: Mullah Mohammed Omar. 2008.” South Asia Journal. Nichol. 2007. Available at: http://www. “Islam's Medieval Outposts.

2002. R. 2005. 2007. 2009].co. “Regional Implications of Shi'a Revival in Iraq. 2005.asp?section=3&id=14953 [Accessed January 29. Mariam. “Achieving a Global Community. 2009].guardian. 2004. 2009]. Wilson. 2008. 2005. 2009]. 2005. Nazir. The ISI. Mehtab Ali.stm [Accessed May 19. Realistically. Gvosdev. The Middle East Media Research the State. 2001. Available at: http://www. Jafa. Available at: http://www.” The Washington Quarterly 27(3): 7-24. Wilson.” Terrorism Monitor 3(4). “Can Pakistan be ‘neutral’in the war against terrorism?.cgi?Area=sd&ID=SP214308&Page=archives [Accessed May 19. Terrorist Group of Pakistan. 115. Nikolas.” The Round Table 94(382): 613-628. Available at: http://abcnews. The General and Jihad. Animesh. 2002. Pakistan Freezes Militant Funds. Jamaatud Dawa Leader: 'Indians Will Continue to Mislead the World Community By Linking Us to Lashkar[-e Taiba]. “Islamic Radicalism in Afghanistan and Pakistan.” Terrorism Monitor 3(11). Zed Books. and the Rise of Sectarian Militancy in Pakistan. Available at: http://news. Available at: http://www. “Humanization of education in Pakistan through Freire’s Concept of Vali. Roy. “Lashkar-e-Toiba: new Threats Posed by an Old [Accessed January 29. New Delhi: Pentagon Press. ABC News. Kalyanaraman.htm [Accessed January 28.jamestown. 122 . 2008. Zed Books. John. 2005.” Asharq Alawsat Newspaper. V.” In Pakistan: Nationalism without a Nation. “Lashkar-e-Jhangvi: Sectarian Violence in Pakistan and Ties to International Terrorism.” The Good Society 14(3). Even Al-Qaeda'. Roul. Abou Zahab. BBC. John. 2005. Available at: http://www.” In Pakistan: Nationalism without a Nation. “The Two Faces of Lashkar-e-Taiba . 2009].jamestown. Nasr. 85-114. [Accessed May 19. Yateendra. “Sectarianism—A threat to human security: A case study of Pakistan. Raja. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www. 2009]. “Islam.Lashkar-e-Jhangvi. Shah.satp. Nasr. Lashkar-e-Taiba Bharadwaj.” Asia Pacific Education Review 6(1): 1-6. Olivier. 2002 “The regional dimension of sectarian conflicts in Pakistan. 2009] [Accessed May 19.go.” Writenet for UNHCR. Key Figures in Kashmir Uprising. 2008. 2009]. Glendinning. and S. Farooq.” The Guardian Online.” Police Practice and Research 6(2): 141-164. “Pakistan police detain founder of Lashkar-e-Taiba militant group | World news | guardian.” Strategic Analysis 26(1): 170-173. “Defeating Terrorism: A Study of Operational Strategy and Tactics of Police Forces in Jammu & Kashmir (India). [Accessed May

cdi. Analisis del Real Instituto. Global Security. Anneli. Stephen.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41(01): 19-24. 123 . La Mouvance Islamiste au Maroc: du 11 Septembre 2001 aux Attentats de Casablanca du 16 Mai 2003. John. Blake 2009].htm [Accessed May 20. Juan Jose Escobar. “Tunisian Government Threatened by Islamist Group. p.cfm [Accessed May 19. 2008.cfm?DocumentID=2227&from_page=.” The Middle East Review of International Affairs 10(3). 2005. 2009]. 2006.independent. 2009]. The Military Balance in the Middle East.” Economic and Political Weekly: 218-227. 2003. Available at: http://www. 2005. Clark.” Boukhars. Sikand. Federation of American Scientists. Keating. 2009].org/program/document.” The Independent. Mohamed. Benjamin. Tunisian Combatant Group. 2006.: RAND Corporation.” Center for Defense Information. Available at: http://www. Anthony H. “Islamist Militancy in Kashmir: The Case of Lashkar-i-Tayyeba. 2004. “In the Spotlight: Moroccan Combatant Group (GICM). Available at: http://news. “Variations on a Theme: Radical Violent Islamism and European North African Radicalization. “Non African Involvement in Transnational Terror Networks: Terrorism in the Maghreb .Sengupta. “Middle East Salafism’s Influence and the Radicalization of Muslim Communities in Europe. 2009]. PO-3380: The United States and Italy Designate Twenty-Five New Financiers of 2005. Jonathan. Karthala Editions. Yoginder. Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group Botha. Reproduction and Communication of Armed Violence. GSPC Dossier. Cordesman. “Tunisia: Trading Freedom for Stability May Not Last–An International Security Perspective.C.stm [Accessed May 19.html [Accessed May 19. D. US Department of the Treasury. Alejandro. Tunisian Combatant Group Assets of Tunisia Group Are Frozen. BBC. Available at: http://www. Sanchez.” Terrorism Monitor 3(12): June 17. Available at: 2008. Center for Policing Terrorism .fas. New York Times. Yoginder.” Defence Studies 9(1): 85-92. 2004. Githens-Mazer. 2004. Sikand. “Changing Course of Kashmiri Struggle: From National Liberation to Islamist Jihad?. “The Origins of Militancy and Salafism in Morocco.htm [Accessed May 20.” In The Practice of War: Production. Washington. Ulph. The Politics and Economics of Organized Crime and Terrorism in Europe. 2007.” Terrorism Focus 2(6).ustreas. and Erin Rosenbach. 2001. 2008. 2002. The Moroccan Combatant Group. Kim. Available at: http://www.An Apology. Greenwood Publishing Group. Ahmed.. 2004. Darif. El Guerbouzi . 2009]. The Tunisian Combatant Group (TCG). Hudson Institute. Anouar. “Terrorist Outlaws – or a Group with Friends in High Places? .htm [Accessed May 20. Chaarani. 2002.

“Terrorism and Democratic Legitimacy: Conflicting Interpretations of the Spanish Elections. “Comprehensive Security and Resilience in Southeast Asia: ASEAN's Approach to Terrorism and Sea Piracy.S. Available at: http://www. 2009]. 2009]. Emmers. 2006.ABC News. “Islam and society in South-East Asia after 11 September.asp?id=4341 [Accessed January 28.. 2009]. “Indonesia Reports the Arrest of a 2nd Top Terrorism Suspect. Ranstorp.” New York Times. 2006. Thomas. Jemaah Islamiyah Abuza.middleeast-online.” New York Times. 2005. Zachary. 2005. “Europe's Angry Muslims. Peter. 2004.. Gelling. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. 2005. Madrid: Real Institute Elcano. Abuzza. Atran. “Terror at Rush Hour.” Southeast Asian Affairs: 123-145. [Accessed January 26. 2007. R. “Freed Cleric Is Hailed by Students. Van Biezen. Indonesian Police Confirm.” “U. “In Indonesia. Evan. 2009. 2009]. but Support Could Be Waning.nytimes. “Is Southeast Asia the Second Front?.com/english/?id=9727 [Accessed May 19. Bonner.” New York Times. 2002. Real Instituto Elcano. Peter. Ingrid.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 56(3): 383-394. 124 . Pressure to Hold Militant Sets Off Outcry in Indonesia. Nesser.start.” New York Times.” HomelandSecurityUS. Available at: http://abcnews. Reinares. 2002. The London bombings and the broader strategic context. “How did Europe's Global Jihadis Obtain Training for their Militant Causes?. 2009]. 2008. Desker. 2008. and Stryker McGuire.” The Pacific Review 22(2). “ Southeast Asian Terrorist Leader Is Under Arrest. John. 2005.umd. Democracy isn’t Enough.” Foreign Affairs 81(4): 60-74. 2008. 2006. Raymond. “Abu Dujana. Bonner. 2009]. “Tentacles of Terror: Al Qaeda's Southeast Asian Scott. Magnus. Available at: http://www. Middle East Online. Available at: http://www.go. Barry.” Mediterranean Politics 10(1): 99-108. Fernando. Robert. Available at: http://www. Raymond.” The New York Times. Gelling.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 24(3): 427-466.” Foreign Affairs 84(4): 120-35.homelandsecurityus. “Indonesia's Year of Living Normally. Gelling.” The New York Times. Moroccan Group "Derivative Structure" of Al Qaeda. 2007. The Insider: Daily Terrorism Report . Zachary. P. 2005. Peter. 2002. Gershman.html [Accessed May 19.” Terrorism and Political Violence 20(2): Barton. Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group.Net. Available at: http://www. The Mediterranean Region and International Terrorism: A New Framework for Cooperation. [Accessed May 19. 2005. “Radical Cleric in Indonesia Is Acquitted of Terrorism.html?_r=1&scp=4&sq=Abu+Bakar+Bashir&st=nyt [Accessed May 19.

Abu Sayyaf Abuza. Bali-terrorism: the return of the Abu Sayyaf. 2006. Donnelly.stm [Accessed May 19. 2006. 2005.” Fragility and Crisis: 320-363. Bill.” Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict 99999(1): 1-17. Naval War College. and Thomas Hegghammer. Anti-Corruption. Lia. Available at: http://www. 2009]. Singh. Brynhar.” BBC.” The Long War Journal. Strategic Studies Institute.” In the Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia.” Sudostasia 26(5): 73-84. Geoffrey.a. Roggio. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. Profile: Abu Bakar Ba'asyir.html [Accessed January 22. Elmer. Anti-Terrorism and Militant Islam: Coping with Threats to Democratic Pluralism and National Unity in Indonesia. Despite Improvement.: The Heritage Foundation. and Paolo Pasicolan. 2009].edu/data/tops/terrorist_organization_member. 2009]. Damien. Jemaah Islamiyah. Available at: http://news. Charles. “Jemaah Islamiyah after the Recent Wave of Arrests: How Much Danger Remains? . “Terrorism in the Southern Philippines: Contextualizing the Abu Sayyaf Group as an Islamist Secessionist Organization. and Nick Grace. Rachel.” Asian Journal of Political Science 13(1): 109-138. Available at: http://www. FFI explains al-Qaida document. 2008. Petter. and (US). Jemaah Islamiah) . Dana. Washington. “From a Counter-Society to a Counter-State Movement: Jemaah Islamiyah According to PUPJI. 2008. “The War on Terrorism in Southeast Asia. “Jemaah Islamiyah's Radical Madrassah Networks. “Islam's role in Indonesia. Disarming the Bearer of the Sword: Delinking the Abu Sayyaf From the Global Insurgency. 2008.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 30(9): 777-800. Kingsbury. 2001. and Scott [Accessed January 22. Forvarets Forskninginstittut. Bilveer. Southeast Asia and the War Against Terrorism.” Asian Survey 48(1): 38-46. 2004. Available at: http://news. Zachary. 2009]. J. 2003. Nagma.” Asia Pacific Viewpoint 48(1): 128-144. Zachary. 125 .longwarjournal. 2008.umd. “The Challenge of Militant Islam and Terrorism in 2005. Buendia. “Indonesia in 2007: Unmet Expectations.Hainsworth. “Rule of Law. Pavlova.C. Nesser. Julio et al. 2007. Lloyd's MIU handbook of maritime security.k. 2007. Available at: http://www. Tomsa. BBC.stm [Accessed May 19. “ In Pictures: Jemaah Islamiyah's Leadership. D. Magouirk.start. Jemaah Islamiyah (a. 2004. 2006. . R. Dillon. Abuza. New York: CRC Press. G. 2008. “The State-Moro Armed Conflict in the Philippines Unresolved National Question or Question of Governance?. “Jihadism in Western Europe After the Invasion of Iraq: Tracing Motivational Influences from the Iraq War on Jihadist Terrorism in Western Europe.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 29(4): 323-342..asp?id=6370 [Accessed January 2007. 2009]. Elena.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 58(1): 2004. Council on Foreign Relations.

gov. Smith.” GMA News. 2009]. 2002.htm [Accessed April 9. 2008.” Terrorism in the Philippines. 2009].” Global Security. 2002. “Moving Out of Moscow's Orbit: the Outlook for Central Asia. Anthony. Available at: http://www. Eduardo. “Beyond the Abu Sayyaf. Quimpo. New York: ME Sharpe. Paul J. Daniel Joseph. Ugarte. 2007. 2009]. Available at: http://www. Jose. Anthony. Niksch. “The Continuation of Civil Unrest and Poverty in Mindanao. Wencesiao. Shireen.” Terrorism and Political Violence 14(4): 131-162. 2009].” SAIS Review 21(2): 65-90. Alfredo. “Abdurajak Janjalani GMA News. 2006. Available at: http://www. and Regine Spector.html [Accessed April 9. 2002.” 2002.” New Zealand International Review 27(6): 24-29. Abu Sayyaf: Target of Philippine-US Anti-Terrorism Cooperation.htm [Accessed April 9.gmanews. Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan Cornell.: Congressional Research Service. politics. Gunter.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 31(2): 125-144. “The Southern Philippines: Conflict and Co-operation: Anthony Smith Backgrounds the Separatist Conflict That Has Wracked the Southern Philippines and Discusses the US Military Involvement in the Area. Available at: http://www. Rogers.” Philippine Information Agency. 2009]. 126 . Svante.. 2004. “The Alliance System of the Abu Sayyaf.mtholyoke. Yasser Igasan Succeeds Janjalani as Abu Chief .” RMS & [Accessed April 9. Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan.” The Washington Quarterly 25(1): 193-206. A. 2007. 2009]. 1993–2000. “Abdurakjak Janjalani. Available at: http://www.” Foreign Affairs 83(1): 15-21. Steven.satp.. Frazie. Hyman.rms-gs. Ajai. and security in Central Asia. D. Available at: http://www. John.” South Asian Terrorism Portal.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 24(1): 33-50. “Contemporary History of the Philippines.htm&no=34 [Accessed April 9. “The US and the Southern Philippines’ Quagmire. Menardo. Torres. 2002. Hunter. and Rosalinda Morgado-Schwarz. Nathan. Available at: http://www. Schwarz. 2000. 2001.nsf/Page/What_Governments_are_doing_Listing_of_Terrorism_ Organisations_Islamic_Movement_of_Uzbekistan [Accessed January 21.The Heat is On.” International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-): 289-304. 2008. “The Abu Sayyaf Group: A Growing Menace to Civil [Accessed April 9. “The Abu Sayyaf and Khadaffy Janjalani. Available at: http://www.pia. “Philippines: Abu Sayyaf Group . “Central Asia: More than Islamic Extremists.globalsecurity.E. “What's Next for Abu Sayyaf?. Lumpkin. “Religion. Australian National Security .htm [Accessed April Sahni. Larry. 2009]. 2009. 2009].org/security/profiles/abdurajak_janjalani_killed. Terrorism and Violence in Southeast Asia. 2004. 2002.C.

00. Uzbek islamists’ Leader Tahir Yuldashev has been Arrested . “Pakistan: Offensive Against Suspected Militants in South Waziristan Ends. Rashid. Available at: Radical Islam in Central Asia: between Pen and Rifle. 2009]. Yemeni Islamic Jihad Leader Arrested. 2009]. 2003. Mite. Available at: http://www.Kimmage. Rotar. 2008. 2009]. Igor. Available at: http://www. “The Islamic Revival in Central Asia: a Potent Force or a Misconception?.” In Digital Libraries: Universal and Ubiquitous Access to Information. Yassin. “The Fires of Faith in Central Asia. The NEFA Foundation . 2009]. Naumkin.” The Long War Journal. Gulf News.gulfnews. 266. Available at: http://www.ferghana. Islamic Jihad. Ahmed.longwarjournal. 2008. Leader of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan Tahir Yuldashev Threatens Presidents Karimov.” Strategic Analysis 16(2).aspx?id=68033&sectionid=351020206 [Accessed May 20. V. “Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan: Will it Strike Back?. 2008.” Terrorism Monitor 1(8).htm [Accessed April 8.” Central Asian Survey 20(1): 63-83. Group Threatens Attack on UAE Embassy in Yemen.html [Accessed January 26. “US Embassy in Yemen Targeted in Complex Assault. Ghonchen. bin Laden and Iran's hardliners. 2008. Poonam. Ferghana. 2009]. 2005. 2001. 2008.html [Accessed May 20. Valentinas. et al. 2009]. Available at: http://www. 2009].php?id=1864 [Accessed January 21.” Spiegel Online. Available at: http://www.ciaonet. 2009]. S. Indonesia: Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 2009]. and Rakhmonov.html [Accessed January 21. Taliban behind the Waziristan Available at: http://enews.shtml [Accessed May 2001. Jane. Tazmini. 2002. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. 2008. 2007.” Global Security. Daniel. Bali.ferghana. 2009].ru/article.presstv. Available at: http://www. Ferghana. Yemen Islamic Jihad Analysis: Yemen. 2009].atimes. Presumably. 127 . Who Is The Yemeni Islamic Jihad Group? .php?id=1595 [Accessed January 21. Available at: http://enews. 2008. 2004. Musharbash. “al Qaeda. Novak. 2004.php [Accessed January 21. Roggio. 2009]. “The Islamic Movement Of Uzbekistan: A Resurgent IMU?. Maureen.jamestown. Available at: http://www.cbsnews.nefafoundation.” World Policy Journal 18(1): 45-55.html [Accessed March 12. 2009].org/archives/2006/09/alqaeda_taliban_behi. “Militant Islam in Central Asia: The Case of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan. United Press International.Ru Information agency.” Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet” Asia Times Online. Available at: http://www.html [Accessed April 8. Bill. Available at: http://www1.Ru Information Agency.553745. Press TV. CBS News. Available at: [Accessed March 12. p.” The Long War Journal.html [Accessed May 20.highbeam. V. Bakiyev. Messages From Terrorist 2006. “Police Arrest Members of Alleged Jihadi Financing Network. “The Growth of Radical Islam in Central Asia. “On Visualizing Heterogeneous Semantic Networks from Multiple Data Sources.

B. [Accessed April 9. “Aden-Abyan Islamic Army.” Strategic Analysis 32(1): 57-80.asp [Accessed May 19.jamestown. 2009]. 2006. 2009]. John. Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahideen Atran. 2009. Ashok.stratfor. 2009]. “Khalid al-Nabi al-Yazidi. Raman.: The Education of a Holy Warrior. “Somalia's ICU and its Roots in al-Ittihad al-Islami .org/papers2/paper152. Goldberg. 'Londonistan. and Kyle Dabruzzi. 2000. The Investigative Project on Terrorism.” Global Security. “Dwindling Expectations ( [Accessed May 19. GST Presented Evidence against Claims. The War on Poverty). 2006. Islamic Army of Aden (IAA) .org/profile/151 [Accessed May 19.southasiaanalysis.Aden Abyan Islamic Army Amnesty International Report 2000 .umd. Available at: http://www.htm [Accessed May 19. Attack on USS Cole: Background. 2009].globalsecurity. Gartenstein-Ross. Lumpkin. 2005. BBC.adl. “Sects Within Sect: The Case of Deobandi–Barelvi Encounter in Pakistan. Pike. 2006. 128 .AMNESTY.” In Congressional Research Service.htm [Accessed May 19.” Science.YEM. Available at: http://www. Links to Osama bin Laden and Islamic Jihad.php [Accessed April 9. 2009]. 2000.hinduonnet.3ae6aa106b.Yemen. 2009].stm [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://www. 1999. 2009]. Available at: http://www.” Global Security. Available at: http://news. Anti-Defamation League. 2008.” The Long War Journal. 2009].edu/data/tops/terrorist_organization_profile. “Attack on USS Cole: Who engineered it?.org/Terror/focus/17_focus_a2.” New York Times Magazine 25. John. 2009]. Available at: http://www. 2007. 2005. 1999. Daveed. Available at: http://www. Cronin. Available at: http://www.html [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://www. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism.investigativeproject. A. Jeffrey. 2009]. Available at: http://www.” Middle East Quarterly 14(3): 3-10.' Al Qaeda and the Finsbury Park Mosque ..globalsecurity. &no_cache=1 [Accessed February 4. 2008.0. Yemeni Militant's Supporters Vow et al. West. 2004. Yemen: High-Profile Militants Killed and the Yemeni Power Structure . Sunguta. Raman. Aden Abyan Islamic Army.htm [Accessed May 19. 2000. “Foreign Terrorist Organizations. “Inside Jihad U.start. 2009. 2009].org/military/world/para/aden-abyan.asp?id=4 [Accessed January 31. UN Regufee “Jihad's New Leaders. Available at: http://www. “Yemen: New Terror Camps as a City Falls to Jihadists. Jane. Novak. Available at: http://www.” Business Available at: http://www.longwarjournal. K. India: South Asia Analysis Stratfor.” Terrorism Monitor 4(15). Library of Congress. 2009].html [Accessed May 19. 2009].

2009]. The Jihadi Terrain in Pakistan. Available at: http://www. “In the Spotlight: Harakat ul-Mujaheddin (HuM). 2009]. 2008. Ajai. Me Worry?.cdi. 2004. Goel. Stephen. Nicholas. Jaish-e-Mohammad A profile of Maulana Masood Azhar. 2001.125. Mir. Terrorism .” Strategic Analysis 24(12): 2179-2198. “Terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir in theory and 2002.htm [Accessed January 28. “Meeting with the Muj. 2003. Rothem. “The Jihad Lives On. 2002. 2009]. 2001. Profiles in Terror. Dan.p df+the+jihadi+terrain+in+pakistan&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a [Accessed April 9. 2005.Harkat ul-Ansar. 2009]. “Understanding the Militant Mind: Can Psychiatry Help?. lami.” Global Politician. Howenstein. Available at: http://www. Jamiat ul-Ansar.nsf/Page/What_Governments_are_doing_Listing_of_Terrorism_ Organisations_Jamiat_ul-Ansar [Accessed January 28. 2009].” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 57(1): 42-50. ISI Fixed Meetings for Hostages' Wives with Harkat. “This is not” Center for Defense Information. Stern. Available at: S. Roman & Littlefield. John. Dhungana.hindustantimes. Available at: http://74. 2008. Mannes. 2005. South Asia Terrorism Portal. “The Jihadist Threat to Pakistan.132/search? D. Abou Zahab.brad. “Harakat ul-Mujahedin. Aaron.” The Washington Quarterly 26(3): 7-25. 2009].html [Accessed January 28. 2009].gov.. “Nexalities: What. Kumar. Available at: http://www. “The Maoist Insurgency and Nepal-India Relations: Contemplating the Future. Swami. 2009]. 2001. Cohen. Sunita. Sahni. and D.” Asia Times Online. Pakistan Security Research Unit.In the Spotlight: Harakat ul-Mujaheddin (HuM).html [Accessed April 9. Sunita. 2008.cfm [Accessed January 28. Available at: http://www. Pike. 2008. Mariam. Available at: http://www. “Pakistan's jehadi apparatus: Goals and methods. [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://www.” An Indian Perspective: 256.satp.” India Review 2(3): 55-88.” Global Security.aspx?sectionName=indiasectionpage&id=1d0f988f-debe4d6e-b285-188cc397c5f2&Headline=A+profile+of+Maulana+Masood+Azhar [Accessed May 19. 2009]. Hindustan Times. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www.” The Maoist Insurgency and Nepal-India Relations: 213. Amir. Indian 2009].com/StoryPage/ Jessica.htm [Accessed January 28. 129 .htm [Accessed January 28.” South Asia Intelligence Review 3(29).satp.95. Saldhanha. 2009].atimes.cfm [Accessed April 9.indianexpress. Australian National Security. Available at: http://www. “The regional dimension of sectarian conflicts in Pakistan. Paramhans.cdi.” Pakistan: nationalism without a nation?: 115.globalsecurity.

Aden Abyan Islamic Army. Available at: http://www. Al-Ittihaad al-Islami Amnesty International Report 2000 . Islam in Pakistan: Unity and Contradictions.” Journal of Conflict Studies 24(2). 2009]. “Meeting with the Muj.” Global Security. Available at: http://www. Daveed. 2009.asp [Accessed May [Accessed May 19. Lumpkin.htm [Accessed January 29. S.php [Accessed January 29. “Aden-Abyan Islamic Army.html [Accessed May 19.YEM.0. “Pakistan: Moderate jihad?. John.: Center for Strategic and International Studies. Mandavi. 2009]. South Asian Terrorism Portal. Novak. Available at: 2001. and Kyle Dabruzzi. The Investigative Project on Terrorism. “Yemen: New Terror Camps as a City Falls to Jihadists. “Khalid al-Nabi al-Yazidi. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www. 2009]” Business Line. 2002.hinduonnet.” The Long War Journal. BBC. 2009. Available at: http://www. 130 .3ae6aa106b. 2009]. Attack on USS Cole: Background. Roggio. Profile: Maulana Masood Azhar. Raman. “Terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir in theory and em. Available at: http://www. Anti-Defamation League. Sunil. Available at: http://www.C. Jane. Jamwal. Available at: http://www.longwarjournal.stm [Accessed May 19. [Accessed May 19. John. Gartenstein-Ross. Islamic Army of Aden (IAA) .” Strategic Analysis 27(3): [Accessed May 19. “Jihad's New Leaders. Links to Osama bin Laden and Islamic Jihad. 2004. UN Regufee Agency. Najum. B. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. Raman.AMNESTY. India: South Asia Analysis Group. “Terrorism in India: Impact on national security. D. 2009].umd. 2009]. Swami.” Middle East Quarterly 14(3): 3-10. M.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 56(4): 15-16. 2009]. “Attack on USS Cole: Who engineered it?. 2000. 2009. 2009]. Sondhi. 2000. “Terrorism and Governance in Kashmir.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 57(1): 42-50. Federation of American Scientists.htm [Accessed May 19. 2009]. 2002. Praveen.” India Review 2(3): 55-88. Jaish-e-Mohammed (JEM).php [Accessed April 9. Available at: http://www. “Terrorists’ Modus Operandi in Jammu and Kashmir. Bill.unhcr. 2006. 2007. 2008. 2000. Jessica.” The Long War Journal. and Teresita Schaffer. Available at: http://www. B. Kamath.satp. 2003. Mehta.globalsecurity.Jaish-e-Mohammad Mujahideen E-Tanzeem.fas. Pike. Available at: http://www.htm [Accessed January 29.start.longwarjournal. 2003. Available at: P.” Global [Accessed May [Accessed January 31.investigativeproject.adl. 2009]. N. 1999.. 2001. 2006. 2009]. “Jaish-e-Mohammed leader placed under ‘house arrest’. 2009]. 2009].” Strategic Analysis 25(9): 1081-1987.

Debessay. Stratfor.” Review of African Political Economy 30(97): 435-444. 2009].West.” Al-Ahram Center for Political & Strategic Studies.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 35(04): 647-673. Yemen: High-Profile Militants Killed and the Yemeni Power Structure . Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. Shifting Terrain: Dissidence versus Terrorism in Available at: http://www.” Terrorism Monitor 4(15).htm [Accessed January 27. 2009].” Journal of Peace Research 41(5): 625. Iyob. [Accessed May 19.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 21(6): 1056-1073.stratfor. [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://news. 1996. and Peter Wallensteen.fas. 131 .jamestown. Wahid. and Peter Wallensteen. “Somalia's ICU and its Roots in al-Ittihad al-Islami . 2009]. Abul Bara'. Available at: http://www. Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya Abdel Maguid. “The Nationalist Revolution in eritrea. Shaikh Khalil Mohammed Amer. Ruth. Eritrean Islamic Jihad Movement A Military Statement of the Islamic Eritrean Reform Movement to the Islamic Nation and a List of Five Operations Executed in Eritrea. Eriksson. Available at: http://www. 2007. Mikael.ahram. Markakis. 2004. 2009]. “The Eritrean Experiment: A Cautious Pragmatism?.” Journal of Peace Research 42(5): 623. “Egypt's Gama'ah Islamiyah: The Turnabout and its Ramifications. John. 1999. Hedru. 2004. “Eritrea: transition to dictatorship. Iyob. State Formation and the Public Sphere: Eritrea 1991–96. 2008. 2009]. “The Politics of Cultural Pluralism in Ethiopia and Eritrea: Trajectories of Ethnicity and Constitutional Experiments.janes. Jane's World Intelligence and Insurgency. 2008. [Accessed April 9. Fouad. 1998. Harbom. Available at: http://acpss. “Armed Conflict.” Foreign Affairs 86(2): 59-74. 2004. 2003. and Colin Thomas-Fensen.” Available at: Lotta. 2006. Sunguta. “Blowing the Horn. Bariagaber. Available at: http://www. 1997. 2003. SITE Institute. “Nationalism. 1998. Hassan Salman. Available at: http://www.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 26(1): 51-70. 1946-2004. Khalil Mohammed.start. BBC. Eritrean Islamic Salvation Movement . 2009]. Yemeni Militant's Supporters Vow Revenge.awate. 2009]. 1991-2003. 2009]. “Armed conflict and its international dimensions. “Interview With the Deputy Amir of the Eritrean Islamic Jihad Movement. 2005.HTM [Accessed January &no_cache=1 [Accessed February 4.html [Accessed January 27. “Eritrean Islamic Salvation Front.” From Nida'ul Islam. 2005.asp?id=6274 [Accessed May 19. Makki. Amer.” Review of African Political Economy 23(70): 475-497.

“Promoting Freedom and Democracy: Fighting the War of Ideas Against Islamic Terrorism. Fuller. “Theories of Terrorism: Instrumental and Organizational Approaches. 2006.html?res=9F05E4DA1031F935A15753C1A9669C8B63 [Accessed February 24. Politics and Terrorism: An Assessment of the Origin and Threat of Terrorism in Egypt. Freedman. 2000. John. R. Airforce University Maxwell. “Pursuing bin Laden: Driving Al Qaeda:Religious Decree. 2007.muslimbrotherhood. Available at: http://www. Vincent. “Terrorism as a Strategy. 2009]. “A Muslim to Muslims: Reflections after September 11.asp [Accessed February 24. Available at: http://query. Available at: http://www.juancole.” New Political Science 22(1): 77-88. 2009]. Gerges. Martha. Fawaz.terrorismanalysts. 2002.php?page=2 [Accessed February 24. 2009].com/articles/2002/01/31/book_ed3_. Burns. 2009].html [Accessed December 28. Abu Jihad al-Masri. “Doomed Arab units prepare for final battle against the odds.cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA30906 [Accessed February 3. “Yemen Reports Arrests of Foreign-Born Arabs in Cole Attack .guardian. Available at: http://www. Ariel. 2006. 2009]. Cole. 2002. “ Al Qaeda's Egyptian Bet.” International Herald Tribune.” The New York Times. Y.terrorism4 [Accessed January 1. 1987. Thomas. Ayman Al-Zawahiri: The Ideologue of Modern Islamic Militancy.” South Atlantic Quarterly 101(2): Carmon. Burton.” The Guardian. 2004. Inside Al Qaeda: Global Network of Terror.” The Middle East Journal: 592-612. Youssef.” Perspectives on Terrorism 2(5). “De-Radicalization of Jihad? The Impact of Egyptian Islamist Revisionists on Al-Qaeda. Ashour. 2000. Available at: http://www. and Nicholas Watt. Fred. Julian. Cornell. The Al-Gama'a Al-Islamiyya Cessation of Violence: An Ideological Reversal. Available at: http://memri. and D Lav. 2002. 2008]. Juan.Aboul-Enein.” Lebanonwire. Y Feldner. 2006. “Informed Comment.” Journal of Strategic Studies 10(4): 13-31. ms [Accessed January 1. “New Approach of Egypt´s Gama´a Islamiya Group \.uk/Home. Anneli. The Middle East Media Research Institute. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies. Alarbya. 2003.” The Muslim Brotherhood Official English [Accessed February 24.iht.nytimes.” Comparative Strategy 22(3): 207-221. 2009]. “The End of the Islamist Insurgency in Egypt?: Costs and Available at: http://www. 2009]. Multimedia Counterterrorism 1970]. Crenshaw. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www. Gunaratna.” More on the split among radical Islamists.php?option=com_rokzine&view=article&id=39&Itemid=54 [Accessed February 13. 2001. 132 . Farrag Ismali.” Government and Opposition 42(3): 314-339. Botha. Khaled Dawoud.nctc. Cohen. 2006. “Political Islam and violence. Columbia University Press.

com/ansub/Daily/Day/971203/1997120301. Preston.” The Atlantic Online. 2008].htm [Accessed February 18. Keats. Angel et al. Alison. 2008. 2005. [Accessed May “Egyptian Gama'a al-Islamiyya's Public Relations Campaign .ahram.pdf+Nageh+Ibrahim&hl=en &ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=us&client=firefox-a [Accessed January 1. Pargeter.” The Middle East Journal: 415-432. “In the Spotlight: Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya . Available at: Ahmed.ahram.” Rashwan. Available at: http://travelvideo. “Egypt attacks: A Closer Look. v. Jailan. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://weekly. 2008. U.theatlantic.defenddemocracy. “Post-Islamist Rumblings in Egypt: The Emergence of the Wasat party. Available at: 133 .php?option=com_content&task=view&id=11783544&Itemid=361 [Accessed February 24. 2006. Diaa. 2005. Omar Abdel Rahman et al.” Al Ahram Weekly Online. Heyer. Chris.htm [Accessed January Islamism. “Militants Available at: http://weekly. 1970]. Berkeley: University of California Press.132/search?q=cache:1JlCz_Djb9wJ:www.php?id=A6130_0_1_0_M [Accessed January 1. “Defendant Tells of His Role in Edict Urging Killing of Jews. Jacquard. Available at: http://weekly.” Available at: 2002.nytimes. Khalil. 2009] Rabasa. In Aftermath of Luxor Massacre: Doubtful Initiative to Stop Violence.” New York Times.” Travel Video Television News.htm [Accessed February 18.html?scp=8&sq=Rifai%20Ahmed%20Taha%20&st=cse [Accessed February 24. 2003. 1998. University of Pennsylvania Press. Available at: http://www.” Al-Ahram Weekly Online.arabicnews. “The Taliban Connection. 2001. Mary Anne. Available at: http://www. “Time for a Historic Reconcilliation?. Joshua. “Bin Laden.htm [Accessed December 28. 2009]. The New Frontiers of Jihad: Radical Islam in Europe. Gilles.” Al-Ahram Weekly On-line.html [Accessed January 1. “A New Rapprochement?. 2009]. The Outer Rings of the Terrorist Universe.45. Mozaffari. Anthony. 2002. Zambelis. Hazel.125. Muslim Extremism in “Beyond Al Qaeda: Part 2009].ahram. “Senior al Qaeda Leader Thought Killed in North Waziristan Strike. “Blowback. 2002. Stacher. Moussa.” Terrorism Focus 3(35).org/index. 2009]. 1970]. 2004. Available at: Bill.” Foundation for the Defense of Roland.htm [Accessed January 1. 2009].S.stanford. Available at: http://www. and Terrorism.” Center for Defense Information.” Society 42(5): 34-42. Available at: http://weekly. Arabicnews. Kepel.” Al-Ahram Weekly On-line. In the Name of Osama Bin Laden: Global Terrorism and the Bin Laden Brotherhood. Leadership of al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya. 2009]. and Jon 1996. Duke University Press. Southern District of New York: Intelwire. 2002. 2009]. 2009]. 2006. M. “Makram Mohammed Ahmed interviews the historic leadership of alGama’a al-Islamiyya inside the “Scorpion” prison.Islamic Group.cdi. Weaver. Sentencing Statements. Julia.htm [Accessed May 19. &no_cache=1 [Accessed January 1. 2009].http://www. 134 .

Appendix III: Commanding Officer Attribute Codebook Type of merger Formal merger Strong affiliation (partnership) Loose affiliation (collaboration) No affiliation Primary motive Secondary motive Not a motive Primary motive Secondary motive Not a motive Primary motive Secondary motive Not a motive Strong leadership Average leadership Weaker leadership Not applicable (Was not active in the organization at the time) 4 3 2 1 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 3 2 1 Opportunism Pan-Islamic ideology Social network Operational leadership Ideological leadership Logistic leadership 0 135 .

Appendix IV: Leadership Attributes Organization name Ansar al-Islam/Jund alMullah Krekar Islam/Ansar al-Sunnah Ansar al-Islam/Jund alAbdullah Shafi Islam/Ansar al-Sunnah al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at Abu Musab al-Zarqawi al-Tawhid wal-Jihad) al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at Abu Ayub Al-Masri al-Tawhid wal-Jihad) al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at Abu Khalil al-Souri al-Tawhid wal-Jihad) Abu Muhjin Asbat al-Ansar Mohammed Omar Taliban Ayman Al Zawahiri Egyptian Islamic Jihad Sayyed Imam Al-Sharif Egyptian Islamic Jihad Islamic Movement of Tahir Yuldashev Uzbekistan Islamic Movement of Juma Namangani Uzbekistan Najmiddin Jalolov Islamic Jihad Union Tariq al-Fasdli Yemen Islamic Jihad Zein al-Abideen alAden Abyan Islamic Mehdar Army Aden Abyan Islamic Khalid al-Nabi al-Yazidi Army Maulana Saadatullah Khan Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahidin Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahidin Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahidin Leader name Organization type Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Organization Date of Ideological country or foundin Date of Type of Opportunistic Alignment Social network origin g affiliation affiliation motives? ? affiliations? Iraq Iraq 2001 2001 2001 2001 3 3 2 2 0 0 1 1 Ideological Logistic Operational leadership leadership leadership preprepre-merger merger? merger? 1 0 3 0 3 0 Operational leadership postmerger? 1 3 Ideological leadership postmerger? 3 2 Logistic leadership postmerger? 2 1 Core Arab Cluster Iraq 1999 2004 4 2 0 1 3 2 3 3 3 2 Core Arab Cluster Iraq 1999 2004 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 2 Core Core Core Core Core Arab Arab Arab Arab Arab Cluster Cluster Cluster Cluster Cluster Iraq Lebanon Afghanistan Egypt Egypt Uzbekistan Uzbekistan Uzbekistan Yemen Yemen Yemen 1999 1986 1994 1987 1987 1998 1998 2002 1990 1990 1990 2004 2000 1996 1998 1998 1998 1998 2005 1992 1998 1998 4 3 3 4 4 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 3 3 1 2 3 3 3 2 2 0 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 3 2 3 0 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 2 3 3 3 3 2 1 1 3 3 0 3 1 2 3 3 3 1 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 3 2 2 Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Southern Asian cluster Pakistan 1985 1998 2 2 1 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 Fazlur Rehman Khalil Southern Asian cluster Pakistan 1985 1998 2 1 2 1 1 2 3 2 3 3 Farooq Kashmiri Khalil Riaz Basra Akram Lahori Hafiz Mohammad Saeed Maulana Abdul Wahid Kashmiri Maulana Masood Azhar Sheikh Ali Warsame Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys Hassan Abdullah Hersi al-Turki Sheikh Khalil Mohammed Amer Lashkar-e-Jhangvi Lashkar-e-Jhangvi Lashkar-e-Taiba Lashkar-e-Taiba Jaish-e-Mohammad al-Ittihaad al-Islami al-Ittihaad al-Islami al-Ittihaad al-Islami Eritrean Islamic Jihad Movement Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster African cluster African cluster African cluster African cluster Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan Somalia Somalia Somalia Eritrea 1985 1996 1996 1990 1990 2000 1984 1984 1984 1988 1998 1999 1999 2001 2001 2000 1991 1991 1991 1998 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 1 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 1 3 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 3 3 1 1 2 0 3 0 2 0 3 3 2 1 1 3 2 3 1 3 2 2 3 3 2 1 3 2 3 1 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 136 .

Hassan Hattab al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la prédication et le combat) Maghreb Arab cluster al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la prédication et le combat) Maghreb Arab cluster al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la prédication et le combat) Libyan Islamic Fighting Group Tunisian Combatant Group Tunisian Combatant Group Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group Jemaah Islamiya Jemaah Islamiya Jemaah Islamiya Abu Sayyaf Abu Sayyaf Abu Sayyaf Algeria 1996 2005 4 2 0 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 Nabil Sahraoui Algeria 1996 2005 4 2 1 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 Abdelmalik Droukdal Anas Sebai Tarek Ben Habib Maaroufi Saifallah Ben Hassine Mohammed Al Karbouzi Taeb Bentizi Abu Bakar Bashir Abu Rusdan Abu Dujana Abdurajak Janjalani Khadaffy Janjalani Yasser Igasan Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Algeria Libya Tunisia Tunisia Morocco Morocco Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Philippines Philippines Philippines 1996 1995 2000 2000 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1991 1991 1991 2005 1997 2000 2000 2001 2001 1998 1998 1998 1991 1991 1991 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 2 3 1 2 1 2 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 2 3 3 1 3 1 3 3 2 3 3 3 1 1 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 137 .

Appendix V: Data on Universe of Cases Figure 1: Number of Affiliations by Year Number of Affiliations by Year 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year Figure 2: Distribution by Type of Affiliation Figure 3: Distribution by Region 138 .

5 20.042330234 139 .67 13.67 13.14786E-09 11 8 13.67 1.67 13.67 13.60648E-06 Table 2: Statistical Significance Testing (Two Scales) Opportunistic Motive Not a motivation Motivation Expected (Not a motivation) Expected (Motivation) P Value 5 36 20.018767854 27 0 13.5 20.67 1.67 0.Appendix VI: Data on Q1 What motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida’s and its pan-Islamic agenda? Table 1: Chi-Squared Test (Three Scales) Opportunistic Motive Total 0 (Not a motivation) Total 1 (Secondary motivation) Total 2 (Primary motivation) Expected Total 0 Expected Total 1 Expected Total 2 P Value 5 Ideological Alignment 22 Social Network Affiliation 14 3 33 13.5 20.5 0.5 0.28936E-06 Ideological Alignment 22 19 20.67 13.67 13.639411853 Social Network Affiliation 14 27 20.5 1.

256764552 5 8.5 14 16.5 5.262682055 P Value 140 .5 5 5.5 17 5 8.5 10.5 7.5 0.5 18.5 0. and logistic leadership before and after the merger) Operational Before Total Not active (0) Total Weak (1) Total Average (2) Total Strong (3) Total Expected Not active Expected Weak Expected Average Expected Strong 7 10 After Sum 4 5 11 15 Ideological Before 6 7 After Sum 4 10 10 17 Logistic Before 6 8 After Sum 4 3 10 11 7 17 41 12 20 41 19 37 82 16 12 41 5 22 41 21 34 82 11 16 41 17 17 41 28 33 82 5.021962838 5 5.5 9.5 7.5 9. ideological.5 14 16.Appendix VII: Data on Q2 What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible affiliates with Al Qa’ida? Table 3: Chi-Squared Test (Strength of operational.5 17 0.5 18.5 10.

421 6 108 18 Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for Logistic Leadership Performance (pre-post) 15 2 -1.95 Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for Overall Leadership Performance (pre-post) 9 5 -1.1425 -1.5 11.1742 -1. ideological.0562 22 365.0146 Paired Sign Test for Logistic Leadership Performance (pre-post) 10 16 15 0.382 0.1269 19 217 11.477 0.Table 4: Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test (Strength of operational.359 0.25 # Ranks <0 # of Ranks >0 Table 5: Paired Sign Test (Strength of operational.422 0.91 0. and logistic leadership before and after the merger) Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for Operational Leadership Performance (pre-post) # of 0 Differences # of Ties Z-Value P-Value Tied ZValue Tied PValue Count Sum of Ranks Mean Rank Count Sum of Ranks Mean Rank 15 3 -1.1549 -1.526 0. ideological.469 10 119.898 0.466 0. and logistic leadership before and after the merger) Paired Sign Test for Operational Leadership Performance (pre-post) # Differences >0 # of Differences <0 # Differences =0 P-Value 10 16 15 0.5 14.0577 -1.1397 16 231.5 16.3269 Paired Sign Test for Overall Leadership Performance (prepost) 10 22 9 0.0501 141 .614 10 162.3269 Paired Sign Test for Ideological Leadership Performance (pre-post) 19 6 16 0.2 Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for Ideological Leadership Performance (pre-post) 16 3 -1.5 16.161 16 229 14.313 10 122 12.

Figures 4-6: Paired Sign Test Results 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Operational Ideologigcal Logistic Total Score Difference (Post-Pre) Improved or no change Declined 25 20 Score Difference (Post-Pre) 15 Improved Declined 10 5 0 Operational Ideologigcal Logistic Total 142 .

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful