Bin Laden’s Henchmen: Al Qa’ida’s Commanding Officers who are Leading the Global Jihad

Sarah Catanzaro Professor Martha Crenshaw, Advisor Interschool Honors Program in International Security Studies Center for International Security and Cooperation Stanford University


Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………...4 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………....5 Chapter 1: Building a Complex Organization………………………………………....6 I. II. III. IV. Evolution of Al Qa’ida’s Organizational Structure…………………………………..7 A Description of Complex Organizations………………………………...…………..12 The Role of “Mergers and Acquisitions”………………………..…………………...13 Initial Thoughts on Policy Implications……………………………………………….15

Chapter 2: Literature Review………………………………………………………….17 I. II. Literature on Al Qa’ida’s Foreign Affiliates…………………………………………17 Literature on Joining Radical Movements……………………………………………20 A. Ideological motivations………………………………………………20 B. Psychosocial motivations…………………………………………….22 C. Strategic/opportunistic motivations………………………………….23 Literature on Terrorist Leadership…………………………………………………….25 A. The personality of terrorist leaders…………………………………..25 B. Targeting leadership………………………………………………….26


Chapter 3: Methodology………………………………………………………………..28 I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. Background……………………………………………………………………………….28 Assessing Q1……………………………………………………………………………...30 Assessing Q2……………………………………………………………………………...38 Developing the Universe of Cases……………………………………………………..40 Selection of Study Subjects……………………………………………………………...42 Problems Regarding Information Gathering…………………………………………43 Case Study………………………………………………………………………………...44 Relevance………………………………………………………………………………….44

Chapter 4: Universe of Cases…………………………………………………………..46 I. II. III. IV. Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: An Evolving Network…………………………………………46 Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: The Geographic Distribution………………………………..53 Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: Mergers? Partnerships? Or Collaborations?...................57 Summary of Findings…………………………………………………………………….59

Chapter 5: Results of Statistical Hypothesis Testing…………………………………60 I. II. Data Analysis and Results for Q1: What motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida’s and its pan-Islamic agenda?.......................................................60 Data Analysis and Results for Q2: What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible affiliates with Al Qa’ida……………………………………………………………….. 61


Chapter 6: Al Qa’ida in the Maghreb and Abdelmalek Droukdal – A Well Executed Merger…………………………………………………………………………………64 I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. The Origins of Islamic Violence in Algeria after the War of Independence……...64 The Birth of the Salvation Islamic Front……………………………………………...65 The Beginnings of the GIA and the Onset of an Epoch of Violence……………….66 An Alternative Emerges: The Origins of the GSPC…………………………………67 Fissions Form Within the GSPC……………………………………………………….67 The Rise of Droukdal…………………………………………………………………….71 Droukdal’s Program: Toward Global Jihad……………………………...………….73 The Announcement of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb………………..………...77 A New Organization……………………………………………………………………..78 Final Observations………………………………………………………………………80

Chapter 7: Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya: The Unrealized Merger………………………83 I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. The Emergence of the GAI from the Ashes of the Muslim Brotherhood………….83 The Sadat Assassination………………………………………………………………...84 Crackdown under Mubarak…………………………………………………………….84 Campaign of Terror……………………………………………..………………………85 Collapse of an Armed Group…………………………………………………………...86 Reconciliation…………………………………………………………………………….88 Explaining the Decision not to Affiliate with Al Qa’ida…………………………….89 Final Observations………………………………………………………………………91

Chapter 8: Conclusion and Discussion – Al Qa’ida’s Commanding Officers: A Skilled Management Team……………………………………………………………………..93 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………...107 Appendix I: List of Terrorist Groups………………………………………………..115 Appendix II: Sources by Terrorist Group…………………………………………...116 Appendix III: Commanding Officer Attribute Codebook……………………….....135 Appendix IV: Commanding Officer Attributes……………………………………..136 Appendix V: Data on Universe of Cases……………………………………………..138 Appendix VI: Data on Q1…………………………………………………………….139 Appendix VII: Data on Q2……………………………………………………………140


4 .Abstract: Al Qa’ida has allied with indigenous terrorist groups for over a decade. However. rather than ideological concerns are the primary motivating factors for joining Al Qa’ida. has Osama Bin Laden increasingly relied upon these franchises to prosecute his panIslamic struggle. shared visions become essential. The local jihadist leaders who become Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers ensure ideological alignment with Al Qa’ida. The conclusion of this paper finds that while opportunistic. only in recent years. this paper offers some broad recommendations regarding the future conduct of the Global War on Terror (GWOT). It then focuses on the role that local jihadist leaders play in the aftermath of the affiliation to shed further light on Al Qa’ida’s current strategy and operations. This paper examines first the motivations of local jihadist groups who associate with Al Qa’ida to understand the transformation that Al Qa’ida has achieved. Based on this analysis. after these affiliations occur.

I distinctly remember the sense of dissociation and unreality as we struggled to understand how our beloved Twin Towers were destroyed. I would be remiss not to acknowledge my parents. and coaching. Their constant support. and Professor Crenshaw most certainly earned mine through her impressive career. Despite his youth. Since my sophomore year at Stanford. Moreover. at length. how friends and neighbors had disappeared and presumably perished during this devastating attack on America’s soil. This solidarity and resiliency consolidated my faith in humanity and sparked my interest in homeland security studies. Finally. There were cars parked at our train station that were never recovered and fathers and mothers who never returned from work. Admiration should be earned. who listened to my presentations with great attention and offered so many thoughtful suggestions and useful comments. Through the CISAC seminars. I have benefited particularly from communications with Professor Martha Crenshaw. I have had the opportunity to try out some of my ideas and receive valuable criticism from my peers. Professor Crenshaw helped answer my questions promptly. New York which was tragically impacted by the September 11. I would have been hardpressed to get this project done in anything like a timely fashion had it not been for this program. not given. In addition. Moreover.Acknowledgements: The ideas of more people than I can possibly mention have affected my thinking about terrorist organizations and Al Qa’ida over the years. I would also like to thank my brother. for whom I would also like to show gratitude. 5 . and with enthusiasm. Thus. Port Washington. I am also grateful to Dara Kay Cohen. She also put at my disposal her insights on numerous topics. this project would have been poorer without her invaluable comments. I was so fortunate to have had Dara around as an academic example and important mentor. objectivity. but most importantly for serving as an incredible mentor. a traditionally male-dominated discipline. she has offered me practical and affectionate support. 2001 terrorist attack on the Twin Towers. I would like to thank Colonel Joseph Felter and Jarrett Brachman who introduced me to several primary and secondary documents. Professors Stockton and May helped me clarify and expand my views about this project on numerous occasions. Thank you so much for your patience. he continues to inspire me every day with his thoughtfulness and intelligence. both personal and intellectual is more important than can adequately be acknowledge in such a brief note. I hope that a general acknowledgement here of the wisdom and understanding may be counted to me for righteousness. Yet despite a pervasive sense of insecurity. who is currently a junior in high school. Acts of kindness and heroism became increasingly visible in my community as people mobilized to help one another. I have been so fortunate to benefit from their generosity and acumen. These sources proved to be a treasure-chest indeed. Professor Crenshaw lives as a role model for the next generation of female investigators researching international security. and more recently into the making of this thesis. It gives me great pleasure to thank Professors Paul Stockton and Michael May for the opportunity to participate in the CISAC Interschool Honors Program. I dedicate my thesis to the population of Port Washington. I want to recognize my community. the members of my community began to dig themselves literally and metaphorically from the ruins of the 9/11 disaster. Without a doubt.

In contrast. to plan attacks. One can 6 . Al Qa’ida has transformed into a more ambiguous entity that scholars cannot easily define. 2001 attacks. an organization characterized by “tight coupling” includes cells that associate intimately. most fail to assess the exchange relationships that distinguish Al Qa’ida. and depend upon each other. The first maintains that Al Qa’ida Central Command retains ideological and operational control over the organization and preserves a certain degree of tactical influence. Gunaratna 2004). A few dominant camps have emerged within this scholarly debate. Al Qa’ida’s structure and degree of centralization may fluctuate within a period of months or weeks. Although most scholars perceive Al Qa’ida as an organization in stasis. While each perspective has its merits. all oversimplify the command configuration utilized by Al Qa’ida. Some scholars even contend that the main threat no longer emanates from Al Qa’ida but from unassociated radicalized individuals and groups who meet and plot in their neighborhoods and on the Internet (Sageman 2008. Al Qa’ida utilizes a mix of both loose and tight coupling to attain a remarkable degree of adaptability. An organization characterized by “loose coupling” has cells that are relatively autonomous and independent. Al Qa’ida was a relatively centralized organization that used Afghanistan as a base from which to strategize. they fail to acknowledge that this combination of loose and tight coupling has enabled Al Qa’ida to become a modern hydra that readily adapts to changes in its environment. and to dispatch operatives worldwide.Stern 2003). Moreover.Chapter 1: Building a Complex Organization Prior to the September 11. since the onset of the Global War on Terror (GWOT). Thus. However. Currently. Dishman 2005). Ronfeldt 2005. communicate often. Others suggest that Al Qa’ida has become a decentralized network of individualized and local cells bound together exclusively by common beliefs (Diebert and Stein 2003.

Al Qa’ida has begun to depend on these affiliates to obtain organizational flexibility to a considerable extent. characterized by an efficient blend of both tight and loose coupling. distinguishing the groups with which Al Qa’ida is strongly associated. This study will examine the incentives and role of former local jihadist group leaders who now serve as Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. each led by a commanding officer). Moreover.therefore classify Al Qa’ida as a complex organization a concept that will be elaborated in this chapter (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2003). This study will draw upon open source and primary source information to understand why and how Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers promote the pan-Islamic agenda. since the onset of the Global War on Terror. By defining the new structure of Al Qa’ida (characterized by loosely integrated and operationally attached subunits. 2001. It is important to analyze these individuals because they have assumed more authority since September 11. this study may affect the allocation of resources in Washington for counterterrorism efforts. Ayman Zawahiri and the core of Al Qa’ida. One method whereby Al Qa’ida achieves such adaptability is by merging or partnering with local jihadist groups. Evolution of Al Qa’ida’s Organizational Structure: 7 . I. these external relationships enabled Al Qa’ida to transform into a complex organization. and identifying and assessing the role of the commanders who interact with Osama Bin Laden. However. recently. Although Al Qa’ida has cooperated with local jihadist groups for years. the conclusions drawn from this analysis may present policymakers with new and novel ways of targeting Al Qa’ida and its partners. Al Qa’ida has affiliated with indigenous terrorist groups for almost twenty years.

coordinated targets. Bin Laden returned to Saudi Arabia as a hero of jihad.e. and authorized asset sharing for terrorist operations. However. At the conclusion of the Soviet-Afghan war. Osama bin Laden. This council promoted common goals. a multimillionaire from a wealthy Saudi family. that Bin Laden began calling his cadre al Qaeda al Askariya (“the military base”) and developing a greater organizational structure (Riedel 2008). procuring. training. He relocated to the Sudan at the invitation of the government of Hassan Turabi and the National Islamic Front. However. an Islamic scholar and founding member of the Kashmiri jihadist group Lashkar-e-Taiba. which had rebuffed his offer to defend the kingdom. after the liberation of Kuwait from Saddam Hussein by the American-led multinational army. and launching support and military operations. a large number of jihadists from the Middle East traveled to Afghanistan to combat the Soviet Union. most of whom he knew since his formative days in Afghanistan. The shura majilis (consultative assembly) received information from four subordinate committees designed to direct specific segments of planning and operations. established an office in Peshawar. Bin Laden expanded the Al Qa’ida organization. The Services Bureau (“Maktab al Khadamat”) provided travel funds and guesthouses in Pakistan for recruits and volunteers to facilitate the struggle against the Soviet forces. and Abdullah Azzam. The organization was centered upon the “shura” (i. The finance committee oversaw and developed financial resources.In the 1980s. advisory council) consisting of Bin Laden’s closest associates. developing a membership roster and establishing a hierarchical arrangement to guide and oversee its functions (Riedel 2008). Pakistan to serve as a hostel for Arabs coming to fight the Soviets and as a press agency to produce propaganda to promote jihad. in 1991. it was not until the summer of 1988. The religious committee justified Al 8 . The military committee was responsible for recruiting. In the Sudan. Bin Laden was disenchanted with his native Saudi Arabia.

the Pentagon. it would be assigned to a carefully selected cell headed by a senior Al Qa’ida operative who reported personally to Bin Laden (Wright 2007). Finally. Al Qa’ida could be classified as a centralized organization.Qa’ida’s actions and operations within the theological parameters of Al Qa’ida model of Islam. in its earlier incarnation. Al Qa’ida’s former propaganda chief. Moreover. Bin Laden cemented his ties to Ayman Zawahiri. all three of which faced indigenous terrorist groups supported by Bin Laden. and Libya. the last emir of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad. Thus. In May 1996. In May 1997. The September 11. 2001 attacks against the United States (Bergen 2002). the media committee produced propaganda intended to generate Muslim support for the organization and its objectives (Harmony Database Released Documents: Al Qa'ida Goals and Structure 2006). Bin Laden personally recruited the plot’s 9 . Bin Laden and Khalid Sheikh Mohammad. hatched the plan to target the Twin Towers. although Al Qa’ida also assisted two other Salafi terrorist groups during this formative period in the Sudan. Bin Laden was able to forge his closest alliance yet with the Taliban by providing it with significant financial and human resources to support the ongoing war against other factions in northern Afghanistan. and the Capitol Building. thereby strengthening Al Qa’ida Central Command and forming a close-knit group of jihadists uniquely capable of executing terror operations like the September 11. Afghanistan’s lack of central government provided Bin Laden with greater leeway to pursue his agenda and centralize his operations. Bin Laden left the Sudan to return to Afghanistan as a result of combined pressure from the United States. Egypt. other western governments. 2001 attacks reveal the former nature of Al Qa’ida’s decision-making apparatus. The plot to attack the United State began in 1999 after Al Qa’ida executed the simultaneous bombings of the American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Saudi Arabia. Once a specific operation was decided upon.

he engaged the Taliban and its leader. When operations are so decentralized. 2006). the attacks precipitated the Global War on Terror (GWOT). networked terrorist organizations would be less vulnerable to traditional counterterrorism measures used by hierarchically organized security forces. Prior to 9/11.tactical leader. it becomes particularly difficult to maintain 10 . he personally handled other elements of the conspiracy. Al Qa’ida allegedly convened a strategic summit in northern Iran at which the shura recognized that Al Qa’ida could no longer function as a hierarchy. Nevertheless. detached from Al Qa’ida Central Command and other cells. Although Bin Laden and Al Qa’ida considered 9/11 an astonishing success. many Al Qa’ida leaders were imprisoned. In November 2002. Al Qa’ida was a centralized organization. Al Qa’ida soon learned that there are limitations to a strictly decentralized structure. Mohammed Atta as well as the fifteen operatives who would intimidate the passengers during the airline hijackings. they established their own individual plans (Felter et al. Mullah Omar in the preparation (Riedel 2008). After the first year of the GWOT and the ouster of the Taliban from Afghanistan. composed of less than ten operatives. for instance. From this point forward. While they operated in support of centralized directives. which used Afghanistan as a base from which to carry out major operations against American targets and did not significantly depend upon its affiliates to support its operations in the Middle East. The shura concluded that a decentralized. Additionally. These arrests led to subsequent arrests of other senior officers. were instructed to develop their own organizational structures. individual cells. Captives revealed the names of their commanders and associates thereby highlighting the need for loose coupling between local operatives and Al Qa’ida’s executive leadership in order to evade government interference and limit the consequences of any further compromises.

who espoused different personal preferences. these low-level operatives sought more violence than was useful due to the cognitive dynamics of an underground organization. who are the most important link in the formation of a resilient. competition for prominence within the movement. Within a decentralized framework. decision to go to war with Iraq and the Pakistani decision to provoke a crisis with India allowed Al Qa’ida to survive by regaining a degree of centralization. Moreover. As the result of restoration of central control. However. the lower house of India’s parliament in New Delhi. the U. Perkins. Al Qa’ida was able to reestablish some of its pre-9/11 operational capabilities by exploiting Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Riedel 2008). Invading Iraq diverted troops from the mission of finding Al Qa’ida’s leadership. nor could it punish renegade agents (Felter. Al Qa’ida leadership found itself cornered along the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan and unable to coordinate its low-level operatives. These commanding officers ensure that preference divergence does not result in the loss of 11 . prior to the invasion of Iraq. Like most other organizations.S. Al Qa’ida can rely upon closer relations with its commanding officers (the former leaders of indigenous terrorist groups). Al Qa’ida could not effectively monitor its agents’ activities. rather than consolidating its victory in Afghanistan.situational awareness and control the use of violence to achieve specific political ends. Bramlett. and their own talent at conducting aggressive attacks (Shapiro 2007). the US allowed Al Qa’ida to reconstitute itself in the tribal areas of Pakistan. In 2002 and 2003. Often. Al Qa’ida faced challenges when Central Command was forced to delegate certain duties to low level operatives. complex organization. Thus. and Fishman 2006). India began to mobilize along the border. thereby provoking Pakistan to divert to the east troops that were needed in the west. Brachman. after five Kashmiri terrorists attacked Lok Sabha.

it was not very efficient. Al Qa’ida continues to morph into a complexly structure organization (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2006). By contrast. II. Unlike strictly centralized organizations. the relationship between its commanding officers and central authorities were also loosely coupled (thus. Empowered by the establishment of its safe haven in Pakistan and increased reliance upon its commanding officers. Although a decentralized organization form was more appropriate and prudent after 9/11. A Description of Complex Organizations: As this history indicates. While the relationships within the cells are tightly coupled. who interact with and mutually affect one another. This flexible structure allows the Central Command to maintain control over specifically identified strategic operations through its commanding officers while enabling cells to maintain their autonomy in local and regional operations (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2006). today. highly visible organizational personnel. Al Qa’ida’s demand for operational secrecy. and large size dictated its organizational decisions. Before Al Qa’ida Central Command reorganized itself in the tribal areas of Pakistan. intricate nature of resource gathering and allocation. qualified by tightly coupled systems or exclusively decentralized organizations. Al Qa’ida is a true “complex organization”). Al Qa’ida was effectively a decentralized network). While it is difficult to 12 . Al Qa’ida now relies heavily upon semiautonomous cells found in operational territories that are horizontally and vertically integrated into the centralized command structure. Complex organizations are composed of a diversity of agents. complex organizations can exploit a diversity of systems (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2001). qualified by loosely coupled systems.operational success or security. the relationship between Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers and central authorities are moderately coupled (thus. the relationships between cells and between operatives and Al Qa’ida Central Command are loosely coupled.

these commanding officers are effective because they can develop mature relationships with their operatives. Previously. the extensive negotiations that continue to occur between Al Qa’ida and its affiliates suggest that Al Qa’ida has consciously utilized these arrangements to remain resilient. Brachman. III. partners. and Fishman 2006). The Role of “Mergers and Acquisitions:” By affiliating with local jihadist movements. it employs the groups’ leaders as its commanding officers and integrates them into Al Qa’ida Central Command by establishing communication channels and by offering financial and technological resources to these leaders for their local outlets with stipulations.determine if Al Qa’ida assumed this structure by conscious design or coincidence. He observed that a dearth of such leaders reduces the maximum level of control Al Qa’ida could exert thereby undermining the potential for political impact (Felter. Moreover. Al Qa’ida has achieved an optimal combination of coupling. Communication frequency. However. Bramlett. Al Qa’ida theorist Abu Musab al-Suri noted the importance of a highly trained cadre of senior commanding officers. These commanding officers can serve a crucial role since they are better able to monitor the behavior of their agents and can punish and reward them for their performance. Perkins. or collaborates with a local jihadist groups. These relationships are characterized by a high degree of leader-member exchange and commitment that was impossible to achieve between Al Qa’ida Central Command executives and operatives due to their lack of physical proximity. interactive communication 13 . Since they are already closely coupled to their agents. they can build differentiated relationships with their rapports rather than espousing an “average” leadership style. Bin Laden did not seek to exert strategic or operational control over the leaders of its regionally based affiliates. now when Al Qa’ida merges.

and Fishman 2006). and member affect are all key in this dyadic relationship (Graen and Uhl-Bien 1995). Perkins. Commanding officers now serve an important role as interlocutors with Al Qa’ida Central Command. their performance. Al Qa’ida Central Command can rely upon its commanding officers to handle finance and logistic tasks and to engage in auditing strategies. Al Qa’ida can ensure that strategic and tactical differences between it and its commanding officers are reconciled. 14 . Local leaders can also effectively monitor operative’s personal and social network. Studies from the corporate world as well as observations by Al Qa’ida theorists reveal that when agents develop high quality relationships with their leaders. cohesive units can innovate and adapt to the demands of the environment because they do not need to conform to a strict set of guidelines passed down from Central Command. Thus. ensuring that relationships that could dilute commitment are avoided and those that enhance commitment are strengthened(Brachman and McCants 2006). Jarrett Brachman. and their overall unit performance improves (Graen and Uhl-Bien 1995). Providing funds on a need-to-have basis to smaller groups of operatives is a risky strategy because each additional transfer entails communications and financial transactions. relying on lower-level operatives (who are often less committed. There is a positive correlation between the level of ideological indoctrination of cell members and the degree of control a leader exerts. since the most devoted operatives are obliged to engage in riskier or inherently fatal assignments) is a more hazardous strategy (Felter. The moderate coupling between Al Qa’ida Central Command and local leaders is essential to the performance of the organization. these new. decision influence. Because affiliations are often preceded by several months of bargaining and negotiations. Bramlett. Moreover. leader-member value agreement.patterns. which can be tracked by counterterrorist forces. subordinate loyalty. Moreover.

and competence of local cells. and equipment. Initial Thoughts on Policy Implications: 15 . Moreover. Moreover. duty of care to their agents. thereby ensuring the unity. they act as a hub of communication. IV. these commanding officers can ensure the dissemination of innovation and information by acting as an intermediary between their cell members and Al Qa’ida Central Command. the use of force. accountability for operation effectiveness. Although these commanding officers have significant responsibilities (for example. thereby allowing Al Qa’ida to maintain ideological and operational control over the organization and by closely interacting with local operatives. Thus. scrutinizing their stories for patterns to determine their motivation. information between operatives and Al Qa’ida authorities (McAllister 2004). press and scholarly articles. transmitting new.By allowing its commanding officers to retain significant freedom to interact with other local leaders and with resource providers. up-to-date. obligations to Al Qa’ida Central Command. finances. efficiency. local leaders-cum-commanding officers perform a crucial function by liaising with Al Qa’ida Central Command. they are given latitude to exploit their specific environment. Drawing upon documents and transcripts of legal proceedings involving global Salafi mujahedin and their organizations. and powers including discipline and punishment of their agents) no researcher has analyzed their role or background. this study compiles the biographies of over forty Al Qa’ida commanding officers. at present. government documents. this study provides valuable insight into the transformation that these leaders undergo when they become Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers by looking at their responsibilities before and after they affiliate with Al Qa’ida. Currently. This is the first study that pinpoints the organizations with which Al Qa’ida has affiliated and identifies their leaders (who subsequently become Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers). and Internet articles.

Government efforts to degrade Al Qa’ida’s capacity should focus on undermining its security environment, minimizing the degree to which it can control operations, and abort its ability to fund its activities. By identifying the crucial role played by commanding officers in sustaining Al Qa’ida, this study will suggest additional means of undermining Al Qa’ida. The government should increase dissension between local leaders and Al Qa’ida Central Command. The US government should publicly recognize and highlight the differences between the acquired groups, who originally espouse ambitions such as regime overthrow and Al Qa’ida, which is committed to a pan-Islamic program. Moreover, the government can disrupt communications channels between local leaders and Al Qa’ida central command by utilizing misinformation and flooding information channels, thereby forcing the commanding officers to communicate more frequently with Al Qa’ida Central Command, possibly revealing crucial information. There may be “psychological” tactics that can be employed to generate dissension, to exploit certain aspects of human or group dynamics that would lead to competition, or rebellion. Moreover, there may be certain personality characteristics of the types of individuals employed at each level of organization that can be manipulated. Finally, government efforts should deny jihadist groups the benefit of security vacuum in vulnerable areas; thereby barring the emergence of potential Al Qa’ida partners. Through troop deployment, the US government can deny terrorists the use of vulnerable countries as staging grounds for the attacks in the West.


Chapter 2: Literature Review
Recently, counterterrorist agents and military officers have mounted efforts to combat Al Qa’ida and Bin Laden supporters. However, there is considerable controversy among scholars regarding the structure of Al Qa’ida and therefore, how best to target this formidable foe. The debate regarding the nature of Al Qa’ida’s threat will inevitably impact upon the allocation of influence and resource by the U.S. federal government in the Global War on Terror (GWOT) embarked upon following the September 11, 2001 attacks. The outcome of the bureaucratic turf wars over funding for programs under the new Obama administration will surely define future directions and strategies to confront Al Qa’ida specifically and global terrorism in general. In the introductory chapter, I highlighted the newfound importance of Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers, which lead the groups with which Al Qa’ida has recently merged or with whom it remains associated. Although Al Qa’ida retains its core group and a well-trained terrorist cadre, it has become increasingly engaged with regional affiliates in Egypt, the Sinai Peninsula, Indonesia, and other sites in franchise operations. I. Literature on Al Qa’ida’s Foreign Affiliates Several scholars have investigated the process whereby Al Qa’ida has achieved a broader geographic and operational reach by employing local jihadist groups. These researchers confirm my commentary that such partnerships can provide Al Qa’ida with increased flexibility and offer advantages in stimulating tactical level innovation within particular environments when they are astutely directed by Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. In a report prepared for the Combat Studies Institute, Kalic describes Al Qa’ida as a “modern hydra.” He observes that before the onset of the GWOT, Al Qa’ida functioned as a regional indoctrination and training center for Islamic terrorist organizations. However, he


corroborates my observation that because of the loss of support and training centers in Afghanistan due to Operation Enduring Freedom, Bin Laden was obliged to rely upon outside groups in order to perpetuate Al Qa’ida’s agenda. Kalic suggests that Al Qa’ida’s alliances with Abu Sayyaf, Egyptian Islamic Jihad, Tunisian Combatant Group, and Libyan Islamic Fighting Group have enabled Al Qa’ida to expand its geographic influence and diffuse its organizational structure. He describes the process whereby Al Qa’ida supports local “walk in” Islamic groups that pitch their plans to Al Qa’ida for financial support. These radical groups provide additional reach to Al Qa’ida and expand its operational capability for minimal investment because they can develop indigenous plans and operations based on local situations and observations. Moreover, they allow Al Qa’ida to minimize exposure of its central command structure (Kalic 2005) In a similar vein, Takeyh and Gvosdev have observed that after the destruction of its sanctuary in Afghanistan, Al Qa’ida has remained buoyant by forging foreign alliances. Through this strategy, Al Qa’ida has established a presence in failed states where it believes the US will opt not to risk significant losses associated with urban/guerilla warfare. Al Qa’ida no longer needs a strong state for funding and supplies since it can rely on its franchises in countries like Kashmir, Kosovo, Chechnya, and Palestine (Takeyh and Gvosdev 2002). Riedel avows that the US invasion of Iraq and subsequent efforts to quell sectarian unrest have allowed Al Qa’ida to regroup in the tribal areas of Pakistan, where it has established a new base of operations. Now, Al Qa’ida is once again focused on enlarging its network. Consequently, Al Qa’ida has developed a closer relationship with Kashmiri terrorist groups, like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Muhammad that have a presence there. Moreover, while Al Qa’ida has failed to topple the governments of Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, its attacks against these


” Due to the adaptability of its mission. Al Qa’ida finds another organization that can attain its other goals and leaves this former associate to continue the war on its own. Moreover. However. the plot to destroy ten commercial airliners en route from the United Kingdom to the United States. In a similar vein. she suggests that both Egyptian Islamic Jihad and the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan compromised their original mission when they joined forces with Al Qa’ida. and revivalist organizations (like Tablighi Jamaat) (Stern 2003). with Shia organizations (like Hezbollah). indicates that Al Qa’ida has established connections in Europe. with traditional organized crime groups (like Artab Ansari’s [an Indian gangster] network). Riedel suggests that Al Qa’ida may seek a foothold in Gaza. Stern observes that terrorist groups’ objectives have evolved to ensure their survival. obliging both entities to adapt. Africa. Al Qa’ida can forge broad. which is not identical to Al Qa’ida’s tactics. The affiliated groups may employ a modus operandi. Finally. 19 . Al Qa’ida remains associated with these groups as long as they cannot operate independently. She maintains that many organizations will form alliances with groups that have ideologies different from their own. or Lebanon in the near future (Riedel 2007). foiled in 2006. and sometimes unlikely alliances with other jihadist groups (like Jemaah Islamiyah). For instance. Al Qa’ida need not maintain constant supervision or control over the activities of its old affiliate’s operatives (Mishal and Rosenthal 2005). Mishal and Rosenthal describe Al Qa’ida as a “dune organization” that employs other loosely affiliated organizations to carry out its missions. when they prove that they no longer need Al Qa’ida’s material or normative support to conduct independent maneuvers. she avows that Bin Laden has adjusted his objectives over time and describes Al Qa’ida as a “flexible group of ruthless warriors ready to fight on behalf of multiple causes.regimes demonstrate its expanded influence throughout the Middle East. thus.

strategic mistakes and are more susceptible to counterterrorism offensives than their mother organization. He avers that Al Qa’ida offers these franchises few benefits. He offers Al Qa’ida in Iraq as an example of a group which compromised Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic mission by attacking Muslim civilians and engaging in conflict with other Iraqi insurgent groups (Fishman 2008). equipment. He contends that Al Qa’ida’s franchises are likely to commit rash. II. and ideology. 20 . they do not reveal why local jihadist groups choose to align with Al Qa’ida. Literature on Incentives for Joining Radical Movements A. including “licensing agreements. Finally.” whereby Al Qa’ida finances terrorist groups with the intention of influencing their strategic activity. whereby Al Qa’ida combines with or subsumes another organization. Many groups that merge or partner with Al Qa’ida adhere to a program based on the ethnic. They contend that these interactions are the most complex form of equity engagements that terrorist groups develop to survive in competitive environments and suggest that mergers/acquisitions allow terrorist groups to consolidate their assets to compete more successfully or exploit resources held by other parties (Desouza and Hengsen 2007). or personnel for a specific purpose and duration and “minority equity investments. They analyze several possible arrangements. Desouza and Hengsen provide the most comprehensive analysis of Al Qa’ida’s collaborative activities.” whereby Al Qa’ida allows other groups to use its facilities. Ideological motivations While these studies analyze Al Qa’ida’s strategy and explain why Al Qa’ida has pursued such arrangements. they describe mergers and acquisitions. They avow that terrorist groups cannot be self-sustaining and must “engage in the fundamentals of established economic practices” to furnish protection from outside threats. offering only its name.Fishman is less worried about Al Qa’ida franchises than other scholars. reputation.

one might expect that local jihadist leaders subscribe to Al Qa’ida’s global jihad because the idea of establishing an Islamic Caliphate throughout the world is attractive to them. Consequently. Jones. enemies and allies are described in different terms at different times (Della Porta 1995). linguistic.sectarian. Studies regarding why individuals join radical movements may inform our understanding of the motivations of local terrorists leaders who connect with Al Qa’ida’s global enterprise. Consequently. Al Qa’ida can co-opt local struggles into an evolving network of worldwide jihad by asserting its dedication to an international agenda. many groups grapple with contradictions between national and supranational aims. Based on her interpretation. and Weeding validate this line of thought. Unfortunately. In fact. they must forsake their indigenous agendas to support the global pan-Islamic movement. and state boundaries in which they arose. Upon allying with Al Qa’ida. she proposes that ideology is a strategic choice made by the organization. few studies investigate the incentives of the local jihadist leaders who adopt Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program and transform their organization into part of Al Qa’ida’s system. She maintains that political organizations often orient their ideology to support recruitment. it is a tool for enlarging the potential supporters of the organization. They observe that although Al Qa’ida was initially devoted to fighting the Soviet forces it now espouses more internationalist objectives. Like Stern. Smith. One could also envisage that Al Qa’ida is promoting its pan-Islamic vision because it is aware of the magnetism of this dream. They contend that Al 21 . Della Porta suggests that individuals are persuaded to enlist in underground organizations when they are enticed by its ideology. She observes that the attention groups pay to adjusting their ideology to circumstance is revealed when they explain and justify their strategies.

other studies suggest that individuals join terrorist networks for psychosocial reasons. Moreover. He avows that traditionally. Similarly. membership in fundamentalist organizations and repeat terrorist acts. B. Post. Sprinzak. and Weinberg observed 80 Palestinian suicide terrorists from 1973 to 2002. they concluded that income and/or educational inequalities do not account for terrorism.Qa’ida has improved its media wing to appeal to local jihadist groups in their native language and honor regional customs. Pedahzur. They deduced that peer influence and increased social standing were major reasons for joining a terrorist group (Post. and Weeding 2003). Islamic Jihad. and Denny 2003). They offer Jemaah Islamiyah as an example of an organization that was seduced by Al Qa’ida’s discussion of a pan-Islamic caliphate (Jones. Perliger. and Denny interviewed 35 incarcerated Middle Eastern extremists from Hamas. rather than local jihad. Gunaratna also supports this argument. Consequently. As a consequence of the GWOT and the war in Iraq. global events have provided the context for the new generation to gain exposure to significant ideological training and indoctrination. However. Gunaratna 2002). As a result. Al Qa’ida anti-Western curriculum is increasingly alluring (R. Sprinzak. Smith. They noticed that these terrorists exhibited a higher rate of religious education. as well as 14 secular terrorists from Fatah al-Islam. they 22 . Psychosocial motivations Conversely. Islamist groups fought secular Muslim governments either to replace them or to form a separate state. They observed that most had a high school education and some had additional schooling and that most came from respected families that supported their activism. and Hezbollah. Al Qa’ida successfully transformed the parochial thinking of these groups through a sophisticated propaganda campaign to orient them towards global.

calculated decision to execute a particular type of action.proposed that the terrorists acted out of altruistic motives (devotion to a religious community) and deduced that recruitment could be based on a network of shared social values(Pedahzur. members of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad. Jemaah Islamiyah. He observed that members of terrorist organizations were generally middle-class. the GSPC. Marc Sageman’s book. and Al Qa’ida. C. Sandler and Enders contend that terrorists must choose between different strategies and modes of attack based on their perception of “prices” associated with alternative operations. spirituality and concern for their communities. educated young men from caring and religious families. Understanding Terror Network is particularly revealing. These participants in jihad grew up with strong positive values of religion. On the contrary. Moreover. Although his research was biased towards leaders who have come to the public attention. Each mode of operation has a per-unit price that 23 . rational. He sample included expatriate leaders of the Egyptian Islamic Group. he found that social bonds were the critical element in the process of joining jihad and he suggested that such connections precede ideological commitment (Sageman 2004). Sagemen found no evidence of pathological narcissism or paranoid personality disorder amongst those who he surveyed. and Weinberg 2003). Sageman compiled data from public sources on 172 individuals who he identified as members of a global Salafi mujahedeen. Several academics believe that terrorist action derives from a conscious. Perliger. Strategic/opportunistic motivations Alternatively. terrorist leaders may have opportunistic motives for securing a spot under Al Qa’ida’s umbrella. which they perceive to be the optimum strategy to accomplish a sociopolitical goal.

while training together. First. while incarcerated together. He further notes that local jihadist cells shed their outlaw status within radical Muslim circles when they have Al Qa’ida’s backing. 24 . Thus. the United States and its allies. Finally. Hoffman notes that approximately 90 percent of all terrorist groups collapse within a year and only half of the remainder survives another decade. Alternatively. etc. embracing global jihad may be perceived as a way to control and recruit new group members (Bruce Hoffman 2004).includes the value of time. These local jihadist leaders may have developed relationships with Al Qa’ida officials during the Soviet-Afghan war. by extension. any act executed by a terrorist organization can be perceived as a rational choice (Sandler and Enders 2004). may unite with Al Qa’ida to guarantee organizational survival. Based on these observations he suggests that several local jihadist outlets need the Al Qa’ida imprimatur to raise money. Based on these accounts. He remarks upon long running government offensives that have nearly crushed several terrorist groups. In joining Al Qa’ida. he mentions that the Iraq war has sapped local jihadist groups of their most active militants. one can imagine three different rationales why local jihadist group leaders would affiliate with Al Qa’ida. and association with the Al Qa’ida label. In this context. who might otherwise be contained or co-opted by local regimes and. local jihadist group leaders may be lured by Al Qa’ida’s ideology. Finally. resources and anticipated outcome. access to training facilities. These affinities may compel local jihadist leaders to liaise with their old compatriots and mutually assist each other in their subsequent struggles. these local jihadist leaders may seek concrete benefits such as the provision of financial resources. local jihadist leaders. It is possible that these groups take the transnational jihadist challenge seriously because the idea of creating a single Islamic state or reviving the united Caliphate of earlier times is captivating. local jihadist leaders may confederate with Al Qa’ida due to psychosocial influences.

III. Literature on Terrorist Leadership A. The personality of terrorist leaders While these studies enlighten the discussion regarding incentives for merging or partnering with Al Qa'ida, very little literature directly addresses the role that local jihadist leaders play before or after a merger. However, some researchers have attempted to identify personality traits that enable leaders to attract and maintain large followings. In the 1920s, German sociologist Max Weber defined charismatic leadership as “resting on devotion to the exceptional sanctity, heroism, or exemplary character of an individual person, and of the normative patterns or order revealed or ordained by him.” He suggested that charisma was a personality trait by virtue of which a leader appeared endowed with exceptional power or superhuman competencies. Charismatic leaders gained authority through qualities unique their own, not through positions that they occupied (Weber 1968). Kostrzebski applied Weber’s theory of charismatic authority to examine leadership in the context of Islamic tradition. He contends that a certain model of charismatic politico-religious leadership, first exemplified by Mohammed, the prophet and founder of Islam, is prominent in Islamic history. He notices that in the Islamic world, religious and political leadership is usually embodied in the persona of a single charismatic individual. He cites Mahdi of Sudan, Ayatollah Khomeini, and Osama bin Laden as examples of this archetype. Furthermore, he predicts that this type of charismatic politico-religious leader will appear with greater frequency in the future (Kostrzebski 2002). Similarly, Bergen contends that Bin Laden’s charisma helped fuel an influx of recruits and attracted aspiring jihadists to Afghanistan from Western countries. Moreover, he avows that Bin Laden’s cult of personality prompted various militant Islamic groups to affiliate with Al


Qa’ida. He notes that Bin Laden left operational planning to trusted lieutenants and stood above the fray. Consequently, few operatives received personal audience with him. However, those who went through the vetting procedures and gained access to Bin Laden describe their encounters with the legendary terrorist leader as “beautiful” (Bergen 2006). B. Targeting leadership While these studies suggest that a leader’s charisma can inspire a devoted following, they do not address the role that such leaders play within an organizational framework. While research addressing this topic has been extremely sparse, some scholars have discussed how the arrest or neutralization of a terrorist leader can affect the group’s performance. In a Joint Special Operations University report, Turbiville perceives that the United States has emphasized targeting and eliminating key terrorist leadership since 9/11. He describes the diverse experience of foreign operations against insurgent and terrorist high value targets. Based on several case studies, he concludes that leadership targeting can be effective, particularly when a group depends heavily on a charismatic leader. However, he cautions that operations which target leadership must be integrated into an overall and effective counterinsurgency and counterterrorist strategy and warns that abuses of national and international law and human rights committed in terrorist leadership targeting programs have a negative impact on larger counterinsurgency goals (Turbiville 2007). Langdon, Sarapu, and Wells examined 35 leadership crises to determine what happens to terrorist movements after the loss of a leader. Although they predicted that the assassination of a leader would cause a dramatic change in ideology leading to increased violence, they found that the assassination of a leader often causes the group to fail or disband. Moreover, they observed that the assassination of a leader is more likely to devastate a terrorist group than an arrest. They


suggest that arrested leaders may continue to play an important ideological role by guiding their group from their prison cell (Langdon, Sarapu, and Wells 2004). These studies suggest that targeting leadership could damage a terrorist group by depriving it of effective direction and demoralizing its rank and file members. However, while these analyses intimate that terrorist leaders play an important role in ensuring organizational survival, they do not expose the particular function that terrorist leaders must execute. Thus, this study is valuable since its looks at both the motivations and specific responsibilities of Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers.


Background: The introductory chapter explained how and why Al Qa’ida relies extensively upon the leaders of regionally focused groups. Al Qa’ida has expanded its reach through its affiliations so that it is uniquely positioned to target the West through spectacular attacks designed to inflict mass casualties and damage to the global economy. I. As such. Al Qaida’s ability to mete out devastating destruction worldwide has increased as cells have become progressively armed with modern technology. As centralized communication nodes within their system. remains an important security threat. Moreover. moderately coupled network of individuals united by a common need and ultimately aligned behind an emergent leader. By depending upon its commanding officers (the former leaders of local jihadist groups). Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers have the ultimate authority over their region and are given wide latitude to run their units within the boundaries of Al Qa’ida’s doctrines. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are held responsible for its success or failure in their region. During negotiations between Al Qa’ida and 28 . Osama bin Laden. recently. In fact. In order to understand why Al Qa’ida is such a forceful and resilient organization. who serve as Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. Al Qa’ida has become a flexible. Currently. we must understand the strength that resides in its leaders.Chapter 3: Methodology Al Qa’ida has clearly transformed and evolved in ways described in the introduction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the motivations and responsibilities of Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. they have become the main link between Al Qa’ida Central Command and the organization’s operative units. Its terrorist activity. conducted by operatives capable of inflicting maximum civilian and economic damages on both local and distant targets in pursuit of their extremist goals.

The surveys reviewed. because academic studies to date have not focused on Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. or credentials of these officials. I theorized that by examining the demographic characteristics of Al 29 . focusing primarily on principals like Osama bin Laden. Finally. little is known about the characters. so too must the commanding officers that merge their organization with Al Qa’ida prepare accordingly (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2006). which consider categories of influence factors and their effect on an individual’s decision to join an Islamic fundamentalist terrorist organization. The previous chapter revealed that literature on the role of leadership in terror networks has remained limited in scope.the potential affiliate. This study is the first to comprehensively examine Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. researchers have overlooked them. Commanding officers also ensure that an operative’s incentives to supply effort are not diminished and mediate conflict within their unit when the affiliation begins and as it matures. they help stimulate interdependency and interaction among their units and other branches of Al Qa’ida. Although these commanding officers play a vital role in expanding the agenda of Al Qa’ida and adding legitimacy to its international campaign. Negotiations are often lengthy processes. Past studies have ignored important hierarchical considerations. Thus. do not adequately explain why certain terrorists leaders affiliate with Al Qa’ida and its program of global jihad nor do they reveal the precise role that these officers serve within the Al Qa’ida network once affiliated. commanding officers are influential arbitrators. it will contribute to the bank of information and stimulate vital discourse on the composition and function of Al Qa’ida today. communicate often and address everyone involved in the deal. Unfortunately. motivations. involving discussions regarding financial and capital resources and tactics. Just as managers from the corporate arena trying to integrate newly acquired companies and divisions. plan ahead.

Qa’ida’s operatives, such as age, educational background, years of religious training, religious affiliation, and by evaluating these operatives for their military backgrounds (e.g. war experiences/participation in the Afghanistan conflict), incarceration/prison time, migration patterns etc, I would be able to detect recognizable patterns that characterize these terrorist executives. The patterns that I observed would help me answer two critical questions: 1) What motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida’s and its pan-Islamic agenda? 2) What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible affiliates with Al Qa’ida?

II. Assessing Q1: The previous chapter outlined three explanations for why individuals join terrorist organizations. Some researchers suggest that terrorists follow a strategic logic and are inspired by opportunism; they perceive armed combat at the most effective way to generate significant governmental concessions (Sandler and Enders 2004, Bruce Hoffman 2004). Others scholars suggest that ideology plays an important role in pushing militants of some militants toward terrorism (Della Porta 1995, Jones, Smith, and Weeding 2003, R. Gunaratna 2002). Finally, some academics claim that individuals join terrorist organizations due to strong solidarity bonds derived from interpersonal relations (Post, Sprinzak, and Denny 2003, Pedahzur, Perliger, and Weinberg 2003, Sageman 2004). Since prior studies have not discussed what incentives provoke local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida, I assumed that the motivations for local jihadist leaders to join Al Qa’ida’s global jihad were similar to the motivations for individuals to


join terrorist movements. Thus, to address my first question, I developed the following hypotheses: H11. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to opportunistic motives H21. Al Qa’ida commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to ideological motives H31. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due psychosocial motives H11 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers aligned with Al Qa’ida due to opportunistic motives) reflects the observation that relatively undersized, less powerful indigenous assemblies of terrorists can invigorate their organization by aligning with Al Qa’ida. In recent years, Al Qa’ida has demonstrated unusual resilience and international reach. It has exhibited a complexity, agility, and global scope that is unrivaled by any previous terrorist organization. Its fluid operational style, based on a common mission statement and shared objectives rather than standard-operating procedures has ensured its success (Stern 2003). Al Qa’ida has a remarkable ability to attract membership by relying upon a web of informal relations with various Islamic groups to gain access to operational collaborators and individuals to execute attacks. Currently, Al Qa’ida’s recruitment process seems to be more a matter of joining than being solicited. Moreover, the Salafi message, which has been disseminated over the Internet by Al Qa’ida’s media division, has attracted numerous members of alienated diasporas (sometimes second and third generation immigrants) who feel isolated from their communities and seek to belong to a group (Bruce Hoffman 2003). By associating with Al Qa’ida, local jihadist groups can shore up popular support and amp up recruitment.


Al Qa’ida’s strength may also lie in its impressive coffers; Al Qa’ida has amassed billions of dollars by building a strong network of financiers and operatives who are frugally minded and business savvy. Moreover, Al Qa’ida’s finances are often hidden in legitimate and illegitimate businesses; Bin Laden is reputed to own approximately eighty companies around the world. Al Qa’ida has learned to effectively leverage the global financial system of capital markets by utilizing small financial transfers, under regulated Islamic banking networks and informal transfer systems throughout the world. Thus, it is difficult to choke off funds destined for Al Qa’ida (Basile 2004). Consequently, Al Qa’ida can grant money to local terrorist groups that present promising plans for attacks that serve Al Qa’ida’s general goals. All terrorist organizations must engage in attacks to maintain support, to buttress their organizational integrity, and to foster their continued existence. Associating with Al Qa’ida ensures that a group has access to the necessary financial resources to conduct attacks. In a sense, Al Qa’ida operates like a large multi-national company and the “product” that it exports is terrorism. One must acknowledge the economic principles that underlie Al Qa’ida’s success, that of supply and demand, limited resources, productivity etc. Finally, Al Qa’ida has successfully exploited the technological tools of globalization to communicate with various audiences. Al Qa’ida has launched an effective advertising campaign worldwide using the latest technology and psychology to reach their desired addressees. Al Qa’ida uses mobile phones, text messaging, instant messaging, websites, email, blogs, and chat rooms for administrative tasks, fund-raising, research, logistical coordination of attacks, and recruitment. When Al Qa’ida’s media division airs its hostage videos and films of terrorist attacks or their aftermath, it provides the organization with the oxygen of publicity necessary to sustain itself. Unless civilian populations are made aware of terrorist acts and cowed into fear by


spectacular attacks. it is important to remember that Al Qa’ida is a unique terrorist organization. More than one dynamic can be responsible for their decline (Cronin 2006). I assumed that opportunism was the primary motivation for merging with Al Qa’ida (coded as 2). the Council of Foreign Relations. Consequently.).g. most modern terrorist groups do not last long. I developed timelines for each organization included in this study. To do so. if there was strong evidence that the group was in a state of imminent decline immediately prior to its merger with A Qa’ida. the founding. If there was 33 . and the NEFA foundation. the beginning of a government offensive. etc.such assaults. I judged that the local jihadist leader. the Institute for Conflict Management in New Delhi. Al Qa’ida cannot influence the governments that it targets. would affiliate with Al Qa’ida if he desperately needed to give his organization a second wind. as a rational actor. the onset of series of attacks. 90% of terrorist organizations have a life span of less than one year. In considering this hypothesis. Consequently. Moreover. Information was gathered from various international security think tanks including the Center for Defense Information. I searched for evidence of terrorist group decline based on Cronin’s criteria. In fact. the Jamestown Foundation. Cronin lists seven broad explanations for the decline and ending of terrorist groups: 1) the capture or killing of the leader 2) failure to transition to the next generation 3) achievement of the group’s aims 4) transition to a legitimate political process 5) undermining of popular support 6) repression 7) transition from terrorist to other forms of violence. to assess H11. these materials are seen by potential sympathizers who may be brought into the folds of terrorism itself (Blanchard 2006). The timelines featured important events in their life cycle (e. Terrorist groups that align with Al Qa’ida can benefits from Al Qa’ida’s media and propaganda expertise.

To perform this appraisal.” most notably Shiite sects. the UK’s security intelligence agency. I considered the assessment of Al Qa’ida’s ideology published by MI5. I considered the leader’s prior involvement in Islamic societies. religious education. the largest denomination and is violently opposed to other Islamic denominations that it regards as “infidel. which they had published regarding their ideology. Al Qa’ida would like to replace all existing governments with a supranational caliphate and impose a strict and exclusive government based on their interpretation of Sunni Islam.”(Al Qa’ida is an anti-Western organization) 2) Al Qa’ida aims to establish a caliphate based on an extreme interpretation of Sunni Islam. According to MI5. To assess H21 (Al Qa’ida commanding officers were inspired by Al Qa’ida’s ideology). I relied predominantly upon newspaper articles published in both the domestic and international 34 . or anti-Shia agendas. Al Qa’ida’s supports a narrow interpretation of Sunnism. I determined that opportunism was the secondary motivation for merging with Al Qa’ida (coded as 1). I determined if the local jihadist leaders who affiliated with Al Qa’ida espoused anti-Western. Al Qa’ida’s ideology is centered upon three key points: 1) Al Qa’ida attributes the obstacles encountered by the Islamic world to the JewishChristian apostate Muslim alliance. (Al Qa’ida is a pan-Islamic organization) 3) Al Qa’ida promotes violence against other Muslim denominations as well as nonMuslims. and statements. To execute this assessment. to evaluate H21.some data that suggested that the group had experienced minor setbacks. Al Qa’ida strongly opposes Western influences and ideologies that it perceives as “un-Islamic. (Al Qa’ida is anti-Shia) (Al Qaida's Ideology) Thus. More information on statistical hypothesis testing follows in the chapter on data analysis and results. pan-Islamic.

if the leader seemed more committed to local programs. Pakistan. If I found that the leader placed more emphasis on anti-Western. or anti-Shia goals than regional initiatives. While some arrived to provide money and weapons to support the fight. the Soviet Union launched a military invasion to restore Soviet control over neighboring Afghanistan. pan-Islamic. North Africa. where available. and elsewhere 35 .press and. speeches and other primary source materials authored by the leaders themselves. yet also expressed anti-Western. However. others enlisted in the growing corps of “holy warriors” under the lead of the legendary Palestinian Sheikh Dr. Osama bin Laden. statements. fearing the collapse of communism in Central Asia. eager to put the Afghan jihad in the past. operatives from foreign countries began trickling into Pakistan. Countless numbers of Afghanis joined the Islamic resistance. pan-Islamic. communiqués. to assess H31 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to prior social network affiliations). Finally. I resolved that ideological alignment was the primary motivation for joining Al Qa’ida (coded as 2). I concluded that ideological alignment was a secondary motivation (coded as 1). or antiShia sympathies. In December 1979. Soon thereafter. the Pakistani government ordered the closure of Arab mujahedeen offices in the country and threatened official deportation to any illegal foreign fighters who attempted to remain in Pakistan. which was organized into several native mujahedeen organizations with headquarters in Peshawar. I considered operatives’ involvement in four episodes that served to rally jihadists around Al Qa’ida principals and fostered the development of social bonds between mujahedeen figures. Thus countless numbers of mujahedeen veterans who had formed tight bonds with their fellow fighters returned to locations in the Middle East. However in January 1993. Abdullah Azzam and the Saudi billionaire.

After being released. The events that unfolded subsequent to the assassination of Anwar Sadat may have played a similar role in forging social bonds amongst jihadists. Ultimately. Moreover. Most jihadists rallied around Ayman alZawahiri. President Sadat of Egypt died after being shot by gunmen who opened fire as he watched an aerial display at a military parade.(Wright 2007). Osama bin Laden journeyed to the Sudan. However. farming. In the Sudan. The second trial consisted of 302 defendants charged with conspiracy and being members of the illegal Tanzim al-Jihad. When presented with the opportunity to reunite with their “brethren. Following President Sadat's assassination. and agriculture (Gunaratna 36 .” these former combatants may have opted to rejoin Al Qa’ida. they may have decided to reunite with Zawahiri and the other jihadists with whom they were imprisoned. several former prisoners left Egypt (Wright 2007). more than 700 people were rounded up. he convinced several Saudi businessmen to invest in Sudan and several of his brothers and Jeddah merchants did invest in Sudanese real estate. in subsequent years. he was treated as a special guest. In prison. Many focused on mobilizing the population to overthrow the government. Only 58 sentences were given and most of the defendants were released after three years in prison. these jihadists developed strategies for establishing an Islamist state and established important personal connections. Two trials took place. After the Soviet-Afghan War. The first was held in camera and consisted of 24 suspects directly involved in the assassination. who appeased his hosts by mobilizing construction equipment and bankrolling construction projects. where the new regime had raised an Islamic banner. In 1981. who became a spokesman for the defendants because of his eloquence and knowledge of foreign languages. despite the prosecution demand of 299 death sentences the judges gave out none.

a precondition which set the stage for the merger). L. This treatment was based upon my observation that not every participant in these episodes. the Taliban controlled some 90 percent of Afghanistan's territory. local jihadist leaders may have established social connections with Bin Laden in Afghanistan before the 9/11 attacks and the Global War on Terror. As ethnic Pashtuns. and embarked upon his jihad against America.-led forces in 2001. Finally. When considering the relevance of social network affiliations. Subsequently. they do not explain why these particular leaders aligned with Al Qa’ida. or spent time in the Sudan before 1996 or Afghanistan during the reign of the Taliban. 37 . In the years after departing from the Sudan. By September 1996. although subject to the same or similar influences. However. while social affiliations may animate a small minority to engage in Al Qa’ida’s program of global jihad. the Taliban had captured Afghanistan’s capital. I determined whether the group member was involved in the Soviet-Afghan war. The bonds that these jihadists formed prior to the US invasion may have sparked their cooperation with Al Qa’ida after the onset of the Global War on Terror.2002). After Bin Laden fled the Sudan in 1996 as a result of international pressure. Bergen 2001). participated in the Sadat trial. banning television.e. The Taliban rule was characterized by a strict form of Islamic law. he established residency in Afghanistan.S. Thus. and jailing men whose beards were deemed too short. he could rekindle these ties. Bin Laden set up numerous training camps in the region. a large part of the Taliban’s support came from Afghanistan's Pashtun community. His second presence in Afghanistan attracted many mujahedeen to return there (P. Before its ouster by U. requiring women to wear head-to-toe veils. Kabul. During this time he established links to Sudanese Islamists as well as fundamentalists in Somalia and Yemen. became an Al Qa’ida associate. I assumed that social network affiliation was a permissive factor (i. disillusioned with existing ethnic Tajik and Uzbek leaders.

They 38 . or legal expertise. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly logistical role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida H32.Unless the local jihadist leader was clearly not incentivized by opportunism or ideological concerns. Consequently. and running training camps. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly operational role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida H22. They have military experience or formation and/or expertise in weapons or explosives. III. or foreign language competencies. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly ideological role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida. financial. Logistical leaders are accountable for the administrative and financial activities of their units. Assessing Q2: To answer my second question (What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible merges or partners with Al Qa’ida?). developing military tactics. They direct the group’s bureaucratic development and organize recruitment drives. I considered social network affiliation to be a secondary motivation rather than a primary motivation. or ideological. I posited that Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers would fall into one of three primary leadership categories after the affiliation occurred: operational. Finally. I developed another three hypothesis: H12. Operational commanders are primarily responsible for conducting operations (including “spectacular attacks”). logistical. They have vocational. ideological/media leaders are responsible for expressing the organizational culture and philosophy of their group through media activity and possibly fatwa as well as personal interactions with their operatives.

I compared leadership performance pre. and released audio or videotapes. To determine the role played by the commanding officer. I did not compare leadership performance across categories because different measures were used to evaluate leadership faculty for each category. If he demonstrated one of the factors in this category. this estimation would have been biases. I coded him as a strong operational leader (3).have granted interviews. and ideological leadership abilities before and after the merger. published books or articles. I coded him as an average operational leader 39 .and post-merger. Instead. I assessed the commanding officer’s operational. Thus. If the leader demonstrated at least two of the factors in the operational leadership category. considered the following variables: Type of leader Operational Logistic Ideological Media activity Military/Front line experience Administrative/financial activities Weapons/explosives training Indications Training camp participation Recruitment experience Organizational restructuring Media innovations Involvement in ideological transitions Operational innovations Involvement in major attacks Vocational skills Language skills Fatwa issues Documented political or religious guidance proffered to operatives After analyzing these variables. logistic.

IV. the Federation of American Scientists. However. The New York Times. which is now available to the public through an agreement between MIPT. I eliminated several from my study based on the following criteria using open source materials. and The Washington Post. and START (About START). Although the TOPs database listed thirty-six Al Qa’ida allies. MIPT collaborated with Detica. the Council on Foreign Relations. I conducted further analyses to determine its accuracy by confirming with at least two separate. If he exhibited none of these factors. From 2004 to 2008 the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security funded the creation and maintenance of the Terrorism Knowledge Base. I used the same secondary and primary source materials listed earlier in this chapter. I used the Terrorist Organization Profiles (TOPs) Database included on the website of the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terror (START). the Library of Congress.(2). I coded him as such (0). I used the same criteria to assess logistic and ideological leadership. a business and technology consultancy. If the leader was not involved with the organization at the time. to collect information on terrorist groups and key leaders of terrorist groups. developed by the Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT). I considered two questions: 1) With whom has Al Qa’ida affiliated? 2) Who led these organizations? To answer the first question. Developing the Universe of Cases To develop my universe of cases. non-partisan sources. since START has not evaluated this data and cannot assure the reliability of the information provided. I also used these sources to determine the date that the affiliation commenced. To perform this evaluation. including reports available through the Jamestown Foundation. 40 . I coded him as a weak operational leader (1). A discussion of the comparison of leadership performance pre-and post-merger follows in Chapter 5. The International Herald Tribune. DHS.

whereby they supported Al Qa’ida. informants. After performing this assessment. a strong affiliation (partnership).1) The group must have been engaged in operations independently of Al Qa’ida (the group must not be a front for Al Qa’ida My study considers the deliberate decision to affiliate with Al Qa’ida. Those groups that I coded as weak affiliates received financing or training from Al Qa’ida. the organization must have developed a symbiotic relationship with Al Qa’ida. intelligence. Al Qa’ida aided the local organization. the group must have formally announced that this arrangement existed through a communiqué broadcast to a wide audience. or logisticians. assets. contact with its network of financiers. 3) While not grounds for immediate disqualification. for example by contributing to its recruitment efforts or operations in Afghanistan or Iraq. I determined that twenty-one groups conformed to these the above standards. 2) The group must not have renounced violence I did not include political movements that supported Al Qa’ida’s aims because armed groups operate differently than other clandestine non-violent organizations. or opportunities for training. I coded each affiliation as a merger. or a weak affiliation (collaboration). To qualify as a merger. I separately examined al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya 41 . thereby potentially compromising their local agenda. To qualify as a strong affiliation. an official denial of connections with Al Qa’ida should induce caution (and invoke more thorough analysis of the relationship) Based on my evaluation. Finally. Leaders who head front organizations for Al Qa’ida do not make a pre-meditated choice to cooperate with Al Qa’ida. and media specialists. but did not actively conduct operations outside their region nor did they contribute to Al Qa’ida’s other initiatives in any meaningful way. In return. perhaps by providing access to operatives.

I considered all of the commanding officers of each group from the onset of their relationship with Al Qa’ida to the present. Thus. While some groups did not experience any leadership transitions after they partnered with Al Qa’ida (ex. Jemaah Islamiya. Selection of my study subjects/study 42 . I did not consider Al Qa’ida’s regional staff officers. namely the establishment of an Islamic state. I included a leader who was had not actively cooperated with Al Qa’ida if this leader had communicated with Al Qa’ida Central Command and if his successors vigorously pursued relations after his term. Asbat al-Ansar). In a few instances. who coordinate and supervise the execution of plans. I made this distinction because I was interested in investigating the motivations and role of those leaders who came from outside Al Qa’ida’s orbit but became involved in its program later in their career. but who never had a vested interest in a particular local jihadist group. and activities. others experienced numerous leadership transitions (ex. I identified the leaders (past and present) of each of these 21 groups.(GAI). In order to understand what motivates certain groups to align with Al Qa’ida. it is equally important to comprehend what deters other groups from associating with Al Qa’ida. Al Qa’ida in Iraq). Selection of Study Subjects My prior discussion focused on terrorist organizations that are overtly in pursuit of Salafi objectives. a group that did not affiliate with Al Qa’ida as a control group. I generated a list of 41 Al Qa’ida field commanders as study subjects. In performing this assessment. V. in which case I treated both as leaders. both past and present. I used open source materials including reports by non-partisan research institutions and newspaper articles. operations. Some organizations had more than one nominal chief at times. the Taliban. Based on this data. I included a detailed investigation of the GAI in Chapter 7. Next.

This grouping is just an assemblage of small illegal clusters centered around charismatic preachers. I did include many groups that were deeply invested in domestic uprising and urban warfare against their own governments. I used sources from the public domain. Moreover. In addition. Because clandestine organizations are often very secretive about their members and operations. Moreover. I included Muslims fighting for the liberation of Kashmir and those fighting an internal insurgency in Central Asia. economic. Although I eliminated all non-Muslim terrorists from the study sample. Often. I chose to limit my sample to in order to reveal certain patterns that might not have otherwise emerged with less stringent exclusion criteria. I did not include Palestinian groups. the data from this study is inevitably biased towards information about those organizations and individuals who are regarded as more visible and who appear publicly with greater frequency. In contrast. I did not include the amorphous social movement. Problems Regarding Information Gathering To conduct this assessment. For instance. there may have been ascertainment bias introduced by the difficulties accurately assessing leaders’ competence in organizing and conducting important attacks. bias was introduced by the actual leader interviews and communications that can be considered well-orchestrated propaganda 43 . less magnetized by Al Qa’ida pan-Islamic agenda.sample was based on demonstrated and documented overt commitment to the principles of Salafism and all of the organizations that I studied were well defined with leadership that supported terrorist operations. and political grievances and who may be less committed to the principles of Salafism and thus. who are fighting a jihad that involves complex social. Salafia Jihadia. VI. terrorist organizations will not take credit for successful operations for fear of provoking the government to conduct a counterterrorism response. which exists in Morocco.

leader of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb. VII. With the aforementioned limitations in mind. as mentioned earlier. and how they aligned their own local jihadist group with Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program. empirical data about Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers was collected and analyzed. I assessed the role he played before and after aligning with Al Qa’ida. I used the materials available to me to try to best collect information about and understand the leaders and organizations that I profiled. what motivates them. Next. press and scholarly articles. VIII. I considered the source of information and its degree of reliability. a comparison of leadership performance across categories was impossible. These sources included: government documents. Case Study Finally. formerly the Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat (GSPC).exercises that may not appropriately reflect the leader’s true motivations and ideology. I arrived at a better understanding of how to recognize and predict who may become Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers and how to anticipate and counter their efforts. Relevance By seeking to understand who Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are. I completed one comprehensive case study (in addition to my detailed discussion of the GAI). My observations regarding 44 . When assessing the data. I considered Droukdal’s prior experiences and the history of the GSPC to determine why he embraced Al Qa’ida’s internationalist agenda rather than remaining committed strictly to jihad in Algeria. As a result. who merged his organization with Al Qa’ida despite the objections of the GSPC’s former leader Hassan AlBanna (Guidère 2007). I investigated Abdelmalek Droukdal. and Internet articles. These concerns withstanding.

if proven.motivations will serve two purposes.g. First. we can better understand Al Qa’ida’s overall strategy (e. 45 . Secondly. my analyses may suggest that our battles in the Middle East and our policies regarding imprisonment are creating gathering places for global Salafi jihadists. are they focused on promoting their message through propaganda or are they intent on conducting more attacks?). The fundamentalists who form interpersonal bonds through these venues may be persuaded by Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic partisans to become the next-generation of Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers in locations scattered across the globe. they will help develop a model to identify local jihadist leaders who may merge or partner with Al Qa’ida in the future. has strong implications for US foreign policy in the post 9/11 era and greater attention should be paid to identifying such settings. This realization. Based on our knowledge of Al Qa’ida’s strategy. by understanding the role that Al Qa’ida commanding officers play. Finally. we can better allocate resources to address this threat.

Jordan. To address this concern. who diluted relations with Al Qa’ida). I also observed noticeable patterns while developing my universe of cases. They contend that after September 11. as well as name recognition 46 . since a group does not merely affiliate with Al Qa’ida and then sever all relations. I have classified the affiliation according to its current state. Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: An Evolving Network Although the purpose of my study was to investigate Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers. 2001. I determined the year that the group first received or conveyed assistance to Al Qa’ida. and failed to overthrow the governments in Egypt. lost several of its top officials. In many instances. Since 2001. Although I have recorded the first year in which the group cooperated with Al Qa’ida. and Abu Sayyaf. Al Qa’ida was deprived of a “state within a state” in Afghanistan. Most of researchers who I discussed in my literature review perceive Al Qa’ida’s strategy of franchising as a new development. First. the relationship between Al Qa’ida and its affiliate has strengthened or weakened (such is the case with the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. that a cumulative effect occurs. the evidence indicates that Al Qa’ida’s strategy is not new: it has operated like an international franchise by providing financial and logistical support. To assess the date of the affiliation. who consolidated relations with Al Qa’ida. therefore.Chapter 4: Universe of Cases I. The investigation of Al Qa’ida’s patterns of affiliation with respect to time is very interesting and indeed. surprising. Al Qa’ida has transformed into an international enterprise with like-minded local representatives loosely connected to a central ideological base (Riedel 2007). I considered the development of Al Qa’ida’s affiliation over a period of time from 1991 until 2005 (Table 1). this relationship has perpetuated to the present day. It is important to keep in mind. they argue. and Saudi Arabia. Despite the popularity of this argument. in every case.

Al Qa’ida first seriously affiliated with other terrorist organizations in 1991. After the Saudi government. In this year. However. when one considers the historical context. He was able to send Al Qa’ida operatives to Somalia in 1991-1992 to liaise with their leaders and then help AIAI organize itself militarily. thereby threatening the security of Saudi Arabia. As a result of the Sudanese government’s hospitality and support. Bin Laden perceived this intrusion as part of a larger Western design to dominate the whole Arab and Muslim world. These operatives also offered advice to their Somali counterparts on how to set up social services for the local population. 47 . 1990. effectively put him under house arrest. While Bin Laden was situated in the Sudan. Somalia. for years. the leader of the National Islamic Front. oil rich state of Kuwait on August 1. this was as perturbing and foreboding an event as the Russian invasion of Afghanistan that had occurred a decade earlier. during his time in the Sudan. Kashmir and Iraq. Consequently. terrorist groups operating in such diverse places as the Philippines. where he was warmly welcomed by Hassan al-Turabi. For Bin Laden. 1990. Yemen. Bin Laden had immediately volunteered his services and those of his holy volunteers but the Saudis did not take this offer seriously (Gunaratna 2002). After Hussein’s forces invaded the small. the first US troops were dispatched to Saudi Arabia as part of Operation Desert Shield. tired of Bin Laden’s critiques. this observation is not nearly as stunning. he departed for the Sudan. Al Qa’ida linked up with Al-Ittihaad al-Islami (AIAI) and Abu Sayyaf. On August 7. Bin Laden could operate freely in the Sudan and in return he would invest millions of dollars in the desperately poor country. Turabi and Bin Laden engaged in a convenient symbiotic relationship. Afghanistan. This relationship strengthened throughout the nineties. Bin Laden organized training camps at which hundred of his followers were tutored in paramilitary tactics as revealed in the previous chapter. Algeria. Bin Laden had the opportunity to interact with other terrorist units to expand Al Qa’ida’s reach. Chechnya. Tajikistan.

Concurrently. Bin Laden exploited a cache of trustworthy warriors who he could rely upon to cultivate his vision of global jihad. Al Qa’ida was preoccupied with other pursuits and could not devote energy towards developing such high-maintenance relations. After associating with these groups. Moreover. he attempted to centralize the core of Al Qa’ida’s operations and develop its human resources as discussed in Chapter 1. Muhammad Jamal Khalifah to support the Abu Sayyaf Group. By 1991. Instead. Bin Laden focused his efforts on other missions like determining how best to attack US forces in Somalia. my data indicates that Al Qa’ida did not engage another affiliate until 1996. Bin Laden convinced several Saudi businessmen. he broadcast a fatwa in which he avowed that having already taken over the Persian Gulf area and now encroaching upon Somalia. many of whom would be employed by these Arabic executives. their parent organization. he persuaded his brother in law. while residing in the Sudan. which would elicit support from the Sudanese population. the US military. Soon thereafter. where their transactions would go unnoticed and in its infrastructure projects. which sought to pursue a more fundamentalist battle against the Philippine authorities than the Moro National Liberation Front. if successful. to invest in the country’s moribund financial institutions. including some of his brothers. Thus. between a thousand and two thousand 48 .Bin Laden ramped up his assistance to the Somali terrorists after the Bush administration sent US peacekeeping troops to Somalia in 2002. While occupied with these financial negotiations. would next march into Southern Sudan and then into other Islamic countries(Gunaratna 2002). Moreover a number of ASG members had fought in Afghanistan in the 1980s (Rogers 2004). From 1991 to 1996. Bin Laden probably saw the struggle in the Philippines as an opportunity to open a second front for his organization without becoming embroiled in the conflicts in the Middle East.

no affiliations were observed between 1991 and 1996. intense pressure had been placed on the Sudanese government by the United States and Egypt to expel Bin Laden. Thus. Bin Laden began to focus. a multi-volume series detailing everything the Afghan Arabs had learned in the jihad against the Soviets. which became the modern world’s first jihadist state. These communiqués served to attract the attention of various local jihadist leaders. Bin Laden was able to function unimpeded. hundreds of Afghan Arabs engaged in fighting in Bosnia (P. Finally. attracting Muslim militants to a country. Given this stable and secure environment. As a result of this multitude of tasks. L. once again. Bergen 2001). Simultaneously some members of the group undertook the massive task of writing the Encyclopedia of the Afghan Jihad. on widening his movement. He also sought to acquire weapons for these militants. By 1996. Upon Bin Laden’s arrival. Mullah Muhammad Omar sent a delegation to assure Bin Laden that the Taliban would be honored to protect him because of his role in the jihad against the Soviets (Gunaratna 2002). who left the Sudan to return to his familiar stamping grounds in Afghanistan. To 49 .members of Al Qa’ida converged upon the Sudan and within three years. He turned his attention to exotic weaponry and weapons of mass destruction. Al Qa’ida engaged 15 of its 21 affiliates. 1996. Bin Laden issued a slew of radical pronouncements beginning with a call to arms against the continued American military presence in Arabia on August 23. During this time. Bin Laden had set up a number of military camps in the north. Bin Laden knew Afghanistan well and greatly admired the Taliban religious warriors who had taken control over much of the country. From Afghanistan. it is not surprising that between 1996 and 2001. Having obtained sanctuary. Bin Laden and his cadre were engrossed by other concerns and did not focus on developing external relations with other jihadist groups.

supplement this strategy. According to this Word Islamic Front manifesto. he needed the backing of religious scholars and the clerical cover to call for a real global jihad. members included the head of the violent faction of Egypt’s Gama’a al Islamiyya. he probably did not rely extensively upon the leaders of these organizations. In part. Bin Laden’s organization nurtured ties with a variety of other armed jihadist groups. The clerics who Bin Laden summoned also had acquaintances with jihadists beyond Afghanistan who they could introduce to Bin Laden (Bergen 2001). Amidst this background. 50 . and Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan. in 1998. we hereby give all Muslims the following judgment: the judgment to kill and fight Americans and their allies.” Based on this quotation. is an obligation for every Muslim who is able to do so in any country. Laden convened conferences of several Afghan ulema. These sequential steps were part of Bin Laden’s plan to expand his multi-national terrorist campaign. Later the IIF was expanded to include the Pakistani jihadist organizations Lashkar-eTaiba. an anti-Shia sectarian party (Carafano 2005). However. before 2001. While Bin Laden was well read in the Koran. the establishment of the IIF can clearly be interpreted as an effort by Al Qa’ida to expand its battle against Western influence. the secretary general of the Pakistani religious party known as the Jamiat-ul-Ulema-e-Islam. in the years before the September 11. Harkat-ul-Mujahideen. In addition to Bin Laden and EIJ’s Ayman al-Zawahiri. he was not a religious scholar. one observes a surge of new Al Qa’ida affiliates. this is due to the fact that in 1998 Bin Laden created the International Islamic Front for Jihad against the Jews and Crusaders (IIF). In addition to its formal alliances through the IIF. “in order to obey the Almighty. Thus. 2001 attacks. and the head of Bangladesh’s Jihad Movement. whether civilians or military.

temporarily crippling it. After 2001. near bureaucratic entity to a fluid movement tenuously bound by a loosely networked transnational constituency (i. are built up through mergers.Contrary to popular belief.e. Thus. and command-and-control nucleus in Afghanistan were destroyed and uprooted. after 2001 and the onset of the Global War on Terror. complex organizations. Bin Laden had to engineer a colossal transformation of his organization from a more or less unitary. infrastructure. Aggressive US and allied efforts impeded Al Qa’ida’s ability to do anything. the dearth of new Al Qa’ida affiliates seems puzzling given what scholars perceive to be Al Qa’ida’s organizational strategy. Al Qa’ida has not enlisted many new affiliates. Bin Laden elected to strengthen existing affiliations rather than pursue new ones. As elaborated upon in Chapter 1. from an actual center to a virtual network) (Bruce Hoffman 2004). characterized by semiautonomous cells that are horizontally and vertically integrated into the centralized command structure. There are two explanations for this observation. be it to plan attacks or to align with other jihadist groups. Whereas before Al Qa’ida had a distinct center of gravity. Firstly. As stated in the introduction. Al Qa’ida’s training camps. few can deny the United States and its allies achieved progress in the first phase of the Global War on Terror. Groups such as the Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat and Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad were brought further into Al Qa’ida’s folds. partnerships. and collaborations (Marion and Uhl-Bien 2006). after 9/11. Al Qa’ida aims to establish itself as a complex organization with a flexible structure in order to preserve control over specifically identified strategic operations while offering cells a degree of autonomy in local and regional operations. Osama Bin Laden was compelled to makeover his organization. To more easily engineer this metamorphosis. 51 . operational bases.

In fact. However. “Iraq’s preeminent utility has been a useful side show” – an effective means to sidetrack American military forces and divert US attention while Al Qa’ida and its affiliates make inroads and strike elsewhere. and Egypt (Michael 2007). the leader of Tawhid. including Shias. in 2004. he urged Zarqawi to prepare for a precipitous American military withdrawal from Iraq. For instance. 2005. Bruce Hoffman has suggested that for Al Qa’ida. Israel. who had become Bin Laden’s second-in command. beheading of hostages. who had become his commanding officers. Al Qa’ida and its affiliates can conduct attacks in countries that are venerable sources of Bin Laden’s antagonism or where an opportunity has presented itself. Ayman Zawahiri. was responsible for developing his own strategy and operations. and lack of concern for public support. For example. Al Qa’ida has exploited the Iraqi occupation for rousing propaganda and as a recruitment tool for the global jihadist cause. Additionally. began to instruct Zarqawi regarding tactics and specific theater-of-war concerns. Al Qa’ida now teams up with terrorist groups who can send foreign jihadists to Iraq where they conduct guerilla warfare against the America and British troops. Moreover. Nowadays.Moreover. and for maintaining the momentum of an Islamist victory by expanding operations into Syria. prior to 2005. For instance. Another observable and notable trend is that the number of affiliates that Al Qa’ida enrolled has increased since the onset of the war in Iraq in 2003. Lebanon. for establishing a post-US Islamist emirate governed by a coalition of Islamic groups. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. the Uzbek fighters associated with the Islamic Jihad Union have supported fighting in South Waziristan against the Pakistani government and US forces hunting Al Qa’ida fugitives (Steinberg 2008). terror attacks 52 . Bin Laden and Al Qa’ida Central Command relied more heavily and interacted more frequently with the leaders of these groups. Zawahiri reprimanded al-Zarqawi for indiscriminate attacks on Shias. Jordan. in a letter dated July 9.

Al Qa’ida Affiliates: The Geographic Distribution Having assessed the development of Al Qa’ida’s affiliations over time. Samuel Huntington observed that after World War II.around the world tripled in 2004. it is interesting to consider the geographic distribution of Al Qa’ida’s affiliates (Figure 2). the American forces went into Lebanon. The smaller clusters come from Southeast Asia and Northeast Africa. Algeria. the 2005 bombings against London’s public transport system. In the aftermath of this transition. II. Arab nationalism and then Islamic fundamentalism strongly manifested. One can anticipate that the majority of affiliates would hail from the Core Arab states and Maghreb Arab states. Notable incidents conducted by or with the assistance of Al Qa’ida’s affiliates since the beginning of the Iraq war. The other large clusters come from the Maghreb (Morocco. France fought a war in Algeria and British and French forces invaded Egypt. when colonial empires began to retreat. For instance. include the 2004 bombings against Madrid’s commuter trains. Egypt Uzbekistan. Afghanistan. Considering the sample as a whole. and Yemen). conflicts along the fault line between western and Arab Islamic civilizations frequently erupted. according to statistics released by the US government’s National Counterterrorism Center. These regions have a history of conflict with the West. 53 . the 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot to detonated liquid explosive carried on board from the United Kingdom to the US and Canada. Later. and the 2007 terrorist attacks in Algiers (Bruce Hoffman 2004). Pakistan). Lebanon. Libya. The warfare between Arabs and the West culminated in 1990 when the United States sent a massive army to the Persian Gulf to defend some Arab countries against aggression by Saddam Hussein The Gulf War left some Arabs feeling humiliated and resentful of the West’s military presence in the Persian Gulf (Huntington 1992). Tunisia) and Southern Asia (namely. over forty percent of the 21 affiliates are based in the Core Arab states (Iraq.

Islam can provide a medium of cultural nationalism that is defiant and self-assuring. just a few miles from the border (Luong and Weinthal 2002). weak security apparatuses and crisis-torn economies. all of which are in immediate proximity to Afghanistan. Al Qa’ida has appealed to militants in the four neighboring former Soviet Central Asian republics. Moreover. Turkmenistan and Tajikistan. Additionally. Al Qa’ida and the Taliban could facilitate the transportation of militants moving back and forth across the borders. There is also a simpler explanation to account for the plethora of Al Qa’ida affiliates hailing from the Core Arab states. For instance. they could permit leaders of these jihadist groups to establish training camps without fear of government intervention. He maintains that most Islamic revolutions evolve from movements for indigenous self-assertion. Thus. Tajikistan. whereas the religious-framed prescriptions of Arabia Islam have a thirteen century-old legacy (Ayubi 1980). for years. Kyrgystan. Since 1996. These states have porous borders. Turkmenistan. Secular prescriptions (whether nationalist or leftist) are regarded as unsuccessful European importations introduced by intellectuals exposed to French and Italian cultures. one of the masterminds behind the assassination attempt against Uzbek President Islam A. Furthermore. Karimov. and leader of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan. the Taliban controlled the Afghan territory bordering Uzbekistan. For those countries resisting foreign dominance. at the present time operatives from these organizations can assist the Al Qa’ida- 54 . Tahir Yuldashev. and Uzbekistan. fled to Afghanistan where he set up a military training camp.These struggles had a profound effect on the development of jihadist outlets. Ayubi suggests that the general Islamic resurgence that one observes today represents a reaction to alienation and a quest for authenticity by disaffected Muslims who resent Western participation in their lands.

fighters transit through Syria. has helped to identify and detain extremists. I also observed that a large percentage of the groups that merged with Al Qa’ida hailed from Pakistan (20%). several Kashmiri separatist terrorist groups turned to Al Qa’ida for support. Upon returning to the Maghreb. Pakistan has allowed the US military to use bases within the country. after the September 2001 attacks.supported insurgency in Afghanistan. quickly granted this concession in return for safe haven. under strong US diplomatic pressure. and has helped to tighten the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan. eager to regroup in Pakistani cities where police control was more negligible. Separatist violence in India’s Muslim majority Jammu and Kashmir state has continued unabated since 1989. affiliates from these nations are particularly desirable. these groups help Al Qa’ida attack coalition troops in Afghanistan and then escape across the Pakistani frontier (Fair 2004). President Musharraf. offered to President Bush Pakistan’s unqualified cooperation in the fight against terrorism. these militants can stage local campaigns due to their recently acquired front line experience (Boudali 2007). Similarly. thus. Al Qa’ida. This too. With the assistant of Al Qa’ida’s Algerian affiliates. where Islamabad exercises limited authority. Consequently. Conservative estimates suggest that at least several hundred North African volunteers have traveled to Iraq. 55 . Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri are now believed to be in Pakistan’s rugged tribal areas. thousands of Muslim extremists were detained. should be expected. In addition. However. terrorist operatives in the Maghreb move easily across international borders. In the wake of these changes. The conflict between Muslims and Hindus in the subcontinent manifests itself in the rivalry between Pakistan and India.

such as the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF). In Indonesia. in general Muslims are a minority in East Africa. Muslims are a minority. There are almost no legitimate terrorist targets and terrorists themselves can be subject to extortion in largely lawless settings. Additionally. Unlike Eastern European countries. The largest and most influential are either political parties or revivalist organizations. the profound ethnic and religious diversity (including in the practice of Islam) that characterizes the area militates against the establishment of a fundamentalist hegemony by any one group. Again. Thailand. the depth of its involvement with terrorists is constrained by the very disorder seen as a classical setting for terrorism. Although Muslims represent a majority in countries like Somalia and Eritrea. In Singapore. many Islamic organizations in Southeast Asia genuinely oppose Al Qa’ida and most are nonviolent.Within my sample. most visibly Al Qa’ida. where the other major Abrahamic faiths dominate. hostility from indigenous religious authorities may also impede the growth of Wahabism (Dickson 2005). and two other mostly Muslim states. this can be easily explained. Despite the fact that Southeast Asia seems like a good candidate for the second front in the US campaign since it is home to the world’s most populous Muslim-majority country. and the fragility of local democracy. while Somalia has served as a transit route for terrorists. it has not emerged as such. Malaysia and Brunei. the nation's continuing economic crisis. Moreover. and the Philippines. in which there is just enough government control and economic security to provide an adequate target for terrorist groups. Also. the rise of political Islam can be linked principally to the collapse of Suharto's regime. in East Africa. there were fewer groups from the Eastern African region and from the Southeast Asian region. Political organizations representing modernist Muslims were 56 . Indonesia. In fact. while Buddhism and Roman Catholicism are dominant respectively. a central government with even rudimentary influence has yet to emerge.

were much less common. Through partnerships and collaborations. Both partnerships and collaborations permit Al Qa’ida to structure itself as a complex organization. This sort of arrangement is convenient when Al Qa’ida wants to spread its radical ideas and has financial resources but does not necessarily care for the local politics in the region. and many of their leaders were imprisoned. Although this type of arrangement allows Al Qa’ida and the merged group to consolidate their assets so that they can compete more successfully. Through partnership and collaborations. Al Qa’ida achieves the ideal mix of tightly and loosely coupled systems. While Al 57 . III. they forfeit a degree of control. it is difficult to cut off centralized funding due to the complex nature of Al Qa’ida’s financial network.banned from the 1950s to the 1980s. Al Qaida can provide financial or logistic support to other terrorist groups with the intention of influencing their strategic activities. While the relationships within the cells are tightly coupled. causes havoc. more extremist forms of Islamism still remain at the fringes (Gershman 2002). The preponderance of affiliations (over 70%) could be classified as partnerships or collaborations. Additionally. and distracts the enemy while Central Command plans for more detailed attacks elsewhere. When a group merges with Al Qa’ida. described in the first chapter. mergers. the highest order form of equity-based engagement. the relationships between cells and between operatives in Al Qa’ida central command are loosely coupled. the group that Al Qa’ida subsumes must be capable of completely integrating Al Qa’ida’s methods and approaches into their repertoire. By contrast. Al Qa’ida’s Affiliates: Mergers? Partnerships? Or Collaborations? Finally it is important to consider distribution by type of affiliation (Figure 3). Although such groups have since become a major political force in recent years. Mergers were much less common (approximately 17%). Supporting local terrorist groups in this manner makes noise.

Executive Order 13224 provides the means to disrupt the support network that funds terrorism. when groups officially merge with Al Qa’ida. When a group commits to jihad against the far enemy. they can “offer” tactical advice. to designated terrorists and terrorist organizations. Such blocking actions are a critical tool in combating the financing of terrorism (Mayer and Price 2002). who have no interest in establishing a global Islamic caliphate. For instance. supporters of terrorism are publicly identified thereby providing warning to other entities that they are prohibited from doing business with the Al Qa’ida affiliate (Uruena 2008). they often become the targets of counterterrorist offensives by foreign governments. as observed with the Zarqawi-Zawahiri letter referenced earlier. requiring them to take steps to prevent designated individuals and entities from continuing to fund or otherwise support terrorism. 58 . operatives are estranged when Al Qa’ida takes credit for the operation and they are forced to assume a more “behind-the-scenes” role (Desouza and Hengsen 2007). In addition. goals. which the merged group must obey. Under this order. mergers often end up splintering as a result of differences of ideologies. Moreover. Finally. most prominently. which should be addressed when discussing mergers. but are more interested in deposing their current government. groups that merge officially with Al Qa’ida may risk alienating the local population. and strategies. financial or otherwise. they may split their own ranks and upset surrounding communities. Oftentimes. designation under the UN Security Council’s 1267 Committee’s consolidated list will trigger international obligations on all member countries.Qa’ida Central Command does not usually plan operations. the United States. the United States government may block the assets of individuals and entities providing support. Through this measure. There are other practical difficulties.

Given these considerations. IV. 59 . while Al Qa’ida’s affiliates are concentrated in the Core Arab and Maghreb states. such as Western Africa. provided in Chapter 6 proves. Thus. Moreover. several groups have announced a formal merger with Al Qa’ida. organizations must have the patience and resolve to work through issues. the data demonstrates that Al Qa’ida may be more likely to pursue lower-order affiliations. mergers only occur when terrorist groups have developed a close relationship and realize the mutual value of working together. since they offer increased organizational flexibility and operational reach. it is also important to acknowledge that organizational issues must be addressed up front when a merger is negotiated since this type of affiliation is a longterm contract. Al Qa’ida may have several mergers in the works that have not yet been publicly announced. As the example of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb. evidence suggests that Al Qa’ida will continue to pursue such relations and will rely upon them more heavily. Al Qa’ida may be seeking to expand into other Muslim-dominated territories. Summary of Findings Although Al Qa’ida’s policy of pursuing affiliations with local jihadist groups is not a new development. Like corporations settling a merger. While in recent years.

0. known or suspected terrorists). each subject was rated on one of three scales: "opportunist motives. one can conclude that opportunistic motives. the null hypothesis was rejected.” and "social network affiliations. thus. 60 .” "ideological alignment. in each case. Statistically significant differences among subjects were evaluated using a chi-squared test statistic for variation within each scale.” Each subject was rated 0-2 for each scale. All three statistics are significant with a p-value less than 0. 2 = primary motivation (for a more detailed explanation regarding coding. and 1. By comparison. This analysis yielded the results contained in Table 1. ideological alignment appears to be of less powerful significance as a motivating factor for local jihadist leaders.Chapter 5: Results of Statistical Hypothesis Testing I. 1= secondary motivation. please refer to Chapter 3 on Methodology). ideological alignment. To assess the effects of motivational factors contributing to individual terrorist's decision to affiliate with Al Qa’ida.e.146E-09.05. corresponding to 0= not a motivation. The chi-squared test yielded pvalues of 1.606E-06 for “opportunistic motives.” and “social network affiliation” respectively.” “ideological alignment.0188. although the smaller values of p for “opportunistic motives” and for “social network affiliation” suggest that these incentives are more robust. Based on this analysis. when three scales were used. Data Analysis and Results for Q1: What motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida’s and its pan-Islamic agenda? Data were collected on 41 individual subjects (i. and social network affiliation all motivate local jihadist leaders to an extent. The null hypothesis tested for each scale was that there was no difference in the frequency of incidence of each level of motational factor.

This analysis produced the results recorded in Table 2. In contrast. The p-value for opportunistic motives permits us to reject the null hypothesis of no effect.” The null hypothesis. H11 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to opportunistic motives) is proven. However. The p-value associated with social network affiliation also allows us to reject the null hypothesis. social affiliations) have some influence on the decision to associate with Al Qa’ida.639.” while score 2 was considered as "motivation. the effect of ideological alignment does not even reach statistical significance.e. and 0.To supplement this analysis and clarify the relative impact of each incentive. tested for both scales. This implies that opportunism is the primary motivation among the variables considered in this study for affiliating with Al Qa’ida. 0.289E-06.” and “social network affiliation” respectively.” “ideological alignment.042 for “opportunistic motives. The p-values associated with the chi-squared test statistic were 1. the data suggests that psychosocial motive(i. H31 ( Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due psychosocial motives) requires further investigation. Based on this analysis. H21 (Al Qa’ida commanding officers associated with Al Qa’ida due to ideological motives) is rejected. thereby suggesting that this particular factor is not a significant motivating variable for local jihadist leaders in this sample. It is of note that the statistical significance for social network affiliation is far less impressive than that for opportunistic motives. Data Analysis and Results for Q2: What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible affiliates with Al Qa’ida? 61 . II. was that there was no difference in the frequency of incidence of each level of motivational factor. scores 0 and 1 were combined into a single scale "not a motivation.

as well as the simpler paired sign test (Table 5). The chi-squared test statistic was used to evaluate the overall difference in performance in each of the three categories post-versus pre-merger. which utilizes both the direction and magnitude of the change. The Wilcoxon statistic was negative for all groups. which considers only the direction of change.and post-merger score for any category. we could not reject the null hypothesis for any category.Subjects were evaluated on their performance in each of three categories: “Operational. pre. This suggests that ideological leadership performance does actually improve after a merger. Accordingto this test. compared to pre-merger. 62 . These included the Wilcoxon statistic (Table 4). pre and post merger. across all terrorists considered individually. However. which suggests that leadership performance may generally improve as well.015).0501). Results are presented in Table 3. The null hypothesis tested in this analysis is that there is no difference in each category post-merger. the paired signed test rejected the null hypothesis for ideology (p=0.and postmerger. thus based on this statistical test. Additionally. across all terrorists considered as a group.there was no statistic difference between the pre.” “Ideological.” and “Logisitic” on a scale of 0-3. Paired statistics were then applied to compare the scores for each individual terrorist. compared to premerger. the p-value for overall leadership performance was borderline (p=0. The null hypothesis tested in this analysis is that there is no difference in each category post-merger.

and these swamped the overall effect. after mergers with Al Qa’ida occur. whether they were categorized as only positive or positive plus no change. for all three categories. it lets us to reject both H12 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly operational role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida) and H22 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play an increasingly logistical role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida). there were a few changes in the opposite direction in particular subjects that were large. shared ideological views become important. Moreover.The results obtained through the paired sign test suggest that the direction of the change for ideological performance was significant. Moreover. The operational category had the largest number of “-3” results and “+3” results. most changes were positive. Most frequently. 63 . there was a tendency to improve scores post-merger. however. a plot of the distribution of scores. This analysis allows us to accept H32 (Al Qa’ida’s commanding officer play an increasingly ideological role after affiliating with Al Qa’ida). thereby hindering us from rejecting the null hypothesis using the Wilcoxon statistic. Figures 4-5 demonstrate that for ideological performance. there were the fewest number of negative changes post-merger. demonstrates that each group had a similar number of “no change” results (i. for the ideological performance.e. Generally. this was clearly most prevalent and only statistically significant for the ideology category. ideological performance improved. a pre-post score of 0). however. However. Effectively what we are observing from this study’s data analysis is that while ideological concerns do not appear to be primary motivating factors for joining Al Qa’ida. the variability among subjects in the magnitude of the changes may have affected the results. Figure 6.

However. in 1965. Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb was born. Defense Minister Houari Boumedienne staged a bloodless coup to remove Ben Bella from power. Three months later. He accomplished this revitalization and expansion of goals and activities by providing compelling ideological leadership and by organizing sophisticated public relations and media campaign both locally and globally. the leader of Al Qa’ida in Iraq announced the allegiance of the Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat (Salafist Group for Call and Combat or GSPC). He then adopted an 64 . Algeria achieved independence from France in 1962. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Abdelmalek Droukdal served as the commanding officer of Al Qa’ida in the Maghreb region and directed the internationalization of the former GSPC's war in order to revitalize a movement that was slowly dying in Algeria. However. I. this metamorphosis of a relatively smaller. The Origins of Islamic Violence in Algeria after the War of Independence The GSPC was founded with a regional focus: it sought to establish an Islamic state in Algeria and rejected the legitimacy of secular democratic governance. whereupon Ahmed Ben Bella was elected the first president of Algeria. 2006. the new organization radically changed its tactics: the series of suicide bombings and violent attacks executed in 2007 by Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) operatives demonstrated this strategic evolution. the only remaining armed terrorist group in Algeria. less powerful Algerian indigenous assembly of terrorists would not have been possible without the leadership of Abdelmalek Droukdal. the Islamic movement in Algeria originated in the 1960s. After the merger of the GSPC with Al Qa’ida.Chapter 6: Al Qa’ida in the Maghreb and Abdelmalek Droukdal – A Well Executed Merger On September 11. While the first official communiqué of the GSPC appeared in September 1998. to Al Qa’ida.

65 . Unlike the MAIA. The MAIA sought to resolve the social and economic injustices that had emerged in Algeria by forcible means if necessary (Johnson 2006). Before the independence. II. the Algerian Islamic movement was centrist. This political platform resonated with the Algerians. socialist political system. in response to the dictatorial and exclusionary policies proffered by the Socialist party. disgruntled by the failure of Socialist economic policies. one-party. which he codified in the Algerian constitution in 1976. not an armed group that sought to reverse the economic decline in Algeria by implementing Sharia. the Salvation Islamic Front (FIS) was formed. during the 1970s. Thus. a fundamental Islamic preacher established the Armed Islamic Algeria Movement (MAIA) in 1982 to establish an Islamic state. The Birth of the Salvation Islamic Front In 1989. directed by Abdallah Djaballah. the fundamentalist Islamic movement became increasingly radicalized in response to President Boudemedienne’s abortive leftward shift in economic and cultural policies. nationalist. This socialist government's repressive secularism and one party rule were oppressive for many people in Algeria and helped fuel a fundamentalist backlash when Islamic leaders branded the government as “a band of atheists” and called for a return to an Islamic government (Johnson 2006). In 1991. However. and maintained an affirmative orientation towards Western learning and culture. The FIS became popular amongst the Algerian population who supported the group financially and politically. Mustapha Bouyali. the weak alliance between the secular and religious groups (the Ulama and the academic elite who led the liberation movement against the French) collapsed. the FIS was a political organization.authoritarian. under Boumedienne’s chosen successor Colonel Chadli Benjedid the right to establish political parties was accorded in Algeria and with this decision. Islamic religious law.

A High Committee was established with Mohammed Boudiaf named as president. several Islamists became disenchanted with the political process and defected from the FIS to form armed splinter groups. less militant Muslim clerics and political leaders whom it designated heretics. However. He was an illiterate criminal and his reign. However. The GIA was responsible for the murder of over 2000 schoolteachers guilty of “taming the youth” and more than 100 other competing. The new regime calculated that the repression of the FIS would ignite a wave of extremist fundamentalist violence. the GIA quickly alienated itself from other Algerian Islamic activities by adopting stringent interpretations of Islamic law. The GIA was formed from a collection of Algerian militant groups who had been executing a series of significant military operations against government targets in an attempt to overthrow the secular government in Algeria. GIA supreme commander Saifullah Ajffar ordered the assassination of over 90 innocent civilians and eventually forced a mass European exodus from Algeria. Antar Zouabri became the head of the GIA on July 18. after the cancellation of the 1992 general elections in Algeria. The Beginnings of the GIA and the Onset of an Epoch of Violence As the new regime predicted. with the prospect of the FIS in control of the parliament. which lasted until his violent death in February 2002. it dissolved the FIS (Celso 2008). Thus.the FIS achieved a victory in national elections. was marked by barbaric methods and attacks against entire civilian communities. Many Islamists became increasingly interested in radical approaches. 1996. III. the secular and military elite forced Benjedid's resignation. He repelled most members of the GIA when he issued a fatwa condemning the entire Muslim population of 66 . halted the electoral process. and suspended parliament. In an effort to racially purify the country. After subsequent leadership transitions. which would divide and alienate the FIS’s many Algerian supporters.

The first prominent leader of the GSPC. However. Bucaille. and hypocrites” for “not supporting them in their struggle against the government” (Blom. the GSPC was able to amass hundred of defectors from the FIS and the GIA (Guidère 2007). he rejected the policy of terror executed by the GIA under Zouabri and enforced symbiosis with the local population. In 1998. Fissions Form Within the GSPC 67 . the GSPC denounced the massacres that the GIA had committed and entered the international arena with the goal of restoring the credibility of armed groups in Algeria and attracting embittered Algerian youths for whom the ideology of Islamic guerilla war had lost its appeal. An Alternative Emerges: The Origins of the GSPC The GSPC was not set up as a pan-Islamic movement. Hassan Hattab. he encouraged operatives to target Algerian government officials. ambushes. However. V. He asserted that the GSPC sought to overthrow the government in Algiers and to install an Islamic regime in Algeria. police. He depicted the Algerian government as a postcolonial lackey at war with Islam. clearly articulated the narrow agenda of the GSPC. these officers founded the GSPC as a military organization dedicated to the Salafist creed and the battle against the Algerian regime to restore the Caliphate and implement Sharia. IV. While he preferred not to engage in force-on-force confrontations with the Algerian military to avoid depleting his cadre. and Martínez 2007). Consequently. the decision to establish the GPSC was the direct result of the GIA’s strategic impasse. who were left without an ideological umbrella. and incursions on towns to steal saleable goods (Guidère 2007). and gendarmerie through the use of false roadblocks.Algeria as “kuffar. apostates. bombings. a former GIA commander. Zouabri’s attacks on innocent Muslims estranged many former GIA military commanders. military.

These fault-lines were exacerbated by external events that occurred soon after the founding of the GSPC. Thus. The law set a deadline of January 13. death penalty and life imprisonment were commuted to a maximum of eight years imprisonment for individuals under probation. Nevertheless. Algerians had become less tolerant to the violence of the GSPC. The issue of whether or not to accept the terms of the Civil Harmony Law created considerable dissension within the GSPC. Consequently. katibats. bombing of public places. Each of the regional groups. and could even participate in the fight against the remaining active terrorist groups.The GSPC was originally organized as a loose confederation of regional divisions under a supreme emir who supervised the organization. controlled a territory that roughly aligned with the governments’ own military districts. the organization was plagued by internal rivalry. or sexual crimes would be placed under probation for a period ranging from 3 to 5 years. Several GSPC cadres were killed or captured by Algerian security services following leads provided by rival GSPC elements (Celso 2008). Although as supreme emir. the Algerian government implemented a law that offered amnesty to the combatants who capitulated. the katibats were responsible for supplying and funding their own operations. In July 1999. By the end of the twentieth century. This law declared that citizens not involved in massive killings. 2000 for members and supporters of armed groups to surrender to the authorities (Black 2007). the Civil Harmony Law was adopted and overwhelmingly endorsed in a national referendum the following September 2000. it was difficult for the local leadership to coordinate or control the activity of its fighters since attempts to communicate could result in discovery or interception by security services. Hattab provided religious guidance. Imprisonment sentences were reduced. A study conducted at the Naval Postgraduate School determined that although the probability of defection by GSPC members was less than 10 68 .

However. They were devoted to regime change and preferred not to actively support the “Muslim brothers. This became a point of friction between Hattab and the younger members of the GSPC and two dominant camps emerged within the organization. the probability of defection reached a high of 60 percent during the Civil Concord period (Gyves and Wyckloff 2006). Due to this amnesty program. and 9 were injured in a massacre that occurred in the Algerian town of Al-Abri.percent before the implementation of the law. It was thus effectively limited in scope by the Algerian government. The GSPC denied involvement. certain members of the GSPC dissented. Members of this organization realized that a merger with Al Qa’ida could have both political and financial benefits to GSPC (Guidère 2007). believing that it would be better to take credit for the attack and thereby imply GSPC’s collusion with Al Qa’ida. 2001 attacks were another defining moment for the GSPC. Fifteen days after the attacks. reasserting their dedication to avoiding civilian atrocities. The pan-Islamists encouraged solidarity with their “brothers in Islam” (Al Qa’ida agents) while the Islamo-nationalists were preoccupied with Algerian politics and the installation of an Islamic state there. on September 26. 2001.” This 69 . 23 people were killed. They accused the Algerian secret service of executing the attack to isolate the GSPC from its popular base amongst the Algerian people and of attempting to align the existing Algerian governmental agency with the intelligence services of the United States in the Global War on Terror. The September 11. the GSPC’s operational reach diminished. They suggested that courting Al Qa’ida would enable the organization to maintain its relevancy and shore up declining recruitment. which resulted in the demobilization of hundreds of militants from both the GIA and the GSPC.

Observing the images of Iraqi soldiers and citizens humiliated by the American invaders. Although Hattab invoked the original Charter of the GSPC. Moreover. the Pan Sahel Initiative consisted of training regional military units by soldiers from the US Special Forces in Niger. Although the GSPC was able to recover from the infighting provoked after 9/11 and aggressive counter-terror measures. The PSI was judged to be a success by US officials and local participants. and Mauritania in an effort to improve border security and counterterrorism capacity. Moreover. his efforts were in vain. the many GSPC fighters sought to engage in the struggle in Iraq. Hattab refused to send Algerian combatants to Iraq to battle the Americans because he predicted that doing so would deprive the GSPC of its best combatants when they joined the insurgency. Chad. Mali. Niger. Algeria. the GSPC was forced to retreat from urban areas (Ellis 2004). the organization should 70 . others within the GSPC did not share this perspective. thereby joining both sides of the Sahara in a complex map of security arrangements.minority faction opposed such a merger and preferred to remain like a small. thus. and Nigeria signed a co-operation agreement on counterterrorism. However. Funded by the United States State Department. which stated that the objectives of armed conflict should be to fight the Algerian regime and not other governments. in July 2003. independently operated company that could focus on their own regional national agenda (Guidère 2007). As a result of hard-hitting endeavors by these transnational partnerships. Chad. the war in Iraq further exacerbated the debates that were occurring within the GSPC concerning the strategies to adopt with regards to Al Qa’ida. its next iteration was expanded to include Algeria. the majority of the local emirs seated on the GSPC’s shura believed that the war in Algeria was lost. Thus. implemented in November 2003. The United States also provided support for the war on terrorism in North and West Africa and in the Sahara desert through the Pan Sahel Initiative (PSI).

he issued a communiqué of support for Al Qa'ida in which he criticized Hattab’s position and extolled bin Laden. Nevertheless. he fostered pan-Islamic solidarity and internationalism in order to reestablish a sense of unity amongst GSPC operatives. On September 2003. his career was cut short when he was killed in a skirmish with the Algerian army in the Béjaïa region in June 2004 (Antil 2006). in fact be absorbed into the GSPC’s domestic campaign. who succeeded Hattab in 2003. the old guard members who espoused a nationalist orientation were expelled from the GSPC (Guidère 2007). Abou Ibrahim Mustapha. Finally. the 2nd anniversary of September 11. asserting his will to establish a community of Muslims dedicated to the creation of a Caliphate and calling upon GSPC members to attack all foreigners who supported the war in Iraq. This was the first strong sign of official will to establish a relationship between the GSPC and Al Qa’ida and the beginning of three years of efforts to prove the GSPC’s will and commitment to Al Qa’ida. for instance. He continued to make entreaties to Al Qa’ida. he did not yet possess an adequate network of fighters. When the shura of the GSPC voted to actively support the “Iraqi brothers. VI. sought to actively support the Iraqi insurgents in order to gain credibility for the GSPC.focus on preserving the honor of the Iraqis. They also believed that participation in the war in Iraq would enable the GSPC to establish connections with other jihadist groups in North Africa and introduce them to new strategies and tactics. The Rise of Droukdal 71 .” Hassan was obliged to resign. Although he wanted to eventually establish his group as some sort of training authority. they could use the war in Iraq to attract new recruits who believed that they would be sent to Iraq after basic training in Algeria. However. Soon thereafter. but who would.

Said Makhloufi. recruited him. a merger with Al Qa’ida was particularly appealing to Droukdal (Johnson 2006). like the majority of young Muslim students. by supporting a cause that was seen to benefit the global community of Muslims. he was enthused when an officer of the FIS and a former member of the Algerian army. Nevertheless. he pursued a degree in technology from the University of Blida. Thus. he was assigned the mission of fabricating explosives due to his scientific background and knowledge of chemical bases and mechanical processes. and logisticians. the GSPC was struggling to fill its ranks with recruits. As a member of the clandestine ranks of the FIS. In 1996. he was promoted to chief bomb maker for one of the most important GIA 72 . from 1990 to 1993. Born on April 20. Thus. After losing combatants due to the amnesty program announced by the Bouteflika regime. As a youth. he was attracted to the FIS and actively sought to get close to its leaders. and media specialists who could reinforce the group’s capabilities and help it lead operations. situated near Mifan in the Blida region. 1970 in the small village of Zayan. the GSPC needed to achieve a certain number of visible successes to appear active and successful. he officially joined the organization and in December 1993. who easily obtained his baccalaureate in 1989 in mathematics. One year later. informants. assets. he went underground at the age of 23 (Guidère 2007). Abdelmalek Droukdal immediately assumed control of the GSPC. Droukdal realized that in order to maintain support. he hoped to study engineering. Additionally. Droukdal was recognized as an exceptional student.Upon Mustapha’s death. Droukdal sought to provide a new focal point for his members by participating in the global jihad. By affiliating with Al Qa’ida. the GSPC would gain access to a network of financiers. He continued to hold this role when he enlisted with the GIA from 1993 to 1996. intelligence. the GSPC could more easily recruit operatives. In 1992.

Thus. Chechnya. Instead of concentrating media attention on local attacks. he frequently issued communiqués 73 . he nominated Droukdal as the director of the consultative council.battalions. and the Sudan. Droukdal’s Program: Toward Global Jihad Upon assuming power. he served the GSPC as an ideological figurehead. Libya. His aspiration was to link his organization to the wider Islamist campaign as represented by Al Qa’ida in order to reinvigorate the group after government crackdowns and legislation had reduced its numbers. instructing his followers in the ways of global jihad. In 2001. He occupied this position until 2003. After Mustapha assumed power. Hattab selected Droukdal as a member of his consultative council and made him a regional commander for the GSPC. Upon his appointment as emir of the GSPC. one year later. he allegedly opposed the massacres conducted by the organization in the late 1990s. he was promoted to the position of supreme emir of the GSPC after Mustapha’s death. Droukdal. Droukdal sought to inscribe the actions of the GSPC in an international context by publicizing the GSPC’s activities in Afghanistan. incentivized by his opportunistic desire to revive the demoralized GSPC. which had been created in 1998. he had not yet had any contact with Al Qa’ida (Guidère 2007). In order to accomplish this feat. Thus. VII. he commenced a policy of internationalization. While he was involved in planning a limited number of attacks. when Hassan Hattab was forced to resign. sought to align with other jihadist groups. Although he served the GIA in a military capacity. Somalia. he was selected to command the Al-Quds Brigade (Abu Bakr alSiddiq Brigade) at the behest of the leader of the GIA (Guidère 2007). he seized to opportunity to serve as chief military sergeant for the GSPC. with his inauguration. he conducted a nuanced public relations campaign and comprehensive media reform. Soon thereafter. Finally.

the President of the Chechen Republic in May 2004.S. 2005. he circulated a communiqué congratulating the Chechen mujahedeen for the assassination of Ahmed Kadirov. and other international themes (Guidère 2007). he issued a communiqué addressed to the leaders meeting in Algiers. This communiqué. Later. which was broadcast to a large audience of operatives and supporters. which took place from March 22-24.regarding international politics and events affecting the Middle East and the Maghreb. The communiqués included messages with international themes. a GSPC statement posted by Droukdal on the Internet defending the raid indicated that the attack was in response to U. The communiqués published in conjunction with the operation in Mauritania demonstrated Droukdal’s commitment to a pan-Islamic program and desire to indoctrinate his operatives in the ways of global jihad. In publishing this document. which were still committed to local initiatives. He criticized the Arab leaders who allegedly embraced communism and capitalism and were becoming increasingly sensitive to the JudeoChristian coalition. was a reprisal of themes elucidated by Al Qa'ida.-led military exercises in northern Africa dubbed 74 . thereby promulgating Al Qa’ida’s anti-Western program. Droukdal launched a magazine for the GSPC. the crisis in Iraq. which was inspired by that of Al Qa’ida in Iraq. For instance. It included articles on Salafism. Droukdal sought to align the GSPC theoretically with Al Qa’ida and express his obeisance to Bin Laden and Zarqawi (Guidère 2007). He derided these leaders as puppets of the American government. Droukdal’s media strategy became clear after the Summit of the Arab League in Algiers. he urged jihad as a way to defend Muslim honor. In response to this event. in Morocco. a more “global” goal. The first operation undertaken by the GSPC outside its borders occurred in Mauritania in June 2005. For instance. These initiatives allowed him to transmit his message to operatives across the Maghreb region. Finally. in Chechnya.

. He began to recruit several operatives from abroad and encouraged his agents to train abroad and engage in jihadist activities in other nations in an effort to expand the GSPC’s global profile. counterterrorism campaign in Africa. Droukdal began filming all operations conducted by the GSPC and distributing these clips online in the same manner as Zarqawi (Guidère 2007). One week after the attack. the director of the media division of Al Qa’ida in Iraq issued a communiqué congratulating the GSPC. Droukdal realized that he could encourage internationalization by amending his membership roster. In fact. These exercises were part of a broader U. This operation provoked the first official reaction of Al Qa'ida to the GSPC. This recognition was particularly meaningful for the Algerian operatives because it made them feel more “secure” in their ventures. including Algerian.the “Flintlock Plan” by military officials. Malian. a long video filming the combatants who had participated in the operation was broadcast over the Internet in jihadist forums. Shortly thereafter.S. leaders from Al Qa’ida and the GSPC signed a pact of fraternity (Jebnoun 2007). knowing that they had Al Qa’ida’s support. This was the first time that Droukdal actively sought to recruit from outside the Algerian ranks. Droukdal sought to encourage Maghreb jihadists to join the Algerians in their struggle. The communiqué ended by urging the Islamic youth throughout North Africa to join the Algerian cause (Lecocq and Schrijver 2007). Furthermore. this was the first time Al Qa’ida had congratulated another group not affiliated with their organization. Using this video. Moreover. 75 . The statement also denounced the recent arrests and trials by Mauritanian authorities of dozens of Islamic extremists accused of having links to the GSPC. Mauritanian and Chadian troops. in 2005.

he murdered the hostages. Consequently. Algerian security services contributed to this information overflow by distributing false reports on the GSPC’s channels. Thus. Upon taking these hostages he promised to execute them unless the Algerian government withdrew its support for the war in Iraq. Droukdal proposed a system of transmitting information whereby a central media committee would transmit all communiqués. Droukdal responded by issuing a communiqué in which he thanked Zarqawi and extolled Al Qa’ida in Iraq (Guidère 2007). Zarqawi signaled his complicity with the GSPC by seizing two Algerian diplomats.. he sought to bracket the Algerian operations. Droukdal launched a systematic communications reform to improve the image of the GSPC amongst Algerians and the international Islamic community and to enable him to preach pan-Islamic sermons to his operatives. 2005). This system enabled the GSPC to elucidate several ambiguous arguments and clarify dubious information(Gray and Stockham 2008). each GSPC katibat possessed its own media bureau and published its own communications regarding its operations and successes within its territory. as evidenced by the frequency of his declarations and interchanges and his efforts to improve the 76 . including the attack in Mauritania and the execution of the Algerian diplomats with other attacks that occurred during the same time period (including the coordinated suicide bomb attacks on London’s public transport system that occurred on July 7. When the Algerian government failed to respond. the GSPC’s communications were characterized by a general cacophony and ataxia.In July 2005. Moreover. Those communiqués not approved by this committee could be regarded as unauthentic. During the summer of 2005. there were numerous GSPC media outlets transmitting information simultaneously. he sought to centralize the GSPC’s communications. First of all. As a result. Droukdal’s leadership during this time period was primarily ideological in nature. Prior to this effort.

thereby crystallizing the relationship. the deputy leader of Al Qa’ida.” He spoke of the need to suppress national borders in order to establish an Islamic caliphate and urged the immediate union of the nations of North Africa under Islamic law. two bombs exploded in the port de Delis. on September 11. Therefore. he expressed the 77 . he published a communiqué affirming the GSPC’s allegiance to Al Qa’ida and bin Laden. It is important to note that this announcement came one year after Droukdal had made his first forays to Al Qa’ida. Ayman al-Zawahiri.GSPC’s reception nationally and internationally. Al Qa’ida Central Command had stalled the merger for one year. on the fifth anniversary of the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks. The Announcement of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb Finally. This was the first time that the GSPC had led an attack against a maritime target. His discourse supported pan-Islamic notions and highlighted the necessity of creating an “Islamic United States. 2005. one cannot ignore the fact that prior to the official announcement of the merger of Al Qa’ida and the GSPC. 2006. a group of combatants had penetrated the highly protected port. Droukdal’s role as an ideological leader steering the GSPC’s internationalization through an assertive public relations drive continued after this announcement. could positively contribute to Al Qa’ida’s ideological appeals and combat operations. Droukdal also directed several tactical changes to prepare his organization for international jihad. overall his leadership performance improved during this time period. Moreover. His communiqué was particularly revelatory because it reflected the alleged changes in the official ideology of the GSPC. The attack involved immaculate planning: the GSPC had surveyed the location for weeks and the day before. On December 22. under Droukdal. Droukdal personally supervised all the preparations (Moss 2008). Two days later. VIII. However. intent on ensuring that the GSPC’s membership. announced the merger of Al Qa’ida and the GSPC.

He expressed confidence in the specific competencies and ideological underpinning of Al Qa’ida’s leadership. including 78 .sentiment that Al Qa’ida was the only group that could unite all Islamic combatants and steer the battle against the Coalition forces. Zawahiri himself refused to allow the group to call itself “Al Qa’ida in Algeria” since this name seemed too “local” and did not reflect the transnational and pan-Islamic agenda of Al Qa’ida (Guidère 2007). The bomb attack killed an Algerian driver in a convoy transporting the workers. Droukdal issued another claim in which he suggested that after pledging allegiance to Islam and demonstrating his faith in Bin Laden. AQIM conducted an attack against a bus transporting employees from Brown & Root-Condor. it was now time for him to change the name of his organization. Droukdal expressed concern about projecting a certain image of his organization to his base as well as the international community. Spain. Sonatrach. KBR. Approximately six months later. a few recent attacks indicate otherwise. and the Algerian stateowned oil company. For instance. nine of whom were wounded. and France). Droukdal and his operatives began to target foreigners who continued to support secular regimes and proselytize their culture (specifically the United States. A New Organization In the months after the name change. Al Qa’ida in the Maghreb (AQIM). a joint venture between a Halliburton subsidiary. IX. he wanted to highlight its role in global jihad. In changing the name of the GSPC to Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb. thereby easing the qualms of his subordinates (Guidère 2007). This change would demonstrate the solidarity of Al Qa’ida and the GSPC. in an elaborate roadside bombing. Moreover. however. Some scholars have suggested that AQIM remains sharply focused on its Kabylia strongholds despite Droukdals’s global rhetoric (Filiu 2009). in December 2006.

three cars driven by suicide bombers blew up in Algiers. and the explosions was also transmitted. On this day. the use of firearms plummeted while the use of explosives augmented (Gyves and Wyckloff 2006).four Britons and one American. Originally. However. killing at least 33 people and injuring others. Iraq and training camps in the Sahel to pursue international jihad. emulated the propaganda materials of Al Qa’ida in Iraq (Jebnoun 2007). These recruits were then dispatched to Kashmir. One bomber drove into the guard post at the government building housing the offices of the prime minister and the Interior Ministry. in online jihadist forums about one month later. As a result of Droukdal’s press campaign. Some specialists fear that AQIM could severely damage the energy sector in the Niger delta (Moss 2008). A lengthy film of the operation. While Droukdal’s role was primarily ideological. Droukdal disclosed a communiqué. Recent reports express fear that AQIM will be able to increased recruitment in Mauritania or Nigeria. and train potential terrorists. Droukdal encouraged the evolution from guerilla-oriented operations such as armed assaults to terror-oriented operations such as bombings. Two other cars were detonated beside a police station in the east of the Algerian capital (one at the seat of Interpol and the other at the 79 . He encouraged his operatives to executed attacks inspired by the Iraqi model. Afghanistan. AQIM was able to establish communities in Europe to provide money. attention should be paid to the tactical changes that he implemented. recruit. Chechnya. Under his leadership. the surveillance and lookout. The attacks that occurred on April 11. 2007 demonstrated Droukdal’s new tactics. in which AQIM admitted to the attack. detailing the fabrication of the bombs. indoctrinate. This video. intended to galvanize combatants and attract recruits. Always attentive to public reaction. the GSPC was engaged in a war of attrition whereby combatants would descend from the mountains and attack the armed forces.

Final Observations 80 . His communiqué suggested that the April 11 attacks were executed in response to a concession agreement with the United States. As always. In doing so. The second justification for the attacks was the Algerian government’s military cooperation with the American forces. Through this rhetoric. Such spectacular attacks could also appeal to younger sympathizers (Algeria: Violence Returns 2007). They also demonstrated the professionalization of AQIM’s services. this method consisted of engaging in spectacular attacks with a symbolic dimension that could destabilize the regime. remote detonation. To capitalize upon his operatives’ anti-colonialist of the special forces of the police in Bab Ezzouar). kamikaze fighters. Droukdal criticized the adoption of an anti-Islamic policy allegedly championed by the Americans in their war against terrorism. Droukdal suggested that this was the beginning of a foreign occupation and deemed it necessary to combat the Western presence in Algeria. This also permitted AQIM officers to move from the periphery of Algeria back into its urban centers. rigged vehicles. he expressed a message frequently articulated by Al Qa’ida. thereby cementing the link between the two organizations (Guidère 2007). These attacks utilized remote explosives and were thus less costly in human lives. Now. an effective propaganda and selective recruitment were employed to make AQIM a formidable. Droukdal was compelled to publish a communiqué to outline his intentions and defuse criticism. Finally. Droukdal positioned his group as the defender of the riches of Muslim countries faced with avarice and imperialism of the West. which could allow the Western power to use petroleum in Algeria for 100 years. X. simultaneous explosions. and sustainable fighting force. Moreover.

Thus. The merger. attacks. Droukdal recognized that by aligning itself with Al Qa’ida. He incited the organization to expand by attacking foreign targets. each accompanied by a revealing and incantatory communiqué. he effectively brought the Algerians insurgents out of isolation so they could work more closely with international Islamic networks to promote Islam. The most powerful French AQIM cell to date was dismantled in September 2005. AQIM continues to conducted several suicide attacks and roadside bombings. The US invasion of Iraq and media coverage of American detention and interrogation policies lent credence to the Qa’ida narrative that 81 . Droukdal advanced the goal of undermining the secular Algerian regime while damaging the interests of Western nations (Black 2007). he directed an ideological shift – from a philosophy based on regional preoccupations to a more internationally oriented perspective. Droukdal sought to effectively straddle the divide between local and international Islamic terrorism. when French police thwarted a series of bombings set to occur in Paris as Algerians voted on the National Charter for Peace and Reconciliation. which had dramatically expanded since the September 11.To this day. After the ranks of his organization had been depleted at the turn of the twenty-first century. Droukdal recognized the global appeal of Al Qa’ida message. most particularly French interests. and its success. Moreover. Through his communications. the GSPC could render itself capable of operating in the context of global jihad. can only be explained by highlighting Droukdal’s ideological leadership and the major shifts that he pioneered on the propaganda front. he reflected AQIM’s international focus and the growing ratio of attacks against foreign targets into an emphasis on international issues and threats against Western countries in AQIM’s statements. By uniting radical Islamists to attack Americana and French targets in northwestern Africa. rather than confining itself to local activity.

Al Qa’ida’s global ideology intersected with local anger directed at the undemocratic regime would encourage jihadists’ activity in the Maghreb. he was able to tap into local grievances and tie them to the global jihad against the west.portrayed isolated American actions as a coordinated war against Islam. 82 . Droukdal capitalized upon these trends by highlighting the importance of solidarity among the mujahedeen in face of Western aggression against Islam. Having formulated an appropriate ideological stance. He saw clearly an opportunity for synergy. Thus. A current of cultural Islamization was created that has increased Al Qa’ida’s attraction. he successfully aligned with Al Qa’ida to co-opt and exploit local. ready-made networks that could be internationalized.

The Emergence of the GAI from the Ashes of the Muslim Brotherhood Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya (GAI) was formally organized as an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood in 1973 in the Upper Nile regions of Al-Minya. in the late 1990s. Why did GAI repudiate terrorism rather than affiliate with Al Qa’ida to continue its brutal campaign? I. the GAI rejected the Muslim Brotherhood’s gradualist approach to change. Upon its birth. GAI recruited more indigent. and denounced Al Qa’ida. two prominent Salafi jihadist groups operated in Egypt: Al-Gama’a alIslamiyya (GAI) and Egyptian Islamic Jihad.Chapter 7: Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya: The Unrealized Merger In the early 1970s. Both broke with the Muslim Brotherhood over the latter’s commitment to nonviolence. Asyu’. his rivals. the Egyptian Islamic Jihad members joined forced with Al Qa’ida. mass arrests. Qina. However. In addition. In contrast. Both campaigned to overthrow the secular Egyptian government and to replace it with an Islamic regime. and instead based their ideology on the principles articulated by Sayyid Qutb. Moreover. However. Both collaborated on the assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat in 1981 and both fell victims to the bitter campaign of state violence. and financial crackdowns during much of the 1990s. Egyptian President Anwar Sadat gave the group’s members free reign. renounced violence. an Egyptian fundamentalist writer and educator. members of Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya apologized for the group’s involvement in the Sadat assassination. GAI quickly gained strong support among the university students in both Cairo and Alexandria by recruiting mid-level leaders from the ranks of the unemployed university students who were disillusioned by Egypt’s lack of economic opportunities. uneducated individuals from 83 . and Sohaj. covertly supplying them with arms with which to defend themselves against potential attacks by Marxists or Nasserites.

clashes between Egyptian security forces and Islamic movements in the universities increased. GAI leaders decided. As a result of his policies. Consequently. III. “A need [had] arisen for a military force for us to defend [themselves]” (Carmon. During Al-Rahman’s time abroad. and Lav 2006). AlRahman served six months in an Egyptian prison. including Saudi Arabia. The Sadat Assassination Upon returning to Egypt in 1980. Al-Rahman issued a fatwa that provided the religious justification for the assassination of President Sadat in 1981. Perturbed by the rapid development and mobilization of the Salafi organizations in Egypt. they established a branch devoted to jihad and began to execute increasingly violent operations. II. He began rounding up several Islamic militants and placing them in jail. Sadat changed his political strategies to combat internal unrest in the mid 1970s. Feldner. Sheikh Omar Abdel Al–Rahman assumed the mantle as spiritual leader for the group during its infancy. avoiding a sterner sentence on a technicality (Keats 2002). As a result of his role in the assassination. Crackdown under Mubarak 84 . The GAI and Egyptian Islamic Jihad allegedly cooperated in this conspiracy. where he found and developed financial supporters.the southern rural regions of Assiuet and Minya to further populate their rank and file (Keats 2002). He provided the moral justifications for the group’s moneymaking attacks on Christian shopkeepers and small-business owners by his issuing fatwa – religious rulings that justify actions normally outlawed by the Koran (Abdel Maguid 2003). Al-Rahman fled Egypt and toured the neighboring Arab countries. Fearing harsh repression (like that which the Muslim brotherhood has experienced under former Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser).

who had immigrated to the United States by this time. some GAI members returned to Egypt where they initiated a campaign against the influences of Western culture. Between 1992 and 1993. torture. Hosni Mubarak began a brutal campaign against Egypt’s militant groups that lasted throughout the 1980s. where they were active in the jihad against the Soviet Union. such as Osama Bin Laden. a leading member of the GAI. and spread diseases such as AIDS (Stacher 2002). again provided the religious justification for these attacks by arguing that tourism in Egypt fostered poor morals. many fighters moved on to combat the Serbian forces that were decimating Bosnian Muslims in Yugoslavia. Although fairly successful at curbing the number of violent attacks. His methods included false arrests. Al-Rahman. IV. they carried out a number of attacks on tourists that killed dozens of people. Campaign of Terror After the Soviet-Afghan war. 85 . this crackdown further radicalized the university-educated population. they trained and fought alongside al-Zawahiri’s Egyptian Islamic Jihad and other Afghan Arabs. Moreover. like Mustafa Hamza. During these years. even worked for businesses owned by Osama bin Laden in Somalia (Carmon. Some. many GAI members continued or commenced their training in Al Qa’ida facilities in the Sudan and Afghanistan. Feldner. many GAI members and leaders fled to Afghanistan. and executions.Sadat’s successor. In Afghanistan. Several were implicated in numerous plots directed against American diplomatic and military targets in the Balkans and other parts of Europe. and Lav 2006). During the 1990s. who continued to struggle under high unemployment(Gerges 2000). following the Soviet withdrawal.

and a stop to agitation to commit attacks. 86 . arresting thousands of suspected terrorists and executing or killing others during police raids. the group killed 63 people at a tourist site in Luxor (including four Egyptians and 59 foreign tourists. including the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels. signed by six of the organization's leaders. The group bombed theaters. Al-Rahman was arrested in the United States in connection with the first World Trade Center bombing. GAI announced a unilateral initiative of conciliation with the Egyptian regime.In 1993. Collapse of an Armed Group As a result of GAI’s campaign in the late 1990s. In 1995. This prompted some influential militants to reconsider their strategy and tactics and some GAI leaders renounced violence. 1997. and banks. he and nine other operatives were convicted for conspiring to destroy New York City landmarks. Al-Rahman was arrested in the United States in connection with the first World Trade Center bombing. 36 of whom were Swiss) (Keats 2002). GAI continued to attack tourists throughout the 1990s and began targeting Egyptian business establishments as well. During a court hearing. he and nine other operatives were convicting for conspiring to destroy New York City landmarks. several GAI leaders immediately conveyed their disgust. when the Luxor attack occurred. Cairo clamped down on both the GAI and Egyptian Islamic Jihad even more. In 1996. Thus. In 1996. militants killed nine German tourists and their driver in front of the Egyptian Museum in Cairo. In 1993. which declared a halt to all armed operations within and outside Egypt. including the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels. Yet despite his arrest. In September 1997. On July 5. a GAI member read aloud a communiqué. the group allegedly collaborated with the Egyptian Islamic Jihad in a failed assassination attempt on President Hosni Mubarak in Addis Ababa. Two months later. Ethiopia. V. bookstores.

Rifai Ahmad Taha courted bin Laden by making trips to Afghanistan and even appeared sitting next to him and Egyptian Islamic Jihad leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in a videotape released in September 2000 that threatened US interests. Consequently. it needed a publicity boost if it was to continue functioning as a viable terrorist organization. Taha signed Bin Laden’s 1998 Declaration of War against the “Jews and Crusaders. the GAI was weakened both operationally and financially by the aftermath effects of the attack. After the schism.” thereby becoming a signatory to the International Islamic Front. Moreover. organized by Mustafa Hamza. the GAI spokesman Osama Rushdie. supported non-violence and the ceasefire. the larger. Moreover. a Netherlands resident announced his resignation (Cohen 2003). The GAI had witnessed how the Egyptian Islamic Jihad had suffered significant setbacks because of its decision to join Al Qa’ida. wanted to seize power in the GAI. but rather by a breakaway faction (Ghadbian 2000). the group split into two factions. he was unable to recruit many of his cadres to support Bin Laden and a minimal number joined the global jihad (Botha 2006). while the smaller. more radical faction. Zawahiri's organization experienced a major upset when in 1998 Albania agreed to extradite 12 members of EIJ to Egypt 87 . moderate one. In 1997. It is unclear whether Taha actually agreed with bin Laden’s views. The Luxor attack and the reports of mutilation of the victims’ bodies had sparked public repulsion at GAI. as a result of increased governmental scrutiny. led by Rifai Ahmad Taha deplored the ceasefire as cowardly and called for a return to armed operations. Therefore. For instance. Yet despite his efforts. or simply saw the financial and organizational advantages that Al Zawahiri had reaped from making the decision to join Al Qa’ida.insisting that the operation was not executed by the GAI.

the group’s historic leadership declared a unilateral ceasefire. agreed to this measure. We are even thinking of paying blood money to the victims” (Halawi 2002). most members of GAI preferred to go underground until the group regained its strength and influence rather than align with Al Qa’ida and risk further setbacks. the historic leadership of the GAI has published a series of books. Since this time. Reconciliation In 1999. “Their aim is jihad. Nageh Ibrahim. Nevertheless. Ayman al-Zawahiri. Ibrahim challenged Al Qa’ida’s Islamic credentials by emphasizing its dependence on violent struggle as a means to further its goals and suggested that Al Qa’ida was propagating a false definition of jihad. VI. in August 2006. Karam Zuhdi. a senior leader and chief ideological theorist for the GAI. and our aim is Islam. stressed that significant differences in philosophy exist between the GAI and Al Qa’ida. by then the closest associate of Osama bin Laden. In doing so. During his interview with Asharq al-Awsat. He asserted that Al Qa’ida’s aggressive tactics have failed Muslims. announced that the GAI had merged with Al Qa’ida. who remained the group’s spiritual leader." he the case known as the “Returnees from Albania” (Aboul-Enein 2004) Consequently. GAI leadership in Egypt quickly rejected this claim. a self-proclaimed leader of the underground group. The GAI has not conducted a terrorist attack either inside or outside Egypt since August 1998. In 2002. the leadership issued a statement reaffirming its commitment to end violence. despite widespread skepticism in Egypt and abroad about the nature of its true 88 . Even Al-Rahman. known as the “Concept Correction Series” in which they renounce indiscriminate violence and extremist interpretations of Islam. even said the GAI owes the Egyptian people "an apology for the crimes which [the group] has committed against Egypt. despite their proclamations in favor of non-violence. Dr. Since this time.

and the media with the goal of undermining Egyptian state power. which gave precedence to doctrinal correctness above all other issues. GAI interpreted their jihad much more narrowly than groups affiliated or associated with Al Qa’ida. tourists. its leaders were convinced that they could accomplish in Egypt what the mujahedeen had achieved in Afghanistan. secular institutions. when their group was in a state of imminent decline. They attacked Coptic Christians. They believed that their main foe was the Egyptian state and that the near enemy was more worthy of fighting than the distant enemy. evidence suggests that this choice was strategic. politicians. and the economy 89 . While they attacked Western targets. Consequently. and exhibited strong anti-Western proclivities. primarily to the establishment of an Islamic state in Egypt (Rabasa et al. banks. GAI was well established and active prior to Al Qa’ida’s emergence in the international arena. GAI’s theoretical and operational priorities were the product of a literal reading of the Quranic and prophetic texts. who were not already entrenched in Salafi jihadist circles. Moreover. however.intentions. VII. the GAI has concentrated its efforts on revising its former extremist worldview and distinguishing itself from Qa’ida (Zambelis 2006). Explaining the Decision not to Affiliate with Al Qa’ida The leadership of the GAI had longstanding connections with Al Qa’ida. they decided to renounce violent activity rather than appeal for Al Qa’ida for assistance to continue their existence as a terrorist group. the ouster of the “illegitimate” governing power. 2006). When GAI reemerged in the early 1990s with a renewed sense of purpose after the return of its members from the Afghan jihad. police. GAI members were less receptive to Al Qa’ida’s ideology of global jihad than other groups that have emerged since that time. they perceived their struggle as regionally confined to the Egyptian territory. While this decision may seem counterintuitive.

admitted that the group was in a stronger position before it started attacking the government. the relative success of the government’s security policy obligated the group to concede to what its leaders called “military defeat. the groups’ leaders acquainted themselves with other schools of Islamic thought. During their time in prison.” Between arrests. Osama Rushdie. Feldner. by the turn of the century the group realized that it was useless to try to topple a powerful regime by force. Additionally. Reflecting on the seven years of GAI violence between 1992 and 1997. He attempted to rationalize this earlier aggression by suggesting that adopting violence in 1992 " was mainly a reaction to what we saw as the suppression and killing of our brothers” (Carmon. in the late 1990s. reunite the groups’ ranks. and Lav 2006) It is possible that in mid-1997. wider reading and understanding is evident in the sources on which the leadership relied to compose the revisionist books that they published (Halawi 2002). after its initiative to end the violence. the security establishment facilitated meetings between the group’s leader and members in Egyptian prisons to ensure that the group honored this commitment. However. GAI were compelled to shift strategies as a political tactic. and severe treatment in prisons and detention facilities. 90 . deaths in armed clashes. and prepare for a new offensive. stiff sentences that included dozens of executions. the ranks of the leadership and general membership were decimated. when several leaders of GAI announced its cease-fire initiative. the effect of their new. a former leader of GAI. even with Al Qa’ida’s backing. Thus. This exceedingly severe security strategy disrupted the ranks and cohesion of GAI prompting the group’s leaders to reconsider its acts and concepts. this may have been a maneuver to buy time. Nevertheless. In fact.and creating the perception that the Egyptian government could not protect its citizens (Keats 2002).

one must note that terrorism depends on the ability to generate the appropriate level of terror and anxiety. the bulk of which may be able to make a reasonable calculation that they are not a risk. However. the consequences of adopting a nonviolent position and the probability of achieving its political goals through terrorist undertakings. nor did GAI members have any interest in targeting the “far enemy. GAI acted on the basis of its calculation of the benefit to be gained from violent action. the costs of attempting violent attacks and of these attacks failing. The costs of executing attacks became too high and the consequences of adopting a nonviolent position seemed promising (Crenshaw 1987). Terrorist organizations engage in a process of constant adaptation to the strategic environment and are apt to respond to policy-induced changes to their constraints since. terrorists groups must conduct a sequence of directed attacks that creates a sufficient sense of threat for it to be understood that the campaign will continue unless and until there is a change in state policy (Freedman 2007). GAI would not have been able to defeat the Egyptian government. it was meant to produce a change in the Egyptian government’s political position.VIII. Even with some assistance from Al Qa’ida. not to destroy the government’s military potential. by definition. which must fan out among a possibly substantial population. Thus. they changed their strategic tactics. the group abandoned its violent 91 . Acts of terror induce psychological effects. Accordingly. Crenshaw’s description of the instrumental approach to assessing terrorist violence is useful for understanding GAI’s rationale. terrorism was a means to a political end. Final Observations For GAI. A constant failure to achieve its stated goals led to internal strife and its ultimate collapse as a terrorist group.” When GAI was unable to achieve its political goal through terrorism. GAI used terrorism to influence political behavior by devaluing the state in the eyes of its citizens. they lack resources.

92 .strategy. For GAI. GAI now appears to be concerned with carving out some political space to operate in Egypt. terrorism was merely a means to an end and substitutes were available.

Chapter 8: Conclusion and Discussion – Al Qa’ida’s Commanding Officers: A Skilled Management Team To understand terrorist organizations. while social bonds facilitated the process of affiliating (i. 93 . It is naïve to focus on chief executives. like Osama bin Laden or Ayman Zawahiri or to concentrate on the suicide bombers who conduct operations. it is necessary to examine the staff that operates at each level of the hierarchy within the system. The data collected in this survey and analysis of Al Qa’ida’s leadership has significantly demonstrated that leaders were strongly incentivized by opportunism. the commanding officers that direct Al Qa’ida’s affiliates. Abdelmalek Droukdal whose desire to revive his group inspired him to associate with Al Qa’ida while the examination of Al Gama’a al-Islamiyya demonstrates why strategic calculations can rouse other organizations to eschew violence and rebuff Al Qa’ida’s forays. or social bonds could motivate local jihadist leaders to enroll in Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program. I posed the question: what motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida? I hypothesized that opportunism. In the first chapters. interventions may need to be focused at understanding and disrupting Al Qa’ida’s mid-level management. the analysis of Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb provides an example of an intelligent and shrewd local jihadist leader. ideology. Consequently. Moreover. While Osama bin Laden’s capture or death would be an important psychological blow to those vested in his invincibility. Recent studies indicate that strategies aimed at enabling stringent police techniques and punitive military action will not succeed in deterring the Al Qa’ida suicide bombers(Atran 2003). social bonds served as a “permissive factor”). broad-based Al Qa’ida network augmented by affiliations with various groups has durability that will surpass his mortality.e. his loosely affiliated.

the fundamental purpose of any political organization is to maintain itself. in particular. organizations must attract and retain members. Since they are rational actors. My data analysis and case studies support these conclusions. or both. as was the case with the GSPC (Sederberg 1995). Psychological surveys indicate that terrorists are not psychologically deviant or ideologically blinded(Sageman 2004). when the costs of other forms of violence increase. and counterinsurgency tactics” (Laitin and Jacob Shapiro 2008) Like individual terrorists. the type of regime against which they are fighting. wish to enhance and promote the organizations that they direct since their personal ambitions are tied to the organization’s viability (Cronin and Ludes 2004). popular support. In order to survive. Conciliation programs can be a successful counter-terrorism strategy when amnesty is offered to operatives who renounce violence. Counterterrorism efforts aimed at winning battles and capturing terrorist actors deplete the ranks of terrorist organizations by physically eliminating combatants. Within the larger understanding of a terrorist group’s political aims. Moreover. One should consider terrorism as “one of a set of rebel tactics that is consciously selected in response to changes in funding. competition against other rebel groups. it is not surprising that local jihadist group leaders have opportunistic motives for joining Al Qa’ida. insurgent groups should also be perceived as rational entities that are more likely to adopt terrorist tactics when the benefits of other forms of violence decrease. But what are these motives? In fact. groups may lose members to other terrorist groups when a competing group can put together a package of purposive goals and selective incentives that is more appealing than that of the first organization. there may be a divergence of opinion on precisely what objectives should be 94 . Factionalism is also common amongst terrorist organizations.Previous studies depict terrorists as rational actors seeking to maximize political goals (Lake 2003). Leaders.

making recruitment amongst these communities increasingly difficult. When loss of membership occurs. Al Qa’ida’s recruitment has picked up in 30-40 countries. Finally. security sources in Algeria said that the Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb offensive in August 2008 reflected the recruitment of scores of operatives.pursued.e. Bin Laden and Al Qa’ida’s elite cadre have convinced many volunteers to fulfill the duty of jihad and to thus respond to “the call of Allah. When this occurs. some groups may find it beneficial to renounce violence and enter the political arena. many groups may choose to align with Al Qa’ida to remain salient. Thus. This divergence compels operatives to defect.000 militants in camps in Afghanistan. their public image shifts from well-intentioned revolutionaries to common delinquents. Al Qa’ida can transfer operatives to help support the local jihadist group since Al Qa’ida’s own recruitment is accelerating. Al Qa’ida trained over 5. when they occupy a “moral high ground”). Recruiters for Al Qa’ida reportedly told researchers that volunteers were “beating down their doors” to join (Atran 2004). Since the 1980s. including suicide bombers. Al Qa’ida probably has several thousand members and associates. groups may alienate the communities in which they operate by conducting particularly violent or poorly executed operations (Crenshaw 1991). Al Qa’ida can easily dispatch a few combatants to assist local groups in desperate need of increased membership and expertise. combatants. Groups only enjoy popular support when the population believes their actions are justified under the political conditions of the country (i. like the GAI. 95 . For example. transforming from an armed group into a political party is no easy feat. In recent years.” While it is impossible to know precisely the size of Al Qa’ida due to the decentralized structure of its organization. However. and those with inside knowledge of the military and police(Gray and Stockham 2008). especially in less democratic nations. Thus.

In doing so. Through a program of propaganda and indoctrination. many terrorist groups are compared to criminal gangs. Therefore. or of occupation forces stepping with their boots on the backs of Arabic men that have just been bound 96 . Al Qa’ida is a high-value global brand that is esteemed amongst the Salafi community. In fact. primarily by means of the Qatari television station al-Jazeera. they are perceived as legitimate actors. striving for global jihad. For instance. To complement this strategy. recruits are shown provocative photos of Iraqi women and children killed or bloodied by Western bombardment. which produces the professional tapes and promotional film clips disseminated throughout the Arab and Western world. the Muslim warriors of the crusader period) by establishing a territorial base for Islam and by protecting those who are oppressed by foreign domination(Henzel 2005). as discussed in Chapter 3. of coalition soldiers shooting wounded insurgents inside a mosque.Additionally. Al Qa’ida has substantially promoted and publicized its image throughout the globe. Al Qa’ida also selects sympathetic journalists to whom it grants interviews (Schweitzer 2008). Al Qa’ida established a communications committee to promote this representation through a well-executed publicity campaign.” To supplement recruitment. Bin Laden has created a company called al-Sahab. their social status is enhanced. groups gain credibility and respect that can be effectively leveraged to increase recruitment. upon aligning with Al Qa’ida. Recognizing the powerful potential of the media. Before joining forces with Al Qa’ida. These journalists present Al Qa’ida to the outside world in a supportive manner. By aligning with Al Qa’ida. Al Qa’ida encourages potential operatives to follow in the footsteps of their pious predecessors (i.e. depicting its operatives as “freedom fighters. Al Qa’ida uses propaganda to foster its positive public image as the defender of Islam. Al Qa’ida raises awareness amongst Muslims of the grievances that gave rise to its birth. However.

Al Qa’ida can help groups conduct attacks. nature of the military and intelligence services. It can also offer groups information on the government. Finally. even death. and weapons. both alumni of the Afghan jihad. 97 . tyrants gained dominance over the Muslims in every aspect and every land”(Calvert 2004). Such emotional narratives highlight the theme of humiliation at the hand of callous and arrogant Western powers(Hafez 2007). Al Qa’ida’s veterans can offer groups tactical and strategic advice. it effectively encourages redemption through faith and sacrifice. and mentored. equipment. According to several reports. known as Muklhas. due to its exceptional intelligence-gathering skills.000 of Al Qa’ida seed money (Ward 2005). Al Qa’ida’s affiliates learn from Al Qa’ida how to conduct comparable propaganda campaigns in their home countries to attract and enhance their own recruitment efforts. financial services. Al Qa’ida established numerous local military training facilities in Mindanao and Indonesia in the last two decades. indoctrinated. For example.000 to $600. For instance. Abdelmalek Droukdal certainly modeled his publicity efforts on that of Al Qa’ida and benefited from advice from Al Qa’ida’s media branch. Because of that. etc. Thus.and forced to the ground with black sacks over their faces. physical environment. known as Hambali and Ali Gufron. Moreover. Ansar al-Islam was started with $300. helped Jemaah Islamiyah plan and execute the 2002 Bali bombing that killed more than 2000 people (Abuza 2003). Riduan Isamuddin. Al Qa’ida is infamous for providing terrorist training and for establishing sites and camps where recruits are educated. Al Qa’ida can offer groups financial resources. Al Qa’ida also attributes Muslim societies’ “greatest misfortune and decadence to their abandonment of jihad due to the love of this world and abhorrence of death.

but also create and promote “heroes” that represent the organization.Conducting attacks connotes a high degree of devotion and strength to potential recruits. Moreover. While not a precipitant cause for an affiliation. strategies should be developed to isolate these groups from Al Qa’ida. Such missions create publicity events that effectively advertise the organization and psychologically appeal to individual needs to feel important and meaningful through membership in a “higher” movement (Atran 2003). demonstrate that the organization has a loyal and impassioned following. social networks can be thought of as a stipulation that pre-structures and facilitates the merger process. martyrdom operations not only produce spectacular incidents of large-scale destruction. Instead. Due to these associations. in particular. it may be futile for counterterrorist forces to discourage local jihadist group leaders from soliciting Al Qa’ida. Efforts should ensure that the necessary resources (both human and 98 . and because such affiliations are not difficult to initiate due to the existence of prior social connections. local jihadist leaders are presented with appealing and cost effective opportunities to bolster their own recruitment and ensure organizational survival and their ability to achieve their political aims without abandoning arms and investigating political avenues. local jihadist group leaders are positioned to seek assistance from their colleagues when decline within their own organizations seems imminent. the results of this study suggest that most local jihadist group leaders have already established significant social bonding and networking with members of Al Qa’ida Central Command. thereby making such affiliations more problematic and risky. Suicide attacks. Since Al Qa’ida provides local jihadist group leaders with numerous opportunities to stimulate and expand their organizations. Also. By joining Al Qa’ida. rather than abandon their mission. just as a conventional military organization might glamorize its heroes to inspire others to volunteer for field military actions.

which features a common visa policy and region-wide fingerprint or iris photography database. Bin Laden has devoted less attention and resources to AQIM. A model system is that which is utilized in the European cannot be exchanged between Al Qa’ida and its weaker partner. portrayed US borders as “conduits for terrorists. and illegal migrants” (Ross 2003). Thus. they are less likely to survive or recuperate from setbacks. governments should implement a networked border monitoring and border control system. If groups are precluded from affiliating with Al Qa’ida. former Secretary of Homeland Security. Throughout the 1990s. In areas like the Core Arab states and the Maghreb. terrorists have learned how to make legal immigration channels and legitimate immigrant communities serve their lethal jihadist ends. previous asylum applications. For instance. especially Muslim. This system is also used to store and disseminate information on extradition. stolen cars and other stolen property as well as biometric data. Since the Iraqi branch of Al Qa’ida suffered this setback. To thwart Al Qa’ida’s connections with local jihadist groups. weapons of mass destruction. Unilateral approaches to border control will leave a mismatch of contradictory national policies. The new Schengen Information System computer database contains information on criminals on the run. However. it is necessary to treat carefully because restrictive “fortress” responses and sweeping immigrant surveillance hinder cooperation with key immigrant. communities. third-country nationals refused entry to the EU and individuals 99 . thereby crippling its ability to supersede a regional dimension (Filiu 2009). some suggest that AQIM’s globalization process has been impeded by the expulsion of AL Qa’ida in Iraq (AQI) from Baghdad in 2008. In the age of globalization. border control measures must be established to prevent the movement of terrorists and terror-related materials. state borders were opened to international trade flows. Tom Ridge.

whereby $50 million for security programs administered by the US Department of Defense was offered to East African states to provide for military training for border control and security of the coastline. and aviation security capacity (Kagwanja 2006). These predictive models could be used in order to develop strategies for a pre-emptive counter-response. etc.subject to a European arrest warrant or under surveillance for criminal activity(One Single EU Border 2005) A system for region-wide arrests would also be useful in areas where terrorist activity is high. Future research will center on the development of predictive models based on emerging patterns among terrorist groups that align with Al Qa’ida. it appears that most leaders took on an increasingly ideological role after the merger. the leaders issued more communiqués. police training. I considered leadership roles before and after the affiliation to uncover trends. The second question that I sought to answer involved the type of role local jihadist leaders played within Al Qa’ida. gave more speeches. After the merger. an understanding might be developed of what government initiatives trigger terrorist organizations to seek partnerships with Al Qa’ida and of the strength of the alliance that materializes as a result. One impressive program was the East Africa Counter Terrorism Initiative. counterterrorist forces can better undermine these leaders. By understanding what function local jihadist leaders play. 100 . The United States can provide assistance to foreign governments to enhance operational capacity to tighten border controls. For example. While there were no significant patterns in the data on the operational and logistic role of the leaders profiled. granted more interviews. Future research may also focus on how alliances mature and evolve over time since this article focuses on aspects of maturity among terrorist groups who have engaged in networking with Al Qa’ida.

Although Bin Laden wants to align with local militant groups with country-specific grievances to increase his global reach and influence. Consequently. The roots of most of the terrorist networks included in this study can be traced to geographically separate.To understand why this increase in evangelizing and political activity of these leaders occurs. In contrast. Al Qa’ida conceives its resistance as a single. unified struggle that transcends local. leader-member value agreement. Central to Al Qa’ida’s vision is the awakening of the Muslim ummah. an affiliation will not occur. The dyadic relationship between these leaders and their followers is characterized by high quality leader-member exchange resulting from frequent communication. an ideology that was widely unpopular in the country in previous years (West 2006). he demands that his commanding officers convince their operatives to adopt and accept Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program. al-Ittihad al-Islami was established in the 1980s through the merger of Salafi groups. When local jihadist leaders are not interested in promoting this agenda. as was the case with the GAI. and subordinate loyalty. state. the worldwide community of believers(Sutton and Vertigans 2006). The leaders of local jihadist groups develop differentiated relationships with their 101 . effective influence tactics. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are uniquely positioned to persuade uncommitted followers that Al Qa’ida has a better ideology. one must consider the philosophy and ambitions of local jihadist groups compared to Al Qa’ida. ethno-religious struggles. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are tightly coupled to their operatives. interactive communication patterns. they gained the support of the Somali people through nationalist causes more than through a common affinity for Salafism. As mentioned in earlier chapters. Siad Barre. and regional concerns. For example. a high degree of decision influence. These groups enjoyed popularity in Somalia in the 60s due to their attempts to regain lost Somali land after independence and to their resistance to dictator.

and interviews. operatives must also integrate new tactics and strategies into their repertoire. Moreover. Valuable insights can be gained by considering the role that managers play when two companies merge in order to understand the role that Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers play in mitigating culture shock and encouraging integration. Based on these motivational communications. Due to such high quality leader-member exchange. When a group first affiliates with Al Qa’ida. followers are encouraged to take personal initiative and exercise personal leadership to make their unit more effective. When the security situation does not permit direct communications. culture shock is inevitable. speeches. they subordinate their radical group to Al Qa’ida’s strategic goals and move their localized Islamic resistance beyond sovereign state boundaries to transcend provincial frames of reference. rather than using an average leadership style. Thus.rapports. the GSPC was encouraged to engage in suicide and arson attacks(Guidère 2007). Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers can ground their message in the narrative elements most likely to resonate with this target group. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers correspond with their cohorts through communiqués. Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers can convince their operatives to integrate their previous regional ambitions with a wider transnational Islamic agenda. Because they know their audience well. In addition to accepting Al Qa’ida’s pan-Islamic program. as Droukdal did on numerous occasions. they can apply effective message management. in which they clarify their vision. In doing so. rhetoric. For instance. Like Al 102 . and spin. due to their close relationship with operatives. through their ideological operations. followers trust their leaders and can be persuaded to engage in activities that they otherwise would not and can be encouraged to move beyond their own self-interest to focus on larger mutual interests(Graen and Uhl-Bien 1995).

Although some of the groups that Al Qa’ida merges with have less than five hundred operatives. When corporate mergers occur. the burden of responsibility still rests on the commanding officers to assuage their followers after the affiliation with Al Qa’ida commences. a corporation may encourage teamwork while the venture it subsumes may be more oriented towards individual initiatives. transition managers must make the case for integration to large numbers of employees. In addition. Droukdal issued a communiqué explaining and justifying this repositioning. This can only be achieved by providing ideological guidance through leadermember exchanges and through public communications and appearances. Employees’ reactions most often pass through four distinct stages. Helen Kubler-Ross’s four stages of bereavement or 103 . major change and generate a great deal of uncertainty due to the fact that organizational cultures are underpinned by deep assumptions that are constant. Soon after the GSPC announced its merger with Al Qa’ida. mergers represent sudden. next emotional bargaining begins. patterned. They commence with disbelief and denial and pass into anger and then rage and resentment. shared vision of future organizational arrangements (Marks and Mirvis 2000). For Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers and corporate transition managers. and shared. often accompanied by frustration and depression. Both transition managers and Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers must be skilled in relinquishing and helping others relinquish past values and practices that are not in tune with the current.Qa’ida’s commanding officers. one of the most common difficulties that arise during the merger is “cultural differences.” For example. finally acceptance occurs. transition mangers assume full-time responsibility and accountability for making integration work. These are identical to Dr. The threat to old corporate values and organizational lifestyle leaves organizational members in a state of defensiveness accentuated by low levels of trust within the institution.

They must assuage their followers’ fears and convince them of the saliency and relevance of the new program through constant communication. When a merger occurs. Leaders. and address inconsistencies between the espoused operating principles and actual management of change. successfully promote change by implementing and campaigning for a unique vision of the organization through a publicity campaign. optimism. principles. These initiatives can only be achieved by assuming an ideological role (Kavanagh and Ashkanasy 2006). they should serve as role models on how to “work together” for the goals of the organization. and a sense that the future will be better than the past through their speeches and other outreach activities. Moreover. transition managers (and Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers) must define the new “combination” goals. Effective leaders possess powerful persuasive personal characteristics and execute actions designed to change internal organizational culture and substance. like Droukdal. Leaders hoping to initiative organizational change and general follower acceptance face a daunting task. they must inspire hope. and support necessary changes in behaviors and culture to successfully realize the post-combination organization. Finally. Communication should be their major priority throughout the merger process. Finally. In this context. A wide range of factors affect organizational change as produced during a merger. promote.grief. and desired end state. 104 . leadership can be viewed as the art of mobilizing others to want to struggle for shared aspirations (Covin et al. 1997). they should clarify critical success factors for the merger. It is their responsibility to define. anticipate the impact of change. What the operative grapples with is akin to the “death” of the previous organization and the letting go of this relationship (Cartwright and Cooper 1990).

For 105 . Such propaganda will appeal to communities anxious to retain their cultural heritage and religious integrity. government communications strategy should build an attractive alternative to the Al Qa’ida worldview by appealing to a sense of deracinated nationalism. Counterterrorism units can use media organizations to launch global propaganda pushes that will taint the Al Qa’ida brand and make it even less attractive to local militants. messaging should refute the imputation of malign Western intention in the Muslim world and undermine the notion that terrorism is authentically Islamic. In fact. have taken steps to promote peaceful co-existence with the government and society(Gunaratna and Ali 2009). authorities can publicize the rejection of Al Qa’ida by credible local figures. Moreover. another principle Islamist militant group in Egypt. Thus. Proxies must manage from affair and this sort of counter-terrorism publicity campaign. For instance. My data indicates that these commanding officers are leading Al Qa’ida’s growing media offensive. Approaching communications in this manner ensures that the government avoids exacerbating feelings of alienation within Muslim communities. This program should expose tension between Al Qa’ida leadership and supporters. especially religious ones. It is important to remember that some groups. For example. Counterterrorist forces can also harness the power of the “Shayma effect” (which refers to an incident where an Egyptian schoolgirl was killed in a jihadist attack) by broadcasting images off jihadist attacks that have killed Muslim children.Understanding Al Qa’ida’s commanding officer’s role as transition managers during a merger is important when designing initiatives to undermine their efforts. do opt to renounce violence. The media has become a crucial battlefield in the current conflict against radical Islamic terrorism (Blanchard 2006). like the GAI. counterterrorist units should channel messages through volunteers in Internet forums(Brachman and McCants 2006). several leaders of GAI and Al-Jihad al-Islami.

instance. and a war with no truce” (Payne 2009). a struggle for survival. Salafi and Islamist communities in London have consistently demonstrated skill. Our government should also realize this truism. The collapse of Al Qa’ida’s propaganda operations will also cause the Arab media to move towards more coverage of the legitimate Iraqi government. the government should continue to capture Al Qa’ida news and production staff. Ed Husain and Shiraz Maher were two young British Muslims who became involved with radical Islamist politics with Hizb ut-Tahir before renouncing their affiliation and speaking out publicly about the dangers of intolerant Islamism (MacEoin 2007). The leaders of the Western world should follow suit. 106 . along with their PCS and data files. Ayman Al Zawahiri acknowledges that the struggle between the secular governments in the West and the militant jihadists of Al Qa’ida is a “battle of ideologies. This study indicates that Al Qa’ida’s commanding officers are playing an increasingly ideological role. courage and commitment in countering al-Qaida propaganda and recruitment activity. Moreover.

Atran. Black. Ayubi.html [Accessed May 14. 2003. Inc. 2007. Airforce University Maxwell.HTM [Accessed January 1. Atran. Available at: http://www. 1980. Basile.: Inside the Secret World of Osama bin Laden. 2004. Mark. Available at: http://acpss. The Osama bin Laden I know: an oral history of al Qaeda's leader. Andrew. 2006. “The Reconstituted Al-Qaeda Threat in the Maghreb. “L’Afrique et la «Guerre Contre la Terreur». Peter. Inc. “Mishandling Suicide Terrorism.” Politique Étrangère 3. Bergen. 2009].eg/eng/ahram/2004/7/5/EGYP16. 2006.17049. Antil. Alain. Bergen. “Going to the Source: Why Al Qaeda’s Financial Network Is Likely to Withstand the Current War on Terrorist Financing. 1st ed. The Threats. 2009].ahram.start. 2004.BIBLIOGRAPHY: Abdel Maguid. Ayman Al-Zawahiri: The Ideologue of Modern Islamic Militancy. Bergen. Abuza.” The Washington Quarterly 27(3): 67-90. Algeria: Violence Returns.” International Journal of Middle East Studies: 481-499. Wahid. New York: Free Press.” Science 299(5612): 1534-1539. L. Zachary. P. Aboul-Enein. 2007. “The Political Revival of Islam: the Case of [Accessed May 14. Free Press. “Egypt's Gama'ah Islamiyah: The Turnabout and its Ramifications.” Terrorism Monitor 5(2): 7-12. Youssef. 2009]. 2002. inside the secret world of Osama bin Laden. 2001. Nazih.” Al-Ahram Center for Political & Strategic Studies.umd.mi5. 2004. Al Qaida's Ideology. Scott. Scott. National Consortium for the Study of terrorism and Responses to Terrorism.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 25(2): 169-200. 107 .gov. Holy war. “Genesis of Suicide Terrorism. Available at: http://www. African Research Bulletin (23): 17045 .” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 27: 169-185. About START. New York: Simon & Peter. Holy War. “Funding Terrorism in Southeast Asia: The Financial Network of Al Qaeda and Jemaah Islamiya. 2003.

2009]. 2006.C. Politics and Terrorism: An Assessment of the Origin and Threat of Terrorism in Egypt. “Theories of Terrorism: Instrumental and Organizational Approaches. p. K.” International Security 31(1): 7-48. The GSPC: Newest Franchise in al-Qa'ida's Global Jihad. Anthony. Laetitia Bucaille. Amelie. Martha.” Terrorism and political violence 3(1): 6987. Brachman. and Louis Martínez. Carafano. 2007. “Stealing Al Qaeda's Playbook.” Mediterranean Quarterly 19(1): 80. 1997. Cronin. Covin. Botha. 2008. John. Available at: http://memri. 2006. London: C Hurst & Co Publishers Ltd. Cohen. 1991. 1990. L. “Global Terrorism and the Global Economy: Unpeaceful” In 2005 Index of Economic Freedom. “How Al-Qaida ends: The decline and demise of terrorist groups. J. Calvert. Crenshaw. 2004.” British Journal of Management 1(2): 65-76. Cartwright. Ariel. Martha.Blanchard. D.: The Heritage Foundation.” Comparative Strategy 22(3): 207-221. Washington. Teresa et al.cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA30906 [Accessed February 3. “Leadership Style and Post-Merger Satisfaction.” Journal of Strategic Studies 10(4): 13-31. Carmon. Storming Media. Y Feldner. and Cary Cooper. “Promoting Freedom and Democracy: Fighting the War of Ideas Against Islamic Terrorism. Nova Publishers. “The Mythic Foundations of Radical Islam. “Al Qaeda in the Maghreb: The" Newest" Front in the War on Terror.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 29(4): 309-321. 2006. 2006. and D Lav. and William McCants. Sue. 2005. Blom. The Enigma of Islamist Violence. 11.” Journal of Management Development 16(1): 22-33. J. 2007. “The Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions on People at Work: Existing Research and Issues. Christopher.” In Al-Qaeda: An Organization to be Reckoned With. The Al-Gama'a Al-Islamiyya Cessation of Violence: An Ideological Reversal. 108 . The Middle East Media Research Institute. Y. Celso. Crenshaw. “How Terrorism Declines. Anneli.” Orbis 48(1): 29-41. 1987. Jarret. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies. “Al Qaeda: Statements and Evolving Ideology. Audrey. 2006. Boudali. 2003.

Lawrence. “The Leaderless Nexus: When Crime and Terror Converge.Cronin. Attacking Terrorism: Elements of a Grand Strategy. G. Diebert. and J. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press. “Briefing: the Pan-Sahel Initiative. “Left-Wing Terrorism in Italy. 2007.” Dialogue IO 1(01): 1-14. Fishman. Najib. 2004. and Tobin Hengsen. 2005.” The Middle East Journal: 592-612. 2004. Fawaz. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.” New Political Science 22(1): 77-88. 2007. Brian. Graen. “Is Southeast Asia the Second Front?.C. Della Porta. D. Available at: http://oai. Dickson. “Hacking Networks of Terror.dtic. Gershman. Washington. George B. and Mary Uhl-Bien.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 30(7): 593-613. 2008]. Christine. “Using the Mistakes of al Qaeda's Franchises to Undermine Its Strategies. Felter. Audrey. Ghadbian.. Ellis. Joe et al. 2005. 2002. Freedman. Counterterrorism Center. 109 . “The End of the Islamist Insurgency in Egypt?: Costs and Prospects. 1995. 2000. “Terrorism as a Strategy. Dishman. Gerges.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 28(3): 237-252. 2000. Kevin.” In Terrorism in Context.” Foreign Affairs 81(4): 60-74. Harmony and Disharmony: Exploiting al-Qa'ida's Organizational Vulnerabilities. Desouza. “Political Islam and violence. 2004. John. Stephen. Political Islam in Sub-Saharan Africa.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 618(1): 46. Stein. Chris. Fair. R. “Connectivity among Terrorist Groups: A Two Models Business Maturity Approach.” African Affairs 103(412): 459-464.” Government and Opposition 42(3): 314339. and James Ludes. 2008. J.” The Leadership Quarterly 6(2): 9 [Accessed December 4. “Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. 2006. David. “Militant Recruitment in Pakistan: Implications for Al Qaeda and Other Organizations. Donatella. 1995.: United States Institute for Peace. 2003.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 27(6): 489-504..

. “The Origins of al Qaeda’s Ideology: Implications for US Strategy. Hoffman. B. 2004. 2002. Rohan.” African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 2(4): 091-097. 2008. 2004. Available at: http://weekly. Columbia University Press. Al-Qaïda à la Conquête du Maghreb : Le Terrorisme aux Portes de l'Europe. and Mbin Ali. Hoffman.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 26(6): 429-442. Samuel.usma. “The Clash of Civilizations?. and Chris Wyckloff. 2007. 2005. “Al Qaeda. 2007. D. Combating Terrorism Center: . Inside Terrorism. 2002. 2006. Mohammed. “De-Radicalization Initiatives in Egypt: A Preliminary Insight. Stockham. Mathieu.asp [Accessed December 6. Jebnoun. “The Post-Madrid Face of Al Qaeda. Noureddine. Hoffman. “Algerian Groupe Salafiste de la Predication et le Combat (Salafi Group for Call and Combat. Halawi. Available at: http://ctc.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 27(4): 549-560. Jailan. Gunaratna. Gyves. Bruce.” Parameters 35(1): 69-80.” Strategic Insights 5(8). “The Changing Face of Al Qaeda and the Global War on Terrorism. 2006. and Future Potentialities: An Assessment. “Martyrdom Mythology in Iraq: How Jihadists Frame Suicide Terrorism in Videos and Biographies. Guidère. 2nd ed. 2009]. 110 . Is the Maghreb the “Next Afghanistan"?: Mapping the Radicalization of the Algerian Salafi Jihadist Movement. Henzel. Editions du Rocher. Harmony Database Released Documents: Al Qa'ida Goals and Structure. Bruce. “Time for a Historic Reconciliation?. Hafez. 2006. Huntington. Inside Al Qaeda: Global Network of Terror. 2003. Georgetown University: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies. Rohan. Trends in Terrorism.” Al-Ahram Weekly On-line. 2009. GSPC): An Operational Analysis. and E. Christopher.” The Washington Quarterly 27(3): 91-100. Columbia University Gunaratna. Cliff. 2007.ahram.” Terrorism and Political Violence 19: 95-115. 2008]. Gunaratna. R.htm [Accessed May 19.” Foreign Affairs 72(3): 22-49.Gray. “Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb: the evolution from Algerian Islamism to transnational terror.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 32(4): 277-291.

” : 73. Available at: http://www. 2004. and P. and Political Openness: 209. Policy Exchange. The Hijacking of British Islam. Pauline.” British Journal of Management 17(S1): S81-S103. African Security Review 15(3). 2008. “Looking for the Pattern: Al Qaeda in Southeast Asia--The Genealogy of a Terror Network.cfm [Accessed May 19.” Institute for Security Studies. 2003.” Emergence 5(1): 54-76.M. W. D. Anthony. old strategies. “The Political. new fears in Central Asia. and Organizational Sources of Terrorism. Fort” Foreign Affairs 81(2): 61-70. Kagwanja. 2006. Sarapu. 2006. Luong.” Terrorism. David. 111 . “Targeting the Leadership of Terrorist and Insurgent Movements: Historical Lessons for Contemporary Policy Makers. Langdon. Economic Development. 2003. Kalic. Keats. M.Islamic Group. “Counter-terrorism in the Horn of Africa: New security frontiers. David. 2006. Wells. Lecocq. Thomas H. Ashkanasy. 2007. and M. 2009].” Journal of Public and International Affairs 15. Peter. L. Marie H. 2002. Marion. Lake.” Center for Defense Information.” Journal of Contemporary African Studies 25(1): 141-166.” Strategic Insights 5(8). Denis... Sean. Schrijver. B. Russ. E.cdi. “New friends. 2002. A. and Neal M.L. “In the Spotlight: Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya . 2002. “An Introduction to a Special Issue of Strategic Insights: Analyses of the Groupe Salafiste pour la Prédication et le Combat (GSPC) . Economic. Kansas: Combat Studies Institute. “The Impact of Leadership and Change Management Strategy on Organizational Culture and Individual Acceptance of Change during a Merger. and Erika Weinthal. Combating a Modern Hydra Al Qaeda and the Global War on Terrorism. “Complexity theory and Al-Qaeda: Examining complex leadership. and Jacob Shapiro. 2005. Smith. Weeding. 2003. J. Kavanagh.. “The Shadow of Muhammad: Developing a Charismatic Leadership Model for the Islamic World..R. 2007. “The War on Terror in a Haze of Dust: Potholes and Pitfalls on the Saharan Front. and Mary Uhl-Bien.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 26(6): 443-457. Jones.” Dialogue IO 1(01): 15-29. Kostrzebski. Laitin. “Rational Extremism: Understanding Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century.Johnson. MacEoin. and M.

. Angel et al. Sprinzak. 2007. and L. 2002. Moss.Emergence. Michael. and Terror. “Altruism and fatalism: The characteristics of Palestinian suicide [Accessed May 18. “The terrorists in their own words: Interviews with 35 incarcerated Middle Eastern terrorists. and Alliances: Creating an Effective Transition Structure. Russ. and Mary Uhl-Bien. “Winning the Battle of Ideas: Propaganda. Russ. “Al Qaeda Strikes Back. Weinberg. Shaul. Rabasa. “ Al Qaeda and the Innovative Firm: Demythologizing the Network. 2009]. Kenneth. 2008.” Terrorism and Political Violence 15(1): 171-184. Mishal. Available at: http://www. George. “Leadership in complex organizations.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 28(4): 275-293.” Organizational Dynamics 28(3): 35-47. 1949-99.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 32(2): 367-386.” Defense Studies 7(3): 338-357.iht. Available at: http://www.” International Herald Tribune. 2005. The Outer Rings of the Terrorist Universe.php?page=2 [Accessed March 17. 2004. 2006. “Managing Mergers. 2005. “In Algeria. M. A. 2009. and Maoz Rosenthal. insurgents gain a lifeline from Al Qaeda . Michael. E. Perliger. “Unilateral presidential powers: Significant executive orders. Mitchell. “Beyond Al Qaeda: Part 2. Kenneth.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 27(4): 297-319. 2000. Bruce.” Emergence 5(1): 54-76. Mayer. One Single EU Border. McAllister.” Riedel. and L. 2003. and Kevin Price. Bruce. Post. Ideology. and Mary Uhl-Bien. Marion. and Phillip Mirvis.” Foreign Affairs 86(3): 24-40. Euractiv.euractiv. Denny. 2006. 2009].” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 32(2): 109-128. A. 112 . 2001. J. 2007. M. “The Legend and Legacy of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. 2003. “Al Qaeda as a Dune Organization: Toward a Typology of Islamic Terrorist Organizations.” Deviant Behavior 24(4): 405-424. Acquisitions.” The Leadership Quarterly 12(4): 389-418. “Complexity Theory and Al-Qaeda: Examining Complex Leadership . Payne..

“An economic perspective on transnational terrorism. Sederberg. “Islamic "New Social Movements"? Radical Islam. “Post-Islamist Rumblings in Egypt: The Emergence of the Wasat party. Steven.” Foreign Affairs 82(4): 27-40. 2005. J. and Future. Joint Special Operations University. Enders. Jessica.” First Monday 10(3). “Protean Enemy. and W. Shapiro.. Rogers. “Al Qaeda and its affiliates: A global tribe waging segmental warfare?. 2006. “Istishad as an Ideological and Practical Tool in the Hands of AlQaeda. Turbiville. 2008. Guido. Control.” Strategic Insights. Joshua. The Search for al Qaeda: Its Leadership. Ray. Ross.” Foreign Affairs 83(1): 15-21. Securitizing Migration after 11 March. 2002. Schweitzer. Yamatz. Leaderless Jihad: Terror Networks in the Twenty-First Century. Stanford University: Center for International Security and Cooperation. 2007. Phillip. 2004. Ideology. 2007. 1995. “Conciliation as Counter-Terrorist Strategy. Stacher. Understanding Terror Networks. 2003. Bruce. The Terrorist's Challenge: Security.” The Washington Quarterly 25(3): 97-108. 2002. Stern. “Do Terrorist Networks Need a Home?. 2008. T. Marc. Sutton. Marc. Brookings Institution Press.Riedel. 2004. Real Instituto El Cano. University of Pennsylvania Press. “A Turkish al-Qaeda: The Islamic Jihad Union and the Internationalization of Uzbek Jihadism. Takeyh.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 11(1): 101-115. David.” Journal of Peace Research: 295-312. 2008. Sageman. Efficiency. Sageman. and Stephen Vertigans. Steinberg. 2003.” Journal of National Defense Studies 6: 25. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Ronfeldt. N. James. Peter. and Nikolas Gvosdev. 2008. 113 . Hunting Leadership Targets in Counterinsurgency and Counterterrorist Operations. Al-Qa'ida and Social Movement Theory. “Beyond the Abu Sayyaf. Sandler. 2004. Graham. The.” The Middle East Journal: 415-432.” European Journal of Political Economy 20(2): 301-316.

” Terrorism Focus 3(35). 1968. Terrorism Monitor 4: 15. 114 . 2006. “Somalia’s ICU and Its Roots in al-Ittihad al-Islami.” International Organizations Law Review 4(2): 321-342. ews%5BbackPid%5D=239&no_cache=1 [Accessed January 1. Ward. 2005. 2007. 2008. Rene. Vintage. Lawrence. “International Law as Administration: The UN's 1267 sanctions Committee and the Making of the War on terror. Chris.Uruena.” Jamestown Foundation. Weber. The Looming Tower: Al Qaeda and the Road to 9/11. Zambelis. Blake . “Egyptian Gama'a al-Islamiyya's Public Relations Campaign . Sunguta. 2006. University of Chicago Press. Max. 2009]. Available at: http://www. On Charisma and Institution Building. Osama's Wake: The Second Generation of Al Qaeda.jamestown. United States Air Force Counterproliferation Center. Wright.

Appendix I: List of Terrorist Groups Merger al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at al-Tawhid walJihad) Egyptian Islamic Jihad al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat) Libyan Islamic Fighting Group Partnership Ansar al-Islam/Jund alIslam/Ansar al-Sunnah Asbat al-Ansar Taliban Islamic Jihad Union Lashkar-e-Jhangvi Lashkar-e-Taiba Tunisian Combatant Group Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group Jemaah Islamiya Abu Sayyaf Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahidin Jaish-e-Mohammad al-Ittihaad al-Islami Eritrean Islamic Jihad Movement Collaboration Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan Yemen Islamic Jihad Aden Abyan Islamic Army Unaffiliated (Control) Al-Gama’a alIslamiyya 115 .

S. Kaplan. 2009]. 2009].nytimes.” The Situation Room.html [Accessed January 2. U.” U.” New York Times.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=16576&Itemid=131 [Accessed January 2.aspx?briefingslideid=309 [Accessed January 2. and Jonathan Finer.html [Accessed March “Starr Reports Live from Ramadi Iraq. MSNBC.html [Accessed January 2. Smith. 2006. 2009]. Karouny. 2009]. 2009]. Available at: Blitzer.S.aspx?id=16029 [Accessed January 3. New York: Free Press. 2009].msn. “Al Qaeda in Iraq Chooses Zarqawi Successor. Jim.” Operation Iraq Freedom: Official Website of the Multi-National Force . Available at: “Abu Hamza al-Muhajir. 2008. Knickmeyer.defenselink. 2007. and Mark Mazzetti. New Al-Qaida in Iraq Leader Reported . 2006a. Department of Defense.” The Times of London.” Backgrounder. 2009]. 2007. Zarqawi's Mysterious Successor (aka Abu Ayub al-Masri) . “The Mysterious Heir to al-Zarqawi . Peter L. 116 . Mariam. 2009].” The Washington Post: A22. 2008. Multinational Force .” The Washington Knickmeyer. 2006. “Al-Qaeda in Iraq Leader May Be in” The Washington Post. 2007.125. Pam. 2006a. and Jonathan Finer. Paley. Department of Defense.pdf+khalid+almashadani&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=24&gl=us&client=firefox-a [Accessed January 2. “Shadowy Trail of al-Qaida in Iraq Leader.cjtf7. 2007. Available at: MNF-I Press Brief – Operational Update . Available at: http://www. Bergner. Coalition Officials Say. Ellen.Iraq. Available at: http://www.html [Accessed March 4. “President Links Qaeda of Iraq to Qaeda of 9/11. Kevin. “Insurgent Leader Al-Zarqawi Killed in Iraq. Gannon. Jim.defenselink.S.Appendix II: Sources by Terrorist Group Al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at alTawhid wal-Jihad) [Accessed March 4. “Al-Qaeda in Iraq Update. 2009]. Available at: [Accessed March 4. 2009].” CNN. 2006b. “Maliki Aide Who Discussed Amnesty Leaves Job.Iraq. 2009]. Available at: http://www. 2009]. Parker. Available at: http://www.msnbc.washingtonpost. Garamone. Bergen.02. Rutenberg. 2006. and Ibon Villelabeitia. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www.timesonline. The Osama Bin Laden I Know. Ned. Amit. and Rana Gargour-Sabbagh.” Boston. “Masri Now Leads Iraq Al Qaeda. Available at: http://transcripts. Gregory. Available at: http://www.: Senior al Qaeda in Iraq Leader Held. 2009]. “U.” The Washington Post: A01.ece [Accessed March [Accessed January 2006. DoD News [Accessed January 2. [Accessed March 3. Laura. Says al Qaeda in Iraq Leader Not Captured. 2006. Available at: http://www.” The Telegraph.” CNN. David. Mansfield. Al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la Prédication et le Combat) Algeria: Violence Returns. Available at: http://www. 2009].html [Accessed January 14. Raphaeli. Egyptian Islamic Jihad Al-Zayat. “Ayman Muhammad Rabi’Al-Zawahiri: The Making of an Arch-Terrorist.start. His Own Words: A Translation of the Writings of Dr. Bergen.S. 2006. Available at: http://www.17049. “Al-Qaida in Iraq Figure in Custody : NPR. 2009].1187180. 2009]. Black. African Research Bulletin (23): 17045 . The Al Qaeda Reader. 2006.” Council on Foreign 2006.” Time. 2002. 2002. 2009]. and A.” National Public Radio.” The New Yorker.Tawfeeq. Nimrod. and John Burnett. 2007. Egyptian Islamic Jihad. Zawahiri. Available at: http://www. 2009b.html [Accessed April 8. [Accessed January 14. Available at: http://www.Council on Foreign Relations. New York: Taylor & 2008. Ibrahim.html [Accessed March 12. “U. Peter. Lee Hudson.” Terrorism and Political Violence 14(4): 1-22. 117 .alqaedafree/index. CNN Programs. “L’Afrique et la «guerre contre la terreur». 2007. Blair.telegraph. 2009]. 2007.. 2007. “Al-Qaeda Founder Launches Fierce Attack on Osama bin Laden.asp?id=5832 [Accessed January 14. Hudson Teslik. Ayman Al Zawahiri. Teslik. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. L.” Wall Street Journal. Andrew. Available at: http://www. Tore. Linda. “Profile: Ayman al-Zawahiri.html [Accessed March 4. Wertheimer. 2009].” Politique étrangère 3. Ayman al-Zawahiri. 2009].” Council on Foreign Relations.telegraph. David. Bjorgo. “Ayman al-Zawahiri. Higgins. Cairo: Dar Raymond.” Terrorism Monitor 5(2): 7-12. Lee. 2002. 2009]. Cullison.cnn.time. 2006. M. Available at: http://www. “The Rebellion Within. 2009]. Ayman Al-Zawahiri Kamaa Aaraftu/Ayman Al-Zawahiri As I Knew Him. Blair.npr. Available at: http://www. TLG Publications. Mohammed et al. “Terrorist’s Odyssey: Saga of Dr. Antil. “Al-Qaeda Founder Launches Fierce Attack on Osama bin Laden . Available at: http://www. “The Reconstituted Al-Qaeda Threat in the Maghreb.cfr.” The Telegraph. 2008. “Profile: Abu Musab al-Zarqawi . New York: Broadway. Leaving Terrorism Behind.00. Wright.php?storyId=12060238 [Accessed January [Accessed March 11. A.9171.

co. Now. Hafez. Laetitia Bucaille.” Strategic Insights 5(8). and D.” African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 2(4): 091-097.” Strategic Insights 5(8). “An Interview with Abdelmalek Droukdal. “Global Jihadism After the Iraq War. 2006. and E. Norwegian Defence Research Establishment. “The War on Terror in a Haze of Dust: Potholes and Pitfalls on the Saharan Front. “In Algeria.iht. Intelligence Brief: Al-Qaeda's New Strategy in North Africa. Peter.php?ac=view_report&report_id=641&language_id=1 [Accessed March 5. Old Strategies. Rogan. Cliff. Gilles. Anthony.. Henzel. 2006. 2009]. Jihadism Online: A Study of how Al-Qaida and Radical Islamist Groups Use the Internet for Terrorist Purposes. Ellis. Available at: http://news. Filiu. Moss. “Algerian Groupe Salafiste de la Predication et le Combat (Salafi Group for Call and Combat. Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam. H. The Enigma of Islamist Violence. Thomas H. and Chris Wyckloff. Kagwanja.” BBC News. 2008. Amelie. Power and Interest News Report. “Al Qaeda in the Maghreb: The" Newest" Front in the War on Terror. Ib tauris.Blom. Jebnoun. Hanna. 2009.” Journal of Contemporary African Studies 25(1): Mohammed.” Middle East Journal 60(1): 11. and Louis Martínez.” Parameters 35(1): 69-80. The GSPC: Newest Franchise in al-Qa'ida's Global Jihad. Noureddine.” The Middle East Journal 63(2): 213-226. West Point Military Academy. A. Jean Pierre. 2004. Available at: http://www. “Briefing: the Pan-Sahel Initiative. 2009]. 2009]. 2007. 2007. Stephen. Gyves.” International Herald Tribune. 2007. “The Origins of al Qaeda’s Ideology: Implications for US Strategy.. “The Local and Global Jihad of al-Qa ‘ida in the Islamic Maghreb. 2007. Kepel. Mekhennet. insurgents gain a lifeline from Al Qaeda . Mohamed arezki. “Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb: the Evolution from Algerian Islamism to Transnational Terror. 2006. GSPC): An Operational Analysis. “New Chief for Algeria's Islamists. Johnson.” African Affairs 103(412): 459-464.stm [Accessed March 5. 2006. Hegghammer. Michael. Is the Maghreb the “Next Afghanistan"?: Mapping the Radicalization of the Algerian Salafi Jihadist Movement. T.pinr. Available at: http://www. Georgetown University: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies.” New York Times . “Counter-Terrorism in the Horn of Africa: New Security Frontiers. B.nytimes.” Mediterranean Quarterly 19(1): 80. 2006. 2008. 118 . 2005. Available at: http://www. 2008. 2008. Lecocq. 2006.” New York Times. Squad et al. Droukdal.” Terrorism and Political Violence 19: 95-115. London: C Hurst & Co Publishers Ltd. Celso. Christopher. and P.php?page=2 [Accessed March 17. African Security Review 15(3).com/articles/2008/07/01/africa/ Gray. 2008. Stockham. Himeur.html?_r=1 [Accessed March 5. Boudali.” Institute for Security 2007. 2007. “Ragtag Insurgency Gains a Lifeline . “An Introduction to a Special Issue of Strategic Insights: Analyses of the Groupe Salafiste pour la Prédication et le Combat (GSPC) . Schrijver. 2009]. Liane Kennedy. 2004. “Martyrdom Mythology in Iraq: How Jihadists Frame Suicide Terrorism in Videos and Biographies.

Luis.asp?id=5862 [Accessed January 26. 2009]. Available at: http://yalibnan. Michael. Osama's Wake: The Second Generation of Al Qaeda.” Mediterranean Politics 12(3): 407-413. Negroponte. 2009]. Pargeter. 2007. Libyan Islamic Fighting Group Clark. 2006.php [Accessed February 27. “Combating Terrorist Networks: An Evolutionary Approach.start.” Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 12(1): 7-20. New York: Columbia Univ Press. 2007. “Libya: Reforming the Impossible?.” Counterterrorism Blog. The Failure of Political Islam. 2007. Pargeter. Al-Qa'ida's Foreign Fighters in Iraq: A First Look at the Sinjar Records. Luis. 2008.” Terrorism Monitor 3(6). 1996.umd. Felter. Annual Threat Assessment of the Director of National Intelligence for the Senate Select Committee on Gambil. 2005. 2009]. Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. “Libya: The Conversion of a ‘Terrorist State’. Ward. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. Boston: Harvard University Press. 2006. Kohlmann. 2006a. “$50. [Accessed January 23..php [Accessed February 27. Martínez. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. 2006.asp?id=4400 [Accessed January 23. Evan. “Istishad as an Ideological and Practical Tool in the Hands of Al-Qaeda. Martinez. Available at: http://counterterrorismblog. Sutton. Available at: http://www. John. “Between the ‘Near’ and the ‘Far’ Enemy: Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb. 2007. Al-Qa'ida and Social Movement Theory. 119 . Schweitzer. “In the Spotlight: The Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG). and Brian Fishman. 2009]. Ansar al-Islam/Jund al-Islam/Ansar al-Sunnah Ansar al-Islam.Roy. Alison. The Libyan Paradox. and I. Counterterrorism” Mediterranean Politics 11(2): 151-165. Goolsby.” Review of African Political Economy 33(108): 219235.” Journal of National Defense Studies 6: 25. G. Available at: http://www. Blake .umd. “Islamic "New Social Movements"? Radical Islam. Available at: http://www. Olivier. Werenfels. Available at: http://www. and Stephen Vertigans.000 Reward Announced for Ansar al-Sunnah Commander in Iraq. National Intelligence Council. Joseph. and John King.cfm?DocumentID=2836&IssueID=56&StartRow=1&ListRows=10&ap pendURL=&Orderby=DateLastUpdated&ProgramID=39&issueID=56 [Accessed May 20. “Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. 2006. United States Air Force Counterproliferation Center. Alison.start. Yamatz. Ya Libnan.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 29(8): 731-747.” Center for Defense Information. Lebanon's Fatah al-Islam leadership & 2007. 2009].” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 11(1): 101-115. 2005.cdi. Phillip. and Carol Volk. “North African immigrants in Europe and political violence. Steinberg. Gary. 2009].

“Ansar al-Islam: Back in Iraq . Gary.” Global 2006. Press Room . 2009]. “Mullah Krekar 2009]. “Ahmad Abd al-Karim al-Sadi. Available at: http://209. Available at: Parliamentary Joint Committee on ASIO.investigativeproject. 2009].” Available at: http://www.aei. Rubin. Jonathan. 2009]. 2003. Schanzer. Available at: http://www. 2009]. Courting Public Opinion. and Charlie subs/sub5.173. 2002. John. Asbat al-Ansar Asbat Al Ansar. 120 .mullahomar/index. 2009].nu/archives/057937.” Perspectives on World History and Current Evens. 2009].org/profile/127 [Accessed February 28. Peter. BBC. 2009].US Department of the Treasury.html [Accessed February 27. 2009].ciaonet.pdf+Asbat+al-Ansar+AND+leadership&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=15&gl=us&client=firefox-a [Accessed January 26.aph. Schanzer. Michael. 2004. Asbat al-Ansar (Lebanon) .org/security/profiles/ Available at: http://www. “Description des groupes terroristes criminalisés par le Canada. Available at: http://www. Gambill. 2005. Available at: 2009].com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/09/09/pakistan. Available at: http://news.” CNN. Available at: http://nationalsecurity.html [Accessed May 19.132/search? “Ansar 2005. [Accessed May 19. 2004. Taliban “Asbat al-Ansar .” Équipe de recherche sur le terrorism et l'antiterrorisme. ASIS & DSD .php [Accessed January 26. Shackleford. 2009].Jane's World Insurgency and Terrorism.globalpolitician. “Army of Ansar al-Sunnah Website Update. “Salafi-jihadism in Lebanon. 2008. 2009].” Middle East Quarterly 11(1). Treasury Designates Individual Financially Fueling Iraqi Insurgency. Rusty.html [Accessed January 26. 2004.” The Jawa Report: .” he Investigative Project on Terrorism. Available at: [Accessed February US Department of State.” American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.janes. Gregory. 2009]. Available at: [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://www. al Qaida. Available at: http://mypetjawa.Oslo court rejects mullah [Accessed May 19. Anderson Cooper. 2004.cnn. Available at: http://www.85. 2005.stm [Accessed May Gomez del Prado.html [Accessed March 10. Available at: errorism_Organisations_Asbat_al-Ansar [Accessed May 19. 2008. 2009]. Ansar Al-Islam: Postmortem or Prelude to More Attacks? The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. “Mullah Omar in Pakistan . Maclean's 115(34): 12.treas. Stanley. 2009. Trevor.htm [Accessed May 19. Jonathan.htm [Accessed February 28. Pike.pwhce. . 2009].

Oxygen. BBC News. Nichol. Tim. Congressional Research Service. 2002. Lashkar-e-Jhangvi Ahmed. Washington. Madrid: Fundación José Ortega y 2004.php?t=TP&st=D&no=4 [Accessed May 19. Islamist Terrorism in Greater Central Asia: The" Al-Qaedaization" of Uzbek Jihadism. Michael. “Counterinsurgency. “Islam's Medieval Outposts. Counterterrorism. Didier. Behuria. and Chris Mason. State-building and Security Cooperation in Central Asia. “The Reclusive Ruler who Runs the Taliban .htm.” In Proceedings of the Forty-eighth Pugwash Conference on Science and World Affairs. K. Central Asia: Regional Developments and Implications for US Interests. JIhadist Terrorism in Turkey. “Musharraf et les islamistes. Guido. “The Taliban Papers. Profile: Mullah Mohammed Omar. Available at: http://kashmirherald. Johnson.” The Telegraph. 2005. 2009. 2007. Husain. “Indo-Pak Détente: Sustainable Ambiguity. “Al Qaeda in the Tribal Areas of Pakistan and 2001. “Annual Threat Assessment of the Director of National Intelligence for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. A Turkish al-Qaeda: The Islamic Jihad Union and the Internationalization of Uzbek Jihadism.” South Asia Journal. 2009]. Kartha. Rohan. Marquand. “Tinder.” Etudes 399(2003/7): 9-16. 187.” Survival 50(6): 183-192. Thomas. and Fuel: The Mysterious Rise of the Taliban. p.” The Christian Science Monitor. 2008. Robert.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 31(9): 775-807. Pantucci.” Journal of Peace Research 44(1): “Sunni-Shia relations in Pakistan: The widening divide. 2001.” In National Intelligence Council. 121 . . Mihalka. 2005. and Anders Nielsen. Available at: http://news. Christina. Lashkar-e-Jhangvi. Jim. Christophe. 2007.” Foreign Policy: 58-64. Mexico: World 2009]. Lamb.” Survival 44(1): 69-80. 2009]. Raffaello. D. Available at: http://www.0. 1998.southasianmedia. Steinberg. Available at: http://www. “Understanding the Taliban and Insurgency in Afghanistan. 131-152.” Strategic Analysis 28(1):” Orbis 51(1): 71-89. Steinberg. 2006. Spark.telegraph. D. p.stm [Accessed March 10. Islamic Jihad Union Chaudet.Haqqani.html [Accessed March 10. Tara. Ashok. 2008. “Who is the Real Mullah Omar?. 2001. Jurica. Guido. Sullivan. Kashmir Herald.C. 2009]. “The Long Roads to Peace. Judah. Center for Contemporary Conflict. Paris: Institut Français des Relations Internationales. 2008. P. Available at: http://www. 2002. “Al-Qaeda 2. Jaffrelot. 2003. John. 2006.” In The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly.html [Accessed March Negroponte.

2005. and S.” Police Practice and Research 6(2): 141-164.stm [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://www. “Pakistan police detain founder of Lashkar-e-Taiba militant group | World news | guardian. “Achieving a Global Community.memri. The ISI.” Asia Pacific Education Review 6(1):” The Washington Quarterly 27(3): Wilson. 2002 “The regional dimension of sectarian conflicts in Pakistan.satp. and the Rise of Sectarian Militancy in Pakistan. 2001.” Writenet for “Islamic Radicalism in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Lashkar-e-Taiba Bharadwaj. The Middle East Media Research Institute. Available at: http://abcnews. New Delhi: Pentagon Press. 122 . Kalyanaraman. 2007. Available at: http://www. 2005. Shah. 2008. “Can Pakistan be ‘neutral’in the war against terrorism?. Lee. 2009]. Available at: http://www. “Lashkar-e-Toiba: new Threats Posed by an Old Organization. “Humanization of education in Pakistan through Freire’s Concept of Literacy. ABC News.aawsat.Lashkar-e-Jhangvi. the State. Nazir. Mehtab Ali.” In Pakistan: Nationalism without a Nation. 2005.jamestown. “Lashkar-e-Jhangvi: Sectarian Violence in Pakistan and Ties to International Terrorism.cgi?Area=sd&ID=SP214308&Page=archives [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://news. 2002. 2009]. “Sectarianism—A threat to human security: A case study of Pakistan. John. BBC. Atul.htm [Accessed January 28. “Defeating Terrorism: A Study of Operational Strategy and Tactics of Police Forces in Jammu & Kashmir (India).org/single/?no_cache=1&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=497 [Accessed May 19.” In Pakistan: Nationalism without a Even Al-Qaeda'.com/International/Story?id=80271&page=2 [Accessed May 19.” The Good Society 14(3). John. Olivier. Terrorist Group of Pakistan. Raja. Glendinning. V. Yateendra.” Asharq Alawsat Newspaper. Roul. Mariam. 2009]. Realistically. Roy. 2009].asp?section=3&id=14953 [Accessed January 29.” Terrorism Monitor 3(4).” Strategic Analysis 26(1): 170-173. 2005. S. Available at: [Accessed May 19. 2009]. Pakistan Freezes Militant [Accessed January 29. Umer. Key Figures in Kashmir Nikolas. R. Available at: http://www. 2008. “The Two Faces of Lashkar-e-Taiba . Gvosdev. 2009].” Terrorism Monitor 3(11). 2005. Nasr. Jafa. “Regional Implications of Shi'a Revival in Iraq. Zed Books. Farooq. p. Abou Zahab.go.” The Guardian Online. Available at: http://www. Animesh. 115. The General and Jihad. “Islam. Wilson. 2002. 2008.” The Round Table 94(382): 613-628. Jamaatud Dawa Leader: 'Indians Will Continue to Mislead the World Community By Linking Us to Lashkar[-e Taiba]. 85-114. Vali. 2005. Zed Books. 2009]. p. 2009].

2009]. 2001. Available at: http://www.cdi. D. John.. Available at: http://www. “Tunisia: Trading Freedom for Stability May Not Last–An International Security Perspective.htm [Accessed May 20. Juan Jose Escobar. Ahmed. New York 2005. Blake Mobley.An Apology. Karthala Editions. Washington. 2004. 2004. “Terrorist Outlaws – or a Group with Friends in High Places? . Benjamin.ustreas. Greenwood Publishing Group. “Islamist Militancy in Kashmir: The Case of Lashkar-i-Tayyeba.” The Middle East Review of International Affairs 10(3). Kim. Available at: http://news. Hudson Institute.” Terrorism Focus 2(6). 2006.” Defence Studies 9(1): 85-92. La Mouvance Islamiste au Maroc: du 11 Septembre 2001 aux Attentats de Casablanca du 16 Mai 2003. El Guerbouzi . Available at: [Accessed May 19. Sikand. The Tunisian Combatant Group (TCG). “The Origins of Militancy and Salafism in Morocco. The Moroccan Combatant Group. Federation of American Scientists.cfm?DocumentID=2227&from_page=. “Non African Involvement in Transnational Terror Networks: Terrorism in the Maghreb .org/security/profiles/tunisian_combatant_group. Available at: http://www. 2005. Global Security. Alejandro.independent. Center for Policing Terrorism .” PS: Political Science and Politics 41(01): 19-24. Sikand. US Department of the Treasury. “Variations on a Theme: Radical Violent Islamism and European North African Radicalization. 2002. Available at: http://www.C. Chaarani./index.cfm [Accessed May 19. 2009]. [Accessed May 20.stm [Accessed May 19. “Tunisian Government Threatened by Islamist Group.globalsecurity. The Politics and Economics of Organized Crime and Terrorism in Europe. Ulph. Darif. 2005. Stephen. “Middle East Salafism’s Influence and the Radicalization of Muslim Communities in Europe.” Terrorism Monitor 3(12): June 17. Tunisian Combatant Group. 2009].co. 2004. 2004. 2008. 2008. Clark. PO-3380: The United States and Italy Designate Twenty-Five New Financiers of Terror. Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group Botha. and Erin Rosenbach.” In The Practice of War: Production. p. Anouar. Sanchez. Anthony H.fas.” The Independent. Jonathan. BBC.” Center for Defense Information. Analisis del Real Instituto. The Military Balance in the Middle East. 2004. Tunisian Combatant Group Assets of Tunisia Group Are Stemmann. 2009. 2006. 2009]. “Changing Course of Kashmiri Struggle: From National Liberation to Islamist Jihad?. “In the Spotlight: Moroccan Combatant Group (GICM). 2002. Cordesman.: RAND Corporation.htm [Accessed May 20. Mohamed.” Economic and Political Weekly: 218-227. 2008. 2009]. Yoginder.” 2007. GSPC Dossier. Anneli. Reproduction and Communication of Armed Violence. 123 . Keating. 2009]. Githens-Mazer. 215.

Available at: http://www. Peter. Emmers.” Southeast Asian Affairs: 123-145. Gershman.go. The London bombings and the broader strategic context.homelandsecurityus. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. 2009]. 2009].com/2005/03/04/international/asia/04indo. Real Instituto Elcano. 2004. Thomas.” Terrorism and Political Violence 20(2): 234-256. 2008. 2009].. Gelling. Available at: http://www. “Freed Cleric Is Hailed by Students. Bonner.” The New York Times. John. Available at: http://abcnews. 2005. “Indonesia's Year of Living Normally.” New York Times.” Foreign Affairs 84(4): 120-35. “Abu Dujana.” Newsweek. Available at: http://www. Zachary. Van Biezen. Peter. 2005.htm [Accessed January 26.” New York Times. Barry. 2007. Barton. and Stryker McGuire. Jemaah Islamiyah Abuza. “U. 124 . Moroccan Group "Derivative Structure" of Al Qaeda. Indonesian Police Confirm. “ Southeast Asian Terrorist Leader Is Under Arrest. “Terror at Rush Hour. “How did Europe's Global Jihadis Obtain Training for their Militant Causes?.start. Gelling. “Is Southeast Asia the Second Front?. 2009].edu/data/tops/terrorist_organization_profile. Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group. Gelling. 2004. “Tentacles of Terror: Al Qaeda's Southeast Asian Network.middleeast-online.asp?id=4341 [Accessed January 28. 2006. Democracy isn’t Enough. Robert. 2007. Desker. Available at: http://www. “Europe's Angry Muslims. Zachary. Middle East Online.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 24(3): 427-466.Leiken.nytimes. Available at: http://www.” HomelandSecurityUS.ABC News. The Mediterranean Region and International Terrorism: A New Framework for Cooperation. Pressure to Hold Militant Sets Off Outcry in Indonesia.html [Accessed May 19. 2006. 2009]. Bonner. Madrid: Real Institute Elcano.umd. [Accessed May 19. 2008. 2005.” Mediterranean Politics 10(1): 99-108. P. Evan. “Terrorism and Democratic Legitimacy: Conflicting Interpretations of the Spanish Elections. 2006.” The New York Times.S. Fernando. 2005.html?_r=1&scp=4&sq=Abu+Bakar+Bashir&st=nyt [Accessed May 19. Ranstorp. but Support Could Be Waning. [Accessed May 19. 2005. Raymond. “Islam and society in South-East Asia after 11 September. 2008.” The Pacific Review 22(2). Atran.. 2009].Net. R. Ingrid. 2009. The Insider: Daily Terrorism Report . Peter. Magnus. “Indonesia Reports the Arrest of a 2nd Top Terrorism Suspect. 2005. 2002.” New York Times.” New York Times. Abuzza. “Comprehensive Security and Resilience in Southeast Asia: ASEAN's Approach to Terrorism and Sea Piracy. 2002.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 56(3): 383-394. 2002. Reinares. “Radical Cleric in Indonesia Is Acquitted of Terrorism. “In Indonesia.” Foreign Affairs 81(4): 60-74.nytimes.

Disarming the Bearer of the Sword: Delinking the Abu Sayyaf From the Global Insurgency.” Sudostasia 26(5): Magouirk. Tomsa.a. Available at: http://www. Abu Sayyaf Abuza. 2003. “Rule of Law. “The War on Terrorism in Southeast Asia.” In the Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia. “From a Counter-Society to a Counter-State Movement: Jemaah Islamiyah According to PUPJI.” Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict 99999(1): 1-17. “Jemaah Islamiyah's Radical Madrassah Networks. “The Challenge of Militant Islam and Terrorism in Indonesia. 2009].” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 30(9): 777-800. Forvarets Forskninginstittut. Jemaah Islamiah) . Singh. “Jemaah Islamiyah after the Recent Wave of Arrests: How Much Danger Remains? .uk/2/hi/talking_point/3091594. Dirk. 2008.cfr. Dana.: The Heritage Foundation. and Scott Atran. Despite Improvement.C.stm [Accessed May 19. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. 2007.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 29(4): 323-342. 2009]. and Paolo Pasicolan. Pavlova. Southeast Asia and the War Against” Asia Pacific Viewpoint 48(1): 128-144. 2004. Nesser.html [Accessed January 22. 2008. Naval War College. J. 2001. 2009]. Elmer. Brynhar. 2006.” Asian Survey 48(1): 38-46. Harvey. Bali-terrorism: the return of the Abu Sayyaf. “Jihadism in Western Europe After the Invasion of Iraq: Tracing Motivational Influences from the Iraq War on Jihadist Terrorism in Western Europe. Dillon. . Roggio.” The Long War Journal. Rachel. 2008.” Asian Journal of Political Science 13(1): 109-138.” BBC.k.asp?id=6370 [Accessed January 21. Anti-Terrorism and Militant Islam: Coping with Threats to Democratic Pluralism and National Unity in Indonesia. Council on Foreign Relations. 2004. 2006. Available at: FFI explains al-Qaida document. 2007. Bill. Anti-Corruption. Available at: http://www. “The State-Moro Armed Conflict in the Philippines Unresolved National Question or Question of Governance?. 2004. “ In Pictures: Jemaah Islamiyah's Leadership.” Fragility and Crisis: 320-363. Nagma. and Thomas Hegghammer. Available at: http://news.umd. Available at: http://news. 2005. Petter. Jemaah [Accessed January 22. Espin-Digon. Kingsbury. 2008. Buendia. Abuza. Zachary. Bilveer. Elena. Lia. 2009]. 2009]. and Nick Grace. Geoffrey.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 58(1): 47-68. R. Donnelly. BBC. “Islam's role in Indonesia. “Terrorism in the Southern Philippines: Contextualizing the Abu Sayyaf Group as an Islamist Secessionist Organization. 2007. Profile: Abu Bakar Ba'asyir. G. 2006. Julio et al.longwarjournal. 2008. “Indonesia in 2007: Unmet Expectations. New York: CRC Press. Washington. 125 . Jemaah Islamiyah (a. Lloyd's MIU handbook of maritime security. and (US).stm [Accessed May 19. Zachary.. Strategic Studies Institute.

2002. 2006. Torres. “The Abu Sayyaf and Khadaffy Janjalani. Lumpkin.” Global Security. 2009].ph/?m=12&fi=p070903. 2009]. 2002.htm [Accessed April 9. Niksch.globalsecurity. Australian National Security . 2009]. D. Available at: [Accessed April 9. Yasser Igasan Succeeds Janjalani as Abu Chief . 2009]. Terrorism and Violence in Southeast Asia. “Abdurajak Janjalani Killed.nsf/Page/What_Governments_are_doing_Listing_of_Terrorism_ Organisations_Islamic_Movement_of_Uzbekistan [Accessed January Available at: http://www. [Accessed April 9. Anthony.” SAIS Review 21(2): 65-90. Svante. Schwarz.” International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-): 289-304. 2002.The Heat is On. 126 . 2009]. politics. Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan Cornell. “The Continuation of Civil Unrest and Poverty in Smith. 2008. “Religion. Gunter. 1993. Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan. Available at: “The Southern Philippines: Conflict and Co-operation: Anthony Smith Backgrounds the Separatist Conflict That Has Wracked the Southern Philippines and Discusses the US Military Involvement in the Area. Available at: http://www.” New Zealand International Review 27(6): 24-29. Available at: http://www.htm [Accessed April 9. Larry.” Philippine Information Agency. “Philippines: Abu Sayyaf Group . Available at: http://www. 2002.” Terrorism and Political Violence 14(4): 131-162. 2002.” GMA News. Washington. Menardo. GMA News. 2008.” The Washington Quarterly 25(1): 193-206. “What's Next for Abu Sayyaf?.html [Accessed April 9.pia.rms-gs. Shireen. Alfredo. A. 2009. Ugarte.” Terrorism in the Philippines. Frazie. “Central Asia: More than Islamic Extremists.” Foreign Affairs 83(1): 15-21.htm [Accessed April 9.. Abu Sayyaf: Target of Philippine-US Anti-Terrorism Cooperation. 2001. Anthony. “Beyond the Abu Sayyaf.: Congressional Research Service. Available at: http://www.satp. 1993–2000. “Moving Out of Moscow's Orbit: the Outlook for Central Asia. John. Sahni.” South Asian Terrorism Portal. 2002..C. Jose. 2000.htm&no=34 [Accessed April 9. Smith.” Hunter. New York: ME Sharpe.E. 2004. “Abdurakjak Janjalani. and Regine Spector. 2009]. 2002. “The Abu Sayyaf Group: A Growing Menace to Civil Society. Steven. 2004. and security in Central Asia. “Contemporary History of the Philippines.gmanews.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 31(2): 125-144. Paul J. Available at: http://www. 2009]. Eduardo. Ajai. and Rosalinda Morgado-Schwarz.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 24(1): 33-50.Filler. “The US and the Southern Philippines’ Quagmire. 2007. Daniel Joseph. 2009]. 2007. Hyman. “The Alliance System of the Abu Sayyaf.” RMS & GS.

Available at: Group Threatens Attack on UAE Embassy in Yemen. Available at: http://www. 2009]. and Rakhmonov. 2008.” The Long War Journal.html [Accessed January 21. V. “Police Arrest Members of Alleged Jihadi Financing Network. 2004.jamestown. 2008. “On Visualizing Heterogeneous Semantic Networks from Multiple Data Sources. 2009].Ru Information agency.html [Accessed May 20. Ferghana. Who Is The Yemeni Islamic Jihad Group? . Available at: http://www. “The Fires of Faith in Central Asia. 2009]. Novak.aspx?id=68033&sectionid=351020206 [Accessed May 20.html [Accessed March 12. “US Embassy in Yemen Targeted in Complex Assault. Messages From Terrorist Leaders. Taliban behind the Waziristan Accord. Available at: http://www. Roggio. p. Tazmini. Igor. Available at: http://www. The NEFA Foundation . et al.ferghana. 2003. bin Laden and Iran's hardliners. 2008. Indonesia: Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 2009].htm [Accessed April 8. Available at: http://enews. CBS News.longwarjournal. 2002.html [Accessed January 26.553745. Gulf News. 2008. Presumably. Available at: http://enews. Rashid. Musharbash. 2006.1518.php?id=1864 [Accessed January 21. “al Qaeda. Poonam. 2008. Yassin. Uzbek islamists’ Leader Tahir Yuldashev has been Arrested .” Spiegel Online. Available at: “The Growth of Radical Islam in Central Asia. [Accessed May 20. Bali. 2009].ferghana.” Asia Times Online.html [Accessed April 8. 2007. A.highbeam.” Central Asian Survey 20(1): Ghonchen. Jane.00. Press TV.presstv.” Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies. Naumkin. Daniel. Maureen.nefafoundation. 2009]. “The Islamic Revival in Central Asia: a Potent Force or a Misconception?. 2009].org/military/library/news/2004/03/mil-040330-rferl04.” Global Security. Ahmed. Leader of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan Tahir Yuldashev Threatens Presidents Karimov.globalsecurity. Bakiyev. Yemeni Islamic Jihad Leader 127 .org/single/?no_cache=1&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=26187 [Accessed March 12. 2001. 2003. Islamic Jihad. 2008. Available at: http://www.” The Long War Journal. 2004.” Strategic Analysis 16(2). V. 2009]. Valentinas. “Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan: Will it Strike Back?. Available at: http://www. 2009]. 2009].de/international/europe/0. Mite. Bill. “The Islamic Movement Of Uzbekistan: A Resurgent IMU?. Mann. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www. 2009]. 2009]. Naumkin. 2005.” Terrorism Monitor 1(8).html [Accessed May 20. Ferghana. Available at: http://www. Yemen Islamic Jihad Analysis: Yemen. “Militant Islam in Central Asia: The Case of the Islamic Movement of 266.” In Digital Libraries: Universal and Ubiquitous Access to Information. 2009].” World Policy Journal 18(1): 45-55.Ru Information Agency.gulfnews. “Pakistan: Offensive Against Suspected Militants in South Waziristan Ends.php?id=1595 [Accessed January 21. Radical Islam in Central Asia: between Pen and Rifle. Vitaly. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. United Press International.php [Accessed January 21.

Available at: http://www. 2009]. Library of GST Presented Evidence against &no_cache=1 [Accessed February 4.” The Long War Journal.” Business Line. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. Jane. “Khalid al-Nabi al-Yazidi. Islamic Army of Aden (IAA) .Yemen. [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://www. 2009]. 2009]. Yemeni Militant's Supporters Vow Revenge. Scott. 2006. and Kyle Dabruzzi. Raman. “Jihad's New Leaders. B.' Al Qaeda and the Finsbury Park Mosque . West. K.stm [Accessed May” Middle East Quarterly 14(3): 3-10.umd. BBC.longwarjournal. 2009]. Links to Osama bin Laden and Islamic Jihad. 2009] “Aden-Abyan Islamic Army. Available at: Available at: http://www. 2009]. Stratfor. Available at: http://www. “Sects Within Sect: The Case of Deobandi–Barelvi Encounter in Pakistan. “Inside Jihad U. Yemen: High-Profile Militants Killed and the Yemeni Power Structure .org/archives/2009/03/yemen_new_terror_cam. UN Regufee Agency.asp?id=4 [Accessed January 31.” In Congressional Research Service. John. 2009. 2009]. Available at: http://www. 2009]. Available at: http://news.stratfor. 2009].hinduonnet. India: South Asia Analysis Group. 2009].htm [Accessed May 19. Stratfor.” Science.html [Accessed May 19. Aden Abyan Islamic Army.southasiaanalysis. 2000.” Global Security. A. Cronin. 2004. B.Aden Abyan Islamic Army Amnesty International Report 2000 . The Investigative Project on Terrorism. 2009]. “Dwindling Expectations (vs. Gartenstein-Ross. Available at: http://www. Daveed.” Global Jeffrey. Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahideen Atran. 2000. 1999. 2009. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www. 'Londonistan.” Strategic Analysis 32(1): 57-80. et al. 128 .unhcr.: The Education of a Holy Warrior. 2008. 2005. 2008. 1999.” Terrorism Monitor 4(15). Lumpkin. Novak.” New York Times Magazine 25.html [Accessed May 19. The War on Poverty). Attack on USS Cole: Background. Ashok.YEM. Pike. Available at: http://www.htm [Accessed May 19.globalsecurity. 2009]. 2000.jamestown.globalsecurity. “Somalia's ICU and its Roots in al-Ittihad al-Islami . “Yemen: New Terror Camps as a City Falls to [Accessed May 19. “Attack on USS Cole: Who engineered it?.htm [Accessed May [Accessed April 9. 2009]. John. Sunguta. Available at: http://www.php [Accessed April 9. 2006. “Foreign Terrorist Organizations.AMNESTY. Anti-Defamation League. [Accessed May 19. 2006. Available at: http://www.

nsf/Page/What_Governments_are_doing_Listing_of_Terrorism_ Organisations_Jamiat_ul-Ansar [Accessed January 28. 2009]. Mir. South Asia Terrorism Portal. Available at: http://www. Nicholas.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 57(1): 42-50. John. Available at: http://www.htm [Accessed January 28. Ajai. Australian National Security. Amir.atimes. “Pakistan's jehadi apparatus: Goals and methods. 2008. “In the Spotlight: Harakat ul-Mujaheddin (HuM). Available at: http://www. 2009]. 2001.htm [Accessed January 28.brad.satp.cfm [Accessed January [Accessed January 28. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www.” India Review 2(3): 55-88. 2009].” The Washington Quarterly 26(3): 7-25. 2005. Pakistan Security Research Unit. Roman & [Accessed May 19. 1997. ISI Fixed Meetings for Hostages' Wives with Harkat. 2005.globalsecurity. Hindustan Times. Sunita. Sahni.132/search?q=cache:8YwDXyrFcLcJ:spaces. “Understanding the Militant Mind: Can Psychiatry Help?. Swami.125.” Asia Times Online.” Pakistan: nationalism without a nation?: 115. Dhungana. Available at: http://www. “This is not Islam. 2009]. “Harakat ul-Mujahedin.html [Accessed April 9.” South Asia Intelligence Review 3(29). 2008.cdi. 2002. 2001.” Center for Defense Information. S. Jaish-e-Mohammad A profile of Maulana Masood Azhar. 2002. “The Maoist Insurgency and Nepal-India Relations: Contemplating the Future. Paramhans. 2003. 2009].” The Maoist Insurgency and Nepal-India Relations: 213. Mariam. Available at: http://www. 2003. “The regional dimension of sectarian conflicts in Pakistan. “The Jihad Lives On.” Global Security. Available at: http://74. Saldhanha. lami. “The Jihadist Threat to Available at: http://www. “Meeting with the Muj. Dan. Howenstein.globalpolitician. “Terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir in theory and practice.. Aaron.In the Spotlight: Harakat ul-Mujaheddin (HuM).satp.hindustantimes. Terrorism . “Nexalities: What. Kumar. Goel.Harkat ul-Ansar. 2001. S.cfm [Accessed April 9. Abou Zahab. The Jihadi Terrain in Pakistan. and D. Available at: http://www. 129 . 2009].” An Indian Perspective: 256. Indian Express. Jamiat ul-Ansar. Available at: http://www. Stephen.” Global Politician. 2009]. Me Worry?. Jessica. Profiles in Terror.html [Accessed January 28.” Strategic Analysis 24(12): Paul. 2009]. 2009]. D. 2009].com/24767islam [Accessed May 19. 2009].p df+the+jihadi+terrain+in+pakistan&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a [Accessed April 9.cdi.95. Cohen.

umd. Sondhi. Available at: http://www.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 56(4): 15-16. 2005. “Aden-Abyan Islamic Army. B.southasiaanalysis.adl.. 130 . John.: Center for Strategic and International Studies.AMNESTY.stm [Accessed May 19. em. Available at: http://www.” Global Security. India: South Asia Analysis Group. Links to Osama bin Laden and Islamic Jihad.htm [Accessed May 19. 2009].com/businessline/2000/10/23/stories/042355uy.” Strategic Analysis 25(9): 1081-1987. Raman. 2008.” Global Security. Jamwal.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 57(1): 42-50. “Jihad's New Leaders.fas.unhcr. Mehta. Washington. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www.htm [Accessed May 19. 2009]. B. “Terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir in theory and 2009].investigativeproject. 2003. 2009.htm [Accessed January 29. D. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://www.asp [Accessed May 19.” India Review 2(3): 55-88. “Terrorism and Governance in Kashmir.0. 2000. Anti-Defamation League. Jane. Available at: http://www.php [Accessed January 29. “Meeting with the Muj. Available at: http://www. and Teresita Schaffer. “Attack on USS Cole: Who engineered it?. “Yemen: New Terror Camps as a City Falls to Jihadists. 2006.html [Accessed May 19. 2000. Daveed. “Terrorism in India: Impact on national security.” The Long War Journal. Profile: Maulana Masood Azhar. Gartenstein-Ross.php [Accessed April 9. Jaish-e-Mohammed (JEM). Stern.” Business Line. 2000. Mandavi. Bill. 2009]. 2009].hinduonnet.Yemen. Raman. Federation of American Scientists. Lumpkin. 2001.YEM. “Pakistan: Moderate jihad?.html [Accessed May 19. Kamath. Islam in Pakistan: Unity and Contradictions. 2009]. 2006.Jaish-e-Mohammad Mujahideen E-Tanzeem. [Accessed May 19. 2004. John. Aden Abyan Islamic Army.globalsecurity.start. Praveen. UN Regufee Agency. Pike. Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. Swami. 2003.” Journal of Conflict Studies 24(2). N. and Kyle Dabruzzi.longwarjournal. Available at: http://www. 2009].org/military/world/para/aden-abyan. Sunil. “Jaish-e-Mohammed leader placed under ‘house arrest’. 2009]. Islamic Army of Aden (IAA) . 2009. “Terrorists’ Modus Operandi in Jammu and Kashmir. Available at: http://news. South Asian Terrorism Portal. Novak. 2007. Mushtaq.3ae6aa106b.” Middle East Quarterly 14(3): 3-10.longwarjournal. 2009].org/profile/151 [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://www.” The Long War Journal. “Khalid al-Nabi al-Yazidi. Available at: 2009]. Available at: http://www.htm [Accessed January 29.asp?id=4 [Accessed January 31.” Strategic Analysis 27(3): 382-403. 2009].satp. 2009. Roggio. Attack on USS Cole: Background.globalsecurity. The Investigative Project on Terrorism. M. BBC.C. 2009].bbc. 2006. Jessica. Al-Ittihaad al-Islami Amnesty International Report 2000 . 2009].

org/programs/gta/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=854&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=181 &no_cache=1 [Accessed February 4. 2005. Ruth. Wahid. 2003. Abul Bara'. BBC.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 35(04): 647-673.HTM [Accessed January 1.” Review of African Political Economy 30(97): 435-444. “Egypt's Gama'ah Islamiyah: The Turnabout and its Ramifications. “Somalia's ICU and its Roots in al-Ittihad al-Islami .org. Jane's World Intelligence and Insurgency. R. [Accessed April 9.” Al-Ahram Center for Political & Strategic Studies. Available at: http://www. 2006. 1997. State Formation and the Public Sphere: Eritrea 1991–96. and Peter Wallensteen. Eritrean Islamic Jihad Movement A Military Statement of the Islamic Eritrean Reform Movement to the Islamic Nation and a List of Five Operations Executed in Eritrea. 2009]. Markakis. Eriksson. Stratfor. Fouad.stm [Accessed May 19. 2009]. 1946-2004. Harbom. “The Nationalist Revolution in eritrea. Shifting Terrain: Dissidence versus Terrorism in Eritrea. Sunguta.ahram.” Available at: http://www. 1991-2003.html [Accessed January 27. “The Eritrean Experiment: A Cautious Pragmatism?.” From Nida'ul Islam. “The Politics of Cultural Pluralism in Ethiopia and Eritrea: Trajectories of Ethnicity and Constitutional Experiments.” Journal of Peace Research 41(5): 625. “Armed Conflict.janes.fas. and Colin Thomas-Fensen.asp?id=6274 [Accessed May 19.htm [Accessed January 27.umd. Yemeni Militant's Supporters Vow Revenge. SITE Institute. 2009].” Foreign Affairs 86(2): 59-74. 131 . Available at: http://www. 2003. Assefaw. Amer. [Accessed May 19. Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya Abdel Maguid. Prendergast. 2007. 1998. Available at: http://www. 1999. Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. “Blowing the Available at: http://acpss.start. 2009]. 2007. Khalil Mohammed.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 21(6): 1056-1073.stratfor. 2008. 2004. “Armed conflict and its international dimensions. 1998.jamestown. John. John.” Terrorism Monitor 4(15). “Eritrea: transition to dictatorship. and Peter Wallensteen. 1989-2003. 2009]. Bariagaber. 1998.” Review of African Political Economy 23(70): 475-497.” Journal of Peace Research 42(5): 623. Hassan Salman. “Interview With the Deputy Amir of the Eritrean Islamic Jihad 1996. 2008. Makki. Available at: http://www. Available at: “Nationalism. 2004. Available at: http://www.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 26(1): 51-70. Eritrean Islamic Salvation Movement . 2009]. Shaikh Khalil Mohammed 2009]. Hedru. 2009]. “Eritrean Islamic Salvation Front.awate. Debessay. Yemen: High-Profile Militants Killed and the Yemeni Power Structure . Iyob.West.

Inside Al Qaeda: Global Network of Terror. 2000. 2009]. “A Muslim to Muslims: Reflections after September 11. 2000. Available at: http://www. and D Lav. Gerges. Cornell.” International Herald Tribune. Alarbya. Thomas.” New Political Science 22(1): 77-88. and Nicholas 2009]. “Yemen Reports Arrests of Foreign-Born Arabs in Cole Attack . Fawaz. 2006.” The Middle East Journal: 592-612. “New Approach of Egypt´s Gama´a Islamiya Group \.terrorism4 [Accessed January 2009]. “ Al Qaeda's Egyptian Bet. Farrag John. Fred.nctc. Available at: http://www. Columbia University Press. Juan. 2006.terrorismanalysts. Ayman Al-Zawahiri: The Ideologue of Modern Islamic Militancy. 2008]. Cohen. 132 . Available at: http://memri. Vincent. Omar.” Government and Opposition 42(3): 314-339. 2002. Martha. 2002.html?res=9F05E4DA1031F935A15753C1A9669C8B63 [Accessed February 24.asp?ID=5166&Lang=E&Press=Show&System=PressR&zPage=Syste ms [Accessed January 1. “Terrorism as a Strategy. Borger. “Informed Comment. Gunaratna. Available at: http://www. 2006. Crenshaw. Airforce University Maxwell. The Al-Gama'a Al-Islamiyya Cessation of Violence: An Ideological Reversal.lebanonwire.” South Atlantic Quarterly 101(2): 325-336. Ashour.html [Accessed February 24. Ghadbian.php?page=2 [Accessed February 24. 2002. “Promoting Freedom and Democracy: Fighting the War of Ideas Against Islamic Terrorism. Freedman. Available at: http://www. “Pursuing bin Laden: Driving Al Qaeda:Religious Decree. Cole. Y.” Comparative Strategy 22(3): 207-221.” Journal of Strategic Studies 10(4): 13-31. Lawrence.” The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website. 2004. Botha. Available at: http://www. Available at: http://query. Youssef. The Middle East Media Research Institute. “Theories of Terrorism: Instrumental and Organizational Approaches. 2007.html [Accessed December 28.” The Guardian.iht. Khaled Dawoud. Burton.” The New York Times. “Political Islam and violence.php?option=com_rokzine&view=article&id=39&Itemid=54 [Accessed February 13. “De-Radicalization of Jihad? The Impact of Egyptian Islamist Revisionists on 2009]. Y Feldner.juancole. Available at: http://www. “Doomed Arab units prepare for final battle against the odds. R. 2009]. 1970]. Ariel. Available at: http://www. Burns. 2009]. 1987. “The End of the Islamist Insurgency in Egypt?: Costs and” More on the split among radical Islamists. Multimedia Counterterrorism Calendar. Politics and Terrorism: An Assessment of the Origin and Threat of Terrorism in Egypt.” Perspectives on Terrorism 2(5).nytimes.cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA30906 [Accessed February 3. Abu Jihad” Julian.asp [Accessed February 24. 2006. Pretoria: Institute for Security 2000. Anneli. 2009].muslimbrotherhood.

2002.Halawi. “Blowback.arabicnews.” Al Ahram Weekly Online.” The Middle East Journal: 415-432. Islamism. Available at: http://intelfiles.htm [Accessed January 1. In the Name of Osama Bin Laden: Global Terrorism and the Bin Laden Brotherhood. 2009]. Weaver. Jailan.” Terrorism Focus 3(35). 2009].” Al-Ahram Weekly On-line.htm [Accessed December 28. Available at: http://weekly. The Outer Rings of the Terrorist Universe. Available at: http://travelvideo. 2006. 2005. 2002. 2009]. “Post-Islamist Rumblings in Egypt: The Emergence of the Wasat party. Gilles. Mary Anne.” University of Pennsylvania Press. 2002.cfm [Accessed May 19. and Jon Rothschild. v.” Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. Bill. 2009]. Joshua.php?id=A6130_0_1_0_M [Accessed January 1. “The Taliban Connection. 2009] Rabasa. In Aftermath of Luxor Massacre: Doubtful Initiative to Stop Violence. 2004.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=11783544&Itemid=361 [Accessed February 24. Leadership of al-Gama'a [Accessed January 1. Preston.htm [Accessed February 18.egoplex.132/search?q=cache:1JlCz_Djb9wJ:www. “Time for a Historic Reconcilliation?. 1970]. Sentencing Statements. Muslim Extremism in Egypt. Hazel. M. “Bin Laden.” Al-Ahram Weekly On-line. “Militants freed. Available at: Jacquard. Berkeley: University of California Press.” Available at: http://74. Pargeter. 2009].ahram.Islamic Group.theatlantic. 2009]. Available at: http://www.” Al-Ahram Weekly Online. 1998. 2009]. 2009]. “Makram Mohammed Ahmed interviews the historic leadership of alGama’a al-Islamiyya inside the “Scorpion” prison. Moussa.stanford. Chris. Stacher. Roggio. Available at: http://weekly. “Egyptian Gama'a al-Islamiyya's Public Relations Campaign .com/ Zambelis. Roland. The New Frontiers of Jihad: Radical Islam in Europe. Omar Abdel Rahman et al. Southern District of New York: Intelwire.ahram.” New York Times. Ahmed.” Society 42(5): 34-42. 1997. Arabicnews. 2008]. “Defendant Tells of His Role in Edict Urging Killing of Jews. U. Angel et al. Available at: http://www. 2001. Available at: 133 . 2008. 1970]. 2002. 2008. Diaa. “In the Spotlight: Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya . and Terrorism. Keats.htm [Accessed May 19. Available at: http://www.htm [Accessed January 1.” Travel Video Television News.htm [Accessed February 18.” Center for Defense Information. “Egypt attacks: A Closer Look. Nevine. Alison. Available at: http://weekly. “A New Rapprochement?. 2002.html?scp=8&sq=Rifai%20Ahmed%20Taha%20&st=cse [Accessed February 24. Duke University Press. Available at: http://www. “Beyond Al Qaeda: Part Available at: http://weekly.ahram. Anthony. 2006. Khalil. 2004. “Senior al Qaeda Leader Thought Killed in North Waziristan Strike.pdf+Nageh+Ibrahim&hl=en &ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=us&client=firefox-a [Accessed January 1.” The Atlantic Online.

org/programs/gta/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=900&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=239 &no_cache=1 [Accessed January 1. 134 . 2009].http://www.jamestown.

Appendix III: Commanding Officer Attribute Codebook Type of merger Formal merger Strong affiliation (partnership) Loose affiliation (collaboration) No affiliation Primary motive Secondary motive Not a motive Primary motive Secondary motive Not a motive Primary motive Secondary motive Not a motive Strong leadership Average leadership Weaker leadership Not applicable (Was not active in the organization at the time) 4 3 2 1 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 3 2 1 Opportunism Pan-Islamic ideology Social network Operational leadership Ideological leadership Logistic leadership 0 135 .

Appendix IV: Leadership Attributes Organization name Ansar al-Islam/Jund alMullah Krekar Islam/Ansar al-Sunnah Ansar al-Islam/Jund alAbdullah Shafi Islam/Ansar al-Sunnah al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at Abu Musab al-Zarqawi al-Tawhid wal-Jihad) al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at Abu Ayub Al-Masri al-Tawhid wal-Jihad) al-Qaeda Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers (formerly Jama'at Abu Khalil al-Souri al-Tawhid wal-Jihad) Abu Muhjin Asbat al-Ansar Mohammed Omar Taliban Ayman Al Zawahiri Egyptian Islamic Jihad Sayyed Imam Al-Sharif Egyptian Islamic Jihad Islamic Movement of Tahir Yuldashev Uzbekistan Islamic Movement of Juma Namangani Uzbekistan Najmiddin Jalolov Islamic Jihad Union Tariq al-Fasdli Yemen Islamic Jihad Zein al-Abideen alAden Abyan Islamic Mehdar Army Aden Abyan Islamic Khalid al-Nabi al-Yazidi Army Maulana Saadatullah Khan Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahidin Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahidin Harkat ul-Ansar/Harakat ul Mujahidin Leader name Organization type Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Organization Date of Ideological country or foundin Date of Type of Opportunistic Alignment Social network origin g affiliation affiliation motives? ? affiliations? Iraq Iraq 2001 2001 2001 2001 3 3 2 2 0 0 1 1 Ideological Logistic Operational leadership leadership leadership preprepre-merger merger? merger? 1 0 3 0 3 0 Operational leadership postmerger? 1 3 Ideological leadership postmerger? 3 2 Logistic leadership postmerger? 2 1 Core Arab Cluster Iraq 1999 2004 4 2 0 1 3 2 3 3 3 2 Core Arab Cluster Iraq 1999 2004 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 2 Core Core Core Core Core Arab Arab Arab Arab Arab Cluster Cluster Cluster Cluster Cluster Iraq Lebanon Afghanistan Egypt Egypt Uzbekistan Uzbekistan Uzbekistan Yemen Yemen Yemen 1999 1986 1994 1987 1987 1998 1998 2002 1990 1990 1990 2004 2000 1996 1998 1998 1998 1998 2005 1992 1998 1998 4 3 3 4 4 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 3 3 1 2 3 3 3 2 2 0 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 3 2 3 0 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 2 3 3 3 3 2 1 1 3 3 0 3 1 2 3 3 3 1 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 3 2 2 Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Core Arab Cluster Southern Asian cluster Pakistan 1985 1998 2 2 1 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 Fazlur Rehman Khalil Southern Asian cluster Pakistan 1985 1998 2 1 2 1 1 2 3 2 3 3 Farooq Kashmiri Khalil Riaz Basra Akram Lahori Hafiz Mohammad Saeed Maulana Abdul Wahid Kashmiri Maulana Masood Azhar Sheikh Ali Warsame Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys Hassan Abdullah Hersi al-Turki Sheikh Khalil Mohammed Amer Lashkar-e-Jhangvi Lashkar-e-Jhangvi Lashkar-e-Taiba Lashkar-e-Taiba Jaish-e-Mohammad al-Ittihaad al-Islami al-Ittihaad al-Islami al-Ittihaad al-Islami Eritrean Islamic Jihad Movement Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster Southern Asian cluster African cluster African cluster African cluster African cluster Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan Somalia Somalia Somalia Eritrea 1985 1996 1996 1990 1990 2000 1984 1984 1984 1988 1998 1999 1999 2001 2001 2000 1991 1991 1991 1998 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 1 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 1 3 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 3 3 1 1 2 0 3 0 2 0 3 3 2 1 1 3 2 3 1 3 2 2 3 3 2 1 3 2 3 1 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 136 .

Hassan Hattab al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la prédication et le combat) Maghreb Arab cluster al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la prédication et le combat) Maghreb Arab cluster al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (formerly Groupe Salafist pour la prédication et le combat) Libyan Islamic Fighting Group Tunisian Combatant Group Tunisian Combatant Group Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group Jemaah Islamiya Jemaah Islamiya Jemaah Islamiya Abu Sayyaf Abu Sayyaf Abu Sayyaf Algeria 1996 2005 4 2 0 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 Nabil Sahraoui Algeria 1996 2005 4 2 1 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 Abdelmalik Droukdal Anas Sebai Tarek Ben Habib Maaroufi Saifallah Ben Hassine Mohammed Al Karbouzi Taeb Bentizi Abu Bakar Bashir Abu Rusdan Abu Dujana Abdurajak Janjalani Khadaffy Janjalani Yasser Igasan Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Maghreb Arab cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Southeast Asian cluster Algeria Libya Tunisia Tunisia Morocco Morocco Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Philippines Philippines Philippines 1996 1995 2000 2000 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1991 1991 1991 2005 1997 2000 2000 2001 2001 1998 1998 1998 1991 1991 1991 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 2 3 1 2 1 2 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 2 3 3 1 3 1 3 3 2 3 3 3 1 1 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 137 .

Appendix V: Data on Universe of Cases Figure 1: Number of Affiliations by Year Number of Affiliations by Year 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year Figure 2: Distribution by Type of Affiliation Figure 3: Distribution by Region 138 .

60648E-06 Table 2: Statistical Significance Testing (Two Scales) Opportunistic Motive Not a motivation Motivation Expected (Not a motivation) Expected (Motivation) P Value 5 36 20.67 13.67 1.5 20.67 13.67 13.67 13.Appendix VI: Data on Q1 What motivates local jihadist leaders to affiliate with Al Qa’ida’s and its pan-Islamic agenda? Table 1: Chi-Squared Test (Three Scales) Opportunistic Motive Total 0 (Not a motivation) Total 1 (Secondary motivation) Total 2 (Primary motivation) Expected Total 0 Expected Total 1 Expected Total 2 P Value 5 Ideological Alignment 22 Social Network Affiliation 14 3 33 13.14786E-09 11 8 13.67 0.5 20.67 1.67 13.639411853 Social Network Affiliation 14 27 20.5 0.042330234 139 .5 1.5 20.018767854 27 0 13.5 0.28936E-06 Ideological Alignment 22 19 20.67 13.

5 17 0.5 0.5 9.Appendix VII: Data on Q2 What type of role do local jihadist leaders play within Al Qa’ida’s network when the organization for which they are responsible affiliates with Al Qa’ida? Table 3: Chi-Squared Test (Strength of operational.5 10.5 14 16.262682055 P Value 140 .021962838 5 5.5 10.5 7. and logistic leadership before and after the merger) Operational Before Total Not active (0) Total Weak (1) Total Average (2) Total Strong (3) Total Expected Not active Expected Weak Expected Average Expected Strong 7 10 After Sum 4 5 11 15 Ideological Before 6 7 After Sum 4 10 10 17 Logistic Before 6 8 After Sum 4 3 10 11 7 17 41 12 20 41 19 37 82 16 12 41 5 22 41 21 34 82 11 16 41 17 17 41 28 33 82 5. ideological.5 14 16.5 0.5 7.5 18.5 18.5 5 5.5 5.5 9.5 17 5 8.256764552 5 8.

1269 19 217 11.161 16 229 14.526 0.1425 -1.3269 Paired Sign Test for Ideological Leadership Performance (pre-post) 19 6 16 0.477 0.3269 Paired Sign Test for Overall Leadership Performance (prepost) 10 22 9 0.1397 16 231.0577 -1.95 Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for Overall Leadership Performance (pre-post) 9 5 -1.313 10 122 12.421 6 108 18 Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for Logistic Leadership Performance (pre-post) 15 2 -1. ideological. ideological.5 16.466 0.382 0.Table 4: Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test (Strength of operational.898 0.5 16.25 # Ranks <0 # of Ranks >0 Table 5: Paired Sign Test (Strength of operational.359 0. and logistic leadership before and after the merger) Paired Sign Test for Operational Leadership Performance (pre-post) # Differences >0 # of Differences <0 # Differences =0 P-Value 10 16 15 0.5 14.0501 141 .422 0.2 Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for Ideological Leadership Performance (pre-post) 16 3 -1.0146 Paired Sign Test for Logistic Leadership Performance (pre-post) 10 16 15 0.1742 -1.614 10 162.1549 -1. and logistic leadership before and after the merger) Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for Operational Leadership Performance (pre-post) # of 0 Differences # of Ties Z-Value P-Value Tied ZValue Tied PValue Count Sum of Ranks Mean Rank Count Sum of Ranks Mean Rank 15 3 -1.91 0.469 10 119.5 11.0562 22 365.

Figures 4-6: Paired Sign Test Results 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Operational Ideologigcal Logistic Total Score Difference (Post-Pre) Improved or no change Declined 25 20 Score Difference (Post-Pre) 15 Improved Declined 10 5 0 Operational Ideologigcal Logistic Total 142 .

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful