"Free Land At Hand" Obtaining Federal Land Patents & Alloidial Titles

The information being offered here is purely educational and informative in nature and does not constitute professional, legal, or tax advice. You must take full responsibility for any liability or loss incurred as a consequence of the use and application, directly or indirectly, of any information contained in this book. With the events of today, you must verify all information as to the truth or validity yourself. As you are the one who will ultimately have to defend your land you must know what is the truth and what is not. I have tried to the best of my ability to ensure that the material contained in this book is the truth. We the People have the unalienable right in a free republic of American Nationals and/or sovereign "state" Citizens to acquire, utilize and "own" property. We the People have the unalienable right to have and hold that property free and clear of government liens and encumbrances. These rights have NOT been abridged, although they have come under attack by the government and the principles/creditors controlling it. But We the People must understand not only our rights, but how to acquire, utilize and "own" property as it was intended by our founding fathers and guaranteed in the united states of America. We the People must understand not only the nature of money, but the political, economic and legal systems to be able to claim our rights to acquire and "own" land. You cannot trust the government, the corporations, the media or the educational system to educate you, or fully disclose honest information about your property rights. One of the major motivators of the first American Revolution was the issue of allodial rights to land, free and clear of the liens and encumbrances of the King of England. The American people desired to acquire, utilize and " own" their own land without interference from any government, including the government of the united states of America. As a result of generations of constructive fraud perpetuated against the American people, and the peoples of the world, we've been conned into believing we are "owning" property, when in fact, and by law, we're only in "possession" of property utilizing it as a renter or tenant would. So long as we pay our rent (i.e., mortgages), get the licenses, pay the fees, have it insured, regulated, zoned and permitted, we can still remain in "possession." But as soon as we exercise what we believe is our sovereign right to do as we please with our private property, providing we don't damage or injure another or their property, we often get slam-dunked by a fine, eviction or foreclosure. We must learn about allodial titles, land patents, deeds and conveyances to reassert our sovereign right to private property. An allodial title was bestowed, by law, upon the land with unalienability forever. No government, agency, bank or other sovereign power could place any lien, attachment or encumbrance on land held in an allodial state. An allodial title is derived from the original, federal land patent. "Land Patents" are still today the highest evidence of title and have never been refuted by any court of competent jurisdiction.

All federal "Land Patents" flow from the treaty (e.g. The Oregon Treaty, 9 Stat. 869, 6/15/1846), therefore no state, private banking corporation or other federal agency can effectively challenge the superiority of title to land holders who have "perfected" their land patent. With an updated land patent brought forward in "Your Name" you can hold the rights and title to land as a sovereign, "state" Citizen. Be very clear that this is distinct from the equitable interest, title and deed. Property tax attaches to the equitable title and interest in the property and real estate through a hidden federal lien. If the property and real estate is recorded with a deed (i.e., Trust Deed, Warranty Deed, Quit Claim Deed) at the County Recorders office, then it's trust property executed and managed by the legal owners < the County, State and federal United States government corporation, and it's principals/creditors. Thus they are the legal owners of the recorded property and real estate, and they can require you (i.e., the tenant) to get building permits, abide by zoning restrictions and other statutory regulations including environmental laws because it's NOT your property or real estate. Most Americans are simply glorified "tenants" on what they erroneously believe is "their" property and real estate. Wake up America! The original "letters of patent" were from the King of England. There is a record of these "Land Patents" in the state archives and county courthouses. Under English land law all realty (i.e., real estate) was owned by the sovereign, and from the crown all titles (both lawful and equitable) flow. "All federal land patents flow from treaty rights and hold superior title to land." After the Declaration of Independence (1776), the American Revolution, and the Treaty of Peace with Great Britain (1783), the American people became complete, sovereign freeholders in the land with the same prerogative as the King. The King had no further claim to the land and could not tax or otherwise encumber it. The "Land Patent" is the only evidence of title to land. Land Patents are derived from the treaties and enabling acts of congress under the signature of the president of the United States when each state entered the Union. Land Patents are stare decisis (i.e., res judicata). It is already well settled law and decided. [Editor's Note: See Suma Corp. supra ; Wine Vs. Gastrell, 54 Fed 819; U.S. Appeal 581] For example, railroad land granted and patented in the late 1800's is still "sovereign" today. Building codes and local zoning ordinances do not apply to railroad property. Railroad patents were also issued by a special act of congress (Railroad Grant Acts) granting alternating sections of land in each township. They are still the largest land owner in America.

UNAPPROPRIATED LANDS = LANDS NOT PATENTED
During the times of the Articles of Confederation, the sovereign state republics wouldn't appropriate any lands to the federal government. They didn't want to relinquish any of their sovereignty to the new government. Finally, the states relented and unappropriated lands were given to the federal government to distribute to the people on the condition that they would grant full allodial title. A "Land Patent Office" was established to distribute these unappropriated land by grant to the people.

STATE HAS NO AUTHORITY OVER THE LAND RIGHT AND TITLE HELD BY THE UNITED STATES
All right and title to the unappropriated land was held to the disposition of the United States government to be granted (not sold) to the people. This is how land comes to the people. In the enabling acts, each state republic agreed and declared they would give up all right and title to land. The state has no authority over the land. Except for Texas which never gave up its lands (State Patent Office) or military (i.e., Texas Rangers) to the federal government. It's still a free and independent sovereign state. The federal United States government became the trustees with a power of attorney over the dispersement of land to the people. "Land Patents are issued (and theoretically passed) between sovereigns. Deeds are executed by persons' and private corporations without these sovereign powers." Through various acts of congress, land was made available for granting (not selling), and the American people became the recipients of those land grants. Land Patents are the first conveyance of title ownership to land. One of the earliest laws for granting Land Patents was passed by Congress on April 24, 1820. It was also how the American people qualified to become sovereign "state" Citizens and electors in their respective state republics. Landowners are the only authority in the united states of America with the power to elect public officers of the government at every level, county, state and federal. This whole system of granting land worked well until the western state republics entering the post-Civil War Union surrendered unappropriated lands to the federal United States government that did not get distributed to the people. Large portions of the west were not distributed to the people, but held as "federal land" or distributed to the states. This was a flagrant violation of the principles upon which America was founded. So who has all the land in America? If the state doesn't have any authority over land, and the federal United States government corporation can't own land, then who has the land? We the People still have all the land in America! The land is still ours. It hasn't gone anywhere. The rights and titles haven't been bought or sold. They are not for sale. By the law of the land, We the People are still holding the right and titles to every square inch of land in the united states of America. We the People must reclaim what is ours!

LAND IS GRANTED, NOT BOUGHT & SOLD
What has been bought and sold is the "real estate," the equitable interest to property, to the buildings, improvements, equipment that occupies the space above the land, not the land itself. This is evidenced in the land patent itself, even in the deeds and title insurance contracts.

Possession is still 9/10th of the law. easements). This was NOT the purchase of land.to give and grant (not sell) unto "Your Name" and his heirs and assigns forever. You have seven years to perfect a claim against land. and each additional state republic entered the Union... real estate and equitable interest for generations and abandoning the rights and title to land." REAL ESTATE VS. it's yours after seven years. Caveat emptor < buyer beware. HEREDITAMENT = INHERITANCE = HEIR APPARENT > APPURTANANCES < that which belongs to something else. The land patent speaks plainly. LAND You cannot buy land.. The United States government corporation may not own any land. . inherent since the original thirteen colonies formed the united states of America. if you claim it. Rights and title to land is well established in law. Research the abstracts of title.. an adjunct or appendage. Update and record your Land Patent in the "Great Book" at the County Recorder's office. We've been selling property. This is distinct from any actions relating to the equitable title. as a right of way or other easement to land.25 acre for a mining claim). Because bringing forth the true title is pursuant to the Common law. Full payment is already made in the Land Patent and all subsequent assignments. make a claim. allodial) land is beholden to no one. that which passes as incidenta. grants and assigns the land patents to his/her heirs and assigns.Title insurance excludes coverage for the Land Patent. You cannot sell land. but it does have equitable interest in lots of "real estate. If notice is duly given and no one contests your claim." To grant is to give freely. Perfecting an allodial title requires updating the original land patent and rewriting the legal description for the land in metes and bounds < the measurements of the original Surveyor General. and sells the property or real estate. Land Patent rights flow from the treaty and enabling acts via power of attorney to an individual landholder who in turn gives.e. Freehold (i. not to purchase. The warranty deed grants (not sells) the land. and bring the title forward minus any exclusions (i. As a sovereign "state" Citizen it's yours. All you need to do in law is to prove that "Your Name" is a heir or assign to the original Land Patent. That's the "fistful of dirt" doctrine. and any liens or encumbrances attached thereof. RIGHT & TITLE IS CONVEYED BY ASSIGNMENT All right and title to land is conveyed by assignment. Records of the original Land Patents are kept there. They cannot and will not insure you against a claim for the right and title to the land itself. gift or grant directly from a Land Patent. Permission to grow your own crops as a tenant is in effect an assignment by the landowner. ". you must be a sovereign "state" Citizen to claim the rights and title to land. The registration and fees in the securing of a Land Patent were paid to the Surveyor General ($1.25 acre or $2.e. The original Land Patent Office is now the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) which consisted of government land officers.

the land patent is the highest evidence of title for the sovereign American "state" Citizen. citizens and directed by its creditors under Admiralty law. and bring the title forward minus any exclusions. . To motivate them. Borrow the FRN's if necessary to discharge the debt in full.) There's a federal lien on all property and real estate. Then notify the County Tax Assessor that the taxes (i. as well as any outstanding bank mortgages. [Editor's Note: Eric Madsen asserts the " real estate" of the united states of America was quit claim deeded to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) by the last sitting U. This lien must be satisfied." UPDATE THE LAND PATENT AS A HEIR OR ASSIGN Federal Liens and Property Taxes: In the de jure united states of America and under the Common law. so please take us off the tax rolls forever. They failed to perform on their end of the contract.) Research the abstract of titles. Now. They will likely settle out of court. make a claim as a heir or assign. Supreme Court in 1944 as their last action. 2. liens) have been satisfied in full. 2. you can sue the title insurance company for treble damages for not revealing the hidden federal lien when you purchased the property and real estate in the first place.) Discover how much debt is attached to your property.) Re-record the updated Land Patent at the County Recorder's office in the "Great Book.S.. It is assessed and collected through the property tax. The rights and title to land still belongs with We the People. But in a bankrupt and de facto federal United States inhabited by U. 3. This federal lien is NOT attached to the land. Lien and Debt Release Process 1.) Update the original Land Patent with the legal description for your parcel in metes and bounds. paid or released to own equitable title to your property and real estate free and clear. OR offer to "pay" the debt in full with gold/silver (they will refuse to accept).Land Patent Process 1. the Land Patent is collateral hypothecated against the debt which has been fraudulently transferred to the international bankers.S.e. evidence of allodial title and true ownership.] RELEASE THE LIENS ON EQUITABLE TITLE Discover how much federal debt is attached to your property and real estate by writing the Department of the Interior and requesting an accounting of what portion of the federal debt is attached to your property. but to the property and real estate situated above the land. There is a hidden federal lien on all property and real estate in the federal United States because of the federal debt to the International Monetary Fund. tell them you want to pay off the debt in full.

) Bargain. A "Warranty Deed" does grant the land. then the property or real estate is the trust property of the State. get yourself out of indebtedness and . Furthermore.send no more bills.) Notify the County Tax Assessor that the property tax has been paid in full . The land. bargain. 5. right of ways. you must be a sovereign "state" Citizen free of all legal disabilities to hold title to any land in the united states of America. DEED IS A TRUST INSTRUMENT Deeds & Conveyances: The deed is a sales (i. sold and conveyed: a) equity is fairness b) chattel and other appurtenances c) stuff and improvements on the land is bought 4. 4. trust) instrument.) Grant rights and title: a) land is not bought or sold -it's free b) those who do not update the patent have abandoned the right c) must be brought up in your sovereign name 3.. These cannot convey and cannot be warranted.e. Note the elements of a "Warranty Deed:" What is a Deed? 1. water. property and real estate must be re conveyed out of the County Recorder's office with a "Quit Claim Deed" from equity to the Common law. RECONVEY EQUITABLE TITLE TO FOREIGN ENTITY Economic Sovereignty and Lawful Money: Regarding a Land Patent. sells and conveys the appurtenances and warrants the performance of the contract. minerals. Note that NO rights convey or are warranted with a Quit Claim Deed. admits valuable consideration.) Assignment is responsibility: a) must be accepted or admitted 5. If a deed is recorded at the County Recorder's office.) Admits valuable consideration: a) a thought process b) must have full disclosure c) $21 of real "money" is evidence of consideration 2.) Borrow the FRN's if necessary to discharge the debt in full.3. assessments.) Sue the title insurance company for treble damages for not revealing the federal lien when you purchased the property and real estate in the first place. OR "pay" the debt in full with gold/silver (they will refuse to accept).) Warrants performance: a) will defend this title if contested 6) exclusions a) such as easements.

United States government is officially declared. not the improvements upon the land which can still be attached by a commercial lien. ALLODIAL existed in feudal law.. > MORTGAGE "A mortgage is a commercial lien and doesn't convey an estate or title. and not of any lord or superior. If you haven't tendered at least $21 of gold/silver in the "purchase" of the property or real estate. The property and real estate must be re conveyed to a Trust or foreign entity when purchased with a Bill of Sale. and prevent foreclosure by the international bankers when the federal. while a sovereign individual makes a claim to the true title. you must be educated and know exactly what you're doing. but foreign entities through which the property or real estate is purchased can. with or without compensation. Rights and title to land does not convey without the tendering of real "money" or "consideration. and the government doesn't condemn or take the land for public use. and the "money" is evidence of it.. land not subject to feudal duties or burdens. A Trust or foreign entity can hold equitable title though. pay the taxes. although your creditors cannot walk across the land to seize the improvements without a trespass on the land. if the property and real estate is recorded at the County Recorder. ALLODIAL TITLE -. or use the land as collateral or security against any debt. allodial ownership of property as the founding fathers intended." Allodial titles only apply to the land. not even after they've paid off the "mortgage" and satisfied the bank note. As a sovereign "state" Citizen. . There are no rights or title conveyed on the improvements or buildings on the land. only equitable title and interest. you will not qualify for any loan from any bank. Then individually. you won't need the loan from a bank. then it's a trust property of the State and you simply have the equitable title. to most people.. most American people do not "own" their land. In matters of deeds and conveyances. Do not get title insurance. Remember.become economically sovereign as quickly as possible. This comes as a surprise. most people have only temporary possession and minimal control over a particular piece of land for so long as they pay the bank note.EQUITABLE TITLE Protection From Foreclosures: You protect the land from foreclosure actions by banks." You can purchase the property or real estate even with a purported "loan" providing the loan is not in your name (let a foreign entity or trust purchase the property directly and qualify for the loan).. Getting a "loan" is not paying for it either because the bank hasn't loaned you any "money. Today. Instead of sovereign." Consideration is a thought process. submit to building codes and regulations... perhaps a shock.A bank has to prove it has title to the land in order to take it over. but not re-recorded with the County Recorder. then it hasn't been bought. unlawful seizures and forfeitures by the government.A title company insures absolutely nothing except the land. land held absolutely in one's own right. Do not place the land in escrow. These are adhesion contracts and remove any true title from the land as a condition of the contract.

By defining U.S.S. citizens have no right to "own" land. Having an allodial title will not eliminate any debt or mortgage if any is presently attached to your land or property. If they do. a doorway opened for legal "persons" such as corporations and trusts to gain control over land. America has returned to the dark ages of feudalism. Since you never actually pay for it with lawful money." and a return to a feudal relationship with the land that the serfs and slaves endured for hundreds of years. All land not held in allodial title has been hypothecated to the Federal Reserve Bank. state Citizens to own land absolutely. With an allodial title. sovereign power. while absolute ownership is not. citizens as legal persons. you cannot "own" your land or property either. . and you must demonstrate the superiority of your allodial title. If for some reason. The American people have unwittingly surrendered their allodial titles and sovereign rights as a condition of every bank contract or mortgage involving the purchase of land or property. checks or other negotiable instruments. debts or claims will remain.S. The allodial title will prevent the creditor from going after your land to collect on the debt if you cannot make a payment for any reason. a land trust might be created whereby you and the bank become "partners" in the property until it's paid. citizens have entered adhesion contracts with the federal United States government under the 14th Amendment whereby their unalienable rights to own land absolutely in an allodial state. Your government and the International Bankers via the Federal Reserve Bank has been using your land for it's own purposes. The founding fathers abhorred the idea of feudal land and owing allegiance to any foreign. Qualified ownership means that the ownership of land is shared (with the government). If you had the true title. or the use of land and property as collateral. its former "state" Citizens having been reduced to tenants and renters once again. As legal "persons. have been reduced to a qualified ownership and "color of title" under the Negotiable Instruments law. the government couldn't utilize your land as a security against the federal debt. without government encroachment of any kind. unless it's with gold or silver." If they don't the land reverts to its allodial title. Getting a mortgage." U. without your knowledge or consent. In the twentieth century. The underlying reason the American Revolution was fought and won was over the right for the sovereign. instead of a bank foreclosure whereby you lose everything. You are "renting" property with a "rented" debt currency system." a qualified and diminished "ownership. anymore than corporations or trusts could prior to the 14th Amendment.Americans have not yet figured out that they have so little control over what they do on "their" land because they do not own it. and take it from the people. and paying a bank note is nothing more than glorified " renting. The law is on the side of the sovereign "state" Citizen regarding allodial titles. After having received proper notice. but the land itself will be forever removed from assets upon which creditors can attach. they must take you to court. You can only "discharge" debt with negotiable instruments. money substitutes. and bought with debt currency. you cannot pay your mortgage or default on the loan. U. as collateral against a federal debt that cannot be paid. your creditors have 60 days to challenge your "Declaration of Land Patent. The federal United States government maintains the true title in the original land patent which it has pledged as collateral against the federal debt. not the sovereign owners of their land.

Be prepared to defend your Land Patent in an Equity/Admiralty/Maritime court which has no jurisdiction to rule on the Land Patent. ruled that the heirs were entitled to the use of the property. . Debts or claims could be made though on the "improvements. If you ask the title insurance company. in order to avoid estate taxes. there is no better way to cloud an equitable title than to update the land patent in "Your Name. neglect and fear. and would instead grant title in law to the trustee. It also depends on the political strength of the sovereign people. and gave them title in equity. Suddenly. but not title to it in the common law. this gave heirs the use of the land." LAND PATENTS CLOUD EQUITABLE TITLES Most all court matters depend on the political strength of the Constitution and how diligent the courts are in upholding the law of the land. Are Land Patents Valid? Regarding the validity of allodial titles and Land Patents. now known as the mortgage. It depends on who you ask. and heirs found that the courts of common law would refuse to recognize the "use" clause. If you ask a clerk at the Bureau of Land Management. while the right to foreclose on the property to merge the common law and equity title were guaranteed in the common law courts. If you ask an attorney. However. Are you willing to stand for your rights and property or NOT? Land Patents were upheld and respected for generations until the American people went to sleep. they'll roll their eyes and say that land patents are worthless. I assert there are hundreds of people who have successfully staved off government intervention through the use of land patents. Land and improvements are still separate and distinctly assessed for taxes. trustees often abused this privilege. because they cannot attach liens or foreclose upon the land if it is ever declared allodial. more often in rural areas than urban areas of the West. As rulings of equity courts ranked above those of common law courts. the courts of equity. If you ask fellow sovereign "state" Citizens who've successfully kept the State or the banks from foreclosing on their property due to a land patent clouding the equitable title. they're waking up and realizing they've been had by their own government. which were developed by the sovereign to deal with obvious injustices in the common law courts. These patents are being upheld 50% of the time by local law enforcement and government officials. Still. Enjoyment of the property during the period where the mortgage was in good standing could be assured through the equity courts. they'll hiss and snort and turn red in the face from embarrassment. People want problems solved without taking any responsibility for creating them in the first place through ignorance. they'll snort and say it has no validity in the courts. Development of Equitable Titles As late as the Tudor period. How long that will last depends on the judicial and political activism of the American people. That's why banks primarily finance improvements not land. this distinction between common law and equity title helped develop forms of security based on the distinction.Allodial land cannot be foreclosed upon or lien-ed. However. then you would say it has validity. a legal loophole was exploited where land was willed to a trustee for the use of the beneficiary. However." although no "person" could access your property to seize the improvements without trespassing.

The conditions under which the government can compel the sale of privately owned real property for public benefit are established by eminent domain laws of either the federal or state governments. it was nearly impossible to determine if land was subject to common law encumbrances (i. where a central office in each county was responsible for the filing of land deed. Alaska). Moreover. New York) refer to allodial title. almost all common law property ownership depended on proving a link of possession from a royal grant of title to the property owner. Florida. only documents that had been filed in the past 40 years had to be consulted to determine the chain of ownership. This led to the establishment in the 18th century of land registry systems. the government powers of police power and escheat have been retained in the American legal system.[2]. in Dartmouth College v. United States In the United States. liens and other evidence of ownership. Woodward. Essentially. which appears to be illegal throughout the United States. in reality. In addition. Many state constitutions (Arkansas. The original grantee (recipient of the land) then sold or granted parcels of land within his/her grant to private citizens and other legal entities. respectively. However. In fact. . Minnesota. they did not want to retain a feudal system of land ownership. all land in the American colonies could also be traced to royal grants. The Treaty of Paris (1783). under statutes of limitation.Proof of Ownership Until the 18th century.S. However. mortgages). There is no specific reference to allodial title in the text of the treaty. possessions were recognized. treaty (the Ohio Valley. Although the feudal system was rapidly disappearing from England in the 18th century. All land under United States government jurisdiction is subject to expropriation by way of eminent domain". Under land registry. or annexation (Texas. in theory the feudal chain of title still exists. and California). deeds and charges were not recognized unless they were filed. The right of the several states to tax real estate is preserved in the Constitution. this merely recognized that no person holding land in the new United States owed any allegiance or duty to the Crown or any English noble. Wisconsin. to be replaced with a system of taxation. which ended formal hostilities and recognized American independence. Hawaii). The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires just compensation for eminent domain compelled sale. transfer or encumbrance. "To say that land is owned “allodially” is a fiction. previous grants prior to those territories becoming U. New Mexico. mortgages. when the colonies won the Revolutionary War. but only to clearly distinguish it from feudal title. However. and forgeries of crown grants were common and difficult to detect. although it is a formality. Arizona. usually one grant creating each colony. the United States Supreme Court ruled a New Hampshire law that attempted to revoke the land grant to Dartmouth College from King George III was unconstitutional.e. also had the effect of ending any residual rights held by the original grantees or the Crown. and persons who filed were given priority over previous transactions that had not been filed. most American landholders can trace their title back to grants by the federal or state governments of land obtained by purchase (Louisiana Purchase. Apart from land that was formally owned at the time of the Revolutionary War. Moreover.[citation needed] Before 1774. proving ownership in absence of the documents was an impossibility. Some states created a form of allodial title while others retained the tenurial system with the state as the new ultimate landholder.

Once this amount was paid. Allodial titles were subject to . by its nature. Once the mortgagee releases the contract as satisfied in full. or to publish a notice of allodial title in a local newspaper. courts may be classified as a "frivolous claim". neither these or any other method is recognized by U. courts. most private property (to include all property in the United States) is not held in true allodial title. There was a time when one was considered a fool to mortgage allodial land and thus give up allodial ownership as among other penalties the owner often lost the right of a freeholder to vote. and attempts to improperly assert an allodial title in U. Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of zoning laws on a very broad basis. allodial title cannot be mortgaged in the first place. However. they claim the foreclosure by the mortgagee is illegal. They claim that only the law of nuisance applies to persons holding allodial title. Limited Allodial Title Two states. created limited allodial title provisions in order to protect property owners from the burden of highly increased property taxes which often occur when unincorporated land becomes part of a town or city. the ownership reverts entirely back to the owner. Property taxes would then be paid by the state treasurer as long as the original owner remained in the home. which would be the only title exempting the title holder from any tax. Schemes to obtain allodial title usually advise property owners to file a deed of allodial title with the local registry office. Mortgagors: Persons who have overextended themselves and face foreclosure often try to create an allodial title. inalienable title to their property. These groups include: 1. Tax protestors: Some tax protesters deny the legal power of municipal and state governments to tax property on the basis that allodial title cannot be alienated by failure to pay those taxes. The state accepted a one-off tax payment based on actuarial calculations of the present value of the future property taxes payable. thus that land falls out of the allodial title domain as it is essentially jointly owned and governed by contract by both the mortgagee and mortgagor. the U. However.S. 3. given the age of the youngest title holder. As allodial title cannot be alienated by seizure by a creditor. and an attempt to create allodial title on land that is subject to encumbrance by debt is impossible. Anti-zoning groups: Persons who own agricultural land that faces re-zoning due to encroaching urbanization often claim that zoning laws that control agricultural use of property are illegal as they constitute an encumbrance on allodial title. However. However.Allodial Title Advocates Some groups say references to allodial title in state constitutions and (allegedly) the Treaty of Paris give property owners absolute. Nevada and Texas. even though such laws all post-date the 1787 Constitution. a certificate of allodial title was granted. Actually a contract can be created by an owner of allodial property with a mortgagee resulting in the transfer of title under certain circumstances such as default on a loan.S. Nevada allowed persons who owned and lived in single family residences to obtain allodial title if the property was not mortgaged and had no tax liens.S. 2.

2005. appurtenances and the land on which it is located. the Nevada Legislature created a new section of statutes within the property tax statutory scheme. However. In most states.900 (1)(emphasis added). NRS 361. property could be seized if used in a criminal enterprise. One or more persons who own such a home in any form of joint ownership may apply for the allodial title. Nevada In 1997. he transfers it to the state treasurer." Id. its appurtenances and the land on which it is located. The Nevada Legislature in 2005 prohibited applications by property owners for allodial title after June 13.905 (3). (8). This is done by using "a tax rate of $5 for each $100 of assessed valuation on the date of the application. and for the payment in installments over a period of not more than 10 years. American Indian reservations also share some similarity with allodial title.]" NRS 361. For example. universities and colleges that hold property for educational purposes can be described as having allodial title." became effective on July 1. however. These "amounts must be calculated to the best ability of the state treasurer so that the money paid plus the interest or other income earned on that money will be adequate to pay all future tax liability of the property for a period equal to the life expectancy of the youngest titleholder of the property. "the state treasurer shall issue a certificate of allodial title[. and submits proof that the home is a single-family dwelling occupied by the homeowner. If the property owner pays the lump sum amount calculated by the state treasurer. the issue of a certificate of allodial title occurs upon the receipt by the treasurer of the last payment. it reverts to the state or the federal government. Instead.905 (2). Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) 361." NRS 361. After the county assessor receives the application. The state treasurer then determines the amount which is required to be paid by the property owner to establish allodial title.900 (6).900 (5). 1998. it is also clear that if the title ceases to be used for the purposes for which it was granted. Other institutional property ownership can also be called allodial. If the property owner enters into an agreement with the state to make installment payments (in lieu of a lump sum payment). the amount that must be paid in a lump sum. NRS 361. and that the property is free and clear of all encumbrances except any unpaid assessment for a public improvement. separately. Those who can apply for allodial title are limited: A person who owns and occupies a single-family dwelling. except any unpaid assessment for a public improvement.900 to 361. the state treasurer is responsible for the payment of the taxes due. in that property granted for certain uses is held absolutely and cannot be alienated in most circumstances." NRS 361. NRS 361. These statutes. in all these cases.920. free and clear of all encumbrances. "unless the allodial title is relinquished by the homeowner or his heirs. Once a property owner receives a certificate of allodial title. he is relieved from the payment of all further property taxes. The treasurer must calculate. Id. jointly if the dwelling is occupied by each person included in the application.exemptions from seizure in debt or bankruptcy under homestead laws. . NRS 361.900 (3). which are entitled "Allodial Title.900 (2). property held by churches for the purpose of worship also has status similar to allodial title. may apply to the county assessor to establish allodial title to the dwellings.

as liens cannot attach to allodial title. an allodial owner can contractually give up allodial ownership and that allodial ownership can be restored or sold or passed on to a single heir.Once allodial title is established. although the regular homestead exemption provides no protection against legal process to enforce the payment of obligations contracted for the purchase of the property. Allodial title cannot be taken away by fraud.010 (5). that also means that it cannot be transferred or encumbered without losing its allodial status. be legally taken away against the will of the owner. if allodial title has been established and not relinquished. As such. the homestead exemption "extends to all equity in the dwelling.915 (5).000. it "is valid for as long as the homeowner continues to own the residence unless he chooses to relinquish the allodial title[. or for any mortgage or deed of trust executed upon the property. or the home is converted to anything other than a single-family dwelling occupied by the owner. NRS 361. NRS 115. Difficulties With Allodial Title Although allodial title cannot be lost in most circumstances. it may well be worth the cost to do so. If one can pursue allodial title. the heir or heirs can reestablish allodial title by using the same procedure that the original property owner used. the property owner is once again responsible for all future property taxes. when a property owner dies and leaves ownership to more than one heir. in theory. only by legitimate contract. or for improvements made thereon (including any mechanic's lien lawfully obtained). the available homestead exemption in Nevada is $125. once incorporated. These benefits are tremendous in the areas of property tax and homestead.915 (1). the holder of an allodial title is fully exempt from all of these under the homestead laws. either voluntarily or otherwise. Despite this one area. Allodial title cannot." Id.010 (4). its appurtenances and the land on which it is located. NR8 361.010 (2). it is difficult to finance improvements to a property held in allodial title as. the property owner receives a refund of the unused portion of the payments made to originally establish the allodial title. Furthermore. Similar to all property in Nevada. . property held by allodial title is subject to forfeiture for criminal conduct. It also has significance in the area of homestead law.910 (1).910 (1)-(9).915 (3)-(4). Once the allodial title is relinquished. Allodial title cannot be mortgaged. NRS 115. allodial title provides significant benefits to those who qualify for it. However. Upon the death of an allodial title holder. NRS 361. Moreover. or for legal taxes. NRS 361. leased or transferred by the allodial title holder. The importance and benefit of establishing allodial title extends beyond the non-payment of property taxes. If allodial title is relinquished. the allodial title holder no longer occupies the dwelling for 150 days. the improvements become part of the allodial title and become exempt from lien or seizure of the property to pay a contractor's bill. (emphasis added). the allodial status of the property is lost. Pursuant to NRS 115. The only area within the homestead laws wherein allodial title fails to provide an extra benefit is in the realm of civil and criminal forfeiture of property. Id.]" NRS 361. However.010 (3). The title shall be relinquished if the property is sold. NRS 115. The holder of an allodial title can voluntarily relinquish it at any time.

Intelligent men do not die for money.” We the sovereign citizens of the 50 sovereign republics are involved in a gigantic belief scam which is a scam based on a lie is told long enough. after sacrificing so much to get rid of a despot that these intelligent people would turn around and institute a government that has become as despotic as King George had been. I have some news for the perpetrators of this land grab. The cat’s out of the bag! It isn’t going to work. is.The Greatest Scam In History We are living during the greatest scam in the history of the world. You can make book on that. Intelligent men will outwit crooks in time. and is the original revolutionary.) First and foremost. Government’s Land Grab . allodial ownership is a fact. that what most people believe. Jefferson and Franklin were very intelligent men as were most of the signers of the Declaration of Independence. It does not make much sense that. They were cut from the same cloth as later Americans would be. What is being tried is a land grab that makes a piker out of Genghis Khan. We know and there are too many of us to shut us up. not four cents on the dollar.” Johnny Liberty. Freedom was now a reality for the common man and our natural rights were recognized. a LIE (public lie). it is lying. That fact is something which the folks who are attempting to steal your land and destroy you liberty have forgotten. not the truth. It is a truism that you may kill the man and destroy the nation but the idea of freedom can never perish. This is happening in all walks of American life. the entire concept of personal status changed. Like the old saying goes “You can fool some of the people all of the time. The revolutionary war was not about taxes. 1. So how in the world have we arrived at this point? It seems a government must subjugate and . We are a trusting people and in some instances.U. i. That was one of the main reasons our founding fathers fought and died in the late 1700’s. or the truth is omitted long enough. S. and slaves. you are a sovereign with all the prerogatives of a king or queen.” there were three kinds of people. Ben Franklin was a self made millionaire and that was back in the days when a dollar was worth a dollar. thinks for himself. Taxation was a miniscule reason for the revolution. “If the government is moving it’s lips. The king and his ilk. and all of the people some of the time but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time. These purloins have also forgotten that the typical American is independent. too trusting. Before he said “Don’t tread on me. their subjects. who were sovereign.) Second.e. too ornery to be subjugated. in fact. There were probably some free men running around too. When the Americans defeated King George and Franklin made him cede sovereignty to the people of the colonies. 2.

or they have sold us out. we have shirked our duty as sovereign citizens to regulate its growth. nor am I a resident of the corporate state or federal government. I am sovereign.com/PageManager/Default. therefore limited government is needed. who are. like most Americans. I can’t make up my mind just what they are. this natural tendency of our government to grow has been helped along by a well thought out business plan developed by people whom we have considered pillars of the community.) Birth Certificate. I had unwittingly surrendered my birthrights through sneaky and fraudulent Adhesion Contracts: 1. nor serf.leanlegal. and their very existence is a determent to mankind. no government is needed. I hope the latter is not tarred with the same brush as the former when the appropriate time comes. nor slave.) Driver’s License. 2. Most of us are aware that we have problems as a nation and we have assumed that our elected officials are hard at work solving and fixing the problems. rude sobs and I have met some. Therein lies the problem. I have met some who are power mad.rule to justify its existence.com/dictionary/a. with no opportunity for negotiation as to its terms. there is no need for pervasive rule and as a consequence. Ultimately. Allodial Title Via Land Patent Our rights have been so eroded that an unelected bureaucrat in the county government believes that he has the authority. etc. Wrong again! I fully intend to show any and all that this piece of patented ground I live on is mine in allodial freehold and I am sovereign on it. I am not an indentured servant. the right and power to tell me if I can stick a shovel in my ground.phoenixhomes.asp A contract which is very one-sided and favors the party who drafted the document. they are rogues. If the people inhabiting an area claimed by a government do not need subjugation or rule. At least that is what they are supposed to do and that is what they promised to do when elected. www. Any entity. www.aspx/PageID=396993 A contract where the bargaining power of the parties is so unequal that the terms are offered on a "take it or leave it" basis. I’m sure they all need their comeuppance. Unfortunately. with no opportunity to negotiate. 3. Now. (because they are rational and responsible). I was not always one because. not all people are rational and responsible. A distinctive feature of an adhesion contract is that the weaker party has no realistic choice as to its terms. the professional bureaucrat is a totally different breed of cat. very unscrupulous people. In fact. in reality.) Social Security Number. such are the clerk in the court house. A standardized contract form generally on a "take it or leave it" basis. has an innate drive to grow and actualize it’s potential. Insurance policies are an example. be it natural or political. who are polite and give you service with a smile and sincerity. Wrong! They are either shirkers and dupes. Where there is any ambiguity in the terms of an adhesion . We have seldom recognized our government’s natural tendency to grow and when we have become aware of it.

the ambiguity will be interpreted against the person who wrote the contract and in favor of the reasonable expectations of the non-drafting party. non-payable federal debt. That went out with the Saxon kings 750 years ago. 1913 Federal Reserve Act The establishment has had it hidden from us for awhile. It is like all the belief scams being run on us. Reread the history books. It really is as plain as the nose on your face.html I believe there are some 750 of them.if you know how) allodial until 1913 when the federal reserve act was passed and our land. Are you listening? If you put this book down and turn on the Valium tube for a dose of the establishment pabulum.com/vlh7/VLH7Glossary. 2. (before they change them again) and it will jump right out at you. Of course. while you still have possession of it! The Secret No One Wants You To Know I am going to let you in on a secret. and all of our possessions. good times or bad.you will wonder how in the world did you miss that. You will hear the establishment’s mouthpieces say “There is no such thing as allodial title. The buck stops here. Thomas Jefferson. As you become aware.contract. Sam Adams and their ilk gave it back to us over 200 years ago. as this whole scam has been very slowly and carefully perpetrated according to a very cunning and complete master plan.) His Heirs. and 3. This secret will enable you to keep your land through thick or thin. no matter what. If too much attention is paid to it. but John Hancock. were hypothecated to the federal reserve bank as collateral to a fraudulent. That would be a safe bet. don’t cry when the banker’s boys in black come to take your land and possessions. and you will see this plan’s unfolding over time. I do not believe we can have real sovereignty on this earth unless we have perfected a land patent on our own piece of ground. Now you know. it slows us down and lulls us back to sleep. Allodial title did go out with the Saxon kings 750 years ago. There is a degree of truth in it.) Assigns Forever owns (not leases. and in the final analysis. All land in the USA is patented and was (still is.” That is true to a degree. Just think back. death may be the only pure sovereignty. rents or otherwise risks losing) that piece of land until you voluntarily give it away. Patent your ground now. if we lose our liberty we have nobody to blame but ourselves. but I have since declared my sovereignty.iciclesoftware. Ben Franklin. and only death will terminate that. Once you know the secret and follow the secret’s directions then the: 1. We have had plenty of warnings. www.) Patentee. . How does that grab you? I would almost bet the farm that most of you didn’t know that.

US 498] You are an “Assigns” via the equity interest you have in your property. local. 2 US 525]. All land disposed of by the government prior to the 1930’s was patented to an individual (that is why you will sometimes see them referred to as PLC’s. 125 so. bank. 258 (1960). “The patent alone passes land from the United States to the grantee and nothing passes a perfect title to public lands but a patent. full and complete title to a land. mortgage company or speculator can take it. All you have to do is update that patent into Your Name.] That’s what this book is all about. There. and you have perfected your land patent. You will learn how updating your patent will be significant in returning America to the state of “land of the free. “A patent for land is the highest evidence of title and is conclusive as against the government and all claiming under junior patents or titles [United States v.” Yes. No. so that government is forced to recognize that sovereignty. “Can I patent my property if it is not free and clear?” Lets deal with that right now so you can read this book without an agony of doubt as to whether this book pertains to you or not. since they quit telling Americans about it. and why they came to be. [Leading Fighter v. w. County of Gregory.” [Wilcox v. and assigns forever”. The government is so afraid of this secret that it has been tight lipped about it for eighty-two years. and not subject to tenure of any lord or superior. Jackson 13 Peter. you are immune to disaster. period. or federal. private land claims) and that patent says “to the patentee. 2dI14. 230 n. or otherwise dispose of it. The supreme court of the United States of America has upheld this time after time. Only in the largest of dictionaries will you find the following definition --”allodial freehold— owned freely. The actual patent should be secured to place at rest arty question as to validity of entries”. sovereign title to property”. land held absolutely in one’s own right. Even definitions of it have been taken out of our dictionaries. state. Miller. If you know what your sovereignty gives you and enough of your fellow Americans know. land not subject to feudal duties or burdens. You will be educated and given the forms and sources of information so you will know beyond a shadow of doubt what patents are. you do have a land patent.’ However.” “Can I patent my property if it is not free and clear?” One of the most frequently asked questions at seminars is.sell it. Stone. you now have the secret to your absolute security because even in the hardest of times you can survive on a small piece of ground that no one can take from you. this is not the ravings of a lunatic. [Young v. his heirs. No government. not subject to restriction of alienation that existed in feudal law. 2d 257. The answer is an unequivocal ‘YES. in equity . 116 (1975)] “A patent regularly issued by the government is the best and only evidence of a perfect. “Patents are issued (and theoretically passed) between sovereigns and deeds are executed by persons and private corporations without those sovereign powers”.

if you are one of the alert ones. They are handling that quite well. and here in Kootenai county.“title under patent from the government is subject to control to protect the rights of parties acting in a fiduciary capacity. Idaho revised coca 59-811. That however. Or. city of Rockland -15 me. custody of official bonds-certified copies given every officer with whom official bonds are filed must carefully keep and preserve the same and give certified copies thereof to any person demanding the same. 132 us 318] “Neither a town nor its officers have any right to appropriate or interfere with private property. This action on the surety bond is effective and fast. and Charley Miller. have successfully demonstrated this fact. 2d 170. I’m not.” [Mitchell v. Sanford 139 u.” [Cleveland v. Idaho. 290 (1891). is outside my expertise and I will leave that to Richard Paine. [Sanford v. “Actual or threatened exercise of power over another is coercion and duress which will render the payment involuntary. smith. you can institute action in court. neither should you be. depends on what the American sovereigns who are awake do. Speaking of debt validity. there is a problem with the validity of the debt itself. This way the courts can require the patentee to pay a certain amount at regular intervals until the debt is paid. Some sovereigns in Washington state. if you like. unless of course. We are living in a very interesting time of history. until the debt is paid.] This protection does not include the invalidation of the patent. then your power quotient will notably increase. 496] That quotient will also jump after I show you how to twist an elected official or bureaucrat’s arm if they happen to refuse to record your patent. Whether freedom lives or dies out (for awhile. Three sentences from you and a short time period for the person to check with risk management. “The land patent is the highest evidence of title and is immune from collateral attack” [Raestle v. upon being paid the same fees as are allowed by law for certified copies of papers in other cases. This protects the owners of an equitable interest. 582p. because you can’t kill an idea).172 (1978)] If you acquiesce to the jurisdiction of the equity court then it will impose a constructive trust upon you. Warren Stone. you start raising your voice and start to challenge those whose assumptions are that we are mere subjects of the state and therefore powerless. the patentee. (1971) . If you perfect your updated patent like I have. Montana.courts (which have no jurisdiction over you if you understand your sovereignty) . s. Whitson. and you will have your desired action. You don’t have to go to court to force action. an interesting aside is that there is a movement afoot now that proves all bank loans and other transactions are fraudulent and illegal. It is going to require that.

when and what brought about risk management. They snuck it in on us and never informed a soul. by the Clinton administration’s own figures. Speaking of gone. The revised code of Washington 4217. I would really like to know where. That in itself is fraud and fraud vitiates everything it touches. They are attorneys employed by county government. Sovereign Americans are not federal citizens. You just may not have known it. eh! I would like to suggest that when you tear the forms out of the back of this book that you make copies for every land owner you know. UCC 1-207.250 is very much to the point.4. but to get as many sovereign Americans on patent perfected land as possible and in as short a time period as possible. They want you to believe that the federal reserve note that you are spending is money. “Public officials are not immune from suit when they transcend their lawful authority by invading constitutional rights” [American Federation of state. the numbers have been changed about year 2003] . AFLCIO v.7)* that national is not responsible for the fraudulent federal debt. This patented land won’t do me any good if all of my neighbors are gone. So much for ego. The purpose of this book is not to generate income (that would be nice and I would not turn it down). It doesn’t get any plainer than that. UCC1-103. Why The Federal Debt Is Fraudulent Notice that I call it the federal debt because we are American nationals and the national government is the one we franchised not the corporate federal government. county and municipal employees. Woodward 406 j2d 137 t] “There is no risk of criminal prosecution where one in good faith challenges an agency” [Casey v. how. Knowledge is indeed power and you are powerful. [*Check this out. It delineates our status as “sovereigns” and “principles” and the officials status as “servant” and “agent”. Wash. Can anybody out there answer those questions? I never knew they existed until I started researching allodial titles and I thought I was well informed. American nationals are still under common law and even under the law of negotiable instruments (UCC) If a national has reserved his or her rights (without prejudice.Every state has similar statutes and they are for the same purpose. FTSCA. They are not to protect the official but to protect the public. Some states. such as Washington state have statutes that are even more stringent. 578j2d 793 (1978)] Another aside. the GNP (gross national product) didn’t even cover the interest on that fraudulent federal debt back in 1997 and that wasn't a logical time to call the debt and take the land and possessions of non-sovereign Americans that were being used as collateral for the federal debt. Share this book with as many as you can.

Haley. you can have the land in this area. but you have to give me apart of what you take from it.) The king’s title is allodial. NOTE: This land is called a fiefdom and the: 1. as this world developed. it is an unrevealed commercial contract between you and the Fed. does this sound familiar? The county (king) rents (taxes) you (the duke) the ground for a certain number of dollars per year. This is the process by which the toughest thug enlisted other. Why Have Sales on Courthouse Steps? Have you ever wondered why it’s done on the court house steps rather than inside the building? I think that inside it would be prima facie evidence of fraud. Therefore. petty thugs to help retain the land he had gained by force. and I believe rightly so. It has not been tested yet in a court of law. emperors. That book and Lynne Meredith’s “Vultures In Eagles Clothing” should be required reading for every American. a concept we know as feudalism came into being when politicians (kings. 2 Ore. Feudalism Began Then. taxes. tributes or what ever he chooses to call the graft. Now. Now. 28 Ill. but I’ll bet the boys who started it knew. that we are rapidly running out of time. president potentates. “A state may provide for the collection of taxes in gold and silver only.” [State treasurer v. So. lawfully assessed are collectible by agents in money and notes cannot be accepted in payment. it is a commercial piece of paper issued by a private banking corporation.) used force to impose their will upon others. I’ll take it away from you and give it to the earl”. if the duke holds out on the land rents. Many patriot groups feel. I honestly feel every American should read both of these books and then we stand a good chance of saving our land. I know that this sounds like an out and out plug for these books and it is. etc. . I strongly suggest you buy and read Johnny Liberty’s book “Sovereign American’s Handbook”.” Town of Frankfort v. 1] (I wonder! Do federal reserve notes fall in this category?) If all of this seems to be Greek to you.Federal Reserve Note It isn’t. not so tough. You withhold the tribute (taxes) for 3 or 5 years.) Duke’s title is fee simple absolute 2. There are addresses in the back of this book for both Johnny and Lynne. 128] “Taxes. 128 ME. Wright. khans. The king would say. Our public servants of today don’t know this. Waldo. if you are not totally loyal to me. deception. and the king (county) takes your land back (by force if necessary-sheriff) and passes it on to the earl (highest bidder on the court house steps). As you intentionally spend it you are obligated to fulfill the contract and that contract is a booger. “Ok Duke. It is one of the best books on sovereignty there is. trickery or theft. the king takes back his land. 5091: [Whitaker v. but I am sure it can be negated as an unconscionable contract.

paragraph 118. “After the American revolution. in Moses Lake. U. weaker party has no realistic choice as to its terms. but you can get absolute title via the land patent.95 plus $1.” [The Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966] Voluntary U. p. take it or leave it basis. Treatise On The On The American Law Of Real Property.“At common law there was no tax lien. not for print. Mail Truths”. 34] Now you know why I call it a belief scam! Our politicians have us believing they have allodial title and they enforce it by force.” [Johnny Liberty. 134 ME.” [Cassidy v. for $19. unless you are still a voluntary U. You and most Americans have been duped plus some other. then you need a course in the Uniform Commercial Code. If he verbally weasels don’t vote for him. I think you are entitled to know that your voter registration card is another one of those insidious adhesion contracts. . and bulk mail for four (4) cents per rescind. Citizen Rescind Your Status Now this does not mean that it applies to you. placed under the UCC. money.S. If you are.S. Ward 10 Gill & J. “It could probably be shown by facts arid figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress. where every vestige of tenure has been annihilated” [E.S. “The entire taxing and monetary system are hereby. Washbum. nor to any services or taxes there to” (Matthews v. and. A person who takes my property (land. the question of tenure as an incident to the ownership of lands “has become wholly immaterial in this country. They also have “U. only patents are title. lands in this state (Maryland) became allodial. Indicate you want the “Stop Property Tax” booklet and enclose $19. actions. and have a reason not to rescind your status but you would like a quick and easy way to stop paying property tax. citizen. If you are still involved in the political process you should ask any politician you intend to vote for where he stands on this issue. Aroostock.] Deed = Color Of Title Patents Are Title Your deed to your property is color of title.the government) that doubts arise as to the voluntary nature of the contract. which I will explain later. By now you should be getting down right mad.S. citizen) while nonrestrictive of the other (e.00 S&H.g.g . subject to no tenure. Sovereign American ‘s Handbook (1995)] If you still have adhesion contracts with the corporate entity. where you can learn how to mail first class for two (2) cents each. and is not really title. etc) at gun point is a crook. (Md) 443 (18390] Tenure was the feudal tenure and the services or taxes required to be paid to retain possession of the land. 59.. write to: American Rescind Group. according to Judge Kent.”-Mark Twain Our founding fathers selected allodial title via the land patent for America. “Adhesion contract—a contract so heavily restrictive on one party (e.95.

no court can save it”. or should I say. feudal and that deeds are not title but color of title the enormity of what has happened to them hits like a ton of bricks. . The usual clincher is color of title. beliefs. I have found the very first objection when faced with this shocking revelation a solid citizen questions how we would keep our country running and providing what little services it does. 3. or. get out. no law. Otherwise. the corporate state and federal governments want the American people to believe that our system of land ownership is of the feudal type and that they have allodial title vested in the state. Where do you stand? I am a sovereign American. “Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women. you might even say stupid. according to our supreme court. Most folks believe that they own their land. I hope you can say the same thing. They can enslave my body.. and this is your only sustenance. but what he knows (believes) that (actually) ain’t so”— Will Rogers When I explain allodial vs. what is about to be done to you. no constitution. the benefits are awesome. Upon reflection. 2. The only reason I can see would be if you have retired. Remember. you are getting benefits from corporate state for a condition rendering you unable to provide for yourself and your family. They also don’t want you to believe that you are indeed sovereign. but my mind and soul are truly free. warranty deeds. That means: 1. sheriffs deeds. When asked how can an entity that does not have equity interest take your property away from you for not paying taxes they are at a complete loss to explain it. I know who I am. the sense of power and lack of frustration will add ten years or more to your life. Actually the foregoing are very dumb. Color of title is simply anything that appears to be title but isn’t. The feeling of being truly free is one of the most fantastic feeling on earth. Join me and together we can save American land! Color Of Title Make no mistake.. “It ain’t so much what a man doesn’t know that causes him so many problems. when it dies. ergo this book. Sovereigns can not be taxed nor regulated without their consent and the government believes that we would not give that consent nor would we pay taxes. if for reasons beyond your control. Our governments also believe that we don’t have the sense to be loose. you are drawing SSI.Why would anyone want to be a federal citizen once you know what has been done to you. S. where do you stand citizen?” Judge Learned Hand (1961) That is a very good question. declare your sovereignty. land patents are the only title. trust deeds. much less govern ourselves. citizen bites the dust and a sovereign is born. the real thinkers come unglued and another U. My most fervent prayer is that some day every American can experience that feeling.

A patent cannot be avoided at law in a collateral proceeding unless it is declared void by statute. wills. and no facts behind it can be investigated. nor can a party travel behind the patent to avoid it (id at 240 (1859) “A patent when attacked incidentally. 3. or its nullity indicated by some equally explicit statutory denunciations. A patent is evidence. federal and state. nor is it proper for dray state legislation to give such titles.245.S. A patent. v. I scam. of the regularity of all previous steps to it. 246] It can’t get any plainer than that. 2d539(I956)] “The patent the fee simple [Squire v. or has been declared void by law.4. “I affirm that a patent is unimpeachable at law. perhaps.S. being superior title. Our (false) ownership is based on three key requirements: 1. even for fraud. except. . It is not to be affected by evidence or circumstances which might show that the impeaching party might prevail in a court of equity. in a court of law. 64 US. 243. “The patent is the only evidence of the legal fee simple title. l. 493. A patent cannot be collaterally avoided at law. Wilcox. al. by anything save an elder patent. must of course. Ok! Lets examine what we have now and why they take your ground if you run into hard times. cannot be declared void. Once perfect on its face is not to be avoided. . that little else will be necessary beyond a reference to them. prevail over colors of title.) Title insurance to protect the ownership of the land. [ID. 292p. in a trial at law. 2. trust. Scheimer. and even 5. when it appears on its own face to be void. Supreme Court decision will forever put that doubt to rest.. (23 how. be it a warranty. This purports to convey ownership.” [City of Los Angeles v. 496 (1896)] Now. Board of Supervisors of Mono County. etc. if there is any doubt where title lies and that anything but a perfected patent is color of title the following U.) Title abstracts to chronologically follow the development of these different types of deeds to apiece of property. which are only equitable in nature with a recognized legal status in equity courts. and the authorities on this point are so uniform and unbroken in the courts. 351 U. Ruddy 166 U. or is void on its face. at 242. precedence over the legal title in a court of law”.) We have a deed. Capoeman. S. 6 (1956)] “and the patent is required to carry the fee “[Carter v.” [McConnell v.) 235 (1859)] A patent can not be declared void at law. unless it be procured by fraud. (ILL) 381 396 (1837)] “Patent rights to the land is the title in fee. tax deeds..are color of title only.” [Hooper et.

These three items give us a systematic and orderly transfer of a piece of property. We already know that it does not convey legal title.

Only the land patent will do that.
None of the three can convey mere possession by itself for it must have one more or both to satisfy the system now. 1.) Since the abstract only traces the title and, 2.) The insurance only insures the title, the most important one is the deed. It purportedly conveys title. Ask a realtor nowadays what the deed does and nine times out of ten, he’ll tell you, “It gives you title.” All deeds state that they convey the ownership to the land. “Deeds are actually color of title” [G. Thompson, Title To Real Property, Preparation And Examination Of Abstracts, Ch. 3 Para. 73, P. 93 (1919)] That’s interesting, but who is G. Thompson? Lets see what the courts have said. “In fact, any instrument may constitute color of title when it purports to convey the title to the land, as well as the land itself; although it is void as a muniment of title” [Joplin Brewing Co. v. Payne, 197Mo. 422, 94 s. W. 896 (1906)] “Muniment” means document serving as evidence of inheritances, title to property, etc. [Webster’s Dictionary, 2nd Ed. 1972] “A color of title is that which in appearance is title but which in reality is not title.” f Wright v. Mattison, 18 How. (U. S.) 50 (1855) J [sic; f and J might be brackets and this is
simply an editorial error from a previous digitization]

Warranty Deeds / Deeds
“A warranty deed is like any other deed of conveyance [Mahrenholz v, County Board of School Trustees of Lawrence County, et. al., 93 Ill ap. 3d 366 (1981)] “A warranty deed or deed of conveyance is a color of title.” (Dempsey v. Burns. 281 Ill. 644, 65 (1917) “Deeds constitute colors of title” (Dryden v Newman 1161LL 186 (1886) “A deed that purports to convey interest in the land is a color of title.” [Hinckley v. Green. 52 ILL 223 (1869)] “A deed which on its face, purports to convey a title, constitutes a claim and color of title “ [Busch v. Huston, 75 III 343 (1874); Chickering V. Failes, 26 ILL. 508 (1861)] “A quit claim deed is color of title “[Safford v. Stubbs 117 ILL. 389 (1886)] “Sheriffs deeds also are colors of title “[Kendrick v. Latham 25 Fla. 819 (1889)] “Thus any tax deed which purports, on its face, to convey title is a good color of title” [Walker

v. Converse, 148 ILL. 622 629 (1894)

Tax Deeds have really been worked and worked hard. There are nine cases in Illinois alone. Some of
them are as follows; [Peadro v. Carriker), [Chicago V. Middlebrooke], [Piatt County v. Goodell], [Stubblefield V. Borders], [Coleman v. Billings], [Whiney v. Stevens], [Thomas V. Eckard], [Holloway V. Clarke] “A will passes only color of title” (Baldwin v. Ratcliff, 125 ILL. 376 (1888); [Bradley v. Rees, 113 ILL 327 (1885)] It seems that the courts have had a lot to say on the matter of color of title. So to make the land available for seizing, it is obvious that something was needed to replace that impregnable land patent and almost anything would do. All that it took was the powers that be to proclaim that this is the way it is. We were living so good and under the illusion of simplifying the procedures, we had a system

run in on us that would allow:
1.) Banks, 2.) Mortgage companies and, of course, the 3.) Tax collectors to “grab ground.” Johnny Liberty quoted Etienne de la Boetie in his book “Sovereign American’s Handbook” and it sure looks like he hit it right on the nail.

Have We: Lost Liberty / or / Won Our Enslavement?
“It is incredible how, as soon as a people becomes subject, it promptly falls into such complete forgetfulness of its freedom that it can hardly be roused to the point of regaining it, obeying so easily and willingly that one is led to say ...that this people has not so much lost its liberty as won its enslavement” [Etienne de la Boetie wrote in French; you can learn more at:
http://www.buildfreedom.com.

Look for the Terra Libra reports – especially the one titled THE NATURE OF GOVERNMENT. It seems to be a natural thing, to take the path of least resistance, or “I’m just me, there isn’t anything I can do about it.” This reminds me of a study conducted in Boston after WW2. It was believed that the German character lent itself to obeying orders. They designed an experiment whereby the experimenter would take responsibility for the subjects’ behavior.

Shock Test To Lethal
They had the subject sit in this chair in front of this impressive control panel and in the center was a knob that went from zero to lethal. When the subjects came in they passed this electric chair with tie down straps etc, but it was out of sight of the chair. The criterion was that the individual in the electric

chair had to answer a series of questions. If he gave a wrong answer he was administered a shock. Wrong answers were accumulative. With the second wrong answer, the shock was increased a notch by the experimenter. It really wasn’t happening because the person being shocked was a stooge. This is the real shocker! Ninety per cent of the Americans tested went all the way to lethal when the experimenter took responsibility. Well folks, the government has taken responsibility for you from cradle to the grave and the latter may not be too far down the road for a lot of us. We are being referred to as useless eaters and the environmental management plan refers to human beings as biological resources. Now I don’t know about you, but I begin to wonder just how important I am to an entity that considers me in the same category as a pig or a chicken or a cow or a horse. Being a number is bad, but this is something else. At this I draw the line, I may go down but it will not be with out a struggle. Move over David, I’ve got a real Goliath and that brings to mind W .E. Henleys poem: INVICTUS: Out Of The Night That Covers Me Black As A Pit From Pole To Pole, I Thank Whatever Gods There Be For My Unconquerable Soul. In The Fell Clutch Of Circumstance I Have Not Winced Or Cried Aloud; Under The Bludgeoning Of Chance My Head Is Bloody But Unbowed. Beyond This Vale Of Doubt And Fear Looms But The Terror Of The Shade And, Yet, The Passing Of The Years Finds, And Shall Find Me, Unafraid. It Matters Not How Straight The Gate How Charged With Punishments The Scroll I Am The Master Of My Fate, I Am The Captain Of My Soul. To be the master of your fate and the captain of your soul requires a tremendous amount of courage. We are up against a system that intends to rule us in any manner they see fit. A declaration of sovereignty and allodial title to your land is a very good stop to that. Your freedom will leave only if you let it. It’s up to you, I’ve declared as has thousands of others. Very few have updated their patent (for the best of reasons, they did not know a patent existed), but they will by the thousands, as soon as they learn how, where, what, and when. Will you be in that group? America needs you and your patented land!

(3) It is voided on it’s face. Sullivan. the intent of congress was to protect the sovereign freeholders and create a permanent system of land ownership in the country.479 (1913) “legal titles cannot be conveyed except in the form provided by law. “An estate of inheritance without condition. and alienable by him. 134 p. Hewitt Land Co. the law will not presume that it was obtained by fraud of the public right. there are only four ways a patent can be voided. Remember. Our courts today are not law. it is a doctrine which is founded upon reason and the soundest principles of public policy. is an absolute estate in perpetuity and the largest possible estate a man can have. Mining Co. 63 RI. not ~ equity court or ~ admiralty court. . 316 (1877)] The Word “Law” Means Common Law Note: When the word law is used it means common law. belonging to the owner. The land patent and the various patent acts are for this purpose. being in fact allodial in its nature. If the patent is regular in its’ form. To do this. (2) The original was fraudulently obtained. or (4) It is set aside by a court of law.. ~ A court of law means a COMMON LAW Court...” [State v. The only court of law that has jurisdiction over a sovereign American is a common law court. absolutely and simply. not ~ world courts. 216696 (1839)] “unless fraud is shown. transmissible to his heirs. 474. 96 U.S. It was adopted in the interest of peace in the society and permanent security of titles. they are equity or admiralty which has no jurisdiction over a sovereign unless the sovereign’s acquiesce.” [Stanton V. it is necessary to protect the sovereign on his ground and to make sure he can keep it.” [McGarrahan v.Patent As Title: Originally. this rule is held to apply to patents executed by the public authorities. (I) You do it voluntarily. Today the stated intent of congress is to retain the family farm. This principle on land patents is not merely an arbitrary rule of law established by courts.

United States. against the patent. [United States v. under the laws of congress.S.” [Walton v. passes title from the United States and the patent when regular on its .” [Bagnell v. (1935)]. 559 p. 1040 (aka.S. and is conclusive against the government and all claiming under junior titles. 475 p.111.Challenge Every Court You Enter Challenge the jurisdiction of every court you enter because if you don’t you freely give away all of your god-given rights. If the government and courts did fulfill their proper and only function we would not be in the mess we are in. Chauteau. were instituted to protect your rights. (Sept. Creek Nation. 1976)] “that the patent carries the fee and is the best title known to a court of law is settled doctrine of this court. (74 U.634 (1973)] “the patent is prima facie conclusive evidence of the title. officials were first and foremost Americans and not lackeys of a foreign power structure. (67 U. however strong. the patent is conclusive evidence as to ownership.S.S.” [Marshall v. Broderick. (1969)] “a patent is prima facie valid and if its validity can be attacked at all. 1 Well. or courts. Horvath. Brooks. Opinions of the United States Attorney General’s office.” [Land Patents. and does protect your rights.2d (Ariz. If you are of the mistaken opinion that the governments. once issued. [United States v. 13 Wall 92 (1871)] “congress having the sole power to declare the dignity and effect it’s titles has declared the patent to be the superior and conclusive evidence of the legal title. 415 f2d 121. and is final determination of the existence of all facts. United States. is conclusive evidence of title in the patentee. 474 f. 103. 2d 628. Cherokee Nation. 765 (1865)] “the patent is the instrument which. until it is set aside or annulled by some judicial tribunal. app.1869)] Back then. Crawford.face. 38 U. It makes me grind my teeth to have to be in an adversarial relationship with the government. “legal title to property is contingent upon the patent issuing from the government. 1970)] .S. 2d 1038.” [Gibson v.123 (10th cir. 49 U. then you have another think coming. ho equitable interest. is the highest evidence of title.233 (1850)] “a patent.” [Marsh v.” [Stone v. 295 U. 7 Wall. to land described in such patent can prevail at law. the burden of proof is upon the defendant” [State v. “a patent is the highest evidence of title.) 106 (1869)] “a patent issued by the government of united states is legal and conclusive evidence of title to the land described therein. 223. when there is a confrontation between two parties as to the superior legal title.” [Sabo v. 438 (1839)] “issuance of a government patent granting title to the land is ‘the most accredited type of conveyance know to our law’ “. Ladd.

” [Constitution Of The United States Of America.” [City Of Los Angeles V. Danowski. not you. Constitution. makes the United States of America a party of interest in any attack on that title in courts of law. 351 U. 246 s. Danowsk One of the latest cases in Michigan [Klais V. “the congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States. 496 (1896) ] “it is the largest estate in land that the law will recognize.Now that’s nice! When you go after them they have to prove it.” Anyway. patents to land were not cut off by the subsequent creation of the state and that the state has no jurisdiction on the patented lands. S. Clause 11. 292 P. acts of congress.172 (1978)] “patents rights to the land is the title in fee. S.590 (Ariz. Be prepared to scotch that idea. Section III. 441p2d 586. nor any lesser court can overturn the U.” [Squire v. The only court of original and proper jurisdiction is the Supreme Court of the United States. Article IV. State courts have no jurisdiction. app.S. That means that neither the Michigan Supreme Court (or any other state supreme court). fee. 74.1968)] “the land patent is the highest evidence of title and is immune from collateral attack. quoting corpus juris secundum]. 337 Mich. 1. The lesser federal courts can not rule on the force and effect of the patent.] Klais V. Being the absolute legal title to land. 2d 539 (1956)] “the patent is the fee simple. a fee simple estate still exists even though the property is mortgaged or encumbered” [Hughes V. sic-um. Michigan Supreme Court] held that. Board Of Supervisors Of Mono County. nor over 200 years of U. based on the supreme law of the land. 582 p. Sherwood. the land patent. a state’s enabling act and constitution. Ruddy.2d 170.S. Oakland Citizens for Justice. secretary. tiger! “a patent to land is the highest evidence of title and may not be collaterally attacked” [State v.” [Raestle v. Whitson. supreme court decisions upholding and abiding by the supreme law of the land which has always held that land patents convey and confirm absolute title to land. 23 (1923)] “state statutes that give less authoritative ownership of title than the patent can not even be brought into federal court. 6 (1956) ] “and the patent is required to carry the. Reports 1964. That must be where that old adage in football comes from “the best defense is a good offense. Crawford.w. Capoeman.” [Langdon V. l24 U.. They must abide by the legislative intent [quoting David Johnson.” [ Carter v. Constitution. Miller’s Mutual Fire Insurance co.81 (1887)] In the beginning they will try to get you in equity court or even admiralty at the state level.S. .S. derived from the U. 493. 166 U. Michigan Attorney General Frank Kelly found he could not attack a patent that is valid on its face.

18 AM. United States Code. It could not be plainer than the nose on your face. privileges. 491 STANTON V. of any state subjects. 1 N. because that section is for federal citizens under federal jurisdiction and that is something you don’t want to be.. United States Code.Y. 10 GILL & J (MD) 443 WALLACE V. United States Code. Their address is in the Address Section. but get the old edition. You want sovereign jurisdiction of common law (no victim no crime ergo no penalty). A word to the wise: in checking definitions in books such as Black’s Law dictionary or Bouvier’ Law dictionary find an old edition because when checking the old against the new. 437. sec. you’re getting better. custom. ordinance. or usage. God forbid that you ever have to do that.Quote This Case Hafer v. Melo. 275. SULLIVAN 7A. 44 PA. 90 681 U. 241 to them also. Government Harassment . Don’t use sec. I am not too sure that is a novel claim but that it is the only one that make sense and it appears to this author the only defense to start with. regulation. If. 1983 suits “every person who. S. sec. you might quote the following Supreme Court decision [Hafer v. CRANDALL.E. 516 PEOPLE V.” Patent Case Law ALLODIAL TITLE MATTHEWS V. That brings to mind the adage. 492 WENDELL V. It’s a lead pipe cinch that if enough of us do not step up and be counted the shoddy practices will continue. 242. sec. shall be liable to the party injured. that held under title 42. 269 M. 696 McCARTEE V. or causes to be subjected. You may take that to mean what ever you want. they still insist. Melo Title 18. There you have it.This is another organization you should contact if you plan to record and defend your patent. (1991)]. 9 COW N. after you tell them the truth. If someone tells you that there is no such thing as allodial title or land patents or land grants or that such things are for mining claims only you can educate them. then you know you are dealing with the enemy or an idiot or both. He goes on to assert that a novel claim might be that patented land is outside of the jurisdiction of whom ever is attempting to deprive you of your property. 241 Should your officials continue to harass you. they are not the same. ORPHUM’S ASYLUM. under color of any statute. DEC.Y. or immunities secured by the constitution and laws. 1033 . In the next section I am going to list every case that I have been able to find that deals with this issue. RICHARDSON. ARMSTEAD.” You might want to quote Title 18. The rest will bore you to death and you will only need it if you have to defend your title. any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights. “You are not getting old.109 N.

HINES.5 CAL.45 N. 858. 89 P. 2d 257.A.S. 2d 114.258 BEAVER V. 34 BARKER V. 80 US 92 WILCOX V. PICKERING. ST. CROMMELIN. SANFORD 139 US 642 FENN v. WRIGHT 28 ILL 509 WHITAKER V.R. STONE. GOTTBREHT 176 N. MILLER 125 SO. V. C. LADD 7 WALL 74 US 106 UNITED STATES V. BLAKE. CORLESS 46 US. TRAIL COUNTY.W. 876 FILE V. 122 MITCHELL V. HALEY 2 ORE. HOLMES. 36 ME. 393 SARGENT V. SCHUBAC 93 US 32 SAVILLE V. WALDO 128 ME. CO. BARBER 66 N.W. 22E ALA 133 . 42 F2d 158. 13 PETER (US) 4 STEEL V. 1032 W ALTON V. SMYSER. SHEIP. 937 STOLL V. JEROME H.LAND PATENT SANFORD V. UNITED STATES. 173 US 26 GIBSON V. 18 US 87 JOHNSON V. RUDDY 166 US 493 RUDDY V. JACKSON 13 PETER (US) 498 UNITED STATES V.) 38-41] STATE V.123 (10th CIR. S. 2 DALL (U. 2d 586590 YOUNG V. 106 US 417 HOGAN V. 2d 268 LEADING FIGHTER V. UNITED STATES 415 F 2d 121. 495 ECHART V. 158 ME. 223 HOOPER V. BEAMON 242 F. 1 MARSHALL V.) 419 WILCOX V. (VA. GREENLAWN CEM. 1 McCARTHY V. AIKEN 31 FED.C. AROOSTOCK 134 ME. 158 REICHERT V. BRODERICK. 496 STATE TREASURER V. 2 US 525 MINTER V. INC 131 SO. 230 N. SHERWOOD 124 US 74 CARTER V. COUNTY OF GREGORY.S. LOUIS SMELTING & REFINING CO. 932. 388 CASSIDY V. 209 US 393 BAGNELL V. CHRISTIAN 128 US 374 DOE v. CITY OF ROCKLAND. 23 HOW 235 GREEN V. 128 TOWN OF FRANKFORT V. 283 US 140 CLEVELAND V.S. SMITH 132 US 318 PEOPLE V. CREEK NATION 295 US 103 UNITED STATES V. HERRICK & STEVENS 221 US 404 NORTHERN R.D. 45 ME.W.) UNITED STATES V. SCHEIMER 64 U. ROSSI 248 US 104 GOLDING V. GEORGIA. PACE 69 US 605 LANGDON V. 115 US 600 BEADLE V. 116 CHISHOLM V. CHEROKEE NATION 474 F 2d 628 MARSH V. CHOUTEAU. APP. 350 F 2d 4 dert denied 387 U. 229. COMMISSIONERS. CALLOWAY [I WASH. 21 HOWARD 481 LOMAX V. ALASKA 593 P.CRAWFORD 441 P. BROOKS 49 U.

EQ. DANKS 13 LA ANN 128 U. 612 KALE V.S. 283 RYNOLDS V. 53 ALA 411 BIRGE V. 26 ILL. S. COUNTY BOARD OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES OF LAWRENCE COUNTY etal. FRAZHO 146 N.19 LED 681 UNITED STATES V. 2d 685 UNITED STATES V. FAILES. DENIED 296 U. 896 ST. SPRAGUE 282 U.2d 233. (7 WHEAT) 212 THOMAS V. CERT.454 HOOFNAGLE V.81 PUTNUM V. GASTREL 54 FED. 93 ILL APP 3d 366 DEMPSEY V. UNITED STATES 489 F2d 449. 18 HOW. PITCHER. CALIFORNIA ex. HALL.S.S.Y. S. 78 F. CO. WHITE. 819. 74. HYLTON. QUACKENBOSS 6 HILL NY 537 OAKLEY V. 85 MORRISON V. 4 AOO CAS. V. ED. 253 ROBERTS V.) 575. 1915) STANEK V. STATE LANDS COMMISSION. PAYNE. THE REGISTER.I. 588596 STATE V. 86 CAL. 172 MINN.J.E. 586. ICKES.) 127 WISCONSIN C.S.S. CRAWFORD 441 P. 3 DALL (3 U. 47 ILL 477 McCONNELL V.R. FOX. DEBEL 227 F 760 (C8 sd. LOUIS V. HUSTON 75 ILL.2d 586590 (ARIZ. PICKERING 173 US 26 43 L. GIBSON. 20 U.S. REYNES.NEWMAN. 80 L.SUPP. GREEN 52 ILL 223 BUSCH V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. BOREL.1 CCA 552.R.1 US APP 581 CAGE V. V.) 50 JOPLIN BREWING CO. STUBBS 117 ILL. rel. 139 F. ANDERSON. 781. STREET 17 ILL 253 MAHRENHOLZ V. 390. 601 COLOR OF TITLE DINGEY V. 538 MOORE V. (U.422 94 S. 389 .4 CCA 596.W. NORMAN. WILLIAMS. BASSETT. BOCK 44 MO APP 69 CONVERSE V. KELLOGG 7 BARB N.S.APP ) WINEMAN V. 590 BLOCH V.W. 9 WALL (U.215 N. 50 MISS 1038 EHLE V. PAXTON. STEENERSON 50 FED 504.Y. 508 SAFFORD V.W. 115 N. BURNS 281 ILL DRYDEN V.2d 496 DONOVAN V. COOK 41 N. 124 U. 116ILL 186 HINCKLEY v. 9 HOW (U.SUMMA CORPORATION V.22N.784 WARE V. 716 UNITED STATES V. 3 LA ANN 203 LITCHFIELD V. 65 ILL 200 DAVID V.S. 199) LOMAS V. 350A. 105 MASS 409 WRIGHT V. APP 332 JENKINS V. 197 NO. GORMAN 29 MO 593 RAWSON V. MATTISON. 92 R. RYAN.ED 2d 237 OLIPHANT V. 343 CHICKERING V.4 U.

256 RASCHELL V. GOODELL.MIDDLEBROOKE. CONVERSE 148 ll—L. PEREZ. 23 ILL 507 WOODWARD V. 49 ILL 197 BROOKS V. 83 N. 16 ILL 424 MARKETABLE TITLE AUSTIN v. MESSNER. CARRIKER 168ll—L 570 CHICAGO V. 123 LA. 1050 . REES. 52 MINN. BUNTIN 47ll—L 396 WALKER V. 868 CUMMINGS V. 7 TEX. 52 WASH. STEVENS. BRUYN. SMITH ILL. BLANCHARD.36 N. 43 ILL 391 COUNTY OF PIATT V. KELLOGG 17 ILL 498 GRANT v.74 S. 132 ILL 607. 192 ILL 160. 348 HERMAN V. APP. RATCLIFF 125 ILL. WATT.61 N .W. 668 PLACE V. CLAYTON. SOMERS. FERGUSON. 112 MICH 452 ORMSBY V. 24N. 819 HULS V. COLEMAN V.W. McFADDEN 32 TEX-CIV. DOLAN. BAMUM. 53 HOLLOWAY V. 2d 800 CLOSE V. 76 CAL. 181. OPPERMANN. 496 100 P.E. 97 ILL 84 SMITH V. 202. 136 ROBERT V. BENNETT 96 ILL. 42427 A. 113 ILL 327 COOK V. 507 McCLAGG V. BROWN. COHEN 15 MISC. 97 ILL 84 STUBBLEFIELD V. CLARKE. STUYVESANT. 2d 10381040 (AK 1976) DEFECTIVE TITLE HELLER V. 89 ILL. 34 ILL. 89 ILL 183 WHITNEY V. 989 SABO V. HEACOCK.98 N. 476 BRIDE V. 559 P. RIDGELY. 378. BILLINGS. 513 MORGAN V. ST. HORVATH. 158 PA. 354 COSPERTINI V. BORDERS 89 ILL 570 THOMAS V. 376 BRADLEY V. 724 WICHELMAN V. 111 KENDRICK V. S.105 BARNARD V. 47. LA TRAM. 18P. PEOPLE. 25 FLA. 483 McCELLAN V. 27 ILL. GRAHAM. 88 ILL 593. 483 BALDWIN V. NORTON. 622 PEADRO V.W. 61 ILL 35 BRADY V. ECKARD. SPURCK 27 ILL 478 BUTTERFIELD V.E. 35 ILL. GOODEN. CLARK 27 ILL. 143 ll—L 265 PIATT COUNTY V. 91 ILL 304 HASSETT V.HOOW AY V.Y.

I CH. CROWELL 55 NEB 57173 N. 206. 3d 85 MORTGAGE AS A LIEN NOT TITLE UNITED STATES V. 375 BARBER V. 51. BUCK. MURPHY 56 N. 30 (183]) 4 STAT.W. SESS II CH. CERTAIN INTEREST IN PROPERTY IN CHAMPAIGN COUNTY. 2d 689 SOUTH OMAHA BANK V. 765 ROBBEN V. 520 31st CONGRESS SESS I CH. 2d 387(7th CIR. 99 (1812) 2 STAT. I CH. 172 (1824) 2 STAT 748 12th CONGRESS. 603 FIRST NATIONAL BANK V. 2d 644. 12th CONGRESS. ILL. GANSWER 146 NET 635. 491. SKINNER 57 NEB. 18th CONGRESS. CALL PUBLISHING CO. SESS. 2d 839387 ILL 436 PEOPLE ex. 1109 SPEER V.E. LAWNDALE NATIONAL BANK. OBERING 279 F. KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY CO. WINNINGHAM ] 86 P. UNITED STATES CHAIN COMPANY 212 F. 650 (OKLA. 16th CONGRESS. 409 HEINEMAN V. 195-96 MANSON V. SESSI CH.E.W.W. S. LEVY 95 N. 18th CONGRESS. 85 (1850-MILITARY BOUNTY SERVICE ACT) 8 STAT. 41 ILL 2d 316. I CH. V.209) STATUTES AT LARGE THE MAIN PATENT STATUTE IS: 3 STAT. 444 21st CONGRESS SESS II CH. 19 HOW (U. (20 HOW) 501 COUSIN V. 97 U. 595 MORRILL V.243 N . 321 MITCHELL HUTCHINS AND CO.D. 56. APP. 716.2d 951.. reI. 335 SO. BERKMAN 356 ILL 20. 2d 1038 PORTER V. 51 (1820) 12 STAT. 2d 193. DICKSON 61 U. 181 U. HADDUCK. 559 P. BARRETT 46 N. SARGEANT 65 NEB.RAISE MILITARY FORCE) 5 STAT.E. 171 (N. 164. 31 FREEMAN (ILL) 439. 2d 263. SUPP. 123 29th CONGRESS SESS II CH. 385 ILL. 39491 N.77 N. 52 N. HORVATH. KANSAS PACIFIC RAILWAY CO.S. 8 (1847. SESS.E.) COMMON LAW UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO. 474 FEDERAL FARM MORTGAGE CORP.S. 2d 369.E.443 UNITED STATES V.E. v. HARMANN. 37th CONGRESS.20 N. 54 N. 392. SESS I CH.. 75 (1850 THE HOMESTEAD ACT) 9 STAT.371 THE EXCHANGE NATIONAL BANK V. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS V. 77 SCHELLER V. BLANC’S EX.W.W.WILD DEEDS SABO V. 68.) KARLSON V. 191 WILLIAMSON V. STATE OF ILLINOIS 165 F SUPP. 190 N.2d 708322 ILL.S.382 ILL. (1812-GENERAL LAND OFFICE ACT) . TRUSTEES OF SCHOOLS OF TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH 67 ILL APP.497 MARKS V. V. 174 (1824) 5 STAT.) MISSOURI. SESS.

U.5. SESS.3. 9th CONGRESS SESS. 590 11th CONGRESS.2 STAT.34 (1807) 2 STAT. (1810) 2 STAT. 34 (1807) [sic. CH. CH. SESS. 9th CONGRESS. sections U and H above are more likely II] *These are not all of the court cases and statutes by any stretch of the imagination but it will be enough to go into court with. H. CH. 437. LIST OF Sample FORMS Assignees Update of Patent (use to bring patent current) Request Letter For Certified Copy of Original Land Patent (get certified copy!) Tax Bill Refusal Letter Short Form Declaration of Land Patent (use short form for multiple properties) Declaration of Homestead (use to patent your actual home) Notice to the Court: Tax Bill Counter Demand Indenture in the form of a Grant Deed Declaration of Assignees’ Update of Patent (a sample of an actual patent) Attestation (an actual sample) The following items finish out the book and are not forms Addresses of BLM Offices Title Registration Statute Examples Additional Information from Ralph Kermit Winterowd “Property Scam” Questions to ask Your Banker Basic Overview & Important Contact Information Definitions from Black’s Law Dictionary – 6th Edition . H. 437.

THE 4TH. 1.S. WHERE THE QUESTION IS WHO HAS THE LEGAL TITLE.) 498.1824]. SANFORD. L. 2 US APP 581. 1 &2 AND ENFORCED BY ORIGINAL/EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION THEREUNDER AND IT IS THE ONLY WAY A PERFECT TITLE CAN BE HAD IN OUR NAMES.) 498. ART. 128. ED. IN THE CASE OF EJECTMENT.1862] AND 43 USC SECTIONS 57. 1 8t 2 . AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AND REFERENCED UNDER PATENT NUMBER LISTED ABOVE IS: (LEGAL DESCRIPTION) (2) NOTICE OF PRE-EMPTIVE RIGHT.ANN. 1846]. LITCHFIELD vs. LA. A GRANT OF LAND IS A PUBLIC LAW STANDING ON THE STATUTE BOOKS OF THE_______________________(YOUR STATE). 139 US 642. 566. GIBSON vs. THE TITLE SO GRANTED CANNOT BE IMPAIRED BY ANY SUBSEQUENT SURVEY MADE BY THE GOVERNMENT FOR ITS OWN PURPOSES. THE HOMESTEAD ACT [12 STAT. 13 PET (U. AN ACT OF CONGRESS [3 STAT. PURSUANT TO THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE [1776]. AND UPON SURVEYS LEGALLY MADE BY ITSELF AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER DEPARTMENT. 681. 13. 54 FED 819. AND 1OTH AMENDMENTS [U. 392. TILE PATENT OF THE GOVERNMENT IS UNASSAILABLE. JACKSON. A PATENT FOR LAND IS THE HIGHEST EVIDENCE OF TITLE AND IS CONCLUSIVE AS EVIDENCE AGAINST THE .Assignees Update of Patent (use to bring patent current) RECORDING REQUESTED BY ) AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO ) ) ) ) ) RECORDER’S USE DECLARATION OF ASSIGNEES UPDATE OF PATENT PATENT NUMBER________________________ KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT__________________________________________________ AND______________________________________________________DO SEVERALLY CERTIFY AND DECLARE THAT _______(WE/I) BRING UP THIS LAND PATENT IN _________(OUR/MY) NAME(S). THE OREGON TREATY [9 STAT. (U. SECTION 4. 101. 4 CCA 596. AND IS NOTICE TO EVERY SUBSEQUENT PURCHASER UNDER ANY CONFLICTING SALE MADE AFTERWARD. JACKSON. CONSTITUTION. 869 . WHEN THE UNITED STATES HAS PARTED WITH TITLE BY A PATENT LEGALLY ISSUED. IV SECTIONS I CL. THE REGISTER. WILCOX vs. GASTRELL. 7TH. 9 WALL. THE TRANSFER OF LEGAL TITLE (PATENT) TO PUBLIC DOMAIN GIVES THE TRANSFEREE THE RIGHT TO POSSESS AND ENJOY THE LAND TRANSFERRED. THE TREATY OF PEACE WITH GREAT BRITAIN (8 STAT. (U. CHOUTEAU. THIS DOCUMENT IS INSTRUCTED TO BE ATTACHED TO ALL DEEDS AND/OR CONVEYANCES IN THE NAMES) OF THE ABOVE PARTY(IES) AS REQUIRING RECORDING OF THIS DOCUMENT. AND 3. WILCOX vs. AND 83. 59. &. APRIL 24. DANKS. 264.) 575. JUNE 15. 2. ED. A PATENT ALONE PASSES TITLE TO THE GRANTEE.S. 13 PET. THE RECIPIENT HEREOF IS MANDATED BY ART. 2. WINEMAN vs. 19 L.S. 80) KNOWN AS THE TREATY OF PARIS [1793. III SECTION 2 CL. BY ORDER OF UNITED STATES SUPREME LAW MANDATE AS ENDORSED BY CASE HISTORY CITED. (1) THE CHARACTER OF SAID PROPERTY SO SOUGHT TO BE PATENTED. 80 US 92. 1781-91J TO ACKNOWLEDGE ASSIGNEE’S UPDATE OF PATENT PROSECUTED BY AUTHORITY OF ART. IN A MANNER KNOWN AS NUNC PRO TUNC [AS IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE IN THE BEGINNING]. VI SECTIONS 1. AND INJUNCTIONS AND MANDAMUS PROCEEDINGS WILL NOT LIE AGAINST IT. (3) NOTICE AND EFFECT OF A LAND PATENT. CAGE vs.S. ALL QUESTIONS OF FACT DECIDED BY THE GENERAL LAND OFFICE ARE BINDING EVERYWHERE. SANFORD vs. 9TH. 264. SECTION 2 CL. 10. ED.

IS AN ABSOLUTE ESTATE IN PERPETUITY AND THE LARGEST POSSIBLE ESTATE A MAN CAN HAVE.. BOUVIER’S LAW DICTIONARY.S. 3 LA ANN 203.WILL BE PROTECTED”. BELONGING TO THE OWNER AND ALIENABLE BY HIM.____________________ AND NOT THE WHOLE THEREOF. 209 US 393. 35 L ED 290 IN FEDERAL COURTS THE PATENT IS HELD TO BE THE FOUNDATION OF TITLE AT LAW. 230 N. WHETHER HE BE THE FIRST. FROM 43 USC & 15 n 44. 30 N. (U.. BARKER 47 NEB 934 66 NW 1032 (7) DISCLAIMER. PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES OF THE ORIGINAL GRANTEE OF LAND PATENT. INDESTRUCTIBLE INTEREST. 21 HOWARD 481. THE POWER OF CONGRESS TO DISPOSE OF ITS LAND CANNOT BE INTERED WITH. THE ORIGINAL MEANING OF A PERPETUITY IS AN INALIENABLE. 642. VANINA. CHOUTEAU. WITHIN 60 DAYS IT THEN BECOMES OUR/MY PROPERTY. THE PURCHASER MUST BE AT HIS PERIL. (6) EQUAL RIGHTS: PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES ARE FURTHER PROTECTED UNDER THE I4TH AMENDMENT TO THE U. SHERWOOD.) 92.. 74 WASH 573. AND HE IS ENTITLED TO ENFORCE POSSESSION IN EJECTMENT. TORRENCE SYSTEM. MARSH vs BROOKS. THERE ALWAYS BEING IN SPITE OF THE UTMOST CARE AND EXPENDITURE. 696. EVEN WHERE THESE HAVE BEEN MOST CAREFULLY COMPLIED WITH.S. OR ITS EXERCISE EMBARRASSED BY ANY STATE LEGISLATION. 24 MISS 118. FENN vs. 116. DOE. 469. UNITED STATES vs DEBELL. TRANSMISSIBLE TO HIS HEIRS ABSOLUTELY AND SIMPLY. AN ESTATE IN INHERITANCE WITHOUT CONDITION. A LAND PATENT IS A CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE PATENT HAS COMPLIED WITH THE ACT OF CONGRESS AS CONCERNS IMPROVEMENTS ON THE LAND. vs. PATENTS ARE ISSUED (AND THEORETICALLY PASSED) BETWEEN SOVEREIGNS LEADING FIGHTER vs COUNTY OF GREGORY. PERE MARQUETTE BOOM CO. (1914). 2570. 80. IF THIS LAND PATENT IS NOT CHALLENGED. 227 F 760 (C8 SD 1915). STONE. 216 7 A.4 U. 332. 227 PAC 45. THE RECORDING OF THIS INSTRUMENT SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO DENY OR INFRINGE UPON ANY OTHERS RIGHT TO .THE POSSIBILITY THAT HIS TITLE MAY TURN OUT BAD: YEAKLE.. 223.233.S. 44. BAGNELL vs.. ETC JANKINS vs GIBSON. SANFORD vs. UNTIL IT ISSUES. SHALL DENY TO ANY PERSON WITHIN ITS JURISDICTION THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS”. WHERE THE QUESTION IS WHO HAS THE LEGAL TITLE THE PATENT OF THE GOVERNMENT IS UNASSAILABLE. ASSIGNEE’S SEIZEN IN DEED. 71 MONT.. 74. IMMUNITY FROM COLLATERAL ATTACK: COLLINS vs. 50 FED 504.. SURGET vs. BARTLETT. 124 U.1 CCA 552.... NOR CAN SUCH LEGISLATION DEPRIVE THE GRANTEES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE POSSESSION AND ENJOYMENT OF THE PROPERTY GRANTED BY REASON OF ANY DELAY IN THE TRANSFER OF THE TITLE AFTER THE INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS FOR ITS ACQUISITION. 134 P 474. THE FEE IS IN THE GOVERNMENT. UNITED STATES vs. 13 PETER (US) 436.. PRIVILEGES.13 WAL.. 44 CAL 371. 1917): STATE vs HEWITT LAND CO.2d 114. 93. 49 U. (CA8 COLO. BRODERICK. W.S. AS STATED ABOVE. INCLUDING HEREDITAMENT. UNTIED STATES CONSTITUTION ARTICLE I SECTION 10. CONSTITUTION. GREEN vs. AS AN ASSIGNEE. 209. AND LAWFUL ENTRY IS INCLUSIVE OF SPECIFICALLY THAT CERTAIN LEGALLY DESCRIBED PORTION OF THE ORIGINAL LAND GRANT OR PATENT NO. SECOND OR THIRD PARTY TO WHOM TITLE IS CONVEYED SHALL LOSE NONE OF THE ORIGINAL RIGHTS. STATE STATUTES THAT GIVE LESSER AUTHORITATIVE OWNERSHIP OF TITLE THAN THE PATENT CAN NOT EVEN BE BROUGHT INTO FEDERAL COURT. BEAMON. “NO STATE SHALL IMPAIR THE OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTS”.. BEADLE vs. “ NO STATE. TRANSFER BY PATENTEE . 2 US 525. A FAILURE TO OBSERVE ANY ONE OF WHICH MAY DEFEAT THE TITLE. PRE-EMPTION RIGHTS APPURTENANT THERETO.. WEBER vs. AND WHERE THE TITLE HAS BEEN TRACED TO ITS SOURCE. vs STEENERSON. THE FINAL CERTIFICATE OR RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGING THE PAYMENT IN FULL BY A HOMESTEADER OR PREEMPTOR IS NOT LEGAL EFFECT A CONVEYANCE OF LAND. LANGDON vs.GOVERNMENT AND ALL CLAIMING UNDER JUNIOR PATENTS OR TITLES. APP. (4) LAND TITLE AND TRANSFER THE EXISTING SYSTEM OF LAND TRANSFER IS A LONG AND TEDIOUS PROCESS INVOLVING THE OBSERVANCE OF MANY FORMALITIES AND TECHNICALITIES. (5) LAW ON RIGHTS. 242 F 876...I. STANTON vs SULLIVAN. 63 R.. AND IMMUNITIES.S. SMYSER. [GIBSON vs. ESTOPPEL HAS BEEN MAINTAINED AS AGAINST A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (COUNTY). 139 U. PITTSMONT COPPER CO.S. SANFORD. W. BEING IN FACT ALLODIAL IN ITS NATURE. IN CASES OF EJECTMENT.S. WHICH BY THE PATENT PASSES TO THE GRANTEE.. U. UNITED STATES vs.”TITLE AND RIGHTS OF BONA FIDE PURCHASER FROM PATENTEE.. TEMEMENTS. THE PATENT IS PRIMA FACIE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE OF TITLE. AS NO ONE ELSE HAS FOLLOWED THE PROPER STEPS TO GET LEGAL TITLE. VOLUME III P. HOLMES.62 MICH 626.

CERTIFIED COPY OF ORIGINAL LAND GRANT OR PATENT. LACHES/ESTOPPEL SHALL FOREVER BAR THE SAME AGAINST ALLODIAL FREEHOLD ESTATE. executed the instrument. ADDITIONALLY. and that by his signature on the instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted. X______________________________________________ X______________________________________________ ASSIGNEE(S) ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of _______________________) (________________________________) ss. DECLARATION OF HOMESTEAD (STRIKE OUT IF NOT APPLICABLE). ASSESSMENT LIEN THEORY TO THE CONTRARY (ORS 275. ___________________________________ personally appeared_________________________________ and___________ personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity. THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DECLARATION. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PORTION OF SAID GRANTOR PATENT. WITNESS my hand and official seal ___________________________________________ Signature of Notary ____________________________ When Recorded.CLAIM THE REMAINING PORTION THEREOF. A COMMON COURTESY OF SIXTY (60) DAYS IS STIPULATED FOR ANY CHALLENGES HEERETO.130). INCLUDED. OTHERWISE. ANY CHALLENGES TO THE VALIDITY OF THIS DECLARATION & NOTICE ARE SUBJECT TO THE LIMITATIONS REFERENCED HEREIN. Return To: __________________________________ __________________________________ . County of______________________ ) On ________________ before me.

00 Postal Money Order . LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: STATE: COUNTY: BASE/MERIDIAN : TOWNSHIP: RANGE: SECTION : ENCLOSED IS A US POSTAL MONEY ORDER FOR $20 TO COVER EXPENSES.Request Letter For Certified Copy of Original Land Patent (get certified copy!) REQUEST FOR CERTIFIED COPY OF ORIGINAL LAND PATENT John-Frank: Smith c/o (Street address etc. (John-Frank: Smith) enclosure: $20. PLEASE SEND ME A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORIGINAL LAND PATENT COVERING THE BELOW DESCRIBED LAND. near [ZIP CODE] Washington state UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT (SEE ADDRESSES ON ONE OF THE FOLLOWING PAGES) DATE: DEAR SIR.) Your City. THANK YOU.

” MARSHALL vs. near [ZIP CODE] Washington state COUNTY CLERK COUNTY COURT HOUSE [COUNTY SEAT. AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT AND ALL CLAIMING UNDER JUNIOR TITLE. I AM NOT A TENANT. 74 U. vs.” STONE vs. AND IS CONCLUSIVE. 103. I RECEIVED A TAX BILL FOR THE AMOUNT OF $_____________. STATE] DEAR [NAME OR TITLE] ON [DATE OF RECORDING]. PLEASE LOOK INTO THIS MATTER IMMEDIATELY. 295 US. 67 US. “THAT THE PATENT CARRIES THE FEE AND IS THE BEST TITLE KNOW TO A COURT OF LAW IS THE SETTLED DOCTRINE OF THE COURT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE UCC 1--207 SINCERELY. US. MY DECLARATION OF LAND PATENT IS SUPERIOR TITLE TO THAT HELD BY THE STATE. RECENTLY.Tax Bill Refusal Letter DATE: [John-Frank: Smith] c/o [Street Address] Your City. I HEREBY REVOKE YOUR POWER OF ATTORNEY AND WITHDRAW MY CONSENT FOR YOU TO TAX ME BASED UPON THE VALUE OF MY LAND..2d 628. THIS MUST BE A MISTAKE. “ISSUANCE OF A GOVERNMENT PATENT GRANTING TITLE TO LAND IS ‘THE MOST ACCREDITED TYPE OF CONVEYANCE KNOWN TO OUR LAW’” US. LADD. US. “A PATENT IS THE HIGHEST EVIDENCE OF TITLE. I RECORDED A DECLARATION OF LAND PATENT WITH THE RECORDER’S OFFICE AS INSTRUMENT #______________ SEE ENCLOSED COPY.111. LAND CANNOT BE TAXED IF A LAND PATENT IS CURRENT. SEE ENCLOSED COPY.S. vs. CREEK NATION. CHEROKEE NATION 474 F. 765. 634. 106. (John-Frank: Smith) . UNTIL IT IS SET ASIDE OR ANNULLED BY SOME JUDICIAL TRIBUNAL.

COUNTY ________________________. PERSONALLY APPEARED _______________________. THIS ASSIGNMENT IS INCLUSIVE ONLY OF THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION.] PREPARED BY. DO SWEAR AND STATE THAT THE ABOVE IS TRUE OR IS BELIEVED. THE UNDERSIGNED. ON 20___. A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE. BY US TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITY AND KNOWLEDGE. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE. AND ____________________________________. when we have county officials trained to no contest and for attaching to other documents. THE FILING OF THIS DECLARATION OF LAND PATENT SHALL NOT DENY OR INFRINGE ON ANY RIGHT PRIVILEGE OR IMMUNITY OF ANY OTHER ASSIGNEE TO ANY OTHER PORTION OF LAND COVERED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND PATENT NUMBER WE ____________________________________. X __________________________________________. KNOWN BY ME TO BE THE INDIVIDUALS WHOSE NAMES ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT. TOWNSHIP ________. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL _____________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC IN & FOR SAID STATE . PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.Short Form Declaration of Land Patent [This form is for the future. ___________________________________ AND. RANGE _________. COUNTY OF _____________________________. CLAIMANT STATE OF ___________________________. BEFORE ME. PROPERTY SO SOUGHT TO BE PATENTED. STATE ZIP DECLARATION OF LAND PATENT UNITED STATES LAND PATENT NUMBER _________________ ISSUED ON THE ________ DAY OF _______________________________ BY _____________________________. ______________________________ DO JOINTLY CERTIFY AND DECLARE THAT WE BRING UP THIS LAND PATENT IN OUR NAME. AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AND REFERENCED UNDER PATENT NUMBER ________________________ LISTED ABOVE IS: _____________________________ COUNTY RECORDS BEING APART OF THE SECTION _________. CLAIMANT X __________________________________________. AND ____________________________. AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: YOUR NAME ADDRESS CITY. AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO THAT THEY EXECUTED THE SAME. NO CLAIM IS MADE HEREIN THAT CLAIMANT HAS BEEN ASSIGNED THE ENTIRE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE ORIGINAL PATENT. MERIDIAN ________.

State of _______________________________ Known And Legally Described As Follows: 4. All Statements Made Herein Are True And Correct. 5. Do Hereby Declare: 2. To The Best Of My/Our Knowledge And Belief. Being Duly Sworn On Oath. Deposes And Says: That As Signer To This Declaration Of Homestead. __________________________________. No Further Declaration Of Homestead Has Been Made By Me/Us Except As Has Be Abandoned. County of _________________________) I/We. I/We _______________________________________________________________. Date: ______________________ X __________________________________________ X __________________________________________ State of ___________________________) ) ss. That My/Our Mailing Address For My/Our Homestead is: _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ 3. Subscribed And Sworn To Before Me.Declaration Of Homestead 1. I/We Hereby Declare And Claim Said Premises As A Homestead. I/We Am/Are Now Residing On The Land And Premises Located In The City of ________________________. County of _______________________. This __________ Day Of ___________________ 20____ Notary Public My Commission Expires _______________________ .

(D) A SIGNED RECEIPT OF THE INSTRUMENT FOR ANY PARTIAL OR FULL PAYMENT AND ITS SURRENDER ON FULL PAYMENT. (A) EXHIBITION OF THE INSTRUMENT THAT CREATED THE LIABILITY. OTHERWISE I WILL CONSIDER THE MATTER CLOSED AND THE PRESENTMENT VOID AB INITIO. MAY TREAT THE PRESENTMENT AS DISHONORED IF THE PERSON TO WHOM THE PRESENTMENT IS MADE [YOUR NAME] MAKES COUNTER-DEMANDS WHICH ARE NOT AUTHORIZED BY UCC 3-505. zip RE: NOTICE TO THE COURTS AND ALL EMPLOYEES OF THE STATE OF (STATE) AND ANY OF ITS COUNTIES AND ANY OF ITS CITIES: COUNTER-DEMAND DEAR SIR: YOU ARE HEREBY INSTRUCTED BY THIS CITIZEN TO PROVIDE ME WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIRED INFORMATION PURSUANT TO UCC 3-505.NOTICE TO THE COURT: Tax Bill Counter Demand Date: _______________________ Name of entity you are counter-demanding Address City. UCC 3-505. (C) THAT THE INSTRUMENT BE PRODUCED FOR ACCEPTANCE OR PAYMENT AT A PLACE SPECIFIED IN IT. CORRESPONDINGLY. AND. AND. (B) REASONABLE IDENTIFICATION OF THE PERSON MAILING PRESENTMENT AND EVIDENCE OF HIS AUTHORITY TO MAKE IT. AND THE CODE GIVES A REASONABLE TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND. OR IF THERE BE NONE. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ANY SUCH REQUIREMENT INVALIDATES THE PRESENTMENT.5 THE PRESENTER OR HIS AUTHORIZED AGENT. IN THE ENCLOSED STAMPED ENVELOPE.4 AND RETURN IT TO ME.4 OR PLACES UNREASONABLE CONDITIONS ON DEMANDS AUTHORIZED BY THIS SECTION. THERE IS NO FURTHER DUTY UPON THE OTHER PERSON TO WHOM PRESENTMENT IS MADE [YOUR NAME] AND THE TIME FOR ACCEPTANCE OR PAYMENT RUNS FROM THE TIME OF COMPLIANCE. . IF THE COUNTER DEMANDS [BY YOUR NAME] ARE PROPER. state. UNTIL THERE IS SUCH COMPLIANCE. THE PRESENTER MUST COMPLY WITH THEM. THE PERSON PRESENTING HAS A REASONABLE TIME IN WHICH TO COMPLY AND THE TIME FOR ACCEPTANCE OR PAYMENT RUNS FROM THE TIME OF COMPLIANCE. YOU HAVE (10) CALENDAR DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF THIS COUNTER-DEMAND IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO THIS COUNTER DEMAND. IF MADE FOR ANOTHER. AT ANY PLACE REASONABLE IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES.

IF YOU DO NOT ANSWER THIS COUNTER DEMAND THEN YOU HAVE CONCURRED WITH MY DECLARATIONS AND TESTIMONY IN THIS MATTER. AND SHALL BE PRESENTED AS EVIDENCE IN A COURT OF LAW. near [ZIP] Washington state . THIS COUNTER DEMAND SHALL BE ENTERED INTO THE OFFICIAL RECORD OF ANY AND ALL PROCEEDINGS ARISING OUT OF THIS MATTER. THANK YOU. ________________________________________ Your Name (John-Frank: Smith) c/o Address City.

to (him. both in law and in equity. privilege. assign. situate. her. her. for and in consideration of the sum of ____________________________ ($_______________. whatsoever. also. ______________________ State (herein called the party of the “First Part” ). acknowledged and confessed. hereditaments and appurtenances whatsoever. remainder and remainders. hereditaments and premises hereby mentioned and intended so to be. WITNESSETH: That the party of the First Part. unto the party of the Second Part. and. claim and demand. her. or.Indenture in the form of a Grant Deed When Recorded. improvements. and the Grantee __________________________________ of _______________County. water courses. them) in hand paid and/or delivered by the party of the Second Part. and more particularly bounded and described. all the estate. aliened. sold. and does. curtesy and right of curtesy. as follows. thereunto belonging. right. bargain.00) dollars. _________________________ State (herein called the party of the “Second Part”). property. and (his.TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all and singular the said premises above described. with the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging. enfeoffed assigned. privileges. return to: ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ INDENTURE IN THE FORM OF A GRANT DEED Grantor(s) / Assignor(s) /Party of the First Part: _________________________________ Grantee(s) Assignee(s) /Party of the Second Part: ________________________________ Legal Description: Assessors Assigned Parcel Number(s) _________________________________ Reference numbers of related documents: _________________________________ THIS INDENTURE. all that certain lot(s). the receipt whereof is hereby admitted. ways. warranted and confirmed. release. lying and being in ___________________________ County. title. and the reversion and reversions. to wit: BEGINNING TOGETHER with all and singular the buildings. immunity. interest. tenements. sell. enfeoff. roads. issues and profits thereof. warrant and confirm. bargained. to and for . of the party of the First Part on. together with the appurtenances. grant. piece(s) or parcel(s) of land. rights. remise. liberties. woods. convey. with the buildings and improvements thereon erected. alien. possession. and the party of the Second Part forever released and discharged therefrom. in any wise appertaining. in GOLD COIN of the United States and/or other considerations. bodies of water. rents. made this ________day of _______________ in the year of our Lord _________________ Between the Grantor ______________________________ of ________________________ County. ___________________ State. their) heirs and assigns. remised. released. their) heirs and assigns. in and to the said premises. has granted. by these presents. conveyed. and to (his. and each and every part and parcel thereof. homestead and right of homestead. unto the party of the Second Part. forever.

her. be impeached. occupy. or indebtedness of whatsoever nature or kind. the party of the First Part has hereunto set (his. by this instrument. their) own proper use. under. (his. their) heirs and assigns. committed or suffered any act or acts. right. unto the party of the Second Part. shall and may. titles. assessments. and each and every part and parcel thereof. her. clear. do and execute. __________________________________________(L S. the premises granted. And the party of the First Part. conveyed. with the appurtenances. her. the same. in or to the premises hereby assigned. (his. as by the party of the Second Part. make. or so intended to be. whatsoever. (his. maintenance. or subject to: 4. full power and lawful authority to assign and convey the same. done and executed. all and every such further and lawful and reasonable acts.) Signed. (his. with the tenements. their) heirs and assigns. their) heirs and assigns. the same.(his. whereby or by means whereof the above mentioned and described premises. her. as follows: 1. with the appurtenances. her. eviction or disturbance of the party of the First Part. and administrators. grants. (his. their) counsel learned in the law. her. 5. themselves). (him. their) heirs and assigns. against all and every person or persons whomsoever lawfully claiming. (his. lawfully or equitably deriving any estate. assigning. charged or encumbered in any manner or way whatsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. or cause to be made. estates. and at the proper costs and charges of the party of the Second Part. trouble. shall be reasonably be advised or required. thing or things. her. and conveying the above mentioned and described premises. or at any time hereafter shall or may. (his. her. herself. 6. her. her. absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance in fee simple absolute of. their) heirs. have) not made. their) heirs or assigns. and each and every part and parcel thereof. or to claim. and each and every parcel thereof. shall and will warrant and forever defend. use. and all and every person or persons whomsoever. or any person or persons lawfully claiming. in and to the party of the Second Part. shall and will. or to claim. with the exception of. her. taxes. (his. benefit and be hoof forever. or them). now is or are. 2. 3. at any time or times hereafter. That the said premises. That the party of the First Part. and (his. That the party of the First Part. at all times hereafter. That the party of the Second Part. from. hold. their) heirs and assigns. her. and (his. (has. their) heirs and assigns. their) hand(s) and seal(s). her. executors. discharged and unencumbered of and from all for ma] and other gifts. or in trust for. liens and encumbrances. without any let. hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging. possess and enjoy the said premises. or any part or parcel thereof. sealed and delivered In the presence of ________________________________________ _________________________ (date) ________________________________________ . That the party of the First Part. collateral for bonding. That the party of the first Part. and has good right. attachment by mesne process. is lawfully seized of a good. forever. are free. their) heirs and assigns. peaceably and quietly have. title or interest of.) __________________________________________(L S. their) heirs and assigns. charges. by. their) heirs and assigns. her. for (himself. the day and year first above written. (his. in and to all and singular the premises hereby assigned and conveyed. hereby covenants to and with the party of the Second Part. conveyances and assurance in law for the better and more effectual investing. judgments. upon the reasonable request. her. done. or (his.

Range 40 East. united States’ Constitution and enforced by original/exclusive jurisdiction thereunder. 282 feet. 400. thence North 10 degrees 22' West. Articles 1-10. to acknowledge assignees’ update of Patent prosecuted by authority of Art. The character of said property so sought to be patented and legally described and referenced under patent number listed above is: A tract of land lying in the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 20. Jackson.6 feet. Article VI. . 13 Pet. thence North 2 degrees 17' West. 237. 391. the United States’ Constitution (1789). thence South 2 degrees 16' East. 78 feet. Washington CF59125CF ] Declaration of Assignees’ Update of Patent Patent number #4108 KNOW All MEN BY THESE PRESENTS That Lanny Messinqer and Jackie Messinqer do severally certify and declare that we bring up this land patent in our names. 256. united States’ Constitution. III. united States’ Constitution. more or less. thence North 2 degrees 20' West along the West line of said tract a distance of 312 feet. and it is the only way a perfect Title can be had in our names. thence South 89 degrees 01' West. bounded as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the East line of the Duncan Road. to the North line of the Duncan Road. the Declaration of Rights of October 1774. [Said property was previously listed under parcel number 8. which is herein noted under necessity.3210-40-17-20-0028. Amendment First..1 feet. thence South 86 degrees 47' West.4 feet to the point of beginning.Declaration of Assignees’ Update of Patent Recording requested by ] and when recorded mail to: ] ] Lanny Messinger ] c/o postal service address: ] 301 Chicken Road ] Endicott. united States’ Constitution.7 feet. thence West to a point of the East line of said Duncan Road. more or less. which point is South 7 degrees 41' East and 637 feet from the Northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 20. along said right of way. and use of said number shall not Constitute express or implied Consent to any entity in any manner whatsoever. to the West line of the OregonWashington Railroad Company right of way. Articles 1-10 (aka “Bill of Rights” of 1791). EXCEPTING therefrom that portion thereof described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of the tract of land owned by the School District. W. “The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America” of July 4. thence North 85 degrees 12' East 339. and preamble thereto. Township 17 North. thence South 2 degrees 20' East. thence Southerly and Easterly along the Easterly and Northerly line of said Duncan Road to point of beginning.] (1) Notice of Right of Preemption. 1791). to the Northeast corner of the tract of land owned by the School District. on the North line of the Duncan Road. united States’ Constitution (“Bill of Rights”. the recipient hereof is mandated by Article IV. M. and Amendment First. 1776 (aka “Declaration of Independence”). Wilcox vs. to the Northwest corner of said School District tract. Pursuant to the Declaration of Rights of the Stamp Act Congress of October 1765.8 feet.

When the united States has parted with Title by a patent legally issued. Until it issues. S. 2). Sherwood. 223. 2570. The patent is prima facie conclusive evidence of Title. indestructible interest. 209 US 393. the final certificate or receipt acknowledging the payment in full by a homesteader or preempt-or is not legal effect a conveyance of land. as stated above. Chouteau. from 43 USC & 15 n 44. Broderick. where the question is who has the legal Title. Wineman vs. within ninety (90) days. 2d 114.S. Patents are issued (and theoretically passed) between sovereigns. S. Privileges. A patent for land is the highest evidence of title and is conclusive as evidence against the government and all claiming under junior patents or titles. United States vs. Jackson. the Title so granted cannot be impaired by any subsequent survey made by the government for its own purposes. United States vs. 3 LA ANN 203. An estate in inheritance without condition. 10. absolutely and unconditionally. our private property. 10 1.) 575. S. v s. Beamon. Chouteau. etc. W. (U. Jankins Vs. S. Ed. Estoppel has been maintained as against a municipal corporation (county).will be protected. Beadle vs. A grant of land from the united States of America is pursuant to the supreme Law of the Land (Article IV. 80.S.) 498.) 92. Volume III P. 230 N. 49 U. 696. Smyser. [Gibson vs. 242 F 876. Sullivan. (CA8 Colo. App. 4 CCA 596. 233. and upon surveys legally made by itself and approved by the proper department. 54 Fed 819. In cases of ejectment. (U. Bagnell vs. belonging to the owner and alienable by him. Count of Gregory. which by the patent passes to the grantee. 124 U. 74 Wash 573. 134 P 474. 50 Fed 504. 9 Wall. Wilcox. the fee is in the government. or its exercise embarrassed by any state legislation. 264. Hewitt Land Co. Danks. 332. 216 7 A. Section 3. 19 L. Litchfield vs. and injunctions and mandamus proceedings will not lie against it. 80 US 92. transmissable to his heirs absolutely and simply. Steenerson. 2 US App 581. As an Assignee. A patent alone passes title to the grantee. Transfer by Patentee. vs. Gibson vs. nor can such legislation deprive the grantees of the United States of the possession and enjoyment of the property granted by reason of any delay in the transfer of the title after the initiation of proceedings for its acquisition.. (4) Law on Rights. The Power of Congress to dispose of its land cannot be interfered with.) 498. A land patent is notice to every subsequent purchaser under any conflicting sale made afterward. (2) Notice and Effect of a land Patent. LA. all questions of fact decided by the general land office are binding everywhere. 264. Langdon vs. by order of united States’ Supreme Law mandate as endorsed by case history cited. 1917): State vs. 1 CCA 552. Gastrell. whether he be the first.. 4 U.I. A land patent is a conclusive evidence that the patent has complied with the act of Congress as concerns improvements on the. U. 116. Gibson. 2 US 525.” United States vs. land. S. L. Stone. 13. …”Title and rights of bona fide purchaser from patentee. Debell. 93]. is an in absolute estate perpetuity and the largest possible estate a man can have. 128. Ed. and he is entitled to enforce possession in ejectment. If this land patent is not challenged. privileges or immunities of the original grantee . 13 Wal. 681. as no one else has followed the proper steps to obtain lawful Title. The Register. second or third party to whom Title is conveyed shall lose none of the original rights. Sanford vs.(U. being in fact allodial in its nature. it then becomes. 13 Pet (U. (1914). ANN. Cage vs. Marsh vs. State statutes that give lesser authoritative ownership of title than the patent cannot even be brought into federal court. 0. (3) Land Title and Transfer. The transfer of legal Title (Patent) to public domain gives the transferee the right to possess and enjoy the land transferred. Leading Fighter vs.. in a manner known as nunc pro tunc [as it should have been done in the beginning]. Brooks. 74. Ed. 13 Peter (US) 436. 227 F 760 (C8 SD 1915. This document is instructed to be attached to all deeds and/or conveyances in the names of the above parties as requiring recording of this document. The original meaning of a perpetuity is an inalienable. Stanton vs. 139 US 642. S. and Immunities. 61 R. Sanford.. Bouvier’s Law Dictionary. the patent of the government is unassailable.

71 Mont. joint tenant. shall not constitute express or implied Consent to the jurisdiction of mere political/legislative laws of the corporate “county of Whitman”. by the Spokane County Sheriff to perfect the public record. Any challenges to the validity of this Declaration & Notice are subject to the limitations referenced herein. W. 30 N. the de facto “STATE OF WASHINGTON” or any other entity. 24 Miss 118: Pittsmont Copper Co. which is. 62 Mich.of land patent. and the filing and recording. Weber vs. made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. S. in performance of his constitutional duties. Amendment First (i. of the de facto “STATE OF WASHINGTON” or the corporate “county of Whitman” or any other entity. dated July 20. 139 U. assessment lien theory to the contrary included. 21 Howard 481. The recording of this Instrument shall not be construed to deny or infringe upon any others right to claim the remaining portion thereof. made apart hereof as though fully set forth herein. of this document by the Whitman County Auditor. Bartlett. or their said real property to the mere political/legislative laws of the de facto “STATE OF WASHINGTON” or the corporate “county of Whitman”. (6) Disclaimer. are natural-born sovereign Electors and as such move in the supreme Law of the Land and the common Law of immemorial antiquity and do not move in the jurisdiction of mere political/legislative laws of the federal government or of any state or political subdivisions thereof. The affixing of the seal of the “STATE OF WASHINGTON” to this document shall not constitute express or implied Consent to the jurisdiction of mere political/legislative laws of the de facto “STATE OF WASHINGTON”. the “county of Whitman” or any other entity. 44. 1999. which is. nor may it be construed that such filing and recording subjects Lanny Messinger. Doe. adjudications. Surget vs. and lawful entry is inclusive of specifically that certain herein legally described portion of the original Land Grant or Patent no. “county of Whitman” or any other entity. THEREFORE. Assignees’ seizen in deed. 469. I. Section 10. Sanford vs. 44 Cal 371. by this reference. Additionally. “Bill of Rights”) united States’ Constitution. and said Affidavit was never challenged by the de facto “STATE of WASHINGTON” or any political subdivision thereof or any other entity. codes. The said property sought to be patented. where the question is who has the legal title. vs. laches/estoppel shall forever bar the same against allodial freehold estate. said real property is exempt from taxation by the de Facto “STATE OF WASHINGTON”. Lanny Messinger and Jackie Messinger. “No state shall impair the obligations of contracts. In cases of ejectment. a common courtesy of ninety (90) days is stipulated for any challenges hereto. 35 LEd 290. as evidenced by the attached “Affidavit of Lanny Messinger and Jackie Messinger”. was heretofore withdrawn from registration on _______________ ______ 2000 as evidenced by the attached “Certificate of Withdrawal from Registry System”. Barker 47 Neb 934 66 NW 1032. The de facto “STATE OF WASHINGTON”. under necessity. the “county of Whitman” or any other entity may not hereafter claim any interest whatsoever in said land sought to be patented.” United States Constitution. Said land may only be taken pursuant to Article V. including hereditament. . Art. 227 Pac 45. tenements. This Update of Land Patent is a common Law document. The said real property sought to be patented shall heretofore not be subject to the jurisdiction of the mere political/legislative laws. Sanford. Green vs. Immunity from collateral attack: Collins vs. otherwise. The said Affidavit was served on July 21. Fenn vs. Pere Marquette Boon Co. etc.. pre-emption rights appurtenant thereto. Jackie Messinger. (5) Status in Law. Vanina. or of any other entity. Holmes. 626. previously listed under parcel number 8-3210-40-17-20-0028.4108 and not the whole thereof.e.. 642. the Patent of the government is unassailable. by this reference. In federal courts the patent is held to be the foundation of Title at Law. 1999.

(7) All Rights. [Filing/Recording fee is tendered in united States Coins. agricultural. nickels] WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL: ____________________________________ Sovereign Elector Assignee WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL: ____________________________________ Sovereign Elector Assignee . which is.e. A certified copy of the original Land Grant #4108 is attached to this Declaration. Privileges.. reserved and preserved. including all water Rights. for mining. by this reference. and Immunities retained. or other purposes. made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. manufacturing. i.

Dakota U. Wyoming 82003 Utah U. BLM Anchorage Federal Office Bldg. Idaho California U. S. S. 3008 300 Booth St. Dept. Of The Interior. N. U. Dept. BLM Box 165633707 N. Dept. S. Of The Interior.S. Of The Interior. 136 East South Temple Salt Lake City. Dept. Room E-28412800 Cottage Way Sacramento. 550 West Fort St.S. Dept. S. 701 “C” St. Of The Interior. Oregon 97208 Idaho U. St. BLM Federal Bldg. BLM 825 Multnomah St. Of The Interior. Dept. Of The Interior. BLM Federal Office Bldg. 7th. BLM University Club Bldg. BLM Federal Bldg.O. BLM Granite Tower 222 N. Dept. Box 2965 Portland. Dakota. Arizona 85011 Wyoming. S. BLM Joseph Montoya Fed. 32nd St.S. Of The Interior. Alaska 99513 . Of The Interior. California 95825 Montana. Dept. Of The Interior. Box 1449 Santa Fe. Rm. New Mexico 87501 Nevada U. All land patents are located here but it will take longer. of The Interior. South Federal Place P. Montana 59107 Arizona U. Utah 84111 New Mexico. Dept. Nevada 89520 Alaska U.S. BLM Box 18282515 Warren Ave Cheyenne. Oklahoma U. Boise. Box 13 Anchorage. Dept. It usually costs about a buck twenty five but I just sent twenty dollars and they returned the change. Nebraska U. Springfield. Box 12000 Reno.S. S. BLM Eastern States Office 7450 Boston Blvd. Be sure you ask for a certified copy as that is the only thing courts will accept as evidence of patent. Box 30157 Billings. Dept. Virginia 22153 (703) 440-1605 Washington & Oregon U. Of The Interior.Addresses of Bureau Of Land Management Offices: The addresses listed below are where you can get a certified copy of the original land patent for you legal description. S. Phoenix. All Eastern States. Bldg.

230 Application to withdraw The owner or owners of registered lands. the registrar of titles. to wit: (Legal description). in Colorado. the title to which has been or shall hereafter be registered in the manner provided by law. in Ohio. the undersigned registered owner(s) in fee simple of the following described real property situated in the county of __________________.225 Withdrawal authorized . These statutes and the forms and procedures they prescribe remain fairly uniform from state to state. shall make and file with the registrar of titles in the county in which said lands are situated. To give you some idea of the nature and content of such statutes. it would be ORC 5309. In Washington (state) it will be found at RCW 65. The title to said above described lands has been withdrawn from the effect and operation of the title registry system of the state of Washington and the owner (or owners) of said lands is (or are) by law authorized to contract concerning. desiring to withdraw the same from registration.230.12. and CRS 38-36-149. shall have the right to withdraw said lands from registration in the manner hereinafter provided. For example.235. Witness my hand and seal this _______ day of __________________. state of Washington. convey. and RCW 65. state of Washington. shall have the right to contract concerning.TITLE REGISTRATION The pertinent statutes for registering and unregistering land titles should be listed in the index of your state’s revised codes. __________________________________________________________. RCW 65.12.68. it would be CRS 38-30-117.235 Certificate of withdrawal Upon filing of such application and the payment of a fee of five dollars. to Wit: (Legal description) hereby make application to have the title to said real property withdrawn from registration. Witness my (or our) hand(s) and seal(s) this __________ day of ______________.Effect.225. those above cited for Washington’s code appear as follows: 65.12. encumber or otherwise deal with the title to said lands in the same manner and to the same extent as though said title had never been registered. 20___ ________________________________________________ Applicant signature(s) Said application shall be acknowledged in the same manner as is required for the acknowledgment of deeds. the title to which has been heretofore registered under the laws of the state of Washington. an application in substantially the following form: To the registrar of titles in the county of. That ___________________________________________the owner (or owners) in fee simple of the following described lands situated in the county of __________________. having heretofore filed his (or their) application for the withdrawal of the title to said lands from the registry system. shall issue to the applicant(s) a certificate in substantially the following form: This is to certify. The owner or owners of any lands. 65. and after the same have been so withdrawn from registration.12. NOW. CRS 38-36-136. (or we). state of Washington: I. if it shall appear that the application is signed and acknowledged by all the registered owners of said land. 200____ ________________________________ Registrar of Titles For _______________________ County . THEREFORE. encumber or otherwise deal with the title to said lands as freely and to the same extent and in the same manner as though the title had not been registered.12.12. 65. convey.

Also in that event. What the codified statutes appearing above set forth is straight-forward and inexpensive to file/record. They will be valid under the Full Faith and Credit guarantee of the united States’ Constitution. use those provided above. . the same year Congress enacted the now infamous Trading With The Enemy Act. you will have to prepare the certificate of withdrawal for the county registrar of titles to sign.It may be of interest to some readers to note that these statutes were enacted in Washington state in 1917. In the event your state’s statutes do not provide specific document formats.

This second method would supersede any former beneficiary right of property claimed by any bank/ government entity. Use your own judgment on this. If the property in question has changed hands since issuance of the original Land Patent and if a Deed of Trust or equivalent instrument was filed at any point in the succession of conveyances. it is information you should be aware of.Additional Information This information is a superlative piece of work and. . and the like to “walk” into if they are foolish enough to try it. The only legal or lawful way to defeat what you have done would be to cha1lenge you in court and prove the validity of their claim and. The first way would be to file a Quiet Title Action (an equity device) which addresses (and settles) the issues raised by the attached material and then bringing the title (Land Patent) forward. The other way would be to repeat the entire conveyance process outlined using a trusted friend or relative as a private “lender” (very short-term loan) and using only Lawful Money (gold and or silver Coin) as the medium of exchange in the transaction(s). in the course of doing so. This would entail taking a confrontational/adversarial posture in the matter. Once the loan is paid off and the title company releases its interest in the title. then your “lender” (for “valuable consideration”) conveys all remaining equitable interest to you with an Indenture in the form of a Grant Deed. bringing the original title (Land Patent) forward in one’s own name might have on any equitable interest retained by a lending institution/government. then this information is vital. provide evidence of fraudulent conveyancing (criminal conversion) -which they are not very likely to do. It is. if any. incidentally. whether or not it applies to your own particular circumstances. an excellent example of how to construct one of many unconcealed “traps” for judges. attorneys. Then bring the original title (Land Patent) forward in your own name. There are only two ways I can think of to be sure. I am not altogether sure what effect. This second method also conforms to the requirements of the “dueling field” concept in that it illustrates the proper way for a sovereign Elector to “set the conditions of battle” (in advance).

1. The very process of the Trust Agreement divides the land [real estate] into an “estate” [your portion] or legal status with limited right of use. BARGAINS. (See attached definitions). we must bother to learn but a few and basic “legal” words to begin to comprehend a great deception that starts with the simple Deed of Trust and Assignment of Rents issued by lenders when we buy our property. the bank through the Deed of Trust agreement acquired “equitable” ownership and you were left with the tailing or what is referred to as “legal” ownership.Bank Title To Land In other words. So much for Noah Webster. or technical words and carry with them specialized meanings. they designate a person [the beneficiary] who has the real or beneficial interest in an estate. 2. the “Trustor [you] GRANTS. the title or administration of which is temporarily confided to another [you]. Oxford. [the beneficiary/bank]. Bank Loan . Of necessity. a Deed of Trust is nothing more than a written trust contract involving three parties or entities called a Trustor. Deed of Trust In the Deed of Trust. and a 3. “PROPERTY SCAM” Legal Definitions v. There is an important difference worth knowing between the words “legal” and “lawful” that the bank may have neglected to disclose. or such as lexicographers give. when you borrowed money from the bank to buy “your” property. Beneficiary. Why? It is the difference between knowingly keeping and unknowingly giving away something of value [your property] when entering into a real estate transaction. which is the bank or lender. a Trustee. This relationship is called a Cestui Que Trust [pronounced cest-we-key] or the easier to pronounce fidei-commissarius. . which is usually the Title Company. especially when involved in matters of law. to understand some of what has taken place right in front of our open eyes. the following described real property:” for someone’s benefit 3. Deed Of Trust Simply. and into “real property” [the bank’s portion] with full right of possession. and CONVEYS to 2. Dictionary Meanings Legal definitions of words are often called “words of an art”. TRUSTEE IN TRUST WITH POWER OF SALE. It is not always safe to adopt the mere etymological meaning.” Further. both of which are referred to in early law books as “uncouth” and “barbarous “ because they both refer to a “beneficiary under a donation in trust.Yours in Liberty. You just donated and freely gave “your” real property to the bank which now rightfully as the equitable owner can claim it as its’ asset. SELLS. you. and Funk & Wagnalls. which is 1.

in the Drafting Manual for Administrative Regulations. it explains that: Implementing Regulation I. here is what happens: REAL ESTATE • Trustor/Donor [You] (Possession/Use) Legal Owner. you being the nice person you are. pay property taxes and homeowners’ insurance on property that you do not lawfully own.As the saying goes. A clever deception? To add insult to injury. “the bank got the mine and you got the shaft”. having served its purpose.” Did the bank forget to disclose this to you? To illustrate: REAL ESTATE • Legal Owner [You] with right of possession/use through a Warranty Deed • Equitable Owner [The Bank] with right of property. Ask him further if when you payoff the loan. never gives up its donation of equitable /beneficial interest you “gave” to them at the outset. and so is fraud! Ask Your Banker? For validation and proof of this “oversight” just ask your banker to do you a favor to clear up a point of confusion. the • Title Company as Trustee ceases to exist! You now hold “legal” ownership but your donation of the “Real Property” remains with the bank as an equitable/beneficial ownership interest in “your” property. Feudalism is alive and well. Ask him to tell you in a sworn affidavit that he has no equitable or beneficial interest in your property. will you emerge with a perfect title and as a true and lawful owner of the property? Next: Is there lawful authority to collect property taxes from you? According to the Attorney General and the Department of Law. as it affects . A Statute by itself then. when applied to the public must have a corresponding Administrative Code or Implementing Regulation to give it force and effect of law. Land Occupier (An estate and interest) • Trustee/Donee [Title Company] (Right of Possession) • Beneficiary [Bank] (Right of Property) Equitable/True Owner (Real Property/Trust Corpus) Paid-Off Loan Warranty Deed After paying off your loan with the bank. right under your nose.E. No Law Without Regulation(s) Statutes. To illustrate. the Title Company as Trustee re-conveys to you its limited estate [Right of Possession] through a Warranty Deed and.

constitutionality.010. If an agency is in doubt. corresponding Code or 2. we can deduce that any statute affecting the public must have a code or regulation to render it constitutional.” NOTE WELL: Anything that affects the public or affects the public’s rights must be adopted under the AP A [Administrative Procedures Act] as a regulation. the State of Alaska does not wish to compromise its sovereign status and knowingly violate your rights secured in the constitution of the United States of America. and is expressly null and void (see AS 44. . To be lawful in its collection process the Statute must have a: 1. is no law without a regulation. an agency must consider “whether it affects the public or is used by the agency in dealing with the public. Implementing Regulation which should in turn be found in the “Statutory Cross Reference Table. Their phone number is 907-269-5100.” Surprise! The taxing Statutory Authority and Administrative Code are conspicuously missing! You may wish to contact the Department of Law yourself to verify.” (Page 4. under Step 9-FINAL AGENCY ATTORNEY LEGAL REVIEW on page 19 of The Regulation Adoption Process it states that “The agency attorney will review the substance of the regulation for its legality. to render an explanation and determination opinion in the form of a sworn affidavit of truth as to whether you owe and must pay property taxes and by what lawful authority. It doesn’t appear to have passed the rigors of the constitutional test because there is no Statutory Authority for its enforcement! Clearly.62. Additionally: Is A Provision A Regulation? “To decide whether a provision is a regulation.45.the public.S.15. Another important issue to address before the Department of Law while you have them on the phone is the requirement for you to have a drivers license as mandated under AS Title 28. the agency should err on the side of adopting regulations under the APA. Supreme Court case of Marbury vs Madison it can be considered repugnant to the Constitution for the United States of America and is void ab initio.640(a) (3)). Introduction to Regulations) Further.011. otherwise. and consistency with other regulations:” So. as if it was no law at all! Property Tax Collecting Statute The taxing authority for collecting property tax is presumably to be found in Title 29 of the Alaska Statutes at Section 29. under the landmark U.

am I just a tenant of the real property (trust corpus)? 10) Please define all interests in my real property. 4. 9) In reality. Deed of Trust (or newer versions . SELLS AND CONVEYS to TRUSTEE IN TRUST WITH POWER OF SALE. GRANTS. Beneficiary. 3. equitable. In your written determination. 2. cestui que trust. B. correct and certain. Words are cheap. The truth is very powerful.Questions to ask your Banker All of the following questions require the Banker to sign an Affidavit of Truth to verify that what he is saying is true. Trustee. Also request a letter signed by the banker on the following questions if he will not do an affidavit. was my Deed of Trust (and Assignment of Rents) executed without fraud and with full disclosure? . Trustor. Answers are in [ ]. and the singular and combined use of the following words: 1. BARGAINS. not to exclude any government entity? 13) Why was this Deed of Trust with all of its’ ramifications never explained to me? 14) Fraud kills all contracts. 2. legal or C. Don’t be disappointed if he won’t even do a letter. 11) Who are all of the beneficiaries to the property? 12) Where is the documentation to the beneficiaries if they have changed from the original bank. Put the description of your property at the top of the letter in a paragraph along with all questions concerning this property. be they A. 1) Who is the Legal Owner of the Real Estate? [You are] 2) Who is the Beneficial Owner of the Real Estate? [The bank/government] 3) Who is the Legal Owner of the Real Property? [You are] 4) Who is the Beneficial Owner of the Real Property? [Bank/government] 5) Does the bank or government(s) have or receive any benefit from the real property.Deed of Trust and Assignments of Rents). 3. undisclosed to me. [Yes] 6) Is the Deed of Trust (and Assignment of Rents) a cestui que trust? [Yes] 7) Did you explain to me that I would not be the true owner of the real property? [NO!] 8) Would you explain to me in writing the definitions of all of the terms and components of the first page of the Deed of Trust (and Assignment of Rents). including but not limited to: 1.

) Do a “Title Search” and “Survey the Land. Article 1 Sec.) Obtaining a Federal Land Patent: For Farm Property: A. This means that the property is Yours and no one else and You are the only one in control of Your Property! Every Property Owner should have a Blacks Law Dictionary! II.) Buying Property: Obtaining Alloidial Land Title: A.netau. 8 c 1.Basic Overview Step By Step: *Make Sure To Get Your Federal Land Patent First Then File For Your Alloidial Title! *Note: I would advise that You become the Secured Party Creditor Before you Start this Process! Go To: http://www.) Get a “Bill of Conveyance” and make sure to retain “All Rights” to the property on the Bill of Conveyance (Make this Contract with the Seller of the property) C.) File all of these documents with the “County Recorder” in the Judicial Circuit or District in which the Property is located. If you do not file for “Homestead Exemption” or make any other Contracts with the County or State.net to learn How To Begin!!! I.) Send a Certified Legal Description of the property (Get this from the County Treasurer or Register of Deeds Office) and a “Town Plat Map” from the Register of Deeds Office. Gold & Silver holds value.) When you buy anything pertaining to property buy it with Gold or Silver Coins. Make sure to have U. .S. then you cannot be Accessed any Tax or be Forced to obtain Permits to improve upon your property.” (Put Survey on Paper Form) D.5 B.sovereign. Minted Coins that were Minted by Congress Approval.

III. write: “Attached Hereto are Exhibits A&B.) Record your Federal Land Patent (FLP) plus your “Declaration of Land Patent” plus Your “Deed” with the Clerks Office in your area.” “Register of Deeds” and the Record them in the “Real Estate” file at your Clerks Office in your area. B. Be sure to request a Certified Copy of the FLP. You can only have “1” Federal Land Patent per Land Parcel.) Obtain “Range Number” and Township from the “City Engineer” plus the “Total Legal Description” of the Lot or Property.B.) FLP for City Property: A. *Note: Make Sure You Get Your FLP First Then File For Your Alloidial Title! .) Then “Circle Your Property” on the Plat Map. Make sure to Declare “All of the Assets” on your property Including “Mineral Deposits” Write these statements on your Declaration of Land Patent.) Obtain your FLP (Follow all steps) C.” D.) Record your Paperwork with a “Declaration of Land Patent” plus Certified FLP plus “Declaration of Homestead “Attached” to it marked “Exhibits A&B.) On your Declaration of Land Patent. C. Your Property may be in one or more sections and or Counties.

Their Contact Info. Box 90104 Gainesville.A. MO. 32607 (352)871-3389 Daniel Hubbard Forensic Auditor Processor (720)434-8733 *There is a $500.Virginia 22304 Ph: (703)235-2875 The Bureau of Land Management Issues Land Patents and this Fee is normally $20 dollars (ask them for a Certified Copy of your FLP) To Get Your Land Patent Quicker.Important Contact Information Offices That Issue Land Patents: Eastern States Office 350 South Pickett Street Alexandria. *There is a $950. To help with the Process of obtaining a FLP & an Alloidial Title.00 fee to have us do a Forensic Audit on your Mortgage Documents in which we look for any type of Fraud.S. PO Box 9547 Kansas City. Contact: Jason Yates Forensic Auditor Processor/Author P. Also Helps With Info.00 fee to have us get your FLP & Alloidial Title. Is: Acres U. FL. 54486 Acres U. 64133 . WI.O. contact: Family Farm Preservation PO Box 2587 (hwy M) Tigerton.S.A.

Equitable interest . Ownership rights which are protected in equity. without recognizing any superior to whom any duty is due on account thereof. or benefit. Beneficial owner . a writing signed by grantor. issues.He for whose use and benefit lands or tenements are held by another. not holden of any lord or superior. and not of any lord or superior.Free. Cestui que use . advantage. whereby title to realty is transferred from one to another. owned without obligation of vassalage or fealty. and not as holder of title for use and benefit of another. or Public Library) Allodial . The person who possess the equitable right to property and receives the rents.Profit. When considered as designation of character of an estate. An estate held by absolute ownership. legatee.Land held absolutely in one’s own right. even though bare legal title is invested in another. Law Library. This term is applied to both estates (as a “beneficial interest”) and to persons (as “the beneficial owner”).The interest of a beneficiary under a trust is considered equitable as contrasted with the interest of the trustee which is a legal interest because the trustee has legal as contrasted with equitable title.One who is recognized in equity as owner of the property. or advantage resulting from a contract. yielding a profit. but not legal title which remains in trustee or personal representative. but the legal title and possession (as well as duty of defending the same) reside in the other. or donee takes solely for his own use or benefit. the opposite of feudal.Tending to the benefit of a person.The ownership Interest of one who has equitable as contrasted with legal ownership of property as in the case of a trust beneficiary. (Black’s Law Dictionary may be located in a local large book store. enjoying or entitled to a benefit or profit.A. The beneficiary of a trust. the legal estate of which is vested in a trustee.A conveyance of realty. benefit. The cestui que use has the right to receive the profits and benefits of the estate. Deed . Beneficial . Beneficial interest . Allodium . . or the ownership of an estate as distinct from the legal ownership or control.Definitions Black’s Law Dictionary -6th Edition Definitions Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence Ancient and Modern -by Henry Campbell Black. Equitable owner . land not subject to feudal duties or burdens. Equitable as contrasted with legal owner. Cestui que trust .Term applied most commonly to cestui que trust who enjoys ownership of the trust or estate in equity. because real and beneficial use and title belong to him. and profits thereof. Equitable ownership .He who has aright to a beneficial interest in and out of an estate the legal title to which is vested in another. is such an interest as a devisee. M.

Fiduciary .A person having duty.The tenures of real estate under the feudal system. periodic tenancy. . and tenancy at sufferance. The four principal types of leasehold estates are the estate for years. full and absolute title or apparent right of ownership with beneficial or equitable title in another. a trustee for his benefit. but which carries no beneficial interest in the property. which he possesses merely in his own right.As listed under owner definition: One who is recognized in equity as the owner of property. the antithesis of “equitable title. or one which is complete and perfect so far as regards the apparent right of ownership and possession. Fee -Estate .One cognizable or enforceable in a court of law. tenancy at will. The legal owner has title to the property. villenage.An estate in real property held by lessee/tenant under a lease.The difference between the total remaining rent under the lease. trustee. because the real and beneficial use and title belong to him. and guardian” Leasehold . There may therefore be two “owners” in respect of the same property. such as knight-service. In a more particular sense.” It may also mean appearance of title as distinguished from complete title. e. Of or relating to lands held in fee or to the holding of such lands. The asset representing the right of the lessee to use leased property. although the bare legal title is vested in another. and the rent lessee would currently pay for similar space for the same time period. having the quality of a feud. Legal title .The true meaning of the word “fee” is the same as that of “feud”. and in its original sense it is taken in contradistinction to “allodium”. Legal owner . One who has a present title in land which will ripen into legal ownership upon the performance of conditions subsequent. another person being equitably entitled thereto: in either case. relating to or growing out of the feudal system or feudal law. which latter is defined as a man’s own land. created by his undertaking. although the title may actually carry no rights to the property other than alien. Legal estate . Leasehold interest .An estate or interest in property which is recognized and enforced in laws.Pertaining to feuds or fees.. “such relationships as executor. Look this one up. administrator. socage.signifies a pure fee. the other the beneficial or equitable owner. not necessarily record title. Feudal tenure . not merely in equity. A person or institution who manages money or property for another and who must exercise a standard of care in such management activity imposed by law or contract. Feudal . the latter being called the “equitable” owner.. an absolute estate of inheritance clear of any condition or restriction to particular heirs. one the nominal or legal owner (legal title). Fee Simple .g..Equitable right .One who is recognized and held responsible by the law as the owner of property. but who holds it in trust for the benefit of another. without owing any rent or service to any superior. one in whom the legal title to real estate is vested. to act primarily for another’s benefit in matters connected with such undertaking. etc. as distinguished from “allodial”.

on its recovery by the true owner.To take or enter upon possession of. hereditaments. tenements. and exercisable within or about land. Periodic tenancy . and generally giving him a lien therefor. being the right to enter and turn out such actual occupant: e. The person in whom the interests are vested has “title” to the interests whether he holds them for his own benefit or for the benefit of another. LOOK THIS ONE UP! Real property . title or proprietary right in a thing or claim. Person having possessory rights. Odal .. Ownership of property is either absolute or qualified. of a tenant’s use of leased premises. Right of possession . trustees.e. when the time of enjoyment is deferred or limited.In general usage.One continuing tenancy subject to termination at various rental periods rather than a series of individual and new tenancies. Also rights issuing out of. The ownership of property is absolute when a single person has the absolute dominion over it. the right of a disseisee.g. who can control what goes on the premises. Occupant . passes to his heir. as opposed to feudal tenure. and generally whatever is erected or growing upon or affixed to land.Collection of rights to use and enjoy property. associations. The-ownership is qualified when it is shared with one or more persons. corporations. annual taxes -pay them or be kicked off ?) Person . or when the use is restricted. to tenant. (?tax notice. annexed to. natural person). including right to transmit to others. to take or hold possession.g. The entirety of the powers of use and disposal allowed by law. The complete dominion. to hold possession of to hold or keep for use: to possess. trustees in bankruptcy. right of ejectment or eviction. to say without more that a person has title to certain property does not indicate whether he holds such property for his own benefit or as trustee. Owner .Land.. Ownership . property which on the death of the owner intestate.The term “owner” is used to indicate a person in whom one or more interests are vested for his own benefit. though by statute term may include 1abor organizations. a human being (i. partnerships. .Mortgage . legal representatives. and may use it or dispose of it according to his pleasure subject only to general laws.Right which may reside in one man while another has the actual possession. Occupancy . Blackstone notes the relation of this word to “allodial”. to the extent to which lasting improvements made by him have increased the value of the land.Person in possession.” unlike “ownership. Thus the term “title.” is a colorless word.Statutes providing for the reimbursement of a bona fide occupant and claimant of land.Complete property. A general term for lands. An estate that continues for successive periods unless terminated at end of a period by notice. Occupy .Taking possession of property and use of the same: said e. Occupying Claimant Acts . or receivers.A mortgage is an interest in land created by a written instrument providing security for the performance of a duty/ payment of a debt.

An expression commonly used in fire insurance policies. and “unconditional” means that the quality of the estate is not limited or affected by any condition. not contingent.Person holding property in trust. Having the character or given the rights of absolute ownership. Trusteeship . without any other person being joined with him. Title is the means whereby the owner of lands has the just possession of his property. under an express or implied agreement to administer or exercise it for the benefit or to the use of another. nor in common or jointly with others. Vested . The term contemplates beneficial and practical proprietorship and not necessarily technical title. Sole tenant -He that holds lands by his own right only. for years.In the broadest sense. One who occupies another’s land or premises in subordination to such others title and with his assent . One in whom an estate.Fiduciary relationship between trustee and beneficiary wherein trustee holds title to property for the benefit of the beneficiary. Trustee .’ the interest or ownership of the insured must be completely vested not contingent or conditional.express or implied. for life.Sole and unconditional owner . to execute a trust. whether in fee. not subject to be defeated by a condition precedent.Fixed: accrued: settled: absolute: complete. one who holds or possesses lands or tenements by and kind of right or title. Who holds vested rights in property is said to have title whether he holds them for his own benefit or for the benefit of another. or otherwise. Title . It is enough that the insured is equitably entitled to immediate and absolute legal ownership. or power is vested. To be “unconditional and sole. It is sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the “sole and unconditional ownership” that the insured is the sole equitable owner and has the full equitable title. Tenant . The trustee owes a fiduciary duty to the beneficiary.under Real Property Law -The formal right of ownership of property. at will. The person appointed. in which the word “sole” means that no one else has any interest in the property as owner. or required by law. . One who holds legal title to property “in trust” for the benefit of another person (beneficiary) and who must carry out specific duties with regard to the property. interest. but of such nature that the insured must alone sustain the entire loss if the property is destroyed: and this is so whether the title is legal or equitable.

Thank You For Understanding The Power Of Freedom! .

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful