Fakebook Rubric: Julius Caesar Project This rubric will be used to assess each of the 5 Acts separately.

Content/Profile: Content Discusses play info Point of View/Purpose /Characterizatio n Remains “true to character” Accuracy Discusses facts Excellent 10 points
Rich, focused, includes all essential elements (refer to project description) Excellent grasp of point of view or character voices and traits Facts are accurate and language is true to the time period Uses first person, writes 10 or more status updates, 3 updates have comments from “friends” Displays 6 or more “friends” that accurately reflect his/her relationships Uses 4 or more quotes or references from the reading or historical time period Profile and conversation are exceptionally attractive in terms of design, layout, images, and neatness All images/quotes are properly cited and images are all copyright friendly

Proficient 9 points
Rich, focused, includes most essential elements Good portrayal of point of view or character voices and traits 1-2 facts show inaccuracies and language is mostly true to the time period Uses first person, writes 7-9 status updates, 2 updates have comments from “friends” Displays 4-5 “friends” that accurately reflect his/her relationships Uses 3 quotes or references from the reading or historical time period Profile and conversation are attractive in terms of design, layout, images, and neatness All but 1-2 images/quotes are properly cited and images were copyright friendly

Average 8 points
Little information is presented &/or information lacks focus Some portrayal of point of view or character voices and traits 3-4 facts are inaccurate and language is somewhat true to the time period Mostly uses first person, writes 56 status updates, 1 update has a comment from a “friend” Displays 2-3 “friends” that accurately reflect his/her relationships Uses 1-2 quotes or references from the reading or historical time period Profile and convers. are acceptably attractive, though it may be a bit messy 3-4 images/quotes were not properly cited or images were not copyright friendly

Limited 6 points
No biographical information is presented Little or no understanding of point of view or character voices or traits evident. 5 or more facts are inaccurate and the language is not true to the time period Either does not use first person, has less than 5 status updates, or has no comments from “friends” Displays less than 2 “friends” that accurately reflect his/her relationships Uses no quotes or references from the reading or historical time period Profile and convers. is distractingly messy or poorly designed. One or both are not attractive 5 or more images/quotes were not properly cited or images were not copyright friendly

Status Updates 10+ updates total w/3 from “friends” Understanding of Relationships 6 friends Text/Historical Reference: 4 quotations & 3 examples of research Images/Creativit y Good images & attractive design

Citations/Refere nces Status updates show Act & Scene; resource

cited Mechanics: Work is proofread
There are 0-1 errors in punctuation &/or spelling There are 2-3 errors in punctuation &/or spelling There are 4-5 errors in punctuation &/or spelling There are more than 5 errors in punctuation &/or spelling

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful