Inside Track A Talk With Suppliers Reveals ‘Pain Points’ Aviation Week & Space Technology March 21, 2011, p.

16 By: Michael Mecham Printed headline: From Ohio to Arkansas Ohio is the No. 1 U.S. supplier to EADS/Airbus ($4.3 billion in annual sales) and No. 2 to Boeing ($4.8 billion), after California. General Electric’s engine works in Evendale and Peebles account for much of that, but there are thousands of other suppliers spread across the state, some dating to World War II, when the government pushed aircraft production inland to make it less vulnerable to attacks. We recently visited with Ohio’s suppliersat a roundtable in Cleveland hosted by Aviation Week and the Ohio Aerospace Institute. Not surprisingly, workforce topped the list of today’s pain points. Alcoa Forgings and Extrusions President Eric V. Roegner reports having to compete with banks and consulting companies for top college graduates. He’s honed his pitch to include topics that will appeal to young professionals, such as green and sustainability. Stephen P. Johnson, director of process technology at Timkin Co., has had two senior technical positions open for two years. He also worries about how he will replace his company’s aging baby boomers. And Fred Lisy, the president of tiny Orbital Research, laments that he spends time and money training young engineers, only to lose them after a few years to bigger companies. Lisy and other small suppliers also complain about their difficulty in finding sufficient financing to sustain them through the program delays that are endemic in aerospace. Financing worried larger contractors, too. With cuts in U.S. and European defense spending, how can they take a chance on longlead R&D investments for next-generation products that may not be funded? Then there’s China, whose aerospace market the group views with a mixture of excitement and apprehension. “If you’re an engineer and you’re interested in working in China, we’d be interested in speaking with you,” says Christopher Farage of Parker Hannifin, a major contractor on China’s new Comac C919 jet. But Ohio’s suppliers worry that the Chinese government’s push to create a domestic aerospace and defense (A&D) base could one day squash them. Roegner points to Chinese investments in new forges that could compete with Alcoa. If Boeing and Airbus find viable suppliers in China, “the game is on,” he says. Is the challenge China poses to U.S. technological leadership being taken seriously enough? “You kind of wish that the U.S. government would wake up,” says Roegner. But China is not the only challenge for the Ohioans. Across Lake Erie, Canada has instituted a tax credit of up to 48% for companies creating R&D jobs there. Then there are competitors springing up in lowercost, non-union southern U.S. states. Farage says higher tax and labor costs push his company’s costs 40% above some of his competitors. “Ohio is not cost competitive,” he complains. If you talk to one of those southern competitors, Taber Extrusions, the competitiveness answer comes not just in lower costs but specialized skills. Privately held and with 250 employees, Taber makes large, long and wide aluminum alloy extrusions in numerous rod, angle, hollow and beam shapes. It uses multiple

forming technologies, including friction stir welding, and focuses on high-value, intricate small-lot contracts. Taber’s 8,600-ton press in Russellville, Ark. (shown), can, for instance, extrude a 100-ft.-long wing stringer that is so large that special routing is needed to rail ship it. Its answer to low-cost China is high-value American expertise. “We specialize in hard-to-make things,” says sales manager Steve Althardt. A Silver Supplier Excellence award winner from Boeing, Taber also serves Gulfstream, Cessna and Lockheed Martin’s aircraft programs. It has felt the downturn in general aviation but balances its aviation portfolio with defense and naval contracts—the MRAP mine-resistant vehicle, M-113 Bradley and Littoral combat ship among them. And Taber has a niche as a major supplier of compound aluminum bow risers for archers. Naturally, the company is watching the evolution of composite structures in aircraft. “It doesn’t make us happy that aluminum will decrease in the aircraft segment,” he says. “But there’s a lot of aluminum that will be used in airplanes for years to come.” With Joseph C. Anselmo and Graham Warwick in Cleveland. !

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful