Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kenneth M. Montville
1
Franklin, Benjamin. Works, Vol. VII. Letter to George Whitefield. p. 75-6.
2
Adams, John and Howe, Randy. The Quotable John Adams. p. 190.
3
Sprague, Rev. William. B. Annals of the American Pulpit. Vol. V. p. 394.
4
Wilson, Rev. Bird. A Memoir of the Life of the Right Reverend William White. p. 196-7
What of the famous Muslim Americans? Keith Ellison, the first Muslim elected to
Congress; André Carson, a Muslim congressman from Indiana; and Ahmed Zewail, Nobel
Prize laureate in Chemistry are all Americans who do not represent the cookie cutter mold
of John Walker Lindh or John Allen Muhammed used to scare Americans into voting for
the party of fear, a party that is so called “tough on terrorism.”
In short it was secularism, not Christianity, which formed our nation and it takes a
wide brush to paint all Muslims as wanting to tear down the traditions, laws and heritage
which make America the nation that it is. These comments made by the former Speaker of
the House are used strictly to ignite anger toward his political opponents. They are
meaningless semantics devoid of context. They this year’s “birther” claims, Glenn Beck’s
Stalinist-Maoist-Nazi witch-hunt, and Sarah Palin’s “drill, baby, drill.” Nothing more than
buzzwords and catchphrases employed to gain a following of people too ignorant of the
political process to understand an actual political platform. These words are for the people
who elected George W. Bush over Al Gore because he seemed more likable, rather than
more experienced and a generation who advocate for a Palin presidency in 2012. People
who can be scammed into thinking that a secular atheist nation dominated by militant
Islamists could possibly exist are no different than those who think that suffer from any
other unreasonable delusion.
It is one thing to be critical of government, or anything for that matter as a fine
tuned critical faculty allows us the ability to distinguish what is and is not genuine; it is
another thing to have irrational grievances based on unsubstantiated claims. If Gingrich
were to lay out his actual political platform, sans any Tea Party jargon or right wing
rhetoric, it would be much less appealing to his base of religious right voters. His
constituents and supporters would see him and his party for what they are, greedy old men
seeking power at the expense of the less fortunate citizens of the United States. Gingrich, a
Roman Catholic, has little vested interest in Evangelical Protestants—let alone middleclass
America—aside from his own political aspirations and his nonsensical fear-mongering
proves just that.