The present chapter discusses the conceptual framework of mergers and acquisitions. It focuses on demarcations between various terms like mergers, acquisitions, takeovers, consolidations, reverse mergers, management buyouts etc. The concept of demerger is also introduced. Various Indian laws and statutes having a bearing on merger process have been outlined and trends traced. Few other related procedural issues are also covered. “The decision to invest in a new asset would mean internal expansion for the firm. The new asset would generate returns raising the value of the corporation. Mergers offer an additional means of expansion, which is external, i.e. the productive operation is not within the corporation itself. For firms with limited investment opportunities, mergers can provide new areas for expansion. In addition to this benefit, the combination of two or more firms can offer several other advantages to each of the corporations such as operating economies, risk reduction and tax advantage1.” Today mergers, acquisitions and other types of strategic alliances are on the agenda of most industrial groups intending to have an edge over competitors. Stress is now being made on the larger and bigger conglomerates to avail the economies of scale and diversification. Different companies in India are expanding by merger etc. In fact, there has emerged a phenomenon called merger wave. The terms merger, amalgamations, take-over and acquisitions are often used interchangeably to refer to a situation where two or more firms come together and combine into one to avail the benefits of such combinations and re-structuring in the form of merger etc., have been attempted to face the challenge of increasing competition and to achieve synergy in business operations. 1.1 Corporate Restructuring Restructuring of business is an integral part of the new economic paradigm. As controls and restrictions give way to competition and free trade, restructuring and reorganization become essential. Restructuring usually involves major organizational change such as shift in corporate strategies to meet increased competition or changed market conditions.


Schall, L.D. and Hally C.W., Introduction to financial Management, McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, P.682.

Mergers & Acquisitions

Page 1 of 93

This activity can take place internally in the form of new investments in plant and machinery, research and development at product and process levels. It can also take place externally through mergers and acquisitions (M&A) by which a firm may acquire another firm or by which joint venture with other firms. This restructuring process has been mergers, acquisitions, takeovers, collaborations, consolidation, diversification etc. Domestic firms have taken steps to consolidate their position to face increasing competitive pressures and MNC’s have taken this opportunity to enter Indian corporate sector. The different forms of corporate restructuring are summarized as follows: Corporate Restructuring

Expansion • Amalgamation • Absorption • Tender offer • Asset acquisition • Joint Venture

Contraction • Demerger + Spin off + Equity carve out + Split off + Split up + Divestitures • Asset value

Corporate Control • Going Private • Equity Buyback • Anti Takeover • Leveraged Buyouts

• Amalgamation: This involves fusion of one or more companies where the companies lose their individual identity and a new company comes into existence to take over the business of companies being liquidated. The merger of Brooke Bond India Ltd. And Lipton India Ltd. Resulted in formation of a new company Brooke Bond Lipton India Ltd. Absorption: This involves fusion of a small company with a large company where the smaller company ceases to exist after the merger. The merger of Tata Oil Mills Ltd. (TOMCO) with Hindustan Lever Ltd. (HLL) is an example of absorption. Tender offer: This involves making a public offer for acquiring the shares of a target company with a view to acquire management control in that company. Takeover by Tata Tea of consolidated coffee Ltd. (CCL) is an example of tender offer where more than 50% of shareholders of CCL sold their holding to Tata Tea at the offered price which was more than the investment price. Mergers & Acquisitions
Page 2 of 93

Asset acquisition: This involves buying assets of another company. The assets may be tangible assets like manufacturing units or intangible like brands. Hindustan lever limited buying brands of Lakme is an example of asset acquisition. Joint venture: This involves two companies coming whose ownership is changed. DCM group and DAEWOO MOTORS entered into a joint venture to form DAEWOO Ltd. to manufacturing automobiles in India.

There are generally the following types of DEMERGER: Spinoff: This type of demerger involves division of company into wholly owned subsidiary of parent company by distribution of all its shares of subsidiary company on Pro-rata basis. By this way, both the companies i.e. holding as well as subsidiary company exist and carry on business. For example Kotak, Mahindra finance Ltd. formed a subsidiary called Kotak Mahindra Capital Corporation, by spinning off its investment banking division. Split ups: This type of demerger involves the division of parent company into two or more separate companies where parent company ceases to exist after the demerger. Equity carve out: This is similar to spin offs, except that same part of shareholding of this subsidiary company is offered to public through a public issue and the parent company continues to enjoy control over the subsidiary company by holding controlling interest in it. Divestitures: These are sale of segment of a company for cash or for securities to an outside party. Divestitures, involve some kind of contraction. It is based on the principle if “anergy” which says 5-3=3! • Asset sale: This involves sale of tangible or intangible assets of a company to generate cash. A partial sell off, also called slump sale, involves the sale of a business unit or plant of one firm to another. It is the mirror image of a purchase of a business unit or plant. From the seller’s perspective, it is a form of contraction: from the buyer’s point of view it is a form of expansion. For example, When Coromandal Fertilizers Limited sold its cement division to India Cement limited, the size of Coromandal Fertilizers contracted whereas the size of India Cements Limited expanded.

Corporate controls • Going private: This involves converting a listed company into a private company by buying back all the outstanding shares from the markets. Several companies like Castrol India and Phillips India have done this in recent years. A well known example from the U.S. is that of Levi Strauss & company. Mergers & Acquisitions
Page 3 of 93

Weinberg. In case of amalgamation a new company may came into existence or an old company may survive while amalgamating company may lose its existence. It is a legal process by which two or more companies are to be absorbed or blended with another. According to Halsbury’s law of England amalgamation is the blending of two or more existing companies into one undertaking. the shareholder of each blending companies becoming substantially the shareholders of company which will carry on blended undertaking. Amalgamation Amalgamation is an arrangement or reconstruction. issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India has defined the term amalgamation by classifying (i) Amalgamation in the nature of merger. takeover and Amalgamations (London: Sweet and Maxwell Publishers. AS-14. Generally the company which survives is the buyers which retiring its identity and seller company is extinguished2. It is thus a combination of two or more companies in which one company survives in its own name and the other ceases to exist as a legal entity. There may be amalgamation by transfer of one or more undertaking to a new company or transfer of one or more undertaking to an existing company. Amalgamation signifies the transfers of all are some part of assets and liabilities of one or more than one existing company or two or more companies to a new company.• Equity buyback: This involves the company buying its own shares back from the market. 1967) Mergers & Acquisitions Page 4 of 93 . the amalgamating company loses its existence and its shareholders become shareholders of new company or the amalgamated company. • • Merger is a marriage between two companies of roughly same size. Anti takeover defenses: With a high value of hostile takeover activity in recent years. This results in reduction in the equity capital of the company. takeover defenses both premature and reactive have been restored to by the companies.A. The Accounting Standard. 2 M. This strengthens the promoter’s position by increasing his stake in the equity of the company. Leveraged buyouts: This involves raising of capital from the market or institutions by the management to acquire a company on the strength of its assets. As a result. The survivor company acquires assets and liabilities of merged companies. and (ii) Amalgamation in the nature of purchase.

except that cash may be paid in respect of any fractional shares. • • • Amalgamation in the nature of merger is an organic unification of two or more entities or undertaking or fusion of one with another. 1. • • Amalgamation in the nature of merger: As per AS-14.1. All the properties of amalgamating company(s) should vest with the amalgamated company after amalgamation. The business of the transferor company is intended to be carried on. merger is defined as amalgamation under sec. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 5 of 93 . by the transferee company. Amalgamation in the nature of purchase: Amalgamation in the nature of purchase is where one company’s assets and liabilities are taken over by another and lump sum is paid by the latter to the former. It is defined as an amalgamation which satisfies the above conditions3. All the liabilities of the amalgamating company(s) should vest with the amalgamated company after amalgamation. after amalgamation. As per Income Tax Act 1961. by the transferee company or its subsidiaries or their nominees) become equity shareholders of the transferee company by virtue of the amalgamation. an amalgamation is called in the nature of merger if it satisfies all the following condition: All the assets and liabilities of the transferor company should become. 2. after the amalgamation. immediately before the amalgamation. 2. It is defined as the one which does not satisfy any one or more of the conditions satisfied above. Shareholders holding not less than 90% of the face value of the equity shares of the transferor company (other than the equity shares already held therein. the assets and liabilities of the other company.2 (1B) with the following three conditions to be satisfied. No adjustment is intended to be made in the book values of the assets and liabilities of the transferor company when they are incorporated in the financial statements of the transferee company except to ensure uniformity of accounting policies. The consideration for the amalgamation receivable by those equity shareholders of the transferor company who agree to become equity shareholders of the transferee company is discharged by the transferee company wholly by the issue of equity share in the transferee company.

to an entirely new company called HCL Ltd. ceased to exist. An example of consolidation is the merger of Hindustan Computers Ltd. 1. c) By purchasing shares of the other company at a stock exchange. all companies are legally dissolved and a new entity is created. liabilities and shares to the acquiring company for cash or exchange of shares. an acquired company ( a seller). Shareholders holding not less than 75% in value or voting power in amalgamating company(s) should become shareholders of amalgamated companies after amalgamation Amalgamation does not mean acquisition of a company by purchasing its property and resulting in its winding up. Consolidation A consolidation is a combination of two or more companies into a new company . separate legal entity.. Laws in India use the term amalgamation for merger.In this type of merger. 1. Either a new company may be incorporated for this purpose or one existing company (generally a bigger one) survives and another existing company (which is smaller) is merged into it. the acquired company transfers its assets. survived after merger while TFL. An example of this type of merger is the absorption of Tata Fertilisers Ltd. to the existing shareholders of that company. exchange of shares with 90%of shareholders of amalgamating company is required. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 6 of 93 . liabilities and shares to TCL.2. Hindustan Instruments Ltd.. All companies except one lose their identity in a merger through absorption.(TFL) TCL.3. According to Income tax Act. • • Merger through absorption Merger through consolidation Absorption An absorption is a combination of two or more companies into an existing company..2 Acquisition Acquisition refers to the acquiring of ownership right in the property and asset without any combination of companies. an acquiring company (a buyer). TFL transferred its assets. In a consolidation. but there may be change in control of companies. and Indian Reprographics Ltd. Acquisition results when one company purchase the controlling interest in the share capital of another existing company in any of the following ways: a) controlling interest in the other company. Thus in acquisition two or more companies may remain independent. By entering into an agreement with a person or persons holding b) By subscribing new shares being issued by the other company. and d) By making an offer to buy the shares of other company.1 Merger Merger refers to a situation when two or more existing firms combine together and form a new entity.

1985. which is substantial acquisition of shares in a financial weak company not being a sick industrial company in pursuance to a scheme of rehabilitation approved by public financial institution which is responsible for ensuring compliance with provision of substantial acquisition of shares and takeover Regulations. These merger schemes are framed in consultation with the lead bank.2. H. In India. 2. 4. 1. Takeover may be of different types depending upon the purpose of acquiring a company. The recent takeover of Modi Cements Ltd. individual. Guide to Takeover and Mergers (Nagpur: Wadhwa and co. A Takeover may be defined as series of transacting whereby a person. N. A takeover may be straight takeover which is accomplished by the management of the taking over company by acquiring shares of another company with the intention of operating taken over as an independent legal entity.3 . 1992). 3. A third type of takeover is takeover of a sick company for its revival. Sridharan and P. R. Takeover is acquisition. by one company of controlling interest of the other. This is accomplished by an order of Board for Industrial and financial Reconstruction (BIFR) under the provision of Sick Industrial companies Act. By Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. usually by buying all or majority of shares. These mergers are motivated and the lead bank takes the initiated and decides terms and conditions of merger. group of individuals or a company acquires control over the assets of a company. Board for Industrial and Financial reconstruction (BIFR) has also been active for arranging mergers of financially sick companies with other companies under the package of rehabilitation. The fourth kind is the bail-out takeover. 1997 issued by SEBI which regulate the bail out takeover. Takeover is a general term used to define acquisitions only and both terms are used interchangeably. the target firm and the acquiring firm. Arvind Pandian .2 Takeover Acquisition can be undertaken through merger or takeover route. either directly by becoming owner of those assets or indirectly by obtaining control of management of the company4. was an arranged takeover after the financial reconstruction Modi Cement Ltd. The second type of takeover is where ownership of company is captured to merge both companies into one and operate as single legal entity. 1. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 7 of 93 .


M.A. Weinberg, op, cit, pp3 3, 4

Takeover Bid This is a technique for affecting either a takeover or an amalgamation. It may be defined as an offer to acquire shares of a company, whose shares are not closely held, addressed to the general body of shareholders with a view to obtaining at least sufficient shares to give the offer or, voting control of the company. Takeover Bid is thus adopted by company for taking over the control and management affairs of listed company by acquiring its controlling interest. While a takeover bid is used for affecting a takeover, it is frequently against the wishes of the management of Offeree Company. It may take the form of an offer to purchase shares for cash or for share for share exchange or a combination of these two firms. Where a takeover bid is used for effecting merger or amalgamation it is generally by consent of management of both companies. It always takes place in the form of share for share exchange offer, so that accepting shareholders of Offree Company become shareholders of Offeror Company. Types of Takeover Bid There are three types of takeover bid 1. Negotiated bid 2. Tender offer 3. Hostile takeover bid Negotiated bid: It is also called friendly merger. In this case, the management /owners of both the firms sit together and negotiate for the takeover. The acquiring firm negotiates directly with the management of the target company. So the two firms reach an agreement, the proposal for merger may be placed before the shareholders of the two companies. However, if the parties do not reach at an agreement, the merger proposal stands terminated and dropped out. The merger of ITC Classic Ltd. with ICICI Ltd.; and merger of Tata oil mills Ltd. With Hindustan Lever Ltd. were negotiated mergrs. However, if the management of the target firm is not agreeable to the merger proposal, then the acquiring firm may go for other procedures i.e. tender offer or hostile takeover. Tender offer: A tender offer is a bid to acquire controlling interest in a target company by the acquiring firm by purchasing shares of the target firm at a fixed price. The acquiring firm approaches the shareholders of the target firm directly firm to sell their shareholding to the acquiring firm at a fixed price. This offered price is generally, kept at a level higher than the current market price in order to induce the shareholders to disinvest their holding in favor of the acquiring firm. The acquiring firm may also stipulate in the tender offer as to how many shares it is willing to buy or may purchase all the shares that are offered for sale. Mergers & Acquisitions
Page 8 of 93

In case of tender offer, the acquiring firm does not need the prior approval of the management of the target firm. The offer is kept open for a specific period within which the shares must be tendered for sale by the shareholders of the target firm. Consolidated Coffee Ltd. was takeover by Tata Tea making a tender offer to the shareholders of the former at a price which was higher than the prevailing market price. In India, in recent times, particularly after the announcement of new takeover code by SEBI, several companies have made tender offers to acquire the target firm. A popular case is the tender offer made by Sterlite Ltd. and then counter offer by Alean to acquire the control of Indian Aluminium Ltd. Hostile Takeover Bid: The acquiring firm, without the knowledge and consent of the management of the target firm, may unilaterally pursue the efforts to gain a controlling interest in the target firm, by purchasing shares of the later firm at the stock exchanges. Such case of merger/acquisition is popularity known as ‘raid’. The caparo group of the U.K. made a hostile takeover bid to takeover DCM Ltd. and Escorts Ltd. Similarly, some other NRI’s have also made hostile bid to takeover some other Indian companies. The new takeover code, as announced by SEBI deals with the hostile bids. Takeover and merger “The distinction between a takeover and merger is that in a takeover the direct or indirect control over the assets of the acquired company passes to the acquirer in a merger the shareholding in the combined enterprises will be spread between the shareholders of the two companies”. In both cases of takeover and merger the interests of the shareholders of the company are as follows: 1. Company should takeover or merge with another company only if in doing so, it improves its profit earning potential measured by earning per share and 2. The company should agree to be taken if, and only if, shareholders are likely to be better off with the consideration offered, whether cash or securities of the company than by retaining their shares in the original company. 1.3 Merger through BIFR5 The companies (Amendment) Act, 2001 has repealed the sick Industrial Companies Act (SICA) 1985, in order to bring sick industrial companies within the purview of companies Act 1956 from the jurisdiction of SICA, 1985. The Act has introduced new provisions for the constitution of a tribunal known as the National Company Law Tribunal with regional benches which are empowered with the powers earlier vested with the Board for Industrial and Financial reconstruction (BIFR).

Mergers & Acquisitions

Page 9 of 93


Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction was established by central government under SICA, 1985 for detection of sick and potentially sick industrial units and speedy determination pf their remedial measures and to exercise the jurisdiction and powers and discharge the functioning and duties imposed on the Board by or under the Act. Before the evolution of SICA, the power to sanction the scheme of amalgamation was vested only with the high court. However, sec.18 of the SICA 1985 empowers the BIFR to sanction a scheme of amalgamation between sick industrial company and another company over and above the power of high court as per section 391-394 of companies Act, 1956. The amalgamation take place under SICA have a special place in law and are not bound by the rigour of companies Act, 1956, and Income Tax Act,1961. There is no need to comply with the provisions of sec.391-394 of companies Act,1956 for amalgamation sanctioned by BIFR. The scheme of amalgamation however must be approved by shareholders of healthy company after getting approval from BIFR. Sec.72A of the Income Tax Act has been enacted with a view to providing incentives to healthy companies to takeover and amalgamation with companies which would otherwise become burden on the economy. The accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation of the amalgamating company is deemed to loss or allowance for depreciation of the amalgamated company. So amalgamated company gets the advantage of unabsorbed depreciation and accumulated loss on the precondition of satisfactory revival of sick unit. A certificate from specialized authority to the effect that adequate steps have been taken for rehabilitation or revival of sick industrial undertaking has to be obtained to get these benefits. Thus the main attraction for the healthy company to takeover a sick company through a scheme of amalgamation is the tax benefits that may be available to it consequent to amalgamation. The approach usually followed is to quantify the possible tax benefits first and then get an order as part of rehabilitation package from BIFR. Once BIFR is convinced about the rehabilitation benefit it passes an appropriate order to see that benefits of tax concessions properly ensure to the transferee isolation Section 18 of SICA provides for various measures to be recommended by the operating agency in the scheme to be prepared by it for submission to the BIFR concerning the sick industrial unit. Before the amendment, in 1994 under SICA, only normal amalgamation (of sick company with healthy one) was possible and the Act did not provide for reverse merger of a profitable company with sick company. Now the amended Sec.18 of the Act contains provision for effecting both normal and reverse merger. It provides for the amalgamation of • • Sick industrial company with any other company Any other company with the sick industrial company6.

1.4 Types of Merger There are four types of merger are as follows:

Mergers & Acquisitions

Page 10 of 93

One potential repercussion of the horizontal merger is that it may result in monopolies and restrict the trade. then it may result in backward integration of its activities. Horizontal merger: It is a merger of two or more companies that compete in the same industry. The merger of Tata Oil Mills Ltd. Vertical merger may result in many operating and financial economies. Horizontal mergers are designed to produce substantial economies of scale and result in decrease in the number of competitors in the industry. Weinberg and Blank7 define horizontal merger as follows: “A takeover or merger is horizontal if it involves the joining together of two companies which are producing essentially the same products or services or products or services which compete directly with each other (for example sugar and artificial sweetness). by the management of the transferee company. “A takeover of merger is vertical where one of two companies is an actual or potential supplier of goods or services to the other.e. It is a merger with a direct competitor and hence expands as the firm’s operations in the same industry. Forward integration may result if a company decides to take over the retailer or Customer Company. replaced.. The transferee firm will get a stronger position in the market as its production/distribution chain will be more integrated than that of the competitors. so that the two companies are both engaged in the manufacture or provision of the same goods or services but at the different stages in the supply route (for example where a motor car manufacturer takes over a manufacturer of sheet metal or a car distributing firm). As horizontal takeovers and mergers involve a reduction in the number of competing firms in an industry. Vertical merger provides a way for total integration to those firms which are striving for owning of all phases of the production schedule together with the marketing network (i.” 2. the great majority of takeover and mergers have been horizontal. on the other hand horizontal mergers and takeovers are likely to give the greatest scope for economies of scale and elimination of duplicate facilities. On the other hand. with the Hindustan lever Ltd. the top management of the company being meted is generally. In case of horizontal merger. If a company takes over its supplier/producers of raw material. In recent years. Vertical merger: It is a merger which takes place upon the combination of two companies which are operating in the same industry but at different stages of production or distribution system.1. was a horizontal merger. they tend to create the greatest concern from an anti-monopoly point of view. Here the object is usually to Mergers & Acquisitions Page 11 of 93 . from the acquisition of raw material to the relating of final products).

cit. Para 167. Both these types bear some common elements of horizontal. where.A. These mergers represent an outward movement by the acquiring company from its current set of business to adjoining business.Guide to takeovers and mergers (Nagpur: wadhwa and co. and Xpro Ltd. sridharan and P. production processes or markets. op. marketing.e. anti-monopoly problems may arise. however there is a degree of concentration in the markets of either of the companies.pp. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 12 of 93 . it defined as product extension merger. Conglomerate merger: These mergers involve firms engaged in unrelated type of business activities i. nor vertically( in the sense of standing towards each other n the relationship of buyer and supplier or potential buyer and supplier). market participants or technologies of the acquiring companies. vertical and conglomerate merger. The potential benefit from these mergers is high because these transactions offer opportunities to diversify around a common case of strategic resources8.1992) 7 M. merger between Hindustan Sanitary ware industries Ltd.H. the business of two companies are not related to each other horizontally ( in the sense of producing the same or competing products). 4. The acquired company represents an extension of product line.10 Conglomerate mergers are unification of different kinds of businesses under one flagship company. When a new product line allied to or complimentary to an existing product line is added to existing product line through merger.” 3. Similarly market extension merger help to add a new market either through same line of business or adding an allied field . Co generic Merger: In these. Arvind Pandian . there is some degree of overlap in one or more of this common factors. Weinberg and M V Blank. For example. and associated Glass Ltd. In a pure conglomerate. The acquiring company derives benefits by exploitation of strategic resources and from entry into a related market having higher return than it enjoyed earlier.. In practice. mergers the acquirer and target companies are related through basic technologies.5 Reducing stock holding and handling costs. there are no important common factors between the companies in production.ensure a source of supply or an outlet for products or services. Western and Mansinghka9 classified cogeneric mergers into product extension and market extension types. however. but the effect of the merger may be to improve efficiency through improving the flow of production and 6 N.R. contains elements of both product extension and market extension merger. The purpose of merger remains utilization of financial resources. is a Product extension merger and merger between GMM Company Ltd. research and development and technology.

the desire to perform better and strengthen efficiency. thus becoming unwieldy and cyclical almost resulting in a loss situation.) is one example of family units splitting through demergers. J. A part from core competencies being main reason for demerging companies according to their nature of business. As the same suggests. more in the nature of family settlements and are affected through the courts order. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 13 of 93 . However these transactions are not explicitly aimed at sharing these resources. Corporate restructuring in such situation in the form of demerger becomes inevitable.e. as called in US involves splitting up of conglomerate (multi-division) of company into separate companies. 1. pursuant to a demerger to a resulting company. Such demergers are accordingly. This occurs in cases where dissimilar business are carried on within the same company. the focus of such conglomerate mergers is on how the acquiring firm can improve its overall stability and use resources in a better way to generate additional revenue... The historical demerger of DCM group where it split into four companies (DCM Ltd. liability and management so as to ensure improved results from each of the demerged unit. Demerged Company. wastage and competition. according to Section (19AA) of Income Tax Act. it denotes a situation opposite to that of merger. western and K. 9 F. Rather.5 Demerger It has been defined as a split or division. Masinghka. restructuring in the form of demerger was undertaken for splitting up the family owned large business empires into smaller companies. business interest and longevity and to curb losses. so demerger of ASE was done. Shriram Industrial Enterprise Ltd. demerger also occur due to reasons almost the same as mergers i. “Tests of efficiency performance of enlarged debt capacity and also synergy of managerial functions. DCM shriram industries Ltd. Undertakings demerge to delineate businesses and fix responsibility. It does not have direct impact on acquisition of monopoly power and is thus favored through out the world as a means of diversification.S. Merger of SG chemical and Dyes Ltd.Lorange. Demerger or spin-off. synergies or product market strategies. 1961 means the company whose undertaking is transferred. Thus. technologies. E Kotlarchuk and H Singh. “Corporate Acquisitions: A strategic perspective in the management Acquisition”. in some cases. with Ambalal Sarabhai enterprises Ltd. (ASE) has made ASE big conglomerate which had become unwieldy and cyclic. and DCM shriram consolidated Ltd.8 P.

constituted or formed as a result of demerger.A. Further. 5.V. Dispatch of notice to shareholders and creditors: In order to convene the meeting of shareholders and creditors. necessary approvals of the shareholders. Intimation to stock Exchanges: The stock exchanges where the amalgamated and amalgamating companies are listed should be informed about the amalgamation proposal. a notice and an explanatory statement of the Mergers & Acquisitions Page 14 of 93 . Examination of object Clauses: The memorandum of association of both the companies should be examined to check if the power to amalgamate is available. pp 5 . From time to time. Approval of the draft amalgamation proposal by the Respective Boards: The draft amalgamation proposal should be approved by the respective boards of directors. according to Section2(47A) of Income Tax Act. 4. boards of directors and Company Law Board are required. 1. involving fairly complex legal considerations. Weinberg. Application to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT): Once the draft of amalgamation proposal is approved by the respective boards.If such clauses do not exists. The board of each company should pass a resolution authorizing its directors/executives to pursue the matter further. Sections 391 to 394 of the companies act. While evaluating a merger proposal. the object clause of the amalgamated company (transferee company) should permit it to carry on the business of the amalgamating company (transferor company ) .6 Merger Procedure: A merger is a complicated transaction. and M. cit. 3. copies of all notices. each company should make an application to the NCLT so that it can convene the meetings of shareholders and creditors for passing the amalgamation proposal. resolutions.1961 means one 10 M. and orders should be mailed to the concerned stock exchanges. one should bear in mind the following legal provisions. 1956 contain the provisions for amalgamations.Resulting company.Blank op. The procedure for amalgamation normally involves the following steps: 1. or more company. and the resulting company in consideration of such transfer of undertaking issues shares to the shareholders of the demerged company and include any authority or body or local authority or public sector company or a company established. Para 107. 2. (including a wholly owned subsidiary thereof) to which the undertaking of the demerged company is transferred in a demerger.

the companies involved in the amalgamation should present a petition to the NCLT for confirming the scheme of amalgamation. 10. 6. 394 of the companies Act. after fulfilling the provisions of the law. Important elements of merger procedure are: 1. who vote either in person or by proxy. in a separate meeting. Issue of shares and debentures: The amalgamated company. Likewise. The NCLT will fix a date of hearing. have to be transferred to the amalgamated company. Holding of Meetings of shareholders and creditors: A meeting of shareholders should be held by each company for passing the scheme of amalgamation. An affidavit confirming that the notice has been dispatched to the shareholders/creditors and that the same has been published in newspapers should be filed with the NCLT. the NCLT will pass an order sanctioning the same. Transfer of Assets and Liabilities: After the final orders have been passed by the NCLT. The notice of the meetings should also be published in two newspapers (one English and one vernacular). 1956: 1. as approved by the NCLT. 8. 7.6. with effect from the appointed date. A notice about the same has to be published in two newspapers. should be dispatched by each company to its shareholders and creditors so that they get 21 days advance intimation. After hearing the parties the parties concerned ascertaining that the amalgamation scheme is fair and reasonable. all the assets and liabilities of the amalgamating company will. At least 75 percent (in value) of shareholders in each class. must approve the scheme of amalgamation. Petition to the NCLT for confirmation and passing of NCLT orders: Once the amalgamation scheme is passed by the shareholders and creditors. It is designed to suit the terms and conditions relevant to the proposal but it should generally contain the following information as per the requirements of sec. Particulars about transferor and transferee companies Mergers & Acquisitions Page 15 of 93 . Filing the order with the Registrar: Certified true copies of the NCLT order must be filed with the Registrar of Companies within the time limit specified by the NCLT. the NCLT is empowered to modify the scheme and pass orders accordingly. There is no specific form prescribed for the scheme. should issue shares and debentures of the amalgamated company.meeting.1 Scheme of merger The scheme of any arrangement or proposal for a merger is the heart of the process and has to be drafted with care. the creditors of the company must approve of the amalgamation scheme. However. The new shares and debentures so issued will then be listed on the stock exchange. 9.

Treatment of specified properties or rights of transferor company 6. 14. 9. Share capital of Transferor Company and Transferee Company specifying authorized.2. employees and status of provident fund. any condition attached thereto and the fractional share certificate to be issued. 16. Proposed share exchange ratio. Enhancement of borrowing limits of transferee company when scheme coming into effect. superannuation fund or any other special funds created for the purpose of employees. Gratuity fund. 12. Terms and conditions of carrying business by transferor company between appointed date and effective date 7. subscribed and paid up capital. issued. Commitment of transferor and Transferee Company towards making an application U/S 394 and other applicable provisions of companies Act. Treatment of expenses connected with the scheme. 11. 1956 to their respective High court. Issue of shares by transferee company 10. Qualifications attached to the scheme which requires approval of different agencies. Effect of non receipt of approvals/sanctions etc. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 16 of 93 . workmen. 13. appointed date of merger 3. Description of power of delegates of Transferee Company to give effect to the scheme. Miscellaneous provisions covering Income Tax dues. 15. Effective date when scheme will came into effect 5. contingent and other accounting entries requiring special treatment. 17. Terms of transfer of assets and liabilities from transferor company to transferee company 4. 8. Transferor and transferee companies consent to make changes in the scheme as ordered by the court or other authorities under law and exercising the powers on behalf of the companies by their respective boards. Transferor company’s staff.

Valuation of assets 2. Valuation of both companies subject to business combination is required for fixing the consideration amount to be paid in the form of exchange of share.1. While the past financial performance serves as guide. current assets.6.2 Valuation in a merger: Determination of share exchange ratio An important aspect of merger procedure relates to valuation of business relates to valuation of business in order to determine share exchange ratio in merger. All assets (value by appropriation method all liabilities . investment on the date of Balance sheet less all debts. The NAV. Earnings of the company for the next two years are projected (by valuation experts) and simple or weighted average of these profits is computed. Valuation is the means to assess the worth of a company which is subject to merger or takeover so that consideration amount can be quantified and the price of one company for other can be fixed. Yield Value Method This method also called profit earning capacity method is based on the assessment of future maintainable earnings of the business. Broadly there are three(3) methods used for valuation of business: 1. Ascertainment of liabilities 3. Fixation of the value of different types of equity shares. These net profits are divided by appropriate capitalization rate to get true value of business. there may be same modifications in this method and fixed assets may be taken at current realizable value (especially investments.) replacement cost (plant and machinery) or scrap value (obsolete machinery).) to get NAV per share. is divided by fully diluted equity (after considering equity increases on account of warrant conversion etc. so arrived at. it is the future maintainable profits that have to be considered. real estate etc. arrears of depreciation etc. This figure divided by Mergers & Acquisitions Page 17 of 93 . The three steps necessary for valuing share are: 1. Deductions will have to be made for arrears of preference dividend. Net Value Asset (NAV) Method NAV is the sum total of value of asserts (fixed assets. borrowing and liabilities including both current and likely contingent liability and preference share capital).preference shares) NAV = Fully diluted equity shares 2. Such valuation helps in determining the value of shares of acquired company as well as acquiring company to safeguard the interest of shareholders of both the companies. However.

The average of high or low values and closing prices over a specified previous period is taken to be representative value per share. The value of net assets of the two companies. it must be valued on independent basis without considering benefits on account of merger. and also summarized by the Apex court in the case of Hindustan Levers. (1995)51 as under. These relevant factors has been enumerated by Gujarat High court in Bihari Mills Ltd. 3.equity value gives value per share. 5. is basically an exercise in valuation of shares of two or more of amalgamating company. Also. While determining operating profits of the business. 7. 4. The relative growth prospects of the two companies. Thus. a business with established brands and excellent track record of growth and diverse product portfolio will get a lower capitalization rate and consequently higher valuation where as a cyclical business or a business dependent on seasonal factors will get a higher capitalization rate. The fact that the dividend of one company is better covered than the other is a factor which has to be compensated to same extent. The relative gearing of the shares of the two companies. Now. Employees union vs.e. 3. due regard has to be given to inherent risk attribute to each business. Hindustan Lever Ltd. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 18 of 93 . The problem of valuation has been dealt with by Weinberg and Blank (1971)49 by giving the relevant factors to be taken into account while determining the final share exchange ratio. The dividends presently paid on the shares of two companies. the determination of share exchange ratio i. 2. (ratio of after tax earnings to divided paid during the year) for the present dividends of the two companies. It is often difficult to induce a shareholder to agree to a merger if it involves a reduction in his dividend income. past or future profits need to be adjusted for extra ordinary income or loss not likely to recur in future. The cover. While determining capitalization rate. The gearing of an ordinary share is the ratio of borrowings to equity capital. The stock exchange prices of the shares of the companies before the commencement of negotiations or the announcement of the bid.. 6. stock valuation etc. are to be exchanged for how many shares of amalgamated company. how many shares of amalgamating company. Market Value Method This method is applicable only in case where share of companies are listed on a recognized stock exchange. The voting strength in the company of shareholder of the two companies. Profits of both companies’ should be determined after ensuring that similar policies are used in various areas like depreciation. 1.

There are however.. abnormal expenses will be added back to calculate ‘yield’ (e. Thus. Ltd. Taxmann 2002.8. • • • • Valuation of shares on book value method is proper and valid mode of valuation of shares.g. If result of two methods differs. pp 1084 ratio in case of amalgamations. then estimate of share value before the set-back and proportionate fall in price of quoted shares of companies which have suffered similar reverses should be considered If company is ripe for winding up. G. The past history of the prices of two companies. cit.Tinsukhia Electric Co. State of Assam. Para 67 pp5 Bihari Mills Ltd. If it is possible to the value the shares in a manner difference from the one adopted in the given case. no rules framed specially for the working out of share exchange 49 51 M. There are bound to be difference of opinion as to what the correct value of the shares of the company is. break –up value. “The valuation of shares is a technical matter which requires considerable skills and expertise. yield value. Kapoor Co. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 19 of 93 . Weinberg and MV Blank.K. Law and practice) N. break up value method to determine what would be realized in winding up process should be considered.D.” In CWT vs. Valuation can be done on basis of asset value. op.K. (1985) cited here from A. Supreme Court has evolved the following guidelines and aspects which should be considered: • • Regard should be had to price of shares prevailing in stock market Profit earning capacity (yield method) or dividend declared by the company (dividend method) should be considered. Often share value cannot be finalized on basis of one parameter only. According to Delhi High Court statement. Mahadeo Jalan (1972) 86 ITR 621 (SC). Qualitative factors like market fluctuations. a golden mean should be found. Majumdar and Dr.e.A. competition. if reasonable estimation of future profits and dividend is not possible due to wide fluctuations in profits and uncertain conditions. company incurring expenses disproportionate to the commercial venture. that the valuation agreed upon has been unfair. market value or on net worth basis. possibly to reduce income tax liability) If lower dividend or profits are due to temporary reasons. final decision depends on judicious consideration of usual methods of valuation i. it cannot be said. vs. In computing yields.

managerial skills are also relevant for the purpose-Sanghi industries Ltd. One such approved in Shiva Texyarn Ltd. name of Transferee Company will be changed to that of Transferor Company. (with post-merger turnover of Rs. a small company merges with large company or a sick company with healthy company.Government policy. In such case. However in some cases. Godrej Soaps Ltd. Some reasons for reverse merger are: a) The transferee company is a sick company and has carry forward losses and Transferor Company is profit making company. Godrej Soaps Ltd.08 crores. it gets advantage of setting off carry forward losses without any conditions. without following strict norms of listing of stock exchanges. a capital reduction aim rehabilitation scheme is an ideal antidote (by way of reverse merger) for sick company. 1.12 crores) restructured its gross profit of 49. Thus. it is provided that on date of merger. (GSL) with pre merger turnover of 436. 60 crores) in 1994. The post merger company. (GGICL) (with pre merger turnover of Rs. 611. b) The transferee company may be listed company. If sick company merges with healthy company. In such cases. ICICI. If Transferor Company merges with the sick transferee company. This capital reduction helps in unity of the accumulated losses and other assets which are not represented by the share capital of the company. this innovative merger which was by way of forward integration in the name of GGICL was completed with the help of financial institutions like IDBI.7 Reverse Merger Normally. reverse merger is done. The amalgamated company. UTI etc. it gets advantages of listed company. 1 per share and later GSL would be merged with 1 share of GGICL to be allotted to every shareholder of GSL. GGICL reverted back to the old name of amalgamating company.77 crores entered into scheme of reverse merger with loss making Gujarat Godrej innovative Chemicals Ltd. liquidate damages besides finding of interest. many restrictions are applicable for allowing set off. IFCI. 10 per share to Re. reverse mergers are also accompanied by reduction in the unwieldy capital of the sick company. 30 crores. higher turnover GSC’s pre-merger profits of Rs. outside people even may not know that the transferor company with which they are dealing after merger is not the same as earlier one. reschedule outside loans and also lower interest rate on term loans. All financial Institutions agreed to waive penal interest. Many times. For example Godrej soaps Ltd.The scheme involved reduction of share capital of GGICL from Rs. Thus. Thus. When a healthy company merges with a sick or a small company is called reverse merger. This may be for various reasons. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 20 of 93 . if Transferor Company merges with the listed company.

(a) in pursuance of a public issue. ii. The objective of these regulations has been to provide an orderly framework within which substantial acquisitions and takeovers can take place. as the case may be. There is no provision under clause 40B for exemption of non BIFR companies. The salient features of this new takeover code (Regulations.1.8 Laws statutes in India 1. Any acquirer. On the basis of recommendations of the Committee. SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of shares and takeover) Regulations 1997 Act. 1997. Clause 40B of listing agreement will not apply. or (b) by one or more transactions. sub clause 13 of amendment of Clause 40B also provides an exemption to the scheme approved by BIFR. Takeover and Listing agreement exemption Clauses 40A and 40B of Listing Agreement Clause 40A deals with substantial acquisition of shares and requires the offeror and the offeree to inform the stock exchange when such acquisition results in an increase in the shareholding of the acquirer to more than 10%. A takeover offer refers to change in management where there is no change in management. 2. shall disclose to all the stock exchanges on which the shares of the company are listed. Clause 40B deals with takeover efforts. or (c) in any other manner not covered by (a) and (b) above. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 21 of 93 . held by him) would entitle him to more than 5% shares or voting rights in a company. who holds more than 5% shares or voting rights in any company. the revised take over code as Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisitions of shares and Takeovers) Regulations. shall within two months of notification of these Regulation disclose his aggregate shareholding in that company. 1997. the SEBI announced on Febuary20.8. Any person.1 Laws applicable to Takeover 1. the aggregate number of shares held by each such person. However. 1. to the company within four working days of the acquisition of shares or voting rights. if any. Clauses 40A and 40B of the listing Agreement the company has entered into with stock exchange. 2. shall disclose the aggregate of his shareholding or voting rights in that company. SEBI’s (Substantial Acquisition of shares and Takeover’s) Regulations. 1997. 1997) may be enumerated as follows: i. to the company which in turn. who acquires shares or voting rights which (taken together with shares or voting rights.

viii. if any. of acquire shares or voting rights which (taken together with shares or voting rights. if any.iii. for being placed before the Board of Directors and to all the stock exchanges where the shares of the company are listed. Every person. No public announcement for an offer or competitive bid shall be made during the offer period except during 21-day period from the public announcement of the first offer. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 22 of 93 . Such offer shall be deemed to be a competitive bid. Within 14 days of the public announcement of the offer. (d) the average of the weekly high and low of the closing prices of the shares of the target company during the 26 weeks proceeding the date of public announcement. make a public announcement of his offer for acquisition of some or all of the shares of the same target company. who holds more than 10% shares or voting rights in any company. vi. shall. shall acquire. The public offer shall be made to the shareholders of the target company to acquire from them an aggregate minimum of 20% of the voting capital of the company provided that acquisition of shares from each of the shareholders shall not be less than the minimum marketable lot or the entire holding if it is less than the marketable lot. x. held by him or by persons acting in concert with him). unless such acquirer makes a public announcement to acquire shares of such company in accordance with the Regulations. ix. make yearly disclosures to the company. in respect of his holdings as on 31st March each year. during the twelve-month period prior to the date of public announcement. Upon the public announcement of a competitive bid or bids. No acquirer holding. the acquire must send a copy of the draft letter to the target company at its registered office address. entitle such acquirer to exercise 10% or more of the voting rights in a company. v. the acquirer(s) who had made the public announcement (s) of the earlier offer(s). shall have the option iv. The minimum offer price shall be the highest of. at any time during the twelve month period up to the date of closure of the offer. (c) the price paid by the acquirer under a preferential allotment made to him.(a) the negotiated price under the agreement . within 21 days from the end of the financial yea. No acquirer shall agree to acquire. not less than 10% but not more than 25% of the shares or voting rights in a company. additional shares or voting rights entitling him to exercise more than 2% of the voting rights. Any person other than the acquirer who had made the first public announcement. vii. unless such acquirer makes a public announcement to acquire shares in accordance with the Regulations. shall. (b) average price paid by the acquirer for acquisitions including by way of allotment in a public or rights issue. within 21 days of the public announcement of the first offer. in any period of 12 months. who is desirous of making any offer.

xvii. xv. No person shall make a competitive bid for acquisition of shares of the financially weak company once the lead institution has evaluated the bid and accepted the bid of the acquirer who has made the public announcement of offer acquisition of shares from the shareholders other than the promoters. once made. at any time up to 3 working days prior to the date of the closure of the offer. (d) the sole acquirer. In case. any make upward revisions in his offer in respect of the price and the number of shares to be acquired. xiii. (c) the statutory approvals(s) required have been refused. the 50% of the consideration payable is to be deposited in Escrow Account. there is any upward revision of offer. the erstwhile promoters do not own any shares in case such acquisition is made by the new promoters pursuant to such scheme. namely-(a) the withdrawals is consequent upon any competitive bid. the date of opening of the offer and the period for which the offer shall be kept open. The acquirer shall deposit in an Escrow Account a sum equivalent to at least 25% of the total consideration payable under the offer up to Rs. Such public announcement shall contain relevant details about the offer including the information about the identity and background of the person acquiring shares. provided that the scheme as far as possible may ensure that after the proposed acquisition. In case of a substantial acquisition of shares in financially weak company not being a sick industrial company. being a natural person has died. offer price. The person acquiring shares from the promoters of the persons in. number and percentages of shares proposed to be acquired. the scheme prepared by a financial institutions may provide for acquisition of shares in the financially weak company in any of the following manner (a) outright purchase of shares. xi. the acquirer who has made the public announcement of offer. the value of the Escrow Account shall be increased to equal to at least 25% of the consideration payable upon such revision. to which it was subject to. the specified date. Where the acquirer specifies a minimum level of acceptance and does not want to acquire a minimum 20%.charge of the management of the affairs of the financially weak company or the financial institutions shall make a public announcement of his intention for acquisition of shares from the shareholders of the company. xii. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 23 of 93 . shall be withdrawn except under the circumstances mentioned in this regulation. No public offer. consequent upon a competitive bid or make an announcement revising the offer or withdrawing the offer with the approval of the SEBI. xvi. Irrespective of whether or not there is competitive bid. 100 crores and 10% of the consideration thereafter. xiv. or (b) exchange of shares. and (e) such circumstances as in the opinion of SEBI merits withdrawal. or (c) a combination of both. (b) the offer did not receive the minimum level of acceptances.

1998. Powers in respect of these matters were with High Court (usually called Company Court). 1997 on substantial acquisition of shares and takeovers has been notified on 28. Indian Companies Act. The most common form of merger involves as elaborate but time-bound procedure under sections 391 to 396 of the Act. These powers are being transferred to National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) by companies (second Amendment) Act. Sec 390(c) As per this section. unsecured creditors who have filed suits or obtained decrees shall be deemed to be of the same class as other unsecured creditors. Arrangement can include reorganization of share capital of company by consolidation of shares of different classes or by division of shares of different classes. Sec 390(b) As per this section. Sec 390 This section provides that “The expression ‘arrangement’ includes a reorganization of the share capital of the company by the consolidation of shares of different classes. 2002. In fact the 20% offer was to facilitate the market movements and competitive process and also to keep the management on their toes. SEBI had decided to increase the creeping acquisition limited to 5% from the 25 and the thresh hold limit to 215% from 10%.8. The decision to increase the threshold limit from 10% to 15% is also difficult to be justified.An amendment to the Regulations. The decision to increase the creeping to 5% and thresh hold limit to 15% appears to be working against the basic spirit of the takeover code. or by the division of shares into shares of different classes. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 24 of 93 .2 Laws governing merger Various Laws governing merger in India are as follows: 1.’Company’ means any company liable to be wound up under the Act. The increase in creeping acquisition will bring in quiet acquisition without the trigger of making a minimum offer of 20%. for the purpose of sections 391 to 393. arrangement and Amalgamation/reconstruction require approval of NCLT while the sale of shares to Transferee Company does not require approval of NCLT. Thus. or by both these methods” Sec 390(a) As per this section . The decision to increase the creeping acquisition from 2%to 5% disregards the objective of protection of small shareholders. The rationale for SEBI’s decision to increase the creeping limit and the threshold limit is difficult to understand. their separate meeting is not necessary. 1. The Compromise. 1956 This has provisions specifically dealing with the amalgamation of a company or certain other entities with similar status.

it will have powers to supervise the carrying out of the scheme. Sec 391(5) In case of default in compliance with provisions of section 391(4). auditor’s report on accounts of the company. the NCLT may sanction the scheme. On such application. It can give suitable Mergers & Acquisitions Page 25 of 93 . e. Sec. Sec 391(7) As per this sub-section. it will be binding on all creditors or members of that class and also on the company.Sec 391 This section deals with the meeting of creditors/members and NCLT’s sanction to Scheme. Copy of NCLT order will have to be filled with Registrar of Companies. 392 This section contains the powers of NCLT to enforce compromise and arrangement Sec 392 (1) As per this section. NCLT can stay commencement of any suit or proceedings against the company till application for sanction of scheme is finally disposed of. application will be made by liquidator. if NCLT sanction. the company or any creditor or member of a company can make application to NCLT. Sec 391(6) After an application for compromise or arrangement has been made under the section. Sec 391(1) As per this sub-section. Sec 391 (2) As per this sub-section. NCLT should also be satisfied that the meting was fairly represented by members/creditors. where NCLT sanctions a compromise or arrangement. A copy of every order of NCLT will be annexed to every copy of memorandum and articles of the company issued after receiving certified copy of the NCLT order. NCLT may order that a meeting of creditors or members or a class of them be called and held as per directions of NCLT. NCLT will make order of sanctioning the scheme only if it is satisfied that company or any other person who has made application has disclosed all material facts relating to the company. latest financial position. pendency of investigation of company etc. its liquidator and contributories. Sec 391(4) As per this sub-section.g. If the company is already under liquidation. Sec 391(3) As per this sub-section. company as well as every officer who is in default is punishable with fine upto Rs 100 for every copy in respect of which default is made. If majority in number representing at least three-fourths in value of creditors or members of that class present and voting agree to compromise or arrangement. Appeal against NCLT order can be made to National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) where appeals against original order the NCLT lies.

statement should give details of interests of trustees of any deed for securing the issue of debentures as it is required to give as respects the companies directors.directions or make modifications in the scheme of compromise or arrangement for its proper working. Sec 393 (2) As per this sub-section.000 and for the purpose of this subsection any liquidator of the company and any trustee of a deed for securing the issue of debentures of the company shall be deemed to be an officer of the company. Sec 392 (2) As per this section.393 (1) Where a meeting of creditors or any class of creditors. and in so far as. Sec 393 (5) As per this section. 50. Sec 393 (4) Where default is made in complying with any of the requirements of this section. the company and every officer of the company who is in default. is called under section 391:a) With every notice calling the meeting which is sent to a creditor or member. managing director. or of numbers or any class of members. if he shows that the default was due to the refusal of any other person. Sec 393 (3) As per this sub-section. Sec. if NCLT finds that the scheme cannot work. manager or trustee of debenture holders shall give notice to the company of matters relating to himself which Mergers & Acquisitions Page 26 of 93 . there shall be sent also a statement setting forth the terms of the compromise or arrangement and explaining its effect. manager or trustee for debenture holders. it is different from the effect on the like interests of other person. being a director. Provided that a person shall not be punishable under this sub-section. and in particular stating any material interests of the directors. any director. the copy of scheme of compromise or arrangement should be furnished to creditor/member free of cost. managing director. there shall be included either such a statement as aforesaid or a notification of the place at which creditors or members entitled to attend the meeting may obtain copies of such a statement as aforesaid. managing directors. Sec 393 This section contains the rules regarding notice and conduct of meeting. if the scheme affects rights of debenture holders. to supply the necessary particulars as to his material interests. shall be punishable with fine which may extend to Rs. and b) In every notice calling the meeting which is given by advertisement. whether in their capacity as such or as members or creditors of the company or otherwise and the effect on those interests of the compromise or arrangement if. or manager of the company. it can order winding up.

only if Registrar of Companies (ROC) has made a report that affairs of the company have not been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interests of its members or to public interest. Sec 394 This section contains the powers while sanctioning scheme of reconstruction or amalgamation. if any application is made to NCLT for sanction of arrangement. Sec 394(1) NCLT can sanction amalgamation of a company which is being wound up with other company. Sec 394 (3) As per this sub-section. company as well as every officer who is in default is punishable with fine upto Rs. Selling shareholders get either compensation or shares of the acquiring company. Sec 395(1) As per this sub-section. if the transferee company or its nominee holds 90% or more shares in the transferor company.the company has to disclose in the statement.5. he is punishable with fine upto Rs. Their shares must be acquired within three months of such notice. Sec 394A As per this section. compromise. In case of default.000.500. This procedure is rarely followed. The transferee company is entitled and bound to acquire those shares on the same terms on which shares of approving share holders are to be transferred to the transferee company. the transferee company will pay the amount payable to transferor company along with the transfer deed duly signed. The transferee company should give notice within one month to dissenting shareholders. This procedure can be followed only when creditors are not involved in reconstruction and their interests are not affected. it is entitled to and is also under obligation to acquire remaining shares. and not only of those attending the meeting. NCLT shall take into consideration any representation made by Central Government before passing any order. Sec 394 (2) As per this sub-section. if he unable to do so. Copy of NCLT order shall be filed with Registrar within 30 days. Sec395 (3) As per this section. notice of such application must be made to Central Government. The dissenting shareholder can make application within one month of the notice to NCLT. if NCLT issues such an order. if shareholders do not submit the transfer deeds. the transferee company has to be give notice in prescribed manner to dissenting shareholder that it desires to acquire his shares. Sec 395(2) As per this sub-section. Sec 395 This section provides that reconstruction or amalgamation without following NCLT procedure is possible by takeover by sale of shares. The NCLT can order compulsory acquisition or other order may be issued. NCLT can direct that the property will be vest in the transferee company and that the transfer of property will be freed from any charge. as sanction of shareholders of at least 90% of value of shares is required. reconstruction or amalgamation. The transferor company will then record name of the Mergers & Acquisitions Page 27 of 93 .

1969 (MRTP 1969) Certain Amendments in the MRTP Act were brought about in 1991. These will not be disposed of without prior permission of Central Government. by issuing notification in Official Gazette. market shares and on the requirement of prior government approvals for mergers that created entities that would violate prescribed limits. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade practices Act. The Supreme Court. 2. rights. the circular of offer shall be accomplished by prescribed information in form 35A. Sec396 (3) As per this sub-section. Sec 396 This section contains the power to Central Government to order amalgamation. Sec 396(2) The order may provide for continuation by or against the transferee company of any legal proceedings pending by or against Transferor Company. creditor and debenture holder of all the companies will have same interest or rights after amalgamation. to the extent possible. Sec. even if transfer deed is not signed by dissenting shareholders. decided that “prior Mergers & Acquisitions Page 28 of 93 . incidental and supplemental provisions necessary to give effect to amalgamation. authorities and privileges and such liabilities. if central government is satisfied that two or more companies should amalgamate in public interest. Sec395 (4A) When the transferee company makes offer to shareholders of transferor company.transferee company as holder of shares. The order can also contain consequential. interest. Books and papers of the company which has amalgamated or whose shares are acquired by another company shall be preserved. Before granting such permission. in a recent judgment. with such property. Government can provide the constitution of the single company. he will get compensation assessed by prescribed authority. Government may appoint a person to examine the books and papers to ascertain whether they contain any evidence of commission of an offence in connection with formation or management of affairs of the company. it can order their amalgamation. The sum received by transferor company shall be kept in a separate account in trust for the dissenting shareholders. every member. duties and obligations as may be specified in the order. Sec 396A This section deals with the preservation of books and papers of amalgamated company. powers.396 (1) As per this sub-section. Offer should contain statement by Transferee Company for registration before it is sent to shareholders of Transferor Company. Sec395 (4) As per this section. If the rights and interests are reduced after amalgamation. or its amalgamation or acquisition of its shares. The compensation so assessed shall be paid to the member or creditor by the company resulting from amalgamation. The Government has removed restrictions on the size of assets.

and d) The shareholders of not less than 90% of the share of the amalgamating company should become the shareholders of amalgamated company.. The Act has been amended to facilitate transfer of shares two non residents and to allow Indian companies to set up subsidiaries and joint ventures abroad without the prior approval of the Reserve Bank of India. the benefits under this act are available only if the following conditions mentioned in Section 2 (1B) of the Act are fulfilled: a) All the amalgamating companies should be companies within the meaning of the section 2 (17) of the Income Tax Act. where the undertaking sought to be acquired is a company which is not incorporated under any law in India. 1961. 1961 Income Tax Act. Income Tax Act. the acquiring firm). However. if any. The depreciation charge may be based on the consideration paid and without any revaluation. cannot be assigned to the amalgamated company and hence no tax benefit is available in this respect. Although there are no provisions in the Act which deal directly with transactions relating to amalgamations.e.e. In case of mergers and amalgamations. Some of the relevant provisions may be summarized as follows: Depreciation: The amalgamated company continues to claim depreciation on the basis of written down value of fixed assets transferred to it by the amalgamating company. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 29 of 93 . Section 29 of FERA provides that no foreign company or foreign national can acquire any share of an Indian company except with prior approval of the reserve Bank of India.. certain provisions of the Act become relevant when shares in Indian companies are allotted to non.approval of the central government for sanctioning a scheme of amalgamation is not required in view of the deletion of the relevant provision of the MRTP Act and the MRTP Commission was justified in not passing an order restraining implementation of the scheme of amalgamation of two firms in the same field of consumer articles”. a number of issues may arise with respect to tax implications. 4. 1961 is vital among all tax laws which affect the merger of firms from the point view of tax savings/liabilities. 3. However. c) All the liabilities of the amalgamating company should become the liabilities of the amalgamated company. the target firm) should be transferred to the amalgamated company (i. Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1973 (FERA 1973) FERA is the primary Indian Law which regulates dealings in foreign exchange. unabsorbed depreciation. b) All the properties of the amalgamating company (i.residents.

and VI. Exemption from Capital Gains Tax: The transfer of assets by amalgamating company to the amalgamated company. it becomes without effect. III. under the scheme of amalgamation is exempted for capital gains tax subject to conditions namely (i) that the amalgamated company should be an Indian Company.Sanction of the NCLT to a compromise has relation back and a scheme or arrangement agreed to by the creditors Mergers & Acquisitions Page 30 of 93 . V. in the amalgamated company.A compromise or arrangement takes effect from the date when it is arrived at subject to the sanction of the court (NCLT). The scheme of amalgamation is approved by a specified authority. 1961 deals with the mergers of the sick companies with healthy companies and to take advantage of the carry forward losses of the amalgamating company. But the benefits under this section with respect to unabsorbed depreciation and carry forward losses are available only if the followings conditions are fulfilled: I. If the NCLT grants sanction it takes effect. 1961. Carry Forward Losses of Sick Companies: Section 72A(1) of the Income Tax Act. then it is deductible in the hands of the amalgamated company under section 35 of Income Tax Act. then such expenses are deductible in the hands of the amalgamated firm. The amalgamating company is an Indian company. The exchange of old share in the amalgamated company by the new shares in the amalgamating company is not considered as sale by the shareholders and hence no profit or loss on such exchange is taxable in the hands of the shareholders of the amalgamated company.9 Effective Date and Appointed Date Effective Date. IV. The amalgamation should be in public interest. The amalgamating company should not be financially viable. The amalgamated company should continue to carry on the business of the amalgamating company without any modification Amalgamation Expenses: In case an expenditure is incurred towards professional charges of Solicitors for the services rendered in connection with the scheme of amalgamation. II. If the NCLT refuses sanction.Capital Expenditures: If the amalgamating company transfers to the amalgamated company any asset representing capital expenditure on scientific research. 1. The amalgamation should facilitate the revival of the business of the amalgamating company. to any shareholder. and (ii) that the shares are issued in consideration of the shares. not from the date of the sanction but from the date when it was arrived at.

British Gas Company has taken over Gujarat Gas Company. and the reason for this is quite obvious. has been merged with Jindal Strips Ltd. Brook Bond Lipton (India) Ltd. and Escorts Ltd. The regulatory and prohibitory provisions of MRTP Act. First. even if scheme is sanctioned later by high court (Now NCLT). This can be retrospective. there has been a spate of merger moves by various industrial groups. merger in India used to be friendly amalgamation resulting as a consequence of a negotiated deal. in 1998 for $8 million and successfully managed to turn it around in a year’s time.of a company becomes operative from the date of the meeting in which it is agreed to and not from the date on which the NCLT sanction is given.. acquisitions and takeovers has not been popular and kept a low profile. 1969 provided for a cumbersome procedure to get approval for mergers and acquisitions under the Act. Pacakaging major Essel Propack which acquired units of the UK’s Arista tubes and Telecon Packaging and turned it around by proper resource allocation. The transfer date specified in the scheme is the date of transfer for purpose of Income Tax assessments. ITC Classic Ltd. Volrho Ltd. unless 1988 when there was the well-known unsuccessful hostile takeover bid by Swaraj Paul (of Caparo Group of the U.. and the offer of Sterlite Ltd. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 31 of 93 .e. has been merged with ICICI Ltd. in most of the cases. India Cement Ltd. Company like Nicholas Piramal has been built only by mergers and acquisitions. 1. Hindustan Lever Ltd. Hindujas etc. Many other Nonresident Indians. It is usually beginning of financial year. and Ponds (India Ltd. has been merged with the latter. Most of the provisions of the MRTP Act. The SCICI Ltd. During recent years. acquired Tata Oil Mills from the Tata Group and then merged other group companies i. have been repealed as a part of economic liberalization drive of the Government of India.. for convenience of accounting and tax assessments. Still.K. ) to get control over DCM Ltd.Appointed date or transfer date is the date on which the property of transferor company vests and is transferred to Transferee Company. also attempted to take over many Indian companies by buying shares of these companies at stock exchanges.10 Mergers and Takeovers: Indian scene In India. Appointed Date.) with it. a loss making company was amalgamated with Voltas Ltd. Jindal Ferroy Alloys Ltd. India’s increasing “turnaround expert” strategy • • Wockhardt acquired loss making Wallis Laboratories of the U. which was initially promoted by ICICI Ltd. for taking over Indian Aluminum Company have heralded a new era of hostile takeovers in India. 1969. such as Chabrias. the concept of mergers.K.’s offer for Raasi cement Ltd.

50 million.Scootish Stampings. Continental engines acquired loss making European remanufactures engines firm vege Motors in June 2005. A month into the acquisition. Key. Bharat Forge has emerged the world’s second largest forging company mainly by way of Mergers and Acquisitions like care Dan Peddinghaus GmbH. such as Us telecom network operator Tyco Global. 1987-4% 2005-13% • Share in Greenfield and expansion projects exceeded 15% in 2005. 4. Tata Group made several significant acquisitions. • • 1.• GHCL Ltd. along with its wholly owned subsidiary. The $ 11 billion deal in a maker in the ground Pure cash deal confidence and aggressiveness. Daewoo and made presence in international market with and enhanced product portfolio. 3. Lakshmi Mittal acquired Arcelor to build the strongest steel venture Mittal Arcelor.and turned it around within six months through better cost control. 2.debt restructuring exercise that reduced into costs. Financial and integration maturity Creditability to attract more bank financing Globally Competitive. Tata motors acquired the bankrupt commercial vehicles units of the Korean group. And the forging major is reaping dividends as a result. Imatra Kilsta. GHCL managed to ramp up production by 34%. • • • The Tata’s Journey of M&A • • Tata Tea acquired loss making Tetley of the UK in 2000 and turned it to profits. (formally Gujrat Heavy Chemicals) acquired a controlling stack of 65 per cent in Romanian Soda ash firm SC Bega Upsom for $ 19. Fedral Forge. Mr. Page 32 of 93 Mergers & Acquisitions . Aluminiumtechink. Daewoo Commercial vehicles and Boston’s Ritz Carlton Hotel. 5. The Tata-Corus 1.11 The changing scenario • Share of global M&A by MNC’s from developing and transition countries. CDP.

More investment abroad implies more the benefits of the home country. Esssel Propack. Strengths the arms of local companies and of the MNC’s to survive in a competitive lieu. Continental Engines and a host of others. Now. making a big ticket acquisition.• • • • • • • • • Most important benefit is increased competition. Since. Almost 50% of top 50 companies have made at least one overseas acquisition in the past 3 years in varied industries. India’s outward FDI has touched $ 19 million. Top 10 Indian mergers (1991-97) • Companies involved in Mergers Zee telefilms Power Generators Satyam Infoway Air products Broad com Schoroedel funds Chase manhaltam Reliance Xerox Indian cements 1. The acquisition boom began as a trickle with software companies picking up small information technology companies abroad. This calendar year.4 1. Followed up by pharmaceutical and auto components outfits.8 1. up from $96 billion in 2005. BharatFirge.0 4. Story vote of confidence in Indian management with such companies as Tata Tea .4 Page 33 of 93 .12 Causes of merger: Mergers & Acquisitions (US$ Billion) 13 10.6 1.6 1.9 1.7 5. leveraging their recently acquired ability to work in challenging business environment. Wockhardt.TataMotors. a deluge with the Birlas now going the Tata’s way.3 2. 2000 India has made over 300 overseas acquisitions.

synergies or product . These are generally undertaken to: a) Achieve optimum size b) Improve profitability c) Carve out greater market share d) Reduce its administrative and overhead costs. Achieve optimum size and carve out optimum share in the market. technologies. Horizontal merger: These involve mergers of two business companies operating and competing in the same kind of activity. Cost reduction as a result of integrated operation. Reverse mergers Reverse mergers involve mergers of profir making companies with companies having accumulated losses in order to: a. They are undertaken for diversification of business in other products. Set up merged asset base and shift to accelerate depreciation. 4. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 34 of 93 . Vertical merger are an integration undertaken either forward to come close to customers or backwards to come close to raw materials suppliers. These mergers are generally endeavored to: a) Increased profitability b) Economic cost (by eliminating avoidable sales tax and excise duty payments) c) Increased market power d) Increased size 3.An extensive appraisal of each merger scheme is done to patternise the causes of mergers. trade and for advantages in bringing separate enterprise under single control namely: a) b) c) d) Synergy arising in the form of economies of scale. b. Conglomerate merger: These are mergers between two or more companies having unrelated business.They do not have an impact on the acquisition of monopoly power and hence are favored through out the world. These hypothesized causes (motives) as defined in the mergers schemes and explanatory statement framed by the companies at the time of mergers can be conveniently categorized based on the type of merger. Vertical merger: These are mergers between firms in different stages of industrial production in which a buyer and seller relationship exists. 2. These transactions are not aimed at explicitly sharing resources. Claim tax savings on account of accumulated losses that increase profits. The possible causes of different type of merger schemes are as follows: 1. They seek to consolidate operations of both companies. Risk reduction by avoiding sales and profit instability.

Cut costs and achieve focus. Eliminate intra-group competition c. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 35 of 93 . Such mergers are initiated with a view to affect consolidation in order to: a.5. Group company mergers These mergers are aimed at restructuring the diverse unitsof group companies to create a viable unit. Correct leverage imbalances and imprvove borrowing capacity. b.

Chapter -2 Motives of Merger The present chapter examines the financial and strategic motives driving the mergers and acquisitions activity and identify them with real life merger cases. creativity. It is defined as ‘two plus two equal to five’ (2+2=5) phenomenon. synergy may also arise from enhanced managerial capabilities. They have become popular in the recent times because of the enhanced competition. But apart from operating economies. Operating economies are one form of synergy benefits. innovativeness. A number of motives are attributed for the occurrence of mergers and acquisitions. Motives of merger: Mergers and acquisitions are strategic decisions leading to the maximization of a company’s growth by enhancing its production and marketing operations. Synergy refers to benefits other than those related to economies of scale. breaking of trade barriers. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 36 of 93 . free flow of capital across countries and globalization of business as a number of economies are being deregulated and integrated with other economies.1 Synergies through Consolidation: Synergy implies a situation where the combined firm is more valuable than the sum of the individual combining firms. 2. R&D and market coverage capacity due to the complementarily of resources and skills and a widened horizon of opportunities.

the synergy comes from some form of economies of scale which reduce the cost or from increase market power which increases profit margins and sales. In case of horizontal merger. marketing and advertisement department can be streamlined.. and thereby can gain by combining these two strength. The sources of synergy of specialized resources will vary depending upon the merger. These are: 1. credit monitoring. The marketing economies may be produced through savings in advertising (by reducing the need to attract each other’s customers). Mergers & Acquisitions Page 37 of 93 . decide to merge into AB Ltd. synergy may be gained by exploiting the strength in these areas. This is possible only if the value of the new firm is expected to be more than the sum of individual value of the target firm and the acquiring firm. since a wider product line may provide larger sales per unit of sales efforts and per sales person. A firm with a good distribution network may acquire a firm with a promising product line. it is the difference value between the combined firm and the sum of the value of the individual firms. However. The research and development expenditures will also be substantially reduced in the new set up by eliminating similar research efforts and repetition of work already done by the target firm. purchasing etc. The firm might be able to reduce the cost of production by eliminating some fixed costs. There are several ways in which the merger may generate operating economies.An under valued firm will be a target for acquisition by other firms. When a firm having strength in one functional area acquires another firm with strength in a different functional area. accounting.e. the fundamental motive for the acquiring firm to takeover a target firm may be the desire to increase the wealth of the shareholders of the acquiring firm. The argument is that both firms will be better off after the merger. Operating synergy: The key to the existence of synergy is that the target firm controls a specialized resource that becomes more valuable when combined with the bidding firm’s resources. Igor Ansoff (1998) classified four different types of synergies. and also from the advantage of offering a more complete product line (if the merged firms produce different but complementary goods). Synergy is the increase in the value of the firm combining two firms into one entity i.g. The management expenses may also come down substantially as a result of corporate reconstruction. then the merger is beneficial if V (AB)> V (A) +V (B) Where V (AB) V (A) V (B) = Value of the merged entity = Independent value of company A = Independent value of company B A merger which results in meeting the test of increasing the wealth of the shareholders is said to contain synergistic properties. For example.. if A Ltd. billing. The selling. and Ltd. A major saving may arise from the consolidation of departments involved with financial activities e.

It may either distribute its surplus cash to its shareholders or use it to acquire some other company. a firm may either combine with its supplier of input (backward integration) and/or with its customers (forward integration). SCL also needed to upgrade its technology and increase its production. An example of a merger resulting in operating economies is the merger of Sundaram Clayton Ltd. The shareholders may not really benefit much if surplus cash is returned to them since they would have to pay tax at ordinary income tax rate. release the financing constraint. manufacturing and marketing –eliminates the need for bargaining (with suppliers and/or customers). Their wealth may increase through an increase in the market value of their shares if surplus cash is used to acquire another Mergers & Acquisitions Page 38 of 93 . Large amount of funds would have been required for creating additional production capacity. (TSL). A merger may help in: • • • • • Eliminating financial constraint Deployment surplus cash Enhancing debt capacity Lowering the financial costs Better credit worthiness Financial Constraint: A company may be constrained to grow through internal development due to shortage of funds.By this merger. when two firms combine their resources and efforts. These resultant economies are known as synergistic operating economies. It needed a large manufacturing bas to reduce its production costs. There are many ways in which a merger can result into financial synergy and benefit. It may not have enough internal opportunities to invest its surplus cash.Thus. TSL became the second largest producer of two –wheelers after Bajaj. The combined company has also been enabled to share the common R&D facilities. Such merger facilitates better coordination and administration of the different stages of business stages of business operations-purchasing. (SCL) with TVS-Suzuki Ltd. SCL’s and TCL’s plants were closely located which added to their advantages. The company can grow externally by acquiring another company by the exchange of shares and thus. Financial synergy: Financial synergy refers to increase in the value of the firm that accrues to the combined firm from financial factors. Deployment of surplus cash: A different situation may be faced by a cash rich company. they will be able to produce better results than they were producing as separate entities because of savings various types of operating costs. The main objective motivation for the takeover was TSL’s need to tide over its different market situation through increased volume of production. 2. and minimizes uncertainty of supply of inputs and demand for product and saves costs of communication. In a vertical merger.

obtain bank loan and raise capital in the market easily. in 1996 and also transfer’s its fiber glass division to FGL Ltd. A common argument for creating a favorable environment for mergers is that it imposes a certain discipline on the management. however. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 39 of 93 . capital gains tax rate. Another aspect of the financing costs is issue costs. which is performing poorly. existing managers will strive continually to improve their performance. The stability of cash flows reduces the risk of insolvency and enhances the capacity of the new entity to service a larger amount of debt. is replaced by a more effective management team. A merged firm is able to realize economies of scale in flotation and transaction costs related to an issue of Better credit worthiness: This helps the company to purchase the goods on credit. 3. cash flows. advertising. can bring stability of cash flows of the combined company. the merged firm should be able to borrow at a lower rate of interest. can gain immensely from the superior management that is likely to emerge as a sequel to the merger. Managerial synergy One of the potential gains of merger is an increase in managerial effectiveness. This may occur if the existing management team. The company would also be enabled to keep surplus funds and grow through acquisition. Sales synergy These synergies occurs when merged organization can benefit from common distribution channels. Often a firm. If lackluster performance renders a firm more vulnerable to potential acquisition. plagued with managerial inadequacies. be taken off partially or completely by increase in the shareholders risk on account of providing better protection to lenders. sales administration. with fluctuating. but negatively correlated. Debt Capacity: A merger of two companies. Since the probability of insolvency is reduced due to financial stability and increased protection to lenders. RP Goenka’s ceat tyres sold off its type cord division to Shriram Fibers Ltd. they would pay tax at a lower. 4. Issue costs are saved when the merged firm makes a larger security issue. Another allied benefit of a merger may be in the form of greater congruence between the interests of the managers and the shareholders. This advantage may. another group company to achieve financial synergies. sales promotion and warehousing. If they sell their shares. The increased borrowing allows a higher interest tax shield which adds to the shareholders wealth.. Financing Cost: The enhanced debt capacity of the merged firm reduces its cost of capital.

the fluctuation of one will tend to set off the fluctuations of the other. While negative correlation brings greater reduction in risk. products diversification resulting from merger can also help the new firm fighting the cyclical/seasonal fluctuations. a shareholder can easily create a diversified portfolio of firms merely by holding the Mergers & Acquisitions Page 40 of 93 . Moreover.The Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Ltd. Through the diversification effects. there will be some diversification effect as long as the two firm’s earnings are not perfectly correlated (both rising and falling together). Indeed. can definitely cover broader economic areas. the cyclically prone earnings of firm A would be set off by the counter cyclically prone earnings of firm B. ABC Company and PQR Company. If investors can diversify on their own by buying stocks of companies which propose to merge. The extent. depends upon on the correlation between the earnings of the merging entities. Diversification into new areas and new products can also be a motive for a firm to merge an other with it. if they merge. If firm A’s income generally rises when B’s income generally falls. The merger of these companies is not necessary for him to enjoy the benefits of diversification. may simply buy the stocks of these two companies and merge them into a portfolio. Any investor who wants to reduce risk by diversifying between two companies.2 Diversification A commonly stated motive for mergers is to achieve risk reduction through diversification. Individually. As a matter of fact. This reduction in overall risk is particularly likely if the merged firms are in different lines of business. But portfolio of firms in a conglomerate merger is costly as the acquisition of firms is a costly exercise. Smoothing out the earnings of a firm over the different phases of a cycle tends to reduce the risk associated with the firm. thus producing a relatively level pattern of combined earnings. if merges with another firm operating primarily in South India. For example. Classic and Anagram Finance to obtain quick access to a well dispersed distribution network. merger can produce benefits to all firms by reducing the variability of firm’s earnings. He can contribute the stocks of ABC Company and PQR Company in any proportion he likes as he is not confronted with a ‘fixed’ proportion that result from the merger. conglomerate mergers. then the risk of combination will be less than the weighted average of the risk of these two projects. say. the earnings of the two firms may fluctuate in line with the cyclical variations. The diversification motive is based on the proposition that if two risky projects are combined. A firm operating in North India. to which risk is reduced. Individually these firms could serve only a limited area.. they do not derive any benefits from the proposed merger. Thus. (ICICI) acquired Tobaco Company.e. ITC. The greatest benefit from diversification can be obtained by continuing firms from different industries i. On the other hand. his ‘homemade diversification give him far greater flexibility. and vice-a versa. firm A has a product line with a particular cyclical variations and firm B deals in product line with counter cyclical variations. where two firms poorly correlated cash flows merged to create a portfolio of a firms. However. positive correlation brings lesser reduction in risk. 2.

shares of diversified companies. This is much easier and cheaper than creating a portfolio of firms in conglomerate merger. Thus, firms diversify to achieve: • • • • Sales and growth stability Favorable growth developments Favorable competition shifts Technological changes

2.3 Accelerated Growth Growth is essential for sustaining the viability, dynamism and value-enhancing capability of company. A growth- oriented company is not only able to attract the most talented executives but it would also be able to retain them. Growing operations provide challenges and excitement to the executives as well as opportunities for their job enrichment and rapid career development. This helps to increase managerial efficiency. Other things being the same, growth leads to higher profits and increase in the shareholders value. A company can achieve its growth objective by: • • Expanding its existing markets Entering in new markets.

A company may expand and/or diversify its markets internally or externally. If the company cannot grow internally due to lack of physical and managerial resources, it can grow externally by combining its operations with other companies through mergers and acquisitions. Mergers and acquisitions may help to accelerate the pace of a company’s growth in a convenient and inexpensive manner. Internal growth requires that the company should develop its operating facilitiesmanufacturing, research, marketing etc. Internal development of facilities for growth also requires time. Thus, lack or inadequacy of resources and time needed for internal development constrains a company’s pace of growth. The company can acquire production facilities as well as other resources from outside through mergers and acquisitions. Specially, for entering in new products/markets, the company may lack technical skills and may require special marketing skills and/or a wide distribution network to access different segments of markets. The company can acquire existing company or companies with requisite infrastructure and skills and grow quickly. Mergers and acquisitions, however, involve cost. External growth could be expensive if the company pays an excessive price for merger. Benefits should exceed the cost of acquisition for realizing a growth which adds value to shareholders. In practice, it has been found that the management of a number of acquiring companies paid an excessive price for acquisition to satisfy their urge for high growth and large size of their companies. It is necessary that price may be carefully determined and negotiated so that merger enhances the value of shareholders.

Mergers & Acquisitions

Page 41 of 93

For example, RPG Group had a turnover of only Rs.80 crores in 1979. This has increased to about Rs. 5600 crores in 1996. This phenomenal growth was due to the acquisitions of a several companies by the RPG Group. Some of the companies acquired are Asian cables, ceat, Calcutta Electricity Supply and company, SAE etc. 2.4 Increased Market power A merger can increase the market share of the merged firm. The increased concentration or market share improves the profitability of the firm due to economies of scale. The bargaining power of the firm with labour, suppliers and buyers is also enhanced. The merged firm can also exploit technological breakthroughs against obsolescence and price wars. Thus, by limiting competition, the merged firm can earn super normal profit and strategically employ the surplus funds to further consolidate its position and improve its market power. The acquisition of Universal Luggage by Blow Plast is an example of limiting competition to increase market power. Before the merger, the two companies were competing fiercely with each other leading to a severe price war and increased marketing costs. As a result of the merger, Blow Plast has obtained a strong hold on the market and now operates under near monopoly situation. Yet another example is the acquisition of Tomco by Hindustan Lever. Hindustan Lever at the time of merger was expected to control one-third of three million tonne soaps and detergents markets and thus, substantially reduce the threat of competition. Merger is not only route to obtain market power. A firm can increase its market share through internal growth or ventures or strategic alliances. Also, it is not necessary that the increased market power of the merged firm will lead to efficiency and optimum allocation of resources. Market power means undue concentration which could limit the choice of buyers as well as exploit suppliers and labour. 2.5 Purchase of assets at bargain price Mergers may be explained by the opportunity to acquire assets, particularly land, mined rights, plant and equipment at lower cost than would be incurred if they were purchased or constructed at current market prices. If market prices of many stocks have been considerably below the replacement cost of the assets they represent, expanding firm considering constructing plants developing mines, or buying equipment. Often it has found that the desired asset could be obtained cheaper by acquiring a firm that already owned and operated the asset. Risk could be reduced because the assets were already in place and an organization of people knew how to operate them and market their products. Many of mergers can be financed by cash tender offers to the acquired firm’s shareholders at price substantially above the current market. Even, so, the assets can be acquired for less than their current cost of construction. The basic factor underlying this is that inflation in construction costs not fully reflected in stock prices because of high interest rates and

Mergers & Acquisitions

Page 42 of 93

limited optimism (or downright pessimism) by stock investors regarding future economic conditions. 2.6 Increased external financial capability Many mergers, particularly those of relatively small firms into large ones, occur when the acquired firm simply cannot finance its operations. This situation is typical in a small growing firm with expanding financial requirements. The firm has exhausted its bank credit and has virtually no access to long term debt or equity markets. Sometimes the small firms have encountered operating difficulty and the bank has served notice that its loans will not be renewed. In this type of situation, a large firm with sufficient cash and credit to finance the requirements of the smaller one probably can obtain a good situation by making a merger proposal to the small firm. The only alternative the small firm may have is to try to interest two or more larger firms in proposing merger to introduce completion into their bidding for the acquisition. The smaller firm’s situation might not be so bleak. It may not be threatened by nonrenewable of a maturing loan. But its management may recognize that continued growth to capitalize on its markets will require financing beyond its means. Although its bargaining position will be better, the financial synergy of the acquiring firm’s strong financial capability may provide the impetus for the merger. Sometimes the financing capability is possessed by the acquired firm. The acquisition of a cash rich firm whose operations have matured may provide additional financing to facilitate growth of the acquiring firm. In some cases, the acquiring firm may be able to recover all or part of the cost of acquiring the cash-rich firm when the merger is consummated and the cash then belongs to it. A merger also may be based upon the simple fact that the combination will make two small firms with limited access to capital markets large enough to achieve that access on a reasonable basis. The improved financing capability provides the financial synergy. 2.7 Increased managerial skills Occasionally, a firm will have good potential that it finds itself unable to develop fully because of deficiencies in certain areas of management or an absence of needed product or production technology. If the firm can not hire the management or develop the technology it needs, it might combine with a compatible firm that has the needed managerial personnel or technical expertise. Any merger, regardless of the specific motive for it, should contribute to the maximization of owner’s wealth. 2.8 Reduction in tax liability Under Income Tax Act, there is a provision for set-off and carry forward of losses against its future earnings for calculating its tax liability. A loss making or sick company may not Mergers & Acquisitions
Page 43 of 93

(Rs. (Rs. the shareholders of selling company can save tax. Similarly. 2. The profits arising from the exchange of shares are not taxable until the shares are actually sold. management functions and management resources and systems.34 crores) Alwyn Missan merged with Mahinder and Mahindra Ltd. (Rs. budgeting. For example.34 crores) Sidhpur Mills merged with Reliance Industries Ltd. Economies will be maximized when it is optimally utilized. The following is the list of some companies along with the amount of tax benefits enjoyed: • • • • • Orrisa synthesis merged with Straw product Ltd. Also. A strong urge to reduce tax liability. A company establishes management systems by employing enough qualified professionals irrespective of its size. Economies of scale may also be obtained fro the optimum utilisation of management resource and systems of planning. facility or resource is utilized for a large scale of operation. Economies of scale may also arise from other indivisibilities such as production facilities. In India. economies in the use of the marketing function can be achieved by covering wider markets and customers using a given sales force and promotion and advertising efforts. a profitable company is allowed to merge with a sick company to set-off against its profits the accumulated loss and unutilized depreciation of that company.2. For example. reporting and control. a given mix of plant and machinery can produce scale economies when its capacity utilisation is increased. particularly when the marginal tax rate is high is a strong motivation for the combination of companies. This happens because a given function. Thus. 16 crores) Ahmadabad cotton Mills merged with Arvind Mils (Rs. tax benefits are responsible for one-third of mergers in the USA12. A number of companies in India have merged to take advantage of this provision. in a position to earn sufficient profits in future to take advantage of the carry forward provision. A combined firm with a Mergers & Acquisitions Page 44 of 93 . the combined company can utilize the carry forward loss and save taxes with the approval of government. When the shares are sold.47 crores) Hyderabad Alwyn merged with Voltas Ltd. 1600 crores) When two companies merge through an exchange of shares. they are subject to capital gain tax rate which is much lower than the ordinary income tax rate. If it combines with a profitable company.9 Economies of Scale Economies of scale arise when increase in the volume of production leads to a reduction in the cost of production per unit. (Rs.3. the high tax rate was the main reason for the post-war merger activity in the USA. fixed costs are distributed over a large volume of production causing the unit cost of production to decline. Merger may help to expand volume of production without a corresponding increase in fixed costs.

pp. 2. A holiday tour 12 Weston. economies of vertical integration may be realized. The recent merger of Samtel Electron services (SED) with Samtel Color Ltd.515. these merger help avoid inefficient market transactions and result in reduced exchange inefficiencies. 1977. Essentials of Managerial Finance. Dryden Press. c) To improve profitability by expanding into high margin activities of suppliers and customers. operator might acquire chain of travel agents and use them to promote his own holiday rather than those of rival tour operators. Thus. Transactions within a firm might eliminate costs of searching for prices. a leading maker of color picture tube. (SCL) entailed backward integration of SED which manufactures electronic components required to make picture tubes with SCL. There are many reasons why firms want to be integrated vertically at different stages. Tata Tea’s acquisition of consolidated coffee which produces coffee beans and Asian Coffee.F. and Brigham.10 Vertical Integration Vertical integration is a combination of companies of companies business with the business of a supplier or customer generally motivated by a pure desire: a) To secure a source of supply for key materials or sources b) To secure a distribution outlet or a major customer for the company’s products.. Proper planning for production and inventory management may improve due to more efficient information flow within a single firm. Forward integration is where company merges to come close to its customers. The real gain can be achieved by integrating backward if raw material market is not perfectly competitive and firm has to buy raw materials at monopolistic prices hence merge to obtain control of supplies.F. Backward integration occurs when a company comes close to its raw materials or suppliers. the merger of a company Mergers & Acquisitions Page 45 of 93 . was also backward integration which helped reduce exchange inefficiencies by eliminating market transactions. costs of communicating and co-ordination. Further.large size can make the optimum use of the management resource and systems resulting in economies of scale. Thus. So forward or downstream vertical integration involves takeover of customer business. vertical merger may take place to integrate forward or backward. Some of these reasons are technological economies like avoidance of reheating and transportation cost as in the case of iron and steel producer. which possesses coffee beans. J. contracting. For example. E. advertising. when companies engaged at different stages of production or value chain merge.

truck finance.engaged in oil exploration and production (like ONGC) with a company engaged in refining and marketing (like HPCL) may improve coordination and control. Market penetration strategy is generally pursued within markets that are becoming more global. One such example is Indian market. Vertical integration. Few instances of MNC’s related mergers are: 1. car purchase. market penetration means developing new and large markets for a company existing products. Milk food to gain an entry into ice cream market with the help of their marketing networks. it may not get the benefit of outsourcing from independent suppliers who may be more efficient in their segments of the value chain. 2. Heinz entered into India through acquisition of Glato Industries. Further. Kwality. 2. and customer finance.11 Early entry and market penetration An early mover strategy can reduce the lead time taken in establishing the facilities and distribution channels. a leading financial institution secured a foot hold in retail network through acquisition of Anagram Finance Company and ITC classic. brands etc. this strategy is mainly adopted by MNC’s to gain to new markets. These acquisitions thus helped ICICI to obtain quick access to well dispersed distribution network.12 Revival of sick companies Mergers & Acquisitions Page 46 of 93 . 3. Cross border merger are a means of becoming or remaining major players in such markets. acquiring companies with good manufacturing and distribution network or few brands of a company gives the advantage of rapid market share. They prefer to merge with a local established company which knows behavior of market and has established customer base. If a company does everything inhouse. Anagram had a strong retail franchise. The ICICI. Rajasthan and Maharastra and a depositor base of over two lakhs depositors. H. is not always a good idea. 2. 4. HLL acquired Dollops. however. the largest player in market with several established brands and nationwide bottling and marketing network. Coca Cola while re-entering India market in 1993 acquired Parle. Hence. ICICI was therefore attracted by the retail portfolio of Anagram which was active in lease and hire purchase. distribution network of over fifty branches in Gujarat. So.J. production facilities. Whirlpool Corporation’s entry into India by acquiring Kelvinator India.

Amalgamation taking place under the aegis of Board for Industrial (BIFR) fall under this category. Bharat Gears Ltd. Some of the group companies which have amalgamated through the BIFR include Mahindra Missan Allwyn with Mahindra and Mahindra. Hyderabad. its group companies. GKW Ltd. Example of restructuring and consolidation within the group companies is the case of Nirma Ltd. 1961. Allwyn with Voltas etc. BIFR found revival of ailing companies through the means of their with healthy company as the most successful route for revival of their financial wealth. Universal Steel Alloys Ltd. Taken over by Transferee company Tata Telecom Ltd. Powmex Steels Ltd. Firstly. Secondly. Cimmco Birla Ltd. There are few other micro economic reasons to decide on mergers with group consideration as their sole consideration: • • • To achieve economies of scale To reduce cost of administration and management expenses in companies within same group. Pentasia Chemicals Ltd. BIFR motivated Rehabilitation Merger Year April April April April May April 95 95 95 96 96 97 Transferor sick company Tata Keltron Ltd. Titagarh Papers Mills Ltd. To bifurcate business by floating separate products this is referred to as demerger.13 Consolidation at Group level Group company mergers are generally initiated with a view to affect consolidation to derive critical mass to cut costs in order to achieve focus and eliminate competition. Nirma soaps and Mergers & Acquisitions Page 47 of 93 . Asian Paints Ltd. improve borrowed capital. Nirma detergents. 2.An important motive for merger is to turn around a financially sick company through the process of merger. the purpose is to revive a group of sick companies by merging it with groups of healthy company by obtaining concessions from financial institution and government agencies and obtaining benefits of tax concessions u/s 72A of Income Tax Act. it also helps to preserve group reputation. Such mergers within group are also aimed at restructuring their diverse units to create a more viable unit. Titagarh Steels Ltd. Biax Ltd. to revive sickness. merging with it.

their Indian offspring’s IDL Ltd. and Guiness plc.merger company. their two Indian counter parts. 3. Its merger with Escorts Tractors Ltd. increased their holding by another 20%. Shina soaps and detergents and Nirma chemicals.15 Increase Promoter’s stake Another motive for merger could be to increase the stake of promoters.detergents. both liquor companies followed this in India. Ltd. Consequent of the merger of Grand plc. Similarly. 2. ‘A’ company which is family owned could be merged with ‘B’ company which is a listed company with family stake in it. and The English Electric Company of India Ltd. Thus. The General Electric Company of India Ltd. Nanda family’s holding in escorts Ltd.K.( just like the GEC. The higher stakes helps to ward off takeover bids. U. France) 2. Merger of Videocon groups Videocon Narmada Electronics with its flagship company Videocon International led to operating efficiencies by controlling costs under one head. By the process of merger. Some instances of such mergers are listed below: 1. The objective was to make Nirma a strong and resilient corporate entity capable of facing global competition by restructuring management. and united Distilleries India Ltd. For instance.V. 1997. So.14 Following Parent’s Footsteps Some of mergers in India belonging to Multinational giants take place as a result of direct fall out of mergers of their parent companies taking place in their home countries. were merged from Ist April 1992 and changed their name to GEC. As per the dictates of their parent companies. 2. was 20% before merger. In London in Dec. Novartis India (51% of Novartis AG) was formed in India by the merger of Hindustan ciba Giegy and Sandoz India Ltd. visa. the family stake could be consolidated without going through the complications of SEBI guidelines of 4th august 199415. merger of Reliance Polythylene and Reliance Polypropylene into Reliance Industries swap ratio of 100: 30 and 100:25 respectively resulted in an increase in Ambani’s stake from 23% to 37%. in 1996 following the merger of their global parents. 2. Alsthen India Ltd. and Alcatel Alsthen. formed by merger of two largest industrial groups The General Electric company plc. mergers could be motivated by the need to enhance promoter’s holdings in post.16 Defensive Maneuver Mergers & Acquisitions Page 48 of 93 . sizable reduction in management costs and increased professionalism. Alsthen N.

Indian companies have also felt the need of becoming global. Globalization has thus resulted in major implications for industrial competitiveness by lowering the cost of labour and opening markets to a great number of producing firms. To meet the opportunities thrown open by fast growing world. merger of Jindal Ferro Alloys with Jindal Strips helped Jindal Ferro Alloys improve its share price from Rs. The process of globalization and increasing integration of Indian economy with the international market will have its impact sooner or later. Also the merged company is able to compete more effectively with increased size. the world’s largest integrated tea company has been driven by the fact that Tetley fits perfectly into Tata tea’s globalization drive and could be a perfect launch vehicle to achieve greater synergies in global arena. many industries have forced most corporate to consolidate.Merger can be used as shields for protection from raiders. it may consider getting involved in a merger game. the world’s largest Tea brands by Tata tea. 160 crores to Rs. it is suggested that mergers and acquisition are intended to: • • • Limit competition Utilize under-utilization market power Overcome the problem of slow growth and profitability in one’s own industry Mergers & Acquisitions Page 49 of 93 . Hence. it is able to expand its size. European countries face competitive pressures from creation of single Euro currency. Also. Its size and capacities are small as compared to MNC’s. A merger or acquisition can be used by a company as defensive maneuver to resist takeover by another company. greater market penetration. making its acquisition very expensive. 2. If a firm feels that it could be acquired by another firm. Industries have to increase its capacity. helped improve operating efficiencies and resulted in instant expansion of product lines of Tata tea –Tetley combines. For example. Asian crisis has forced most Asian nations to look to the west for technological and capital support. On the one hand.17 Acquire Global Competitive strength With competitive forces resulting from globalization and deregulation. on the other hand. For instance. generic market and to acquire global competitive strength. by increasing market capitalization of the merged company’s threat of takeover can be tackled. 550 crores with the help of swap ratio of forty five Jindal strips for every hundred Jindal Ferro alloy shares. Ansoff16 suggested a number of reasons that are attributed to the occurrence of mergers and acquisitions. merger are planned to acquire global competitive strength. After the pitched Battle against Multi National Company (MNC) in domestic arena. European and Asian market have become more receptive to merger and acquisitions. The acquisition has brought with it. In doing so. 65 to Rs. induct new technology and development markets. 170 and market capitalization of Rs. Cross border mergers and acquisitions are being resorted to such mergers provide opportunities for taking up larger projects. The recent acquisition of Tetley. The globalized business environment thus demands that Indian Industries also restructured.

al.L. Acquisitive Behaviour of U. Vanderbilt University Press. SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of shares and takeovers) Regulations. et. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 50 of 93 . Manufacturing Firms 1946-65. 1994 15 16 Ansoff H.S. 1971..• • • • • • • • Achieve diversification Gain economies of scale and increase income with proportionately less investment Establish a transnational bridgehead without excessive start-up costs to gain access to a foreign market Utilize under-utilized resources-human and physical and managerial skills Displace existing management Circumvent government regulations Reap speculative gains attendant upon new security issue or change in P/E ratio Create an image of aggressiveness and strategic opportunism empire building and to amass vast economic powers of the economy.

and the accounting consideration involved in merger and acquisition Firms are acquired for a number of reasons. firms have also acquired or merged with other firms to gain the benefits of synergy. how to develop acquisition strategy. or lower costs. Through time. the matters relating to the valuation of the synergies.Chapter-3 ACQUISITIONS This chapter covers the historical background of acquisition. their own management or wealthy raiders. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 51 of 93 . In the 1980s. In the 1960s and 1970s. Beatrice and RJR Nabisco were acquired by other firms. we saw a wave of consolidation in the media business as telecommunications firms acquired entertainment firms and entertainment firms acquired cable businesses. who saw potential value in restructuring or breaking up these firms. process of acquisition. corporate giants like Time. firms such as Gulf and Western and ITT built themselves into conglomerates by acquiring firms in other lines of business. in the form of either higher growth. In the 1990s. amount paid to the target firm. as in the Disney acquisition of Capital Cities.

These transactions can range from one firm merging with another firm to create a new firm to managers of a firm acquiring the firm from its stockholders and creating a private firm. For instance. AT&T initially offered to buy NCR for $80 per share. 3. 3. The final and often the most difficult step is making the acquisition work after the deal is consummated. this difference will be recorded as goodwill on the acquiring firm’s books or not be recorded at all. and the understanding of what the strategy requires in terms of resources. The acquisition price. The acquiring firm offers a price higher than the target firm’s market price prior to the acquisition and invites stockholders in the target firm to tender their shares for the price. This price is usually based upon negotiations between the acquiring firm and the target firm’s managers. and following up with structuring and paying for the deal. in 1991. is the price that will be paid by the acquiring firm for each of the target firm’s shares. but the process has its costs. with premiums for the value of control and any synergy. seek it out. we are talking about a number of different transactions. how best to raise funds to do it. in the context of mergers and consolidations. The third is the determination of how much to pay on the acquisition. we examine the four basic steps in an acquisition. in some cases. The first is the development of a rationale and a strategy for doing acquisitions. if there are other firms bidding for the same target firm or if an insufficient number of stockholders tender at that initial price. AT&T ultimately paid $110 per share to complete the acquisition. continuing with the identification and valuation of a target firm. In a hostile acquisition. starting with establishing an acquisition motive.2 The Process of an Acquisition Acquisitions can be friendly or hostile events. a premium of $ 25 over the stock price at the time of the offer. 3.1 Background on Acquisitions When we talk about acquisitions or takeovers. This decision Mergers & Acquisitions Page 52 of 93 . In this chapter. We begin this section by looking at the different forms taken by acquisitions. This price may be higher than the initial price offered by the acquirer.Acquisitions seem to offer firms a short cut to their strategic objectives. The second is the choice of a target for the acquisition and the valuation of the target firm. and whether to use stock or cash.3 Steps in an Acquisition There are four basic and not necessarily sequential steps. In either friendly or hostile acquisitions. In a tender offer. Depending upon how the acquisition is accounted for. in acquiring a target firm. There is one final comparison that can be made and that is between the price paid on the acquisition and the accounting book value of the equity in the firm being acquired. In a friendly acquisition. the difference between the acquisition price and the market price prior to the acquisition is called the acquisition premium. continue the section by providing an overview on the acquisition process and conclude by examining the history of the acquisitions in the United States. the target firm’s management does not want to be acquired. it is the price at which the acquiring firm receives enough shares to gain control of the target firm. the managers of the target firm welcome the acquisition and.

Skill in execution: If the acquirer. Acquire poorly managed firms and change management Some firms are not managed optimally and others often believe they can run them better than the current managers. three basic components need to come together. the price exceeds the estimated value. These motives were studied in detail in the last chapter. we consider a number of different motives for acquisitions and suggest that a coherent acquisition strategy has to be based on one or another of these motives.1 Developing an Acquisition Strategy Not all firms that make acquisitions have acquisition strategies. 1. and perhaps the most challenging one. assume that the estimated value for a firm is $100 million and that the current market price is $75 million. or better analytical tools than those used by other market participants. allowing the acquirer to claim the increase in value. To illustrate. 3. 3. is to make the acquisition work after the deal is complete. there will be no value gain from the acquisition. Acquiring poorly managed firms and removing incumbent management. Access to capital depends upon the size of the acquirer – large firms will have more access to capital markets and internal funds than smaller firms or individuals – and upon the acquirer’s track record – a history of success at identifying and acquiring under valued firms will make subsequent acquisitions easier. and not all firms that have acquisition strategies stick with them. If that premium exceeds 33% of the market price. Access to the funds that will be needed to complete the acquisition: Knowing a firm is undervalued does not necessarily imply having capital easily available to carry out the acquisition. in the process of the acquisition drives the stock price up to and beyond the estimated value. While the strategy of buying under valued firms has a great deal of intuitive appeal. it is daunting. For this strategy to work. especially when acquiring publicly traded firms in reasonably efficient markets. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 53 of 93 . where the premiums paid on market prices can very quickly eliminate the valuation surplus. In acquiring this firm.3. The odds are better in less efficient markets or when acquiring private businesses. A capacity to find firms that trade at less than their true value: This capacity would require either access to better information than is available to other investors in the market. as the motives behind merger and motives behind acquisitions are same. or at least changing existing management policy or practices. 2. the acquirer will have to pay a premium. This value increase is often termed the value of control. and the acquisition will not create any value for the acquirer.has significant implications for the choice of accounting treatment for the acquisition. should make these firms more valuable. In this section. The acquirer can then gain the difference between the value and the purchase price as surplus. however. Firms that are undervalued by financial markets can be targeted for acquisition by those who recognize this mispricing. The final step in the acquisition.

The poor performance of the firm being acquired should be attributable to the incumbent management of the firm. increase the length of the growth period. If the market price already has the control premium built into it. 2. Thus. an under valued stock is one that trades at a price well below the estimated discounted cash flow value. The second is the more concrete question of how to value a target firm. a bank with a price to book value ratio of 1. • Mergers & Acquisitions Page 54 of 93 . The market price of the acquisition should reflect the status quo. 3. there is little potential for the acquirer to earn the premium. noncyclical firms to get the fullest benefit from diversification. the current management of the firm and their poor business practices. there are two key questions that need to be answered. 1. Thus. an under valued stock is one that trades at a multiple (of earnings. The acquisition has to be followed by a change in management practices. How such a firm will be identified depends upon the valuation approach and model used. growth.2 would be an undervalued bank. and risk) but trade at much higher price to book value ratios.3. actions that enhance value increase cash flows from existing assets. increase expected growth rates. With relative valuation. i. or reduce the cost of capital. given the motives.e. if other banks have similar fundamentals (return on equity. If the motive for acquisitions is diversification. As noted in the last chapter. the potential for its success rests on the following. Choosing a target firm Once a firm has identified the reason for its acquisition program. the target firm must be under valued. at least. corporate control has been increasingly cited as a reason for hostile acquisitions. In discounted cash flow valuation approaches. after controlling for significant differences on fundamentals. book value or sales) well below that of the rest of the industry. a cyclical firm should try to acquire counter-cyclical or. • If the motive for acquisitions is under valuation.2 Choosing a Target firm and valuing control/synergy Once a firm has an acquisition motive. the most likely target firms will be in businesses that are unrelated to and uncorrelated with the business of the acquiring firm. In the last two decades.Prerequisites for Success While this corporate control story can be used to justify large premiums over the market price. The first relates to how to best identify a potential target firm for an acquisition. 3. and the change has to increase value. rather than to market or industry factors that are not under management control. it has to find the appropriate target firm.

or a firm with significant net operating losses carried forward. Given the inter-relationship between synergy and control. if the motive is tax benefits. the target firm will be a poorly managed firm in an industry where there is potential for excess returns. In particular. especially those that they perceive to be poorly run. Determinants of the Value of Corporate Control Mergers & Acquisitions Page 55 of 93 . For financial synergy.• If the motive for acquisitions is operating synergy. the target firm should be strongest in those functional areas where the acquiring firm is weak. In addition. the choice of a target firm will reflect managerial interests rather than economic reasons. if the motive is increased debt capacity. If the motive is managerial self-interest. although the existence of control and synergy premiums introduces some complexity into the valuation process. the expected growth in these cash flows during a high growth period. the acquisition of Security Pacific by Bank of America was motivated by potential cost savings from economies of scale. the target firm will be chosen to reflect the likely source of the synergy – a risky firm with limited or no standalone capacity for borrowing. its stock holdings will be widely dispersed (making it easier to carry out the hostile acquisition) and the current market price will be based on the presumption that incumbent management will continue to run the firm. This section explores the determinants of the value of corporate control and attempts to value it in the context of an acquisition. the safest way to value a target firm is in steps. Status Quo Valuation We start our valuation of the target firm by estimating the firm value with existing investing. • • Valuing the Target Firm The valuation of an acquisition is not fundamentally different from the valuation of any firm. Investors and firms are willing to pay large premiums over the market price to control the management of firms. financing and dividend policies. the value of the firm is a function of its cash flows from existing assets. Thus. b. and following up with a value for control and a value for synergy. If the motive for the merger is control. This valuation. starting with a status quo valuation of the firm. the typical target firm will vary depending upon the source of the synergy. provides a base from which we can estimate control and synergy premiums. The Value of Corporate Control Many hostile takeovers are justified on the basis of the existence of a market for corporate control. For economies of scale. which we term the status quo valuation. a. For functional synergy. the length of the high growth period and the firm’s cost of capital. the target firm should be in the same business as the acquiring firm.

. and the firm can be restructured to maximize value. since a restructuring will yield little additional value. If we can identify the changes that we would make to the target firm. optimally managed . when there are economies of scale)? Will it increase future growth (e. if so. since a restructuring can lead to a significant increase in value. One school of thought argues that synergy is too nebulous to be valued and that any systematic attempt to do so requires so many assumptions that it is pointless. If this is true. to have an effect on value. higher growth potential). has to influence one of the four inputs into the valuation process – cash flows from existing assets. what that value should be.. the value of control will be much greater for a poorly managed firm that operates at below optimum capacity than for a well managed firm.g. over whether synergy can be valued and. The value of control can then be written as: Value of Control = Value of firm. in one form or the other. the longer it takes for it to show up.g. It can be substantial for firms operating at well below optimal. the lesser its value. when there is increased market power) or the length of the growth period? Synergy. higher expected growth rates (market power. While valuing synergy requires us to make assumptions about future cash flows and growth. In general. in many takeovers. the financing mix can be changed and the dividend policy reevaluated. Thus we maintain that synergy can be valued by answering two fundamental questions. Some disagreement exists. however. The value of controlling a firm comes from changes made to existing management policy that can increase the firm value. Valuing Operating Synergy There is a potential for operating synergy. (2) When will the synergy start affecting cash flows? –– Synergies can show up instantaneously. the lack of precision in the process does not mean we cannot obtain an unbiased estimate of value. a longer growth period (from increased competitive advantages). or a lower cost of capital (higher debt capacity). Assets can be acquired or liquidated. Since the value of synergy is the present value of the cash flows created by it. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 56 of 93 . but they are more likely to show up over time. (1) What form is the synergy expected to take? Will it reduce costs as a percentage of sales and increase profit margins (e.Value of firm with current management The value of control is negligible for firms that are operating at or close to their optimal value. we can value control.The value of wresting control of a firm from incumbent management is inversely proportional to the perceived quality of that management and its capacity to maximize firm value. a firm should not be willing to pay large premiums for synergy if it cannot attach a value to it. c.

d.3 Structuring the Acquisition Once the target firm has been identified and valued. The final step is the choice of the accounting treatment of the deal because it can affect both taxes paid by stockholders in the target firm and how the purchase is accounted for in the acquiring firm’s income statement and balance sheets. which though a widely used rationale for mergers. Several factors. Consequently. This division of value is unfair. if the market price of a poorly managed firm already reflects a high probability that the management of the firm will be changed. They include: 1. however. and whether to borrow any of the funds needed. Deciding on an Acquisition Price The value determined in consideration of synergy and control represents a ceiling on the price that the acquirer can pay on the acquisition rather than a floor.3. cash or some combination of the two. with no synergy. Second.Once we answer these questions. whether to use stock. i. We will begin the discussion. The first is the decision on how much to pay for the target firm. Third. however. there is no surplus value to claim for the acquirer’s stockholders and the target firm’s stockholders get the entire value of the synergy and control premiums. The difference between the value of the combined firm with synergy and the value of the combined firm without synergy provides a value for synergy. the greater the current market value of equity. if it is publicly traded. the lower the potential for gain to the acquiring firm’s stockholders. by discounting expected cash flows to each firm at the weighted average cost of capital for that firm. There are three interrelated steps in this phase. if the acquiring firm plays an indispensable role in creating the synergy and control premiums. there is likely to be little or no value gained from control. the acquiring firm should try to keep as much of the premium as it can for its stockholders. The second is the determination of how to pay for the deal.a greater “tax benefit” from accumulated losses or tax deductions. we build in the effects of synergy into expected growth rates and cash flows and we value the combined firm with synergy. by adding the values obtained for each firm in the first step. 3. we can estimate the value of synergy using an extension of discounted cash flow techniques. synergy and control built into the valuation.e. For instance. Valuing Financial Synergy Synergy can also be created from purely financial factors. The market price of the target firm. We will consider three legitimate sources of financial synergy .. will act as constraints. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 57 of 93 . we value the firms involved in the merger independently. an increase in debt capacity and therefore firm value and better use for “excess” cash or cash slack. If the acquirer pays the full value. First. prior to the acquisition: Since acquisitions have to base on the current market price. is not a source of increased value by itself. the acquisition moves forward into the structuring phase. with diversification. we estimate the value of the combined firm.

Mergers & Acquisitions Page 58 of 93 . of course. In particular.2. 1.33% in contested takeovers. Although the mechanics of raising the money may look the same in this case. If there are a large number of firms with cash slack and relatively few firms with high-return projects. a decision has to be made about the following aspects of the deal. the bulk of the synergy benefits will accrue to the target firm. value is created. The first is to use cash balances that have been built up over time to finance the acquisition. It is also possible that the acquiring firm has excess debt capacity and that it uses its ability to borrow money to carry out the acquisition. 1. If it is unique. If it can be easily replaced. The third is to offer stock as payment for the target firm. The second is to issue stock to the public. The presence of other bidders for the target firm: When there is more than one bidder for a firm. The question of which of these approaches is best utilized by a firm cannot be answered without looking at the following factors. They estimated the market-adjusted stock returns around the announcement of the takeover for the successful bidder to be 2% in single bidder takeovers and -1. it is important that the value of the target firm not reflect this additional debt. Payment for the Target Firm Once a firm has decided to pay a given price for a target firm. the sharing of the benefits of synergy among the two parties will depend in large part on whether the bidding firm's contribution to the creation of the synergy is unique or easily replaced. Debt versus Equity: A firm can raise the funds for an acquisition from either debt or equity. Thus. and Kim (1988) examined an extensive sample of 236 tender offers made between 1963 and 1984 and concluded that the benefits of synergy accrue primarily to the target firms when multiple bidders are involved in the takeover. it has to follow up by deciding how it is going to pay for this acquisition. raise cash and use the cash to pay for the acquisition. the acquisition of a target firm that is significantly under levered may be carried out with a larger proportion of debt than the acquisition of one that is already at its optimal debt ratio. where the payment is structured in terms of a stock swap – shares in the acquiring firm in exchange for shares in the target firm. the odds are likely to favor the target firm’s stockholders. 3. Bradley. Desai. The relative scarcity of the specialized resources that the target and the acquiring firm bring to the merger: Since the bidding firm and the target firm are both contributors to the creation of synergy. the benefits will be shared much more equitably. Cash versus Stock: There are three ways in which a firm can use equity in a transaction. when a firm with cash slack acquires a firm with many high-return projects. The additional debt has nothing to do with the target firm and building it into the value will only result in the acquiring firm paying a premium for a value enhancement that rightfully belongs to its own stockholders. The mix will generally depend upon both the excess debt capacities of the acquiring and the target firm. Thus. This. is reflected in the value of the firm through the cost of capital. the bulk of the value of the synergy will accrue to the latter.

Since this benefit can be significant in an acquisition. The goodwill is then written off (amortized) over a period of 40 years. managers who believe that their stock is trading at a price significantly below value should not use stock as currency on acquisitions. Accounting Considerations There is one final decision that. when an acquisition is a stock swap. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 59 of 93 . the option of using cash on hand is available only to those firms that have accumulated substantial amounts of cash. The stockholders in the target firm are also aware of this and may demand a larger premium when the payment is made entirely in the form of the acquiring firm’s stock. The final aspect of a stock swap is the setting of the terms of the stock swap. Tax factors. the ratio that results may be skewed by the relative mispricing of the two firm’s securities. we describe the accounting choices and examine why firms choose one over the other. the stockholders in the target firm may be able to defer capital gains taxes on the exchanged shares. i. and that is the accounting treatment..e. The perceived value of the stock: When stock is issued to the public to raise new funds or when it is offered as payment on acquisitions. the potential tax gains from a stock swap may be large enough to offset any perceived disadvantages. On the other hand.The availability of cash on hand: Clearly. Purchase versus Pooling There are two basic choices in accounting for a merger or acquisition. While this amount is generally based upon the market price at the time of the acquisition. the book values of the target and acquiring firms are aggregated. seems to play a disproportionate role in the way in which acquisitions are structured and in setting their terms. with the more overpriced firm gaining at the expense of the more under priced (or at least. less overpriced) firm. in our view. In purchase accounting. the number of shares of the acquired firm that will be offered per share of the acquiring firm. In this section. The premium paid over market value is not shown on the acquiring firm’s balance sheet. In other words. the acquiring firm’s managers are making a judgment about what the perceived value of the stock is. reducing reported earnings in each year. If an acquisition qualifies for pooling. the entire value of the acquisition is reflected on the acquiring firm’s balance sheet and the difference between the acquisition price and the restated value of the assets of the target firm is shown as goodwill for the acquiring firm. since what they gain on the acquisitions can be more than what they lost in the stock issue. The amortization is not tax deductible and thus does not affect cash flows. A fairer ratio would be based upon the relative values of the two firm’s shares. firms that believe their stocks are overvalued are much more likely to use stock as currency in transactions.

For an acquisition to qualify for pooling. Firms seem to be willing to accept these constraints. firms that qualify can follow up an acquisition by writing off all or a significant proportion of the premium paid on the acquisition as in process R&D. discount rates and value is making such a difference in whether acquisitions get done. In-process R&D In the last few years.3. Stock buybacks or any other distributions that change the capital structure prior to the merger are prohibited. Some firms will not make acquisitions if they do not qualify for pooling. especially for acquisitions in the technology sector. Each of the combining firms has to be independent. The question whether an acquisition will qualify for pooling seems to weigh heavily on the managers of acquiring firms. the top executives at high technology firms fought back. and it eliminates or drastically reduces the goodwill that needs to be amortized in subsequent periods. the issue of preferred stock or multiple classes of common stock is not allowed. Lev (1998) documented this tendency and also noted that firms that qualify for this provision tend to pay significantly larger premiums on acquisitions than firms that do not. claiming that many acquisitions that were viable now would not be in the absence of this provision. the merging firms have to meet the following conditions. or they will pay premiums to ensure that they do qualify. the in-process R&D charge allowed the acquiring firms to write off a significant portion of the acquisition price at the time of the deal. Only voting common stock can be issued to cover the transaction. other than duplicate facilities or excess capacity. just to qualify for pooling. 3. as the conditions for pooling make clear. pooling is not allowed when one of the firms is a subsidiary or division of another firm in the two years prior to the merger. The net effect is that the firm takes a one-time charge at the time of the acquisition that does not affect operating earnings12. such as restricting stock buybacks and major asset divestitures. No transactions that benefit only a group of stockholders are allowed. The combined firm cannot sell a significant portion of the existing businesses of the combined companies. In acquisitions such as Lotus by IBM and MCI by Worldcom. as both the accounting standards board and the SEC sought to crack down on the misuse of in-process R&D.4 Final Considerations Mergers & Acquisitions Page 60 of 93 . The one-time expense is not tax deductible and has no cash flow consequences. In early 1999. Here. another accounting choice has entered the mix. firms are constrained in what they can do after the merger. It is revealing of managers’ obsession with reported earnings that a provision that has no effects on cash flows. The potential to reduce the dreaded goodwill amortization with a one-time charge is appealing for many firms and studies find that firms try to take maximum advantage of this option. Furthermore.

Given the transparency of this write off (firms report earnings before and after goodwill amortization). we believe that this fear is misplaced and the empirical evidence backs us up. In particular. merger acts governing mergers and acquisitions . This behavior is rooted in a fear of how much financial markets will punish firms that report lower earnings. regulations of tender offers . When accounting choices weigh disproportionately in the outcome.The managers of acquiring firms clearly weigh in the accounting effects of acquisitions. Chapter – 4 Change forces and Mergers This chapter deals with the changed forces affecting mergers. The rules of the games are changing as well. firms will often acquire entire firms rather than the divisions that they are interested in and defer asset divestitures that make economic sense. Firms will reject some good acquisitions simply because they unable to meet the pooling test or because in-process R&D cannot be written off. even when accounting choices have little or no effect on cash flows. Firms will overpay on acquisitions. largely as a consequence of the write off of goodwill. The volume of deal activities declined quarter by quarter through the first quarter of 2001. The Hart-Scott-Rodino Act of 1976 was amended on December 21.It also describes the merger performance during the 1980’s and the factors affecting mergers and acquisitions and the cross border mergers. The abolition of the pooling method of accounting appears to be Mergers & Acquisitions Page 61 of 93 . But overcapacity in a number of industries will predictably result in consolidation mergers. consequences of changed forces. just to qualify for favorable accounting treatment. Mergers and restructuring activities accelerated through the first quarter of 2000. To meet the requirements for pooling. 2000. the results can be expensive for stockholders in the acquiring firm.

The stock market indexes reached their peak in March 2000. For both segments of the world.likely. which began in 1993 and has been characterized by strategic mega-mergers.Merger activity leveled off in 2000. and have occurred since 1998. Table 4.1. The Vodafone–Air Touch transaction involved a foreign (United Kingdom) acquirer. The rules for writing off goodwill and other intangibles are being changed. The ninth largest transaction involved foreign T A B L E 4. All these mergers are greater than $50 billion. The average dollar volume of M&A activity in the United States for the years 1998 through 2000 was slightly more than $1. but from unusually high levels. So while the pace of M&A activities may decline from the torrid levels of the late 1990s. the percentage increases compared with average levels in 1995 to 1997 were approximately 157 percent. they continue to represent a major force in the financial and economic environment. as shown in Table 4.5 trillion.2 lists the top 10 mergers in all history through January 2001. for the rest of the world the corresponding figure was somewhat more than $1. This was associated with a decline in merger activity toward the end of the year.1. the year 2000 represented a leveling off of worldwide M&A activity. and stock prices continued to decline during the fourth quarter. Merger activity in the United States and worldwide rose to unprecedented levels in 1998 and 1999. The current merger activity is a part of what has been called the fifth merger movement.3 trillion. As shown in Table 4.1 Announced M&A Activity ($ Billion) Mergers & Acquisitions Page 62 of 93 .

The largest of all was AOL and Time Warner. combining the new and old economies.U.S. Domestic Year 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Average 95–97 98–00 $ Totals %Change $201 205 2 214 4 356 66 306 –14 172 –44 133 –23 132 –1 219 66 310 42 404 30 564 40 811 44 1480 82 1436 –3 1661 16 $593 1526 Worldwide $Totals $237 260 312 503 556 430 339 322 435 527 825 1003 1497 2302 3072 3180 $1108 2851 %Change 10 20 61 11 –23 –21 –5 35 21 57 22 49 54 33 4 Rest of the World $Totals %Change $36 55 53 98 78 147 50 250 70 258 3 206 –20 190 –8 216 14 217 0 421 94 439 4 686 56 822 20 1636 99 1519 –7 $515 1326 157.3 157. Five of the ten were in telecommunications.2 Top 10 Merger Rank Acquirer Acquired Announcement Amount Page 63 of 93 Industry Mergers & Acquisitions . T A B L E 4. To understand the reasons for the strong growth of M&A activity worldwide in recent years and whether the slowing toward the end of 2000 will continue requires some historical perspective.2 Source: Thomson Financial Securities Data. two in oils and financial services.3 157. which will be placed in the Internet/media category. Firms on both sides of the deal.

acquiring Dreamworks for $3.. The pace of technological change has accelerated. with Compaq (Announced Sept. The costs of communication and transportation have been greatly 3. Hence markets have become international in scope.5 Oil July 1998 53. announced July 2006. sources. and intensity of competition have expanded.0 Tele communication June 1998 53. 4. acquiring Pixar. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 64 of 93 . reduced.1 billion (4) The Walt Disney Company. 2. 4.6 Financial Services January 1999 60.9 Internet/media December 1998 78. $54 billion) ([6]) (3) Paramount. $7 billion Microsoft and Wininternals Inc.6 Tele communication July 1999 53. 5.Final May 2002) ($25 billion) ([5]) (2) Procter & Gamble buy Gillette (2005.9 Oil April 1998 72.6 Financial services May 1998 62.3 Tele communication April 1999 56. announced January 2006. New industries have emerged. The forms.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AOL Exxon Travelers Group SBC Comm.4 Tele communication Major Mergers & Acquisitions 2000-2006 (1) Hewlett-Packard. 2001 .6 Tele communications April 1998 61.1 THE CHANGE FORCES The increased pace of M&A activity in recent years has reflected powerful change forces in the world economy. Nations Bank Vodafone group AT&T AT&T Total Fina Bell Atlantic Time Warner Mobil Citicorp Ameritech Bank America Air Touch Communication Media One Group Telecommunications Elf Acquitaine GTE date ($Billion) January 2000 $165. Ten change forces are identified: 1.

combining a company strong in research with one strong in marketing. Another major force stimulating M&A and restructuring activities comprises changes in industry organization. The growing forces of competition have produced deregulation in major industries such as financial services. Improvements in communication and transportation have created a global economy. PC software. Another efficiency gain is achieved by combining complementary activities. and medical services. server hardware. An example is the shift in the computer industry from vertically integrated firms to a horizontal chain of independent activities. including the Internet. Examples are Bill Gates at Microsoft. problems have developed in individual economies and industries. Favorable economic and financial environments have persisted from 1982 to 1990 and from 1992 to mid-2000. the Internet. Andrew Grove at Mergers & Acquisitions Page 65 of 93 . rising stock prices and relatively low interest rates have favored internal growth as well as a range of M&A activities. Nations have adopted international agreements such as the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) that have resulted in freer trade. Within a general environment of strong economic growth. for example. While regulations have increased in some areas. Inequalities in income and wealth have been widening. in turn. which include personal computers. 8. The next set of factors relates to efficiency of operations. created further dynamism in industrial activities. 9. Individual entrepreneurship has responded to opportunities and. server software. has been very successful concentrating on PC sales with only limited activities in the many other segments of the value chain of the information industry. computer services. Economies of scope refer to cost reductions from operations in related activities. software. servers. Overriding all are technological changes. these would represent economies of activities in personal computer (PC) hardware. Mergers to catch up technologically are illustrated by the series of acquisitions by AT&T. and the many advances in information systems.6. 10. and other related activities. Dell Computers. The economic and financial environments have also been favorable for deal making. 7. Economies of scale spread the large fixed cost of investing in machinery or computer systems over a larger number of units. deregulation has taken place in other industries. In the information industry. Strong economic growth. Valuation relationships and equity returns for most of the 1990s have risen to levels significantly above long-term historical patterns. airlines. for example.

among the many. but increased in others. The pace of product introductions has accelerated. The forms and number of competitors have been increasing.2 CONSEQUENCES OF THE CHANGE FORCES The change forces are having major impacts. The requirements for human capital inputs have grown relative to physical assets. The technological requirements for firms have increased. The decline and failure rates of firms in some sectors have accelerated.3 MERGER MOVEMENTS The foregoing describes M&A activities beginning in 1993. Europe is experiencing similar forces from its effort at integration. Strategy formulation and revisions are more important. The value chain has deconstructed in the sense that more activities are performed by specialist firms. this merger movement in the United States has thus far been of greater magnitude than any others.Intel. Forces for vertical integration have diminished in some areas. Economic activity has shifted from manufacturing to services of increasing sophistication. A wide range of adjustment processes have been used by firms in response to their increasingly changing environment. The four previous merger movements in the United States can be briefly summarized: First Merger Movement—1893 to 1904 The merger movement at the turn of the century was associated with the completion of the transcontinental railroad system. telephone. and the basic manufacturing industries at the time. major horizontal mergers took place in steel. Changes in the organization of industries have taken place. 4. New growth opportunities have attracted such large flows of resources that unfavorable sales-to-capacity relationships have developed. Growth opportunities among product areas are unequal. the fifth major merger movement—the era of strategic megamergers. not just in the U. Second Merger Movement—1920s Mergers & Acquisitions Page 66 of 93 . The forces in Europe have been similar to the factors in the earlier merger movements in the United States. John Chambers at Cisco Systems. New industries have been created. It created the first common market. and Bernie Ebbers at MCI WorldCom. Industry boundaries have become increasingly blurred. oil. In the United States. Real-time financial planning and control information requirements have increased.S. Distribution and marketing methods have changed. This M&A activity exists worldwide. so the merger forces in Europe are very strong. 4. Jack Welch at General Electric. In relation to the gross domestic product (GDP). economy. The knowledge and organizational capital components of firm value have increased. These impacts have expanded opportunities and risks. even in new industries such as telecommunications and e-commerce.

Chemical Bank and Disney were both almost taken over. Media (movies. but suffer rapid imitation. with the new planning literature. Much of the diversification at this time was ill advised as companies moved away from their core competencies. It is an attractive and glamorous industry (attracted Japanese investors beginning in late 1980s). diversified.This period was characterized by an increase in vertical mergers. The industry characteristics related to strong M&A pressures can be summarized as follows: • • Telecommunications: Technological change and deregulation in the United States and abroad (particularly Europe) have stimulated efforts to develop a global presence. pharmaceuticals: Both require high amounts of R&D. hoping to avoid their growth being tied down to population growth. Chemicals. Each of the merger movements in the United States was driven by a different set of economic and development forces. Third Merger Movement—1960s The conglomerate mergers of the 1960s represented in part an adjustment to the slowdown in defense expenditures. which permitted more effective geographic sales and distribution organizations. which made national advertising possible. Chemicals become commodities. junk bonds. forest). But these movements did not occur randomly. Also influencing this was the idea that a good manager. commercial banks. could manage anything. more than 50 percent of the M&A activity in a given year has been accounted for by five or six industries. A distinct group of change factors propelled each movement. industries like the food industries. but this is eroded by “me. So the availability of high-risk financing strongly propelled the 1980s and there was some dismantling of the diversification of the 1960s. the identity of the industries has varied at different time periods. and the automobile. insurance companies). made all firms vulnerable to a takeover bid. Pharmaceuticals enjoy a limited period of patent protection. In the fifth merger movement described above. Globalization of industries and firms requires financial services firms to go global to serve their clients. Financial (investment banks. newspapers): Technological changes have impacted the relationship between the content and delivery segments. There is potential overlap in the content of different media outlets. too” drugs and generics. Fourth Merger Movement—1980s Financial innovations. records. Any company that was not performing up to its potential could be taken over. In every sample of conglomerates. Vertical mergers enabled manufacturers to control distribution channels more effectively. Changes in the Page 67 of 93 • • Mergers & Acquisitions . However. These were associated with the development of the radio. Also at this time. magazines. at least one-half of the companies were aerospace or natural resource–depleting companies (oil.

in the form of various amendments to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. became law on July 29. The SEC imposes periodic disclosure requirements under Section 13. Its stated purpose was to protect target shareholders from swift and secret takeovers in three ways: (1) by generating more information during the takeover process that target shareholders and management could use to evaluate outstanding offers. The Securities Act of 1933 has primary responsibility for recording information. Section 12(j) empowers the SEC to revoke or suspend the registration of a security if the issuer has violated any provisions of the 1934 act. Food consumption will only grow at the rate of population growth. industrial machinery: All face unique difficulties that give advantages to size. Expanding internationally offers opportunities to grow in new markets. New kinds of competitive forces have created needs for broadening managerial capabilities. oil and gas.4 REGULATION OF TENDER OFFERS The regulation of tender offers stems from the original Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934. The act was amended in 1970 to increase the SEC powers and to reduce the trigger Mergers & Acquisitions Page 68 of 93 . Food. and (3) Form 8-K. stimulating M&A to achieve critical mass. the SEC has the power to request more information or to issue a stop order. and (3) by explicitly authorizing targets to sue bidding firms. 1968. Natural resources. It is the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEA) that provides the basis for the amendments that were applicable to takeover activities. timber: Both face exhausting sources of supply. The basic reports are (1) Form 10-K. Section 8 provides for registration and permits the statements to automatically become effective 20 days after it is filed with the SEC. Section 13(d) of the Williams Act of 1968 required that any person who had acquired 10 percent or more of the stock of a public corporation file a Schedule 13D with the SEC within 10 days of crossing the 10 percent threshold. Autos face global excess capacity. Utilities: Deregulation has created opportunities for economies from enlarging geographic areas. Oil faces the uncertainty of price and supply instability due to actions of the OPEC of basic research and increased risks due to competitive pressures have created the stimulus for larger firms through M&As. • Autos. • • • 4. Problems exist in matching raw material supplies with manufacturing capacity. retailing: It is hampered by slow growth. However. the annual report. Williams Act The Williams Act. Section 5 prevents the public offering and sale of securities without a registration statement. (2) by requiring a minimum period during which a tender offer must be held open. the quarterly report. thus delaying the execution of the tender offer. (2) Form 10-Q. the current report for any month in which specified events occurred. which delays the operation of the 20-day waiting period.

SHERMAN ACT OF 1890 This law contains two sections. nondisclosure. This was the basis for actions against IBM and AT&T in the 1950s. Both firms were required to sign consent decrees in 1956 restricting AT&T from specified markets and requiring that IBM sell as well as lease computer equipment. Section 7 involves mergers. Section 1 prohibits mergers that would tend to create a monopoly or undue market control. An acquiring firm must disclose in a Tender Offer Statement (Schedule 14D-1) its intentions and business plans for the target as well as any relationships or agreements between the two firms. two are of particular interest. SEA Section 14(c) prohibits misrepresentation. Section 13(d) provides management and the shareholders with an early warning system. Section 2 is directed against firms that had already become dominant in their markets in the view of the government. Among its sections. deceptive. Section 14(d) applies only to public tender offers but applies whether the acquisition is small or large. Basically. antitrust actions were usually taken after completion of a Mergers & Acquisitions Page 69 of 93 . The suit against AT&T resulted in divestiture of the operating companies effective in 1984. or any fraudulent. IBM and AT&T were sued again in the 1970s. As enacted in 1914. or manipulative acts or practices in connection with a tender offer. Under Section 2. Its objective was to strengthen the powers of the DOJ and FTC by requiring approval before a merger could take place. The amendment also added an incipiency doctrine. any group making solicitations or recommendations to a target group of shareholders that would result in owning more than 5 percent of a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Act must first file a Schedule 14D with the SEC.point for the reporting obligation under Section 13(d) from 10 to 5 percent. The 1950 amendment gave the FTC the power to block asset purchases as well as stock purchases. HART-SCOTT-RODINO ACT OF 1976 The Hart-Scott-Rodino Act of 1976 (HSR) consists of three major parts. Before HSR. Thus. The 5 percent trigger rule also applies under Section 14(d). The Microsoft case illustrates the policies of the Department of Justice under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. The FTC can block mergers if it perceives a tendency toward increased concentration—that the share of industry sales of the largest firms appeared to be increasing. which had gone on for 10 years. the DOJ turned its attention to Microsoft during the decade of the 1990s. This was the basis on which the DOJ stopped the merger between Staples and Office Depot. Companies made asset acquisitions to avoid the prohibition against acquiring stock. so its coverage is broader. Section 7 made it illegal for a company to acquire the stock of another company if competition could be adversely affected. Section 5 gives the FTC power to prevent firms from engaging in harmful business practices. was dropped in 1983. Parallel to DOJ’s suits against IBM during the 1970s. The suit against IBM. CLAYTON ACT OF 1914 The Clayton Act created the Federal Trade Commission for the purpose of regulating the behavior of business firms.

000. it can require firms to provide internal records that can be searched for evidence.000. Under the guidance of attorneys. It expands the powers of state attorneys general to initiate triple damage suits on behalf of persons (in their states) injured by violations of the antitrust laws. For transactions that are valued at more than $500 million. an amendment to Title II was signed into law by President Clinton. A briefing package should fully develop the business reasons for the merger. From $100 million to $500 million. The overriding approach should be for the lawyers and executives to convey a factual.” Under Title I. It is expected that the amendment will cut the number of reportable transactions in half. the fee will increase to $125.000 fee. 2001. the merged firms had been operating for several years.000. This gives the individual states the incentive to increase the budgets of their state attorneys general. The presentation should demonstrate how the industry dynamics Mergers & Acquisitions Page 70 of 93 . 2000. A successful suit with triple damages can augment the revenues of the states. Some deals that currently are not covered would become reportable (firms with assets below the $10 million threshold that have an acquisition price over $200 million would become reportable). logical story. The idea here is that if the DOJ suspects a firm of antitrust violations. the fee will become $280. Title III is the Parens Patriae Act—each state is the parent or protector of consumers and competitors. high-level business executives should be made available for informal presentations or staff interviews. The HSR amendment increases the amount of time the reviewing agency has from 20 to 30 days. The transaction threshold will be annually adjusted to follow GNP. It became effective February 1. For transactions under $100 million. By the time a court decision was made. Companies should follow a proactive strategy during the 30-day review period. the attorneys general of 22 states joined in the suit filed by the DOJ. The staff attorney’s should be contacted with an offer to voluntarily provide additional information. There will now be a three-tier fee system in place of the old $45. the DOJ has the power to issue civil investigative demands in an antitrust investigation. In the interest of maintaining the same HSR revenue levels the amendment increases the filing fees. In the Microsoft case. Title II is a premerger notification provision. The amendment increases the minimum threshold that requires filing from $15 million to $50 million and eliminates the alternative 15 percent of target voting stock threshold. The amendment was designed to reduce the number of transactions that require HSR notification and to increases the fees for large transactions. emphasizing the industry dynamics that make the transaction imperative for the preservation of the client as a viable entity for providing high quality products to its customers at fair prices. The state itself does not need to be injured by the violation. We have seen cases in which firms were required to provide literally boxcar loads of internal files for review by the DOJ under Title I. The HSR process should be viewed as an educational endeavor to provide the necessary information to the government staff attorneys. so it was difficult to “unscramble the omelet. the fee is $45. On December 21.transaction.

4. 57 percent were the object of a takeover attempt or experienced a major restructuring during the 1980s. the event return results could differ also. 1992. the spirit of the regulatory authorities was altered. The exploding number of blockbuster transactions is consistent with these data. The information was obtained from the Mergerstat database. with 11 major deals totaling $65 billion announced on “Merger Monday. The remaining 13 percent of the firms engaged in defensive asset restructuring or financial recapitalization. The study summarized deal structure patterns and calculated event returns. In addition to the concentration measures. The stock market adjustment that began in July 1998 dampened new M&A deal announcements. the communities in which it has its plants and offices. and successively in 1987. this annual number became so large that the cutoff was raised to $1 billion or more. the courts and the antitrust agencies began to be less rigid in their approach to antitrust. the third quarter of 1998 was still high because of deals initiated earlier. Of the firms involved in takeovers or restructuring. employees. 4. they found significant differences in the rate of M&A activity as well as in the timing of the activity. Most of the M&A activity occurred in Mergers & Acquisitions Page 71 of 93 . 40 percent were hostile takeover targets. The selection criteria began with all M&A in which the price paid for the target exceeded $500 million. Thus. The stock market began to recover in mid-October and was associated with resumption in an active M&A market. For completed transactions.5 MERGER PERFORMANCE DURING THE 1990s This study used a sample of 364 transactions that accounted for almost one-half of the total M&A values between 1992 and mid-1998 (Weston and Johnson. however. 1999). The study ended with transactions announced through June 1998.” November 23. increasing to almost 69 percent for the first half of 1998. supplemented by proxy statements to shareholders soliciting approval of transactions. Mitchell and Mulherin (1996) studied industrylevel patterns of takeover and restructuring activity during the 1982 to 1989 period. concentration tests were applied somewhat mechanical the internationalization of competition and other economic realities. The sample accounted for about 40 to 45 percent of total deal value in most years. By 1997. The results reflect large transactions whose patterns are different from those of smaller transactions. Somewhat more—47 percent of the firms—were targets of friendly takeovers. They found that in their sample of 1064 firms.require the transaction to enable the firm to fulfill its responsibilities to consumers. the study captures a distinctive cycle of M&A activity. Among their 51 sample industries. and 1996.6 INDUSTRY INFLUENCES ON M&A ACTIVITY In an in-depth analysis of industry effects. 1998. THE ANTITRUST GUIDELINES In the merger guidelines of 1982. and its owners and creditors. the economics of industry were taken into account. In the merger guidelines of 1968.

7 HOSTILE TAKEOVERS When the management and the board of directors resist the takeover attempt by bidders.3 shows that as a percent of total value of transactions. and drops to. machine tools. diversification. Their evidence supports an impact of industry shocks. which had a major impact on the air transport. 4. the ratio of imports to total industry supply. air transport. Their broader framework also measures the role of other influences— synergy. They find a dual role in that own-industry mergers are used in industries with excess capacity to achieve consolidation.3 Mergers & Acquisitions Page 72 of 93 . agency costs. A third major factor was foreign competition. These shocks affected not only the oil industry but also the structure of industries in which energy represented 10 percent or more of input costs. Mitchell and Mulherin conclude that the interindustry patterns in takeovers and restructuring reflect the relative economic shocks to the industries. and trucking industries. This is measured by changes in the import penetration ratio. A fourth major influence was innovations. Table 4. natural gas. and lower leverage. A second major factor was the oil price shocks that occurrence in 1973 and 1979.7 percent for the United States. broadcasting. Their data set is based on Value Line companies and industry groupings covering the period 1970 to 1994. and steel. The median level of hostile M&A activity to the total worldwide value of transactions is 3. Table 4. acquiring firms appear to be those with better performance. like internal investment. and trucking. entertainment. The industries most directly affected were integrated petroleum. One major force was deregulation. and market power. The number rises to 3. The asset reallocation results in improved efficiency. The industries with the largest change in import penetration ratios were shoes. office equipment and supplies.3 percent. 2. The bidder in hostile takeovers is often referred to as a raider. autos and auto parts. Their basic economic finding is that mergers. construction equipment. hostile M&A activity is relatively small. owing to identifiable major shocks defined as factors causing a marked change in overall industry structure and corporate control activity. apparel. coal. lower capacity utilization. natural gas. we have hostile takeovers. Many large and well-publicized hostile episodes have taken place.5 percent for the rest of the world.relatively few industries. are a response to favorable growth potentials. Their results support the view that a major influence on the takeover activity of the 1980s was a combination of broad underlying economic and financial forces. In contracting industries. tires and rubber. The ability to use public markets for leveraged financing increased both the rate of takeovers and the size of takeover targets. Andrade and Stafford (1999) extend the Mitchell and Mulherin results.

5 Source: Thomson Financial Securities Data Schwert (2000) shows the difficulty of distinguishing between hostility versus strategic efforts to increase bidder or target gains from a potential transaction.4 1. The outcome of hostile bids is shown in Table 4.8 0.5 4.4 3.9 6.2 3. Domestic 11. All these challenges are magnified in hostile mergers. The target will not cooperate in providing information.6 6. differences in information systems. These factors can be broadly summarized into two categories: Mergers & Acquisitions Page 73 of 93 .3 6.5 15.2 7.9 1.8 Factors affecting merger There are several factors that motivate the mergers and acquisitions.5 0.9 4.1 1.1 22.7 2. the company remains independent.3 4.1 7. Differences in cultural factors.7 3. All empirical studies find that the returns to bidders in hostile takeovers are negative.0 5. Given the evidence.5 9.3. At best.8 0. combining companies is difficult. the target company is sold to a third party. In somewhat less than one-third of the efforts.6 4.0 0.3 0. a bidder needs to understand the difficulties likely to be encountered and have a well-formulated plan that has a reasonable probability of success.2 3.7 3.9 0.2 0.4 1.6 5. In somewhat under 40 percent of the cases.Percent of Hostile M&A Activity to Total Value of Transactions Year 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Mean Median U.7 6.5 17.0 2.2 5.0 2.3 Rest of the World 27.9 1. Considerable animosity is likely to be encountered in combining the two organizations.9 1.2 1.3 0.1 3.1 0.9 3. 4. The probability of success of a hostile bid is low.S.7 22. and problems in implementing the combination of two different organizations are formidable.7 Worldwide 14.2 1.3 3.2 0. The hostile bids succeed in somewhat more than one-third of the attempts.8 12.8 6.4 2.1 0.

At this time it appears that the EU has become a bit more restrictive and the U. Exogenous Factors Affecting Mergers: Accounting. Pooling avoids dilution of earnings brought about by the recognition and mandatory amortization of goodwill when a merger is accounted for as a purchase. They will continue to be a force both facilitating and promoting mergers. The sharp decline in the Euro during 2000 was a deterrent to European acquisitions of U.S. companies in Asia. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 74 of 93 . first at the end of 2000 and then in the first-half of 2001. As pooling came under increasing pressure from the SEC and the FASB. with a change in administration. a factor in assuring the shareholder vote necessary to approve a merger. retard or prohibit mergers and is a major factor affecting mergers. They sometimes band together to encourage a company to seek a merger and sometimes to encourage a company to make an unsolicited bid for a company with which they are dissatisfied. An impairment charge would be taken when the fair value of goodwill falls below its book value..S. The recent strength in the Euro has not had time to become a factor in mergers. undoubtedly acted as a stimulant for some mergers.1. By accumulating large amounts of stock of a company to be acquired. The uncertainty as to the U. Arbitrage. Now. the FASB is proposing that purchase accounting replace pooling but that goodwill should not be automatically written down. are a major factor in merger activity. accounting will basically be a neutral factor in 2001 and the foreseeable future. together with hedge funds and activist institutional investors. its impending demise. licenses and business restrictions to cure problems. Government policy can promote. The availability of pooling accounting for mergers has been a significant factor in the 1990s merger activity. at the beginning of 2001. However. the new purchase accounting will make hostile exchange offers practical for the first time in the United States and therefore might be a greater stimulant to merger activity than presently thought. This method of accounting could be even more favorable for mergers than pooling in that it will avoid amortization of goodwill and not saddle the merged companies with the restrictions against share repurchases and asset dispositions that encrust the pooling rules. Currencies. and frequently are. Fluctuations in currencies have an impact on cross-border mergers and current conditions in the foreign exchange markets have contributed to the slowdown in merger activity. They have recognized that markets are global and have accepted divestitures. but instead should be subjected to a periodic impairment test. The strong dollar and weak Asian currencies led to a significant increase in acquisitions by U. Antitrust. Arbitrageurs. The “big is bad” concept has been abandoned. neither significantly stimulating nor restraining mergers. will be a bit less restrictive. but it is not possible to gauge accurately how many deals were undertaken in 1999 and 2000 to beat the deadline. The antitrust regulators in the U. Thus. The overall situation can be summarized: Current antitrust enforcement policies will not unduly restrain mergers in 2001. and the EU have been reasonably receptive to mergers. they can be. companies.S.S.S.

and the shift to strategic transactions. media and technology stocks and for five years these sectors led merger volume to new heights.S. trade deficit and the strength of the dollar portend at best slow growth of cross-border acquisitions of U. AT&T. In addition there has been a dramatic increase in hostile bids in Europe. these funds have the capability of doing major deals and will continue to be an important factor. IBM. While some consider this to be phenomenon of the 1980s. The growth of LBO funds from a humble beginning in the 1970s to the megafunds of the 1990s has been a significant factor in acquisitions. Hostile Bids. So too the availability of specialized lawyers. it in fact dates to the turn of the 20th Century when JP Morgan merged the Carnegie steel interests with a number of others to create U.economy. Wells Fargo and Norfolk Southern are some of the companies that have done so. The general prosperity and full employment in the U. Prior to mid 2000 the equity markets were very favorable for telecommunications. major companies have been willing to make hostile bids. Deregulation of specific industries – like financial institutions. This Mergers & Acquisitions Page 75 of 93 . With tens of billions of dollars of equity to support leverage of two to three to one. valuing and executing mergers has been a significant factor.S. employee resistance to mergers will not be meaningful. Experts.S. The development of experts in conceiving. Pfizer.S. consultants and accountants to provide backup and support to the managements and directors of merging companies has been a merger stimulant. Steel. General Electric. Johnson & Johnson. the success rate for strategic hostile bids by major companies has similarly led to an increase in activity. analyzing. The worldwide movement to market capitalism and privatization of state controlled companies has led to a significant increase in the number of candidates for merger. LBO Funds. With the demise of the financially motivated bust-up bids of the 1970s and 1980s. the U. The $202 billion record-setting bid by Vodafone for Mannesmann being the prime example. Labor. The concomitant change in attitude toward cross-border mergers has had a similar effect. companies.S. Receptive equity and debt markets are critical factors in merger activity. It should be noted that the present debate in the EU with respect to the long-pending merger legislation revolves around a last-minute attempt to require company boards to consider employees as well as shareholders prior to effectuating a merger and to authorize target companies to adopt takeover defenses.S. The fact that global investment banks are calling merger opportunities to the attention of all the major companies in the world is a merger stimulant. utilities and radio and television in the U. In the U. – has also contributed to an increase in mergers. Deregulation. Markets. in the 1990s resulted in weakened resistance to mergers by the employees of acquired companies. The willingness of continental European governments to step back and let the market decide the outcome of a hostile bid has opened the door and led to a significant increase in European hostile bid activity. As long as there is a vibrant job market.

the pending change in German tax law – to facilitate banks selling their significant stakes in German companies – is viewed as a potential stimulant to mergers in Germany. This has resulted in a reduction of cash acquisitions. Just as the explosive formation of new companies in the latter part of the 19th Century fueled the first and second merger waves. For example. that restraint on mergers will be ameliorated. The general worldwide reduction in capital transaction taxes has lifted a restraint on mergers. The junk bond market has virtually dried up and banks have tightened their lending standards.same period saw an active. The 19th Century Interstate Commerce Act and Sherman Antitrust Act were the governmental response to the creation of trusts to effectuate railroad and oil mergers. media and technology stocks down even more. growing junk bond market and ready availability of bank loans. with concern that the landing will be hard rather than soft. Sharing the benefits of an improved operating margin through reduction of operating costs. The recent actions of the Federal Reserve in twice reducing interest rates may change market psychology and stem the fall of the equity markets. Outside of the telecommunications. has dampened the merger ardor of many companies. Experience indicates that one or more of the following factors are present in all mergers: Obtaining market power. they do not explain why companies want to merge. the recent formation of thousands of new companies in the technology areas has fueled the fifth wave and will be a major factor in merger activity in the future. but the uncertainty as to the economy. merger activity has been less impacted by the decline in the securities markets. both at attractive interest rates. media and technology sectors. New Companies. Taxes. media and technology mergers. While they basically determine whether a particular merger is doable at a particular time. Autogenous Factors Affecting Mergers: The foregoing external factors are essentially beyond the ability of companies to control or even to influence significantly. Left unrestrained by government regulation it would be a natural tendency of businesses to seek monopoly power. stock mergers in these sectors are no longer readily doable and at this time there is little prospect of a return to conditions conducive to telecommunications. a prime motivation for merger has been to gain and increase market power. What are the autogenous businesses reasons driving merger activity? There is no single or simple explanation and again no ranking in importance is possible. If so. With the NASDAQ down more than 50% from its early 2000 highs and many telecommunications. A special feature of the collapse in the telecommunications. Starting with the 19th Century railroad and oil mergers. Many of today's acquisitions involve a company with a favorable operating margin acquiring a company with a lower operating margin. media and technology stocks is that there are now many good companies with low stock market values and a need for fresh capital that may be met only through merger with a stronger company. By improving the acquired company's Mergers & Acquisitions Page 76 of 93 .

telecommunications.operations. the acquirer creates synergies that pay for the acquisition premium and provide additional earnings for the acquirer’s shareholders. The mega-mergers of. Response to the global market. Concentration of management energy and focus. oil and gas companies is another example of an effort to reduce costs by eliminating overcapacity. The usual and generally least risky means of increasing global market penetration is through acquisition of. and joint-venture consolidation of refining and marketing operations by. Many of the most important and largest product markets for U. The Defense Department encouraged the consolidations to assure that its suppliers remained healthy. However. Banking. A similar situation has resulted in a large number of mergers of suppliers to the automobile manufacturers. cross-border merger and acquisition activity has been steadily increasing. U. Acquiring firms may reallocate or redeploy assets of the acquired firm to more efficient uses. This factor is particularly significant in the aerospace/aircraft and pharmaceutical industries. Integrating back to the source of raw material or forward to control the means of distribution.S. Currently it has a poor record in media and entertainment. intra-industry consolidating acquisitions provide opportunities to reduce costs by spreading administrative overhead and eliminating redundant personnel. The 1990s witnessed a recognition by corporate management that it is frequently not possible to manage efficiently more than a Mergers & Acquisitions Page 77 of 93 . Additionally. or joint venture with. Over the years vertical integration has had a mixed record. and the cross-border utility mergers following the relaxation of state utility regulation. insurance. is being widely pursued as a response to the Internet. transportation and utilities are industries that have experienced mid1990s mergers as a result of deregulation. Sharing the costs and benefits of eliminating excess capacity. companies have become global in scope. healthcare. Examples are the acquisition of investment banks and insurance companies by commercial banks following the relaxation of restrictions on activities by commercial banks.S. Response to deregulation. money management. Due to the increased globalization of product markets. The advantage or necessity of having a more complete product line in order to be competitive. The need to spread the risk of the huge cost of developing new technology. a local partner. vertical integration continues to be a motivation for a significant number of acquisitions. particularly where "hardware" companies have acquired "software" companies. The pressure to control healthcare costs has had a similar impact in the healthcare industry. The sharp reductions in the defense budget in the early 1990s resulted in defense contractors consolidating in order to have sufficient volume to absorb fixed costs and leave a margin of profit. as noted below. and. This is particularly the case for companies such as suppliers to large retail chains that prefer to deal with a limited number of vendors in order to control costs of purchasing and carrying inventory. The acquisition of Time Warner by AOL is an example.

Response to industry consolidation. Rapid and dramatic technological developments have led companies to seek out acquisitions to remain competitive. software. AT&T’s acquisition of cable companies reflected its strategy to use cable lines to form a network for local phone and internet services. companies will try to create value by using what they view as an overvalued currency. cable and media companies designed to place them in a position to compete in an era of high-speed Internet access via cable in which people interact with the World Wide Web for news. resulting in divestitures of non-core businesses and sales of entire companies in some cases. Banking is another example where rapid changes in technology have sparked a significant number of mergers. In other cases. forest products. there is pressure on companies to not be left out and to either be a consolidator or choose the best partner. The enhanced ability of shareholders to communicate among themselves and to pressure boards of directors has had a significant impact. Morgan shows that size has a major impact on a company’s price earnings multiple. there has been recognition that a spinoff can result in the market valuing the separate companies more highly than the whole. the AOL and Time Warner merger is premised on convergence of media and the Internet. So too the Mergers & Acquisitions Page 78 of 93 . The recognition by boards of directors that it is appropriate to provide incentive compensation. When a series of consolidations takes place in an industry. expand product lines or gain entrance to new geographic areas. The amendment to the tax law eliminating new Morris Trust spinoff/merger transactions had a dampening effect on the level of spinoff/merger activity. Response to changes in technology. The receptivity of both the equity and debt markets to large strategic transactions. entertainment and shopping. Similarly. information. Similarly.P. When debt financing for acquisitions is also readily available at attractive interest rates. advertising and oil and gas. A recent study by J. These factors resulted in the spinoff or sale of non-core businesses by a large number of number of businesses. companies will similarly use what they view as cheap capital to acquire desirable businesses. Current examples of industries experiencing significant consolidation are banking. but spinoffs have continued as a frequently used means of focusing on core competencies. Cogent examples are the acquisitions by telephone. When equity investors are willing to accept substantial amounts of stock issued in mergers and encourage deals by supporting the stock of the acquirer. For instance. Institutional investors and other shareholder activists have had considerable success in urging (and sometimes forcing) companies to restructure or seek a merger. Less management resistance to takeovers. shareholder pressure has been the impetus for growth through acquisitions designed to increase volume. Boards have responded by urging management to take actions designed to maximize shareholder value. significant stock options and generous severance benefits has removed much of the management resistance to mergers. Larger companies have significantly higher multiples than smaller companies with the same growth rate. food. Pressure by institutional shareholders to increase shareholder value.

Below is a brief analysis of how it is impacting various regions of the world. With disparate political interests involved. In addition. Without a global perspective.ability of management to obtain a significant equity stake through an LBO has been a stimulant to these acquisitions.2 trillion in 2000 from $322 billion about a decade previously. The worldwide volume of mergers and acquisitions reached $3. United States As more US companies engage in operations outside the US. Cross-border merger and acquisition activity has been steadily increasing and is expected to continue for many years. was between two non-US firms. the landscape of mergers and acquisitions from an international perspective is changing. even the most routine merger or acquisition seems to have a transnational component. accounting. 4. Since global scale is often necessary to boost earnings. it is quite unlikely that any future waves will be dominated by US companies as they were in the past. Both large and small companies must now think of global competition and cannot merely focus on their neighboring competitors. Many of the more notable transactions have either involved parties entirely outside the United States or have involved at least one non-US party. they increasingly seek to penetrate local markets through acquisitions or joint ventures.9 THE CHANGING INTERNATIONAL M&A LANDSCAPE This is the first merger wave that can truly be called an international one. some commentators predict that Mergers & Acquisitions Page 79 of 93 . As US companies realize that many of their brethren are being bought by companies outside the US. and European companies increasingly are looking for targets outside Europe. European companies tended to conduct merger activity ‘‘in market’’ (i. Europe Even before it received a boost from the use of a single currency in the late 1990s. companies often find themselves an unwilling target. From a regulatory perspective. the number and size of European mergers and acquisitions had climbed gradually. many mergers are intended to have worldwide implications. As the pace of European deals continues unabated. the $180 billion Vodafone-Mannesmann transaction. The relative importance of the US is in a steady decline based on any number of factors. the growth of international transactions has created a greater need for – and has forced some – global harmonization in the legal and accounting areas. Now. including economic and capital raising ones. within the same country). As a result.e. As many of the product markets for larger companies become global in scope. and law firms. the globalization of their clients has led to expansion of US investment bankers. this is no small feat. Not only is the sheer volume of deals on the rise. Based on the trends in the marketplace. but almost every aspect is dramatically evolving – from the viewpoints of the regulators to the corporate strategies employed. cross-border transactions are quite common within Europe. This is most clearly exemplified by the fact that the largest deal in history. they seek to acquire non-US companies to enhance the likelihood that they can compete with these non-US giants in the future. At the beginning of this merger wave.

currencies. Other types of considerations include the change in the Mergers & Acquisitions Page 80 of 93 . customs. cultures. there has been an unprecedented sharp increase in the number of hostile takeovers during the past few years. and as the trend to transition from control by family-owned enterprises to professional managers continues. the Asian economic crisis caused a blip in this trend. reflecting slower economic recovery and a general unwillingness to encourage foreign acquisitions. FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN A CROSS-BORDER TRANSACTION Although the basic merger or acquisition is the same worldwide. they have also begun to take hold as a mode of entry into developing countries and economies in transition. 4. from a valuation perspective.10 Cross border mergers Cross border mergers and acquisitions are playing an important role in the growth of international production. hostile takeovers have been politically difficult in most European countries (with the notable exception of Britain). as reflected by the mid-2000 European Union Takeovers Directive that was loosely patterned on the takeover friendly British and US regulatory framework. In 1998. Historically. ``Not only they dominate FDI flows in developing countries. How should the transaction be financed? The financial structure of the transaction might be impacted by which country the target is in. Acquisition activity in Australia and Africa is relatively low compared with the rest of the world. For example.e. ‘‘flowback’’ can have a negative impact on the acquiror’s stock price and cause regulatory problems (i. undertaking a crossborder transaction is more complex than those conducted ‘‘in market’’ because of the multiple sets of laws.the European level of merger and acquisition activity during 2002 may surpass that of the US1. Asia During the past decade. In Europe. Although this Directive was rejected by the European parliament due to the objections of a few countries. Now these political impediments are falling. Other areas In 2001. this activity should grow as regulators recognize that elimination of restrictions on foreign investment is necessary to provide capital for their countries’ economies. but by 1999 activity had rebounded. stock ‘‘flowing’’ back to the acquiror’s home jurisdiction). As rapid economic growth continues. the level of South American mergers and acquisitions activity has fallen. the level of Asian mergers and acquisitions activity has increased steadily. it reflects the deregulatory attitude of many regulators and should continue to boost the level of deal activity. mainly as a function of the limited number of sizable companies in those continents. and other factors that impact the process.

They can select ‘‘ground rules’’ that are the laws from either of the home countries. Public relations are important in winning the hearts of the target’s employees. how will the acquiror’s stockholder base be composed? How many shares are held by cross-border investors? Does the new composition shift stockholder power dramatically? Will any of the new stockholders cause problems? » If the transaction involves debt.The following are issues for an acquiror to address when structuring the transaction. particularly the financial disclosure laws? » After issuing stock. unsecured. and if so. secured. it is common for both the acquiror and target to have two sets of advisors. will cash be raised by raising capital in the public markets. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 81 of 93 . will the stock be common or preferred stock. Employees worry about overseas managers and communities wonder about loss of jobs. In comparison. » If the transaction involves issuing stock.nature of the investments held by institutional investors caused by a stock exchange merger – these investors may be compelled under their own investment guidelines to sell newly acquired stock in the acquiror. How do the applicable laws govern the transaction? If the transaction is public. such as a tender offer. foreign tax credit is useless to US tax-exempt investors). can the acquiror comply with any applicable margin requirements. where will the debt be issued.g. This will be necessary to share with the target and its employees and shareholders. in which market will the stock be issued? If cash financing is obtained in the target’s country. from ‘‘in country’’ or cross-border? What type of debt will be issued – senior. such as those promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board in the US? How are the customs and cultures of the parties different? Before contemplating the transaction. and shareholders. One cultural issue is whether the target will still be managed ‘‘in country. and will the stock be issued directly to the target the transaction. or mezzanine? » If the transaction involves cash. This may require disclosure of financial information to which the target’s investors are accustomed. If two sets of laws are involved. or even a third-party country with established merger laws like the US. as well as with its own shareholders. It is also fairly routine for non-US parties to have their own US investment banker and law firm as advisors in a transaction – even if neither party is from the US. the parties can choose which law governs if the transaction is private. particularly if one is based on a code system and the other is common law. but which is new for the acquiror. communities. or to the target’s stockholders? Is the acquiror prepared to be subject to the laws of the target’s country if it issues stock in the transaction. From a financial perspective. the acquiror should be able to express a clear vision of how the target will be operated and funded. investors will want pro forma information to understand how the combined company will operate going forward.’’ or whether it will be part of a regional center or managed solely from the acquiror’s headquarters. and the possible change in the tax treatment of dividends that encourages the sale of the stock (e. the parties generally must abide by the law of the country where the offer will be made. one from the country of each party.

any other major agreements should be reviewed. such as licensing and joint venture agreements. that makes the transfer of those subsidiaries difficult so that they will have to be forcibly divested to consummate the deal? » Is the target or any of its subsidiaries in a heavily regulated industry (e. such as requisite governmental approval under exchange control or national security laws? For example. in the US. The following are issues for an acquiror to address before a deal is struck with a target.’’ an acquiror must consider the laws of the target in deciding whether to pursue a combination. » Will the acquisition have to be approved by the target’s shareholders.e.Even if the parties do not use the target’s country’s laws as the ‘‘ground rules. without an initial tender offer)? » How will the formal merger or acquisition agreement be drafted? Will it be local to the acquiror or the target. In addition to access to all financial information. the acquiror should review the target’s loan agreements. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 82 of 93 . such as restrictions on ownership. and if so. or Germany. or a pure US agreement? What level of due diligence is appropriate? Due diligence is critical in a cross-border transaction since there is a greater likelihood for undesirable surprises to surface after an agreement has been reached initially. and does the target’s country have laws that make this difficult? » Does the target have subsidiaries or do business in countries other than its home country. will these customs be used as a shield to stall or prevent a transaction? » How difficult will it be to obtain complete financial information? Are there laws that prohibit disclosure or enable the target to share data that are not reliable? » What is the role of regulators in the target’s country? Do they have tools to effectively stall or prevent a transaction. to determine whether any benefits may be lost due to the pending change in control.g. For example. and if so. Similarly. there could be laws that pose substantial obstacles to consummating a deal. banking. the President of the United States has the power to block the acquisition or to render it void after it has been completed. The acquiror should ensure that it has adequate access to the target’s documentation and personnel to facilitate the due diligence process. under the Exon-Florio provisions of the Trade Act. will the regulatory delays make it appropriate for the acquisition to take the form of a one-step merger (i. » Will the target insist on ‘‘in market’’ customs. such as Canada. defense contracting. severance plans. or insurance) that requires regulatory approval. and other employee agreements to see if the target’s change in control would impose any previously undisclosed costs or obligations (e. Australia. constitute an event of default so as to accelerate outstanding indebtedness). It is important to establish in the formal agreement what type of due diligence is permitted and what the consequences are of finding certain types of surprises. There are more than a few instances of cross-border bids that have failed because the target’s government blocked the transaction to stop a company from falling into the hands of another country. or a US agreement with one of the local laws governing.g.

g. In the US. and there are a number of regional economic organizations that have competition law frameworks. Based on the acquiror’s own tax preferences. Are there any significant antitrust or non competition issues? Although the US generally has the most aggressively enforced antitrust laws in the world. The acquiror must also take care to consider the volatility of any currencies that are implicated in the transaction and ensure that it has adequate protection from downward swings in them before the transaction is closed. or has a provision that requires a super-majority vote to approve mergers. it may be necessary to report the acquisition in advance to a governmental agency.The target’s charter and bylaws should be checked to see if they have any peculiar provisions that might make it more difficult for the acquiror to gain full control of the target. If it cannot tolerate the currency risk that is involved in the target’s operations. more than 70 countries have their own competition laws. the European Union has become quite aggressive (e. Even if a significant antitrust problem is not present. the acquiror should determine whether the target has a shareholder rights plan or poison pill. If the target is involved in operations out of its home country. For example. The following are issues for an acquiror to address before pursuing a target. This requires an analysis of the interplay of local law and tax treaties as well as the expectation of where future revenues and deductions will be derived. Chapter -5 Post-Closing Challenges Mergers & Acquisitions Page 83 of 93 . dividends) or capital gain.e. the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act requires a notice and waiting period unless the transaction is below specified minimal levels. or vice versa? Are there any significant tax or currency issues? The acquiror should structure the transaction with a complete understanding of the tax implications. the acquiror should conduct a review of the relevant antitrust laws. Overall. the acquiror should consider the ongoing impact of a volatile currency after the transaction is complete. and should structure the transaction accordingly. blocking the General ElectricHoneywell merger). it may desire current income (i. » To what extent do the acquiror and target compete in a line of business? » Will the acquisition substantially lessen competition in any line of business in any particular country? » What products or services does the acquiror sell to the target now.

wasted time and resources devoted to solving post-closing problems. Another common problem is the psychological consequences of ‘‘seller’s remorse. The integration of human resources. even litigation. Often one of the greatest challenges for the buyer is the postclosing integration of the two companies. the accounting methods and financial practices. But the term closing can be misleading in that it suggests a sense of finality. and achieve the economies of scale potential provided by the transaction. or politics. and their respective advisors. avoid duplication. It is a time of fear. has just begun.’’ particularly when the seller remains on-site in a consulting capacity or even as a minority owner. otherwise. The seller can be so accustomed to managing the business that he/she may not be open to changes in strategies or policies implemented by the buyer. The seller must facilitate smooth transition of ownership and management to the buyer’s team without ego. A Time of Transition Post-closing challenges raise a wide variety of human fears and uncertainties that must be understood and addressed by both buyer and seller. Estimates are as high as three out of every five M&A deals results in an ineffective plan for the external integration of the two companies. when in truth the hard work. the uncertainty associated with the change will likely lead to widespread insecurity and fear of job loss at all levels of the organization. emotion. The buyer must have procedures in place to prevent the seller from undermining these transitional efforts and assume control of the company—also without ego. The fear of the unknown experienced by the employees of the seller must be addressed and put to rest. Once word of a deal leaks out to employees. Everyone has worked hard to ensure that the process went smoothly and that all parties are happy with the end result. the employees’ stress and distraction will affect the seller’s performance and the viability of the transaction. the operating and management information systems. particularly for the buyer. emotion. seller. stress and frustration for most of the employees who were not on the deal team and may only have limited amounts of information regarding their roles in the post-closing organization. The closing of a merger or acquisition usually brings a great sigh of relief to the buyer. Many of the fears experienced by the employees of both buyer and seller result from expectations of downsizing to cut costs. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 84 of 93 . the corporate cultures. and in some cases. and related matters are often the most difficult part of completing a merger or acquisition. well they don’t always work out as anticipated. The consequences of a weak or ineffective transition plan are the buyer’s inability to realize the transaction’s true value. And even if there is a plan.The focus of this chapter is on understanding and anticipating the nature and types of post-closing challenges faced by both buyer and seller after the deal is completed. or politics. The need to quickly integrate the two corporate cultures also raises personal and psychological issues that must be addressed. Post-closing challenges may arise in a wide variety of subject areas.

Management In many ways. Some issues are addressed in the closing documents. and things. and receives deferred compensation. the chances for for not fully realizing success are greatly increased. it is much more difficult to reduce staffing levels. and who goes. These two groups must be distinguished because the terms of employment are often quite different. 5. On the other hand. staff cutbacks are probably appropriate and healthy. management staffing is a much easier problem to resolve.1 Staffing Levels and Other People Problems One of the primary areas that an acquiring company looks to in order to realize the projected return on its investment is the new company’s level of staffing. The bottom line is that if the buyer doesn’t plan to address the following issues. Only in this way can a true evaluation be made.000. Important issues that need to be managed fall into three areas—people. and in what positions. stock options. Most employment agreements and/or management benefits can be quantified to determine the cost of such decisions. Such a process is normally driven by the acquiring company. while staff can be protected by union contracts and/or federal or state employment laws. This is the greatest source of employee fear and is the fuel that powers the rumor mill.The seller undermines the buyer’s efforts or contradicts its authority. if the terms dictate that the acquired firm is to maintain its independence. The first step in determining staffing levels is to divide the workforce into management and staff/labor. The biggest cuts came in the telecom and high tech industries. Gray & Christmas recommended that job cuts following M&A deals in the first quarter of 2005 soared to nearly 77. Most require forethought in order to anticipate potential pitfalls. But some of these fears are valid. These sellers often want the benefit of the bargain but seem unwilling to accept the burden of the bargain and relinquish control of the company. it is more likely that earnings projections will be met or exceeded. the buyer must coordinate a smooth and efficient post-closing process. In attempting to realize the true value of a merger or acquisition. places. The hard part is deciding who stays. over six times the rate of the last quarter of 2004 and three times the rate of the first quarter of 2004. An April 2005 report published by Challenger. On the one hand. if the acquired firm is absorbed into the acquirer. This should have been examined during the due diligence process and worked into the pricing for the transaction. The primary task of resolving the level of management staffing is to determine where there are redundancies and who the most qualified candidates are. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 85 of 93 . and other issues. If a certain number of employees can be eliminated. Not consideration of all candidates fairly may result in a lower return on the investment. These problems are particularly common in mergers where the management and flow of the deal may be one of shared objectives and values as opposed to an acquisition that more clearly has a designated quarterback. Much of this depends on the nature of the acquisition. Management is often party to employment contracts. but it is not a bad idea to involve the acquired company as well.

All candidates must be evaluated objectively. This limits the options available when deciding who should stay and who should go. religion. or sex discrimination for which the buyer may be held accountable under civil rights legislation. Be honest. which may or may not be consistent with staffing plans after the acquisition. which must be sent 60 days in advance by the seller to its employees if there is a plan to close facilities. employees on matters of wages. and working conditions. For the acquiring company. • Whistle-blowers who could bring claims of wrongful discharge. a formal evaluation of all candidates can lead to a stronger. which protects workers against changes in the workforce or changes in benefit plans that would discriminate against workers over 40 or make age-based distinctions. or disability. The following is a list of legal considerations to be examined: • Employment agreements that may contain conditions that are unacceptable to the buyer or conditions that may be triggered in the event of a merger or acquisition. more diverse team. choosing the incumbent management team is an easy decision. This may require the formation of a review committee made up of representatives from each organization to ensure that the terminations occur according to agreed upon procedures. • WARN (Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification) notices. even if claims are filed based on events that occurred before the acquisition. it should not prevent the buyer from evaluating all employees. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 86 of 93 . Develop a selection methodology by targeting certain employees for layoff or retention based on performance and experience. However. By evaluating first and then worrying about possible protections. which has certain rights to comparable positions upon their return to work. it is necessary to embrace the change inherent in acquisitions to enhance your chances of success. However. Be balanced. • Union contracts that could fall under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The same rules apply to evaluating labor as to evaluating management. hours. It is often difficult to do so because emotions often cloud the judgment of the evaluators. Labor Labor is often protected by union contracts and labor laws. they must be examined from a legal point of view. While change can be difficult. • Race. Be objective. Make sure that the applied criteria are documented and objective and are supported by a performance evaluation and that any review of personnel files and performance evaluations is confidential. as well as nonunion. the buyer gains a much better sense of the quality of the workforce that does ultimately remain. • Employees on family leave workers ’ compensation. The buyer shortchanges itself by not doing so. • Age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and/or Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA). Once the selections are made. which protects the rights of union.

As a result. the burden of compliance is on the employer under the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA). Each transaction is unique in that the above issues will apply in differing degrees. among other things. Perhaps more important. • Whether state law counterparts to federal employment laws have precedence. • To ensure that the employees being acquired are legally able to work in the United States. However.• Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). which. especially concerning the determination of exempt versus nonexempt positions. the customer may be a direct competitor of the buyer or of one of the buyer’s customers. A disgruntled employee can very quickly destroy this goodwill and perhaps jeopardize a significant income stream on which the value of the acquisition was based. This entails all manner of documents related to such issues. unless the customer enables the merged company to penetrate a new market or if the customer helps achieve scale economies. a violation in this area could lead to substantial payments to current and former employees for overtime worked but not paid. requires a review of job descriptions to ensure that there. The bottom line is that the buyer needs to conduct a thorough labor and employment review. In addition. thereby enabling other customers to be profitable. The key steps to transferring this goodwill are: • • • Personal introductions to customer contacts Social events to acquaint customers with the new owners Letters from both the seller and buyer that thank customers for their business and announce the new management and plans for the merged entity Mergers & Acquisitions Page 87 of 93 . • Problems that could develop under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OSHA) if current compliance is not verified and the cost of future compliance is not factored into operating results. It makes little sense to keep a customer if it is not possible to make a profit on the relationship. one of the most valuable assets is the customer base. Customers When a buyer acquires a business. It may be necessary to discount the value of the acquisition to account for a customer base that is unprofitable or duplicative and that provides little additional strategic value. • Lack of compliance with the Drug-Free Workplace Act and various government contract laws can lead to suspended payments or terminated contracts for a seller that is a federal government contractor. there is a limit to the amount of losses that make financial sense. One of the post-closing challenges is to determine the profitability of the customers. is for the seller to transfer the goodwill of its customers to the buyer. The acquirer should review all customers for profitability and sustainability. Often the acquired company has legacy customers that they have been unwilling or unable to terminate if the customer is unprofitable or difficult to manage. • Violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) or Equal Pay Act. is a distinction between essential and nonessential duties and a review of property leases to determine who is responsible (the lessee or the lessor) for renovations required under the ADA. however. it is important to evaluate the seller’s customer base. even in these cases.

just as much as when examining staffing levels. there are certain suppliers whose replacement would cause significant disruption. However. The space should be evaluated to determine if the rent is more or less expensive than other company space and if the amount of space is more than is needed. The standard assumption is that the combined company will use the buyer’s professional suppliers. which means that we need x percent less of square footage in which to work. This will go a long way toward helping to cut expenses in order to reach the target return. subject to any potential conflicts of interests being resolved. it may be best to continue to use both firms for certain purposes. the bankers may not have the appropriate expertise. Essential vendors are a key component of the continued success and uninterrupted operations of a company. The accountants of the seller may be providing outsourcing of certain tasks for which it may not be practical to change immediately. But very few decisions in a merger or acquisition can be resolved with a simple mathematical equation. but this may not always be desirable or feasible. These factors should be considered carefully before any key relationships are terminated. After all.Vendors Suppliers are much more often overlooked than customers. If a buyer is purchasing a business in a different industry. and with people come emotions and unpredictability. Ultimately. This has to be accounted for when looking at space. the staff has x percent more square footage per employee than our company. or if the supplier is an integral part of a just-in-time inventory system. thereby saving $x. The legal counsel of the seller may be better suited to deal with certain local matters or be more cost-effective. 5. This can occur in situations where there is only one supplier of a given product or service. there must also be human considerations. and lawyers. In addition. When examining the space requirements of the combined entity. As a result. However.2 Problems Involving Places Often one of the larger expenses on the income statement. it is certainly helpful to consider the square footage. any vendor can easily be replaced. we can reduce the staff by x percent. Of special importance are suppliers that provide professional services—in particular. Since this is often true. There usually are people involved. it is necessary for the buyer to conduct a thorough review of the existing suppliers to ensure that the seller is getting the best prices and terms. accountants. How long have the employees been in this space? How does the commute compare to where they might be relocated? How much interaction is required between the staff being relocated and staff in a different location? How much reconfiguration of the office and facilities of each company will be required to accommodate additional staff or functions? How much productivity can be expected from these people during the course of the move? Mergers & Acquisitions Page 88 of 93 . bankers. total square footage can be reduced by x percent. rent and/ or lease payments are a natural place for a buyer to focus on when evaluating the efficiencies to be gained by a merger. It would seem to be an easy issue to resolve: In acquiring this company.

industry group identification. It is taken very personally by many employees. there are many legal and administrative tasks that must be accomplished by the acquisition team to complete the transaction. While the buyer’s legal counsel attends to these matters. and how it is different from other corporations. customers. The key is to identify what changes have occurred and respond to them by shaping the image or identity that is communicated to the public. A corporate identity defines what makes a corporation unique. This may seem obvious. management Mergers & Acquisitions Page 89 of 93 . Only then does it make sense to put a name on it and identify an image with it. but the real issue goes much deeper. The company name and logo are merely manifestations of that identity.Non-consideration of these and other related questions can open up a can of worms. employees. if not all. There are several aspects of a corporation that go into its identity. it must be determined what the corporation stands for. it only stands to reason that the merged entity is different from what existed before. Our suggestion is to take steps to maximize your efficiency of space and property but to do so considering the human elements of the changes. distributors. Location is a factor that can effect the overall integration of the buyer by the seller and can lead to significant turnover. it may be important to consider a new corporate identity in the form of the company name and/or logo. depending on the size and type of the financing method selected by the purchaser. 5. these post-closing tasks typically include the following: • Final verification that all assets acquired are free of liens and encumbrances • Recording of financing statements and transfer tax returns • Recording of any assignments of intellectual property with the Library of Congress or Patent and Trademark Office • Notification of the sale to employees. 5. a stock acquisition may also include the following: • Filing articles of amendment to the corporate charter or articles of merger • Completion of the transfer of all stock certificates • Amendments to the corporate bylaws • Preparation of all appropriate post-closing minutes and resolutions Such actions require legal counsel familiar with the issues of corporate governance and intellectual property.3 Corporate Identity Now that the two companies have become one. The nature and extent of these tasks will vary. and direction. These include market share. The parties to any acquisition must be careful to ensure that the jubilation of closing does not cause any post-closing matters to be overlooked. In an asset acquisition. Before such issues can be decided. of these aspects are altered in some way as the result of a merger or acquisition. and suppliers • Adjustments to bank accounts and insurance policies In addition to the above. Since there is essentially a new company.4 Legal Issues Following the closing of the transaction. Yet this is a point that can often be forgotten when it comes to corporate identity. where it is going. Most. customer base.

workplace location. is communication. Some kind of Mergers & Acquisitions Page 90 of 93 . the two keys to effective communication are to determine (1) the importance of the information and (2) who should communicate it. is more difficult as organizations grow larger. The primary emotion that will be encountered in dealings with various groups will be fear. which in turn contributes to efficiency! This. As a result. Think of how it feels on the first day of a new job. as relates to such things as job security. a lack of communication typically means a lack of success. If a merger is thought of as the beginning of a marriage. There will be fear on the part of employees. and benefits • Job location and operating procedures As a result of the importance of this information. It is a bit disconcerting to walk the halls in an organization and not know people. 5. This can help overall efficiency because employees will be focusing on doing their job rather than wondering who someone is and how that person might affect their career. of course. It also helps in the socialization process among the employees. But you may also have to deal with fear on the part of customers (the buyer may discontinue a product line) and suppliers (the buyer may already have someone to supply that good). the person doing the communicating is also important. As with any relationship. This will assist in the transition and add credibility to the process. the natural response of most people is to avoid change. They can place a name with a face and know who is being referred to in discussions. If possible. works best. people are more comfortable. that’s how it feels for all the employees of an acquired company.5 Minimizing the Barriers to Transition No matter how hard you try and how well you anticipate the issues that need to be addressed. This means that you want to first communicate that information that affects people directly. The next most important information is the introduction of the new management team and the transition to new managers and employees. Well. Finally. communicate the new reporting structure and have individual managers introduce the two sides when there will be day-today interaction.can more readily focus on the other aspects of the business combination for which they are better qualified and more effective. By making an effort to introduce the key players. think of the amount of communication that is necessary in the first few weeks and months of such a relationship. it is important to be aware of the various aspects of change management and address them as well. and reporting structure. Communication The primary tool for dealing with fear. along with an important person from the buyer’s side. including changes in: • The organization. have the prior manager make some kind of handover to the new. compensation. Information should be communicated in the order of its importance. A trusted person from the seller’s side. In a merger. especially who is staying and who is leaving • Reporting structures • Job descriptions and responsibilities • Title. and many of the other emotions that surface during the course of acquisition transition.

and resolve post-merger problems. which needs to be defined and communicated early. The role of the task force is best kept simple. An honest assessment of those being considered for the task force will go a long way toward establishing its credibility. is to uncover. Once its work is completed. The task force can also be used to organize the information that needs to be communicated to the new employees. it is often helpful to give the task force a set life at its beginning—60 or 90 days—and to evaluate the situation at that time. the CEO should probably avoid making him or herself a member. The final call will come from the CEO. The amount of information to be communicated can be overwhelming. It can serve as a conduit from labor to management to resolve problems that arise during the course of the meeting or social gathering among the employees of various departments. Failure to do so will limit its effectiveness and call into question the resolve of the new organization. 5. Nonetheless. As a result. In this way. people will not take the task force seriously. and the way it is communicated can also cause problems. If one of the members from the seller’s side is an employee who is not respected by the majority of the workforce. The importance of effectively communicating the role of the task force cannot be emphasized enough. when it is determined that the value of the task force has been expended and it is now time to get to work to realize the true value of the combination.6 Post-Merger Task Force One of the tools through which communication can be made more effective is a postmerger task force. The task force can serve to communicate the issues in order of importance and to address them accurately. An additional indication is the amount of information flowing back from the employees to the task force has significantly waned. the task force must be dissolved. The first sign that the end of the task force’s life is near is when all the information deemed to be important in relation to the merger has been disseminated. Such an entity should be composed of a representative group from both sides of the transaction and should be formed after the due diligence process. as it is much easier to say when the merger activity begins than to define when it is over. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 91 of 93 . evaluate. Creating the dialogue and organizing the information serve to help reduce or eliminate the fear. This helps prevent the grapevine from disseminating erroneous information. a dialogue can be opened and people will get the impression that actions are being taken to address concerns. can go a long way in making everyone more comfortable with the new faces. This is easier said than done. The composition of the task force has a bearing on its effectiveness and the integrity of the buyer. especially those that interact regularly. In a very real sense this is the first operating decision to be seen by the seller’s employees and thus it will greatly influence the new employees’ perception of the acquiring organization. The role of such a group. functions. and procedures. as viewed by the seller’s employees.

the value of the transaction may never be realized. This will require assembling a team with proven implementation skills and a desire to see the transaction work. 1967) Mergers & Acquisitions Page 92 of 93 . and picking the right people for the job. The sheer number of issues that need to be addressed can seem overwhelming at first glance.The importance of a well-planned and smooth post-closing transition cannot be emphasized enough.A. This will serve to encourage further growth through mergers and acquisitions. By planning properly. a buyer will gain confidence in its ability to successfully integrate the seller into its operations. takeover and Amalgamations (London: Sweet and Maxwell Publishers. But the importance of these issues in the success of a business combination cannot be overemphasized. Without the proper attention to these matters. BIBLIOGRAPHY M. paying attention to the details. Weinberg.

H. Motives. “Corporate Acquisition.K. Theory and Practice (Tata McGRAW Hill) P. Sridharan and P. and Dr. A. advanced Accounting. Mergers & Acquisitions Page 93 of 93 . G.R. oxford University press) N.O. Mergers: Motives.. 1983) Prasanna Chandra. Modes.K. Rock F. Company Law and Practice (New Delhi: Taxman Publications) Goldberg. Nagpur: Wadhwa and company 1992) M. Companies Act (16th edition) V.A. Policies (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. (Hampshire: Gower Publishing Co. (Calcutta.S.” The journal of finance. E Kotlarchuk and H Singh. Milledge A. Mergers. 1971. Arvind pandian. guide to takeover and Mergers. Lorange. Kapoor. Weaver. Mergers and Acquisitions from A to Z 2nd edition. Western and K. effects. Weinberg. Methods. J.. Mergers and Acquisitions. 1975) A Ramaiya. 9th edition (Taxmann) Broc Romanck and Cythia M. Walter H.Datey. Ltd. HART. ed by Milton L. Andrew J. Mcgraw hill.. 1971) Majumdar.S. Corporate laws and secretarial practice. P. “tests of efficiency performance of conglomerate firms.. 1st edition (capstone Publishing.Fred Weston and Samuel C. A strategic Perspective in the management Acquisition Handbook. Sherman. Steiner.2002) J.Krus. On mergers and Takeovers (London: Sweet and Maxwell Ltd. Mansinghka.H Chakraborty. Financial Management.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful