Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TEXTS OF EXORCISMS[1]
Preparations: Prayers, blessings, dedications, prescribed psalms, three Rosaries (Joyful, Sorrowful and
Glorious Mysteries) Litanies of the Saints, prayers of exorcism, etc.
E: Demon Akabor, we priests order you, in so far as we are representatives of Christ, in the name of
the Most Holy Trinity, Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
We order you in the name of the Holy Cross, the Precious Blood, the Five Sacred Wounds, the
Fourteen Stations of the Cross, the Most Blessed Virgin Mary, the Immaculate Conception of Lourdes,
Our Lady of the Rosary of Fatima, Our Lady of Mt. Carmel, Our Lady of the Great Victory of
Wigratzbad, the Seven Dolours of Mary, (in the name of) St. Michael the Archangel, all the nine Choirs
of Angels, the Angel Erabel, Guardian Angel of this possessed woman, St. Joseph, the Scourge of Evil
Spirits, the patron Saints of this woman, all Guardian Angels and Angels especially assigned to priests,
all the Saints in Heaven especially those who were exorcists, the Holy Curé of Ars, Saint Benedict, (in
the name of) the servants of the servants of God, Padre Pio, Theresa (Neumann) of Konnarsreuth,
Catherine Emmerich, all the souls in Purgatory and in the name of Pope Paul VI.
As priests of God, we command you therefore Akabor, in the name of all whom we have just invoked,
and in the name of the Most Holy Trinity, Father, Son and Holy Spirit: you must return to Hell.
HELL IS TERRIBLE
A: There is more that I must still say.
E: Speak the truth, and nothing but the truth, in the name of the Most Holy Trinity, the Most Blessed
Virgin Mary, the Immaculate Conception...!
A: Yes, in Their names, and in the name of the Thrones from whom I came, I am forced to go on
speaking. I must speak.
E: Tell the truth, and only the truth. You have no right to lie. In the name...!
A: I was a member of the Choir of Thrones. I, Akabor, must speak (his breathing is gasping; he [3] cries
in a terrible voice). I must say how terrible Hell is. It is much more terrible than anyone could believe.
God's justice is terrible, so terrible (he moans and groans).
E: Continue to tell the truth in the name of the Most Holy Trinity, the Blessed Virgin Mary, the
Immaculate Conception. Say what God commands you to say.
A: Hell is so much worse than you imagine - you do not think deeply enough to comprehend. God's
justice... naturally, His Mercy is available... but this requires many things. You must have great
confidence, say many prayers, go to Confession. You must do everything according to the old ways.
Novelties cannot be allowed to come in easily and wantonly. It is the Pope who speaks the truth.
E: Continue, in the name of the Most Holy Trinity, the Most Blessed Virgin Mary, the Immaculate
Conception, continue in the name of the Thrones, continue!
SENSE OF SUFFERING
E: Continue, in the name of the Blessed Virgin, to say what she commands you to say!
A: It (the Passion of Christ) has to go on. People must suffer for each other, and offer up these
sufferings in the name of the Cross of Christ and the sufferings of Christ. You must suffer in union with
the Blessed Virgin and all the renunciations she endured during her life in order to unite her own
sufferings with the terrible sufferings of Christ on the Cross and in His Agony in the Garden of Olives.
These sufferings were more terrible than men believe. In the Garden of Olives, Christ suffered in ways
other than those that you perhaps know about. He was crushed by the Justice of God as if He had
been the greatest of sinners, and as if He were going to have to go to Hell. He had to u ndergo this
suffering for you men. Otherwise, you would not have been saved. He had to endure such terrib le
sufferings, that He was almost on the point of believing that He would go to Hell.[10]
His sufferings were so great that He felt Himself totally abandoned by the Heavenly Father. He
sweated blood because He felt Himself totally separated from the Eternal Father and abandoned Him
(he weeps piteously). He was crushed as if He were one of the greatest sinners.
This is what He has done for you, and you must follow Him; these sufferings are worth so much; these
sufferings, darknesses, these terrible feelings of abandonment when it seems that all is lost and
suicide is the only way out... I would rather not say it, no (he sighs heavily).
E: Continue to tell the truth in the name of the Thrones...!
A: God's response is the greatest, and rightly so. When these sufferings make it seem as if all is lost;
one feels completely abandoned by God, the least among men and the lowest of creatures. These
terrible, terrible sufferings in darkness are the most precious there can he. But the young do not know
that. Most of the young do not know that, and therein lies our triumph.
ACCEPTANCE OF SUFFERING (THE CALL TO SUFFER)
E: Continue to tell the truth, in the name...!
A: Many, the majority who commit suicide, do so when they feel abandoned by God and the least of
men. They no longer feel that, however dark the night. God is always near them. It is as if God no
longer existed, and, momentarily, His presence is no longer felt by them. But, in spite of this, it is
necessary for men to imitate the sufferings of Christ; especially those whom He has called to suffer
much.
There are many who believe that they are perhaps no longer normal - but the majority are - so they
give in. They give in much too easily; they believe they should kill themselves because they are no
longer understood by men. Therein lies our triumph. Most of them go to Heaven, [11] but it is our
triumph nevertheless because...
E: Continue, in the name...!
A: ...they have not fulfilled their mission. They should have gone on living.
E: Continue, in the name the message from the Thrones!
A. There are today, somewhere in the world, some extremely heavy crosses - it is She who makes me
say that (he points upward). These crosses are often mounted on illness. Visible crosses, like cancer,
infirmities, or other handicaps, are often easier to bear than the terrible anguish or darkness of the
soul which many people are enduring today. She up there (he points upward) makes me say what She
has said before through a privileged soul: “I will send my children sufferings, sufferings as great and as
deep as the ocean”. Those people who have to bear these terrible crosses and many are predestined
to do so - must not despair.
E: In the name of the Most Holy Trinity, Father, Son and Holy Spirit - Akabor, say what the Blessed
Virgin charges you to say! A: By the way, the crosses of which I have just spoken are crosses which
seem to be useless and pointless. They can lead on to despair. Often they become almost
insupportable, but that is when they are most precious. I, Akabor, I am forced to say once again: She
(he points upward) wants me to shout it to all the cross-bearers: “Courage! Do not be disheartened!”
In the Cross lies salvation, victory is in the Cross. The Cross is stronger than the battle.
E: Continue, in the name... the message of the Thrones!
MODERNISM
A: Modernism is false. Modernism must be totally rejected. It is our work, it comes from hell. Priests
who spread Modernism are not even in agreement among themselves. Nobody agrees with anybody
else. That indication alone should be enough for you.
E: Continue in the name of the Immaculate Conception! Tell the truth, in the name..., you must speak
the whole truth, by order of the Blessed Virgin!
A: The Pope is tormented by his cardinals, his own cardinals... he is surrounded by wolves.
E: Tell the truth, in the name...!
A: If that weren't so, he would be able to speak out more. He is, as it were, paralyzed. He can no
longer do very much; believe me, he can no longer do very much you will feel in your hearts what
must be done. But, whatever else, in no way must you abandon the smallest scrap of the old faith. I
want to say, I must say, that the Second Vatican Council was not very good. It was, in part, the work of
Hell.
E: Tell the truth, in the name of the Most Holy Trinity!
THE HOLY MASS
A: There were a few small things, which needed to be changed, but most of it - no. Believe me! In the
liturgy, there was practically nothing to be changed. Even the Gospel reading should not be in the
vernacular; it would be better if the Holy Mass were said in Latin. The reason can be seen if you just
look at the Consecration, only the Consecration, but that is typical. At the Consecration, one uses the
words: “This is My Body which will be given up for you”, followed by: “This is My Blood, which will be
shed for you and for a great number”. That is what Jesus said.
E: It is not correct to say “for all”? Tell the truth, in the name... you have no right to lie.
A: It certainly isn't. The translations have not been completely accurate, and this is particularly the
case with “for all”.[12] It should not, and cannot, be “for all” - it should be “for a great number”.
When the text is not correct, so the abundance of graces diminishes; the channel of graces still flows,
but only sparsely.[13] And the Consecration is accompanied by so many graces when the priest does
things correctly, according to the old Tradition, and according to the Will of God. For you and for a
great number” must be said, just as Christ Himself said it.
E: But, didn't Christ shed His Blood for all? Tell the truth in the name...!
A: No, He would have liked to shed it for all, but, in fact, it did not flow for all.
E: Because many have rejected it? Tell the truth in the name...!
A: Exactly; in this way it did not flow for all, for it did not flow for us in Hell.
E: Tell the truth, in the name...!
A: The new order of the Mass - the bishops have changed the Tridentine Mass - the new Mass is
absolutely not as They up there want it (he points upward). The point will soon be reached when the
whole Mass will no longer be valid. [14]
E: How is the Tridentine Mass, the old Mass, which was prescribed by Pope St. Pius V? Tell the truth,
in the name... and you have no right to lie!
A: It is the best in existence; it is in the standard, the true, [15] the good Mass (he groans).
E: Akabor, tell the truth, in the name of and by the order of, the Blessed Virgin! We order you to say
everything she charges you to say!
A: I said all that against my will, but I was made to! She up there (He points upward) forced me (he
mutters).
E: Is there anything more that you must say, in the name..! But speak only the truth!
OBEDIENCE
A: Many priests make reference to obedience. But now, in these times, it is not necessary to obey
modernist bishops. It is now the time of which Christ spoke: “There will rise up many false Christs and
false prophets” [16]
Those (modernist bishops) are the false prophets. But one ought not - nor has one the right - to
believe them. Soon, one will no longer be able to believe them, because they... because they... have
accepted so many novelties. We are in them; [17] we from down there (he points downward) have
stirred them up. Prior to that, we deliberated a great deal as to how to destroy the Catholic Mass.
It is over a hundred years ago that Catherine Emmerich said: “It was in Rome...” She saw Rome, the
Vatican in a vision. She saw it, surrounded entirely by a deep ditch, and beyond the ditch stood the
unbelievers. In the center of Rome, in the Vatican, stood the Catholics. They threw their altars, their
statues, their relics - almost everything - into this deep, deep ditch until it was almost filled-up. And
that - that time is here now (he cries out in a frightening voice).
Then, when the ditch was filled, those of the other religions were actually able to get across it. They
crossed, and looked around in the Vatican. They saw how the Catholics, the Catholics of today and
the modern Mass had very little to offer them. They shook their heads, turned their backs and went
away. And many from among you Catholics were stupid enough to leave ahead of them. But they did
not take one step in your direction. There is something more I must say.
E: Tell the truth, in the name...!
THE LITURGY
A: In the Mass, the true Mass, the Tridentine Mass, there used to be thirty-three Signs of the Cross.
Now, there are very few - sometimes two, three when all goes well. And at the end - for the Blessing -
you are not even required to get down on your knees (he cries and weeps despairingly). Do you
know how we would kneel down...would fall to our knees...if we were still able to (he weeps and
wails).
E: Is that correct – thirty-three Signs of the Cross were made at Holy Mass? Tell the truth, in the
name…!
A: Of course it is correct, it is even compulsory. When it happens that way, we are not present; we are
forced to flee from the Church; but the way things are now, we are there. The 'Asperges Me' must also
be restored.” During the Asperges, we were obliged to flee before the holy water and the incense.
The burning of incense must also be resumed. And, after Mass, the prayers “St. Michael the
Archangel”, the three “Hail Mary's” and “Hail Holy Queen” must be said again.
E: Tell the truth, say what you must say, in the name...!
A: Lay people should not distribute Holy Communion (he cries out in a frightful voice), not at all! Not
even nuns and brothers, never! Do you believe Christ would have entrusted this to the Apostles, if
women and laymen were able to do it (he groans). How I was forced to say that!
Allida (another angelic demon of lesser rank, equally present in the possessed woman), did you hear?
Allida, did you hear what I have just been forced to say? Allida, you can speak too! (The other demon
replied angrily: “Shut up!”)
E: Have you said everything now, Akabor, in the name...? Have you said everything, have you spoken
the entire truth?
A: She, up there (he points upward) does not allow me to be tormented by the Old One (Lucifer)
because I have been made to say these things for you, for the Church. She does not allow it... happily!
But it was not good for those down there (He points downward) for all of us, for all of us (he cries and
groans).
E: In the name of the Blessed Virgin, continue; have you anything else to say? By order of the
Thrones, your old companions, have you anything else to say?
(After seven hours of prayer, and six hours of exorcism, without food or drink, many of the people
present are tired)
A: No, but maybe you can go away. We will be happy if you go away. We will be happy! Just go!
E: Continue your discourse! In the name of the Blessed Virgin speak! Say what she commands you, in
the name...!
A: Because I have spoken, because I have had to say all that, She allows me a moment more. You
must recite, three times: “Holy, holy, holy...” (Those present recite the prayer)
E: In the name of the' Mystical Rose... Akabor, say what the Blessed Virgin has charged you to say!
A: She has charged me to say what I have had to say and what I have said; I have said it against my
will (he weeps with vexation).
E: In the name..., have you said it all?
A: Yes!
1. The first “Hail Mary” for her sorrow when Simeon prophesied to her: “A sword will pierce your
heart”.
2. Next, the Flight into Egypt; while contemplating the tears and torments she endured at that time.
3. The Child Jesus lost in the Temple: let this bring to mind the anguish she suffered because He was
the Son of God.
4. She meets Jesus on the Way of the Cross; the humiliation in which she sees her Son.
5. The dreadful one, the most dreadful one: the Crucifixion and Death on the Cross; what she endured
then - the tears, the anguish, the despondency.
6. The Descent from the Cross; that terribly disfigured Body which they carried together to the tomb;
the part she had to play throughout this whole scene.
7. Finally, the laying in the tomb; her great sorrow: her sadness. She suffered enormously.
A: (He calls out the last prayers, in a voice full of hatred : Now, three times: “Holy, holy, holy...” (Those
present recite the prayer)
E: In the name of the Holy Trinity...in Their name, you must now go away for ever into Hell, Akabor.
A: (He groans and cries out in a terrible voice): Yes...
E: In the name... call out your name and go away to Hell. Go, in the name of your old companions, the
Thrones, who serve God as you have not served God!
A: (Groaning) I wanted very I much to serve God, but Lucifer didn't want me to serve God.
E: You must now go away. We priests order you, in the name of the Holy Trinity, Father, Son and Holy
Spirit... you must go away now, in the name of the Holy Heart of Mary and in the name of the Seven
Sorrows of Mary.
A: (He cries out despairingly).
E: In the name... take yourself off to Hell! Call out your name
A: A-Ka-bor (he cries his name, weeping)! A-ka-bor!
E: Go away to Hell and never return, in the name...!
***
Note: This chapter has been abridged. In particular, the revelations made by Akabor during the time
of his expulsion have in effect, been highlighted, rather than detailed in their entirety.
August 14,1975
E: Exorcist
J: Judas Iscariot, a human demon [18]
THERE IS A HELL
J: If only I had not lost hope afterwards! It is frightful in Hell! If only I had not lost hope! (spine chilling
howls of despair)
E: The Blessed Virgin orders you to go away, in the name of the Crucified One, in the name of His
Precious Blood!
J: Let me stay a little longer in this woman.
E: No, depart, in the name of all the Holy Apostles, in the name...!
J: I don't want to. No, no! (he howls' in a voice full of hatred)...but they will come soon (the infernal
spirits) - (heartrending cries)
E: You must go now, Judas Iscariot, in the name of Our Lady of Mount Carmel! She commands you to
go back to Hell, to eternal damnation.
J: (A prolonged, heart- rending cry) No, No…! (he sighs dreadfully, and emits sounds of despair)
E: In the name of the Seven Sorrows of Mary, in the name of the Most Holy Trinity...go away to Hell!
J: But I don't want to, I don't want to (terrible howls)
E: In the name of the Most Holy Trinity, of the Immaculate Conception, the Mother of God, we order
you to return to the home of Lucifer!
J: (Drawn-out moaning): No! (With a terrible howl of despair): No, no! They do not want me at all in
Hell. (Suddenly, Judas shouts despairingly: “Lucifer, Help.'“)
(The priests say a new exorcism and two litanies)
E: In the name of the most Holy Trinity, we order you to go back to Hell for eternity!
J: Oh, you infernal spirits, come to my aid! Help me so that I am not forced to go away! Hurry, Akabor!
Help me! Oh, oh, hurry, hurry! (he groans woefully)
E: Judas Iscariot, go away, in the name...!
J: Lucifer, you sent me, you must help me!
E: We priests order you, in the name of the Most Holy Trinity, the Father...
J: (He cries in despair): They are coming...they are going to come soon (Lucifer and his cohorts). Do
you know how I fear them? Do you know that?
E: We, priests of the Catholic Church, order you, in the name of the Most Holy Trinity, of the Holy
Cross, of the Immaculate Virgin and Mother of God, Mary of Lourdes, of Our Lady of the Holy Rosary
of Fatima... go away, Judas Iscariot!
(Thereupon the priests recite three times: “Holy, Holy, Holy...” and the “Glory be to the Father.” At this
moment, Judas, in the mouth of the possessed woman, assumes a masculine voice”)
J: No! Oh, (he groans)...if only we could kill her (the possessed woman) right now. We would like to kill
her. A long time ago we decided that she had to be killed.
E: We order you not to kill her, in the name of the Most Holy Trinity...move out now, move out in the
name of the Blessed Virgin, of all the Holy Angels and Archangels, and especially of Saint Michael.
J: No, Michael, you must not… (he howls like an animal and utters a dreadful groaning). They are
coming... they are coming... they are coming...!
E: In the name of the Most Holy Trinity, call out your name, Judas Iscariot, and go away!
J: I...they are coming! I... Judas Iscariot... I... Judas Iscariot... I must go away, I must go away! Go away - I
must... I must, I must, I must! They are coming... there they are! (he howls and shouts in a terrible
voice). There they are, the wicked spirits! (He weeps)... Lucifer, Lucifer!... Go away, Lucifer, go away
Lucifer!... I am afraid of you, go away! (He cries out in a frightened manner)
E: It is necessary for you to go away, Judas Iscariot, right now, in the name...!
J: He is coming... he is coming.
E: In the name of the Blessed Virgin - flee for ever to Hell and never come back!
J: They are there they are. There they are... (terrible cry and groaning) I must go away...they are
greeting me!
E: Go away now, in the name of the Most Holy Trinity...and call out your!
J: I have already called (it)...I, Judas Iscariot, I must...I...I must go away.
E: In the name of Our Lady of the Most Holy Rosary of Fatima, in the name of the Immaculate of
Lourdes, go away! In the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, it is necessary for you to leave now!
J: “Judas Iscariot!” (Fifteen long, frightening and heart-rending cries are heard)...No, no, no…no, I would
rather not go away!
E: We order you, in the name of the Catholic Church in the name of the Most Holy Trinity...!
LITURGICAL RITES
J: On August 14 (1975), Akabor was forced to speak about the Mass and the Asperges Me which
should be re-introduced at the beginning of Mass. That is true, that is true; then, we are obliged to flee
from the church.
E: Tell the truth, Judas Iscariot, tell the truth, on behalf of the Blessed Virgin!
J: Without it, we are in the church. It would be better if the priest were to start again sprinkling the
people with holy water from the top to the bottom of the church, as used to be the custom. It would
also make us flee from within the people. [43]
E: Tell the truth, on behalf of the Blessed Virgin, the whole truth and nothing but the truth! J: Another
of our tasks is to distract the congregation. When the priest goes through the church with the holy
water, the people are able to pray better. [44] Moreover, this also removes the ideas and powers of
black magic.[45]
E: On behalf of the Blessed Virgin, tell the truth!
J: The Asperges Me, the thirty-three signs of the cross, the recitation of “Oh Lord I am not worthy”
three times, and finally, at the end of the Mass, the prayer “St. Michael the Archangel”, the three “Hail
Mary's” and the “Hail Holy Queen” should all definitely be brought back. Their suppression is our
work, and, one way or another, that of the cardinals who are in our power.
E: Continue to tell the truth, on behalf of the Blessed Virgin!
THE TRIDENTINE MASS[46] OR THE NEW “ORDO MISSAE”?
J: Furthermore, Those up there (he points upward) prefer the Tridentine Mass to the Mass in German
(=also French, English - “the vernacular”) and to the New Mass, because it cannot be translated exactly.
E: Do you mean the Tridentine Mass in Latin? Tell the truth, tell the truth. Judas Iscariot, nothing but the
truth, on behalf of the Blessed Virgin!
J: The texts are difficult to translate into German. [47] That is how those inexact words have come in -
words which carry fewer blessings at Mass. [48] Everything which is not said exactly as Christ wishes
it, carries fewer blessings. This applies especially at the Consecration; the words of consecration must
be pronounced in a perfectly correct way. Not one syllable should be changed. Everything must be
done strictly correctly. Do you know how, in our place (Hell), everything is perfectly well-ordered?
Even in the Catholic Church, things are no longer conducted in such an orderly fashion as they are
where we come from.
E: Tell the truth, on behalf of the blessed Virgin, nothing but the truth!
CATHOLIC FEASTS
J: Feasts... Catholic Feasts! Everything is changed and higgledy-piggledy; dates have been altered and
the people can't find them any more. Formerly, they were able to know in advance: “Now, here is such
and such a feast coming up”... and now... (ironic laugh)
E: Tell the truth, on behalf of the Blessed Virgin!
J: Now, people don't know any longer when these feast-days occur - neither the dates, nor which
dates are fixed ones. This is a great win for us, but a senseless loss for everyone else; for there used
to be feasts for which men used to prepare themselves for weeks in advance. Now they can't do that
any more, or they do it only rarely, because they don't have the dates fixed in their minds any longer;
and in every calendar they are on different dates. How are they expected to prepare themselves? It
is not the same thing to come to the Church and celebrate a certain feast with the bishops and priests
on a certain day in a certain way, and then, later on, in their own homes, celebrate the old feast on the
old date all by themselves.
E: Tell the truth, on behalf of the Blessed Virgin!
J: But believe us, even where we live in Hell, it is the old feasts which are in force. They have much
more impact where we are then where you live, on earth. You are well aware of that already from the
Feast of Our Lady of Mount Carmel.
E: Tell the truth, nothing but the truth, on behalf of the Blessed Virgin!
RELIGIOUS ART
J: Oh yes, the Blessed Virgin! That is something else again! They put her statue right in the corner, or
better still, right at the back, in such a way that it can be seen as little as possible. Often it is a cheap
little Madonna (when you can still recognize what it is). With modern statues, it is often difficult to tell
whether they represent a gangster's moll or someone from On High (he points upward).
E: By order of the Blessed Virgin, tell the truth!
J: When there are still beautiful statues of the Blessed Virgin, people are more drawn to pray. That is
why. They up there wish that...
E: Continue, tell the truth by order of the Blessed Virgin. Say everything that she commands you to
say!
J: ...good works of art be displayed, at all events good and beautiful statues, which speak to the
people. The tabernacle should be - when this is possible - richly gilded, and installed in such a way
that the whole appearance of the church is in harmony. Let it not look like a nest for a dog - I have a
fancy to say: like a tree-house for pigs (sarcastic laugh).
E: Tell the truth, as ordered by the Blessed Virgin. Leave out expressions like that which come from
Down Below!
J: They do come from below, but I have been allowed to use them (He breathes heavily and
laboriously)
E: Continue to tell the truth, say everything the Blessed Virgin charges you to say! Continue to speak!
ECCLESIASTICAL DRESS
E: Tell the truth, in the name...! J: Priests should get back into their black clothing. We have already had
to say that before; some of the human demons said it. [57] When a priest goes out in civilian clothes,
in an open-necked shirt - or wearing a necktie for that matter - then nobody knows if he is a reporter...
(he laughs ironically)
E: Tell the truth, on behalf of the Blessed Virgin, nothing but the truth!
J: ...a diplomat, or an Executive Vice-President (full - throated laughter), or a lecturer who...
E: Tell the truth, on behalf of the Blessed Virgin, nothing but the truth!
J: who...(sarcastic laugh)
E: Tell the truth, on behalf of the Blessed Virgin; stop laughing; stop playing the fool; Speak now, by
order of the Blessed Virgin!
J: ...or a lecturer, or some other jackass prowling round looking for a “ good time”, a romantic spree.
E: Tell the truth, say only what the Blessed Virgin wishes!
J: That fits into the picture; it fits into the picture (he continues to laugh with wicked joy)
E: Tell the truth, Judas Iscariot, by order of the Blessed Virgin, say what she wishes to say!
J: That was exactly what I was doing! (he grumbles)
E: Speak, in the name of Jesus!
J: I don't want to speak!
E: You must tell the truth, speak Judas Iscariot!
J: That was the truth.
E: You must speak, by order of the Blessed Virgin!
J: When a priest goes out in a sport-shirt - preferably a stylish one - any old cat could think he was
after her. What sort of an example is that for a priest to give? What sort of example? How many of the
errors of the last years have been caused by that sort of thing. They could have been avoided if
priests were still wearing their correct, primitive, old, good, traditional...(he grumbles)
E: Tell the truth, in the name of the Blessed Virgin, say what you must say, speak!
J: ...not only good...(he sighs)
E: Tell the truth, speak, bring out the truth, the whole truth; speak, Judas Iscariot, in the name...!
J: ...their very suitable clothing, or...
E: Continue in the name...! Lucifer, you have no right to torment him!
J: In their priestly soutane, [58] their costume...! Don’t know how to put this. Let us take, for example,
the Benedictines. The habit of Saint Benedict would still suit many priests much better than crumpled,
secular clothing, which will never be able to present the imago which should he presented. Or let us
look at the habit of Saint Francis with its cowl. How many lay people's thoughts would become better
at the mere sight of this habit, even from a distance - it need not necessarily be right along side.
How many times has the salvation of a soul been made easier through that sort of thing! Many people
were made aware of the fact that there were still many priests and that God must exist in spite of
everything. Otherwise, those men would not be wearing that habit.
E: Continue to tell the truth, on behalf of the Blessed Virgin, say what you must say, what the Blessed
Virgin charges you to say, nothing but the truth!
J: And then (the person) says to himself: “If there really is a God, perhaps he could enter into me. What
must I do?” Then that works away all night in the soul of this individual and, in the end, will find the
way which will lead to a correctly-attired religious, be it a man in a black soutane or a priest in the
flowing garb of a Benedictine...I don't know the correct name for all these things.
If that happened, it would be marvelous good fortune for you and for the whole world. It would be a
tremendous advantage for souls. Thousands and thousands of souls would be saved just because of
that. How many men and women, wherever they happen to be, wherever they happen to be going,
on trains, in public places, would feel better, less neglected shall we say - they would change their
behavior (he remains silent
E: Tell the truth, Judas Iscariot! Say what the Blessed Virgin charges you to say, and nothing but the
truth, in the name...!
J: How many beneficial rays (of grace) would then come down right into the souls of these people
when they think: “He is a priest; he represents the Divine Blessing, the Blessed Sacrament, he has all
the power. God must be standing right behind him; besides, we can do nothing about the fact that we
will have to die one day...” It would be good if things were like this, as I have just said. I repeat it yet
once again, because...
E: Tell the truth, Judas Iscariot, say what the Blessed Virgin charges you to say! Lucifer, you have no
right to prevent Judas Iscariot from speaking, or to upset him, in the name...!
J: ...because it is frightful when a woman in a mini-skirt sits facing a priest in secular dress and does not
know that he is a priest. She sees from the look of him or from his general bearing, that he must be
someone quite important. She feels that in a certain way and she tries to get nearer to him. That
wouldn't happen if he were wearing the soutane or the religious habit. Things like this have already
led many priests astray - have led them to get married, and to abandon their priestly role. The
Catholic Church is in a very bad way. It has reached rock bottom.
E: Tell the truth, Judas Iscariot! Lucifer, you have no right to prevent Judas Iscariot from speaking, nor to
torment him. Judas Iscariot, say what the Blessed Virgin charges you to say!
J: (Only unintelligible, guttural noises are heard, and there is an impression of suffocating)
E: Speak, Judas Iscariot, in the name...! Lucifer, you have no right to disturb him, go away, in the name...!
February 5, 1976
E= Exorcist
Al= Allida, an angelic demon, from the Choir of Archangels.
March 30,1976
E= Exorcist
J= Judas Iscariot, a human demon
B=Beelzebub, an angelic demon, from the Choir of Seraphim.
THE CROSS AND THE HOLY SACRIFICE OF THE MASS OPEN THE GATES OF HEAVEN
B: ...He prepared Himself for forty days for His public life, and also for His great Sacrifice. He knew that
it would be a Sacrifice as vast as the world, with a universal efficacy, which He, God, would have to
offer to the Almighty, in reparation for the guilt due to sin, so that you would be able to attain the
eternal vision of God.
Without that, you would at best have seen Paradise (the Garden of Eden), nothing else, supposing that
you could have still seen even that. Also many more men would have come to Hell because they
would not have had any share in the Graces brought by the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. Countless
graces flow from the unbloody Sacrifice of the Cross, at the offering of which the Blood of Christ flows
anew.
We, down there, (he points downward) hate this Sacrifice of the Mass which is celebrated every day in
many churches. It is true that it is no longer celebrated properly in many of the houses of God.
Formerly it was frantic for us when the true, the old Sacrifice of the Mass was offered. That is, in actual
fact, the renewal of Christ's Sacrifice on the Cross, which wipes out sin and obtains marvelous graces
for the salvation of souls which, without it, would be lost by the thousands and would come to join us.
I must say this again: you are forcing me (he sighs). I am saying nothing, I do not wish to speak any
more.
E: In the name of the Most Holy Trinity, of the Most Blessed Virgin and Mother of God, Mary, of the
Immaculate Conception, in the name of Saint Michael the Archangel and of all the Holy Archangels, in
the name of Saint Joseph, Patron of the Church, and in the name of Catherine Emmerich, tell the truth,
say what the Blessed Virgin charges you to say!
B: I do not wish to say it. I no longer have the right to say it. If I must speak, then you must recite again
a little exorcism.[93] Lucifer is furious about this. He would like to throttle me; I shouldn't say that. If I
speak any more, he is going to grab me by the neck when I arrive back down below.
E: (After the recitation of the exorcism). By order of the Blessed Virgin, Lucifer has no right to do that,
because you have spoken for the Church. He has no right to harm you again!
B: I was a great angel, I was second in grandeur. That is why Lucifer gets in such a rage and says:
“Since you are so great you ought to know that you should not say stupid things like that. You must
have more control of yourself”. That's what he is going to say (his teeth chatter violently). She (he
points upward) has ordered me to speak because I was present earlier at the fall of the angels. I was
the second in importance, that is why it is I whom she forces to speak about this “filthy business”. She
always has the power to dictate to us down there (he growls vehemently).
E: Beelzebub, on her order, you must speak now and say only the truth!
CONCERNING THE NAMES OF THE ANGELIC DEMONS
B: I still have to say this: in writing these revelations, you must mention my name. You must quote my
name. With the other demons too, you must always specify who has spoken. You must do it. It is not
for nothing that we tell you who is speaking. Why do you think we do it?
E: Beelzebub, you must speak, on behalf of the Blessed Virgin!
B: She allows us to say our names... who is speaking, and then she also wished you to note who has
spoken. Concerning the important matters above all, she wants it to be known which demon she
chose, which one had to speak...
E: Beelzebub, you must speak now, in the name...!
B: ...Just because I am well known, it is essential that my name be mentioned.
E: In the name of the Blessed Virgin and Mother of God, Mary, of Saint Michael the Archangel, of all
the Choirs of Holy Angels, of St. Joseph, Patron of the Church, of all the saints of Heaven, and of
Catherine Emmerich, you must speak now and only the truth!
HUMAN STUPIDITY
B: Veroba has spoken previously on January 12, 1976, of the Warning and the Catastrophe. He said
then that that should also be put in the little book. [94] He also told why the Warning has not come
yet, and why it was paradoxical to pray. You men, you are worth nothing (laugh of wicked joy). You are
nothing, and you will be nothing. You are asses who can be told the same thing over and over again.
Have you the brains of a fly, or maybe you have a sieve for a brain?
If He up there (he points upward) did not exist, all your bones would disintegrate; it is He alone Who
supports your carcass every second without that, you would be rags and scraps. This is why we, down
there below, cannot understand how teachers, doctors and I don't know how many more, have such
insane presumption; how can they have such great presumption, although they are only dirt which will
be eaten up by worms!
E: Beelzebub, continue, in the name and by the order of the Most Holy Trinity... of the Immaculate
Conception of the Most Blessed Virgin and Mother of God, Mary, of Saint Michael the Archangel, of all
the Holy Angels and Archangels, and of all the Nine Choirs of Blessed Spirits, of all the Saints of
Heaven!
B: On the subject of this presumption, she wants this to be said in addition: she deems it entirely out
of place on the part of these people to exalt themselves so inordinately; they are an abomination in
the eyes of the Lord. She considers it entirely misplaced since she comported herself with such
perfect humility.
She would have had cause to carry her crown high and to flourish her scepter. She would have had
every reason to. Did she ever do it? At all events, not on earth. Consequently, she has been exalted in
accordance with the Scriptures, as Jesus said: “For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and
everyone who humbles himself will be exalted. [95] This means that everyone who exalts himself will,
in the end, be humbled in an extraordinary way, not just by one degree, but by innumerable degrees.
Do you understand what we mean? He who exalts himself will not be humbled by the same amount,
but a million times more. and still more than that. But he who humbles himself, however high his place
may be - we are learned, we know that! (He emphasizes what he is saying with a wave of a finger) -
according to the parable of the banquet where Jesus said: “He who puts himself in the last place will
perhaps be placed in the first place by the Master of the banquet” [96]... I mean that those who
humble themselves thus will not be exalted by the same amount. They will be placed a million times
higher than they were... and that applies for all eternity.
I have to say that it is a paradox and a monumental act of stupidity to exalt oneself on earth. I have to
say it because it is an abomination for the Lord. If men knew what they are doing, they would be
horrified with themselves (laugh of wicked joy).
E: Beelzebub, in the name of the Father... of the Immaculate, of the Most Blessed Virgin and Mother of
God, Mary, of Saint Michael the Archangel, of the Nine Choirs of Blessed Spirits, of all the Saints of
Heaven, of all the Holy Exorcists and of Catherine Emmerich, you must speak now, by order of the
Blessed Virgin!
[1] The following testimonies are in chronological order. The titles of each of the following paragraphs are not
therefore in logical order.
[2] The demons or devils are fallen angels from the 9 choirs of Angels and in descending order of excellence these
choirs are: Seraphim, Cherubim, Thrones, Dominions, Powers, Virtues, Principalities, Archangels and Angels
(guardian). Apparently damned human souls in some cases are allowed to join the ranks of devils and tempt mankind
e.g. Judas Iscariot.
This order of the Angelic choirs is as revealed by St. Michael to Antonia d' Astonac, and found in his chaplet,
approved and heavily indulgenced by Pope Pius IX in 1851.
[3] All the gestures, contortions, cries, come from the demon, but are manifested through the possessed woman. That
is why the pronoun 'he' is used: 'he' as the actual person speaking, and therefore the subject of the verb that follows.
[4] Information we have received since 1970 shows that practically ALL the Catholic Organizations and Movements
of any significance, which once were comprised of traditionalists', have been infiltrated.
[5] These are: either regularly named and consecrated bishops, but traitors like Judas; or bishops irregularly named
(by the imposter 'reigning' in the Vatican) even though they have been validly consecrated; or, a fortiori, invalidly
consecrated, or even not at all, for anything is possible today.
[6] Exorcisms (the great exorcisms of the Roman Rite) at which we have been present, and participated in through
prayer, have familiarized us with this procedure of incessant, stinging exhortations made by the exorcist. Helped by
the continuous, humble and confident prayers of the people present, they force the Devil to obey - he who is the
original rebel; They force him to tell the truth, he who is the father of lies (John 8:44). What a lesson in truth from the
Beyond.
[7] In honor of Each of the Persons in the Holy Trinity, Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
[8] See also a complementary message of June 18, 1977 and the corresponding footnote.
[9] The sufferings of Christ are sufficient on their own for the redemption and atonement, in principle, of all men. But
the faithful man is called on to share in the redemptive suffering of Christ on behalf of sinners, so that the benefits of
atonement and redemption can be applied to them. This is what the Church has to do, the Church, the Spouse of
Christ, the Mother of Souls. If it were any other way, these titles would be mere words, empty and lifeless. Hence, the
words of Paul: “I complete in my flesh, what is lacking in the sufferings of Christ” (Col 1.24)
[10] That is to say that Jesus, by His heroic “Let Thy will be done” accepted that the dark shadow of our sins would
put a veil between His Humanity and the Face of His Divine Father and His Own Divinity and Total Innocence. This
separation was made even more cruel because His sensitivity, faced with the horror of sin, and His insight, faced with
the immensity of the drama of damnation, remained that of the HOLY ONE God made Man, the “Well-beloved Son”.
[11] Maria Simma, born in Austria in 1915, having privileged communications with the souls in Purgatory, says that
most suicides are saved because they are not completely responsible for their actions as a result of the intensity of
their sufferings (physical, moral, spiritual). The action is also contrary to man's instinct for self-preservation. (Ref:
“Les Âmes du Purgatoire m'ont dit” Ed. Christiana, Stein am Rhein, Switzerland. Ed. Resicac - 53150 Montsurs)
[12] Christ would certainly have wished to redeem the demons if He had known it to be possible. As this was not the
case, it is evident that His Blood did not flow for the (angelic) demons.
Moreover, the redemption of Christ was predestined, in principle, for all men. But in its application it was necessarily
limited by their freedom to refuse. Consequently, in the final count, Christ's Blood does not profit the men who reject
it, and who, for this reason, and through their own fault, end up in Hell, where they share the unredeemable fate of
the (angelic) demons.
In this sense, the Blood of Christ did not “flow” for any of the inhabitants of Hell. Hence, Akabor's sentence: “He
would have liked to shed it for all, but, IN FACT, It did not flow for all.”
ADDITIONAL NOTE: In the consecration of the Latin words “PROMULTIS” = “FOR MANY” The current
English translation = “FOR ALL MEN” which equates to the Latin “PRO OMNIBUS”, is therefore inaccurate. The
current moves afoot to remove all forms of “Sexist discrimination” (!) from the Mass could logically lead to “FOR
ALL “, which as Jean Marty points out would imply, in effect, a denial of the existence of Hell.
[13] The demon's admission indicates that, because in the new “ordo missae” the Holy Mass has been thrown into
disorder, there has been an immense loss in the number of graces flowing from it. So, in a time of dereliction, when
the attacks of the demon are becoming more and more subtle and strong, the graces received are becoming fewer and
weaker. Hence the lack of recognition of the spiritual enemy who is attacking so many Christians who end up by
giving in and losing their foothold, and of the blindness which strikes so many of the consecrated who end up in
error, while persuading themselves that they are on the right road.
[14] Michel Servant wrote in 1972: “The new Mass is still valid... for if we are not deluding ourselves regarding the
plans of the 'Synarchy' - certain members of whom hold key positions in the Church - these modifications (of the
ordo missae) are only a first stage in their thinking.” The second stage will result in the invalidation of the Mass by the
total suppression of its sacrificial nature.
[15] “The True Mass” - this is the expression used by Our Lord in His messages to Jeannette of France since June 23,
1967 (“Parce Domine”distributed by theT.R.C. Association).
[16] Mark (13,22)
[17] Totally in agreement with the messages received by Jeannette of France - thus: “The Devil is in several from
among them (bishops) and those ones, unfortunately, are leading the others” (November 3, 1970). The Lord had said
on October 31: “If it “were not for the supplications of just souls, I would already have reduced them to dust”.
[18] It is appropriate here to recall the words of the gospel:
(A) At the moment of the washing of the feet: “The devil had already put it into the heart of Judas, son of Simon, the
Iscariot to betray him” (John 13,2)
(B) Possession follows soon after Judas' acquiescence: “Then after Judas had taken the bread, Satan entered him”
(John 13,27)
(C) There is also the affirmation of Jesus, at the end of His discourse on the Bread of Life: “Yet one of you is a devil.”
St John adds: “He spoke of Judas son of Simon Iscariot” (John 6 70-71)
(D) Finally, there is the declaration of Jesus during His sacerdotal prayer: “Only one of them” (of those whom His
Holy Father had given Him) “has been lost, he whom perdition claims for his own.” (John 17,12)
[19] Jesus died for all men. It is Judas, a human demon, who is speaking here, and not, as previously, an angelic
demon (Akabor, on that occasion).
[20] What appalling suffering for this victim soul.
[21] Peter denied his Master, publicly and three times; then “he went out”...”and wept bitterly” (Matt 26,75). Judas
betrayed his Master and delivered Him up: then “he went out”...”and hanged himself”. (Matt 27,5) The greatest sin for
man is not to believe in the Mercy, the Infinite Mercy of God.
[22] Hell is an inevitable consequence of “freedom” when that is the highest prerequisite of Love.
Love can always be rejected. A temporary rejection during time, an eternal rejection in Eternity. Everything in time is
a preparation and is fixed finally at the moment of death, which is that of the passage to Eternity. Because of what is at
stake at this crucial, decisive moment, the soul benefits then from the supplementary grace of “the Great Celestial
Light” (cf. our leaflet, published under this title and distributed by the Association “Tout restaurer dans le Christ”) The
existence of Hell is a dogma of the Church (Cf. Fourth Lateran Council, 1215 - and many other documents of the
magisterium).
[23] “One must blame the manipulators of the episcopal conferences where the wolf in lamb's clothing figures
prominently” ('Parce Domine' - message of July 2. 1971)
[24] See the preceding note.
[25] See also the message of May 11, 1975 ('Parce Domine'), in particular: “God must be obeyed rather than man.” “It
is not the bad bishops who will be their judges on the last day, but I.”
[26] Questions and exclamations of astonishment...!
[27] Let us pray that the priests and seminarians of Ecône remain quite small and stay very humble, as befits their
great responsibility, to prevent the devil gaining a hold -the devil, who is at work there as elsewhere, and even more
than elsewhere (he, himself, confirms that in these exorcisms)... and not without success.
P.S. We read in the exorcism of January 23, 1978, through the voice of Judas Iscariot: “Mgr. Lefebvre must literally
follow the Way of the Cross and of Humility.” Refer Matt 10, 24: “There is no disciple better than his master.”
[28] Saint Luke wrote in the Acts of Apostles concerning Judas, after his suicide, applying these words of the Psalms
to him: “Let another take over his office” (Acts 1, 20- Ps 109,8)
this was translated by Pere Feder in his Missal (1958 edition) as: “Qu'un autre prenne sa place dans l'episcopat.”, a
literal translation from the Vulgate: “Et episcopatum ejus accipiat alter.” (Let another take his place in the episcopacy)
[38] Confirmation from Beelzebub, during the exorcism of November 7, 1977: “That which today calls itself the
Church, has not for a long time been the Church in the eyes of Those On High...”
[39] “IN THE VATICAN” (Beelzebub. Exorcism of November 7, 1977). The demon gives the following details: The
greater part of the time, (he is) in his apartments. Occasionally, they whisk him away rapidly when visitors come.”
(And the other Pope - the double - is brought in) “THE GREATER PART OF THE TIME” - “the old one, the real one
is no longer present except rarely... One can't say 'present'... when he mounts his dais, they must first give him an
injection to revive him so that he can speak just a little bit...”
[40] Without forgetting the sacrilegious horrors of the black masses, called correctly “masses of Satan” by the
“initiated”.
[41] The context further on will show that it is not strictly all the cardinals who are concerned. We have already seen
that.
[42] “Now” that Satan dominates everywhere, even within the Church..
[43] Holy water, in all its sacred uses, is a sacramental, whose ' precious effects are indicated in the liturgical prayer
for the blessing of the water:
“Holy and pure be this water of your creating, kept free from all the enemy's assaults and cleansed by the withdrawal
of every sort of evil. Make it a living fount, a life-giving water, a cleansing stream that all who are due to be bathed in
this bath of salvation may have the Holy Spirit at work within them and receive the grace to be wholly clean” Thus,
holy water is a “bath of salvation”, a preparation for the “Holy Spirit at work”. It is therefore the sign and the
instrument of redemption.
[44] See the preceding note.
[45] It can never be said too often: “The Church of Satan” stands, always and everywhere, in opposition to the Holy
Church of God. All churches and chapels are the targets for black magic practices directed against them from a
distance. So, Ecône would be encircled by nine places of satanic cult, all concentrated against it. It is a miracle how it
has resisted - and is resisting - such diabolical attacks.
[46] This is its true name. Because of earlier abuses and certain divergencies, the general rules for Mass were
specified by the Council of Trent (Decree: “Da Sacrificio Missae” of September 17, 1562; whence its name “Tridentine
Mass”); then codified, “ritualized” by a later decree of Saint Pius V (Bull: “Quo Primum” of July 14, 1570; whence its
current name “Mass of Pius V”).
[47] The same applies to French, English - all “living languages”. Having the characteristics of a non-spoken language
which is no longer evolving, Latin through its unchanging nature places a considerable curb on the kind of fantastic
interpretations or fallacious translations which are found so frequently in the vernacular texts. The demon himself
gave a precise example of this (See “THE HOLY MASS” Page 6)
[48] See “THE HOLY MASS” on page 7, and note 13 there.
[49] These are two separate things, but through what one has been able to read, one can understand that, even apart
from the superiority of the Tridentine Rite in itself, there is also the superiority of Latin (over the vernacular).
[50] By your own (demons') authority.
[51] It seems clear that the demon, unwilling mouthpiece for Our Lady, has left aside, probably through lack of
specific instructions from the Universal Queen, the masculine reactions and thoughts at such limes, when piety is
certainly conspicuous by its absence, to say the very least! The remarks we have heard on this subject leave us in no
doubt of this.
[52] “No women in the sanctuary. These practices are against my wishes” (Parce Domine”, message of July 2, 1972)
[53] In actual fact, the Church has always differentiated between men and women with regard to sacred things,
obviously connecting this with the fact that, as Christ established His Church, only men are eligible for the Priesthood.
That is why, for many centuries, the Church has permitted the majority of the functions of Minor Orders (Porter,
Reader, Acolyte) to be exercised by simple laymen.
In our day, the modern movement has wanted to go much further, pushing forward to the function strictly reserved
for Deacons and Priests: the distribution of Holy Communion.
It Is obvious that, In quite exceptional circumstances (persecutions, wars, concentration camps), - such as we have
known under Nazi barbarism, and which are also looming up again with Soviet-Communist barbarism -laymen can
be authorized (or can even presume authorization) to touch the Sacred Species for legitimate reasons.
But it must be remembered that giving Communion is, in its very nature, an act of Priesthood. That is why it belongs
normally to the priest and, marginally only, to the deacon (if the priest cannot cope); the deacon being invested with
the lowest, although still very real, degree of the Sacrament correctly called Orders. (See Council of Trent, Session
23)
[54] Beelzebub. Exorcism of November 7, 1977: “The world today wants to be seen. It wants women in the sanctuary,
smart as new pins, well coiffured. No matter that the Mother of God never held office in the Church; no matter that:
Christ said that women no longer had the right to enter the Holy of Holies, as a punishment, because Original Sin
came from Eve and she was the first to fall. Christ said that a little while before His Passion...”
[55] This concerns the 'Warning”, which was announced by the Blessed Virgin at Garabandal, on January 1, 1965,
through the voice of Conchita. One can legitimately think that the present “Warnings from the Beyond” are a merciful
prelude to the “Warning of Garabandal” which is the last act of Mercy before the Chastisements, the great
Chastisements.
[56] Jesus spoke to Carmela, September 29, 1969: “The Archangel, Saint Michael... humility in truth is the virtue
which makes him strong and which he points out and obtains for those who ask for it, through his intercessions.”
“These writings (the teachings of Heaven as dictated to Carmela Carabelli of Milan) are truly riches of faith and holy
ardour for the cause of God.” (Mgr. P. Pletro Santoro, Bishop of Termoll, for the Imprimatur)
[57] In an earlier exorcism, not published in this work.
[58] One must believe that the soutane impedes the demon terribly, that it is, in itself, an obstacle to his work,
because it took repeated orders from the exorcist to make the word come out of Judas's mouth.
[59] In contrast to false “Renewal”, called charismatic, in which the devil plays the star part.
[60] Compare: “To those who, breaking away from human respect and servile fear, will take up the True Mass again,
I promise very abundant graces of light, and the return of the faithful towards them.” (Message May 11, 1975 “Parce
Domine”)
[61] “Disasters and misfortunes will proliferate without respite throughout the world, as long as the True Mass Is not
re-established”. (“Parce Domine” message of November 15, 1974)
[62] See Note 65.
[63] Ah, yes! The remedy would be worse than the sickness. The mere presence of Paul VI (even in his powerless
state) is sometimes like a stopcock against the action of the ecclesiastical subversion of the Vatican. All that will
become clearer during the following pages. And the whole truth will come out publicly, at its due time.
[64] It is obvious that this sweeping expression, so cunningly used by the demon: “by means of the cardinals”, must
be understood to refer to part of the Sacred College, and not to all Its members. It concerns cardinals subject to
Satan's influence, whether consciously or unconsciously. In what proportion are they - the ones who are and the
ones who aren't? God alone knows the answer to that.
[65] “As smoke is driven away so drive them away; as wax melteth before the fire, so let the wicked perish at the
presence of God” - (Prayer of Exorcism, Ps. 67 V.2)
[66] Beelzebub is next to Lucifer in the hierarchy of Hell.
[67] “You will say to him: Well-beloved Holy Father, it is the True Mass which will assure the peace of the world”
(“Parce Domine” -message of November 15, 1974)
[68] “What is veiled will all be revealed, what is hidden will all be known”. (Matt 10,26) The treacherous cardinals
and disloyal prelates may be sure of that!
[69] John, 16,2
[70] 1976 (January 12) + 10-1986. The private prophecies, which have been collected by Michel Servant and
published In 1972 in his book: “Veillez et priez car l'Heure est proche” (Watch and pray for the hour is close),
unanimously place the progressive arrival of the chastisements (which have commenced in a diminished form) at
around the years 1980-1984, the same conclusion also being found in the books by Pierre Roberdel on Marie-Julie
Jahenny (ed. Rasiac, 1972-1977, 53150 Montsurs).
[71] Cf. Matt 24,42 and 25,13.
[72] This concerns the “Warning” of Garabandal.
[73] That seems to call for more precise details. The leaders were surely more aware of what they were doing and
their motives, than the people, always able to be influenced by (he abuse of authority (although not so much as
today). Furthermore, it is obvious that everything in the Catholic Church at that time was not exemplary.
[74] In fact Zwingle (Zurich 1518)- a contemporary of Luther (Wittenberg 1517) - under the direct influence of the
leader of Hell, quickly went further than the most advanced positions of Luther, who was driven by mere demons.
This revelation by the demon, Allida, explains many things, including the present time.
[75] All that is not altogether incorrect, psychologically speaking, but it is very pessimistic. It shows the devil
publicizing his own house. He would like us to believe that grace is powerless to act.
[76] This book of demoniacal “Warnings”
[77] The fault means the sin, and sin in general which is a revolt against God. “The man who commits sin, violates
order; sin of its nature is disorder”. (1 John 3.4)
[78] See: 'THE PREACHER PRIEST AND HIS AUDIENCE'
[79] The custom of celebrating a Mass each day came only gradually, particularly in the Latin Church. But the other
side of this old custom is the scrupulous care taken in preparation, and often also the importance and the quality of
the ceremony.
[80] This is the same expression used by Mary of Agreda in “The Mystical City of God”, which is Mary. It was during
the course of a second diabolical “Council”, held in Hell after the death of Christ, that a new plan for the domination
of the world was established, as in future men would have “a powerful advocate in this new Woman”.
This plan is now being put into practice by the High Council of the Synarchy, as has been disclosed equally by Michel
Servant and several other authors (Pierre Virion, Henry Coston, Jacques Ploncard d'Assac, Jacques Bordiot);
throughout this book, the demons are pointing out the terrible consequences of this.
[81] The devil having no power over Mary, the magicians, mere tools of the demon have, a fortiori, no power over
her.
[82] To “ponder” in a parallel sort of way. Pure spirits, as the demons are, experience more of a process of activity
within their intelligence, but that takes place without a brain, and thus in a different, purely spiritual way.
[83] In the broad sense of the word, Saint Mark and Saint Luke were not members of the group of Twelve Apostles.
The New Testament actually distinguishes between “The Twelve” and the “apostles” in general in the sense used
here.
[84] The inspired work of Mary of Agreda, the writing of which was completed in 1665, bears the title; “The Divine
History of Life of the Virgin Mother of God” or: “The Mystical City of God”. It comprises eight books which the
demon Beelzebub has just cursed. It was translated into English by Rev. Father George J. Blatter of Chicago in 1912,
and this English version is published in four volumes. It is available from Ray's Catholic Book Store, Necedah,
Wisconsin 54646, at a cost of $35.00 for the 4 volumes.
[85] League = 5 miles
[86] St. Louis de Montfort wrote in his “Study on True Devotion to the Blessed Virgin”: “She presents (our) good
works to Jesus Christ; for in the end, she keeps for herself NOTHING of what is presented to her; she faithfully returns
everything to Jesus”.
[87] If they could say more about her...but they are not able to.
[88] The English edition consists of two volumes and is entitled “The Life of Anne Catherine Emmerich” by Carl E.
Schmöger, C.S.S.R. It is available from Tan Books, P.O. Box 424, Rockford, Illinois 61106 at a cost of $18.00. Also
available from Tan Books is “The Life of Jesus Christ and biblical Revelations of Anne Catherine Emmerich in 4
volumes 2,088 pages. These books include “The Dolorous Passion of OUR Lord Jesus Christ,” mentioned by the
demons. This is in volume 4, set of 4, cost $25.00. Tan also has available an abridged version of Mary of Agreda's
Mystical City of God (1 volume) cost $10.00, 800 pages. These books are also available from many other Catholic
Book stores.
[89] Same title in English.
[90] A clearly pejorative expression in the mouth of the demon to describe these works. Jean Marty translated this
literally from the German as: “Ce sont tous des nains de chaumieres”, making the point that it makes no more sense in
German than in French. A literal translation from the French into English would be: “Dwarfs/midgets/pigmies from
thatched cottages” - in context, “village idiots” seems a reasonable English rendition.
[91] Through a privileged soul, the Lord asked Michel Servant on June 12, 1971 to “distribute my hidden sorrows
widely!” They were published as an illustrated booklet and have been circulated by the Association “Tout Restaurer
dans le Christ” since 1972. Then the Lord asked again, but this time that everybody should “spread my hidden
sorrows” (June 4, 1972). Innumerable and incredible graces, both spiritual and material, have been obtained by this
devotion to the hidden sorrows of Jesus. We can bear witness to that. How very much in accord this is with the
avowals dragged out of the demon!
[92] Jesus was always perfectly aware of what He was: God and Man. However. He so totally identified Himself with
the misery of sinners, whom He loved and wished to save, that this apparently excessive expression is still in line with
classical theology.
[93] What a lesson for all of us! If the little exorcism (that of Saint Michael, prescribed by Leo XIII) -which can be
said by lay people as well as by priests - forces the demon, by his own admission, to speak, it can just as well force
him to flee.
[94] We know that this Is a reference to this work “Warnings from the Beyond” - warnings transmitted, albeit
unwillingly, by the demons. They persist, and for a reason, in calling this work “little”. Fundamentally, this is most
valuable testimony for the book.
[95] Luke 14,11.
[96] From the parable about the choice of places by those invited to a banquet (Luke 14, 7-11).
[97] The wounds of the stigmata.
[98] Truth, that is the habit of telling the truth. It is therefore the exact opposite of the devil's habit - he who is “the liar,
the father of lies.” (John 8,44)
[99] “Long debates on the question of the writer of “The Imitation of Christ” ended in the authorship of this
admirable treatise on mysticism being attributed to him.” (Larousse, ed. of 1964)
[100] It is always the same procedure, characteristic of ecclesiastical Subversion, constantly applied since Vatican II
in the translation of all texts, liturgical and other. Many examples may be found in the 3rd volume of Michel Servant's
work “Veillez et priez...” (“Watch and Pray...”), on the subject of the New Mass in particular.
[101] Who has not recognized the Very Holy and Adorable Trinity: Father, Son and Holy Spirit?
[102] “The wicked ones will make several attempt son his life (that of the Holy Father) in those days. (Message of La
Salette of September 9, 1846)
[103] Probably an allusion to the “great battle” - which is spoken of in the Secret of Fatima - between the faithful
Christians (helped by the Angels and the Saints) and the impious (helped by the demons); a battle which must take
place at the end of the Time of the Chastisement and which will be followed by the dawn of the Renewal, of the
Spiritual Reign of Jesus and Mary.
[104] In October 1975
[105] If, when each of us bears his share of responsibility for the “self-destruction” of the Church, all faithful Catholics
had reacted positively and had used the divine weapons of prayer and penance on the Holy Father's behalf, instead of
those sterile and inauspicious weapons of diatribe, polemics and even accusation, then the clusters of corrupt wills,
both diabolical and human, who impede and smother Pope Paul VI, would have been denounced by God a long
time ago. For He alone can do it, and the truth will be brought to light.
[106] Mark 13, 21
[107] This is the goal pursued by Michel Servant in his book (1972) where he analyses in the light of deeds and
events, (past, present and to come), private prophecies, particularly those of Anne-Catherine Emmerich and Mary of
Agreda.
[108] Disbelief - of other people with regard to them.
[109] (1) Message from Jesus to a French priest through Jeannette: “Suggest to him that he say each day, after Mass,
the exorcism of Leo XIII for the Church. Let him invite his colleagues to do the same...” (Parce Domine”- July 10,
1972)
Moreover, In his explanatory commentary on Passiontide, Father Feder writes In his missal (page 343 of English
Version, “Layman's Daily Missal, Prayer Book and Ritual” published In 1962): “In the gospel accounts of the plots and
schemes of Christ's enemies we see the incompatibility of our own ignoble ambitions with love for Christ...man will
not accept Him Who presents Himself as the Son of God”
It is always the same “plot” which continues through the centuries to our own times - to destroy the Church through
the destruction of its Head. A plot which, after the Passion of the Church and its apparent death, will end with Christ's
victory and the triumph of His Church.
[110] That is why the almost unbelievable numbers of “miracles”, “conversions” and “cures” worked by the
“charismatic” Catholics (and even more by the “Pentecost” Protestants) appear to us, on the whole, to point to a
diabolical cause (as the demon, Beelzebub, explains very clearly here by order of the Holy Spirit), rather than the
Holy Spirit, whatever the part of faith, love and fervent, often very emotional, prayers of the participants In
charismatic “Renewal” or Pentecostalism.
[111] Therein lies particularly, the extreme difficulty of the present time. The phenomenon is linked with the
extraordinary power of the demon over the last century. In how many authentic privileged souls, sometimes very
well known, there is a mixture (supernatural, human and diabolical in the messages that they receive! And it is very
difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff.
[112] 1 Thess. 5, 21
[113] Our Lord, Jesus, clearly warned us of this: “The kingdom of God comes unwatched by men's eyes; there will be
no saying, See, it is here, See, it is there; the kingdom of God is here, within you” (Luke 17. 20-21)
[114] Free quotation from Saint Matthew 24, 24; or Saint Mark 13-22
[115] Saint Luke 21, 29-31
[116] (3) After completing a detailed analysis of hundreds of private prophecies, spread out over fifteen hundred years,
and having compared them with revelations from the Scriptures, Michel Servant has reached the following
conclusion, confirmed by the Secret message of Fatima: the Spiritual Renewal, marked by the triumph of the Church
and the general conversion will take place before the year 2000 ('Veillez et priez..., Chap XVI and XVII principally)
[117] His “day” par excellence, the Last Day, the Day of the Last Judgment. But here also, by analogy, His “day” nearer
at hand, of the events which are coming which will be followed by the Spiritual Reign of Jesus and Mary, of the Son
and of the Mother, over our world.
PART TWO
AUTHOR'S NOTE
During the course of the exorcisms and adjurations, the demons, on behalf of the Blessed Virgin,
demanded most insistently that the revelations about the double be published in the book.
We have been much less hesitant to do so, now that the work of Theodor Kolberg, “Der Betrug des
Jahrhunderts” (The Deception of the Century) - published by the author in November 1977 contains,
amongst others, the photographic proof of the existence of Paul VI's double, and of his activities as
impersonator and of the deception in the Vatican.[5]
April 25,1977
E=Exorcist
B=Beelzebub
E: In the name of Jesus, tell the truth, Beelzebub, in the name of the Precious Blood of Jesus Christ,
speak!
B: She (he points upward) makes me say: Alas! Alas! Some of the cardinals who surround the Pope
are wolves and...
E: In the name of Jesus, continue! In the name of the Most Holy Trinity, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, tell
the truth, nothing but the truth, say what the Blessed Virgin orders you to say!
B: ...If they were not so, they would not be able to maintain in position with such subtle skill, a man
who is playing the part of a second Pope, or rather of the first one, for the true Pope is the one in the
background.
E: Continue, say what you have to say, in the name of Jesus!
B: It is said that they are doing this, for in this way they are condemning the true Pope to many cruel
sufferings, which he would otherwise not have to endure.
E: Continue, in the name of Jesus, speak, Beelzebub!
B: However, we are doing everything to prevent people from becoming aware that there is a second
Pope functioning. We are shrewder than all men put together. We are doing everything to keep that
hidden...
E: Speak, Beelzebub, in the name of Jesus!
B: I have said that they can keep it hidden with a subtle skill and that even “traditionalist” priests and
lay people do not want to believe it nor to acknowledge it. But, unfortunately - for you, I mean - that is
the way it is.
E: Speak, in the name of the Most Holy Trinity!
B: They say: “There is no double. It isn't possible; there is only one Pope.”
E: What else must you add? In the name...!
B: This must be said: Be prudent and as cunning as the serpents!
E: Speak, Beelzebub, in the name of Jesus!
B: Be prudent and cunning like the serpents, but do not be in a hurry to give the lie to it, for...(the
words don't come)
E: In the name of Jesus, speak only the truth!
B: For there reigns (in a loud voice) in actual fact, there reigns a false Pope, [6] an imitation Pope[7]... It
is important that people are woken up gradually, for they are nearly all asleep.
E: Beelzebub, what else must you still say, in the name of Jesus...? Speak only the truth, say what the
Blessed Virgin wishes!
B: We are now confusing laymen, priests and bishops, and goodness knows who else! We are seeking
to confuse everyone everywhere, and to whisper in their ears...We can even blind the cardinals who
come and go in the Vatican. We can organize things in such a way that they are not even aware of it to
begin with.
Surgery has made so much progress today that it will soon be able to make a man the same as
another even to the feel of him[8] (As to his breathing, that is difficult.) And when a man lives in the
Vatican - as the double does - the cardinals can, at their leisure, talk to him, and teach him all the
habits and mannerisms of the true Pope so well, that he has no difficulty in imitating all this mimicry.
Only, sometimes, he makes a small blunder, but nobody notices it.
June 10,1977
E: Is the double still alive? Tell the truth!
B: Yes, he is still alive. We still have the luck that he is living. If he had been assassinated, that would
be our contriving, so that the whole affair could be hushed up. We must say, by Her order (the Blessed
Virgin) that he is still in existence. The Pope is suffering a great torment, as we have already had to
say. If he had been at the helm, able to say what he would like to say, the Church would never have
reached the situation where it now is.
He lives wretchedly in his apartments and is waiting for better time to return for the Church. Yet
everything seems hopeless. He is literally tormented by his subordinates who should support and
help him in his task and, in the grave situation in which the Church finds itself, back him up in
everything.
Instead of that - we don't want to say it - instead of that, we are able to arrange it so that he is no
longer as competent. He doesn't have much to say any more. He is a martyr. [9] I have said that
previously. He is in a worse situation than the martyr, Stephen. He is very much loved up there (he
points upward) - very much loved. And we must say yet again -about what comes from those
insubordinate cardinals and those false...it must not he obeyed. E: Does Pope Paul VI know that he
has a double?
B: At all events, he knows what is going on. He knows that...that... [10] He is suffering unspeakably[11]
because, owing to what those cardinals are doing, it is not what heaven and what he himself would
wish which is published in the world and in the Church, and which reaches the bishops. He is very
well aware that he is like a prisoner, that he is, as it were, a prisoner of the Vatican. He suffers a great
torment because of this.[12]
Because some cardinals do not obey him and also deal in many things which are not the Will of God,
Judas was forced to say on August 17, 1975, that now it is no longer necessary to obey them.
Judas said then: “One cannot obey wolves, and no sheep throws itself into the jaws of the wolf.” That
should be shouted from the rooftops. All the bishops should be told that what comes from certain
cardinals is not the truth, and because of that, obedience is not required. But they are all so blind, so
completely and utterly blind, that they do not want to recognize this.
Then there is still another factor: these three senior cardinals (or “controllers”). [13] There are some of
them in it, but those are the worst. Because to a large extent, they are in communication with us, we
are able to organize and camouflage everything they are doing in such a way that the people are not
aware of it. That is our good fortune. We are happy that they are unaware of it. If the infernal game
those three cardinals are playing ever came to light...!
In former times, during the fifteenth century, that sort of thing would have led them to the stake as
sorcerers. But today - it is a phenomenon of the time - all those who preach and do good are victims
of discrimination and are harassed. On the other hand, those who do evil, who squabble with their co-
religionists and who act in such a diabolical way...who are involved in plots - which can never, or only
with extreme difficulty, be discovered - those are the ones who are much better off. They are
accepted as being good and very competent, they must be obeyed and what comes from them is
perfect.
It is inevitable that, in this insane and disoriented epoch, that we, down there (he points downward),
very often make that which is evil and artificial and which leads, or can lead, to apostasy under the
guise of obedience, appear to be good...on the other hand, we make that which is good be
considered disobedience, deliberate irreligion and a lack of humility. So it is with Mgr. Lefebvre.
Among the communists and freemasons, [14] there are some who receive such strength from us that
they are unable to sleep, neither day or night - they can only work unceasingly to harm the Church.
We give them the strength, we have the ability. We have such power that, if they make an alliance with
us, we can give them the strength to harm the Church, in a way not spoken of in any book. Absolutely
nothing has been said about what we are doing and what is being plotted by the freemasons and by
certain cardinals.
E: Is the Pope informed about the cardinals? Has he investigated them? In the name of the Most
Blessed Virgin Mother of God, tell us the truth!
B: He went into it a long time ago; he knows everything, everything, but he can do nothing. As we
have said, his hands and feet are tied. He can do nothing, he receives injections. The doctor - listen
carefully - who treats the Pope, is manipulated in such a way that the Pope receives certain poisons
which are harmful to his head and to his mind. But in spite of that, he knows perfectly well what is
good.
The Blessed Virgin does not, for example, permit it that he might say one day: “I excommunicate Mgr.
Lefebvre.” That She would never allow.
His strength is always so paralysed, so reduced, that he no longer has the power to stand alone
against the others. That is his martyrdom. It is a heavy trial and is permitted from On High. He is, as we
have said, a martyr Pope.[15] He who does not believe this will see, his eyes will be opened.
Then what a blow that will be for us! We are working day and night to prevent these things coming to
light. Many are already aware, but the majority are not.
E: If God wished it, it will come to light in spite of your work. In the name...tell us the truth!
B: The true (truth) will always come out; it always comes out in the end. But when it does, many
people will suffer frightfully; they will suffer frightfully as a result of it, just as the Pope, the true Pope, is
suffering now.
At the same time, I must say again, because things always happen as Those up there wish, and as it is
They who began the development of this book...I must say: that of the important revelations, and of
the revelations of the book in general, there is not one which has not been made and written as
Heaven wishes now, and wished it in the past, and in accordance with the Will of On High. Even with
the minor revelations. They do not allow them to he false. Nevertheless, if anyone should not believe
them, we would rejoice about that.
Fundamentally, the Blessed Virgin is always and in every way in command against us. If only She also
had a little less power! She reduces us to nothing - our actions, I mean. She is making me say what
She wishes at this time of great and frightful confusion: it is that the good people should at least be in
agreement with each other and that they should have, as far as possible, one single way of speaking
and acting. One must not say: “There is no double, I do not believe it”, while another says: “There is
one”. There must be unity.
Because of this, She wishes it to be published strongly and insistently: the double does exist.
E: How does one recognize the double?
B: We have already had to tell you that previously. Pick up the manuscripts, there is more about it in
them than we wanted to say; single out the revelations in which we spoke about the double on earlier
occasions, and then read Kolberg's book: “Conspiracy in the Vatican?” [16]
E: Is what Kolberg wrote correct?
B: It is correct.
E: Has Kolberg written the truth? In his book, “Conspiracy in the Vatican?”, is he telling the truth?
B: Kolberg tells the truth in his book. He has only a few small things that are not completely correct;
but that is not very important.
E: 'Is the evidence of the voice recording [17] authentic?
Voice prints (same exact words, different voice signatures):
Photos are only one type of physical evidence to distinguish identity. Other physical evidence
includes fingerprints, voice-prints, medical findings, etc. In his Umsturz im Vatikan? (An Overthrow in
the Vatican?), Kolberg presents further evidence for the existence of the impostor pope. Voice
recordings of the Latin "Urbi et Urbi" speech of "the Pope" were made on two different occasions. The
two recordings were passed through a voice-frequency analyzer made by Kay Elemetrics of Pine
Brook, New Jersey. The output Type B/65 sonagram voice prints of the same words pronounced by
the "the Pope" on two occasions shows that they they were made by two different men.
B: That damned evidence of the voice recording is authentic. [18] We (demons) have been
responsible for its being placed in doubt and rejected...the majority of the collaborators were men
who work more with us than with the other side...There are also among them, those who say what is
not true, in order that they may destroy him (Pope Paul VI) and his words... How we are forced to say
that!
E: Have you anything else to say, or is that the lot?
B: She wants nothing more said today, except finally that what she has caused to be said, must be
paid attention to.[19]
INDULGENCES
E: What about indulgences? Can a Pope suppress indulgences that another Pope has granted? Tell
the truth, and nothing but the truth, in the name...!
B: He can say that the indulgences are no longer valid... but they continue to be valid.
E: Why do they continue to be valid? He still has the power to bind and to loose. In the name...!
B: There is not the full power to loose, if he has not absolutely wished it, She makes me say. [21]
E: Tell the truth!
B: That is the entire truth![22]
MISUNDERSTANDINGS
E: We wish to carry out the Will of God, the will of the Most Blessed Virgin. We would like to work for
the glory of the Most Blessed Virgin.
B: Yes, that is what you would like. We know that, but it will bring you misunderstandings. We are
telling you.
E: But we can accept these misunderstandings for the glory of the Blessed Virgin. B: You must offer it
up for the Church, in union with the Cross of Christ, through and with the Blood of Christ which has
been shed for you... and through the Immaculate Heart of Mary. You must offer it for the Holy Church...
Nothing should be too great a cost for you (he mutters with irritation.)
E: We are going to thank the Blessed Virgin for having made you tell us that.
B: It is something above all thanks, She makes me say (he points upward). But what is not beyond all
thanks? Was it perhaps the Death of Christ on the Cross?... Was that within the range of your
gratitude? When He was insulted and covered in filth by His own people, who previously were crying
out to Him: “Hosanna!”... was this within the extent of your gratitude? You are worth much less (than
Christ)...
That Woman up there makes me say that as He suffered Death on the Cross, as He had to undergo all
that, so you must also walk in His steps and you must take these misunderstandings upon
yourselves... until the situation arising out of this has reached the point where Those up there wish -
where the Great Lady expressly wishes. That is what She makes me say (he breathes painfully)
BE AS HARD AS GRANITE
E: For the glory of the Blessed Virgin, say what She still wishes you to tell us, in the name...!
B: Once again, She makes me say: Be as hard as granite, as firm as iron, as inflexible as marble! Pursue
good, step by step...Look neither to the right nor to the left, neither towards the east nor towards the
west, neither ahead nor behind... Look simply and solely upward... towards what she wishes (he
points upward) and what is the truth. And that means towards Her. That is what the Great Lady makes
me say.
E: Continue, in the name...!
THE SACRAMENTS
B: The Sacraments...that is precisely what we do not want to talk about. It is a subject we would prefer
not to tackle. Things are now the way they are.
E: In the name... say only what the Most Blessed Virgin wishes!
B: Whether we should now say more about it or not, things are now the way they are and you cannot
do anything more to change them.
E: That depends! What does the Most Blessed Virgin wish? Tell the truth, and nothing hut the truth, in
the name...!
B: If only you had all stayed at home! What is it you want? E: We want to carry out the Will of God. Tell
us therefore, what the Blessed Virgin wishes to tell us about the Sacraments.
April 25,1977
As this text is connected with the subject of the Sacraments, it has been inserted here.
PRUDENCE IN JUDGMENT
E: In the name...!
B: There are some quite sincere people who believe that this comes from the Pope and who do not
know of the existence of a double. Nor do they know that it is a sin to receive Communion in the
hand. They do not wish to stand out from the crowd nor to be conspicuous; they do not know, for
example, what is said in the book, “Warnings...”, or what has been said previously through authentic
privileged souls, namely that Communion should not be taken in the hand; such people are not
committing a serious sin;[52] it is not their fault if the priest does things that way.
And then, there is also this: in many churches, when people genuflect and wish to receive
Communion in the mouth, they are made to feel unpopular as far as the priest is concerned. In that
case also, the sin is not so serious. He up there (he points upward) judges each case individually. It
cannot be said categorically that such a person will go to Hell because he receives Communion in the
hand, when he does not know that this practice is not desired up there.
These people act through obedience and believe that it comes from the Pope, because they do not
know that there is a double and that there are some cardinals who are disloyal to the Pope. They go
along under the banner of obedience. I want to say that if these Christians should happen to get hold
of tracts coming from other genuinely privileged souls, or from priests, which warn them that they
have no right and should not, and if they receive the interior light - which, when received certainly
comes from On High - and if, in spite of everything, they do the opposite, saying to themselves: “It's all
the same whether I receive Communion in the mouth or in the hand - it is of no importance”, then the
situation is different. Then, naturally, it is a sin. That is what else we must tell you. It depends always on
each individual case.
The same thing applies to the Holy Mass. The Mass of Saint Pius V is considered by Those up there
(he points upward), by Heaven, to the preferred Mass. But many priests should be told that they have
no right to trouble (or upset) people by saying: “If there is no Mass of Saint Pius V, do not go at all... say
a Mass[53] for yourselves at home on your own”.
This attitude is not good. In spite of everything, such a priest is not a good pastor (shepherd). For we
have already said it on a previous occasion: It is a huge loss of graces, it is true, but the New Mass to
the degree in which it is celebrated in all good faith and through obedience to the bishop, still brings
nevertheless, many graces. Even if it does not have the plenitude of graces of the Mass of Saint Pius
V, it brings some graces all the same. If people stay at home and believe that they only have to open
up their missals, thus believing themselves to be better and superior to the rest, this is not good.
There are also some “traditionalists” who exalt themselves above the modernists. Those up there do
not want any of that. That is not the Spirit of On High (he points upward). They think in Heaven that
this smacks of phariseeism, and no one has the right to be like that. She makes me say that there are
also many “traditionalists” who are full of themselves... We do not wish to speak any more!
TRADITIONALISTS
E: In the name...!
B: There are numbers of “traditionalists”, as many lay people as priests, who are full of self-
righteousness, who are steeped in a kind of new phariseeism. They say, and sometimes they preach:
“We are the good ones, we are the just, the rest are not worth much any more. We will go to Heaven.”
That is pretty close to the sects: they say the same thing. Those up there (he points upward) do not
like this behavior at all.. They do not love men very much who are righteous in their own eyes.
If, in this book, it has been necessary to speak about the Mass and about the Church, and amongst
other things, the Mass of Saint Pius V, that does not mean to say that certain “traditionalists” should
exalt themselves above the modernists, as if they were the only ones who know how to make a
sound judgment, in a suitable way, and with all the necessary competence. That is not what this book
is all about. It is simply intended to expose all the abuses in the Church, such as they exist today.
But, to complete the picture, we must still say this: The priests who say: “It is better for you to stay at
home rather than go to such Masses”, are making a mistake. If the Mass is degraded to that point
where the priest himself no longer believes in the words of the Consecration, and no longer
pronounces the words as they should be pronounced, if he no longer has the intention of
consecrating, then the host is not consecrated, it is true... but, for all that, people can still pray in the
church.
I have to say this also: they are defrauded of Christ and of the fullness of the graces, it is true, but
certain graces are still attached to it. Especially when good Christians, of deep faith, go to Mass and
Communion full of devotion, with the intention of receiving Christ, then Heaven is fair enough not to
say simply: “Because the priest is not doing things properly, there will be no graces here!” Those
people nevertheless do receive certain graces. [54]
E: Do these people fulfill their duty to the Lord?
B: If the people have the opportunity of going to a Mass of Saint Pius V, then Heaven prefers that,
very much so. But if there is no other possibility, they may go to another Mass. After the Mass of Saint
Pius V in Latin,[55] the Tridentine Mass[56] in the vernacular comes in second place, provided that it
comprises the totality of the words of the Tridentine Mass as far as this is possible. Only after these, in
third place, comes the New Mass. But those people, if they do not know these things and are of good
faith, nevertheless fulfill their duty to the Lord, in so far as that is their intention.
On the other hand, if they know very well that a kilometer further away, they would find a Mass of
Saint Pius V, and if they say to themselves: “Bah! That, is too far away for me, I am not going to run
over there!”; and if they know very well that that would be better, then we have a different situation.
Then, they have lost out enormously through negligence. They should have gone that kilometer. Do
you know (in a tearful voice) how far we would go, if we were still able to share in such great graces?
Ah! We would travel to the ends of the earth, if we still had a chance! We do not wish to imply by this,
that the other Masses are as good. We have already said enough about which Mass Those up there
prefer (he points upward).
We have to reveal the error which many priests are making. It is a fundamental error to instill into men
that they must not go to any New Mass, that it comes from the devil, etc... That also is throwing the
baby away with the bath-water, it is going to the opposite extreme. Never does such a condemnation
have any place under the mantle of love of neighbor. In these circumstances there are modernists
who have love of neighbor, who are sometimes better than such “traditionalists” who exalt
themselves above others. We are obliged to say that as part of this... and everything we have just said
about the Sacraments and other subjects...
And it should also be said that there are many “traditionalists” who are Pharisees. Otherwise, the
modernists will think that all the “traditionalists” should be lumped together, that (all) the
“traditionalists” are fanatics, rebellious fanatics, and will fight them with every means... Now we do not
wish to speak any more (he grumbles).
E: In the name of the Blessed Virgin Mary...!
B: This is the way it is: Those up there (he points upward) love all their children, even if they have
fallen into error. If, under the cloak of obedience, because they no longer know what they ought to do,
they follow the opinions of. the bishops and the priests, then it is hardly their fault. If they act in all
good faith, it will not be held to their account so strictly, although these circumstances are so frightful,
frightful, frightful.
GUARDIAN ANGELS
E: Guardian Angels?
B: They are all together. Naturally, one's own Guardian Angel should be invoked in particular; or if one
has several, they should all be invoked. You priests especially, have more than one of them. There are
some of you who have two or three Guardian Angels... if you are involved in Work of the Angels,
according to the responsibility that they have to fulfill. But also... we do not want to speak any more.
E: In the name...!
B: ...but most of the time, the rest of the priests also receive a second Guardian Angel at their priestly
ordination, unless they have only a very limited responsibility when one great and competent Angel is
enough. But most of the time, priests receive a second one. E: Do bishops have even more Guardian
Angels?
B: Yes, their Angels are assigned to them according to the importance of their function and their
burden... I must explain that the Guardian Angels are all great, but they do not all possess the same
might and power of protection. There are all kinds of them: it is in the hands and the disposition of
God.
It can happen that the Guardian Angel of a child who has grown up not having the dignity or the
protective power of a great one (1), or even an Archangel, may be assigned to another child; and that
this man who is grown up and who is subject to greater trials, may have a more powerful one allotted
to him.
That is how God, He up there (he points upward), treats you. He does everything for your greatest
good - He orders and directs and does everything; you really have no idea of what He does. Thus it is
that His Paternal Eyes watch over you. And as for us, down below (he points downward), what do we
have? (With a tremendous sigh:) Ah! We do not like speaking about the Angels!
E: You have been able to teach us wonderful things about the Angels. We are going to thank the
Blessed Virgin especially for that.
B: But then, She is always wanting something, something which is in opposition to our schemes.
(1) This means an Angel superior in rank, and therefore in power
PRAYER MUST PRECEDE AND ACCOMPANY THE ACTION OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
E: In the name...!
B: I must get back to Confirmation. If such a candidate has not prayed to the Holy Spirit beforehand,
and prays to him even less afterwards, he will never be a true Soldier of Christ. He will drift along, he
will follow the crowd. He now receives far fewer graces than if the Sacrament were still administered
in the proper way, with all the oil and with all the words which were said formerly. [63]
The candidate should also, to as great a degree as possible, make his own commitment to become a
true Soldier of Christ; then he would not change direction to the left [64] at the first trifle which is
found to be blocking his way. Being a Soldier of Christ means putting oneself alongside Christ and the
Church, even when that becomes difficult - even when it becomes difficult on all sides.
There are some situations where one is pilloried by the world and where one would prefer not to
hold fast in front of men to what should be done and said. But it must be done, because Christ has
said: “He who will acknowledge me before men, I too will acknowledge him before My Father.” [65]
That happens only when one really does the right thing and is a true Soldier of Christ.
E: Say what the Most Blessed Virgin wishes! Tell us the whole truth!
B: During all of your life, it must be remembered that you carry an ineffaceable mark. When a man has
been confirmed and bears this ineffaceable mark, we can torment him much more in Hell than one
who has never been confirmed. But, nevertheless, he who has been confirmed has much more
strength to resist evil and to do good, than he who has not been.
E: In the name of the Most Blessed Virgin...!
PRESENT SITUATION
The possessed woman is not free yet, because her mission has not been accomplished yet. Her
parents, just like their terribly afflicted daughter, did not know the origin of her unspeakable sufferings
until 1974. They had tried everything they could, whether through medicine or through psychiatry, to
bring her relief and cure. But in vain. The only thing left for them was to take refuge in prayer.
The most striking thing about the parents is their simplicity and their horror of any desire for the
marvelous or the spectacular. To them, the origin of their daughter’s sufferings is inexplicable and they
commend themselves, in prayer and a calm confidence, to the unfathomable Wisdom of God.
The numerous documents: Letters, tape recordings and photographs taken during the exorcisms, are
at the disposal of the Church for a canonical investigation. But everyone will understand that in this
book there are no names of people, nor places, nor are there any illustrations, in order that a flood of
visits and disturbances are not drawn to the tormented woman and her parents particularly, as Divine
Providence has willed that her friends and neighbors know nothing of what is going on. Her
possession is manifested only in her interior life; while for entire nights she is cruelly tormented,
during the day she is able to carry out her household tasks.
DECLARATION
THE UNDERSIGNED, DOCTOR MICHEL MOURET, CHIEF DOCTOR OF THE PSYCHIATRIC
DEPARTMENT OF THE LIMOUX HOSPITAL (AUDE), AFTER HAVING EXAMINED MRS. R.B. IN
SWITZERLAND, AND HAVING BEEN PRESENT THIS DAY, APRIL 26, 1978, AT AN EXORCISM
INVOLVING HER, IN THE PRESENCE OF FOUR PRIESTS, OF A DURATION OF THREE AND A HALF
HOURS, DECLARE THAT IN THE TYPE OF MANIFESTATIONS PRESENTED BY THE SUBJECT THERE
WAS NO EVIDENCE OF EITHER A RAVING PSYCHOSIS, NOR OF AN HYSTERICAL PERSONALITY -
TWO DIAGNOSES TO BE ELIMINATED IN THIS CASE. BUT HERE WAS EVIDENCE OF MEDIUMISTIC
PHENOMENA THAT THE CHURCH IS ACCUSTOMED TO CALL POSSESSION, WHICH IS MORE OR
LESS, TRANSITORY.
Dr. Michael Gabriel Mouret
BEING ON GUARD[96]
“Who can disapprove of my cries, I am a little lamb, as I try to wake up my shepherd, whom I believe
to be asleep and about to be eaten by a cruel beast”
SAINT BERNARD
Father Lamy (died 1931), the holy parish priest of La Courneuve, a suburb of Paris, whom Cardinal
Amette, the Archbishop of Paris, used to call “a second Curé of Ars”, relates this anecdote from his
frequent conversations with the Blessed Virgin and the Holy Angels [97]:
“While he was conversing with Our Lady, she suddenly stopped speaking, turned around and said to
the demon who was standing behind Her: “What are you doing here?” And the Adversary, in reply to
the Immaculate Virgin, said these extraordinary words, which should be engraved in letters of fire
(make no mistake about it) where they can be seen by everyone, in all the churches and chapels of
the whole world:
“YOU KNOW WELL THAT I AM ALWAYS BEHIND YOU. EACH TIME THEY ALLOW YOU TO PASS BY, IT
IS I WHOM THEY FIND THERE.”
IS THERE AN ETERNAL HELL? WHAT DOES THE WORD OF GOD SAY? [98]
“In Me, the Eternal, there is no change.” (Mal. 3, 6)
Hell does exist, and it is eternal. Saint Matthew writes in his account of the Last Judgment: “Go far from
me, you that are accursed, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and for his
angels.”
(Matt.25, 41)
So speaks the Divine Master, Who finishes His discourse with these words:
“And these (the accursed) shall pass on to eternal punishment, and the just to eternal life.”
(Matt. 25, 46)
Saint Paul gives details about these ungodly, hardened “accursed ones”:
“...the day when the Lord Jesus appears from Heaven... as He pours out vengeance on those who do
not acknowledge God, on those who refuse obedience to the Gospel of Our Lord. Jesus Christ.. They
will be condemned to eternal punishment, far from the presence of the Lord, and the majesty of His
power.”
(2 Thess.1, 7-9)
And Saint John, in the evening of his life, completes the description in the Apocalypse: “The smoke of
their torment goes up for ever and ever; day and night no rest is theirs, who worshipped the beast
and his image, who bore the mark of his name.”
(14, 11)
In affirming that there is a Hell, and that Hell is eternal, the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) has only
repeated what the Scriptures tell us. So:
“Make no mistake about it; you cannot cheat God.” (Gal. 6, 7)
WHAT IS POSSESSION?
By Rev. Father Renz, S.D.S.
POSSESSION
Although possession can be neither proven nor invalidated by Science (Psychology, Parapsychology),
nevertheless Science ventures to do so, thus exceeding its competence. Possession must be
acknowledged. Even disregarding the teaching of the Magisterium and of Holy Scripture, it is evident
from the experience of the Saints (for example, Saint John of the Cross; the case of a nun in the life of
Saint Theresa of Avila; the holy Curé of Ars and many other Saints).
The history of the Church provides a great number of cases of possession that are not mentioned
here. Prudence is certainly necessary in the belief in possession, for there are psychological maladies
that are very similar to possessions. There are several phenomena or manifestations that prove that a
case of possession exists, but the most conclusive is the reaction when confronted by exorcism,
called in a purely intellectual way “exorcismus probativus”.
But even then, it is possible for the demons to remain in hiding, neither manifesting themselves nor
reacting. If they do not react, that still does not prove that they are not present. But if they do react,
that proves there is a possession. An important indicator is provided by the behavior when
confronted with blessed objects - relics, holy water, medals ... but in this case, the person must not
know beforehand that the objects are blessed.
Behavior in the face of ordinary water and holy water is an indication of the presence of demons.
Certain people have the gift of being able to distinguish between holy water and ordinary water, but
their reaction is not a furious rejection. It always depends therefore, on this reaction of furious
rejection that cannot be explained naturally.
Another conclusive sign is the result of the exorcism. To quote just one example: the possessed
children of Illfurth.[111] These demons were successfully expelled. After their expulsion, which
extended over two years, the two little boys were absolutely normal.
IS THE FAILURE OF THE EXORCISM A NEGATIVE INDICATION?
(a) If there is no actual possession, the exorcism cannot succeed. Then the condition can become
even worse.
(b) There are some cases of possession that have a particular objective - for example, the purification
of a person who is living in sin, or the chastisement for a life of sin. This is the case particularly when
people have given themselves to the Devil. Such instances are most often long-lasting and require a
laborious effort on the part of the exorcist. But they are not hopeless, especially when the person has
good will. (Magda, with Rev. Fr. Kofiewyk)[112]
(c) One particular type of possession consists of what is called “expiatory possession”. Such people
have no personal culpability. For example, they may have been cursed.
Why is a curse effective in some cases and in other cases, not? That will always remain a mystery.
When people accept suffering on behalf of others, that can take the form of a possession. Possession
brings with it terrible suffering. History shows that possessed people who have endured a great deal,
do not live to an old age (the children of Illfurth). There are possessed people who suffer for men in
general, for the Church, or for particular groups of people - for example, priests.
(d) When cases such as that of Nicolas Wolf, of Rippertschwand, [113] or that of Altotting[114] are
considered, it may be thought that these cases have a special mission to fulfill for the Church, not only
through their sufferings, but also through their revelations; to these could be added the case which is
the subject of “Warnings from the Beyond” (the present book) and equally, that of Klingenberg. [115]
The revelations made during these cases should be for the Church to witness and a help for the
difficult times she is going through.
These cases resist exorcism until their mission is fulfilled. In the Klingenberg case, the suffering was
similar to that of Christ and the death on the Cross. Annelise died of hunger and thirst.
The demon of “Warnings....” says about Klingenberg: “God has subjected this family and all who were
involved in the affair to a trial beyond words; He has taken up this poor suffering soul so that her
pitiful and hard life may end and she can enjoy the eternal beatitude.”
In the exorcisms of “Warnings...”, the demons have avowed: “Even if she (Annelise) did not attain
eternal happiness immediately, she nevertheless was brought very high up - very high up (in
Purgatory)” (June 10, 1977). The death of Annelise was a permission from God, not a failure of the
exorcism.
IS POSSESSION AN ILLNESS?
Fundamentally, possession is not an illness; yet it can be accompanied by an illness. Often the
illnesses of possessed people go away with the influence of the demon and cannot be controlled by
medicine.
WHAT IS EXORCISM?
Exorcism is the remedy of the Church which strives to cast out the demon by prayer, by readings from
the Holy Scriptures, with adjurations, summations in the Name of Jesus, etc....; the use of holy water,
blessings, signs of the cross, the imposition of the stole, the imposition of hands. It would be wrong to
believe that demons would vacate the premises on one single exorcism, one single summation. It is a
hard struggle between the exorcist and the demons, who repeat over and over; “We are not yet
obliged to leave!” That is why here also the following maxim applies: “God has the last word!”
RESPONSE TO OBJECTIONS
Rev. Father Arnold Renz replies to questions and objections concerning the demoniacal revelations in
Part One of this book:
QUESTION 1:
CHRIST DID NOT ACCEPT THE WITNESS OF THE DEMONS. HE ORDERED THEM: “BE QUIET!” [118]
REPLY:
(a) Christ was there Himself. He had not yet revealed His Divinity. He had no need of the witness of
the demons. His Father was Witness for Him.
(b) Christ also commanded His Apostles to remain silent. After His Transfiguration on Mount Tabor, He
gave this order to the three Apostles: “Do not tell anybody of what you have seen, until the Son of
Man has risen from the dead.”[119]
(c) Christ prepared men progressively for the revelation of His Divinity. That is why He declined the
witness of the demons. He did, however, permit them to say: “We know Who You are: the Holy One of
God!”[120] He could have prevented them from making this declaration; He did not do so.
QUESTION 2:
WE HAVE THE TEACHING OF THE CHURCH - WE DO NOT NEED REVELATIONS FROM DEMONS.
REPLY:
(a) The demons are not teaching us the truths of the Faith. When they speak for themselves - more
particularly, when they are saying what they want to say - then they regularly, and skillfully produce a
mixture of truth and error.
(b) Idle questions must not be asked. When that is done, untruthful answers must be expected. That
applies not only to the demons, but also to seers and privileged souls. Unfortunately, they are often
taken for Information Bureaus. For example, someone once asked the Curé of Ars: “Is my husband in
Purgatory?” He replied: ''The man in question is saved. He had time to make an Act of Contrition.” On
such occasions, there was always a special reason. It was not the reply to an idle question.
(c) The existence of demons is a fact. Holy Scripture informs us about the existence of Hell and of
demons. The Pope speaks of the existence and action of demons. In spite of that, many do not
believe in them. So the Virgin Mary says to Don Gobbi: “The Pope suffers and prays; he is on a cross
which is destroying and killing him. This time, he has spoken too but his voice falls in a desert. My
Church has become worse than a desert.” [121] Through possessed souls, the existence and action of
the demons becomes tangible. This is also an affirmation for our belief.
(d) Many of the truths taught by the Church are today passed over in silence. For example, during
these last few years, who has still spoken about Hell and demons? Hell and the demons were almost
forbidden subjects for preaching in the Church, in the Kingdom of God. It was necessary for the
Klingenberg affair to bring this problem back into discussion on a worldwide scale. The result - a
division of minds: some believed in, others denied, the existence of both Satan and Hell. This has
resulted therefore, in a denial of the facts on one hand, and a stronger belief on the other. Certainly
many have begun to think about Hell and the actions of Satan. This would not have happened to such
an extent if it had not been for the Klingenberg affair.
(e) We would need neither revelations from apparition sites, nor revelations from seers and privileged
souls, if we were to read the Holy Scriptures more seriously. Thus, for example, Mary says to Don
Gobbi: “My messages are multiplying by as many times as the voices of my ministers refuse to preach
the truth. The truths which are so important for the conduct of your life today are no longer
proclaimed; for example, the teaching about Paradise which awaits you; about the Cross of my Son
which saves you; about sin which wounds the Heart of Jesus and my Heart; about Hell into which
countless souls are rushing headlong every day; about the urgent need for prayer and penance.”
(f) If it were just the demons themselves speaking, they would refuse to make these revelations. But in
these latest cases of possession, the Blessed Virgin is indeed demonstrating her power and her
sovereignty. She forces the demons to express truths necessary for our times, to make revelations for
the Church of today; both truths and revelations need to be brought back to mind.
(g) The teachings of the Church are rejected, as are the messages of the Blessed Virgin from the
apparition sites, as are also the revelations of privileged souls. The tears, the tears of blood of the
Mother, are rejected. Now the Blessed Virgin is trying yet another means of revelations through
Demons.[122] But these also are in their turn being accepted only in those places where there exists,
at the least, a small spark of good will.
(h) The revelations of the demons are themselves a favour from Heaven, a testimony to the loving
solicitude of the Blessed Virgin.
(i) The Blessed Virgin said at the Marriage Feast of Cana: “Do whatever He tells you.” [123] But today
what He tells us is not being done. The Blessed Virgin is telling us again today, in pressing terms: “Do
whatever He tells you.” She is telling us, even through the medium of demons, so that we may be
saved and that we may save others.
(j) As “Mother of the Church”, as the Pope called her at the Council, she wishes to do everything to
save her children who were redeemed by her Son. Would souls be less important to her than to Hell,
which puts everything into working and toiling — without respite for the perdition of souls?
QUESTION 3:
BUT SURELY THE DEMONS ARE NOT GOING TO SPEAK AGAINST THEMSELVES, TO SPEAK TO THE
DETRIMENT OF HELL? SURELY THEY SEEK ONLY TO HARM THE CHURCH!
REPLY:
(a) It is understood that the demons seek only to harm us. They do not want to say what runs counter
to Hell. They wish only to harm the Church, wherever that is possible for them. But as Goethe made
the Devil say: “I am the Power which always wishes evil and who yet always does good.” [124]
(b) It is precisely in these cases of possession, that the power of the Blessed Virgin is shown in a
tangible way, as she forces the demons to proclaim what is good, what is true.
(c) The demons are unwilling to make these revelations. They make them only because they are
forced to, under the powerful authority and by order of the Blessed Virgin, and by order of the Most
Holy Trinity. They make these revelations only when they are called upon to do so: in the name of the
Most Holy Trinity, in the name of the Most blessed Virgin, of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, in the
name of Jesus; when they are called upon to tell the truth and nothing but the truth. (In the text, these
summations made to the demons are for the most part abridged or omitted, through lack of space
and so that the reading will not be too tedious). But, without these summations, this sort of dialogue
can -and did - happen:
The demon: Now, you've got a bit of a cheek! - Why? - You just say: “Tell the truth!” If you speak only in
your own name, we are not obliged to say things as they really are.
(d) These revelations are a gift from Heaven to the Church. If they are complied with, they can
accomplish a lot of good; for many souls, they can signify spiritual well-being and salvation, and they
can be the start of the renewal of the Church. That is why the possessed people must suffer horribly -
suffer right to the limits of endurance; thus, for example, the young Annelise Michel, who died after
exorcism.
“We tormented her beyond all measure, said the demon from “Warnings from the Beyond”, to the
point where she would have had to surrender and fall into despair, and we were very hopeful that
she would despair and would fall into our clutches. But our plans fell through. She held fast and all of
us demons were punished most terribly by Lucifer.” And the demons were forced to admit: “Even if
she did not go straight to Heaven, she is nevertheless highly placed (in Purgatory), very highly.”
Those who know about the life of the possessed woman in “Warnings” can get some idea of the
unspeakable sufferings that she has endured for many years and is still enduring. Such sufferings and
such a life are a guarantee of the authenticity of this possession and of these revelations. As a prelude
to the appearance of this book and these revelations, she suffered cruelly. That is why this book will
be an important work both for the good of souls and the good of the Church.
(e) Hell is concerned with and seeks the destruction of the book. If the Blessed Virgin and the Holy
Trinity had not-watched over the book, the obstacles and the difficulties would not have been able to
he surmounted. The book would never have been published. The demons themselves have been
forced to admit this. However, those involved with it were sure of this, even without the diabolical
revelations. These revelations have done nothing except confirm what they already know. [125]
(f) For the exorcisms and adjurations during the period June 10 to July 13. 1977, I can say that I
confined myself to the prescriptions of the “Rituale Romanum”, according to which the exorcist must
not allow himself to descend in trivial conversation, nor to ask idle or curious questions, especially
about the future, and about secret matters, this not being part of his role. (g) The whole development
of the “Warnings” has shown that the Blessed Virgin - apparently as a last resort - has wanted to say
by means of the demons, what is useful to the Church and for the good of souls. It is with this in mind
that questions have been put and new revelations demanded in return, but “nothing but the truth and
what the Blessed Virgin wishes.”
(h) Before important revelation, particular prayers were demanded: [126] “so that we (demons) may
be obliged to tell the truth.”
(i) If the demons did not speak the “language of Hell”, a possession would not be authentic. The
demons always come back to expressing their own point of view. The reader will easily recognize
when the demons are expressing their own opinions.
(j) The demons are bound to the instrument in their manner of speech. So it is possible that the ideas
of the instrument (the possessed person) are mingled with their revelations. That is why it is always
necessary to compare the revelations with the certain teachings of the Church. “Scrutinize it all
carefully, retaining only what is good,” says Saint Paul (1 Thess. 5, 21)
(k) At a time when the demons are especially powerful - and that seems to be the case today - it
seems supremely fitting that the Blessed Virgin, “victorious in all God's battles”, who will crush the
head of Satan, is forcing them to make revelations against their will, for the good of men and of the
Church. This also is a triumph for Mary.
Throughout the time this book was being prepared, many prayers were said. The demons
themselves, on behalf of the Blessed Virgin, were always asking for the repetition of certain specific
prayers. “Pray much to the Holy Spirit!”
If the readers for their part accede to this demand, they will certainly profit greatly from this reading,
and they will receive enlightenment, even if all the revelations have not been written (and translated)
with as much clarity as desirable.
[1] This means that the Truth revealed by God is as true in Heaven as on earth, since it is Divine.
[2] NOTE FOR ENGLISH VERSION: The French adjective ‘ordonné’ can also mean ‘ordained’. It was felt
that if the meaning here was that he was a priest, it would have been more clearly stated, but this, of course,
is a matter of opinion only.
[3] An explanation for this could be in the message of Our Lady at Marienfried (Germany, 1945): “The
demon knows how to blind men so well that even the best of them let themselves be deceived.” In the
present case, doubtless a number of people have not reached the point of yielding to the evidence. Or of
admitting it: both to themselves...and to others. Or again, they convince themselves very easily that it should
not be disclosed. Could this not be said as much of the loyal cardinals, who know, but think it better to
remain silent, awaiting the hour of God?
[4] “But their eyes were held last, so that they could not recognize him” writes Saint Luke (24,16) about the
two disciples on the road to Emmaus, who did not recognize Jesus, their companion on the road. Why
couldn't the same phenomenon of blindness be reproduced in the present case, by the action of demons this
time, with the permission of God? Everywhere here, we come up against obvious signs of the triumphant
subversion of our time, spawned by Satan, and of the “mystery of iniquity” at work. (2 Thess. 2,7)
(ADDITIONAL NOTE: It is interesting that in his translation of the New Testament Into English, published
in 1945, Monsignor Ronald Knox translates this as “THE CONSPIRACY OF REVOLT”)
[5] The existence of the activity of this double are proven, for example, by a detail which all the world can
verity: that of the color of his eyes. The Holy Father, Pope Paul VI, has indeed as the demon has just said,
clear bright eyes of a sky-blue color, while those of the impostor double are of a color tending towards
green. There are many other differences, anatomical and others, all easily seen, given by Kolberg in his
work.
One can't ask the members of Pope Paul's family for information, because they do not answer such
questions. Would it be because they have been subjected to pressure, or even to actual threats? Indeed, for
the members of the occult Power, 'non-violence' is a term used only for export and for propaganda.
[6] The expression “imitation Pope” follows and effectively corrects what could be understood by the
erroneous expression, “a false Pope”: firstly, because he (the impostor) is a simple understudy of the
authentic Pope, Paul VI; and secondly, because he is only a puppet in the hands of those who have created
him and who maintain him in his position - the supreme, occult heads of the Synarchy, or the worldwide
occult Power.
[7] He began to make his appearance towards the end of 1974. He was often seen during Holy Year. Then he
supplanted Paul VI in a more or less permanent way from September 1975.
[8] Even to the feel of him? Perhaps, but only in a limited way. Surgery can modify a fingerprint
superficially: by burning, scarring...however that is immediately obvious. But it absolutely cannot create a
new one (the old print always remains) and still less can it make it resemble another fingerprint.
[9] Beelzebub-Exorcism of November 7, 1977: “Look at your old man on the throne. So that he can still
stretch his legs normally, and go that he is not overcome by poison, give him fortifiers secretly. Give him
fortifiers so that he does not die after his eightieth birthday. Unless you do, he must die, but that will be the
best thing for him. He should not have wished to guide the Church so piously. He would have done better
yielding to those cardinals.
[10] In his book: “Conspiracy in the Vatican?” recommended by the demons later during this exorcism,
Theodore Kolberg states that since at least the second half of September 1975, Pope Paul has been cloistered
and replaced by an imposter double. It is certain that the revelations from Hell on this subject are incomplete
and unfinished. The refusals of the demons to speak, during the exorcism, indicate this clearly.
[11] See note 126 above.
[12] “The true Pope has had his heart broken on account of Mindzenty, on account of this cardinal.. He
suffered terribly and pitied the Cardinal... “What happened to that poor Mindzenty did not come about
through the true Pope Paul VI. Even we in Hell (he points downward) could not understand how we
succeeded in getting this poor cardinal put in the lowest place, such a disgusting place, while repugnant
people such as Kung, Haag or others like them, are installed in the best places.” (Avowal of Judas Iscariot,
Exorcism of January 23, 1978)
[13] We do not publish their names, quoted by Beelzebub during the exorcism (unedited) of March 7, 1977.
But, in fact, they are well known, especially one of them.
[14] (3) Communism, Freemasonry - the two faces of subversive Janus, of the Occult Power: Communism
for the poor, Freemasonry for the rich.
Avowal of Judas Iscariot, January 23, 1978: “Freemasonry will soon have penetrated into the last nooks and
crannies of your churches in order to destroy them under its pestilential blast, which they (the freemasons)
consider to be an agreeable wind of well-being, but which is the pestilential blast of evil...”
[15] (1) Exorcism of September 15, 1977:
E: Would it not be our duty to liberate the Pope in Rome so that he can flee the Vatican in order to be free
and be able to tell the Catholic Church what he would like to tell her?
Judas: In the current situation, that would be senseless because, firstly, he must endure his martyrdom as has
been predestined for him. Secondly - this could actually be the main reason - those cardinals and everyone
who is mixed up with these iniquities, are so cunning and astute, that you would achieve nothing unless
there were a miracle.”
[16] Theodor Kolberg: “Umsturz im Vatikan?” published by the author, Ernsbergerstrasse 19, 8000 Munich
60, Federal Republic of Germany, January 1977. A French edition is under way (ref. Jean Marty)
[17] The voice recording, consisting of the recording (followed by analysis) of the vibrations of the voice is
characteristic of each individual and cannot be faked, in exactly the same way as it is for fingerprints.
[18] (3) At the end of his book, Kolberg compares the voice-recordings of Paul VI (Easter 1975) and his
double (Christmas 1975), after which date Paul VI, confined since September 1975, practically never
appeared again in public audiences. It was the impostor who celebrated the Office of the Nativity in 1975.
We have the proof of it.
Has Paul VI revealed this secret privately? We do not know. It is a mystery. God wishes to keep him alive,
according to several private revelations and also to Beelzebub himself: “He is a martyr...it is a permission
from on High.”
[19] In these exorcisms therefore, the demons are simply the messengers, the voice boxes, of the Most
Blessed Virgin.
[20] It is during this exorcism that Judas declares, by order of the Most Blessed Virgin: “The book (of
Warnings) must go to the whole world... just as it is now, with an imprimatur if possible.”
[21] If the Pope does not have the formal intention of suppressing the indulgences, they remain valid.
[22] Complementary to the revelations on indulgences; “An indulgence is the remission before God of the
temporary punishment due for sins, the guilt of which has already been forgiven. A remission which the
faithful, suitably disposed and on certain prescribed conditions, may obtain through the intervention of the
Church, which, in its capacity as minister of the Redemption, dispenses and applies with authority the
treasure of satisfactions of Christ and of all the Saints.”
(Apostolic Constitution INDULGENTIARUM DOCTRINA of Paul VI of January 1,1967, art. 1)
[23] John 20, 29 The demon, although unwilling, bearing witness for the Scriptures!
[24] Matt. 11, 25
[25] ... to us demons, who would prefer to keep things vague!
[26] This chapter merits being read very carefully — with a completely open mind - so that the reader may
be brought through the hesitations, the concealments, the beating about the bush of the demon, Beelzebub,
in his avowals, to a sound judgment. The conclusion that we draw from it is that, if the idea of the Council
was not in itself bad, then its consequences — even while the Council was still taking place — were, and
are, to an unimaginable degree.
The cause for this is simple, always the same: the interior occult action of the enemy Forces, which the holy
Pope, John XXIII, seems to have failed to recognize, except at the end of his pontificate; and of which the
Holy Father, Paul VI, did become aware... a little late.
[27] There has been a persistent rumor that John XXIII died from poisoning (the same as for his predecessor,
Pius XII, in whose case it is probable. Cf Kolberg's book: “The Deception of the Century”)
In John XXIII's case, for the moment, there are simply strong presumptions. As for Paul VI, it can be said that
he is being kept miraculously alive by the Lord.
[28] ADDITIONAL NOTE - It is obvious in this instance, that “up there” does not refer to Those in heaven,
but to those on earth, i.e. Pope John XXIII and others, and that the term relates directly to the previous
reference to “down below” (in Hell).
[29] There is no doubt it would have required here an exorcist who was also a professional inquisitor, such
as an examining magistrate with a prisoner, to push the demons to the stage that they didn't have a leg to
stand on. For it is certain that the first idea of the Council was manifested by Pius XI as early as 1922. Pius XII
also thought about it (in 1948). John XXIII made the decision to call it together.
[30] And Paul VI, also, was driven by ideas of “progress”. Remember the message received by Jeanette of
France on I August 1976, and published with other extracts from the pamphlet “Parce Domine” in a separate
leaflet in October 1976: “The Pope has opened the door to everything which is now happening, but he is
paying for it with tears of blood.”
[31] The key to the mystery is there: “...these will be days of vengeance, bringing fulfillment of all that has
been written.” (Luke 21, 22) And what if written in the Scriptures, St. Paul has given notice of: “Already the
mystery of iniquity ** is at work” (2 Thess. 2, 7). It is at work in the Church.
**Note; The Knox translation refers to “the conspiracy of revolt.”
[32] This is true only in the light of the explanation that follows: “We (the demons) did our utmost...”
[33] To take all things into consideration, as far as is possible, it is advisable to read the work of Rev. Fr. Ralph
Wiltgen, the director of an independent press agency in Rome, covering the whole Council: “Le Rhin se
jette dans le Tibre. Le Concile inconnu.” (The Rhine flows into the Tiber. The Unkown Council) French
edition published in 1973; the original American edition, with imprimatur, published in 1967 - English title?)
[34] “The anomalies of the conciliar texts have allowed treachery to rush into the Church, from the moment
these texts were put into effect. And what the enemies have not done, the gullible ones have carried into
effect.” (Pamphlet “Le pouvoir occulte a l'assaut de l'Eglise”, published in February 1975).
[35] It would astonish us very much if all the texts approved by the Conciliar Fathers were the work of the
Holy Spirit! We wrote at the beginning of 1975 (2½years prior to these revelations); “When a jurist proceeds
to a careful examination of the text of the Constitution on the Holy Liturgy (December 4, 1963, he finds there
a lack of precision and contradictions, so that he is automatically and legitimately led to ask the question, to
find out what can be the cause of these anomalies.” And we concluded in favor of the actions of the
ecclesiastic conspiracy (the “treacherous cardinals and the disloyal prelates”) in the very bosom of the
Council.
[36] This does not mean, purely and simply, that the Holy Spirit was absent; if for no other reason than that
God is present everywhere. But, instead of having the positive and intrinsic role of inspiration (in the strictly
biblical sense), which He always should have had, He has had to be content, out of respect for human free
will, to an extrinsic role of preservation from too serious blunders.
This double aspect of things is seen clearly in two typical examples: the NOTA PRAEVIA of Paul VI, to
correct the dogmatic Constitution on the Church; the first two paragraphs of the Declaration on Religious
Liberty, to correct the rest of this document. In these two cases, the Holy Spirit makes use of the Pope to
counterbalance the dangers of the conciliar writings.
[37] “Today” - that is, June 18. In spite of the statement which may be read in another of the exorcisms, it is
evident that Heaven, which forces the demons to speak here, does not disregard the new liturgical Calendar,
which has transferred the Feast of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, previously celebrated on August 22.
[38] The Rosary
[39] Beelzebub would like to ridicule the prayers of the Holy Souls.
[40] The souls in Purgatory do know the judgment that God has pronounced on them. But it could be,
perhaps that in this inferior level of Purgatory, they undergo a darkening of the mind, justifying this assertion
of Beelzebub, who, however, corrects it immediately in his very next answer: “They bless God in complete
submission that He has sent them there.”
[41] The sacrifices of others, which have allowed these saved souls to freely say their “Yes”; to make an act
of love of God.
[42] The gaining of the indulgences TOTIES-QUOTIES, a plenary indulgence for the dead, is attached to
each visit to a church or cemetery on the two days of All Saints and All Souls, each visit to be accompanied
by certain prayers for the dead.
[43] Among these treasures, there is the application for the benefit of the Souls in Purgatory of the graces
from six Holy Masses, all related to the Passion of Our Lord, Jesus Christ, Redeemer and Savior.
[44] The fact is that indulgences are no longer mentioned in the Church. Consequently, the practice of
saying indulgenced prayers has fallen into disuse.
[45] This refers to days and years of the world, early penances of former times, for which we do not know
the corresponding “Purgatory time”.
[46] This is exactly what we wrote in the booklet and leaflet on the New Mass which appeared in February
1975: the Holy Father having in no way expressly manifested his intention of suppressing the Rite of Saint
Pius V, which has still remained in force, being able to be used, freely by any priest who so desires. To forbid
him this in the name of obedience is a breach of trust and a violation of conscience. This is a conclusive case
where the refusal to obey a distorted Episcopal authority, which the demons speak of elsewhere, is a sacred
duty. It is true that it requires much courage...
[47] John 14, 6.
[48] Three more than those who are already at work.
[49] As a matter of fact, in this instance the word “calm” is a more apt description for the soul than the word
“peace”. An artificial calm, inspired by the demon, a misleading calm. But it is not peace of soul.
[50] The seven capital sins: Pride, Covetousness, Lust, Gluttony, Anger, Envy, Sloth.
[51] The parents can prepare the child themselves, in the event of failure on the part of the responsible priest,
the demon says here. But, earlier, they MUST do so if such a situation should arise. In actual fact, therefore,
parents MUST act in this way in such a situation.
[52] One thing has struck us here. The demon says that the Christian who, through ignorance,
communicates in the hand “is not committing a serious sin” This indicates that nevertheless, he may have
committed a sin by so doing, although not a serious one.
This explains, when one rereads the beginning of the demon's warning, Christians' acting in this way
because “they do not wish to stand out from the crowd nor to be conspicuous” that clearly means: through
cowardice for certain, when it is not through pride.
This brings to mind the words of the Holy Curé of Ars, saying that after lust and theft, ignorance was the
most widespread sin. Yes! Because ignorance is often culpable.
[59] This is the fourth time during the course of the game exorcism, that the demon, Beelzebub, speaks of
the diabolical-masonic collaboration whose objective is the destruction of the Church.
[60] Beelzebub to the exorcist (November 7,1977): “Not so much holy water; you would think it was
raining. We are going to have to open up our umbrellas against this rubbish. Don't do it!” The demon has
said in a previous exorcism that holy water puts them to flight.
[61] The exact formula is “through the sense of taste and power of speech.” (Layman's Daily Missal Prayer
Book & Ritual 1962.)
[62] In the ritual for the administration of the Sacraments (every bit as much as in the rite of the Mass), each
word, each gesture, each promise... in as much as they have been fixed in the name of Christ... has its own
strength, its irreplaceable value, since it derives from Christ. To change the smallest part is to diminish the
graces received.
[63] One must indeed distinguish between the sacramental “character” and the graces which flow from it.
The latter can vary a great deal, while the former is always the same (provided it is valid).
[64] This, of course, refers to the “left-hand of Christ”, which is for the reprobates described as “the goats” of
the Last Judgment. “...He will set the sheep on his right, and the goats on his left... Then He will say to those
who are on His left hand, in their turn. Go far from me, you that are accursed, into that eternal fire which has
been prepared for the devil and his angels.” (Matt 25, 33 & 41)
[65] Matt 10, 32
[66] The exorcist priest senses, or guesses (from the attitude of the possessed woman) that the demon has
more revelations to make, which explains the repetition here.
[67] “Tannhauser”, an opera by Richard Wagner (1845). For incurring damnation in the arms of Venus,
Tannhauser must go to Rome to beg for his salvation. Pursued by the curses of the Pope, who refuses to
absolve him, he calls again on Venus; but a pure song rises up: it is Elisabeth who gives up her life while
asking pardon for the sinner; then Tannhauser kneels beside the body of his fiancée and rejoins her in death,
while the Divine Mercy is manifested by a miracle.
[68] “De Vrouwe van alle Volkeren” in the original Dutch title.
[69] Michel Servant concluded his investigation into the Amsterdam messages as follows: “The facts in
Amsterdam have their origin, we believe, in a crafty maneuver of The Evil One. Many are falling into the
trap.” (Written in October 1971, published in May 1972)
[70] Michel Servant wrote about this formula: “The blessed name of Mary must be exalted and not
diminished. One sees very well here the wound oozing its venom”.
[71] See INTERPOLATED NOTE which follows.
[72] None of the other great published messages of the Blessed Virgin: Kerizinen, Garabandal, San
Damiano... have obtained the imprimatur; but they have all been refused by Episcopal authority (not by the
Vatican).
[73] “Warnings from the Beyond”
[74] idem
[75] See note 194.
[76] This will, therefore, be the triumph of the True Mass, of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, such as Jesus
instituted it at the Last Supper and as He wanted it for His Church, which will then be victorious.
[77] In the sense that it has the fullness of what constitutes the Priesthood, because of its unique, authentic
reality.
[78] “Your Church - to be precise, your Church at the moment, in its present state -... this is not the Holy,
Catholic and Apostolic Church. It is a Church of dissimulators, odious dissimulators... Mgr. Lefebvre is for
many a terrible example who reminds them of their duty. They think: if he is treated the way he is, how
would we be treated... we do not want to lose our little job... nor, above all, do we want to be humiliated, to
be belittled, nor to create a scandal - that is what they are thinking.” (Avowal of Judas Iscariot. Exorcism of
Jan. 23, 1978)
[79] One of the numerous occasions on which our bishops are fooled.
[80] According to the opinion of the demon, who is taking revenge as much as he can for the thousands of
souls whom the sanctity of the Curé of Ars has snatched away from him. Has he not just admitted that “no
doctorate, nor any other title, can be compared to the good done by priests who still have the true
understanding of souls”?
[81] See note 10.
[82] “It is five minutes before mid-day” - thus Michel Servant subtitled his book... in 1972. “It is five minutes
past mid-day,” the Blessed Virgin announces in 1977. This means that the Cup is running over, that the time
of the Chastisements has arrived; and that a final reprieve from the Infinite Mercy is the only thing which,
like a miracle, is holding back the anger of God...
[83] The ecclesiastics and lay people ''in the wind” having done the rest.
[84] One goes to meet men, and finishes up by abandoning God.
[85] The conditions for fasting were previously: complete fasting from the midnight preceding the
Communion. During the last few years, the Holy See has reduced this delay to one hour before
Communion, with some exceptions with regard to drinks.
[86] This text was a revelation for us, not much that it astonished us, but that it was clearly just one
application of the infernal conspiracy, hatched since the dawn of Christianity, to destroy the Church.
[87] In this connection, one can compare the following passage from the Council of Trent (Session XIII,
chapter 8):
“In the sacramental reception (of the Eucharist) the custom has always been, in the Church of God
(therefore in the Universal Church and not just in the Latin Church), that the laics receive Communion from
(the hand of) the priests (a sacerdotibus), and that the celebrant priests give Communion to themselves.”
The custom therefore, affirms the Council of Trent, has always been that the Holy Eucharist is received: by
laics, from the priests; by the celebrant, from himself. This means, therefore, that laics receive It in the mouth;
it they were to receive it in the hand, even coming from the priest, this would be the same as giving
Communion to themselves. This distinction established by the Council could have no other reason for
existence - it would not make sense. The Council concludes thus, to make it quite clear for us:
“(This) custom must be maintained, with good reason, and rightly, as originating in the Apostolic Tradition”.
This last part of the Conciliar sentence seems to us to be very important, for it seems to make it very plain
that the custom which was established during the first centuries of Christianity, of distributing Communion in
the hand (which was covered by a clean, white cloth, and the Eucharist carried straight from that to the
mouth) was an exception which was not justified, because it was against the Thought and the Will of Christ,
as well as the manner of action of the Apostles; and also, we can now be certain, Christ's manner of action
with His Apostles at the Last Supper.
[88] The ordinary attitude for prayer among the Ancients was “standing” (Cf. Luke 18, 11-13): “The Pharisee
stood upright and made this prayer in his heart... and the Publican stood far off... and said: God, be merciful
to me...”. However, kneeling and even prostration at the end of supplications and adoration was not
unknown to them. Perhaps it was the very humble Mary who, through her example, gave this attitude of
kneeling the privileged place that it was to have later in the Church.
[89] This affirmation of the demon, which at first reading seems fallacious, makes more sense in the light of
our explanation in note 204. Did the Holy Council of Trent have their suspicions about this?
[90] Dialogue, (with its sister dialectics) is the number one weapon of the diabolic and destructive strategy
of the occult Power of High Freemasonry... just as is change.
[91] We recommend that the reader, particularly members of the Priesthood and medical practitioners, read
this account very attentively. The life of the person concerned, from her very earliest age, is characteristic of
the interference of diabolical ascendancy, and of a therapy, useless because of being inadequate, doing
nothing but add to the intolerable sufferings of the victim. But God had His plan...
[92] Could this phosphorus deficiency originate from a parasitic action on the part of the diabolical Powers?
“Phosphorus” is one of Satan's names for the “initiated”.
[93] Mechtilde Thaller, a German mystic and stigmatist, who was known as “Ancilla Domini” and who died
in 1919, was told by her Guardian Angel: “We, the Angels, will never be able to suffer for God, not even in
obedience to His Will. And if we were capable of envy, there is one single thing that we would be envious
of: that is being able to suffer, since we are not able to do so.” And again: “The beatitude of the Saints is
much greater than ours, because they have been able to suffer for God.” (F. von Lama, “Les Anges” (The
Angels), Stein am Rhein, Switzerland 1976, with imprimatur. Ed. Resiac, Montsurs)
[94] From the Bishop of Croire, Switzerland.
[95] This took place at Montichiari in Italy. Since then, the exorcist priests have used the exorcism of Leo
XIII. The demons are 19 in number (exorcism of November 7, 1977). Their names have been given.
[96] Text proper to the French edition
[97] Complete and unedited text, taken from the researches of Michel Servant. Father Lamy's biography, by
Paul Biver: “Le Père Lamy, Apôtre et Mystique” (Father Lamy, Apostle and Mystic) simply makes passing
reference to this incident.
[98] Included in French edition only.
[99] Karl Rahner and Herbert Vorgrimler: “Petit Dictionnaire de Theologie” (Little Dictionary of Theology)
7th Ed., Fribourg-en-Brisgau, 1968, p. 49.
[100] Denonger-Schonmetzer, 800. Henri Denzinger, S.J., Catholic German theologian (died 1883).
His ENCHIRIDION SYMBO-LORUM ET DEFINITIONUM is a classic.
[101] Denzinger-Bannwart, 237-238 (1937 edition)
[102] “Gaudium et Spes, 22 (cf. Ad Gentes, 3)
[103] “Lumen Gentium”, 17.
[104] Exegesis = Exposition, especially of Scripture (The Concise Oxford Dictionary)
[105] Jog. Ratzinger, “Adieu au Diable?”, 1973 (“Farewell to the Devil?”)
[106] (5) Herbert Haag, “Abschied vom Teufel” (“End of Belief in the Devil”), Einsiedeln, 1969, p. 48
[107] “Belief in the Devil”, in collaboration, Tübingen, 1974, p. 205
[108] H. Haag. “End of Belief in the Devil”, pp.47,49.
[109] H. Haag, “End of belief in the Devil”, pp. 47,49.
[110] “Besinnung auf das Neue Testament” (Reflections on the New Testament), vol 2, Fribourg-en-Br.,
1964, pp 146-148, 157.
[111] Abbe Sutler: “Aux prises avec Satan. Les possédés D'Illfurth (1868)”... ed. Résiac, 53150 Montsurs, 1977.
(In the Clutches of Satan. The Possessed of Illfurth.)
[112] Rev. Fr. Adolphe Rodewyk, S.J.: “Dämonische Besessenheit Heute” (Demoniac Possession Today –
Magda), ed. Paul Pattloch, 08750, Aschaffenburg, 1976.
[113] Abbe Jean Erni: Teufelspredigt” (Sermons from the Devil - Nicolas Wolf, of Rippertschwand) Ed.
Siegfried Hacker, D-8031 Grobenzell, 1975.
[114] “Teufels-predigt von Altotting” (Sermons from the Devil from Allotting) Publication B. Gunther.
[115] Note from French edition: definitive information on the facts concerning Klingenberg is not available.
[116] Which includes people who are the victims of voodoo, acts of black (and even of white) magic,
sorcery, etc.
[117] “Heal the sick, raise the dead, cleanse the lepers, cast out devils.” (Matt. 10, 8)
[118] “And there, in the Synagogue, was a man possessed by an unclean spirit who cried aloud: ...I recognize
Thee for what Thou art, the Holy One of God. Jesus spoke to him threateningly: Silence! He said. Come out
of him.” (Mark 1, 23-25)
[119] Matthew 17, 9
[120] Luke 4, 34
[121] Don Stefano Gobbi, a priest from Milan, has been receiving messages from the Virgin since 1973,
addressed to “Her Beloved Priests”, which have resulted in the setting up of the Marian Movement of Priests,
then the Marian Movement (for lay people) that is linked with it. Within these messages is a spiritual treasure
offered to us by our Heavenly Mother from which many souls of priests and of the faithful have drawn
strength, light peace joy... and perseverance. The Marian Movement of Priests has been endorsed by the
Holy Father, Paul VI.
[122] After these, if their evidence is also rejected, will any other door remain open to Heaven through
which she can send her messages? Or rather, have we here the last warnings of Our Lord before the Great
Warning of Garabandal, after which the Great Chastisements will commence?
[123] John 2, 5
[124] Because “everything helps to secure the good of those who love God.” (Rom 8, 28) It is obvious that
whatever the demon does is evil in itself.
[125] The observations made by father Renz for the German edition are just as valid for the French (and
English) editions. The subtlety and the deceitfulness of the demons are absolutely unbelievable. It is not for
nothing that Scripture calls him: “THE Evil One” |Matt. 13, 19)
[126] By the demons themselves, under orders from Heaven.
PART THREE
B: They (he points upward) say: Adore, adore more, have more veneration before the Most High,
Infinite, Sublime, Universal Majesty of God. It is much greater than you believe. Never turn your back
on the Blessed Sacrament (painful breathing) and exhort others also to adore the Majesty of God by
bringing it to their notice without delay. Think how the greatest courage and even the greatest good
will (gasps and groans) must appear compared with such Majesty; or think how everyone should
prostrate themselves in the dust before such Majesty. And how much more should they grovel in the
dust, and how repugnant to the Divine Majesty are those who are cowardly, like present-day
superiors, bishops and priests who, in the name of God, have no courage at all and who turn more
towards exterior things than towards that which is their duty: that which they are commanded to do
by Those up there (he points upward), that which the impetus of grace inspires in them. Often they do
not respond to the impulses of grace (because this is so difficult in our era) and take the road of so-
called obedience, which is no longer obedience in the minds of Those up there (he points upward), as
we have previously been compelled to say.
There will come a time when everyone, good and bad, modest and proud (very painful breathing),
sick or well, will see everything clearly. But many will not see clearly until too late, or after they will
already have allowed many graces to pass them by, and when they will already have led many into
error through this. That is what is tragic. Those up there make me say (he points upward), because it is
no longer possible to bring back a man who is lost and goes to Hell - nothing can be done to save his
soul, if it is already lost.
There are many souls who have died within these last ten years who would have been saved, if they
had been led well by the priests, the bishops and the superiors. It is horribly tragic (shouts and howls
of despair), it is horribly tragic and it can no longer be corrected-we are compelled to say that
(dreadful howls).
She (he points upward) is feted today, on this Her Feast-day as Mother, as the Immaculate
Conception... there She is, celebrating Her Feast. Christ was totally without sin and without fault and
She too was without the least sin or fault. She is, and She was, without the smallest blemish.
But men carry on the “way they are going, with their blemishes and their faults, believing that this is an
improvement, and that there is nothing wrong with trumpeting their ideas to the world and converting
others to their way; of thinking. They often wish to teach others the ideas they have in their hearts.
But this is not good, because these doctrines they have in their hearts are false. They should, they
should... One cannot simply throw overboard a Church, a Mass and sermons that have existed for
dozens and hundreds of years. The clergy are blind. [2] The clergy will see too late. Many of them will
be lost because they have not wanted to see things clearly. We are being compelled to say all that on
this Her Feast-day of the Immaculate Conception - She who was conceived totally immaculate.
She has always obeyed Him and has never done anything else, in the greatest as in the smallest
matters - She has done nothing except carry out His Will. Yes, She has done even more than strictly
what Christ required of Her. Oh, what has She not accomplished in Her great virtue! She has
accomplished even more than was expected of Her up there (he points upward).
But you men, and especially the clergy, do not even accomplish what you should accomplish. True, the
clergy are not without original sin; that is reserved for, Her, the Most Pure (he points upward). But
these priests, bishops, superiors and lay people still receive many enlightenments which they could
respond to, if they wanted to. If they were to pray more to the Holy Spirit, they would be able to
accomplish much better what Those up there wish (he points upward), according to what is right and
as it will be understood in the end, for they (these priests and lay people) are mistaken.
The current manner in which the clergy are directing and leading the Church is not in line with the
views of Those up there (he points upward). They are our views (in a loud voice), originating from us
down below (he points downward) - we are being compelled to say this. Imagine being obliged to say
this! We are obliged to on this day of Her Immaculate Conception - She up there (he points upward),
whose purity and sublimity no human can appreciate even in an approximate way (howls)!
Even we who are down below, who are proud and who were among the Angels, must bow down
before so much sublimity, purity and virtue, must lower ourselves into the dust. How much more
should you men sink down in into the dust and ashes, but you do not do it. Most men still think that
they are almost Saints when they set themselves apart from others who are still truly humble and
wish to make reparation. Many think that what is actually vice is virtue (groans and gasps).
When She will come (he points upward), when She will come (in a terrible voice), and that time is
approaching ..... it will be too late. Then, for many, it will be too late. They do not realize; many no
longer believe in the Great Warning or in the Great Catastrophe. In the same way, many do not
believe - well, even less still - in what this book is proclaiming (“Warnings”) and what has had to be
proclaimed.[3] (Terrible wailing.)
If we could come back, we would behave better. How much better we would behave if we were still
able to (shouts, sobs in a disturbing voice). If only - if only we could come back! If we could have again
those last ten seconds which we had up there (he points upward) before being hurled into the abyss,
if we had only those last ten seconds just once more (cries of despair) so as to be able to adore His
Majesty again and to say: we are sorry; we wanted, in our senseless pride, to be greater than Your
Infinite Majesty. We are sorry, do not damn us! Take us up there (he points upward), let us stay there in
the most remote corner... But it is too late, too late for us... it is too late for us... We can do nothing any
more (with unspeakable despair, howling and weeping)... This despair, this endless torment... this
darkness which surrounds us for all eternity...
Men, open your eyes! Clergy, priests, superiors, bishops, open your eyes! Come back! We can no
longer do it - but you still can. You still have these last hours and seconds. Many of you still have
years; what good will they be if you do not use them properly? What use will they be to you? What
will be the good, if you do what should not be done, and do not do what you ought to do? Do you
know what we would do if we were still able to? But we cannot any more - not any more!
The darkness is appalling, the gnawing worms are appalling, the fire which surrounds us and from
which we cannot escape,[4] is appalling.
But appalling, too, in the sight of God, are these priests, superiors and bishops, who, in their pride,
wish to exalt themselves above Goodness, above Messages, Warnings and Exhortations from Those
up there (he points upward) and who are unwilling to do what Those up there (he points upward)
wish and have ordained.
Many laymen are suffering because of this; The clergy are taking them with them, because the lay
people believe the clergy, want to have faith in them, and so they should under normal circumstances.
But with such men, they cannot, and must not, have faith in them any longer. Judas has said previously
on July 17,1975: NOW, ONE CAN NO LONGER OBEY. And we are being compelled to repeat that on
this day, the Feast of Her Immaculate Conception.
Follow the Way of the Cross, listen to the exhortations, the good exhortations. Without doubt, there
are certain people who receive graces and yet are not good, but that quickly becomes obvious
(painful breathing).
Look neither to the right nor to the left, neither to the front nor to the rear, neither towards the East
nor the West,[5] but only upward, even if this Will from On High (he points upward) is now difficult to
carry out. Do not carry out any other will but that from On High (he points upward), for we have seen
what it costs to disobey His Infinite Majesty ... we disobeyed and must now pay the penalty
eternally ... we will never be able to come back ... and many of these priests will never be able to
come back, and that is their loss...
We have finished speaking for today, the day of the Immaculate Conception.
THE IMPRIMATUR
“.... The imprimatur would be a very great help for the spreading (of the book) of the Warnings. If the
work had had the benefit of the imprimatur (from a bishop, in spite of all the fluttering leaves [6] and
all that attacks, it would have made its way. This would be a great advantage for you, and you must
work hard to obtain this goal... because it is the Will of Those from On High (he points upward).
At the end of the exorcism of Leo XIII used, in this instance, by Fr. Fischer, numerous invocations were
pronounced, including that of Saint Vincent Ferrier, [18] the great Spanish Dominican missionary of the
fourteenth and fifteenth centuries; he traveled throughout Spain, Italy, Switzerland and France, where
he died at Vannes in 1419. He was a formidable opponent of the devil, from whom he wrestled many
souls,[19] through his life of love and penance and his stirring sermons.
In short: Saint Vincent Ferrier, a model to imitate; Abbot Verdi-Garandieu, an example not to follow.
The demon is going to speak for nearly two and a half hours on end. We reproduce here the text of
his adjurations, by order of Heaven, to the priests of our time. [20]
Verdi-Garandieu after having pointed out that he also has become “a demon among the demons”,
suddenly begins to cry out, saying): “What a stupid thing I did not responding to grace and leading the
life that I led!”
(Then while uttering woeful cries, he exclaims, making the possessed woman jump to her feet): “Why
did I let myself go that way, why? Why did I agree to being admitted to the Priesthood, this very
heavy responsibility, since I was not equal to it if I was not prepared to take the trouble to lift myself
up to the heights of this great ideal? Why did I give bad example as thousands and thousands of
priests do today, by not acting in accordance with my priesthood? Why didn't I teach the catechism as
I should have done?
I spent my time looking at the women's dresses, rather than in observing the commandments of God.
The truth of it is, I was neither hot nor cold, I was lukewarm and the Lord vomited me from His mouth.
[21] In my youth, I was still good, I still responded to grace.”
(While he was speaking, we heard his cries through the possessed woman.)
“It was later that I became lukewarm. It was when I entered onto the wide and easy road of pleasure
and abandoned the narrow road of virtue, by not responding to grace any more; and from then on, I
fell lower and lower.
At the beginning, I used to still confess my sins; I wanted to change myself, but I did not succeed
because I no longer knew how to pray adequately. I did not respond to grace because of this tepidity,
I went further down to the stage of coldness. Between this tepidity and coldness, there is only the
distance of an onionskin. If I had been warm and ardent, I would not have known this wretched
destiny.
If the priests of our time do not pull themselves together - Ah, well! They will experience the same
fate that I have. At the present time, there are thousands, tens of thousands of priests in the world
who are like me, who give bad example, who are lukewarm and who no longer respond to God's
grace. All, if they do not change themselves, will have a destiny no better than that which I, Verdi-
Garandieu, have had.
Ah! What a destiny for me in Hell! If, at least, I had not been born. [22] If I were able to come back to
life again! Ah! How I would love to return to earth in order to live a better life! Ah! How I would love to
spend my nights and my days on my knees, in prayer, calling on the Most High! I would invoke the
Angels and Saints of Heaven, in order for them to help me to leave the road to perdition, but I can no
longer go back, I am condemned (he finishes in a woeful voice).
Alas, the priests do not know what it is to he condemned to Hell, and what Hell is. At the present
time, nearly everyone on earth takes the line of least resistance. They want to enjoy the pleasures of
life. They are convinced that practicing humanism, as they call it, being of the mentality of their time, is
something that is now established forever.
Bishops, cardinals and abbots give an example that is no better than that given by their subordinates.
Do they live according to the simplicity that Christ used to practice in his meals and the kind of food
he ate? As the Gospel says, Jesus Christ did indeed participate in banquets, to which He was invited
by various people, but at these meals, He did not eat very much. And if He did eat a little during the
course of these banquets, it must also be stressed that, many times, He chose to suffer from hunger.
The Holy Family and the Apostles too, fasted a great deal. Otherwise, they would not have received
all the graces with which they were blessed. And yet, Jesus did not need to acquire grace, since He
was Himself the Author of grace, but He wanted to give an example: to His Apostles certainly, but also
to all the cardinals. bishops and priests of all the centuries. But what good was that, since in our time
cardinals, bishops and priests sit down to their meals in luxurious surroundings and enjoy delicious
dishes.
They go so far as to ruin their health in following this way of life, but they imagine that this befits their
position as bishop, cardinal or provincial. Poor cooks, who imagine that because they are serving
bishops or important people, they must present complicated things on the table! They imagine, poor
souls, that it would be a disgrace for them if they were not able to bring all these dishes to the table.
They forget that by doing this, they are not helping the bishops to imitate Christ any more than the
priests do. It would be better if these cooks could tell such personages that Christ (too) used to be
alive, and that He lived much more simply.
Those from On High (he points upward) value whatever is in accordance with the imitation of Jesus
Christ; and what is being done at the present time is completely contrary to the imitation of Jesus
Christ. Many live in refinement, luxury, and abundance, to the point of excess, to the point even of
sinfulness. Sin has often had its beginnings at the table. Sinning begins there where a certain
asceticism should be practiced, but this asceticism is rejected.
The rejection of the spirit of sacrifice is not the sin, but the open door to sin through which it can enter.
It is this lack of asceticism that slowly leads to sin. Between the two there is only an onionskin. If the
priest does not follow the teachings of the Church, it is we who come along to pull him by the end of
his robe[23] in order to lead him onto our path. It is only a little end of his robe that we take hold of,
just for a moment, but with the hope of carrying off the whole habit.
For a long time, I fully intended to become a good priest; but it must be mentioned that priests are
attacked by us (demons) much more than the lay people are. Certainly, the lay people are also in
danger, especially those who are doing their utmost to be among the just and those who have an
important responsibility. But since the priest has a very great power for blessing, we give preference
to attacking the priest First of all.
As far as I was concerned, I used to remember that I was a priest and, at the beginning, I used to
exercise my Priesthood responsibly. And then, as time went by, I found that monotonous and,
forgetting prayer, I also forgot about celibacy. I cut out prayer, firstly because I believed I was too busy,
and then I used to take it up again occasionally, and then, finally, I abandoned it altogether. I used to
think that those long prayers in the breviary were tedious and useless and, in the end, I lost the taste
for prayer.[24]
When I cut out the breviary, I fell into the sin of impurity, and from that moment on, I had no more
taste for saying the Mass. This was a chain reaction. When I fell into impurity this was the chain
reaction - I no longer said the Mass devoutly because I was no longer in the state of grace. In this
condition, the reading of the Bible and of the Gospel, in particular, and also the sight of God's
commandments, became a reproach to me.
There was a warning for me in that, and because I paid no attention to the warning, I resolved not to
teach the children as it should have been my duty to teach them. How could I have been able to
teach them about Good, if I myself was not practicing it? But those who, today, call themselves
humanists and modernists, know all that just as well as I do.
How could they impose on lay people and children, things that they themselves do not believe and
do not practice? How could they bear teaching them as they should, knowing that their teaching is not
in accord with their interior life, and that they would therefore be telling enormous lies? Within many,
in these times, the heart has become like an abyss of death. There are many more than one would
think, who find themselves in this state. They are rotten apples; how could a rotten apple give off a
good smell? It is only a priest who strives to attain virtue, who can touch souls and give them what
they need.
If priests were to give an example of virtue, in particular to the young, we would have a world
completely different from the one we know. You would have a world a thousand times and more
better than the one you have at the present time. How can you want to spread Good if you do not
have it in you? How can I speak of the Holy Spirit, if I myself am happy not to listen to Him? How can
one point out the road to follow, when one has left if himself? It is a much deeper tragedy than you
can imagine.
The tragedy is that it is at the very moment when the priest leaves the road of virtue, that he is
tempted to draw many souls after him.
This begins with the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, which is said from beginning to end without any taste
for it. Consequently, no personal benefit is received from it. At all events, that is the way it was for me,
and I developed an aversion for the Mass and for its sacred texts, which, for someone who is
behaving badly, are a permanent reproach.
In my case, as for thousands of other priests, there was at least the Transubstantiation which allowed
the faithful to assist truly at Mass, because these people cannot know the depths of a priest's heart;
but woe betide priests who no longer say what they should say to ensure that the Mass is valid, and
who no longer live by it.
Woe betide anyone who leads the faithful onto the road of error. These priests would do better to
shout publicly from the height of the pulpit: “I have sinned. I am no longer capable of practicing virtue.
Pray for me, so that I may be converted, and once again teach the ways of virtue.” Speaking in this
way would be much better, and we demons would no longer have this power to dominate these
priests, because they would have made an act of humility.
Even if some people were going to develop a contempt for a priest who would speak this way, the
majority of those hearing him would be edified by his humility and would be able to help him to pull
himself together. The majority of the faithful would have respect for a priest who would express
himself in this manner; this would be much better than continuing along the way of lying and
hypocrisy.
What is the use of celebrating Mass facing the people, and telling them: “Come near! God pardons
you all your sins. He understands you. Come to the Father of Light; and if you are in the darkness, He
will bring you back into grace again.” They all forget that something must be done beforehand, in
order for the Father to take you back into His arms and bring you back into His grace.
It is true that the Father takes His children back into His arms, but before this happens, it is necessary
for them to repent and to promise to change the direction of their lives. It is necessary to avoid the
roads that lead to perdition.
The priest ought to think: “I must begin with myself. That would be the only way to be a model for
each one, and to be able to preach the teaching of the Holy Spirit and of Jesus Christ to the whole
community. That would also be the mission which the. Most High considers that I should preach and
carry out among the people.”
Much too much is said about the love of neighbor, while forgetting that this love results from the love
which one has for God. How can one speak of loving one's; neighbor, of drawing nearer to one
another, if one forgets the first commandment, the principal commandment: “You must love God with
all your heart, with all your soul, with all your strength.” [25] The directive to love your neighbor comes
only in second place.
If the priest were to first of all make peace with Those from On High (he points upward), love of
neighbor would immediately start to flow out. It is the freemasonic masquerade which says: “It is
necessary to love each other, to help each other, to support each other.” But where does all that lead
to? Even if one speaks of charity, or of forgiving, or of mutual support, see the result, should this only
be the number of present-day suicides.
It is true that there is a commandment to love your neighbor as yourself, but that comes after the one
to honor and adore God first of all. It is necessary to begin at the very beginning of this
commandment, and to love God first, which in fact, includes love of neighbor. It is in the first part that
the whole commandment is found. If one were to love God truly, one would not talk incessantly about
loving one's neighbor, supporting him, helping him. [26]
But nothing like that actually happens. They chatter away about it all the time, in the parish rooms, at
the bishops' conferences, and even in Rome. They chatter away, they discuss, they decide something,
they forget about it, they want to accept everything in a way which Those from On High (he points
upward) do not agree with.
Those from On High (he points upward) are not only Mercy, they are 'also Justice, and I, Verdi-
Garandieu, know what I'm talking about! If I had exercised virtue, prayed, done penance, I would not
have learned the hard way what I now know. I would have been obliged to ask for crosses in order to
help my sheep to sanctify themselves and also to sanctify myself; but I forgot to ask for those things.
In our times, the majority of priests forget that it is necessary to put into practice the way of the cross,
to make self-sacrifices, to pray for others, to forget about oneself. In our times, it should be
proclaimed, from the height of the pulpits, to our faithful, that they must do penance to make
reparation for and to raise up from the gutter all those who are wallowing there at the present time.
This would be a way of practicing Charity in its true sense.
All that,[27] to be sure, has its importance, but it all sinks into the dust, more especially as God
Himself has promised to give us what we need to live, particularly in our era where material things are
dispensed in a remarkably organized way. That is why they must not be the main goal of our charity,
but the means which allow us to have access to the other, that of God.
Certainly, it is necessary to help him who is in need, but to proceed from that to over-rating it to the
point of thrusting aside duty towards God is too much. It would be much preferable to give one's
attention from the height of the pulpit, to leading the people:
to pray for so and so who finds himself in great spiritual difficulty, and therefore in great danger; to ask
them to light a blessed candle, or to make use of the cross, the cross of the dead [28] and of holy
“water, not forgetting the Rosary in order to bring help from afar to this person.
All that brings blessings even when it is done by lay people; it flourishes in discretion and silence.
And we (demons), when confronted by such things, have to withdraw our involvement in the affair.
Men should be reminded from the height of the pulpit, that it is necessary to take religion seriously, to
sacrifice themselves for each other in order to keep up perseverance in each one's heart, and thus to
keep men on the path of virtue.
The lay people should also be told that they must pray for the members of the clergy and for all their
responsibilities, in order that they may be preserved in the service of God and not fall into the traps
of the demon. They must pray for the priests to guide the faithful well. I, too, am a priest, and it is for
that reason I suffer terribly in Hell because of the mark of my consecration.
The priests should also ask the faithful, from the height of the pulpit, to pray for themselves, because
they should make it known to the faithful that the demons are attacking them much more strongly
than they believe. They should pray for the priests in order that they may persevere in their ministry
and in the right direction until the hour of their death. It is necessary also for the lay people to pray for
each other, in order that they may continue on the road of virtue and of everything that is good, not
just occasionally, but all of the time.
It is the tragedy of thousands and thousands of priests and lay people that they have grown like
tender-weeds. Without warning, at the moment of temptation, they are trampled on by the demon, as
Jesus Christ has pointed out to us in the Gospel: because they lack either sun or water, or because the
sun has scorched them. This happens more and more as the lay people of our time are turned away
from the right road by the priests themselves, who tell them that what used to be done previously
has today been cast aside. Among them all (priests and lay people) there used to be some who
practiced great virtue, then suddenly, they have wilted because they were not rooted sufficiently
deeply in the good earth.
It is I, Verdi-Garandieu, who am telling you that it is necessary to pray constantly so that priests and
lay people may continue in perseverance. It is necessary for priests in particular to know that it must
be announced from the height of the pulpit, that prayer is more and more essential in our days. It is
necessary to recall that perseverance along the road of the cross is the law of happiness, because he
who knows how to bear (trials) is placing himself on the road to Heaven.
In particular, people who are poor must be told that they have to be content to bear their misfortune
because it is later on that they will be profoundly happy in Heaven. Even if the poor have to bear
(privations), these are, all things considered, still a long way away from the fastings and sacrifices
which were accepted by, for example, the Curé of Ars, and other great Saints, right up to the very end
of their lives. It is necessary to tell the poor that they should thank the Lord for the lot in which He has
placed them, because acceptance of poverty can help them to imitate Jesus Christ more.
Thank the Good God,[29] because in accordance with the kind of poverty that you have, you also
have much less time when you could, be succumbing to temptations, since it is necessary for you to
work all the time. Those who are endowed with a large family, and who, as a consequence, have
much to do to educate and feed them, must thank the Good God three times a day, because in these
circumstances, they have every chance of escaping from the pleasures of the world and of preparing
themselves better for the Kingdom of Heaven where their place is reserved.
When the fourth child comes into some families, then there is a drama both for the people around
and for the family itself. What is to be done? What is true for the fourth is true for the second or the
third; and, unfortunately, the priests enter into a spirit of understanding when-these complaints are
presented to them and agree that the faithful may make use of the pill to avoid the child. The faithful
do not realize the danger into which they are putting themselves, because between the taking of the
pill (already a serious fault) and abortion (an even more serious fault), the distance is short.
ABORTION IS MURDER and, consequently, a very grave sin. In our times, people are unwilling to
accept as the truth, what has been believed for thousands and thousands of centuries beforehand.
[30] So, even if God does not punish onanism straight away, as He punished the crime of Onan, [31]
our God considers the means of birth control to be as serious as anything which is done. You just
imagine then, what He thinks of abortion! FOR ALL THESE MISDEEDS ARE CONTRARY TO THE PLAN
OF SALVATION CONCEIVED BY GOD.
So, therefore, I Verdi-Garandieu, see myself under an obligation to tell everyone, bishops, cardinals
and priests, that they must, from the height of the pulpit, announce - what, then? - : “Follow the way of
the Lord, for there where self-denial and sacrifice are found, there also is the possibility of grace.”
Where there is neither sacrifice nor self-denial, no grace is possible. And where there is neither self-
denial nor sacrifice, the very smallest chink offers us, with our guile, the chance of very soon
becoming the masters. This little chink is enough for us to turn the whole house upside down, which is
what has happened to all your churches at the present time.
It is necessary to give missions to the people again, and to preach to them again, not from the choir
but from the pulpit, as we have already said before. There are even some churches where one must
descend to the altar rather than go up to it and, immediately, the people are distracted because their
gaze is not directed upward but toward the distractions which abound below, and sometimes a very
long way below, right down to our place. These popular missions should be brought back in force,
because when the road of virtue is presented in this way, it is a shower of graces that is being offered
to the people.
The influence of a priest who lives according to the laws of the Lord is enormous, which is what can
be noted in the life of the Curé of Ars of Ars. The Curé of Ars did not save souls by running off on
trips, by eating very fine food, by attending all kinds of conferences, but by remaining in his room and
in front of the Most Blessed Sacrament, which is, moreover, what I myself, Verdi-Garandieu, should
have done. Instead of that, I neglected my pastoral duties with respect to my parish, and I led it in this
manner, onto this path. In our era, there should be thousands and thousands of Curés of Ars, and if
they do not still exist, then this man should be being thought of as someone to imitate.
This is what I, Verdi-Garandieu, am obliged to say: priests must avoid habitual contact with women
and must recite the entire breviary. It is a fact that, if the priests do not say the breviary, they are in
great danger of succumbing to temptation; on the other hand, if they do recite it, the Most High
Himself helps them to overcome it, because the priests are subjected to great temptations in relation
to this.[32] It is noticeable that, even when the priest falls into sin, and in spite of that, recites his
breviary, the Most High gives him the chance of continuing his ministry and being a profitable
instrument for the faithful.
It must be said to all those who are subjected to great difficulties, that they must persevere in the
hope of the Lord, because the Lord loves to put those who love Him to the test, particularly in an age
where financial means allow men to protect themselves [33] against suffering and trials. It must be
repeated often, from the height of the pulpit, that they must first of all put their trust in the Lord in
order to be able to wrestle against their trials and to bear them.
At the present time, this point should be stressed very much, because those financial means are an
occasion of weakness, especially in parish communities, and because the easy and pleasure-filled (or
free and easy) lives of the priests, and even of the bishops, do not lead in this way to the imitation of
Christ, but rather to the loss of souls.
How could the Holy Spirit come into souls, if the priest fosters easy-going ways, by not giving the
people the understanding of sin and by holding out bright prospects before them that God is merciful
and pardons everything very easily, without their being asked to repent or to do penance. It must be
shouted from all the rooftops that the Way of the Cross is required by Heaven. It is by following the
Cross of Jesus Christ that one can best help one's neighbor to salvation, because the Good God
makes use of this penance; or rather, the Good God makes use of this penance to help in the
salvation of the neighbor. Because if one carries out the first part of the commandment of God, one
also carries out the second part of the commandment of love.
Is it really practicing love with regard to God, to celebrate Mass facing the people, as if it were being
addressed to the people and not to God? The priests must say their Masses in such a way that they
are recognizing that it is uniquely the service of God and the honor of God that are being sought
through this Sacrifice. All the rest is only complementary or supplementary; the priests preach far too
much about the things of everyday life and about love of neighbor, in general or in particular,
forgetting that it is the love of God that leads to the true love of neighbor and the true practice of
charity. This manner of action and behavior would, through the practice of self-denial and penance,
bring about the salvation of thousands and thousands of souls if people truly set about it. So many
souls are falling like snowflakes into Hell, as the privileged souls have so often reminded you.
If the bishops and priests persist in maintaining this disastrous situation, thousands and thousands of
churches will no longer be The Church, which situation has begun to happen even now. For thousands
and thousands of the faithful, the present-day sermons in the churches are justifications for remaining
perfunctory in the service of the Lord; consequently they are instruments of death, since they do not
lead directly to Heaven and do not make people think about it.
All this happened because the priest himself has got into careless ways, and no longer lives the first
commandment of love for God. Such a one is like an apple with a worm inside it, and he is no longer
the guide in the way he ought to be. If the bishops, priests and abbots had lived following the laws
determined by the Lord, you would not have this catastrophe that you now see in Rome.
IF IT HAD BEEN LIKE THAT, THE LORD WOULD NOT HAVE TOLERATED THAT SOMEONE OTHER
THAN POPE PAUL VI COULD PRETEND TO REIGN IN HIS NAME.
This state of affairs, which moreover has spread outwards from the Vatican, is the work of
freemasonry. But if, everywhere in the world, millions of faithful had united through religious exercises
to pray and do penance, and at the same time ask the Lord to bring us out from this situation, Heaven
would have prevented, would not have allowed this catastrophe to happen.
IF THEREHAD BEEN CRUSADES OF PRAYER, ROME WOULD STILL BE ROME.
I have to say this too: I must say to thousands and thousands of present-day priests that women can
become their downfall, and that this would not happen if they were to arm themselves with prayer. If
the priests were to take up their breviary and to nourish themselves on the doctrine of the Doctors of
the Church, who, as a result of prayer, have such great knowledge of men, things would go differently
for them; whereas, if they do not do this, they belong among those thousands and thousands of
priests who today are living in mortal sin.
Thousands of priests are living outside the state of grace, and they no longer say their breviary - just
as I myself used to act. If only, at the very least, I had called on my Guardian Angel [34] to help me; but
no, I rejected every means which would have allowed me to pull myself together, and in following this
way of life, I indeed neglected to teach the young people, and yet I was not nearly as bad as what is
happening today with the priests and the young people. This warning should be a. light for the priests
who are on the way to perdition.
Formerly there were still many priests who were watchful, for their own sanctification, but today they
have adopted the wide road that is, at the same time, the road to perdition. If prayers are not said for
them, if penitential souls do not rise to their defense and to obtain graces for them, they are lost. That
seems incredible, it is tragic, but I am obliged to tell it the way it is.
It is all the more tragic because our God is not a God who resembles a “sugar daddy”. He has created
laws; these laws are eternal. They must be obeyed, and the faithful should not listen to those in the
clergy who advocate change, because it is not the clergy who fix the laws, but the Lord, and His laws
remain in force eternally. It is not for nothing that the Lord caused it to be noted in the Gospel that it is
better to enter the Kingdom of Heaven blind in one eye, then to have both eyes in Hell. [35]
It is indeed through his sight that the priest of our times is becoming more and more lost. These days.
the priests do not mortify their gaze sufficiently. They receive into their hearts far too many images
that are constraints on their interior life. This begins with television, and continues on in the activities
of the parish where women are now numerous. Formerly the women in the church used to have their
heads covered. In our times, that isn't done any more. Then why turn the altar to face the people? I,
Verdi-Garandieu, used to say Mass with my back turned to the people, and even then I was still
seduced by women; today's priests with Mass said turned towards the people, have more
temptations than ever.
It is not for nothing that the Lord, in the Gospel, has said that it is better to enter (into the Kingdom)
blind in one eye, or with only one hand, or only one foot, than to enter the terrible torment of Hell
with both eyes, both hands and both feet. Could the priests believe that the Gospel has lost its value
today, and they can change it about to suit their taste? Could they believe that the Lord Jesus spoke
only for the men in whose presence He gave His message? In His time, they used to wear long robes.
[36]
It doesn't occur to the priests that perhaps He might have been speaking more for the people of our
age, where perdition is being spread more and more through technical means, and where no one is
capable of stopping what is happening. It is a burning furnace of perdition that cannot be extinguished
by the rain of efforts, to which a certain number of good priests who are struggling here and there,
feel themselves compelled.
The Lord always addresses Himself to the freedom of each individual. Besides, the Bible is there, the
Gospel in particular; and also all THE MESSAGES WHICH CONSTANTLY RECALL THE DIRECTIVES
WHICH HAVE BEEN DETERMINED BY THE LORD. If people refuse to listen to them, Heaven can do
nothing about it, especially if people are amusing themselves by adapting the Gospel to their own
taste.
If all these mercies are thrown to the wind, what can Heaven do about it? How will grace be able to
act if holy books are no longer read, or books about the Saints, for example the life of Catherine
Emmerich, or that of the Cure of Ars, or even that of Padre Pio who has given a great example to our
times. Each of these Saints feels the same love for the same sacrifice, in the same self-denials,
through love of others. The penance of these Saints has been acceptable to the Most High.
He would be just as prepared to accept still more reparations, still more sacrifices, made for the
conversion of souls. The Good God would often love people to be capable of saying to Him: “I accept
the sufferings You will send me. Give me the grace to bear them for the conversion of this one or that
one.” But on the whole, it must be said that when the Lord sends Sufferings, very often the Christians
reject them with horror and with all their strength. Man too often does his best to avoid suffering. It
should be up to the priests to live according to this way of seeing things and to preach it to the
faithful.
All those who reject suffering and seek only to eliminate it are not living in conformity with the first
commandment of God. The best way to conform to the Will of God is to say: “Not my will, but Thine
be done!”[37] This uniting oneself to the Agony of Christ would be the best way of honoring the love
of God. If suffering was united with acceptance of the Will of God, it would take on a very great value.
[38]
Excruciating as certain sufferings may be, by uniting them with those of Christ, they would be the
means both of sanctification and of reparation for the sins of others. I am thinking of all the sufferings
which are sometimes inherent in the state of marriage and how they are rejected in the hope that one
day, perhaps, one will be able to separate from one's partner, and yet, if they are borne, these
sufferings would accomplish great reparations. Thousands and thousands of people would be able to
suffer thinking of others and these sufferings offered up would not be in vain.
All that is completely forgotten in your Catholic Church of today. Very rarely is it mentioned from the
pulpit, and that applies everywhere. The imitation of Jesus Christ and the solicitude for the salvation of
one's neighbor are the things that are important. The rest is secondary, and this is what “Love you
neighbor as yourself[39] is all about.
If Christ were to come back into your midst, there would be thousands and thousands of people who
would again look on Him as a revolutionary and a madman. All those who are pledged to following
Christ today are looked upon as fools. Instead of raising themselves up to the heights, people are
going down to the depths, and so many priests are no longer preaching these truths because they are
for them a vivid reproach, because they are no longer living by them. If they themselves were to
practice virtue, they would be able to ask much more from the people. How can I think that others
might want what I do not want myself?
It is a truly tragic state of affairs in which you are living now in the Catholic Church. That applies from
the priests right to the cardinals in Rome. If the priests were to live like Christ and the Apostles, they
would be leading souls along a much better-lit and much safer road. As Saint John the Baptist and
Jesus preached in their time, they must be converted and do penance.
So many priests nowadays are fighting against effort and good because they themselves have turned
in the direction of evil. They are already on the broad highway which leads to the abyss. This is what
the priests should be told straight to the face, but in a manner which respects the ways of psychology
and which indicates that one is only concerned about their well-being. It is not a question of telling
them that they are bad, but of MAKING USE OF PSYCHOLOGY, [40] to bring them to the point of
coming back (to where they should be).
It is necessary to ask questions in their presence, at all events very discreetly, to find out whether they
have stopped praying or not, and to bring them to the understanding that the things of God become
clear only through prayer, just as solicitude for the salvation of souls. As for those who are more
capable of accepting criticism, one could make use of that with regard to them, and, perhaps, thanks
to God, bring them back again. Natures are different. It is necessary to adapt oneself according to
what one is faced with, in the same way that Padre Pio used to do.
Some among the priests are perhaps victims of ignorance, but the majority know very well into what
a state of deficiency they have fallen; reminding them of their vocation could perhaps be a way of
bringing them back onto the straight road and to the Lord. All, without exception, would lead the souls
they have to be concerned with, much better, if they were to enter onto the road of self-denial [41] It
is very, very true that I would prefer to remain silent, except that Those from On High (he points
upward) are ordering me to reveal and to recall to mind, although I am in Hell, into which I never
thought I would fall.
What sufferings I would undergo, on my knees, for the defense of my flock, if I could come back on
earth! I would accept even martyrdom to save my flock, and several times even. I would accept it
voluntarily and with the greatest devoutness, if this were the Will of Those from On High (he points
upward). My main goal would be first of all to carry out the first commandment, and to seek means of
honoring it and making myself worthy of this commandment. I would ask the Good God to enlighten
me about His Will concerning me.
There is a principle that says that, when in doubt, one should choose the way that costs the most. [42]
Are the priests and the faithful giving any thought to this principle? It is only a proverb. God did not
say it, but it is quite suitable to the situation. Thousands of priests are on the road to perdition
because they have chosen the easiest road. Yes, they choose the way of least resistance. This manner
of action is not what is pleasing in the eyes of God.
It is necessary to know, paying heed to the Apostle Saint Paul, how to distinguish between the
possible solutions, and to choose the best. It is essential to pray to the Holy Spirit, as Beelzebub, Judas
and all the other demons have already said, before me. Everyone must strive to recognize his true
vocation, because THE LORD HAS A PRECISE PLAN FOR EACH PERSON. Already highly regarded
before the Lord, because of his priestly state, the priest should also present himself before men with
a great authority. He must draw near men and make himself esteemed among them because he is
truly following the way about which he speaks, which is in line with his vocation.
The faithful need to see before them someone who gives them example, and not someone who leads
them to perdition, or who, at all events, in spite of the fact that he is a priest, lives the way of
perdition. There should be a great distance between a priest and a layman. The Most High has always
wanted that, because THE PRIEST IS A TREASURE-HOUSE OF BLESSINGS. The priest ought to make
people think of this High Priest Who is Jesus Christ, and for this reason, should draw to himself the
respect of the faithful. Throughout his life he must remember untiringly, what a great majesty the
Divinity represents, and he must believe that we have the duty to adore It and to live It as It
commands.
It is something which should be taught from earliest years. Children, even the very young, must be led
into the churches in such a way that, when passing in front of the Tabernacle, they get into the habit of
genuflecting with the greatest devotion; they must be helped to adore the Most Blessed Sacrament,
by saying prayers such as this one: “Praised and adored be the Most Blessed Sacrament of the Altar.”
The children should then be invited to invoke the Holy Angels so that they can help them to praise
the Divine Majesty and the grandeur of the Most Holy Trinity in the highest heavens.
What does a Church stand for which is no longer capable of raising hearts towards the Most Holy
Trinity? What does a Church stand for which no longer presents God as being above men in every
way, which no longer points out the sublimity of the Most Holy Trinity, which no longer recalls that it is
absolutely essential to be pleasing to the Almighty in Heaven? If the priests don't do this any more, at
least the parents should be doing it as far as their own children are concerned. One must never cease
making it known that God must be adored, even if all around one, the state of souls is very bad and
very distressing.
It should be known that, when suffering is accepted, it is necessary to thank God for the triumph
which He will know how to extract for us from this difficulty. The Lord should be thanked on one's
knees, for the sufferings that He sends to us in order to make us better and to lead us on the way of
virtue. THOSE WHO FLEE FROM DIFFICULTIES AND SUFFERINGS ARE DOOMED TO LOSE VIRTUE.
In past centuries, there were always priests who were at the heights of their vocation. But, in our times
too, there are some who are living the same way, in very humble circumstances; because they carry
the peace of the Lord in their hearts, they surpass everyone on earth.:'' What use is it if a man gains
the universe, but ends up losing his soul?” [43] I, Verdi-Garandieu, have to say that our era is very
badly enlightened on this subject. It is in an age, where there is no love of neighbor, that the Church
has set about preaching the love of neighbor, exclusively. The true love of neighbor begins with
concern for his soul, and not with concern for his body. Isn't it better for men to perish through plague
and war and all kinds of suffering, and, by saving their souls, to acquire the glory of God?
Furthermore, men who live in luxury and earthly pleasures are in great danger of losing their souls.
CHARITY OF THE MASONIC TYPE HAS THE SMELL OF DECAY. It is the perdition of so many souls
because it is not truly love of neighbor, but comes from hypocrisy. If they (the priests) knew into what
perdition they are making their faithful sink, they would hurry away from this kind of talk and would
speak completely differently.
It is obvious that one should help others materially, especially if they are suffering much misery, but it
is not the main thing. The main thing is to remain faithful to the Doctrine which one must defend, and
not to sell one's soul. To practise love of neighbor is to lead the neighbor onto the straight road. Alas!
Thousands of priests, directed by their bishops and cardinals, have imposed on the Church this way
of living charity;[44] by doing this, they have altered the shape of this virtue in a manner, which is not
at all what God determined it should be.
This is because TRUE LOVE OF NEIGHBOR IS NEVER PRESENT WITHOUT SOLICITUDE FOR THE
SOUL OF THE NEIGHBOR, because making him suffer by telling him and showing him the truth, is also
practicing love of neighbor. Later on, he will recognize [45] that this was, indeed, the right medicine.
The priest, from the height of the pulpit, should, in his language, make use of the stick and very
determined words, because justice exists in eternity; and because Hell exists, which they never speak
about any more, since they no longer believe in it. They no longer even believe in Heaven in it's
supreme reality. If they did believe in it, they would not be leading thousands of people into error,
people whom they should be leading towards Heaven.
What kind of priests are we up against today? I myself did not speak in my time as contemptibly as
they do today. They are running towards perdition and their place in Hell is already prepared (the
demon shouts this last observation). '
But what I am saying now, I am saying equally as much for the cardinals, the bishops, the priests, the
lay people. If all these people knew the chaotic situation in which they are entangled, they would say
a thousand times 'mea culpa' - a thousand times a thousand times. They would take themselves by
the scruff of the neck and they would tear out these worms that are eating away their souls. They
would not stop tearing these worms out in order to prevent them from spreading everywhere. They
should use red-hot pincers to destroy these parasites that are working so much destruction in souls.
They should immediately put into practice the first part of the commandment of love, and after that,
the proper love of neighbor.
True love is not manifested only through gifts, because even with these gifts, the neighbor can still be
being maintained on the road to Hell. That is what I have been obliged to say, and that is what
explains why, for such a long time, I refused to say my name. But Those from On High (he points
upward) have forced me to speak, because I have lived this destiny myself; because I myself did not
carry out my priesthood as I should have.
The difficulties of the Sixth Commandment, [46] I must say this, together with luxury, [47] have become
the means of perdition for many priests. If they were to recognize this immense tragedy they would
sacrifice themselves to the last drop of their blood. They would have an immense sorrow for
everything which has happened, and they would go right back to square one. They would call to their
rescue all the Saints and Angels, so that they could help them to find the true road again, because in
the eternity of Hell the fire is continuous, and the worm eats away at your soul for ever. This immense
pain, this horrible tragedy of Hell, lasts for eternity, and I, Verdi-Garandieu, am forced to say these
things.”
POSTSCRIPT
“All would be completely destroyed - in the Vatican - if it were not for the presence of the true Pope.
Yes! If the Pope were not praying, on his knees, day and night, and sending his pleas up to the Lord,
by now the Church would have been wrecked - the whole Church would have reached the bottom.
But this Holy Father, with his great sanctity, has been installed and predestined so that the Church
does not sink.
Your Church would not be The Church any more if Pope Paul VI had not existed. But Pope Paul VI has
been predestined for all eternity in the Plan of God, for this age: so that that Church would not be
submerged and that one man, the Pope, would know how to carry it. Because his sufferings and his
crosses allow him to carry it still. Every day he is living a martyrdom, a great martyrdom. The Pope
bears immense sorrows, which no one else among those who are in the Vatican, would be capable of
bearing.
And foul mouths have the temerity to attack this very Holy Father! For it is not the Pope who has set
the Church in the wrong direction, but the double and his helpers. These wretches do not realize that
the sufferings which they have been responsible for in the soul of the Pope, have been the means by
which they have donned the boots which are leading them to Hell and condemning them.
It is we (demons - by order of the Most Holy Trinity) who are making known what the Gospel has
already repeated several times ... that Hell is a terrible thing. Neither the Gospel, nor all the
descriptions which could be given to you, would be able to convey to you the appalling thing which is
Hell. And we are the ones who are suggesting to everybody, priests or lay people, that Hell does not
exist.”
PRAYER TO SAINT MICHAEL, THE ARCHANGEL[48]
Holy Michael, Archangel, defend us in the day of battle, be our safeguard against the wickedness and
the snares of the Devil.
May, God restrain him, we humbly pray, and do thou, O Prince of the Heavenly Host, by the power of
God, thrust Satan down to Hell, and with him all the other wicked spirits who wander through the
world for the ruin of souls.
AMEN.
A Question: Why such an exceptional procedure of avowals drawn from the demon, to make known
the truth about the Church today? The Answer (given by Judas during the Exorcism of September 15,
1977 - unedited text): “The Church has never, in man's memory, been delivered to a destruction
carried out so subtly by all the demonic forces and powers, free-masonry and everything which is
connected with them. That is why the Most High (he points upward) must use all the means which are
STILL AVAILABLE to Him.” Since, let us specify: ... the means of His Apparitions: Kerizinen,
Garabandal, San Damiano ... have failed; ... the means of the privileged souls: Filiola, the priest of
Utrecht, Jeanette of France ('Parce Domine') and so many others ... have failed; etc.
If what is left fails again, the only means remaining will be the Chastisements.
The “Warnings” from Heaven, directed to “Traditionalists” [50] through the spokesmanship of the
Demon Beelzebub, on June 18, 1977, have prompted us to reflect as follows:
“Cry aloud, never ceasing, raise thy voice like a trumpet call, and tell my people of their
transgressions, call the sons of Jacob to account” (ISAIS 58, 1)
It will be noticed that in these Warnings, as also in the others on the same subject, the Demon does
not use the word: “integrationists”. And yet, outside of the pejorative meaning which is artificially
attributed to it, this term contains an authentic reality: that of maintaining in the face of ravening
wolves, the INTEGRITY OF DOCTRINE, which originates from Revelation AND from Apostolic
Tradition.
Neither does the Demon make use of the word: “progressivists”, one of his inspired godsends
moreover, because it suggests the word “Progress” - this mirage - the Blessed Virgin without a doubt
not having authorized its use here.
In this term “progress”, there is, very often, a return to pagan spiritual barbarism. It is, fundamentally,
the affirmation of the rights of man being substituted for the rights of God. It is quite simply and
unconditionally the “non serviam” - “I refuse to obey” of the first rebel, Lucifer. [51]
The most important - and far-reaching, because of its almost universal influence - official public
manifestation of this spirit of revolt of the creature against his Creator, is the “Declaration of the Rights
of Man”, voted by the Constituent Assembly on August 26, 1789, still in force, and directly inspired by
the ideas of the deistic and naturalistic philosophers of the eighteenth century, ideas having been
impregnated with Masonic principles.
This satanic principle of the rights of man has acquired its universal status under the name of “the
right of peoples to make their own decisions”, which became, after the war, the right to self-
determination. It has its official translation in the very Masonic UNO, the work on this occasion of High
American Masonry. This cacaphonic aviary of the UNO, in which more than 140 countries or states
sing, some louder than others!
Whoever sees only this planetary spread would not know that the only ones to profit are the two
associated master singers[52]: American plutocracy and Soviet imperialism; the first having in tow the
liberal systems, the second: the communist regimes. With, at the summit, their common orchestral
conductor: LUCIFER.
Michel Servant explains all this in his book: “Watch and Pray ....”, mentioned previously. His thesis is
confirmed by facts on the natural plane, and by prophecies on the supernatural plane; for these two
planes cannot be dissociated under pain of condemning oneself to UNDERSTANDING NOTHING of
what is happening.
And the Warnings from the Beyond, published here, fit perfectly into this chain, being both realistic
and prophetic at the same time, which gives them an extraordinary solidity. “If it has been the Will of
God, in this case, to make use of demons to proclaim the truth: His Church is occupied, taken over,
humanity is reduced to slavery.- this is not only to show that He was the Master, the only Master of the
demons as of all the other creatures, and of events, but also to reveal that all the iniquities which are
corrupting the Church, and through that the whole world, are not simply the work of men, however
depraved they may be, but are more profoundly, the work of the demons, who are driving them from
interior action. That is called: possession, infestation, envelopment, obsession, temptation. The
analysis of this can be read in the pamphlet: “Exorcisme. Expérience Vécue.” (“Exorcism. An Actual
Experience.”)
That is really why, fundamentally, nothing remains but spiritual means to regain peace and liberty, for
God alone knows how to deliver us and to liberate the Church, [53] the Mistress of Truth, from its
occupiers: cardinals and other unworthy prelates, of whom the Holy Father, Pope Paul VI, is the
prisoner and the victim.
To achieve that, all sincere Christians must, of necessity, unite with courage in reciprocal love and the
mutual respect for their vocation.
That is really why the heavenly accusations addressed to the “traditionalists” through the demonic
voice assume a tragic accent, because it is THROUGH THEIR UNITY, SEALED WITH HUMILITY, THAT
VICTORY CAN COME. Failing that, we are heading straight for the Chastisements.
One can therefore, legitimately ask oneself: If the world does not believe, is this not ALSO the fault of
those who want to keep on the good way: in the light of Tradition and in the Truth? “I pray ... that they
may ALL be ONE ... so that the world may come to believe that it is Thou (the Father) Who has sent
Me.” (John 17, 21)
When then is the criminal behavior of their disunity - where pride looms large - finally going to end?
What Heaven has affirmed so strongly in these “Warnings”, on the subject of Ecône and its Superior,
clearly points out the way, the only way, for salvation: the maintaining of the “True Mass”.
This is exactly what Our Lord demanded three years earlier in His messages transmitted through
Jeannette of France, and which we have published in the pamphlet 'Parce Domine': “The Mass for all
times, fraudulently supplanted, must in point of fact, be brought back” (June 26, 1972) “Rome will in
effect, have to put the helm hard over to re-establish the TRUE MASS” (June 23, 1973)
The HOLY SACRIFICE of the Mass, the renewal of that of Calvary, is the Sovereign Center for all the
graces of the world, their reviving and irreplaceable Source, the Focus and Culminating Point of all the
Liturgy (cf. Vatican II) and the Source of all the vitality of the Church, and through Her, of the world.
All those who wish to be Her (the Church's) defenders must be UNITED around Her, and, in the front
ranks, the “Traditionalists” on whom it falls to give the example, according to the degree of their
vocation ... and their responsibility.
THEN, the Holy Father, Paul VI, would be in a much stronger position to be able lo free himself from
his imprisoning mould and to proclaim the Truth URBIS ET ORBI, by publishing his document which
has been ready for three years, on the re-establishment of the one authentic Sacrifice of the Mass (at
least in the Latin Church of today): the Tridentine Mass. [54]
AT THE SAME TIME the “great movement of reparation and public penance” demanded by the Heart
of Jesus, could take place A movement: which must be initiated by “the Holy Father ... at Vézelay” by a
personal public act of penance; which must he taken up by “France, the eldest daughter of the
Church”, which “must give the example”; and which, finally, must be spread through the whole world
(messages of January 31, April 6, April 23, 1967, etc. - 'Parce Domine')
THEN, God would act - He alone can do it, but He will not do it without us - and sweep away the
ecclesial Subversion: the clique of treacherous cardinals and disloyal prelates who, with their
followers, have taken over the Church.
THEN, without the Chastisements,[55] that would be God's victory which will be the triumph of the
Holy Church; through the return to unity of ALL Christians, and the return to Truth of ALL “men of
good will”, the unyielding ungodly suffering their fate. And that will be the “Golden Age” on earth:
THE REIGN OF JESUS AND OF MARY,[56] OF THE SON AND OF THE MOTHER
JEAN MARTY
President of the French Association
“TOUT RESTAURER DANS LE CHRIST”
P.S. 1
We find, in the text of the exorcism of January 23, 1978, this exhortation from Judas: “You must support
each other, you must regroup yourselves. But this is the age of which Christ has said that there would
come a time when brother would rise up against brother, son against father etc. [57] And that is what
is happening in your Church, even in the “Traditionalists” camp ... we do not wish to speak!”
P.S. 2
Beelzebub declared during the exorcism of November 7, 1977: “No barricades stand against us at the
present time. ALL the barriers have been raised. We can cross as we please.”
That is clear, and alas, true! The demons are no longer meeting any obstacles standing in their way,
not even within the Church. Paul VI proclaimed it on June 29, 1972: “The smoke of Satan [58] has
entered into the Temple of God”: the Church. So if Satan is IN THE CHURCH, how can anyone hold
that he is not EVERYWHERE ELSE as well?
Beelzebub adds: “The Traditionalists, those fools, are making openings. [59] They do not have the
courage to stand fast, and they make openings. And through them we can most often pass.”
The conclusion seems clear to us. To the frequent usage of the sovereign remedies: HOLY
CONFESSION and HOLY EUCHARIST, one MUST add the two specific remedies: THE ROSARY and
EXORCISM, the one which Leo XIII made accessible to ALL: priests and lay people, since 1884.
We can bear witness to the marvelous results that their daily recitation brings (the Rosary and the
Exorcism) into humanly desperate situations.
CONCLUSION
We asked a theologian, Father Bernard, who is well versed in mysticism, if he would be agreeable to
expressing his thoughts following the reading of these “Warnings”:
“For a theologian, the principal objection which can present itself when confronted by such
“revelations”, is this: What credit can be given to the statements of possessed people? For there are
two possibilities:
1. That it may be the human spirit who is speaking and may be expressing its own thoughts;
2. That it may be the demonic spirits, and that they may be lying, lying being the soul of Hell.
For the first, we reply: the human spirit of the possessed woman in this instance, [60] would not know
how to speak as a damned soul and at the same time, to proclaim ceaselessly the truths of salvation,
not to mention thousands of things outside her competence, and thousands of phenomena peculiar
to possessions and exorcisms, and inexplicable by natural laws.
For the second, we reply: it is true that the demons are always very clever about lying. But it is also
true that they can be COMPELLED by God to tell the truth, just as they can be compelled by Him to
go away.
How do you know if they are lying or if they are acting under compulsion from God? Firstly, by the
contents of what they are saying: everything which conforms to the authentic Faith is true, and
inversely for what is contrary to it. Finally, by the circumstances demonstrating their compulsion, in
particular by the fact that they are not able to resist the Divine adjurations and prayers, by the sanctity
of the person whom they are possessing, by the necessity whereby they have to speak before being
expelled, and to go away after having said EVERYTHING that they must say.
In the present case, the two points are inarguable. What is more, it is obvious that they are under a
singular compulsion - as they themselves keep on saying, OVER AND OVER AGAIN - to have to
proclaim the truths which are the most damaging to their own interests as demons, and the most
useful for the Divine Cause.
We are well aware that this book will be violently rejected, by some, criticized profusely by many
others, in ALL camps. It is not difficult to foresee that it will not please everybody.
We state only this: the position, that is to say the overall position, which each one will take when faced
with these “revelations” will be exactly that which he will take faced with God. For it is the very
teaching of the Church, the authentic teaching of the authentic 2,000-year old Church which is
contained in the evidence here.
There are, it is true, points that relate to contingent matters in particular on the subject of the
impostors who imprison and torture the Pope. But even there, if one is willing to really think about it,
the logic of the True Faith pertains there much more than the facile skepticism of the “Freethinkers”,
those whom the Enemy blinds and makes use of with the greatest ease and cheek.
Let us also note that, taken as a whole, these “revelations” can be verified, and are in fact verified,
from different and important sources. And, indeed, many good souls knew all this already, or at least,
the essential part of it.
In the same way as, in fact this division between those who “believe in them” and those who “don't
believe in them” is largely predetermined beforehand by the choice of each one opposite God.
In the final analysis, the best advice we can give to those who are sincerely seeking the truth, is that
given in the text itself: Get down on your knees, and pray with humility, fervor and persistence, pray
especially to the Holy Spirit.
We want to add just one thing: put yourself in the presence of God, with the same intensity as if you
knew you were going to die in a few hours and be judged by Him. [61] It is to those who refuse to
take this view of Eternity as a fundamental precondition for seeing things clearly, that Our Lord gives
the terrible lesson of the “Wicked Rich Man” [62]; he saw clearly only when it was too late, irrevocably
and cruelly too late, and all through his own fault.
And it is not we, but Our Lord who bitterly concludes His Lesson: “If they do not listen to Moses and
the Prophets, they will be unbelieving still, though one should rise from the dead.”
April 25, 1977 - “Not even in the case of minor declarations do Those up there allow them to be false.
Yet if anyone does not believe them, we are delighted about it (we, the demons).”
June 18, 1977 - “We (the demons) were hoping that this book might disappear before being
successfully distributed. However, this wretched scrap paper (“Warnings from the Beyond”) has grown
even bigger. Alas! Only thanks to the will of Those up there. From the human viewpoint, this rag would
not have been able to proceed.”
July 13, 1977 - SHE (the Blessed Virgin) and the Holy Trinity ... make it known that it is sad that They
have been forced to reveal so many things through the medium of demons, because they were not
believed when they came from the mouths of privileged souls.”
OBJECT LESSON
The Blessed Virgin to sister Josefa Menendez, the messenger of the Heart of Jesus:
“My daughter, I wish to give you a lesson of great importance: the demon is like a wild dog, but he is
chained, which means he has only limited freedom. He can therefore only seize and devour his prey
when it comes near him; and in order to lay hold of it, his usual tactic is to transform himself into a
lamb. The soul does not realize this, comes gradually nearer and discovers his malice only when it
finds itself within striking distance. When he seems to be a long way away, do not cease to watch out
for yourself, my daughter; his movement is silent and stealthy in order to pass unnoticed.” [64]
WITNESSES
The priests whose names are listed below, testify that, based on their personal knowledge of this case
of possession, they are firmly convinced of the authenticity of the revelations made by the demons,
by order of the Blessed Virgin:
Abbot Albert d'Arx, Nieder-Buchsiten,
Abbot Arnold Egli, Ramiswil,
Abbot Ernest Fischer, missionary, Gossau,
Reverend Father Pius Gervasi, o.s.b., Disentis,
Abbot Karl Holdener, retired, Ried.
Reverend Father Gregoire Meyer, Trimbach,
Reverend Father Robert Rinderer, e.p.p.s., Auw,
Abbot Louis Veillard, retired, Cerneux-Pequignot.
DECLARATION
Some of the shepherds of the Church who ought to be protectors of the Faith and of the Truth are that
no longer. That is why the Blessed Virgin Mary forces Satan -the father of lies - to tell the truth and to
teach the pure doctrine of the Church, even while he fulminates against these Warnings. It is a
question of waking the shepherds up and bringing about the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of
Mary, the Mother of the Holy Church.
It must be understood that all these communications should be compared with the authentic doctrine
of the Church and with its present situation. But it is certain, here and now, that the contents of this
book show the way towards a profound renewal of the Church.
PREFACE[65]
The “Warnings from the Beyond”: nothing extraordinary, yet everything is extraordinarily clear. Nothing
has changed in Catholic Doctrine. Hell exists ... and how! Demons, under compulsion by the Virgin
Mary, have put forward a despairing description of it.
The Church can change, can adapt itself in its non-essential points, as it has always done throughout
history. But its message, its doctrine, its 'dogma' concerning' the Sacrifice of the Mass, remain complete
and unchanging. Woe to whoever takes advantage of our eccentric times to preach a different Gospel
from that which was stamped by the Blood of Jesus, Christ on the Cross.
After the Holy Trinity, the Virgin Mary is the Great Personage of Heaven and Earth. Anyone who can
imagine that in our days a truly Catholic Pastorate can go without her help ... is already set on the road
which leads to the loss of the Catholic Faith. Nothing is more humble than the Virgin Mary, nothing is
more immense.
Who is it saying these things, who is preaching so well? It is Judas Iscariot; it is demons, furious at
being forced to wake our shepherds up, by order of the sublime Shepherdess of the Church, the
Virgin Mary!
In all this, what is happening to the Pope? Paul VI is a new “Man of Sorrows”, a man for whom every
Catholic should have compassion - for a mystery surrounds this apparently disastrous Pontificate. But,
as you read ... you will understand that this Vicar of Jesus Christ has not yet finished being spoken
about.[66]
A book to think about, a book to be read, an unforgettable book. Hell is spitting out the truth. [67] It is
a miracle from God.
December 24, 1977
(ADDITIONAL NOTE: Pope Paul VI is no longer with us, but surely this book may be regarded as
being a posthumous vindication for this holy and suffering martyr.)
NOTES ON PRESENTATION
I. The revelations which are the subject of this work have been collected and published:
- by Bonaventure Meyer, for the German language edition, for the “Marianisches Schriftenwerk” -
4632 Trimbach (Switzerland) under the title: “Mahnung aus dem Jenseits uber die Kirche in unserer
Zeit”, with the sub-title: “Textliche Dokumentation der Aussagen von Dämonen beim Exorzismus”
- by Jean Marty, for the French language edition, accompanied by original notes, under the
auspices of the Association “Tout Restaurer dans le Christ” with the title “Avertissements de l'Au-delà à
l'Eglise contemporaine”, sub-titled “Aveux de L' Enfer.” [68]
II. This “Beyond” - which is beyond the visible world and is, therefore, the invisible world - is also and,
most importantly, an “Above”: above the perceptible world. For it consists of purely spiritual beings:
Angels and Demons, who are pure spirits.
This invisible Beyond - which is not self-evident because those who belong to it need intermediary
bodies or materials: men, animals, plants, elements ... to be made perceptible - is still perfectly real or
living. We are going to see the truth of that all through these pages.
Here, the actors in this drama are demons - fallen angels, angelic demons therefore; but there are also
human demons present in the case, fur example Judas Iscariot. [69]
III. SIMPLE OPINION It was during the third reading of these Warnings, while reflecting and praying
about them - always with pen in hand, as a supplementary aid for reflection - that we began to
discover the meat in them and to assimilate their substance. And yet, God knows whether, for almost
ten years, the announcements and information from the Beyond were becoming familiar to us as a
preparation for this work-sailing by in the midst of reefs of ancient prophecies and shoals of modern
prophecies.
But the Word of God, even transmitted through private prophecies, once perceived, lets itself be
integrated into our life only after we have given our complete attention to it.
IV.
N.B. 1 - The number of exorcists present during the exorcisms varies from two to six. The exorcisms
are still going on.
N.B. 2 - During the exorcisms - particularly lively as you will see -there are always people praying in a
chapel before the Most Blessed Sacrament.
N.B. 3 - “We have invited the Swiss Bishops to be present during the Exorcisms. No favorable
response has been received.” (Bonaventure Meyer)
N.B. 4 - A copy of a film of the exorcisms carried out on January 23, 1978, has been sent to the Swiss
Bishops.
V.
N.B. 1 - All the notes at the bottom of the pages are proper to the French edition.
N.B. 2 - The abbreviated expression: “In the name ...!”, used very frequently in the book, recalls that
the Exorcist has been constantly obliged, in order to compel the Demon to tell the truth, to give him
the command to do so: “In the name of the Most Holy Trinity, Father, Son and Holy Spirit” followed by
many other invocations (see Part One). The constant repetition of these adjurations is not justified in
the text, which would have become too tedious (see the explanatory note of Father Renz, on this
same topic)
INTRODUCTION
Never in the course of the history of the Church, have the truths of the Faith been placed in question
by its own members, nor been so shaky in the minds of the faithful, as in our day. We are living the
self-destruction of the Church by its own members, which Pope Paul lamented earlier in Holy Week
1969.
The Catholic doctrine about the Holy Angels and the Devil has also been plunged into the fiery
furnace of the forge of Truth, and has become for many a red-hot poker. The burning character and
the reality of the questions which are connected with this topic are testified to, on the one hand, by
the great increase on the world book market of literature concerning the Holy Angels and the Devil;
on the other hand, through such phenomena as the new cult of Satan in the United States, and the
world-wide success of the film, “The Exorcist”.
At the same time, while Catholic professors of Theology are proclaiming the “death of the devil” and
the whole ecclesiastic Institution is taking on a diabolical character in all sorts of ways, the opinion is
spreading, even into the liberal papers of the USA, that “the devil is no more than the product of a
primitive superstition.”
In the seven volume dogmatique “Mysterium Salutis”, the work of Swiss Theologians J. Feiner and M.
Lohrer, M. Speman first deals with some preliminary questions on angelology and demonology.
The author endeavors to build on biblical and dogmatic foundations with human experience. He
observes: “The existence and activity of Satan can be perceived, or at least recognized, better today,
in a time when evil, violence and inhumanity have acquired a public legitimacy as never before; in a
time when in depth psychology teaches that realities cannot be eliminated or made inoperative, by
simply declaring, in the name of rationalist reasoning, that they do not exist.”
The Roman Catechism teaches, and the Second Vatican Council confirms, that the Church draws
revealed Truth from two sources: Holy Scripture and oral Tradition. The Church, through its
Magisterium, has the authority to declare the truths of Faith obligatory for all the faithful. Public
revelation ceased with the death of the last of the Apostles.
Thus we have a clearly defined treasury of Faith, the “depositum fidei”. The Church must transmit this
treasury of Faith, intact, to all generations. In that consists the role and the duty of Tradition in the
Church. In the framework of this public Revelation, the Church recognizes and ratifies the existence of
private revelations, above all those that have a general interest for the Church. “Private revelations,
says theologian Karl Rahner, are not a luxury for the Church, but a necessity indicating to her how to
act in an historically determined situation.”
On the basis of this information, it has seemed at least useful, if not necessary, to reproduce at the
beginning of these revelations resulting from the exorcism, the most recent teachings of Paul VI on
the existence and activity of demons; [70] then an interview with His Eminence, Cardinal Joseph
Hoeffner of Cologne, on the occasion of an actual case of possession; and after that to show the
parallelism between the visions of the stigmatic Catherine Emmerich and the present crisis of the
Church.
(At the General Audience of November 15,1972) What are the most important needs of the Church
today? Do not be astonished by our reply, which you could find simplistic, or even superstitious or
unreal. One of its greatest needs is to defend itself against this evil that we call the demon.
Before giving details of our thinking, we invite you to consider, within a perspective of faith, human
life, the immense panorama of which we can henceforth uncover and examine in depth. This tableau
whose whole reality we are to contemplate is, indeed, very beautiful. It is the tableau of creation, of
God's work, the substantial beauty of which, being an exterior reflection of His Wisdom and Power, He
Himself has admired.
So it is with much interest that we look at this tableau of the dramatic history of humanity, from which
emerges the story of Christ's Redemption, of our salvation, with its marvelous treasures of revelation,
prophecy and sanctity, of life elevated to a supernatural plane, of eternal promises. (Cf. Eph. 1,10)
If we know how to look at this picture properly, we cannot fail to be amazed. (Cf. St. Augustine,
“Soliloquies”)
Everything has a meaning, everything has a purpose, an order; everything indicates a transcending
presence, a thought, a life, and finally, a love of such a kind that the universe, through what it is and
through what it is not, is presented to us as a rapturous and intoxicating preparation for something still
more beautiful and still more perfect. (Cf. 1 Cor. 2,9; 13,12; Rom. 8. 19-23)
The Christian vision of the cosmos and of life is therefore triumphantly optimistic. This vision justifies
our joy and our understanding of living; in celebrating the Glory of God, we sing of our happiness (Cf.
the “Gloria” of the Mass)
But is this vision complete? Is it correct? Are we insensible to the deficiencies which exist in the
world, to the things which are out of harmony in our existence - to suffering, death, wickedness,
cruelty, sin - in short, to evil? Do we not see all the evil which exists in the world, especially moral evil
- that is, evil which is committed simultaneously, although by varying degrees, against man and against
God? Is this not a sad spectacle, an inexplicable mystery?
And we, the disciples of the Word, we who extol good, we the believers - are we no longer sensitive
to, no longer troubled by the sight and the experience of evil? We find it in the realm of nature, where
so many of its manifestations seem to us to proclaim a disorder; we find it among men, where we see
weakness, fragility, suffering, death and even worse; we are in the presence of two opposing laws: the
one which would wish for good, the other which tends towards evil. Saint Paul has shown clearly the
humbling evidence of this torment in order to show the necessity of, the good fortune of, the grace
which saves us - this means of the salvation brought by Christ. (Cf. Rom. 7) In the past, the pagan poet,
Ovid, wrote of this conflict in the heart of man: “Video meliora proboque, deteriora sequor.” (“I see
what is good and I am in agreement with it, but I do what is evil” (Met. 7, 19)
We find sin, the corruption of human liberty and the fundamental cause of death, because it is a
separation from God, the Source of life (Rom. 5,12); sin, the occasion and the effect of the intervention
within us and in our world, of a dark and hostile agent, the Demon. Evil is not just a deficiency, it is the
fact of a living, spiritual being, corrupt and corrupting. A terrible, mysterious and dangerous reality.
Those who refuse to acknowledge his existence, or who attribute him with an autonomous beginning,
not having had his origin in God as did all creation, are deviating from the teaching of the Bible and of
the Church; as also are those who explain him as a pseudo-reality, an invention of the mind to
personify the unknown causes of our evils.
The problem of evil, complex and preposterous for our unilaterally rational minds, becomes
obsessive. It constitutes the greatest difficulty for our religious conception of the cosmos. Saint
Augustine who suffered from it for many years, knew this well: “I was searching to find the source of
evil, but I could find no explanation.” (“Confessions” VII 5,7,11 etc.)
Hence the importance of the awareness of evil, in order to be able to see the world, life, and
salvation, in a correct Christian perspective. Who does not recall in the Gospel, that chapter so heavy
with meaning, about the triple temptation of Christ at the beginning of His public life: or the numerous
accounts where the Lord meets the demon, and features him in His teachings (for example. Matt 12,
43)? And how can we forget that three times Christ calls His enemy, the Demon: “Prince of this world”
(John 12,31; 14,30; 16,11).
The reality of this baleful presence is emphasized in very numerous passages of the New Testament.
Saint Paul calls him “the God of this world” (2 Cor. 4,4); and he warns us that we Christians have to
struggle against the powers of darkness, having not one such demon, but a redoubtable plurality of
demons confronting us: Put on the armor of God, so you will be able to withstand the maneuvers of
the devil. It is not man who is our opponent, but Principalities, Powers, Dominations from this world of
darkness, Spirits of Evil who are widely distributed in the atmosphere. (See Eph. 6, 12-13)
Many passages from the Gospel show us that it is not a question of just one, but of numerous
demons. (Luke 11.21; Mark 5.9) One of them however, is the principal one. This is Satan, who wants to
become the Adversary, the Enemy; and with him there are many others, who are all creatures of God,
but they are fallen creatures who rebelled and were damned. We know very little indeed about this
whole mysterious world, thrown into confusion in an almost painful drama.
We do, however, know many things about this diabolical world which concern our life and the whole
history of humanity. The demon was the cause of humanity's first misfortune. He was the insidious and
deadly tempter, the instigator of the first sin -original sin (Gen. 3 - Sag. 1,24).
Since the fall of Adam, the Demon has acquired a certain dominion over man from which only the
Redemption of Christ can deliver us. And this story is still going on. Let us call to mind the Baptismal
exorcisms and the frequent references in Holy Scripture and the Liturgy to the aggressive and
oppressive “power of darkness”. (Cf. Luke 22, 53 - Col. 1,13) he is the enemy. Number One, the
tempter par excellence.
We know, therefore, that this dark and troublesome being truly exists and that he is always at work
with a treacherous guile. He is the occult enemy who sows error and misfortune into the human story.
Let us not forget the very enlightening parable about the good grain and the cockle; it summarizes
and explains the illogic that seems to govern our inconsistencies: “It is an enemy who has done that”
(Matt, 13,28).
Christ describes him as one who “from the first was a murderer ... the father of lies” (Cf. John 8, 44-45).
Insidiously, he threatens the moral equilibrium of man. He is the perfidious and wily seducer who
knows how to infiltrate into us through our senses, our imagination, our concupiscence, Utopian logic
and socially disordered contacts; to introduce into our actions deviations which are so harmful, but on
the surface appear to be in keeping with our physical or psychic make-up, or with our instinctive and
profound aspirations.
Concerning the demon and the influence which he can exert over individuals, communities, whole
societies, or over events, a very important section of Catholic doctrine in which very little interest's
shown today, should be studied anew. Some people think they can find sufficient information in the
study of psychoanalysis and psychiatry, in the experiences of spiritualism which today, unhappily, is
very widespread in certain countries. There is a fear of falling again into the old Manichean theories or
into fatal, fantastic or superstitious deviations.
Today, one prefers to display a strong, unprejudiced, positivist mind which then makes one free to put
one's faith gratuitously in so many magic or popular fads; or worse to deliver one's soul - a baptized
soul which has so many times been visited by the Eucharistic Presence and which is the dwelling-
place of the Holy Spirit -to sensual and licentious experiences, to experiences poisoned by drugs, or
to the ideological seductions of fashionable errors. These are, moreover, the cracks through which the
Evil One can easily insinuate himself to alter the spirit of man.
Certainly, all sin is not attributable directly to the action of the devil. But it is none the less true that he
who does not watch himself sufficiently closely (Cf. Matt. 12-45 - Eph. 6.11) exposes himself to the
influence of “the mystery of iniquity” of which Saint Paul speaks (2 Thess. 2. 3-12) and compromises
his salvation.
Our teaching becomes uncertain obscured as it is by the darkness which surrounds the Demon.
But two questions legitimately call for our curiosity, aroused by the certainly of his multiple existence.
Are there signs, and . what are they, of the presence of the devil's actions? What are the means of
defending ourselves against such an insidious danger? The reply to the first question requires a great
deal of prudence, even if the signs of the Evil One seem sometimes to be obvious. We could
presuppose his sinister intervention there, where God is denied in a radical, subtle and preposterous
way; there, where hypocritical lies are affirmed vigorously in opposition to evident truth; there, where
love is suffocated by a cold and cruel selfishness; there, where the name of Christ is the object of a
premeditated and wild hatred (Cf. 1 Cor. 16,22; 12,3); there, where the spirit of the Gospel is distorted
and belied by what is being done; there where it is asserted that despair is the only outlook, etc.
But here we have a matter for diagnosis that is too vast and too difficult so that, for the moment, we
do not venture to go into it deeply and establish the whole truth about it. However, it is not devoid of
dramatic interest for everyone. Modern literature has, indeed, devoted famous pages to the subject.
The problem of evil remains, for the human mind, one of the most important and most permanent,
even after the victorious answer to it given by Jesus Christ: “We can be sure, writes Saint John the
Evangelist, that we are God's children, though the whole world about us lies in the power of evil” (1
John 5.19)
The other question is: What is the defense, what remedy to oppose the action of the Demon? The
reply is easier to formulate, even if it remains difficult to put into practice. We could say -everything
which defends us from sin protects us, by the same effect, from the invisible Enemy. Grace is the
decisive defense. Innocence has the appearance of force. And everyone remembers how the
apostolic teaching took the arms of a soldier as a symbol of the virtues which can render the Christian
invincible (Cf. Rom. 13.12; Eph. 6, 11, 14, 17; 1 Thess. 5.8). The Christian must be militant, vigilant and
strong. Sometimes he must practice a special asceticism to banish certain attacks of the devil. Jesus
teaches us and demonstrates the effectiveness of prayer and fasting (Mark 9,29). And Saint Paul
suggests the guideline, we should follow: “Do not allow yourself to be conquered by evil, but conquer
evil with good.” (Rom. 12,21; and Matt. 13.29)
Being thus aware of the adversity in which souls, the Church, the world, find themselves today, we
should do our utmost to give meaning and effectiveness to the words of our principal prayer: “Our
Father ... deliver us from Evil.”
(From the visions of the Venerable Anne-Catherine Emmerich, as related to the Pilgrim, [72] during the
years 1819 and 1820)[73]
“I saw St. Peter's. A great crowd of men were trying to pull it down whilst others constantly built it up
again. Lines connected these men one with another and with others throughout the whole world. I
was amazed at their perfect understanding. The demolishers, mostly apostates and members of the
different sects, broke off whole pieces and worked according to rules and instructions. They wore
white aprons bound with blue ribbon. In them were pockets and they had trowels stuck in their belts.
The costumes of the others were various.
“There were among the demolishers distinguished men wearing uniforms and crosses. They did not
work themselves, but they marked out on the wall with a trowel where and how it should be torn
down.[74] To my horror, I saw among them Catholic priests.
“Whenever the workmen did not know how to go on, they went to a certain one in their party. He had
a large book, which seemed to contain the whole plan of the building and the way to destroy it. They
marked out exactly with a trowel the parts to be attacked, and they soon came down. They worked
quietly and confidently, but slyly, furtively and warily.
“I saw the Pope praying, surrounded by false friends who often did the very opposite to what he
ordered, and I saw a little black fellow (a laic) laboring actively against the Church.
“Whilst it was thus being pulled down on one side, it was rebuilt on the other, but not very zealously. I
saw many of the clergy whom I knew. The Vicar-General gives me great joy. He went to and fro, coolly
giving orders for the repairing of the injured parts. I saw my confessor dragging a huge stone by a
roundabout way.
“I saw others carelessly saying their breviary and, now and then, bringing a little stone under their
cloak or giving it to another as something very rare. They seemed to have neither confidence nor
earnestness nor method. They hardly knew what was going on. It was lamentable....”
From the beginning of August to the end of October 1820, Anne-Catherine devoted herself to prayers
and supplications for the Holy Father, which were brought about by a comprehensive vision:
“I see new martyrs, not of the present but of the future, though even now they are oppressed.
“I saw the secret society undermining the great church (St. Peter's) and near them a horrible beast that
rose out of the sea. It had a tail like a fish, claws like a lion, and numberless heads that lay like a crown
around one large head; its jaws were large and red, its body spotted like a tiger. It was very familiar
with the demolishers lying near them whilst they worked, and again, concealing itself in a cave.
“Here and there throughout the whole world I saw many good, pious people, especially ecclesiastics,
harassed, imprisoned and oppressed, and I felt that at some future day, they would be martyred.
“When the church was well-nigh overturned, the choir and altar alone remaining untouched, I saw the
demolishers thronging into it accompanied by the beast. But they encountered a tall, majestic female
who seemed to be with child for she walked very slowly. The wretches were filled with affright on
seeing her and the beast lay paralyzed, furiously darting its head towards her, as if to devour her; but
she turned and fell prostrate on her face. Then I saw the beast fleeing to the sea, the enemy hurrying
off in disorder, and immense circles of combatants surrounding the church, some on the earth, others
high in the air...”
On August 10, she relates: “I see the Holy Father in great distress. He lives in another palace and
receives only a few to his presence. If the wicked party knew their own great strength, they would
even now have made an attack. I fear the Holy Father will suffer many tribulations before his death,
for I see the black counterfeit church gaining ground, I see its fatal influence on the public. The
distress of the Holy Father and of the Church is really so great that one ought to pray to God day and
night. I have been told to pray much for the Church and the Pope...
“Last night I was taken to Rome where the Holy Father, plunged in affliction, is still concealed in order
to elude dangerous exigencies. He is very feeble, quite worn out by distress, anxiety and prayer. His
chief reason for lying concealed is because he can trust so few. But he has by him a very simple-
hearted, pious old priest, his true friend, whom his enemies on account of his simplicity think it not
worthwhile to remove. Now, this good old priest is full of God's grace. He sees, he remarks many
things, which he faithfully communicates to the Holy Father. More than once I have had to point out to
him in prayer traitors and evil-minded men among the Pope's high, confidential officers, that he might
give him notice of them. In this way, he has been warned against one who was all-influential up to the
present; but who will be so no more. The Pope is so feeble that he can no longer walk alone.
October 1: “The Church,” she groaned, “is in great danger. I must ask every one who comes to see me
to say an “Our Father” for that intention. We must pray that the Pope may not leave Rome, for
unheard-of evils would result from such a step. We must pray the Holy Ghost to enlighten him.
October 4: “Last night I had a vision of the Pope. I saw Saint Francis carrying the church, and the
basilica of Saint Peter borne on the shoulders of a little man who had something of the Jew in his
countenance.' It looked very perilous.
“Mary stood on the north side of the church with her mantle extended over it. The little man was
almost bent double. He is, as yet, a laic. I know who he is. The twelve men whom I always see as the
twelve new Apostles ought to have helped him, but they arrived too late; however, just as he was
about to fall, they all ran up with myriads of angels to his assistance. It was only the pavement and the
back part of the church, for all the rest had been demolished by the secret society helped by the
servants of the church themselves. They bore it to another place, and it seemed as if rows of palaces
fell before it like fields of wheat in harvest time.
“When I saw Saint Peter's in this ruinous state and so many ecclesiastics laboring, though secretly, at
its destruction, I was so overcome that I cried earnestly to Jesus for mercy. Then I saw my Heavenly
Spouse before me under the form of a youth. He spoke to me for a long time. He told me that this
translation of Saint Peter's signified that the Church would apparently fall to total ruin: but that, resting
on these supports, she would be raised up again. Even if there should remain but one Catholic
Christian, the Church would again triumph since its foundations were not cast in the intellect or
councils of men. She had never yet been without members praying and suffering for her.”
“I was also told that very few Christians, in the true sense of the term, are to be found nowadays ... I
am greatly afflicted at what I saw.
October 7: “As I went through Rome with Frances [75] and the (other) Saint, we saw a great palace
enveloped in flames (the Vatican). I was in dread lest the inmates would be consumed, for no one
tried to extinguish the fire; but when we drew near, it suddenly ceased and left the building black and
scorched. After passing through numerous magnificent apartments, we reached that of the Pope. We
found him sitting in the dark asleep in a large armchair. He was very sick and weak, no longer able to
walk.
“I see the Church alone, forsaken by all and around her strife, misery, hatred, treason, resentment,
total blindness.
October 10: “I saw Saint Peter's utterly demolished, all except the choir and main altar. Saint Michael
girt and armed, descended into the church and with his sword repulsed several bad pastors who
were trying to enter.
“Soon the whole front of the church was down; the sanctuary alone stood. Then I saw a most majestic
lady floating, over the great square before the church. Her wide mantle fell over her arms as she
arose gently on high, until she stood on the cupola and spread it over all the church like golden rays.
“The destroyers were taking a short repose, and when they returned they could in no way approach
the square covered by the mantle. On the opposite side, the repairs progressed with incredible
activity. There came men, old, crippled, long-forgotten, followed by vigorous young people, men,
women, children, ecclesiastic and lay, and the edifice was soon restored.
“Then I saw a new Pope coming in procession, younger and far sterner looking than his predecessor.
He was received with pomp. He appeared about to consecrate the church. But I heard a voice
proclaiming that it was unnecessary, as the Blessed Sacrament had not been disturbed.
“The same voice said that they should solemnly celebrate a double feast, a universal jubilee and the
restoration of the church. The Pope, before the feast began, instructed his officers to drive out from
the assembled faithful a crowd of the clergy both high and low, scolding and grumbling. Then the Holy
Father took into his service others, ecclesiastic and lay. Now commenced the grand solemnity of Saint
Peter's.
December 30: “Again I saw Saint Peter's with its lofty cupola on whose top stood Michael shining with
light. He wore a blood-red robe, a great banner in his hand. A desperate struggle was going on below
- green and blue combatants against white, and over the latter, who seemed to be worsted, appeared
a fiery red sword. None knew why they fought. The church was all red like the angel, and I was told
that it would be bathed in blood. The longer the combat lasted, the paler grew the color of the church,
the more transparent it became.”
“Then the angel descended and approached the white troops. I saw him several times in front of
them. Their courage was wonderfully aroused, they knew not why or how, and the angel struck right
and left among the enemy who fled in all directions. Then the fiery sword over the victorious whites
disappeared. During the engagement the enemy's troops kept constantly deserting to the other side;
once they went in great numbers.”
“Numbers of Saints hovered in the air over the combatants, pointing out what was to be done, making
signs with the hand, etc., all different, but impelled by one spirit.”
“When the angel had descended, I beheld above him a great shining cross in the heavens. On it hung
the Savior from Whose Wounds shot brilliant rays over the whole earth. Those glorious Wounds were
red like resplendent doorways, their center golden-yellow, like the sun.”
“He wore no Crown, of Thorns, but from all the Wounds of His Head stream rays. Those from His
Hands, Feet and Side were fine as hair and shone with rainbow colors; sometimes they all united and
fell upon villages, cities and houses throughout the world. I saw them here and there, far and near,
falling upon the dying, and the soul entering by the colored rays into the Savior’s Wounds. The rays
from the Side spread over the Church like a mighty current lighting up every part of it, and I saw that
the greater number of souls enter into the Lord by these glittering streams.”
“I saw also a shining red heart floating in the air. From one side a current of white light to the Wound of
the Sacred Side, and from the other a second current fell upon the Church in many regions; its rays
attracted numerous souls who, by the Heart and the current of light, entered into the Side of Jesus. I
was told that this was the Heart of Mary.”
“When the combat on earth was over, the church and the angel became bright and shining, and the
latter disappeared; the cross also vanished and in its place stood a tall, resplendent lady extending
over it her mantle of golden rays. There was a reconciliation going on inside, and acts of humility were
being made.”
“I saw bishops and pastors approaching one another and exchanging books. The various sects
recognized the Church by her miraculous victory and the pure light of revelation they had seen
beaming upon her. This light sprang from the spray of the fountain gushing from the Prophet
Mountain.”
“When I saw this reunion, I felt that the Kingdom of God was near.. I perceived a new splendor, a
higher life in all nature, and a holy emotion in all mankind as at the time of the Savior’s birth. I felt so
sensibly the approach of the Kingdom of God that I was forced to run to meet it uttering cries of joy.
[76]
EXPLANATORY NOTES
Heaven forces the demons to speak, against their will, about the Church and its present situation, and
to do so in such a way that their statements run counter to their reign and favour the reign of Christ.
In their rage, the infernal spirits most of the time avoid naming Mary, the Most Blessed Virgin Mother
of God; they call her: “that Woman up there”. They do not say “Mary wishes it”, but “ she wishes it”,
“She forces me”, “She makes us say...”
In the same way, they dodge all around the name of Jesus and of God. Most of the time, they
emphasize their words by an upwards gesture of the possessed woman's finger.
When the demons demand prayers - for example, when they say that such and such a prayer must
be said before they speak, it is clear that this demand is not resultant from the wishes of Hell, but
from those of Heaven which expressed them through the medium of the demons.
It should be kept in mind that, as the revelations were being made through the mouth of the
possessed woman, she was often violently tormented - by difficulty in breathing, gnawing pains,
cardiac troubles and choking fits. Hence the often disjointed character of the sentences.
As this publication is in opposition to Hell, the demons often refused to continue speaking. As well as
this, they were continually making various objections-grumbling, shouting or sneering. A large number
of these interruptions, particularly in the second part, have been omitted for reasons of brevity and
simplification. But taken as a whole, the battle was often harder and longer than the reader can
possibly imagine.
This must be borne in mind so that one does not go away with the impression that these revelations,
so important for the Church, have been obtained easily.
NOTE BY P. KNOWLES-SMITH
In his book, Jean Marty says Beelzebub was from the choir of Archangels. Unless by this term he
means just high angel, I do not believe he is correct. In the exorcism in Earling, Iowa in 1928,
Beelzebub admitted he was from the Seraphic choir, which certainly makes sense if as he says in
“Warnings” he was second only to Lucifer amongst the angels prior to the Fall.
The order of the Angelic choirs as printed on the first page of this work is that revealed by St. Michael
the Archangel himself to Antonia d' Astonac and is the order found in the St. Michael Chaplet. This
Chaplet was approved by Pope Pius IX on August 8, 1851 and was highly indulgenced by him.
Further confirmation that this is the correct order of the angelic choirs is found in the revelations of
the German mystic, Magdalene of the Cross, in this century.
However, this is not universally believed and Donald Attwater's Catholic dictionary has a slightly
different order. It appears that this latter order is what Jean Marty has used in his book.
Thus in this order, the Principalities are the 5th choir, but in the Angelic Chaplet, they are the 7th choir.
When we talk of St. Michael the Archangel, does this mean just high angel or is he from the choir of
Archangels. From the revelations of Magdalene of the Cross, it appears he is from the choir of
Archangels, the eighth choir.
From the Mystical City of God of Mary of Agreda, it is apparent that the good angels at the time of the
Battle in Heaven gained varying degrees of merit according to how they behaved at that time. St.
Michael, referred to by Beelzebub in “Warnings” as a little unimportant angel they had paid little
attention to, so distinguished himself that God elevated him above all the Superior Choirs and made
him chief angel, Prince of the Heavenly host. Is this so surprising when we consider Our Lady, a
human being of a nature inferior to the lowest angel, has been placed way above the highest Angels
in Heaven.
Thus it can be seen, that one's definitive place in Heaven, both for Angels and men, does not depend
on “the accidents of birth”, but on the use one makes of what one has, the degree of love of God and
conformity with the Divine will. Thus St. John Vianney - a dunce at school - can end up in Heaven, one
of the greatest saints, and St. Michael from a lower choir of Angels becomes the Chief. It is worth
recalling here the words of Christ that some of the first shall be last and some of the last first.
BEELZEBUB
In the New Testament, the fallen angel, Beelzebub, is mentioned in Matt. 10:25, Matt. 12:24-27, Mark
3:22, and Luke 11:15-18. In Matt. 12:24, Beelzebub is called “the prince of devils.”
In the Old Testament, Beelzebub is mentioned in II Kings, where he is called “the god (or lord) of
Ekron”. A magnificent temple to Beelzebub was erected in the Philistine city of Ekron; and during the
time of Elijah (9th cenutry BC:), King Ahaziah of Israel sent his emissaries to consult this false god.
Ahaziah himself was on his way to the shrine of Beelzebub when Elijah intercepted him, demanding
to know if Israel was without a God such that he consulted the false god of Ekron.
The name “Beelzebub” (Hebrew “Baal-zebub”) means “Lord (or god) of the flying ones (or flies)”. This
name may be a Hebrew alteration of the Canaanite name, “Baal-zebul”, which means “Exalted Baal” or
“Lord of the high place.” Baal-zebub (or Baal-sebul) reappears in the New Testament as “the prince of
devils”.
From the Bible alone, one does not know if Beelzebub, “the prince of devils”, is the same as Lucifer.
Thanks to the Swiss revelations, however, we now know that Beelzebub and Lucifer are two different
devils. We also know that Beelzebub is the second ruling devil in Hell, having power immediately after
Lucifer.
Actually, these things are not entirely new. In the famous exorcism at Earling, Iowa, in 1928, almost the
same facts are indicated. That exorcism is described in the booklet, Begone Satan! (Published by Tan
Books, Box 424, Rockford, Illinois 61105). The following citations are taken from this booklet:
“When Satan was asked in the Name of Jesus, the crucified Savior, whether there were more spirits
involved in the possession of the woman, he did not feign in the least, but boastfully admitted that
there were a number of them present. As soon as the name of Jesus was mentioned, he began
through the woman to foam and howl like a wild raving animal.”
“This ugly bellowing and howling took place every day and at times it lasted for hours. At other times,
it sounded as though a horde of lions and hyenas were let loose, then again as the mewing of cats,
the bellowing of cattle and the barking of dogs. A complete uproar of different animal noises would
also resound. This was at first so taxing on the nerves of those present that the 12 nuns were forced
to take turns at assisting in order to save themselves and to have the necessary strength to continue
facing the siege.”
The exorcist: “In the name of Jesus and His Most Blessed Mother, Mary the Immaculate, who crushed
the head of the Serpent, tell me the truth. Who is the leader or prince among you? What is your
name?
Devil, barking like the hound of Hell: “Beelzebub”.
Exorcist: “You call yourself Beelzebub. Are you not Lucifer, the prince of devils?”
Devil: “No, not the prince, the chieftain, but one of the leaders.”
Exorcist: “You were therefore not a human being, but you are one of the fallen angels, who with selfish
pride wanted to be like unto God?”
Devil, with grinning teeth: “Yes, that is so. Ha, how we hate Him!”
Exorcist: “Why do you call yourself Beelzebub if you are not the prince of the devils?”
Devil: “Enough, my name is Beelzebub.”
Exorcist: “From the point of influence and dignity, you must rank near Lucifer, or do you hail from the
lower choir of angels?”
Devil: “I once belonged to the seraphic choir.”
Exorcist: “What would you do, if God made it possible for you to atone for your injustice to Him?”
Devil, sneering: “Are you a competent theologian?”
Exorcist: “How long have you been torturing this poor woman?”
Devil: “Since her fourteenth year.”
Exorcist: “How dared you enter into that innocent girl and torture her like that?”
Devil, sneering: “Ha, did not her own father curse us into her?”
Exorcist: “But why did you, Beelzebub, alone take possession of her? Who gave you that permission?”
Devil: “Don't talk so foolishly. Don't I have to render obedience to Satan?”
Exorcist: “Then you are here at the direction and command of Lucifer?”
Devil: “Well, how could it be otherwise?”
“Let it be noted, too, that Father Theophilus [77] addressed the devil in English, German, and again in
Latin. And the devil, Beelzebub, and all the other devils, replied correctly in the very same tongues in
which they were addressed. Apparently they would have understood any language spoken today
and would have answered in it ... “
“Father Theophilus indeed was anxious to know why the father had cursed his own daughter. But he
only received a curt uncivil reply: “You can ask him. Leave me in peace for once.”
Exorcist: “Is then the father of the woman also present as one of the devils? Since when?
Devil: “What a foolish question. He has been with us ever since he was damned.” A terrible, sneering
laughter followed, full of malicious joy.
Exorcist: “Then I solemnly command in the name of the Crucified Savior of Nazareth that you present
the father of this woman and that he give me answer!”
“A deep rough voice announced itself, which had already been noticed alongside the voice of
Beelzebub.”[78]
Exorcist: “Are you the unfortunate father who has cursed his own child?”
With a defiant roar: “No!”
“Who are you then?”
“I am Judas.” “What, Judas! Are you Judas Iscariot, the former Apostle?”
Thereupon followed a horrible, woefully prolonged: “Y-e-s, I am the one.”
This was howled in the deepest bass voice. It set the whole room a-quivering so that out of pure
fright and horror the pastor and some of the nuns ran out. Then followed a disgusting exhibition of
spitting and vomiting as if Judas were intending to spit at his Lord and Master with all his might, or as if
he had in mind to unloose his inner waste and filth upon Him (the exorcist had a consecrated Host in
a pyx on his breast).
When the prayer of exorcism was renewed, the demon Jacob made his appearance with a healthy,
manly voice. As in the case of Judas, one could detect at once that he had been a human being.
“Which Jacob are you?” asked the exorcist.
“The father of the possessed girl.”
Later developments disclosed the fact that he had led a frightfully coarse and brutal life, a
passionately unchaste and debased life. He now admitted that he had repeatedly tried to force his
own daughter to commit incest with him. But she had firmly resisted him. Therefore he had cursed her
and wished inhumanly that the devils would enter into her and entice her to commit every possible
sin against chastity, thereby ruining her, body and soul...
The reader would undoubtedly be misled if he were of the opinion that these questions and answers
followed in regular order. It must be remembered that these battles and encounters with the devils
extended over a number of days. At times the answers were interrupted by hours and hours of
howling and yelling that could be brought into submission only by prolonged prayer and persistent
exorcism. Often no further answers could be forced from the devils in any other way. Countless brats
of devils also interrupted the process of exorcism by their disagreeable and almost unbearable
interferences.
As a result of these disturbances, the woman's face became so distorted that no one could recognize
her features. Then, too, her whole body became so horribly disfigured that the regular contour of her
body- vanished. Her pale, death-like and emaciated head. often assuming the size of an inverted
water pitcher, became as red as glowing embers. Her eyes protruded out of their sockets, her lips
swelled up to proportions equaling the size of hands, and her thin emaciated body was bloated to
such enormous size that the pastor and some of the Sisters drew back in fright, thinking that the
woman would be torn to pieces and burst asunder. At times her abdominal region and extremities
became as hard as iron and stone. In such instances the weight of her body pressed into the iron
bedstead so that the iron rods of the bed bent to the floor ...
It has been intimated above that out of the voices coming from the possessed woman, four different
ones could be very clearly distinguished. They announced themselves as Beelzebub, Judas Iscariot,
Jacob, the father of the possessed woman, and Mina, Jacob's concubine ... in addition, there were also
a great number of other unclean spirits in her. Among these the so-called dumb devils and avenging
spirits made themselves especially prominent. The number of silent devils was countless. Apparently
they were from the lower classes, for they displayed no marks of strength or power. Their voices
were rather a confusion of sounds from which no definite answers could be distinguished. There was
no articulate speech, rather a pitiful moaning and subdued howling ... It seems as though they came
and left in hordes ... The avenging spirits were wild and violent, of rough and ill-mannered character.
They were filled with hatred and anger against all human beings. Their very presence suggested an
ugly and disgusting attitude - a mixture of hatred and envy, meanness and revenge, deception and
trickery. These were precisely the ones that threatened to make the pastor rue his consent to the
exorcism...
It was very evident that the forces of Hell were under the direction of a high commander, who, like a
general and field marshal, sent forth new recruits for battle whenever the veterans, in their exhausted
condition, were forced to retire. What pitiful sighs and pleadings they sent forth. One could hear
voices to this effect: “Oh, what we have to put up with here; it is just terrible, all that we have
suffered.” There were other voices that kept on urging their fellow-devils not to let up: “And how we
will again have to suffer and cringe under him, how he will torture us again if we return without having
accomplished our task.” They clearly referred to Lucifer as the torturer...
Father Theophilus, basing his opinion on his numerous experiences with cases of possession, believes
that the hour of the Antichrist is not far distant. Lucifer himself was present for about 14 days in the
Earling case. With all the forces of Hell at his disposal, he tried his utmost to make this a test case.
Once Father Theophilus saw Lucifer standing visibly before him for half an hour - a fiery being in his
characteristically demoniac reality. He had a crown on his head and carried a fiery sword in his hand.
Beelzebub stood alongside of him. During this time the whole room was filled with flames. Lucifer was
cursing and blaspheming in a terrible rage: “If I could, I would have choked you long ago. If I only had
my former powers, you would soon experience what I could do to you.”
Through the powers of Christ, he had been deprived of his original might as even now through
exorcism his influence was further diminished. Father Theophilus asked him one time: “What can you
accomplish, you helpless Lucifer?” To which he replied: “What could you do, if you were bound as I
am?”
At the very mention of St. Michael, Satan began to recoil. He was tortured by that part of the prayer
which refers to the solemn petition addressed to St. Michael. He absolutely refused to listen to the
statement that St. Michael, as leader of the faithful angels, cast Lucifer together with his legions into
the very abyss of Hell. It was astounding how much he dreaded the prayer in honor of St. Michael
commonly recited at the end of the Mass ...
A rather peculiar circumstance induced Pope Leo XIII to compose this powerful prayer. After
celebrating Mass one day, he was in conference with the Cardinals. Suddenly he sank to the floor. A
doctor was summoned and several came at once. There was no sign of any pulse-beating, the very
life seemed to have ebbed away from the already weakened and aged body. Suddenly he recovered
and said: “What a horrible picture I was permitted to see!” He saw what was going to happen In the
future, the misleading powers and ravings of the devils against the Church in all countries. But St.
Michael had appeared in the nick of time and cast Satan and his cohorts back into the abyss of Hell.
Such was the occasion that caused Pope Leo XIII to have this prayer recited over the entire world at
the end of the Mass...
... the poor (possessed) woman admitted during her periods of rest that she had visions of horrible
battles between the good and evil spirits. Countless numbers of evil spirits continually arrived. Satan
tried his utmost not to be outdone this time. The good angels came to assist at the exorcism. Many
approached seated on white horses (Apoc. 19:15) and under the leadership of St. Michael, completely
routed the infernal serpents and drove the demons back to the abyss of Hell...
On one occasion, when Father Theophilus insisted “that the devil should depart and return to Hell, the
devil replied in a growling tone: “How can you banish me to Hell? I must be free to prepare the way
for the Antichrist.” And again he spoke out of the possessed woman: “We know a lot. We read the
signs of the times. This is the last century. When people will write the year 2000, the end will be at
hand.” ...
Father Theophilus, who has had 19 cases of possession under his care within recent years, seems
convinced that present indications point to the beginning of the great battle between Christ and
Antichrist. He also seems to have learned that Judas will appear as Antichrist in this manner, that a
human person, soon after birth, will he controlled and completely ruled by him...
At one time Satan became rather talkative about the Antichrist (and said:) “Yes, Satan is already
abroad, and the Antichrist is already born in Palestine (on another occasion he also mentioned
America). But he is still young. He must first grow up incognito before his power can become known.”*
* In John 17:12, Judas Iscariot is called “the son of perdition”; and in 2 Thes. 2:3. Antichrist is called “the
son of perdition”. One may conclude that Antichrist will be the demon Judas Iscariot in the body of a
man.
PART THREE
EXORCISM OF DECEMBER 8, 1977
EXORCISM OF MARCH 25, 1978
EXORCISM OF APRIL 5, 1978
EXORCISM OF MAY 1, 1978 - The Feast of Saint Joseph
PRAYER TO SAINT MICHAEL, THE ARCHANGEL
TO CONCLUDE THESE WARNINGS
AN ADDRESS TO THE “TRADITIONALISTS “ OF FRANCE
DECLARATIONS OF THE DEMONIACAL ACTORS
OBJECT LESSON
WITNESSES
DECLARATION
PREFACE
NOTES ON PRESENTATION
INTRODUCTION
ALLOCUTION OF POPE PAUL VI
I SAW THE CHURCH OF SAINT PETER
EXPLANATORY NOTES
NOTE BY P. KNOWLES-SMITH
BEELZEBUB
[1] This text is not included in the German-language edition of “Warnings” (Oct. 1977) It was sent to us direct with
view to publication in the French edition, together with the other two exorcisms of “Part Three”.
[2] “The heads, the leaders of the people of God, have neglected prayer and penance, and the demon has darkened
their understanding... Lucifer with a great number of his demons will be released from Hell: by degrees they shall
abolish the Faith, even among persons consecrated to God. They shall blind them...” “They shall blind them”
announced Our Lady at La Salette, September 19, 1846.
“The clergy are blind” confirms the demon in 1977.
[3] By us, demons.
[4] Under the title “Manuscrit de L'Enfer” (Manuscript from Hell) there was published in 1964, with imprimatur (Lib
du Carmel, 27 rue Madame, Paris) a “Letter from the Beyond”, noted down by a nun, which originated from one of
her friends who had fallen into Hell. Mgr. L. Cristiane, a specialist in demonology, wrote the preface for it. “This
writing ... racks the soul with a shuddering of emotion, of piety, and at the same time, a feeling of horror.” It
corroborates completely everything which we have read about Hell in the present “Warnings”.
[5] Ah yes! We know that well. Salvation lies neither in atheistic communism (“East”), nor in luxurious capitalism
which turns souls lukewarm with its liberalism (“West”). Both are materialistic and, in fact, narrowly and secretly
associated at the summit, with the aim of dominating the world and enslaving the church, under the rule of the
“Prince of this world”. Salvation lies in GOD ALONE.
[6] A reference to the leaflets which were printed and widely distributed in Switzerland, attacking the revelations
made by the demons and published in the book of “Warnings”, as soon as it appeared in the German language in
Switzerland.
[7] See RITUALE ROMANUM, heading 11, Chap. 1: “Let the exorcist not be misled into gossip, useless or idle
questions ... with no connection with his function ... ; let him not believe anything, if the demon claims to be the soul
of a saint, of a deceased person, of a good angel...”
[8] This in not the case here, as the possessed woman is a reparatory victim.
[9] Cf. Matt. 12, 10-13; “And of what value is a sheep compared to a man? There is nothing unlawful, then, in doing a
work of mercy on the Sabbath day” (v.12) (Cf. also Luke 14, 1-6)
[10] “Do not judge others, or you yourselves will be judged” (Matt. 7, 1)
[11] Complete translations, not abridged.
[12] Of the present “Warnings”.
[13] At that time ready for final printing as soon as this text was received.
[14] Which has been done - all of “Part Three” of this book.
[15] Therefore, in all possible languages in use in the world.
[16] According to the studies of Michel Servant, a certain merciful delay is still being offered to us. But “the hour is
near” (end of the title of his work).
[17] Exhortations which are, at the game time, warnings.
[18] Whose liturgical Feast Day happens to be April 5.
[19] “It is the Old One (Lucifer) who has carried these souls off, and not me.” (Declaration of the demon Garandieu,
in the course of the exorcism).
[20] In actual fact, to the Priesthood as a whole, because as the demon states, he is also addressing: “bishops,
cardinals and abbots (ecclesiastical superiors).”
[21] “Being what thou art, lukewarm, neither cold nor hot, thou wilt make Me vomit thee out of My mouth.” (Apoc. 3,
16)
[22] “...better for that man if he had never been born.” (Matt. 26, 24) - Our Lord, speaking about Judas, whom we
now know to be in Hell.)
[23] By his soutane? ...or perhaps, his “garment of flesh” (Cf Saint Augustine, “Confessions”)
[24] Let us invoke the Holy Angels of the Fifth Choir: the Principalities, to give us the taste for and a love of prayer,
and perseverance in prayer, for such is their vocation.
[25] “The first commandment of all is, Listen, Israel; there is no God but the Lord thy God; and thou shalt love the
Lord thy God with the love of thy whole heart, and thy whole soul, and thy whole mind, and thy whole strength. This
is the first commandment, and the second, its like, is this, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.” (Mark 12, 30-31)
[26] It would be done.
[27] All the ways of helping one's neighbor.
[28] A cross indulgenced for the purpose of helping the dying.
[29] “Give thanks (to God) upon all occasions; this is what God expects of you in Christ Jesus.” (1 Thess. 5, 18)
[30] In other words, forever.
[31] “Whereupon Juda bade his son Onan mate with the widow, and do a husband's duty by her, so as to beget
children in his brother's name; but Onan, who knew that they would not be reckoned as his, frustrated the act of
marriage when he mated with her, so that his brother's line should remain without issue. Him, too, tor this
abominable deed of his, the Lord punished with death.” (Gen. 38, 8-10)
[32] Those which are the result of “habitual contact with women”, the demon has just said.
[33] Jean Marty explains that the French word used, “se parer” means: “To take precautions against any danger
whatsoever.” (Larousse)
[34] This angelic help, placed permanently at our disposal by God, is all the more necessary since - outside of the
daily struggles against the inclinations of our poor human nature, tainted by Original Sin, and constantly led into
confusion by our passions - it if not “against beings of flesh and blood” that we have to battle, but “with principalities
and powers, with those who have mastery of the world in these dark days, with malign influences in an order higher
than ours.” (Eph. 6, 12)
[35] “And if thy eye is an occasion of failing, pluck it out; better for thee to enter blind into the Kingdom of God, than
to have two eyes when thou art cast into the fires of Hell; the worm which eats them there never dies, the fire is never
quenched.” (Mark 9, 46-47)
[36] ADDITIONAL NOTE: i.e. old-fashioned, out of date, different from modern men!
[37] “Sufferings are the greatest gifts and the greatest graces from God ... they are the only thing the Angels would
envy you, if they were capable of envying anything.” (Her Guardian Angel to Mechtilde Thaller in “The Angels”
(“Les Anges”))
[38] “I then recognized my lack of courage and how wrong it was of me to wish so ardently for an end to my
sufferings” - “I recognized with what indescribable ardor Jesus had desired suffering, and how a soul dwells within
God's Love and His Grace, when it suffers patiently, in accordance with the Will of God.” (M. Thaller, idem.)
[39] “Thou shalt love they neighbor as thyself'. A commandment decreed by God Himself, first in the Old Testament
through Moses (Leviticus 19, 18) ; then again in the New Testament thru our Lord ... and quoted, passed down, and
taken up again afterwards by the Evangelists, the Apostles, etc.
[40] Everything which is natural is in the service of the supernatural. Clearly, this is a question of PSYCHOLOGY
here, and not psychoanalysis, a sacrilegious and demonic parody of the Sacrament of Penance, a veritable violation
of the soul.
[41] “If any man has a mind to come My way, let him renounce self, and take up his cross, and follow Me.” (Mark 8,
34)
[42] The way of self-denial and sacrifice, and not that of ease.
[43] “How is a man the better for gaining the whole world, if he loses himself, if he pays the forfeit of himself?” (Luke
9, 25 - The New Testament in English, Mgr. Ronald Knox) Probably more familiar: “What doth it profit a man if he
gains the whole world and suffers the loss of his own soul?”
[44] The wrong way, described earlier by the demon Verdi-Garandieu.
[45] If he accepts the light.
[46] The Sixth Commandment of God; “Thou shalt not commit adultery”.
[47] The spirit of luxury, that is of indolence, lack of restraint, free-and-easiness.
[48] (1) Shortened prayer of Exorcism, after Low Mass, prescribed by Leo XIII in 1884. which the demons have said
must be taken up again; privileged souls have said the same thing (Jeanette of France, for example).
[49] Pius XII again described France in this way on June 25, 1956, in his message marking the occasion of the fourth
centenary of the rehabilitation of Saint Joan of Arc. In another connection, Jesus said to Jeannette of France: “France,
the eldest daughter of the Church, must give the example to the other nations.” Now is the time for France to
accomplish her liberating mission with regard to other peoples, by being the first to get down on her knees” ('Parce
Domine' messages, Jan. 31, 1967 and August 27, 1968).
[50] To be “traditionalist” is in fact to be quite simply “catholic”, to have remained completely faithful to one's
religion (which is the only true one). It is to be, as in duty bound, attached to the Faith and to the Tradition - the
FAITHFUL transmission of Revelation.
[51] “It is an old tale, now, how thou didst break in pieces the yoke of my dominion, didst sever all the bonds between
us, crying out, I will serve no more!” (Jeremias 2, 20)
[52] Accomplices could be more correct: Secret agreements from Yalta in 1945 (published in part in 1955 in America)
on the dividing up of the world between the two Great Powers; Agreements renewed in Moscow in 1972 and detailed
at Vladivostok in 1974, the three agreements having been signed, very significantly, in Soviet territory. Thus the lack
of American, and subsequently European, action: in Hungary in 1956, in Czechoslovakia in 1968, in Angola in 1975
(and elsewhere in Africa); and the abandonment in the end of Vietnam in 1975. Next on the list: Yugoslavia. All
countries delivered through the terms of the agreements to the Soviet octopus.
[53] This is exactly the direction of the messages received by Jeannette of France, published (in February and June
1975) in the pamphlet 'Parce Domine'. These messages are like a forward to the present “Warnings” which began on
August 14, 1975 and which finish them off, in a manner of speaking.
[54] The codification, in fact, of the Mass, going back to all intents and purpose to Apostolic times, at least for its
essential core. (Council of Trent 1562 - Saint Pius V, 1570)
[55] Or perhaps, with these being less widespread. Only God knows the answer!
[56] The “Spiritual Reign” as Michel Servant calls it. He devotes Chapters XVI and XVII of Volume II of his work,
“The Triumph of Love”, to this subject.
[57] God is love and Mercy; He warns when he is going to chastise ... so that people may come back to Him. Then,
as soon as man repents, He pardons him (cf. Jonah, Chap. 3: the preaching of Jonah, the demon, the conversion of the
Ninivites ... through the announcement of the Divine Chastisements, and Divine pardon).
[58] Which generates cloudiness, whence blindness is born.
[59] They open the “barrier” - the obstacle he has just spoken of.
[60] She is a victim soul; the sufferings arising from her possession are expiatory and reparatory sufferings for others.
[61] See the parable of the hoarder (Luke 12,16-21), a model for those who refuse to take as a perspective for their
plans, the only truth: ETERNITY. “Thou fool, this night thou must render up thy soul...” (Luke 12,21)
[62] Luke 16, 19-31.
[63] Made under compulsion of the exorcisms.
[64] “Un Appèl à l'Amour” (A Call to Love) - message of the Heart of Jesus to the world; original edition with
Imprimatur of Cardinal Saliège in 1944.
[65] Written by one of the French priests present at the exorcism.
[66] The author, very well-informed on the Vatican, has told us he is convinced that Our Lord Jesus Christ will not
permit Paul VI to depart this earth leaving behind the impression that he had concealed the rationalist and modernist
errors which have invaded the Church, and that He will defend His Vicar against the injustice of the present situation
by making known the truth.
[67] Hell “is spitting out” - this implies “poison”. “The Truth” -that is the “antidote”. This contrast of opposing words
gives great strength to the idea expressed by the author.
[68] This is an English translation from the French. Most of the notes from the French edition are included - only
those with no apparent relevance to the English-speaking reader have been omitted.
[69] The angelic demons are demons, strictly according to modern usage of the word. The word “demons” is also
applied here, by extension, to condemned human souls - principally Judas - who, in fact behave the same way as the
angelic demons.
[70] Rev. Father Renz comes back to this subject in his article: “What is Possession?”
[71] Symbol of the Church. From now on, all notes are proper to the French edition.
[72] The name by which Clement Brentano is described according to a vision of Anne- Catherine Emmerich herself.
[73] Rather than translating from Jean Marty's French, this section has been taken directly from the 2. volume English
edition of “The Life of Anne-Catherine Emmerich “ (1968 edition of Maria Regina Guild, Los Angeles, reprinted from
Eng. edition 1885)
[74] The description is clear - the anti-Christian Conspiracy. The “distinguished men”: the hidden heads of High
Masonry who give the orders; the “workmen”: the KNOWN members of the Freemasons who carry out the orders.
[75] This refers to Saint Frances of Rome, the mother of a family (died 1440) who was a frequent communicant and
who used to converse familiarly with her Guardian Angel.
[76] This she really did in her vision, praying in a loud voice.