Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Background: The Society states, “the mission of the National Underground Railroad Freedom
Center is to reveal stories about freedom's heroes, from the era of the
Underground Railroad to contemporary times, challenging and inspiring everyone
to take courageous steps for freedom today.”
According to NURFC officials, the plan would call for the existing bond debt to be
transferred to another yet-to-be established entity, unsecured, leaving the facility
debt-free (a condition of the federal transfer).
Legal Agreements
Signatory: Donald Murphy, CEO
Reimbursement
Certification By: Benjamin Reece, CPA, finance director
Legislative History:
Facility Information
Name: National Underground Railroad Freedom Center (the “Center” or the “Facility”)
Project Information
Scope: The Freedom Center is a $117.7 million project, opened in August 2004, and
features three pavilions celebrating courage, cooperation, and perseverance.
The current appropriation will reimburse the Sponsor for construction expenses
previously incurred but not yet reimbursed (the “Project”).
Project Need
Financial Assessment
Commission staff analyzed the Sponsor’s financial statements, including the following:
x internally generated financial statements for year-to-date July 31, 2009 (“YTD09”);
x audited financial statements for fiscal-years-ending December 31, 2008, and 2007
("FYE08" and “FYE07”);
x five-year pro forma; and
x internally generated statements through October 31, 2009 (used solely to observe
whether the organization’s financial trends have changed; they have not).
Increase Increase
YTD09 (Decrease) FYE08 (Decrease) FYE07
ASSETS:
Total Current Assets $ 4,431,282 $ (3,287,603) $ 7,718,885 $ (6,599,903) $ 14,318,788
Total Other Assets $ 6,522,591 $ (18,090,270) $ 24,612,861 $ (2,061,470) $ 26,674,331
Total Long-Term Assets $ 76,070,093 $ (2,413,368) $ 78,483,461 $ (4,233,014) $ 82,716,475
TOTAL ASSETS $ 87,023,966 $ (23,791,241) $ 110,815,207 $ (12,894,387) $ 123,709,594
LIABILITIES:
Total Current Liabilities $ 408,635 $ (667,621) $ 1,076,256 $ (308,808) $ 1,385,064
Total Long-Term Liabilities $ 27,000,000 $ (19,000,000) $ 46,000,000 $ (3,000,000) $ 49,000,000
TOTAL LIABILITIES $ 27,408,635 $ (19,667,621) $ 47,076,256 $ (3,308,808) $ 50,385,064
NET ASSETS:
Unrestricted $ 58,772,883 $ (3,790,355) $ 62,563,238 $ (9,142,202) $ 71,705,440
Temporarily Restricted $ 822,448 $ (333,265) $ 1,155,713 $ (443,377) $ 1,599,090
Permanently Restricted $ 20,000 $ - $ 20,000 $ - $ 20,000
TOTAL NET ASSETS $ 59,615,331 $ (4,103,620) $ 63,718,951 $ (9,585,579) $ 73,304,530
Solvency:
An organization is solvent when assets are greater than liabilities. The Sponsor is solvent because net assets
are positive (YTD10 total assets are $87M; total liabilities are $27.4M).
Another gauge of solvency is whether or not the institution has sufficient net assets to pay off long-term debt.
The viability ratio (unrestricted net assets minus capital assets minus restricted endowments plus long-term
debt divided by total debt) measures one of the most basic determinants of clear financial health: the
availability of expendable net assets to cover debt should the institution need to settle its obligations as of the
Statement of Financial Position date. A ratio in the range of 1.25 to 2.0 indicates a strong creditworthy
institution.
YTD09 FYE08 FYE07
Viability Ratio 0.34:1 0.65:1 0.77:1
The viability ratio is below what is considered creditworthy due to $27M in bond debt and only $10M
in liquid assets (the book value of the building is $76M of total assets of $87M).
During YTD09 the sponsor liquidated $18M in investments and paid off $19M in bonds as part of a
negotiated settlement when the Sponsor failed to meet bank covenants (see the following Leverage section).
Liquidity:
Liquidity relates to availability of, access to or convertibility to cash. A test of liquidity is current ratio (current
assets divided by current liabilities), which indicates how many times over the entity can pay its current
liabilities with its current assets. (Note: Restricted current assets were not used to calculate the current ratio
because they generally are not available to service current liabilities. Including restricted current assets in the
calculation could have the effect of artificially inflating the current ratio.) A current ratio of greater than 1:1 is
considered acceptable.
YTD09 FYE08 FYE07
Current Ratio 10.8:1 7.2:1 10.3:1
The current ratio is high due to nearly $3.7M in pledges receivable which, per the Sponsor, are not restricted
and are available for operations once collected.
The Sponsor’s YTD09 working capital is $4M. Days of cash-on-hand (an indication of how many days an
organization can pay expenses if its revenue stream ceases) at 12, is significantly lower than the 30-day
norm.
Leverage:
Leverage is the degree to which a sponsor is borrowing money. A measure of leverage is debt ratio (debt
divided by total assets).
YTD09, the Sponsor’s total assets are $87M and total debts are $27M. The debt ratio, which indicates what
proportion of debt an organization has relative to its assets, is 31 percent. This means that for every $1.00 of
assets, the Sponsor has $0.31 in debt.
YTD09
Debt Ratio without building 271%
value included
Reimbursement agreements related to the letter of credit no longer require the Sponsor to make annual
principal reductions until the bond sinking fund payments start or the letter of credit agreements are
amended.
NURFC did not meet ongoing bank covenant requirements at either measurement (June 30 or December 31,
2008) and rather than call the letter of credit, the bank required the Sponsor to pay off $19M in local bond
debt by liquidating investments, and then the bank extended a revised letter of credit. The letter of credit
currently extends to July 2010, with prior instances of noncompliance waived.
Increase Increase
YTD09 (Decrease) FYE08 (Decrease) FYE07
A decline in revenues from FYE08 to FYE09 is due to decreases in government grants and admissions.
Average monthly grants and admissions at FYE08 was $649K; YTD09 average monthly grants and
admissions is $178K.
Pre-Depreciation
Surplus (Deficit) $ (1,717,000) $ (1,845,000) $ 520,000 $ 614,000 $ 569,000
Investment Income $ (258,000) $ (86,800) $ (45,000) $ (64,000) $ (79,000)
Interest Expense $ 1,008,000 $ 937,000 $ 222,000 $ 217,000 $ 212,000
Post-Depreciation
Surplus (Deficit) $ (2,467,000) $ (2,695,200) $ 343,000 $ 461,000 $ 436,000
The Sponsor’s submitted pro forma assumes enactment of the proposed federal legislation to transfer title of
the facility to the federal government, as well as transferring the bulk of the bonds payable to a second entity.
The proposal calls for the bonds to be unsecured. In FYE11, revenues increase $4M to $8.4M due to
operating subsidies by the federal government, and interest expense decreases to $222K because bonds
payable have been transferred. The result is a projected pre-depreciation surplus in FYE11 and beyond. It is
clear that without the federal transfer and subsidies, the organization is not sustainable.
Although the Commission approved the Determination of Need on October 9, 2001, in resolution R-
01-26, the Sponsor’s financial condition has changed significantly for the worse since then. Prior to
the expenditure of these new state capital funds, the Sponsor must demonstrate a viable business
model. The Sponsor has indicated it plans to do so through federalization of the facility.
A review of the Sponsor’s solvency, liquidity, leverage, change in net assets and pro forma indicates it is
unlikely the Sponsor will be able to operate the Facility and present culture to the public over a sustained
period of time in accordance with Section 3383.07 of the ORC unless the proposed arrangement with the
federal government is put in place.
See Exhibit E for a summary of the Sponsor’s financial statements.
Regional Support
Matching Resources
The Sponsor demonstrated a minimum of non-state matching resources equal to at least 50 percent of
the total state funding of $15,500,000 (a minimum of $7,750,000). Matching resources were
substantiated in November 2008. On October 9, 2001, Substantial Regional Support was confirmed by
the Commission in resolution R-01-26. The following table is provided for informational purposes.
Funding Model
Although on October 9, 2001, the Commission confirmed Substantial Regional Support in resolution
R-01-26, the Project is no longer Fully Funded. In order for the new state capital funds to be paid out,
the Sponsor must demonstrate that the Project is Fully Funded. Since the Sponsor did not meet bank
covenants in 2008, the bank required the Sponsor to sell $19M in investments to pay down the local
bond balance. The $7.75M unsubstantiated funds listed in the table below were the projected
investment income from these $19M in investments that were sold.
Conditions of Approval
Recommendation: The materials submitted by the Sponsor were reviewed and analyzed, and the
Commission project analyst, project managers, assistant director for project services, and executive
director recommend approval of Resolution R-10-04 with the following conditions:
x The Sponsor provides to the Ohio Public Facilities Commission (the “OPFC”), the
Treasurer of State and the Commission an opinion of nationally recognized bond
counsel, acceptable to the Treasurer of State, and addressed to the OPFC, the
Treasurer of State and the Commission, stating that the financing structure, ownership
and/or operational/management structure will not a) adversely affect the validity of the
state-issued tax-exempt bonds; and b) will not adversely affect the exclusion of the
interest on the state-issued tax-exempt bonds from the gross income of the holders of
the state-issued tax-exempt bonds for federal income tax purposes;
x In recognition that the Project is no longer Fully Funded, the escrow funds on deposit
in the Commission’s capital donations fund will remain in escrow until the state bonds
are retired. “Fully Funded” means that funds have been raised for the total costs of the
Project including all hard costs, soft costs and start-up costs and, the operating
endowment for the Project. “Raised” means receipt of written pledges from
creditworthy entities, written funding commitments from governmental entities, written
guarantees from creditworthy entities (in a form approved by the Ohio Attorney
General’s Office), cash receipts or any combination of the foregoing, all as determined
in the sole discretion of the executive director of the Commission; and
x The Sponsor provides the Commission with status reports each calendar quarter,
within thirty days of the quarter ending, beginning the second quarter of 2010, until
such time as the federal legislation is enacted. Depending on the contents of these
reports, the Commission may reconsider its approval should the financing structure,
ownership and/or operational management structures prove unacceptable to the
OPFC, the Treasurer of State and/or the Commission.
Other Assets
Other Assets $ 603,096 7.49% $ 561,074 -4.92% $ 590,119
Investments $ 5,919,495 -74.89% $ 23,577,212 -9.54% $ 26,064,212
Assets Limited As To Use (restricted) $ - -100.00% $ 474,575 2272.88% $ 20,000
Total Other Assets $ 6,522,591 -73.50% $ 24,612,861 -7.73% $ 26,674,331
Long-Term Assets:
Museum Facility. Net $ 76,070,093 -3.08% $ 78,483,461 -5.12% $ 82,716,475
Historical Collections $ - 0.00% $ - 0.00% $ -
Total Long-Term Assets: $ 76,070,093 -3.08% $ 78,483,461 -5.12% $ 82,716,475
Liabilities
Current Liabilities:
Accounts Payable $ 140,212 -39.43% $ 231,472 -33.96% $ 350,516
Accrued Liabilities $ 137,545 -48.87% $ 269,017 20.02% $ 224,150
Interest Payable $ 67,856 -80.69% $ 351,400 -10.40% $ 392,201
Deferred Revenue $ 63,022 -71.91% $ 224,367 -46.35% $ 418,197
Total Current Liabilities $ 408,635 -62.03% $ 1,076,256 -22.30% $ 1,385,064
Long-Term Liabilities
Tax Exempt Bonds Payable $ 27,000,000 -41.30% $ 46,000,000 -6.12% $ 49,000,000
Total Long-Term Liabilities $ 27,000,000 -41.30% $ 46,000,000 -6.12% $ 49,000,000
Net Assets
Unrestricted $ 58,772,883 -6.06% $ 62,563,238 -12.75% 71,705,440
Temporarily Restricted $ 822,448 -28.84% $ 1,155,713 -27.73% 1,599,090
Permanently Restricted $ 20,000 0.00% $ 20,000 0.00% 20,000
Total Net Assets $ 59,615,331 -6.47% $ 63,738,951 -13.07% $ 73,324,530
Total Liabilities and Net Assets $ 87,023,966 -21.47% $ 110,815,207 -10.42% $ 123,709,594
Note: 1) Prepaid expenses 2009 amount estimated using 2008 for purposes of determining the "Other Assets" amount where prepaid expenses were includ
Exhibit E 1 of 2
EXHIBIT E
Expenses
Museum Programs $ 866,428 -72.11% $ 3,107,028 -27.48% $ 4,284,281
Administrative and General $ 1,641,589 -30.24% $ 2,353,061 35.92% $ 1,731,222
Fundraising, Developments, and Communications $ 1,169,619 -17.20% $ 1,412,517 -49.58% $ 2,801,597
Other Programs $ 142,012 -89.01% $ 1,292,082 53.05% $ 844,231
Interest Expense $ 729,132 -66.03% $ 2,146,243 -13.56% $ 2,482,793
In-Kind Expenses $ 93,938 -65.70% $ 273,891 486.42% $ 46,706
Depreciation $ 2,463,200 -43.23% $ 4,338,937 -4.76% $ 4,555,891
Depreciation $ (2,463,200) -43.23% $ (4,338,937) -4.76% $ (4,555,891)
Total Expenses (net of depreciation) $ 4,642,718 -56.14% $ 10,584,822 -13.17% $ 12,190,830
Net Assets at the Beginning of Year $ 63,738,951 -13.07% $ 73,324,530 -5.60% $ 77,672,626
Net Assets at the End of Year $ 59,615,333 -6.47% $ 63,738,951 -13.07% $ 73,324,530
Ratios
Current Ratio 10.8 51.20% 7.2 -30.63% 10.3
Working Capital $ 4,022,647 -39.44% $ 6,642,629 -48.64% $ 12,933,724
Days of Cash-On-Hand 12 -86.01% 82 -43.92% 147
Debt Ratio 31% -25.26% 42% 4.80% 40%
Viability Ratio 0.34 -47.78% 0.65 -15.72% 0.77
Exhibit E 2 of 2
Project Registration Form
Project Detail Form
* 0,# ;
' <&#
(
#
' ,
+#(,"###",,-#-!-.-#($#,/-#",0,#
-123-4!"##!-!"&51,6,-3,-3"
($"-,#.,%#&'($#!(&#()(#*7---#-
#&-#-#!"(#7-,#-3"#,#",'($#!(
&#(##.#5-3,&&$$(-.$5##/
#!$#!--.-"#"(##(5,)(#*&-#&-,,
"$,"#"(##!-#,-5(53,'(8-(#!(,
1#&(3(,#&-&&#"!-9,#.,-#-1&&"#((
-.(51,,56.,)(#*##-(,#11
&(1,##,#/,1#&(.&
(
'
0,#*!&!&)&-*#--#3
:-#(838!
=$#"
*#&!!-30,#;
;>3&>;
3"6>;
! ""
. %#
*,
*:0
3 ! @
' )
0,#
: ;
' <&#
0,#*!&!&)&-*#--#3
:-#(838!
=$
#"
*#&!!-30,#;
;>3&>;
3"6>;
! ""
!#($ $
?-
6=9
,
?
,
' ,
+#(,"###",,-#-!-.-#($#,/-
#",0,#-123-4!"##!-!"&51,
6,-3,-3"($"-,#.,%#&'($#!(
&#()(#*7---#-#&-#-#!
"(#7-,#-3"#,#",'($#!(&#(#
#.#5-3,&&$$(-.$5##/
#!$#!--.-"#"(##(5,)(#*&-#
&-,,"$,"#"(##!-#,-5(53,
'(8-(#!(,1#&(3(,#&-&&#"!-
9,#.,-#-1&&"#((-.(51,,5
6.,)(#*##-(,#11&(
1,##,#/,1#&(.&
,
,1!-!"&51-#-!(#1#5.#(
$#!(/$A!
(.!&#.$!$!-
;
8.&..#.#-,"!((6,#--"#,
%#&'($#!(&#()(#*
0,#*!&!&)&-*#--#3
:-#(838!
=$#"
*#&!!-30,#;
;>3&>;
3"6>;
%
&'
(
(&()(*
'
(
(
&
'
(
(&(
&
(
(
&(&
(&
&&
(
)(*
&&
(
&&&
&&
(
(
(
)(*
(
&
(
&(
&
&&)(*
(
(&&
&&
()(
=&
(
((&&
(*&&)&*
"(
=>
*&()
)>&>)
>)
+
*
&
( +
)
(&("
((
= +
%&
=&( +
*
(
F
(*
G +
(
"
(
+
=*
+)
*
E
+
*E
+)
)(&E
+
( +
(*&&)&*
"(
=
>
*&()
)>&>)
>)
*
D
)
(
+
+
+
*
&
( +
+
+
=*
+
+>
+>
*
E
+
+
+
*E
+
+>
+>
)(&E
+
+
+
&)
(
+
+>
+I
(*&&)&*
"(
=>
*&()
)>&>)
>)
*
* +)>
*
)
( +
%
+
) )
"'
+
( +
"
) +I
= +
( +)
'& +)
(
)( +
%
+
(
"'
+
*
+
=
(
) +I
(
(
* +
J&) +
& +
( +)>>
+>
=
(&&
(*&&)&*
"(
=)>
*&()
)>&>)
>)
+
)
!
"
I
"
I
)
$
@
A
$
@
A
$
(*&&)&*
"(
=>
*&()
)>&>)
>)
@
A
B
I
&&&&
'(
D
A
E A
D
D
! %
F %
(*&&)&*
"(
=>>
*&()
)>&>)
>)
Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. R-10-04
OHIO CULTURAL FACILITIES COMMISSION
February 11, 2010
WHEREAS, the Ohio General Assembly (the “General Assembly”) established the Ohio
Cultural Facilities Commission (the “Commission”) under Chapter 3383 of the Ohio
Revised Code (the “Act”) to engage in and provide for the development, performance,
and presentation or making available of culture to the public, including the provision,
operation and management of Ohio cultural facilities, as defined in the Act;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3383.07(D) of the Act, the General Assembly required
that state funds, including the proceeds of state bonds, not be spent on the construction
of any Ohio cultural facility until (i) the Commission has determined that there is a need
for the cultural project and the Ohio cultural facility related to the project in the region of
the state for which the Ohio cultural facility is proposed to be located, and (ii) provision
has been made, by agreement or otherwise, satisfactory to the Commission, as an
indication of substantial regional support for that Ohio cultural facility, for local
contributions amounting to not less than fifty (50) percent of the total state funding for the
cultural project and the Commission has established guidelines for such evaluation and
determinations;
WHEREAS, the Ohio Building Authority issued State of Ohio Arts Facilities Bonds, dated
February 15, 2003 (the "2003 Bonds" and, together with any other bonds issued for the
purpose of paying the costs of Ohio cultural facilities, the "State Bonds") to finance the
State's portion of the cost of construction of the National Underground Railroad Freedom
Center (the Center);
WHEREAS, on August 31, 2005, the Treasurer of the State of Ohio (the "Treasurer")
issued the State of Ohio Cultural and Sports Capital Facilities Bonds, Series 2005A and
on December 14, 2006, issued the State of Ohio Cultural and Sports Facilities Bonds,
Series 2006A for the purpose of paying the costs to finance the state's portion of the cost
of construction of Ohio cultural facilities, including the state's portion of the cost of
construction of the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center (the "Project” or the
“Facility”);
WHEREAS, the Project Sponsor and the Commission are parties to a lease agreement
entered into on March 25, 2003, and amended from time to time (the "Lease
Agreement"), a Management Agreement dated March 25, 2003, and amended from time
to time (the "Management Agreement"), and a Cooperative Use Agreement, in order to
facilitate the use of Treasurer of State bonds for the various facility improvements, all of
which are still in effect;
WHEREAS, the 127th General Assembly in Am. Sub. H.B. 562 appropriated bond funds
in the amount of $850,000 in ALI C371H2 and the Project Sponsor proposes to utilize
the appropriation for further reimbursement of costs associated with the Project;
WHEREAS, the Ohio General Assembly has authorized the Treasurer of State to issue
bonds for the purpose of funding Ohio Cultural and Sports Facility projects, including the
Project, which issuance the Treasurer of State has or will undertake;
WHEREAS, the Commission has reviewed a project application form submitted by the
Project Sponsor and Commission staff recommendation and has also heard and
considered oral presentations made at the Commission meeting held on the date of this
resolution;
WHEREAS, the federal government may enact legislation that would provide for the
federal government to own and provide for the operation of the Facility as a national
museum, and this arrangement would be beneficial to the provision of culture to the
public in this state and the nation; and
WHEREAS, new legal agreements amongst the various parties will be required in order
to accomplish the foregoing and the Commission wishes to state its intentions to support
such beneficial arrangements.
2
the Project Sponsor be permitted to act as construction administrator on the Project in
accordance with Section 3383.07(A) of the Act.
(ii) The Project Sponsor provides to the OPFC, the Treasurer of State
and the Commission an opinion of nationally recognized bond
counsel, acceptable to the Treasurer of State, and addressed to
the OPFC, the Treasurer of State and the Commission, stating
that the financing structure, ownership and/or
operational/management structure will not a) adversely affect the
validity of the state-issued tax-exempt bonds; and b) will not
adversely affect the exclusion of the interest on the state-issued
tax-exempt bonds from the gross income of the holders of the
state-issued tax-exempt bonds for federal income tax purposes;
3
(vii) the Project Sponsor provides the Commission with evidence
satisfactory to the Executive Director of the Commission that it is
in good standing with the Secretary of State’s Office;
(ix) the Project Sponsor provides the Commission staff with copies of
the construction bids, consultants’ contracts and construction
contracts;
(xi) the Project Sponsor provides the Commission staff with complete,
accurate and updated documentation of material changes in
project costs, project scope or other relevant information affecting
the organization or the Project;
(xiv) the Project Sponsor has provided the Commission staff with a
copy of its resolution or ordinance authorizing its execution of a
Memorandum of Understanding and whatever legal agreements
are needed to carry out the intentions of this Resolution and the
federal legislation, and any other required documents;
(xv) the Attorney General has reviewed and approved the document(s)
as to form, as appropriate;
(xvi) the Controlling Board or the Director of the Office of Budget and
Management, as required by law, approves and certifies the
release and availability of funds;
4
(xvii) the Project Sponsor provides the Commission with a signed
Declaration Regarding Material Assistance/Nonassistance to a
Terrorist Organization (DMA) pursuant to Senate Bill 9 of the 126th
General Assembly; and
(xviii) The Sponsor provides the Commission with status reports each
calendar quarter, within thirty days of the quarter ending,
beginning the second quarter of 2010, until such time as the
federal legislation is enacted. Depending on the contents of these
reports, the Commission may reconsider its approval should the
financing structure, ownership and/or operational management
structures prove unacceptable to the OPFC, the Treasurer of
State and/or the Commission.
Section 9. Other Matters. The Project Sponsor shall keep the Commission staff
informed in writing and by presentation at a future Commission meeting, if requested by
the Commission or its Executive Director, of any matters financial, organizational, or
otherwise that will have any impact on the construction of the Project and/or operation of
the cultural facility.
Section 10. Open Meeting. All formal actions of this Commission concerning and
relating to the adoption of this resolution were taken and adopted in an open meeting of
5
this Commission, and all deliberations of this Commission that resulted in those formal
actions were in meetings open to the public, and in compliance with all legal
requirements including Ohio Revised Code Section 121.22.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing Resolution
was duly adopted at a meeting held on February 11, 2010, by the members of the Ohio
Cultural Facilities Commission.
______________________________
Craig A. Marshall, CPA, Secretary/Treasurer