This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Potter, employee of Van Raalte, assigned wages earned as security for payment of an account she had with Steckler Sporting Goods. This was then assigned to Continental. Van Raalte was notified of the assignment, but paid Mrs. Potter, and not the assignee. Continental brought this action to recovery the amount owed, and Van Raalte says he doesn’t owe this b/c it was already paid to Mrs. Potter (This was done before statute that restricting assignability of wages). Issue: Whether a debtor is liable for paying his indebtedness to an assignor rather than an assignee? Holding/Reasoning: If a debtor who has been given notice of an assignment pays an assignor any money that, under the assignment, belongs to the assignee, or if he does anything prejudicial to the rights of the assignee, the debtor is liable to the assignee for any resulting damages.