DECREE OF SOVEREIGNTY

United States of America ) ) President of the United States .)

SS

By the knowledge of the Writer, with the conviction of the Conscience, this Declaration admits, as fact and truth, that, the President never dies as does not the King or Queen; neither does the Parson, whose Office lives forever. With the “Express Written Trust” of extant statutes and the dissolution of the states “de jure,” this Writer’s “assumption” that all skeletal structures of corporate de facto State government are, indeed, under “Territorial” jurisdiction and rule. The U.S. Supreme Court in 1860, reviewing the Act of the 34 th Congress, ordered ALL the states in existence at that time to close down all the Court’s of law and all courts complied in 1860. None of the Court’s of any State are created by the Constitution of their State. Every Court, from top to bottom, the justice of the peace courts, the police courts, the municipal courts, the district courts and the circuit courts are ALL Statutory Courts created by Statutes which were enacted by the Legislature and in fact, and law, merely Administrative Agencies and only have the authority conferred by Statute. They are Legislative Courts, not Judicial Courts. This action transformed the “Judicial Process” into a “Legislative Process” wherein the states of the Union were “set-aside” and the Territorial Jurisdiction was instituted upon all the “corporate” States of the Corporate United States. As per referenced material found at 48 USC 1406f: “All judicial process shall run in the name of "United States of America, scilicet, the President of the United States", and all penal or criminal prosecutions in the local courts shall be conducted in the name of and by authority of "the People of the Virgin Islands of the United States." To solidify this position of, strictly, “territorial” jurisdiction, Writer makes reference to the foundational stipulation that there shall be “One Supreme Court.” This “one” Supreme Court is the only (available) remnant of an Article III “Judicial” Court. So, what does the Supreme Court have to say concerning this topic of territorial jurisdiction ruled by the President of the United States? Answer: 28 USC APPENDIX - RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT, Rule 45, Process; Mandates -STATUTE- 1. All process of this Court issues in the name of the President of the United States. Now, I wonder, where did “We Thee People” and the “Republic” go? Please be mindful that when you get to Article 10, PL 88-243, 77 Stat 630, - Construction with other laws that you begin to see that the laws of the Republic were left in place in Section 28:10104; Laws not repealed. So, “with the lights on and nobody home,” the de jure system of government, having a judicial branch, was effectively removed from the People.

It is no longer a court of "law. Lawyers. a Republic. be aware. or other issues. President of the United States. and. where the Supreme Court ruled that particular case was the last time it would address "official definitions" of the term "United States. Illegal? Not according to the above Senate Bills. for that matter. So. laws." Slight deviations transfer meaning of words to fit a dolus agenda. You will be in violation of copyright infringement and punishment is mandatory. 14th. Often their answers will reflect such changes. 652. 15th. including every corporate office of every “territorial” enterprise under the de facto President of the United States as made explicit in previous and annexed documents. I will take only the space for one small example: In 1976 our court system (what was left of it) was flushed away.there is NO LAW in this nation. but this document does not have room. in parity with all other de jure offices and makes this Decree. as facts by making such changes. These solidified changes in all operations of law by utilizing the words "construe and construct. and the D. because all of the states are subdivisions with interlocking directorates. and 16th. Learn this . Senate Bill 94-204 deals with the court system and Senate Bill 94-381 deals with Public Law. 324 U. Evatt. [“Opposite” means opposing!!] CONCLUSION: By the knowledge conferred within this document this Writer decrees Himself subordinate to the Sovereign.” brought in all of the Uniform (Commercial) Codes through District of Columbia. Can you use the same copyrighted codes." but a court of "construe and construct". not of a Sovereign.. v. How does the “court system” see this? Many illustrations could be included. or the world. but Superior to every office de facto. and the "court system" are now allowed to change any word they wish to mean any thing they choose. and. statutes.S. The "law" now means whatever they choose it to mean. code applies . you have no say about it.if you are a corporation. both having the same congress. They intentionally misquote past cases. And. Lawyers are the guilty culprits that make these devious changes. de jure. de jure. all are simply municipal (territorial) corporations of D. ruling “elite.C.C. the only Bill of Rights the "courts" are required to take cognizance of is the 13th. "they" can construe "their" copyrighted laws any way they wish to fit the situation for their own betterment. but of one of the Sovereign ty of The United States of America. Writer is Seated in Office of Parson. . "Judicial Notice" was commanded in the case of Hooven and Allison Co. There is ONLY contract." affirming that there are two (2) distinctly different United States with two (2) opposite forms of governments.The de facto. and regulations against them? Not unless you have a license from the BAR. judges.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful