IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, NEBRASKA
RICHARD W. JOHNSON AND MAUREEN
J.JOHNSON,
Case No. CI 19-452
ORDER TO RESCIND
Plaintifi/‘Condemnee, CONDEMNATION PROCEEDING
vs.
TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE,
LP,
Defendant/Condemner.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
;
)
)
)
)
)
)
‘This matter came for hearing before the Court on the joint motion of TransCanada
Keystone Pipeline, LP (“Keystone”) and RICHARD W. JOHNSON AND MAUREEN J.
JOHNSON (“Landowners”) to rescind the condemnation proceedings. This motion and hearing
being properly noticed, and the Court being fully advised in the premises, finds and orders as
follows:
1. Keystone and Landowners are the only parties who have appeared and claimed an
interest in the property rights taken and damaged.
2. Keystone and Landowners have agreed to rescind the condemnation of property
‘that occurred in this proceeding, and the Court finds that rescission is proper. Following rescission,
no property owner will have property taken or damaged by this condemnation proceeding.
3. The County Court is hereby ordered to retum the deposited award with any
accumulated interest to Keystone.
4. Upon receipt of the condemnation award, Keystone is directed to record a
termination of easement with the Register of Deeds.5. Once the award is returned to Keystone and the termination is recorded, the parties
shall alert this Court so that this appeal may be dismissed.
DATED. sing of,IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, NEBRASKA
DONNA L. HERRICK & DONNA L. ) Case No. CI 20-16
HERRICK AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF)
THE ROGER D. HERRICK REVOCABLE)
TRUST AGREEMENT, )
) ORDER TO RESCIND.
) CONDEMNATION PROCEEDING
)
Plaintiff/Condemnee, )
)
vs. )
)
TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE,
LP, )
Defendan/Condemner. ;
‘This matter came for hearing before the Court on the joint motion of TransCanada
Keystone Pipeline, LP (“Keystone”) and DONNA L. HERRICK & DONNA L. HERRICK AS.
SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE ROGER D. HERRICK REVOCABLE TRUST
AGREEMENT (“Landowner”) to rescind the condemnation proceedings. This motion and
hearing being properly noticed, and the Court being fully advised in the premises, finds and orders
as follows:
1. Keystone and Landowner are the only parties who have appeared and claimed an
interest in the property rights taken and damaged.
2. Keystone and Landowner have agreed to rescind the condemnation of property that
‘occurred in this proceeding, and the Court finds that rescission is proper. Following rescission, no
property owner will have property taken or damaged by this condemnation proceeding.
3. The County Court is hereby ordered to return the deposited award with any
accumulated interest to Keystone.4. Upon receipt of the condemnation award, Keystone is directed to record a
termination of easement with the Register of Deeds.
5. Once the award is returned to Keystone and the termination is recorded, the parties
shall alert this Court so that this appeal may be dismissed.
DATED this 27 Cay of
» 2021
TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE,
LP, Defendant
eo Gtose