SAP vs.

CSAP, Oracle and Microsoft are behemoth ERP vendors in this decade. They are top 3 shorted-listed ERP systems. It means most of people consider and compare their features when selecting ERP software. This article I’m going to present comparison between SAP and Oracle based on Panorama Consulting report. In this article I’m going to highlight comparison the high level characteristics of the vendor and detail their competing products and technologies. Unfortunately the report did not tell what kind of business type of the 1600 surveyed correspondents, are they manufacturing, financial services or other else? Anyway, here is list of SAP vs. Oracle comparison

1. Market Share
Below is a chart showing overall market share distribution for the time period 2005-2009 of ERP vendor based on Panorama’s annual survey :

SAP and Oracle are the top two ERP vendors where SAP rank highest by capturing 32% of the market, followed by Oracle with 23% of total market share. In addition to have the highest market share, SAP is also the most commonly short-listed ERP system, as the following table

Satisfaction According to the chart below.The data above does not mean SAP has the highest selected ERP vendor. Almost 72% of companies are satisfied with their SAP software. . Oracle PeopleSoft is selected at a high rate when this solution makes a short-list – 67% of the time it is on a company’s short-list. of which both SAP and Oracle are very proficient. 2. while about 74%. ERP users attain that high level of satisfaction through advanced operational processes and robust functionalities. of Oracle users are satisfied with their Oracle software. either SAP or Oracle has very high satisfaction levels. As the table below.

Implementation Duration The table below shows that SAP project was longer than Oracle. Benefit Realization The chart below indicates the benefits realized by customers of SAP and Oracle. . Oracle clients have a much higher likelihood of realizing at least 50% of the expected business benefits compared to SAP clients. This actual duration of implementation duration begin from the time of software purchasing until it was fully functional 4.3.

58 2. The cells highlighted in green represent the higher score.14 3.51 3.02 3.90 2.25 Oracle EBS 3. Functional Rating by Panorama’s clients The table below shows the average functional score based on Panorama’s client ratings of vendor demos (1= very poor functional fit and 5=Very strong functional fit).29 3.74 3.41 3.26 3. These results are average numbers for clients that included both SAP & Oracle on their short list.20 3.88 4.98 3. Functionality Sales & Marketing Quality Control Regulatory Finance & Accounting Logistics Human Resource Product Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering Product Configurator Product Scheduling SAP 2. the strengths of SAP and Oracle are summarized respectively.5.37 4.00 4. Based on the ratings.00 2.06 .53 4.

13 3.9% 4.4% 76.37 4.03 Executive Satisfaction Satisfaction 75.32 4.11 4.75 60.6 Months Benefits Pay Procure toFactor IT Architecture Cash Management Employee Customer Service 72.MICROSOFT ERP: .84 3.01 3.ORACLE.9% 58% Make-to-Order Order-to-Cash 4.25 3.22 4.8 Make-to-Stock Order-to-Cash Months Time to Implement 20 4.39 76.20 4.0% 4.45 4.2% 4.4% 3.22 3.6 3.00 3.Product Development Global Sourcing 4.6 18 Months 68.49 Cost $16.40 4.35 $12.90 SAP ORACLE MICROSOFT $2.40 4.00 56% Customer Setup and Credit Warehouse and Inventory Repair and Returned Goods Retail Tax Comparison Between SAP.3% 3.54 3.6% 3.32 Business Risk Product Operations Factor E-Portals 50% 3.32 3.76 3.67 18.0% 65.34 3.15 73.48 58.10 4.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful